Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

the joy of 6

since they last faced the brewers and cubs, the cardinals have only gone 6-7 --- but they've still managed to cut half a game off milwaukee's lead and pick up a game and a half on chicago. . . .  how fitting is it that the nl central was bud selig's division?

last week i noted that it had been more than a year since the cardinals received a full rotation-cycle's worth of 6-inning starts. four games later, they are trying to make it 2 cycle's worth. yesterday's outing by anthony reyes was the 8th start in a row of 6 innings or longer --- first time that has happened since july 6 - 17, 2005. it was also the 6th consecutive quality start, a feat the cardinal rotation last accomplished in the 2d week of this year, april 8 through 15 --- games 6 through 11 on the schedule. randy keisler threw one of those starts.

if wells keeps it going tomorrow night, it'll be the cardinals' first string of 7 consecutive quality starts since 2005 --- the aforementioned july 6 - 17 run that lasted 8 games. and it will be the first run of 9 starts of 6 innings or longer since april 27 - may 5, 2005. the 2007 corps very nearly logged a streak of this length, though you've prob'y forgotten by now --- 10 of this season's first 11 starts lasted 6 innings or more, with the only shortfall a 5-inning, 3-run effort by anthony reyes. the rotation posted a cumulative era of 2.97 over those 2 weeks but only went 4-5 because the team wasn't hitting. the starters couldn't sustain that early-season run; after it ended, they recorded just 1 quality start in the next 8 games.

4 of the 5 guys who contributed to that run (reyes wainwright wells and looper) are still in the rotation; can they keep it going this time? during the current streak, the rotation is 5-2 with a cumulative era of 2.11; the only losses came when reyes and wainwright matched 0s with two of the best starters in the nl, peavy and penny.

here's a little puzzler: if the rotation continues to get reasonably good results and the cardinals stay in the race, who loses his spot when mark mulder is ready to pitch? or do the cardinals simply stand pat and let mulder sit out the year? what do you think the cardinals a) should do? b) will do?

re the kerfuffle over juan encarnacion: i've never been one to dog the guy over his so-called lack of hustle. i think "hustle" is largely in the eye of the beholder, and the perception thereof is often colored by factors that have nothing to do with actual performance. my gripe with encarnacion has always been with his skill set: lousy on-base skills and just so-so power. but he is what he is --- i never faulted the player, i faulted the front office that signed him. since joining the cardinals, encarnacion has given the franchise the very best of his modest abilities --- a line of .282 / .321 / .443, all of which figures are slightly above his career averages. he's not a great fielder, but he's no worse than taguchi and far superior to duncan. i'm not suggesting he should remain in the lineup --- ludwick / ankiel are younger and cheaper and have more upside, and they're likely to be at least as good as juan from now through the end of the year. but i think encarnacion is being scapegoated; i think he's being treated differently by fans, and by the manager, than other players. say all you want about the guy's inadequate effort; his professional pride has been stung, and he's reacting the way any of us would --- angrily.

having said all that: i hope they clear his salary off the books, and i wish him well with his future team. the tigers reportedly have had interest in encarnacion since last winter; they're getting nothing out of craig monroe, and they don't have a whole lot of other options. encarnacion came up through their system; maybe they want him back. the angels might be another possibility --- they've been shopping for an outfielder to bolster their bench. the Indians need a bat but apparently aren't in the market.

that's all from me for today; short post, as i'm on the road the rest of the day, heading home. other good stuff to read:


0 recs  |  Comment 155 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Give Juan a Break
I have to agree with lboros's ambivalence amidst the slew of Juan-bashing that goes on in this blog and elsewhere (including TLR!).

I cannot help but feel bad for the dude, when his manager calls him out publicly for lack of effort, then gets pissed when Juan voices his feelings about not being played (Bernie claims that Juan's comments led to his benching yesterday...not the 'sore knee'.

Despite his lack of 'hustle', Juan has been nothing short of clutch this year for the cardinals. He has come through with key hits in all sorts of situations and he has provided a semblance of power when two-thirds of the MV3 haven't been able to. It is really sad that he has to be the odd man out for the Ankiel resurgence.

If it really where about who 'earns' their playing time (as TLR claimed) then there is no doubt that our outfield should be - Dunc in left; Ankiel CF; Juan RF...I know, I know - Jimmy  has been 'hot' lately, but he has come nowhere near the level of Juan's consistency.

A final note - lboros notes that Juan is being treated 'differently' by fans, the manager, etc. I don't want to pull out a whole can of worms here, but I think this is - in part - racial. Fans and others are very quick to label Latino players (mainly domincan) players as lacking hustle and intensity. I've seen it hear in Boston as the fans are very, very quick to rant and rave about 'manny being manny' and 'silly willy mo', while 'dirtdogs' Trot Nixon and Mike Lowell - despite mental gaffs, errors - get idolized.  I'm not saying that sometimes these players do not show these traits, but I want to suggest they get put on a shorter leash - and the shortness, I think, is rooted in racial ideas white people have about brown people from tropical areas.

OK - last item - just to add to the 'other side'. I know a guy who is close with a member of the cardinals medical staff. And he said that Juan consistently did not show up for MRI's on his wrist last season. If you remember he didn't get surgery on it until (I think) december. If he had showed up for MRIS earlier, he could've had the surgery earlier, and then, perhaps, would have been a starter on opening day. So Tony's quip before hopping a jetplane about juan not showing for MRIs appears to have a long history.

 

by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 9:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He's been one of our
Most consistent batters since he came back from injury. He's had some sloppy seasons, but at the end of the year, like he says, his numbers are always there.
I''m a Jenius!

by gibbons on Aug 13, 2007 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure
that I'd be so quick to point out those numbers if I were him.

by plh903 on Aug 13, 2007 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cardzfan...
IMHO you are making huge assumptions when saying that the fans disdain for Encarnacion is Racially slanted.  I realize that Juan is what he is a very average major league OFer making slightly more than average.  I don't want him on this team, but it has nothing to do with his race.

Despite having a horrible offensive season last year, and not yet proving to be an average offensive catcher has not kept Yadier from being a fan favorite even if he's "brown".

Nothing pisses me off more than people throwing out the race card when it doesn't apply.  Usually it's a black/white issue (i.e...Barry), but it's still a lame excuse for undeserved sympathy.

by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right on
I seriously doubt for most people this is a race thing at all.  Maybe a culture thing but not race.  Cards fans love Pujols, Molina, Oquendo and many other racial minorities that have played for the team.  The problem with Juan is that he shows very little emotion, I saw him say the f word once and almost lost it laughing so hard.  He may hustle but I can't see it, he is better then Pujols has been lately that is certain but when I compare him to Duncan I just don't see the same type of play.  Yes it is perception but my perception is that he is just there to hit for his numbers and collect a pay check.  He doesn't seem to care if the team wins or loses.

by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly...
Cardinals fans hated JD Drew for the exact same reasons as they hated Juan, and JD was about as white as they come.
- Y. Molina stole third

by TriplePlay on Aug 13, 2007 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and tino martinez
theres a long list of players of every color who have fallen out of favor.

by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

great point TriplePlay
cardsfaninmass:
please take that race card and file it elsewhere... ridiculous, cheap, and thoughtless comment.  

by _pistol_ on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well
Slightly different reasons to dislike J.D. Drew.

Drew had immense talent.  He just was always hurt and missing games.  He appeared to be kind of nonchalant, but I don't remember him making the kinds of errors that JuanE makes.

JuanE has moderate talent, but suffers from mental gaffes that end up overshadowing whatever talent he has.  Great, he had that hit and RBI, but he also allowed a run to score.  That's not much of an upside.

That said, I don't really dislike Juan.  I just think it's wiser for the Cards to cut ties with him and go with a cheaper, healthier outfield.

by spants on Aug 13, 2007 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
I was frustrated by JD Drew and his lack of effort and emotion just as I am Encanarcion.  I love Ronnie Belliard for his hard work, and intensity.  I wish Ronnie was still with STL instead of Kennedy.  This Juan thing is not EVEN close to being a race thing.  Get real please.....

by gorn on Aug 13, 2007 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

race always applies
like or not, but we live in a world (and especially a nation) that has been shaped by along history racial ideas and conflicts - racialized ideas are always teeming under the surface of everyday discourse.

I did not claim that 'brown' players cannot become 'fan favorites' due to racism. Most of the fan favorites of today are dominican (Pujols, Vlad).

My only point is that dominican players especially are given a shorter leash than white players.  When they show signs of 'lack of hustle' it fuels disproportionate outrage and disdain (surely vistors to this blog have seen this with regard to Juan).

When Jimmy doesn't hustle around the bases or if Dunc takes a ridiculous route to a fly ball, we complain, but it does not engender the type of mass bashing that occurs when Juan does it. That, I think, is, in part, related to a long history in and outside of baseball about the racial 'character' of Caribbean and other 'tropical' peoples.  

by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

your analysis is lazy
who exactly are you calling a racist here? There is no vivelbirdos forum opinion. Each fan gets to express his/her personal views.  If you think someone here is racially biased, direct your opinion towards that user.  otherwise,
STFU.

by _pistol_ on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You should relax, pistol
I didn't see that he called anyone here a racist.  He made a comment about what he sees as pervasive racism in society -- that laziness by white players (or perceived laziness) is given a longer leash, in general, than perceived laziness by latin players.  

Feel free to disagree if you must, but he didn't call anyone a racist and, if anyone's gotten personal here, it is you.  Save the "STFU" stuff for another board.

by chuckb on Aug 13, 2007 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are entitled...
to your opinion, and I completely disagree with it.  

