Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

going going . . . . .gone?

wells' unexpected line of zeroes provided a nice little tonic at the end of a day of bad news . . . . emphasis on "little." i'm not trying to deny him due credit for a good game --- it's nice to see him show everybody that he does have some skill --- but it ain't much consolation on a day when the ETA for chris carpenter's return shifted from late 2007 to 2008 or beyond. even la russa, notoriously tight-lipped about injury matters, let it slip that more surgery might be in the offing --- and if tony's talking about it, it's probably 90 percent certain to happen. will carroll described the situation as "bleak" at Baseball Prospectus yesterday; another injury know-it-all, rick wilton, suggested somewhat more hopefully at Hardball Times that it might just be scar tissue. i'm dubious of the latter, because i've never heard that scar tissue causes the kind of swelling carp is experiencing. tightness, yes; discomfort, yes; major swelling, no. maybe i'm wrong; i hope i am. if that's the case, please correct me in the comments thread.

i can't think of a precedent for this situation in the years i've been following the cardinals --- a career-threatening injury to a transcendent player. well, there was the kile death, but that one goes in a special category. if carpenter's injury should prove to be career-ending or even merely career-diminishing, it would be both a greater, and a lesser, blow than the loss of kile. it would be lesser in the sense that the personal tragedy of kile's death rendered the loss of his talent almost meaningless; a serious injury to carp would be a drag, but it wouldn't be a tragedy. however, if we limit the discussion strictly to talent, the loss of carpenter would be the greater one. carp is the only st louis pitcher aside from bob gibson to win a cy young award; he ranks first on the franchise's all-time leaderboard in won-loss percentage, first in k/bb ratio, second in whip, second in strikeouts per 9 innings, and 6th in era+. he has a postseason record of 5-1, an era of 2.53; that the cardinals beat the mets without a win from him is well-nigh miraculous.

if he can't return from this injury to pitch at that level, it'll probably be a long time before we see another cardinal hurler attain it. . . . . . but maybe it's not hopeless. john smoltz had a rash of shoulder injuries in his late 20s and underwent TJ surgery on his elbow at age 32. he returned to the mound at age 34, and in the seven years since that operation he has gone 39-21 as a starter with a 3.20 era --- and saved 154 games to boot. he's made four all-star teams and twice finished in the top 10 in the cy young voting. in other words, he picked up right where he left off. so even if carpenter has to go under the knife again, the possibility might still exist --- theoretically, anyway --- that he can reclaim his place among the league's elite pitchers.

if it's arthritis --- well, thanks for the memories, big guy.

on to other matters. bernie ripped la russa in his column today. a lot of you won't like what he wrote; indeed, some of you don't like anything bernie writes. he may even be less popular than the targets of his criticism today, la russa and juan encarnacion. but i urge you to give this column some consideration; don't knee-jerk hate it just because you don't like the writer. and don't read it as a blanket condemnation of la russa, because it isn't. the point of the column is not to dismiss tlr's long list of contributions to the franchise, nor to deny his many strengths as a baseball manager. bernie's asking, with justification, to what degree this team's lax play results from the manager's own malaise. tony has been, to put it mildly, a tad moody this year; "distracted" is probably a better term. you can understand why, i suppose --- the dui, the injury to carpenter, the death of hancock, the lousy play of the team. but let's not make excuses for the man; he never tolerates excuses from his own players, after all. it has been a tough season, but la russa has made it tougher on himself by picking fight after fight --- and not only with the media. how many of his own players has he exchanged sharp words with in the press over the past 12 months? a quick list off the top of my head: pujols (the little all-star flap), edmonds, rolen, reyes, wainwright, preston wilson . . . . who'm i leaving out? and those are only the clashes that took place in public. tony always seems to initiate them; he has manifested the air of a man harboring deep frustrations, which bubble to the surface unpredictably and in a fashion that makes no sense to anyone else. they're stupid little spats, the kind of crap that happens in an unworkable marriage (or in the bad moments of a workable one) --- almost always over meaningless bullshit. people often manifest this kind of behavior when they feel they've lost an important battle; they look for proxy fights, ones they can win --- because they're powerless to win the one that really matters.

in my opinion, the fight that really matters to tlr --- the one he has already lost --- is the battle over the future of the organization. he wants to stick with the tried-and-true formula --- sign or trade for established veterans, and work in a few kids around the margins --- but the organization wants to emphasize player development. it's no secret that tony's pissed off about that; it has been reported both locally and nationally. i think he's misplacing his anger, directing it at players and reporters.

if my armchair psychoanalysis is even close to being right, then tony's got to go. of course, if it's right then he probably will go voluntarily --- but if he doesn't, he should be shown the door. the field manager has to be committed to the organizational philosophy; if he's not, no good can result. if he were fired, it wouldn't mean that tony was a bad manager in the past; it would mean he's not the right one going forward.

think of it this way: almost every cardinal fan considered it unthinkable that the team would let edmonds depart after last season; it's now pretty clear that he was the centerfielder of the past, not the future. likewise, the contract extension that locked up carpenter through age 36 was universally applauded hereabouts, based on his past performance. but past performance doesn't guarantee . . . . well, you know the line. tony was the right manager; that doesn't mean he is the right manager anymore.

alrighty, then --- goodbye to the manager and the ace pitcher. is that any way way to start things off the day after a shutout win? let's end this post where it began, on a small happy note: BP's kevin goldstein likes bryan anderson a lot. he rates the cardinal farmhand as the 2d-best catching prospect in baseball:

Anderson had a very good year in 2006, batting .302/.377/.417 in his Midwest League full-season debut, but nobody saw him as the kind of talent that would be ready for a two-level jump to the Texas League. As it turned out, not only was he ready, but he's now ranked second in the circuit's batting race. Defensively, Anderson is neither plus nor deficient in any area, but it's his bat that'll keep getting him promoted. That said, Anderson's primary value as a hitter comes from his batting average. He's an aggressive, contact-oriented hitter who attacks balls early, with a slicing swing that isn't designed much for power or power potential. Anderson is a very good prospect doing very well while being young for the level, but it's easier to see him developing into that rare catcher who fits in the number two spot of a lineup than his developing into a true impact hitter.

0 recs  |  Comment 234 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Precedent...
exists I believe for the Cards firing a manager either the season after a World Series or two seasons after it.  It seems to be Sam Breardon, or is it Beardon, did it in the 20's and 30's.  I want to say that one of them was Miller Huggins.  

I've been reading Lowenfish's biography of Branch Rickey.  It's quite good.  I've been meaning to write a diary about it, but I think you gave me a good idea to look back at Cardinal performance immediately after the other 9 rings.  

by Brock20 on Jul 19, 2007 9:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Great post....
....and thanks for the Carp links. Every day the post-dispatch claims the Carp "announcement" will happen "today" - and then, the rumors swirl, and we're still left wondering.

So, w/ the Smoltz analogy in mind, can we seriously be claiming TJ surgery is a 'best case'?? I guess compared to an 'arthritic' condition?

If someone has the time, I'd love to see a comprehensive diary post objectively detailing the record of the cardinals medical staff. It seems to me that they've had a negative hand in the fall of Rolen, Mulder, and now Carp.

Perhaps, if Tony leaves, they can just leave right with him.....

by cardsfaninmass on Jul 19, 2007 9:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I second that motion -
great post from the best in the biz: A bit of well-considered, to-the-point analysis of the really big picture that overshadows the win-one-lose-one rhythm of the '07 squad. And some tough love for all.

With so much of what was great crumbling around us, it's good to look forward with clear eyes. (and remember October '06)

by Urban Pawnee on Jul 19, 2007 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cards approach to injuries
Don't forget Isringhausen.  It does seem that the Cardinals do a very bad job of handling players with chronic injuries.  To me this seems part of their general tendency to play whom they want to play, facts be damned.  

by apack on Jul 19, 2007 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apack
I really like that view.  That does, in fact, seem to sum up many of the moves this team has made in recent memory.  Using Flores in spite of his awfulness, pushing Reyes to change despite the absence of evidence he needed to do so, the various shoulder injury debacles, everything.

Facts be damned!  

Facts can be used to prove anything that's even remotely true.  Facts, schmacts.  
                                 -Philip J. Frye

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget Edmonds
Last year and this year.

by whopperman on Jul 19, 2007 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i disagree
if my armchair psychoanalysis is even close to being right, then tony's got to go.

I think flatly stating that Tony must leave is oversimplifying the situation.  There have obviously been some differences of opinions on how to address the needs of the team, but in reality it's been injuries and a lack of available free-agent talent and replacement veterans that's plagued the cardinals.  Even if Jocketty had addressed Tony's desires and acquired an expensive free-agent, where would we be?  Jason Schmidt & Carpenter on the DL?  Tony probably realizes this and Jocketty has got to be the voice of reason.  Just because TLR's frustrated doesnt mean he doesn't realize the lack of available options.  Give him time. TLR has shown himself to be innovative and adaptable over the years.

by _pistol_ on Jul 19, 2007 10:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

actually, he's not very adaptable
he's pretty stubborn and set in his ways. do you see him easing his opposition to the player-development movement and becoming an enthusiastic proponent of it? i don't.

i do agree with you, though, that the team was wise to stay out of the free-agent market this year. i am down with the player-development approach. but i don't think tony is, or ever will be.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mumbo? Perhaps. Jumbo? Perhaps not!
I think LaRussa was, at one time in his past, a very innovative manager.  I don't necessarily know that he's ever been all that adaptable, however.  He's never shown an ability to deal with players, owners, media, or anyone else who questions his way of doing things, much less tries to get him to compromise.  And, to my way of thinking, even calling Tony innovative is a stretch at this point.  He simply trots out his same ideas about what has won in the past, (see: C. Duncan, two hole hitter) then digs his heels in ever more deeply whenever someone calls him on something that doesn't make any real sense.

Innovative?  In the past, yes.  Adaptable?  I just don't see it.    

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

his on-field managing methods wont change, but
I'm simply stating that he has to warm up to the idea of developing a few more 'inside' talents than in the past.  the Jocketty's and Luhnows of the world can make the decisions. I don't see TLR as incapable of coming to the conclusion that we need to rely a little more heavily on player development.  
Will there be some kicking and screaming? yup.
Will the personality conflicts get in the way progress? we're already seeing that.  
Ultimately the question is:  Are the differnces in personality & approach incapable of being bridged or already irreparably damaged?  we'll see.  But to render the situation absolutely destined for implosion... premature.  
Maybe i'm just being blindly optimistic.

by _pistol_ on Jul 19, 2007 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but why should the team opt for
kicking / screaming and personality conflicts?

maybe they can make progress in spite of those things, but why would you choose them if you didn't have to? i would expect progress to take place more swiftly, and more surely, under a field manager who's already in synch with the upper management.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Second
the thing is, if you really want to commit to becoming a player deverlopment based organisation, why would you forge ahead with a manager whose stated preference is the exact opposite of that?  I understand he's an all time great, but what you need is something he seems to be very bad at.  Could it work?  I guess it could, but it would be lessening the chances of success significantly, I think, to move ahead into building a young team with LaRussa at the helm.  
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LaRussa and young talent = bad idea?
First of all I would like to say this is a wonderful site for us Cardinal fans that crave more information. Thank you.
Another thing to consider as we discuss TLR staying/going and the transition to a player development organization - read Three Nights in August. Partcularily the section where Pujols (the young talent) has injured his elbow and the physicians have told LaRussa he should not throw. LaRussa feverishly works to keep Pujols in the game despite the risk. Being competitive is one thing, but, risking someone's health to win is a bit much. Yes, Pujols said he wanted to play, but, he was young and thought on some level that he bulletproof.

by cards n catfish on Jul 20, 2007 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Manager
Is there anyone else out there who wants the Cardinals to sign Joe Girardi as manager?
I would be thrilled to have him as our manager.

by Calhoun on Jul 19, 2007 10:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Girardi???
Not sold, even with a quality debut in managing. If we're going for a rookie (sorry, the year Joe has under his belt doesn't eliminate his rookie status in my book), I'd rather promote Oquendo.

by jomfa on Jul 19, 2007 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't see why in the world people think
Girardi is a fit.  

