/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47263430/GettyImages-489879966.0.jpg)
Only two of the three National League Central contenders competed on September 24, 2015:
- The St. Louis Cardinals bested the Milwaukee Brewers and have equaled their 2013 win total of 97.
- The Pittsburgh Pirates completed a four-game sweep of the Colorado Rockies.
- The Chicago Cubs did not play as it was their final off-day of the 2015 slate.
The Cardinals' victory reduced their magic number by one against both the Cubs (4) and the Pirates (6). It allowed St. Louis to maintain their game lead on the Pittsburgh and grow their lead over Chicago by one-half of a game. According to Fangraphs, their division title odds crept upward. The Cards are one win or Los Angeles loss away from making it mathematically impossible to finish with a record worse than the Dodgers'.
Today's chart and graphic look at how the Cardinals, Pirates, and Cubs are positioned after the games of Thursday, September 24, and entering play on Friday, September 25.
Rest-of-Season Records
How can the Pirates or Cubs catch the Cardinals and tie St. Louis for first place after Game 162? I resurrected the chart showing the scenarios in which this is possible. Red is the Cardinals. Yellow is the Pirates. Blue is the Cubs.
W |
L |
W% |
Final W |
Final L |
Final W% |
W |
L |
W% |
Final W |
Final L |
Final W% |
W |
L |
W% |
Final W |
Final L |
Final W% |
9 |
0 |
1.000 |
106 |
56 |
.654 |
||||||||||||
8 |
1 |
.889 |
105 |
57 |
.648 |
||||||||||||
7 |
2 |
.778 |
104 |
58 |
.642 |
||||||||||||
6 |
3 |
.667 |
103 |
59 |
.636 |
||||||||||||
5 |
4 |
.556 |
102 |
60 |
.630 |
9 |
0 |
1.000 |
102 |
60 |
.630 |
||||||
4 |
5 |
.444 |
101 |
61 |
.623 |
8 |
1 |
.889 |
101 |
61 |
.623 |
||||||
3 |
6 |
.333 |
100 |
62 |
.617 |
7 |
2 |
.778 |
100 |
62 |
.617 |
||||||
2 |
7 |
.222 |
99 |
63 |
.611 |
6 |
3 |
.667 |
99 |
63 |
.611 |
10 |
0 |
1.000 |
99 |
63 |
.611 |
1 |
8 |
.111 |
98 |
64 |
.605 |
5 |
4 |
.556 |
98 |
64 |
.605 |
9 |
1 |
.900 |
98 |
64 |
.605 |
0 |
9 |
.000 |
97 |
65 |
.599 |
4 |
5 |
.444 |
97 |
65 |
.599 |
8 |
2 |
.800 |
97 |
65 |
.599 |
3 |
6 |
.333 |
96 |
66 |
.593 |
7 |
3 |
.700 |
96 |
66 |
.593 |
||||||
2 |
7 |
.222 |
95 |
67 |
.586 |
6 |
4 |
.600 |
95 |
67 |
.586 |
||||||
1 |
8 |
.111 |
94 |
68 |
.580 |
5 |
5 |
.500 |
94 |
68 |
.580 |
||||||
0 |
9 |
.000 |
93 |
69 |
.574 |
4 |
6 |
.400 |
93 |
69 |
.574 |
||||||
3 |
7 |
.300 |
92 |
70 |
.568 |
||||||||||||
2 |
8 |
.200 |
91 |
71 |
.562 |
||||||||||||
1 |
9 |
.100 |
90 |
72 |
.556 |
||||||||||||
0 |
10 |
0 |
89 |
73 |
.549 |
Playoff Odds
I included the Fangraphs playoff odds, which are rendered like this:
The FanGraphs Playoff Odds are an adaption of the coolstandings.com playoff odds originally created by Greg Agami and Sean Walsh. To generate the playoff odds we simulate each season 10,000 times.
I used the Fangraphs projection mode for the playoff odds, though there are other options. This mode "uses a combination of Steamer and ZiPS projections and the FanGraphs Depth Charts to calculate the winning percentage of each remaning game in the major league season."
Magic Numbers
I added the Cardinals, Pirates, and Cubs' so-called magic numbers to the graphic as well. This represents the sum of eam wins and opponent losses necessary for that team to finish ahead of the opponent in the standings. I used the following formula:
Magic Number = 162 + 1 - (Team Win Total) - (Opponent Loss Total)
For fun I included the magic numbers for St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and Chicago against all postseason contenders, including the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Mets, who are currently in first place and likely to win their divisions. It provide more context of the wild-card race. It also illustrates how close the Central champion is to potentially sealing home-advantage in the NLDS and, if they should happen to make it that far, the NLCS.
PhamDuel, er, I mean, FanDuel
SBN and FanDuel have entered into an exclusive daily fantasy baseball agreement. Carlos Martinez starts at home against the Brewers. I like that matchup for El Gallo. Play FanDuel here.