Dear Mr. and Mrs. Mozeliak...
Enclosed you will find Johnny's grades for the first term. I've thoroughly enjoyed having him and look forward to seeing him back in the new term. Looking over his marks, I hope you will get an idea of where Johnny is in his development. I hope that you will take this opportunity to discuss with him the areas he needs to improve in, all the while remembering to be supportive and encouraging in recognising his achievements. Remember, the greatest gains come only when we all work together to provide the proper framework for success.
If you have any questions, I encourage you to feel free to contact me at any time. I consider the alliance between pupil, parents, and instructor to be a true partnership, and I would welcome your input or any concerns you may have. Until next we speak, I remain,
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Theodore E. "Red" Baron
With the completion of the Scott Rolen deal, I think the Cardinals are pretty close to finished for the offseason. We know, as per published reports, that they remain in the market for a swing man, preferably of the sinister variety. However, given the relatively slight nature of any such deal, I feel pretty comfortable in looking at this offseason as a fairly done deal. As such, I think it's appropriate at this time to look back at the Cardinals' first offseason under the stewardship of John Mozeliak, and see how it all looks so far. Obviously, the product we see on the field will trump any analysis I, or anyone else, can come up with at the moment. However, snap judgements on things that we won't really be able to evaluate for several more months is, quite possibly, the best thing about sports in general. So, without further ado, Ladies and Gentlemen, let's get to it.
First off, a quick word about the Rolen deal. In yesterday's post, Lboros refers to the framework of a deal with the Dodgers, in which Los Angeles was willing to part with Andy LaRoche for Scott Rolen only under if the Cards were willing to take on the Dodgers current albatross, Juan Pierre. I've thought about this, considered it from most angles I can think of, and I think I would have been sorely tempted to do such a deal. Not because I think having Juan Pierre in any way improves your team, but simply because I believe you could have then flipped him to another team. I know, it's a terrible contract, and if the Cardinals and Dodgers neither one really wanted it on the books, why would some other club be willing to take it on? Ah, therein lies the rub. I think the Cardinals could have taken on that contract, then turned around and traded it, paying down the annual cost to the point that it became more palatable. I think that 3mil. per year, or 12 mil. dollars total, would have brought the deal into range to be at least somewhat acceptable. The Cardinals were going to be paying Scott Rolen $12 million this season. Take that salary and send it along to whatever team you move Pierre to. At that point, you're only paying LaRoche's league minimum salary over what was already a sunk cost. You then have the younger, potential cornerstone type player you needed, another mid level prospect you get back for moving Pierre and the cash, and the same salary on the books for 2008 that you already had tied up in your current third basemen. Maybe I'm completely off base, but I think that's a deal that would have worked out in the long run.
Alright, on to reality. We'll examine the moves that have actually been made this winter, and attempt to come to a consensus.
Organisational stability and direction
Overall Grade: A
When Mozeliak took over as General Manager, he inherited as bad a situation as one could imagine. Jocketty had been handed his walking papers due to a rift in the front office between his own factions and that of the Cards' minor league guru, Jeff Luhnow. Following all of that, several of the Cardinals' other GM candidates had pulled out of the running, largely due to what was perceived as a less than desirable situation. Ownership had already brought back Tony LaRussa, whose shadow was likely to fall heavily on whoever took over in the front office, and the chain of command, specifically in regards to Luhnow's situation, was ill defined.
Mozeliak was handed the General Manager position in the midst of that strife. At the time, he was seen as the Cards' second or even third choice, and many were predicting that there was no way he could be successful. His first move, once in office, was to begin bridging the organisational gaps that so confounded his predecessor. So far, according to most published reports at least, he's been far more successful than most predicted. He proved, even during Jocketty's tenure, that he was able to work with the player development/drafting arm of the organisation, and so far, he looks to have done a good job of bringing the front office together. I feel comfortable giving him a solid 'A' here.
Organisational Hiring
Overall Grade: B+
Mozeliak has brought in several new members of the on field staff, as well as moving a couple of holdovers around.
John Abbamondi, asst. GM
Abbamondi, most recently of the home office of MLB, is a specialist in arbitration cases. He brings an area of expertise the Cards will rely on heavily in coming years, given their new emphasis on youth. I think he's a solid hire.
Gary LaRocque, senior special assistant
Mr. LaRocque came from the Metropolitan organisation. He will be handling the professional scouting department of the team. I like this move, but he seems to have had more success when he was in amateur scouting. (Reyes, Wright, Lastings Milledge, Aaron Heillman, Scott Kazmir, and several others were brought in on his watch.) I think he may be miscast.
Brent Strom, pitching coordinator(?)
Honestly, I'm still a little iffy on how this one works. Dyar Miller, the former pitching coach at Memphis, and Mr. Strom, are apparently sharing the title of minor league Pitching Coordinator. As near as I've been able to determine, from interviews and the like, the organisation wants to delegate the responsibilities of the position to two people, rather than relying on just one. I believe Strom is going to be the top authority on the mechanical side of pitching. If so, I think he's a great hire. Strom has been the pitching coach at the major league level for the Houston Astros and the Royals, and minor league pitching coordinator for the Expos franchise. More importantly, the man really knows what he's talking about when it comes to mechanics and conditioning for pitchers. You can read one of his essays, on long tossing, here. Again, I'm not totally certain on what the division of responsibilities is going to be, but I love what Mr. Strom brings to the table.
Jaron Madison, assistant scouting director
Mr. Madison came from the Padres organisation. I honestly know very little about him, so I can't say too much one way or the other. I would appreciate some help from anyone who knows more about him.
Michael Girsch, director of baseball development
This is an internal promotion. Girsch has worked in the analytical wing of Luhnow's department for the last few years. Again, I don't know a whole lot about him, but the department he's been part of has had some nice success. I don't have enough info to make a real solid judgement on this one either.
On Field moves
Here we are. Now we come to the meat. I'll grade most of these moves individually, as they're a little more cut and dried.
Resigning Joel Pineiro Grade: C
This move was made while Mo was still the interim GM. Pineiro had put up a nice line with the Cards in half of the 2007 season, and word was that Duncan loved working with him, wanted him back, etc. Personally, I wasn't all that impressed with the decision to bring Joel back, but if the on field staff really believes in him, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now. Plus, at only two years on the deal, it won't cripple the club long term, so it's not terrible.
Picking up Jason Isringhausen's option Grade: B-
Izzy, after struggling with health issues and effectiveness in 2006, pitched very well in 2007. The Cards don't have any slam dunk candidates to step into the closer role as of yet, Izzy appears to be in position to succeed going forward, the manager may have mutinied without an established closer, and he's appreciated by the fans. Still, this move begs the question: what .500 (or worse) team really needs an $8 million closer? I think this was probably the proper move, but I can't give it an unequivocal thumbs up.
Declining to offer David Eckstein arbitration/ signing Cesar Izturis Grade: D
I'm putting these two together. The Cards declined to offer salary arbitration to their outbound shortstop, David Eckstein. He was a Type B free agent, meaning he would have netted the team a sandwich round pick if he signed elsewhere. At the arbitration deadline, he was still considering offers from several other teams, and I think he would have declined the offer to test the market further. Even so, if he had accepted, the team would have had him, declining skills and all, for one year, at a fairly reasonable rate. Instead of offering him a deal, the Cardinals signed Cesar Izturis to be their starting shortstop for 2008. This move cost them $3 million, whereas Eckstein likely would have cost them in the neighborhood of $5 million or so. The problem with this tandem is that the Cardinals, rather than risking being stuck with a declining player, signed a markedly worse player for a nominal savings. If the organisation was really that desperate to save money and avoid committing to a player, they have minor leaguers who could have replicated the best that we can expect out of Izturis for even less. Otherwise, taking the chance on Eckstein accepting would have been a far better proposition, considering the potential draft payoff. Bad move.
Trading Jim Edmonds for David Freese Grade: B+
As much as I hated this move at first, I've really come around on it. The Cards had a severe outfield crunch, particularly once you add in the prospect of Colby Rasmus getting a shot in Spring Training. With Edmonds on the team, there would be almost no chance of Colby seeing the team any time soon. Even though I think it would probably be better if Rasmus at least started out in AAA, opening up space in the outfield was probably one of the more important things the team could have accomplished this offseason. Personally, I don't see David Freese having much of an impact one way or the other, but just freeing up the roster space, and the salary, make this a good move, no matter how much it pains me to say it.
Signing Matt Clement Grade: A-
I really like this move. The Cardinals brought in one of the highest upside, one year contract pitchers on the market. True, I would have liked to see them kick the tires on Mark Prior, but there appears to be more reason to believe that Prior is done than there is for Clement. It's only one year, he's actually costing quite a bit less than what Kip Wells did last year, and he's had plenty of time to rehab from his surgery. The payoff could be very good, and it's not much of a risk. Nice move here.
Signing Jason LaRue Grade: C
He's a backup catcher. I can't imagine a less important move. That being said, LaRue has been brutal the last couple of years. He offers more upside than Sno Cones, so it's not a bad move. Really not a whole lot on either side of the ledger.
Letting Aaron Miles go, then resigning him Grade: D-
It was a good idea to release him. Bringing him back doesn't really serve any purpose that I can see. I don't have any thing else to say.
Releasing So Taguchi Grade: A
It's tough to let a fan favourite, (not to mention a Tony favourite) walk away. Credit to Mozeliak for recognising it was the right move to make.
Trading Scott Rolen for Troy Glaus Grade: B+
This is the big one. Under the circumstances, Mozeliak did as well as one can possibly expect him to have done. He eliminated a year off of a contract, improved the offense, and saved some money. Hopefully, Rolen will do well in Toronto, and the Blue Jays will come out looking fine in this deal as well. I think moving Rolen as successfully as he did brings Mo's offseason average way up. As I said above, I might have been even happier with a slightly different move, but this is really solid, given the situation.
Roster Management
Players Added to 40 man roster:
Jason Motte
Mark Worrell
Kyle McLellan
Jarret Hoffpauir
Mike Parisi
Removed:
Andy Cavazos
Brian Falkenborg
Overall Grade: A
I think all of these moves were good ones. All the players added should have a chance to contribute at least something to the team, if necessary, in 2008. The two players removed were both middle relievers, both with lower upsides than the players added. I like all of these.
Adding Brian Barton via Rule V Grade: A
Barton was, quite possibly, the highest ceiling player in the Rule 5 draft this year. Due to health concerns about his knees, he dropped down to where the Cardinals were picking. They took the chance on him, and it was a great risk, in my opinion. Barton has a good chance, I think, to stick on the roster; he even has a chance to become a starter. All for $50k and a roster spot. Great move.
Picking only one player in the Rule 5 draft Grade: D
Specifically, I think there was one move that should have been made here that wasn't. Leyson Septimo, a left handed pitcher, was still available when the Cards picked in the second round. Septimo is a converted outfielder who can occasionally hit triple digits with his fastball. I don't know anything else about him, but Kelvin Jimenez is still on the roster. I think Septimo's upside has to be worth not seeing Jimenez pitch another year in red. It's not a huge thing, but I think it's an opportunity missed, and the Cards can't afford to miss many, regardless of how small.
Final Grade for John Mozeliak as GM of the Cardinals: B
I'm giving Mo a solid B for his work so far. I could cop out and give him an incomplete, seeing as how he's only been on the job for a few months, but I prefer to be bold and wrong than timid.
I really like what he's done restructuring the front office, and trying to repair the rifts from the previous administration. He's brought in some solid baseball people, and I think that everyone is finally on the same page going forward.
I'm cautiously optimistic about most of the major league level player moves Mozeliak has made so far. The job he did moving Rolen, in a terrible situation, makes pretty throws a shadow over anything else he's done in the offseason. That being said, I think the Miles situation is a black mark, and I don't think the Eckstein arb./Izturis signing was handled very well. For the money spent, the organisation could have gotten a better return, at least in terms of the future. Some of the other, truly marginal moves don't make much of a difference one way or the other. The Pineiro signing really will need to be revisited; the Izzy option is probably worth it. A first time GM could have done much worse, with pressure from fans, manager, and owner pressing in on all sides.
I like the construction of the Cards' 40 man roster as it stands now; outside of a few obvious exceptions.
Given all of the pressures that came with the job Mozeliak was inheriting, I think he's done a solid job so far. He appears to have a definite idea of where he wants the team to go, and hasn't made any significant moves that negatively impact it long term. He's still saddled with a bit of a lodestone in his on field manager and the long shadow he casts, but Mo has mostly been his own man so far.
The Cardinals may not have gotten their first choice, but I think they ended up with a very good choice in the end anyhow.
0 recs |
103 comments
Comments
Jim Edmonds for David Freese?
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jan 16, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dan,
Let's weigh a final year of a fan favorite in a wasted season versus the potential of developing our CF of the future in a wasted season.
And if Edmonds has a gasp left in him, then my brother in Escondido can see him play another great year or two for the Pads.
I'm not sure that Freese enters the equation for me so much as the money and opportunity cost of the move.
In that regard, and the fact that he had to do it against the wishes of the casual fan and the media, I'll give the move a
B
by tinstl on Jan 16, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ted
1 - $1M for Matt Clement - good
2 - $1M for Aaron Miles - bleh
That leaves $4M, hopefully not spent on Juan Gonzalez.
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jan 17, 2008 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shoot.
by the red baron on Jan 16, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There.
by the red baron on Jan 16, 2008 12:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The intro to the report card
by gonzostl on Jan 16, 2008 10:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
excellent
i also note that you skipped over the springer and franklin signings. i still object to the springer signing and give it a low grade, franklin is pretty neutral. a lot of this depends on what happens before the trade deadline. if izzy is moved and franklin and/or springer end up stepping into the closer role, then their contracts look a little better. only time will tell if johnny mo learned enough in calc-1 to do well in calc-2.
by sportsman on Jan 16, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Franklin, Springer
The Springer signing I initially meant to include along with the Pineiro deal. Then, I decided to put it separately, and then, I sort of forgot about it. My bad.
I give it a C. It's probably too much money, and I think Springer is due to fall of next season. Unfortunately, this was another of the deals that got done while Mo was still 'interim' GM, so it's a little tougher to evaluate, in my opinion. Even if Springer regresses a bit, he's still a solid presence down in the bullpen, and there were some other issues involved, so I can't really muster up a whole lot of outrage.
by the red baron on Jan 16, 2008 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Springer = B+
by Hungry Jack on Jan 16, 2008 11:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
D'angelo Jimenez/Josh Phelps?
by airhad on Jan 16, 2008 11:04 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
As I mentioned a few days ago.....
by Pujols for MVP on Jan 16, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've always liked
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jan 16, 2008 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Phelps/ Jimenez
Seriously, this thing wasn't long enough?
(please, somebody say it, so I don't have to.)
by the red baron on Jan 16, 2008 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it was too long
An A+ for your article, sir!
I would have given Mo a B- rather than a solid B, but that's probably only because I would weight a few of the on field moves more heavily than things like organizational changes. Specifically the Miles debacle and the Eckstein/Izturis blundering. But overall I agree with nearly every one of your assessments. Nice work, both of you.
by Mr Clean on Jan 16, 2008 5:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Izzy
by JeffD on Jan 16, 2008 11:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Trade
by mikedallas23 on Jan 16, 2008 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeahbut
OR, another team would have to sign him before the arby deadline. That's possible. But look at the closers who enter FA after '08:
Nathan
Rivera
Hoffman
Gordon
Lidge
Gagne
Has there ever been a group of brand name closers like that on the market at the same time? It all depends on his performance and health, but that glut of closers should make the process go slower.
by meat on Jan 16, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no risk, imo
by dmb60614 on Jan 16, 2008 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there's much danger...
Gordon, Lidge, Gagne aren't currently in the class of Izzy...Gordon never was.
Rivera reupped for three years with the Yanks, so he's off the list. That leaves Hoffman and Nathan.
Hoffman will be 41 in October, he's still a solid closer...but will be a year at a time guy. Nathan is elite, and is Izzy's only real competition out of this bunch.
Of course your list didn't include K-Rod and he is in the same class as Nathan. Considering the Reds just handed Corder 4/$46 mil, I don't see Izzy having any trouble getting 3/$30 mil; unless he bombs this year...in which case he probably won't be a type A free agent.
by cardzfanbub on Jan 16, 2008 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Izzy signing needs a higher grade for two reasons:
- Trading Izzy near the deadline will bring us some young talent and Perez can slide into the role for the final few months.
- We will not be winning games by more than a couple runs. Somebody reliable needs to finish off games for our sub-.500 team
by pedro on Jan 16, 2008 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding point #2
stlfan
by stlfan on Jan 16, 2008 9:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Add in
Mo couldn't completely fix the team this offseason, but he could have made the rebuild longer, more expensive, and more painful by making bad moves (say, like the Astros).
He has modestly improved the 2008 team and in the process trimmed some payroll and made the team marginally more youthful. More importantly hasn't hamstrung the future.
The middle infield looks pretty muddled and mediocre and the starting rotation is only moderately more plausible than last year's version at this time, but the answers Mo has come up with for these problems certainly aren't that much worse than the other options that were available. Perhaps had Mo known he'd be able to deal Edmonds and Rolen without (effectively) eating any salary, he might have gambled on Eckstein's qualification?
by vances law on Jan 16, 2008 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lboros
Come on man, you've got to give that up.
Post it right here>>>>>>>
I've got to tell him about this player I saw last week in small town in Northern Mexico. He is best I've ever seen!!! Clocked his fastball at 108MPH and he hits like Albert!!!!
Sorry no sabermetrics on him, it's a real small town and his team stinks. They only have 8 players, 2 of them are women, and they had a goat playing third base.
But I'm telling you this guy is KING KONG!!!!!!
by That's a Winner on Jan 16, 2008 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
An overall B
by rockin redbird on Jan 16, 2008 12:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this!
by tbell61 on Jan 16, 2008 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ORGANIZATION
by Yadi4MVP on Jan 16, 2008 12:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Spelling
by FreddyBurroughs on Jan 16, 2008 12:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm in no way trying to pick a fight...
Just my 2 pence... er... cents, rather. :-)
by SmashedAtoms on Jan 16, 2008 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent list
I wonder if Mo forgot that Springer basically only wanted to play in St. Louis, because the money they're paying him is like there was a huge bidding war after him . . . and I'm pretty sure there wasn't.
by aet15 on Jan 16, 2008 1:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Totally missed the mark with this grade
by cariocacardinal on Jan 16, 2008 1:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yeah,
by aet15 on Jan 16, 2008 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Give me an example of moves that Mo could have made to make this team more competitive while keeping in mind two things:
- The strategy is long term so the team needs to get younger.
- You have a payroll max over the next 3 seasons of around $115 million per season.
by fourstick on Jan 16, 2008 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I second...
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with fourstick also
-- I loved Scotty and was strongly ambivalent re Jimbo... but it was a good time for both to go.
