Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

What's young pitching worth?

There's been quite a bit of talk about the possibility of trading Scott Rolen this offseason. Apparently, Mozeliak floated the idea at the GM meetings this past week to see what kind of interest there was. Rolen, of course, is coming off another shoulder surgery and a relatively ineffective season (by his standards) and is owed $12 million for each of the next 3 years. There's also the too-often reported spat between Rolen and LaRussa that likely won't be repaired any time soon. If a World Series title can't do it, not much can.

Here's where I have to add, lest I run the risk of divorce, that my wife, as a huge Scott Rolen fan, is adamantly opposed to trading him. Tony LaRussa be damned!

There's also the possibility of a lot of 3rd basemen being on the move this offseason, beginning with the free agency of the third basemen from MLB's 2 most important teams (sarcasm alert - settle down!). The Yankees will almost certainly need a new 3B and have the means to pay Rolen. He's still, after all, an excellent defensive 3B - one of baseball's best. The question, of course, is how effective he'll be at the plate returning from his annual trek to the surgeon's table.

The rumor that turned most heads this week was the one that had the Twins discussing Rolen w/ the Cards. This topic is dealt with in this diary and this one and stems from reports found at mlb trade rumors .

This rumor interests me for 2 main reasons. The first is that the Twins are a notoriously tight-fisted organization. Trading for a 33 year old player coming off his 3rd shoulder surgery who is set to earn $36 million yet isn't exactly par for the course in the land of 1000 lakes. The other reason it's interesting is that the Twins are awash with talented young pitchers. The prospect of receiving one in a trade for Rolen is very enticing. The obvious conclusion is that the Cards would be forced to pick up some of Rolen's contract - but how much? Essentially this means that the Cards would be buying a young pitcher. We need all of those we can get but we need to figure out what those prospects are worth?

The prospect of trading Rolen extends beyond the Twins and Yankees. There will be other losers in the race to sign A-Rod and Lowell. Even if those 2 teams turn out to be the only options, we have to determine how much, if any, of his contract it would be worth to pay in order to extricate the team from his contract and pick up something of value in return.

As mentioned above, the Twins have a lot of young pitchers who may be tradable commodities. There's been talk of trading Santana this offseason; clearly we're not talking about a Rolen for Santana deal and there's no way they'll trade Francisco Liriano either. Still, the Twins have several good, young pitchers. All of them have at least 5 years until free agency, good minor league numbers and major-league experience. They would fit into the Cards' rotation immediately. Four of them - Matt Garza, Scott Baker, Boof Bonser, and Kevin Slowey - are right-handers and there's one lefty - Glen Perkins. Baker and Bonser have 5 years until being eligible for free agency while the other 3, if I've calculated correctly, will be under the team's control for 6 years.

Below you'll find the numbers they put up last year in the majors and in their minor-league career numbers. The first 5 columns are their major-league numbers for '07. The last 3 are their career minor-league numbers

ML FIP BB/9 K/9 HR/9 GB% BB/9 K/9 HR/9
Baker 3.94 1.82 6.39 0.94 36.6 1.81 7.62 0.60
Bonser 4.98 3.38 7.08 1.40 46.6 4.04 9.31 0.86
Garza 4.18 3.47 7.27 0.87 47.7 2.50 10.05 0.56
Perkins 4.36 3.77 6.28 0.63 40.7 3.33 9.50 0.67
Slowey 5.59 1.49 6.35 2.16 30.1 1.22 8.70 0.43

Entering 2007, both Baseball America and Kevin Goldstein of Baseball Prospectus had Garza listed as the Twins' number 1 prospect . There's a lot to like there - the high K rate, low walk rate, low HR rate, and high GB%. He wouldn't come cheaply. In fact, if I were the Twins, he'd be untouchable.

Both sources had Perkins #2 and Slowey was ranked #3 from BA and #4 from BP. Baker and Bonser already had enough major-league experience that they weren't considered prospects. However, when combined with all Twins' players 25 and younger, Bonser ranked just below Garza and above Perkins and Slowey.

The way I figure it, in 5 years, the Twins' pitchers stand to make a total of about $20 million. They'll make the minimum of about $400,000 each of the first 2 years, then about $4 M in year 3, $6 M in year 4, and $9 M in year 5. For Perkins, Garza, and Slowey, who are all 6 years from free agency, add another year at about $1 M. They'd earn the minimum but you'd have to add something for the overall salary inflation rate by adding another year.

PECOTA estimates that the players' value will be between $5 M and $10 M per year over the next 4 years. Add another year at around $8 M and another at $10 or so for the 3 players under the team's control for the 6th year. So, the 5 year players (Baker and Bonser) should be worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $38 - $40 M but they'll only earn about $20 M, yielding a plus-$18 M for the team. The 6 year players (Garza, Slowey, and Perkins) will be worth around $48 - $50 M but they'll earn only about $21 M, yielding a plus-$27 M for the team. It's likely Garza may be worth a little more and Slowey a little less. These figures are just estimates, of course. If they're a little low b/c their performance is a little better, they'll also likely earn slightly more, keeping the value to the team at plus-$18M or plus-$27M. The difference is probably the same also if they're not quite as good as expected - their value will be lower but so will the salary.

Of course, trading Rolen for one of these pitchers also means that Rolen must be replaced. Spiezio is the obvious choice, of course. But he's probably not an everyday player and he would have to be platooned with. The Cards have Hoffpauir, Barden, and Ryan, all of whom have played some third at either the major or minor-league level. How would a Spiezio/Barden platoon look at third? Don't answer that, as I already know but it would allow the Cards to bide some time in what figures to be a rebuilding year anyway. In 2009, Hank Blalock, Joe Crede, Troy Glaus, and Morgan Ensberg are all free agents. In fact, the Cards could probably trade some fringe prospect to the Pads for Ensberg this offseason.

Rolen's probably worth 12-15 wins over the next 3 years. It's reasonable to believe that the pitcher the Cards would receive in return would provide at least league-average production while a member of the Cards rotation - that's worth about 5 wins per season, according to SNLVAR . That means 25-30 wins, depending on the pitcher, about 15 of which would occur while Rolen's under contract. So the Cards could pay Rolen $36 M for those wins or one of these pitchers about $5 M.

So what's it worth to get out from under Rolen's contract and add a good, young starting pitcher? Well, all the young pitchers are risky, as they've never produced for an entire major-league season (except for Baker). But Rolen's risky, too. He may never be any better than he was last year and that wasn't very good. He's not getting any younger and no one knows how much mileage is left in those shoulders. If we were to pay ½ of Rolen's contract -- $6 M per year - the young pitcher essentially costs the team $6.5 M each of the next 2 years and $10 M or so the 3rd. That's probably right about what the pitcher would be worth but it eliminates all of the value out of the contract. Is gambling on an unproven pitcher worth losing all of the value that the team would receive from having the young pitcher? Probably not, so clearly $6 M is too high. We may as well take the risk that Rolen recovers and hope Garcia, Boggs, Ottavino, et al emerge.

What about $3 M per year? That's probably a gamble worth taking. $3 M for the next 3 years of any of these pitchers is probably worth the gamble. Scott Baker's SNLVAR of 3.1 was worth about $8 M this year and he was just 25 and earned less than $400,000. So the Twins clearly have the pitching to spare and the Cards, obviously, have the need. If you think the Cards are a contender in '08, it probably makes no sense to trade Rolen even w/o sending money but if you're like me and believe that the Cards' best chance to contend is in 2009 and beyond, trading Rolen for a young pitcher makes sense and is worth sending the Twins a few bucks in order to get one of those pitchers.

So which pitcher should the Cards ask for? I'd assume that Garza would be a non-starter though it probably never hurts to ask. And how much should the Cards be willing to pony up? My favorites are Perkins (left-handed, 6 years under team control) and Bonser (good K rate and good GB%) if we can't get Garza. Bonser's BB rate scares me a little but it's a little misleading as it's decreased every year since 2002. Scouts like his stuff and his numbers are improving - both scouts and statheads should approve. I'd be willing to pay $3 - $4 M per season to get one of those. The Cards could find someone to play 3B and it would allow them to keep Duncan.

Here are the minor league numbers for each player.

Scott Baker

Boof Bonser

Matt Garza

Glen Perkins

Kevin Slowey

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

another great post
houstoncardinal, thanks for the breakdown.  (and thanks for the late night reading)  While it hurts the heartstrings to think of trading rolen, i think it may be the smart way to go.  he's only getting older and his decline will be increasing, the caveat is that the team must be prepared to deal with the loss of his defense.  if they trade him, the slack needs to be picked up by a more rangy shortstop (as has been discussed here). the thing i wonder about bonser is how does he carry his weight over the next number of years?  6'4 260--does he maintain that and be another sid fernandez?  what happens if he starts gaining weight?  does he retain effectiveness or become another sid ponson?  don't know, but some intangibles i think about.  his stat lines certainly look good, aside from his fielding-independent era being a bit higher on the list.  perkins is quite intriguing as well and is two years younger. just a couple thoughts in the wee   hours.

by mdarshan on Nov 11, 2007 3:00 AM EST reply actions  

I can see...
both sides of the argument on the trading of Scott Rolen.  My main feeling right now, though, is he's not worth that much...  he just isn't.  Now, I don't feel like Scott Rolen has turned to soggy mush;  the guy keeps himself in great shape and he knows how to play the game.  If this final shoulder surgery is what he needed, or at least relieves the pain he's been suffering through and allows him to rebound to his 2006 production then we're getting a pretty decent deal, you know?

I firmly believe there is no one better at the hot corner than Scott Rolen, there is no finer glove I have ever had the pleasure of watching work the infield and my main concern is...  what do we do without him?  The possibility of adding a Matt Garza or a Kevin Slowey sounds great to me, but I don't really feel like Scotty could get that type of pitcher right now and I don't want to sell him short.  Does the money suck right now?  Yeah, absolutely, it sucks...  but if he rebounds to 2006 Scott Rolen, even that is worth the money to me right now.

A major question for me, a recurring one, is how much do we really know about this LaRussa/Rolen quibble?  Now, they may not get along, but are we making more out of it than need be?  Scott Rolen is definitely a little sore around the clubhouse given the constantly pain, injuries, and inability to play the game and contribute in the way that he's used to.  Thus, I can understand there being tension come up where it otherwise wouldn't/shouldn't.  There's absolutely no reason why Scott and Tony can't coexist without being buddy-buddy and I just question how deep this rift between the two of them truly is.  Scott Rolen has always been nothing if not the epitome of class and professionalism in my eyes.

Thanks for the late night read.

by mynameistyler on Nov 11, 2007 3:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Tony and Rolen can coexist
they're pros, after all. But I still don't think the relationship will get better. Them not liking one another isn't the reason to make a trade happen. Getting out from under most, if not all, of that contract is.

by chuckb on Nov 11, 2007 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think these rumors
have been quashed, but I can't find the link for the life of me. A good analysis of player value though (even though I hate MORP).

The first is that the Twins are a notoriously tight-fisted organization. Trading for a 33 year old player coming off his 3rd shoulder surgery who is set to earn $36 million yet isn't exactly par for the course in the land of 1000 lakes.

If I were the one pulling the trigger on the trade, this sums up why I'd be scared shitless.

by plh903 on Nov 11, 2007 4:10 AM EST reply actions  

Wow
Exactly to the right as I am typing this in the rotoworld box. Not that denial means they haven't talked, or that this discussion isn't a good one even if it's academic.

by plh903 on Nov 11, 2007 5:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Star Tribune column?
http://www.startribune.com/blogs/christensen/?p=414
Improve the Cardinals team spirit, integrity and positive public image...sign Bonds for 08'!

by cardschinmusic on Nov 11, 2007 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

yep
I laughed a little.

but who knows what the truth is.

by jealousblues on Nov 11, 2007 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

We would have to eat all of his contract
And we'd still end up with someone like Baker or Slowley.

They think they can get Delmon Young or B.J. Upton for Garza (and they are probably right!).

by SpringfieldDude on Nov 11, 2007 4:26 AM EST reply actions  

ZiPS are out for the Twins BTW
Name                     Age    ERA   W   L   G  GS     INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K
Matt Garza                24   4.21  13  12  33  32   186.0  198   87  19   52  140
LEAGUE AVERAGE STARTER ------- 4.39 -----------------------------------------------
Scott Baker               26   4.50  11  12  31  30   186.0  205   93  24   39  127
Boof Bonser               26   4.98  10  12  31  31   179.0  194   99  29   63  142
Glen Perkins*             25   5.42   5   8  28  17   103.0  113   62  17   47   76

by plh903 on Nov 11, 2007 4:31 AM EST reply actions  

houston card: You should list ages.
PLH903 did this above. Ages for next year:

Garza = 24
Slowey = 24
Perkins = 25
Baker = 26
Bonser = 26

I think Slowey is being vastly underrated.  He's the youngest of the non-Garzas, and he's only 6 months older than Garza.

I've never seen him pitch, but Slowey has the best HR/9, BB/9, and K/BB of the entire group.  This is important because an outrageous HR/9 explains his terrible performance for the Twins this year. Based on his history, he'll cut that 2.16 HR/9 at least in half.

Hopefully, the Twins feel the same about Slowey as everyone here--that is, the worst of the bunch.

That's why I think we should go for him, since the Twins won't give up Garza for anything the Cards have to offer.

Now, on to Rolen. No team will send us any talent if the Cards are only paying $3M/year on Scotty's contract.

If Scotty were a FA this offseason, would he get 3/$27M, which is what you are suggesting his new team would have to pay?  I think it's debateable.  And you aren't going to get someone to pay ABOVE market rate for Scotty while also sending a pitcher that would immediately become the best non-Wainwright starter on the opening day roster.

I think Scotty is bound to bounce back with an 850 OPS season with stellar defense. Trading him now is like the Marlins trading Dontrelle. Plus, we'd have to consider what would happen to the left side of our infield--it'd become worse than a sieve.  It be a transmogrifier that turns easy outs into infield hits and doubles down the line.

I'd trade Scotty + $9M in a heartbeat for Slowey, Baker, or Garza, but I don't think the Twins are that dumb.

However, I'm not willing to pay half (or more) of Scott's salary for the same players.

And I'm certainly not willing to send him away solely for salary relief. Why? Because ownership is not going to say "Hmmm, we are willing to let payroll go to $115M in 2008, but since it only went to $103M, we'll apply that $12M to 2009's payroll."  As nice as it would be, it simply doesn't work like that.

Sorry for the rambling.

Aaron Gleeman, by the way, has some glowing nuggets about Slowey here <http://www.aarongleeman.com/2007_10_28_baseballblog_archive.html#83119782508465697>

by gretchen on Nov 11, 2007 6:01 AM EST reply actions  

I say don't trade Rolen*
I have repeatedly written that I oppose a Rolen trade simply from the standpoint that his value is at an all-time low and likely not worth what other GMs will give for him.

However even I agree with HC's assesment of a Rolen-for-young-pitcher swap where the Cardinals pick up $3M/ year.  (That is I would make that trade).  The problem is that I just can't imagine the Twins willing to take only $3M.

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Nov 11, 2007 6:03 AM EST reply actions  

But, more importantly
is his value the lowest it WILL be or the lowest it's just been so far?

If you hold on to your random stock that hasn't been below $40 for years and it sinks to $25, then you have to decide, is it likely to rebound?  If so, selling is foolish, obviously, which is what you're stating about Rolen.  However, if this is a sinking ship and that $25 is going to turn into $10 or $0, then you've just thrown away a considerable investment.

I know it's cold to think of a person as an investment, but when we're talking about someone making $12M a year, the investment part of it becomes a pretty major issue.

Scott Rolen's contract would prevent the Cardinals from seeking a big name pitcher or position player for 2009 and he might end up sucking once again, due to his continually injured shoulder.  

Unless you see him being a contributor during 2009 and 2010, then now, when the opportunity is available, is the time to try to unload him.

Afterall, his value may be low as an individual, but the other side of "supply and demand" is of course, demand.  His value as a third-baseman in general is very high, since the two highest payroll teams are both seeking someone to fill in at 3rd.

If a good deal can be made where we can get any kind of prospect and dump the majority of his contract, then it's a good deal.

by mtalken on Nov 11, 2007 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Risk
I understand that there is risk in everything we do.  My thought is that Rolen is likely to bounce back to at least a respectable level where his contract has a neutral value.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Nov 11, 2007 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way
Slowey is the Twins minor league pitcher of the year for 2007.

So much for being underrated by the Twin Cities.

by gretchen on Nov 11, 2007 6:04 AM EST reply actions  

...bravo Ms HC!
I applaud both  your wife's loyalty and level headedness! In a recent diary I believe you suggested the Cards should trade Rolen for a "bag of f-in balls," we can hope she saw that!

If he were traded at the deadline in Aug (when he might WANT to go to a hot contender considering age etc.) and he put up good numbers and stays healthy, he might be just the player in the right deal that could fleece a team of several pitching prospects. If, the Birds are out of it.

The Red Sox just drug an ancient bunch of players thru a season w/o injuries...luck?'?? No Hee Sop?

He's currently not worth much return, he wont go unless he wants to and I say +1 to Tyler and Ms. HC.

Improve the Cardinals team spirit, integrity and positive public image...sign Bonds for 08'!

by cardschinmusic on Nov 11, 2007 6:31 AM EST reply actions  

Red Sox luck?
Nope not luck.  It just isn't true.

The Sox only had 3 pitchers over the age of 30...
Clement who didn't pitch a game,
Schilling who did spend time on the DL and was much less than his old self.
and Timlin.

Of the position players, here's the oldest:
Manny 34
Veritek 34
Lowell 33
Papi 31
Drew 32

Here's a list of key contributers under the age of 30...

Beckett
Lester
Delcarmen
Javy Lopez
Daisuke
Papelbon
Pedroia
Youkalis
CoCoCrisp
Ellsbury.

Hardly ancient.

by RedbirdRay on Nov 11, 2007 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

....the yardstick principle....
Yeah, I posted the ages of the Bo Sox on a diary recently myself....But Im referring to the standards many here apply to aging vets, not my personal perspective. Im sure you understand.

"The Sox only had 3 pitchers over the age of 30...
Clement who didn't pitch a game (DL)
Schilling 39 who did spend time on the DL and was much less than his old self.
and Timlin 39."

Of the position players, here's the oldest:
Manny 34
Veritek 34
Lowell 33
Papi 31
Drew 32
Youklis (30 in month)

This age group is considered over the hill re: Cardinal "vet" standards by many posters, Cited as the need to rebuild and trade vets by many.

Improve the Cardinals team spirit, integrity and positive public image...sign Bonds for 08'!

by cardschinmusic on Nov 12, 2007 5:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Oy
I just noticed that Slowey's GB% is only 30%

While Busch III seems to be somewhat pitcher-friendly, we lack the OF defense to support a flyball pitcher.

Plus, we all see what Duncan did to Reyes; we can only assume that a "pitch-to-contact-in-the-lower-half-of-the-zone" won't match up well to Slowey's repertoire.

Too bad.

by gretchen on Nov 11, 2007 9:45 AM EST reply actions  

Is it any wonder
that if Mo actually floated such an exchange using Rolen, that the Twins would deny that they even listened to such a proposition?

Thanks HC for another good post.

Watching the Playoffs as Reigning Champs is not a bad thing.

by Birds on the Bat on Nov 11, 2007 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

Reason for Rolen going backwards in 2007
Please forgive a question that many of you may already know the answer to, but after making a sizable comeback in 2006 from his major surgery the year before, Rolen took a huge step backwards this past season. Healthwise what went wrong? Did something come unhinged or was it a new injury? And what does this backwards step say about a longterm prognosis? I can't seem to find the information anywhere. Thanks to all of you in the know people who can fill me in.

by bmacwood on Nov 11, 2007 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

Scar tissue built up in his shoulder
causing him to lose range of motion in the shoulder.

They cleaned him out and reported no new damage.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 11, 2007 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Has anybody laid odds on percent of recovery
or time frame for rehab activities and the extent that he will be ready for ST?
Watching the Playoffs as Reigning Champs is not a bad thing.

by Birds on the Bat on Nov 11, 2007 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure that
he's already recovered from the scoping.  Unless something happens, he should be ready for ST.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 11, 2007 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

While I say
the Cards should not trade Rolen, because simply keeping him around offers the Cards the best possible avenue for an offensive improvement in 2008, if they must make a deal then I say go for Bonser. I get the feeling Bonser is becoming undervalued because of his so-so MLB numbers last year and might allow the Cards to get a player with lots of up-side while also requiring the Cards to pick up less of Rolen's salary.

by JMedwick on Nov 11, 2007 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

FIP
What is FIP again?  I checked baseball-reference.com and baseballprospectus.com and am not finding it.

Thanks!

stlfan

by stlfan on Nov 11, 2007 12:27 PM EST reply actions  

Fielding Independent Pitching
From the HBT.

Fielding Independent Pitching, a measure of all those things for which a pitcher is specifically responsible. The formula is (HR*13+(BB+HBP)*3-K*2)/IP, plus a league-specific factor (usually around 3.2) to round out the number to an equivalent ERA number. FIP helps you understand how well a pitcher pitched, regardless of how well his fielders fielded. FIP was invented by Tangotiger.

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Nov 11, 2007 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

stlfan
FIP = Fielding Independent Pitching.

Basically, you take all of the things a pitcher can control and translate it into a "luck-free" ERA. It's supposed to give you an idea of how that pitcher would have fared if he had pitched in front of an average defense.

It's not perfect, but it's a more reliable judge of performance than regular old ERA.

Imagine Wainwright pitched in front of an infield consisting of Giambi, Kent, Jeter, and Braun.

Then consider how his numbers would look pitching in front of a Gold Glove infield.

FIP is supposed to even out pitching performance by removing the impact of the fielders behind him.

by gretchen on Nov 11, 2007 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

$4 million for the first arbitration year?
Where did you get the figure that Minny's pitchers would be worth $4 million in their first arby year?         The only starter I can find who has ever commanded that was Willis and he had a CY Young type year in year 3.   Maybe Minney should just hold on to their guys and in a few years they'll have 5 cy young candidates and a pennant.

by cariocacardinal on Nov 11, 2007 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

I guessed
I looked at 2 pitchers I thought were comparable -- Jake Westbrook and Jon Garland -- 2 league-average or maybe slightly better pitchers. I threw out the numbers but I think they got around $3 - $3.3 M in their 1st year. I figured that w/ overall salary inflation we would be looking at close to $4 M. It's an estimate -- probably w/i 1/2 a million either way.

by chuckb on Nov 11, 2007 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Top $$ only for top production
Westbrook got $925K his first arb year and Garland $2.3 million  (both in 2004).    I'd probably figure about 50% inflation.  However, you used league average production for them in your calculations but want to pay them top dollar.  That seems incongruent.   If these guys are going to get top dollar they are going to be top line starters and if that's the case you probably eat nearly Rolen's entire salary to get them.

by cariocacardinal on Nov 11, 2007 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Homers for Rasmus and Anderson
In Team USA's game against Spain today.  Anderson went 4-for-4, and his homerun was a 420 foot bomb.  We won 12-1, with Perez allowing the only run.
"A great catch is like watching girls go by; the last one you see is always the prettiest." - Bob Gibson

by stl tyler on Nov 11, 2007 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

Actually
The final was 12-2, one run in the 1st & one in the 7th off Perez before they applied the mercy rule. Not your fault; the website contradicted itself at least three times, including the final linescore which shows both runs and still lists Italy's total as one.

Noted that in 11 games as part of Team USA, Colby has 10 doubles and an inside-the-park HR.

That said, the Cubs do deserve my pity, but never my support.

by Solanus on Nov 11, 2007 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope!!
I hope he is!!  we don't have much help after him.

by ICbirdfan on Nov 11, 2007 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I do a good impersonation
of Colby Rasmus.

Here goes.

"My name is Colby Rasmus, and I hate singles, so I hit doubles instead."

"A great catch is like watching girls go by; the last one you see is always the prettiest." - Bob Gibson

by stl tyler on Nov 12, 2007 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

this Rolen drama is gettting really
OLD

Bernie has a good column today about this subject as well. here's the link.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/columnists.nsf/berniemiklasz/story/D959F65C7F6D4D1C862573900 00B4521?OpenDocument

here's my thoughts. MO needs to come out soon & say one way or the other if he's sticking around for 08. i'm sick of this. all of this drama is because he's been hurt & pouting about it & fighting with Tony about it for so long. i love the guy as a player & all. but man, his seemingly never pitty party over his shoulder has completly turned me against him as a person.

i mean come on! the dude's making millions of dollars to do something most of us would gladly do for free & all he can do is cry & whine & pick fights with the manager when he dares pull him because he cant get the ball out of the infield any more. i know he's hurt, i know that pisses him off because he cant play like he used to be able to play. but that gives him no right to keep picking fights with Tony just because Tony puts some one else at 3rd when scotty cant give the Cards what they need.

scotty needs to check himself right quick. he's got nothing to whine & complain about. he makes millions of dollars to play a childs game. he better get over himself quick, or get out of town. the Cards need his bat to produce once again. and if he cant get over himself & just shut up & play, its time for him to go.

i love scott rolen as a player. before his injuries he had no equal at the 3rd base position. but now, well as you can tell i'm just sick & tired of all his drama. i dont think it's a smart move for MO to dump his salary. if the Cards are going to pay him, i'd rather see them pay him to play for the Cards & not some other team. the only reason MO should move him is if some team pays the majority of the $36Million he's owed AND gives them a decent prospect or mlb ready player.

of course what are the odds of that happeneing? is there any thing lower than slim & none?

end rant.

great job again today H-Town.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Nov 11, 2007 8:14 PM EST reply actions  

agreed
I respect the way Scott plays but he is reverting to his antics when with the Phillies.

I don't know why he has a problem with TLR not playing him.  What is Scott so selfish he can't understand why he was benched in 06?  I would be pissed at TLR if he did not bench Rolen as he could not even swing a bat.  Same goes with 07, I would say TLR was pretty patient.  It got to the point where he just could not play Rolen.

Rolen was seen as a constant complainer at Pilladelphia, so was just but some was just him being a baby.

by ICbirdfan on Nov 11, 2007 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

You know what? ROLEN never brought any of
this up in the media.  LaRussa did, and Mozelak did.  Scott has never been quoted, not once, about any of it.  He hasn't been whining-he has said nothing about it.  
There appears to be a problem with the two of them, but I didn't know that because of anything Scott ever said.  
I guess the organization feels the best way to mend fences between the two is to float trade rumors.  I don't get that at all.

They are all grown men and I expect them to behave as such.  They have contracts and I expect them to honor them.  Rolen has a no trade contract.  If they want to trade him, he has the right to refuse, or the right to waive it.

Folks state all kinds of opinions about this situation here, on sports radio, on ESPN.  Don't confuse everyone else whining about the situation by saying Rolen is whining--I have seen no quotes attributed to him anywhere.  If you have, please give me a source because I'd be curious to know what HE actually said.

by jillsinmo on Nov 11, 2007 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually
most of this is in response to 'a person close to Rolen stated'.  The reason people believe Rolen wants out is because quote are being attributed to people close to Rolen.

Which could be a cover protecting Rolen from fan backlash and not burning a source.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 11, 2007 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Or it could be someone just flapping their jaws...
Sure it could be his agent, his wife, his best friend or a guy who knows the painter that worked at his house the year before last. And did he authorize the person/persons to say anything?  I'm not going to presume to know what Rolen said until he says something on the record--which he hasn't.

by jillsinmo on Nov 11, 2007 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Tony & Rolen
I think both are at fault.

I am just saying I don't get what Rolen could be mad about?  Last year in the playoffs wasn't Scott on the record stating him and Tony were not talking?

I don't know but he was not healthy in the playoffs and he was not healthy this year.  I don't know how Rolen could have a beef with TLR over being benched at times.  He was flat out terrible offensively at times.  He could not hit 83 MPH fastballs up in the zone.

I just want Scott to be healthy in 07.  I am not on the trade Rolen bandwagon by the way.

by ICbirdfan on Nov 11, 2007 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

hey jill i've heard
jim "the cat" hayes & joel goldberg of FSN Midwest say scott has told them he's not happy with the way Tony's handled him. heck he's said that in sit down interviews with FSN Midwest. so he has said he has said he's unhappy with Tony.

it's been talked about in the clubhouse by all the players for years as well. why do you think Albert & scott aren't the best of friends? a big reason is because of scott's beef with tony. Albert would follow tony through the gates of hell & he does not understand why scott has such a big problem with him.  

bernie, joe strauss, jeff gordon all have said scott's said for a couple years now that he's unhappy with Tony. even the WWL's guys know this. you may have not heard it jill, but trust me. it's true.

it is a well known fact scott flat out does not like playing for Tony. MO knows it, Dewitt knows it.
Tony knows it. all the players know it. the press knows it. every body knows it.

what we dont know is if scott can shut up & play. MO needs to find out ASAP.

because if not, as much as i hate to say it, scott has got to go.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Nov 11, 2007 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of Scott and Albert
when the 2006 team was approached after the World Series about promotional autographed memoribilia, etc. as every team is at the end of the year, Albert and Scott got into a pissing match about needing to be paid more than the other for the rights to their name.

This contract usually brings in a sizeable chunk of change for everyone on the team.  Past teams have divided the cut up evenly, letting lesser paid guys to get a nice bonus after the success.

Not these two primadonas.  They fought about who should get more money until finally the whole deal fell through.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 11, 2007 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah i remember that
one of the few examples of Albert "big timing" a situation. that really hurt the young kids & the guys who dont make multi millions of dollars. Albert & scott should be ashamed of themselves for that.

this is a perfect example of those two not getting along. i'm not saying they dont get along simply because Albert is tight with Tony & scott is not. but it's a big reason why.

scotts beef with Tony, along with scott & Albert not seeing eye to eye cant be good for the clubhouse.

i'm so sick of all this needless drama.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Nov 12, 2007 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I have heard NONE of what you're talking about
I never heard it on FSN or any other player say anything about any of this, or the signing money (ugh) or Scott speak publicly about it, or any other player say a thing about it. I still have never heard Rolen quoted directly about it.

I never got the sense that he didn't give 100% on the field.  Even when he's hurt.  

If they think he's got to go, if he thinks he's got to go, I think it's best that all parties just KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT and do what they have to do.  

by jillsinmo on Nov 12, 2007 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is the problem
We don't know who said what.

"a person close to Rolen stated" could be Tony for all we know. We don't know who said what and we have no idea what spin the media wants.

It's hard enough to get the correct story when the media quotes everyone involved.

All I know is we don't know anything.

by Harknights on Nov 11, 2007 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

he whined during the first half of the '06 PS
while spiezio was clearly the better option. speizio was getting huge hits left and right when he started, whereas rolen was consistently K'ing and popping out. granted, rolen came back and played great after the "benching" (and after getting the cortisone shot), but i remember being really frustrated at the time that...

a) he was playing poorly and everyone knew it
b) he was clearly injured and not himself
c) he made it into an issue with la russa and seemingly put his starting position over the good of the team ... again, while spiezio was really playing well and helping the team

i want to see him come back, be healthy, play well, and get along with la russa. but i do not want to see him return to being the bitter, sullen, overly proud pop-up machine he was at times this past year and late in '06 -- it's no fun to watch and and it can't be fun for anyone on the team to deal with, rolen included.

by willievinceterry on Nov 12, 2007 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes/No
The trouble with publically stating whether Scott will be back is it shows our cards.

If he's definitely coming back, it might be a good measure to try to smooth things over.   If he's not, we pretty much have to trade him by blowing about it in the media.   That gives other GMs the advantage cause they know we have to move him.

by RedbirdRay on Nov 12, 2007 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

New team linked to Rolen
The OC Register claims that the Angels consider A-Rod their "last resort" for upgrading their offense.  

The article goes on to claim that the Angels will look into Cabrera, Tejada, and Rolen at third before considering A-Rod.  They will likely trade at least one of Joe Saunders and Ervin Santana.

Another New York paper listed Rolen's name again, though at this point the Yanks have been linked to something like thirteen different third basemen.

"A great catch is like watching girls go by; the last one you see is always the prettiest." - Bob Gibson

by stl tyler on Nov 12, 2007 1:13 AM EST reply actions  

The Halo's
Would be a far better trading partner than the Twinkie's. A package deal with the Angles could be very nice. Say Rolen/Reyes for Santana/Figgins or Bradon Wood.

 I think trading Rolen would be a mistake. I feel, and I only have my gut to go on, that Rolen has a come back year. Scott could very well be asking to be traded, and if so we have to move him. I don't want him moping around the club house.

 

by nybirdfan on Nov 12, 2007 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Totally off-kilter.
Man, this off-season stuff is really getting to me.  I just had a dream last night that we traded Adam Wainright and Anthony Reyes for Jeff Suppan and J.J. Hardy.  Wow.
I'm a man, a manly, manly, man. Unknown

by Eckstreem on Nov 12, 2007 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

You dream funny.
That is not a dream, that is a nightmare.

Hate to say it, but Rolen needs to be gone.  We need prospects, as I (and many others) think the best chance to compete for WS will be 2009.

 

by RDF922 on Nov 12, 2007 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols