community projections XI: braden looper

by lboros on Mar 13, 2007 8:47 AM EDT

seems like a new category would be in order here: games started (GS). otherwise, the usual. remember: mulder is supposed to return at midseason and bump somebody (not necessarily braden) from the rotation. . . . .

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

oh, and here are looper's career stats.

Tweet Comment 27 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

braden

20,147,162,50,81,11,8,7,4.40

by lboros on Mar 13, 2007 8:50 AM EDT reply actions

mr. looper

10, 102, 110, 40,77, 4, 8, 8, 4.69

why don't they just give the 5 spot to narveson?

by elirock83 on Mar 13, 2007 9:06 AM EDT reply actions

loop

23,155,165,55,85,20,9,12,4.85

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Mar 13, 2007 9:10 AM EDT reply actions

Looper

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

12, 96, 111, 39, 58, 13, 6, 4, 4.78

by Bivouac77 on Mar 13, 2007 9:27 AM EDT reply actions

Hang on Loopy

18,127,139,45,81,14,6,8,4.69

by michajo on Mar 13, 2007 9:32 AM EDT reply actions

Looper 2007 Projection

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

25, 135, 140, 45, 75, 8, 7-7, 4.25

stlfan

by stlfan on Mar 13, 2007 10:12 AM EDT reply actions

LOOP

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

4,90,95,25,57,4,6,7,4.01

by Harknights on Mar 13, 2007 10:12 AM EDT reply actions

Looper's line

20,120,125,42,86,15,8,8,4.50

by JBagKY on Mar 13, 2007 10:29 AM EDT reply actions

everyone must be guessing big time

26,150,171,32,83,17,11,8,4.42

by jeff abs on Mar 13, 2007 11:00 AM EDT reply actions

Does anyone really have any idea

I have to say, he's been great so far in spring -- but he hasn't gotten to batters 3rd time through yet either.

21,115,124,29,59,10,8,7,4.44

Why not? Maybe he becomes tradeable as an SP at the deadline!

by chuckb on Mar 13, 2007 11:08 AM EDT reply actions

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

12,110,125,40,75,6,8,7,4.65

by cardzfanbub on Mar 13, 2007 11:49 AM EDT reply actions

I have reasonably high hopes

His spring has convinced me he can be decent. He won't go very deep into games, though.

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA
25,140,152,42,94,15,9,8,4.35

by montalban on Mar 13, 2007 1:37 PM EDT reply actions

Deadline Trade

Will send him back to the bullpen. I'm thinking maybe Westbrook from Cleveland. But anyways for Mr. Looper-

25,160,172,45,88,11,7,8,4.40

by stl3bagger on Mar 13, 2007 2:52 PM EDT reply actions

Hmm

Don't forget Mulder.

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Mar 14, 2007 2:06 AM EDT up reply actions

Looper

20,140,150,50,80,10,6,9,4.65

by mcg96 on Mar 13, 2007 3:12 PM EDT reply actions

bloop

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA
30,181,190,67,93,22,13,9,4.20

by DanUpBaby on Mar 13, 2007 3:36 PM EDT reply actions

I wanna Loop, loopdadoop

24,150,160,40,120,12,11,4.35

by JonesSoda on Mar 13, 2007 7:03 PM EDT reply actions

Looper projections

18, 90, 125, 60, 85, 15, 7, 9, 5.80

by youngunn on Mar 13, 2007 9:59 PM EDT reply actions

Dunc's experiment

Well, now, ain't this one a shot in the dark? I'll give him roughly until Mulder returns.

22,140,145,40,95,11,9,10,4.46

by DCGreg on Mar 13, 2007 10:06 PM EDT reply actions

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

16, 120*, 131, 33, 68, 12, 10, 10, 4.20*

*- approx. 80 starting, 40 relieving
*- approx. 4.50 starting, 3.60 relieving

by mateodh on Mar 14, 2007 1:36 AM EDT reply actions

if

if he could have a era around 4 that would be pretty good. as far as the other parts of the rotaion i think they already have their # 2 starter in wainwright. everybody has looked good in the spring.

personally i would feel more comfortable with looper as the 8th inning guy but it looks like now he is going to win the 5th starter job.

SWH

by BRINGBACKWILSON on Mar 14, 2007 5:35 AM EDT reply actions

Loop

21,132,137,38,76,16,10,9,4.36

by Stanfan6 on Mar 14, 2007 9:01 AM EDT reply actions

Call me crazy

I know it's only spring training, but he's been a groundball machine so far. If he can put up even league-average #s as a starter, it sure makes his damn contract easier to stomach.

GS,IP,H,BB,SO,HR,W,L,ERA

23,155,174,47,90,11,10,8,4.52

(about 125 innings as a starter; the rest as a reliever)

Of course, this experiment could also be a total disaster. I'd say it's 50/50....

by DCRedbird on Mar 14, 2007 12:14 PM EDT reply actions