clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Game 43 Open Thread: May 20, 2006

New, 53 comments

i'm officially on the scott spiezio bandwagon, thanks to the bunt he dropped leading off the 4th inning last night. in case you missed it, the cards -- playing behind their ace against a .250 team -- were down 5-0 at the time. but spiezio kept his head in the game; batting directly in front of pujols, and with the team needing baserunners, he took advantage of tony graffanino's lax positioning at 3d and set the table for albert -- then scored three pitches later on the pu's 20th dinger. that made it suddenly 5-2 -- the cards had hope again, the royals had doubt, and by the next inning st louis was ahead 9-5. it was only a bunt, an unlabeled a blip on fangraphs' win probability chart of the game -- not nearly as impactful as the big blow that followed, nor even spiezio's own game-tying single in the 5th inning. i don't care; i still like the bunt more. it was a discretionary play -- great situational recognition. so put me down as a huge fan of that bunt and, now, an unabashed fan of the player.

be honest: were you happier to see reggie sanders' homer (his 297th -- three more until he puts that 300-300 thing to rest) or the two extra-base hits by encarnacion? i can't help it, i'll always root for reggie. i mean, the xbh by encarnacion were nice and all, but . . . .

you know.

the cardinals are now 12 games over for the first time this season.

mark worrell absorbed a disastrous loss at double a last night. he was called in to get the last three outs after springfield broke a 5-5 tie with 3 runs in the top of the 9th; got the first man on a pop up but then yielded a homer, single, walk, walk, and grand slam. game over; cards lose 10-8. his season stat line is suddenly a mess: 11 walks and 5 home runs in 18 innings, a 1-3 record, and an era of 6.00. it's his 2d blown save this week; he coughed up monday night's game, too, walking in the tying and winning runs. in his last inning and a third he's yielded 3 homers, 6 walks, and 8 earned runs. that'll hurt your confidence a little bit . . . hope he can turn things around, will keep an eye on't.

while i was fishing out that information, my eye fell across this: some farmhand for the reds pitched a no-hitter and a one-hitter back-to-back. some guy named johnny cueto; pitches for dayton in the midwest league (low a ball). turns out the no-no was only a 5-inning rain-shortened one, and the one-hitter was a 7-inning doubleheader nightcap; takes a bit of the sparkle off the accomplishment. johnny vander meer, he's not. but in 8 starts this kid has thrown 40 innings, walked 6, struck out 52, and allowed 23 hits. that's right -- 2.25 strikeouts for every hit. the reds might want to consider moving him up a classification or four . . . .

. . . . which leads us to anthony reyes, whose start tonight seems like a much bigger deal than his big-league debut last august. in that start, he didn't seem to have anything on the line, nothing to prove. this game has far more the feel of an audition; he needs to make a good impression. the situation couldn't be more advantageous: facing a weak lineup and opposing a pitcher with a 6.48 career era. if you're at the game, please post a diary and tell us what you saw.


reyes bautista
0-0, 0.00 0-1, 4.50