Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Mozeliak the new GM

Press Conference at 3pm.

This is per Bernie.

This freaking stinks. He isn't bad I suppose, but I thought Antonetti would be a step in the right direction for this organization.

Oh well, here's hoping Mo will prove me wrong.

Update [2007-10-31 13:10:56 by lboros]: mozeliak has some talent, and he might work out just fine --- it's too soon to say what he will do. he deserves a chance. but the troubling thing is that the cardinals wanted antonetti, and he turned them down. that's inauspicious, to say the least.

Update [2007-10-31 13:34:12 by lboros]: rec'd this e-mail from a source outside of st louis: "Shapiro might be stepping to CEO to give Antonetti the reigns. It's more about CLE than STL."

Comment 222 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

well......................
that sucks.

i think this doesn't change anything. this team needs on overhaul, a whole need direction. mo is just perpetuation of the same direction, just without jocketty's pride and strife.

blech. i'm mad.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not mad
but I am profoundly disappointed. This organization had an opportunity to do something great and fucked it up. This is bad!

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh...
I hope Mo shows us more than he did in the past few weeks. If not, this organization is sunk.

by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed
It probably is not an end of the world thing.  I don't see such a proud organization going the direction of Tampa Bay or anything.

But it seems like a wast of time considering all the talk of Antonetti and what not the past few weeks.

I was kind of excited to see what an outsider could do.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Mozeliak!
I'm disappointed and shocked.  LaRussa has won.

by jjray on Oct 31, 2007 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe I'm overreacting
But I'm livid with Bernie.  Twice he's been wrong about major acquisitions (for lack of a better term).  He might as well have called them "slam dunks."
Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 31, 2007 12:58 PM EDT reply actions  

No sir...
You're definitely not overreacting.  Or maybe both of us are.

I wish Bernie would be out of a job.  Can't we find someone who isn't a blow-hard to fill his spot?  I mean, even if they have to be wrong as much as Bernie is about the important matter...  they're just straight forward about it.

"I don't really know this for sure...  I thought I overheard someone talking but it probably wasn't true.  So, here's this crap that I made up to feel important for a few days.  Dig in!"

An honest Bernie, if you will.

by mynameistyler on Oct 31, 2007 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

this isn't bernie's fault
first of all, he's sharing information that has been in wide circulation --- even i, a lowly blogger, heard from more than one source (not bernie) that the job was antonetti's if he wanted it, and that presumably he would take it. i wrote a few days ago "the papers aren't signed, but this guy's the new gm" --- and i wrote that with no fear that i would be wrong.

second, it wasn't bernie who reported that antonetti flew in with his wife to tour st louis neighborhoods; it wasn't bernie who reported that antonetti had "signed off" on la russa and luhnow. that was joe strauss's reporting. maybe we all jumped to conclusions, or maybe our conclusions were correct until antonetti had a change of heart. i'm trying to find out right now.

i'm as disappointed as any of you, but don't hold the media responsible. i don't believe anything was misrepresented.

by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right lb
I apologize for throwing it all on Bernie.  I'm very underwhelmed (to put it lightly) about this decision, and I sincerely hope I come out to be completely wrong.  I was against the Jocketty firing, but came around when people said "We're changing into a newer direction."  I understand that CA was the first choice, and he would take us in a new direction, but why have our in-house guy as the second choice?  We might as well have kept Jocketty, IMHO.
Cardinal fan in War Eagle land

by Mr Redbird on Oct 31, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Same thing?
Was that the same thing that happened with the AJ Burnett scoop?  

Not to say I told you so, but I told you so.

There are so many reasons not to like Bernie, I guess I just can't give him the benefit of the doubt regardless of your excuses.

by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the thing that people fail to see
Is that Bernie is going above and beyond what his job calls for.  He is sharing more than just the news that is "fit to print."  My sense is that in doing so he shares things that have not been fully verified or vetted.  And the normal consequence of this is that sometimes the info will prove to be wrong.  I just don't see how we can complain when Bernie is sharing whatever info he has as soon as he get it.  I view that as a real benefit and hate to see people complaint about it.  Especially if the alternative is that we get less insider reports.

by OCCardsFan on Oct 31, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

He is?
you don't think it's bernie's job to run his "pressbox" and keep people logging into the newspaper's site?

bernie stirs up controversial items and often reports things wrong, steals ideas and is generally a pompous blow hard.  

I will dislike him if i want to regardless if you don't think he's accountable for things he puts in writing.

by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Post Dispatch is a newspaper first
He freely admits that his pressbox postings do not necessarily meet the standards for actual newspaper articles.

At best, his pressbox material is well-placed gossip.

by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

ray, i'm not making excuses for bernie
i'm just stating the facts. it was no secret that the cards were serious about antonetti and vice versa. and there were many people --- including yours truly --- hinting that antonetti had an offer and was probably going to take it. and that was true --- he did have an offer, and he was leaning toward taking it. but he changed his mind.

if you want to blame bernie for that, be my guest. blame me too, because i issued the same "all-but-a-done-deal" proclamations here at VEB. i was wrong. i don't apologize.

also, i'm pretty certain that bernie never reported anything about AJ Burnett. brian walton made an erroneious report over at the Birdhouse. i don't think bernie was wrong about that.

by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with LB
completely.  I felt the coverage, Bernie's included, was sourced.  That's all you can ask as a reader.   if the sources are mistaken or if something unforeseen occurs (as appears to have happened here), I don't think its Bernie's fault.

my prelim take is CA wanted to stay in Cleveland all along and eventually take over for Shapiro.  I'm not taking it personal as a Cards fan.

by MrPlow on Oct 31, 2007 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Bernie
Always have. He write well, he loves Cardinals baseball. He's been doing this for as long as I can remember. What's more, I can't think of any specific sports writer that I like better. I don't understand the negativity that comes his way.
So says, The Dude

by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's disheartening,
to say the least. Third offseason in a row now we've been not just teased, not just promised, but ready to pop some bubbly on a signing, only for it to fall through. Cripes.

Prove us wrong, Mo. Prove us wrong.

(But in my mind, all I can think is this really fuckings sucks right now. Get ready to welcome back David freaking Eckstein, So Taguchi, and Aaron Miles: 400 AB/per season "bench" player. Oh, and feel free to sign another 5th starter for 7 mil to fill out this "rotation" of ours.)

(I'm one of the more optimistic Cards fans out there... but... just... fuck.)

Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me too, man
I'm an eternal optimist for this franchise...  but right now, I just want to sleep for a week.  I'm losing faith steadfast and I live and die for this team.  I'm fully aware that I am far too emotionally invested in the Cardinals...  but I don't care, man.  I hate being disappointed so much.  This is just painful.

by mynameistyler on Oct 31, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe this is a...
big win for Luhnow. Not that I'm sold on the guy, but without a big name guy in the GM chair, who's going to be plotting the course over the long term?

Maybe Mozeliak handles the contracts, and Luhnow gets a bigger voice on the major league side of the club.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 12:58 PM EDT reply actions  

big win for LaRussa
No, I see this as a big win for LaRussa.  Luhnow has zero input in the major league roster.  None.  IMHO, Antonetti and Luhnow would have been allies against the "let's muck up the roster with broken down vets to try and win now" strategy of LaRussa.  Mozeliak will carry watter for LaRussa.  He's already done it as interim GM: picked up Izzy option, extended Springer, said interested in signing Eckstein.  Mozeliak will bring both Eckstein and Taguchi back because that is what LaRussa wants.

There will be no overhaul.  Not this year.  Not until LaRussa leaves.  He'll just reload with vets at the back end of their careers.

by jjray on Oct 31, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can you really blame him?
He'll get a shot someday, that's almost guaranteed.
And when he does it will likely not come with a heavyweight manager, an assistant, and a minor league guru already in place. It wasn't that great of a deal for Antonetti to begin with. If they really wanted him they should have fired Luhnow as a condition of him getting the job.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think Luhnow was the problem
While I don't know all the particulars, I'm under the impression that Luhnow's philosophy is closer to that of the Indians organization than anyone else with the Cardinals.

If anything, I would think Luhnow would be an ally for an incoming Antonetti.

If Antonetti isn't coming in, it's because La Russa and his ilk still have a big voice in the organization.

Luhnow would be on Antonetti's side.

by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

No...
LaRussa will be gone in a couple years and Mozeliak (as assistant can be dominated or marginalized). It was Luhnow that has DeWitt's ear. The fact that he's a stat guy is exactly the problem... he would be a competitor with Antonetti.

If DeWitt likes Luhnow then Luhnow should be the GM. The problem is he's too new. So you put Mozeliak up as something of a figurehead while Luhnow's way of thinking and methods take over the organization...

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don't see it that way.
Luhnow's philosophy is modeled on organizations like Cleveland, Arizona, etc.  

After the factionalism (don't know if that's a word) Luhnow had to deal with from Jocketty's camp, my assumption is he would welcome a kindred spirit with arms open.

If I were Antonetti and I looked at the Cards, I'd see an owner who wants to win with a moderate payroll, a player development director with a similar philosophy to my own, and an increasingly dinosaurish manager and pitching coach who are unenthusiastic about homegrown talent and prefer veterans.

Considering Antonetti's philosophy, which one of those personalities is going to be the most difficult to deal with?

I'm not saying La Russa, et al, is the reason Antonetti did not accept.  Obviously, Cleveland wants to keep him around.  But, if anyone within our organization was a deal-breaker, I don't think it would be Luhnow.

by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not so sure
Just because they're both "player development" guys doesn't necessarily mean that they both see eye to eye on everything.

by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't even think...
it's about seeing eye to eye. It's about having total control over the organization and not having to compromise.
Who needs Antonetti? Give Luhniak a chance!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait a minute
I'm sure most MLB GM's are Alpha Dogs, but who in their right mind would think they could operate an organization like this without having to compromise?

That's exactly why Jocketty is no longer with the Cards.

Antonetti, who is much younger (read: probably less crotchety) and is coming from an organization that has made a strong team precisely by compromising between statistics and scouting, wants total control with no compromising?

Like I said, the person he would have to compromise the most with would be La Russa.

by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

antonetti was an assistant
So Antonetti was an assistant, apparently with enough power to make a name for himself as an assistant, and subsequently be pursued for every GM opening.  Yet as a GM, he wants absolute control?  Odd.

by cdb on Oct 31, 2007 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just what I feared this organization would do
Stand pat. The Cardinals badly need a fresh perspective from outside.  I fear all this will produce is more congeniality in the front office.  Otherwise, I suspect Mozeliak may just be a younger and probably less talented version of Jocketty.  Wasn't he responsible for the dreadful 2004 draft or was that Manno?

by MikeG on Oct 31, 2007 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

That draft
even with all its complications was still under his control.  the results of that draft are enough to worry me about the cardinals future.

by Dave Barry on Oct 31, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think
we all know the draft is Lunhow's now.  I don't think Mo will have the final say in that area.

by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

One nagging worry: Is DeWitt too involved?
One nagging worry that's been in my mind for a while  is: now that the his team has won a ring, does DeWitt think he knows how to run a baseball team by himself with only minimal help, essentially reserving for himself the powers that a normally strong GM would have?

The whole who has what powers question gets a whole lot simpler if Lunhow, LaRussa, and the new GM all answer to DeWitt.

by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

sure seems that way...
It's impossible to know FOR SURE what's going on, but this reeks of too much meddling by DeWitt.

by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

DeWitt is the GM
This fear was expressed to lboros a week or so ago.
Who wants to be GM if every move has to be approved by DeWitt? He wanted a yes man and he got him.

by vinniefromjersey on Oct 31, 2007 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cards really wanted Antonetti
Sounds like Anotonetti was the top choice, but the Indians offered him more money and promises of the GM position in the future. The link below is an article from Ken Rosenthal that comments on the situation.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7394064?CMP=OTC-K9B140813162&ATT=49

by plaz on Oct 31, 2007 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Dear diary...
please tell plaz that you exist.

by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like this at all.
David Eckstein gets a 2- or 3-year deal very soon.

I hope I'm wrong, but this does not look good.

by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

things are trending that way...
Mozeliak has a very short track record. But so far we haven't seen much imagination. I wouldn't be surprised to see Eckstein return. Ug.

by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dare I bring back my quote from yesterday?
"Antonetti official?

Am I missing something or did you jump the gun, lb?

It's kinda scary 'cause the last time somebody jumped the gun this year, they were saying that the Rockies would be playing the Indians in the world series.

So if you did make an assumption, let's hope it comes true."

Not accusing you of jinxing us or anything, but this site really needs to start knocking on wood . . .

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Oct 31, 2007 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

i don't believe in jinxes
and i never said it was official --- i said the papers weren't signed, which means it wasn't official.

but there were many overt indications that he was the guy:

  1. the cards delayed their search specifically to talk to him, waiting until the indians got knocked out of the playoffs. they obviously were very interested.
  2. antonetti flew in not only to interview, but also to look at houses with his wife --- he obviously was interested in the job. and don't forget, he had declined invitations to interview for other jobs; he accepted this invitation.
and those are only the on-the-record indications. off the record, there was so much info circulating that some of it even found its way to me. he was extremely close to getting the job, there is no question of that; the only question is why the deal fell apart. i'm trying to find out.

by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The factor that wasn't taken into account...
Was that CA wanted. We might never know exactly what it came down to, although it seems pretty clear that the situation wasn't ideal with regards to the power structure and the distribution of responsibilities.

by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

LB - your opinion of Mo?
I don't want to have "the sky is falling" attitude about this, but I sure had my hopes dashed.  

Will this franchise really take a new approach under Mo?

by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't know
he is close to la russa, which is not a good sign. on the other hand, i've heard that he is a big supporter of brendan ryan's, that he thinks reyes can and should succeed in the bigs, that he has pushed for guys like wainwright and brad thompson to get shots in the bigs.

i think people are jumping to a lot of conclusions about him --- none of us really knows what to expect. i have an open mind.

like everyone else, i was excited about antonetti; c'est la vie. that ship has sailed. we move on. in 6 months, i'll have a much firmer opinion about big mo than i do today.

by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

he also said a deal
involving dan haren would have to be one the cardinals would be floored by. it's hard for me to imagine him being floored by mulder, i think that was all jock and tony.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh I know.
I'm mainly just kidding, but I was referring to this quote that you used to sign off with yesterday:

"not an easy knot for mr. antonetti to untangle; he'll have to be creative."

You're not the only one, though. I think we all (through Bernie and other sources) thought the deal was all but an announcement away.

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Oct 31, 2007 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

larry has jinxed us plenty
this team will be ok as long as Carp and Pujols are there to steer ship, Carp is broke, Pujols is dinged.
the offense is fixed, it gets broke.
the pitching is fixed, it gets broke.
we are finished - start selling, we get back in contention.
the zombies are back, we go on massive losing streak.
indians are going to the series, bosox come back.
antonetti has to fix this mess, mo gets hired.

Of course, this is all pure coincidence, but I'd love to hear larry say "There is no way this team will win the World Series next year, nor will Pujols hit 85 HRs and Edmonds and Rolen play 155 games each.  Mark Mulder has no shot at winning the Cy Young award".

:D

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not lboros, but I'll try it...
"There is no way this team will win the World Series next year, nor will Pujols hit 85 HRs and Edmonds and Rolen play 155 games each.  Mark Mulder has no shot at winning the Cy Young award"

stlfan

by stlfan on Oct 31, 2007 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

More Bernie BS
-"Just an FYI...

It's official.

3 pm newser at Busch

Mozeliak is hired ...

3-year contract...

Antonetti apparently backed out; concerns over autonomy (in other words: the Luhnow factor).

Much more later.

STLtoday.com reported this first, despite what you will hear elsewhere.

Thank you."

Surprise, surprise.

by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Not suprising really
Many figured that control might be an issue for any GM candidate and apparently it was a deciding factor.

How unfortunate. Looks like the major rebuilding will have to wait until 2010 or 2011 (right as Albert is really to leave) unless Mo and Luhnow are a better combo than most believe at infusing this team with the fresh perspective that it desperately needs.

by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Autonomy
If the perception that Luhnow is the GM of the future caused Antonetti to back-out, that is very frustrating.  If DeWitt doesn't have the confidence to hand Luhnow the reigns, they, and we, need to get off this guy.  An organization might sit on its hands while a hot prospect works through the system, but to essentially do the same with front office personnel is ridiculous.

by bgodar on Oct 31, 2007 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not good
The organization needed a shakeup.  All it is getting is a light stirring.

by Cardinal70 on Oct 31, 2007 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I am so sick of "Standing pat"
i want action. and not Eck/Taguchi/Miles/Rincon/Ponson/Wells/Pinero/Wilson/Cairo action.

by TICY on Oct 31, 2007 1:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Antonetti
Olney was talking on 1380 this morning that he (CA) pretty much has a 50/50 shot at the Yankees job next year (if the yanks dont make the playoffs, Cashman is gone), so perhaps he's just holding out for greened pastures but... fuck.

...We get Jocketty Lite when the entire org needed a change of direction. 105 wins, 100 wins, 83 wins, 78 wins. $100 million already invested to a 2008 team which will be lucky to win 75 games. Yeah, lets stand pat in the front office.

Fuck.

(this post is easily going to past the most cursing post of all time.)

Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

PS
I'm going to go pop my 2006 world series dvd in and fall asleep. this sucks.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

nice
>>We get Jocketty Lite<<

Great tag line

by jjray on Oct 31, 2007 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Intersting info LB
because this deal was defiantly making me wonder about the perception of the Cardinals organization within baseball (particularly as a troubled organization).

by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

wow....
So now we're perceived to be a troubled organization within baseball? BASEBALL is a troubled organization, so I guess the Cards are right in step being one team in the pile!

Somehow I missed the part where MLB as a whole was something special to be admired for its integrity and high virtue these past few years.

Of course there are going to be trying times, but it ain't just the Cards, BUT... Wainwright DID jump in the air just a little over a year ago....I saw it happen.

The Braves announcers really got to you....or was it the D-backs?

Improve the Cardinals team spirit, integrity and positive public image...sign Bonds for 08'!

by cardschinmusic on Nov 1, 2007 4:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Antonetti turned the Cards down
that is disheartening for the organization, but it is also may be an unwise career move on his part.

Luhnow or no Luhnow, TLR or no TLR, opportunities to build a team around one of the greatest hitters in a generation, and to have $30 million-plus to spend in his second off-season as GM, aren't going to come around that often.

And, as LB pointed out the other day, he is not going to be the "it" guy forever.  Now all of the guys he developed look great; if the Indians have a couple of shitty years, the idea of hiring their #2 won't seem quite as compelling. For some reason, the lyric ""The Whiz man" never fit him like the "Whiz Kid" did" comes to mind . . .

by tdawg on Oct 31, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Robothal was just on XM
says that it was more than likely mostly about not leaving Cleveland but he's heard that a sticking point was going to be that Jeff Lunhow had DeWitt's ear and was in essence the proxy-GM.  That was going to cause pause for a lot of GM candidates.

I'm not as upset about Mo, I wasn't as down as most on the Pineiro signing, the Izzy option, etc.

If he resigns Eckstein (other than just offering arbitration because WE HAVE TO), I'll be disgusted.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

This information
pretty much refutes what I was saying above.  

If it's true that Luhnow was the catch, then I retract my argument.

Looking at it from the outside, it's just not what I would expect.

by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on Springer/Izzy/Pineiro
I don't see those as catastrophically stupid moves like alot of people do.

But if the big free agent signing/"new player deal" is resigning Eckstein and bringing in some random player who isn't any good (a Wes Helms-type) then we're going to have serious issues.

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sprizzyeiro
I don't think they have to be catastrophically stupid to be bad moves.  Izzy was a no brainer really, but the other two were quite unimiginative and could very easily backfire.

I just don't like the status quo feeling I get with this club.  Something needs to change, and so far...absolutely nothing has.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am excited
I like Mo, while I was excited about CA I am equally excited about Mo.  I can't wait for his first official move as the full GM.

by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm sure...
they'll be just as stupid as the moves he made as interim GM.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow!
The first sighting of a positive post in this thread!  Well, I am going to join you.  I agree 100% with what lb said a few post north of here - that ship has sailed, time to move on.  I'm disappointed, but life is full of disappointments.  Roll up the sleeves and get to work, let's see what Mo can do.

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 31, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe we can think into existence...
Some good, shrewd moves from our new GM. For starters - fiscal restraint with regards to re-signing Eckstein.

by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree
If the buzz is accurate - and Antonetti main issue in rejecting was a lack of complete autonomy - I think we are probably better off without him.  

Lets face it - numbers crunchers aren't as rare as they once were and the be all and end all - there are plenty of posters on VEB that can crunch the hell out of numbers in their spare time.  Imagine what they could do salaried!

Complete autonomy is never good - we now have a front office that at least can get along.  

by cdb on Oct 31, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can we just all keep in mind
that we know NOTHING about Mozeliak? That the things he did and said while an EMPLOYEE of Jocketty do not tell us anything about his tenure as boss?  That moves he made or did not make as interim GM do not tell us anything about his vision for the future?

Jeez, the knee-jerk reactions about this are astonishing.  I can understand disappointment, but to assume that any of have a clue what's in Mo's mind is just ridiculous.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

But we do have a clue
in his trial run in trying to get the job, he overpaid for Springer and Pineiro.  We do know something about him.  We also know that he was in charge of the 2004 draft, which is the worst in the Cards' recent history.

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

At Least
we don't have Dusty Baker as the manager.  I am let down by this development, but I thought this would really signal a new direction for the Cards.  I love the club and will still root for them, but today definitely deflated our hopes.

by JBagKY on Oct 31, 2007 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cardinals...
really are going in a new direction, they're just not going to be led by Antonetti. The hiring of Luhnow, the refusal to bid on the Carlos Lee's of the world, the interest in Antonetti and Woodfork for the GM position... All of this signals a departure from the Jocketty model.
Who needs Antonetti? Give Luhniak a chance!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was going for sarcasm
but I was disappointed to hear that Antonetti won't be coming here.  Hopefully, they will continue in a new direction with Mo.  

by JBagKY on Oct 31, 2007 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

No point in blaming the media...
I'm disappointed too, but it isn't Bernie or Rosenthal's fault...if you think about it, it's not surprising that one of the "up and comers" wouldn't come here given he wouldn't have the chance to bring in his own people...I'm just glad that somebody like DePodesta didn't get the job... you know, recently fired from another job and willing to eat crap just to get another GM position.

by tbell61 on Oct 31, 2007 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Sickening...
More stupid moves and 80 win seasons (if lucky) to come.  I thought this was supposed to be about a new direction, instead it's about Jocketty getting into a pissing match with DeWitt.

TLR is now in TOTAL control of this team.  We'll be the last team to come around to the new way of doing things and we'll pay for it badly.

More news within the next week.

Hello Taguchi, Miles, a new extension Eck.  Hell, we might as well extend Jimmy for 3 more years.

This is now one of the worst run organizations in baseball.

Get ready for 5 more seasons of station to station, pitch to contact snoozefests.

I'm not the only one who feels this way.  The rest of baseball is laughing in our face.  We can't even get another teams assistants to take the job.

This makes me not even want to follow baseball.  Stupid, stupid, stupid.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

We wait with baited breath
for the merest scrap of solid evidence for ANY of your statements, apart from the last one.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

MO
I agree with LB and others about how do people claim to know MO.  

Izzy was a good signing.
Frankin:  Could have been worse

Just because Mo worked with Walt does not mean he is Walt JR.  Yes he probably took some of Walt's good and bad traits and developed his own style.  Also CA probably stayed in Cleveland because he was going to be a GM there.  Why would he want to leave the org he came up in?  I don't blame him for being loyal and wanting to stay where he has opportunity and is comfortable.  He has not hit the ceiling in that org yet.  Maybe he is not looking to be a GM more than a couple years.  He may have other goals.

But back to it, Let's sit back let Mo make some actual moves and then evaluate.  Everyone was saying if CA came over we would need to give him time.  So why is eveyone jumping on Mo.  Some moves may be made to make things better in the future.

FYI signing IZZY & Franking cost us no prospect and not a lot of $$ in the grand scheme of things.  If you want to look at our bad contracts look no further than Carp or Mulder who can't pitch and are raking in a ton of $$$.  Now those hurt us.  Aaron Miles at 1.2 Mill chickenfeed.  So people stop talking about Aaron Miles contract because in the overall picture he is being paid $1.  

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since when do the Cardinals...
have to settle for their last choice to fill the GM position.

Mozelaik is there because noone else wanted the job.  Have the Cardinals slipped that far?  Hell, Rick Hahn withdrew himself from consideration.

The Pirates have a better front office.

Give me a break.

At least Mizzou Football is heading in the right direction.

How long before we are cellar dwellars and AP demands out.  I give it 2 years.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Hahn
Hahn was NEVER a real candidate, he withdrew because it looks good for him and for no other reason.  My goodness we have one so so season that ends in a championship and one ugg season that still left us in third place not far under .500 and now the sky is falling.  Come on bobby I know you are disappointed and I know you don't agree with the organization on everything but you can't seriously be this down on the team and the future it isn't healthy.

by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

NEVER?
Doesn't make sense to interview someone who doesn't have a shot at the job.

Oh well, doesn't make sense to do everything in their power to keep this craptastic team together either.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't have wanted
Hahn. The Sox are in worse shape than the Cards.

I can;t blame this on TLR, either. Most possible GMs would love to work for a HoF manager.

Either DeWitt refused to give up enough power for him or he has a better offer (read: Cleve this year or NY next year). I wish we would have had him, but thinking about it now, it's understandable.

I hate to say it -- and hope this changes in a month or two -- but it's play of '09 time. Sucks.

Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

More from Bernie
Also: the San Diego Union Tribune reports today that the Cardinals have hired Jaron Madison, the Padres' assistant director of scouting.

Madison, 32, will assist Jeff Luhnow.... Cardinals have made changes in their scouting department and Madison figures to have a prominent role in the player-development operation.

-----------------

Looks like we might be fully embracing this player development philosophy after all.

by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Um...
Isn't the Padres system one of the worst in MLB?

by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Makes sense
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Office
Assistant TO the Director of Scouting ;)

by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was announced last night
I suspected then it was an indication Mozeliak was moving up.

by MikeG on Oct 31, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps
if the cardinals had viewed Mo as an equal, a real challenger to CA than the reaction would be different.   Maybe they did, but from my perspective it looks like they were forced to take second best.

by Dave Barry on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Actually...
I'm jumping the gun here.  It's disheartening that the GM job can't attract the candidate they really wanted, or even their second or third choice.

I'll quit with the sky is falling attitude for now.  In truth, we don't know much about Mozeliak.  Maybe he is on board with player development and statistical scouting.

However, the two signings he had made so far scream Jocketty lite.

I'll wait until they give Eck 3 years to denounce baseball.  What do I have?  A week?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:53 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cardinals just hired...
someone that the Astros and Reds turned down.  Think about that for a moment.  

It is depressing that we can't get one of the top candidates out there.  I hope I'm proved wrong, but I think this is terrible.

