clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Can the St. Louis Cardinals afford Jason Heyward?

Heyard is likely to command a long-term contract with a hefty salary this winter. Do the Cardinals have the payroll flexibility to sign him?

Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

You may have heard that Jason Heyward, one of the best position players in baseball, is a free agent and that the St. Louis Cardinals have interest in signing him. Entering his age-26 season, Heyward is poised for a large payday—perhaps in the $180- to $200-million range. Setting aside the question of whether the Cardinals should sign Heyward (a question VEB writers have delved into previously this young offseason), I thought it might do us well to look at whether the Cardinals can afford to sign Heyward.

Last week, we compared the Cardinals' 2015 payroll to their current 2016 payroll commitments after players became free agents. We're going to take a longer view today, at the Cardinals' payroll obligations from 2016 through 2021. Naturally, for this exercise, I've use the information freely available at the indispensable Cot's Baseball Contracts, which is now under the Baseball Prospectus umbrella.

It helps me to have a visual of this information, so I made a chart. On it, a red box signifies a team option for a given year. A purpose box indicates a joint option. There are no blue boxes because the Cards do not currently have a player under contract who has a player option for a future season.

Cardinals' Payroll Obligations:  2016-2012

Player

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Carpenter

$6,500,000

$10,000,000

$13,750,000

$14,750,000

$2,000,000


Wainwright

$19,500,000

$19,500,000

$19,500,000




Molina

$14,200,000

$14,200,000

$2,000,000




Peralta

$12,500,000

$10,000,000





Lynn

$7,500,000

$7,500,000





Diaz

$2,500,000

$2,500,000





Holliday

$17,000,000

$1,000,000





Garica

$11,500,000

$500,000





Walden

$3,675,000

$250,000





Jay

$6,850,000






Rosenthal

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3




Adams

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3




Maness

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3




Cruz

Arb 2

Arb 3





Bourjos

Arb 3






Moss

Arb 4






Martinez

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3



Wacha

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3



Wong

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3



Siegrist

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3



Grichuk

Min 2

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3


Piscotty

Min 1

Min 2

Min 3

Arb 1

Arb 2

Arb 3

Options vs. Buyouts

I've included the amount of the Cardinals' buyout of these options on the chart because that is the most that the club is obligated to pay. Obviously, if St. Louis exercises one of these options, their payroll obligations will increase. Here is the amount for each option:

  • Matt Carpenter, 2020:  $18.5 million ($2 million buyout)
  • Yadier Molina, 2018:  $15 million ($2 million buyout)
  • Matt Holliday, 2017:  $17 million ($1 million buyout)
  • Jaime Garcia, 2017:  $12 million ($500,000 buyout)
  • Jordan Walden, 2017:  $5.25 million ($250,000 buyout)
The Cardinals' 2017 payroll could fluctuate by $32.5 million depending on whether or not the Cardinals exercise their options on Holliday, Garcia, and Walden. Sitting here today, it's difficult to predict whether the Cards are likely to exercise their options on Walden or Garcia, because of each player's respective health issues. Entering 2015, chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. stated that the Cards would likely exercise Holliday's 2017 option. After Holliday lost the bulk last season to a recurring quad injury and Randal Grichuk and Stephen Piscotty's dynamite partial seasons, who knows if this is still their intent. Whether the Cards are able to sign Heyward this winter may also be a factor in whether they'll pay Holliday $17 million to lumber around left field and swing the bat for them in 2017.

League Minimum and Arbitration Eligible

This can get a bit tricky to calculate. Players like Tony Cruz and Bourjos are pretty easy to project. The same goes for Rosenthal, Maness, and Adams. But the lesser the MLB service time, the more difficult it is to project exactly what a player will be making. I imagine that Martinez, Wacha, Wong, and Siegrist will be big-leaguers throughout the entirety of the next four seasons and hit their projected arbitration-eligible seasons, but they could conceivably get sent down and push those projections back. The same goes for Randal Grichuk and Stephen Piscotty.

Nonetheless, you can see where the homegrown players—so cheap up to this point in their careers—will start to get more and more expensive. The window between 2018 and 2020 is where a bulge in payroll will be felt from their guaranteed increases in wages under the collective bargaining agreement. It's also plausible that one or two of them may sign an extension with the Cardinals, which might accelerate their pay increases.

Overall

The Cardinals will have a larger payroll in the years to come than what I'm going to put on this graph. This represents the guaranteed payroll. The league-minimum earners are not included. Neither are the arbitration-eligible players. Both will drive up costs in each year above what is shown. That being said, the salaries that the Cardinals must pay under guaranteed contracts are shown and they form the payroll foundation, so to speak.

The Cardinals have a fair amount of guaranteed payroll for 2016 and 2017. But after that, the club's payroll obligations go down and quickly. In 2019, the only guaranteed salary on the books is Carpenter's. His option is the only money that the Cardinals must pay out in 2020. The Cardinals have no guaranteed salary obligations in 2021.

The Cardinals have the future payroll flexibility to sign Heyward.