back to basics
does that count as a complete game for reyes?
he simplified things nicely last night, returning to the fastball-changeup repertoire that (ahem) got him to the big leagues in the first place. fastballs up, changeups down, the occasional slurve to keep them honest, and about 5 or 6 strategically placed 2-seamers. the vast majority of his fastballs were above the belt and above 90 mph (on SNY's gun) last night; those are obviously 4-seamers. and 2 or 3 were unquestionably 2-seamers --- they were at the knee or below, and 87 or slower on the gun. one of those was the pitch david wright hit out of the park --- the only clear-cut 2-seamer reyes threw in the entire inning. another one came on his final pitch of the outing, inducing the groundout by paul lo duca with men at 2d and 3d to end the threat in the 5th. maybe 7 or 8 pitches fell into a grey area, ie they were thigh-high and 88 to 90 mph; some of those pitches were probably weak 2-seamers, and the others must've been weak 4-seamers.
he returned his changeup to the fore last night, and it was sharp --- most of his 7 groundball outs last night came on that pitch. for all the endless back n forth about 2-seam / 4-seam, the inconsistency of reyes' changeup has contributed mightily to his collapse this year. the pitch deserted him in his very first inning of this season, and he has struggled with it all year long. but last night he threw it with confidence and to great effect. of course, the pitch works best in tandem with the high heat (let last night serve as an object lesson), so an argumentative person might say that the ineffectiveness of the change has been a direct result of dave n tony's distaste for reyes' 4-seamer . . . . but i'm not the kind of guy who would say such a thing. i will say, however, that reyes blew some high fastballs past some pretty good hitters: jose reyes, lo duca, and delgado all swung through fastballs up in the zone. if he continues to pitch this way, he just might hang on to his increasingly tenuous slot in the rotation.
* * * * * * * *
one of my favorite non-prospects, mike parisi, made a very nice start at memphis last night --- 8 innings, 3 runs in a 3-2 loss. i'm probably the only guy who thinks this guy can pitch in the major leagues --- or who even cares whether he can or not. his overall line at triple A looks pretty bad --- 5.32 era, .296 avg allowed --- but those numbers are distorted by two catastrophic starts in hitter-friendly, high-altitude ballparks (salt lake and colorado springs). in those two outings he gave up 24 hits and 17 runs in 8.2 innings; his line for the other 13 starts looks like this:| IP | H | BB | SO | HR | ERA | WHIP | AVG | OBP | SLG |
| 79.1 | 78 | 30 | 41 | 7 | 3.97 | 1.361 | .260 | .334 | .387 |
not eye-popping numbers by a long shot --- the k/9 and k/w figures are flat-out unimpressive --- but one might discern in them, if one wished, the vague outlines of a brad thompson-esque pitcher. parisi is a groundball maker (1.70 go/ao) with a hard sinker --- the type of guy who usually gets a look in this organization. i'll admit it's kind of cheap to arbitrarily expunge a guy's two worst games from the record and say "see --- he's really a very good player," so let's chop things up a little more conventionally:
| IP | H | BB | SO | HR | ERA | WHIP | AVG | |||
| first 7 starts | 35 | 52 | 14 | 16 | 3 | 7.46 | 1.800 | .374 | ||
| last 8 starts | 53 | 50 | 18 | 30 | 5 | 3.91 | 1.283 | .243 |
he appears to have made some adjustments, which you like to see --- parisi has increased his strikeout rate and drastically lowered his hits allowed while improving his control. he's no big deal, a 9th-rounder from the scorned 2004 draft who keeps plugging away, advancing one rung a year through a weak system. all the same, he reached triple A in less than 3 years and is surviving there. for reasons i don't really understand, i have always rooted for this player; i hope he keeps taking little steps forward, and if he does i'll write 'em up.
* * * * * * * *
because new stl pitcher mike maroth has a blog, i figured he might be amenable to doing an interview with me. the folks at Gateway Redbirds had the same idea, though, and they got through the door first: maroth has agreed to take questions at GR. if you want to submit a question, put it in this thread. i'll let you know when the answers are posted.finally, a programming note: i'm heading off to a family reunion next week and will be mostly out of pocket. various members of the community will be posting on the main page during the week; please treat 'em with courtesy. how many games out do you figure the cardinals will be by the time i get back from vacation? i reckon the team will be in full "sell" mode by then . . . .
0 recs |
109
comments
Comments
Buehrle
He has no idea what is going on and said "I don't know anything about it. Apparantly they drugged me last night and I signed the deal. I guess I'm here for another 4 years."
Then he went on to say that he personally had had no conversations with management about an extension.
So, reports are now that if the deal is not completed by Friday, they'll deal him.
Take that all for what it is.
by Big Red on Jun 28, 2007 8:23 AM EDT 0 recs
Please deal.
by gibbyfan on
Jun 28, 2007 9:34 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Put an end to the speculation
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=270627130
I like him a lot, but honestly I was biased because of his St. Louis roots. We need much more than just another pitcher, so this offseason the brass needs to open the pocketbooks on a SS and an OF. Two of Buerhle's teammates (Dye and Iguchi) are both free agents. Any chance So played in Japan with him?
by GForce9 on
Jun 28, 2007 12:18 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Ken Williams said Buerhle and his wife
That doesn't sound like a player who wants to get traded or a GM who wants to trade a player. Williams said, yes, it's a business, so we gotta do what we gotta do. Having said that, recall that Jimmy Edmonds signed for two years with the Cardinals last winter, <<mais non>>?
by kwhiteside on
Jun 28, 2007 2:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Ken Williams said Buerhle and his wife
That doesn't sound like a player who wants to get traded or a GM who wants to trade a player. Williams said, yes, it's a business, so we gotta do what we gotta do. Having said that, recall that Jimmy Edmonds signed for two years with the Cardinals last winter, <<mais non>>?
by kwhiteside on
Jun 28, 2007 2:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Dye and Iguchi
Look, I live in Chicago and have the opportunity to see these guys on a regular basis. Dye is old and useless. He's about a step faster than Yadier. And Iguchi has fallen fast in the past year.
This isn't 2004 anymore. That whole team got real old, real fast. I wouldn't take one of 'em (outside of Buehrle, Garland and some of the young starting pitchers like Danks or Masset).
by Big Red on
Jun 28, 2007 5:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Let's move on from Buehrle
by lefty fan on
Jun 28, 2007 9:46 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Lots of pressing needs
But yea, we need someone who can hit the friggin ball.
by paCardsFan on
Jun 28, 2007 9:53 AM EDT
up
0 recs
We've actually got 2 starting everyday OF
I guess we are still in the 'baby steps for Chris' mode.
Hey, whatever gives us more of Juan in the #4 spot, I'm all for. Lord knows we already score too many runs as it is.
by Hardcore Legend on
Jun 28, 2007 10:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
You're right on
by lefty fan on
Jun 28, 2007 10:24 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Rolen
Rolen is making way too much money for the fuedal bat, and so-so defense.
by briferg07 on
Jun 28, 2007 11:03 AM EDT
up
0 recs
The Dodgers don't want him
by Hardcore Legend on
Jun 28, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Also, you realize Rolen was the only Cardinal
by Hardcore Legend on
Jun 28, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Don't know about that...
He's still a helluva defensive third baseman, and he gives us a shot every time up. This so-so defense line of thinking bothers me...he still can pull it off, and perhaps we're questioning his defense because he's getting so many more "opportunities" (read: pitching sucked). Anybody got any stats on that?
I don't think he's fully healthy, and I think he's pressing.
If he has a strong second half - which is entirely possible - I think we should look at what we could get for him based on that...but if they don't trade him, I'm not going to get upset.
by bukowski on
Jun 28, 2007 4:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yadi
A wrist is very important for the swing - Juan E????
Yadi was swining the bat so well before the injury, I'd hate to see him struggle with pain and post another sub-.250 clip the rest of this year.
by cardsfaninmass on Jun 28, 2007 8:58 AM EDT 0 recs
Not me
by houstoncardinal on
Jun 28, 2007 10:39 AM EDT
up
0 recs
If the bone is healed
by silent_bob on
Jun 28, 2007 11:35 AM EDT
up
0 recs
It's been barely
by cardsfaninmass on
Jun 28, 2007 12:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
SilentBob is our resident Medical Expert
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Jun 28, 2007 2:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
BP
by ChiTown CardFan on
Jun 28, 2007 1:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
the medical staff
by bukowski on
Jun 28, 2007 4:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
what does full sale mode actually mean
by gonzostl on Jun 28, 2007 9:26 AM EDT 0 recs
Izzy?
by gibbyfan on
Jun 28, 2007 9:37 AM EDT
up
0 recs
We do have Percival..
Obviously has closing experience, and has been impressive at Memphis. Perhaps he would be an option.
I for one hope that they hold onto Izzy as he seems to be back to his old tricks, and we might miss him VERY badly next season.
by cardzfanbub on
Jun 28, 2007 9:44 AM EDT
up
0 recs
You have to be ahead
Bottom-dwelling teams make serviceable closers out of journeymen all the time (see: Roberto Hernandez, Lance Carter, Shawn Chacon, etc.). Russ Springer can close, because by that point it won't make any difference. If he blows a few, it's only the difference between 75 wins and 72 wins.
by blove121 on
Jun 28, 2007 10:14 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I, for one,
by silent_bob on
Jun 28, 2007 11:37 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I agree
by houstoncardinal on
Jun 28, 2007 3:02 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Extend?
by awpierce on
Jun 28, 2007 3:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Izzy
by gonzostl on
Jun 28, 2007 12:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Reyes changed delivery...
I know very little about pitching mechanics, but in conjunction with your post find this comment very interesting.
Anyone else notice the higher leg kick?
by cardzfanbub on Jun 28, 2007 9:42 AM EDT 0 recs
Sure did.
by gibbyfan on
Jun 28, 2007 9:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
His wife
by Alxfritz on
Jun 28, 2007 10:04 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Mike Shannon
by jjray on
Jun 28, 2007 10:04 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Not living in STL....
by cardsfaninmass on
Jun 28, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Since when...
by cardzfanbub on
Jun 28, 2007 10:05 AM EDT
up
0 recs
no
by beanocook on
Jun 28, 2007 4:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Where you been, sir?
Normally, we would activate your Bat Light - someone complaining real hard about "Tony/Dave screwing up our Cy Young-caliber phenom" - to get you back on the boards. But there has been so much grousing about that this year you must have thought somebody left the "beacon" on.
(All meant with much respect. Welcome back.)
by Solanus on
Jun 28, 2007 5:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Parisi
Also this was the same game Ankiel hit 3 bombs and went 4-5. We got free tickets 2 rows behind the memphis dugout from a bartender the night before. It was fun to see Rick go off... and its always fun to mouth off to cub fans, even if it is AAA.
by thewizard3 on Jun 28, 2007 10:06 AM EDT 0 recs
you mean this game
6 ip, 8 hits, 4 earned, 1 bb, 7 ks.
i thought he threw harder than 88 mph. if that is as hard as he throws, though --- well, that about matches wonderbrad's velocity.
i'm not crazy about soft-tossers either, but having two or three on a staff can be useful. the cards' problem recently has been that the whole staff consists of soft-tossers.
by lboros on
Jun 28, 2007 11:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Last night
He was getting clobbered the first two innings, and it took him almost 50 pitches to finally get one swing and miss.
But then he settled down and pitched fairly well the rest of the way. He was helped out by some spectacular defense behind him yesterday though.
by whopperman on
Jun 28, 2007 11:54 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yes...
But whatever it was, if they were sitting on it they tatooed it and if they weren't they whiffed badly. I suppose that means he needs to develop another pitch or be more consistent with his out pitch.
As far as the velocity, I questioned the gun at first but it stayed pretty consistent. Is there a scouting report anywhere that could prove me wrong? He looked big enough to throw in the 90's.
by thewizard3 on
Jun 28, 2007 12:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Milton Bradley?
Has anyone else heard this? Is this good? I'm wary...
by joeyart on Jun 28, 2007 10:21 AM EDT 0 recs
I don't think it is good
Cry, more than likely.
And tell us dinosaurs don't exist. Or was that Carl Everett?
by Hardcore Legend on
Jun 28, 2007 10:33 AM EDT
up
0 recs
That was crazy carl
by Alxfritz on
Jun 28, 2007 10:35 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Maybe this is why Tony
I'm not sure that Bradley would be an improvement right now over an OF of Duncan, Taguchi, and Juan but I guess it's worth a shot.
by houstoncardinal on
Jun 28, 2007 10:43 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Fellas...
When the Royals tried to deal for him they were only giving up a double a middle reliever who never projects to make it to the majors, but the deal fell through because Bradley is hurt again and the Royals backed out. Wasn't Bradley designated for assignment anyway? I'm sure we'll just scoop him up for league minimum a la 30% of our roster.
by lopey986 on
Jun 28, 2007 2:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
PJ WALTERS...
by stanchar on Jun 28, 2007 10:39 AM EDT 0 recs
a nasty rumour at scout.com...
by SleepyCA on
Jun 28, 2007 2:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Tucked away in that...
by guayzimi on
Jun 28, 2007 4:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
How a teammate sees Daric Barton's torrid...
"It's borderline absurd,'' said Oakland lefty Dallas Braden, who was recalled from Sacramento on Monday. "Daric could go up there with a toothpick and a blindfold right now and still hit. He's just dangerous right now.''
Ugh...
by stanchar on Jun 28, 2007 10:49 AM EDT 0 recs
Daric Barton
by Alxfritz on
Jun 28, 2007 11:00 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Who cares?
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Jun 28, 2007 11:04 AM EDT
up
0 recs
At the time of the trade...
And giving up Barton wasn't even a concern for me. I thought Haren might be good (not this good), but what can you do?
Some trades just don't work out the way you thought they would. Time to move on.
by joeyart on
Jun 28, 2007 11:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Who cares?
by Carps on
Jun 28, 2007 12:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Have you guys not noticed
by whopperman on
Jun 28, 2007 1:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
so where would you put this guy?
by houstoncardinal on
Jun 28, 2007 1:22 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Who knows
But I can't see automatically saying defense when we're watching Chris Duncan attempt to play an outfield position.
by whopperman on
Jun 28, 2007 1:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
He's not up now.
by Carps on
Jun 28, 2007 1:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Opportunity, mainly.
He's not up yet mainly because he broke a bone in his elbow last year. If he'd been with the Cardinals, that freak collision might not have happened.
The biggest reason is that it's easier to get into the Cardinals' bench than it is Oakland's right now. They've got more talent in the upper levels of their farm system and more capable AAAA veteran depth.
by whopperman on
Jun 28, 2007 2:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Trade value
Maybe we could have traded him and actually gotten back something good...and not had to throw in a top tier pitcher either.
by RedbirdRay on
Jun 28, 2007 3:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Barton's "position" will be DH...
Seems to me they'd be happy to put Swisher back in the OF and not worry about that. If Barton's stick is all everyone says, then if he could actually hold down a spot on a daily basis, he'd be in Oaktown. Otherwise, he has to figure out a way to beat out Jack Cust.
by kwhiteside on
Jun 28, 2007 2:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Did I just read...
by Timbo02 on Jun 28, 2007 11:18 AM EDT 0 recs
Well, they've probabl got to see if Yadi
by sdrone on
Jun 28, 2007 11:48 AM EDT
up
0 recs
No
by houstoncardinal on
Jun 28, 2007 2:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Rotoworld
by rockin redbird on
Jun 28, 2007 5:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Wait a minute
But if he is healthy i think he will be an improvement over what we have.He was SMOKING the ball in the playoffs last year wasnt he one of Oaklands best hitters in the playoffs?
by Calhoun on Jun 28, 2007 12:50 PM EDT 0 recs
MB (not Mark but Milton)
Career AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS : .271 .354 .430 .784
but last season's numbers are all above that (w/ 351 ABs). He has ML exp at all 3 OF positions, decent speed- though not sure how long that will last given injuries and age (he's 29 years old). Signed 1yr contract for $4M (2007). DFA'd 6/21/07.
by redrey on
Jun 28, 2007 1:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Watched Bradley in L.A...
by Timbo02 on
Jun 28, 2007 1:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yes -
by _pistol_ on
Jun 28, 2007 2:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Reyes
I also see that in his 12 starts this year the Cards have only scored 14 runs while he was in the game. I wonder when he is in Vegas does the craps table it 7 out when he walks by?
Maybe instead of "Iron Bill" we should call him "The Cooler"
by Harknights on Jun 28, 2007 2:02 PM EDT 0 recs
