Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Rickey Henderson Coming Back to A's? Bar-right-arrows



rockies in 6

la russa's decision is expected any day now, and when it comes down there'll be a lot to discuss. so i think i'll sneak in a few thoughts today about the nlcs.

of the 60 people who submitted pre-playoff predictions last monday, only 12 correctly called this matchup, or 3 fewer than we'd expect by random chance. nobody predicted a pair of sweeps. of those 12 people, 8 of them picked the rockies to beat the diamondbacks the nlcs --- Hugo (in 6 games), WiscCard (6), Hardcore Legand (6), abstl (5), Zubin (6), the red baron (6), redbirds6 (7), and acham8206 (6). these 4 guys picked the dbacks: jomfa (dbacks in 6), sdesserman (6), stlcardinalsfang (6), Trayton in Seattle (6).

the dbacks and rockies have the two best records in the league --- 90-72 for arizona, 90-73 for colorado; the rockies won the head-to-head matchup 10-8 and outscored arizona 86-72 in those games, for whatever that's worth. their pitching staffs are ostensibly not great --- dbacks were 4th in the league in era, the rockies 8th --- but that's misleading, because both staffs had to pitch in extreme hitters parks. zubin pointed out last week that the rockies posted a 110 era+ as a team, the 4th-best figure in the league; the dbacks led the league in this category at 114. so the series features the league's two winningest teams, and (arguably) two of the four best pitching staffs. strong matchup.

they're also both very young teams and largely homegrown. colorado's oldest starter is 33, and 6 of the 8 are 28 or younger; arizona has only 1 starter over age 30 (eric byrnes, who's 31). both teams drafted and developed 5 of their 8 everyday players; the rockies self-generated 3 of their postseason starting pitchers, the dbacks 2; both teams produced their closers in-house. it's the rockies' first nlcs ever, the diamondbacks' second; good chance we'll be seeing one or both of them back here before too long. toss in the dodgers' strong crop of prospects, and it looks as if the nl west is gonna be one hell of a division for the next few years.

the rockies' season has featured two tremendous hot streaks --- their current one, a 17-1 run that began on september 16; and a 20-7 run that lasted from may 22 through june 21. the latter spurt corrected an 18-27 start and seemed to establish the rockies as contenders, although they were still only 4th in the strong nl west. but a deflating 8-game losing streak immediately ensued --- an extremely deceptive streak, in that the rocks led 4 of those games heading into the opposing team's final at-bat. basically, they lost 8 in a row because brian fuentes had a bad week. a few days later, on july 4, fuentes got placed on the dl, and setup man manny corpas was promoted to closer; corpas posted a 1.46 era the rest of the way. a couple weeks later, on july 19, they promoted ubaldo jimenez to the rotation; he replaced the disabled jason hirsh, who'd come over in the jason jennings trade. jimenez got rocked in two starts early on, leaving him with a 6.57 era; but in his last 10 starts he posted a 3.30 era and a .207 opponent average. at about the time jimenez got hot, the rockies promoted franklin morales to the rotation, replacing opening-day starter and theoretical staff ace aaron cook (who also went to the dl). morales began the year at double A and had only reached triple A a couple weeks earlier, making only 3 starts at that level before the rockies recalled him. he walked 13 men in 17 innings at triple A, but in the big leagues he threw strikes (just over 3 walks a game) and kept the ball in the park --- 2 hr in 39.1 innings. threw strikes, kept it in the park . . . . pitching is really not very complicated.

corpas, jimenez, and morales are all 24 or younger; they turned the rockies' season around. from the day corpas saved his first game (july 7) through the end of the year, the rockies --- coors field or no --- allowed the fewest runs in the national league.

colorado's defense deserves mention here as well. the rockies committed only 68 errors this year, setting an all-time record for team fielding percentage; they also turned the most double plays in the league (178) and finished 2d (to the cubs) in defensive efficiency ratio. when you don't give away free baserunners, and wipe a lot of them off via the twin-killing and overall good range afield, that can make your pitchers look awfully good. and it might well explain why both morales and jimenez had drastically better control at the major-league level than they ever displayed in the minors --- they had confidence in the defense. helton, holliday, and tulowitzki all rank among the best defenders in baseball at their positions, both per uzr and enhanced zone rating. garrett atkins and brad hawpe rate as very bad defenders, however.

the diamondbacks, it's well known, are a strongly anomalous team, having been outscored by their opponents 712-732 on the season. the Hardball Times' chris jaffe argues that the run differential is misleading, although his colleague sal baxamusa begs to differ. one thing all parties would agree on: the diamondbacks can't score runs. they finished 14th in the league in scoring and dead last in park-adjusted ops+. also dead last in batting average and on-base percentage. they did finish middle of the pack in homers, dead even with the rockies (171 apiece), but their inability to get on base doesn't bode well. they won't get any help from the colorado staff, which yielded the 3d-fewest walks in the league. nor do the individual matchups offer any encouragement: three of the colorado playoff starters --- fogg, jimenez, and jeff francis --- posted a combined 2.73 era vs the dbacks in 9 starts this year, yielding just 3 hr in 56 innings. all 3 pitchers had era's under 3.00 vs arizona. manny corpas had a 1.64 era vs them in 11 innings; brian fuentes (now the setup man) held the dbacks scoreless in 9.2 innings.

now turn that question around. brandon webb, doug davis, and livan hernandez combined for a 3.66 era against colorado in 14 starts, but that doesn't tell the story. webb was atrocious vs colorado --- a 5.77 era in 6 starts, with a 1-3 record. but livan hernandez was magnificent, with a 1.54 era in 5 starts. these are ridiculously small sample sizes, so you can't read a whole lot into them. a more telling indicator is that webb has a career 4.24 era, 1.500ish whip at coors field, where he will probably pitch game 5; livan hernandez has a lifetime era of 6.78 there.

the dbacks do have one young starting pitcher to counter the rockies' duo of morales and jimenez --- micah owings, who was one of the dbacks' best pitchers down the stretch. in his last 10 starts he put up a 3.03 era and a .195 opponent average, with a 3.5 to 1 k/bb ratio. and he was a better hitter than rick ankiel --- 1.032 ops (in 60 at-bats), vs slick rick's .863. maybe the cardinals should trade for this guy and ruin him as a pitcher --- voila! another outfielder.

relax, people; just kidding.

on paper --- and we know what that's worth, after the cards' run last season --- the rockies seem to have a strong upper hand: their pitchers are as good as arizona's, and their hitters are much better. i haven't even looked at the offenses because there'd be no point; the rockies scored nearly a run a game more than the dbacks, and that's all you or i need to know. another way to look at this: while the dbacks were outscored by 20 runs this year, the rockies outscored their foes by 102 runs. so per run differential, the rockies are 120 runs better than arizona --- which makes this an even more lopside matchup than last year's cards-mets nlcs, where the mets (+103) were 87 runs better than the cards (+16). in my forecast last week, i had the rockies facing the cubs in this round, with the cubs advancing; given the current matchup, i'll take the rockies to move on. make it 6 games.

a final note: of the 12 people listed above who picked the rockies and dbacks for the nlcs, 9 also picked the red sox over the angels and therefore have a chance to go 4 for 4 in the lds round. three of them need the yankees to come back and win: jomfa, Zubin, and the red baron. the rest are hoping the indians can hang on: WiscCard, abstl, stlcardinalsfang, redbird6, Trayton in Seattle, and acham8206.

0 recs | Comment 48 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

an exciting matchup
no matter the outcome.
it'd be spectacular if the rockies sweep the d'backs.
thanks for the great analysis, mr. lb.
From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 8, 2007 10:04 AM EDT   0 recs

Rockies/ Wall Street Journal
lb:

I saw in the WSJ's daily fix you were picking on the NL a bit:

"...Couldn't they just leave the National League out of the playoffs entirely this year? The Senior Circuit only produced one team with as many as 90 wins, the Diamondbacks -- and they finished with a minus-20 run differential. The NL-best D-Backs would have missed the playoffs by four games in the American League, so why allow these flawed teams to compete for the championship?  ...The [National League] All-Stars might be capable of extending the BoSox or Angels to 7 games in the World Series."

Personally, I'd give the Rockies a decent shot against any team.  Certainly the Red Sox, Indians and probably the Yankees would be favored over the Rox, but I other than that them Rockies have to have one of the best teams in baseball.  Do you really think the Rockies aren't as good as the Angels, much less the Mariners?  

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 8, 2007 10:14 AM EDT   0 recs

That's funny...
it's awful similiar to the headline "Tigers in 3..".
"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Oct 8, 2007 10:26 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

NL vs AL
I hate when people use W/L records to compare leagues or divisions, with an unbalanced schedule and very little inter league play 90 wins in one league is not 90 wins in the other, it may be less it may be more, how many games would the DBacks have won if they played Seattle, LAA, Oak and Texas? I mean come on the Angels got to beat up on old Texas, Oak and Weaver in Seattle all season yet the DBacks had to play against Penny, Peavy, Young, Maddux, Wells, as well as these surging Rox is it really fair to compare records between these teams?  Especially comparing a 4 team division to a 5 or in the NLC's case a 6?

by StLHugo on Oct 8, 2007 10:56 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

relax you guys, i'm just an old fart
who thinks 8 playoff teams is too many. obviously i like having the rockies involved --- they play right down the street, i'm familiar with their personnel, and the town is energized. but they were a .500 team until mid-september. and the other 3 nl teams are all badly compromised --- the phils couldn't pitch, the dbacks were outscored on the season, and the cubs only won 85 games. (yes, i'm aware that the world champs only won 83 last year . . . . )

the two leagues obviously are not balanced --- the al played .544 vs the nl this year, .611 in 2006, and .540 in 2005. i was merely pointing out that the al field looks much stronger on paper than the nl field, and i was trying to say it in an entertaining way. if either the rockies or dbacks should win it all, i'll salute them as legitimate champs.

by lboros on Oct 8, 2007 2:37 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Well, I figured you were being entertaining,
but that doesn't answer my question.  When do you place the Rockies in the hierarchy of basball-dom's best?  
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 8, 2007 9:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

they still have to prove it to me
they're a legitimately good team, but 18 games ago they were 3 or 4 games over .500 --- they were the dodgers, basically.

now, which is a more true representation of their true ability --- the last 3 weeks, or the first 22 weeks of the schedule?

keep in mind, this team was so far out of the race that even a 13-1 run down the stretch almost wasn't enough. they only got into the one-game playoff because the padres pulled an el foldo in milwaukee in the final two days of the season --- trevor hoffman blows a save with 1 out to go on saturday, and the middle relievers blow a 3-run lead on sunday.

no matter which team wins the nlcs, i'll have my doubts about whether they're one of the top 2 teams in baseball. but baseball's postseason is no longer designed to determine the best team. it's more like the nhl now --- totally separate from the regular season. as scott rolen said earlier this year, the cards might have been the worst team in the '06 playoff field --- but what the hell, they won. they weren't the best team in baseball, but they were the champs of the tournament. the same might hold true for the rocks or the dbacks if they win it this year.

by lboros on Oct 8, 2007 11:24 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Good Luck
with your Rockies, LB. Now that Chicago is done, my emotional investment in the rest of the post-season is zero. I will blissfully watch the rest of the games hoping for exciting play and not much else. The Rockies do look good though. They seem to have the drive and, on any given day, the talent to go all the way. We'll see if they make that potential pay off. Since it would make so many VEBers happy, I will pull for them. But with no Birds or Blueboys in the mix, I just can't work up a real head of steam for or against anybody. Well, I guess I can still hope the Tribe takes the Yanx. If Torre is fired and Tony doesn't come back (which I believe will be the case), I wonder what the attitude toward bringing Torre back to The Lou would be. He didn't do so hot skippering the Cards before, but I'll bet he's learned a lot over the years--especially working for a nutcase like The Boss. He was one of my childhood Bird heroes, so I may be projecting in some way...but I'd be happy to see Ol' Joe don the BOB for one last stretch. Maybe he's been spoiled by the Yanx payroll and it wouldn't be a good fit. I dunno. What say you, VEBers? Joe or no Joe?

by rockin redbird on Oct 8, 2007 10:40 AM EDT   0 recs

I think.....
you are much more likely to see Tony wearing the pinstripes than Joe with the BotB...Yanks lose and you will not only see that, but you might just see Jocketty take over for Cashman as they make it a big package deal...Hey?...the Yanks have a Duncan there  too, so I'm sure Dave would follow ....

by Timbo02 on Oct 8, 2007 11:40 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Y'know...
If LaDunketty all leave, I'd be fine with them going to the Evil Empire. We'd only have to face them if we'd draw them for an interleague series or in a WS situation. I'd much rather see that than them going to Cincy. Besides, it would be fun to see how TLR would deal with the hardcore NY media after the relative honeymoon atmosphere of The Lou. Is it money or just plain non-interest that makes you think Joe wouldn't come back to the Birds? And IF he would, would you want him?

by rockin redbird on Oct 8, 2007 3:24 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Torre
I wouldn't mind seeing Torre back here, personally.  I thought he did a fairly good job with a very limited resource pool when he was here before.  (caveat: I was only 14 when he left, so my perceptions may not be completely accurate)  I don't think there's any way Tony would be a good fit in New York; the microscope just wouldn't agree with his Louis XIV act.  

I sincerely doubt we would see Torre back here, however.  For one thing, if ownership is serious about going with a building from within/youth movement sort of thing, they will most likely get a younger, "player's" type manager to lead a young squad.  Veteran managers tend to be more of the win now ilk, and don't tend to like trying to mentor a bunch of 20 year old kids and teach them why you have to hit the cutoff man.  Secondly, I have a feeling that if Torre is run out of New York, he'll probably just retire.  He doesn't have anything left to prove, his age is getting up there, and he's talked more and more frequently the last couple of years about how nice it would be just to sit on the beach or fish, that sort of thing.  I just don't think he would want to manage many more years, and he's not at the point in his career that he's going to want to start all over.  

Free to a good home.

by the red baron on Oct 8, 2007 3:37 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I wouldn't want Torre back
and I don't see why he'd come back.  Don't get me wrong, he was a decent manager, but not the genius Whitey was or Tony is (kinda).
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 8, 2007 9:05 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree
that there are probably precious few reasons he'd want to come back, but I wouldn't be sad to see his hat in the ring. If he has an interest, see what he wants and what he can bring. Several of his players are in walk years and may want to jump ship with him. I've read from more than a few posters lusting after ARod. Who knows? Joe might help that become possible. And as you say, he was a decent manager--during a pretty dark time in franchise history. He's also had a bit of post-season experience since then :-)

by rockin redbird on Oct 9, 2007 12:58 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

NL West Pitching
I'm starting to think the D'back's offense stats are misleading since they suffer from having to face the Dodgers and the Padres.  Add to that the good young starters (although bipolar) for the Rockies and Giants and that league is deep in starting pitching.  The D-backs young growing hitters really had it tough.

I'm becoming convinced the NL West was the best top-to-down division in baseball this year, beating all the AL divisions.  The AL central held it last year but the White Sox and Twins suffered this year.

by enoscountry on Oct 8, 2007 10:54 AM EDT   0 recs

i dunno enos
playing half their games in the offense-inflating Chase Field should counteract whatever run-suppressing effect the padre/dodger staffs might have had on the dback hitters --- and you could add the giants in there too, and for that matter the rockies (who as i mentioned allowed the lowest run total in the nl over the 2d half). if they were a truly good offense, or even an average one, there's no way they could finish 14th in scoring playing in that ballpark, no matter how good the staffs in their division might be. the rockies played in the same division, after all, and had to face all the same staffs --- they finished 2d in the league in scoring. the padres faced all those staffs (well, not themselves) and finished in the middle of the pack in scoring, despite playing in the most run-stifling ballpark in baseball.

i agree that it's a fine top-to-bottom division. no argument there.

by lboros on Oct 8, 2007 2:46 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Well,
I pick the D-backs to advance to the NLCS, but in four games.  So the Cubs messed me up by failing to win even ONE game. That figures!  The Phillies also failed me.  My only pick left with a chance is the Indians in four.  Go Indians!

But I now fear to go against the Rockies' playoff mojo and think that I will agree with Larry - the Rox in six games.  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 8, 2007 12:58 PM EDT   0 recs

micah owings
We went to the same college, so I watched plenty of his games back then. I was legitimately shocked when he was drafted as a pitcher. Back then, he seemed like a better first base/DH prospect to me.

by sjoshi on Oct 8, 2007 1:01 PM EDT   0 recs

Another reason
the relative pitching stats are misleading has to do w/ the structure of their staffs.  Arizona's bullpen is very strong at the top, but pretty weak at the bottom.  They gave up a lot of irrelevant runs in games they were losing.  Those weaker pitchers are unlikely to even know where the mound is in this series so you'll see the best of what they've got.

As for the Rockies, both Jimenez and Morales only pitched about 1/2 a year, yet they stand to get 4 of the 7 starts in this series.  They're young and impressive and, at worst, better than the Rodrigo Lopez's they were running out there at the beginning of the season.  This stands to be a really good matchup of good, young players.  They're not as good as the AL teams are, but they may be more exciting b/c of the youth.

by houstoncardinal on Oct 8, 2007 1:05 PM EDT   0 recs

I just want to point out...
That if the Indians do in fact beat the Yankees, every team I will have picked will have lost in the first round.

I rock!

by mtalken on Oct 8, 2007 1:26 PM EDT   0 recs

haha
Never goin' to vegas with you my friend.

by brindled on Oct 8, 2007 1:44 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Wrong. Such a "friend"
would be extremely valuable in Vegas, no?

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 8, 2007 2:15 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Just pick
the opposites.

by spants on Oct 8, 2007 2:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's to hoping
Cleveland wins the AL, if for no other reason than to throw it in the face of self-righteous pricks like Colin Cowherd and the FOX execs. BTW, Herd has been calling the NL "Junior Varsity" baseball. We'll see...

by cardsrul on Oct 8, 2007 2:11 PM EDT   0 recs

Cowherd...
Until this is all over?.....tell that self-rightous asshole that the current WORLD CHAMPION is from that Junior Varsity league....that guy knows NOTHING about baseball....and since his wife left him he's become one of the most bitter men on the planet.  

by Timbo02 on Oct 8, 2007 2:31 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Cowherd
I think I've only caught his show flipping through the dial two or three times, but even from that limited exposure, you're right.  He is unusually nasty and arrogant, even for sports talk radio.  And that's saying something.  
Free to a good home.

by the red baron on Oct 8, 2007 3:26 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

He has an interesting perspective at times
but usually he comes off as a jerk to me as well.  Everyone else's opinion is completely wrong and his is alwasys right.

He really knows nothing about baseball.  I think he really only has knowledge about college football; that's all he talks about most of the time it seems.

Somtimes I do wonder if some of his "jerkiness" is an act, though....

by saladdays on Oct 8, 2007 3:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

TV Execs
Have to be screaming in their sleep over this one.  An NLCS that takes place in the Mountain time zone?  No Cubs?  No Phillies?  Maybe no Yankees?

by Cardinal70 on Oct 8, 2007 2:39 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

the execs are PISSED
  1. 3 of 4 series sweep = fewer games = less money.
  2. everyone was happy because of 4 huge markets in the playoffs - ny, la, chi, phi. now if the yanks lose, all 4 of those markets will be gone.
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 8, 2007 2:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Is Boston
Not considered a large market also?

Still, three out of four small market teams.

by stl tyler on Oct 8, 2007 5:24 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

For your information...
we prefer "Arizona Standard Time" to just being lumped in with Mountain Time.

Arizona, minus the Navajos, are on the same time as California until November 4th.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 8, 2007 2:46 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

My apologies
I knew that Arizona had a different version of the daylight savings time, I'd forgotten it.

I'm sure there will be headlines screaming "lowest postseason viewership ever", but, starting with the wild-card playoff, there's been some pretty good baseball so far.

by Cardinal70 on Oct 8, 2007 2:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Not really a "Standard" then is it?
How about Arizona LOL Time?

And why Nov. 4th? Is that the expected WS clinch date?

Watching the Playoffs as Reigning Champs is not a bad thing.

by Birds on the Bat on Oct 8, 2007 8:06 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Daylight saving time
ugg, I hate this ignorance about time zones.  Daylight savings time has been changed this year and won't end until november we are still in CDT not CST yet so many people are still using the ST abbreviations.  Arizona is in MST not MDT while the Rockies are in MDT it all depends on whether you go on Daylight saving time or not.

A good source on it is here: http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/b.html

by StLHugo on Oct 9, 2007 10:09 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

What do you guys think about......
trading Chris Duncan for Jair Jurrjens and some tiger prospect?

Tigers are looking for a LH bat.

Miller sucks.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Oct 8, 2007 3:04 PM EDT   0 recs

Hurts me to say it,
but, (and I admit I have fairy limited knowledge of Jurrjens) I think I would have to do it.  
Free to a good home.

by the red baron on Oct 8, 2007 3:22 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Wasn't that the annoying guy from Star Wars Ep 1?
In another funny name news did anyone see the name of the guy returning kicks for Indy this weekend: Craphonso Thorpe.

by OCCardsFan on Oct 8, 2007 4:10 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yes, a player from Curaçao !!
i'd love if he would become a Cardinal. Jair lives and works hard to achieve "his dream"...
btw, all games he pitched have been on the local public tv channel. that would be a plus too.
From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 8, 2007 4:25 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No offense to Curacao..
but we already went down that road and it wasn't pretty. I suppose Big Sid isn't representative of the entire island, but still, bad memories...
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 8, 2007 4:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Representative
Of the whole lesser Antilles, maybe.

by liam on Oct 8, 2007 5:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

He was from Aruba
Andruw Jones was from Curacao

by houstoncardinal on Oct 8, 2007 6:59 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

it's ok, don't worry
but i don't think it's wise to generalize. ponson probably isn't a model of the people of Aruba.
otoh Curaçao and Aruba are two different islands, two different countries, like Cardinal nation en Brewer nation are.

i can tell you down here we really think Jair will achieve a lot, as long as he will maintain the right attitude.

From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 8, 2007 7:40 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Which Island is bigger?
Curaçao, Aruba, or Ponson?
Watching the Playoffs as Reigning Champs is not a bad thing.

by Birds on the Bat on Oct 8, 2007 8:21 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

good point
i guess it depends on which transportation you use (walking in the sun makes those islands a lot bigger) and what you're drinking...
From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 9, 2007 1:17 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yankees
I only picked them because I had expected ARod to finally have a big series.  So far, that hasn't happened, and, frankly, I'm pretty happy about it.  I really like Cleveland; I'm desperately hoping they can put the kibosh on the Sawx blitzkrieg, (or the Yanks can if they really want, anybody but Boston) so being wrong about that series is really not so bad.  
Free to a good home.

by the red baron on Oct 8, 2007 3:29 PM EDT   0 recs

Heh
Boston is only good to me as Yankee-killer.

by saladdays on Oct 8, 2007 3:59 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Load'em up
on a foul ball.  Always a good call.  They better plate them all.
Watching the Playoffs as Reigning Champs is not a bad thing.

by Birds on the Bat on Oct 8, 2007 8:18 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

3lfwyghi_small
MLB expansion and division re-alignment
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Recognizing Cardinal Greats

Recent FanPosts

Ray_charles_small
Could this work?
Molina_small
UPDATE: Instant replay coming to a stadium near you in August
Photo_29_small
The MI problem
Molina_homer_small
I heart Adam
W67ca65zdr4cauktiuhcawca7d2cakul8alca9sbjppcaa8a2yycaanhi96cail6nf5ca50jzzgcag0l09icayljxomcanf3schcak4373oca0sfbi5ca0a8bv7cagjm0qeca4msmm8ca30cv5wcamim0gk_small
Payroll Reduced in '09?
Bab_small
Brett Wallace on the Move
Small
The Good, The Bad, and the Uggla
Small
Grading the 2008 Cardinals
281076883_6920dd7053_small
Can Mather play 3B?
150px-st_louis_cardinals_1967-1997_logo_small
Cardinal Dreams

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Birdos_avatar_small lboros

Editors

Az_small azruavatar

Adam1_small houstoncardinal

Lewishine_newsiespic-close_small the red baron

ad

Site Meter