-- if Clement returns to form, what a plus!! I was a strong Weaver supporter when we got HIM, and I feel similarly about Clement, if not better.
-- a hunch only, I think LaRue is undervalued by most on here. Injuries, yes; down years lately, yes. But I know this guy well; he eats scorpions sprinkled over rusty nails for breakfast
-- Kip Wells is gone.
The stand-out two on the other side of the sheet, for me, is that LaRussa was retained, and Adam Kennedy has not yet been shown the door.
by the Tewk on Jan 16, 2008 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Frustrating
This is a problem entirely of the Cardinals own making. They took a small but necessary step to correct it by moving Edmonds but this is a situation that has come about because of keeping around players like So Taguchi/Skip Schumaker and pretending that Scott Spiezio can play the outfield. Players that have no tangible current value and no future upside. Trading Duncan to someone like the Twins for say Brian Duensing would have been the right move to make this offseason.
Now the Cardinals have put themselves in a bad position by not leveraging a surplus. They have Chris Duncan, Rick Ankiel, Skip Schumaker, Colby Rasmus, Joe Mather and Brian Barton that could all do with playing time at the major league level at some point this season. Add in players like Nick Stavinoha and Cody Haerther who are just a little more removed and I'm continually baffled why all of these players remain within the system.
by azruavatar on Jan 16, 2008 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
by BigJawnMize on Jan 16, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree
I had kind of a related question for you, since you brought this subject up. People on this board (myself included) view Ludwick as at least a serviceable, and at best complete, replacement of Duncan's production. I can't help but wonder if Ludwick might be a useful trade tool to a team that really takes the time to look at his profile. Maybe he wouldn't get the name-value of Duncan, but maybe a smarter team like the A's or the Indians might not care, and might view Ludwick the same way I do.
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I luv Luddy
by the Tewk on Jan 16, 2008 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that duncan
by SleepyCA on Jan 16, 2008 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
think about how many 20+ HR lst/DH players there are out there? that's basically what duncan is.
how times have you even heard duncan's name in trade talks? the only time i heard it was to the pirates with the bounty being jack wilson.
by FutureMan on Jan 16, 2008 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
except that duncan has much more
He hit 22 HR in 314 healthy PA's in 2006- adjusted to 162 games, that is 39 HR in 565 PA's, which basically reflects the fact that he'd be platooned. He was on a very similar pace in 2007 until he got hurt; through 1 Aug he had 20 HR in 328 PA, or 39 HR in 650 PA.
by SleepyCA on Jan 16, 2008 8:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
40HR
by FutureMan on Jan 16, 2008 10:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's a myth
Duncan's '07 performance, in particular, was significantly hurt by batting in the #2 hole. In '06 he pretty much only batted in the 2nd spot in the order, but in '04 his OPS in the 2nd lineup position was over 100 points less than his OPS in the cleanup spot. Using B-r's prediction tool, he'd have hit 44 HR's in 648 PA's in '07 in the cleanup position, vs 31 in the 2 position.
by SleepyCA on Jan 17, 2008 3:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
e#$%$#%$#%$
Oh for an edit button ;)
by SleepyCA on Jan 17, 2008 3:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why ignore the ease of improving on an awful 2007?
This year's rotation follows the worst starting rotation in franchise history. So the bar for making improvements isn't exactly difficult to reach. Consider this year's starters, by May 2008 when Mulder is expected to be on board:
Wainwright
Clement
Pineiro
Mulder
Looper
First, the Cardinal rotation should be noticeably improved in 2008 just by replacing the 33 starts by Wells and Maroth with starts by Clement and by replacing the 20 starts by Anthony Reyes in 2007 with starts by Pineiro. The 5.70 ERA by Wells in 26 starts and the 10.66 ERA by Maroth in 7 starts, taken together, yielded an ERA of 6.66. (I know, AZ, ERA isn't the best index for performance. I agree. But I don't have time to look up ERA+ or go into the key fielding-independent peripherals of K/9, BB/9, and HR/9. Please feel free to update this analysis with those figures if you care to.) Clement could easily beat that 6.66 ERA mark by two full points, at least, even if the reportedly healthy Clement has an "off" year, as he did in his last full season before his injury, 2005, when his ERA was 4.57 (just over his career ERA of 4.47). The result is likely that Clement's performance, compared with Wells and Maroth, will subtract about 47 runs from the ER allowed by the rotation. That's close to half of the Cardinals' 104 negative run differential last year.
Likewise, Pineiro is a very good bet to be an improvement over the 2007 version of Reyes, even if Joel's ERA this year is 5.71, his ERA as a starter over the last three years. Even that would subtract about 8 runs from the total allowed by the starting rotation. I predict that Pineiro's ERA will be much closer to his career ERA of 4.47 and his overall ERA last year of 4.33, considering that Pineiro ended up with an ERA for the Cardinals last year of 3.96 in 11 starts, after Dave Duncan detected that Pineiro was tipping his pitches. Joel's dominating win against the Mets, in his last start, which virtually knocked the New Yorkers out of the playoffs, could be an indicator that Pineiro has finally found his mojo and is ready to be a solid middle of the rotation (league average) starter this year.
Wainwright's ERA in the second half last year was 2.71, about two points better than the first half of his first ML season as a starter. Obviously Wainwright adjusted to the hitters much better than they adjusted to him. It is reasonable to expect Adam continue his trajectory of improvement and finish 2008 with an ERA around 3.70 or lower, splitting the difference between his first and second half numbers last year.
Assume that Looper will perform at the same level as he did last year (or be replaced by a pitcher who will perform at that level or better.)
It is reasonable to hope that the other member of the rotation, Mulder, will be able to match the level of performance in the 28 starts by Thompson, Wellemeyer, and 2007's ailing Mulder himself. Mulder would replace his own three very poor starts in 2007, at an ERA of 12.27; and the much better 11 starts of Wellemeyer at a 3.65 ERA; and the 11 average starts by Thompson at a 4.54 ERA, and the three starts by Keisler, at an ERA of 5.19. Even if Mulder is not completely back to form this year, even if he performs only halfway between his career ERA of 4.18 and his 2004 ERA of 4.43 for Oakland, when he was ailing in the second half, he would put up an ERA of 4.31, almost exactly the same as the combined performance by Mulder, Wellemeyer, Thompson, and Keisler in 2007.
On offense I think we have general consensus that the extremely poor performance by Rolen, Edmonds, and Kennedy in 2007 will be easy to surpass this year by Glaus, Ludwick/Rasmus, and a rebounding Kennedy this year. In addition, Duncan should do better, now that he is free of the hernia that dramatically hindered his second half performance last year. And Encarnacion's mediocre performance as the right fielder should be easy for the more talented, much more powerful Rick Ankiel to match. Molina finally seems ready to be a solid contributor, as he showed all of 2007, having finally settled on a consistent batting stance; he is still in his prime, so it is reasonable to expect him to continue to perform at the level he did in 2007. Few have any hope that Izturis will contribute respectably on offense, but even if he and Miles (gag) and/or Jiminez or Ryan fail to match the combination of Eckstein, Miles, and Ryan in 2007, all the other improvements should net an overally improvement in offense. Considering how low the bar was set by last year's offense, we can reasonably expect that with average health all of these offensive improvements in 2008 should add about 50 more runs scored in 2008 than in 2007.
That addition of 50 runs scored, combined with the 55 runs subtracted from runs allowed by Clement and Pineiro, would erase the rest of the team's -104 run differential. So the Cardinals would actually score as many runs in 2008 as they would allow (hold your applause please).
Any other improvements would be a bonus. Like, say, replacing the fifth starter in August with Chris Carpenter's solid contribution over the last third of the season; or like Jamie Garcia emerging as the fifth starter at the beginning of the season. Or Anthony Reyes putting it together and becoming a valuable contributor or a valuable trade chip for some other improvement. Etc.
"So what if the Cardinals do reduce their run differential to zero?", you ask? "Big deal. Surely you don't imagine that the team could be a contender with such mediocre performance, do you?" Hey, maybe the Arizona Diamondbacks can answer that question. Who would have guessed that Arizona would have the best record in the NL in 2007, despite a negative run differential of 20, while the Braves, with a positive 77-run differential, the Padres with a positive 75-run differential, and the consensus pre-season pick, the New York Mets, with a positive 54-run differential, all would fail to even make the playoffs. Consider also the Cardinals themselves, who found the magic to win the World Series in 2006, despite a positive run differential of only 19.
Even if imagining the Cardinals in the postseason in 2008 is an outrageous long shot (which, of course, it is), it's a pleasant little winter fantasy, isn't it? Why not "accentuate the positive" for a change while we gather around the hot stove, just for fun? Would that be such a bad way to improve our own pleasure/pain differential? As Joaquin Andujar would say, "You never know...."
by CardsWin on Jan 16, 2008 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Optimistic...
by MRCARD on Jan 16, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to add...
by MRCARD on Jan 16, 2008 3:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Optimists believe Mo did the best he could
I agree that it is unlikely so many breaks (a wave of injuries and accidents, one career-ending, even an off-field death) will go against the Cards this year as last year.
Yes, admittedly, the scenario I've laid out emphasizes the optimistic side of the possibilities, in the end. But with all the "if's" taken into an aggregate group and all their "protection" or hedge bets (backup players) pooled together, too, the pleasant and unpleasant surprises will most likely balance out and leave us close to the midpoint range of possibilities. It does seem to me that the midpoint in the range of the possibilities, for the players now on the roster, is the Cardinals being a .500 team, with about as many runs scored as given up.
It isn't improbable that the Cards will get solid or better performance from at least five of these 11 starting pitcher candidates: Wainwright, Looper, Pineiro, Wellemeyer, Thompson, Reyes, maybe even Garcia or Hawksworth or Boggs, all healthy at this point, and Clement and Mulder the recovering ones, and later Carpenter). That's a large enough pool of candidates to not have to resort to leaving someone in the rotation this year who pitches as poorly as Wells, Reyes, Maroth, and Mulder did last year. Again, how unlikely is it that the Cardinal rotation will be significantly better with this pool of candidates, in comparison with the worst starting rotation in the history of the franchise? That's not only a reasonable expectation. It's a very good bet.
Likewise, how improbable is it that Glaus will add more value for the Cards this year than Rolen did last year? Or that the centerfielder (Ludwick or Rasmus or Barton or Shumacher, or a platoon) will contribute more than Edmonds did last year (Jim's subs last year actually demonstrated already that they can and very probably will perform better). Or that Kennedy will have a much better year this year than last, closer to his career and recent performances? Or that Duncan will have a better year than last year, when he was hindered so much in the second half by a hernia? Or that Ankiel (or Ludwick or Schumacher) will at least match last year's modest performance of Encarnacion? Etc. Each of these possibilities is the best bet, taken individually, and in aggregate, they amount to the likelihood that the overall offense will very likely be better this year than last.
Enough so that I'm betting the Cardinals will win close to half of their games, if not more, through August 1, by which date Chris Carpenter and Colby Rasmus and Josh Kinney, and probably Perez, and/or possibly Boggs and/or Worrell should be added to the team, along with one or players added through trade (of Reyes? Thompson? Duncan? one or more relief pitchers?) by the end of July deadline. With all of those improvements, the Cardinals could make a late run for the NL Central title, especially if among Clement, Mulder, and Carpenter there are two starters who are back in full form at the top of the rotation along with Wainwright, and the back of the rotation can be filled out by some combination of Pineiro, Looper, and/or others. Even with average breaks, the good breaks counterbalancing the bad ones, this rotation could be the best in the NL Central by August. Of course, with enough bad breaks, the rotation could be mediocre. But given the number and upside potential of starting candidates, I think it's a very good bet that "mediocre" is the worst that is likely to happen, among the 90% range of probabilities.
Even "mediocre" would be a big improvement over last year's historically "awful" overall rotation.
by CardsWin on Jan 16, 2008 6:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great post Baron
I don't agree that Ryan is an alternative at the SS position. He's not the best option at second base either -- that would be Hoffpauir. I don't see why they aren't trying to actively move him to a team that needs help at second base.
by fourstick on Jan 16, 2008 1:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Baron, I recommend you for tenure
I've been wondering, but why do you do the English-style stuff (favOUrite, organiSation, etc.)? Were you born in Lancastershire (pronounced "Lancashur") or something?
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 1:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i was
by beanocook on Jan 16, 2008 1:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm sure you meant
i was
thinking Canadian maybe, eh.
by RosevilleRedbird on Jan 16, 2008 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shove off
by Hardcore Legend on Jan 16, 2008 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Take off to the freat white north
by gonzostl on Jan 16, 2008 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not only that,
by PujolsFor President on Jan 16, 2008 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pineiro - Interesting Quote from TLR
"What Adam and Braden did last year making the transition from the bullpen was remarkable," La Russa said. "With Pineiro, it was as simple as him tipping his pitches and (Dave) Duncan fixed that."
The Cardinals seem to be pretty good at picking up stuff like this. If that is really all that was needed, I'm cautiously optimistic. However, I guess one could also say, if that is all they "fixed," then perhaps they didn't really fix anything and we are likely to see regression.
by OCCardsFan on Jan 16, 2008 2:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
They said this back in August
They also wanted him to stay agressive with his pitching mentality and not be afraid to so what he wants to do and not what the hitter dictates.
Who knows, really. He could be the next Jeff Suppan or he could be the next Sydney Ponson.
by Hardcore Legend on Jan 16, 2008 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Piniero
by stl tyler on Jan 16, 2008 3:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm with you...
by kindred on Jan 16, 2008 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That is my least favorite phrase....
Quick story to explain my point. A few years ago I was talking to a guy who used to work for the Chicago Cubs as a trainer. He was in the dugout for a game and Ishmael Valdes was throwing for the Dodgers in a game in 2000. For the first six innings of the game, Eric Karros was sitting in the Cubs dugout and literally predicted EVERY SINGLE PITCH VALDES THREW FOR 7 STRAIGHT INNINGS. He was talking to players in the dugout between AB's about how to pick up the pithes in the batters box.
Final Score -- Dodgers 5 - Cubs 0
Valdes 7 2/3 IP 2 H 0 ER 2 BB 10 K
Pretty impressive for a guy tipping his pitches.
In summary, there are certain pitchers who tip pitches all the time (Maddux has been known to do this in the past with his breaking balls) -- the important thing is tipping location, which most pitchers don't do, but is done by a runner on second base. All in all, if you throw your game and hit your pitch locations you're not getting shelled regardless of whether the hitter knows it's coming.
by fourstick on Jan 17, 2008 12:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Right, however
If you take away the fact that the hitter actually has to guess between fastball and off-speed, you are really putting a strain on yourself to hit your spot everytime you throw the ball. Also, it's alot easier for a mistake to turn into a disaster when they know atleast what pitch type is coming.
by Hardcore Legend on Jan 17, 2008 1:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how about a catcher
I realize it is 'politically incorrect' to criticize Yadi Molina's defense, but I do so anyway. Despite his many defensive plusses, he too often bounces around behind the plate like a ping-pong ball on adrenalin.
The worst aspect of this being that he often fails to give the pitcher a stable (visual) target.
I also wonder if his gyrations (leaving aside the "distraction" aspect) might provide some last-second indice of pitch location.
I'm no Eric Karros, but I can often tell where the pitch is going watching on TV in my living room. And that's not from anything the pitcher is doing, it is from looking at Yadi.
Perhaps my memory of Mike Matheny is unduly fond, but it seems to me he rarely moved his glove or body until the pitch was already on the way.
by the Tewk on Jan 17, 2008 8:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Batters aren't looking at the pitch location
That said, I don't really recollect Matheny as any better/different than Molina on setting up for the pitch.
by StanTheManFan on Jan 17, 2008 6:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mo did fine
and as far as letting eckstein go, how pissed would we all be next year when we are paying 5-6 million to another player on the DL because we all know that's where eck is headed. and he would have taken arb... all that talk about his offers were just posturing. and signing izturis was the better of all evils. at least he has upside and plays good D.
and finally the majority of the signings Mo made were all 1 year so even if they are busts there's minimal risk.
by FutureMan on Jan 16, 2008 3:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Miles is fine
Brendan Ryan is younger, cheaper, and plays better defense. Hoffpauir is younger, cheaper, and deserves a shot to crack the roster.
by stl tyler on Jan 16, 2008 3:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
low chance
barring extended injuries miles is looking at <250 AB's.
if ryan isn't going to get the starting SS job for the big league team than i think he's better served getting everyday AB's in memphis than he is being a backup. if you want to talk about opportunity cost Ryan sitting on the bench is an opportunity cost. if he tears it up in AAA this year the SS job on the cards will be nice and warm for him in 2009. that's the beauty of the one year deals for izturis and miles.
by FutureMan on Jan 16, 2008 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Quote from the P-D
"And IF Mark Mulder and Chris Carpenter return along the way and regain their old form, the Cards could have the best starting pitching in the division"
I saw this and, admittedly, I blinked. Granted, he put IF in caps, but that big an IF would fill the whole page.
Not a Gordo fan, but except for that sentence, pretty ok Wednesday-in-January type piece.
Thoughts?
by bukowski on Jan 16, 2008 4:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, if we're talking about unlikely events...
Remember, kids...every time someone reads a Gordo column, god kills a kitten.
by Mr Clean on Jan 16, 2008 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One in 18 million or worse
The chances that at least two pitchers will step up to the needs at the top of the rotation, among the four candidates (Wainwright, Mulder, Clement, Carpenter) is about 50-50, I'd say.
If any two of those four return to form, the Cardinals will have as good a 1-2 combo as any team in the NL Central, and the 3-4-5 roles (filled by 2 of these 7 candidates: Pineiro, Looper, Wellemeyer, Reyes, Thompson, maybe even Garcia or Boggs) will very likely be competitive with the division, too.
(cf. the Cubs' 3-4-5 candidates behind Zambrano and Lilly: Hill, Marquis, Lieber, Marshall, Dempster; and the Brewers' 3-4-5 candidates behind oft-inured Sheets and now merely average starter Suppan: Guillardo, Villanueva, Bush, Capuano, Parra, Vargas).
by CardsWin on Jan 16, 2008 6:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if that is how probability works
I think the chance that Chris Carpenter will be a Cy Young-caliber starter and Mark Mulder will be the best LHP in baseball are virtually nil. I like Carpenter out of the pen and a good bounce back next year, but Mulder has to show at least something before I can even be optimistic he'll make the rotation let alone succeed.
by giveml on Jan 16, 2008 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Six of one and half a dozen of the other
Then only one among the threesome of Carpenter, Mulder, and Clement has to step up to become part of the top of the rotation for the Cards. Shall we say that the chances of returning to form for each of those three players, individually, is only 1/3?
If so, then each of them would have a 2/3 chance of NOT returning to form. That would mean that the chance that NONE of the three returns to form is 2/3 x 2/3 x 2/3 = 8/27 = 29.6%. So the chances that ONE OR MORE of the three will return to form would be 1 - 29.6% = 70.4%.
Then the chances that Wainwright improves AND that at least one of the other three returns to form would be 70% x 70.4% = 49.3%, or roughly 50-50. Even if Wainwright did not improve over his 2007 performance and step up to the #2 level, there would still be a small chance that two of the other three would step up to the 1-2 level of performance. That chance would push the overall probability of the Cards having a strong 1-2 combo in the rotation by August over 50%.
If you believe Wainwright's chances or any of the threesome's chances are better or worse than assumed here, then the chance of having a true 1-2 combo in the rotation will be higher or lower than 50% in your calculation.
The bottom line is still that we don't know what's going to happen, of course. Unlike Hollywood and Broadway the drama and supsense on the baseball diamond are real. Except for those of us who don't like uncertainty, the fact that we won't know the actual outcome until it happens is at least half the fun of being a sports fan, isn't it?
In other words, if uncertainty is dreadful to you, then you must be pretty miserable about now, but if uncertainty is interesting or exciting for you, you're gonna LOVE this year's Cardinal team!
by CardsWin on Jan 16, 2008 8:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Statistically that works....
Brewers (Sheets - 50-50 to be healthy, Davis - 75-25 to return to form, Gallardo - 50-50 to strikeout 200 batters)
Cubs (Zambrano - 80-20 to win 20 games, Lilly - 80-20 to repeat his second half, Hill 50-50 to come back to the 2nd half 2006 form)
by fourstick on Jan 17, 2008 12:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You must be picking the Cubs to win by a mile!
I wouldn't lay a big bet against either of your sets of picks right now but I might once we see how Clement, Mulder, and Wainwright look in spring training. I'm expecting Adam to become a true #2 this year, and I am cautiously hopeful that either Clement or Mulder might regain their former excellence.
Even if they fall short of that, it's going to be a very interesting season for Cardinal fans who enjoy watching younger players develop and recuperating veterans show whether or not they still have the "right stuff".
by CardsWin on Jan 17, 2008 4:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
I see some of the Brewers' team regressing to the mean a bit (Hart, Weeks) this season and I don't think that Braun is going to have near the year he had last year as he adjusts to playing outfield and pitchers adjust to his tendency to swing early in the count. The addition of Cameron was a great signing as it will improve their defense and moves Hall back to the infield, which will hopefully improve his bat as well.
Houston should score a lot of runs....and give up a lot of runs. They're really similar to the Cardinal teams of 2005 and 2006 with LESS starting pitching depth and a mediocre bullpen. They're going to lose a lot of 11-9 games this season and win a lot of 13-10 games.
Reds -- Homers + K's + Harang + Bailey * Dusty Baker = mediocre ballclub.
Pirates -- On the way up, but not enough to contend, although Snell and Gorzellany are a nice one two punch at the top of the rotation.
I see Wainwright as a solid #2 starter as well. I don't see Carpenter coming back as his 2004-2006 self and I don't think Mulder will ever recover the 20 win form he had in Oakland. Shoulder injuries are hard to recover from, as we've seen with Rolen for the past couple of years. It's even worse for pitchers. Piniero is an interesting case: He won a lot of games for Seattle from 1999-2003 and threw a lot of innings, but he's just not been that same pitcher the last few seasons. Maybe a fresh start in St. Louis will help, he's shown he can be a solid #3/#4 starter in the past.
by fourstick on Jan 17, 2008 9:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs look like the team to beat
Looks like the Cardinal rotation has a strong #2 in Wainwright and solid #3 in Pineiro, and a #5 won't be hard to find with so many candidates. So the big question is can Mulder or Clement return healthy enough to be a solid #1 while the other fills in the #4 slot, at least. Will Carpenter return as the #1? I agree the odds are against it. Maybe he'll be a solid #4 the last third of the season and return to full strength in 2009 (at least as a #2). By the time we find out about Chris this August, the Cubs may already be 15 runs up on the Cards and by then even the Brewers won't be able to catch Zambrano and Marmol and Company.
by CardsWin on Jan 17, 2008 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I always check my comments for replies...
I like how the Cardinal roster shaped up; it's a much better ballclub talent and depth wise than it was going into the 2007 season.
I like the Clement signing but, again, shoulder problems are always chronic for pitchers. I think it's a much better deal than the one that San Diego made for Prior. After reading articles about his rehab, I think he's got a fork sticking out of his back at this point. I don't see him or Mulder exhibiting #1 starter type stuff. I think at best the Cards probably have a solid #2 starter (Waino) and potentially 4 or 5 middle rotation guys (Mulder, Clement, Piniero, Reyes, and 1/3 of a season of Carpenter) I still think all of those guys has the talent to be a solid #3 on a NL staff and Carpenter may well come back completely healthy, but I doubt it.
By the way, if there's a team not named the Metropolitans that can find a way to blow a 15 game lead after August 1st it's the Chicago Cubs. They could be up 20 games at the All-Star break and their fans would be wondering when the wheels were going to fall off. I'm surrounded by them living in Des Moines, IA -- I've never seen such a somber bunch of fans even when they're winning.
by fourstick on Jan 17, 2008 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Aw, Jeez! (Ron Santo's most frequent phrase)
As for the Cubs and their fans, I know what you mean. I went to college at Northwestern and several years later lived north of downtown Chicago for two more years, four miles from Wrigley Field, so I had the opportunity to go to quite a few games over those six years. (I'm in the San Francisco area now, where I've lived through the Bonds era, one that has weakend the team overall and is about to haunt the Giant owners it appears, for good reason.) Maybe the Cubs' day games wear the players down by late summer. I don't know. But the June swoon legend does have some truth, even if it's actually an August Bust sometimes or a story of how their hopes were dismembered in September or knocked over in October, as Steve Barton demonstrated (have I got his name right?). It would be a great drama if the Cards were 8 games or so out of first place in the summer, as they were in 2007, then soared into first place after the return of Carpenter, the call-up of Rasmus, and maybe a deadline trade at the end of July. I can just hear Ron Santo now moaning, "Aw, JEEZ!" (Good guy, much more enjoyable to listen to than Shannon in my opinion, and a MUCH better third baseman than Shannon was in his experiment there.)
by CardsWin on Jan 17, 2008 4:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
Shannon was at his best when paired with a great play-by-play man like Jack Buck who could keep control of the booth while letting Shannon tell his stories and quirky anecdotes. I have to say, though, that I'd rather have him in there than some of the other yahoos they've tried to bring on in recent years (although I have taken to liking Rooney for some reason) I've also been impressed with the FSN team of Hrabosky and Dan McLaughlin. I watch just about every Cardinal game either live or recorded in the summer time and those two do a fantastic job. Much better than the WGN tandem in my opinion.
by fourstick on Jan 17, 2008 4:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Finally got around to reading it
I may still be reeling in the frothy wake of stupidity that was Dan O'Neill's column from a few days ago.
