the p-d's morning elbow report cuts right to the chase: "Cardinals ace Chris Carpenter probably will remain disabled for the rest of this month after an examination Monday disclosed that he is suffering from what the club called moderate arthritis and a mild impingement of the right elbow." our community's own experts weigh in here.
Update [2007-4-10 12:5:28 by lboros]: will carroll just sent me a sneak preview of his remarks for Under the Knife, which haven't posted yet at Baseball Prospectus but ought to appear there shortly. the gist of his comments: surgery looms as a pretty likely outcome. he also warns that with nonsurgical treatment, there's a risk that carp alters his mechanics to favor the elbow --- and thereby re-injures his shoulder or causes some other, more serious injury.[end update]
teams can survive the temporary loss of an ace, but few teams are as dependent upon their ace as the cardinals are. the red sox, defending their championship in 2005, lost curt schilling for most of the first half --- he went to the dl after only 3 starts and stayed there until july 14, and when he returned he was the team's closer; didn't rejoin the rotation until august 25. like the cardinals, those red sox had suffered heavy free-agent defections (derek lowe and pedro martinez) from their title rotation; with schilling gone, they had to get by with tim wakefield, david wells, bronson arroyo, and matt clement. schilling's absence hurt --- they finished 11th in the league in era --- but they still won 95 games, thanks to a 910-run output from the offense.
these cards won't be scoring 5.5 runs a game, though, so the red sox comparison isn't very useful. another, more instructive recipe for survival was demonstrated by --- and in this crowd, i cite the following example with the utmost trepidation --- the 2004 chicago cubs, who managed to improve upon the record of the division-winning 2003 team despite losing both prior and wood for 10 starts apiece. their offense in 2004 wasn't much better (7th in the league in '04, vs 9th in 2003), but their secondary pitchers were much, much better --- matt clement pitched at the top of his range, zambrano emerged as ace material, and greg maddux was a gigantic improvement over the previous year's #5 starter, shawn estes. those cubs entered the final week of the season leading the wild-card race; if not for the collapse of the bullpen in that final week, they would have won 90+ games and made the playoffs --- and would have done so in a league much tougher than this year's nl, with five other teams above 90 wins.
in a best-case scenario, the cardinals would follow a recipe similar to this one (sans the late-september swoon), with the other four starters pitching at or near the top of their games to cover for carpenter during his absence. it's a bit early to start handicapping that prospect, given that we haven't even cycled through the rotation twice yet. but it's not an entirely vain hope. the cardinals themselves can point to a couple of happy precedents, 20 and 40 years ago, respectively. the '87 team lost john tudor to a broken leg after only 3 starts; he was out from april 17 until august 1. those cards were nearly as reliant on their ace as the current team is; the remainder of the rotation prominently featured a 2d-year pitcher (greg mathews), a rookie (joe magrane), and a wizened old codger (bob forsch). herzog tiptoed through the schedule with a couple of replacement pitchers (lee tunnel, tim conroy) and 6 decent starts from rickey horton; by the time tudor returned, the cardinals were 24 games over .500 and 5 games up on the division. the '87 cards had a great offense, which the '07 team doesn't; but then, they faced more difficult competition --- three divisional rivals topped 90 wins that season.
and of course there is the 1967 team, the original El Birdos, who lost their only proven pitcher, bob gibson, for nearly two months (also to a broken leg) and thrived in his absence. i wrote lovingly of that team in this post last june, when pujols went down. citing that entry:
i'm not saying this is likely, ok? it's far more likely the cardinals will struggle if carpenter's out for any significant length of time. and the aces of '67 and '87 suffered injuries to their legs; carp's injury is to his arm, a much scarier proposition.
but don't stop watching. not yet.
* * * * * * * * * *
i matched the rotation with the schedule to see where keisler's starts would fall. i realize that keisler's not guaranteed more than one start; if he bombs tonight, they may try brad thompson, matt ginter, or somebody else. so just read keisler as "replacement pitcher" in the ensuing discussion. just for the sake of argument, let's make the assumption that carpenter will be out for another four weeks; i realize his disablement might be shorter or longer, but let's just pretend. if they stick to a straight five-man rotation with no adjustments for off-days, here's how things line up:|
4/8 @hou wells |
4/9 @pgh looper |
4/10 @pgh keisler |
4/11 @pgh wainwright |
4/12 OFF |
4/13 mil reyes |
4/14 mil wells |
|
4/15 mil looper |
4/16 pgh keisler |
4/17 pgh wainwright |
4/18 @sf reyes |
4/19 @sf wells |
4/20 @chi looper |
4/21 @chi keisler |
|
4/22 @chi wainwright |
4/23 OFF |
4/24 cin reyes |
4/25 cin wells |
4/26 cin looper |
4/27 chi keisler |
4/28 chi wainwright |
|
4/29 chi reyes |
4/30 @mil wells |
5/1 @mil looper |
5/2 @mil keisler |
5/3 OFF |
5/4 hou wainwright |
5/5 hou reyes |
|
5/6 hou wells |
5/7 col looper |
5/8 col carpenter |
5/9 col wainwright |
5/10 OFF |
that's 5 starts by keisler/replacement guy, all against divisional foes: 2 against pittsburgh, 2 against the cubs, 1 against the brewers. now we'll adjust for the off days, skipping the #5 guy's turn wherever the schedule affords the opportunity:
|
4/8 @hou wells |
4/9 @pgh looper |
4/10 @pgh keisler |
4/11 @pgh wainwright |
4/12 OFF |
4/13 mil reyes |
4/14 mil wells |
|
4/15 mil looper |
4/16 pgh wainwright |
4/17 pgh keisler |
4/18 @sf reyes |
4/19 @sf wells |
4/20 @chi looper |
4/21 @chi wainwright |
|
4/22 @chi keisler |
4/23 OFF |
4/24 cin reyes |
4/25 cin wells |
4/26 cin looper |
4/27 chi wainwright |
4/28 chi keisler |
|
4/29 chi reyes |
4/30 @mil wells |
5/1 @mil looper |
5/2 @mil wainwright |
5/3 OFF |
5/4 hou reyes |
5/5 hou wells |
|
5/6 hou looper |
5/7 col wainright |
5/8 col carpenter |
5/9 col wainwright |
5/10 OFF |
we eliminate a start; keisler only pitches 4 times --- twice vs pittsburgh, twice vs the cubs. but man, those two starts vs the cubs stick out; you hate to see the cards throwing a bad pitcher two times against one of their chief rivals. but because of the way the off days fall, it's difficult to get keisler out of there. the only way i can figure it out (and i've ruled out anybody starting on short rest) would be the following: give keisler a couple of starts and see how he does. if it looks like he's trustworthy, go ahead and throw him vs the cubs; if not, then insert another replacement starter on april 19, in order to set up the rotation for optimal matchups. like so:
|
4/8 @hou wells |
4/9 @pgh looper |
4/10 @pgh keisler |
4/11 @pgh wainwright |
4/12 OFF |
4/13 mil reyes |
4/14 mil wells |
|
4/15 mil looper |
4/16 pgh wainwright |
4/17 pgh keisler |
4/18 @sf reyes |
4/19 @sf thompson |
4/20 @chi wells |
4/21 @chi looper |
|
4/22 @chi wainwright |
4/23 OFF |
4/24 cin reyes |
4/25 cin thompson |
4/26 cin wells |
4/27 chi looper |
4/28 chi wainwright |
|
4/29 chi reyes |
4/30 @mil thompson |
5/1 @mil wells |
5/2 @mil looper |
5/3 OFF |
5/4 hou wainwright |
5/5 hou reyes |
|
5/6 hou wells |
5/7 col looper |
5/8 col carpenter |
5/9 col wainwright |
5/10 OFF |
i used brad thompson as the 2d replacement starter in this example, but it could be anybody --- matt ginter, narveson, whoever you want. you still wind up with only five replacement-pitcher starts, but the replacement-level guy only pitches once against a strong contender (milwaukee on april 30); his other four starts come against the two weakest divisional teams (pittsburgh and cincinnati) and a so-so nl west team (giants). 14 of the 15 games against the cubs, astros, and brewers would be started by one of the top 4 starting pitchers. everybody gets plenty of rest --- most of the regular starters are pitching on 5 days' rest more often during this stretch than on the normal 4 days.
until more is known about carpenter's condition, they'll be flying in the dark vis-vis the rotation; it might be most sensible to simply go with the first option above and keep everybody on a normal cycle. tony could lose more than he gains by tinkering around and shuffling guys in and out of slots; it's still very early in the season to be playing matchups to the hilt.
as long as we're discussing replacement players: blake hawksworth made his triple A debut last night, and another key prospect (jaime garcia) debuted at double a. head over to erik's for the full prospect report.