Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

My last lament for Anthony

You know, I'm getting very tired of saying the same things about Anthony Reyes, and I know that I'm exhausted with seeing the same performance from him nearly every time out.  With that in mind, I just had to get all of my thoughts regarding the kid out there one last time, and then I do believe that I'm done talking about him.  I'll even do it after the jump so as not to clutter up the diary page for people who would rather just skip the whole damn thing.  I'll warn you ahead of time, it's fairly long.  (That's what she said.)  

Sorry, the new Office DVD set just came out, and I've watched pretty much nothing else the past week.  

Star-divide

A few weeks ago, I posted a diary in which I postulated that it would be a good idea to have Anthony's arm looked at, to see if there are any physical problems to explain what has happened to him as a pitcher.  That didn't happen, and Reyes managed to put together a decent run of pitching, so it looked, at least momentarily, as if he was maybe turning a corner.  Following his last couple of outings, I think it's safe to say that isn't the case.  He has the same problems now that he's had all season, and I don't see any sort of solution coming any time soon.  My solution?  

Trade him.  

That's what I fully expect to happen, and, to be frank, what I'm actually hoping for.  To my way of thinking, there is no way that Anthony Reyes is ever going to be an effective starting pitcher for the St. Louis Cardinals with this coaching staff.  I find this very disheartening, as I think Reyes has it in him to be not just a good pitcher, but a great one.  I really do.  And I'm not going to try and blame all of his problems on Dave Duncan and Tony LaRussa alone.  Sometimes, however, situations just don't work out, and I think this is one of those times.  You can be perfectly capable of doing a certain job, you may work for a fine company, and it still may not be a good fit.  It happens.  Unfortunately, I think the Cardinals are in a true no win situation with Reyes, as I think either course of action they take with him is going to lead to regret.  If they trade him, I fully expect some other team, and some other coaching staff, to get him back to where he needs to be, and the Cards will have another Dan Haren situation, and they'll wish to god he were still pitching here.  If they keep him, I don't think he's ever going to live up to what he could have been, and the team will regret having gotten nothing of any real value out of him.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't.  So how did it come to this?  

I was reading through last night's game thread this morning, and I saw all sides of the issue presented.  First, there was the question of whether or not Reyes had been jerked around any more than either Adam Wainwright or Brad Thompson.  I think the answer to that question is yes.  Not a shouted, resounding yes, but a yes none the less.  The starting rotation competition of last spring training was an absolute farce, one of the most frustrating displays of all of LaRussa's worst attributes at once.  You had his distrust of youth, his dissembling attitude toward the truth, and his inability to admit that the reality of a situation didn't match what he expected on display.  Both Wainwright and Reyes outpitched Sidney Ponson, and yet he was given the job over the two of them for reasons that were'nt clear then, nor really, ever.  Wainwright went to the pen, Anthony back down to the minors, to work on pitching the way they wanted him to.  Really, it all worked out pretty well for both of them; Wainwright got to close out a championship, and Anthony set the tone for the whole thing.  Not to shabby.  

Fast forward to this season.  Both Reyes and Wainwright were installed in the rotation, which is where they should have been, and all seemed right with the world.  The handling of the two was very different after that, though.  When Wainwright struggled early in the year, Tony assured the press that "he's a keeper".  When Anthony struggled, he was criticized for his pitch selection, his preparation, whatever.  Don't get me wrong, Anthony dug himself an awfully big hole, but the attitude toward him was never one that is really conducive toward helping a young player gain confidence.  Now, I will say that both he and Thompson got the shaft, badly, this season when it comes to the way they were handled.  Thompson did the rotation a great service, stepping in and stepping up when things were very bleak, throwing innings, (and decent ones at that) when the bullpen was starting to show signs of collapse and the rotation was a shambles.  Was he used as a starter then, and given the chance to prove he could succeed in that role?  No.  He was throwing out of the bullpen in between starts, with the rationale being that sinkerballers are bettter when they're tired.  Personally, I don't buy it, but it's conventional wisdom, so it must be right.  I realize that we can't definitively assume causality as to the downturn in Thompson't pitching, but it certainly seems to me that he got much worse after he started throwing in between in games.  I don't care if a guy would throw on that day or not; throwing on the side and trying to get major league hitters is not the same thing at all.  As for Anthony, he was skipped in the rotation several times, even early in the season, before his problems got to the point they eventually did.  Just like last night, Anthony hadn't thrown in what, around seven or eight days again, I believe?  It was eight days between starts before that, too, before the game against the Reds when he went 1+.  You have a yound pitcher who is struggling to gain consistency, and the solution is to use him on a pretty much random schedule?  Now, the last little bit here, the Cards have been back in the race, so I can understand the thinking a little more than I could earlier.  But the fact remains that the team's handling of Anthony has been basically the opposite of everything I would hope for if I were drawing up a plan for giving a young player the best possible chance to succeed.  Above all else, as someone in last night's thread so succinctly stated, (I believe it was gdm126, but I'm not going to look right now, so forgive me if I'm wrong) "(Tony and Dave) didn't try to change anyone else's pitches."  So I think that, yes, the handling of all three young pitchers has been suspect at times, but I think Anthony has been handled in a more damaging manner than either of the other two.  

Which brings me to the real crux of the whole thing, in my opinion.  Again, reading the comments in the game thread, both sides of the Anthony Reyes debate were represented.  His boosters tend to speak thusly:  

"If Reyes were free to pitch his way, he would be much more successful."  

"They're asking him to do things he just can't do."  

"The game plan just isn't the right way for Anthony to pitch."  

To which his detractors typically answer with things such as:  

"91 isn't enough to throw by anybody.  The guy doesn't throw 96 mph. I don't get where everyone thinks he's a power pitcher."  

"You ever think the kid just isn't good?  He doesn't seem to have good stuff to me."  

"Reyes just doesn't have an out pitch.  He doesn't have the stuff to dominate with what he currently has, so he needs to either add a pitch or something.  He's just brutal once he gets men on base."  

I hope I did a decent job of characterizing the comments from both sides; they're pretty predictable by now.  The problem is that both sides of the debate are missing the real point.  The pro-Reyes guys say Reyes should pitch his way and everything will be all right, and the anti-Reyes faction responds he doesn't have the stuff to do it.  The truth?  Somewhere in the middle, with the detractors a little closer to the reality.  Anthony does have much better success when he throws the way he prefers to, with more four seam fastballs, offset by the changeup and the occasional curve thing.  At the same time, Anthony doesn't have the repertoire of the kind of pitcher who can just blow hitters away.  When he gets runners on base, he does seem to just absolutely wilt.  The detractors say he's weak mentally, and his backers say Reyes needs to shake off his catcher and go with what he believes in.  Again, I think the truth is a little of both, but I really think Anthony has been put in a bad position here by his coaching staff.  The game plan, particularly with men on, is not one he is going to execute all that well.  He's not in a good position to shake off the catcher and do whatever the hell he wants, though, because it's very clear to everyone that he's not going to be supported if he tries to do things his way.  He's screwed either way.  

The truth of Anthony Reyes' situation is this.  He doesn't have the repertoire of a power pitcher now.  There's a caveat to that statement, though, and it's a doozy.  When Anthony came up, he was that pitcher.  He had the velocity and the movement to blow guys away.  He had command of all his pitches.  His out pitch, his changeup, was rated as one of the best in all of baseball.  This is where the real problem is.  The changes that Reyes has tried to make have robbed him of what he had.  To me, there was a very telling little tidbit in the MLB.com story of last night's game, courtesy of Edwin Encarnacion:  

"When I was in the Minor Leagues, he was one of the nastier pitchers I ever faced," Encarnacion said. "I guess here, I just see the ball and hit it."  

Now, Encarnacion makes it sound like he just has a better approach up here, but,with all due respect, I think it says far more about what Anthony isn't anymore, rather than anything new that Mr. Encarnacion has discovered.  When he was coming up, Anthony's stuff was regularly described as electric.  He's always been compared to Prior, and the comparisons were pretty favorable.  He didn't have the breaking ball, but his changeup was leaps and bounds better, and a lot of scouts said that Reyes actually threw a little bit harder.  His command was nearly as good; his K/BB rate in the minors certainly bore that notion out.  

I have a DVD of the very first game Reyes ever pitched in the big leagues, that August 2005 game against the Brewers.  I had bought a Tivo with the disc burner earlier that year, and I occasionally made copies of what I considered to be significant games.  (please don't come and get me MLB)  In that contest, Reyes threw his fastball right around 92-94 mph all night long.  He hit 96 eight times by my count.  (He was a little less on velo in the first, said afterward he was a little tight and nervous)  He threw fastballs all over the zone, both up and down, with tremendous movement and beautiful command.  He made one bad mistake, the ball that Bill Hall put in the left field seats, but the Brewers couldn't square the ball up whatsoever for the most part.  The kid showed every sign of being overpowering.  Right around two years later, he's anything but.  

Here's where I start to have problems with the handling of Anthony.  His struggles with the sinker have been well documented, with most people recognizing that he just doesn't do well throwing the two seam fastball.  The problem, to me, isn't the fact that he's had so much trouble with the sinker.  The attempted change to his mechanics, to keep him on top of the ball, is where I see the real issue.  The other thing I have a big problem with, but I haven't heard much about, is the change to his breaking ball.  When Reyes came up, he threw a slider.  It was a little inconsistent, but it had decent depth and nice bite laterally.  It came in in the low to mid 80's.  So he had a fastball at 92-95, a slider at 83-85, and a change in the mid 70's.  He could attack a hitter at three different speeds, and the separation between his fastball and his change, (around 17-20 mph) made the latter absolutely devastating.  

For whatever reason, (and I have yet to hear any kind of rationale) Anthony now throws a curveball.  Leaving aside the fact that it's not a very good pitch, he throws it in the low to mid 70s.  So now, with the tweaks to his repertoire, Reyes throws a sinker in the high 80s, topping out at about 91, a changeup still in the mid 70s, and a curveball at the same speed.  So now, rather than having three speeds to attack hitters with, all of his pitches are going to be one or the other.  He no longer has the same separation between his fastball and his offspeed stuff,(around 12-14 mph now) and only two speeds.  Usually, pitching coaches try to get their pitchers to diversify their repertoires, but the changes to Anthony's have, if anything, made it much more limited.  

In addition to the changes to Anthony's arm action, he's become much more passive with his delivery overall.  He no longer drives aggressively with his legs, favouring more a 'tall and fall' style.  Again, it's the sort of change one would make if you were trying to throw the ball on a downward plane.  I can only speculate, but I believe that Reyes has changed his mechanics to match the philosophy of the team's coaching staff.  The problem with this is that it has resulted in a significant downturn in his overall stuff.  When someone says he doesn't have the stuff to be a power pitcher, they're right.  He doesn't anymore.  I still think there should be a medical examination, to determine if Reyes is pitching hurt, but even if he's not, he no longer has the approach of a power pitcher, from a physical standpoint, and subsequently he doesn't have the repertoire.  

Overall, both sides of the debate are right, and both are wrong.  Reyes isn't the worst pitcher in the game, but he isn't very good.  He does have the talent to be a top notch pitcher, but I don't think he can be the way he is now.  More than anything, I think it's really a huge missed opportunity for the St. Louis Cardinals.  I don't think you can lay the entirety of the blame at the feet of Duncan and LaRussa, but the handling of Reyes has robbed the team of what could have been a tremendous asset.  I do want to say that I think Reyes represented sort of a 'Perfect Storm' for the coaches.  Reyes was young, and we know the problems that often leads to here.  He isn't the seen and not heard sort of kid that the old school guys like.  He doesn't seem brash to me, but he's definitely not going to blend in, with the high socks and the hat; he didn't seem overwhelmed when he came up.  His pitching style is literally the exact opposite of what Dave Duncan advocates; he's not a sinker guy, he challenged hitters with his fastball, whatever the situation.  Plus, his closest baseball friend is Mark Prior, a guy who is known to really get under the manager's skin.  Put it all together, and you have a player that is, quite possibly, the worst fit imaginable for this team, with this staff.  Like I said, sometimes situations just don't work.  

I think it's a shame that Reyes hasn't worked out, and it kills me to say that it'll be best for all parties if and when he's moved elsewhere.  To me, this coaching staff has become too dogmatic, too hidebound.  But I can't blame them entirely.  In the end, Anthony has to perform, and he hasn't.  The whole thing has gone as badly wrong as it possible could, and I just wanted to get all my thoughts regarding it out there.  I'm going to just let it go now, and I apologize for letting it run so long.  Thanks if you stuck around for the whole thing.  Later.  

0 recs  |  Comment 58 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thanks for pulling all those thoughts together
I just wanted to add something interesting that Strauss said yesterday, and this supports those who continue to believe in Reyes' potential and possible mismanagement at St. Louis:

Strauss:  "Several NL clubs (Philadelphia, Atlanta, SD) still like Reyes and believe his problems a product of organizational mixed signals."

A trade may be possible and could be to the liking of both his supporters and detractors.  

by nycardfan on Sep 13, 2007 9:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta can send us Edgar
and $5 M and we will call it even.
Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 13, 2007 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to laugh at the Atlanta one, because
my son is an avid Braves fan, and he would love the idea of them having two Reyes' on the staff.  Anthony and Jo-Jo.  The righty and the lefty.  The boy and the girl.......that's what he called them.  

by jillsinmo on Sep 13, 2007 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all seriousness, I could see Atlanta being
interested--they have successfully navigated a lefty pitcher named Chuck James, a fellow who's two quality pitches are a fastball/change-up combo, who has trouble throwing- but is working on a curve and a slider, that he can't always locate in a game.  He has trouble with righty's the 3rd time he faces them, thus he often doesn't get six innings--this is what they are working on with him right now, getting to six innings.  He has for the most part been pitching well with this approach.  I can see where Bobby Cox might see Anthony as a carbon copy of James.  I would hate to see him go--even with all the horrorshow his season has been, he has seemed to keep his head up and I have never heard him whine and complain about anything.  They may very well regret letting him go........

by jillsinmo on Sep 13, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes' mechanics
will prevent him from having a long career.  The Cards should have traded him earlier while he had more value, instead of trying to "fix" him.  They'd better package him up and trade him this offseason before his arm falls off and they get nothing.

by hit and run on Sep 13, 2007 9:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What
don't you like about his mechanics?  Honest question, not trying to be nasty.  

Personally, I liked his delivery before the alterations to it.  

If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 13, 2007 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

his inverted M
or a "W".  Puts all kinds of stress on his shoulder and he's gonna blow it out repeatedly just like Billy Wagner.

http://chrisoleary.com/projects/Baseball/Pitching/RethinkingPitching/Essays/Hyperabduction.html

by rocKStark5 on Sep 13, 2007 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you therefore believe
that Wainwright is headed toward shoulder problems?

by sdrone on Sep 13, 2007 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like the pictures
that this guy uses to strenthen his argument.  First of all, Wainwright DOES NOT "hyper-abduct" there.  Second of all, his pictures of Suppan, his "correct" example, show him at his release point.  All the other pictures show the pitchers in their early cocking or late cocking stages of their motions.

I'm not discounting his theories - I think he's on to something.  But I don't think you can make assumptions based on static photos like that.

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hah. Interesting
Now that I look at the pic for the 3rd time, I notice that his shoulder plane is tilted slightly and therefore you're right.  His elbow is pretty much level with and not above his shoulder plane.

by sdrone on Sep 13, 2007 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Throwing a baseball overhand is unnatural; it's
bound to cause numerous injuries no matter the mechanics.  Carpenter had flawless mechanics-and look at him-he's had a lot of injuries too.  Pedro Martinez threw every pitch maximum effort-he looked downright silly when he threw.  It took him until he was 35 before he broke down.  And some pitchers have more problems with injuries AFTER they try to FIX their mechanics.  Every body has different capabilities, strength and flexibility-it could even be genetic for all I know. When I watch pitchers, I see more differences than similiarities in the way they throw.

by jillsinmo on Sep 13, 2007 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone remember the last pitcher we had
Who threw across their body (like Wood) and duncan tried to revamp their mechanics?

It didn't turn out well.  Thankfully he could hit.

BTW: I am not blaming Duncan for that meltdown.  Just an example where trying to fix something may have done more harm than good.  They let him go back to his way then he blew out the elbow.

Either way you roll the dice.  Boston and Toronto both did on pitchers with bad mechanics.  Perdro did well, BJ Ryan did well for a while then blew up.

by DriverZn on Sep 13, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to this guy...
I agree that the arm slot w/ the high elbow that they're talking about is problematic...BUT to use Mark Prior as an example is missing a ton...He had many other issues with his mechanics, despite all the announcers practically giddy over his supposedly "perfect" mechanics.  

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/breaking-down-the-broken-down-a-video-analysis-of-mark-pri or/

Thats what Carlos Gomez, one of the more interesting baseball writers out there had to say on the subject...

The other issue I take with this guy's ideas is the fact that if you drop your elbow BELOW your shoulder level, then you are doing damage to your ELBOW.  Basically, he's arguing that one way to pitch is dangerous, so don't do it under any circumstance...but he's forgetting that pitching is an inherently violent and unnatural act, and doing it puts your arm in peril one way or the other.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Sep 13, 2007 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That idea occurred to me, too
but I'm kind of under the impression that it's WORSE for the shoulder than it is for the elbow.

That's just my impression.

by sdrone on Sep 13, 2007 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this for a fact:
rotator cuff weakness and elbow strains go hand-in-hand when it comes to throwers.  I've seen it personally with patients.  If you don't have the rotator cuff strength to keep the upper arm at shoulder level, you place undue stress on the medial elbow.  

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Basically
In my experience dropping the elbow protects your shoulder.  Try putting your elbow in the reverse W (or down L or whatever you like to call it, its the same thing and varies only by what ever term you like to use)...You probably feel a stretch in your shoulder before you even throw.  Now, drop your elbow below your shoulder, and I'm assuming it feels more natural and more comfortable...But here's the catch: try throwing w/ your elbow from there...it probably causes a strain in your elbow when you throw.  So basically, as the other guy on this section said, if you don't have the strength to keep your shoulder and elbow on a flat line, you're in trouble.  Its a catch-22 if you can't...Lower your elbow and you'll probably hurt your elbow, raise it above your shoulder and you're asking for shoulder problems.  

My background is as a college pitcher and also as a certified pitching instructor, which I did for 5 years during summers, and also w/ individual clinics for younger kids.  That was how that whole scenario was explained to me when I first got into pitching seriously.  Basically, throwing is dangerous, and there are ways to make it less so, but you can't make it completely fail safe...Best thing to do is work w/ someone who actually does know what the heck they're talking about (and I'm not saying I do, the people I learned from blew me out of the water, and I hope I didn't ruin some 16 year old's arm) so you get a good mechanical base, start late (you don't need to be pitching before even high school to go somewhere on it), do Jobes, mediballs, medibands, etc. to strenghten your arm and cross your fingers...Cuz the only way not to get hurt is to be lucky to be honest.

by redbirdnation8206 on Sep 13, 2007 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So in shorter terms he's half right...
...And that half is exactly, 100% correct, just based on my admittedly limited background.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Sep 13, 2007 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate his mechanics
And I think that he will never be able to consistently pitch at a high level (which means a mid-90's level).  His mechanics are similar to Prior's.  He's a Tommy John or labrum tear waiting to happen.  

What alterations have you seen in his delivery?

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
rocKStark5 and SilentBob - that's exactly what I was talking about.  That elbow-above-the-ball delivery puts too much stress on the shoulder and elbow.  To me, it means surgery is inevitable.  He might generate more velocity and movement with it now, but it can't be sustained.

by hit and run on Sep 13, 2007 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Obviously I'm
Not the guy you directed your question towards, but I didn't/still don't like the way he doesn't use his legs or his front side.  He essential generates all his power from the throwing-side of his torso.  I think his arm action is a wee suspect too, but that wasn't his biggest issue.  Lots of guys have survived with odd/violent arm action b/c it works for them (Peavy for one).  I think Duncan's attempt to make Reyes get on top of the ball and drive it down was a decent idea to fix his arm action (not the best, but not the worst either), but completely ignored his bigger issues.  It would be like saying that Bad Boys II would have been a best picture nominee if Al Pacino had played the Cuban druglord...Yes it does fix one issue, but completely ignores about 50 other issues w/ the flick.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Sep 13, 2007 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah
You are right, and he's still relatively young so its not out of the question that he may get hurt before too much longer...It was probably a bad example, but it was the first one that popped into my head.

I think the WBC also set him back a little, but that is a completely away from the picture guess.

I think Pedro may have been a better example, b/c his stuff got worse as he aged (lost velocity) but he remained serious-injury-free for quite some time.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Sep 13, 2007 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

anybody know a good mechanic?
After a ten-minute analysis, Reds radio announcer Jeff Brantley noticed Reyes rushing his delivery- gets his arm out too soon and stays on top of the ball, reducing movement on the fastball, and control suffers, too.

I'm not sure I'd call Brantley an expert (he's got Nuxhall in the booth- that's a lot of pitchers in a booth) but it demonstrates that other baseball people see potential in Reyes, and if the Cards can't fix him, another club will definitely try.

Anyhow, nice lament- we feel your pain!

by baked mcbride on Sep 13, 2007 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's interesting
that someone who's pitched before, and therefore should know at least a little bit about it, would talk about staying on top of the ball as a bad thing.  That's all we hear about from our own team, staying on top of the ball and creating downward plane.  It sort of jives with what I see personally, though.  I think Reyes would be much better off if he got his lower half further out in front of the mound and stayed behind the ball more.  
If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 13, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Staying on top of the ball
a little vague, isn't it?

Reyes does not "stay on top of the ball", IMHO.  His  throwing shoulder and elbow go toward the plate first and his hand lags behind.  This puts a TON of stress on the front of the shoulder and the medial elbow. He has always been "upright" and he doesn't lean to take stress off his elbow as he accelerates to the plate.  

To me, if he's rushing his delivery, it means that he's throwing more than pitching - he's not pitching fluidly; his arm is not in synch with his trunk and lower body.

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The other thing that's interesting about that
is that Wainwright said that the mechanical problems he was having earlier in the year (when he was recovering from sore or tired arm problems) were due to rushed delivery.  

What's also interesting is that it is Edmonds that figured that out and talked to Wainwright about slowing his delivery down.  He immediately improved--I mean immediately as between the second and third inning.  Wainwright has said that Jimmy was one of the biggest helps in getting him through that rough patch.  I was always perplexed as to why Duncan couldn't identify and "fix" something that Edmonds seemed able to do with relative ease.

by nycardfan on Sep 13, 2007 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The same reason
Pujols' wife has as much impact on his swing that McRae does. Sometimes it's easier to see the forest, etc.

(On this same note, Rich Hill's hand seemingly falls a lot lower when he's throwing a curve. I don't if this hasn't been picked up yet or is just an illusion.)

Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Sep 13, 2007 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute. I don't get it
I've seen Reyes pitch a few times.  Only a few.

He has always had a low 80s pitch.  It always looked to me like most of his pitchers were either the high 80s/90mph deal (I swear I rarely say him hit 91) that I assumed was the fastball, and the low 80s deal that I assumed was the changeup.

You're saying that pitch wasn't the changeup?

Am I an idiot?  I thought changeups were usually in the low 80s.

by sdrone on Sep 13, 2007 10:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Anthony
throws his sinker in the mid to upper 80s now; I think he may be throwing a little cutter or something in the low 80s.  

His changeup is quite a bit slower than that, though.  

If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 13, 2007 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in the WS
In the WS his fastball got in the mid 90s (obv. 4 seamer), however, at first they thought he was doing something wrong because he couldn't top low 90s.  After he came back from Memphis one of the times he had that super Dontrelle leg kick.  However, they (by "they" i don't know if it was the media or the team) later attributed his "loss" as a juiced radar gun in Detroit (um, duh, no team has 4 people that can reach 103mph).

Anyway, my personal thoughts (could be selective memory or me trying to remember anything that strengthens my arguements) was when they left him alone about his 4 seamer he had flashes of brilliance (the sox game, the ws, etc).  Last year against the Mets in the NLCS he got roughed up because he was apparently tipping his pitches, thus they had confidence in him for game 1 of the WS.  

I haven't followed or looked at his AAA stats but one of the broadcasters said the reason why he was called up in the first place was his ridiculous control, if that's true then it's obv. psychological.  

He's never been able to throw that 2 seamer pet pitch worth a poopy, mid 80s no movement.  Looks like a change up :D

by rocKStark5 on Sep 13, 2007 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

okay
I just had time to read the whole diary, it looks like Socks McReyes actually had legitimate velocity in the past.  When will I learn to quit listening to broadcasters??

by rocKStark5 on Sep 13, 2007 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel confident AR will
become at least a pretty good starter somewhere.  But I also feel confident he ain't gonna be Steve Carlton either.  So I say trade him for what you can get, and don't be afraid of that precedent (which still makes me shudder 35 years later).
"We're sniffing the winning situation."

by MdRedbirdFreak on Sep 13, 2007 10:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well said baron
i'm with you, i wish this kid could step up and that the coaching staff would try to put him in the best position to be successful rather then continue to try to put a square peg in a round hole.  you just think back to some of his early starts and think of what could've been for both him and the team
foot soldier in the memphis mafia.....

by CarolinaCardinal on Sep 13, 2007 11:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If the decision to trade is made...
What do you think we could get for him?  Because of his performance this year, his value can't be all that high.  What could we get?  Do you think we could land a good position prospect?
Let me get this straight...Rowand over Pujols??? Really, Tony?

by cardzfan24 on Sep 13, 2007 11:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

future redbirds
futureredbirds has an interview with a guy that studies mechanics, I suggest you read the interview Baron.

by StLHugo on Sep 13, 2007 11:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Excellent reading
Everyone should look at Beckett's arm action on the 2nd and 3rd row of videos.

Does that look at all like Reyes?  

This is what I'm talking about.  Reyes stays upright the entire time.  His body hardly leans to the left as he follows through and this keeps him from extending his elbow while still staying on top of the ball.  Since Reyes stays upright, he uses his rotator cuff muscles and pecs to drive the arm forward and rotate his shoulder forward (placing a shitload of stress on the shoulder and elbow joints).  This robs him of velocity, as there is no way he keep his lower body in synch.

Is anyone with me here?

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure...
... i'm with you. but i know nothing about any of this.

by kindred on Sep 13, 2007 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you, Bob.
And that's what I was talking about, when you asked above about what alterations I've seen in his delivery.  Reyes has become much more of a short strider since he's been here.  That's what I'm talking about when I say 'passive' with his lower body.  Don't get me wrong, Anthony's never been a guy who really jumps off the mound at you, like I would actually prefer, but he used to get much further out in front of the mound when he threw than he does now.  That's the problems I have with his delivery now.  

As for his arm action, there have been questions about it in the past, and while I don't see a huge issue with it, it may be a problem.  It's tough to say for sure, with any one.  

If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 14, 2007 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One other thing
about Anthony's arm action.  This is the least scientific way possible to assess something, but it doesn't hurt my arm to throw like that.  Ever since I was little, I would imitate pitchers, and I got really good at it.  I throw a ball with the same action as Anthony, and I don't have any sort of pain or anything.  (Admittedly I'm only throwing 25 pitches like that, but I already said it wasn't a good method of research.)  
If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 14, 2007 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just starter a Diary about this
What about trading Reyes for Ervin Santana? Both are obviously very talented, plus young cheap pitching is worth so much these days it would be nice to get another young guy back. Thoughts?

by jnangle472 on Sep 13, 2007 12:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know
what his Trade Value is really at.  There's probably a team or two waiting to rape the cardinals on this then turn him into what he should be or at least what he was.  If his trade value is lower then it should I say ship him off to AAA let him dominate there AGAIN next year and get his value back up.

 

by rocKStark5 on Sep 13, 2007 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guess what, Ervin Santana is a flyball
pitcher.  It's safe to say that he doesn't throw a sinker, or he doesn't throw it much, or he doesn't throw it well.  Let's not even go there again.

by jillsinmo on Sep 13, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My contribution
What I liked about your post was the mention of his slider. It is rarely mentioned, but coming up he was supposed to have a good one. This isn't me saying

"I once knew a guy who gave tickets to a guy who said he threw a wicked slider in Palm Beach."

This is Baseball America's top 10 Cardinal's prospects issued in December of 2005. A quick summary of the sidebar shows Anthony as the #1 Prospect as well as possessing the farm's best Fastball, Control, and Slider (!). Phillip Anderson (who?) had the best changeup, but I find it odd that I've never seen a slider from the guy who, per baseball america, had the best slider in the system.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/05top10s/cardinals.html

by TICY on Sep 13, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"Tall and fall"
I've been reading a lot of Carlos Gomez on the Hardball Times, and he consistently rails against the "tall and fall" approach - notably, in looking at Mark Mulder's deteriorating mechanics last year. I haven't stopped to wonder if this was an organizational (read: Dave Duncan) approach to pitching mechanics until I read your recap on Anthony. Is this the case, or is this just two cases that are not representative of the whole?

by taiko on Sep 13, 2007 2:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Tall and fall a popular approach
Cubdom loved it when that label started to be applied to Prior and Prior's pitching coach (not Rothchild, the one he occasionally goes to outside the organization).

Now that Prior's arm is screwed, everyone believes tall and fall sucks and proclaim that they always believed that.

by sdrone on Sep 13, 2007 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I understand, Clemens is the model
Who wouldn't love a pitching philosophy that proffers to take the approach of a living HOFer and applying it to the next crop of young studs?

by taiko on Sep 13, 2007 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And he after Ryan
The drop and drive approach takes strain off your arm but isn't conducive to getting a lot of sink on the pitches.  Its best throwing hard rising fastballs, changeups, curveballs.

Mechanics and the pitches someone throws are linked.

A brief list of "drop and drive" guys.
Ryan
Clemens
Verlander
Lincecum
Wagner
Oswalt

They all tend to throw hard and have power asortments.  They don't "pitch to contact".  

by DriverZn on Sep 13, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good stuff -
Clemens uses a splitter to get the ball down.  You're right...none of those guys has anything close to a sinker.  They rely on their plus plus fastballs and then change speeds.  

On another note - they're all pitchers that I stop what I'm doing to watch when they're on TV.  Oswalt especially amazes me with what he does with such a small frame.  He generates so much power with his lower body and trunk.

by silent_bob on Sep 13, 2007 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can anyone name some Tall and Fall aces?
We have lots of examples of durable drop and drive pitchers that dominated for a long time.  Can anyone name similar pitchers using the tall and fall approach?  Preferably ones that lasted several years without falling apart.

BTW: Add Schilling, Smoltz to the drop and drive group.

by DriverZn on Sep 13, 2007 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

more drop and drive cases
tom seaver, sandy koufax, nolan ryan . . . . drop-n-drivers were the rule, not the exception, in the 1960s.

by lboros on Sep 13, 2007 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

carpenter
is a "tall and fall" guy, as is Verlander.  Dwight Gooden, Robb Nen and Don Sutton were, according to Doug Myers ("The Louisville Slugger's Complete Guide to Pitching").  Nolan Ryan claimed to be a tall and fall pitcher in his book Nolan Ryan's Pitcher's Bible".
"and we're grasping at rainbows, holding on till the end..."

by SleepyCA on Sep 13, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

also
Nolan Ryan specifically said that it is much harder to throw a curve ball using the drop and dive (he calls it "dipping and diving") and that as you age, the drop and dive becomes less effective for all pitches.  He quotes House and says he agrees because it requires more upper body strength to "dip and dive".
"and we're grasping at rainbows, holding on till the end..."

by SleepyCA on Sep 13, 2007 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would suggest looking at the breakdown
On their mechanics.  His claim didn't line up with what he did.  Verlander is very much a drive pitcher.  

Its possible we have slightly diffrent definitions of what each is.  I view pitchers that really push off the rubber hard and have a good stride as the drop and drive type.  

by DriverZn on Sep 13, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that may be so
i was never a pitcher or pitching coach and am just going off of what I read in books written by pitchers and pitching coaches.  I don't have a horse in this race, have no idea if "tall and fall" is bunk or the best thing since sliced bread -- in fact, House himself says in his most recent book that neither "drop and drive" or "tall and fall" are universally better, but depend on the build and flexibility of the pitcher -- but if Tom House uses photos of Ryan in his instruction guides on how to execute the "tall and fall" delivery, and Nolan Ryan considers himself a user of the tall and fall delivery, I'm obliged to believe them (I'm guessing you are quoting Carlos Gomez over on BBTF when you say "look at the breakdown"?)

Anyway, add Kevin Brown and Randy Johnson as "aces" who used "tall and fall".  

"and we're grasping at rainbows, holding on till the end..."

by SleepyCA on Sep 13, 2007 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was a comment I read.
Probably from Carlos, but not 100% on that.

He once commented on Reyes and didn't find anything that he viewed as a major problem.

When I think "tall and Fall" I think of Tudor, Glavine, Moyer, ... Guys with great movement on their pitches but not a lot of velocity. They throw with their arm and don't really use their lower body much.  Typically a control pitcher.

by DriverZn on Sep 13, 2007 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nor does the best pitcher in baseball--
Johan Santana.  To me he is the gold standard-the one pitcher I'd pick first if I was building a staff.

by jillsinmo on Sep 13, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Drop/drive tall/fall
Both delivery styles have their merits; personally, I'm not a big fan of the tall and fall method, particularly for pitchers who throw hard.  You can get nice downward plane and control throwing that way, but your body doesn't seem to be engaged enough to protect your arm, to me.  

As for examples of the two styles, in the modern game, Roy Oswalt is the absolute perfect example of a drop and drive pitcher.  Lincecum's good, too, but there's a lot of twisting and other machinations in his delivery that make it harder to see.  Oswalt's is much simpler; he kicks, he drives.  You can see exactly why it's called a 'drop and drive' delivery.  

As for the tall and fall method, it's going to look like I'm just choosing a guy to try and knock down the method I don't care for, but that's not my intention.  He just happens to have the simplest, most readily identifiable version of the mechanics I can think of; the Oswalt of the tall and fall, if you will.  Jason Marquis is an ideal example of a tall and fall delivery.  Again, he has very simple mechanics, so you can see exactly what is being described.  His left leg goes up, he stays directly over his right, then just sort of falls forward to his foot plant, using his body as a lever to drive the ball downward.  

I think a good analogy to compare the two styles is to compare drop and drive mechanics to the plunger thingy that puts a ball into play on a pinball machine.  All of the body's mass and momentum is behind the ball, driving it forward.  Tall and fall, on the other hand, more resembles a lacrosse player, using a levering action to generate velocity on the ball.  Or, if you like medievil warfare, (and why wouldn't you?) compare a crossbow and a catapult.  There are arguments for both styles; I just feel that there have been changes attempted to Anthony's delivery that have hurt the quality of his stuff.  

If you don't ask me to dinner, I don't eat.

by the red baron on Sep 14, 2007 7:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Chris O'Leary Here
This is Chris O'Leary. I have seen my name come up, and thought I'd reply to a couple of things.
  1. I hope the Cardinals trade Anthony Reyes before he is entirely worthless.
  2. Anthony Reyes was much better in the past, and I think his recent problems are a product of the toll his terrible mechanics (e.g. Inverted W) have take on his elbow and his shoulder. Reyes is pretty much a clone of Mark Prior, and I expect his injury problems to run a similar course. Elbow problems followed by shoulder problems.
  3. Mark Prior does not and never had perfect mechanics. The guy who pronounced Prior's mechanics to be perfect (Tom House) is the same guy who designed those mechanics. He's not exactly objective. He also taught the same mechanics to Anthony Reyes.
  4. Dyar Miller may be a great guy, but his comments about Anthony Reyes' problems make it clear that he has never looked at high speed film of his pitchers.
  5. Chris Carpenter also has terrible mechanics (e.g. Inverted L). That's why he has had so many elbow and shoulder problems.
  6. I am very nervous about Adam Wainwright due to his significant Hyperabduction. If the Cardinals hold onto Reyes, I could see both him and Wainwright going down next year.
  7. The photos of Wainwright and Suppan are not comparable because they represent different moments in time. The point is that to get the elbow up at the release, you have to tilt the shoulders rather than trying to get the elbow up at the high-cocked position.
  8. Next year very well may be as bad as this year for the Cardinals, if not worse, in terms of pitching.
Chris O'Leary

by thepainguy on Sep 16, 2007 8:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Jeff Pearlman Thinks Of Hair Clumps When He Thinks Of The Thief McGwire
Black-spider-monkey_small
Losing my religion (w/ baseball)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Can someone explain to me...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..
Cathybachebay1_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?
Avatar_small
VEB CheBird T-Shirt for Sale - Red or Powder Blue, CLEARANCE

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Trigun_001_small the red baron