You can hear the collective conscience of those faithful to the Flock.I haven't heard half of that nonsense and none of it needed repeating in a column.Walt Jocketty is gone. A submissive Jimmy Olsen is in his place. Diabolical Jeff Luhnow lurks in the background, an evil Sith Lord skilled in the ways of the dark side. Ownership is trimming inventory, maximizing profits, ready to sell. The brewery wants to reunite the great American baseball franchise with its Great American Lager.
Fact or fantasy, the perceptions are out there, spreading through the city like Highway 40 detours.
The six other positions [after Pujols and Molina] are filled with players either coming off poor seasons, coming off injuries or coming off both. The exception is center field, where the thought is that 21-year-old Rasmus might emerge from a .275 season at Class AA Springfield.It sounds an awful lot like he's disparaging Rasmus there for having a .275 batting average as one of the youngest players in AA—hack.
by liam on Jan 16, 2008 8:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WTF?
"Once upon a time, a man named Columbus sailed across the ocean, which was blue. On Sunday, the Broncos, dressed all in blue, played a football game."
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 10:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
FYI I made that one up.
by redbirdnation8206 on Jan 16, 2008 10:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I once had a revealing email
Your best strategy is to just avoid baseball columns by Gordon or O'Neill. Since I started that a year ago, I've lost 80 pounds, inherited a fortune and married Morgan Fairchild, whom I've slept with.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jan 16, 2008 11:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good stuff red
like Tony said about Scotty, MO's the boss. if Tony doesn't like what he does he can quit.
good stuff again dude.
by gdm426 on Jan 16, 2008 5:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's somebody's birthday
Here's to another year of Joe DiMaggio as baseball-reference's "Closest Comparison by Age".
by stl tyler on Jan 16, 2008 6:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dear Dr. Baron
Of course, we realize this is a very important transition year for Johnny and that he may struggle at times with the difficulty of your curriculum. We are confident that with your guidance and Johnny's hard work he will eventually receive the sort of marks we have come to expect from him. He has always been a Very Enlightened Boy. We realized it is crucial for Johnny to surround himself with quality people such as yourself and we would like to ask for your assistance in keeping him on the straight and narrow.
We understand that the well known bully Tommy Lee Rasta has been hanging around the St. Louis School of General Management and we hope you can nip that right in the bud. We have always tried to bring little Johnny up the right way. Mr. Mozeliak is particularly proud that little Johnny was raised with a strong foundation of OPS+, OBP, FIP, and UZR. In fact, Johnny always reads from The Fielding Bible at bedtime. However, we have heard some unsettling rumors about Tommy Lee Rasta. As you know he likes to surround himself with older boys and we all know what kind of trouble that can bring. I think he hangs around with them because they buy him wine.
My sister's friend's cousin works with Tommy Lee Rasta's mother and she told her that Tommy Lee has been a long-time LOOGy abuser and is currently fighting an addiction to intangibles. I am sure you can agree that is not desirable company for an impressionable young man like Johnny. Why that whole Aaron Miles project that you graded him so poorly on was done just so Tommy Lee Rasta would stop taking Johnny's lunch money.
Thank you again for your thorough analysis of Johnny's performance. We look forward to hearing from you again at the end of the term.
Very Respectfully Yours,
Mrs. Mildred Mozeliak
by giveml on Jan 16, 2008 6:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Very nice
by OCCardsFan on Jan 16, 2008 7:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like that quote too.
by jillsinmo on Jan 16, 2008 7:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very Enlightened Boy (VEB)
by Ray Lankford on Jan 16, 2008 9:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well done!
"In fact, Johnny always reads from The Fielding Bible at bedtime."
Good stuff.
by Mr Clean on Jan 17, 2008 12:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sweet
by jacksonian on Jan 16, 2008 7:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Solid work
I'd also have to throw out the hiring grade on the grounds that I have no freaking idea what kind of impact those moves will have long or short term and can't really get too excited about any of them.
So that said, I'd move him from a C- to a nice, solid C after the Rolen deal, but I really think considering what was (or wasn't) available on the free agent/trade market, the project maxed out at a C grade anyway. He mainly just did what he had to, and didn't screw anything up too bad. His dissertation is due next off season, when we see what he does with all that money off the books and a better free agent crop.
Also, with some of the recent moves (Miles, Phelps) I have reason to suspect that Johnny is getting the answers to some of his quizzes slipped to him under the table by Tony. We'll have none of that in this classroom, young man!
by Tupelo on Jan 16, 2008 10:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Late in the day and off topic
I'm just glad I watched him play before discovering that guys like Aaron Miles actually suck. Otherwise I might never have fallen in love with MiniMac to begin with.
by effin fisk on Jan 16, 2008 10:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
wow
by gdm426 on Jan 17, 2008 2:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Red for the Report, but we need to
Also, I thought that the grades should be properly weighted giving more credit for those tough advanced placement courses in "moving aged or damaged veterans" where he surprised with pretty reasonable results. I know he did pretty poorly in "stop-gap one year infielders", but at least it wasn't a big money disaster like classmate Wade put together, and as aggravating as Johnny's mess is, at least it shouldn't take as long or be as expensive to clean up. So I hope you can discount this mistake (although I have a hard time with that myself).
Other than that, I think you need to find a way to be sure Johnny doesn't miss recess so often. If you saw any of his diaries posted by Inkster, you'll see he's really put himself under a lot of stress. At least let's hope he doesn't have to spend so many days in detention in the next semester.
Just to wrap, let's hope that he is well prepared for final exams. We'll keep our fingers crossed. Thanks again Red, and to all the others at veb that have contributed so much to help Johnny with his new school. Go Cardinals.
by Birds on the Bat on Jan 16, 2008 10:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff all around today.
by cardsgirl95 on Jan 17, 2008 12:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Glaus won't wear #25
by Hardcore Legend on Jan 17, 2008 1:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just to be contrary
by easy on Jan 17, 2008 5:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















