Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

the edmonds trade

jim edmonds stands 10th on the all-time franchise leaderboard in on-base percentage (.393), 7th in slugging (.555), 6th in ops (.948), 4th in homers (241), and 7th in walks (645).

the trade is bitter medicine, but it's necessary. the cards should have let edmonds walk last year, or simply picked up his one-year option; the extension was a mistake, and they're acknowledging as much. they're getting on with the overdue business of letting go of the past. since taking the reins mozeliak has jettisoned five position players from the 2006 championship team --- all of them over age 30 --- and created opportunities for younger players who might or might not pan out. it's not pretty, it's not exciting, it's not fun. but it's the right direction.

here's a breakdown of the cards' centerfielders last season:

AB H 2B 3B HR RBI AVG OBP SLG
edmonds 352 88 14  2 12 49 .250 .324 .403
others 285 85 16  1  7 36 .298 .338 .435

the cards paid edmonds a lot of money last year to play worse than his understudies; smart organizations don't do things like that. as a group, st louis centerfielders posted a .747 ops in 2007; the holdovers are capable of matching or exceeding that production. the team hasn't lost anything in terms of present value; the money they would have paid edmonds can now be put toward upgrading somewhere else.

i'm too old to be terribly sentimental about these things; edmonds was a noteworthy player, and i'm grateful for the thrills he provided. he's part of a proud tradition stretching back to 1982, when a never-heard-of-him player named willie mcgee took over in centerfield. since then the cardinals have had just 3 centerfielders: mcgee, lankford, and edmonds. colby rasmus has a chance to extend that reign of excellence.

mozeliak's facing the future, not the past. brave man; thankless task.

Comment 276 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

jimmy
we'll miss you
but its good for everyone
interested in seeing if this Freese kid will be worth something someday
"back.. at the track...at the wall..homerun." -joe buck

by omshagome on Dec 15, 2007 9:32 AM EST reply actions  

Farewell Jimmy
Jimmy had been my favorite Cardinal for several years.  That is making it hard for me to be objective about this trade.  I understand that in all likelyhood 2008 won't see the Redbirds hoisting any trophies in October, but I don't think this was a necessary move.  I think the fact that we won't be tops in our division makes this trade all the more perplexing.  What is Mo planning on doing with the saved salary?  IMHO throwing the savings at Silva or Lohse (sp?) would be a mistake.  I hope that is not his intent.  I guess we will all just have to wait and see.  Goodbye Jim.

by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 9:43 AM EST reply actions  

agreed
how the money is spent will determine the value of this, not whether mr freese ever makes it (kind of unlikely it seems)

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting question about this trade...
Does anyone think that Walt would have made this trade? I think not. Good to see that Mozeliak is taking this onus head on and making the tough and gutsy moves. Cannot wait to see the subsequent move that will follow this trade.

We all loved us some Jimmy Ballgame, he was a GREAT Cardinal. The game 6 walk-off was one of the best Cardinal moments ever. Good luck to 15.

Nuthin'....I got nuthin'over here.

by Handsome Jimmy on Dec 15, 2007 9:44 AM EST reply actions  

wwwjd vs wwcad
one question is whether wj would have done this, the other is whether chris antonetti would have?

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

it's pretty obvious...
CA would have traded Edmonds to SD, but he would have gotten Chris Young in return.  WJ would have traded Edmonds to SD for Freese and then signed Cameron to a 3-year 25M deal.
Christmas lights are an extremely efficient method for converting Christmas Spirit into heat. -anon

by SleepyCA on Dec 15, 2007 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Waht?
No, Antonetti would have visited Jimmy personally, told him he's not on the block and then traded him for Freese and a pitching prospect to use in another trade to get Young two years later.

IMHO, the idea that Antonetti walks on water and Mo blows is premature on both counts.

CA does not have the history or credentials to annoint him for saberhood yet, take a look 10 years from now. Im glad he used us, it'll be harder sneaking up on the next club GM position uness he DOES walk on water.

With all due respect, if Antonetti could, he'd bring Young to Cleveland, but the Padres have other ideas about that.

Trade for Sean Rodriguez! (But please dont call him S-Rod!)

by cardschinmusic on Dec 16, 2007 5:00 AM EST up reply actions  

should have used sarcasm tags
IMHO, the idea that Antonetti walks on water and Mo blows is premature on both counts.

that was my point ;)

Christmas lights are an extremely efficient method for converting Christmas Spirit into heat. -anon

by SleepyCA on Dec 16, 2007 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Moi' apologetti!
I should have seen that sleepyca, I almost always find much agreement with the content in your posts, so I should have seen that one sneaking up!
Trade for Sean Rodriguez! (But please dont call him S-Rod!)

by cardschinmusic on Dec 17, 2007 4:08 AM EST up reply actions  

My favorite Cardinal
is now gone.

But, life goes on. We'll always have the memories, won't we? And the memories with Jimmy are largely of the positive variety. Far too many to count, but despite all the defensive gems, the 2004 NLCS Game 6 HR will always be my favorite Edmonds highlight.

Good luck, Jimmy. We will miss you.

"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

my favorite Cardinal as well
and with all the turmoil around this team
im not sure it was worth trading him to free up a few million unless we have a good use for the money

im not expecting his performance to be worth the money, but he has been the clubhouse leader on a team that seems to lack it by all reports

Come on 2009!

by benstl on Dec 15, 2007 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I can't be objective
Jimmy was my favorite player on the team...I had hopes that he would retire a cardinal, and maybe someday get his number retired.  I think you put it best, lboros, this is bitter medicine, and I know it is needed.  But I am going to miss #15.

by Irishman on Dec 15, 2007 9:53 AM EST reply actions  

I don't buy it
At least, I am not yet convinced it was a good idea at all.

It's pretty much a given we will be sub-par in 2008.   It's doubtful we will best .500 or finish in the top half of the division.

It's also fairly likely Rolen might be moved by season's end.

Like azru and the rest of the statistically oriented crowd, I tend to think of things subjectively.   However, intangibes are a part of the game and do have a financial impact.  How much of a financial impact is the money saved?  What does it come to?  $6+ million?

So, in a subpar season, you hypothetically move two of the three franchise icons (Pujols, Edmonds, Rolen).   What does this do to ticket sales?  What does it do to merchandising sales?  Edmonds stuff was a top seller.   How much does this disenfranchise the common fan?   Is the lost revenue from these things worth the difference when subtracted from the $6+ million?   Does this curb the likelyhood Jimmy will come and wave with the rest of the folks in the convertibles?  

This move seems to save marginal dollars for no real gain to me.  

I lose confidence in Mo daily.

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 9:54 AM EST reply actions  

ray, i think he moved a player with no value
and got the most he could get in return --- payroll flexibility and a C+ prospect. the alternative was to appease the fan base by letting edmonds play out the string, delaying the necessary step of moving on.

i'm a little puzzled here. walt was criticized for letting the team grow old and stale, relying too heavily on name-brand veterans, not taking any chances on kids. yet what are the biggest complaints about mozeliak so far? he cut ties w/ two name-brand veterans, eckstein and edmonds.

damned if you do . . . .

by lboros on Dec 15, 2007 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree
first of all, we were going to be sub-par in '08 anyway.

secondly, while mozeliak's hardly done anything to instantly transform this team into a champion, he is slowly making the right moves -- allowing the team to get younger.  He's working for the long-run and doesn't appear to be willing to salvage the long-term for the short-term, ala Ed Wade.  I was not a fan of Mozeliak in the beginning, but I'm beginning to come around.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Subpar in '08 anyway...
Nail on the head.

Why not let Edmonds retire as a Cardinal if you aren't a good team anyway?

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

and
How does that make you a better team in 2009, 2010, etc.?

I don't get this obsession with "letting" Edmonds retire a Cardinal. He had a great run here. I loved the guy. But this is a business and it was the right business decision to trade him. I've seen what Edmonds can do. I haven't seen what Barton, Rasmus, etc. can do. It's time to see something else.

There are so many instances of teams holding on to players a year or so too many and it hindering the development of the franchise. This is about the franchise as a whole, not a feel-good, Jim Edmonds send-off.

SUBURBS: Where Americans cut down trees and then name streets after them.

by beanocook on Dec 15, 2007 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

How does....
dumping his salary and getting a nothing prospect in return do anything for '09, '10 etc...

As I've said before, I wouldn't rush Mr Rasmus and Barton/Ankiel were going to get plenty of playing time even with Jimmy on the team.

I'm not dead set against trading him, but if it's a pure salary dump then yeah, I'm against that.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

As AZ said....
They should have been willing to eat more money and get a better prospect...that, I'd have been fine with.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

"Why Not..."
I can think of about 7 million reasons...$. It's a business.
"Dude, we're running out of stadium" - said on the way to our seats in Section 428.

by bukowski on Dec 15, 2007 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a business where PR and image
is important as well. The Cardinals have been failing on those fronts lately and moving Edmonds isn't going to help that. I'm one of the last people to argue for PR based decisions but when they essentially got very little in return for a season when they could have built up some big hoopla for Edmonds departure.

by azruavatar on Dec 15, 2007 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not like he
was going to ride off into the sunset on the last day of the regular season. What if he didn't want to retire? Hoopla for a the release of a 38yr old CF? There's nothing classy about that...give him a shot at a title with the Padres as a way of paying him back...this may have been a mercy trade so a great guy and good player doesn't have to suck it up on a bad team for his last year or two. I do agree that the Cards have had horrible PR - but it's of their own making. The Rolen B.S. was not propagated by Scott. DeWitt should shut the fuck up and sign checks. Ballpark Village is an abortion. LaRussa has been an embarrassment off the field. They had a player die, and one get brought up in HGH... But you know what? I'm still going to be there on March 31st. Because it's baseball. And because it could be the worst 9 ever assembled by the Cards, and it will still be baseball.
"Dude, we're running out of stadium" - said on the way to our seats in Section 428.

by bukowski on Dec 15, 2007 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry to think it
Reading your post makes me think more and more that we are rooting for an image this current team (in the broadest sense, owners, players etc.) does not represent.  That's a depressing feeling and a real bummer that this team thinks it can coast on its incredible fan base while all this other bullshit is going on.
get up baby, get up

by jimmybaseball42 on Dec 16, 2007 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed entirely
I just don't see the logic if we aren't spending the money this year, which we shouldn't.
Rasmus or bust.

by Zoop on Dec 15, 2007 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Walt was relying on
aging players during years where we were going to contend. We aren't in the mix realistically next year and Edmonds contract doesn't extend beyond that.

by azruavatar on Dec 15, 2007 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe
maybe the question is with so much history and reverence of the past major contributors is:  is mo pushing folks out the door faster than is prudent just to prove he is not walt (or chris a. even)

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Emotional Disconnect
It is very possible I am failing to see this objectively enough due to emotions involved.  

However, I just can't buy that this particular dump is as black and white as a platooning declining 9 million dollar outfielder.

First of all, that's not what we are gaining.   We don't save 9 million dollars.  What is the exact dollar amount?  Is it 6+?  I am not sure.  

A player that will push a team from a 90 win to a 94 win season is worth more than he is to an 80 win team.  I feel the converse is probably true in this instance.   A face-of-the-franchise player is probably worth more to a team that is going to royally suck and may be forced to dump another of it's icons (Rolen) than to a team that fans will cheer to contention.  If we were going to knock down 90+ wins next year and clinch the division, the average rainy day fan would probably forget all about Jimmy Ballgame.  This year, most fans who haven't ever heard of Barton, Rasmus and the like will probably just continue to feel the owners are cheap (which I do not believe).  

It seems there is much more to consider financially than cutting the fat with the likes of Taguchi, Eck and Miles.   Truthfully, I do not know the answers to these questions.  Maybe they were wieghed...What kind of difference in ticket sales will result in a down year with this kind of PR hit?   Edmonds was the number 2 in merchandise sales...How many people who would buy Edmonds T-shirts or other stuff will in turn spend that same money on Wainer, Rasmus or whomever?   How much would keeping Edmonds during this transition year buffer trading Rolen to the average fan?  In other words, how big of an impact on viewership, attendence, etc will cutting both Rolen and Edmonds result in?  If you consider that marginal wins are costing 2-3 million these days...do you feel Jimmy could convey anything to Rasmus that might be worth 1-2 wins over the course of his team control?

How much does this really save the bottom line?  I am sure they will still save some money, but I doubt it's 6 million.  

A ton of money comes off the books next year.   Jimmy said he's going to retire.  His contract expires anyway.   It's not like it was going to anchor us going forward.    

It doesn't seem like this really gives us much more of an advantage.   I know 2-6 million or so is a lot of money to me, but will it really make a difference between us winning say 88 games and 90 games in 2009?   If it is that big of deal, how do you in turn explain the Izturis signing?  

I agree with all the other cuts so far.  As I said, I could just still be leading with my heart.  I just don't buy this is a good move for this team.

I won't even get into the going rate of centerfielders and how much Jimmy would need to bounce back to justify 6 million dollars.

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

A later thought
If we are truly rolling over and rebuilding...and trading for prospects...and a few million dollars saved out of this years budget gets us further a few years from now...

What the hell is Isringhausen still doing on this team?

I know he has a trade clause and all, but teams seem to talk players out of those regularly.

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

And how smart
And how smart is a top-3 paid closer on a 75 win team?

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly right
yes, it is the contradictory nature of the moves that is most puzzling.  no team, financial, athletic, etc., succeeds without leadership.  with rolen on the outs we are  about down to nothing.  of all of them (izzy, rolen, eck, etc., i'd say jed was most valuable to the organization.  unless he pushed for it, i still say bad move and especially bad timing (vs. june or july).

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say if you have a top closer
keep him. I still don't understand Arizona trading away Valverde...
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I say we hang on to him til the deadline
Either (unlikely) we're in it and Izzy is a valuable asset, or we're out of it and (if we can get him to waive the ntc) can deal him I feel like teams will give up a little bit more for a closer at the deadline.  If you're on the bubble and have been blowing games in the 9th inning, you'll pay top prospects for a lights out closer.
"A great catch is like watching girls go by; the last one you see is always the prettiest." - Bob Gibson

by stl tyler on Dec 15, 2007 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

i don't take this move in isolation
i look at the pattern of moves --- and the pattern is extremely rational and long overdue. ever since the 2005 nlcs, when the cards' aging bats were exposed, they have needed to get younger. but walt shied away from the difficult choices necessary to make that happen. he had to fill every hole with a proven vet and wouldn't ever risk filling a roster hole with a risky young player. mozeliak is rolling the dice --- gambling that the young centerfielders (barton schu ankiel and, by the 2d half, rasmus) can provide equal or greater production than edmonds, for pennies on the dollar. he's gambling that izturis / ryan will, on balance, be the equal of eckstein for a lot less money. his judgments might or might not prove correct, but i for one am thrilled to see the cardinals taking risks and creating opportunities for their own players --- even fringey guys like ryan and schumaker.

it might pan out, or it might not. but the only way to grow the talent base is to give the talent on hand a chance to blossom. this move opens up more at-bats for youngsters. and i wouldn't be so quick to dismiss freese as a nothing prospect. let's see what he can do. for all we know, he'll be pushing for playing time by mid 2009.

by lboros on Dec 15, 2007 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Larry
I was locked out of all comments again for about the last 7 or 8 minutes.  Every diary or main post I opened showed the Glenfiddich ad.   I finally opened with comments showing and it was different ad.

I understand where you are coming from.   I agree it's where we need to head overall.   I agree every move should be made with a long-term vision...and also wieghed individually.  

I think the balance of this move probably wieghs to the positive.   I don't feel it's by much.  It's not 9 million dollars positive.   I doubt it's even 4 when you consider the indirect losses from losing an iconic player.  

I also think you could argue Ryan/Miles could equal Eck's performance for less money than Izturis/Ryan.  That move seems inconsistant with the path we are hoping is the reason for these moves.

Does Edmonds really take that many at bats away from those guys?  Several of them will get ABs even with Jimmy in the lineup.   Maybe he hurts Schu?    I don't see much chance of lightning striking there.  But, if it were the issue forcing a decision...wouldn't you shed Speizio for a bucket of balls?  He makes a couple million over, has no upside and youth could get his ABs. Is Rasmus only getting half a season knocked off his team control years instead of a whole in a year like this so bad?   That seems almost a bigger financial decision than cutting Jimmy's difference in payroll...an extra year of Rasmus before free agency?

There is something I do not understand about free agency/draft picks.   If Edmonds were to finish his contract, file for free agency but retire...would we get a pick (or two if he regains type A?)

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

But thats exactly the point
Edmonds ISN'T going to take many at bats away, and even when he does, they aren't going to be extremely productive at bats (on the whole).  So why pay 8 mill for an ineffective backup when you can keep the bulk of the salary and give ALL those at bats to someone looking to improve instead of ride off into the sunset.

by Ray Lankford on Dec 16, 2007 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

At least they picked a side...
Now we can stop delluding ourselves. I still think we have a shot at being competitive with Tony leading the kids. But at least I don't have to fool myself anymore that we are in on every big name that comes up in trade rumors. So long "Sell the Farm Guy".
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 9:59 AM EST reply actions  

I had been yelling to the top of my lungs
whenever anybody asked who would hit leadoff this year... RASMUS! . I think the kid is ready. But when I saw Miggy on the block I was drooling for him to be in Cardinal Red along with Willis. I got un-hinged a bit when Detroit did the trade instead. The Bedard crap was leftover angst from that deal. I like Colby and look foward to him possibly starting this year. I think a

Rasmus
Ankiel
Pujols
Duncan

Starting the top of the line-up off will generate a lot of runs. Hope I'm right...Might as well trade Rolen and get at least one highly touted pitching prospect to complete the change and see what Barden can do for awhile. Long as he is strong with the glove he won't hurt us to bad. Afterall Rolen wasn't that great with the bat last year.

"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

tlr
so much for tlr as a vets only guy, or do you think he will bail if this is all cost cutting with no subsequent acquisitions?

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

It's for the best
Glad to see you have turned around

by SpringfieldDude on Dec 15, 2007 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I live for this
Here's a link to Jimmy's "I Live For This" commercial on YouTube, in case anyone is interested. Reminds me why I loved watching him play so much...

I Live For This

"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 10:01 AM EST reply actions  

Thanks man
I have an animated gif of his catch at Minute Maid, I'll try to find it.

by sdrone on Dec 15, 2007 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Thank you
Nice to see these highlights again. I pulled out my "Millions of Cardinals Memories" DVD, as well as the 2004 NLCS Game 7 to relive some of these before I get on with things today.
"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Where did you get those?
Did you buy the NLCS games individually?  

I dont' really wanna buy an Edmonds jersey; I've just got baseball cards right now.  The DVDs might be nice.

by sdrone on Dec 15, 2007 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually
I got both at Borders. And I don't even live in the STL area.

The 2004 NLCS Game 7 is part of the Greatest Games of Busch Stadium box set. That particular DVD also has a lot of other highlights.

The Millions of Cardinals Memories DVD is another production of MLB Productions...and not one I expected to be able to find where I live, but I did. You can probably find it on amazon.com, although I haven't checked.

"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Looks like
you can get it at amazon.com...

Millions of Cardinals Memories: Busch Stadium 1966-2005

I highly recommend this DVD...for anyone who grew up in the era of Busch II, it's a must-have. Great celebration of the stadium and the franchise.

"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't like it
Call me sentimental, but what's the difference?  I don't see us blazing any trails in '08 anyhow, so why not let Jimmy retire a Cardinal?  Have they made some marginal gain in production, maybe.  Will it be enough to turn us into a 90 win team...not a chance.

If they use this as a tool to get locked in to 4 or 5 years of Lohse/Silva then the move looks even worse.

It's a pure salary dump, plain and simple.  They got nothing in return, and last time I checked...6M doesn't get you a difference maker.  If we were locked into him for 2+years then I could understand, but why dump him for nothing when we aren't going anywhere in '08 anyway?

I can only hope that this move gives some of the young guys a legit chance of starting...we'll see.  

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:02 AM EST reply actions  

man, i hope not
if this was a move to free up money for one of those clowns.....

the guy should have retired here
im all about moving forward
but i think this move was completely unecessary
he was holding it down until rasmus came
he was the teamleader and an all time great cardinal

Come on 2009!

by benstl on Dec 15, 2007 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree...
I just don't see what this accomplishes.

Do you get marginally better in CF....maybe, but in a year where you aren't going anywhere why trade away a franchise figure head that was going to retire at the end of the year.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

They would have been better off
paying more salary and getting a better prospect.

by azruavatar on Dec 15, 2007 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes...
They absolutely would have.

Even if they had to eat 6M of his salary to get it done.

As it sits now, it maybe makes the slightest difference in the present and doesn't help us in the future.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

$ for headley or kouzmanoff
would've made a lot of sense. both of them can't play 3B
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

prob way too much to ask
without sweetening the deal, however
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice thought but
I think you are overvaluing Edmonds drastically, and besides, the Commish would veto any deal where we would essentially be buying a player like that. Remember the Jacque Jones to Marlins non-deal?

by Hungry Jack on Dec 15, 2007 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed
we needed a tutor for these guys and we disposed of one good one to do what?  i agree, better not be lohse or silva, i'd rather take a chance on colon or clement.  at least they were once good, and neither lohse or silva ever will be.  we already have one of those guys in piniero, that's enough

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

What makes you think
this was even an option?  Maybe the Padres don't think he's worth a better prospect.  I don't.

by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Our share
Apparently the Cards chipped in $2 mil.  This makes me even more sick to my stomach.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/weblog/2007/12/padres_get_2_million.html

by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Goodbye Jimmy, Hello Future third sacker
Goodbye, Mr. Edmonds. It's always a bittersweet day when a Cardinal fixture is traded - sad to see Jimmy go, excited to get a new prospect in our depleted farm system.

Jimmy's catches in centerfield will forever be in my memory; but, life (at least as I know it) moves on. He wanted to be back in California anyway and now he has his wish.

Now we have our replacement -a few years down the road - for Scott Rolen. This kid can hit!! (At least so far) Does anyone know if he is any relation to Gene Freese, who had a nice undistinguished 12 year career mostly with the Pirates in the 50's and 60's?

by treborsgonecruising on Dec 15, 2007 10:06 AM EST reply actions  

Prospect
I guess I am not that excited about him.

I know Erik said (Sickles?) he's rated as a C+ prospect and he tore up A ball...

But, he was a college player and it's taken him a whole season and a half to break out of A ball.

Furthermore, I am not all that impressed when a 24 year old posts an .800 or so OPS in a league of 19 year olds.

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

re: season and 1/2 to break out of A ball
Just a technicality - per the rotoworld sidebar on the left of the main page, he was blocked from advancing to double-A by Chase Headley.  

by SmashedAtoms on Dec 15, 2007 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Future third sacker?
Wow, don't get to carried away here.  The guy was 24 in A ball...he better hit.  We already have a better 3B prospect anyhow in Craig.

They gave Edmonds to SD

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Early
To call this guy the future 3B for the Cards. They have 2 higher rated guys ahead of him at least. (Barden and Craig) This guy is a nearly 25 year old A baller. That age at that level is usually a sign of a non-prospect. If we are lucky, he is just a late bloomer, but Alan Craig is the likely future 3B for this team.
How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Dec 15, 2007 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

i think i'd put
barden below freese.
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Why?
They are about the same age and Barden has put up good numbers at AA and AAA and is widely considered the best defensive 3B prospect in the minors. Freese is almost 25 and has only played as high as A ball putting up numbers against 19 year olds.
How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Dec 15, 2007 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I'll take the kid with the Defense
I don't want to watch a horror show on the field at 3B like the Brewers did this year even if the kid can hit 30+ 100+ homers and ribis which he won't cause he is still in A ball.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd take Ryan Braun
over Brian Barden every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd take Braun too but just not at 3B
He's a butcher. They should just give him a meat cleaver instead of a glove.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He could chop the ball in half
and it wouldn't roll as much?
"Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals." --Churchill

by lordsummer on Dec 18, 2007 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

because barden
has been long pegged as a utility man by scouts. his numbers were inflated by his leagues and park and last year he totally sucked, so much so he ended up being a waiver claim.
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

furthermore
the reports on freese's glove are mixed. ba had him the best defensive 3b in the mwl last year, according to managers and scouts
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

where to play him
Where is this guy even gonna play this year??  Craig should be the 3B in AA.  Will this guy stay at A+ or will one of them move positions?

by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

AAA
Maybe Rico Washington's days in Memphis are over and Craig moves to Memphis.  Too bad Washington was hurt last season making him unavailable for a callup when Rolen went down.

by jjray on Dec 15, 2007 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It's entirely possible
That Memphis could use Uncle Rico as their utility man, I'm relatively certain he can play all the infield positions.
"A great catch is like watching girls go by; the last one you see is always the prettiest." - Bob Gibson

by stl tyler on Dec 16, 2007 12:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Damn I liked Edmonds
I know this is the right move team wise, but SIGH.

by sdrone on Dec 15, 2007 10:09 AM EST reply actions  

This Move
Yes, it is a salary dump, but it is also clearing a spot on the 40 and 25 man rosters. If there is not a second move coming after this that uses the $6MM and the roster spot, then this is a poor move. However, this could be the deal that begins to shape the 2008-09 roster. Jimmy was my favorite and I wish him well in SD, but I am going to wait and see what Moz does from here.
How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Dec 15, 2007 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Jimmy's wishes
In terms of the trade - if Jimmy OK'd it then I have no problem with it.  In fact, reading the Post-dispatch it sounds like the Cardinals did exactly what he wanted.

In a bit of irony, it seems like Tony's resigning partially contributed to this rebuilding trade. Regardless, I'm buying tickets for when the Padres come now.

by enoscountry on Dec 15, 2007 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

I think
that it is worth noting that holiday ticket sales have been awful thus far. They even ran a major discount for the plans on thursday(60 bucks off each larussa plan). I also was able to move from a half season to a full season rather easily considering my requests were rather confining. Must have bleachers, must be on the aisle.
 I do think they are salary dumping and are just gonna take the flack. I'm looking forward to an entire year of idiots like brian Mckenna calling me one of the many sheep.
  Also, thank freaking God Kent Bottenfield had that one good year. None of these wonderful things would have happened to us without him. I sat behind him at a colts game a few years ago(the classic 38-34 contest against the Pats in Indy). Apparently he's a huge Colts fan. Me and my buddies kept saying to ourselves "that's gotta be him, nobody has a neck that thick". We thanked him for his tenure as a Cardinal, but really we were thanking him for bringing us Jimmy Ballgame. One of the greatest cardinals I have ever seen in my 33 years. Ok, I'm done.
  Ahh, that feels better

by The Butcher on Dec 15, 2007 10:22 AM EST reply actions  

Can't forget the other half
of that trade, a hot young 2nd base prospect Adam Kennedy. Maybe thats why Walt signed him, thought he could trade him for another all-star caliber player. I also met Kent Bottenfield at a hotel I worked at. When I saw the name on the cc I asked if he was the Pitcher from the cards, he corrected me "The FORMER MLB Pitcher". Nice guy talked for a long time. He said he loved his time in STL. This was a few years ago but at that time he was a christian music artist, came back later that night with an autograph for me on his newest CD. Not as prized as my Gibby or Brock autographs but I still love it.

by That's a Winner on Dec 15, 2007 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

yes
He is a nice guy. After we broke the ice. We talked most of the game

by The Butcher on Dec 15, 2007 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Cards' Center Fielders
Wow. Talk about a franchise dominating at a position. The reign will most certainly continue... maybe as early as 2008. There's lost of discussion that the Raz will be giving every opportunity to win the spot in ST.

by rockin the red on Dec 15, 2007 10:22 AM EST reply actions  

typos
I can't type... that should say lots* of discussion and given* every opportunity

by rockin the red on Dec 15, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

so
is it plausible to expect a salary dump move with Rolen as well?

by The Butcher on Dec 15, 2007 10:26 AM EST reply actions  

Nope
Cardinals brass thinks he will return to form- at least somewhat- next year and therefore is undervalued by other teams.  That why he wasn't traded.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 15, 2007 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I am shocked
I hope J'Ed returns to form and makes a great HoF bid.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 15, 2007 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

Heh
I had a bizarre dream the other night that I was arguing with my dad over Jimmy's HOF worthiness.  I may be a little biased, but I think he deserves a fair shot.  

by jdub176 on Dec 15, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Completely agree
with you on that one, Zubin.  

by cardsgirl95 on Dec 15, 2007 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

B y Jimmy
Jimmy ballgame you will be missed, Thank You for the memories. Rasmus has large shoes to fill, itt sure is gonna be exciting to see what the kid can do though for all this talk.

by GhostofJimLinderman on Dec 15, 2007 10:36 AM EST reply actions  

So long Jimmy
I still remember sitting in front of the TV watching Sportscenter back before the 2000 season and seeing the headline come across the bottom of the screen saying that the Cards just traded for Edmonds.  I yelled so loud in excitement that my dad came running into the room to see what was wrong!

My favorite memory of watching Edmonds play was a game I got to see in Cincy back in '03.  He hit a homer and made an awesome catch taking a homer away from one of the Reds. The Cards blew them out.

It's been a good run but unfortuately things like this are part of the game. I'll still wear my Edmonds jersey with pride.

by PujolsRules on Dec 15, 2007 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

Larue...
I think Jimmy has done that to him 3 times.

Well, looks as if he'll get his chance again assuming Larue ever hits one that far.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Rolen...
Wonder what this means for him?

Seems like they want to blow out the veterans and clean house.

The Angels need a 3B.

Would something like this work?

Rolen, Duncan, Reyes and Cash for Brandon Wood, Ervin Santana and Miguel Gonzalez.

The cash payout would look like this...

'08 9M
'09 4M
'10 2M

What do you think?

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

I think we need Duncans bat to much
to trade him right now. With no Jimmy and Rolen probably not lasting more than a few months into the season I would like to see him stay.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

So...
you believe the Angels would do it?

I'd be very happy could they pull off that trade.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't wait
for Mo to be fired.  Edmonds should retire as a Cardinal and go into the HOF as a Cardinal.

by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 10:54 AM EST reply actions  

Regardless of your feeling on Mo...
Jimmy is likely not getting into the HoF.

Despite having among the 5 greatest seasons any center fielder has ever had (2000-2004), I don't believe his excellence was sustained for a long enough period.

From BP's PECOTA Card entry for Jimmy in 2005:

In terms of offense alone, over the last five seasons Edmonds has been roughly as good as Duke Snider in his prime. Throw Edmonds' superior glovework into the mix, and he's been more valuable over that span than both Snider and Ken Griffey Jr. in their best seasons. In other words, he's had one of the greatest peaks of any center fielder in baseball history, short of the Mays-Mantle clash of titans, but historically notable.

I'd love for him to make it...but unless he plays a few more seasons, and recovers a dramatic power stroke, it's probably not going to happen.

"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

That's just silly!
With all due respect, that's silly. Dude's been on the job for about six weeks and he has a lot of dead weight on the roster with little financial flexibility. Wanting to fire him is just silly; let him have an entire offseason to work. If the roster still looks horrible, or if he begins to make moves that are truly horrible (ie, signing Kyle Lohse to a huge contract), then you may purchase the firemo.com domain name.

Personally, I admire the fact he had the cajones to trade one of our heroes. As much as I love Jimmy Baseball, I don't see him rebounding. We can get better production from some combination of Rasmus, Barton, Ankiel and Schumaker.

I just hope he can get rid of Rolen for a decent return...then we'll see what kind of GM Moz is.

by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Let me explain
I am more a fan of certain players than I am a fan of a team.  Edmonds is one of my favorite ballplayers and he is(was) a member of the Cardinals, therefore I will follow the Cardinals.  The Cardinals are also my local team and they have the best radio broadcaster in all of Baseball in Mike Shannon, which made it very convenient and nice to listen to Jimmy play.  Now Mo has thrown a wrinkle into my audio entertainment by trading away Edmonds.  I have listened to the Padres broadcasters and don't particularly care for them.

As far as the trade itself goes, I believe it will be viewed as a very poor one.  As you said yourself "if he begins to make moves that are truly horrible then you may purchase the firemo.com domain name" and I think that he just made a horrible move by trading away a HEALTHY centerfielder for absolutely nothing in return.  The only reason in my mind as to why we even recieved this 3rd baseman in return is because the kid is from St. Louis.  Had the kid been from Detroit, then Mo wouldn't have asked for him in return.  It was quite frankly, simply a PR move - "The fans won't be quite so upset if we have this local kid on the team."

I don't think that Rasmus is ready to play center for the big club.  Even if he was, we will no longer recieve the veteran advice from one of the greatest centerfielders of my generation.  I believe that if Edmonds was tutoring Rasmus in CF, then that would greatly enhance Colby's developmental process.  Now we'll never know.

I still stand be my phrase...FIRE MO.

by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Mike Shannon
but he's not the best in the game... Don't think it was a PR move, I think this Freese kid was a throw-in...just happened to be from StL...
"Dude, we're running out of stadium" - said on the way to our seats in Section 428.

by bukowski on Dec 15, 2007 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

No offense
But Mike Shannon is mothafuckin dreadful.  I once was driving from St. Louis to Wentzville, so I put on the Cards game to give it a listen.  It was about a 35 minute drive or so, give or take a few minutes.  I picked up the game in the top of the third, and it wasn't until I was pulling in to the house of the dude I was visiting that Shannon EVER mentioned the score.  Turns out it was 2-1 Cards.  No one scored during the drive, so literally the entire time I was in the dark.  Half the time you can't understand his slurred-ass voice, and he seems more interested in talking about random bullshit than the game.  The worst was when he used to cut off Jack Buck during games and yack in his drunk-sounding voice about this restaurant he ate at one time.  Its like nails on a chalkboard.  

The man is an institution though, so maybe I just committed a sin or something...But quite frankly I'd rather gouge out my own eyes and smash my own eardrums than listen to Shannon every night.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Your first paragraph
is exactly why I love Shannon.
I will be in briefs.

by Alxfritz on Dec 15, 2007 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Shannon
Don't get me wrong, I bet he's a blast to hang out with.  He seems like he'd be that strange uncle who walks around at your Christmas reunion with a beer in one hand, a vodka in the other, and a cigar in his mouth, hitting on the oldest nephew's girlfriend.  

I just can't stand listening to him doing a game.  I think he's a dreadful announcer.

I think it was amazing that he was able to do any games this year considering what was going on with his wife.  I was at the Cards/Crew game the day after his wife died.  It was a pretty sad day.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

The Moonman
is a national treasure.

by 26thMan on Dec 15, 2007 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Get up baby GET UP!!!!
Home Run

The Man in Black is in the breed of broadcasters like Harry Carry and Dizzy Dean. Many people don't like that but I love it.

by That's a Winner on Dec 16, 2007 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Shannon can paint a picture
with his voice like no other can.  Of course, this is all my own opinion.  I have a hard time listening to Cards games when Shannon isn't there calling them.  The only other announcing crews that I have heard that comes close to Shannon are the Brennemans calling Reds games and Uecker with the Brewers.  

by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point.
Mike does do a nice job of painting the scene.  Last year during a home game against the Padres, he was discribing Izzy's routine on the mound right before he pitches and it instantly brought a vivid picture to my mind.  That's a talent that some broadcasters don't have.  

by cardsgirl95 on Dec 15, 2007 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

mike shannon
i can't remember the game but i swear, shannon said: "Sun blown pop fly"

i like him but he ain't the best.

"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Dec 15, 2007 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Mo's not the bad guy
Mo is an agent of change--whomever replaced Jocketty was going to be an agent of change. These people usually come as surprise hirings (or obscure promotions), make huge changes, ruffle a ton of feathers, and are given a nice severence package and thanks from ownership when the dirty work is done. I've seen it done in business, education administration and, yes, sports. Perhaps Mo can turn it around quickly enough to satisfy fans like you and become the next great Cards GM... perhaps not.

Thankless, thankless job for Mo. But he's doing the right things. I'll always remember games 6 and 7 of the 04 NLCS. Homer and catch, sheesh. I'm excited about what this means for Rasmus and/or Ankiel.  

"I don't believe what I just saw!" ~ Jack Buck

by itsalemmon1019 on Dec 15, 2007 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree
What I can't understand are all the comments on this blog calling for Mo's head and calling it a tragedy that Edmonds didn't finish his career as a Cardinal.  This overlooks, IMO, 2 very important details: 1) Edmonds waived his no trade clause.  He wanted out.  If he didn't, then he wouldn't have waived it.  Can't keep a guy here if he doesn't want to be here.  2) This move is exactly the kind of move we need to make to improve for the future: trade old, expensive, underperforming veterans for young cheap talent.  These moves are the kinds of moves that we bemoaned Walt for being on the opposite side of (ala Haren).  

lboros was right: damned if you do, damned if you don't.

by Ray Lankford on Dec 15, 2007 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

ok, but
i agree, except in this case a 25 year old who largely duplicates allen craig and is at the same level in milb, is not an exchange for talent.  it is a dump/gift to he padres.  i wish someone would do something that nice for us before xmas!

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish they would have
gotten a better prospect too.  But even if its a straight salary dump, I still don't think its a bad move.  I love Edmonds as much as the next guy, but there is absolutely no need for the Cardinals to pay 8 mill for a backup who was outperformed by scrap-heapers like Taguchi.  So if we can trim fat from the payroll, get a prospect (even if not a ++ prospect) and make room for our younger players to get at bats and develop their skills, then I'm all for it.

I will miss Jimmy, but I miss the memory of him more; 04' Edmonds, as opposed to the Edmonds who struggled mightily last year.

by Ray Lankford on Dec 15, 2007 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

He's not going into the HofF
regardless of whether Mozeliak is the GM or not.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Had he....
gotten to 400HR and 10GG he would have certainly made it.  Unfortunately, both look like an extreme long shot at this time.

Jimmy will get some votes, but in the end fall short.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That remains to be seen...
With all of the discovery going on in the now-named "Steroid Era", I think that it will be more difficult to predict how the writers are going to vote for the HOF.  If the consensus decides that anyone under suspicion of using PEDs will not be voted in, then Edmonds stands a much better chance of getting to Cooperstown.

by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

umm
Don't you think Edmonds would fall under the same suspicion? He always has with me.
SUBURBS: Where Americans cut down trees and then name streets after them.

by beanocook on Dec 15, 2007 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

why exactly?
does everyone have to be suspected now? The rampant speculation about everyone without any hint of of use is what pisses me off most about this whole deal.
"Show me a guy who takes his time on the mound and I'll show you a damned loser." - Leo Durocher

by mattyfrommo on Dec 15, 2007 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Trades
Arizona was busy this morning acquiring ace Dan Haren and sending Valverde to Houston...

by Calhoun on Dec 15, 2007 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

deserved better than this?
several posts in the various threads expressed this sentiment along with the idea of allowing Edmonds to retire a Cardinal.  However, 6 months from now, with Edmonds batting .236 and the Cards mired in last place, similar (the same?) voices would be calling for Edmonds to be benched in favor of Rasmus, Barton, or Skip Schumaker.  Edmonds, in my opinion, deserves better than that.

As far as retiring as a Cardinal, Edmonds had control over that.  He waived his no-trade clause.  Seems he opted for another shot at the WS rather than a farewell tour.

As far as the 3B prospect we got back, he's hit well at all 3 levels in his year and a half of pro ball.  He likely would have spent much of last season at AA, except the Pads #1 prospect was playing 3B at AA.

Now we seem to have a log-jam at 3B in the high minors.  Craig and Freese both ought to be at AA with Rico Washington at AAA.  Is Craig available to package in trade? or have they given up on him defensively at 3B?

by vances law on Dec 15, 2007 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

Deserved Better?
Um, he waived his no trade clause.  It was entirely up to Edmonds if he wanted to stay, and he opted out.  

by Ray Lankford on Dec 16, 2007 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Trades
The six players Oakland ended up with: left-handers Brett Anderson, Dana Eveland and Greg Smith; infielder Chris Carter; and outfielders Aaron Cunningham and Carlos Gonzalez.

Arizon got Haren and pitcher Connor Robertson.

From Houston they received reliever Chad Qualls, infielder Chris Burke and right-hander Juan Gutierrez.

by Calhoun on Dec 15, 2007 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

So Long Jimmy Ballgame
As many of you aforementioned, I believe this was a salary dump to put to use in a move that is coming.  However, the more I thought about it(and this is by no means a probability, but a possibility), could Edmonds or his agent have hinted at this not being his last season?  And knowing that the Cards knew he wasn't going to retire a Cardinal anyway (there is no way he would have worn the BOB in '09)??  Maybe it's wishful thinking, but IMHO it's a slight possibility.  They figured he may play another 2 years, opposed to the 1 we had him signed for, and decided to get the salary relief a year early.  Just an idea.

Anyway, I wish him the best, and will always remember running from work into a bar just in time to see him win Game 6 of the 2004 NLCS.  One of the greatest moments (and reactions - the double fist pump) in Cards history.  So long, Jimmy Ballgame!!  

by joecardsfan on Dec 15, 2007 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

Mo vs. Tony
There was a lot of negative chatter here and elsewhere, both when Tony re-signed and when Mo took reins, that we would avoid the necessary rebuilding and try and patch the current roster.  If we believe what we wrote about their conflicting motivitations, then this is the clearest indication to date that Mo is getting his way.  

I'm as big a fan of Edmonds as anyone -- I think LB's nonchalance does not do justice to the excitement JEd brought to Cards fans, not to mention the hardware.  But he was not going to be with us after 2008.  Assuming we use the money we're saving (not yet announced, but must be $5-6M) on adding to mid-term nucleus, this is a good move.  But I don't think it's Tony's move.

I am curious about the plan for the OF now:  under Tony you basically have 1.5 OFs in Ankiel and Duncan.  If Rasmus isn't ready, where's your backup?  Are we really going to platoon Spezio, Ludwick, Shu and/or Barton?  I still think pitching has to be the priority for what looks like ~$15M in payroll room, but that outfield is looking pretty suspect.

by Secret Weapon on Dec 15, 2007 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

outfield - no problem
We've got Duncan, Ankiel, Ludwick, Schu, and Barton.   That looks just fine to me.  Remember, as Larry pointed out, the backups outperformed JEd last year.

The main difference now is that the promising guys we don't really know about will now get to play every day.  That's presuming that they don't sign someone like Cameron, of course.

So this is progress of a sort.  But now I really don't understand why they were in such a hurry to sign Izturis.  It's hard to see what the plan is here, other than to wait for the current crop of prospects in the minors to come on up.

by apack on Dec 15, 2007 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Like the approach, but not the move
I agree that we need to give the younger players more time, but I wouldn't have done a straight salary dump here.  It is hard to evaluate the market, but I guess that Edmonds could have fetched more later -- either later in the off-season or at the trading deadline when a contender would be looking for a "veteran presence."  Edmonds just about fits the definition of a stretch-run pickup.

It seems to me that the best approach would have been to keep JEd here but not to over-expose him during the season (as they did in the first half last year) in order to give the other outfielders more playing time. However, this and other moves appear to be strongly influenced by Tony's propensity to play veterans over kids, as well as by his personal interactions with some of the players.  These tendencies, combined with the comments on Rolen, which were said to have "horrified" Mo, strongly suggests that La Russa is indeed a barrier to rebuilding.  At the very least, he is a barrier to Mo's leadership in developing and executing a consistent strategy for the organization.

Does anyone still wonder why Antonetti backed out?  

That said, while I didn't like the extension it didn't work out too badly -- because the first-year salary was for less than the option on Edmond's prior contract, we will end up paying about the same or even a bit less for 1 year of him, and we got a (marginal) prospect out of it. I still don't see that we get the marginal value out of the trade to make it worthwhile, particularly because I don't see anyone who's really worth investing the money we saved by making the deal.  And I too would have like to see Edmonds get his last hurrah with the team.

by apack on Dec 15, 2007 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

It's just a horrible trade
I respectfully disagree that this trade is necessary.  It's just a horrible trade by Mo.

I'll preface this by saying that Jim Edmonds is my favorite current Cardinal and maybe my favorite Cardinal of All-Time so this trade is a huge emotional blow and I know I am not alone in Cardinal nation.

Yes, this trade makes room for Colby Rasmus, but the timing is horrible. Mo trades Edmonds at his lowest value and after a series of injuries.

I'll repost part of my comment from the "So Long Jimmy" and comparison with Paul Molitor.

Jim Edmonds should have been given the opportunity to bounce back after getting hit hard with injuries and resume his off season training. it was obvious that his legs were out of condition during Spring Training after having to take time off during the surgeries.

At age 37 and beyond, there are many cases of players coming back to have big years.

Age 37  .351/.422/.612
Age 38  .337/.423/.528

Who is this player?

Stan Musial.

Paul Molitor slumped to .270/.350/.423 at the age of 39 and then came back at age 40 to hit .341/.390/.468.

At age 38 Molitor hit .341/.410/.518. Edmonds and Molitor both had injury plagued careers and in the Brewers case were haunted by not re-signing Molitor.

OK, you can also make the case Edmonds won't come back and will have another mediocre year, but Edmonds has earned the chance to make a comeback. Now what the Cardinals have done is broken up the big three of Rolen, Pujols and Edmonds and have thrown in the towel for 2008.  

All this trade did was officially end the DYNASTY that began in 2004 and start a full blown rebuilding project.  Edmonds should have been allowed to retire as a Cardinal and the Cardinals DYNASTY should have been given one last chance to continue.  

DYNASTY League Baseball - the leader in realism in Baseball simulation games from the designer of Pursue the Pennant.

by DYNASTYLeagueBaseballMike on Dec 15, 2007 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

Yes, but...
Molitor was a DH by then and didn't have to play defense. And didn't Musial at first at the end of his career? I would think playing 1B would be less physically taxing to an older player than playing CF.

Re: your handle... I'm a big fan of Dynasty League, too. I also had PtP back in the day. Played the 1987 season like crazy back then.

by 26thMan on Dec 15, 2007 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Edmonds defense
Agreed and yes Musial played first and Molitor played first and DH.

It certainly is tougher to play CF at an older age, but it's not an option moving Edmonds to first - much of his value is still on defense.  Edmonds slipped range wise last year, but did get better during the end of the year when his legs started getting ikn better shape and still has a very good arm.  Edmonds always relied on his superb jumps and great hands rather than speed so his defensive decline should not be as great as some other CF.

Great to hear you are a DYNASTY League Baseball and Pursue the Pennant fan!

DYNASTY League Baseball - the leader in realism in Baseball simulation games from the designer of Pursue the Pennant.

by DYNASTYLeagueBaseballMike on Dec 15, 2007 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure this is a good trade...
...while I think it is more than evident Jimmy Ballgame is in his decline phase, it is a quite frequent occurrence for a player in his decline phase to put up one more near-peak season (call it "the last hurrah").  And I had a sneaking suspicion this was going to be the year.

Now, from a team perspective, I'm not sure how important that production would be, as I, like Larry, am fairly convinced 08 is a wash of a season.  We are very unlikely to compete for a playoff spot.

That said, I believe that it makes a whole lot more sense to keep Jimmy and allow him to re-establish some of that value.  In such a case we might have mustered a Larry Walker-like trade (3 prospects) around the trade deadline from a team looking to improve for their playoff run than we would have now.

So why did the Cardinal's trade Jimmy?  In the scenario I mention above, while the Cardinals make out better in prospects...they don't make out as well in salary relief.  As I see it, this is the same reason they passed up on Rick Porcello.  When it comes to the question of talent versus savings, this team has become increasingly cost-concsious.  And that doesn't bode well in my opinion.  D.GOOCH

Cardinals, Cardinals, Cardinals!

by GOOCH24 on Dec 15, 2007 11:29 AM EST reply actions  

exactly
like rolen, my bet would be that his value would be higher in june than now.  i must say the padres clearly also believe that to be the case!

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Have you actually noticed
the quality of the three prospects the Cardinals gave up for Walker?  None of them amounted to a thing.  That was a pure salary dump too--no greater prospect quality, just quantity.

by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

yes but
yes, but that was the rockies doing the dumping.  so far mo has cut ties with folks, but acquired no one for the ml roster except  the iz.  this does not require great intellect or cajones for that matter.

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Nobody loves Jim more than I do
But I view this as a necessary, intelligent step toward improving this team. When Larry talks about the way this team has stagnated in recent years, you need look no further than Jim Edmonds to see a prime example. He's old, he's relatively expensive and his value can be easily approximated by other in-house options. That's the very definition of a guy who should be cut loose.

The fact that the Cardinals got a decent third base prospect for him--one of the weaker positions in the system, might I add--seals the deal for me. We can argue about this if Mo goes and blows this money on Kyle Lohse, but I think this was a good move. It'll just be a huge adjustment to watch somebody else patrol center next year.

The Falcoholic
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog

by Dave Choate on Dec 15, 2007 11:30 AM EST reply actions  

Improve the team?
I understand all the arguments against Edmonds, old, slow, injury prone, shell of his former self...and they all have merit.

However, exactly how has the team improved?  Have they gotten marginally better?  Addition by subtraction?

I'll state it again, they MAY have gotten MARGINALLY better by turning CF over to in house options but if they use the 6M they are saving to have the pleasure of 4/5 years of Silva/Lohse it's one step forward two steps back.

Sure, they saved a decent chunk of money but who in the FA market is worth giving that money to.

People who are claiming that this team has made a major step forward by giving away their CF for a 24 yr old a baller are way off base.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't claim this is a major step forward
But yes, I do think it's addition by subtraction. We save a little money, get a decent prospect back and fill up the production with in-house options. Given the position this team is in for next year, it made exactly zero sense to me to keep someone like Edmonds around.

I expect this to be a rebuilding year, and you can't rebuild without letting the young guys take a crack at producing for you.

The Falcoholic
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog

by Dave Choate on Dec 15, 2007 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Disagree...
First, I didn't necessarily mean you were claiming they took a major step forward.

I'll address your your points one by one...

"We save a little money"

Irellevant.  They did save money, but there isn't anything in the FA market worth spending it on.  An argument could be made that saving that 6M was a bad thing if it means we get stuck with 4/5 years of Silva/Lohse.

"get a decent prospect back "

I just don't see him as much of a prospect.  24yr olds in A ball don't get me too excited.  However, he was behind Headly and MAYBE that had something to do with his progression.  He's nothing to get thrilled about, and he's behind Craig.

"fill up the production with in-house options."

That's no sure thing.  Sure, I'd like to see what Barton/Rasmus can do, but to think they are sure to be an upgrade is a bit of a stretch.

"it made exactly zero sense to me to keep someone like Edmonds around. "

Let's just throw aside the fact that he was one of the greatest Cardinals of all time and it would have been cool to see him retire in Cardinal red.  That seems to be getting brushed aside.

Forgetting that, this could be an economic windfall for the team as well.  If the team isn't winning for the second year in a row attendance will start to decline.  Giving Jimmy a sendoff would have been a good way to keep people coming to the park.  Concessions will be affected as well as merchandise sales.  It makes sense on alot of levels, especially since this team isn't going to compete and are not any closer to that goal after the deal.

"I expect this to be a rebuilding year, and you can't rebuild without letting the young guys take a crack at producing for you."

This is one part where I agree.  If they were going into full out rebuild mode then they should have ate 6M of the salary and got a real prospect in return.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Good points
I agree that the team should've just ate the salary and gotten more prospects back, because I think we both know this is a team in desperate need of retooling. Again, if the salary goes toward Silva or Lohse on a multi-year deal, I'm going to look at this trade a lot less favorably.

Still, I'm not quite understanding the retirement talk. Who says he would've retired after his contract ran out? (If he did, I apologize for not spotting it.) Then the team is faced with another dilemma, because Rasmus is likely to be ready or damn close to it. Would they have re-signed him for a farewell tour, or would he have just walked to another team? In my eyes, it was no sure thing that Jimmy Ballgame was going to retire in Cardinal red.

Also, I get the sense that you're assuming I'm saying Barton/Rasmus/Ankiel/whoever can outproduce Edmonds. I simply think they can approximate his value, which isn't a stretch considering that his OPS has declined each of the last three seasons and he put up a .728 last year.

I know he's a Cardinal great. The team wouldn't have been where it was these last several years without Jim in center, and if we were a contender I'd argue long and hard for keeping him. With the team (I pray) looking to reload, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me to keep him around.

Enjoying the discussion, by the way.

The Falcoholic
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog

by Dave Choate on Dec 15, 2007 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

You make a good point...
Jimmy may well not retire at the end of the year.  
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Retirement
Bobby, you seem to overlook the fact that if retiring as a Cardinal was a priority for Edmonds at this point than he wouldn't have waived his no-trade clause.

And either way, you are right in this particular post.  Most people have assumed that he was going to retire after this year, and supposedly he was leaning that way...But who knows?  He wouldn't be the first player to realize that he's going to miss it too much/can still play/wants more money/wants another ring/whatever else.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

If they were able to exchange
Edmonds for Lohse or Silva even up it would be a good trade. Face it, the value of Edmonds is minimal.

by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

If they were able to trade Edmonds
for Lohse or Silva + 5 years and $60 M, that would be the most horrendous of trades.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't say for five or six years
And the pitcher who has a five-year contract doesn't have to be kept for five years.  Just because concepts like stockpiling talent or trading from a position of strength is alien to the Cardinals, it doesn't have to be.

by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

No
Hardcore said it best.  It's not Edmonds for Lohse/Silve.

It's Edmonds for 4/5 years at 10+ per of Lohse/Silva.

BEYOND TERRIBLE

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

i think a lot of you
have your judgment beclouded by sentiment.

yes, he was probably the best CF in Cardinal history.

but from 8/1/06 to the present, jed has hit for a .736 OPS. and he's lost a step or five in the OF. i love jimmy ballgame...a lot. but it was either another season of him being below average in cf for about 100 games, or a chance to get a half decent prospect. that's the best they could probably get for him.

it's better then nothing, it's better then just watching the decline phase of jim run it's full course. to me that's just as sad to see. those of you calling for mo's head and whatnot are being totally unreasonable.

I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 11:35 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed.
I hate to see the guy go, but they can get similar production for a fraction of the cost. If this team wants financial flexibility, this is the way to go about it.

I thought it was telling the return prospect was 1) a third baseman and 2) from St. Louis. I think a Rolen trade is coming before too long.

by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed
As noted by Eric and in LB's post above, Jimmy may not have even been the best center fielder on the team last year.  To call this move a "salary dump" infers that he has much more value than he presently does.  The notion of "retiring a Cardinal" is alluring, especially for an all-time fav like Jimmy.  But was it really that special to watch 2004 Ray Lankford?

For what one untrained observers eyes are worth, I watched Rick Ankiel play some very good center field in the minors last year.

by bgodar on Dec 15, 2007 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Ouch...
Come on, let's not compare Lankford and Edmonds in terms of their place in Cardinal history.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

lankford
was one of the best...he ranks 9th in cardinal history in total bases, 8th in doubles, 5th in HR, 9th in RBI, 4th in walks, 8th in steals, 8th in runs created (ahead of edmonds), 6th in extra base hits, 4th in sac flies, 1st in power/speed #, 9th in ab/per HR...

nobody disses lankford around me! :-)

I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

OH, I'm not...
Ray-Ray was one of my favs as well.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

If you could bat Ray 3 times in a row
the first inning you could push the opposing pitchers pitch count up to 40 or 50 forcing him out of the game by the 3rd inning. Man can he take some pitches and spoil like a madman.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

That's not the Lankford I remember
He was a horrible two-strike hitter, especially in his later years.  Once he got to two strikes, a third quickly followed.

by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't know how we can settle this I
have no idea were to look. I do remember a lot of 10/13 pitch at bats. He did strike out a lot as well.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey
I don't think you're allowed to come on here and back yourself up, dude!  I remember one game where you threw the ball into the stands while trying to get the ball back in after a double...One of the wierdest damn plays ever.  Am I the only one who remembers that one?

BTW...Lankford and Brian Jordan made the 94-95 Cardinals bearable.  I really liked both of those guys, in a completely manly-hetero-appreciatetheirbaseballabilities sort of way of course.

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Lankford
Was one of my all-time favorites as well.  In fact, probably held in higher regard by virtue of those seasons when he was the only player on the field worth watching.

So I was excited in '04 when Old Ray returned to finish his career as a Redbird.  But after watching a shell of his former talent struggle in left field, miss a month or so and then make token appearances as a pinch hitter, then be left of the playoff roster, I don't think watching him "retire as a Cardinal" was any kind of transcendent or important experience.  For him or for me.

by bgodar on Dec 15, 2007 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree
While my sentiments for JEd are high as well, I do believe this is a step in the overall right direction. Also, JEd obviously wanted this to happen or it wouldn't have happened. What's done next will seal my opinion of whether this was a smart move to make right now or not. Loved ya, Jimmy. But this is baseball. Let's see what Mo does next before pronouncing it "bad baseball." So many people here were so freaking sure Mo was gonna be just Walt Lite or a TLR puppet. Well, if nothing else this shows Mo is running things his way. It may not turn out to be the best way, but we really won't know that for awhile. For everyone who was clamoring for a youth movement--you got your wish. It had to start somewhere.

Good luck as a Friar, Jimmy. You won't be forgotten here.

by rockin redbird on Dec 15, 2007 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree
I'm pretty surprised to read so many posts of people who are really upset by this trade.  Edmonds was our worst OF last year.  Only Taguchi was really that close.  He's 37 and entering the final year of his contract.  The Cards owed him $9 M and he was replacement-level last year.  Getting most of that contract off the books as early as possible was an important step in helping to rebuild this franchise AND it got better for '08 as well.  It allows Rasmus an opportunity to play, if he can get there in the spring, or allows one of the other OF's an opportunity to hold the spot until he is ready.

It's insane to pay $9M per year for a platoon OF who's average defensively and poor offensively.  I've got great memories of Edmonds but should we keep him 1 more year in hopes that he'll make another catch like the one against the Reds or against the 'stros in the '04 NLCS?

AZ said earlier that we should've paid more cash and gotten a better prospect.  That's a good point.  But it was time to let Edmonds go and I didn't think we had a prayer until the season ended.  This is a good trade for the team.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Seems like....
You are assuming the money saved from Edmonds will de directed back into other areas of need.

Let's say it's not, and instead used to pay down the stadium debt.  Do you still like the move?

Edmonds was probably going to be a part time player anyway, and I don't like the idea of starting Colby's arb clock jumping past AAA.  There were going to be plenty oppurtunties for Barton/Rasmus even with Jimmy on the team.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

So what if does
pay down stadium debt? It's not our money.

This team is going nowhere in 2008 anyway, and the remaining items on the free-agent shelves aren't all that attractive.

I have no quarrel if DeWitt wants to put that $6M in his pocket. It's his dough. Hell, for all we know, that $6M could go "in the bank," as it were, for spending on someone worth a crap next year.

by 26thMan on Dec 15, 2007 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Then stop raising ticket prices
if you aren't going to keep true on the promises of a) spending money on Ballpark Village or b) spending money on players with value, then stop asking for more money from the fans.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

If it...
is reinvested in the team than I am fine with it.

If it's goes directly into old Billy Boy's wallet than I am not, and you shouldn't be either.

If you are going to lower payroll, then don't raise ticket, concession, merchandise prices etc...

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Rebuild for 2008
How? With Kyle Lohse?

This trade, at best, made the Cardinals marginally better for 2008. It did nothing for them beyond that (no, a 24-yo drafted as 5th year senior isn't a real prospect). What's the point beyond putting a few dollars back in DeWitt's pocket?

by Rob H on Dec 15, 2007 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It's sound as a baseball move
But you'd be hard pressed to find a Cardinal fan who doesn't love #15. With or without him this team isn't going anywhere next year, so it isn't a horrible idea to let him play part time, collect 300 at bats, and retire as a Cardinal at the end of the year.

But if Edmonds hadn't planned on retiring or had no intention of being a part time player I can see why they felt he had to go-- and hey, if he somehow tears it up next year in San Diego we can always bring him back.

I'm just surprised that the Padres think he can be an effective everyday centerfielder in that giant ballpark.

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Dec 15, 2007 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Jimmy , be good !!
i'll always remember you as a Cardinal. thanks for the great memories.

i hope you still have a lot of fun and great baseball in you, playing in your backyard. you deserve it.

... come back to StL as a coach or manager.

"bury the dead, feed the survivors and rebuild the city" (marques do pombal, 1777)

by Johnny64 on Dec 15, 2007 11:59 AM EST reply actions  

maybe they
wil trade rolen and have a fire sale but i doubt it..This does give jimmy a chance to play for a contender so good for him..

by cm1000 on Dec 15, 2007 11:59 AM EST reply actions  

Intangibles loss
I think the biggest loss, other than sentimental, is the tutoring he could have continued to give Ankiel throughout the whole season, and presumably Rasmus for the last half. This, coupled with the loss of clubhouse leader could make it a very difficult year for everyone inside. I hope Albert doesn't crack this year...

Now hitting leadoff, Skip Schumaker.

by dralexp on Dec 15, 2007 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

reconstruction
at this point, we have no senior leadership left in the clubhouse, and this will make tlr earn his money big time.  counteract rolen's attitude, keeping albert within himself (last year saw too many times when he tried to do too much), and convincing/showing the young guys it isn't enough to be young--or you will be on your way too.  to me, this makes getting rolen off somewhere else more desirable, but not for a class A third baseman!  how about rolen straight up for burnett (they would get to keep their personal orthopedists)!

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 12:15 PM EST reply actions  

I just hope
it's not a prelude to a trade with the Dodgers with the principals being Rolen for Pierre

by vinniefromjersey on Dec 15, 2007 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Oh Shit....
I hope you were knocking on wood when you typed that.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

noo hell noo
I hope for laroche from the dodgers or santana form the angels// not pierre we have enough outs in our line up already... also we have young players to play on cf till colby  is ready... I hope we dont spend the money or silva or loshe thompson or reyes or welleymer will be okay and save money for 09

by cm1000 on Dec 15, 2007 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Bill DeWitt saves a few more dollars
people wonder why you can't trust anything that man says.  Ballpark Village is a parking lot filled with water.  "We've got the money to spend if the right person comes along" means absolutely nothing because Joe Dimaggio ain't walking through that door.

The moment he said payroll would go up to $115 M, I knew that it was the first sign of a massive salary dump.  Which is what makes the Izturis signing so incredibly stupid.  Why pay Cezar the Suck $3.5 M if you are going to sell off parts to save dollars elsewhere?

If Skip Shumaker is on the opening day roster and Colby Rasmus is not, then DeWitt isn't trying to field the best team possible..he's trying to save the most dollars possible (keeping Rasmus controlled longer).

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 12:36 PM EST reply actions  

Gee, Hardcore...
How do you feel about the Izturis signing? Is it like a prerequisite of every post you make?

by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That's what makes me angry too
Yeah, we just saved about $7 mil on Edmonds, but HALF OF THAT went to Izturis. Then if we look at the Springer deal, well damn, that's where all the money went already.
On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 15, 2007 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

it's my dead horse and i'll beat it if i want
iz doesn't bug me as much as the money they gave springer.  they've thrown in the towel, so why is a 7th or 8th inning pitcher worth north of $3M?  this is what bugs me about mo et al..  letting jimmy go for basically cash, letting eck go for a few bucks, and then spending it on iz and springer?  at least there is an outside chance iz is not a deadend.  not so springer (unless izzy is on his way somewhere).  i'd have much rather kept jimmy for at least part of the season and not signed springer.  money would have been little different.

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree
that the towel has been thrown.  It's still way too early to make that assessment.  It's unlikely that we'll compete, but stranger things have happened...

FYI springer was worth 4 WARP1's last year- in only 66IP- that's more than any other pitcher on the team not named Wainwright.  You can't let a guy like that go for $3M.  With springer in the bullpen and Ankiel/Rasmmus in CF we're probably 5-6 wins better (and maybe a lot more!) than with Jimmy in CF and a replacement-level bullpen arm.

Christmas lights are an extremely efficient method for converting Christmas Spirit into heat. -anon

by SleepyCA on Dec 15, 2007 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

i have to agree with the above
The NL central is crap. pitching will win the division. If the cards can get another arm i will feel alot better, the season isn't over yet.

well maybe two or 3 arms..........

"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Dec 15, 2007 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah but,
it'd be nice to see him somewhat play for the present too.

So I can only hope that Mo has some sort of plan to make this a decent team next year. He now has the money to do it, so let's just hope he makes a move before everyone's taken. (and please don't let it be lohse).

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 15, 2007 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

I find
it interesting how many people here are so interested in saving the Cardinals money.

by The Butcher on Dec 15, 2007 1:21 PM EST reply actions  

I find it interesting
how many people here are interested in hanging on to a $9M platoon OF who was replacement-level last year and is 1 year older.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right HC...
Every decision should be made in a vacuum with blinders on.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

It is
very clear to me that you think the exact opposite of me on absolutely everything

by The Butcher on Dec 15, 2007 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha!
Anyone else find that exchange really funny?
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

5-10 Guy
Don't forget that Jimmy was a 5-10 guy. He could have vetoed if he wanted to stay. He wanted this also.

by saladdin69 on Dec 15, 2007 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

"Wanted this" is a bit strong
He just consented to the team's wishes.  The only thing he wanted was that if he were to be traded that he go to a So-Cal team, and the Cards obliged.  Consenting to the trade just means he leaves on amicable terms.  

by bailorg on Dec 15, 2007 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Rasmus
After looking at the P-D article title, it looks as though the rebuilding with Rasmus in center could happen sooner rather than later.  Memphis might well be skipped!

stlfan

by stlfan on Dec 15, 2007 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

That's what I'm talking about
lets get the show started. Rasmus should be our opening day leadoff hitter starting in CF flanked by Big Dunc and "Ammerin" Ank. I really want to see what they can do over a full year and then maybe consider the changes after we know what we have. Next year could be fun even if we don't go to the post season.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

The trade
surprised me, but what they got in return didn't, especially considering the "aging veteran" tag Jimmy falls under. Look at all of the trades so far this off-season; the majority of them have involved prospects.
As far as Rasmus is concerned, while I expect him to get a shot in ST, I don't see him making the Opening Day roster; unless he pulls a Pujols and just blows everyone's doors off.
"It's always about the money. Anyone who says it's not is lying."- Gene Simmons

by cardsrul on Dec 15, 2007 1:34 PM EST reply actions  

I'm sorry but I have to say
that my favorite team has become a complete mess.

The whole origanzition from the front office all the way to the Quad Cities farm team is quite frankly is in a state of disarray.

A few points to back this up.

  1. The front office lies to it's loyal fans about various promises from adding "impact players" to getting a top on the rotation pitcher.  Then they also have the nerve to raise the ticket prices and yet are going to field a team that will be lucky to finish 4th in what has been one of the worst divisions in baseball.
  2. You have LaRussa and Rolen fighting and making headlines like baseball's version Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell. Instead of making good headlines at the winter meetings about the Cards improving their team somehow, we just got a bad soap opera.
  3. They fire Jocketty and then go one this big search for a replacement and settle for the in-house guy in John Mozeliak mostly because the more attractive main canadates out there wanted nothing to do with the management politics going on right now.
  4. They trade a huge fan favorite in Jim Edmonds for basically nothing.  Granted Jim was at the twilight of his career and probably wouldn't have put up huge numbers, but going with him to San Diego was the chance for a great farewell party and some special events in 2008 that they could have maketed similar to what the Astros did last year for Biggeo. This would have guaranteed some big crowds in late Spetember and gave the fans something to look forward to at the end of the season. Not to mention his leadership to the team and valuable mentorship that he could have given Ankeil & Rasmus.  
People say that the organization has a plan for the future and they very well might, but as of right now I simply don't see one that is very promising. Yeah you can say we are going in a youth movement but other than Rasmus we don't really have a bunch of prospects that can come up and make an impact, especially in starting pitching. If we had the blue-chip horses down on the farm that are ready for the show that's one thing but just playing "AVERAGE" players that are under the age of 30 just to be "younger" isn't really going to do much for the club other than rival the Pirates who also have "Average" younger players for the bottom of the NL Central.

I hope my view changes in the coming year.

by KYCards on Dec 15, 2007 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

"The front office lies...."
Bernie, Randy Karraker, and Joe Strauss brought up that exact same point the other day on the radio. The subtrafuge that the front office continues to propagate is what irks them(and me for that matter) more than anything else. Just come clean, for Christ's sake...
"It's always about the money. Anyone who says it's not is lying."- Gene Simmons

by cardsrul on Dec 15, 2007 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed
Where's the vision?  Where's the leadership?

by apack on Dec 15, 2007 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It's tough medicine
for the team to get younger, and its no fun for any of us, in 2 years we'll be glad for these changes.  What I don't understand is why did TLR sign on for 2 years of this?

And as for Jimmy going out a Cardinal, who knows San Diego might be out of the race next August, DFA Jimmy, who then has a September farewell tour in STL

by rajah424 on Dec 15, 2007 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

How can you say "everything" is a mess?
I understand that the front office governs all, but you made no mention as to how the whole farm system is a mess.  

Was it a mess that that Springfield was in the Texas League championship?

by saladdays on Dec 15, 2007 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

As usual, Larry nailed it
I think Moz is faced with the daunting task of cleaning up the mistakes of the past few years: the ill-advised Edmonds extension; the unnecessary Carp extension; the Mulder trade; the Mulder extension; the Juan E signing.

It is not pretty, but I am glad he is being decisive and moving fast. I like the fact that young players will have the chance to accumulate some ML experience in 2008.

Letting Eck go ensures that Ryan will have a fair shot to win the SS job over Izturis. I doubt this happens if Eck is on the roster.

Letting Miles go opens up an opportunity for Jarrett Hoffpauir.

Trading Edmonds opens up room for Barton and potentially Rasmus, and reduces the left-handedness of the OF.

Extending Pineiro is a low-cost commitment ($$ and years) relative to what is likely to be available in this year's FA starter market, where guys like Lohse and Silva will likely get 3-5 years. If Pineiro returns to early Seattle form, the Cards will have caught lightning in a bottle.

The Springer signing is a bargain, considering guys like Linebrink got 4/19. He could have some value at the trade deadline.

This is still a work in progress, but I like the fact that Moz is breaking unproductive ties with a heroic past. Time to move on.

by Hungry Jack on Dec 15, 2007 2:08 PM EST reply actions  

Bonds
While Bonds would HELP the team's offense for 2008 and believe me we really need some help, I highly doubt DeWitt will authorize Bonds coming to the Cardinals.

It would just be way too much "bad publicity" for a team that is already in disarray and has one soap opeara (LaRussa/Rolen) going on already. DeWitt wouldn't want to add another. Especially one that relates to the steroid scandal.

by KYCards on Dec 15, 2007 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Bad Trade
Edmonds had offseason surgery and admitted to having leg problems last year.  There's no guarantee that an off-season of rest would cure that, but it's also not a foregone conclusion that it wouldn't.

Without anything noticeable to spend the $6M (or whatever) on in the free agent market or on the trade market, I'd much rather bet $6M on a comeback by a Hall of Very Good OF who has come back from injury before.  In this market, you don't have to do that much to be worth $6M, particularly at  premium defensive position.  He's still a plus CF defensively, even if he's lost a step.

A 24yo 3B in the California League who put up a sub-900 OPS is not a prospect, plain and simple, no matter where he went to high school.
This was a salary dump, nothing more.

by South Side Cards Fan on Dec 15, 2007 2:09 PM EST reply actions  

Freese
I take issue with people deriding Freese as a '24-year-old who hasn't gotten out of A ball yet'

It's not like his bat or defense held him back. There was speculation that he could start the 2007 season in Double-A and move quickly, but that didn't happen because the Padres were committed to sticking with top prospect Chase Headley at Double-A all year. The Padres were stacked with third basemen (enough to move Antonelli to a new position) - that's not Freese's fault.

In almost any other organization, Freese would be at the Double-A level or higher by now... perhaps looking like an older/good hit/ok defense type of minor leaguer that Kevin Kouzmanoff was one year ago.

by birdo on Dec 15, 2007 2:12 PM EST reply actions  

Barry Lamar Bonds
Just, ya know, to throw this out there.

Let's say Rasmus is given the CF job.  Let's say they trade Ankiel or Duncan.  Hell, let's say they don't trade either.  The A's are out of the Bonds running.  The only other rumored team was the St. Louis Cardinals.

So, let's say Bill DeWitt takes Edmonds $7 M and gives is to Bonds.  The lineup changes over dramatically:

Ramsus CF
Bonds/Duncan LF
Pujols 1B
Ankiel RF
Rolen 3B
Molina C
Kennedy 2B
Pitcher P
Ryan/Izturis SS

With Rasmus on the team, we don't need a leadoff hitting SS..which makes Izturis even dumber of a move (if that is a word).  You could have had Everett bat 8th and play SS and save us runs on defense.

Anyways, back to Bonds.  There is an opening now in the OF where the offense can be improved.  If they are serious about giving Rasmus the CF job, then Bonds makes some sense from an offensive standpoint.

What irks me the most is this team had two strengths (a glut in the OF and a glut in the bullpen).  John Mozeliak found a way to give away one of our OF for nothing in return.  How do you give away from a strength and get nothing for it?

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

The A's have no interest in Bonds
and Ankiel and Duncan are Tony's guys.

The guy we should be shopping either this year or next is Duncan. He's a good hitter, but his defense is pretty terrible, and he hasn't hit much against LHP. He's a guy likely to be overvalued. I'd like to see what he can do over a course of a full season before we shop him though.

Believe it or not, I'm not totally oppposed to Bonds, but I have a hard time imagining him playing defense. I can really only see him DHing on an AL team looking for a sideshow to drum up interest in their team. I've read so far there's been zero interest in Bonds from all 30 teams.

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Dec 15, 2007 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Bonds
I replied to the wrong one earlier so let me put it where it belongs.

While Bonds would HELP the team's offense for 2008 and believe me we really need some help, I highly doubt DeWitt will authorize Bonds coming to the Cardinals.

It would just be way too much "bad publicity" for a team that is already in disarray and has one soap opeara (LaRussa/Rolen) going on already. DeWitt wouldn't want to add another. Especially one that relates to the steroid scandal.

by KYCards on Dec 15, 2007 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

How much bad publicity is it though?
I mean, the Astros don't seem too conscerned they have a drug dealer on their roster.  

If Bonds hits 35 HRs next year and accounts for 52 of Pujols RBI total, I don't think anyone will give a flying flip how much creamy white stuff he rubbed on his knees.

The genie is out of the bottle as far as steroids now.  If the Mitchell Report did anything, it made Barry Bonds look more 'like everyone else'.

His an asshole, terrible husband and probably a felon.  That doesn't mean he isn't a great ballplayer and a decent option for a 1 year fix.

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

+1
i concur...
"Back in the day when I played, a pitcher had 3 pitches: a fastball, a curveball, a slider, a changeup and a good sinker pitch." - Mike Shannon

by nomar34 on Dec 15, 2007 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

If we did get Bonds I would flip him and Ank
in the line-up. I think that would make more sense.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

I disagree
the point is to a) get him more pitches to hit or b) get more people on in front of Albert.

Albert isn't moving out of the #3 slot, so putting Bonds #2 ensures that teams MUST pitch to him or face Albert with a runner on.

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Edmonds 7 Million going to Bonds would be...
a brilliant move!

Yeah he can't play D, but pull him out in late game situations.  The dude raked it when he was in the lineup last year and a combo of him and Albert makes the middle of the lineup pretty scary for any pitcher.

by TommyBruno on Dec 15, 2007 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe but
Ank needs to see more fastballs and can run a lot better than Barry no-knees Bonds. Also Bonds will get Pujols more pitches. Worse than Pujols with a gimpy Bonds at the plate is Bonds with a spry(compared to Bonds) Pujols who is a savy baserunner. Bonds is a prototypical 4 hitter. I think you support the top of the line-up better with him in the 4 spot. Ank has got no protection in the 4 spot. He is still developing as a big league hitter who could benefit from hitting in front of Al.
"Re-build the Team Guy"

by Red Blazer on Dec 15, 2007 3:01 PM EST reply actions  

A question for those who want to Edmonds retire...
...a Cardinal:

What if Jim Edmonds doesn't want to retire after this year? Would you advocate throwing yet another contract at him, even though Rasmus is arriving?

People talk about him retiring here as if this was definitely his last year. I'd love to see Jimmy finish here too, in a sort of vague emotional way, but the reality is that keeping him around after this year would be insanity given our current glut of younger and equally talented outfielders. So why pay him the money this year when we're not going to pay him anything the year after? He's not going to take a $1 mil contract in 2009, and the Cards giving him anything more would be stupid.

I love Edmonds. He was my favorite Cardinal. I have his jersey. But this move makes nothing but sense. It would be one thing to keep him around if he said he was going to retire after '08 -- that way he could finish here, sure. But he hasn't said that (or even begun to suggest it), and it would be impossible for them to justify keeping him beyond that from a baseball standpoint. Save the money now, bid Jimmy a fond farewell, and give the man a roaring ovation every time he comes to the plate in Busch III as a Padre.

by mojowo11 on Dec 15, 2007 3:03 PM EST reply actions  

Decent point....
No, I would not be willing to throw another contract at him just so he could "retire a cardinal".

However, considering the return we got...I'd gladly let him play out his current contract.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

bad deal
I think we are making a lot of excuses in favor of the organizational shift in strategy here.  Yes, we are all happy the Cardinals are looking toward the long neglected farm system and letting go of veterans to provide for the future.  However, a lot of the prospects are at least a year away from performing at the big league level.  If Rasmus comes out of spring training the next Pujols, Mo deserves all the accolades in the world.  But if Rasmus struggles, I'm not plunking down coin to go watch a bad Cardinal team with Schumacher et al in center. I would go see Edmonds in his farewell tour and I'd place good money of JEd outperforming most of the CF wannabes next year.  Our offense looks pretty dismal right now with few prospects to realy count on.  Not offering Eckstein arbitration shows the same lack of concern for next years team.  Why not take a chance on Eck and Edmonds rebounding on one year contracts and deal them if/when the team looks out of contention or you're sure the younger players are ready?  They might get hurt but what do we have to show for those losses right now anyway.  Money? to spend on what? I like that the team is looking toward 2009 but must we suffer so terribly through 2008 with the likes of Freese, Izturis, and Ryan to keep us warm.      
All my friends became Cardinal fans and grew up happy and liberal. I became a Cub fan and grew up embittered and conservative." -- George Will

by wannabeGedman on Dec 15, 2007 3:16 PM EST reply actions  

the likes of ryan and izturis
will outperform the likes of 2007 david eckstein
does this mean boras is human?

by nycbirdo on Dec 15, 2007 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I like the comments that we are ushering the youth
movement.  However where are we getting these good young players from?  Since the FA market is so bad this year, why would you want to free up cash for flexiblity?  Wouldnt it have made more since to see if Edmonds could play better in 08 than trade him at the low point of his value?  Then maybe we could have gotten some prospects for him.  

by KOA Cards on Dec 15, 2007 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

Yes it would...
Everyone speculating this is a good move is assuming that Jimmy will be as bad this year as last.

He's said his in the best shape (health-wise) that he's been in years.  I don't think it's much of a stretch to think that Jimmy can have a productive year if he's handled correctly.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

We are currently acting like the type of franchise
we used to rip off.  A team selling a player low rather than trying to rebuild their value and in the end, probably getting fleeced for nothing.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess it all depends on what you think of
David Freese.  The only way we really lose is if  J'Ed returns to form and Freese doesn't make it as a platoon/ backup IFer.  If J'Ed performs at replacement level or worse and Freese is a wash, then we got nothing for nothing.  If Feese becomes an everyday player than we found a bargain.

Put it this way, say we held on to J'Ed and he puts together a decent season in '08.  Would you throw more money at him for two years to hold on to him?  Would you even offer him arbitration?

 

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 15, 2007 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd offer him arbitration
absolutely.

How many utility, backup infielders in the 24-27 year old range do we need?

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Generally 2
Who knows how many we will have in a few years.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 15, 2007 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Limited trading partners
Edmonds would only waive his no trade clause if he was going to a SoCal team.  SD had a need now, not in July, so the trade was done.  If SD got another CF now instead of Jim, then there probably wouldn't be a trade partner in July.

by ubeddie on Dec 15, 2007 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

On the subject of trades,
Can the P-D trade for a decent sportswriter? Hummel, buddy, write some more man...hockey and football writers covering baseball is like watching old people screw- painful.
"Dude, we're running out of stadium" - said on the way to our seats in Section 428.

by bukowski on Dec 15, 2007 3:49 PM EST reply actions  

Joe Strauss isn't that bad
he seems to atleast have his head screwed on straight.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

see goold,
derrick
I will be in Short & Sassy Pantaloons.

by erik on Dec 15, 2007 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

+1
DG is always a good read.

by cardsgirl95 on Dec 15, 2007 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I forgot about DG
DG is ok. Hummel, when he writes is ok. So you got the P-D MV2...and the rest of the roster?
"Dude, we're running out of stadium" - said on the way to our seats in Section 428.

by bukowski on Dec 15, 2007 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh?
We could do far far worse than Hummel.  Ever read a Houston paper?
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 15, 2007 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe
he was encouraging Hummel to write more, in order to bring up the overall level of quality.  

I will add that I think Goold does very nice work, but I really dislike Strauss.  

Punch. Drink. Cry.

by the red baron on Dec 15, 2007 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Goold really does some good work
I also found it interesting when I saw a Hummel byline on a Mizzou basketball story the other day.  I had no idea he covered college hoops.

by OCCardsFan on Dec 15, 2007 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The Commish(Hummel)
is to the P-D as Tony Kornheiser is to the Washington Post(no, I don't mean old and crotchety). He's earned his day in the sun...
"It's always about the money. Anyone who says it's not is lying."- Gene Simmons

by cardsrul on Dec 15, 2007 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Rasmus
I give him a less than 10% chance of being the opening day centerfielder for the Cards in 08. Think about it. Do you want this guy to come up and hit .240 this year and take away one of his 6 years of team control? The Cards will only make him the center fielder when they feel he is 100% ready. Barton, Ankiel, and Schumaker will battle it out for CF next year and we may see Rasmus in September. I would predict a Duncan-Ankiel-Ludwick outfield...at least until they make another deal...Jason Bay, anyone?
How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Dec 15, 2007 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

bay would be nice
but it will take prospects and who would that be?

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Mark Mulder for Dan Haren
Although Billy Beane has masterfully won just 1 single playoff series in his career, the Dan Haren for Mark Mulder deal has now netted him:

Daric Barton
Kiko Calero
Brett Anderson
Greg Smith
Dana Eveland
Carlos Gonzalez
Aaron Cunningham
Chris Carter

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

yes
that's nauseating
does this mean boras is human?

by nycbirdo on Dec 15, 2007 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Indeed
Not to mention a top 3 AL pitcher for the past 2 seasons... Haren basically filled Mulder's shoes after about 3 months there.

So Billy traded away 3 months of a good pitcher for those 6 players plus 2 years of an ace...

that's why he is the one of the best, proven repeatedly throughout the past decade.  just imagine if he had another $20 million to play with out there...

by DuncanDipper on Dec 15, 2007 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Those
were my exact thoughts when I read about that trade.  That is a pretty sweet haul!

by cardsgirl95 on Dec 15, 2007 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The LaRussa factor
I thought this trade was initiated by Edmonds.  Just last week, Mozeliak was quoted as saying Rasmus was no longer untouchable.  This week we're talking about Rasmus coming to ST with a chance to go north with the club.

Jimmy has had his problems with TLR.  Last year he was kept on the DL at a time when JED was telling the media he can play and can't understand why he is still on the DL.  I would bet Rolen and JED have talked and the ugliness of that situation has led Jimmy to not want to be part of the soap opera next season.  Remember that JED married an STL girl last year and just opened a restaurant here.  The TLR factor must have been strong for him to ask for a trade.

by jjray on Dec 15, 2007 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't have to be about LaRussa
it could be about the fact that the teams highest priority on the FA market were Jason LaRue and Cezar Izturis.  Perhaps Jim Edmonds doesn't want to sit around and twiddle his thumbs for the last 2 or 3 years of his career.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

LaRussa
Yes, I agree.  Supposition on my part ... but reasoned supposition.

by jjray on Dec 15, 2007 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

JED interview
Apparently JED said in an interview on Ch. 5 in STL that a disagreement with LaRussa led to his asking the club for a trade:
http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=509333&postdays=0&postorder=asc&&star t=0

Jimmy ballgame wanted to know he would be the starting CFer and TLR made no promises.  So TLR pushed Mozeliak's hand.  I don't care how it happened, just that the team is now taking the painful yet necessary hard steps toward and getting younger and building for the future.

by jjray on Dec 15, 2007 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

So Edmonds wanted out because
he wouldn't be promised the CF starting job?

Didn't he say in the middle of last season that he'd be willing to move to RF?

Is there anyone in this organization that sticks to the same story for more than a month?

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 16, 2007 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Well...
If he asked to be traded because he would not be guaranteed the CF then that blows the hole "let him retire a cardinal" bag.  I knew he had to consent, but it's hard to stay somewhere that wanted to get rid of you.  

I still don't like just giving him away, but the fact he asked out changes my view immensely.

"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 16, 2007 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Buh-zing
Kinda funny how Tony goes on about how the team won't be "held hostage" by a player. He's certainly correct; they're held hostage by their skipper.
Rasmus or bust.

by Zoop on Dec 17, 2007 3:16 AM EST up reply actions  

What does Scott Rolen have to do then?
To get traded?  If Edmonds can just walk up, ask for a trade in a clubhouse he ISN'T feuding with his manager in and gets one (that we pick up the tab on), Rolen's gotta be pissed.
I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

prove he can still play baseball?
Rolen is a heck of a lot higher risk than Edmonds at this point.  3Y vs 1Y, bigger $/y, season-ending surgery...
Christmas lights are an extremely efficient method for converting Christmas Spirit into heat. -anon

by SleepyCA on Dec 15, 2007 5:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Rolen is also, what, 4 years younger than
Edmonds?  He still, while injured, had a better season than Edmonds did.

And his defense didn't take a hit.  It was still Gold Glove caliber.

I will be boxer briefs

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Rolen's a lot more productive
also. At least he's still an above-average defensive player at a position on the right side of the defensive spectrum. There's also hope that surgery may help Rolen be productive again offensively. I see none of that in Edmonds.

by chuckb on Dec 15, 2007 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

What about his last two months?
When he was finally healthy, Edmonds put up a .831 OPS in August and a .791 in Sept...

by DiscoJer on Dec 16, 2007 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

doesn't matter
my negative feelings about the trade are not from the sentimental end, but the business end.  i just think more could have been had, certainly freese was unlikely to be scooped up by anyone.

by sportsman on Dec 15, 2007 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, hell
At least we still have Edwards.

by RedbirdRay on Dec 15, 2007 5:25 PM EST reply actions  

baseball is a funny game
where the best team dont always win... its the only sport in my mind, where you just cant decide who will win until it is all said and done..

for those of you who think the birds wont compete next year is out of their minds.. it'll be harder now that fellas like eckstein and edmonds are gone.. they gave so much more to us than just mere statistics.. they have heart, guts, and most important, charisma.. they led this team.. i honestly believe that jimmy e will post better numbers than any of our outfielders next year despite playing in the dreaded pardres ball park, and play his immaculate d as usual

i cant give up on the birds.. they'll find ways to compete.. playing crucial games the past few sesason really gave them character.. sometimes, ONLY in baseball, its worth more than the talent..

by mybirds3 on Dec 15, 2007 6:24 PM EST reply actions  

i can only imagine
how many owners, GMs, managers, fans would die to have a group of guys like the ones we field day in and day out...

by mybirds3 on Dec 15, 2007 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Rasmus
He's started slowly at every level, but I'm not sure he won't be a better bat than anybody out there once he gets comfortable.

Bitter medicine, indeed. But so necessary,

by sjoshi on Dec 15, 2007 6:56 PM EST reply actions  

Andy pettite and so called confession
he started by saying if..even steve phillips pointed that out..WOW...

TIMMMY K said that if guys take cortisone they are heroes but if they take HGH they are villians but its not that much different..ok that shocked me then he basically later said they are not like cortisone but not steroids...

OK HGH is legal through a doc right? so the question is did he get it from a doc..yes different from steroids but if he got it from a doc its somehwat different than oh say just shooting it.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punchinjudy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 15, 2007 7:08 PM EST reply actions  

bizarre day in stl
the edmonds trade was shocking but i am over it.

the blues traded weight (again).

two of my fav stl'ers gone in one day weird, just weird

(sorry about the hockey)

"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Dec 15, 2007 7:52 PM EST reply actions  

Anybody know where I can get a video of...
...that NLCS Game 6 HR by Edmonds?  It's one I need for the archives.

by Matty I on Dec 15, 2007 9:16 PM EST reply actions  

We'll regret this
He'll have a great season next year. I bet he has a few more seasons in him, maybe not a full-timer, but an above average CF in a platoon role.

Let's hope he hangs in there for 3 more seasons and builds the HOF resume and that he goes in with a Cardinals hat.

Thanks for the memories Jimmy Ballgame

by The Duke on Dec 15, 2007 9:29 PM EST reply actions  

I hope he does
but I don't think that is likely.  He hasn't hit lefties in years.  Being in great shape isn't going to cure that.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 16, 2007 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

i always thought he could hit lefties
or up until the 2005 season... thats when la russa started doing the whole lefty/righty match ups.. put him in his funk

by mybirds3 on Dec 16, 2007 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

You got it...
He used to flat out rake lefties.  In fact, his inability to do so anymore has coincided quite well with his overall decline in play.
"You're either rebuilding for something special, or you're on the verge of something special. To be in between is foolish." Billy Beane

by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 16, 2007 2:12 AM EST up reply actions  

i wonder...
if that by essentially saving 6MM in salary on jimmy, ownership hasn't just opened the door to eat some more of rolen's salary than was originally intended.  thinking maybe that once they realized what the market is for rolen, and their goal being to pick up some top notch prospects in any swap of our 3B, they perhaps realized the need to eat more salary on rolen in hopes of getting something more back.   interested to see if that was a factor at all.  i am cool with that from a business standpoint and a looking forward standpoint.

by trip mcneely2 on Dec 15, 2007 9:32 PM EST reply actions  

I'm so glad
I'm so glad that this team won in 2006. It would have been sad to see this nucleus not win a championship. That said, I'm not upset that Jimmy is gone, and hope him the best in San Diego. Life and baseball goes on. The teams that rely on sentimentality often founder as a result.

I look forward to the Rasmus era beginning, and am hopeful that this signals that Rasmus is indeed untouchable. This is now Mo's team, and it'll be interesting to see what he comes up with. Mo came in in a difficult situation without much hope for 2008 (beyond the positive of being in the NL Central). I'll start expecting results in 2009.

by Yellow Dog on Dec 15, 2007 10:18 PM EST reply actions  

So long, Jimmy
I love this guy. One of my favorites ever. My brain says this was a smart move to make, and hopefully we'll follow it up with more smart moves. My heart is hurting right now, because I know #15 will not be patrolling CF next season.
Cardinal fan in War Eagle land

by Mr Redbird on Dec 15, 2007 11:59 PM EST reply actions  

Late to Jimmy's wake, but....
so long, Jimbo, it's been wonderful watching you play as a human highlight reel all these years with the Birds On The Bat. I will NEVER forget what you gave us in the 2004 NLCS, and I will miss you terribly.  

May the road rise up to meet you.
May the wind always be at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
and rains fall soft upon your fields.
And until we meet again,
May God hold you in the palm of His hand.

"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Dec 16, 2007 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

I heard
Krasovic has learned that the Cards sent $2MM over to the Padres in the Edmonds deal.  Kevin Towers apparently pushed for more salary relief but settled there. But I am not sure.

by enochyukt on Dec 17, 2007 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols