Jocketty out as Cards GM
The Cardinals and general manager Walt Jocketty have "parted ways," according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation.
Assistant general manager John Mozeliak has been named interim GM by Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. and is a candidate to succeed Jocketty on a full-time basis. Ok, who should the new GM be? Post Ideas once we have enough I will post a poll, keep in mind the Lunhow is not a candidate at this time.
Update [2007-10-3 16:42:56 by lboros]: i promoted this from the diaries section and deleted the duplicates --- thanks to everybody who posted this news, i'm rather late to find it out. i'm stunned, frankly; didn't see it coming. walt did great things for this franchise and ranks among its all-time front-office luminaries. rather obviously, the difference of opinion about the direction of the franchise came to a head. it's just over 1 year since luhnow was promoted at the expense of bruce manno; apparently walt never got over that, and couldn't live with the implications. he was reportedly unhappy all season, and the revelations of the last couple of days (particularly the comment in joe strauss's article that farm-system personnel were afraid to talk to luhnow's guys, for fear of reprisal from the jocketty camp) paint a pretty stark picture of an unworkable marriage.
0 recs |
325 comments
Comments
I guess this means Tony's gone too
Now we have three-six years of painful rebuilding to go through. Hopefully for the better.
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what this will mean,
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what this means for FA signings
by Valatan on Oct 3, 2007 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd imagine it means none will be made
I'd bet that the $110 M bluff DeWitt threw out there was nothing more than lip service. He'll probably start selling off pieces not named Albert, Yadi and Adam.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Stretch money for FAs"?
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which FA's did walt ever
WJ did a quality job, building what was effectively a dynasty team, and should be remembered as a top GM. He's also had some good luck, IE pujols coming out of nowhere and Carp turning into an ace. That doesn't mean he is irreplaceable or that whoever takes over for him will be incompetent, or that the team is going to be blown up. WJ also made a lot of bad signings (Wells, Edmonds 2Y contract, Miles, Rincon, Encarnacion) that wasted money he could have used to bring in real talent, and did what I consider to be a poor job of evaluating young talent and promoting from within.
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How was signing Aaron Miles
I guess Walt really hasn't brought in a big name FA in awhile. His ability was more of trading for players and then getting them to sign at below market/defer money.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is true
Miles was "OK", but had no upside and therefore was a waste of a roster spot most of the year. I'd rather give that job to someone like Barden, who might turn into something special (like Ludwick did this year). It's not hard to find a middle infielder who can put up a .680 OPS, even in our minor league system. This year we had at least 3 of them (ryan, hoff, gonzalez).
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was a good trade
I suppose Walt's firing is something that had to be done. I wish him success wherever he goes, he's a class act. (Preferably in the American League, though.)
by liam on Oct 3, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
I don't understand that statement at all. In fact, the free agent market has to be the weak spot on what is a strong resume for Walt.
Walt did his damage in the trade market...just not lately.
Well...Here it is. I got my wish (refer to my diary "Open Letter to Dewitt"). I don't think there is any doubt that Tony and Dave will be following him out the door and the team is now in full-blown rebuilding mode. Hopefully, the management team they bring in will help fascilitate that.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd chip in
by RedbirdRay on Oct 3, 2007 4:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why fire Jocketty?
People I'd fire in order of culpability if I were Bill DeWitt:
George Paletta
Tony LaRussa
Myself
Dave Duncan
Walt Jocketty
Looks like he went right to the bottom.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get it either
by Alxfritz on Oct 3, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was fired
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rebuild
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good luck with that
You can't come out and say on Monday we are going to spend more payroll next year, upwards of $115 M if need be and then on Wednesday fire your GM looking for someone who can rebuild.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
by rockin redbird on Oct 3, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next year...
This is finally a smart move. Get the ball rolling quickly, and lessen the rebuilding timeframe.
This team had major holes to fill next year with little resources to do it with.
Let some of these big contracts expire...sign premium talent, and fill around them with the best group of young players you've had in more than a decade. They finally get it.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You forget
Molina could very well be traded with Tony probably being gone.
Can you imagine the return we would get from the team that Tony goes to??? Yowza!!!
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
This is an odd time. You are excited (at least some are) about a change in the direction of the franchise, but you also fear the security of having Tony, Dave and Walt around and that you can very well take a few steps backwards.
by bdief on Oct 3, 2007 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not sure how...
by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
early 90's
by elirock83 on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly...
I much preferred bold strokes like trading for McGwire, flipping Bottenfield for Edmonds, and developing Matt Morris and Albert Pujols.
by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally different...
No payroll constrictions.
They bought there way out of that mess...ain't happening this time.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe this was
by ridgesee on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If not Bobby Cox, do they have an assistant
by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think the Braves
by ridgesee on Oct 3, 2007 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dayton Moore was the assistant GM...
by taiko on Oct 3, 2007 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn, I knew that the Royals got
by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't be so hard on yourself.
by Glenn Brummer stole home on Oct 3, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
preemptive>
DeWitt fires him a year early instead of having Jocketty in 08 but only treading water.
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not wait until Tony tells him he is leaving
Dave Duncan was on the radio just this morning talking about what they plan on doing next year. I don't see Tony leaving without Dave.
Dave said he wanted Tony to outline how to retire as a Cardinals manager.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Office Politics
by RedbirdRay on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
From what I heard 550 AM will be carrying it and you can stream it over the net on their website. 4PM local time.
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is
This is an opportunity for this franchise. They could really screw this up or turn this into a franchise that builds for the long-term and has one of the best minor league organizations in baseball. I'm hoping for the latter.
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is it
I don't know much about Mozeliak, perhaps someone should start a diary aggregating information and reports about him.
It looks like the La Russa and Jocketty hating fanatics have gotten their wish. I'll do my part in calling attention to the things they did to put the Cardinals in a position to rebuild capably. Jocketty could have made desperate moves last off-season and saddled the team with bad contracts. That he didn't is something to appreciate going forward, and a standard that his heirs will need to be held to.
by liam on Oct 3, 2007 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
Dewitt wants to rebuild and become a player-development team. Walt and Tony are guys that like veteran-laced, high-priced teams. It just wasn't going to work moving forward and I applaud Dewitt for being proactive. It was the right move.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No matter what happened...
by itsalemmon1019 on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I heartily agree
by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saves us money
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
especially if they hired me
I think they still have top pay WJ for next year though, since he's under contract.
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
by kwhiteside on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wishful thinking?
by birdjam on Oct 3, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If it helps
by Some witty name on Oct 3, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bernie on Mozeliak...
Hell, he's the one who signed Franklin and Springer last offseason...
agents like him; Tony likes him.
--B
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds about right
I'd like John as our GM - he'd bridge the gap between the way Jocketty did things and the new philosophy of the organization - "building from within."
by silent_bob on Oct 3, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by aet15 on Oct 3, 2007 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did he really...
by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fired B/c of Luhnow
What is sad about this is that Jocketty is one of the premiere GM's in the league. I'd say there is a 5% chance that we'll get someone better than him as a replacement, which is crazy. Why terminate Jocketty if you've got him under contract through '08 if you don't even have a replacement?
I hope Dewitt's got a better plan in mind than what I'm imagining.
by Titus Pullo on Oct 3, 2007 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get it either
I'm glad that it's Mozeliak and not Lunlow in the interim.
by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe Jocketto told them
by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interim
It is very hard to comment on this stuff since none of has have any clue as to what goes on behind closed doors.
I would hope Mozeliak takes over and Tony and Dave stay for a few more years. I wish the best to Walt but maybe this may help ease some tension.
Who knows?
I don't really see this as a good day by anymeans.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't wait
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Refresh my memory
by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Numbers guy
by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Accountant
Or the fuzzy math that has the Cards reporting $96 M in payroll towards luxury tax yet telling the papers we crested at $102.
A good accountant is indispesible.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Judge of Talent
So is a good judge of talent. The farm system has done a 180 since he was hired...give him his due.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Out of nowhere
If you mean prior to that, then from a baseball standpoint, I agree. If you mean prior to being given his new job last year, then I don't.
by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry should have clarified
by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Surprised
Walt was great, and probably will go on to do a great job in another city. And I'll have fond memories of everything he did for the Cardinals over the past 13 years.
With that being said - this team needs to get younger, and Walt has been a trade guy, not a development guy. Ditto for Tony. The team needs to rely on youth in the short term, not veterans. This is a step in that direction.
And if there really were personality problems between "Walt's guys" and "Jeff's guys", then once again, this was needed. You have to stick with the guys of the future, not the guys that aren't as well equiped to deal with the business at hand.
by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your points
by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just hope our next GM isn't
by outraged on Oct 3, 2007 4:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i vote for dusty baker
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
evident the wash!
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about Allard Baird?
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 4, 2007 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just sad
The organization does need an overhaul, but the results of that overhaul are years away. Who better to keep the team "competitive" in the interim than Jocketty? How many gems has he mined, how much lead turned into gold? Granted, some of the lead, like Kip Wells, remained lead, but no alchemist is 100 percent successful.
by blove121 on Oct 3, 2007 4:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Walt is a top 5 GM along with Tony and Dave being top 5 coaches. You don't just replace those guys and do well right away. This organization may struggle and it is too bad that the Cardinals may just be awful during Albert's prime.
Enjoy Albert being good when the team sucks.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
You can't blame DeWitt for being stingy with money, money was made available for guys that went elsewhere. You can't blame Jocketty for the lack of available talent on the market. All things considered, I thought TLR did a good job this year, what with all the tragedies this team had to endure. And you can't blame Dave Duncan for not being able to get Cy Young out of Kip Wells.
This whole thing strikes me as A Very Bad Move.
by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
30 Minutes later
The owners have a vision of how this franchise will succeed both financially and on the field (even though these are very closely related) - through internal player development. The only way the franchise is going to move in that direction is by a commitment by everyone in the organizations leadership to that vision. That starts with the GM, the manager, the staff, etc.
Now what do you do with anyone that does not share your vision? The most successful organizations will purge those that do not share in the vision and that is why Walt's dismissal is not as shocking.
by bdief on Oct 3, 2007 4:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wacky
Walt included. He was a very, very good GM, as good or better as any GM in baseball through 2006. But he spent much of the last year airing his grievances to Peter Gammons and other people in the national media and now he seems to have gotten his wish, a separation from the Cardinals.
by Youneverknow on Oct 3, 2007 4:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jocketty
Seriously - trades for Ron Belliard, Jeff Weaver, Preston Wilson, Jorge Sosa, and Jose Vizcaino worked out due to 80% luck and 20% skill.
Granted, we don't know what he had to work with money wise. But those moves should not have resulted in a World Series ring. I'm glad they did, but...
by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Post W.S. Carnival
Not the historical company I'd like to be in.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks DeWitt, for being bold.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 4:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It was time for Jocketty to go...
I don't know much about Mozeliak... Give me Antonetti or DePodesta.
by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Educate me
by boredatwork on Oct 3, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
quite a bit...
- Jeff Kent
- Brad Penny
- Milton Bradley
- Derek Lowe
- Paul LoDuca
- Juan Encanacion
- Adrian Beltre
- Shawn Green
- Hideo Nomo
by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DePodesta was a huge factor
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DePodesta?!
by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll leave it to others to explain
by Just Rope Ball on Oct 3, 2007 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever
by boredatwork on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
What a woeful deal that was!!!
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But but but...
I don't know if the advantage of having a "Moneyball" GM is a great as it was 5 years ago, since the majority (prolly all) use the approach. They key will still be finding an undervalued type of player to augment the stars on your team.
by Just Rope Ball on Oct 3, 2007 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really all that needs to be said
by joker24 on Oct 3, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who's more valuable...
by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i believe "lo duca" means
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DePodesta
I think he did some pretty good stuff for the Dodgers and am shocked no one else gave him a shot. I think the only mistake he made w/ the LoDuca etc for Penny etc trade was the timing. But in all reality the Dodgers got the guy who was the 3rd best pitcher in the NL this year out of it, and lost Mota, Encarnacion, and Lo Duca. Not too bad in the long run honestly.
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 4, 2007 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyone know
by truemun12 on Oct 3, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
News conference audio
I just turned to KTRS right now and their saying nothing.
Has anybody tried KMOX or anything else?
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
590
by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on 550 ktrs
by truemun12 on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
will the press conference be anywhere on the web?
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
perfect.
ugh....i think i'm going to spew.
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
scout.com has it archived
http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/686746.html
You might need a subscription to the site to hear it, but I'm not sure.
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DEWITT
I just have a bad feeling about things. Change is good but I don't see an owner who is that great either.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hmmm...
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
who was that that interjected
by _pistol_ on Oct 3, 2007 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
quotes from dewitt...
"...tension got to the point is was counter-productive..."
"...division in the organization is well documented in the press....
"lunow is not a candidate for the gm position"
"tony and walt are close. had a good conversation with tony. wants dewitt to consider someone with alot of walt's characteristics. we want tony and his staff back and told him as much."
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if that's just lip service
by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
and that's probably the right answer....as much as it pains me to say it.
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lip service
He says every year they are going to 'keep the powder dry' to spend on 'the right type of player' if the become availible.
DeWitt is all about lip service.
He must think Roberto Clemente is going to be put on the waiver wire.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you like
You seem pretty PO'd with Billy Boy.
I applaud the man. He has a plan and he is going to move forward with it. I like his plan and think it will work.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You and I are on the same page
Just say no to mid priced replacement level talent.
Next we need to let Miles, So, Cairo, and Maroth walk. Then trade Flores. Don't spend any new money on outfielders unless they are young and can really rake (900+ ops types).
If Pinero will sign for the right $$$ amount, great. Otherwise see ya.
Lets not give some washed up pitcher 4-6M just so we can have a Vet. Lets not trade young players just to get a vet.
Overspending is by definition never the right answer.
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nail on the head...
You are exactly correct. I'm not saying don't spend money...I'm saying spend it smartly. Quit tying up 20% of your payroll in Walt and Tony's beloved gritmeisters.
Overspend on premium talent, and fill the other holes with cheap, young players. It's a great philosophy in my opinion. I love the direction this team is going and couldn't be happier with this decision. Now Tony/Dave need to be the next ones to go.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
unbelievable
by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If next year is tough
by spants on Oct 4, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We disagree
It may take a year or two to turn it around. I understand that and think its the right thing to do.
by DriverZn on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
An easy way of reversing that is
It would also help to reverse it by making a significant free agent signing over that span as well. And no, Ryan Franklin doesn't count.
The Cardinals in 2005 were 2 games away from the World Series. They let Reggie Sanders, Larry Walker, Matt Morris, and Mark Grudzielanek walk out the door, all of which accounted for $15.25 M in payroll. They replaced them with Larry Bigbie, Juan Encarnacion, Sydney Ponson and Aaron Miles/Timo Perez. That came to $6.5 M. A team on the cusp of winning it all used that extra payroll to sign Braden Looper and a bunch of other middle of the road players to replace 2 OF bats, one of the winningest pitchers in Cardinals histroy and a very servicable 2B.
In 2007, the purged the midseason pickups of Ronnie Belliard (another above average 2B), Jeff Weaver (better than the crap we threw out there), Jeff Suppan (reliable starter over recent run of success) and Jason Marquis (frustrating starter who could be really good or God awful).
Is the trend really because the Cardinals were unable to develop talent from their minor league system since 2005? (Adam Wainwright, Chris Duncan, Rick Ankiel, Tyler Johnson, Brad Thompson) Or is it a complete lack of devoting the funds from management to replace talent with talent?
The team kept getting cheaper and cheaper (talent wise and spending wise). People say the 'game passed Walt by' while he was on the job because of the way teams are valuing their farm systems now. I'd say the game passed the Cardinals by when it comes to comitting to 5th and 6th years on players contracts. While DeWitt sat around finding ways to defer money until after we are all dead and hoping players would sign the same contract but with less years than another teams offer, the talent level of the team slipped more and more.
Putting more value in the farm system is a great idea. But in this baseball climate, in which owners are seeing the highest revenue ever with attendance records being set each year, why the hell should teams payrolls be getting smaller? and that's exactly what is going to happen when Bill DeWitt uses statements like "our market dictated this".
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You just don't get it...
Are you reading what you type?
Every GM in baseball has a budget, except two, and 20 other GMs have less of a budget than Walt.
He knew what funds he had available and allocating them poorly...end of story.
Let me guess. It was Dewitt who was behind the signings of Edmonds, Mulder, Kennedy, Carpenter(with still a year on his deal, and a history of injury). Was it Dewitt who shipped out Haren/Barton/Calero for a grizzled vet who's arm was falling off?
The amount spent isn't poor...the way it was spent is.
Here is the main thing you are missing...player development. If you have a steady stream of young talent you are able to afford the premium free agents on the same budget. If you fill out some starters, and the fringes of your roster with cheap players...it leaves the big dollars to be spent on actual difference makers. Instead of signing all the market value talent he could, he should have been focusing on how he could get the best talent. The philosophy is flawed and it isn't working.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you this warm in your everyday life
I'm the one that doesn't get it? Edmonds was signed to a 2 year deal for cheaper than just about any FA OF on the market. Mark Mulder came in 2005, was one of the Top 20 pitchers in the NL and helped bolster a rotation that was tops in the National League that year.
When ownership won't pony up to add extra years to guys like Burnett and Renteria, you are left trying to sign the damaged goods of Mulder's and Edmonds in hopes of squeezing 2 good years out of them.
Am I to believe that you don't think Chris Carpenter won't return from TJ surgery by 2010? Cause the new contract only increased payroll for 2007 and 2008 by $4 M. Even still, Chris Carpenter got a 5 year extension which in reality was only a 3 year extension on his current contract.
When you aren't given the freedom to offer the extra year or the extra million to lure a FA to St. Louis, you are left having to sign the Adam Kennedy's of the world.
Jocketty and LaRussa have made it clear all season that they wanted DeWitt to give them the proper funds to go out and get the talent needed to compete. Do you honestly believe they would be asking for it if it already existed.
Of course you need a farm system to compliment the superstar contracts to balance out the payroll. You have that in Duncan, Ankiel, Ludwick, Molina, and Wainwright. If Anthony Reyes hadn't shriveled up, he'd have been another name to throw into that ring. But what were they complimenting? Albert Pujols and Scott Rolen, I get that. Juan Encarnacion? Adam Kennedy? David Eckstein? Braden Looper?
Pujols and Rolen signed their deals in 03 and 04 respectively. Before the Carpenter deal, what superstar contract did DeWitt hand out in 05 or 06? Nada. Walt went out and got what had been one of the best pitchers in the AL in Mark Mulder who would only cost the team $6 M each of the years he had left on his contract.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, you are the one that doesn't get it.
How were we susposed to replace Walker? The choices were pretty bleak. Giles was imo the best option at the time.
Which free agent did we miss out on that would have been a diffrence maker? By all means tell us.
by DriverZn on Oct 4, 2007 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would have had some money
The Cardinals followed that season by increasing this years payroll $2 M over the 2005 mark.
The Dodgers, the model of which many want this team to take, had a payroll of $83 M in 2005. It went up $15 M the next year and $10 M the year after that. The Dodgers payroll increased $25 M over that span. The Cardinals, $2 M.
Keeping up with the rest of the league doesn't just fall on player development. The Cardinals didn't keep up with replacing superstar talent through free agency.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
which superstar players
regarding the dodgers --- they signed schmidt, wolf, garciaparra, and gonzalez this off-season --- yet they only won 4 games more than st louis. the astros took on carlos lee and woody williams --- they finished behind the cardinals. the giants in the last few years have signed zito, morris, matheney, bengie molina, steve kline, plus paid megabucks to re-sign ray durham and bonds . . . .they finished last.
given the fact that many of the cardinals' own highest-salaried players --- rolen, carpenter, edmonds, mulder --- have been nonfactors or worse over the past few years, how can you remain convinced that $$$$ = wins?
by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 2:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Dodgers
The Giants had nothing really in the way of young talent and had to try to rebuild an entire franchise in a few off-seasons.
The Astros lost two exceptional pitchers in the off-season (Pettitte and Clemens) and addressed another need they had all of last year (offense).
The Cardinals needed to add another bat to that roster. They've needed to for 2 years now. Whether they had to do it by trade or by free agent signing, it had to be done. The Chris Duncans and Rick Ankiels are those extra slide in starters or bench players that put teams over the top. They can be starters on this team, don't get me wrong, but the Cardinals gave up on above average talen in RF, SS and 2B for 3 years now.
The Cardinals farm system is in better shape than the Giants or the Astros, which isn't really saying much. But at the MLB level, the Cardinals still had youth and talent in their rotation and lineup, something neither the Giants or Astros did.
For the Cardinals to add a Carlos Lee or a Barry Zito (yuck), it would be a replacement of talent being lost in 2009 that compliments what is on the team now.
The AJ Burnett deal, which I didn't think was worth it when the Cardinals actually tried to put together a starting rotation seems like it was a bigger miss by not offering him the extra year simply because it would have filled another rotation slot for next year with talent, something that doesn't seem likely now.
Rolen's $12 M comes off the books in 2010. Do we think the Cardinals are going to replace that chunk of payroll by paying a very talented player from within or with a big name FA? I personally don't.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I am always warm...
Cheap yes...productive no.
"Mark Mulder came in 2005, was one of the Top 20 pitchers in the NL and helped bolster a rotation that was tops in the National League that year."
Mulder was solid in '05, not the top of the rotation starter he was billed as but solid. Unfortunately, Haren was better in '05 and going forward it's only getting worse. Not to mention we gave up our best prospect at the time, and a cheap serviceable reliever. It was a bad, bad trade and there is no getting around it.
"When you aren't given the freedom to offer the extra year or the extra million to lure a FA to St. Louis, you are left having to sign the Adam Kennedy's of the world."
Again, nobody twisted Walt's arm. Kennedy was his guy. Walt knew the funds available and the team that was under .500 the past two years is what he created with it. Many teams did more with less.
If you are saying that with an unlimited payroll that Walt would field a good team...then I agree, but so would a monkey.
Again, we've consistently had a top 10 payroll for years now and Walt managed to put a team on the field that played less than .500 ball the past two seasons. That's a poor job anyway you slice it.
Quit crying payroll. There is more than enough money being spent to win. It's just not being spent wisely, and that falls on the shoulders of Walt.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE unbelievable
The sky is NOT falling. The team is not going down the toilet. They are going in a different direction...one they need to go in. With the amount of payroll tied up in unproductive players, and no trading chips at his disposal do you really think Walt could fix this mess. Tony/Walt were ready to sell the farm in order for one last push. Terrible idea imo.
"you think they are going to be replaced by perfect, omnipotent beings who never make mistakes?"
no
"you think these new people are going to magically fix anthony reyes and let brendan ryan start and that's going to solve all the franchise's problems?"
absolutely not
"what level of success would it have taken or tony/dave/walt to actually satisfy you? three straight nlcs appearances, five in seven years, playoffs almost every year this decade, two world series, first world series win since 1982?"
Who said I wasn't satisfied? They have had a great run here, and it's run its course. This team is in a big downward spiral, and their philosophy of putting band-aids on gaping wounds isn't going to work. They are not going to have another 13th rounder turn into Albert Pujols, or have another reclamation project become a CY winner. Look at the guys record the past couple of years...it's time for a change. The days of getting Scott Rolen's and Jim Edmonds' for nothing are over...ESPECIALLY when you don't have the payroll flexibility to eat large contracts. He flat out refused to develop his own talent...it's time for him to go.
"i am baffled by the unrealistic expectations and the ingratitude of people on here, who seem to conveniently ignore the fact that ANY replacements are also going to be fallible human beings who make mistakes."
Don't be baffled. It's painfully obvious that it's time for a change if you know where to look.
Again, I applaud Mr Dewitt for being proactive and choosing a direction. Bravo!
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Someone with Walts Charecteristics"
by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Candidates all over America
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jocketty
It's going to be a rough stretch of years ahead. Don't count on Albert staying in St. Louis after 2010.
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pujols
If the Cards suck for the next 3 years? Sure, Albert will likely go. But saying he's gone in 3 years now is a knee-jerk reaction.
by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so fast
I for one do not want to see Albert gone. Out team looks a lot worse and farther away from hope with Albert gone.
I think that is why Tony will be treated well. I think Dewitt is not a moron. He knows not to ruffle Alberts feathers.
And believe me if Albert is gone in 2010 it will be really, really, really bad.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Albert ever plays anywhere else
by joker24 on Oct 3, 2007 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please reread
What I wrote is not a prediction (at least certainly not a strong one) and it's certainly not a knee jerk reaction. I don't know for certain if Albert will or won't be here after 2010. I don't have a crystal ball, and neither does anyone else on VEB.
I was just expressing a thought based on concurring with statements in one of the earlier posts whcih mentioned the Cardinals are likely to go through a rough stretch in the upcoming years and this corresponds to Albert's prime career slot. I think it's possible the situation will wear on Albert and he might want to go elsewhere unless things are largely turned around by 2010. That's going to be a tall order for the organization.
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it would likely depend on who the manager is
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a very good point
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing Albert is, is a professional.
by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ankiel is a more immediate consideration
I agree about Pujols and would also throw in Yadi. Having a "core" to this team may very well become a thing of the past. And if it does, you can also say goodbye to Wainwright and other young players who have voiced pride in the culture of the "Cardinal's clubhouse." I can't see that they would have reason to stick around.
I'm all for player development. But I'm not at all sure, given the Cards' draft picks this year, that the people in development know how to build a good farm system.
Overall, I think it was a terrible decision and will likely mean that we will not be in contention for a long time.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree with nycardfan
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeez, you act like these are the
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So....
I think you may be overreacting a little.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Ankiel very well could
Much will depend on the morale of the clubhouse and whether they see themselves as a team who can still be in contention. If it's in a 'developmental' stage for 2-3 years, why would people who are used to being in the playoffs want to stay?
They want to win, and they want to win now while they are in their prime.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Jackson, Lincoln, Hamilton,
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you think Pujols doesn't care about
When they are able to make a decision, I'm sure many of our top players will consider whether the Cardinals is still a club that can be immediately successful in the post-season.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ankiel doesn't get a choice about
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
New Manager
by whiteyball on Oct 3, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad Day
Walt will be missed
by BluesDrummer85 on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hear, hear.
by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rebuilding
by johnnyawesomo on Oct 3, 2007 5:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
is there a plan????
but okay....you want to get rid of him, you want to change the philosophy and walt's not on board...okay. fine.
but i want a plan. it's one thing to fire someone but something completely different to HIRE someone.
who are we going to get that is an UPGRADE from walt? fire walt? fine. but who are we going to get that's better.
i want to see a plan. and right soon, mr. dewitt.
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Best post!
Change is good especially in professional sports. New ideas/people can bee good.
If Walt was causing problems and has been doing so for a while, fine.
I agree with you. We better not be firing him because he is not getting along with a guy who is buddy, buddy with Mr. Dewitt.
Mr. Dewitt better have a for sure person waiting in the wings. A good person at that.
You better have a top notch guy because it is a horrible move if you do not have a top notch replacement lined up.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why not?
Part of a professional's job is to interface with people whom they disagree with. If WJ's ego was preventing him from having civilized discussions with someone that WJ's employer felt had ideas worth considering, as has been mentioned by Bernie and others, then he should be replaced with someone who is capable of behaving professionally.
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Business
It happens everyday.
by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that may be how it happened
The GM has as much opportunity to convince the owner that the ideas have flaws as the other has to convince him that they are good. If he is unable to do argue convincingly for his convictions, then he is either wrong (which is probably the case given his apparent dismissal of pretty much any sabermetric ideas) or he is just not the right fit for the organization.
Reasonable men can agree to disagree, and can argue against each other passionately while maintaining a professional working relationship. Refusing to speak to another member of the organization because he doesn't agree with you is not acceptable, regardless of whether that person is a "baseball man" or not.
It would be interesting to know the whole story here, but we never will.
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball
This was a post about how it happens in business all the time and much of it seems to possibly apply to the Cardinals' situation.
In many cases, the GM character does not get to argue his point properly because the buddy's point has already been driven into the owner's head as the correct one. The GM becomes out of the loop and plans are being put in place without his knowledge and he gets blindsided by it one day. (With the GM losing credibility for not knowing what is going on.) This is when the rift often starts.
Grown men can argue their points and discuss them rationally, but when both men are busy with separate tasks and they have to force an interaction with the other...it is more likely that they will avoid contact unless absolutely necessary if they dislike each other.
As far as the not speaking to each other...that is a decision made by both parties. Both are to blame, but this often happens when one consistently uses the others' words against him in private conversations with the owner.
I don't know how much this plays into the Cards' situation, but it smells like it went this way to a certain extent. Lunhow is a stat guy and Walt is a character type guy. This is sales versus marketing in any company. They both want the same thing, but don't agree on how to get there.
As far as who is right or wrong, the buddy in these circumstances is wrong for not working through the proper channels, but probably did so to save time and get quicker feedback. The GM in these circumstances was likely wrong for not getting the 3 men in the room together to work it out. As far as who's plan is right or wrong, in the Cardinals' case, that would likely be impossible to tell for a couple of years.
Who is to blame? Where was Mark Lamping in all of this? Isn't he the team president? And if DeWitt knew all about this, why didn't he play more of a referee? (Maybe they both tried...who the heck knows)
by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why do you blame walt?
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
here, here
Walt just got fired. Of course the person who fired him is going to make it out to be all his fault. DeWitt could look foolish for this decision. He has to try to spin things his way while he can.
And for all those who expect great things to come of this, remember that DeWitt holds the purse strings. He could very well hire a cheap manager and make cheap investments in player development. We've seen no real investment strategy from him.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you and I are generally in agreement
Where's the respect for the man who's paid for all of this good baseball?
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok, sorry if i misread you
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right, dewitt did a great job of paying
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
I like and respect Dewitt and I think player development is a necessity, but did his relationship with Lunhow influence this decision? It sure does look like it (IM0)...not that it is necessarily a bad thing or a real thing. If this situation leads to greater success for the organization, that is great. Walt won't go hungry.
The decision sure does point toward further house cleaning. LaRussa and Duncan have both implied that they need alot of help for 2008. The FA market sucks...and Dewitt implied that we are not likely to trade top prospects. That will make it very difficult to upgrade.
by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i apologize
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely agree
I wanted to hear a plan or a philosophy today on the radio to justify firing one of the best GM's around. Who is better? Why? Where does DeWitt want to take the Cardinals. All I know is that he holds tight purse strings. That doesn't give me confidence.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly right
maybe there is a plan and he has a short list of people that are an upgrade. for all "live-and-die with the cardinals" fans like myself out there, i hope this is the case.
but i sure have this gnawing feeling in my gut that is screaming out "no plan...no plan...NO F'ING PLAN!!!"
by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luhnow has a history of reading
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know that DeWitt cares what the opinion
If he did, you should expect the Cardinals to overpay for atleast 1 'name' FA or atleast trade for one.
- No increase in payroll after World Series Title.
- Failure to sign Edgar Renteria, AJ Burnett, Miguel Batista, World Series hero Jeff Weaver, etc in a successive stretch of seasons.
- Hodge podge rotation falls apart.
- Team fails to reach the postseason for only 2nd time this decade.
- No real help coming from the minor leagues.
- Architect of one of the greatest stretches in teams history is fired because of feuding with front office people you installed replacing his people.
If DeWitt cared about public opinion, he'd allow the Cardinals to bid on a 'name' and attempt to land him to usher in the new GM as 'capable'.
But I don't know if he cares to or if he will. He could just decide to fully embrace rebuilding and allow the team to ride out these contracts, trading off players where he can to full the farm system and go the route of the Marlins.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What takes more guts?
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt
The new ownership group is equally as responsible for our success as Tony and Walt, and I thank them, but after listening to that I'm scared.
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I haven't
by Some witty name on Oct 3, 2007 5:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt comes to terms with LaRussa for a 3
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad that's snark...
by roebirds on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Walt
I am ready to take over. www.cardinalsgm.com
by tknup on Oct 3, 2007 5:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WJ
by sportsman on Oct 3, 2007 5:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Love this move
He inherited 13 seasons of a top 10 payroll, to go along with a remarkably bad central division, yet he's considered a huge success. The reality is Jocketty was one 13th round pick away from crashing our farm system into the ground and having nothing but mixed results to show from it.
As the games emphasis shifts to player development and advanced valuation techniques, its clear Jocketty's time has past. No one will trade a centerfielder with power for a starting pitcher with 17 wins and a 4:3 K:BB anymore. The game became too smart, his strengths don't exploit inefficiencies in 2008 as they did in 1998.
Thanks and goodbye, Walt.
by Jonathan23 on Oct 3, 2007 5:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that is absurd
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mozeliak
by Handsome B Wonderful on Oct 3, 2007 5:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not happy about this
It's odd. As I was just driving home, I was thinking to myself, that maybe all along I've been wrong and that LaDuncetty wasn't right to lead this team anymore. All along I've been saying that if TLR goes (I guess this could signal the start) we will suck for a few years. But I guess I finally realized that although having TLR around the next 3 or so years will guarantee us maybe an 80-win season as opposed to a 70-win season, we will probably be in better shape after 3 years to move forward.
I'm still pretty shocked/pissed. I'd much rather Jocketty have left on his own terms. This is the guy who brought McGwire, Renteria, Walker, Rolen, Edmonds, Clark, Woody Williams, Steve Finley, etc. over to this organization when we needed those parts. I salute you, Walt Jocketty, and best of luck in whatever you decide to do from here.
by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 5:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm in shock partly because of how it was handled
I was just reading this morning about plans for the future and I was thinking "Good, they can take this October and really get a head start to make this team more competitive. They seem to be moving quickly on what they want to do."
Now, everything is in turmoil, and probably not just for October, but likely for much longer.
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i really dont know what to say
that goes for every one who wanted tony&dave gone as well, because they aint coming back now. looks like the reds are going to swoop in and pick up walt tony&dave. good luck with all that guys.
ok, so now what dewitt? whats the plan? we need a GM, Manager & a whole new coaching staff. plus a bunch of new players. whats the plan dewitt? whats the freakin plan?
by gdm426 on Oct 3, 2007 5:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Larussa, Duncan, Walt & Staff
It would have been better for all to go the AL and to the West in Seattle.
I am real worried about the dominoe effect.
I think everyone who says this is great is kind of missing a lot of important things.
This is far from a great day.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree
the talk out here is ohio is the reds are swooping in on walt tony & dave. every reds fan is giddy.
how is this a good thing?
by gdm426 on Oct 3, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not that big of a deal...
That's a sub-500 record over 323 games, and next year's club figures to be even less promising than either the '06 or '07 Cards. This is clearly a downward trend. Now is a splendid time for a wholesale change.
As for LaDunketty taking their act to Cincinnati, keep in mind this regime was crap for the first five years of their tenure in StL.
by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ha
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also
"keep in mind this regime was crap for the first five years of their tenure in StL."
nlcs in 1996, nlcs in 2000. THAT is "crap"? what would it take to satisfy you? i am completely baffled. those are totally unrealistic standards if THAT was "crap," especially considering the team's state in the early 1990s.
by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the five years...
1995 / 62-81 / 4th place / 22.5 games back
1996 / 88-74 / 1st place / NLCS
1997 / 73-89 / 4th place / 11 games back
1998 / 83-79 / 3rd place / 19 games back
1999 / 75-86 / 4th place / 21.5 games back
That sir, is crap. One exciting September (McGwire's feats aside) in five years. And the 1996 team was quite flawed, as they exhibited in '97.
Jocketty made great moves starting in December of 1999, but the first five years of his tenure, and the last three years, have been quite poor.
by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...this is not a good day
He was a major reason that our club has been so successful in recent years. I hope Jeff Luhnow knows what he's doing.
by SethWestern on Oct 3, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt on 1380
by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt on 1380 (reposted more legibly)
A: Well, we knew there was a difference in philosophy, and it led to further division
Q: Did you try to get Jocketty to change?
A: Talked to him a bit, there was a disagreement, so it was time to move on
Q: Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive.
Q: If there'd been more success this year, would we still see Jocketty gone?
A: Hard to say. We won it all last year, and there was still plenty of discontent. When things go bad, it makes everything seem worse.
Q: Should we expect differences in philosophy for next year?
A: We definitely expect to improve for next year no matter who's running it, and we've got a group in charge now that knows where Tony and the coaches stand, and has scouts who knows what we need to do.
Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters. (He's dodging the question)
Q: What are you looking for in a new GM?
A: We're going to look for a guy with good player/agent relationships who can represent the Cards well and is "competent in the baseball organization" and "committed to building young players"
Q: What does this mean for Tony?
A: Dunno. Talked to Tony, but couldn't get a sense either way. He'll make his decision and let us know.
by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
tremendous job
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nevertheless
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A little easier to read, sorry to jack your post
A: Well, we knew there was a difference in philosophy, and it led to further division
Q: Did you try to get Jocketty to change?
A: Talked to him a bit, there was a disagreement, so it was time to move on
Q: Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive.
Q: If there'd been more success this year, would we still see Jocketty gone?
A: Hard to say. We won it all last year, and there was still plenty of discontent. When things go bad, it makes everything seem worse.
Q: Should we expect differences in philosophy for next year?
A: We definitely expect to improve for next year no matter who's running it, and we've got a group in charge now that knows where Tony and the coaches stand, and has scouts who knows what we need to do.
Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters. (He's dodging the question)
Q: What are you looking for in a new GM?
A: We're going to look for a guy with good player/agent relationships who can represent the Cards well and is "competent in the baseball organization" and "committed to building young players"
Q: What does this mean for Tony?
A: Dunno. Talked to Tony, but couldn't get a sense either way. He'll make his decision and let us know.
by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
48 seconds
by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, no worries
by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds good to me
by srs on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree w/ you 100%
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Future GMs
- I don't see them hiring a DePodesta, Ng, or other hard core analytical guy. They've already got that in Luhnow. Rather, I would expect them to hire more of a deal-maker; an outside guy to work with the agents and get deals done and to go with Luhnow's inside guy (e.g. Mike Martz in his OC role) trend. Like a CEO to Luhonw's COO.
- I was quite happy with how the 2007 draft went. I think Luhnow knows what he's doing.
- I think the long-term trend is to develop from within. Jocketty's inclination was more to build via acquisition.
- It may take 2-3 years for this strategy to pay off, but I think it will.
by thepainguy on Oct 3, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Started to read that article
"Due to the way the offseason is unfolding, it is becoming apparent to us that, barring an unforseen miracle, the Mariners aren't going to be contenders in 2007. Even in a best case scenario, where the young core takes a step forward and the aging veterans stave off decline, this is still an inferior team to that of the Angels, Rangers, and Athletics."
by Big Red on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rockies Win!
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ryan Howard ....
by Timbo02 on Oct 3, 2007 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd just like to say....
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Oct 3, 2007 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Where is the panic button!?
I do not like this move at all, and its gotta mean that TLR and possibly Duncan are next to head out the door.
Even though DeWitt helped us win a title, he's always making decisions with nothing but $$$ in mind. KMOX, and holding salary despite absolutely raking in the money the past few years are the two primary examples.
Now he forces out one of the best GM's in the game and the architect of that championship team.
No matter how bad this season got, I always felt optimistic bc Jocketty was in charge and had confidence he'd get us back on top in 08....now I fear we are teetering on the edge of falling into a stretch like the early 90's. That is, with an owner who is more concerned with his check book than the product on the field.
At least we have Pujols....right?
Ack. This is bad.
by TheFranchise9 on Oct 3, 2007 6:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
apparently
So we may need to get ready for that time again. I see Dewitt going the wrong direction.
Steve Stone was even wondering what the heck STL's owners were doing not spending money after wining the WS and drawing a ton of fans.
It seems around baseball people are starting to view Dewitt as a cheap ass. I hope they are wrong for our sanity.
This team could go down fast.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should be upset
The pre-Walt era was horrible but the idea that the next several years will be horrible b/c Walt is gone is overly fatalistic, IMO. The owners seem to want to make a commitment to getting younger, to player development -- these are good things and clearly the direction the franchise should be headed. If Walt wasn't the person for the job, let's find the person who is.
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not return to early '90s
When the DeWitts bought the club, there was a renewed commitment to winning -- that's how Jocketty and LaRussa wound up in St. Louis -- and I doubt that's changed. The DeWitts are baseball people.
by MoCrash on Oct 3, 2007 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's a sad day.....but not unexpected.
by Timbo02 on Oct 3, 2007 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really think
Perhaps a little time to think about it would help. We didn't fire the captain of the Titanic nor did we fire George Washington at Valley Forge.
It will never be as bad as you fear and it was never as good as you remember.
by Harknights on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!
by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
guess i missed some history lessons...
by Johnny64 on Oct 3, 2007 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assignment
You shall go out tonight and rent a movie. Playoffs be damned.
The movie you shall rent it Animal House.
You shall watch said movie and then and only then shall you understand why it wasn't over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.
by Zubin on Oct 3, 2007 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the advice...
by Johnny64 on Oct 3, 2007 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I WILL TAKE SOME TIME
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, we never fired the captain of the Titanic...
I agree with the idea that this is a good decision, even though Jocketty has had a great deal of success with us in the past. Not necessarily because the market has passed him by, but because there's no reason to maintain a counter-productive and (by most accounts) poisonous working environment in the organization.
by The Man in Blak on Oct 3, 2007 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Compensation...
Now - How could we just let Walt walk? Couldn't we let him go off to other clubs and auction him to the highest bidder (ala Leo Mazonne) along with Dave Duncan (with LaRussa obviously included).
I know it doesn't happen often, but my read is that we have given up a top 5 GM for nothing. Not the smartest move in the world if it is avoidable (and I believe Walt's salary is in the $1M range which in itself is below market)...
Anyway - maybe I am just on the crack rock, but in running a business I am not sure why you give up an asset for nothing.
As an aside, if we are going to get rid of Jock why would we replace him with someone who was a virtual clone (which is what Tony has requested).
Also, everyone is talking organizational shakeup, but of our top 5 or so contracts only Pujols is tradable.... I'm not ready to go there...
by Lawless on Oct 3, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hot Stove Season
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Who I'd like to see interviewed for the GM opening
Terry Ryan, formerly the Twins GM, and currently a talent advisor for them. Under his watch, the team acquired players like David Ortiz, Johan Santana, Joe Nathan and Francisco Liriano.
And,
Logan White, assistant GM for the Dodgers. He has a large role in their draft and their system is loaded. I guess that might conflict with the role Luhnow currently has with the Cardinals, but Mr. White might know which under the radar players to acquire from LA if he gets a GM position elsewher. Plus, I'm not sold on Luhnow's talent evaluation yet.
I hope Walt lands in the American League. Less of a threat to St Louis that way.
by michajo on Oct 3, 2007 7:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought
by spants on Oct 3, 2007 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i should have been more specific
by michajo on Oct 3, 2007 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Terry Ryan has done an extremely poor
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it true that the Twins
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay I just found out about this
and i am bummed. this season was rough on all of us cardinal fans, but i wasn't ready for wholesale slaughter, and i fear that is what we are about to see...
change is bad... i fear change... (okay, not really, but i like it better when we have some kind of transition, and some warning...)
by RosevilleRedbird on Oct 3, 2007 7:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's gonna be okay.
by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 8:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a question
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 8:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great question
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a while
i'm happy they are committing to player development method over "win now", but i'm not so sure luhnow is the guy who leads the cards out of the wilderness, unless he starts tweak his drafting and stop taking safe, or even quirky guys over players with a little higher upside. for this team to contend sooner then later, they will still need to depend on making smart trades and free agency.
by erik on Oct 3, 2007 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for responding
I realize I'm asking you to go out on a limb to an extent and that leaves you open to future blog recriminations. But I assure you that it won't be from me or from any other thoughtful VEB'er. Guys like you probably are positioned better than most to make the estimate, and I just want to have a "ballpark" (no pun intended) estimate in order to keep things in perspective.
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good I was hoping you would answer
We do have enough 4th outfielders to last us until like 2017 though.
Your comment on Luhnow outsmarting himself worries me because I can sort of see that. If the Cardinals are really, finally committed to player development, I think we'll find out next draft. The Cardinals will have a shot at someone who is perceived as a difficult sign. If they pass, then I'll be severely dismayed -- player development requires drafting talent. Drafting talent requires money.
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is normally
- a future star cf in colby
- a solid closer in perez, but he has to get things under control.
- a good hitting catcher in bryan anderson.
- a solid SS in kozma, but he's years away. martinez is a lot closer
- some decent arms for the rotation like herron, ottavino and garcia....
for more of an overview, here's a spreadsheet for quick ref of how i see the system
by erik on Oct 4, 2007 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I found your spreadsheet to be
Man, our pitching really is depressing....
by nycardfan on Oct 4, 2007 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure I agree
STL uses the Stars and Scrubs approach to team design. We can afford a few big contracts. They don't have to comes from the minors.
So we tie up about half our payroll in 5 players. Those are your stars. (Albert, Rolen, Edmonds, Carp, Izzy today). The minors need to be able to provide us quality filler. Recently we have gotten Duncan, Ryan, Ludwick from them. Thats not bad but not great.
Our problem is we have no starting pitchers close and no surplus talent that can be used as trade bait left.
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the filler has been fine
here's the filler the farm system has kicked out since 2004:
2 solid starting pitchers (wainwright and haren)
2 solid relievers (calero and ty johnson)
2 still-unsettled pitchers (reyes and thompson)
3 decent everyday players (molina duncan ankiel), with the potential for a 4th (brendan ryan)
plus some bench depth -- taguchi, schumaker, rodriguez
that's not a bad four-year haul, especially since it comes during a supposed down cycle. four years from now, the system will likely have kicked out another 2 or 3 everyday players (rasmus, maybe anderson, maybe a shortstop, maybe hoffpauir) and a few starting pitchers (garcia, boggs, ottavino, herron, walters all decent candidates), plus potentialy a late-inning reliever or two (perez, motte, dove) and the inevitable middle-relief driftwood.
will they be stars? probably not more than one, if they're lucky two --- but i don't think that matters. they don't all have to be stars; average big-league players are extremely valuable. in the 1980s, an extremely productive era for the farm system, the cards had a bunch of average to above-average major leaguers (coleman mcgee pendleton herr cox magrane etc etc); the true impact players all came via trade from outside the system (ozzie, jack clark, tudor, andujar).
by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JRod was actually a Yankee farmhand;
by jillsinmo on Oct 4, 2007 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's as far off as some people
The biggest concern is pitching. We don't have what most talent evaluators consider to be a true front of the rotation starter anywhere in our system. Jaime Garcia had elbow problems this season but he's the only player that has a shot at being a #2 type pitcher. We have a few mid-rotation ceiling starters (Ottavino, Herron) and a lot of back of the rotation material (Boggs, Walters, etc.). I personally think that our relief prospects are overlooked on a system wide basis (even though I'm not a big mid-reliever fan). We have several that are within 1-2 years of contributing (most noticably Chris Perez).
I don't think the pitching will arrive for 2-3 years though and that's what the Cardinals really need. Until the Cardinals remedy that issue, they are simply going to continue to struggle at run prevention. Now (and this is going to piss some people off) if Reyes were to put things together like he was projected to as recently as a year and a half ago, he and Wainwright could anchor a staff. But the farm system isn't quite ready to produce any starting pitchers.
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Question. If Tony goes but Duncan stays, what does that do for our young pitchers?
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yusmiero Petit was different too
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
awesome stats in the minors.
(Finish your thoughts, Azru.)
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's still pretty young, though.
by jillsinmo on Oct 4, 2007 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And thanks also to
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats the problem
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ouch!
I don't know if it CAN'T be done (2001 Diamondbacks?), but the odds obviously aren't in a team's favor.
Thanks again for the feedback. This is good stuff.
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hope we will treasure 2006
This whole thing reeks of an owner ready to fill his pockets while playing the fans as fools.
DeWitt knows he has a good thing going in St. Louis. There isn't a whole lot of media pressure, the fans of the team are very faithful and will spend tons of cash to see the Cards even if there isn't a good team on the field. Hell just the new stadium alone is enough to bring millions of fans in for the next 2-3 years.
I think DeWitt is going to keep bringing in some "yes men" until he decides to sell the team in 4-5 years, while taking the fans who buy tickets and food at the stadium for all their worth in the mean time.
I hope I'm wrong, but I wouldn't count on the Cards doing a whole lot this off season. Unless DeWitt has a plan (which I don't think he really does) we are in for some pretty bad years ahead.
Cubs/Reds/Brewers fans can rejoice because I don't think the Cards are going to be in the hunt for awhile now.
by KYCards on Oct 3, 2007 8:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I can think of a lot better ways...
by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
History Lesson
Fast forward to today. The O's have just completed their 10th straight losing season, going through GMs with no authority and managers with limited skills. The minor league system continues to be two years away. A once proud franchise opens each year with no hope of a winning record, let alone competing for the playoffs.
Hopefully, DeWitt's move fosters an operation that builds talent from within and supplements the team with key acquisitions through free agency or trade & sign.
by ubeddie on Oct 3, 2007 8:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bingo
He started making sure no contracts (other than Carp) would go past a certain date and restricted funds/years on FA signings.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thoughts...
hate to see walt go, but, if this does really end the divisiveness in the front office, it needed to be done
i wonder if there is any chance of tony staying, just to see what could be done with this team, and get back to the playoffs with pujols?
by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 8:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
It's the only thing he's ever said that I liked.
by spants on Oct 4, 2007 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hadnt heard that
at this point, though, it may also depend on whether he thinks they could be competitive in the next 3 years, if he doesnt think that, then seeing pujols' prime may not matter as much
by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 4, 2007 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Win, win
Dewitt looked at the direction his industry was taking and realized that Walts philosophy didn't jive.
"Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive."
Basically Dewitt is saying the same things Larry, I and others have been saying: with the sabermetric kitty out of the sack, Walt is having a hard time fleecing other teams:
"Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters."
It is entirly possible Dewitt goes '98 Marlins on us, but I doubt it. I think he want a winner and realizes we need to develop talent, not just acquire it.
by Zubin on Oct 3, 2007 8:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he can go
I think you're basically correct that we could see some of what we have traded, but we'll hardly be in a position to collect the bounty that the Fish collected.
It's possible now, for example, that Reyes stays. Yesterday, I would have put the likelihood of him returning at about 10%. Now I'd say it's closer to 50/50.
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Reyes staying on this team
We've clearly overvalued Anthony Reyes and it would take a HISTORIC turnaround for him to be an above average MLB pitcher.
It seems we should have traded him a year ago. Now, if we put another year between his decent minor league career and current day, his value continues to dwindle as he and his mechanics creep closer to shoulder reconstruction.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO: don't expect a firesale
You may see parts like Izzy let go. The low performance per $$$ players. Izzy is good but he didn't really out pitch Springer or Percival this year.
However, I fully expect players like Rolen, Pujols, Ankiel, Carpenter, Molina to stay. Its much, much easier to keep a superstar (Pujols, Rolen) than it is to get one. Its been said time and time again the money is there for the right players. What star level player have we let walk because of money? Edgar is the only one that comes close.
What I think got looked at here were deals like Haren for Mulder. The Wells signing wasn't an attempt to be cheap, it was Duncan getting his pet project.
This is a good thing for the team. The owner wanted someone that wouldn't continue to squander cheap, young talent and acted to make it happen.
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure
To wit:
WXRL WPA
Izzy 4.202 2.75
Springer 2.168 1.55
Percival 1.148 0.89
by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought I read the other day that
by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had read that instead of
by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know what you're talking about
by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm guessing that you read that
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think it was Goold
by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was looking more at the predictor stats.
Springer 9.0 K/9 0.42 HR/9
Percival 8.0 K/9 0.71 HR/9
Izzy also walks far more people. 3.8 vs 2.6 and 2.1
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't take single year statistics for
What we don't want to do is extend him yet given his injury last year and age.
by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Relievers are about the most replacable parts on any team.
by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if relievers are so replaceable
by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
because teams value
by azruavatar on Oct 4, 2007 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the only acceptable explanation
by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by ridgesee on Oct 4, 2007 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dewitt
by BluesDrummer85 on Oct 3, 2007 9:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was just reading your post, and almost
by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey jill
as far as andruw, when reports are that boras wants many years and 20 mil a season, no thanks on him either
by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh My
by lynx on Oct 3, 2007 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i doubt if an MBA is a requirement
by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh shit.
by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well done, sir
by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ROFLMAO.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What
On to the subject of a Cubs/Diamond-backs thread - a pitchers' duel is going on. Webb and Crazy Z are battling it out.
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, no!
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Z's Head Melt
by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No,
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is that?
by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way!
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The curse
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it is
by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you sir are a gentleman and a scholar
by RosevilleRedbird on Oct 4, 2007 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JW, BD, etc
by sportsman on Oct 3, 2007 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just hope...
stlfan
by stlfan on Oct 3, 2007 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow another 'zona home run
by Zubin on Oct 4, 2007 12:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also...
Oquendo is apparently a very good teacher as a coach, which might be a good way to bring in the rebuilding era. DePodesta seems to know how to get good bargains, much like Jocketty, and might be good to fill some gaps while we work on bringing in the youth. The guy from the Indians (mentioned above) seems like quite the analytical guy, but I think we have that in Lunhow...but the combo of them might just be even better...who knows. I have no clue for pitching coach because Cox and his aren't splitting up in ATL any time soon.
I am in shock...but I don't know yet if that is bad.
stlfan
by stlfan on Oct 4, 2007 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On the subject of the Cubs/Zona game
So the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of the Rockies (who have the added statistical advantage of taking game 1 on the road) and the Red Sox, and, if things hold, a certain team that's not the Cubs.
by stl tyler on Oct 4, 2007 12:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i love the fact that
by SleepyCA on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give in
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad you came to your senses
Also, I tend to hold out my favor for teams that try to buy championships, so that's another mark against this year's Cubs team.
As long as the Red Sox, Yankees, or Cubs don't win the series this year, I'll be happy about the outcome.
by stl tyler on Oct 4, 2007 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As will I.
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i am indifferent to this series pretty much
however, i also wont be rooting for either team
the cubs are our rivals, so i cant root for them
arizona beat us in 2001 on a heartbreaker, so i cant root for them
i will be rooting for the winner of phils/rox in the nlcs
by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 4, 2007 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was
by rockin redbird on Oct 4, 2007 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This Whole Deal and My $.02
Yes, the Mulder trade has looked like crap in retrospect, but I really don't remember ANYONE being mad about that at the time. Its amazing how things like that happen isn't it?
No, Kennedy, Wells, Carp's extension, and Edmonds's extension were probably not the best decisions, but once again that is in retrospect.
I'm really nervous about this upcoming season. If Tony LaDuncan is gone for an Oquendo/Mason, Miller, whatever group and its a youth movement, we're flat screwed next year. It will be Albert, Duncan, Waino, and then a rotating crew of AAAAers and bench players. That is ALL we have MLB ready right now. Hoffpauir looks decent, Ryan looks to be a solid defensive player, Ludwick has some pop (but isn't exactly a hot stud prospect, he's in his late20s)...but I don't see a Stephen Drew/Mark Reynolds/Hanley Ramirez/Justin Upton/Matt Kemp/James Loney/(insert favorite young stud) in that group. I see solid players, but All Stars? Not a one! I love Rasmus, I think Anderson is intriguing, Garcia will be solid probably, Mortenson is also interesting...but none of them are close yet IMO.
The only way I see this team being competitive with a new staff in youth movement mode is if Duncan, Reyes, Molina are all shipped out of Dodge for talent, young or otherwise. We shall see...But point is, I'm nervous, and its 2 am so I have no idea how logical anything here sounded, and don't care...
Good luck Walt Jocketty, I have a good feeling you're going to be getting a call or two not so long after the World Series.
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 4, 2007 2:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is fun
October 3, 2007
by Stan McNeal
A few weeks before the season ended, I was talking to Albert Pujols about a home -- palace might be a better description -- he was having built in the St. Louis area. He said he'd put a hold on the plans, partly because there was a lot more work involved than he and his wife have time for -- but also because he wants to see what direction the team takes in the next couple years.
After the firing of Jocketty and the possible departure of La Russa, Pujols isn't likely to be pleased with what he's going to see.
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=285393
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 3:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and now all our
Albert's going to demand a trade to bean town or the Yankees.
thanks Hardcore, now i'm never going to get some sleep
by gdm426 on Oct 4, 2007 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
gulp...
by JMedwick on Oct 4, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are going to have to bid...
At least we may have some flexibility by that time now. If Walt and Tony were still here we'd have 20% of the payroll tied up in Miles, Taguchi and Kennedy clones.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My main problem: development ain't easy
Unless there is some certified talent spotting genius out there or within the organization, I greatly despair for the near to mid term future of the organization.
While the veteran/free agent approach is expensive, it seems somewhat less foolproof in that major leaguers are more of a known quantity, while even the most highly regarded minor league prospects are still severe gambles.
by bailorg on Oct 4, 2007 4:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
foolproof????
by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 4:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're missing the point...
Think Twins with 40-50M more to spend annually. That's the goal.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2009
2009
Rotation
Carp, Wainwright, Garcia, Boggs, (FA, Hawksworth, Reyes, Mulder...etc.
Bullpen
Perez, Franklin, Johnson, Worrel, LOOGY...(Thompson, Dove, Wellemeyer, Falkenborg, Cavasos, Jimenez, Kinney...etc.)
C Molina (random FA, Anderson)
1B Pujols
2B Kennedy (Hoffpaiur)
3B Rolen (Barden, Craig)
SS Ryan (Barden, Martinez?)
LF Duncan (Ludwick)
CF Rasmus (Schumaker)
RF Ankiel (Jay, JRod, Stavinoha, Mather...etc.)
Money off the books. Juan E., Izzy, Edmonds, Looper, Taguchi, Spiezio, Maroth and maybe Mulder.
That is $30 to $40 million to play with to upgrade the above roster in a few places. That 2009 team might be pretty good.
by Elvis on Oct 5, 2007 5:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