I like him, but what he seems good at is firing up or smacking around young kids.   Do you see Pujols, Edmonds, or Rolen enjoying that?

Again, I like him.  But I don't see him as a fit here for the same reason I don't see him as a fit for the Chicago vacancy last winter.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No no no....
Please... no Girardi or Baker....EVER! I dont think TLRs gonna be leaving anyway....not this year.
"I don't need a damn number to tell me the guy's no good right now!" Old Casey.... Pitching, base running and defense!

by cardschinmusic on Jul 19, 2007 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure where the love fest
w/ Girardi began, or w/ Oquendo, for that matter.  I think the Cards would be making a serious mistake by simply anointing someone LaRussa's successor w/o a full vetting process.  If LaRussa leaves, and I believe he probably will, management needs to explore all the available people, whether they played for the Cardinals or not.  

The media's been in love w/ Girardi forever, and he may be a great manager.  But it's too early to anoint him the answer, and the same goes for Oquendo.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oquendo
I'm going to assume your remarks were at least somewhat in reference to my remarks made above (if I'm incorrect, please disregard). Take another look, I wrote that IF we were going to consider a "rookie" manager, I'd prefer Oquendo to Girardi. That's not a statement which anoints him as successor without consideration of a process for finding the best manager for the team. Simply, if the process and powers that be are interested in giving some rookie manager a shot and it comes down to Girardi versus Oquendo, I'd rather give Oquendo a shot. I realize all of this is highly qualified, but then again, this little portion of the comment thread was merely about the two and wasn't intended for the universal discussion about our teams next manager. That's my angle anyway.

by jomfa on Jul 19, 2007 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My remarks weren't meant
toward you directly.  I've read a lot of people who say "Anoint Oquendo!"  I'm saying that that's premature.  He may end up being the right choice, but we should explore all possibilities, not just choose Oquendo b/c he's an ex-Card and has been here for a while.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lboros
thank god you're not a doctor..so much for bedside manner. thanks for saying it straight,covering the farm system this season the one great fear in my mind with about every player is will they mesh with tlr and unless they are a future star like rasmus should be, i have to say no... tlr prefers yadi, so anderson must go... ottavino is having issues pitching to contact, so he could end up languishing in AAA for forever... it goes on. thanks for the memories tony...now please just go away

by erik on Jul 19, 2007 10:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lb as a doctor
You know, he would definitely be the kind that would drive down health insurance costs, though.  No patient with any kind of illness would accept treatment after that kind of a layout.  

Patient:  You say I have the flu, doctor?  

Dr. Larry:  Yep, I'm sorry.  

P:  Well, just make it quick, then.  

DL:  What?  What do you mean?  

P:  Just don't make me suffer.  Get it over with.  

DL:  But, you just have the flu.  Go home, get some rest, drink plenty of fluids, you'll be fine.  

P:  No, I understand what you said.  It's over.  Just do it.  Tell my wife I love her.  

DL:  Alright, then...  

(sounds of cranial saw being used in wildly inappropriate ways)  

and... Scene.  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the key to good bedside manner
is to be honest with the patient.

people with much greater expertise than me are reporting that this sounds like a worst-case scenario --- not a mere case of the flu, figuratively speaking. he has had his arm examined by three doctors this week. that should tell us all that the problem, whatever it is, probably doesn't have a simple fix.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want honesty
I want you to tell me everything will be just fine.  I want you to say that the Cardinals will find someone to fully replace one of the three best pitchers in baseball over the last few years in their farm system by Sunday.  Then I want you to take me out for ice cream.  Ice cream, dammit!  
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And yes,
I realize that the intelligence and clear thinking of the esteemed moderator of this site, as well as of the community in general, is why I come here.  And I also realize that my above scenario, in print, is only half as humorous as it was in my head.  And I further realize that it probably sounded as if I were accusing Lboros of blowing a small problem out of proportion, which was actually the complete opposite of my intention.  (I should have gone with cancer, my first choice.  Wasn't sure if it would have been funny at all.  Oh well, too late now...)  

Ice cream, dammit!  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, my main reaction
was to the "flu" characterization --- because it suggests that all parties (not just me in particular) are overreacting to a minor problem. it's possible the problem will turn out to be manageable (and let's hope so), but it seems appropriate to brace ourselves for bad news.

re my bedside manner ---- i admit, it's probably a bit on the abrupt side. just my nature, i guess --- hope-for-best / prepare-for-worst.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyway
I was just effing with you.  My own thoughts about the team are usually even darker, often featuring fantasies of becoming some sort of super hero/villain to avenge payroll constraints and/or players from the Cardinal fanbase area who express a desire to play for the franchise then resign with a team based in a city which shall remain nameless.  
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dr. House
would be so proud of you LB....
"It's always about money; anyone who says it's not is lying."- Gene Simmons

by cardsrul on Jul 19, 2007 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your comparison,
John Smoltz, also went to Dr. Andrews to have his shoulder examined.

I believe he just struck out 12 batters in his first start back.

I am an optimist by nature, but I do not believe that the sky is falling on Carp just yet.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Injury Comp
could we use Matt Morris as a comp? He had Tommy John (I know, he was much younger than Carp is now) and then had some shoulder work done a few years later and has been pretty mediocre ever since.

by bdief on Jul 19, 2007 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Morris vs. Carp
The interesting thing about that comparison is that the injuries occured in the opposite order.  Morris had the TJ earlier, came through it quite well, then saw his shoulder deteriorate and with it, his stuff.  

Carpenter has already had the shoulder surgery, which is the one that usually has a higher occurence of reduced effectiveness afterward, and has been great since.  Now the elbow appears to be a problem.  Tommy John has a very high success rate of maintaining a pitcher's stuff afterward, so I would hope, if that's the case, that Carpenter might actually have a little better chance than Morris of remaining at least fairly near his performance levels.  

Of course, if it's some sort of arthritic degeneration, I have no idea what that would mean...

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI
I have it from an inside source that Carp is definitely destined for TJ surgery.

by _pistol_ on Jul 19, 2007 10:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

His source saw
Carp's doctor at the airport...
"It's always about money; anyone who says it's not is lying."- Gene Simmons

by cardsrul on Jul 19, 2007 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

who else?
Great post.  Agree that TLR is not the right manager for the new direction the club wants to go.  As TLR will never change, he needs to go.  

>>a quick list off the top of my head: pujols (the little all-star flap), edmonds, rolen, reyes, wainwright, preston wilson . . . . who'm i leaving out?<<

TLR's gratuitous shot at Eli Marrero.

by jjray on Jul 19, 2007 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Tony & his final year in Oakland
I would be curious to hear some detailed accounts of LaRussa's final year with the Athletics. The situation was a little different (if memory serves, their owners were more interested in pinching pennies), but I think it would be instructive to get an idea of Tony's demeanor back in 1995.

May drop a line on our blog brothers in green & yellow to get their take.

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 19, 2007 10:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Drat
Guess you have to wait 24 hours after setting up a new account. Anyone else already signed up over there who could ask the question today?
Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 19, 2007 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sigh...
You know, I try very hard to keep this whole baseball fandom thing in perspective.  Days like this, however, sorely test my capabilities in that arena.  

The Cardinals desperately need to figure out something different for a staff physician, I think.  The record of this group, led by Paletta, seems to be coming down firmly on the wrong side of the Hippocratic Oath.  I have very little idea if it has to do with the medical side, or if the organisation and management are the chief causes of many of the problems, (rushing players, pushing for non surgical treatments against doctor recommendations, etc.) but the asset management practices involved in the treatment of player injuries would get me, and I'm sure many others here, shown the door immediately at my job.  (And for the record, nothing in my work world is worth $80 million.)  

I'm even having a hard time getting excited about the Bryan Anderson stuff.  While this is the sort of player who normally sends me into absolute paroxysms of joy, I have the sneaking suspicion that the type of catcher this org likes is the same type they already have, and Anderson will quite likely get his shot somewhere else in a year or too.  Hope I'm wrong, though.  

Also, I hate Kip Wells.  I think I'm developing some variant of Stockholm Syndrome from watching him pitch.  

I agree with you on Tony big time, Larry.  I've felt the same way for quite a while now.  The time has come to move on.  

I'm sorry, Kip.  You seem like an awfully talented guy, and you sure are handsome.  Your fastball was beautiful last night.  Please don't ever leave us.  

See?  This sucks.  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 10:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Carp/Tommy John
I am skeptical that this "Tommy John" talk is legitimate at this point.  Cusamano tries to "break" these stories but he never really fully comes out and puts his journalistic integrity on the line, as he throws this stuff out on his talk radio show only.

In my opinion, with how much (or how little) we know about Carp's rehab after surgery, there is no reason to think that there was/is a ligament issue.  I find it hard to fathom that the UCL ligament wasn't seen in plain view by Paletta when he scoped out Carp's joint a few months back.  

Furthermore, if Paletta did see ligamentous issues (stretching/fraying, etc), there is absolutely no reason why the training staff would have proceeded full steam ahead with the aggressive throwing protocol that they put Carp on.

Could Carp have torn the UCL ligament when throwing off the mound during his rehab starts?  Maybe.  Is it likely?  I think not.  

That's all I got.  I really have no clue as to what his setback may be caused by.  I am skeptical about the Tommy John talk.  Take my opinion or leave it.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

what about scar tissue?
could that explain what we're seeing?

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe
it's quite a vague opinion to say that "scar tissue" is the problem.  So, um...sure.  

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was wondering this as well
perhaps the scar tissue hasn't broken up yet from his surgery.

Perhaps the MRI isn't showing any damage inside the elbow and whenever they test the ligament, it shows no trouble, yet the swelling still pops up.  Maybe it is the fact that they can't FIND what is wrong is the reason he is seeing all the doctors.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A legit possibility
is that you're right.

It is scary, though.  If you remember F. Liriano, they never saw a ligament tear, and he ended up having TJS anyways.  The difference there, though, is that Carp never was diagnosed with medial elbow pain or with a "forearm flexor strain."  

I still contend that Paletta had to have looked at the UCL personally while he scoped out the elbow.  That's standard procedure.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could Paletta believe it is scar tissue
and is sending Carpenter around for 2nd opinions?

What is the SOP for scar tissue?  Another surgery (wouldn't that create more scar tissue)?  

Perhaps they are visiting the best doctors to go over an approach on how to remove/breakup the tissue in the least 'downtime' possible.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We're all speculating here
but from the reports I read on Carp's 2 rehab starts in Palm Beach it sounded like his velocity was fine. That would seem to discount the need for TJ surgery. It was very suspicious to me at the time that his pitch count was so low. Do we have any eyewitness accounts of those starts?  It would seem they might give us the best clues at to what is wrong.  

by lefty fan on Jul 19, 2007 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are all speculating, but one thing that sort
of leaves me scratching my head is why when our ace goes down with an elbow problem, they don't start with Dr. Andrews--he is the doc of choice to fix what ails pitching arms.  I mean wasn't Chris worth the best from the beginning?  Or was that his choice?  Does anyone have any insight into this? Is Dr. Paletta considered an expert in sports injuries....the rash of injuries and problems with diagnosis seems to be a real problem, and I'm not saying Dr. Paletta is not a fine doctor, I don't know him.  But does he specialize in sports injuries?

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dr. Paletta
and Dr. Lehman are probably the top 2 sports medicine physicians in the region.

Paletta is a well-respected orthopod.  Teams have their own doctors.  James Andrews has made a living in Birmingham.  He doesn't have an affiliation with a team.  He's used (often) for second opinions as well as for major surgeries.  

Believe it or not, it does come down to the patient's choice in some cases.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post, BTW LB
I agree almost completely with Bernie and with you about TLR.  It's time to play for 2008 and beyond.

Bernie has been a JuanE backer for 2 years now.  This, from what I remember, is the first time that he's bashed him.  Juan is a good athlete and an above average player.  All the numbers confirm this.  My frustration with him is that he could probably be significantly better if he didn't rely on his God-given talent and worked harder.  

What a mess this season has turned out to be - on the field and off.  

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Man, Bernie kills my view yesterday
on why I excuse Pujols occasional lack of hustle (production) vs. why I don't excuse Enc.

"We're all too willing to push aside fair-minded values, forgive and forget, and gloss over things as long as an athlete performs well in the next game. Get a couple of hits; get a free pass."

I must be just another fan full of double standards.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Spoooooooky -
after reading Bernie's column on TLR, one can easily substitute Dusty Baker's name for LaRussa, and then Moises Alou and Aramis Ramirez' names for Juan Encarnacion and Albert Pujols - and the whole thing would be spot on. Dusty's final year (or two) was chock full of these embarrassing, brain-dead displays of base running gaffs and baseball fundamentals deficiencies, which he in turn continually soft pedaled to the media and fans to defend his rep as a "player's manager", or some such horse shit. Meanwhile, stirring up that tiresome "us vs. them" mentality within the clubhouse that made rooting for Dusty's Cubs (and watching them) such a disagreeable prospect.

Man, Lou runs a different ship.

Signed,
Obervant-Card-Fan-Stuck-In-Cub-Market

by Urban Pawnee on Jul 19, 2007 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now, make no mistake
Dusty is just a bad manager.   Without a good team and big leaders in the clubhouse you see how little he really knew about what's going on.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sir, you are correct ...
I'm just struck by the analogous situation, and how it usually is an indicator of a manager who is on the way out.

Having lived through the day-to-day minutae of Dusty's demise, I'm experiencing deja vu.

by Urban Pawnee on Jul 19, 2007 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

When Juan doubled in the first last night
Pujols was on 2nd, having previously doubled.  Juan made it to 2nd before Pujols scored -- he wasn't exactly going to tear a hamstring scoring.  Maybe it's not a big deal b/c there was no chance that they throw home in that situation but Juan just beat the throw to 2nd.  If they had, for some strange reason, thrown home, they might have gotten Pujols.

And Pujols did the same thing last night that Juan did the previous night by not sliding into home on that dp that was lined off of Willis.  If he slides, he's safe.

That said, neither Pujols nor anyone in MLB would have been safe on the liner to Ramirez the previous night.  Everyone would have stopped running as soon as they saw it go into his glove.  Then he had to restart.  He had no chance!

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no way
Pujols was out by 5-6 steps on that throw home.  Now whether that was from waiting too long to run or not running hard or just poor judgment, I don't know, but he was caught dead, and he knew it, and just pulled an A-Rod-All-star "excuse me" play.

I was terrified he'd try to run the catcher over and get hurt... I was actually thankful that he didn't slide.

Now, yesterday when he didn't run to first on the line drive that got dropped, THAT made me mad.  

Panic!!!

by SleepyCA on Jul 19, 2007 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, no
he was tagged on the back leg crossing home plate -- he was just out, barely.  On the liner, he had no chance.  

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

medical mysteries......
So Carpenters "possible" arthritis just crops up out of nowhere and there were no signs of it in the past? Is that possible? If so, while Im certainly no orthopod, thats news to me. Isnt there normally a more progressive nature to arthritis? It has to be something else?

The Cards medical staff seems to follow a step by step procedure that prolongs the eventual bottom line diagnosis and the medical procedure needed to deal with it....and therefore recovery. Is that the way of the sports world now?

Prior and Wood  should be pitching, if the Cubs surgeons and medical staff have as much control over the health of those arms as we think the cards medical staff should have with carp, Mulder, Edmunds, Rolen etc etc.

Or maybe, its the agents that control this process more so than we'll ever know...steps to protect high paid clients and prevent a rush to judgement that might further jeopardize their health. Millions at stake?

"I don't need a damn number to tell me the guy's no good right now!" Old Casey.... Pitching, base running and defense!

by cardschinmusic on Jul 19, 2007 10:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Arthritis
was diagnosed with the bone spurs.  It wasn't considered severe.  Remember, Carp has had this procedure performed when he pitched for the Jays.  This stuff doesn't just pop up out of nowhere.  There are long term effects, such as arthritis, from  pitching.  What do you think bone spurs are?  Look up the definition of osteoarthritis, and you'll get a clearer idea of what's going on.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok.....
Maybe what Im saying is it would be better to hear this from the Cards front office or medical staff that are paid to care for the atheletes than to go reading medical dictionaries, which I aint gonna do. Sorry I mislead you..there, the sarcasm was missed....
"I don't need a damn number to tell me the guy's no good right now!" Old Casey.... Pitching, base running and defense!

by cardschinmusic on Jul 19, 2007 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...
Jocketty and LaRussa's past success is no guarantee of future returns... It's important to remember that this team has basically been sliding for a year and a half. There was a World Series win in there to confuse things, but it's been a pretty constant, downward sloping curve.

LaRussa's a win-now guy. He's a terrible choice to lead a long-term rebuilding project.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 10:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i like the change
in your sig line . . . . funny.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The idea of "firing"...
a WS winning manager and a sainted GM was ridiculed mercilessly... A more respectful approach seems easier for people to swallow.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe
you should suggest sending them to a "farm", like people do with their children's dogs.  

"There's lots of bench players, so Tony can double switch all day long... Everybody there is gritty and scrappy... Walt can make deals with all the other GMs all day long.  Every day they put on the winter meetings at noon.n  I wish you could see it, son, but they don't allow visitors.  It's really the best thing for them."  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wait ... what?
scruffy ....

by sjoshi on Jul 19, 2007 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will Carroll
LB - what did he have to say about Carp?

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 10:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

quoting his post yesterday
at Baseball Prospectus:

Carpenter saw Dr. George Paletta on Monday, and all signs seem to be negative. There are rumors that Paletta wasn't the first doctor Carpenter saw----as of deadline, that could not be confirmed. [ed note: it later was confirmed.] From the sound of every source I could reach, things sound bleak. Again, there are little or no hard facts that I could lay my hands on. On the heels of this winter's extension, any significant problem, whether ligamentous or arthritic, would be along the lines of the worst-case scenario.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In today's BP Rundown...
Will Carrol said Carpenter has also visited Dr. David Altcheck (sp?) and Dr. Jim Andrews, noting "when you visit those two guys, something serious is going on."  I don't know those names, but perhaps someone who does could speculate.

Carrol promised more details in an Under The Knife piece today or tomorrow, adding "this is more than a setback, this is a problem that's going to go on.  Now we're dealing with more than just bone spurs, more than just a simple arthritic condition."

by bgodar on Jul 19, 2007 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Altcheck
I believe, is the Cincinnati based doctor who performed Rolen's shoulder surgery.  I think Andrews may actually be the guy who did Mulder.  (based in New York?)  Both are big time heavyweights in the sports medicine/ortho surgeon world.  
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kremcheck is the Cincinnati guy
who did the surgery.  Andews is a big ligament guy, isn't he?

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kremcheck
Crap, you're right.  I don't know who the hell Altcheck is, then.  I think Andrews is the top guy for ligament stuff, thought.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Andrews
is from Birmingham.

by whopperman on Jul 19, 2007 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kremchek
is a Cincinatti orthopod.  He worked on Rolen's shoulder.

 Altcheck (sp?) I believe, is the Mets team doc.  He worked on Mulder's shoulder.

Dr. James Andrews is only the top name for all sports medicine injuries.  He gets all of the big names' second opinions.  He is out of Birmingham.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

carroll also says in the rundown today
that it's not just a season-threatening injury; it's a career-threatening one.

link: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/radio/

click the "download the july 19 rundown" --- he addresses carpenter right off the bat, in the first 30 seconds of the show

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This has to be osteoarthritis
that has progressed quickly.

I still doubt the Tommy John stuff.

by silent_bob on Jul 19, 2007 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

When did
Tyler Johnson get a surgery named after him? And does it involve a strip club?
Boooo-urns.

by Alxfritz on Jul 19, 2007 11:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

TJ surgery
It's a relatively new procedure that's only come into it's own as of right around last October.  

It's a fairly radical situation, usually used only to correct severe situations relating to excessive nut busting on various object.  (Babies, etc.)  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

note
this comment was perfect
Boooo-urns.

by Alxfritz on Jul 19, 2007 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah,
but I forgot the 's' at the ends of 'nuts'.  Also, my double use of situation is a little clumsy.  

I sacrificed top quality for rapidity.  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crap
I meant the 's' at the end of objects.  Jesus, I just screwed up my own correction.  How very meta.  
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i just have to say this
do u guys realize how easily you could kill a guy by making him shoot a nice cold refreshment out of his nose? great stuff
Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Jul 19, 2007 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TLR has always seemed to me
like a guy who appreciates and thrives on a challenge.  You'd think ownership would pitch the player-development idea to him as a new kind of challenge ... why not try to do something different for a couple of years, and impart your 4 decades of baseball wisdom to some kids who haven't been shaving very long? But if the situation is as Lboros has described, it's time for a change.

As for the ugliness that is 2007, I've seen damn few great teams whose decline was NOT ugly.  I'm going to try to look at the rest of this year, and probably next year, more clinically and less emotionally.

But it will be exciting to watch the NEXT great Cardinal team be built.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 19, 2007 11:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You know,
that's an interesting way of looking at it, Md.  The only problem with that, as I see it, is that LaRussa seems to have a special sort of antipathy toward the building phase of a team.  He has stated, on more than one occasion in the past, that he is, "not in the business of developing players.  I'm in the business of winning ballgames."  

I really just don't think the guy has the mindset to help in developmental stage of players.  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a different world today...
It's hard to imagine a manager in today's game having the shelf life of a guy like Walter Alston.  12 years is a pretty good run.  What is happening now should not detract from what has been the greatest run of success for this franchise since the  40's.  TLR has been a major part of that,obviously, but no organization stays static for over a decade, and it should be natural and expected that priorities change as the years go on.  That said, I have been feeling exactly what Larry has described, that being TLR's distraction, of late.  I was in Oakland in 1995, and what I vaguely recall is that the A's were in transition on a number of fronts, and TLR did not have the stomach for a rebuild...the A's that we remember from the post-McGwire,early 2000's(Jason Giambi, Tejada, Chavez, the big 3)were still a few years away...this doesn't feel like exactly the same thing to me, but it's not totally dissimilar, either...I think I said a few days ago, that we seem to be approaching the "parting by mutual agreement" zone...I don't think that is a bad thing for TLR or the organization.

by tbell61 on Jul 19, 2007 11:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Going Out On Top
Good post lb.  I've been dying for real news on carp, and caught bernie's post before yours.  your take is spot on.

At the end of October I wondered why tlr wouldn't stop with the WS.  But it became clear that going out on top means riding the glow of champion through opening day and the asg.  But for tlr, and his years to gain acceptance in stl, it is also clear that he really wants the all time club record for w's that is presntly held by Red Schoendienst.  He needs another 22 wins to surpass, and I don't think anybody will keep that from happening, even if it takes to the end of september.

I happen to like many of the things tlr does as a field manager, in particular plays like the suicide squeeze, and use of the bench players via the double switch.  He's had a good run, like the MV3 and Carp.  Time to plan on turning the page, bringing on new talent, and new leadership.  

Fan for Life. Go Cards.

by Birds on the Bat on Jul 19, 2007 11:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Paletta
Is it me, or have we consistently misjudged and misdiagnosed injuries?  It seems to me that we have screwed up frequently - Mulder, Rolen, now Carp.

I think that if Rolen requires more surgery, Paletta should be fired.

Thoughts?

Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Jul 19, 2007 11:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is an ongoing theme...
here... the Cardinals' doctors are lousy. What happened with those guys that indicates the doctors did something wrong?

I'm surprised at the willingness of people to criticize medical situations for which there is very little information provided. Not saying Paletta is great, but on what basis can we judge his performance?

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blaming the Docs
I actually have to agree with you here a little, guayzimi.  I don't think the medical staff for the Cards has any kind of track record to be proud of, but to be fair, a lot of the problems we've seen have seemed to have more to do with what the organisation wants to see happen than with the actual surgeries, etc.  

Whenever a player is put on the DL and told to rest his bloody stump, I think that may be the Cardinals, and not the doctors, who are making that call.  I'm not sure, though.  

I don't need no instructions to know how to rock.

by the red baron on Jul 19, 2007 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point, but
let me clarify mine.

It just seems as though, with every major injury, there are three stages with the Cardinals:

  1.  The injury and the first diagnosis.
  2.  The attempted comeback/rehab - even playing.
  3.  The reinjury/admittance that it didn't work leading to a second diagnosis and another solution.
If that is the organization, then so be it.  I've always said that the Cardinals are a business, first and foremost - and the fans are the investors.  
If I make  a multi-million dollar investment in an asset for my business, and that asset develops a problem - then I owe it to my investors to correct the problem.  Part of that problem, to me, is that when it comes to injuries, they don't make sure that they have the right opinion on how to fix it the first time.

I support the Cardinals with my time and money - I invest in them.  How are they repaying my investment by not correctly diagnosing issues with their assets the first time?  This is in direct correlation to the only thing the Cardinals owe their fans - trying to put the best product on the field that the business can put together.

Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Jul 19, 2007 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep!
Agree...I said this (below) about 25 posts earlier and got a lecture on arthritis when I was trying to bring the players agents into this mess.  They have to have influence in the decesions made re: players health issues. I also said it had to be more than arthritis ....that was before the TJ surgury was announced, because of previous SOP with Izzy, Mulder, Rolen, etc...

"The Cards medical staff seems to follow a step by step procedure that prolongs the eventual "bottom line diagnosis and the medical procedure needed to deal with it....and therefore recovery. Is that the way of the sports world now? "

Prior and Wood  should be pitching, if the Cubs surgeons and medical staff have as much control over the health of those arms as we think the Cards medical staff should have with Carp, Mulder, Edmunds, Rolen etc etc."

"Or maybe, its the agents that control this process more so than we'll ever know...steps to protect high paid clients and prevent a rush to judgement that might further jeopardize their health. Millions at stake? "

Its the days and tmes were living in ...

"I don't need a damn number to tell me the guy's no good right now!" Old Casey.... Pitching, base running and defense!

by cardschinmusic on Jul 20, 2007 4:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DeWitt
Yesterday on Bernie's show, he addressed the LaRussa and Jocketty situations.

He said that as far as Jocketty, he has no idea where the rumors of him leaving are coming from.  He is not being forced out.  Lunhow was given duties that weren't Walt's.  DeWitt wanted somone to handle player development on the draft, international and all minor league levels.  He says 'one man can't do both'.  

As far as going to Cincy, Walt is under contract and he wouldn't believe that his close friends in Cincy would tamper with Walt while he is still with the Cardinals.  There is no friction between DeWitt and Jocketty and there is room to make the team better for this year while doing so for next year.  He will increase payroll for the right types of players.

When it comes to LaRussa, he says this year isn't Tony's fault and he won't be fired over it.  If Tony wants to come back next year, just like every year, the job is his.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 11:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I listened to the Dewitt interview
as well and didn't exactly come away with a warm, fuzzy feeling. I came away thinking that DeWitt will rely on Tony to decide when the team is done for 2007. That means we won't get much of a look at guys like Ryan, Ankiel, Reyes (ha!), Hoffpauir, etc.  DeWitt defended Tony's track record of using young players by citing Ankiel the pitcher, Molina, and Pujols. You don't have to be a HOF manager to give those guys a chance.  We need the post-season 2006 Tony to show up and start trusting the kids!

by lefty fan on Jul 19, 2007 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think last night cemented his trust in Ryan
After the sunglass incident, I think Ryan was probably in the doghouse.  After his tremendous play at 3B last night, which Tony was gushing over, I think Ryan has earned playing time with Tony.

This past week, he has played Skip and Ryan a good number of innings.  He has gone to Cavazos and Cate, too.  He's got Wainwright as his Ace.

As far as the guys down at Memphis, I don't think he'll ever 'dump' players from the big league roster to bring them up.  If someone gets injured or they change places with another MILB player, then we have to worry about him playing them.  However, a guy like Ankiel is going to have trouble cracking an outfield with Juan, Chris, Jim and Ludwick.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For the unrelenting optimists
Since June 20th, when he worked on some things in the bullpen and then wound up getting the win in 2 scoreless innings, here's Kip's stats:

  IP R ER HR BB SO  ERA
25.0 8  6  0  8 19 2.19

by john vb on Jul 19, 2007 11:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Turning the corner...with one (horrific) setback?
I don't know what to make of Kip.  They say "consistency" is one of the hallmarks of a Major Leaguer...maybe he's got the talent, but simply can't harness it consistently.  Maybe that bullpen session was truly a turning point...but he regressed or something in that awful Philly start?

Your little data slice sure does look tempting.  That 25.0 IP span covers 7 appearances, 4 in relief and 3 starts.  The only appearance in which he DIDN'T give up a mere 0 or 1 ER was the 1.0 IP Philly debacle.

Here are his splits for the period:

IP  H 2B 3B HR BB SO IBB HBP GDP   BAA   OBA   SLG
25 22  6  2  0  8 19   2   2   2  .234  .308  .340

That looks pretty good.  Conveniently remove the one "anomolous" (and disastrous) Philly inning, and his numbers are stellar.  But even without looking sideways at the time period, it's fairly compelling.

Does anyone NOT think he deserves another couple of starts to see if this is a real adjustment rather than just a mirage?

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Jul 19, 2007 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll be honest
I have FREAKING ZERO IDEA what to think about Wells right now.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same here
I mean the dude is just perplexing.  Just when I think he isn't worth a spot on a Major League roster (especially ours), the dude throws a freakin' GEM, or strings several fine appearances together.  Then he gets absolutely hammered and can't make it into the 2nd or 3rd inning.

Remind anyone of a certain pitching prospect currently toiling down in Memphis, by any chance?

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Jul 19, 2007 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually,
that description reminds me a lot more of a certain guy pitching for Chicago now.

by Valatan on Jul 19, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Jul 19, 2007 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's like
a scary Frankenstein hybrid of the two.
Boooo-urns.

by Alxfritz on Jul 20, 2007 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm.
So...since Marquis was dubbed "Bi-Polar Betty", perhaps we should nickname the Kipster "Bolt-Necked Betty"?
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Jul 20, 2007 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Carp
Just out of curiosity, if this would be a career-ending injury, what would the Cardinals be on the hook for, payroll-wise? What happens at that point? I'm sure they have insurance, but would it cover the entire extension? Does the extension become null and void?

Obviously, no one wants to see this happen, but I was curious as to what the organization's responsibility is.

"Slide DiMaggio, slide!" "Hey, my name isn't DiMaggio, my name is mm..mmmm...mmm....mud."

by cmat on Jul 19, 2007 11:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If he is not 'usable' by the team
the insurance will pick up the contract, I believe.

Meaning we'd have 'ACE' money to use on somebody.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we can really know
Strauss said yesterday in his chat that his understanding was that the Cards were able to get insurance for 70-80 percent of the contract.

My understanding is that these insurance contracts are pretty individualized.  It is very hard in the abstract to know whether or not insurance will pick up the tab.  For instance there may be certain conditions, such as prior injuries, that insurance would not pick up the tab for.  Also they may have only been able to pick up insurance for the first few years.  I just don't think we can know. A lot will depend on what the exact injury is as well as what coverage was actually secured.

Best case scenario is that they will have "Ace" money available, but I'm not certain that is the case.

by OCCardsFan on Jul 19, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My biggest fear
-in regards to "then tony's got to go", I wholeheartedly agree. I will say, that in the right situation he is the perfect manager, but his preferences or style are not sustainable long term. You can only trade away the kids for so long. It seems like you need to have a starter come out of your farm system every two years to stay afloat without too many lean years (the Braves seem to be doing this perfectly).

-about the Card's doctors being lousy. I agree with you just can't tell what is going on. Just reading the Goold article today, you wonder who is intervening. Is there a culture (set by TLR) about hiding or playing through injuries. In that article he seems very opinionated about what treatments should be done. You just hope that his knowledge or his perception of his knowledge doesn't push players into making wrong decisions (eg. playing when they shouldn't, not resting enough, incomplete treatment, not coming forward early enough with injuries).

-Last, lets say Tony, Walt and Dunc all leave this season. Where do you go from there? Chance are that Lundhow gets the job. We can expect him to have a preference towards younger players based upon his current position. You probably do not want someone who has never managed in the minors. That persononality (Dusty, Girardi, etc.) seems to have a hard time integrating younger players, which would have to be part of the next regime. So once again, whom? Maloney and Miller? Jose?

This is what scares me, getting the wrong guy to manage the next phase of the franchise.

by bdief on Jul 19, 2007 12:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Girardi didn't have a problem with young players
he had problems with his nutjob owner.
Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worse than imagined
Check out Studeman's post today at Hardball times and scroll down for the graphic.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/ten-things-i-didnt-know-last-week40/

someday we'll all be adept at the link abreviation thing.

Fan for Life. Go Cards.

by Birds on the Bat on Jul 19, 2007 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The graphic at the bottom of the article
that shows number of at bats with runners in scoring position for NL teams.

As you can see, the Cards are at -7,312.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your post undermines Bernie's main point
Although it sounds like you and he are in full agreement, in reality you did a good job of gutting one of his key arguments.

He's raking TLR over the coals because TLR doesn't publicly criticize his players and needs to rebuke them more sharply in the press; Bernie thinks TLR is cowardly for providing cover for his players and taking the easy road of talking with them privately.  You are saying that Tony has lost it, evidenced by the way he has been picking fights and publicly criticizing his players.  You guys are actually saying opposite things.

Bernie is also mostly concerned with media relations and he's been harping on this all year.  You're right, many readers are beginning to hear Bernie's ongoing complaints as defensive and self absorbed (self aggrandizing?) and wish he would get back to baseball.  This doesn't seeem to be your main concern, except that it points to TLR's "moodiness".

So I guess your main reason for recommending Bernie's article is to show us that TLR has a temper and that you and Bernie both think he should go.  

TLR's temper has been around forever.  No news there.  And your wanting him to go has also been voiced frequently, and with growing frustration, since the Reyes dust-up.  No news there either.  As to rifts in the organziation, that's based on rumor and conjecture.  Strauss and Gordo both believe it's up to Tony whether he stays or goes--given what he's done for St. Louis, the choice is his.

Is this deserving of a full day's discussion as the central post or would it have been more appropriately placed in a side-bar diary?  It's an interesting discussion.  But can it be sustained all day?  

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 12:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wake up on the wrong side of the bed?
I honestly would rather talk about this than dwell on one good start from Wells or the possiblity of losing Carp for longer than anyone previously thought.

Not really sure what your problem is with today's post, but I found it perfect for the current situation. I'm as down as any fan about this year's team, but I prefer to keep my negative views to myself.

When I open my eyes this whole season will be a dream...

by gforce on Jul 19, 2007 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since you didn't check the number of
comments before you posted, I'll do it for you.

94.

I'll be damned.  94.  That's a pretty good day for most sports blogs.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bernie
I have long been a defender of Bernie and his opinions.  Most of the people I talk to on a daily basis despise him, but I haven't really seen that until this latest article and recent posts by him on his board.  I would like to see his oversized ego and body out there for 162 games and see what his legs feel like about half way through a season.  Say what you want about Pujols or Enc. not hustling, but at least they are in the lineup everyday trying to give this team a chance.

by boredatwork on Jul 19, 2007 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he missed the point...
I think he took the Enc baserunning gaffe as an opportunity to call out Tony, while in reality Tony's defense of Enc and subsequent decision NOT to bench him, has probably been for the better (see: Wednesday's game...).
More indefensible (and more in-line with the VEB post) is TLR's seemingly random disposition towards his players... Edmonds, Reyes, Wells, Rolen, etc. It was sad to read the Bernie article purely because there are so many legitimate reasons to be angry with TLR, and he hit on none of them....

by duncansarmy on Jul 19, 2007 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nycardfan, there are nearly 100 comments
to the post, and it's only noon central time. seems like a lot of people want to talk about this.

you say "[my] wanting [tony] to go has also been voiced frequently, and with growing frustration, since the Reyes dust-up." show me one instance where i voiced the opinion that tony needs to go, before today.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nycarfan is right though
bernie and lboros are sayign different things with respect to tony picking fights with / coddling his players.  or thats what it seems to me.  

by PGeorge on Jul 19, 2007 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes and no
i disagree with one piece of bernie's article --- that tony is coddling his players too much. but i agree that la russa is not applying any consistent, uniform standards in his criticism ---- e.g., edmonds commits a baserunning gaffe, and tony calls him out on it; encarnacion commits a worse one, and tony rushes to juan's defense. reyes gets chided for not getting groundballs and not pitching deep into games; wellemeyer exhibits the same tendencies but gets praised for giving the team a lift and maintains his spot in the rotation (or did until he got hurt).

this type of thing, combined with his silly battles vs reporters, leave the impression that tony is just lashing out randomly, and that something else must lie at the root of his frustration. there no longer seems to be any rhyme nor reason to his "code."

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree with Tony (somewhat)
But I also see the importance of not handling everyone in the same fashion. It is pretty apparent that Edmonds does not suffer from a lack of ego (not in a negative sense), so Tony feels that he can challenge and "insult" him without worrying about crushing his confidence. On the other hand, from my observations, Encarnacion requires quite a bit more of a kid-gloves approach, maybe having Tony pull him aside in the clubhouse for a few tactful words.

As for Reyes/Wellemeyer, I don't know if I can come up with a viable explanation for his actions. The only thing I can posit is that Wellemeyer has been kicked around a few organizations already and would more than likely have been humbled some time ago. LaRussa may feel that Reyes needs to ... erm ... well, crap, I don't know what he's thinking with Anthony. Maybe it's Flatbill's attitude that needs an adjustment, maybe it's a completely misguided vision by Duncan of how Sophie should pitch, maybe it's a combination of both - who frelling knows?

I'm sure Tony has his reasons for how he treats each of his players. It's just human nature that prevents him handling everyone the same.

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 19, 2007 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWIW
I'm not crazy about a manager publicly criticizing a player.  The criticism of Edmonds, whether he can handle it or not, was off-base.  I have no problem w/ him dealing w/ Juan privately, but Edmonds should have been afforded the same professionalism.  

And it doesn't justify him lashing out at the media for asking legitimate questions.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's been a sore spot with me for awhile the
way he has been so critical of Reyes in the press.  The kid was pitching poorly and he sure didn't need that, but LaDuncetty has gone out of their way to make sure the press knows every detail of everything they have a problem with about him,  even telling the PD twice they were looking to deal him. Reyes has barely spoken to the press, so who knows if he'll ever have anything to say about it. He really seems like a quiet kid, and they really did rake him over the coals.  He was quoted as saying "He lacked confidence at the big league level"  Ya think? Maybe if they had tried to show a tiny bit of confidence in him it would have helped.  Or maybe he killed a dog or stole someone's hat.  It truly baffles me.

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

holy crap, dude.
why the hell would you purposefully bite the hand that feeds you?   your criticism of lb's choice of a central post is un-fucking-real.  

the number one rule of public speaking.... "KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE."  you obviously forgot this or were completely ignorant of it to begin with.  

by busch league on Jul 19, 2007 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahahah
"Hmmm, before I submit this blog post, I'd better think about this.  Will these guys want to talk about TLR?  Or something Bernie wrote?  Maybe I should change the subject."

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this is a real place of discussion
posters shouldn't be afraid of "biting the hand that feeds them," whatever that means.  Are we supposed to be fearful of or obedient to lboros, other lead posters, or their "audience"?  I thought honest discussion and frank disagreements were at the heart of good blogs--not falling into step with either the lead or the majority of posters.  I pointed out repectively a couple of facts: that lboros undermines one of Bernie's primary arguments and that calls to throw TLR and Duncan out have been talked about frequently on this site.  If you find my claim that I don't find this covering new territory offensive, you should perhaps read some more blogs with vigorous and sometimes wild debate.

Yesterdays blog had excellent debate, disagreement, and passion, and it covered new territory.  That's what happens a lot on VEB and I simply prefer debates that takes us into new topics of discussion.

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Covering new topics
Almost everything that we talk about here is not a new topic. It is a collection of slight variations over a major theme, with the hope that I can either convince someone else of my slightly different point or learn something from another commenter's opinion.

The only stuff that can be considered new on here is breaking stories (trades, injuries, etc.), last night's game (a slight twist on the same old stuff), and some idiot spewing out some crazy premise of combining baseball with Premier League Football (that idiot would be me).

So unless there is some monumental trade proposal in the rumor mill that we hadn't considered or rattling off the facts from a game last night, we're always discussing "old business". Approaching Kip Wells' (in)effectiveness or LaRussa's penchant for platoon (dis)advantages from yet another angle, slightly different from the last story about it, is what our expectation should be. Not the impossible standard that Larry and his cadre of guest bloggers have set over the past couple of years.

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 19, 2007 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i, for one, welcome lboros
as our unquestioned leader.  i have for years felt that capital letters are a waste of my time.  

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't ask whether the post would attract
a lot of comments from people who want to move TLR along.  I asked if it was "deserving" of being the primary post given that this is territory that has been endlessly covered by VEB, especially since the Reyes disagreements.

I saw a logical disconnect between lboros' post and Bernie's article which I thought should be pointed out.  Only one person has acknowledged that logical problem and no one has denied it.  Also, no one has said anything about today's VEB post covering new ground.  Where there's passion, there's endless discussion.  That doesn't mean it's taking us into any new territory.

And to the one poster who enquired:  No, I didn't wake up on the wrong side of the bed.  I woke up thinking about the win last night and how nice it was to finally to see Wells' "electric stuff" dominate a game and how great Brendan Ryan played third base.  I woke contemplating future possibilites as I'm anxiously waiting for news about Carpenter.  

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so start a diary about wells' outing
and everyone who wants to talk about that can converse in the diary thread.

or come up with some "new ground" you would like to discuss, and put that in a diary.

but don't whine about how you didn't like my choice of subjects. i don't work for you.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was pointing out a logical problem
with your use of Bernie's article.  If you take criticism as automatically whining then I can see why another poster expressed such surprise that anyone would dare "bite the hand the feeds you."

Relax.  I'm not a lead or side poster and don't want to be--I don't have the time.  How about allowing discussion that respectively challenges the logic of a leader's post without demanding that the person then take additional time to start a whole new diary?  It's just a little bit of criticism.

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you had left it at that ---
--- ie, if you had merely pointed out the conflict between my position and bernie's --- we wouldn't have a problem. that sort of critical observation is welcome. i clarified my position here; you can accept my position or not, but in the end that's a side issue anyway. it doesn't matter whether i agree with bernie or not. i used bernie's article as a starting point to express my own opinion about la russa's future with this organization.

but your comment didn't merely point out the conflict between me and bernie. you went on to question whether it was even "deserving" of discussion. in your mind it wasn't deserving; whatever. you're not my editor, but if you want to express your opinion about that, go for it. but then don't get your back up when others --- including me --- exercise their right to disagree with you about that.

stop playing the victim. every time you come onto this site and people disagree with you, you get your feelings hurt --- and then your next gambit is to start accusing me of being some sort of tyrant who is intolerant of criticism and quashes free discussion. if my blog is really so unwelcoming to you, and your right of expression is so badly circumscribed here, then stop posting. the cardinal blogosphere is huge, and there are many other places that you might find more to your liking.

by the way --- i'm still waiting for you to document your assertion that i have been calling long and loud for la russa's ouster. in fact, today is the first time i've ever done it --- wouldn't that meet your desire for "new ground"?

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i am not sure...
but i dont remember nycardfan posting since the incident where he felt he was wronged, and this seems like another unnecessary attack on lb, in some way retaliating for that post, do you think this is possible lb?
Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Jul 19, 2007 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I posted lots of comments yesterday
in different threads and I have been posting off and on the last week.  I read the site when I have time and post when I have time.  Let's not go into conspiracy theories.  Yes, Ive had two or three disagreements with lboros.  Yesterday, I was in full agreement with Valatan and the day before that I was again in agreement with Valatan in another debate about Reyes.  Two disagreements with one or two agreementd with another means nothing.  It's just debate.  Today, I was criticial of lboros' logic and said I was tired of the "throw out the bums" talk--take that for what it is.  It's is not a wholsale attack on lboros but comments about particular issues.  Again, let's not go into conspiracies.

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow, you read a lot into my comments
I don't see any "victim" talk in my posts today.  Being critical of your logic, advocating for frank disagreements, suggesting that "throw out the bums" seems like an old theme--that sounds like a whining victim to you?  In fact, most of the posters think I'm crazy for challenging your initial post--that's not a victim's normal course of action.  I've said nothing about "feelings" or being "hurt" so why are you interjecting these into the conversation?  Frankly that did make me laugh out loud when I read it.  I'm used to lively  discussions because I lead heated debates as a professor so your trying to turn this into a personal thing seems both odd and out of proportion (on that note, lets stay with this converstation and not try to reignite past differences).  I have never said in this discussion today that I've felt unwelcome; I've simply put forward views different from others and responded respectively to their replies.  And as to the tyrant stuff...again, please keep things in proportion.  I was responding to a comment made by another poster not to "bite the hand that feeds you" (meaning you), which I found odd, not because it "hurt" me or made me "emotional", but because it sounds apprehensive about being critical of the lead poster.  That comment came from someone else not me and it was fine for me to respond to that poster.  It had to do with that poster's perception and my comment was directed to him or her.

Of course I'm not your editor and you are not my editor.  Perhaps we can leave it at that and not toss around generalized characterizations like "vicitm" and "tyrant" so freely.

I'm not going to get into a never-ending escalation with you.  If you don't recall saying it's time for TLR and Dunc to go in your many laments about Reyes and the failure to develop young players, then we'll leave it at "we remember things differently."  

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn, that was some seriously condescending
smugness. Makes me want to smack the next academic I see, which is going to make the rest of my day really shitty because I'm an academic.

by BTown Birds fan on Jul 19, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea well that makes two of us
I sometimes have the urge to smack random academics too

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nycard, if one of your students
made an assertion that she couldn't document, and then hid behind an explanation such as "we remember things differently" when challenged to back up her opinion with facts --- what grade would you give her?

i'll accept criticism that has a basis in fact. but your assertion that i have been campaigning for tony/dave's ouster has no such basis. the fact that you can't admit your error tells me what type of academic you are.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well that just
wounds me to the heart!  Fact is this isn't school and I'm not your research student and this isn't my job.  It was a memory of your views about TLR?/Duncan.  Don't take it as a frontal attack.  I don't have time to sift through your various statements.  And as an academimc, I do have more pressing concerns and research projects than your taking offense at one of my comments on a blog.

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes you have more pressing concerns
yet you've written about 1,000 words at my site today. . . . . i see right through you, professor.

and stop dodging, already. the facts don't support your position; i've asked you 4 or 5 times to document your assertion, and every time you change the subject. why not just admit that you overreached?

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

take a look at my posting times
I'm not glued to your blog-- I looked at it when taking breaks from my work.  I'll admit that you aren't that important to me and that i didn't take the time to sift though your comments.  Will you admit that you and Bernie were not saying the same thing and indeed that you gutted his article?  You seem to have stayed quiet on that front.  Are you dodging me?

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

whether i "gutted" bernie's article
is a matter of opinion, not fact. i disagree with your delineation; i do not think i gutted it. but you are entitled to your point of view, and every reader is free to judge for him or herself.

i'm not dodging that issue; i clarified myself twice, here and here.

next time you post something here, i hope you'll do a better job with your facts. and, since you are a busy person with more important things to do, i would hope you'll be open to those of us who do have time to stay on top of these facts. if somebody points out that your facts are not correct, you might try saying "i stand corrected" next time, instead of clinging to a position that can't be supported.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why have you put my user information page
on the menu of VEB's front page?  That seems bizarre to say the least.  I'm not one of your menu items.  Please remove it immediately.  That info should be available in the same way it is for all other posters.

by nycardfan on Jul 20, 2007 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha
I'm sorry, this is too funny. Your username is on the front page because you're signed in. My front page says "baw's page."

That, or admin hung your profile out for public humiliation and mockery.

by baw on Jul 20, 2007 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really?
I've never noticed that before.  Thanks for responding quickly.

by nycardfan on Jul 20, 2007 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and that is funny...
thanks for the humor.

by nycardfan on Jul 20, 2007 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is a sort of weird way to refer
to user profiles... you'd think a personal possessive pronoun would do the trick. heh, how's that for academic? (i went to public school)

by baw on Jul 20, 2007 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Larry's point
Is that you shouldn't expect him (or Valatan or erik) to come up with a new and exciting topic on a daily basis. He picked something to write about, that spurred his thoughts last night / this morning, and he spent a good chunk of time typing it up. That it wasn't what you were looking to talk about is not his fault.

If you feel that you would rather discuss something else, please start a diary. If another commentor wants to further that discussion, they can do that. And I'm sure that, if your topic (or any other) draws enough interest, Larry would be willing to "promote" it to main post status so it gets the attention it deserves.

The bloggers here have one responsibility: to generate a post that he can speak of intelligently. If he can stimulate discussion from it, all the better. If you want to talk about something else, bring it up yourself, wait for someone else to do it, or go somewhere else. (The latter would be a shame, as you've been a valued member of this community otherwise.)

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 19, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, that's probably what I should have
done in terms of the topic (as opposed to the logic) comment, but I'm too busy to put something together.  I see that my comment about today's post was clearly taken as more critical than I meant it to be.  It was more of a sigh--oh, this again, throw the bums out, can't we move on....  It's strictly my opinion and i was throwing it out that way.  But you're right, my comment did not take into account the hard work and thought it takes to put together a blog.  And not having the time to write one up myself should have made me more aware of that.

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The very nature
of baseball gives you endless coverage of whatever the hot-button topics are.

Doesn't make it any less relevant.

by whopperman on Jul 19, 2007 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not at all what Bernie wrote
He's not rebuking Tony for failing to publicly criticize Tony and dealing with it privately.  Bernie's criticism of LaRussa is for failing to criticize the players who have screwed up/failed to hustle and, instead, criticizing the media for asking questions about it.  Tony has been misdirecting the criticism by aiming it at the members of the media rather than at those players who have been playing lazily, according to Bernie.  

My only criticism w/ Bernie's take is that we have no idea what was said to Juan and Albert privately.  For all we know, Juan was fined for failing to slide into 2nd base.  Bernie is absolutely correct when he said that Tony is wrong in directing his criticism at the members of the media rather than members of the team.  Publicly ripping a member of the media who asks about Pujols not running out the line drive is off-base, and Bernie was right in saying so.  

Besides, it's LB's blog.  If he wants to devote a daily thread to saying why Tony needs to go, that's his prerogative.  

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should add
that LB's comments are entirely consistent w/ Bernie's.  Bernie's comments are about Tony misdirecting his criticism -- lashing out at those who don't deserve it instead of lashing out at those who do deserve it.  It has nothing to do w/ public vs. private criticism, as I've already noted.

LB's comments are that Tony's lashing out has been inconsistent and misdirected and his opinion is that that has resulted from Tony's frustration over a number of things -- Hancock, poor play, the new direction of the franchise.  Disagree w/ that conclusion, if you choose -- it's an opinion isn't immune from criticism.  Disagree w/ the notion that Tony is frustrated or that the lashing out has been inconsistent (though that would be a tough sell) -- that's why it was the subject of today's thread.  

I fail to grasp the idea that this is somehow unworthy of discussion as a daily thread and, I would also suggest going back and re-reading Bernie's column and LB's post as well.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lboros on society
"harboring deep frustrations, which bubble to the surface unpredictably and in a fashion that makes no sense to anyone else. they're stupid little spats, the kind of crap that happens in an unworkable marriage (or in the bad moments of a workable one) --- almost always over meaningless bullshit. people often manifest this kind of behavior when they feel they've lost an important battle; they look for proxy fights, ones they can win --- because they're powerless to win the one that really matters"

very nice analysis and wordsmithing!

I'm not sure of lboros profession but that description beautifully captures a huge chunk of society and helps explain road rage, the crazy neighbor, the looney gunman and me kicking the dog on a bad day.

Sorry to drift from baseball.....delete if appropriate

by Hinkster on Jul 19, 2007 1:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Back to Baseball
I do believe that tensions within De(Witt)LaDunketty are overstated.

But I wonder why Tony would stay.  He doesn't seem particularly happy, he's not in a rebuilder phase of his life, he doesn't need the money, he's not from Stl, he's marketable, he's been here 10 years and he got his ring.

Take a break, Tony.......you've earned it.

by Hinkster on Jul 19, 2007 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

lboros profession
he leaps tall buildings with a single bound...
Just remember -- if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off

by RosevilleRedbird on Jul 19, 2007 1:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

With regards to Bryan Anderson..
Since everyone is beating the Carp issue to death, I was wondering about Bryan Anderson, referenced in the post.  It mentions that he is a likely #2 hitter at the MLB level.  Does he have the skills/speed to make the move to 2b since Yadi appears to have the position tied up for several years?  Ala Biggio?

by Cards67 on Jul 19, 2007 1:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ala Zeile
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or, more recently,
Brandon Inge.  Anderson is supposed to have a good arm, but issues blocking pitches in the dirt.  If he has the minimum level of mobility, sounds like a 3B to me.

by Valatan on Jul 19, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just thought ...
It might make more sense at 2B since he is a) not projected to be a "power" guy (and we all know you would like to have power at the corners) and b) our current weakness at 2b, regardless of Kennedy's recent surge.

by Cards67 on Jul 19, 2007 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His hitting might translate to 2nd base
fairly well but I doubt that he'll hit enough, for power at least, to become an effective 3B.  IOW, if he's moved to 3rd, he would fall way down on the prospect list b/c of his lack of power.  As a C, he projects to be way above average as a hitter and, if he's average but unspectacular defensively, it would be justified in leaving him behind the plate.  If he's moved, he probably ceases to become a very good prospect.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beating it to death?
Our ace, a former Cy Young winner, signs a $63.5 million extension, pitches exactly one game, and comes down with a potentially career-ending injury... and we found out about the seriousness of it this morning.

I think it's ok to obsess for a few hours.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anderson
Exactly why does Yadi have the position tied up? Yes he's a great defensive catcher, but he's absolutely brutal with the stick and is certainly not entitled to be locked into the starting lineup no matter who else comes along. Is there some Matheny law that I'm not aware of that forbids the Cardinals from playing a catcher that might actually break a .700 OPS?

by mikedallas23 on Jul 19, 2007 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im ok...
with that approach too.  I guess I am just too used to the "Matheny" mentality that has been with the organization for the last few years.  Was just wondering if Anderson could be a serviceable 2B but movin Yadi might not be a bad idea either.  Just openin up some conversation.  Personally, I would like to see us get aggressive with the youngsters and start building.

by Cards67 on Jul 19, 2007 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me too
I don't want to move Anderson to 2B because Hoffpauir is looking pretty good right now, I'd like to see him get a shot sometime next year.

by mikedallas23 on Jul 19, 2007 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree 100%
I like Yadi a lot, but by the time Anderson's ready, Yadi will be in his, what, 2nd year of arbitration-eligibility and will probably have a couple of Gold Gloves.  Therefore, he'll be making near $5 M.  If Anderson and Yadi are worth the same # of runs to the team (Anderson for offense, Yadi for defense) and Anderson makes the minimum and Yadi makes $5 M, and Yadi has trade value, why would we not trade Yadi and go w/ Anderson?

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, there is in fact a
Matheny law.  TLR laid it down after he was told that Tom Pagnozzi had video showing him (LaRussa) strangling kittens, and to keep it buried, Tony promised that all future Cardinal catchers would thenceforth be chosen so as to make Pags look like Yogi Berra.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 19, 2007 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
If I wasn't already bald, all of this would make my hair fall out.  

by Hammondsbird on Jul 19, 2007 1:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lbros and Bernie
I really liked Lbros stuff today and didnt think he was overreacting to the carp issue.

Bernie well I'm not a big Bernie guy think he is imature at times(last yr with the Pujols stuff)

However I do agree with todays piece a bit. A manager does need to hold guys accoutnable, but does that mean calling them out in the media? Not sure about that one.

I agree that your star player needs to be the example, but dont think you can compare AP and Juan in the same sentence. Ap has made mistakes at times he is human, but Juan makes alot of dumb moves(that transend the ocassion mistake thing). I'll have to give him this he seems a lot better at the plate this year, but stil makes boneheaded moves in the field, and basepaths. For instance a few weeks ago Juan gets a base hit...thats great only to get picked off first.

Oh and someone mentioned AP no sliding into home...if its not close i could care less Ive seen him do it before and it made me squeemish...the franchise big and bulky and awkward sliding into a catcher ...no way

07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 1:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There seems to be a general malaise to the
organization.  I don't know if anyone has noticed, but not only are the Cubs playing well....they have made some moves this month.  They got rid of Barrett because the pitchers felt he was hurting their game-and it wasn't only Big Z who felt that way, even though he was physical about it--they acquired a playoff tested catcher from the A's in Kendall, and they shed Izturis to the Pirates for cash considerations. Which means they have committed the shortsop position to Thieriot.  The Cardinals don't seem to be in a postion to do much of anything, except check for DFA players.  Maybe we'll get lucky and find something worth having...but it pains me to see Lou all puffed up and Tony like the grim reaper has come to call.
lboros...sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I didn't feel like starting a diary.  

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Picking up Jason Kendall struck me as crazy
he hasn't posted a league average OPS+ since he was a Pirate.  And we've been making moves, notably Wellemeyer, Percival and Okha, and two of those have worked out on some level, the former would have more had we not decided to put him in the rotation

by Valatan on Jul 19, 2007 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point was that they were
DOING something.....I don't know if any of the moves will work out long term, and I'm not advocating doing something just to say you're doing something, but they are trying to find the right pieces......

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, they are doing something and Hendry better

And this year we can only dream of being in a position - like the Cubs - where fine tune roster adjustments are a critical factor in a pennant race

by Hinkster on Jul 19, 2007 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget
expiring contract.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calling players out in public.
I may only coach at a high school JV level, but Rule #1 is: never do anything to embarrass yourself, you players or your team.  I just don't see how calling guys out in the media can lead to anything productive.  Not only will the player be upset, but airing your dirty laundry in public makes the team and organization as a whole look dysfunctional.  I agree with Larry that TRL's spats with players through the media are simply the result of his bulit up frustrations.  However, as Manager, he is supposed to be the leader of the team.  It is totaly inappropriate for him to let his anger get the best of him at the expense of his players and team.  As manager, he simply does not have that luxuray.  

by WizardofOz on Jul 19, 2007 2:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

not calling them out is one thing
but actively making up excuses on their behalf --- "he thought he heard a foul tip" --- is, as bernie says, insulting to the intelligence of the fan. all tony has to say is, "i agree, he should have slid, i'll talk to him about it."

and no matter how he chooses to handle it, it's not right to make joel goldberg the villain. joel goldbeg hasn't made any plays, good or bad --- he's just doing his job, and asking questions that most fans would want him to ask. by holding the press in contempt, tony ultimately is disrespecting the fans.

by lboros on Jul 19, 2007 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No offense to you
but I can't imagine you are giving post game press-conferences with tv and print media after every game. I think TLR could be handling things better but I give him a pass on this one. I know if I had reporters asking me the same questions and team was struggling... and there are 162 post game interviews, I would occasionally lose my cool. I think it's human nature.

Also you'll not find a manager that protects his players more than TLR. Sometimes, when they clearly don't deserve it.

I just don't think anyone else can put themselves in those spots until they've done it.

by paCardsFan on Jul 19, 2007 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
I cannot imagine the pressure put on a MLB manager.  That being said, those guys get paid big bucks to manage a boys game.  Part of that job, albiet difficult, is keeping your cool.

by WizardofOz on Jul 19, 2007 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very true.
I guess that's why it's always entertaining when a Bobby Knight or Sweet Lou lose it.

by paCardsFan on Jul 19, 2007 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Cubs just traded Cesar Isturiz for a PTBNL
with the Pirates.

My first question is, why?  Not for the Cubs, because I don't really care.  But why for the Pirates?  They have Bautista as their 3B, Freddy Sanchez as their 2B.  Then they have a 3 man crew of MIF now with Jack Wilson, Jose Castillo and Cesar Isturiz.  All are above average defenders.  

Castillo is in the doghouse and Wilson can't hit.  Wilson has a huge contract, so maybe they are planning on trading him to someone who needs a SS.  Who that might be, I have no idea.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 2:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well...
there is a distinct possibility that the answer to your question is: Because they are the Pirates, and therefore do stupid things.

by mikedallas23 on Jul 19, 2007 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Izturis is no longer even an average defender
He seems to make an error in just about every game he plays.   I'm not really exaggerating.

by sdrone on Jul 19, 2007 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why the hell would the Pirates
trade for Cesar Izturis?  They already have him and he earns $5 M.  His name is Jack Wilson.  That is one screwed up franchise.  I'm glad they're in our division.

One guy with whom I work is a huge Pirates fan -- HUGE!!!!  Defintion of a fan -- as in a fanatic.  Every year -- this is the Pirates year, they made some good additions, gonna make a run at the Wild Card, etc.  I just shake my head.  He insists that Littlefield, the GM, is doing a great job and that all these players are future stars -- trading Oliver Perez AND Roberto Hernandez for Xavier Nady, for example was a great trade for the Pirates!  Just WOW!

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Covering for players
I don't see anything wrong with protecting your players by covering for them.  At the end of the day, its a mangager, his coaches and 25 guys that got to war together.  The team will benefit if everyone knows that everyone else has their backs

by WizardofOz on Jul 19, 2007 2:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rumors out of Milwaukee
the Brewers and Reds have reached a deal:

Dunn for Matt Wise, Gwynn Jr and PTBNL.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 2:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brew Crew
Wow,there is the power bat that the Brew Crew needed.  

by WizardofOz on Jul 19, 2007 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They needed a power bat?
They are 1 HR behind the NL leader in HRs.
Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

inter divison trade of big name
wonder in the long run how that will work out if its legit
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not nearly enough...
for Dunn... That Krivsky is real tool. I suppose the PTBNL could be significant.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For what it's worth
Gwynn is in CF in the Brewers game right now.
Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trade status?
This hasn't been confirmed anywhere as far as I can see.

by apack on Jul 19, 2007 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow!
There's Krivsky trading power bats for middle relief help again!  I'm really pulling for the Brewers -- not b/c I hate the Cubs (though, of course, I do) but I think it would be great to see this team of young players win the division and have a good playoff run (of course, if the Cards aren't going to win).

The good news for the Brewers is that Dunn's team option at the end of the year disappears if he's traded (I believe).  He'll help the Brewers win the division, leave as a FA and then the Brewers will get 2 compensatory draft picks.  There aren't many better GM's than Doug Melvin.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beries Boloney
Re Bernie Miklasz's  take on TLR.  The gist of the column, as I read it, was that TLR is hyperventilating over the media when he should be using that vitriol on his misdirected players.  Bernie's whole approach here, and indeed in most of his writing, is establishing  a thesis and scurrying around for "facts," or events, that support it.  Never mind that this is the furthest thing from objective reporting, we're taking Bernie here.
  The whipping boy this time, in addition to TLR, is Juan Encarnation.  In fact, it's one play by Encarnation - his failure to "hustle," in Bernie's view, on a steal attempt.  Now I saw that play, and I was disappointed with its outcome - major league players should never go in standing up at second base on a contested steal attempt.  It was dumb. But to extrapolate from that the idea that TLR has lost control of his team, the season and God knows what else, as a result of his not hammering Juan about that play, is absurd on the face of it.
  "Once again, La Russa found it more convenient to jump a media person rather than hold his players accountable. It continued a season-long pattern: La Russa initiating a conflict with the media while waving off his players' lapses in the commitment to fundamentally-sound baseball." was Bernie's idea. "Once again indeed; hell we've got a pattern here!  In the same column Bernie also writes: "Albert Pujols fail (sic) to immediately leave the batter's box after scorching a ball to the shortstop."  However, suffering from a well know inconsistency, he does not suggest TLR admonish Pujols.  One gets the feeling that, had La Russa done so, that would have been another Bernie column - the one about his attacking his star player.
  Later in the piece, playing up to the crowd, Bernie opines : "How about channeling some of this anger towards millionaire athletes who don't play hard or consistently up to their ability level?"  And he calls this whole thing "the rot at the core of professional sports."
  What garbage; Bernie, I got one thing to say - you a hack, jack.

by deweydell on Jul 19, 2007 2:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

RE: "...he does not suggest TLR admonish
Pujols."

Bernie didn't state it explicitly, but the clear implication of that paragraph was that TLR also shouldn't put up with that sort of thing from Pujols either. One could make a pretty strong case that Enc's sin was more serious (Pujols' running wouldn't have affected the outcome; lapses like that are a lot less common for him than for Enc, and he saves runs with his brains a lot more often than he gives them up; he's had some ongoing leg problems this year; etc...). But that wasn't Bernie's point. There was no inconsistency, I think just you misread what he wrote.

by BTown Birds fan on Jul 19, 2007 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bernie is a columnist, not a reporter...
He writes opinion pieces, he doesn't report. Columnists by their nature aren't "objective" (as if reporters actually are, but at least in theory they are supposed to be)

by DiscoJer on Jul 19, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes. He is a columnist.
But good ones use a sharp knife to criticize - cutting deeply and purposefully.

Sometimes Bernie's a sledgehammer, trying to obliterate an argument.

He's ok.  He's not great.

Good pitching will beat good hitting any time, and vice versa. ~Bob Veale, 1966

by bukowski on Jul 19, 2007 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Power
They needed more power out of their OF.  Hart has been on fire, but Hall's power numbers are down.  While the Mench/Jenkins platoon has been effective, Dunn is a signifigant upgrade.  With Sheets down, the brewers are going to need to score as many runs as possible to keep rolling.

by WizardofOz on Jul 19, 2007 2:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hall is out for maybe awhile...
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/07/05/brewers.hall.ap/

Plus they have about a 100 ops split against righties, Dunn will help with that.

Hart
Hardy
Braun
Fielder
Dunn
Jenkins/Mench
Estrada
Weeks

That's a pretty good lineup...

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember how I suggested Matt Morris
yesterday?

Well, he is sucking hard at Wrigley today.  Bengie Molina is apparently giving him signals he doesn't understand.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 2:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

matty mo
no thanks...he has had decent games this year..like the 2 hitter in Oak i saw, but he has the tendincy to get lit up.
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jack Wilson to Cardinals?
I doubt it would happen with the apparent new regime incoming, and he is signed for the next two years for more than Eckstein would probably get. Buster Olney comments on the ESPN website about the Izturis trade:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2942263&campaign=rss&source=MLBHeadlines

"Among the teams for whom Wilson might make sense: ...the Cardinals, who will lose David Eckstein to free agency after this season..."

by dralexp on Jul 19, 2007 3:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brendan Ryan
I would hope that Ryan could put up a .260 average and play his current level of defense for a lot cheaper:

Wilson's contract
08:$6.5M
09:$7.25M
10:$8.4M club option ($0.6M buyout)

Eckstein would cost less than that if resigned.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly why
we should have no interest in either Izturis or Wilson.  We already have them -- Brendan Ryan, and he earns the minimum.  Giving up the worst prospect in our system for either one of them at this point would be a horrible idea.

by chuckb on Jul 19, 2007 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't have the info at my fingertips
but I think Wilson might have been in the Cardinals system before.  He's not all that good, IMO and he's got a pretty hefty contract, so I hope he's not coming here.

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No major league team..,
would take that contract. The Bucs would have to pay most of it, and even then, why bother?
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but why bother...
with Wilson even if he comes for free when you have prospects that can play just as well and may get better.

Wilson is getting any better.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So...
We should actively seek Pirates castoffs?

by whopperman on Jul 19, 2007 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kip Wells
Quietly walks away.......

by ibby001 on Jul 19, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OUCH
that one hurt.
I believe in the Sports Guy rule. Any "complaining" in this post is actually happy, cheerful "constructive criticism."

by nycbirdo on Jul 19, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No--I said in an earlier post that I didn't think
he was a very good player.  They should pass.  Put if Izturis was available to the Pirates, he would have been available to the Cards, no?  He's had a tough time lately, but I think it's an injury problem---so I don't know.  But I would much rather take a chance on IZturis than Wilson, because he's a better defensive shortstop......but that's just me.

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I forgot to add, why not just stick with
Brendan Ryan for awhile and see what you have.

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brewers are going to win another close home
game.

The DBacks have been 1 big hit away each of these 4 games from sweeping the Brewers.  Instead, they only got 1 yesterday to spare themselves from being swept.

Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 3:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hudson's
not a soft tossing lefty, so we have a chance.  For once, we'll have the guys throwing in the high sixties on our side.  

by bobeans on Jul 19, 2007 3:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, he isn't......but he's
still a very good pitcher having a very good year

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Cheers to you lboros,
for doing your best to set the table.......

by jillsinmo on Jul 19, 2007 4:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bonds hit 752 and 753 at Wrigley today
Cubs lead 8-7 going into bottom 7.
Interested in pre-1990 Cardinals games on tape

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 19, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hmm
who do i dislike more? Bonds or the cubs..although to me it would be funny to see Bonds do it against the cubies...

the only thing funnier bonds gets traded to the marlins and then breaks the record against the cubies, when only seconds b4 a fan drops an a sure out..wait we did that before?

07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

KIpper
I posted last night that if he continues his string of luck(barring the Philly Start) i wouldnt mind him becoming cal eldred...move him back to the pen he did good there...i know the pen is loaded but i think he could bump someone...thoughts? Id much rather see him in the pen he was alot more consistent
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap

by punchinjudy on Jul 19, 2007 4:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't really matter...
at this point. He's not going to be around next year. I'd just as soon DFA him and give his innings to Reyes, Dove, Cavazos, Cate etc...
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Jul 19, 2007 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 questions about TLR/Bernie
  1. I imagine this has been asked before, but have the transcendent young players Larussa has managed before -- I think of Canseco, McGwire, and Pujols off the top of my head -- raised his expectations unduly of what a guy just starting out in MLB can do?  Granted, Canseco was midway through his great first full season when Larussa arrived in Oakland; and granted, every manager, particularly those with TLR's staying power, has a handful of guys like this -- and some no doubt manage to also realistically cultivate rookie talent of lesser proportions.  But is there any weight to thinking that Tony, having been blessed a few times, operates with some sort of McGwire-Standard in mind, even if subconsciously?
  2. How much of Bernie's antics (and I'm with those who disagree with his methods of calling out TLR here) are driven by something I'll call the traditional sports columnist's obsolescence?  I mean really, in the culture of blogdom and the multiplying venues for sabr analysis, etc., doesn't the sports columnist (again, I'm suggesting subconsciously -- a big theme for me today, apparently) looks around and asks what his currency now, what he has that others don't... and, of course, it's access to the players and the manager in post-game press conferences, in the clubhouse, etc.  TLR saying juicy stuff at the press conference after a game -- doing anything other than the 95% cliche-speak we all know from sports interviews -- gives Bernie a better column, something of a scoop.  (Granted, a lot of these postgame press conferences are televised, right -- I'm not a cable guy, so I don't know.)  So naturally Bernie, when he's frustrated with the material he's getting from TLR in those venues, he makes that the theme of his writing: regardless of what TLR might be saying to players in private (which we all know is a more effective management tool and more within TLR's total control, which we know he likes), Bernie wants his special arena -- where the manager faces down the tough ol sportswriters -- to be where he manages the team.  Granted, Bernie acknowledges in the column under discussion that TLR may prefer to be doing his managing in more behind-the-scenes ways (and lboros points out that the real problem overall is TLR being too quick to use interviews to rag on players).  But I read Bernie's writing and just see his ego at work: he wants a bit of a boxing match at press conferences because that flatters his own ego and, more importantly, flatters the currency of his trade, what bloggers don't have -- face-to-face contact with the stars and the brass.
Blah, blah, blah.  Thanks for listening.

by jfs on Jul 19, 2007 6:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

re:
on 1., i think any manager realizes that canseco, mcgwire, and pujols are the exception rather than the rule. i don't think that's tlr's problem. some managers just have a thing for vets, just like some college coaches never play freshmen.

actually, if you're looking for a tlr-centric reason for the vet preference, it might be that tlr fancies himself a stat guy; always looking for the right matchups. and a vet is a much more proven commodity than a young player - for better or worse, you know what you have to work with. and that means tlr can better manage the way he wants to.

on 2., i think you're actually giving bernie - and, even more than bernie, his ilk - too much credit. i think most traditional sports journalists are a lot closer to the murray chass, bloggers-are-all-fat-and-unemployed-and-live-in-their-mom's-basement view than they are to considering bloggers a real threat to their power. i think they're way off base there, but yeah - i think they've got their heads too far in the sand to be subconsciously worked up about it enough to write a column attacking tlr for not acting in a way that's bad for the cardinals just to protect bernie's franchise.

I believe in the Sports Guy rule. Any "complaining" in this post is actually happy, cheerful "constructive criticism."

by nycbirdo on Jul 19, 2007 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, I take offense
My room at my Mom's place is in the attic.

;-)

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.

by Solanus on Jul 20, 2007 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i've now read bernie's colum twice
and the only thing i disagree with is him calling out Albert for not leaving the batter's box. dude smoked it to short, the ss dropped it, and threw him out. Albert couldn't have gotten half way down the line even if he had two good hammies. bernie's calling him out was stupid, and he knows it. he just needed another example of TRL covering or not calling out another player like he did with Juan. but calling out Albert is stupid. he's the one Cardinal you can depend on to not quit. EVER. and calling him out wont do bernie any good. in fact, it might cause less players and staff on the Cards to trust him and talk to him.

personally after this season of discontentment, i'm done with Tony. i've gone on record before, even as recently as this season as saying Tony should not leave and if he did, the Cardinals would stop losing. i no longer feel that. thanks for the wins, the ring, and all the good memories Tony, but its time to go. his act has gotten tired. he looks tired, he acts tired, and he' all over the place picking fights with FSN guys, Bernie and any one who dares question him. he's making himself look bad, and the Cards look bad. and as a manager, when you start making your team look bad, it's time to take a step back and check yourself. i think Tony's finally burnt out. the DUI, Josh Hancocks death, the losing, all the injuries. it's all finally to much for Tony to handle. the defending World Champs are not suspossed to have this bad of a season right after winning it all. and i dont think Tony can handle it any more.

Tony's had a wonderful career, not just with the Cardinals. i'm so grateful for every thing he's given us fans. but the times they are a changin. Tony's as old school as they come, and he's not a fan of change. the writings on the wall. owners want younger&cheaper players, fans want younger&cheaper players. the only one who does not is Tony. somethings got to give.

goodbye, and good luck Tony. thank you for everything.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Jul 19, 2007 6:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There seems to be a little skirmish at p-d today
today between Bernie and Gordo.  After Bernie's "La Russsa plays hard 9, but only with the media", Gordo posted "Cards barely can field a healthy 9, much less play a 'hard 9'".  Then Bernie gives an "extra points" commentary:  "2007 Cardinals: Injuries are no excuse."

Gordo:  " On balance, the Cards have done surprisingly well with fill-in players.... This doesn't excuse the team's inconsistent hitting, sloppy defense or inattentive baserunning. But the cumulative effect of the injuries compromised the team's ability to compete -- and the surviving players know it.  We all expect these guys to "play a hard nine." But when The Skipper struggles to find a healthy nine to put on his lineup card, reality eventually sets in."

Bernie in extra points:  "I continue to hear that the poor Cardinals' plight is understandable, considering all of their injuries...  Please.  Throw away those crutches, and don't use them as an excuse to cover for a losing team that doesn't always give 100 percent or commit itself to smart, fundamentally clean baseball...."

by nycardfan on Jul 19, 2007 7:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Jeff Pearlman Thinks Of Hair Clumps When He Thinks Of The Thief McGwire
Black-spider-monkey_small
Losing my religion (w/ baseball)

Recent FanPosts

Small
40 Man Question..
Cathybachebay1_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?
Avatar_small
VEB CheBird T-Shirt for Sale - Red or Powder Blue, CLEARANCE
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
October Lore: One In A Million
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
A Team of Free Agents
St-louis-cardinals_small
Report: LaRussa Will Return
Small
Skip's Lament: The Curse of Too Many Decent Players
Stlcardinals4070_small
Closer Fail

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Trigun_001_small the red baron