"It takes pitching, hitting and defense. Any two can win. All three make you unbeatable". Joe Garagiola

by MRCARD on Oct 31, 2007 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Good Point
I can't believe the Cardinals have fell this far.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think about this...
Krivsky has bombed in Cincy and Ed Wade is contemplating going 5yrs/$80 million with Torii Hunter or Aaron Rowand.

Sometimes not getting your first choice is ok...

Who needs Antonetti? Give Luhniak a chance!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

well,
i'm not saying the world is ending, but I don't want to see what the man responsible for the 2004 draft can do with full control of this team...

by tnek5 on Oct 31, 2007 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Here, here....Mo was in charge of that draft
it was widely panned by everyone in baseball too.  I knew Mr. LaRussa wouldn't let Mr. DeWitt hire Mr. Antonetti.  I just knew it.....I don't know Mo, but I just don't see him telling Mr. LaRussa no.  Ever.

by jillsinmo on Oct 31, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

come on
that's paranoid talk. who said it had anything to do with TLR?

by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jill,
just please start www.firetonylarussa.com and get it over with.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Damn
I too had my tighty-whities in a bunch over Antonetti. Still, I'm willing to give Mo a shot before I crap all over him. But I'm with bobbyballgame for once on this one--if signing Eck is Mo's first official move (or his second or third or whatever), he's already in the crapper as far as I'm concerned. C'mon Mo, show us you've got the juice to make some real moves.

by rockin redbird on Oct 31, 2007 2:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Walt Jocketty
was a good GM.  I know the game is changing in terms of evaluation of players, but that doesn't mean Jocketty was good at what he did.

One thing he did was scoop up players he viewed as undervalued.  Sometimes they worked out (Carp) and sometimes they didn't (Wells).  

Walt Jocketty put the best team on the field in 2004.  He brought a new era of playoff baseball to StL.  

The Cards main weakness under Jocketty was the farm system.  I think that is being addressed.  I think statistical analysis will be used more readily.  Mo gets to hire an Assistant GM.  Maybe that way will be more slanted towards stats.  Mo has some relationships, and that's one thing Jocketty was known as being great for - having good relationships with other GMs.  

I don't think this is the end of the world.  CA got a better offer - that's just how markets work.  We went with a guy who already knows everyone - I don't think it's the end of the world.  

CA may not end up being a good GM - there are no sure things.  We'll see.

by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I wrote
this in response to all the Jocketty-lite comments.

by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Key Word
WAS

Sure, he was great when teams were giving away the Jim Edmonds and Scott Rolens of the world for peanuts.  That's not happening anymore, and Walt really never did well in the FA market.

Let's just imagine that a scrap heap pitcher never turned into Cy Young, and a 13th round draft pick never turned into the best player in the NL.

There was alot of luck that led to Walt's success here.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luck
A lot of GM's are "successful" due to luck and Walt does fall into that category.

I don't know if it was Walt, or Dewitt but the Cards just seemed to miss out on the FA market by just a bit on a lot of guys.  Maybe a lot of guys think STL is a nice place to play but they just hate the idea of living in Missouri.  There are a lot of factors that paly in to FA signing and I think it is hard to say you fell short for any reason other than $$$.  Now I know Walt/Dewitt did not like to set the market price on guys.  Like the Cubs signed Alfonso for $136 Mill he was overpaid for but the Cubs wanted him so they chose to overpay.  The Cards never liked to overpay that if for sure.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luck
Whatever.  You can call anyone who has had a successful career lucky.  Bill Gates is lucky he started such a successful business.  Warren Buffet makes lucky stock picks.  Roy Oswalt is lucky he was born with a good arm.  

Walt was a good GM - I think he would have adapted moving forward.  You can see what works.  The best time to be a moneyball GM was before everyone else was.  Calling what he did here luck is ridiculous to me.  Why tear him down.  What does it accomplish.  Everyone thinks they know the best moves for the Cards - sometimes we're wrong, too.  I think you can look at his track record and it speaks for himself.  

by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes!!!
You are right.  Being under .500 over their past 400 games and having 100m tied up in virtually the same craptastic team does speak for itself.

Recent history is the Cards punishment for the way Walt built the team.  He raised them up only to sink them in the end.

If you are going to give him praise then you have to hold him accountable for the current situation.  Can't have it both ways.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

And if the Cubs weren't so stupid
to give up on Lou Brock and the Reds not so impatient with their OF full of great players to give up on Curt Flood as a last many "look we did something" deal or if the Cardinals hadn't lucked into Josh Gibson being a bird-dog scout for them and recommending his younger brother Bob...

...Bing Devine would have been known as the GM that traded for Dick Groat and traded away HOF'er Steve Carlton.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luck
Just about every team in baseball has breaks go there way at some point.  Cases in point:

The 1a starter for the Indians was a failed closer who was trying to re-learn starting at AAA when Cliff Lee went down with an injury, forcing him into the rotation this year.  

The best pitcher on the planet was Rule 5ed to Florida and dealt to Minnesota for essentially a bag of baseballs, Flippy the Perfoming Chimp, and a big bag of saltine crackers.  

The recent WS MVP was a throw in on the Ramirez for Beckett trade.  

And on, and on, and on...  

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

So...
When is the Eckstien press conference?

When is the Taguchi press conference?

When will we trade for Niefi Perez?

by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

You came to the right place to
ask those questions, since we have so many people here who know EXACTLY what our new GM is going to do next!  (Me, I'm curious about what he's planning to have for dinner tonight.)

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dinner...
He'll be having chicken cordon bleu.

Bank on it.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

TOO LATE
Dusty Baker will get Nefi Perez once he serves his 50 game steroid suspension!

Dusty loves Nefi.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is
A guarantee right there!  Perez will be their starting SS, displacing Alex Gonzalez.  Or maybe Baker will let Perez fill out the lineup himself and pick where he wants to play.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

what's the big deal?
I don't know why everyone's so upset with hiring Mozeliak as GM.  He's a good combination of the old and new baseball and apparently can get along with Jeff Luhnow.  A lot of people seem to think that the organization is going to hell in a handbasket, but we're only a few years removed from a 100 win season and a world series title.  The last two years have been injury-plagued.  DeWitt wants to win, and I'm pleased that we have a great manager in La Russa back for a few years.  Calm down and let La Russa, Duncan and Mozeliak do their jobs.

by barry whiteteeth on Oct 31, 2007 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

MO = Team player.
How else can you describe a guy whose boss & mentor was canned & then sticks around to get the GM spot? The important thing to remember is that even with the speculation that Antonetti was getting the job, DeWitt came out early & said that Mo would still be in the organization.. Wouldn't that mean that the guy is cool to work with ?

Plus, we all need to remember that his name offers much better "nickname" potential than Antonetti's did..
Think of it..
Somehow finds players we like to fill all of the holes? = BIG MO!
Makes a faux pas in the press or doesn't take a player we like in the draft? = little mo.
Trades Rasmus or re-signs Eckstein? = No Mo..
Just a thought.

Boomer.

by glamboomer on Oct 31, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

good point
also, "LaDunc-iak" is much less effeminate than "LaDuncetti" would have been...

by SleepyCA on Oct 31, 2007 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm a LaDunkiak
for salsa.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about this one..
Luhmoz LaDunc!
  1. Goes to 2 names, which may or may not be a good thing...
  2. Includes Luhnow, since he's apparently involved in everything except pricing LP's at my work..
  3. Throws "Moz" in there as an alternative to "Mo" which may or may not be played out at this point & gives a subtle hat-tip to Morrissey..
  4. Sounds like "Toulouse-Lautrec", which I've always thought was one of the coolest sounding names ever...
Boomer.

by glamboomer on Oct 31, 2007 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Been waiting for all this.....
I figured when we didn't hear the Cards announce a press conference for Monday...or Tuesday...that there was a fly in the ointment with CA coming on board.  As to WHY he turned down the job?...it might have come down to something as simple as...not offered enough money. Lets face it, if DeNitWitt is going to be a bit conservative with the players payroll, it's not too far-fetched to think he is going to be the same way with Front office staff's salaries. Remember Mo got his contract extension before they interviewed AC...perhaps it's for much less money than what AC wanted to move from the organization he was comfortable with. Moot point now. He is gone and Mo is the man.
I also think you have to give him time now to form his own personality as a GM. Just because he worked for Jocketty doesn't mean he's going to be of like mind or manner in carrying out his duties.  Lets all take a deep breath here...and give the guy a chance to show us who he is before we start assuming what he's going to be like in the position.

by Timbo02 on Oct 31, 2007 2:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Antonetti
From anESPN story:

Antonetti turned down an offer to be GM of the Cardinals, despite calling it "one of the best jobs in the game" and admitting to being "blown away" and "immensely impressed" with Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt.

It appeared Antonetti was leaning toward moving to St. Louis until Indians owner Paul Dolan stepped up, defined the succession process under which Mark Shapiro will eventually be the club president and Antonetti the GM and made other promises.

Antonetti said he was "very fortunate to have a choice of two of the best jobs there are with two of the best owners to work with," Antonetti said. "The Cardinals may be one of the top five GM jobs in the business, but we are very happy where we are and Paul Dolan made it impossible to leave."

by holden on Oct 31, 2007 2:56 PM EDT reply actions  

That makes sense
I wouldn't want to leave my good job if my family likes it where I am, I'm getting a raise and a promise of promotion for all the world to see.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Umm, he'd rather live in Cleveland?!!!
Cleveland?! Really? There was a 30 Rock about this. Maybe he likes the Rock'n'roll Hall of Fame . . . Admittedly, I bet it kicks the Bowling Hall of Fame's ass . . .
So says, The Dude

by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone's a model...
East of the Allegheny.

That is a GREAT show. After that episode I was dying to "flee to the Cleve."

I can't think of a good offseason signature.

by effin fisk on Oct 31, 2007 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

What smells so good?
CLEVELAND!!!
The 2007 offseason: Butter? Or Steel?

by the red baron on Nov 1, 2007 7:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Damn...
..I am usually the type of guy who lusts after the girl I can't have. It takes me a little while to realize that the one I do have is the best fit for me.  

A few points on this thought:

  1. If Dewitt didn't low-ball him, then CA made a mistake.  He should have taken the job.  All organizations with openings have warts.  His declining of other and this job smacks of a fear of failure situtation from him.  If that was the case, I didn't want him anyway.  I was a little of a shot at his honor.
  2. What I suspect is that Dewitt did low-ball him in terms of years.  A longer contract would have ensured that he whould have the most front office power.  I bet he was offered the same three year contract that Mo got and realized he wouldn't be able to reshape the front office in his image before his contract was up.
  3. One of the big things that CA offered was basically setting up a version of the Indians Diamondview.  The Cardinals already have developed a similar system.  It probably wasn't deployed at the major league level because of Jockety.  I would bet Luhnow already has it set up.
  4.  If Dewitt didn't remove Luhnow from consideration would we be complaining as much if he was named the GM today? He has similar qualifications to CA.
I guess I am disappointed because CA was kinda sexy as a canidate, but MO will do fine--he doesn't have a whole lot of flexibility in his first year anyway.

 

by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

wake-up call
"He doesn't have a lot of flexibility in his first year anyway". You said it, man. Why do you think Antonetti turned us down. Dolan told him that he would have power in a couple years and DeWitt told him that he would have power with Luhnow, Mozeliak and LaRussa.

Mozeliak hasn't done anything bad yet, but this front office really needed a shakeup. I hope we finish last in the central next year. This organization thinks too highly of itself.

Erik Bedard would look good in red

by stlknows on Oct 31, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

He didn't make a mistake
He probably did the same thing I'd do.   Why take on the big unknown in place of the known quantity?  He's gonna get the power, he's gonna get the cash, he doesn't have to move, and he knows what shape his farm system is in.

by sdrone on Oct 31, 2007 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree...
...it is just a matter of opinion.  This would be his opportunity to make his own mark as a GM.  If he inherits the Cleveland job, it will be in the shadow of Shapiro.  You never want to be the man following the man.  You always want to be the man following the man following the man.  Less expectations...

by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone acknowledges
that the evaluation system in Cleveland is his.  Not Shapiro's.  so he's already not in the shadow of Shapiro.

by sdrone on Oct 31, 2007 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

im so pissed right now
i can't even really write a comment with common sense to it.

by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 31, 2007 3:19 PM EDT reply actions  

this luhnow guy is really getting on my nerves
first he gets Walt fired. then the best GM for the job says thanks but no thanks because he has to much power. what's next?

Dewitt needs to check himself & ask himself why he's given one man so much power. if no one besides MO wants to work with the guy one would think Dewitt could see this as ask himself if he hasn't made a mistake & given jeff way, WAY to much power. if the guys not the GM why the hell does he have so much freaking power? it obvious to every one now whos really running the Cards.

i cant blame Antonetti for walking away. i mean come on, if he cant control the farm system, & he cant control the major league roster because thats Tony's job, and MO handles all the contracts & the other day-to-day activities, what was he going to do all day? get Dewitt coffee? pick up his dry cleaning?

this is all Dewitts doing. if & when the Cards fail miserably to reach the playoffs in the next five years we have one man & only one man to blame.

Bill Dewitt Jr.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 3:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Take a deep breath.
Feel better?  Let's see what happens this winter before we give up on '08 (or the next 5 years), ok?  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 31, 2007 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lunhow
Has had all of 2 years to leave his mark on the system. Give it till next year when the kids he actually drafted will be playing in AAA to judge his success. Our farm system isn't anywhere near the best, but I challenge you to find someone who says it is the same or worse now than it was 2 years ago.

by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

here are the facts
Lunhow has more power than the GM when it comes to every aspect of his job. Walt hated that & got fired because of that. Antonetti didnt want to have a guy he does not know running something he as a GM should have full control over.

so due to the fact Dewitt chose Lunhow over two very good GM's, shouldn't that send up red flags?

i never questioned Lunhow's ability to restock the farm system. he's done OK so far. but his only boss shouldn't be Dewitt. he should have to answer to the GM, and the fact that Dewitt doesn't want him to really bothers me & a lot of other big names around MLB.

nothing against MO. dudes cool in my book. but he's a puppet. he's got four masters, Tony, Mark Lamping, Dewitt & Lunhow. the guy running the Cardinals should not be a puppet for any body.

it should really concern every one that Dewitt ran off two guys like Jocketty & Antonetti because he placed all his bets on Luhnow.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's what I don't get
If Dewitt is that big of a Luhnow supporter, why not just make him the freaking GM? We might as well sign Bonds now, because we are now the Giants minus McCovey Cove.

by mikedallas23 @ Viva El Birdos on Oct 31, 2007 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luhnow
the idea that Luhnow has more power than the GM is foolish, frankly, and simply untrue.  It may be true that DeWitt listens to Luhnow more than he should, but he doesn't have the power that the GM has.  He runs the draft and the minor leagues.  He has no involvement whatsoever with the major league roster.  He doesn't negotiate deals with the top draft choices, or else the Cards would have signed Russell.

To your point that he should have to answer to the GM, that is true.  I'm not sure if he'll answer to Mozeliak or not.  But he doesn't have more power than Mozeliak -- not even close.

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

i hear what you are saying
but when every one from bernie, to pete gammons to roesnthal says exactly the opposite, that Luhnow has all the power he wants & does indeed answer to only Dewitt. and that's why Walt was fired & Antonetti turned down the job. what am i suspossed to think?

mark lamping just told bernie on the radio that Luhnow reports to MO and does not have more power than him. and it was only because Walt was upset at how Luhnow was hired is the reason he spoke to Dewitt only. he said Dewitt was acting like a GM when Walt was there because Walt refused to work with Luhnow. he said Dewitt & MO had to be a go betweens & Dewitt & MO were not going to do that any more.

of course when asked at the press conference why Antonetti turned down the job every one said he was never offered the job. well if he wasn't offered the job, why the hell was he looking at homes in the st louis area?

OK. so who do we believe? the outsiders or the Cardinals? both have given us reasons in the past to not believe what they are saying. the outsiders dont know half of what they say they know. and the Cards spin every thing so much that we really dont know what to believe.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

positive spin?
How is saying that your GM refused to work with someone that the owner himself hired, positive spin? That sounds like a rare instance of them actually being candid.

by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who ever said
that Luhnow has "all the power he wants?"  That's absurd.  If Gammons and Bernie did say something that irresponsible they should lose their jobs.  But they didn't.  He may have only been reporting to DeWitt but that doesn't mean he has "all the power he wants."  He has absolutely no control over the major-league roster -- the key control that any GM has.  Maybe DeWitt has too much influence over the major-league roster.  That doesn't mean that Luhnow has control over it.  

Luhnow has no control over the major-league roster, therefore his power is severely limited and is less than Mozeliak's and would have been less than Antonetti's.  If Antonetti was concerned that Luhnow would report to DeWitt and not to him, that's legitimate -- and a problem DeWitt should have rectified.  That does not mean, however, that Luhnow has powers that he simply doesn't have.  Anybody who suggests that Luhnow is, in any way, in control over the major-league roster, is creating a fiction.

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Branch Ricky ----> Bing Devine
Branch was washed up in baseball and was hold the team back but had Gussie's ear.  It severly hampered Bing's initial plans with the team.

This is a different situation though, because Lunhow isn't some old buzzard trying to hold on to baseball. But the problem could be the same.  

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

But wait a minute here, folks......
everyone who is concerned about Luhnow having too much power and being the stumbling block to hiring Antonetti, must remember that Mo was going to stay as his assistant-Antonetti wouldn't be able to hire his OWN assistant general manager.  And the manager is already hired for 2 years.  He wasn't going to hire his own manager.  I know he said he was "okay" with it, but if he had a choice, would LaRussa had been his pick?  We'll never know.  Then you look at the constraints with current contracts, and no real area of strength to deal from (except middle relief, which is a trading chip, but not a real big one until mid-season needs emerge on contenders) AND that Cleveland wants him to stay badly enough that they have made certain promises to him.  It's just real simple I guess to blame it all on Luhnow....

by jillsinmo on Oct 31, 2007 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Um
I didn't do that.  In fact, I was defending Luhnow.  DeWitt may be to blame for this debacle; he probably is, in fact.  Luhnow isn't.

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, about 30 posts up
you blamed it all on la russa. how is that any less simple?

by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

was referring to jillsinmo
not houstoncardinal with that last post. (not that either of you are big fans of my posts, i know...)

by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Skill Sets
(Thanks for that quote Holden, that makes me feel better.)

There's been a lot of discussion already about how Lunhow/Antonetti would either be competitive/complimentary with their similar bent toward statistics. But could that skill have become redundant? Did we really need two stat-masters?

Perhaps our current arrangement will allow the complimentary skills of Lunhow (player development) and Mozeliak (player relationships, contracts) to meld.

That said, I was hoping for Antonetti too. But the Indians (well run orgnization that they are) made sure to keep him. I think of it as their win rather than our loss, if that makes any sense.

The Eckstein decision should prove an excellent and immediate baromoter for the Mozeliak's tone from now own. I'm net yet sure how much we can blame him for the Piniero/Springer deal, those may have been just to show that we plan to stay competitive to LaRussa and GM candidates.

I'm excited for this off-season, whoever's running it.

WWJD -- What Would Jocketty Do

by joshuadivine on Oct 31, 2007 3:29 PM EDT reply actions  

now that i'm calm
i really don't think this is the end of the world. antonetti turned it down, it was time to move to plan b. i don't think it has as much to do w/luhnow as robothal is spinning it. i really don't. luhnow and antonetti are similar in philosophies, that theory doesn't make a lot of sense to me. i can see it from a certain angle, but whatever.

mo seems like he's an open guy to both the new and the old, stats and scouting based on the googling i've done. and he's not going to be a cancer. he worked well with both sides in a toxic situation. it's not the end of the world.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Plan B?
I'm not so sure Mo was even plan B.

If we can all agree on one thing it's that the Cards "settled" when they gave the job to Mo.

I equate signing Mo to taking the fat girl home from the bar.  You spend all night trying to get in with a couple of hotties, but by the end of the night you just end up taking the only person willing to come because you had to take someone.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm 25
Going out and trying to pick up women is a big part of my life.

Not so sure what is immature about that.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for just posting
the least self-aware comment on this sight. ever.
So says, The Dude

by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was one of those...
where you reflexively hit reply to this, but then you realize there's nothing to really add.
Who needs Antonetti? Give Luhniak a chance!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go ahead and Judge...
I'm sure many on this site have went through a similar period in their life.

Like I said, I'm 25, I have fun and the analogy is spot on.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe I'm just stupid...
Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with what I said.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the source
may have as much to do with their reaction as the comment does.  You do tend to ruffle some feathers around here.

IMO, most of the time its just some healthy feather-ruffling.  I appreciate many of the points you bring up.  But this isn't the first time you've come off as "immature" due to some content in your posts.

by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe...
you are right.

I'm sure if someone else had said it it would have been taken in jest.

You make a good point.

Oh well, I apologize if my comments offended anyone in anyway.  Although, if you were offended I think you have VERY thin skin.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thin skin
or we're the fat girl.  And if we're the fat girl, don't you think we catch enough grief already?  Can't we just come here and read about baseball?

by spants on Oct 31, 2007 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry...
Like I said.  I didn't mean to offend anyone and certainly didn't mean to hurt anyones feelings.  If I did, I sincerely apologize.

It was a joke, and it wasn't taken well by most.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

i liked
and related to it.  Total 2 at 10 and a 10 at 2 philosophy going on here.  
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now this guy...
knows where I'm coming from!
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

If this is the reaction we had over the GM
position, I can't wait to see what happens when Rasmus comes up that first month and hits .205 and makes 2 or 3 fielding errors.

Zoinks!

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:38 PM EDT reply actions  

The GM...
has alot more effect on this team than one month of poor play from our top prospect.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lunhow
I am more concered with Lunhow than Mo.  The Cardinals biggest problem is they have only one minor league player who could come up next year and possibly make a difference.  That is Rasmus.  Lunhow is in charge of minor league and that is the Cardinals future.  The Cards need to get to Latin American asap, in fact they should already be deeply entrenched there.  If this team is going to have a bright future they need to get the farm system up and going.

The next most ready guy besides Rasums is Jarrett Hoffpauir and most people who are considered experts rank him as a back up league average MLB player.  And they say he can only play 2B.  So he really is not better than Miles.  He would be about $830,000 cheaper and that is about it.

Minor Leagues need to be built up asap.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Luhnow is the future
anyway, as far as I can tell. If he does a good job building the farm system, he'll eventually be the GM. Mo gets a shot first. Based on what everyone says about his rep w/ agents, I'm ok with it. plus, he'll get along w/ Luhnow, which is what walt wouldn't do.

yes i wanted antonetti but this isn't the end of the world.

also, i think the eckstein situation will tell us whether Mo is committed to a youth movement or following in his predecessors footsteps (sure hope not)

by kalmavet on Oct 31, 2007 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Latin America
There are a few players in the low minors that have a shot that came from Latin American signings.  They have just recently started their academies there.  Give it time...

by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well said
ICBirdfan.  Without prospects there's no cheap replacements for roster vacancies and (if needed) to use as trade bait. Derek Goold's blog entry from yesterday summed things up nicely. I'd feel better about this team if it was filled with young guys, even if it meant several sub-.500 seasons.  We do have a couple of things going for us, Albert at 1B and being in the NL Central.

 

by Yellow Dog on Oct 31, 2007 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well...
In his first few years here he has taken us from the worst system in baseball to middle of the pack.  Minor league development is no longer the problem.  Major league talent evaluation is.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

As erik points out below
they are in Latin America.  And to say that Hoffpauir isn't better than Miles, because he can only play 2B, is silly.  Miles is beyond awful at any position other than 2b, so he's limited to that position as well.  On top of that, Hoffpauir is likely a better offensive player today than Miles and, as you point out, is considerably cheaper.  As bad as Miles is defensively, and as bad as he is offensively, it's difficult to see some area in which Hoffpauir ISN'T better than Miles.

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

they are in latin america
and a lot is being done to turn that situation around. it does take some time, not going to change overnight.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

furthermore
from what i understand, luhnow is over there a lot, talking to his scouts and watching players. he now even speaks fluent spanish. they were very active in the signing period this year, getting ryde rodriguez and kevin moscatel, two big prospects from latin america.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice
I need to follow your site more Erik.  I am sure you have that type of info over there.

It is always hard to predict but it seems other systems have multiple can't miss type guys where our system is just weak.  We have a bunch of solid guys but no one that just make you say "wow" besides Rasmus.  Anderson sound like he is close to being a "wow" guy or just another solid guy.

Who knows.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

NP
when mo was over the scouting and luhnow was his aid, mo stated that he felt if they got three big leaugers out of a draft, it would be considered a success.

none so far, which isn't good but here goes who i think will make it -

07, kozma, mortensen, todd
06, ottavino, perez, craig...and possibly furnish, and hamilton is a nice trading chip.
05 rasmus, anderson, boggs and probably herron.
04 (gasp) hoffpauir, worrell (?)

there isn't a lot of wow, but there is some help on the way.  it's not all bad. maybe with his new helper from SD the drafting will improve. the pads go also very college heavy, but they've done well recently with chase headley and mark antonelli. i think luhnow has time to make his mark, but i too share a bit of a skeptical eye.

by erik on Oct 31, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is there a chance you are confusing lunhow with
Bill Braski?
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

What About Asia, Erik?
last year didn't the red sox sign a cooperative deal with a japanese team?  i could look it up and give the specifics but i'm feeling lazy.  

the cards were way late to the party in L.America.

Are we going to be late to the Asian game too?  

I'm interested in hearing what our plans are on that fertile front.  Anyone know anything?  

by MrPlow on Oct 31, 2007 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the problem...
I have doubts he was even the second choice.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a plus in my book...
being a Simpsons fan.

About the only plus.

by DiscoJer on Oct 31, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh crap...
best move at the major league level: David Eckstein.
Who needs Antonetti? Give Luhniak a chance!

by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

the bright side of Mo
Probably been commented on already, but when Jocketty left, Mozeliak was described as a guy that got along with Lunhow and Jocketty.  We knew Lunhow wasn't going anywhere, so at least we can now keep some sort of positive connection between player development at Lunhow's end at Mozeliak's duties as GM.  And I guess Mozeliak can keep Lunhow's chair warm.

And what's the deal with Bernie blaming Antonetti's backdown on "the Lunhow Factor"?  I guess I saw Lunhow and Antonetti as of the same mind (both stat-headish).  Guess we know that's not true based on what Rosenthal said, but for Bernie to just throw it out there unsubstantiated is ridiculous!  Blog or column, a journalist should be held to the same standards and accountability for whatever he writes in whatever medium.  

by lightbulb on Oct 31, 2007 4:32 PM EDT reply actions  

i don't know
Just because they are both "stat-oriented" executives doesn't mean they would have been friends or allies or even have respected each other in any way.  

Dealing with scientists/engineers on a daily basis, you find that the most violent disagreements are often between two people with like mindsets who see minor variations in the data differently, who interpret results in ways that would seem virtually identical to people with no background in the field but result in almost religious levels of conflict between otherwise rational individuals.  It's amazing.

Anyway, I think we may have dodged a bullet with CA.  Guys like him (and Luhnow) probably make great advisers, and having guys like them around is a requirement for a modern front office to be successful, but there are talents necessary to run an organization that there is no proof that either of them have.  Part of that is being able to listen to alternative viewpoints, imo, which is one reason WJ had to go, but there are others such as leadership and judgment and negotiation etc that none of us are in a position to evaluate...

by SleepyCA on Oct 31, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

MO's talkin to Bernie live right now
1380espn.com
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:08 PM EDT reply actions  

sometimes i cant get
the listen live to work from that site, if so go here and click on kslg 1380espn & it should work

http://www.streamaudio.com/site/Stations.aspx?format=Sports

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

GOULET!!!
(rip)
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don't think philosophy
was the problem.

as stated before, the problem was the fact that lunhow had dewitt's ear.  So whenever there was a question about anything within the organization that lunhow and CA didn't agree with, lunhow could also pull the dewitt card and get his way.  that was probably the sticking point for a lot of candidates.

also, it seems like whoever got the gm position was just going to be keeping it warm for lunhow for the next three years till he is ready to take the position.

i like mo and i agree that his and lunhow's skill sets will work well together but i still think we had to "settle" for him.

by FutureMan on Oct 31, 2007 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

If this is truly the case...
then why didn't we just let Lunhow be the GM.

Tony hates him for sure, but if he has more power than the GM what's the difference?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

par for the course
well tony got all that he desired.

this franchise is headed south and quick.

mo is a mouthpiece and no more.

and that is a real shame.

by semohawg on Oct 31, 2007 6:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Lets make that a poem
The owner promised a new GM quick

Antonetti was the consensus pick

but Cleveland make him an offer to stick

now cardinals fans are sick

(thats not supposed to be good, btw)

2006 Cardinals- An underdog story

by Born in 82 on Oct 31, 2007 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony
wanted to hurt the franchise?  Please.  I was less than pleased that LaRussa was returning but he's done a great job in his years here and, even if he had been a terrible manager, it could scarcely be argued that he wants anything but the best for the Cardinals.  To suggest that Tony wanted to run them into the ground is beyond lunacy!

by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank you, hc
people should try to remember that, whatever tony's faults, most teams' fans would be very happy to have a manager with tlr's track record and commitment to winning.

by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did DeWitt choose Mo last week?
DeWitt's comments last week (Oct. 23, reported by David Wilhelm, Belleville News Democrat) show signs that he knew already that Mo would be his GM and that he was waiting to interview Antonetti only because Cleveland had not yet been eliminated from the playoffs, so that interviewing Antonetti was just going through the motions, to gain another free consultation (along with Hahn's) on the state of the Cardinal organization and to lend credibility to the hiring of Mo (as if to say, "He must be good if we chose him over Antonetti.", supported by Mozeliak's own comment in today's press conference: "Quite honestly, I'm glad Bill and Mark went through the process of interviewing these people (other candidates), because at the end of the day, getting it, I have a lot more pride with that." (verbatim)

Excerpts:

"He knows all the people here," DeWitt said, beginning a list of Mozeliak's qualifications. "He's got a good working relationship. He works well with people. He's decisive and knows baseball. He's got a lot to offer.

"He's done a great job in the interim. Signing free agents isn't easy, particularly ones you're pretty sure you want. So the fact that he's here and has taken this interim (title) gives him a good shot. He had a good shot going in, but he's done some things since he's been here, too."

...DeWitt said interviewing candidates like Antonetti, 32, and Woodfork could provide a benefit to the Cardinals even if neither gets the job.

"I don't want to get into specific attributes of these candidates, but I think it's always helpful to get views from someone from the outside," DeWitt said. "Just in the interview process, you get an external opinion of the organization and how they view it and how maybe the industry views it. That's all good information.

"There are 30 different teams, 30 different approaches. Some are more similar than others. When you go through this process --I know how things have been done here over the years --it's good to hear other candidates talk about how they approach it, if it's similar (to the Cardinals), maybe not as good or maybe they have some views that would enhance what we've done."

http://www.bnd.com/sports/cardinals/story/159686.html

by CardsWin on Oct 31, 2007 6:04 PM EDT reply actions  

DeWitt's comments on ESPN1380 within the last hour
"We have so much more information now (than we did when I bought the Cardinals).... For example, a pitcher may be much better than his record.... because the plays weren't made behind him."

"I think scouting and stats are equally important."

"Jeff Luhnow was brought in two develop our statistical analysis and to find international players.... We hadn't been too happy with (our drafting).... This year we had three of the youngest stars at AA.... Jeff was handling a lot.... He's moved the analytical group and it will now report directly to Mo."

"Rolen should be much healthier. Edmonds should be much improved. Carpenter won't be available until later in the season, but we're hopeful Mark Mulder will be much more productive next year.... We've been given high odds that (his shoulder) will be fixed."

"It's a pretty thin market from a free agent standpoint but we have more assets than we've had in the past from a trade standpoint."

"I think after next year some of the kids from AA this year will step up (and contribute on the big league team)."

[This seems to indicate that any trades will not sacrifice most of the top talent that was at AA this year.]

by CardsWin on Oct 31, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

And the Bill DeWitt annual reversal has
taken place.

October
"We're going to improve the team, make a big splash, bump up payroll to fill holes."

February
"There just wasn't anything out there we wanted to get in on.  There were a few, but the bidding got out of control.  We are going to keep the powder dry and make a move at midseason.  We can improve from within."

This year, it just didn't take as long.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

All of the useful FA reupped with their old teams
unless DeWitt is planning on opening the books to make a run at A-Rod, who is the free agent that improves the team?

by Valatan on Oct 31, 2007 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

40 Million in payroll
gets us Schilling, Glavine and Bonds, all on one and/or option year deals, making us competitive in '08 and flexible in '09.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds good to me
Even if Glavine and Schilling only pitch 24 games each, they'll still be 24 better game scores than what we'd get out of Anthony Reyes, Braden Looper and Todd Wellemeyer.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

That type of gamble
by DeWitt, even if it failed, would really make me respect the man. That would take some cojones. And I would love to see it tried.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bonds...
The thought of Bonds being a Cardinal makes me sick to my stomach.

I'll take Schilling and Glavine though.

Moot point anyway, they won't be adding 40M in payroll.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Nov 1, 2007 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

40M
I know, I'm getting ready to go to bed, let a man dream. And I can't stand Schilling, either, but Bonds' OPS is still something to dream about to.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Schilling and Glavine
Schilling will be $13 M, no ifs ands or buts.  Glavine will probably take alittle less.  He was originally getting a $9 M contract for this year with the incentives built in that moved it up to $13 M.

Give him the same contract in '08. $9 M 1 year plus additional $1M (up to $13M) for each additional 10 IP in 2008.

You'd be looking at $22 M in payroll upfront, which added to the current $99 M, puts payroll at $121 M.  Trade Braden Looper. $115.5 M.  Bill can pick up the extra 500k.

Rotation
Schilling
Wainwright
Glavine
Pineiro
Mulder/Thompson/Wellemeyer

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm on board...
Maybe Looper could even net you a young SS or RH OF.

Probably the most realistic shot we have of putting a competitive team on the field and the best part is it doesn't hinder our future either.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Nov 1, 2007 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Still an easy mark
Well these statements indicate not much is going to change if they are still buying that crap from the doctors about how everybody's going to be healthy.

by cariocacardinal on Oct 31, 2007 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't think
lunhow thought he was ready for the job.  He's eyeing October 2010.

by FutureMan on Oct 31, 2007 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Catch 22
If luhnow does his job well, there won't be an opening in 2010.  If he doesn't, he won't deserve the job.

by cariocacardinal on Oct 31, 2007 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

But
he'll get one elsewhere
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let's recap
Many of us have gone through all the stages of grief over this one, so let's take stock and recap.

First, no matter what we all think of Mo, this represents a big failing for the Cardinals organization.  We had a chance to hire THE consensus top available GM candidate, and we couldn't get it done.

Second, it appears that this largely has to do with decision-making authority.  No surprise there -- why would a top candidate take the job if they don't get to make all the key decisions?  The only way to get a top person is to be aggressive about the hire and to make a strong commitment to them.   So, in a sense, DeWitt did choose Lunhow and LaRussa over Antonetti.  

Third, Mo's strength will clearly be to unify the organization, and that is definitely valuable.  We don't really know exactly how much the organization will change, but it will definitely change to some extent.  In fact Jocketty's dismissal had a lot to do with the fact that he wouldn't accept the organizational change.  Also we don't really know how much of the rent-a-veteran strategy came from LaRussa vs. Jocketty, so we don't really know how much the new regime will push player development. Hopefully Mo will sit down with LaRussa and Luhnow and map out a strategy to balance short-term and long-term objectives. That would be positive.

Given all the above, the bottom-line question here is whether you think Antonetti or the Mo/Luhnow tandem will be better at player development and procurement in the long run.  Me, I'd take Antonetti, but of course I'm rooting that Mo and Luhnow both develop into top-notch execs. But our recent draft history and also the contracts we've just given out don't make me overly hopeful about this.  We'll see...

by apack on Oct 31, 2007 6:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Recap
My own recap would be:
  1.  Mozeliak's skills probably compliment Luhnow better than Antonetti's would.  
  2.  Mozeliak and Luhnow will somewhat be 'co-executive's', each with different responsibilities, but both needing to work together.  Mozeliak and Luhnow have already proven they can do this.
  3.  LaRussa is NOT the one gaining power to do things 'the same ole way' here.  DeWitt has clearly pushed for new thinking - that's why Luhnow was hired.  LaRussa does have a two-year contract, but that's just to avoid all the speculation of re-hire that a one-year contract would bring.  You can bet if things don't work out, LaRussa and DeWitt will part company at the end of this seasons.  Part of LaRussa being welcomed back certainly rested on him agreeing to go with the 'new' thinking, or else DeWitt would not have brought him back at all.
  4.  In most front-offices, the GM does not have absolute power.  Just look at Boston, with Epstein contending with Lucchino, Allard Baird, Lou Gorman, Bill James, etc.  It's a TEAM of front-office personell working together.

by KJOK on Oct 31, 2007 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

the sky is not falling...
and the sun will come out tomorrow. Antonelli didn't turn down the offer, but withdrew his name from consideration. Why? Because of the Cardinal situation? More than likely, because of the Indian situation. He helped build this, and had an offer to  continue with a promotion. Hard to turn down. I like Mo, he's a Cardinal man, who is repected by team members and baseball in general. Let's hope he has the vision to build this team for next year and the future.
go crazy folks..........

by wwbd on Oct 31, 2007 10:26 PM EDT reply actions  

little miss pellings says
a-n-t-o-n-e-T-T-i.

l-u-H-N-ow.

by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Rejected due to spelling
My theory is CA is a frequent reader of VEB and he based his decision not to come to STL on the numerous occurrencs of incorrectly spelling his name.  

Note I used his initials to make sure I didn't piss him off for 2010.

by ubeddie on Oct 31, 2007 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Recap...
  1. Putting any of the "blame" for this on Bernie, Rosenthal et al is ludicrous. What the hell do they have to do with hiring a GM?
  2. More than one GM candidate has said, under anonymity, that the Cardinals front office situation is pretty much a clusterfuck;
  3. Hard as it may be to accept, the Cardinals organization is no longer(and hasn't been for a while now) one of THE places to go for either players OR front office people. Up and comers like Antonetti or Kim Ng will continue to look elsewhere for GM jobs or stay where they are because they've been promised advancement, and "big name" FA will continue to sign elsewhere, because they know they can get more money, for more years. Signing for less just because it's the Cardinals ceased being the drawing card it once was years ago. You may not like it, but that's the way it is these days.

by cardsrul on Oct 31, 2007 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

as true as all this may be
have any positive for us? or do u want to add and It is as bad as it seems and they are a=out to get you???jk(hate adding jk to sarcasm but if i dont people will get offended,and not u)
07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap..with replacement actors

by punchinjudy on Nov 1, 2007 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Eck is Type B according to Elias
hurry up and offer him arbitration so we can get that pick.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:37 AM EDT reply actions  

reply to H-Town
i had to check out for evening & i'm sorry i didnt get to continue this earlier. so i'll put this here at the bottom so it's easier to see.

gammons, bernie & roesnthal have indeed hinted that luhnow has too much power & can do what ever he wants. i cant remember if any one of the three ever came right out & said if he did or not, so i'm not going to put words in their mouths. but they have strongly hinted at it & it has been a widely assumed belief that luhnow can do what ever & when ever he wants when it comes to the minors.

today (in case you didnt hear) on his afternoon show bernie asked mike lamping, dewitt & MO if the rumor was true that luhnow had the run of the house. they all flatly denied that claim & said luhnow only has control over the minor leagues. but not total power. he has to clear every thing with MO now. both lamping & dewitt said today luhnow lost some power & responsibility. and luhnow was very happy about that because he's in south america trying to get some players.

lamping & dewitt guess the rumor that luhnow had ultimate power was because of Walt's refusal to work with him. luhnow was supposed to report directly to Walt, but Walt never wanted him to, so thats how the rift in the front office started & why luhnow began to report directly to dewitt. as of right now luhnow reports directly to MO. both lamping & dewitt said that was the plan all along. luhnow was suspossed to report to Walt, but Walt refused to work with him.

my beef is not with jeff luhnow. but he is obviously in the middle of all of this. i dont know the guy & dont really have an opinion of the man. i dont think this is his fault. if he is indeed an innocent bystander in all of this i think he's taken far to much heat. if dewitt had hired some other guy to do luhnow's job & things still turned out this way he'd be getting all the heat instead of luhnow. my beef is with dewitt & the way he's handled things. i think he could have gone about hiring luhnow in a different way that didn't piss off Walt & half of the front office.

my beef is the fact this all makes the Cardinals look like a less than desirable place to work for top GM candidates. when in my opinion this should be the best GM job out there. gammons, roesenthal & others have written columns & have gone on tv trashing the Cardinals for how this has gone down. and if Walt really did leak some info to them or had one of his friends leak some info, then shame on him. this whole mess has made the Cardinals look bad. and that really pisses me off.

roesenthal reported today on FSN Midwest right after MO's press conference that the two main reasons why antonetti turned down the job was

#1 the perception that luhnow had ultimate power & would only report to dewitt & not the GM. and that MO & Tony would have most of the control of the 40 man roster. thus antonetti feared he really wouldnt have any power or control over the Cardinals.

and,,,

#2 that the indians didnt want to lose antonetti, so they made him an offer he couldn't refuse. but he would have refused & taken the Cards GM job if the perceptions & fears he had about the Cardinals GM job were false.

lamping & dewitt also said antonetti was never offered the job. but the questions remains, if he wasn't offered the job, why the hell was he looking at houses & schools in the st louis area? it's obvious some kind of offer was made or hinted at otherwise he never would have wasted his time looking at schools & houses. this is another example of the Cardinals lying to their fans & spinning the facts to make them look good.

i never said luhnow had all the power over the Big Birds. i said & others reported & believed it, that luhnow has total control over the minor leagues & only answers to dewitt. and thats the problem. no GM wants a guy working under him who he has no control over. some one, probably Walt started the rumor & it turned into a common belief that luhnow had ultimate power regarding the minor leagues. lamping & dewitt shot down that today after the press conference.

i guess it's up to each individual whether they believe the Cardinals front office, or the press. i for one dont know who to believe.  

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Nov 1, 2007 1:07 AM EDT reply actions  

visits to houses and schools....
i suspect that Antonetti had a good idea of what was going on in the cards house and it was not an ideal situation for him, and the visit to schools and houses with the wife was B) a backup plan in case he decided to take the job, and A) leverage for the Indians to step up to the plate fearing they might really lose him (and making them pay).  

Kudos to Antonetti, I wish we had someone that shrewd working for us.  

by HoosierCardFan on Nov 1, 2007 2:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Visualizing a Sweet Future
I cannot deny that Jeff Luhnow and Chris Antonetti would have been a "match made in heaven", but like in most marriages, two of the same kind could have been a bit too aggressive, especially when statistical analysis continues to face tremendous skepticism and even animosity (ie. Jocketty and maybe.....La Russa?) Even if statistics continue to threaten these professional "old timers" in baseball, I have to admit that relying on cold, hard numbers rather than human instinct seems soulless. But how many times was our own intuition wrong? Bear in mind, that Mr. Luhnow and Mr. Antonetti (whom I prefer to refer as instead of "geeks" or "sabermetric geeks") deserve the respect and admiration that we continuously emit through blogs and other sites such as this one, must also, in some way or another, rely on their instincts. We speak of them as if they are oblivious to what we are all sharing here, as well as what is said in the media, and as if they are "aliens" that have just landed onto this earth to "save" our favorite sport in the world!!! Just because they have the ability that most of us lack, the challenge these talented young executives face is the lack, or thereof, being "persuaders". This is where Mr. Bill DeWitt enters and gave Mr. John Mozeliak the GM position. INTEGRATION!!! He will continue to be an asset to the organization as he has in the last decade, but with Mr. Luhnow's expert guidance, even the most gifted among us can get better...and the rewards of doing it properly are great!
In short, just because Mr. DeWitt was unable to recruit another "whiz kid" (Antonetti) to join the family, (because of this, and ONLY this: "it happens all the time, in every industry --- a hotshot up-n-comer gets wooed by an outside employer, lands an offer, takes it back to his current boss, and extracts a promotion (or the promise of one) and a bigger salary. that's all that happened here. it's not as if antonetti spurned the cardinals in order to wait for a more attractive job with some other team. he chose to stay with the organization he knows and is familiar with, in the city where he and his family already have roots. can't hardly blame him for that.")...does not mean that we are in bad shape at all. What is important, as is to any organization, is that we all share the same vision. And by our continued support and loyalty as  fans to the Cardinals organization, we will all help build a #1 World Class Team!

by proathlete on Nov 1, 2007 8:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes
Luhnow and Antonetti deserve the respect!That We only can do is support!

by Evelynhas523 on Nov 1, 2007 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols