the joy of 6
since they last faced the brewers and cubs, the cardinals have only gone 6-7 --- but they've still managed to cut half a game off milwaukee's lead and pick up a game and a half on chicago. . . . how fitting is it that the nl central was bud selig's division?
last week i noted that it had been more than a year since the cardinals received a full rotation-cycle's worth of 6-inning starts. four games later, they are trying to make it 2 cycle's worth. yesterday's outing by anthony reyes was the 8th start in a row of 6 innings or longer --- first time that has happened since july 6 - 17, 2005. it was also the 6th consecutive quality start, a feat the cardinal rotation last accomplished in the 2d week of this year, april 8 through 15 --- games 6 through 11 on the schedule. randy keisler threw one of those starts.
if wells keeps it going tomorrow night, it'll be the cardinals' first string of 7 consecutive quality starts since 2005 --- the aforementioned july 6 - 17 run that lasted 8 games. and it will be the first run of 9 starts of 6 innings or longer since april 27 - may 5, 2005. the 2007 corps very nearly logged a streak of this length, though you've prob'y forgotten by now --- 10 of this season's first 11 starts lasted 6 innings or more, with the only shortfall a 5-inning, 3-run effort by anthony reyes. the rotation posted a cumulative era of 2.97 over those 2 weeks but only went 4-5 because the team wasn't hitting. the starters couldn't sustain that early-season run; after it ended, they recorded just 1 quality start in the next 8 games.
4 of the 5 guys who contributed to that run (reyes wainwright wells and looper) are still in the rotation; can they keep it going this time? during the current streak, the rotation is 5-2 with a cumulative era of 2.11; the only losses came when reyes and wainwright matched 0s with two of the best starters in the nl, peavy and penny.
here's a little puzzler: if the rotation continues to get reasonably good results and the cardinals stay in the race, who loses his spot when mark mulder is ready to pitch? or do the cardinals simply stand pat and let mulder sit out the year? what do you think the cardinals a) should do? b) will do?
re the kerfuffle over juan encarnacion: i've never been one to dog the guy over his so-called lack of hustle. i think "hustle" is largely in the eye of the beholder, and the perception thereof is often colored by factors that have nothing to do with actual performance. my gripe with encarnacion has always been with his skill set: lousy on-base skills and just so-so power. but he is what he is --- i never faulted the player, i faulted the front office that signed him. since joining the cardinals, encarnacion has given the franchise the very best of his modest abilities --- a line of .282 / .321 / .443, all of which figures are slightly above his career averages. he's not a great fielder, but he's no worse than taguchi and far superior to duncan. i'm not suggesting he should remain in the lineup --- ludwick / ankiel are younger and cheaper and have more upside, and they're likely to be at least as good as juan from now through the end of the year. but i think encarnacion is being scapegoated; i think he's being treated differently by fans, and by the manager, than other players. say all you want about the guy's inadequate effort; his professional pride has been stung, and he's reacting the way any of us would --- angrily.
having said all that: i hope they clear his salary off the books, and i wish him well with his future team. the tigers reportedly have had interest in encarnacion since last winter; they're getting nothing out of craig monroe, and they don't have a whole lot of other options. encarnacion came up through their system; maybe they want him back. the angels might be another possibility --- they've been shopping for an outfielder to bolster their bench. the Indians need a bat but apparently aren't in the market.
that's all from me for today; short post, as i'm on the road the rest of the day, heading home. other good stuff to read:
- rich lederer on being mark mcgwire.
- what's lou brock up to these days?
- mike carminati has rick ankiel as the 32d left-handed pitcher in major-league history to become a big-league outfielder
- eric neel muses on which is the greater evil, steroids or booze. if it weren't for the fact that it's considered cheating to use one of those substances. . . .
0 recs |
155 comments
Comments
Give Juan a Break
I cannot help but feel bad for the dude, when his manager calls him out publicly for lack of effort, then gets pissed when Juan voices his feelings about not being played (Bernie claims that Juan's comments led to his benching yesterday...not the 'sore knee'.
Despite his lack of 'hustle', Juan has been nothing short of clutch this year for the cardinals. He has come through with key hits in all sorts of situations and he has provided a semblance of power when two-thirds of the MV3 haven't been able to. It is really sad that he has to be the odd man out for the Ankiel resurgence.
If it really where about who 'earns' their playing time (as TLR claimed) then there is no doubt that our outfield should be - Dunc in left; Ankiel CF; Juan RF...I know, I know - Jimmy has been 'hot' lately, but he has come nowhere near the level of Juan's consistency.
A final note - lboros notes that Juan is being treated 'differently' by fans, the manager, etc. I don't want to pull out a whole can of worms here, but I think this is - in part - racial. Fans and others are very quick to label Latino players (mainly domincan) players as lacking hustle and intensity. I've seen it hear in Boston as the fans are very, very quick to rant and rave about 'manny being manny' and 'silly willy mo', while 'dirtdogs' Trot Nixon and Mike Lowell - despite mental gaffs, errors - get idolized. I'm not saying that sometimes these players do not show these traits, but I want to suggest they get put on a shorter leash - and the shortness, I think, is rooted in racial ideas white people have about brown people from tropical areas.
OK - last item - just to add to the 'other side'. I know a guy who is close with a member of the cardinals medical staff. And he said that Juan consistently did not show up for MRI's on his wrist last season. If you remember he didn't get surgery on it until (I think) december. If he had showed up for MRIS earlier, he could've had the surgery earlier, and then, perhaps, would have been a starter on opening day. So Tony's quip before hopping a jetplane about juan not showing for MRIs appears to have a long history.
by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 9:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He's been one of our
by gibbons on Aug 13, 2007 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure
by plh903 on Aug 13, 2007 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cardzfan...
Despite having a horrible offensive season last year, and not yet proving to be an average offensive catcher has not kept Yadier from being a fan favorite even if he's "brown".
Nothing pisses me off more than people throwing out the race card when it doesn't apply. Usually it's a black/white issue (i.e...Barry), but it's still a lame excuse for undeserved sympathy.
by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right on
by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly...
by TriplePlay on Aug 13, 2007 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and tino martinez
by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great point TriplePlay
please take that race card and file it elsewhere... ridiculous, cheap, and thoughtless comment.
by _pistol_ on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
Drew had immense talent. He just was always hurt and missing games. He appeared to be kind of nonchalant, but I don't remember him making the kinds of errors that JuanE makes.
JuanE has moderate talent, but suffers from mental gaffes that end up overshadowing whatever talent he has. Great, he had that hit and RBI, but he also allowed a run to score. That's not much of an upside.
That said, I don't really dislike Juan. I just think it's wiser for the Cards to cut ties with him and go with a cheaper, healthier outfield.
by spants on Aug 13, 2007 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by gorn on Aug 13, 2007 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
race always applies
I did not claim that 'brown' players cannot become 'fan favorites' due to racism. Most of the fan favorites of today are dominican (Pujols, Vlad).
My only point is that dominican players especially are given a shorter leash than white players. When they show signs of 'lack of hustle' it fuels disproportionate outrage and disdain (surely vistors to this blog have seen this with regard to Juan).
When Jimmy doesn't hustle around the bases or if Dunc takes a ridiculous route to a fly ball, we complain, but it does not engender the type of mass bashing that occurs when Juan does it. That, I think, is, in part, related to a long history in and outside of baseball about the racial 'character' of Caribbean and other 'tropical' peoples.
by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
your analysis is lazy
STFU.
by _pistol_ on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You should relax, pistol
Feel free to disagree if you must, but he didn't call anyone a racist and, if anyone's gotten personal here, it is you. Save the "STFU" stuff for another board.
by chuckb on Aug 13, 2007 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are entitled...
Fans don't get mad at Jimmy, because he has played at a level that Juan has never breathed. If Jimmy doesn't hustle, it may also mean he doesn't get hurt...
I am not saying that this country does not have a long history of racism, and that it still exist today. I would even say that there is more racism towards latin people in this country today than any other ethnicity ('cept middle eastern), but I truly believe that this doen not exists from a fan's perspective in baseball. Are there some fans that don't like him 'cause he's "brown"? Probably...but I would say they are few and far between.
Furthermore, when people bring up race in situations it doesn't belong I think it worsens what level of racism already exists.
by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you nuts?
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My bad...
In the outfield Jimmy has never been known as a guy to "pull-up" on a ball.
by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Race does NOT always apply
"...related to a long history in and outside of baseball about the racial 'character' of Caribbean and other 'tropical' peoples."
absolutely revolting. I understand your point, and I would agree that many people have issues with race- acknowledged or not. But I strongly disagree that Juan is picked on disproportionately because he is not white. I wonder: where do ideas like this originate? Ridiculous!
by redrey on Aug 13, 2007 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I should
Brown players? Give me a fucking break. It seems like you are the only one with these preconceived notions about people from the Caribbean. Stop quoting something in every sentence, it makes your post even more annoying.
Juan glides and looks like he doesn't care. Duncan goes after fly balls like a bull in a china shop, and Edmonds had a Griffey/Snider/Mantle/Mays-type peak while in a Cardinals uinform.
by plh903 on Aug 13, 2007 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude.
Fans don't bring race into the equation. People with agendas do. (And yes, I am suggesting that you may have an agenda other than the local 9 playing hard and winning by your previous post.)
We bash Juan because we bash Juan. We bash others just as hard (re: Miles and his 3 error inning, Kennedy because he blows this year, etc).
Don't go there on us here, man. We're Cardinals fans - and they could field a team of purple midgets - we'd still congratulate and criticize equally as fans.
by bukowski on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
You're living in a dream world.
"Don't go there on us here, man. We're Cardinals fans - and they could field a team of purple midgets - we'd still congratulate and criticize equally as fans."
And you've got some weird, high and mighty thing going on. To think that 100% of Cardinals fans are all good people who are color blind and hold no prejudices, is as naive as I've seen.
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said that
by bukowski on Aug 14, 2007 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"they get put on a shorter leash"
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bobby Abrue
I agree with your outfield. The big question is what to do about JimmE.
Mulder needs to do his re-hab and lets see. If he's ok he needs to pitch in September. If there is a sign of swelling or pain he should be shut down.
by nybirdfan on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So did
by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thread representative of Viva??
(The above has nothing to do with dmbs comment, its just a statement in general)
by cardschinmusic on Aug 14, 2007 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Racial?
I think what Lboros thinks he doesn't have that great of skills and he had the horrible unfortunate job of replacing a gold glove outfielder who when healthy can hit 40+ homers in Larry Walker THATS why fans don't like him.
Juan will never be as good as Walker and that`s one reason fans don't like him he also has a very laid back manner which makes fans think he doesn't care about the game.
People didnt like J.D. Drews lazy laid back manner and he`s not latino it has nothing to do with race
Don't even get me started on Manny...... fans not liking Manny has nothing to do with his race.
Manny asks to be traded EVERY SINGLE YEAR that doesnt make fans like you very much.
At least those other guys you mentioned Lowell and Nixon don't ask for trades publicly talking about how you dont like playing where your at.
Why would fans like you when you say you dont like it there?????????????
by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right about the
by MdRedbirdFreak on Aug 13, 2007 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely Ridiculous
I`m sure there are people who don`t like Juan because of race but thats no reason to bring it up here.
It`s making it seem like those on here who are wanting to get rid of Juan are racists and thats just STUPID.
You should not make assumptions like that and you should not bring up issues like this on a baseball blog.
by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well at least someone agrees with me :-)
There is a (conservative...dare I say, right wing) tendency to believe that all racism is done. That all prejudice is gone. That we've entered a wonderful 'color blind' world in which people are evaluated solely on their performance.
I believe that we have made progress on racial issues. But, I also believe that racial prejudices always animate social life UNDER THE SURFACE (as the above poster says, we do not have 'complete control of our prejudices').
Ideas of the lazy, 'laid back', and 'uncaring' Dominican player are rampant. And I think these ideas allow (and fuel) a disproportiante level of disdain when these players show just a little lack of hustle.
You can all find as many anecdotes of white players who fans hated or Dominican players who fans loved, but that is besides the point. Juan takes a disproportionate amount of heat on this blog. And this is despite the fact that he has been a core productive member of this team since his return.
by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stop
It's one thing to discuss racism applied to baseball but you walking a dangerous line -- the community guidelines are pretty explicit about no politics. Keep the topic focused to baseball if you want to discuss it.
by azruavatar on Aug 13, 2007 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm done, but...
by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i completly agree with azruavatar
by stlcardinalsfang on Aug 13, 2007 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan
Did you see the play he made the other day?
the ball was hit to him he could of reached out and got it easily he let the ball go right by him.
it wasn't even hit that hard!
It allowed a run to score after we had score 2 in the first inning that's inexscusable. We never get out to an early lead and to let them come back and score a run in the first was horrible.
If anyone on our team had made that play I would be yelling about them it just happens he had made that play.
Sure he takes a lot of heat on this blog but I think its rightfully so he shouldn't make dumb plays like that.
Do not bring up politics on this blog.
by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wrong
I honestly feel really bad for Juan. Not because the fans dislike him, that happens. He has been hosed by TLR despite being probably our most productive and consistent outfielder. The Rick Ankiel story is great, but Juan has simply gotten hosed. I hope he gets traded. I used to hope he would get traded because I wanted to dump his salary, but now I just feel bad for the guy and I think a change of scenery would be in his -- and the organization's -- best interest.
by Mr Redbird on Aug 13, 2007 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe you are forgetting someone...
Duncan has been by far our most productive OFer, and though he has struggled somewhat since the ASB his OPS during that time is still .007 higher than Juan's.
I guess you did say "probably".
I do feel that Tony has been a little rought on him, and that his trade value is lessened when it's so obvious the team want rid of him.
by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duncan
by Mr Redbird on Aug 13, 2007 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since July 1st
G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO BA OBP SLG OPS
Enc 28 107 96 14 32 5 0 2 21 9 0 18 .333 .387 .448 .835
Dunc 36 118 96 13 28 5 0 6 21 21 1 34 .292 .415 .531 .946
Lud 36 99 86 12 25 9 0 6 19 10 1 19 .291 .378 .605 .983
Encarnacion really hasn't been the best outfielder for the Cardinals for a long time. He's been good, but he's got 2 other guys who have also had their playing time reduced that are performing as well or better. Encarnacion's BA is hollow.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and while we're playing with the dbd db
Duncan .274/.388/.535 - .923 OPS
Ludwick .265/.329/.574 - .902 OPS
Encarn .308/.355/.485 - .840 OPS
Taguchi .331/.384/.391 - .775 OPS
Edmonds .243/.331/.374 - .704 OPS
to answer toris34's question below,
from 7/1 to 7/13:
Ludwick .357/.400/.786 - 1.186 OPS
Duncan .522/.656/.870 - 1.526 OPS
Encarn .318/.348/.591 - .939 OPS
Toris- you can look numbers up yourself here.
by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Sleepy,
by toris34 on Aug 13, 2007 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hollow batting average
Can you please explain what you mean by "his batting average is hollow"?
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A Hollow
In short, a hollow batting average is one where the number looks good at first, but when you look at the rest of the package, there's not much real production.
by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His batting average is higher than the two OFers
Example:
Eckstein BA - .295
Molina BA - .268
Eckstein OBP - .342
Molina OBP - .337
People talk about Eckstein being valuable to this team still because of his ability to be a leadoff hitter. The prime job of a leadoff hitters is to get on base. Eckstein does so with as much frequency as our often derided catcher.
Larry, I believe at the start of 2006, put up a daily post about how Eckstein's average is the only thing that really masks him as a good leadoff hitter (my conclusion, not his).
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, from these two definitions
However, I think its an unfair assessment to call his BA hollow, if you're only going to compare him to these two guys. All three have been extremely productive imo, and to look at certain stats like walks and declare him a failure is unfair.
Also, keep in mind he strikes out much less than the other two guys which gives him more of a chance to be productive plus raises the amount of at bats which is a factor in BA.
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan strikes out less
Ludwick, of course, doesn't have a higher OBP, but just a shade lower.
You compare these 3, because they are competing for the 2 corner outfield positions.
Encarnacion's BA is the only thing that truly differentiates him from the other 2 players, and even with that, he isn't really more productive than them.
As far as runs produced (I'm assuming that means RBIs and Runs added together)
Encarnacion - 35
Duncan - 34
Ludwick - 31
So, are you saying that his 40 point higher BA isn't hollow because he 'produced' 1 and 4 more runs? Remember, Ludwick had 10 fewer at-bats than Juan as well.
The bottom line is: We've got enough 'Juans' on this team who are cheaper and have a much higher upside. And as far as defense, I'd stack Ludwick's glove up against Juan's any day.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's fine.
What I'm trying to say, is...base it on the entire league. Not two guys who are doing well. Juan's not a great player, but he's a lot better than many give him credit for.
And I get tired of hearing "he doesn't 'look' like he cares". What the heck is that supposed to mean? So, if he looked like he did, but really didn't we'd all be okay with that?
And as far as his comparisons to Drew and how people got all over Drew when he "looked" like he didn't care, or wouldn't play because he was hurt or whatever.
I ask this one question. How many Drew jerseys do you STILL see around Busch? That should answer your question.
And Hardcore, I'm sorry to be lumping all of these gripes in a response to you. These aren't all directed at you (mainly just the "hollow" thing). I just kinda got on a roll and let some frustrations out. Don't take it as a shot.
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
He really isn't "right there or just behind in the same stats" though. The only thing he is close to the others in is OBP, and that comes from his batting average (his walk rate is even worse than Ludwick's, and right now walk rate is the biggest black mark against Ludwick). Encarnacion's power numbers are woefully inadequate.
Here's isolated power for STL outfielders:
ISO since June 1 / season
Duncan .261 / .246
Ludwick .309 / .248
Encarn .177 / .140
Taguchi .060 / .075
Edmonds .131 / .138
Enc's not even close, and while his OBP is slightly higher, it is based almost entirely on hitting singles. Ludwick has more extra base hits in 2/3 as many PA's; even though Encarnacion has more hits overall, Ludwick has helped his team far more. This is better described by his (scaled to 269PA) WARP3 of 3.63 vs Encarnacion's 1.8- Ludwick has twice the value to this team that Encarnacion has, and the gap is only going to grow.
by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's debatable...
I noticed Duncan has struck out in 30 of 76 AB's since the ASB...has the opposition figured something out? That's and EXTREMELY high K-rate!!
by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
STL OF in the last month
duncan .237/.344/.447 = .792 OPS
encarnacion .333/.389/.395 = .784 OPS
taguchi .327/.411/.367 =.778 OPS
edmonds .262/.357/.344 = .701 OPS
by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
completely agree
by jeff abs on Aug 13, 2007 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My reasons
I am going to the game Tuesday in Milwaukee and I am hoping to see Ankiel in right and not Juan since my seats are in the right field bleachers. Maybe I will have the opportunity to catch an Ankiel homerun ball.
by stl4all on Aug 13, 2007 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fans never liked him
That being said, he has essentially produced as expected or better in his time in STL. He has actually had some of his better years as a Cardinal. However, in the eyes of most fans, he is a poor player taking up a decent chunk of cash. When he makes poor plays in the outfield and doesn't seem to give his all, he is going to be criticized, not because he is of a particular race, but because he is an average player. Although, I'm sure there are plenty of racists all over Cardinal Nation, I really don't see the criticism of Juan as an example of this.
In all honesty, from my rather large group of Cardinal friends, Edmonds and Kennedy this year and Izzy last year are the largest targets for criticism. And a large number of those guys are racist...
by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
As for everyone else, whether you feel your personal opinion toward Juan is racially motivated or not, to deny that there is an undercurrent of race, even in the way we view athletes, is a little naive. I distinctly recall last year, right around this time, there was quite a bit of discussion as to whether or not Ronnie Belliard's 'thuggish' appearance was something this franchise should be bringing in or not. Even more than that, earlier this season, whenever Preston Wilson was struggling, there were even one or two negative comments directed toward him which were focused on his spandex do rag thingy that many black players wear. I'm not saying it was widespread, but that sort of nastiness does crop up occasionally, even among fairly even minded people.
My own father roots specifically for teams that have the most white players when he's watching, say, college basketball, or that sort of thing. He's not the most highly evolved human being on the planet, now, but for the most part, he's fairly enlightened, especially considering the rest of his family. And yet, there is still some of those tendencies ingrained.
Again, even if you feel strongly about you yourself not being racist, jumping down the throat of someone who has the guts to say what some people may not want to consider is bogus. I understand the race card often gets played when it shouldn't, but that doesn't mean it's never valid.
by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good stuff baron
It was exactly what I -- as a friend of quite a few %$#)&@! $@!))&ts! -- wanted to hear in the 7th inning of a great pitchers dual.
(Point being -- not only did this gentleman hold animosity towards &%)#&*%ing ^&!@#$)ts; but I assumed as soon as I saw his jorts, tattoos, and bandanna, that he would be the type of person that would hate %^&@)!ts. See, I assume by appearance too!)
Point being -- we all aren't as evolved as we hope and/or think we are. These ugly, despicable notions such as racism do play a role in some peoples illogical, ill conceived opinions of others. Call it a "White" elephant in the room if you will, but it does exist.
by Alxfritz on Aug 13, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
just replying out of boredom
"there was quite a bit of discussion as to whether or not Ronnie Belliard's 'thuggish' appearance was something this franchise should be bringing in or not."
it seems to me that most of the readership here was skeptical about this deal because we were fans of Hector Luna (black man from the DR). Hector was fat, and really, really ugly, but he hustled, tucked his shirt in, and didn't stick his tongue out whenever a camera happened to focus him. My personal thoughts were that Luna would provide the exact same production for a lot less money, and I was afraid they would give Belly a long-term contract (if only...)
by SleepyCA on Aug 14, 2007 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually,
The PDub comments were from here, and I was surprised, and disappointed, to read them. But my overall point wasn't focused just on the specific posters here; I meant more the overall fan base. Hell, not just our fan base, pretty much everyone when it comes right down to it.
by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice catch
grr, off days make me cranky...
by SleepyCA on Aug 14, 2007 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan...and the rest
That said, if we can find a team to take his salary for next year, even if we get next to nothing in return, we should.
As for Mulder, I think he needs to pitch this year. If he doesn't, he begins next Spring having not thrown a major league pitch for about 19 months. I think he needs some work.
Whose spot will he take? My guess is that, if the team is out of it, there's a good chance that Wainwright or Reyes will get shut down for the last couple of weeks to avoid having them throw too many innings this year. I'm not saying it's the right thing to do, but it's what the team might do.
I still think there's a possibility that Wells gets traded this month. He's been pitching well of late and a team may be willing to take a chance w/ a couple of starts from Wells in September. And Pineiro, though very good last time out, wasn't his first time out. He's far from a sure thing.
I'd say that the most likely candidate to remain in the rotation this year is Looper. They need to decide where he belongs next year (rotation/pen) so they'll want to see him get as many starts as possible and see how the accumulating innings affect him as he gets close to 180 IP.
by chuckb on Aug 13, 2007 9:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Won't Mulder's
I don't know about y'all, but I found that Bonds/Mantle piece kind of creepy.
by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 9:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe not AAA
by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That makes sense
by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
mulder
he needs to pitch well in his rehab starts and maybe a few games out of the pen before i'd want to start him. it would be great to get him a few starts to help prepare him for next year, but i dont think i'd want to pull someone who is pitching well just to give mulder some extra practice.
if mulder is pitching well...i wouldnt bump wainwright or reyes. if the rest of the bunch is performing roughly equal i'd probably bump looper to the pen. i think thats where he belongs anyway. he is under contract for next year and i am a little worried about his arm falling off. if looper stays, my next choice would be to put wells in the pen. he was solid out of the pen this year and i dont think i'd want him back next year. the cards have an option on pineiro for next year so if he is pitching well i'd give him a few more starts to see if its worth bringing him back.
of course, if the cardinals get eliminated it doesnt really matter who gets bumped.
by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mulder
by Zubin on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Btw on Pineiro....
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pineiro
by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw the
by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dads' lineup
by silent_bob on Aug 13, 2007 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes perception is reality
To Juan's credit, he has produced this year (better than his averages). I don't quite understand Ankiel's replacement of him in RF, given Juan's recent productivity. I would think that he would find his 4-game replacement in RF somewhat insulting, but it is hard to argue with the short term results. We'll see about the next 6 weeks.
Regarding Mulder, if the Cards are still in contention and the rotation is pitching well without him, why would he be thrown in there? Those are big if's, but I wouldn't pitch him if it comes to pass. In that scenario, we couldn't afford to throw away a game.
by Wahoo on Aug 13, 2007 10:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's some reality
If it was his first lapse or lackadaisical or apparent lack of hustle play this season, I don't think he would have been sitting for 4 straight games.
Don't get me wrong -- I've been happy with the way he has hit the ball since he came back from injury this year. Higher than career average is a good thing. I'm not saying he should be giving us more there.
Also, he did drive in one of the two runs in the bottom of the 1st Wednesday to "make up for" his gaffe in the outfield.
But the bottom line is that if you appear to not be giving effort, you're not going to be appreciated, especially when you appear to turn a routine play into an error/mistake that allows an easy run.
I haven't been wild about him nor wildly against him, this year or last. But when I saw that play Wednesday night, I was disgusted. If he wants to play, let him hustle, let him swallow his pride and show by his effort that he wants to be in the lineup.
In the 2004 offseason, I heard both Edgar Renteria and Pedro Martinez sound off about not getting enough respect from their former teams during contract negotiations. Then I was told (at least two independent baseball scribes, ESPN and the Post-Dispatch, maybe?) that to the Latino player, respect is equivalent to the total dollar value of the contract. Given that in prior posts above, the conversation about racial stereotypes took place, I hope that the Latino player in question in this case, Mr. Encarnacion, will show the game and his contract and the fans the respect they deserve by playing hard and seeming to care about whether or not he and this team put their best effort forward toward winning a pathetic division that is out there just waiting for some team to get hot and win it.
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Aug 13, 2007 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its all about the hustle
by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, applying an
by MdRedbirdFreak on Aug 13, 2007 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um didn't say that...
I also think that if you look at some of the underdog teams that have won WS i think you would find that most of the teams are hustlers, and not in the since they pose in magaizines...lol Someone who hustles wants to be there and is giving it their all.
Now if Juan has actually has a hurt knee, then I will show him some grace, but what is the excuse for before the injury? Hurt toe? Ingrown toe nail?
I think half the time Juan is just there to get a check assumes that if the club is going to lose, why go all out. I think that is why younger players and guys who recently made it to the majors can become a spark plug for the rest of the team because they bring hustle and energy to the team. Case in point, the team did well with Dunc last year, has done well with Ryan up and currently is doing well with Rick up.
by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but
You can have your team of all scrappy, hustly guys. Personally, I would rather watch a team that wins.
by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
read again
by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we're in agreement here for the most part
by Wahoo on Aug 13, 2007 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all relative
Juan is replaceable, yet he plays as if he thinks he's not. You pretty much have to be Manny Ramirez to have your defensive lapses ignored or forgiven. Juan is no Manny Ramirez. On top of that, Juan also has base-running issues.
The reason Juan is so frustrating is because he fails to put in extra effort to compensate for his overwhelming averageness.
by spants on Aug 13, 2007 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan & Pineiro
Also: lboros said "4 of the 5 guys who contributed to that run (reyes wainwright wells and looper) are still in the rotation" Is Pineiro out of the rotation? What happened?
by cardinalfan7 on Aug 13, 2007 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oops---
by cardinalfan7 on Aug 13, 2007 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought...
by jdub176 on Aug 13, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Mulder returns in early September
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Very good idea
by liam on Aug 13, 2007 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's already on the 40 man roster
Also, another option is to have Braden Looper/Joel Pineiro skip a start (saving their arms) to let Mulder pitch, then have him go in the DH.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why can't
by SprfldCards on Aug 13, 2007 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of the Braden Looper Experience
I certainly didn't buy into it.
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah--
by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The discussion surounding the outfield
Do they go with a cheap middle infield rotation of Hoffpauir and Ryan?
Do they drop Kennedy and choose not to resign Eckstine?
Do they try and trade Edmonds and Juan?
If they could save enough money by moving Kennedy, Eck, Edmonds, and Juan, do they throw it at trying to sign someone like Andruw Jones?
by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 11:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't trade Edmonds or Kennedy
You have to give Adam Kennedy another season or atleast half season. Remember how the Red Sox essentially threw away Edgar Renteria after his first frustrating year there. He comes to Atlanta and puts up near career numbers. Sometimes players just have down years, sometimes players have trouble adjusting to the new league.
Encarnacion and Eckstein are both gone before April '08.
Hauf comes up to replace 1 of 2 people, Aaron Miles or Scott Spiezio. Speezer has a contract for the next 2 years and Miles is still arbitration eligible. Depending on if the Cardinals want to cut ties with Speez after this drug problem or not will decide what happens. Then again, don't be suprised to see both Speez and Miles up here. Miles is throwing up some ridiculous home splits this year in spite of his supsect defense.
2008 25-Man Roster
1B Albert Pujols
3B Scott Rolen
2B Adam Kennedy
C Yadier Molina
CF Jim Edmonds
LF Chris Duncan
RF Rick Ankiel
SS Brendan Ryan
Bench
Scott Speizio
Aaron Miles
Gary Bennett
Ryan Ludwick
Skip Schumaker
Starting Rotation
SP - Mark Mulder
SP - Adam Wainwright
SP - Anthony Reyes
SP - Joel Pineiro
SP - Braden Looper
Randy Flores
Tyler Johnson
Chris Perez
Josh Kinney
Russ Springer
Ryan Franklin
Jason Isringhausen
That can all change, depending on what they decide to do with Flores, Springer, Looper. They could even try to bring Percival back. Who knows. With so many young players on the roster, I doubt there will be very much turnover between 2007 and 2008.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that roster . . .
by SprfldCards on Aug 13, 2007 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few points
- Given that the offense has been passable since May, I would not at all be surprised if the Cards choose to make no upgrades to the offense, figuring that an uptick from Rolen (as was assumed in 2006 as well) will be adequate.
- I don't mind trying to keep Kennedy around. I still think he is a better player than he has shown for much of this season.
- As for Edmonds, the only reason to keep him around is to use him as either as part of a 4 or 5 outfielder rotation or for sentimental reasons. To count on him as an anchor for the offense is foolish.
2008 25-Man Roster
1B Albert Pujols
3B Scott Rolen
2B Jarrett Hoffpauir
C Yadier Molina
CF Andruw Jones
LF Chris Duncan
RF Jim Edmonds
SS Brendan Ryan
Bench
Adam Kennedy
Aaron Miles
Gary Bennett
Rick Ankiel
Skip Schumaker
Starting Rotation
SP - Mark Mulder
SP - Adam Wainwright
SP - Anthony Reyes
SP - Joel Pineiro
SP - Braden Looper
Randy Flores
Tyler Johnson
Chris Perez
Some righy...
Russ Springer
Ryan Franklin
Jason Isringhausen
by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pineiro has to prove a lot
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ed in Right?
by gibbyfan on Aug 13, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He already said he would
by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fun
Ryan SS
Duncan LF
Pujols 1B
Ankiel RF
Rolen 3B
Edmonds CF
Molina C
Pitcher
Kennedy 2B
Bench
Speizio
Mather
Ludwick
Bennett
Hoffpauir
Leaves us weak at shortstop, but it's not like Miles plays it much better than Hoffpauir probably could. Both are really second basemen. Encarnacion gets moved in the offseason.
Rotation
Mulder
Wainwright
Reyes
Maroth
Pineiro
60 day DL Carpenter
Relievers
Isringhausen
Franklin
Kinney
Johnson
Thompson
Flores
Looper
Hawksworth might be regaining his command, but he'll probably repeat at AAA. I think Franklin will stay in the pen, even though he has a starts incentive next year again. I believe that Flores has a two year contract and I doubt we can move him. Springer will probably retire. I really doubt Percival will resign here; he hasn't been used in many high leverage situations and probably is taking a bit of an ego hit here. I doubt we bring back Wellemeyer-- I think we have enough pitchers already. I don't think Perez makes the opening day roster, barring an injury.
by johnstonburg on Aug 13, 2007 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember
by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kennedy at SS
When he was promoted to the big leagues, he was promoted as a second baseman.
by liam on Aug 13, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on Kennedy's ML career sheet
by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maroth
by mikedallas23 on Aug 13, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Against that lineup
by Zubin on Aug 13, 2007 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like it
The offense could struggle if Rolen and Edmonds continue to underperform, Duncan regresses, the young guys don't perform, and/or Pujols does not return to God level, but the beauty of that roster is that there is room for improvement. If Ryan or Ankiel aren't cutting it the Cards can deal for someone better, but giving them a chance at the beginning of the season is a good call IMO.
by DJ87 on Aug 13, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for Mulder
This is of-course part of my issue with continuing to pursue 2007 post-season play. Seems like the Cards would be better off not having to push Mulder in 2007.
by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 11:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There's no problem with Mulder coming back...
by guayzimi on Aug 13, 2007 1:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wells
Remember, Weaver had an awful start to 2006, and only really pitched well for the last part of the season (similar to what we're hoping for from Wells). And as we all know, Weaver didn't exactly go cheap in the off season.
If Wells pitches like a $7 million pitcher (averaging the good and the bad, with the emphasis on the late season trend), then don't expect to sign him for $1-2 million + incentives.
by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wells more than likely wouldn't be cheap
1 - When he stunk, instead of DFA'ing him, they stuck with him in the bullpen and allowed him to save his career.
2 - I don't believe Scott Boras is his agent (see: Jeff Weaver)
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Weaver vs. Wells
- Weaver had his success in the post-season on a much larger stage. Wells will go largely unnoticed because he is doing it for a 3rd place team and his 1st half was so bad it will mask 2nd half improvement.
- Weaver had past success to fall back on (early in his career) with Detroit and then with the Dodgers. Wells has been pretty much mediocre to bad his entire career.
by DJ87 on Aug 13, 2007 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoffs
by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff salary bump = overrated
But I really doubt that Weaver got a significant boost to his salary by virtue of his being on a World Series champion. Do you all think that other GMs only watch their opponents' games during the playoffs/World Series?
There is probably a very small bump to a player who has been part of a WS champion because other teams want to add players with playoff experience to help mentor their other players. But I suspect that bump is very small - perhaps on the order of 5% more salary than they might otherwise have commanded.
A free agent's salary will be based primarily on reasonable projections of their future performance. In turn, that can best be guesstimated based on their past performance - sort of a weighted average of recent years, with extra emphasis on the most recent year. Of course, there are other factors like injuries, and for a select few players, perhaps a 'superstar' bonus if they can draw fans based on star power.
Some players may accept a bit less than their market value in order to play with one team or another. That's probably the Cardinals best hope of getting Wells cheap. But to assume that other GMs are dumb strikes me as a bit naive.
by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would strongly disagree
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by cardsgirl95 on Aug 13, 2007 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff success
by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff overperformance? Probably random...
One might observe a player doing well/poorly in the playoffs relative to their regular season performance, but such over/under performance is very likely to be caused by random factors at play in a small sample size.
As with clutch hitting, it's possible that there is a small residual effect (i.e. that for a small handful of players, there might be a small over/under performance beyond random factors), but I think that those cases would be few in number and difficult to identify.
by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"kerfuffle"
by gonzostl on Aug 13, 2007 1:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just like the title:
Except I was kind of hoping for some tips on how to please my partner
by baw on Aug 13, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Along the same lines,
by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the "6" part is a
by MdRedbirdFreak on Aug 13, 2007 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparing #'s from Hardcore and Sleepy
by toris34 on Aug 13, 2007 4:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Most the team had a good July...
July:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/batting?team=stl&season=2007&split=43&seasonType=2&a mp;type=reg
August:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/batting?team=stl&season=2007&split=44&seasonType=2&a mp;type=reg
by DiscoJer on Aug 13, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could be wrong, but...
Regardless of the various outcomes, here are a few of the starters we've faced in the last 10 games (since Aug 3rd, sans a few of the "duds"):
STARTER IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA
Redding 6.1 7 1 1 2 8 0 2.43
Hanrahan 5.0 6 1 1 3 3 1 3.27
Peavy 6.0 3 0 0 2 5 0 2.21
Maddux 6.0 4 2 2 0 5 0 4.15
Young 6.0 3 4 4 5 5 0 2.02
Penny 7.0 5 0 0 3 6 0 2.54
Lowe 6.0 7 5 3 0 5 1 3.61
Heck...looking back over that list and the performances of the opposing starters, I'm AMAZED that we went 5-5! We could easily have gone 3-7 or 4-6 against pitching like that.
But it might certainly help explain why many of our guys appear to be "struggling" in August.
by Mr Clean on Aug 13, 2007 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We could've done much worse than that
by stl tyler on Aug 13, 2007 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan
97 - .710
98 - .915
99 - .737
00 - .763
01 - .700
02 - .773
03 - .759
04 - .704
05 - .796
First off: don't be mad at Juan. He is what he is and has always been (check stats above). As far as the "lack" of hustle, I'm not sure how relevant that is. I don't think he has gotten any "lazier" since we signed him, so don't compare him to other players. Aaron Miles goes all out all the time, just ask the guy who tried to rob him; that doesn't make him a great player. I appreciate hustle, but I'll take Manny's numbers any day no matter what you say about his hustle.
The reason this has become such an issue this year is simple: winning. There was no upside with him, and I think we all knew that coming in. But when you're in a rebuilding type mode as the Birds are in now, players getting paid quite a big for league average production just doesn't make sense. Juan (according to PECOTA) should be worth about $5.3 mil this year, which is about what he is getting paid. Consistency has a price tag and that is what Juan is worth. But when you're not competing for championships (which I doubt we will this year), it's obviously better to take guys like Ankiel and Ryan and see what production you can get out of them for the league minimum.
To sum up, on a rebuilding team, players like Juan don't make much sense. Don't be pissed off at him for wanting to play and know where he stands; this is LaRussa/Jocketty's fault for not clearing things up with him about the direction of the team.
SD
by sdangler on Aug 13, 2007 5:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OTOH, you could say
by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a bad point...
-His pride is hurt
-Anger is a natural reaction
-If we can clear his salary let's do it.
I just think bashing Juan the person (not Juan the average RF) and trying to get insight into every clubhouse incident is pointless and wasteful.
SD
by sdangler on Aug 13, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I for one...
I look at the carcass wearing our uniform and I want him gone...wanted him gone, since way way before Rick Ankiel or anyone else
by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amazing post
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh, this is the same guy
by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Barden
3:07 pm
CARDS ADD CORNER PROSPECT
CARDINALS ADD DEPTH...
The Red Birds have added Brian Barden to the organization.
Barden, 26-years old, was recently DFA by Arizona.
The Cardinals placed a claim and was awared Barden.
Barden, a 3B, registered a solid AAA season in 2005, and seemingly had a breakout season last year however has scuffled this season.
His defense has lapsed this season with D'Backs insiders believing his struggles at the plate touched his overall game.
Simply stated, his makeup is similar to several others signed throughout this decade that proved productive players for the Cardinals.
He has legit upside as well as versatility.
He has legit hands and throwing arm... his foundation position is 3B however he's capable of playing all four infield positions. He is considered a plus-player defensively.
Since elevating to Tucson (AAA for D'Backs) midway through the 2004 season... he improved in every aspect of game displaying a power potential (153 XBH in first 352 AAA games).
This season however has proven taxing for Barden leading the D'Backs to head in another direction.
That noted, Arizona is chock with big league and high-minor corner infield players... that's not the case with the Cardinals.
With the loss of Scott Spiezio... if Barden regains his stroke and levels his overall play... he could become a valued role player for the Cardinals in the near future.
In fact, with Travis Hanson failing to elevate his game... Barden enters into a tailor-made situation if he produces.
by Carps on Aug 13, 2007 5:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I rush to the bottom
re Mulder: I don't think he will toe the rubber at all this year; as to whether he 'should,' I am ambivalent but lean towards "no." Maybe this is counter-intuitive, but if we ARE in the race, I say avoid the intrusion of the 'spring training arm' Mulder. The boat has been rocked enough.
Now, if we are out of the race, letting Mulder throw some tune up 'window into his recovery' games in mid and late September is fine. Why not.
re Juan, unlike many I am NOT ambivalent. The simplest thing I can say (to his defenders) is... I've watched him play. I've prayed that he would not wear the birds on the bat for over a year now,, and I would have felt the same if he hit .400
by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 6:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
seriously?
Haha, if he somehow managed to hit .400, you'd happily adorn yourself in a #43 jersey and hang "Viva Encarnacion" pennants in your bedroom.
You said that you're not inclined to bash any player personally, including Juan - then you called him a "carcass wearing our uniform." In this post, you're saying that even if Juan attained some level of objective awesomeness (a .400 BA, for example), you'd still want him gone. What gives?
by jdub176 on Aug 13, 2007 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan E Racisim
Racisim..I guess no one on here dogged reyes this yr he's not latino is he?
People ripped Mcgwire for his* i don't want to speak of the past*
by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 8:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just checking
by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nope its not
by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who the...
Juan takes heat because we're fans and we're entitled to our opinion. Personally, I think he's average, and average doesn't hurt. He makes mistakes, we all do. I do think he is rather emotionless, but that's probably his personality - not a cultural trait.
McGwire never nutted up - that's why I don't like him. If he would have sacked up and told his story - steroids or not - I would still have respect for him. He never did, and a person who doesn't stand up for himself - regardless of the issues at hand - doesn't earn my respect.
by bukowski on Aug 13, 2007 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for backing the point
by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the bottom line: on Juan
I wish to ask a question. Who among you would buy in to the following 'prediction' ??:
... over the next six weeks neither the Brewers nor the Cubs go on a hot streak or really "earn" the NL Central division title, thus the Cardinals had their chance. And yet we failed, came up short... and MOSTLY because we lacked that one more solid bat in the middle of the order... AND we lacked that solid bat that we needed, that would have got us into the playoffs, because we foolishly and stubbornly gave up on Encarnacion. --
Personally, I can conjure up several possible 'factors' (or failings) that would keep us out of the playoffs, but the above Juan scenario is not one of them. But that's just me.
Another way of asking the question is this: take your playoff hopes for the Birds as they exist RIGHT NOW (whether they are cynically next to nil, or naively high, or anywhere in between) and then add to that equation the "news" that Juan Encarnacion just broke his leg {like tripping on the sidewalk going out to get the morning paper or something}... did your playoff hopes (such as they were) suffer, or not?
by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 10:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i dont know if they rest or die with Juan
by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly it
But, if we lose Juan, yes I think it weakens the team. He's a solid baseball player who has produced. Is he better than Ankiel? Well, right now, he isn't. But there's nothing to suggest Rick's going to keep up any pace like this whatsoever.
by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
CurtFlood's right
DFA him!
by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
very late on this
first off as one of the most vocal fans against every thing Juan, i'm very offended by cardfaninmass saying race has any thing to do with how i feel towards the guy. I AM NOT A RACIST. my parents raised me to judge no man or woman by the color of their skin. and if i must judge them, judge them by their actions & what comes out of their mouth.
second, politics has no place here & i'm glad it was shot down quickly. BUT it's important to point out that cardsfaninmass by their own admision leans towards the left, as i'm sure a lot of people who post on here do. and it is a classic left trait to throw the race card into a issue when race has nothing to do with it because they dont have a better arguement to make.
and why does race have nothing to do with Juan? simply put the Cardinals and their fans have been pioneer's in having players other than white guys on their teams. and many many minorites have been fan favorites & heroes over the years. heck the Cards where the first team to have black players & white players stay in the same hotel in spring training, and on the road. Mr. Buch actully bought the hotel in Florida just so guys like Gibby, Curt & other black players & their families could stay with the rest of the team. the Cards have also had many Latin players as fan favorites. the Secret Weapon, Orlando Cepeda, Joaquin Andujar are the first ones to come to mind. heck i'm sure Keith Hernandez considers himself a Latin guy.
i also feel cardfaninmass argument that latin players show no emotion, or hustle is a weak argument with no legs to stand on. clearly they did not pay any attention while Pedro was in Boston. or to the thousands of intense latin fans that came to every game he started in. WWL & NESN camera's showed them waving their flags, and signs and going crazy in the stands over any little thing Pedro did. and they acted the same towards Manny when he first came over from the Indians. and those same latin fans showed just as much emotions towards Orland Cabrera while he played for Boston. OH and how could I forget Big Pappi? that guy never shows any emotion does he?
Boston does not the only latin players who show a lot of emotion. have you ever heard of a guy named Albert Pujols cardsfaninmass? dude is the biggest and loudes cheerleader on the Cardinals team. in fact, most latin guys are very outgoing and show a lot of emotion, hustle and grit on the diamond. Jose Reyes has made his rep as the "most exciting player in baseball" just because he's a high energy latin player. Albert's best friend in the world and former Cards utility guy Placido Polanco is another latin guy who shows a lot of emotion. and NO ONE has ever questioned his hustle or grit. in fact Juan is in the minority of latin guys in that respect. i think that could be one reason people think he does not give his all is because most latin players are always jumping around and running their tails off on & off the field. while in all honesty, most of the time he looks like he'd rather be any where else than on a baseball diamond.
simply put, race has NOTHING to do with why Juan is picked on. i cannot of course speak for every man, woman & child. but here is why i have such a big problem with Juan.
just like JD, i believe Juan is a HIGHLY talented individual. if he wanted to, i believe he could be a 40-40 guy. EASILY. but the fact is, he has no desire to put in the work to become a 40-40 guy. Juan by his own admition is completly satasfied with being a "average" player. and the fact is, on his best day, Juan is just that. average at best. its not that he glides in the outfield or on the basepaths. or shows no emotions when he strikes out, or lets a ball roll right through his legs. i feel Juan wastes his GOD given abilities. over his career he's had chance after chance to become a star in the bigs, yet he's not been willing to put the work in. it's a waste of his talent & ability for him to not be a 40-40 guy. i feel he has no idea just how lucky of a guy he is to be able to play a kids game, and make millions & millions of dollars playing this kids game. if i had talent, i know i'd work my tail off to be the best player i could be. BUT Juan does not.
that, and that alone is why i have a problem with Juan. it has nothing to do with the color of his skin, or if he's a liberal or conservative. jewish, muslim, catholic, baptist or an atheist.
i know cardsfaninmass didn't directly call me out by name. but by throwing out the race card as a reason most fans have a problem with Juan. they might as well should have called me out by name because every one who's been on here for the past two season knows i'm one of the loudest guys against Juan. and i dont believe that cardsfaninmass didn't want to "pull out a whole can of worms" as they put it by throwing out the race card. because that's exactly what a person trys to do when they do throw it out. its a hot button issue in this country, and has been for decades.
i dont have now, nor have i ever had any problem with cardsfaninmass. but i do have a problem with being called a racist just because someone doesn't have a better argument to make. i've had a lot of good back and forth during games with cardsfaninmass, and i hope to contine that in the future. all i ask that in the future cardsfaninsmass is more careful with your words, and think about how people might react to those words.
it's after 1am out here on the east coast now, so i doubt any one will read this, but as a Juan "hater" i felt i had to defend myself. there are a lot of more important things than Juan's issues with Tony that we need to devote our time too. and i hope we can. the Cards are finally showing some life, and i'm actually looking foward to this weeks series. i hope the Cards dont let me down, but i'm preparing myself that they might. lets put this argument behind us for good. make it a great Tuesday every one. and i'll see you all, tomorrow night.
good night VEB.
by gdm426 on Aug 14, 2007 1:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm still up
If I was really good, I could even incorporate Calhoun's comment, when he called Juan a "carcass."
Anyway, as I see it, CFIM was just grasping at ways to explain the inexplicable -- how so much piss and vinegar gets spewed at a guy who has been exactly what he was expected to be when he signed his pretty-fucking-reasonable contract. Which brings me to your craziest point.
I don't know how in the wide world of Walt you figure JUAN ENCARNACION could be a 40-40 guy "if he wanted to" -- "EASILY"! This is irrational and baseless and stupid. Do you have any idea how many 40-40 guys there have been in the history of baseball? We're talking, like, 4 or 5 freaking players? What is it that qualifies you to make this judgment, and how in the hell are you making it, anyway? Is it because Juan can hit a home run, and can steal a base, and therefore he must be able to do each of those things 40 times in a season if he just works hard at it? That's crazy. Maybe you think the 40/40 club is for people who can catch 40 fly balls and use 40 different bats in a season.
It sounds to me like your expectations of Juan Encarnacion are insanely unrealistic. I'd hate to know what you expect out of Ankiel next year.
You have no way of knowing if Juan "wastes his GOD given abilities" and settles for averageness or if -- God forbid -- he is actually an average major league baseball player, which is something 99% of the people on this planet aren't. Who is your secret Juan Encarnacion informant?
Juan by his own admition is completly satasfied with being a "average" player. and the fact is, on his best day, Juan is just that. average at best.
If that's not enough, that entire paragraph is just complete and utter BS. Juan, on his best day, is actually an ABOVE average player... because Juan, for his CAREER, by YOUR own admission... is an average player. Do you understand the mathematics at work here?
You don't have to like Juan. You don't even have to have good reasons to not like Juan. Just don't post your crappy speculations about his supposedly casual squandering of talent and expect people to admire you for it.
Another thing: politics has no place here & i'm glad it was shot down quickly. BUT it's important to point out that cardsfaninmass by their own admision leans towards the left, as i'm sure a lot of people who post on here do. and it is a classic left trait to throw the race card into a issue when race has nothing to do with it because they dont have a better arguement to make.
How exactly is that a non-political statement? You high-and-mightily say people should be careful with their words and think about how others will react to them... but you can't even follow your own advice. Besides, cardsfaninmass didn't "throw the race card" in some desperate attempt to win an argument; his was the first freaking comment on the thread. And he was agreeing with lboros, anyway. I think you should do as we were all told to do near the beginning of this thread -- shove the politics.
But back to baseball. When you say you're "one of the loudest guys against Juan," don't you mean "I'm the guy that writes 12 posts calling him 'Mr. Clutch' in every game thread"? Seriously, not to get personal, but I've seen enough "Is LUD a STUD or a DUD" and "Thou shalt not run on YADDA" and "Let's go DUNK" to recognize your posts with my eyes shut. Don't ask me how I do it.
Now, I haven't yet addressed your laundry list of Latin players, as if we were unaware of the fact that Jose Reyes is a fan favorite or that Big Papi is charismatic. But cardsfaninmass didn't say everyone hates Latin players... he said some of the labels people use, consciously or not, are inconsistent -- and perhaps racially motivated. I believe him. If you really think these types of racial topics are taboo -- or that simply broaching them is tantamount to calling someone a racist -- then you should spend some desensitization time on Sheff's Youtube page.
Anyway, I'm burnt out on this post, so good riddance to it. I hope you consider it a fitting reply to your late-night VEB public address.
by baw on Aug 14, 2007 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was CurtFlood
by baw on Aug 14, 2007 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and I did not CALL him a carcass
We all have a carcass; it's a neutral (common noun) word.
by CurtFlood on Aug 14, 2007 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, you said
brb, i have to go shower my carcass
by baw on Aug 15, 2007 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's ridiculous.
That is absolute hypocrisy, and I'm far more offended by what you did than what he initially said.
by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Draftin'
by Alxfritz on Aug 14, 2007 5:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good lord that's a lot of money!
by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 6:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah... risk/reward, etc.
by Alxfritz on Aug 14, 2007 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan Encarnacion
by madding on Aug 14, 2007 6:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think only people that drive el caminos
Personally I hated him because the corner OFers needed refilled from 04-05 and who did they get to replace Larry Walker and Reggie Sanders?? Larry Bigbie and JuanE. Most token STL fans hate JuanE because they don't take him for what he is, a very league average player but they take him as Larry Walker's replacement, which is unacceptable but that's Jocketty's fault, not JuanE.
by rocKStark5 on Aug 14, 2007 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs



