Fans don't get mad at Jimmy, because he has played at a level that Juan has never breathed.  If Jimmy doesn't hustle, it may also mean he doesn't get hurt...

I am not saying that this country does not have a long history of racism, and that it still exist today.  I would even say that there is more racism towards latin people in this country today than any other ethnicity ('cept middle eastern), but I truly believe that this doen not exists from a fan's perspective in baseball.  Are there some fans that don't like him 'cause he's "brown"?  Probably...but I would say they are few and far between.

Furthermore, when people bring up race in situations it doesn't belong I think it worsens what level of racism already exists.

by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you nuts?
You're practicing selective reading if you've never read that "maybe Jimmy should sit" or "dammit 2004 Jimmy gets that ball" or something to that effect on this site.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My bad...
I was really following the original poster's comment about Jimmy not getting the same treatment as Juan.  I do see fans get upset with Jimmy, but I also think he gets a longer leash due to his past performance and injury risk.

In the outfield Jimmy has never been known as a guy to "pull-up" on a ball.

by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Race does NOT always apply
I find your comment:

"...related to a long history in and outside of baseball about the racial 'character' of Caribbean and other 'tropical' peoples."

absolutely revolting.  I understand your point, and I would agree that many people have issues with race- acknowledged or not.  But I strongly disagree that Juan is picked on disproportionately because he is not white.  I wonder: where do ideas like this originate?  Ridiculous!

by redrey on Aug 13, 2007 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I should
stereotype you as a racist since you live in Massachusetts.

Brown players? Give me a fucking break. It seems like you are the only one with these preconceived notions about people from the Caribbean. Stop quoting something in every sentence, it makes your post even more annoying.

Juan glides and looks like he doesn't care. Duncan goes after fly balls like a bull in a china shop, and Edmonds had a Griffey/Snider/Mantle/Mays-type peak while in a Cardinals uinform.

by plh903 on Aug 13, 2007 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude.
It's baseball.  Players are known only by the color of their uniform and how they produce.

Fans don't bring race into the equation. People with agendas do.  (And yes, I am suggesting that you may have an agenda other than the local 9 playing hard and winning by your previous post.)

We bash Juan because we bash Juan.  We bash others just as hard (re: Miles and his 3 error inning, Kennedy because he blows this year, etc).

Don't go there on us here, man.  We're Cardinals fans - and they could field a team of purple midgets - we'd still congratulate and criticize equally as fans.

Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What?
"It's baseball.  Players are known only by the color of their uniform and how they produce.  Fans don't bring race into the equation."

You're living in a dream world.

"Don't go there on us here, man.  We're Cardinals fans - and they could field a team of purple midgets - we'd still congratulate and criticize equally as fans."

And you've got some weird, high and mighty thing going on.  To think that 100% of Cardinals fans are all good people who are color blind and hold no prejudices, is as naive as I've seen.

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said that
all Cardinals fans are all good people.  I was referring to people on this board, who, by and large, care about the quality of baseball more than skin color.  Perhaps my word choice needed work - but I don't pretend to be an english major.
Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Aug 14, 2007 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"they get put on a shorter leash"
WHen you give up too many triples to the right field corner at WRigley, I put you on a shorter leash.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bobby Abrue
got tagged that way in Philly as well, but I never thought is was because he is Latin.

 I agree with your outfield. The big question is what to do about JimmE.

 Mulder needs to do his re-hab and lets see. If he's ok he needs to pitch in September. If there is a sign of swelling or pain he should be shut down.

by nybirdfan on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So did
Pat Burrell and David Bell...

by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly
philly hates everyone. they booed santa claus.

by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thread representative of Viva??
I found this thread referred to on MLB Trades re: trading Juan and possible interested parties. Now after reading it, I hope nobody comes from there to here to read this thread that is not familiar with a more typical VEB thread. While there were good (and not so good) comments made here on one specific topic that runs thru out, it really wasnt needed here...was it? A blog named for a ex-Cardinals latin players rally cry!

(The above has nothing to do with dmbs comment, its just a statement in general)

Wait a minute...I can see La Russa in pinstripes, and there's still TWO Duncans in the dugout!

by cardschinmusic on Aug 14, 2007 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Racial?
I cant speak for anyone else but I think that's ridiculous.
I think what Lboros thinks he doesn't have that great of skills and he had the horrible unfortunate job of replacing a gold glove outfielder who when healthy can hit 40+ homers in Larry Walker THATS why fans don't like him.
Juan will never be as good as Walker and that`s one reason fans don't like him he also has a very laid back manner which makes fans think he doesn't care about the game.
People didnt like J.D. Drews lazy laid back manner and he`s not latino it has nothing to do with race

Don't even get me started on Manny...... fans not liking Manny has nothing to do with his race.
Manny asks to be traded EVERY SINGLE YEAR that doesnt make fans like you very much.
At least those other guys you mentioned Lowell and Nixon don't ask for trades publicly talking about how you dont like playing where your at.

Why would fans like you when you say you dont like it there?????????????

by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're right about the
racial/cultural thing.  A few people have responded to your post using words like "ridiculous" about that suggestion, but there's nothing ridiculous about it.  Certainly those whose objections to Juan's play are free of a racial/cultural slant (e.g., the posters above) have a right to feel offended, to the degree that they think you are talking about them.  But they also don't speak for ALL Cardinal fans, and I think it's incredibly naive to think there are not a lot of Cardinal fans whose responses to a player are influenced by race (even if they have the best of intentions). I don't think any of us have complete control over our prejudices. I think we've made tremendous advances in race relations in the last generation, but the battle ain't quite over yet.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Aug 13, 2007 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely Ridiculous
It`s completely ridiculous to bring up racial issues on a baseball blog.
I`m sure there are people who don`t like Juan because of race but thats no reason to bring it up here.
It`s making it seem like those on here who are wanting to get rid of Juan are racists and thats just STUPID.
You should not make assumptions like that and you should not bring up issues like this on a baseball blog.

by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well at least someone agrees with me :-)
The image of the 'laid back' (read: lazy, lacking work ethic) 'native' of places all over Latin America is written in the history of colonialism.

There is a (conservative...dare I say, right wing) tendency to believe that all racism is done. That all prejudice is gone. That we've entered a wonderful 'color blind' world in which people are evaluated solely on their performance.

I believe that we have made progress on racial issues. But, I also believe that racial prejudices always animate social life UNDER THE SURFACE (as the above poster says, we do not have 'complete control of our prejudices').

Ideas of the lazy, 'laid back', and 'uncaring' Dominican player are rampant. And I think these ideas allow (and fuel) a disproportiante level of disdain when these players show just a little lack of hustle.

You can all find as many anecdotes of white players who fans hated or Dominican players who fans loved, but that is besides the point.  Juan takes a disproportionate amount of heat on this blog. And this is despite the fact that he has been a core productive member of this team since his return.

by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stop
"There is a (conservative...dare I say, right wing) tendency to believe that all racism is done."

It's one thing to discuss racism applied to baseball but you walking a dangerous line -- the community guidelines are pretty explicit about no politics.  Keep the topic focused to baseball if you want to discuss it.

by azruavatar on Aug 13, 2007 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm done, but...
...All the talk above about how 'completely ridiculous' it is to discuss race and player performance are extremely political statements. Just because you attach the word 'right', 'left', 'democrat', 'republican', does not mark your entrance into politics.

by cardsfaninmass on Aug 13, 2007 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah
pretty much it does. if you have any questions, email lboros. let's stop it right now please.

by erik on Aug 13, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i completly agree with azruavatar
you pull the racial card as much as you want but if you bring politics in the discussion, you're in trouble.
VEB Fantasy Football League! leave me a comment, and i'll send you an invite!

by stlcardinalsfang on Aug 13, 2007 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan
"Juan takes a disproportionate amount of heat on this blog."

Did you see the play he made the other day?
the ball was hit to him he could of reached out and got it easily he let the ball go right by him.
it wasn't even hit that hard!
It allowed a run to score after we had score 2 in the first inning that's inexscusable. We never get out to an early lead and to let them come back and score a run in the first was horrible.
If anyone on our team had made that play I would be yelling about them it just happens he had made that play.
Sure he takes a lot of heat on this blog but I think its rightfully so he shouldn't make dumb plays like that.
Do not bring up politics on this blog.

by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong
That was the top of the 1st, it was 0-0, and it allowed a run to score.  But you've all but forgotten how Juan drove in the tying run in the bottom of the 1st and scored the go-ahead run to make it 2-1.

I honestly feel really bad for Juan.  Not because the fans dislike him, that happens.  He has been hosed by TLR despite being probably our most productive and consistent outfielder.  The Rick Ankiel story is great, but Juan has simply gotten hosed.  I hope he gets traded.  I used to hope he would get traded because I wanted to dump his salary, but now I just feel bad for the guy and I think a change of scenery would be in his -- and the organization's -- best interest.

by Mr Redbird on Aug 13, 2007 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe you are forgetting someone...
"He has been hosed by TLR despite being probably our most productive and consistent outfielder."

Duncan has been by far our most productive OFer, and though he has struggled somewhat since the ASB his OPS during that time is still .007 higher than Juan's.

I guess you did say "probably".

I do feel that Tony has been a little rought on him, and that his trade value is lessened when it's so obvious the team want rid of him.

by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan
It can be argued that Duncan has been the best outfielder for the team this year.  Hell, he was a one-man show for the first part of the season.  But he has hit a wall recently, and Juan has been the best in the last month.  So why bump him down?

by Mr Redbird on Aug 13, 2007 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since July 1st

     G   PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO  BA    OBP   SLG   OPS

Enc  28 107  96  14  32  5  0  2  21   9   0  18 .333  .387  .448  .835
Dunc 36 118  96  13  28  5  0  6  21  21   1  34 .292  .415  .531  .946
Lud  36  99  86  12  25  9  0  6  19  10   1  19 .291  .378  .605  .983

Encarnacion really hasn't been the best outfielder for the Cardinals for a long time.  He's been good, but he's got 2 other guys who have also had their playing time reduced that are performing as well or better.  Encarnacion's BA is hollow.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and while we're playing with the dbd db
Since June 1:
Duncan  .274/.388/.535 - .923 OPS
Ludwick .265/.329/.574 - .902 OPS
Encarn  .308/.355/.485 - .840 OPS
Taguchi .331/.384/.391 - .775 OPS
Edmonds .243/.331/.374 - .704 OPS

to answer toris34's question below,
 from 7/1 to 7/13:
Ludwick .357/.400/.786 - 1.186 OPS
Duncan  .522/.656/.870 - 1.526 OPS
Encarn  .318/.348/.591 - .939 OPS

Toris- you can look numbers up yourself here.

"This is a ball club with issues." -Nats announcers (talking about the Cardinals)

by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Sleepy,
I don't remember but please tell me that Dunc won at least 1 NL Player of the Week award w/ those 2 week #'s.

by toris34 on Aug 13, 2007 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hollow batting average
Hardcore.  This is the second time I've seen you use this term in the past week.  I didn't understand it the first time and I don't understand it now.

Can you please explain what you mean by "his batting average is hollow"?

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Hollow
batting average is used in reference to a player who hits for a decent batting average, but without any other stats to go along with it.  The player in question hits, say, .300, but doesn't draw any walks, so his OBP is only in the .320 range.  Yes, he's hitting, but he's still not getting on base much.  Or he hits, again, in the .290-.300 range, but all his hits are singles, so his SLG is only about .370.  He's not driving the ball effectively; the only way for him to really gain extra bases is to steal them.  (incidentally, this is the exact profile of Juan Pierre, and why he's a decent complementary guy for the top a lineup, but not a good core player for $11 mil a year)  

In short, a hollow batting average is one where the number looks good at first, but when you look at the rest of the package, there's not much real production.  

To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His batting average is higher than the two OFers
he is up against, yet both have clearly been more productive.  

Example:

Eckstein BA - .295
Molina BA - .268

Eckstein OBP - .342
Molina OBP - .337

People talk about Eckstein being valuable to this team still because of his ability to be a leadoff hitter.  The prime job of a leadoff hitters is to get on base.  Eckstein does so with as much frequency as our often derided catcher.

Larry, I believe at the start of 2006, put up a daily post about how Eckstein's average is the only thing that really masks him as a good leadoff hitter (my conclusion, not his).

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, from these two definitions
I would conclude that Juan's BA is not "hollow".  I'm looking at runs produced and he's better than both other players.  

However, I think its an unfair assessment to call his BA hollow, if you're only going to compare him to these two guys.  All three have been extremely productive imo, and to look at certain stats like walks and declare him a failure is unfair.

Also, keep in mind he strikes out much less than the other two guys which gives him more of a chance to be productive plus raises the amount of at bats which is a factor in BA.

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan strikes out less
but he's also hit into 9 DPs.  Duncan has hit into 4, Ludwick into 1.  Sometimes, a strikeout isn't a bad thing.  Especially when those two players still have higher OBPs than you.  

Ludwick, of course, doesn't have a higher OBP, but just a shade lower.  

You compare these 3, because they are competing for the 2 corner outfield positions.  

Encarnacion's BA is the only thing that truly differentiates him from the other 2 players, and even with that, he isn't really more productive than them.

As far as runs produced (I'm assuming that means RBIs and Runs added together)

Encarnacion - 35
Duncan - 34
Ludwick - 31

So, are you saying that his 40 point higher BA isn't hollow because he 'produced' 1 and 4 more runs?  Remember, Ludwick had 10 fewer at-bats than Juan as well.

The bottom line is: We've got enough 'Juans' on this team who are cheaper and have a much higher upside.  And as far as defense, I'd stack Ludwick's glove up against Juan's any day.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's fine.
I'm just saying you can't call his BA "hollow" if you are comparing him to guys who are producing in all of your categories, when he's either right there or just behind in the same stats.

What I'm trying to say, is...base it on the entire league.  Not two guys who are doing well. Juan's not a great player, but he's a lot better than many give him credit for.

And I get tired of hearing "he doesn't 'look' like he cares".  What the heck is that supposed to mean?  So, if he looked like he did, but really didn't we'd all be okay with that?  

And as far as his comparisons to Drew and how people got all over Drew when he "looked" like he didn't care, or wouldn't play because he was hurt or whatever.

I ask this one question.  How many Drew jerseys do you STILL see around Busch?  That should answer your question.

And Hardcore, I'm sorry to be lumping all of these gripes in a response to you.  These aren't all directed at you (mainly just the "hollow" thing).  I just kinda got on a roll and let some frustrations out.  Don't take it as a shot.

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree
I'm just saying you can't call his BA "hollow" if you are comparing him to guys who are producing in all of your categories, when he's either right there or just behind in the same stats.

He really isn't "right there or just behind in the same stats" though.  The only thing he is close to the others in is OBP, and that comes from his batting average (his walk rate is even worse than Ludwick's, and right now walk rate is the biggest black mark against Ludwick).  Encarnacion's power numbers are woefully inadequate.

Here's isolated power for STL outfielders:

ISO since June 1 / season
Duncan  .261 / .246
Ludwick .309 / .248
Encarn  .177 / .140
Taguchi .060 / .075
Edmonds .131 / .138

Enc's not even close, and while his OBP is slightly higher, it is based almost entirely on hitting singles.  Ludwick has more extra base hits in 2/3 as many PA's; even though Encarnacion has more hits overall, Ludwick has helped his team far more.  This is better described by his (scaled to 269PA) WARP3 of 3.63 vs Encarnacion's 1.8- Ludwick has twice the value to this team that Encarnacion has, and the gap is only going to grow.

"This is a ball club with issues." -Nats announcers (talking about the Cardinals)

by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's debatable...
whose been better over the last month Dunc or Juan (as I posted above there OPS's are almost the same), but there's no arguing who has been our best OFer this year.

I noticed Duncan has struck out in 30 of 76 AB's since the ASB...has the opposition figured something out?  That's and EXTREMELY high K-rate!!

by cardzfanbub on Aug 13, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

STL OF in the last month
ludwick  .246/.352/.492 = .844 OPS
duncan   .237/.344/.447 = .792 OPS
encarnacion .333/.389/.395 = .784 OPS
taguchi .327/.411/.367 =.778 OPS
edmonds .262/.357/.344 = .701 OPS
"This is a ball club with issues." -Nats announcers (talking about the Cardinals)

by SleepyCA on Aug 13, 2007 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

completely agree
I don't understand why people are jumping on this guy. I think MdRedbird nailed it by saying that we aren't necessarily cognizant of our prejudices. If we're selling a guy short and saying it's because of his play (when there may be other factors) I think it's perfectly relevant for a baseball blog.

by jeff abs on Aug 13, 2007 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My reasons
For not wanting to see Juan play are his stumbling out of the batters box everytime he gets a hit and looking like he is playing every ball hit to him on the bounce. Whether he can get to them on the fly or not his first step most of the time is back because he doesn't want to charge the ball and dive if need be.

I am going to the game Tuesday in Milwaukee and I am hoping to see Ankiel in right and not Juan since my seats are in the right field bleachers. Maybe I will have the opportunity to catch an Ankiel homerun ball.

by stl4all on Aug 13, 2007 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fans never liked him
He was the answer to a depleted outfield a few years ago, which was not the answer most fans wanted. From most of the people I know, it wasn't popular to let Reggie walk and sign Juan for more money than Reggie was making. I don't know many people who weren't frustrated with that move.

That being said, he has essentially produced as expected or better in his time in STL. He has actually had some of his better years as a Cardinal. However, in the eyes of most fans, he is a poor player taking up a decent chunk of cash. When he makes poor plays in the outfield and doesn't seem to give his all, he is going to be criticized, not because he is of a particular race, but because he is an average player. Although, I'm sure there are plenty of racists all over Cardinal Nation, I really don't see the criticism of Juan as an example of this.

In all honesty, from my rather large group of Cardinal friends, Edmonds and Kennedy this year and Izzy last year are the largest targets for criticism. And a large number of those guys are racist...

by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Cardfaninmass:  re the 'conservative' comment, I happen to be a left wing nut job, and still, not the right forum, dude.  Just not productive.  

As for everyone else, whether you feel your personal opinion toward Juan is racially motivated or not, to deny that there is an undercurrent of race, even in the way we view athletes, is a little naive.  I distinctly recall last year, right around this time, there was quite a bit of discussion as to whether or not Ronnie Belliard's 'thuggish' appearance was something this franchise should be bringing in or not.  Even more than that, earlier this season, whenever Preston Wilson was struggling, there were even one or two negative comments directed toward him which were focused on his spandex do rag thingy that many black players wear.  I'm not saying it was widespread, but that sort of nastiness does crop up occasionally, even among fairly even minded people.  

My own father roots specifically for teams that have the most white players when he's watching, say, college basketball, or that sort of thing.  He's not the most highly evolved human being on the planet, now, but for the most part, he's fairly enlightened, especially considering the rest of his family.  And yet, there is still some of those tendencies ingrained.  

Again, even if you feel strongly about you yourself not being racist, jumping down the throat of someone who has the guts to say what some people may not want to consider is bogus.  I understand the race card often gets played when it shouldn't, but that doesn't mean it's never valid.  

To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good stuff baron
I think cardsfaninmass may have gotten jumped on a little too much on his first point. Racism -- and in fact all prejudices -- shape someone's opinion; overtly, covertly, whatever. And if you believe that the Cardinals fan base is too highly evolved to think otherwise... well, this weekend I sat next to a shirtless fellow who had a sword tattoo on his back and a bandana on and during the seventh inning stretch went on a three minute long diatribe about how much he hates #@#$!!* $!&&)@ts! and their &%$-^(#@&% ways.

It was exactly what I -- as a friend of quite a few %$#)&@! $@!))&ts! -- wanted to hear in the 7th inning of a great pitchers dual.

(Point being -- not only did this gentleman hold animosity towards &%)#&*%ing ^&!@#$)ts; but I assumed as soon as I saw his jorts, tattoos, and bandanna, that he would be the type of person that would hate %^&@)!ts. See, I assume by appearance too!)

Point being -- we all aren't as evolved as we hope and/or think we are. These ugly, despicable notions such as racism do play a role in some peoples illogical, ill conceived opinions of others. Call it a "White" elephant in the room if you will, but it does exist.

Boooo-urns.

by Alxfritz on Aug 13, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just replying out of boredom
you did a great job of refocusing this discussion, imho, keeping the politics out, but when reading:

"there was quite a bit of discussion as to whether or not Ronnie Belliard's 'thuggish' appearance was something this franchise should be bringing in or not."

it seems to me that most of the readership here was skeptical about this deal because we were fans of Hector Luna (black man from the DR). Hector was fat, and really, really ugly, but he hustled, tucked his shirt in, and didn't stick his tongue out whenever a camera happened to focus him.  My personal thoughts were that Luna would provide the exact same production for a lot less money, and I was afraid they would give Belly a long-term contract (if only...)

"This is a ball club with issues." -Nats announcers (talking about the Cardinals)

by SleepyCA on Aug 14, 2007 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually,
I wasn't referring solely to VEB as far as the Belliard comments.  A fair amount of that stuff came from sports radio, other sources, etc.  I was really talking about the fan base in general, not just the people here.  

The PDub comments were from here, and I was surprised, and disappointed, to read them.  But my overall point wasn't focused just on the specific posters here; I meant more the overall fan base.  Hell, not just our fan base, pretty much everyone when it comes right down to it.  

To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice catch
he's also a cancer survivor, according to wikipedia.  also, trot nixon has a career OPS of .833 (115 OPS+)...  he'd be "good" regardless of whether or not he hustled (or maybe he has an .833 instead of an .815 career OPS because he beats out a couple of ground balls every year and turns a couple of singles into doubles?)

grr, off days make me cranky...

"This is a ball club with issues." -Nats announcers (talking about the Cardinals)

by SleepyCA on Aug 14, 2007 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan...and the rest
I agree on Juan, completely.  He is what he is and what he always has been.  He is what the Cardinals signed and for LaRussa to be drumming up stuff to throw at him publicly right now is pretty absurd.  I think he's doing it as a way of justifying playing Ankiel everyday over Juan while trying to avoid problems in the clubhouse -- if there are those who see Ankiel as a sort of "favorite son".  

That said, if we can find a team to take his salary for next year, even if we get next to nothing in return, we should.  

As for Mulder, I think he needs to pitch this year.  If he doesn't, he begins next Spring having not thrown a major league pitch for about 19 months.  I think he needs some work.

Whose spot will he take?  My guess is that, if the team is out of it, there's a good chance that Wainwright or Reyes will get shut down for the last couple of weeks to avoid having them throw too many innings this year.  I'm not saying it's the right thing to do, but it's what the team might do.

I still think there's a possibility that Wells gets traded this month.  He's been pitching well of late and a team may be willing to take a chance w/ a couple of starts from Wells in September.  And Pineiro, though very good last time out, wasn't his first time out.  He's far from a sure thing.

I'd say that the most likely candidate to remain in the rotation this year is Looper.  They need to decide where he belongs next year (rotation/pen) so they'll want to see him get as many starts as possible and see how the accumulating innings affect him as he gets close to 180 IP.

by chuckb on Aug 13, 2007 9:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Won't Mulder's
fate depend on how he does in his AAA rehab starts? If he is completely awful, they won't even bring him up, will they?

I don't know about y'all, but I found that Bonds/Mantle piece kind of creepy.

by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 9:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not AAA
It seems his first rehab start might be in A since Palm Beach has a home game in Jupiter and he is already there.

by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That makes sense
but won't they want to try him at the higher levels before throwing him out on a Major League mound? And again, what if he's awful? Will they shut him down or make him sink or swim in some real games?

by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

mulder
it depends on the circumstances.

he needs to pitch well in his rehab starts and maybe a few games out of the pen before i'd want to start him.  it would be great to get him a few starts to help prepare him for next year, but i dont think i'd want to pull someone who is pitching well just to give mulder some extra practice.

if mulder is pitching well...i wouldnt bump wainwright or reyes.  if the rest of the bunch is performing roughly equal i'd probably bump looper to the pen.  i think thats where he belongs anyway.  he is under contract for next year and i am a little worried about his arm falling off.  if looper stays, my next choice would be to put wells in the pen.  he was solid out of the pen this year and i dont think i'd want him back next year.  the cards have an option on pineiro for next year so if he is pitching well i'd give him a few more starts to see if its worth bringing him back.

of course, if the cardinals get eliminated it doesnt really matter who gets bumped.

by dmb60614 on Aug 13, 2007 10:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mulder
I am guessing Wells goes to the pen or is pulled entirely.  But if the we are still in the race and our starting pitchers are all pitching well, there is a good chance they don't use him this year.  
The St Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champs!

by Zubin on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
I don't think we'll see Mulder pitch for the big club this year.  There will be some setback in his rehab starts.

If we see him at all, it'll be bullpen work.  There is no way he's going to have enough stamina to start.

by spants on Aug 13, 2007 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Btw on Pineiro....
what's he got?  What type of pitcher is he?  Decent fastball?   I don't know anything about him.   Are scouting reports available on the web?

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pineiro
I dont know all the pitches he throws but I know he has a decent two-seamer and a good curveball.

by Calhoun on Aug 13, 2007 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw the
game he pitched against San Diego and, yes, he had a decent fastball and a good curve. Lots of movement. Blanked them for 7 innnings. If that was a better example of what he's got than his first start, then they did get a damn good arm for almost nothing. Unfortunately, 2 starts (1 bad, 1 good) isn't enough to tell anything definate. The Red Sox obviously didn't think much of him. Hopefully, they were wrong. But I liked what I saw.

by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dads' lineup
is AAAA level.  I'm happy to get the results, but he needs to string some together.  The biggest positive  IMHO is that he went 7 innings, showing he is gaining stamina.

by silent_bob on Aug 13, 2007 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes perception is reality
I don't think the fans perception of Juan's lack of hustle is racially motivated.  His lapses of focus, concentration, hustle are fairly well documented and most of us have seen it in person or on tv.  Obviously, his growing rift with TLR stems from last year when Juan was the odd man out in the WS.  Furthermore, Juan did not attend the WS celebration the Sunday following the Cards victory in the 5th game.  This obviously did not endear him to Cards fans.

To Juan's credit, he has produced this year (better than his averages).  I don't quite understand Ankiel's replacement of him in RF, given Juan's recent productivity.  I would think that he would find his 4-game replacement in RF somewhat insulting, but it is hard to argue with the short term results.  We'll see about the next 6 weeks.

Regarding Mulder, if the Cards are still in contention and the rotation is pitching well without him, why would he be thrown in there?  Those are big if's, but I wouldn't pitch him if it comes to pass.  In that scenario, we couldn't afford to throw away a game.

by Wahoo on Aug 13, 2007 10:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's some reality
In Wednesday's game, Juan trotted slowly toward a ball that took a bad? quick? unexpected? (or maybe it was obvious?) hop and got past him for a run.  The way this team has lacked consistency in scoring runs, they cannot give runs away.

If it was his first lapse or lackadaisical or apparent lack of hustle play this season, I don't think he would have been sitting for 4 straight games.

Don't get me wrong -- I've been happy with the way he has hit the ball since he came back from injury this year.  Higher than career average is a good thing.  I'm not saying he should be giving us more there.

Also, he did drive in one of the two runs in the bottom of the 1st Wednesday to "make up for" his gaffe in the outfield.

But the bottom line is that if you appear to not be giving effort, you're not going to be appreciated, especially when you appear to turn a routine play into an error/mistake that allows an easy run.

I haven't been wild about him nor wildly against him, this year or last.  But when I saw that play Wednesday night, I was disgusted.  If he wants to play, let him hustle, let him swallow his pride and show by his effort that he wants to be in the lineup.

In the 2004 offseason, I heard both Edgar Renteria and Pedro Martinez sound off about not getting enough respect from their former teams during contract negotiations.  Then I was told (at least two independent baseball scribes, ESPN and the Post-Dispatch, maybe?) that to the Latino player, respect is equivalent to the total dollar value of the contract.  Given that in prior posts above, the conversation about racial stereotypes took place, I hope that the Latino player in question in this case, Mr. Encarnacion, will show the game and his contract and the fans the respect they deserve by playing hard and seeming to care about whether or not he and this team put their best effort forward toward winning a pathetic division that is out there just waiting for some team to get hot and win it.

