we're no. 15
hallelujah --- the cards are out of the cellar in nl runs scored. they passed the nationals yesterday to slip into 15th place. the astros lie dead ahead, 9 runs distant; pass them, and the cards can shed the ignominy of having the weakest offense in the weakest division in baseball. another cause for rejoicing: yesterday's output nudged the cards' scoring average past four runs a game for the first time all year.
small triumphs . . . . they may have to suffice this year, so we may as well celebrate 'em.
on the flip side, st louis is now tied for dead last in national league team era, at 4.77. they occupied the bottom by themselves for a day or two, but yesterday the phillies got bombarded for 17 runs at the hands of stl's next opponent, the (gulp) royals, to sink to the cardinals' level. couple of interesting things to note about that, however. first, the cards are much closer to league-average than to league-worst in the component stats (batting avg, on-base, and slugging):
| avg | obp | slg | era | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| league avg | .260 | .329 | .409 | 4.14 |
| cardinals | .269 (11th) | .334 (10th) | .426 (13th) | 4.77 (16th) |
| league worst | .280 (pgh) | .355 (fla) | .464 (phi) | 4.77 (phi/stl) |
we can chalk those anomalies up to reyes' and wells' terrible numbers with men on base --- if the cards simply do a better job of stranding runners henceforth (and they ought to improve just by random chance), they'll see that era come down quickly. here's another interesting item: against national league teams only, the cardinal pitchers aren't half-bad:
| era | avg | obp | slg | w-l | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cards vs nl | 4.31 | .254 | .311 | .375 | 26-28 |
| nl avg | 4.14 | .260 | .329 | .409 | 27-27 |
| cards vs al | 9.17 | .363 | .418 | .553 | 1-5 |
the fact that the cards actually salvaged a game against the angels is in itself a rare achievement: it was their first regular-season win in two years (less two days) against an american league team with a winning record. that last happened in this game, one of the more memorable ones of a memorable year. just another reminder of how unexpected, how downright bizarre, the cardinals' world series victory was last october.
against teams that currently have winning records, the cardinals are now 4-16 in 2007; they're 23-17 against everybody else. against the nl central, st louis in 19-14, a .576 clip. the cardinals play 44 of their final 66 games inside the division, and 27 of their final 33 --- and carpenter will be back by then. just gotta stay close . . . .
items:
- since he injured his knee during the last week of may, chris duncan is 2 for 22 with zero walks and 12 strikeouts. one of the hits was a homer . . . .
- pujols is slugging .886 for the month of june; encarnacion, .818.
- bernie miklasz did an interesting breakdown of pujols' swing tendencies; i reckon he's using some proprietary data from stats inc, bis, or the like. the upshot: albert has been notably less aggressive than usual on the first pitch this year. something to keep an eye on.
- 3 of the cardinals' 4 active minor-league affiliates boast a league-leader in home runs. brandon buckman is pacing the midwest league with 14 clouts; allen craig sits atop the florida state league leaderboard with 13 (his teammate mark hamilton is 2d in the league with 12 hr, and tied for the league lead in rbi); and joltin' joe mather leads the texas league with 17 bombs. caveats: first, all these guys are old for their league, dominating weaker competition; second, three of the four are natural first basemen. all four of these guys are good candidates to move up a level just before or after the all-star break, but if they ever help the big-league club at all it's likely to be as trade fodder.
- here's a bizzarro world interview with ozzie smith . . . .
- spot reportage of the springfield cardinals at whiteyball and, remotely, the swing of the quads at future redbirds.
0 recs |
83 comments
Comments
typo
Maybe I am mistaken, but the last sentence of the fourth paragraph seems to have an extra unecessary word, "here's another interesting item: they against national league teams only, the cardinal pitchers aren't half-bad"
Thought you'd like to know.
by Zubin on Jun 11, 2007 9:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
typos suck
by lboros on Jun 11, 2007 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Immortal
by raisin on Jun 11, 2007 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He's not at memphis...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Jun 11, 2007 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seabol hit 2 HRs
I know, I was there. Cate did not look good at all.
by player2bnamedl8r on Jun 11, 2007 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i remember that game now!!
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 11, 2007 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2-run homer by seabol
by lboros on Jun 11, 2007 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks LB
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 11, 2007 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball Cube
by liam on Jun 11, 2007 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw that home run
by effin fisk on Jun 11, 2007 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You, sir, are amazing
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 9:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No doubt...
by rockin redbird on Jun 11, 2007 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bannister
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
royals are playing .500 over the last month or so
just the same, that's the type of team the cardinals have to fatten up on if they're gonna get back into it.
by lboros on Jun 11, 2007 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really enjoyed that
by jillsinmo on Jun 11, 2007 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interview with Ozzie
by tdawg on Jun 11, 2007 9:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And that backflip
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jun 11, 2007 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Royals
by cardsrul on Jun 11, 2007 10:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
Cardinals record against KC, last six seasons, information provided free of charge by Retrosheet:
2006 4-2
2005 2-1
2004 3-0
2003 3-3
2002 5-1
2001 0-3
So you have to go all the way back to 2001 to say the Royals beat the Cardinals in the season series -- and back to 2003 to say they tied in the season series. I'll take 4-2 this year, though I'd like 6-0. And about yesterday's 17 against the Phillies -- they'll wish they saved some for the Cards.
5 1/2 back and charging (limping? crawling?) . . .
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jun 11, 2007 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, bad link
by TedSimmonsFan on Jun 11, 2007 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly
by rockin redbird on Jun 11, 2007 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta agree with TSF
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Going to Tuesday's game
I've caught a couple of I-70 Interleague series...I especially remember the first one in 1997. It was right after we got McGwire and the Royals won by ten or something...the next day they got in a brawl. It was awesome.
by itsalemmon1019 on Jun 11, 2007 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
going to all three royals games
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 11, 2007 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Certainly not assuming
However, if you were gonna pick an AL team to play 6 of your next 9 against, who would you choose ahead of the Royals? Texas is a half-game worse, the White Sox and Devil Rays are a few games better. KC's the shortest flight of the bunch for the 3 road games. In recent years, the Cardinals have played well in their stadium. I'm thinking this is the best opportunity to make up some ground on the stumbling NL Central leader.
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on Jun 11, 2007 11:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree with your assessment
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Table 1
by CURVEBALL on Jun 11, 2007 12:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pitching
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 11, 2007 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is anyone else surprised
by chuckb on Jun 11, 2007 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's the bullpen
by nybirdgirl on Jun 11, 2007 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They also have
by jillsinmo on Jun 11, 2007 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When is Percival getting to Memphis?
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 11, 2007 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure he can actually pitch?
by sdrone on Jun 11, 2007 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that why
by cardsrul on Jun 11, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
from the memphis redbird's site...
by _pistol_ on Jun 11, 2007 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wonder how they'll make roster space
by liam on Jun 11, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's hope...
by whopperman on Jun 11, 2007 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees game - 2005
by texbird on Jun 11, 2007 12:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
no ---- you are correct
that means last reg-season win vs a +.500 al team came in this game, slightly more than 2 years ago. good catch, texbird.
by lboros on Jun 11, 2007 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which your loyal readers know was the biggest
by Zubin on Jun 11, 2007 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Revenge of the Also-rans"
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wanna see something funny?
I know ESPN.com isn't very bright, but I can't believe they're not embarrassed to use this system.
by Archaeopteryx on Jun 11, 2007 3:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe...
by FunkeeC on Jun 11, 2007 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again...
by Archaeopteryx on Jun 11, 2007 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think your comment
I have no problem with that statement. Thus far, Reyes has had an incredible year and Pujols has been mediocre. We all expect that at the end of the year, the stats will be more true to form.
by _pistol_ on Jun 11, 2007 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read
by azruavatar on Jun 11, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see
by cardsgirl95 on Jun 11, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um just read this:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2897967
by Zubin on Jun 12, 2007 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sdf
by cpebbles on Jun 11, 2007 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I *do* have a problem with that statement.
by Archaeopteryx on Jun 11, 2007 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
by TNFan32 on Jun 11, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wwl is everything wrong with sports today
glad the Cards had the day off. even not being able to watch the game yesterday because it wasnt on dtv ei, i needed a break. i'm sure Dunk did too. he's really pressing. which makes me wonder if he's really 100% healthy, or is he currently going through a sophmore slump? ryan howard's having a bad year compared to last year as well. so Dunk's not alone in his misery.
by gdm426 on Jun 11, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aramis Ramirez to the DL for the Cubbies
He wouldn't be back until the White Sox series.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 11, 2007 6:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not to mention
if only the astros had anyone but poor old woody pitching.
by SleepyCA on Jun 11, 2007 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how do you spell relief?
by madding on Jun 11, 2007 8:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cards draft pick
His line so far:
4 IP 1 hit 1 walk 0 ER 5 K's
Not too shabby
by stltrav09 on Jun 11, 2007 8:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ANother 1-2-3
Extremely early impressions:
quick delivery
gets ahead and throws strikes
has an explosive fastball - only registering at 89-91 but it looks more like mid 90's
by stltrav09 on Jun 11, 2007 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oregon State
by madding on Jun 11, 2007 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Final Line
Gave up a solo homer in the top of the 9th and they took him out with an 8-2 lead.
by stltrav09 on Jun 11, 2007 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1st round draft pick...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Jun 12, 2007 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eddie Degerman's line for the night
by CardFaninVA on Jun 11, 2007 9:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Around the League update
by Molina4MVP on Jun 11, 2007 9:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry
by Molina4MVP on Jun 11, 2007 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs win 2-1
by ortic jones on Jun 11, 2007 10:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You all know that
by jillsinmo on Jun 11, 2007 10:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
anyone who calls themselves Big Z
by gdm426 on Jun 11, 2007 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
all aboard
by gdm426 on Jun 11, 2007 11:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I looked at the box score when I saw your post,
by BTown Birds fan on Jun 12, 2007 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was pitching hurt last year
how happy would we be right now if we never let Matty Mo and Danny go?
by gdm426 on Jun 12, 2007 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haren
by rockin redbird on Jun 12, 2007 3:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking about Mark Buehrle
Franklin is only a 1 year (half year) rental anyways and he is cheap. He has been pretty reliable and can be used as an 8th inning guy or as a #5 starter. Jiminez has some upside, prone to the gopher ball, but strikes me as a rubber arm guy who can throw 5 out of 7 days.
The White Sox currently have 2 guys in CF who are God awful. They've been regretting letting Rowand go since the day he left. I'm not saying Skip is a world beater, however he is a decent defensive outfielder with speed. With Dye leaving as a free agent, they need to stock that outfield with as many capable players as possible. If not, perhaps they take John Rodriguez in hopes that his lefty power bat could reawaken and he could be a stopgap for Dye until something is found this off-season.
Odds are, the White Sox aren't going to get nearly what they think they deserve for Buehrle. With Precival possibly being the future 8th inning guy for the Cardinals, and worst case scenerio TJ could fill the void, I think Franklin becomes expendable if not used as a starter more so than Izzy does.
The White Sox already have a closer and I doubt they would trade for Izzy to use him in the 8th inning. That's not what he does and I believe he has a no-trade clause as a 10-5 guy.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 11, 2007 11:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ron Jacober
by tinstl on Jun 12, 2007 12:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wainwright isn't going back to the pen
He was good in the playoffs, but he certainly wasn't Mr. Lights Out as a reliever in 2006.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 12, 2007 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So I'm looking at the numbers
1.) When did we become a "put the ball in play" type team?
2.) Why would we be a "put the ball in play" type team if LaDuncan thinks that the best thing to do as a pitcher is get the batter to "put the ball in play?"
by Harknights on Jun 12, 2007 12:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Big Z??
Buerhle chances of coming here seem to be on the wain as Chicago cant decide how much they want or what they want to do with him. He needs to show something.
by cardschinmusic on Jun 12, 2007 7:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Despite all of his flaws,
by jillsinmo on Jun 12, 2007 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buerhle is 28
i didn't know 28 was the new 42
by azruavatar on Jun 12, 2007 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I KNOW Buerhle is 28......
by jillsinmo on Jun 12, 2007 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reyes as a centerpiece seriously?
by superbry30 on Jun 12, 2007 11:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs


