TSF

by TedSimmonsFan on Aug 13, 2007 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its all about the hustle
My problem with Juan is all about the hustle. Little Dunc isn't as good as a fielder as Juan, but it looks like he is always busting his arse off. He isn't pretty to watch running, but he goes all out. Think about many of guys the fans have fallen in love with (Bo Hart, Eck, Ozzie, Willie, etc.)...its all about the hustle. I personally hope we keep eck and dump AK, again its the hustle. Eck sprints to first base on a walk. I like the hustle. I will take 9 nine who look like they want to be there and will hustle over any over priced "top" player.
http://welcometojohnsonville.blogspot.com

by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, applying an
all-hustle, all-scrappy philosophy to your team's roster will get you a nice affordable payroll ... and third place.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Aug 13, 2007 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um didn't say that...
I never said scrappy. One maybe two scrappy guys are good on a team, but i said hustle, there is a difference. Eck is scrappy and i would perfer someone with a better arm, but I also want a guy who wants to play a hard nine. I want someone with hustle, I don't care if you are scappy or a stud.

I also think that if you look at some of the underdog teams that have won WS i think you would find that most of the teams are hustlers, and not in the since they pose in magaizines...lol Someone who hustles wants to be there and is giving it their all.

Now if Juan has actually has a hurt knee, then I will show him some grace, but what is the excuse for before the injury? Hurt toe? Ingrown toe nail?
I think half the time Juan is just there to get a check assumes that if the club is going to lose, why go all out. I think that is why younger players and guys who recently made it to the majors can become a spark plug for the rest of the team because they bring hustle and energy to the team. Case in point, the team did well with Dunc last year, has done well with Ryan up and currently is doing well with Rick up.

http://welcometojohnsonville.blogspot.com

by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, but
just because a player tries really, really hard, it doesn't make him a good ball player.  I don't care how hard Eck runs to first after a walk, it doesn't change his talent level.  

You can have your team of all scrappy, hustly guys.  Personally, I would rather watch a team that wins.  

To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

read again
again, never said scrappy. Hustle isn't just trying hard. I assume that if a player made it to the majors they have some level of talent and skill for the game. Maybe a better word might be drive or motivation rather than hustle.
http://welcometojohnsonville.blogspot.com

by arthropodtodd on Aug 13, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we're in agreement here for the most part
It seems like there is a double standard on the team with Pujols getting the ok from TLR to not hustle down the 1b line on ground outs, even double plays, presumably because of his leg or hamsting problems.  It siill make me mad when I see Albert do that, but the fans tend to overlook it.  If Juan really has a knee issue, some of his lack of hustle at least in certain situations might be better accepted by the fans.  However, on the defensive side, it is mostly unexcusable.

by Wahoo on Aug 13, 2007 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's all relative
The difference is that we have a significant investment in Pujols that only pays off if he's healthy and playing.  As far as I know, Pujols hasn't ever had any lapses in defense because he's lazy or not paying attention.  

Juan is replaceable, yet he plays as if he thinks he's not.  You pretty much have to be Manny Ramirez to have your defensive lapses ignored or forgiven.  Juan is no Manny Ramirez.  On top of that, Juan also has base-running issues.  

The reason Juan is so frustrating is because he fails to put in extra effort to compensate for his overwhelming averageness.  

by spants on Aug 13, 2007 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan & Pineiro
Anyone else remember Juan skipping out on the World Series parade?  It seems like this attitude issue has been ongoing.

Also: lboros said "4 of the 5 guys who contributed to that run (reyes wainwright wells and looper) are still in the rotation" Is Pineiro out of the rotation?  What happened?

by cardinalfan7 on Aug 13, 2007 10:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

oops---
I see that he was talking about the run at the beginning of the season, back when Pineiro was in Boston.  

by cardinalfan7 on Aug 13, 2007 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought...
..that he missed the parade because of a family emergency?  Who knows.

by jdub176 on Aug 13, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He did
this came up in the discussion yesterday. His kid was sick, but I guess Juan didn't tell anyone about it until after the parade.

by baw on Aug 13, 2007 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Mulder returns in early September
as the Cardinals plan, they feasible could go to a 6 man rotation one cycle through, and then use Mulder again in the doubleheader against Chicago.
Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 10:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Very good idea
To get ahead of myself by quite a distance, what would we need to do to make Mulder post-season eligible? Does he need to come up before rosters expand?

by liam on Aug 13, 2007 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's already on the 40 man roster
so he is postseason eligible.

Also, another option is to have Braden Looper/Joel Pineiro skip a start (saving their arms) to let Mulder pitch, then have him go in the DH.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why can't
Mulder go in the bullpen ala Matty Mo coming back from surgery . . . he gets some work in, finds out that he can pitch in the big leagues again, and is ready to go next year--I don't see any real reason why he has to be a starter this year.  All that assumes that the current 5 starters continue to pitch well and stay healthy--no guarantees there.  If all those starters were throwing well, I would sent Looper to the pen just to avoid having an even larger increase of innings on his arm . . . but (surprisingly) I like him in the rotation and think he should get a shot at the #5 job next year--he is  a pretty good #5
Here's to the hopeful resurection of the MV3

by SprfldCards on Aug 13, 2007 11:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of the Braden Looper Experience
Raise your hand if you thought he'd be making a run at 12 victories this year.

I certainly didn't buy into it.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah--
Duncan deserves mucho kudos for helping that to work out. I really thought it was going to be a miserable failure.

by rockin redbird on Aug 13, 2007 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The discussion surounding the outfield
and infield lead to a number of big questions for the team in the 2007 offseason.

Do they go with a cheap middle infield rotation of Hoffpauir and Ryan?

Do they drop Kennedy and choose not to resign Eckstine?

Do they try and trade Edmonds and Juan?

If they could save enough money by moving Kennedy, Eck, Edmonds, and Juan, do they throw it at trying to sign someone like Andruw Jones?

by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 11:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't trade Edmonds or Kennedy
Edmonds has shown over the last 2 weeks that he can still be a productive MLB player when healthy.  I'd put good money against him being just as good (for cheaper) than Andruw Jones .600 OPS.

You have to give Adam Kennedy another season or atleast half season.  Remember how the Red Sox essentially threw away Edgar Renteria after his first frustrating year there.  He comes to Atlanta and puts up near career numbers.  Sometimes players just have down years, sometimes players have trouble adjusting to the new league.

Encarnacion and Eckstein are both gone before April '08.

Hauf comes up to replace 1 of 2 people, Aaron Miles or Scott Spiezio.  Speezer has a contract for the next 2 years and Miles is still arbitration eligible.  Depending on if the Cardinals want to cut ties with Speez after this drug problem or not will decide what happens.  Then again, don't be suprised to see both Speez and Miles up here.  Miles is throwing up some ridiculous home splits this year in spite of his supsect defense.

2008 25-Man Roster
1B Albert Pujols
3B Scott Rolen
2B Adam Kennedy
C Yadier Molina
CF Jim Edmonds
LF Chris Duncan
RF Rick Ankiel
SS Brendan Ryan

Bench
Scott Speizio
Aaron Miles
Gary Bennett
Ryan Ludwick
Skip Schumaker

Starting Rotation
SP - Mark Mulder
SP - Adam Wainwright
SP - Anthony Reyes
SP - Joel Pineiro
SP - Braden Looper

Randy Flores
Tyler Johnson
Chris Perez
Josh Kinney
Russ Springer
Ryan Franklin
Jason Isringhausen

That can all change, depending on what they decide to do with Flores, Springer, Looper.  They could even try to bring Percival back.  Who knows.  With so many young players on the roster, I doubt there will be very much turnover between 2007 and 2008.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that roster . . .
makes me scared of our ability to score runs . . . I am all for the youth movement . . . but that team could be in a big offensive hole--or Edmonds and Rolen could return to (close to) normal, Ank could pan out, and all could be fine . . .
Here's to the hopeful resurection of the MV3

by SprfldCards on Aug 13, 2007 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few points
  1. Given that the offense has been passable since May, I would not at all be surprised if the Cards choose to make no upgrades to the offense, figuring that an uptick from Rolen (as was assumed in 2006 as well) will be adequate.
  2. I don't mind trying to keep Kennedy around. I still think he is a better player than he has shown for much of this season.
  3. As for Edmonds, the only reason to keep him around is to use him as either as part of a 4 or 5 outfielder rotation or for sentimental reasons. To count on him as an anchor for the offense is foolish.
With the above in mind (including keeping Edmonds and Kennedy) I would still say the Cards should try and free up the payroll to go after Andruw Jones. Given his awful season, why not try an 1 year "make good" contract?

2008 25-Man Roster
1B Albert Pujols
3B Scott Rolen
2B Jarrett Hoffpauir
C Yadier Molina
CF Andruw Jones
LF Chris Duncan
RF Jim Edmonds
SS Brendan Ryan

Bench
Adam Kennedy
Aaron Miles
Gary Bennett
Rick Ankiel
Skip Schumaker

Starting Rotation
SP - Mark Mulder
SP - Adam Wainwright
SP - Anthony Reyes
SP - Joel Pineiro
SP - Braden Looper

Randy Flores
Tyler Johnson
Chris Perez
Some righy...
Russ Springer
Ryan Franklin
Jason Isringhausen

by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pineiro has to prove a lot
before I'd want to go ahead and pencil him in for the 2008 rotation.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ed in Right?
No way he won't do it, and we have seen what a grouchey Jim Edmonds is like.
Save the Kipper don't make him go back out there.

by gibbyfan on Aug 13, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He already said he would
At least once in the paper he has said he would move to right if it would help the team, I think injury wise he would be better off in right as well.

by StLHugo on Aug 13, 2007 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fun
Lineup
Ryan SS
Duncan LF
Pujols 1B
Ankiel RF
Rolen 3B
Edmonds CF
Molina C
Pitcher
Kennedy 2B

Bench
Speizio
Mather
Ludwick
Bennett
Hoffpauir

Leaves us weak at shortstop, but it's not like Miles plays it much better than Hoffpauir probably could. Both are really second basemen. Encarnacion gets moved in the offseason.

Rotation
Mulder
Wainwright
Reyes
Maroth
Pineiro
60 day DL Carpenter

Relievers
Isringhausen
Franklin
Kinney
Johnson
Thompson
Flores
Looper

Hawksworth might be regaining his command, but he'll probably repeat at AAA. I think Franklin will stay in the pen, even though he has a starts incentive next year again. I believe that Flores has a two year contract and I doubt we can move him. Springer will probably retire. I really doubt Percival will resign here; he hasn't been used in many high leverage situations and probably is taking a bit of an ego hit here. I doubt we bring back Wellemeyer-- I think we have enough pitchers already. I don't think Perez makes the opening day roster, barring an injury.

by johnstonburg on Aug 13, 2007 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember
Kennedy was once a SS and probably would be fine, as would Miles filling the SS spot in a pinch.

by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kennedy at SS
He was a pretty lousy SS, though, and would've been moved to second earlier if we had anyone at all to handle short.

When he was promoted to the big leagues, he was promoted as a second baseman.

by liam on Aug 13, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

on Kennedy's ML career sheet
I see only ONE game at SS... and that was this year for two innings

by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maroth
I think most of this is reasonable, but Maroth has really looked terrible so far. He's going to have to show something the rest of the season to avoid getting non-tendered.

by mikedallas23 on Aug 13, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Against that lineup
I'd only throw a lefty.  Hell, even if Dan Haren was gonna pitch against that line-up, I'd make him switch gloves.
The St Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champs!

by Zubin on Aug 13, 2007 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like it
That is probably the roster I would put out there for 2008.  If Wells pitches well the rest of the way I'd try to sign him to a cheap incentive laden deal and put him in Looper's rotation spot sending Loop to the 'pen and Chris Perez to Memphis to start the year (he'd be the first guy called up if there was an injury).  Brad Thompson probably has to figure in somewhere as well.

The offense could struggle if Rolen and Edmonds continue to underperform, Duncan regresses, the young guys don't perform, and/or Pujols does not return to God level, but the beauty of that roster is that there is room for improvement.  If Ryan or Ankiel aren't cutting it the Cards can deal for someone better, but giving them a chance at the beginning of the season is a good call IMO.

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Aug 13, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops
I forgot WonderBrad!  He'd probably take Springers spot if Springer retires.
Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As for Mulder
If the Cards really are in this thing (and I think the next 7 road games should finally hash out this question), then I say you have to bring Mulder along with the intention of seeing whether he can be the 1/2 type starter the Cards would need to have a real shot in the post season.

This is of-course part of my issue with continuing to pursue 2007 post-season play. Seems like the Cards would be better off not having to push Mulder in 2007.

by JMedwick on Aug 13, 2007 11:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There's no problem with Mulder coming back...
it's inconceivable that Pineiro and Looper will continue to thrive. Looper especially... I think they will and should move him into long relief.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Aug 13, 2007 1:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wells
I don't know why everyone assumes that a resurgent Wells would be a cheap re-sign.  

Remember, Weaver had an awful start to 2006, and only really pitched well for the last part of the season (similar to what we're hoping for from Wells).  And as we all know, Weaver didn't exactly go cheap in the off season.

If Wells pitches like a $7 million pitcher (averaging the good and the bad, with the emphasis on the late season trend), then don't expect to sign him for $1-2 million + incentives.

by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 1:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wells more than likely wouldn't be cheap
however, 2 things

1 - When he stunk, instead of DFA'ing him, they stuck with him in the bullpen and allowed him to save his career.

2 - I don't believe Scott Boras is his agent (see: Jeff Weaver)

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 13, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More Weaver vs. Wells
  1. Weaver had his success in the post-season on  a much larger stage.  Wells will go largely unnoticed because he is doing it for a 3rd place team and his 1st half was so bad it will mask 2nd half improvement.
  2. Weaver had past success to fall back on (early in his career) with Detroit and then with the Dodgers.  Wells has been pretty much mediocre to bad his entire career.
I'd expect the very BEST he could get would be the same $4 mil he got this year.  However, I think the Cards could probably get him for cheaper with incentives..
"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Aug 13, 2007 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playoffs
I doubt Weaver would have made nearly that much had the Cardinals not made the playoffs.

by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playoff salary bump = overrated
First, I have to admit that I haven't done an analysis of Weaver vs. Wells, either their history pre-Cardinals, or the shape of their 2006/2007 seasons.

But I really doubt that Weaver got a significant boost to his salary by virtue of his being on a World Series champion.  Do you all think that other GMs only watch their opponents' games during the playoffs/World Series?  

There is probably a very small bump to a player who has been part of a WS champion because other teams want to add players with playoff experience to help mentor their other players.  But I suspect that bump is very small - perhaps on the order of 5% more salary than they might otherwise have commanded.

A free agent's salary will be based primarily on reasonable projections of their future performance.  In turn, that can best be guesstimated based on their past performance - sort of a weighted average of recent years, with extra emphasis on the most recent year.  Of course, there are other factors like injuries, and for a select few players, perhaps a 'superstar' bonus if they can draw fans based on star power.

Some players may accept a bit less than their market value in order to play with one team or another.  That's probably the Cardinals best hope of getting Wells cheap.  But to assume that other GMs are dumb strikes me as a bit naive.

by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would strongly disagree
While I don't argue that playoff bumps may be overrated, I think Weaver winning game 7 with a great game absolutely made his 2007 salary.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think
you mean Game 5 (of the WS), yes?

by cardsgirl95 on Aug 13, 2007 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playoff success
Its more than just exposure for the player or "mentoring" abilities. Success in the post-season has been elusive for many good players, so a player who has proven he can win games in the post-season is more valuable than a similar player who has not.

by googs77 on Aug 13, 2007 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playoff overperformance? Probably random...
I strongly doubt there is much statistically significant playoff over/under performance by individual players.

One might observe a player doing well/poorly in the playoffs relative to their regular season performance, but such over/under performance is very likely to be caused by random factors at play in a small sample size.  

As with clutch hitting, it's possible that there is a small residual effect (i.e. that for a small handful of players, there might be a small over/under performance beyond random factors), but I think that those cases would be few in number and difficult to identify.

by psteinx on Aug 13, 2007 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"kerfuffle"
I may be late the game, but this is a word I was unfamiliar with before this post.  I think it is my new favorite

by gonzostl on Aug 13, 2007 1:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just like the title:
"joy of 6"

Except I was kind of hoping for some tips on how to please my partner

by baw on Aug 13, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Along the same lines,
there are so many new possibilities for new variations on the old '789' joke.  
To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 13, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comparing #'s from Hardcore and Sleepy
It could be due the performance b/t 7/1 - 7/13, but it seems like all 3 (Dunc, Lud, & Enc) have a huge difference in their #'s since 7/1 and their #'s over the past month.  Maybe I'm missing something, but did they all start July so hot as to cause the discrepencies?

by toris34 on Aug 13, 2007 4:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Most the team had a good July...
But a slow August. For whatever reason. The guys who weren't hot in July are hot now (Edmonds, Miles, Yadi).  Only Ludwick (and Taguchi to a lesser extent) have stayed the same so far.

July:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/batting?team=stl&season=2007&split=43&seasonType=2&a mp;type=reg

August:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/batting?team=stl&season=2007&split=44&seasonType=2&a mp;type=reg

by DiscoJer on Aug 13, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could be wrong, but...
I think the "slow August" for many of our offensive players can be attributed at least in part to the way the schedule worked out and the plethora of top-tier starters we've been facing recently.

Regardless of the various outcomes, here are a few of the starters we've faced in the last 10 games (since Aug 3rd, sans a few of the "duds"):


STARTER   IP  H  R ER BB SO HR   ERA
Redding  6.1  7  1  1  2  8  0  2.43
Hanrahan 5.0  6  1  1  3  3  1  3.27
Peavy    6.0  3  0  0  2  5  0  2.21
Maddux   6.0  4  2  2  0  5  0  4.15
Young    6.0  3  4  4  5  5  0  2.02
Penny    7.0  5  0  0  3  6  0  2.54
Lowe     6.0  7  5  3  0  5  1  3.61

Heck...looking back over that list and the performances of the opposing starters, I'm AMAZED that we went 5-5!  We could easily have gone 3-7 or 4-6 against pitching like that.

But it might certainly help explain why many of our guys appear to be "struggling" in August.

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Aug 13, 2007 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We could've done much worse than that
It's a tough week when the highest ERA you face is Greg Maddux.

by stl tyler on Aug 13, 2007 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan
OPS by year:
97 - .710
98 - .915
99 - .737
00 - .763
01 - .700
02 - .773
03 - .759
04 - .704
05 - .796

First off: don't be mad at Juan.  He is what he is and has always been (check stats above).  As far as the "lack" of hustle, I'm not sure how relevant that is.  I don't think he has gotten any "lazier" since we signed him, so don't compare him to other players.  Aaron Miles goes all out all the time, just ask the guy who tried to rob him; that doesn't make him a great player.  I appreciate hustle, but I'll take Manny's numbers any day no matter what you say about his hustle.

The reason this has become such an issue this year is simple: winning.  There was no upside with him, and I think we all knew that coming in.  But when you're in a rebuilding type mode as the Birds are in now, players getting paid quite a big for league average production just doesn't make sense.  Juan (according to PECOTA) should be worth about $5.3 mil this year, which is about what he is getting paid.  Consistency has a price tag and that is what Juan is worth. But when you're not competing for championships (which I doubt we will this year), it's obviously better to take guys like Ankiel and Ryan and see what production you can get out of them for the league minimum.

To sum up, on a rebuilding team, players like Juan don't make much sense.  Don't be pissed off at him for wanting to play and know where he stands; this is LaRussa/Jocketty's fault for not clearing things up with him about the direction of the team.

SD

by sdangler on Aug 13, 2007 5:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

OTOH, you could say
he stands wherever we want him to stand, as long as his paycheck doesn't bounce.

by sdrone on Aug 13, 2007 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a bad point...
Larry made all the right points at the outset

-His pride is hurt
-Anger is a natural reaction
-If we can clear his salary let's do it.

I just think bashing Juan the person (not Juan the average RF) and trying to get insight into every clubhouse incident is pointless and wasteful.

SD

by sdangler on Aug 13, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I for one...
am in no way "pissed" at Juan, nor am I inclined to bash ANY player personally.
I look at the carcass wearing our uniform and I want him gone...wanted him gone, since way way before Rick Ankiel or anyone else

by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amazing post
You just went from saying you are not "inclined to bash ANY player" and then called him a "carcass".

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, this is the same guy
who wants Juan gone even if he hits .400 (which he could easily do, if only he weren't so goddamn lazy)

by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree
you and me both on the "why Juan" boat

SD

by sdangler on Aug 13, 2007 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brian Barden
Monday, August 13, 2007
3:07 pm
CARDS ADD CORNER PROSPECT
CARDINALS ADD DEPTH...

The Red Birds have added Brian Barden to the organization.

Barden, 26-years old, was recently DFA by Arizona.

The Cardinals placed a claim and was awared Barden.

Barden, a 3B, registered a solid AAA season in 2005, and seemingly had a breakout season last year however has scuffled this season.

His defense has lapsed this season with D'Backs insiders believing his struggles at the plate touched his overall game.

Simply stated, his makeup is similar to several others signed throughout this decade that proved productive players for the Cardinals.

He has legit upside as well as versatility.

He has legit hands and throwing arm... his foundation position is 3B however he's capable of playing all four infield positions. He is considered a plus-player defensively.

Since elevating to Tucson (AAA for D'Backs) midway through the 2004 season... he improved in every aspect of game displaying a power potential (153 XBH in first 352 AAA games).

This season however has proven taxing for Barden leading the D'Backs to head in another direction.

That noted, Arizona is chock with big league and high-minor corner infield players... that's not the case with the Cardinals.

With the loss of Scott Spiezio... if Barden regains his stroke and levels his overall play... he could become a valued role player for the Cardinals in the near future.

In fact, with Travis Hanson failing to elevate his game... Barden enters into a tailor-made situation if he produces.

by Carps on Aug 13, 2007 5:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I rush to the bottom
so as to to be swayed as to what others have said:

re Mulder: I don't think he will toe the rubber at all this year; as to whether he 'should,' I am ambivalent but lean towards "no."  Maybe this is counter-intuitive, but if we ARE in the race, I say avoid the intrusion of the 'spring training arm' Mulder.  The boat has been rocked enough.
Now, if we are out of the race, letting Mulder throw some tune up 'window into his recovery' games in mid and late September is fine.  Why not.

re Juan, unlike many I am NOT ambivalent.  The simplest thing I can say (to his defenders) is... I've watched him play.  I've prayed that he would not wear the birds on the bat for over a year now,, and I would have felt the same if he hit .400

by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 6:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

seriously?
"I've prayed that he would not wear the birds on the bat for over a year now,, and I would have felt the same if he hit .400"

Haha, if he somehow managed to hit .400, you'd happily adorn yourself in a #43 jersey and hang "Viva Encarnacion" pennants in your bedroom.

You said that you're not inclined to bash any player personally, including Juan - then you called him a "carcass wearing our uniform."  In this post, you're saying that even if Juan attained some level of objective awesomeness (a .400 BA, for example), you'd still want him gone.  What gives?    

by jdub176 on Aug 13, 2007 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan E Racisim
i agree he takes some heat, i think hes just scatter brained hell get a cluthc hit only to get picked off or boot a ball...

Racisim..I guess no one on here dogged reyes this yr he's not latino is he?

People ripped Mcgwire for his* i don't want to speak of the past*

07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 8:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just checking
nope, the 'Reply to this' button ain't broke..

by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nope its not
i dont like it when the thread runs into the side and gets real tiny and hard to read...at least for me..mayb im "lazy"
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who the...
...hell cares if Reyes is Latino?  He's 2 and 12.  Wells takes it full force here because he's not that good.

Juan takes heat because we're fans and we're entitled to our opinion.  Personally, I think he's average, and average doesn't hurt.  He makes mistakes, we all do.  I do think he is rather emotionless, but that's probably his personality - not a cultural trait.

McGwire never nutted up - that's why I don't like him.  If he would have sacked up and told his story - steroids or not - I would still have respect for him.  He never did, and a person who doesn't stand up for himself - regardless of the issues at hand - doesn't earn my respect.

Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Aug 13, 2007 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for backing the point
i was making...it went with the initial comment way up above...i didnt reply to it there cause as i said it got long and ran into the side...if you didnt read it basically minorities get critisized harder
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the bottom line: on Juan
wow...reading the above posts have alternately given me goosebumps and a flushed face.
I wish to ask a question.  Who among you would buy in to the following 'prediction' ??:

... over the next six weeks neither the Brewers nor the Cubs go on a hot streak or really "earn" the NL Central division title, thus the Cardinals had their chance.  And yet we failed, came up short... and MOSTLY because we lacked that one more solid bat in the middle of the order... AND we lacked that solid bat that we needed, that would have got us into the playoffs, because we foolishly and stubbornly gave up on Encarnacion. --

Personally, I can conjure up several possible 'factors' (or failings) that would keep us out of the playoffs, but the above Juan scenario is not one of them.  But that's just me.

Another way of asking the question is this:  take your playoff hopes for the Birds as they exist RIGHT NOW (whether they are cynically next to nil, or naively high, or anywhere in between) and then add to that equation the "news" that Juan Encarnacion just broke his leg {like tripping on the sidewalk going out to get the morning paper or something}... did your playoff hopes (such as they were) suffer, or not?

by CurtFlood on Aug 13, 2007 10:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i dont know if they rest or die with Juan
but the whole thing has me stumped...he has had a good O yr, and then all the sudden hes not playing..just weird, epitimizes the 07 cards...
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Aug 13, 2007 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's exactly it
This team's playoff hopes don't live and die with Juan.  I'm more concerned about Pujols' recent struggles or if Rolen's shoulder will hold together or if Edmonds can make it one last hurrah (ugh...2 more?) or if our rotation will continue to pitch well!!!

But, if we lose Juan, yes I think it weakens the team.  He's a solid baseball player who has produced.  Is he better than Ankiel?  Well, right now, he isn't.  But there's nothing to suggest Rick's going to keep up any pace like this whatsoever.  

by Big Red on Aug 13, 2007 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

CurtFlood's right
A stunning realization: imagining Juan Encarnacion breaking his leg actually doesn't shatter my otherwise reasonable playoff hopes!

DFA him!

by baw on Aug 13, 2007 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

very late on this
but i've been car shopping and away from the computer all day, and will be gone all today tomorrow. i've read Larry's words and every one else so here's my take.

first off as one of the most vocal fans against every thing Juan, i'm very offended by cardfaninmass saying race has any thing to do with how i feel towards the guy. I AM NOT A RACIST. my parents raised me to judge no man or woman by the color of their skin. and if i must judge them, judge them by their actions & what comes out of their mouth.

second, politics has no place here & i'm glad it was shot down quickly. BUT it's important to point out that cardsfaninmass by their own admision leans towards the left, as i'm sure a lot of people who post on here do. and it is a classic left trait to throw the race card into a issue when race has nothing to do with it because they dont have a better arguement to make.

and why does race have nothing to do with Juan? simply put the Cardinals and their fans have been pioneer's in having players other than white guys on their teams. and many many minorites have been fan favorites & heroes over the years. heck the Cards where the first team to have black players & white players stay in the same hotel in spring training, and on the road. Mr. Buch actully bought the hotel in Florida just so guys like Gibby, Curt & other black players & their families could stay with the rest of the team. the Cards have also had many Latin players as fan favorites. the Secret Weapon, Orlando Cepeda, Joaquin Andujar are the first ones to come to mind. heck i'm sure Keith Hernandez considers himself a Latin guy.

i also feel cardfaninmass argument that latin players show no emotion, or hustle is a weak argument with no legs to stand on. clearly they did not pay any attention while Pedro was in Boston. or to the thousands of intense latin fans that came to every game he started in. WWL & NESN camera's showed them waving their flags, and signs and going crazy in the stands over any little thing Pedro did. and they acted the same towards Manny when he first came over from the Indians. and those same latin fans showed just as much emotions towards Orland Cabrera while he played for Boston. OH and how could I forget Big Pappi? that guy never shows any emotion does he?

Boston does not the only latin players who show a lot of emotion. have you ever heard of a guy named Albert Pujols cardsfaninmass? dude is the biggest and loudes cheerleader on the Cardinals team. in fact, most latin guys are very outgoing and show a lot of emotion, hustle and grit on the diamond. Jose Reyes has made his rep as the "most exciting player in baseball" just because he's a high energy latin player. Albert's best friend in the world and former Cards utility guy Placido Polanco is another latin guy who shows a lot of emotion. and NO ONE has ever questioned his hustle or grit. in fact Juan is in the minority of latin guys in that respect. i think that could be one reason people think he does not give his all is because most latin players are always jumping around and running their tails off on & off the field. while in all honesty, most of the time he looks like he'd rather be any where else than on a baseball diamond.

simply put, race has NOTHING to do with why Juan is picked on. i cannot of course speak for every man, woman & child. but here is why i have such a big problem with Juan.

just like JD, i believe Juan is a HIGHLY talented individual. if he wanted to, i believe he could be a 40-40 guy. EASILY. but the fact is, he has no desire to put in the work to become a 40-40 guy. Juan by his own admition is completly satasfied with being a "average" player. and the fact is, on his best day, Juan is just that. average at best. its not that he glides in the outfield or on the basepaths. or shows no emotions when he strikes out, or lets a ball roll right through his legs. i feel Juan wastes his GOD given abilities. over his career he's had chance after chance to become a star in the bigs, yet he's not been willing to put the work in. it's a waste of his talent & ability for him to not be a 40-40 guy. i feel he has no idea just how lucky of a guy he is to be able to play a kids game, and make millions & millions of dollars playing this kids game. if i had talent, i know i'd work my tail off to be the best player i could be. BUT Juan does not.

that, and that alone is why i have a problem with Juan. it has nothing to do with the color of his skin, or if he's a liberal or conservative. jewish, muslim, catholic, baptist or an atheist.

i know cardsfaninmass didn't directly call me out by name. but by throwing out the race card as a reason most fans have a problem with Juan. they might as well should have called me out by name because every one who's been on here for the past two season knows i'm one of the loudest guys against Juan. and i dont believe that cardsfaninmass didn't want to "pull out a whole can of worms" as they put it by throwing out the race card. because that's exactly what a person trys to do when they do throw it out. its a hot button issue in this country, and has been for decades.

i dont have now, nor have i ever had any problem with cardsfaninmass. but i do have a problem with being called a racist just because someone doesn't have a better argument to make. i've had a lot of good back and forth during games with cardsfaninmass, and i hope to contine that in the future. all i ask that in the future cardsfaninsmass is more careful with your words, and think about how people might react to those words.  

it's after 1am out here on the east coast now, so i doubt any one will read this, but as a Juan "hater" i felt i had to defend myself. there are a lot of more important things than Juan's issues with Tony that we need to devote our time too. and i hope we can. the Cards are finally showing some life, and i'm actually looking foward to this weeks series. i hope the Cards dont let me down, but i'm preparing myself that they might. lets put this argument behind us for good. make it a great Tuesday every one. and i'll see you all, tomorrow night.

good night VEB.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Aug 14, 2007 1:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm still up
I'm sure we all appreciate your crash course in racial harmony, but gimme a break. Cardinalfaninmass wasn't out here calling everyone a racist; you guys took it that way. I wish I could think of some clever way to combine "riding a high horse" and "beating a dead horse," because both apply to your post.

If I was really good, I could even incorporate Calhoun's comment, when he called Juan a "carcass."

Anyway, as I see it, CFIM was just grasping at ways to explain the inexplicable -- how so much piss and vinegar gets spewed at a guy who has been exactly what he was expected to be when he signed his pretty-fucking-reasonable contract. Which brings me to your craziest point.

I don't know how in the wide world of Walt you figure JUAN ENCARNACION could be a 40-40 guy "if he wanted to" -- "EASILY"! This is irrational and baseless and stupid. Do you have any idea how many 40-40 guys there have been in the history of baseball? We're talking, like, 4 or 5 freaking players? What is it that qualifies you to make this judgment, and how in the hell are you making it, anyway? Is it because Juan can hit a home run, and can steal a base, and therefore he must be able to do each of those things 40 times in a season if he just works hard at it? That's crazy. Maybe you think the 40/40 club is for people who can catch 40 fly balls and use 40 different bats in a season.

It sounds to me like your expectations of Juan Encarnacion are insanely unrealistic. I'd hate to know what you expect out of Ankiel next year.

You have no way of knowing if Juan "wastes his GOD given abilities" and settles for averageness or if -- God forbid -- he is actually an average major league baseball player, which is something 99% of the people on this planet aren't. Who is your secret Juan Encarnacion informant?

Juan by his own admition is completly satasfied with being a "average" player. and the fact is, on his best day, Juan is just that. average at best.

If that's not enough, that entire paragraph is just complete and utter BS. Juan, on his best day, is actually an ABOVE average player... because Juan, for his CAREER, by YOUR own admission... is an average player. Do you understand the mathematics at work here?

You don't have to like Juan. You don't even have to have good reasons to not like Juan. Just don't post your crappy speculations about his supposedly casual squandering of talent and expect people to admire you for it.

Another thing: politics has no place here & i'm glad it was shot down quickly. BUT it's important to point out that cardsfaninmass by their own admision leans towards the left, as i'm sure a lot of people who post on here do. and it is a classic left trait to throw the race card into a issue when race has nothing to do with it because they dont have a better arguement to make.

How exactly is that a non-political statement? You high-and-mightily say people should be careful with their words and think about how others will react to them... but you can't even follow your own advice. Besides, cardsfaninmass didn't "throw the race card" in some desperate attempt to win an argument; his was the first freaking comment on the thread. And he was agreeing with lboros, anyway. I think you should do as we were all told to do near the beginning of this thread -- shove the politics.

But back to baseball. When you say you're "one of the loudest guys against Juan," don't you mean "I'm the guy that writes 12 posts calling him 'Mr. Clutch' in every game thread"? Seriously, not to get personal, but I've seen enough "Is LUD a STUD or a DUD" and "Thou shalt not run on YADDA" and "Let's go DUNK" to recognize your posts with my eyes shut. Don't ask me how I do it.

Now, I haven't yet addressed your laundry list of Latin players, as if we were unaware of the fact that Jose Reyes is a fan favorite or that Big Papi is charismatic. But cardsfaninmass didn't say everyone hates Latin players... he said some of the labels people use, consciously or not, are inconsistent -- and perhaps racially motivated. I believe him. If you really think these types of racial topics are taboo -- or that simply broaching them is tantamount to calling someone a racist -- then you should spend some desensitization time on Sheff's Youtube page.

Anyway, I'm burnt out on this post, so good riddance to it. I hope you consider it a fitting reply to your late-night VEB public address.

by baw on Aug 14, 2007 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was CurtFlood
who called Juan a carcass, not Calhoun. Sorry buddy!

by baw on Aug 14, 2007 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and I did not CALL him a carcass
I said something the effect that his carcass should be strapped to a rocket ship and sent to the moon.
We all have a carcass; it's a neutral (common noun) word.

by CurtFlood on Aug 14, 2007 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, you said
"I look at the carcass wearing our uniform and I want him gone," but I guess that is just a common way of referring to a person's body.

brb, i have to go shower my carcass

by baw on Aug 15, 2007 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's ridiculous.
Cardfaninmass made a blanket statement about a political orientation.  Many of us were quick to remind him that's not really a good area of discussion for a baseball blog.  You condemn his blanket statement about a political persuasion, then make one of your own.  Is it okay because you made it against people you disagree with?  Or is it okay just because your arrogance makes you think it's alright?  Which one of those guys do you want to be?  

That is absolute hypocrisy, and I'm far more offended by what you did than what he initially said.  

To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good lord that's a lot of money!
You know what, though?  The Tigers will still have the most terrifying rotation on Earth for the next five years or so.  Yeah, it's a bunch of coin for a guy with no real track record, but I would bet it'll still be worth more than what we got.  
To hell with your spoiled baby! I need those shoes!

by the red baron on Aug 14, 2007 6:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah... risk/reward, etc.
You gotta crack the eggs to make the omelet... But I'd hate to be the guy that made the final call on the deal if he blows his arm out in A ball.
Boooo-urns.

by Alxfritz on Aug 14, 2007 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Juan Encarnacion
is much better than Shea Hillenbrand.
Acquire some runs!

by madding on Aug 14, 2007 6:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think only people that drive el caminos
hate JuanE because of race.  No, but seriously folks, race is certainly not the issue.  

Personally I hated him because the corner OFers needed refilled from 04-05 and who did they get to replace Larry Walker and Reggie Sanders??  Larry Bigbie and JuanE.  Most token STL fans hate JuanE because they don't take him for what he is, a very league average player but they take him as Larry Walker's replacement, which is unacceptable but that's Jocketty's fault, not JuanE.  

by rocKStark5 on Aug 14, 2007 9:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0981_small
Put Some Hot Sauce On My Burrito (It's OT, Yadi2.)
God_small
Albertofstan fact sheet
Gawstab_small
Offensive Ability Rating Rankings for 2009
Royconrad_fullthrottle_small
25 players : 25 seasons, 1910-1934

Recent FanPosts

4849_buschstadium_small
My Hall of Fame Induction Speech
Mightymouse_small
Schumaker Gets New Contract
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
The_i
VEB Day 2010 v2.0
Small
Spring Training Split Squad?
Cardwash_small
Chris Duncan signs minor league contract with Nats, also a great pic of him

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Le-samourai_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb