Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Can Tebow Say No To Anything?

Jocketty out as Cards GM

The Cardinals and general manager Walt Jocketty have "parted ways," according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/32456B7DBB9EEC44862573690069E6D7 ?OpenDocument

Assistant general manager John Mozeliak has been named interim GM by Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. and is a candidate to succeed Jocketty on a full-time basis. Ok, who should the new GM be? Post Ideas once we have enough I will post a poll, keep in mind the Lunhow is not a candidate at this time.

Update [2007-10-3 16:42:56 by lboros]: i promoted this from the diaries section and deleted the duplicates --- thanks to everybody who posted this news, i'm rather late to find it out. i'm stunned, frankly; didn't see it coming. walt did great things for this franchise and ranks among its all-time front-office luminaries. rather obviously, the difference of opinion about the direction of the franchise came to a head. it's just over 1 year since luhnow was promoted at the expense of bruce manno; apparently walt never got over that, and couldn't live with the implications. he was reportedly unhappy all season, and the revelations of the last couple of days (particularly the comment in joe strauss's article that farm-system personnel were afraid to talk to luhnow's guys, for fear of reprisal from the jocketty camp) paint a pretty stark picture of an unworkable marriage.

0 recs  |  Comment 325 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I guess this means Tony's gone too
well, many of us got our wish.  

Now we have three-six years of painful rebuilding to go through.  Hopefully for the better.

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

*sigh*
It's definitely not MY wish! I'm afraid this signals a downward spiral for the organization, or at best a painful rebuilding process. As noted by Hardcore and others, WJ was not remotely the problem with the '07 Cardinals.

by roebirds on Oct 3, 2007 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure what this will mean,
Lunhow is still in charge of the draft, so he won't be the GM who is a good rebuilding GM?  Also if Tony doesn't come back now, which I think is more likely today then yesterday then I think Giradi might be a top candidate even if I don't think he would accept it.  This sure made an interesting off season much more interesting.

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd imagine it means none will be made
if there was ever a GM who could stretch money for FAs, it's Walt.  

I'd bet that the $110 M bluff DeWitt threw out there was nothing more than lip service.  He'll probably start selling off pieces not named Albert, Yadi and Adam.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Stretch money for FAs"?
Where does that come from?  I see a long list of FAs he COULDN'T stretch to sign.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which FA's did walt ever
"stretch money" on?  He was pretty good at running the price up for other teams, but he hasn't signed a good FA in a while.

WJ did a quality job, building what was effectively a dynasty team, and should be remembered as a top GM.  He's also had some good luck, IE pujols coming out of nowhere and Carp turning into an ace.  That doesn't mean he is irreplaceable or that whoever takes over for him will be incompetent, or that the team is going to be blown up.  WJ also made a lot of bad signings (Wells, Edmonds 2Y contract, Miles, Rincon, Encarnacion) that wasted money he could have used to bring in real talent, and did what I consider to be a poor job of evaluating young talent and promoting from within.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How was signing Aaron Miles
or trading for him, rather, a bad deal?  Miles has done exactly what they expected him to do for real cheap.

I guess Walt really hasn't brought in a big name FA in awhile.  His ability was more of trading for players and then getting them to sign at below market/defer money.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that is true
He did a great of of fostering loyalty (with the exception of Renteria, whom he jerked around a bit) and seemed to manage to broker a lot of good extensions.  Though he also did some bad ones (carp, edmonds).

Miles was "OK", but had no upside and therefore was a waste of a roster spot most of the year.  I'd rather give that job to someone like Barden, who might turn into something special (like Ludwick did this year).  It's not hard to find a middle infielder who can put up a .680 OPS, even in our minor league system.  This year we had at least 3 of them (ryan, hoff, gonzalez).

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was a good trade
We were over the barrel with Big Tubby Ray very publicly demanding a trade. That we were able to get a slightly below average outfielder and a slightly below average middle infielder for an unhappy, below average relief pitcher was spinning straw into, I don't know, yarn? Something that's useful to have around at least.

I suppose Walt's firing is something that had to be done. I wish him success wherever he goes, he's a class act. (Preferably in the American League, though.)

by liam on Oct 3, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?
"if there was ever a GM who could stretch money for FAs, it's Walt. "

I don't understand that statement at all.  In fact, the free agent market has to be the weak spot on what is a strong resume for Walt.

Walt did his damage in the trade market...just not lately.

Well...Here it is.  I got my wish (refer to my diary "Open Letter to Dewitt").  I don't think there is any doubt that Tony and Dave will be following him out the door and the team is now in full-blown rebuilding mode.  Hopefully, the management team they bring in will help fascilitate that.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd chip in
I'd throw in some bucks to lure Oakland's GM.

by RedbirdRay on Oct 3, 2007 4:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why fire Jocketty?
Does DeWitt honestly believe that Walt is the reason for this down year?

People I'd fire in order of culpability if I were Bill DeWitt:

George Paletta
Tony LaRussa
Myself
Dave Duncan
Walt Jocketty

Looks like he went right to the bottom.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it either
Unless Walt wanted out for the Pittsburgh position or to GM elsewhere.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 3, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was fired
According to Bernie he was flat out fired.

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rebuild
Walt is a trading GM not a rebuilding one, and I think that is what this entire thing is about, next year will be a rebuilding year most likely and he wants a GM that can sign the young players and get good prospects for awhile.

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good luck with that
you have to have something to get something.  We've got 3 real commodities that'll bring us any talent from the farm system: Wainwright, Pujols, Molina.

You can't come out and say on Monday we are going to spend more payroll next year, upwards of $115 M if need be and then on Wednesday fire your GM looking for someone who can rebuild.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep
This is a bad omen, I believe, for next year. Don't like it. Don't like it at all.

by rockin redbird on Oct 3, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Next year...
It was over before it even started anyway.

This is finally a smart move.  Get the ball rolling quickly, and lessen the rebuilding timeframe.

This team had major holes to fill next year with little resources to do it with.

Let some of these big contracts expire...sign premium talent, and fill around them with the best group of young players you've had in more than a decade.  They finally get it.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You forget
You forget about Chris Duncan, who the btw is most likely following his Dad out the door for a SP.

Molina could very well be traded with Tony probably being gone.

Can you imagine the return we would get from the team that Tony goes to???  Yowza!!!

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
Looks like youth will prevail next year. I think that the mid-season reports linking Walt to Cincinnati, and the fact that your payroll has $83 million for 12 players next year, most which are question marks in terms of health.

This is an odd time. You are excited (at least some are) about a change in the direction of the franchise, but you also fear the security of having Tony, Dave and Walt around and that you can very well take a few steps backwards.

by bdief on Oct 3, 2007 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not sure how...
Not sure how you justify that statement. Didn't Jocketty rebuild this franchise from a stale bottom dweller into a perennial contender? Body of work and track record speak a great deal to me.

by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

early 90's
when larussa and jocketty came here, it was after the disaster known as joe torre, and a couple other warm bodies. I dread to think of the 90's god awful teams.
"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly...
Remember when Todd Zeile led the club in homers with...11. Or when the big move was trading for Tom Brunansky?

I much preferred bold strokes like trading for McGwire, flipping Bottenfield for Edmonds, and developing Matt Morris and Albert Pujols.

by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Totally different...
Different time period.

No payroll constrictions.

They bought there way out of that mess...ain't happening this time.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe this was
a well thought out move by De Witt, and not a spur of the moment thing. This was just the time ot announce it. Good chance he already knows who he wants. Wonder if Bobby Cox is tired of field manager and would like to go back to GM for a few years. There is not an opening in Atlanta, but boy I would like to see him in St.Louis. He is a good judge of young players and veterans to sign and pick up

by ridgesee on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If not Bobby Cox, do they have an assistant
GM we might lure?  The Braves have ALWAYS been good at developing and turning talent into new/more talent.  

by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think the Braves
have an Asst.GM. Bobby Cox and John Schuerholz pretty much run the show. Cox left as manager of the Blue Jays in about '89 or '90 for the GM position for the Braves.  He was given full athority to do what ever it took to make the braves a winner.In a couple of years he had put together a great bunch of young players and  And in '93 ( I think) he took over the field manager and promoted John Schuerholz, his assistant to GM. Even though Scheurholz has been GM all this time, Bobby Cox is the authority in that orgination and nothing is done without his approval. He would not want to root out his old friend Scheuholz, but he just might want to take up a new challenge with a new club. he is stated he is tried of managing and probably won"t return next year. but he might be inticed to take a GM job.

by ridgesee on Oct 3, 2007 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dayton Moore was the assistant GM...
Before he was plucked to run the Royals. Even if they have a new assistant in his place, it's doubtful that that person has had time to pick up much from Schuerholz.

by taiko on Oct 3, 2007 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn, I knew that the Royals got
him from the Braves......He's done some great things in a short time with KC.  I would have loved him here.  Maybe the Braves have someone else blocked in the office?  Please?

by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't be so hard on yourself.
It happened on a Sunday afternoon, August 22, 1982.

by Glenn Brummer stole home on Oct 3, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha
re-read it.
Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

preemptive>
My only thought is DeWitt sensed Tony wasn't coming back and Jocketty would follow him the next year.

DeWitt fires him a year early instead of having Jocketty in 08 but only treading water.

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why not wait until Tony tells him he is leaving
then?

Dave Duncan was on the radio just this morning talking about what they plan on doing next year.  I don't see Tony leaving without Dave.

Dave said he wanted Tony to outline how to retire as a Cardinals manager.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Office Politics
maybe the whispers regarding office dissension were true enough DeWitt felt it was an unhealthy, unproductive work environment.   If so, maybe DeWitt was picking a direction for the franchise by choosing which side needed to go.

by RedbirdRay on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True
I think this very well could be that, and in that case the interim GM stands no chance of becoming the full GM since he is a Jocketty side guy.  It will be interesting to see how DeWitt explains this.

From what I heard 550 AM will be carrying it and you can stream it over the net on their website. 4PM local time.

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is
exactly the reason this happened.  DeWitt had to make changes in the front office b/c they couldn't work together.  To me, this signals that DeWitt intends to go in a more developmental direction rather than a short-term playoff push.  This gives lip service to the idea that they want Tony back.  They can't exactly tell Tony they don't want him back but Walt's firing is a big signal that it's time to move in another direction.

This is an opportunity for this franchise.  They could really screw this up or turn this into a franchise that builds for the long-term and has one of the best minor league organizations in baseball.  I'm hoping for the latter.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is it
If the culture in the system top-to-bottom if as dysfunctional as Strauss' article made it sound, then a change needed to be made. I respect Jocketty and admire his career, but I trust our future in Luhnow and his cohort.

I don't know much about Mozeliak, perhaps someone should start a diary aggregating information and reports about him.

It looks like the La Russa and Jocketty hating fanatics have gotten their wish. I'll do my part in calling attention to the things they did to put the Cardinals in a position to rebuild capably. Jocketty could have made desperate moves last off-season and saddled the team with bad contracts. That he didn't is something to appreciate going forward, and a standard that his heirs will need to be held to.

by liam on Oct 3, 2007 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...
It makes all the sense in the world to fire him.

Dewitt wants to rebuild and become a player-development team.  Walt and Tony are guys that like veteran-laced, high-priced teams.  It just wasn't going to work moving forward and I applaud Dewitt for being proactive.  It was the right move.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no joke
paletta not getting it right the first time with rolen and not seeing other issues with carp and mulder sank this ship this year
they need to replace him yesterday
RESIGN JIMMY BALLGAME....HE SHOULD RETIRE A REDBIRD!

by benstl on Oct 3, 2007 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No matter what happened...
It's the end of an era. A very good one.
"I don't believe what I just saw!" ~ Jack Buck

by itsalemmon1019 on Oct 3, 2007 4:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I heartily agree
As a relatively young Cardinals fan (I started following them in 1996 when I was old enough), Jocketty and LaRussa is all I ever knew. Seeing them gone is truly the end of a great era, and it saddens me that I can no longer brag about having one of the best GM's in the game.

by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Saves us money
Look at it this way Jocketty and LaRussa gone save us some money - that will buy us another Kip Wells!

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

especially if they hired me
I'd do the job for free as long as they let me sleep in the ballpark (and gave me a daily hot dog allowance ;).

I think they still have top pay WJ for next year though, since he's under contract.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1
I'll volunteer as your assistant.

by kwhiteside on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wishful thinking?
Maybe the Yanks will get swept and we can get a Cashman/Torre combo.

by birdjam on Oct 3, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If it helps
calm the childish and unproductive rift in the from office, than good can come from it.   This certainly doesn't look like a decision based on performance, how much could Lunhow and Walt not like each other, had bad could it be.  
I love lamp

by Some witty name on Oct 3, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bernie on Mozeliak...
If Mozeliak gets the job, things can continue as normal.

Hell, he's the one who signed Franklin and Springer last offseason...

agents like him; Tony likes him.

--B

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sounds about right
If John gets the job - the odds of LaDunc staying are much higher IMO.

I'd like John as our GM - he'd bridge the gap between the way Jocketty did things and the new philosophy of the organization - "building from within."  

by silent_bob on Oct 3, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
I don't see myself losing any sleep over this. Maybe it's all of the washed up veterans we've been signing getting to my head, but refreshing our front office like this kind of excites me. A new face could be a good thing for this ballclub.
On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Oct 3, 2007 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did he really...
Did Mozeliak really sign Springer and Franklin? Is there a reference or a link to this somewhere? Do we have any other indication of his track record?

by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fired B/c of Luhnow
Isn't it clear that Jocketty was terminated because of conflicts with Dewitt's buddy Luhnow?

What is sad about this is that Jocketty is one of the premiere GM's in the league.  I'd say there is a 5% chance that we'll get someone better than him as a replacement, which is crazy.  Why terminate Jocketty if you've got him under contract through '08 if you don't even have a replacement?

I hope Dewitt's got a better plan in mind than what I'm imagining.  

So says, The Dude

by Titus Pullo on Oct 3, 2007 4:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it either
I don't see why you wouldn't just wait one year for his contract to be up.

I'm glad that it's Mozeliak and not Lunlow in the interim.

by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe Jocketto told them
he had offers or wanted a particular job that was open now.

by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interim
Interim tends to mean absolutely nothing.  He may be out of a job before we know it.

It is very hard to comment on this stuff since none of has have any clue as to what goes on behind closed doors.

I would hope Mozeliak takes over and Tony and Dave stay for a few more years.  I wish the best to Walt but maybe this may help ease some tension.

Who knows?

I don't really see this as a good day by anymeans.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He didn't wait
b/c it would mean another year of discord in the front office.  I think this was the time for a change. Waiting another year just to save the rest of the $$$ on Walt's contract would have put off the change that needs to take place in the organization.  It likely would have meant spending more $$ on older, higher-priced players and less emphasis on younger players.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Refresh my memory
Luhnow is a sabermetrics guy?  A player development guy?  Just someone's pet?  

by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Numbers guy
He came out of nowhere and got put in charge of player development, putting one of Jocketty's close friends out of a job, and creating a bit of a front office schism.  He's some business degree accountant type guy.

by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Accountant
maybe he's the guy that convinced Bill to tell people we spent $102 M in payroll this year when in reality, $10 M of that is deferred to 2012.

Or the fuzzy math that has the Cards reporting $96 M in payroll towards luxury tax yet telling the papers we crested at $102.

A good accountant is indispesible.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Judge of Talent
"A good accountant is indispesible"

So is a good judge of talent.  The farm system has done a 180 since he was hired...give him his due.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Out of nowhere
It depends on what you mean "out of nowhere".  I mean, he was hired as VP of baseball development 4 years ago this month.  

If you mean prior to that, then from a baseball standpoint, I agree.  If you mean prior to being given his new job last year, then I don't.

by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry should have clarified
I just meant that he didn't have a background in baseball.

by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Surprised
This is quite a shock, but probably a step in the right direction.  

Walt was great, and probably will go on to do a great job in another city.  And I'll have fond memories of everything he did for the Cardinals over the past 13 years.

With that being said - this team needs to get younger, and Walt has been a trade guy, not a development guy.  Ditto for Tony.  The team needs to rely on youth in the short term, not veterans.  This is a step in that direction.

And if there really were personality problems between "Walt's guys" and "Jeff's guys", then once again, this was needed.  You have to stick with the guys of the future, not the guys that aren't as well equiped to deal with the business at hand.

by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your points
but I wish I weren't looking forward to a sucky season or 2 or 3.

by sdrone on Oct 3, 2007 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just sad
Whether the real reason was internal strife or not, this will be widely perceived as Jocketty taking the fall for a bad Cardinals season.  When the blame did not really fall on him, for the most part.

The organization does need an overhaul, but the results of that overhaul are years away.  Who better to keep the team "competitive" in the interim than Jocketty?  How many gems has he mined, how much lead turned into gold?  Granted, some of the lead, like Kip Wells, remained lead, but no alchemist is 100 percent successful.

by blove121 on Oct 3, 2007 4:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

agreed
I agree change is always good and we know Tony and Dave will really only be around a few more years at most.

Walt is a top 5 GM along with Tony and Dave being top 5 coaches.  You don't just replace those guys and do well right away.  This organization may struggle and it is too bad that the Cardinals may just be awful during Albert's prime.

Enjoy Albert being good when the team sucks.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
This season waasn't really any one's fault.

You can't blame DeWitt for being stingy with money, money was made available for guys that went elsewhere.  You can't blame Jocketty for the lack of available talent on the market.  All things considered, I thought TLR did a good job this year, what with all the tragedies this team had to endure.  And you can't blame Dave Duncan for not being able to get Cy Young out of Kip Wells.

This whole thing strikes me as A Very Bad Move.  

by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

30 Minutes later
Now that I am over the shock of this (it was pretty quick) this makes sense from an organizational development perspective.

The owners have a vision of how this franchise will succeed both financially and on the field (even though these are very closely related) - through internal player development. The only way the franchise is going to move in that direction is by a commitment by everyone in the organizations leadership to that vision. That starts with the GM, the manager, the staff, etc.

Now what do you do with anyone that does not share your vision? The most successful organizations will purge those that do not share in the vision and that is why Walt's dismissal is not as shocking.

by bdief on Oct 3, 2007 4:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wacky
Things have certainly gone haywire there in the last year. I'm not sure I have ever seen a team turn a world championship into such a carnival of misadventures. There is very little the St. Louis Cardinals have done right as an organization since the World Series parade.

Walt included. He was a very, very good GM, as good or better as any GM in baseball through 2006. But he spent much of the last year airing his grievances to Peter Gammons and other people in the national media and now he seems to have gotten his wish, a separation from the Cardinals.

by Youneverknow on Oct 3, 2007 4:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jocketty
I'd actually go further and say that he didn't even do a great job in 2006, World Series or not.  

Seriously - trades for Ron Belliard, Jeff Weaver, Preston Wilson, Jorge Sosa, and Jose Vizcaino worked out due to 80% luck and 20% skill.

Granted, we don't know what he had to work with money wise.  But those moves should not have resulted in a World Series ring.  I'm glad they did, but...

by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Post W.S. Carnival
Remember the Marlins after their 1997 WS win and then they sold the team off.  Maybe we're following their lead.

Not the historical company I'd like to be in.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
They did win the WS 6 years later.  It's not like they totally tanked.  They did a great job of rebuilding after that sell off.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks DeWitt, for being bold.
Boldness is good, it's what I have wanted to see this offseason.  Will the follow-up decisions be good ones?  That's the pudding wherein is the proof.  But I think this transition had to happen.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 4:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It was time for Jocketty to go...
not that I'm especially happy to see him get the ax. He was the architect of one of the best runs in the history of the franchise, but he's not the right guy to rebuild going forward. We need someone who can eek out marginal advantages here and there from the inefficiencies in the market. Waiting for lopsided deals and picking over the remains of moribund franchises is not going to get it done.

I don't know much about Mozeliak... Give me Antonetti or DePodesta.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Educate me
What has DePodesta done that is so wonderful?

by boredatwork on Oct 3, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

quite a bit...
He correctly identified the skills and acquired the following players:
  • Jeff Kent
  • Brad Penny
  • Milton Bradley
  • Derek Lowe
He correctly sold high (or let go) on these guys:
  • Paul LoDuca
  • Juan Encanacion
  • Adrian Beltre
  • Shawn Green
  • Hideo Nomo

by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DePodesta was a huge factor
in the turnaround in the Dodgers drafting system.  I'd be thrilled if we lured him away from other ventures.

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DePodesta?!
you kidding me? the guy that singlehandedly ruined the dodgers? if he came here he'd prolly trade away yadi or wainwright, like how he got rid of lo duca and other fan faves. In my opinion all those moneyball guys are overrated

by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

EXACTLY

by boredatwork on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll leave it to others to explain
but this article really sums up why people on this site like him.

by Just Rope Ball on Oct 3, 2007 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whatever
I wouldn't laud anyone for signing J.D. Drew to anything.

by boredatwork on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...
JD only posted an OPS+ of 132 as a Dodger.

What a woeful deal that was!!!

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...
people on this site think it's a good thing when a GM leads his team to the playoffs for after a long dry spell. Why does this need to be explained?
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But but but...
he didn't play pro-ball.  He's a Harvard grad.  He can't be a good GM.</sarcasm>

I don't know if the advantage of having a "Moneyball" GM is a great as it was 5 years ago, since the majority (prolly all) use the approach.  They key will still be finding an undervalued type of player to augment the stars on your team.

by Just Rope Ball on Oct 3, 2007 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really all that needs to be said
The guy made good moves and clearly has balls.
Cheeseburger in paradise.

by joker24 on Oct 3, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's more valuable...
Lo Duca or Penny?
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i believe "lo duca" means
"the fifty-cent piece" so that's more than a penny
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DePodesta
Got a raw deal b/c he made a somewhat blockbuster deal that didn't work out right away, and he did it in the middle of a season.  It was a gamble and a half and didn't work out in the short term, so dumbbuckets like Bill Plaschke pretty much ran him out of town (he called DePodesta "Google Boy" way to show a high level of maturity and journalistic skill, you dweeb).  

I think he did some pretty good stuff for the Dodgers and am shocked no one else gave him a shot.  I think the only mistake he made w/ the LoDuca etc for Penny etc trade was the timing.  But in all reality the Dodgers got the guy who was the 3rd best pitcher in the NL this year out of it, and lost Mota, Encarnacion, and Lo Duca.  Not too bad in the long run honestly.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 4, 2007 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

anyone know
if a st louis radio station will be carrying the press conference?

by truemun12 on Oct 3, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

News conference audio
where one can listen to the news conference?

I just turned to KTRS right now and their saying nothing.

Has anybody tried KMOX or anything else?

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 4:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

590
Someone on stltoday said that 590 will have it, I would try 590, 550, and 1380 to see if any of those have it.

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

on 550 ktrs
website it says it is going to carry it

by truemun12 on Oct 3, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ktrs.com
i am listening to commentary now

by StLHugo on Oct 3, 2007 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

scout.com has it archived
not sure if it's on mlb.com or not, but it's available here:

http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/686746.html

You might need a subscription to the site to hear it, but I'm not sure.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DEWITT
Well Dewitt still needs to spend money.  We have no shot at competing with the Cubs if we think we are going to develope a bunch of talent.  We are at the point where Albert is going to be in his prime the next 6-7 years so lets get this thing fixed asap!!  We do not want to look back at this 13 years from now saying how we wasted the prime of one of the best players in the game.

I just have a bad feeling about things.  Change is good but I don't see an owner who is that great either.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hmmm...
..."time to move forward with an undivided vision.."

by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Let the Depodesta era
begin!

by johnnyawesomo on Oct 3, 2007 5:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

who was that that interjected
"... continuity without a common purpose... blah, blah, blah."??

by _pistol_ on Oct 3, 2007 5:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

quotes from dewitt...
"...clearly there was tension in the organization..."

"...tension got to the point is was counter-productive..."

"...division in the organization is well documented in the press....

"lunow is not a candidate for the gm position"

"tony and walt are close.  had a good conversation with tony.  wants dewitt to consider someone with alot of walt's characteristics.  we want tony and his staff back and told him as much."

by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jocketty
It sounds like the rumors of Walt going here and there during the season really ticked off DeWitt.  Understandably so if he were campaigning for said jobs while under contract.

by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if that's just lip service
Because it really doesn't make sense to me to fire Walt and keep Tony.  If it's going to be regime change, why not do it across the board?

by stl tyler on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed
i feel like dewitt knows that tony and walt are a packaged deal.  getting rid of walt = getting rid of tony.  

and that's probably the right answer....as much as it pains me to say it.

by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lip service
DeWitt spent all year telling anyone that would listen that Walt was sticking around.

He says every year they are going to 'keep the powder dry' to spend on 'the right type of player' if the become availible.

DeWitt is all about lip service.

He must think Roberto Clemente is going to be put on the waiver wire.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you like
the direction this team is heading?

You seem pretty PO'd with Billy Boy.

I applaud the man.  He has a plan and he is going to move forward with it.  I like his plan and think it will work.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You and I are on the same page
Now I just really, really hope TLR follow Walt out the door.  

Just say no to mid priced replacement level talent.

Next we need to let Miles, So, Cairo, and Maroth walk.  Then trade Flores.  Don't spend any new money on outfielders unless they are young and can really rake (900+ ops types).

If Pinero will sign for the right $$$ amount, great.  Otherwise see ya.

Lets not give some washed up pitcher 4-6M just so we can have a Vet.  Lets not trade young players just to get a vet.

Overspending is by definition never the right answer.  

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nail on the head...
"Just say no to mid priced replacement level talent."

You are exactly correct.  I'm not saying don't spend money...I'm saying spend it smartly.  Quit tying up 20% of your payroll in Walt and Tony's beloved gritmeisters.

Overspend on premium talent, and fill the other holes with cheap, young players.  It's a great philosophy in my opinion.  I love the direction this team is going and couldn't be happier with this decision.  Now Tony/Dave need to be the next ones to go.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+2
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

unbelievable
you love that it's going down the toilet? you think they are going to be replaced by perfect, omnipotent beings who never make mistakes? you think these new people are going to magically fix anthony reyes and let brendan ryan start and that's going to solve all the franchise's problems? what level of success would it have taken or tony/dave/walt to actually satisfy you? three straight nlcs appearances, five in seven years, playoffs almost every year this decade, two world series, first world series win since 1982? i am baffled by the unrealistic expectations and the ingratitude of people on here, who seem to conveniently ignore the fact that ANY replacements are also going to be fallible human beings who make mistakes.

by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If next year is tough
you're going to say "I told you so," aren't you?

by spants on Oct 4, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We disagree
I think this is a step in the right direction.  We had been on a 4 year downward trend.  We needed to reverse that, this is a good step in doing so.

It may take a year or two to turn it around.  I understand that and think its the right thing to do.

by DriverZn on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

An easy way of reversing that is
by not letting your starting Gold Glove SS, a reliable #3 starter, 2 above average 2B walk out the door in a 3 year span because the 'money wasn't right'.

It would also help to reverse it by making a significant free agent signing over that span as well.  And no, Ryan Franklin doesn't count.

The Cardinals in 2005 were 2 games away from the World Series.  They let Reggie Sanders, Larry Walker, Matt Morris, and Mark Grudzielanek walk out the door, all of which accounted for $15.25 M in payroll.  They replaced them with Larry Bigbie, Juan Encarnacion, Sydney Ponson and Aaron Miles/Timo Perez.  That came to $6.5 M.  A team on the cusp of winning it all used that extra payroll to sign Braden Looper and a bunch of other middle of the road players to replace 2 OF bats, one of the winningest pitchers in Cardinals histroy and a very servicable 2B.

In 2007, the purged the midseason pickups of Ronnie Belliard (another above average 2B), Jeff Weaver (better than the crap we threw out there), Jeff Suppan (reliable starter over recent run of success) and Jason Marquis (frustrating starter who could be really good or God awful).

Is the trend really because the Cardinals were unable to develop talent from their minor league system since 2005? (Adam Wainwright, Chris Duncan, Rick Ankiel, Tyler Johnson, Brad Thompson) Or is it a complete lack of devoting the funds from management to replace talent with talent?

The team kept getting cheaper and cheaper (talent wise and spending wise).  People say the 'game passed Walt by' while he was on the job because of the way teams are valuing their farm systems now.  I'd say the game passed the Cardinals by when it comes to comitting to 5th and 6th years on players contracts.  While DeWitt sat around finding ways to defer money until after we are all dead and hoping players would sign the same contract but with less years than another teams offer, the talent level of the team slipped more and more.

Putting more value in the farm system is a great idea.  But in this baseball climate, in which owners are seeing the highest revenue ever with attendance records being set each year, why the hell should teams payrolls be getting smaller?  and that's exactly what is going to happen when Bill DeWitt uses statements like "our market dictated this".

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You just don't get it...
You throw the blame of a declining team on the guy footing the bill rather than the guy who's job is to contruct the roster?

Are you reading what you type?

Every GM in baseball has a budget, except two, and 20 other GMs have less of a budget than Walt.

He knew what funds he had available and allocating them poorly...end of story.

Let me guess. It was Dewitt who was behind the signings of Edmonds, Mulder, Kennedy, Carpenter(with still a year on his deal, and a history of injury).  Was it Dewitt who shipped out Haren/Barton/Calero for a grizzled vet who's arm was falling off?

The amount spent isn't poor...the way it was spent is.

Here is the main thing you are missing...player development.  If you have a steady stream of young talent you are able to afford the premium free agents on the same budget.  If you fill out some starters, and the fringes of your roster with cheap players...it leaves the big dollars to be spent on actual difference makers.  Instead of signing all the market value talent he could, he should have been focusing on how he could get the best talent.  The philosophy is flawed and it isn't working.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you this warm in your everyday life
or just on the intertubes?

I'm the one that doesn't get it?  Edmonds was signed to a 2 year deal for cheaper than just about any FA OF on the market.  Mark Mulder came in 2005, was one of the Top 20 pitchers in the NL and helped bolster a rotation that was tops in the National League that year.

When ownership won't pony up to add extra years to guys like Burnett and Renteria, you are left trying to sign the damaged goods of Mulder's and Edmonds in hopes of squeezing 2 good years out of them.

Am I to believe that you don't think Chris Carpenter won't return from TJ surgery by 2010?  Cause the new contract only increased payroll for 2007 and 2008 by $4 M.  Even still, Chris Carpenter got a 5 year extension which in reality was only a 3 year extension on his current contract.

When you aren't given the freedom to offer the extra year or the extra million to lure a FA to St. Louis, you are left having to sign the Adam Kennedy's of the world.

Jocketty and LaRussa have made it clear all season that they wanted DeWitt to give them the proper funds to go out and get the talent needed to compete.  Do you honestly believe they would be asking for it if it already existed.

Of course you need a farm system to compliment the superstar contracts to balance out the payroll.  You have that in Duncan, Ankiel, Ludwick, Molina, and Wainwright.  If Anthony Reyes hadn't shriveled up, he'd have been another name to throw into that ring.  But what were they complimenting?  Albert Pujols and Scott Rolen, I get that.  Juan Encarnacion?  Adam Kennedy? David Eckstein?  Braden Looper?

Pujols and Rolen signed their deals in 03 and 04 respectively.  Before the Carpenter deal, what superstar contract did DeWitt hand out in 05 or 06?  Nada.  Walt went out and got what had been one of the best pitchers in the AL in Mark Mulder who would only cost the team $6 M each of the years he had left on his contract.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, you are the one that doesn't get it.
Walt made a lot of bad decisions.  If it hadnt been for the dumb Mulder deal he would have had money for some of those other position.

How were we susposed to replace Walker?  The choices were pretty bleak.  Giles was imo the best option at the time.  

Which free agent did we miss out on that would have been a diffrence maker?  By all means tell us.

by DriverZn on Oct 4, 2007 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would have had some money
he put together the best pitching staff in the NL in 2005 for $17 M.  In 2006, a season that followed a disappointment that left the Cardinals 2 games away from a pennant, payroll went down.

The Cardinals followed that season by increasing this years payroll $2 M over the 2005 mark.  

The Dodgers, the model of which many want this team to take, had a payroll of $83 M in 2005.  It went up $15 M the next year and $10 M the year after that.  The Dodgers payroll increased $25 M over that span.  The Cardinals, $2 M.

Keeping up with the rest of the league doesn't just fall on player development.  The Cardinals didn't keep up with replacing superstar talent through free agency.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

which superstar players
do you think the cardinals should have spent their money on in these last 2 years?

regarding the dodgers --- they signed schmidt, wolf, garciaparra, and gonzalez this off-season --- yet they only won 4 games more than st louis. the astros took on carlos lee and woody williams --- they finished behind the cardinals. the giants in the last few years have signed zito, morris, matheney, bengie molina, steve kline, plus paid megabucks to re-sign ray durham and bonds . . . .they finished last.

given the fact that many of the cardinals' own highest-salaried players --- rolen, carpenter, edmonds, mulder --- have been nonfactors or worse over the past few years, how can you remain convinced that $$$$ = wins?

by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 2:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Dodgers
were attempting to build a core, not replenish it.  The Cardinals still had a relatively young Albert Pujols to build around.  The 'non-factor' Chris Carpenter has only been so THIS year.  And even then, they did literally nothing to surround him with better pitching this year.  They attempted to get Jason Schmidt (which would have been a disaster), didn't seem to interested in Gil Meche but really went after Miguel Batista.

The Giants had nothing really in the way of young talent and had to try to rebuild an entire franchise in a few off-seasons.

The Astros lost two exceptional pitchers in the off-season (Pettitte and Clemens) and addressed another need they had all of last year (offense).  

The Cardinals needed to add another bat to that roster.  They've needed to for 2 years now.  Whether they had to do it by trade or by free agent signing, it had to be done.  The Chris Duncans and Rick Ankiels are those extra slide in starters or bench players that put teams over the top. They can be starters on this team, don't get me wrong, but the Cardinals gave up on above average talen in RF, SS and 2B for 3 years now.

The Cardinals farm system is in better shape than the Giants or the Astros, which isn't really saying much.  But at the MLB level, the Cardinals still had youth and talent in their rotation and lineup, something neither the Giants or Astros did.

For the Cardinals to add a Carlos Lee or a Barry Zito (yuck), it would be a replacement of talent being lost in 2009 that compliments what is on the team now.  

The AJ Burnett deal, which I didn't think was worth it when the Cardinals actually tried to put together a starting rotation seems like it was a bigger miss by not offering him the extra year simply because it would have filled another rotation slot for next year with talent, something that doesn't seem likely now.

Rolen's $12 M comes off the books in 2010.  Do we think the Cardinals are going to replace that chunk of payroll by paying a very talented player from within or with a big name FA?  I personally don't.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I am always warm...
"Edmonds was signed to a 2 year deal for cheaper than just about any FA OF on the market."

Cheap yes...productive no.

"Mark Mulder came in 2005, was one of the Top 20 pitchers in the NL and helped bolster a rotation that was tops in the National League that year."

Mulder was solid in '05, not the top of the rotation starter he was billed as but solid.  Unfortunately, Haren was better in '05 and going forward it's only getting worse.  Not to mention we gave up our best prospect at the time, and a cheap serviceable reliever.  It was a bad, bad trade and there is no getting around it.

"When you aren't given the freedom to offer the extra year or the extra million to lure a FA to St. Louis, you are left having to sign the Adam Kennedy's of the world."

Again, nobody twisted Walt's arm.  Kennedy was his guy.  Walt knew the funds available and the team that was under .500 the past two years is what he created with it.  Many teams did more with less.

If you are saying that with an unlimited payroll that Walt would field a good team...then I agree, but so would a monkey.

Again, we've consistently had a top 10 payroll for years now and Walt managed to put a team on the field that played less than .500 ball the past two seasons.  That's a poor job anyway you slice it.

Quit crying payroll.  There is more than enough money being spent to win.  It's just not being spent wisely, and that falls on the shoulders of Walt.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RE unbelievable
"you love that it's going down the toilet?"

The sky is NOT falling.  The team is not going down the toilet.  They are going in a different direction...one they need to go in.  With the amount of payroll tied up in unproductive players, and no trading chips at his disposal do you really think Walt could fix this mess.  Tony/Walt were ready to sell the farm in order for one last push.  Terrible idea imo.

"you think they are going to be replaced by perfect, omnipotent beings who never make mistakes?"

no

"you think these new people are going to magically fix anthony reyes and let brendan ryan start and that's going to solve all the franchise's problems?"

absolutely not

"what level of success would it have taken or tony/dave/walt to actually satisfy you? three straight nlcs appearances, five in seven years, playoffs almost every year this decade, two world series, first world series win since 1982?"

Who said I wasn't satisfied?  They have had a great run here, and it's run its course.  This team is in a big downward spiral, and their philosophy of putting band-aids on gaping wounds isn't going to work.  They are not going to have another 13th rounder turn into Albert Pujols, or have another reclamation project become a CY winner.  Look at the guys record the past couple of years...it's time for a change.  The days of getting Scott Rolen's and Jim Edmonds' for nothing are over...ESPECIALLY when you don't have the payroll flexibility to eat large contracts.  He flat out refused to develop his own talent...it's time for him to go.

 "i am baffled by the unrealistic expectations and the ingratitude of people on here, who seem to conveniently ignore the fact that ANY replacements are also going to be fallible human beings who make mistakes."

Don't be baffled.  It's painfully obvious that it's time for a change if you know where to look.

Again, I applaud Mr Dewitt for being proactive and choosing a direction.  Bravo!

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Someone with Walts Charecteristics"
Does that mean Mozeliak ?
The Red Blazer

by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Candidates all over America
are dyeing their hair white right now.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jocketty
Wow, what a bummer.  I can't believe that this won't domino to include Tony and Duncan as well.  I guess that a lot of people are starting to get what they want, but I'm willing to bet they might not like how it plays out.

It's going to be a rough stretch of years ahead.  Don't count on Albert staying in St. Louis after 2010.

"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pujols
There's no way anyone can predict in 2007 what Albert Pujols is going to do in 2010.  For all we know, he'll become the player manager next year and be given part ownership of the team.

If the Cards suck for the next 3 years?  Sure, Albert will likely go.  But saying he's gone in 3 years now is a knee-jerk reaction.

by Robb on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not so fast
Yes it is knee jerk to say he is gone for sure.  But if Tony leaves and the Cardinals mess things up the next few years it is not a far streatch to say Albert will be gone.

I for one do not want to see Albert gone.  Out team looks a lot worse and farther away from hope with Albert gone.

I think that is why Tony will be treated well.  I think Dewitt is not a moron.  He knows not to ruffle Alberts feathers.  

And believe me if Albert is gone in 2010 it will be really, really, really bad.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Albert ever plays anywhere else
DeWitt is going to have ~2 million residents burning effigies of him.
Cheeseburger in paradise.

by joker24 on Oct 3, 2007 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please reread
The post more carefully.  I said "Don't count on Albert..."  I didn't say he would definitely be gone, and I don't see how what I wrote could possibly be interpretetd that way.  Catch your breath and breathe slowly.

What I wrote is not a prediction (at least certainly not a strong one) and it's certainly not a knee jerk reaction.  I don't know for certain if Albert will or won't be here after 2010.  I don't have a crystal ball, and neither does anyone else on VEB.  

I was just expressing a thought based on concurring with statements in one of the earlier posts whcih mentioned the Cardinals are likely to go through a rough stretch in the upcoming years and this corresponds to Albert's prime career slot.  I think it's possible the situation will wear on Albert and he might want to go elsewhere unless things are largely turned around by 2010.  That's going to be a tall order for the organization.

"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
that would certainly enter into the scenario.  I just don't know if it would be enough to offset a theoretical lack of player talent if that's where the Cards find themselves in 2010.
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's a very good point
who wants to play for a rotten team, especially when they are used to being champions?  Look at how depressed Pujols was in not getting to the playoffs.  I don't think he'll take that for long, not if he has a choice about it.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing Albert is, is a professional.
He will play for whatever manager he's assigned to play for.  If he's not happy he will sign somewhere else when he's a free agent.  He may want to go out on the big stage, say New York or Boston, no matter who the manager is.  He has a long term contract with the Cards and I expect he will honor it.

by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah
but I can imagine Albert whining a little bit if next year (or '09) are losing years.  Kind of like the ASG complaint; he'll bitch a bit, and then toe the company line the rest of the season.

by spants on Oct 3, 2007 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ankiel is a more immediate consideration
since it was Walt who convinced him to stay and it's reported that he has a close relationship with him (as does Edmonds).  If Walt and Tony go, I doubt we'll hold onto Ankiel.  

I agree about Pujols and would also throw in Yadi.  Having a "core" to this team may very well become a thing of the past.  And if it does, you can also say goodbye to Wainwright and other young players who have voiced pride in the culture of the "Cardinal's clubhouse."  I can't see that they would have reason to stick around.

I'm all for player development.  But I'm not at all sure, given the Cards' draft picks this year, that the people in development know how to build a good farm system.

Overall, I think it was a terrible decision and will likely mean that we will not be in contention for a long time.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with nycardfan
everyone who came on here and complained about "ladunketty" is going to get what they wanted and have to live with it. it is beyond me how people could be down on these guys. yes, they have made mistakes, but they have been one of the best managing/coaching combinations in baseball for the past decade. everybody wants to "build from within" and "go young," not acknowledging that there have been plenty of young players on the team over the past few years and that it takes a mix of youth and veterans to have a really good team. here we have had one of the most successful teams in pro sports for the last decade and people seemingly want us to turn into the devil rays. good luck finding a new gm (and manager, if it comes to that) who is as good as these guys have been.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jeez, you act like these are the
only "winners" in the world.  I count 11 non-Cardinal teams that won the WS while Jock/TLR have been in STL.  There ARE a few other guys who can build championship clubs, and every generation produces a new batch of such guys.  Cheer up!

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So....
All of the good players on this team are going to follow Walt and Tony out the door?

I think you may be overreacting a little.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 3, 2007 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Ankiel very well could
and depending on who the new manager is, others who have special relations with them (like Pujols and Yadi) may decide to leave.  We're not in any danger of losing Rolen!  

Much will depend on the morale of the clubhouse and whether they see themselves as a team who can still be in contention.  If it's in a 'developmental' stage for 2-3 years, why would people who are used to being in the playoffs want to stay?  

They want to win, and they want to win now while they are in their prime.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jackson, Lincoln, Hamilton,
Jefferson, Franklin and Washington are the only "special relations" that most players are interested in ... including our guys.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you think Pujols doesn't care about
being on a team that can be in contention evey year (and is only interested in money), then I don't think you understand his competitive drive, or that of many other people on our team.  

When they are able to make a decision, I'm sure many of our top players will consider whether the Cardinals is still a club that can be immediately successful in the post-season.  

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ankiel doesn't get a choice about
moving.  he's still under team control thru his arbitration years.

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

New Manager
I think Pujols' happiness could depend on who is managing this team. I think it is common knowledge that most of the Latin players are quite friendly with Oquendo. If the Cardinals go outside of the organization, does this cause a rift between the organizations and those Latin players? www.whiteyball.com
www.whiteyball.com

by whiteyball on Oct 3, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sad Day
Here is a GM that pulled off some of the greatest trades in team history. Renteria, Clark, McGwire, Edmonds, Rolen, Woody, Kile

Walt will be missed

Come on You Redbirds--Mike Shannon

by BluesDrummer85 on Oct 3, 2007 5:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hear, hear.
i just hope he doesn't go to a central division rival

by PolancoMcEwing on Oct 3, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rebuilding
Depodesta is the guy who drafted and traded to get all of those young Dodger players who Cards fans are theoretically trying to trade for.

by johnnyawesomo on Oct 3, 2007 5:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

is there a plan????
that's really what i want to see.  i don't like getting rid of walt.  end of a really, really good era.  

but okay....you want to get rid of him, you want to change the philosophy and walt's not on board...okay.  fine.  

but i want a plan.  it's one thing to fire someone but something completely different to HIRE someone.  

who are we going to get that is an UPGRADE from walt?  fire walt?  fine.  but who are we going to get that's better.  

i want to see a plan.  and right soon, mr. dewitt.

by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 5:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Best post!
You said it best.

Change is good especially in professional sports.  New ideas/people can bee good.

If Walt was causing problems and has been doing so for a while, fine.  

I agree with you.  We better not be firing him because he is not getting along with a guy who is buddy, buddy with Mr. Dewitt.

Mr. Dewitt better have a for sure person waiting in the wings.  A good person at that.

You better have a top notch guy because it is a horrible move if you do not have a top notch replacement lined up.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why not?
"We better not be firing him because he is not getting along with a guy who is buddy, buddy with Mr. Dewitt"

Part of a professional's job is to interface with people whom they disagree with.  If WJ's ego was preventing him from having civilized discussions with someone that WJ's employer felt had ideas worth considering, as has been mentioned by Bernie and others, then he should be replaced with someone who is capable of behaving professionally.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Business
This happens alot. The owner has a good general manager in place doing a good job. The owner hires one of his buddies to work in the organization and the buddy is very ambitious and talks to the owner around the general manager's back. The buddy has all kinds of ideas and produces some convincing, yet questionable numbers. He shows these to the owner without telling the general manager. The owner starts talking about all of these new plans. (which may have serious flaws.) The general manager starts to figure out where those plans came from and sees flaws in them. He tell the buddy that he should go through him instead of around him to the owner and that his plans have flaws. The buddy starts telling the owner that the GM is hard to work with and doesn't know what he is talking about and that he is out to get him. (and chooses a couple of mistakes that the GM has made in the past as examples.) He tells the owner that the GM is making the owner look bad behind his back. The GM finds this out. He defends his position, but by this time, the owner no longer trusts the GM because his buddy has completely undermined him. The split becomes unworkable and the owner makes a choice...I am going with my buddy.

It happens everyday.

How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that may be how it happened
But in my opinion your statement "which have serious flaws" should be phrased "which the GM believes may have serious flaws".  We don't know what those plans or ideas were, so we aren't qualified to pass judgment on them at this point. All we know is a small amount about what WJ's reactions to them were.

The GM has as much opportunity to convince the owner that the ideas have flaws as the other has to convince him that they are good.  If he is unable to do argue convincingly for his convictions, then he is either wrong (which is probably the case given his apparent dismissal of pretty much any sabermetric ideas) or he is just not the right fit for the organization.  

Reasonable men can agree to disagree, and can argue against each other passionately while maintaining a professional working relationship.  Refusing to speak to another member of the organization because he doesn't agree with you is not acceptable, regardless of whether that person is a "baseball man" or not.

It would be interesting to know the whole story here, but we never will.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Baseball
Oh, was I talking about baseball in that paragraph? I thought I was just venting about work...just kidding:) I did write "may have serious flaws" in my original post and yes, I did mean in the eyes of the GM.

This was a post about how it happens in business all the time and much of it seems to possibly apply to the Cardinals' situation.

In many cases, the GM character does not get to argue his point properly because the buddy's point has already been driven into the owner's head as the correct one. The GM becomes out of the loop and plans are being put in place without his knowledge and he gets blindsided by it one day. (With the GM losing credibility for not knowing what is going on.) This is when the rift often starts.

Grown men can argue their points and discuss them rationally, but when both men are busy with separate tasks and they have to force an interaction with the other...it is more likely that they will avoid contact unless absolutely necessary if they dislike each other.

As far as the not speaking to each other...that is a decision made by both parties. Both are to blame, but this often happens when one consistently uses the others' words against him in private conversations with the owner.

I don't know how much this plays into the Cards' situation, but it smells like it went this way to a certain extent. Lunhow is a stat guy and Walt is a character type guy. This is sales versus marketing in any company. They both want the same thing, but don't agree on how to get there.

As far as who is right or wrong, the buddy in these circumstances is wrong for not working through the proper channels, but probably did so to save time and get quicker feedback. The GM in these circumstances was likely wrong for not getting the 3 men in the room together to work it out. As far as who's plan is right or wrong, in the Cardinals' case, that would likely be impossible to tell for a couple of years.

Who is to blame? Where was Mark Lamping in all of this? Isn't he the team president? And if DeWitt knew all about this, why didn't he play more of a referee? (Maybe they both tried...who the heck knows)

How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why do you blame walt?
and not the others? you are not there. we're not there. we don't know what goes on in the front office. but to say he doesn't act "professionally" is not something you (or any of us) has the right to say. show some respect for one of the people who has helped make this such a great team for such a long time, this past rough year excepted.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

here, here
and besides, why believe DeWitt without other perspectives having been voiced?  He's the one who has been raking in all the money and refusing to invest in the team.  He's the last person I'd believe to give me a straight story.

Walt just got fired.  Of course the person who fired him is going to make it out to be all his fault.  DeWitt could look foolish for this decision.  He has to try to spin things his way while he can.

And for all those who expect great things to come of this, remember that DeWitt holds the purse strings.  He could very well hire a cheap manager and make cheap investments in player development.  We've seen no real investment strategy from him.  

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you and I are generally in agreement
I'm not one of your "ladunketty" haters; I'm just trying to make sense of this.  I do find it ironic that you choose to order me to show WJ respect when I was replying to a post which accused the owner of the franchise of cronyism in an extremely disrespectful manner.

Where's the respect for the man who's paid for all of this good baseball?

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, sorry if i misread you
i must have missed the context and wasn't trying to attack you personally, more the whole "good riddance" vibe. i don't have a real opinion on dewitt, but i agree that so far he has gotten really good results, and people should definitely respect that. sorry again.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

right, dewitt did a great job of paying
for all our "good baseball" this year; thanks for not giving Walt and Tony the support they needed to build a winning team.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny
I find it ironic that you are now accusing me of writing a post accusing the owner of cronyism in an extremely disrespectful manner...I wrote a post about a "potential scenario" that maybe could have included cronyism and you will noticed that names were not used to further distance the post from an accusation. It is all speculation.

I like and respect Dewitt and I think player development is a necessity, but did his relationship with Lunhow influence this decision? It sure does look like it (IM0)...not that it is necessarily a bad thing or a real thing. If this situation leads to greater success for the organization, that is great. Walt won't go hungry.

The decision sure does point toward further house cleaning. LaRussa and Duncan have both implied that they need alot of help for 2008. The FA market sucks...and Dewitt implied that we are not likely to trade top prospects. That will make it very difficult to upgrade.

How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Oct 3, 2007 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i apologize
the words "buddy, buddy" set off a knee-jerk reaction that probably wasn't warranted, upon re-reading your post.  IMO a lot of very serious accusations are being levied at DeWitt in this thread and I just picked a convenient target to vent my disagreement.

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree
especially about the buddy buddy part.  The draft this year gave me zero confidence in the player development side of the team.

I wanted to hear a plan or a philosophy today on the radio to justify firing one of the best GM's around.  Who is better?  Why?  Where does DeWitt want to take the Cardinals.  All I know is that he holds tight purse strings.  That doesn't give me confidence.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly right
that's what i wanted to hear.  but all we got were excuses.

maybe there is a plan and he has a short list of people that are an upgrade.  for all "live-and-die with the cardinals" fans like myself out there, i hope this is the case.

but i sure have this gnawing feeling in my gut that is screaming out "no plan...no plan...NO F'ING PLAN!!!"

 

by busch league on Oct 3, 2007 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Luhnow has a history of reading
VEB, and of being a "friend" of this site, through interviews, etc.  I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt when it comes to brains and competence.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know that DeWitt cares what the opinion
of the fan base towards him is.  That isn't meant to be a slight, I just honestly don't know if he cares or not.

If he did, you should expect the Cardinals to overpay for atleast 1 'name' FA or atleast trade for one.

  • No increase in payroll after World Series Title.
  • Failure to sign Edgar Renteria, AJ Burnett, Miguel Batista, World Series hero Jeff Weaver, etc in a successive stretch of seasons.
  • Hodge podge rotation falls apart.
  • Team fails to reach the postseason for only 2nd time this decade.
  • No real help coming from the minor leagues.
  • Architect of one of the greatest stretches in teams history is fired because of feuding with front office people you installed replacing his people.
The organization looks like a mess and the owner looks to be going 'cheaper' and more 'yes men' as the money keeps rolling in.

If DeWitt cared about public opinion, he'd allow the Cardinals to bid on a 'name' and attempt to land him to usher in the new GM as 'capable'.

But I don't know if he cares to or if he will.  He could just decide to fully embrace rebuilding and allow the team to ride out these contracts, trading off players where he can to full the farm system and go the route of the Marlins.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What takes more guts?
Making a bold move and facing the huge flak from it, or saying the right things to Walt and Tony, appeasing Walt w.r.t. front-office politics, and appeasing fans by signing some big "names" to overloaded contrax?  There are many, many LESS courageous ways to handle this situation than to fire Jock and essentially show the door to TLR.  What DW has done is anything but the "easy" way out.  In fact, he's opening himself up to even worse criticism in the future now that he's got to start over with the organization.  After 2 months if they go "cheaper" and hire "yes-men" (though I'm damned if I know how I'm supposed to recognize them when I see them; is there a special haircut or something?), then I'll agree with you.  But it's way too early to be deciding what the plan is, especially when none of us has the slightest insight into the thinking inside the ownership group.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DeWitt
certainly didn't give an inspiring performance.  

The  new ownership group is equally as responsible for our success as Tony and Walt, and I thank them, but after listening to that I'm scared.

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 5:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I haven't
Fully wrapped my head around this scenario.  What else would be a fitting finale to such an odd and unpredictable season.  
I love lamp

by Some witty name on Oct 3, 2007 5:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

DeWitt comes to terms with LaRussa for a 3
year extension and then announces he is moving the team to Portland so that Tony can be closer to his home in California.
Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 3, 2007 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Too bad that's snark...
I'd go for all of that just fine. As a Cards fan in Oregon, I'd take them and Missouri can have the Marlins when they move. :p

by roebirds on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Walt
On the other side of the coin, if an owner doesn't like the way an employee reacts to something, he should feel free to let him go.

I am ready to take over. www.cardinalsgm.com

www.cardinalsgm.com

by tknup on Oct 3, 2007 5:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

WJ
wonder about the impact of not signing russell, stutes, etc. from this draft?

by sportsman on Oct 3, 2007 5:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Love this move
The game changed during Jocketty's tenure and he couldn't change with it.  

He inherited 13 seasons of a top 10 payroll, to go along with a remarkably bad central division, yet he's considered a huge success.  The reality is Jocketty was one 13th round pick away from crashing our farm system into the ground and having nothing but mixed results to show from it.

As the games emphasis shifts to player development and advanced valuation techniques, its clear Jocketty's time has past.  No one will trade a centerfielder with power for a starting pitcher with 17 wins and a 4:3 K:BB anymore.  The game became too smart, his strengths don't exploit inefficiencies in 2008 as they did in 1998.  

Thanks and goodbye, Walt.

by Jonathan23 on Oct 3, 2007 5:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that is absurd
there are probably 26 or 27 other teams whose fans would kill to have a gm who got the results jocketty has gotten. what does it take to make people happy? unbelievable. the guy is one of the best in the game, and i'm sorry if people cannot see that.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mozeliak
Wasn't he in charge of the 2004 draft?  If so, I would say that's not a very good mark on his resume.

by Handsome B Wonderful on Oct 3, 2007 5:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not happy about this
Walt Jocketty is a great GM.  I'm going to miss him.

It's odd.  As I was just driving home, I was thinking to myself, that maybe all along I've been wrong and that LaDuncetty wasn't right to lead this team anymore.  All along I've been saying that if TLR goes (I guess this could signal the start) we will suck for a few years.  But I guess I finally realized that although having TLR around the next 3 or so years will guarantee us maybe an 80-win season as opposed to a 70-win season, we will probably be in better shape after 3 years to move forward.

I'm still pretty shocked/pissed.  I'd much rather Jocketty have left on his own terms.  This is the guy who brought McGwire, Renteria, Walker, Rolen, Edmonds, Clark, Woody Williams, Steve Finley, etc. over to this organization when we needed those parts.  I salute you, Walt Jocketty, and best of luck in whatever you decide to do from here.

Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 5:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm in shock partly because of how it was handled
Given all that Walt has done for the Cards, this seems like an incredibly slimy way to let him go.  And it sounds like he, and everyone else on the managing/coaching side, was blindsided.  

I was just reading this morning about plans for the future and I was thinking "Good, they can take this October and really get a head start to make this team more competitive.  They seem to be moving quickly on what they want to do."  

Now, everything is in turmoil, and probably not just for October, but likely for much longer.  

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DimWitt is
on 1380 right now..

by cardsrul on Oct 3, 2007 5:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i really dont know what to say
i guess bernie was right. dewitt was pissed walt kept telling espn he was unhappy and wanted out. well now he got his wish. be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.

that goes for every one who wanted tony&dave gone as well, because they aint coming back now. looks like the reds are going to swoop in and pick up walt tony&dave. good luck with all that guys.

ok, so now what dewitt? whats the plan? we need a GM, Manager & a whole new coaching staff. plus a bunch of new players. whats the plan dewitt? whats the freakin plan?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 3, 2007 5:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Larussa, Duncan, Walt & Staff
If they all go to the Reds it will be the worst move in the history of the Cardinals to fire Walt.  That would be just devistating considering the Reds are in the Cardinals division.

It would have been better for all to go the AL and to the West in Seattle.

I am real worried about the dominoe effect.

I think everyone who says this is great is kind of missing a lot of important things.

This is far from a great day.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

totally agree
if this is such a great day, why do i have a sick feeling in my stomach?

the talk out here is ohio is the reds are swooping in on walt tony & dave. every reds fan is giddy.

how is this a good thing?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 3, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not that big of a deal...
the Cards were 83-78 last year and 78-84 this year.

That's a sub-500 record over 323 games, and next year's club figures to be even less promising than either the '06 or '07 Cards. This is clearly a downward trend. Now is a splendid time for a wholesale change.

As for LaDunketty taking their act to Cincinnati, keep in mind this regime was crap for the first five years of their tenure in StL.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ha
yes, 83-78 last year. i seem to remember them winning the world series lat year and going to the nlcs 3 straight years. yeah, they don't know what they're doing, and the reds fans are stupid for wanting any people with that meager track record. after all, they were SIX whole games under .500 this year! sheesh.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm....
This regime took the Cardinals to the playoffs for the first time in nearly a decade their FIRST year here.

by roebirds on Oct 3, 2007 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

also
are you kidding here?

"keep in mind this regime was crap for the first five years of their tenure in StL."

nlcs in 1996, nlcs in 2000. THAT is "crap"? what would it take to satisfy you? i am completely baffled. those are totally unrealistic standards if THAT was "crap," especially considering the team's state in the early 1990s.

by willievinceterry on Oct 3, 2007 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the five years...
from 1995 to 1999 the Cardinals stunk and Jocketty avoided getting canned by a whisker.

1995 / 62-81 / 4th place / 22.5 games back
1996 / 88-74 / 1st place / NLCS
1997 / 73-89 / 4th place / 11 games back
1998 / 83-79 / 3rd place / 19 games back
1999 / 75-86 / 4th place / 21.5 games back

That sir, is crap. One exciting September (McGwire's feats aside) in five years. And the 1996 team was quite flawed, as they exhibited in '97.

Jocketty made great moves starting in December of 1999, but the first five years of his tenure, and the last three years, have been quite poor.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 3, 2007 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...this is not a good day
To paraphrase a quote from my good buddy Will Ferrell... "This months issue of Maxim Magazine, "Walt Jocketty IS Figure Skating"

He was a major reason that our club has been so successful in recent years.  I hope Jeff Luhnow knows what he's doing.

by SethWestern on Oct 3, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

DeWitt on 1380
Q: When did you know there was a problem in your front office? A: Well, we knew there was a difference in philosophy, and it led to further division Q: Did you try to get Jocketty to change? A: Talked to him a bit, there was a disagreement, so it was time to move on Q: Was the disagreement about the minors? A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive. Q: If there'd been more success this year, would we still see Jocketty gone? A: Hard to say. We won it all last year, and there was still plenty of discontent. When things go bad, it makes everything seem worse. Q: Should we expect differences in philosophy for next year? A: We definitely expect to improve for next year no matter who's running it, and we've got a group in charge now that knows where Tony and the coaches stand, and has scouts who knows what we need to do. Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009? A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters. (He's dodging the question) Q: What are you looking for in a new GM? A: We're going to look for a guy with good player/agent relationships who can represent the Cards well and is "competent in the baseball organization" and "committed to building young players" Q: What does this mean for Tony? A: Dunno. Talked to Tony, but couldn't get a sense either way. He'll make his decision and let us know.

by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

DeWitt on 1380 (reposted more legibly)
Q: When did you know there was a problem in your front office?
A: Well, we knew there was a difference in philosophy, and it led to further division

Q: Did you try to get Jocketty to change?
A: Talked to him a bit, there was a disagreement, so it was time to move on

Q: Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive.

Q: If there'd been more success this year, would we still see Jocketty gone?
A: Hard to say. We won it all last year, and there was still plenty of discontent. When things go bad, it makes everything seem worse.

Q: Should we expect differences in philosophy for next year?
A: We definitely expect to improve for next year no matter who's running it, and we've got a group in charge now that knows where Tony and the coaches stand, and has scouts who knows what we need to do.

Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters. (He's dodging the question)

Q: What are you looking for in a new GM?
A: We're going to look for a guy with good player/agent relationships who can represent the Cards well and is "competent in the baseball organization" and "committed to building young players"

Q: What does this mean for Tony?
A: Dunno. Talked to Tony, but couldn't get a sense either way. He'll make his decision and let us know.

by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

tremendous job
thanks for doing this. Usually we get a summary of a couple of important sentences. It's almost as if you recorded it and printed the transcript. Great job -- I can't emphasize enough.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I do want to point out that only the stuff actually in quotation marks are direct quotes. It was me frantically typing, paraphrasing Carraker's Q's and DeWitt's answers to keep up with the questions.

by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nevertheless
it was great for you to be able to keep up at that pace. Many of us aren't in St. Louis and that kind of recording is tremendously appreciated.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little easier to read, sorry to jack your post
Q: When did you know there was a problem in your front office?
A: Well, we knew there was a difference in philosophy, and it led to further division

Q: Did you try to get Jocketty to change?
A: Talked to him a bit, there was a disagreement, so it was time to move on

Q: Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive.

Q: If there'd been more success this year, would we still see Jocketty gone?
A: Hard to say. We won it all last year, and there was still plenty of discontent. When things go bad, it makes everything seem worse.

Q: Should we expect differences in philosophy for next year?
A: We definitely expect to improve for next year no matter who's running it, and we've got a group in charge now that knows where Tony and the coaches stand, and has scouts who knows what we need to do.

Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters. (He's dodging the question)

Q: What are you looking for in a new GM?
A: We're going to look for a guy with good player/agent relationships who can represent the Cards well and is "competent in the baseball organization" and "committed to building young players"

Q: What does this mean for Tony?
A: Dunno. Talked to Tony, but couldn't get a sense either way. He'll make his decision and let us know.

Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

48 seconds
Sorry bout that man.
Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 3, 2007 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, no worries
I always forget to HTML format my multi-paragraph comments on this site.

by Phyrkrakr on Oct 3, 2007 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds good to me
As long as they hire the right guy to replace Walt.  DePodesta or Kim Ng would be good choices, but I'd be in heaven if they hired Antonetti.  Read this post on why he's such a great candidate and you just may be convinced too.  Of course, I'm not sure how much faith I have in DeWitt making the right hire.  

by srs on Oct 3, 2007 5:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree w/ you 100%
these 3 should be the top 3 candidates. All would do a sensational job, IMO.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed
any of those 3 would be absolutely fantastic
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Future GMs
Some thoughts...
  1. I don't see them hiring a DePodesta, Ng, or other hard core analytical guy. They've already got that in Luhnow. Rather, I would expect them to hire more of a deal-maker; an outside guy to work with the agents and get deals done and to go with Luhnow's inside guy (e.g. Mike Martz in his OC role) trend. Like a CEO to Luhonw's COO.
  2. I was quite happy with how the 2007 draft went. I think Luhnow knows what he's doing.
  3. I think the long-term trend is to develop from within. Jocketty's inclination was more to build via acquisition.
  4. It may take 2-3 years for this strategy to pay off, but I think it will.

by thepainguy on Oct 3, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Started to read that article
and laughed after I read the first paragraph which ended with this...

"Due to the way the offseason is unfolding, it is becoming apparent to us that, barring an unforseen miracle, the Mariners aren't going to be contenders in 2007. Even in a best case scenario, where the young core takes a step forward and the aging veterans stave off decline, this is still an inferior team to that of the Angels, Rangers, and Athletics."

by Big Red on Oct 3, 2007 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rockies Win!
Way to start the NLDS!  15 of the last 16 -- Keep it going.
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 6:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ryan Howard ....
0-4 with 3 Strikeouts....whew...nice job by the Rocks pitchers today just on that alone..

by Timbo02 on Oct 3, 2007 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

utley
had 4 k's today too
"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Oct 3, 2007 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd just like to say....
I truly appreciate everything Walt Jocketty has done for this organization. That being said, change may be what this organization needs. I hope we get DePodesta as our GM.
Miller sucks.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Oct 3, 2007 6:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yes
I second that opinion completely.

by airhad on Oct 3, 2007 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is the panic button!?
Cuz I need to hit it.

I do not like this move at all, and its gotta mean that TLR and possibly Duncan are next to head out the door.

Even though DeWitt helped us win a title, he's always making decisions with nothing but $$$ in mind. KMOX, and holding salary despite absolutely raking in the money the past few years are the two primary examples.

Now he forces out one of the best GM's in the game and the architect of that championship team.

No matter how bad this season got, I always felt optimistic bc Jocketty was in charge and had confidence he'd get us back on top in 08....now I fear we are teetering on the edge of falling into a stretch like the early 90's. That is, with an owner who is more concerned with his check book than the product on the field.

At least we have Pujols....right?

Ack. This is bad.

10-time World Champs!

by TheFranchise9 on Oct 3, 2007 6:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

apparently
Apparently a lot of people on this board have forgotten the 1990-1995 era.  I am 27 years old and I remember that era as being horrible.

So we may need to get ready for that time again.  I see Dewitt going the wrong direction.  

Steve Stone was even wondering what the heck STL's owners were doing not spending money after wining the WS and drawing a ton of fans.

It seems around baseball people are starting to view Dewitt as a cheap ass.  I hope they are wrong for our sanity.

This team could go down fast.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 3, 2007 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We should be upset
b/c Steve Stone didn't understand the owners' decision?  Success in baseball is much bigger than Steve Stone's opinion.  Doubtless he's read as many articles about the front office rift as my 4 year old has.  There are lots of good GM candidates out there.  I'm not sure Mozeliak is one of them so I hope that they take a look at Antonetti, DePodesta, or Kim Ng.

The pre-Walt era was horrible but the idea that the next several years will be horrible b/c Walt is gone is overly fatalistic, IMO.  The owners seem to want to make a commitment to getting younger, to player development -- these are good things and clearly the direction the franchise should be headed.  If Walt wasn't the person for the job, let's find the person who is.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not return to early '90s
The current Cardinals organization is completely different that the one of the early '90s. The Brewery still owned the franchise then, after Augie Busch passed on, and was entirely bottom-line conscious. Further, Dal Maxvill was an inept GM. Other than getting a career season from Kent Bottenfield, his deals never worked out and he didn't get much out of the minor league system.

When the DeWitts bought the club, there was a renewed commitment to winning -- that's how Jocketty and LaRussa wound up in St. Louis -- and I doubt that's changed. The DeWitts are baseball people.

by MoCrash on Oct 3, 2007 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's a sad day.....but not unexpected.
I am sorry to see Jocketty go as the guy did a lot for Cardinal baseball in his 13 yrs here. But I can't say that his being fired, is not unexpected. There were certainly enough clues over the last season that he was not happy and didn't agree with the direction of the team. I happen to think that his leaving will lead to the end of LaRussa and Duncan for next season and perhaps even make Chris Duncan a more viable trade commodity too. I can't say that DeWitt gives me a warm cozy feeling about the immediate future of the team either. I think we are going to have some "Reds" seasons in the next few years and if they are serious about really building from the farm systems...then perhaps...it will be worth the anxiety and frustration that we will all endure in getting to that.  But I think everyone better be prepared for a long 08 summer and even beyond that.....You don't just replace guys like Jock and Tony...you just don't.

by Timbo02 on Oct 3, 2007 6:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I really think
everyone should walk away from this topic until tomorrow.

Perhaps a little time to think about it would help. We didn't fire the captain of the Titanic nor did we fire George Washington at Valley Forge.

It will never be as bad as you fear and it was never as good as you remember.

by Harknights on Oct 3, 2007 6:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

guess i missed some history lessons...
From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 3, 2007 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Assignment
Johnny,
You shall go out tonight and rent a movie.  Playoffs be damned.
The movie you shall rent it Animal House.
You shall watch said movie and then and only then shall you understand why it wasn't over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 3, 2007 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for the advice...
...i will report when done
From Curaçao, the friendly island in the Caribbean

by Johnny64 on Oct 3, 2007 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I WILL TAKE SOME TIME
TO COOL DOWN AND REFLECT BEFORE I MAKE HYPERBOLIC COMMENTS ON THE INTERNETS WHEN I AM GOOD AND READY YOU HEAR ME
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, we never fired the captain of the Titanic...
...because he went down with the ship.

I agree with the idea that this is a good decision, even though Jocketty has had a great deal of success with us in the past.  Not necessarily because the market has passed him by, but because there's no reason to maintain a counter-productive and (by most accounts) poisonous working environment in the organization.  

by The Man in Blak on Oct 3, 2007 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Compensation...
I'll start off by saying that I have thoroughly enjoyed the WJ and LaDunc show...

Now - How could we just let Walt walk?  Couldn't we let him go off to other clubs and auction him to the highest bidder (ala Leo Mazonne) along with Dave Duncan (with LaRussa obviously included).  

I know it doesn't happen often, but my read is that we have given up a top 5 GM for nothing.  Not the smartest move in the world if it is avoidable (and I believe Walt's salary is in the $1M range which in itself is below market)...

Anyway - maybe I am just on the crack rock, but in running a business I am not sure why you give up an asset for nothing.

As an aside, if we are going to get rid of Jock why would we replace him with someone who was a virtual clone (which is what Tony has requested).  

Also, everyone is talking organizational shakeup, but of our top 5 or so contracts only Pujols is tradable....  I'm not ready to go there...

by Lawless on Oct 3, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hot Stove Season
Is now officially HOT for the St. Louis Cardinals.
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 7:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who I'd like to see interviewed for the GM opening
Two guys near the top of my list would be:

Terry Ryan, formerly the Twins GM, and currently a talent advisor for them.  Under his watch, the team acquired players like David Ortiz, Johan Santana, Joe Nathan and Francisco Liriano.

And,

Logan White, assistant GM for the Dodgers.  He has a large role in their draft and their system is loaded.  I guess that might conflict with the role Luhnow currently has with the Cardinals, but Mr. White might know which under the radar players to acquire from LA if he gets a GM position elsewher.  Plus, I'm not sold on Luhnow's talent evaluation yet.

I hope Walt lands in the American League.  Less of a threat to St Louis that way.

by michajo on Oct 3, 2007 7:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought
Kim Ng was the assistant GM for the Dodgers...

by spants on Oct 3, 2007 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i should have been more specific
My apologies, Logan White is the Assistant GM in charge of scouting.  I think Ng is asst for operations.  

by michajo on Oct 3, 2007 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ahh
so they're BOTH assistant GMs.  Cool.  

by spants on Oct 4, 2007 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Terry Ryan has done an extremely poor
job of handling their roster over the last few years with guys like Rondell White and Nick Punto seeing significant time.  When did they last have a legit DH?  Terry Ryan reminds me of Walt Jocketty, who for all their triumphs, may not be the best suited to be a GM anymore.

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it true that the Twins
gave Ortiz his outright RELEASE? Whoever made that decision immediately gets crossed off the candidate list!

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay I just found out about this
having wasted valuable internet time sitting in a staff infection... er, i mean, staff meeting...
and i am bummed. this season was rough on all of us cardinal fans, but i wasn't ready for wholesale slaughter, and i fear that is what we are about to see...
change is bad... i fear change... (okay, not really, but i like it better when we have some kind of transition, and some warning...)
When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?

by RosevilleRedbird on Oct 3, 2007 7:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's gonna be okay.
I think Tony will stay.
The Red Blazer

by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 8:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure
you're wrong. If it was 50/50 yesterday, and Walt's gone today, w/ the owners saying that they wanted to emphasize player development -- that doesn't exactly say that they want to add veterans who can win now. Doesn't sound like Tony's cup of tea.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a question
for erik, azruavatar and others who have heavily invested their time tracking and evaluating the Cardinal's farm system:   Given an optimal development scenario (and whatever you think that needs to entail), what's the earliest time horizon in which you see the parent club being seriously competitive for post-season play?
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 8:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

great question
i join in the asking.
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a while
the system has one future star..colby rasmus. outside of that, there are several good prospects with question marks, and a bunch of 4th outfielders and bottom of the rotation/middle relief types. i'm sorry, that's just the way i see it. luhnow has got things on the upswing, but the team had no where else to go but up. i'm not 100% sold on him, sometimes I almost think he outsmarts himself by drafting players the consensus agree are good, but he reaches for them while passing on players with higher upside.

i'm happy they are committing to player development method over "win now", but i'm not so sure luhnow is the guy who leads the cards out of the wilderness, unless he starts tweak his drafting and stop taking safe, or even quirky guys over players with a little higher upside. for this team to contend sooner then later, they will still need to depend on making smart trades and free agency.

by erik on Oct 3, 2007 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for responding
erik.  I sincerely appreciate it.  However, I'd like to put you (and azruavatar et al) on the spot:  given what you've stated, just how long do you think it will take to become seriously competitive in the NLC?  

I realize I'm asking you to go out on a limb to an extent and that leaves you open to future blog recriminations.  But I assure you that it won't be from me or from any other thoughtful VEB'er.  Guys like you probably are positioned better than most to make the estimate, and I just want to have a "ballpark" (no pun intended) estimate in order to keep things in perspective.

"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good I was hoping you would answer
while I was typing mine.  You sound a little more down on the system than i do. Isn't that slightly opposite from what we usually think?

We do have enough 4th outfielders to last us until like 2017 though.

Your comment on Luhnow outsmarting himself worries me because I can sort of see that.  If the Cardinals are really, finally committed to player development, I think we'll find out next draft.  The Cardinals will have a shot at someone who is perceived as a difficult sign.  If they pass, then I'll be severely dismayed -- player development requires drafting talent.  Drafting talent requires money.

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that is normally
different, isn't it. i'm usually the optimist. i dunno, just combing over the guys we have...i like it, but so many of them are just untested. the drafts we've recently have are encouraging, but there's few high upside types, and the high upside guys they've taken seem to be misses. in the system, i would say we have...
  1. a future star cf in colby
  2. a solid closer in perez, but he has to get things under control.
  3. a good hitting catcher in bryan anderson.
  4. a solid SS in kozma, but he's years away. martinez is a lot closer
  5. some decent arms for the rotation like herron, ottavino and garcia....
and then...................well, some guys like hoffpauir, mortensen, mather, todd, boggs, walters, norrick, maiques, jay, and so forth who could be good but it's either too early to tell for sure or they have different question marks from scouts and such.(heck, i wouldn't even count on ottavino making it to the bigs after watching his k rate slide and his control slip towards the end of the season. ) i'm not trying to be down, i like the system, it's much better then what it used to be. but i'm not sure how i'd grade it in terms of potential impact. i'm not trying to say everyone has to be a future star or what not, nothing wrong with having lots of back of the rotation types to choose from, but you'd like to see more.

for more of an overview, here's a spreadsheet for quick ref of how i see the system

http://tinyurl.com/yqvccf

by erik on Oct 4, 2007 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I found your spreadsheet to be
very helpful.  For those of us who only hear about the well known prospects through interviews, it's good to get a better grasp of the whole field.  Thank you for taking the time to make that available.

Man, our pitching really is depressing....

by nycardfan on Oct 4, 2007 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure I agree
I don't expect the minors to be able to develop a large number of star level players.  If you get one regular a year I think thats reasonable.  Thats lets us fill out half of the team.

STL uses the Stars and Scrubs approach to team design.  We can afford a few big contracts.  They don't have to comes from the minors.

So we tie up about half our payroll in 5 players.  Those are your stars. (Albert, Rolen, Edmonds, Carp, Izzy today).  The minors need to be able to provide us quality filler.  Recently we have gotten Duncan, Ryan, Ludwick from them.  Thats not bad but not great.

Our problem is we have no starting pitchers close and no surplus talent that can be used as trade bait left.  

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the filler has been fine
it's the stars who haven't produced. edmonds got old, rolen and carpenter got hurt . . . . that's why the team is in disarray.

here's the filler the farm system has kicked out since 2004:

2 solid starting pitchers (wainwright and haren)
2 solid relievers (calero and ty johnson)
2 still-unsettled pitchers (reyes and thompson)
3 decent everyday players (molina duncan ankiel), with the potential for a 4th (brendan ryan)

plus some bench depth -- taguchi, schumaker, rodriguez

that's not a bad four-year haul, especially since it comes during a supposed down cycle. four years from now, the system will likely have kicked out another 2 or 3 everyday players (rasmus, maybe anderson, maybe a shortstop, maybe hoffpauir) and a few starting pitchers (garcia, boggs, ottavino, herron, walters all decent candidates), plus potentialy a late-inning reliever or two (perez, motte, dove) and the inevitable middle-relief driftwood.

will they be stars? probably not more than one, if they're lucky two --- but i don't think that matters. they don't all have to be stars; average big-league players are extremely valuable. in the 1980s, an extremely productive era for the farm system, the cards had a bunch of average to above-average major leaguers (coleman mcgee pendleton herr cox magrane etc etc); the true impact players all came via trade from outside the system (ozzie, jack clark, tudor, andujar).

by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JRod was actually a Yankee farmhand;
and he's one of the players that got lost in the vet preference shuffle.  I do think he could have been a solid, if unspectacular major league outfielder.

by jillsinmo on Oct 4, 2007 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it's as far off as some people
make it out to be.  Yes our system was low on talent but we have a superstar at 1B for years to come and in 2009 Colby Rasmus should be in CF.  Rasmus is an all-star level talent who I think is going to surprise a lot of people.  It's easy to say he's the number 1 talent in the system but that doesn't tell you how frickin awesome this kid is.  He's phenomenal.  If Bryan Anderson develops and someone like Jarrett Hoffpauir pans out, I think the system will be sufficient as far as position prospects go. If everything were to break right, the team could bounce back next year with a full season of Ankiel, Duncan and a healthy Rolen.  If Brendan Ryan can hold par offensively and Jarrett Hoffpauir's OBP translates, then things could be good without a serious downturn.  I'm not particularly worried about the Cardinals offense.

The biggest concern is pitching.  We don't have what most talent evaluators consider to be a true front of the rotation starter anywhere in our system.  Jaime Garcia had elbow problems this season but he's the only player that has a shot at being a #2 type pitcher. We have a few mid-rotation ceiling starters (Ottavino, Herron) and a lot of back of the rotation material (Boggs, Walters, etc.).  I personally think that our relief prospects are overlooked on a system wide basis (even though I'm not a big mid-reliever fan).  We have several that are within 1-2 years of contributing (most noticably Chris Perez).

I don't think the pitching will arrive for 2-3 years though and that's what the Cardinals really need. Until the Cardinals remedy that issue, they are simply going to continue to struggle at run prevention. Now (and this is going to piss some people off) if Reyes were to put things together like he was projected to as recently as a year and a half ago, he and Wainwright could anchor a staff.  But the farm system isn't quite ready to produce any starting pitchers.  

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree
I think Walters will translate better than your projections.  He is diffrent enough that MLB hitters just may have trouble adjusting.  Also as long as he doesn't walk people he has a fighting chance.  This year not withstanding, mlb teams are generally good at fielding.

Question.  If Tony goes but Duncan stays, what does that do for our young pitchers?

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yusmiero Petit was different too
and he put up some awesome stats.  85mph fastballs just don't excite me.

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

awesome stats in the minors.
he's been 'blah' in the majors.  

(Finish your thoughts, Azru.)

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's still pretty young, though.
He may still develop into at the very least a useful pitcher.

by jillsinmo on Oct 4, 2007 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And thanks also to
you as well azruavatar.  This is the kind of feedback I was interested in.  Looks like a significant amount might depend upon the organization's ability to fill out a competitive pitching staff with pricey FA's at some point in the next 2-3 years?  (Not that I'm opposed to that approach -- just speculation.)
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats the problem
you cannot build a good pitching rotation from the FA market.  (Take a look at this list from USSMariner.  It's distressing for the Cardinals.)

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch!
I see what you mean by distressing -- that was a very good article by USSM.  Chasing past pitcher performance is much like the warning issued on the evaluations for various stock/MutFund investments.

I don't know if it CAN'T be done (2001 Diamondbacks?), but the odds obviously aren't in a team's favor.

Thanks again for the feedback.  This is good stuff.

"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hope we will treasure 2006
Because I highly doubt we will see a Chmpionship in St. Louis for many many years years to come now.

This whole thing reeks of an owner ready to fill his pockets while playing the fans as fools.

DeWitt knows he has a good thing going in St. Louis.  There isn't a whole lot of media pressure, the fans of the team are very faithful and will spend tons of cash to see the Cards even if there isn't a good team on the field. Hell just the new stadium alone is enough to bring millions of fans in for the next 2-3 years.

I think DeWitt is going to keep bringing in some "yes men" until he decides to sell the team in 4-5 years, while taking the fans who buy tickets and food at the stadium for all their worth in the mean time.

I hope I'm wrong, but I wouldn't count on the Cards doing a whole lot this off season. Unless DeWitt has a plan (which I don't think he really does) we are in for some pretty bad years ahead.
Cubs/Reds/Brewers fans can rejoice because I don't think the Cards are going to be in the hunt for awhile now.

by KYCards on Oct 3, 2007 8:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can think of a lot better ways...
to make money than to buy into a major league ball club. I don't think he is in it for the money.
The Red Blazer

by Red Blazer on Oct 3, 2007 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

History Lesson
from Baltimore.  The year is 1997 Pat Gillick and Davey Johnson are the GM/Manager of the O's.  Peter Angelos is meddling away in the baseball operations by promoting his people into front office power positions.  A huge rift develops with the baseball operations.  Angelos gets his way with Gillick/Johnson resigning.

Fast forward to today.  The O's have just completed their 10th straight losing season, going through GMs with no authority and managers with limited skills.  The minor league system continues to be two years away.  A once proud franchise opens each year with no hope of a winning record, let alone competing for the playoffs.

Hopefully, DeWitt's move fosters an operation that builds talent from within and supplements the team with key acquisitions through free agency or trade & sign.

by ubeddie on Oct 3, 2007 8:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bingo
Somewhere along the line, I think DeWitt saw what the Dodgers were doing and the As were doing and say "Hey, I wanna try that" not realizing the successful baseball operations he currently had.

He started making sure no contracts (other than Carp) would go past a certain date and restricted funds/years on FA signings.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thoughts...
wasnt home all day, so i just heard a while ago

hate to see walt go, but, if this does really end the divisiveness in the front office, it needed to be done

i wonder if there is any chance of tony staying, just to see what could be done with this team, and get back to the playoffs with pujols?

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 8:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah
Frank Cusamano from Channel 5 said about TLR leaving Pujols, "You don't leave Sophia Loren when she's 27."  

It's the only thing he's ever said that I liked.

by spants on Oct 4, 2007 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hadnt heard that
but that is kinda what i was referring to, in that tlr has said for a while now that pujols is the best player he has ever had, and i would be surprised if he left in his prime, even during a rebuilding period

at this point, though, it may also depend on whether he thinks they could be competitive in the next 3 years, if he doesnt think that, then seeing pujols' prime may not matter as much

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 4, 2007 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Win, win
Hmm, I am sorry to see Walt go, but it sounds like a win, win situation.

Dewitt looked at the direction his industry was taking and realized that Walts philosophy didn't jive.

"Was the disagreement about the minors?
A: Yeah, that was pretty much it. I thought we needed to develop more from within, and Jock's approach was different. That led to divisiveness in the org, and wasn't productive."

Basically Dewitt is saying the same things Larry, I and others have been saying: with the sabermetric kitty out of the sack, Walt is having a hard time fleecing other teams:

"Q: Should we do the Cleveland thing, and get young next year, let guys get healthy, and gear up for 2009?
A: Good point, it's hard to make those trades we used to. We could do sneaky things before there was revenue sharing/new CBA, and it's harder to make those deals now. We want to be competitive next year, but we also want to keep developing the youngsters."

It is entirly possible Dewitt goes '98 Marlins on us, but I doubt it.  I think he want a winner and realizes we need to develop talent, not just acquire it.

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 3, 2007 8:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he can go
'98 Marlins -- they had usable parts -- Kevin Brown, Sheffield -- others I can't remember right now.  What vets do we have w/ a lot of value?

I think you're basically correct that we could see some of what we have traded, but we'll hardly be in a position to collect the bounty that the Fish collected.

It's possible now, for example, that Reyes stays.  Yesterday, I would have put the likelihood of him returning at about 10%.  Now I'd say it's closer to 50/50.

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anthony Reyes staying on this team
because Walt Jocketty was fired makes firing Walt Jocketty a very poor decision.

We've clearly overvalued Anthony Reyes and it would take a HISTORIC turnaround for him to be an above average MLB pitcher.

It seems we should have traded him a year ago.  Now, if we put another year between his decent minor league career and current day, his value continues to dwindle as he and his mechanics creep closer to shoulder reconstruction.

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

IMO: don't expect a firesale
Our division has no powerhouse in it.  We can in any one year turn back around to being competitive just as easy as we fell from it.

You may see parts like Izzy let go.  The low performance per $$$ players.  Izzy is good but he didn't really out pitch Springer or Percival this year.  

However, I fully expect players like Rolen, Pujols, Ankiel, Carpenter, Molina to stay.  Its much, much easier to keep a superstar (Pujols, Rolen) than it is to get one.  Its been said time and time again the money is there for the right players.  What star level player have we let walk because of money?  Edgar is the only one that comes close.

What I think got looked at here were deals like Haren for Mulder.  The Wells signing wasn't an attempt to be cheap, it was Duncan getting his pet project.  

This is a good thing for the team.  The owner wanted someone that wouldn't continue to squander cheap, young talent and acted to make it happen.

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure
that Izzy should return -- or that he should be paid $8.25 M to return -- but he had a great season and was considerably better than either Springer or Percival.  Percival and maybe Springer could probably do the job, but he was distinctly better.

To wit:

               WXRL        WPA
Izzy          4.202       2.75
Springer      2.168       1.55
Percival      1.148       0.89

by chuckb on Oct 3, 2007 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought I read the other day that
Izzy's option this year is in the 6 + million range, not 8.25 mil.

by nycardfan on Oct 3, 2007 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had read that instead of
picking up the option, that they were thinking of restructuring it for a 2 year deal.  If I got to make the decision, I'd keep it for the 1 year, keep close tabs on Perez at AAA, and if he starts strong, bring him up to work side by side with  Izzy.  If Perez was ready, I'd tell Izzy thanks and goodbye in 2009.

by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know what you're talking about
Izzy's '08 option is for $8M, but there's a $1.25M buyout. There was an article discussing whether there's some other pitcher out there that's worth taking the buyout whereby you make up the cost in better performance. So you'd need to find a pitcher at < $6.75M who's better than Izzy to come ahead.

by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm guessing that you read that
it is $8M witha 1.25M buyout, so if we don't pick it up we only net $6.75M.  At least accoring to mlb4u.com, an unofficial source.  Someone probably said "don't sign izzy and we save 6.xM"?  (may have been me, though that is no longer what I think we should do)

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think it was Goold
In his last PostCards post to Bird Land that discussed it in that way to the widest audience.

by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was looking more at the predictor stats.
Izzy      7.3 K/9   0.56 HR/9
Springer  9.0 K/9   0.42 HR/9
Percival  8.0 K/9   0.71 HR/9

Izzy also walks far more people. 3.8 vs 2.6 and 2.1

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't take single year statistics for
any reliever.  50-60 innings just contain too much random variation.  I don't think there's any serious harm in retaining Izzy for one year.

What we don't want to do is extend him yet given his injury last year and age.  

by azruavatar on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
But if we find a good use for 6 mil and have hit the limit of the budget, I wouldn't panic if we let him go.

Relievers are about the most replacable parts on any team.

by DriverZn on Oct 3, 2007 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if relievers are so replaceable
why are teams ALWAYS looking for bullpen help? what closer had a better save percentage than izzy this year? it's this cavalier attitude that i just do not get. "the grass is always greener..." izzy did a great job and any team would be happy to have a closer who helped the team as much as he did this year. elite relief pitchers do not grow on trees (nor do elite GMs).

by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

because teams value
relievers incorrectly.  They don't understand the simple variation from year to year or that "experience" doesn't matter as much when a player simply isn't as talented as they used to be.

by azruavatar on Oct 4, 2007 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the only acceptable explanation
is a personality / difference of vision sort of thing. NOT past performance. NO GM has a better track record this last decade. ONE bad trade is hopefully not enough to get a gm as successful as walt canned (three years after the fact). again, the idea that it is good to be kicking out one of the most successful combos in baseball (for a team without one of the highest budgets) is just wrong.

by willievinceterry on Oct 4, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think
you have said it pretty well. That's my thoughts. If I was an owner and I looked around and saw  25 or 30 million of wasted money because of deals that shouldn't have been made, I'd make some changes and go a different direction. Jockety has made some good moves in the past, but really in baseball it's what have you done for me lately.

by ridgesee on Oct 4, 2007 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dewitt
Why is it always a conspiracy with some fans? He wants this team to succeed. Lets give it a couple of years before we make him into the Monopoly guy. This offseason should tell quite a bit. We aren't going to land ARod and the free agent pitching market is crap. I think signing a big name OF (Rowand, Jones??) would make a statement. However, would it improve the club long term? Even signing ARod would hurt the team long term. We wouldn't be able to afford others when they reach free agency and ARod is chewing up 25-40% of the payroll. Let's use some logic.
Come on You Redbirds--Mike Shannon

by BluesDrummer85 on Oct 3, 2007 9:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I was just reading your post, and almost
spit my soda at the computer.  I read the name "Jones" and I thought of the Cub Jacque Jones.  I'm thinking you mean Andruw Jones, right?  Please tell me it's not Jacque......

by jillsinmo on Oct 3, 2007 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey jill
i thought the exact same thing at first, who the hell would want jacque?

as far as andruw, when reports are that boras wants many years and 20 mil a season, no thanks on him either

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh My
My dream job is available!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I'm seriously sending in my resume,  Damn it, too bad my MBA isn't done yet, still got until May.  Maybe we can work something out!

by lynx on Oct 3, 2007 9:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i doubt if an MBA is a requirement
pretty sure they just review your internet posts and make the decision based on that.  I'm guessing post count is a factor, so get busy!

by SleepyCA on Oct 3, 2007 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh shit.
Our next GM is going to be an undersupervised 8th grader from Bernie's Pressbox!

by liam on Oct 3, 2007 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well done, sir
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 3, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ROFLMAO.
Well, the punk will finally understand what it's like to be on the receiving end, no?

by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 3, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my god
I don't believe they did that.

by sjoshi on Oct 3, 2007 9:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

wow

by Pujols on Oct 3, 2007 10:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cubs thread?
never know when history will be made:


by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 10:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What
is someone pointing at?

On to the subject of a Cubs/Diamond-backs thread - a pitchers' duel is going on.  Webb and Crazy Z are battling it out.  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, no!
Drew the Younger homers.  Will Big Z lose it now?

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big Z's Head Melt
Not quite yet.  He's probably more conscious of his flaw at this point in the season.  That might change if he gets in a jam with a bunch of base runners.
"Requiescat In Pace - 2007 Zombie Cardinals"

by AustinBOB on Oct 3, 2007 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No,
Big Z hasn't imploded (yet), but he did strike out swinging with the bases loaded in the sixth. Too bad.  (Sarcasm alert!)  But the Flubs tie it up at 1-1.  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

is that?
is that bartmans seat?
Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 3, 2007 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way!
Is it really?  If so, then bless you, enoscountry, for posting that picture.  That alone could doom the Small Bears tonight!

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 3, 2007 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The curse
of Seat 113 lives!  Cubs lose, 3-1!

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it is
found it on Flickr today - it's amazing what you can find there.

by enoscountry on Oct 3, 2007 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you sir are a gentleman and a scholar
When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?

by RosevilleRedbird on Oct 4, 2007 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JW, BD, etc
Just 2 cents in favor of DeWitt having put some thought into this move.   I highly doubt it's a knee jerk decision.  I think it realisitically reflects WJ's recent performance, ie, that of the team needing an additional $10-15M to compete, the Edmonds decision, the Mulder trade, etc.  A team with this payroll and record is what WJ delivered (to compete in the NL central no less).  The lack of farm hands also largely falls on WJ's approach, not just of trading away players, but of ending up largely out of trade chips.  As great a job as WJ did in some instances, his recent record is underwhelming and we are in trouble for next year.  Who knows what is really going on in the inner circles, but we were geting real close to the iceberg and somebody needed to do something.  Hopefully this was the right thing.

by sportsman on Oct 3, 2007 10:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just hope...
that the new GM doesn't try to trade with Walt at all.  We'll get fleeced worse than Mulder for Haren, Barton, and whatever else.

stlfan

by stlfan on Oct 3, 2007 11:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow another 'zona home run
That ball was hit very high...
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Oct 4, 2007 12:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Also...
I am very, very apprehensive about this move...yet excited at the same time.  I hate to see him go; I taught in the same school as his kid a few years ago and liked the family.  They seem like good people...and he did a heck of a job for over a decade.  It also (probably - as noted several times here) means the end of the LaRussa/Duncan regime in St. Louis.  That is sad as well.  I don't know what combination of general manager/manager/pitching coach would work out the best for us.

Oquendo is apparently a very good teacher as a coach, which might be a good way to bring in the rebuilding era.  DePodesta seems to know how to get good bargains, much like Jocketty, and might be good to fill some gaps while we work on bringing in the youth.  The guy from the Indians (mentioned above) seems like quite the analytical guy, but I think we have that in Lunhow...but the combo of them might just be even better...who knows.  I have no clue for pitching coach because Cox and his aren't splitting up in ATL any time soon.

I am in shock...but I don't know yet if that is bad.

stlfan

by stlfan on Oct 4, 2007 12:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

On the subject of the Cubs/Zona game
I'd like to remind everyone that, since 2000, only three times has the winning of a DS Game 1 failed to take the series.  Oddly enough, all three of the series where the game 1 winner failed to win involved the Yankees one way or another.

So the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of the Rockies (who have the added statistical advantage of taking game 1 on the road) and the Red Sox, and, if things hold, a certain team that's not the Cubs.

by stl tyler on Oct 4, 2007 12:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i love the fact that
$136M made the last out with the tying run on base.  Git'r'dun, Az (and yes, I realize that I said a week ago that rooting for the cubs would be the Right Thing to Do, but after trying hard tonight for a couple of innings I realized it just wasn't going to work)

by SleepyCA on Oct 4, 2007 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Give in
to the Dark Side.  Just kidding.  Rooting for the D-backs is also the Right Thing to Do, so you are in the clear.  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Glad you came to your senses
You think they were rooting for us last year?  You root against your rivals, that's just how it works.  

Also, I tend to hold out my favor for teams that try to buy championships, so that's another mark against this year's Cubs team.  

As long as the Red Sox, Yankees, or Cubs don't win the series this year, I'll be happy about the outcome.

by stl tyler on Oct 4, 2007 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As will I.
Well, as happy as I can be with any outcome that doesn't involve the Cards winning.  

by cardsgirl95 on Oct 4, 2007 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i am indifferent to this series pretty much
as i said the other day, i feel no ill will toward the cubs, nor the diamond backs

however, i also wont be rooting for either team

the cubs are our rivals, so i cant root for them

arizona beat us in 2001 on a heartbreaker, so i cant root for them

i will be rooting for the winner of phils/rox in the nlcs

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 4, 2007 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was
a fun game to watch in a bar full of Cubfans. Chicago, except for Zambone, didn't even put up a fight. When Piniella pulled him after only 85 or so pitches, the boos were deafening--as was the silence after Marmol gave up the dinger. I can only hope tomorrow's game is as entertaining. Lilly is a better pitcher, but for some reason the Blueboys usually can't hit Doug Davis at all. Go Snakes!

by rockin redbird on Oct 4, 2007 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This Whole Deal and My $.02
I'm sad to WJ go.  He, Schuerholz, and Beane are on a short list of great GMs in the game.  The guy has had a tremendous run in St. Louis.  This is the guy that got McGwire, Edmonds, Rolen, Renteria for sacks of baseballs, KFC gift cards, garden rakes, and fertilizer.  He signed all of those guys to below market value deals back in the early '00s, and we had a great run from it.  

Yes, the Mulder trade has looked like crap in retrospect, but I really don't remember ANYONE being mad about that at the time.  Its amazing how things like that happen isn't it?  

No, Kennedy, Wells, Carp's extension, and Edmonds's extension were probably not the best decisions, but once again that is in retrospect.  

I'm really nervous about this upcoming season.  If Tony LaDuncan is gone for an Oquendo/Mason, Miller, whatever group and its a youth movement, we're flat screwed next year.  It will be Albert, Duncan, Waino, and then a rotating crew of AAAAers and bench players.  That is ALL we have MLB ready right now.  Hoffpauir looks decent, Ryan looks to be a solid defensive player, Ludwick has some pop (but isn't exactly a hot stud prospect, he's in his late20s)...but I don't see a Stephen Drew/Mark Reynolds/Hanley Ramirez/Justin Upton/Matt Kemp/James Loney/(insert favorite young stud) in that group.  I see solid players, but All Stars?  Not a one!  I love Rasmus, I think Anderson is intriguing, Garcia will be solid probably, Mortenson is also interesting...but none of them are close yet IMO.  

The only way I see this team being competitive with a new staff in youth movement mode is if Duncan, Reyes, Molina are all shipped out of Dodge for talent, young or otherwise.  We shall see...But point is, I'm nervous, and its 2 am so I have no idea how logical anything here sounded, and don't care...

Good luck Walt Jocketty, I have a good feeling you're going to be getting a call or two not so long after the World Series.

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 4, 2007 2:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is fun
Jocketty fallout: Expect Cards to rebuild
October 3, 2007
by Stan McNeal
A few weeks before the season ended, I was talking to Albert Pujols about a home -- palace might be a better description -- he was having built in the St. Louis area. He said he'd put a hold on the plans, partly because there was a lot more work involved than he and his wife have time for -- but also because he wants to see what direction the team takes in the next couple years.

After the firing of Jocketty and the possible departure of La Russa, Pujols isn't likely to be pleased with what he's going to see.

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=285393

Call up PJ Walters!

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 4, 2007 3:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

and now all our
worst fears will come true.

Albert's going to demand a trade to bean town or the Yankees.

thanks Hardcore, now i'm never going to get some sleep

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 4, 2007 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

gulp...
That is what I fear the most: cards aren't competitive between now and 2011 and Albert leaves.

by JMedwick on Oct 4, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are going to have to bid...
for Albert's services when his contract runs out anyway.  I don't see anyway he doesn't test the market.  That's just the way I see it.

At least we may have some flexibility by that time now.  If Walt and Tony were still here we'd have 20% of the payroll tied up in Miles, Taguchi and Kennedy clones.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My main problem: development ain't easy
It's one thing to take the develop from within approach, it's quite another to actually succeed with it.  Just about every small market team attempts to develop from within, but how many actually succeed while doing it?

Unless there is some certified talent spotting genius out there or within the organization, I greatly despair for the near to mid term future of the organization.

While the veteran/free agent approach is expensive, it seems somewhat less foolproof in that major leaguers are more of a known quantity, while even the most highly regarded minor league prospects are still severe gambles.

by bailorg on Oct 4, 2007 4:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

foolproof????
adam kennedy, mark mulder, jim edmonds . . . .

by lboros on Oct 4, 2007 4:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're missing the point...
We are not going to turn into the Pirates or DRays.  They are still going to spend money.  They just want to fill out more roster spots with cheap talent so they can be competitive when it comes to getting the elite talent.  We are not a "small market team".  If we develop a star...we can keep him.  That's something the small market teams can't do.

Think Twins with 40-50M more to spend annually. That's the goal.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 4, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2009
Will this team be good in 2008...it would take a series of miracles, but not impossible.

2009
Rotation
Carp, Wainwright, Garcia, Boggs, (FA, Hawksworth, Reyes, Mulder...etc.

Bullpen
Perez, Franklin, Johnson, Worrel, LOOGY...(Thompson, Dove, Wellemeyer, Falkenborg, Cavasos, Jimenez, Kinney...etc.)

C Molina (random FA, Anderson)
1B Pujols
2B Kennedy (Hoffpaiur)
3B Rolen (Barden, Craig)
SS Ryan (Barden, Martinez?)
LF Duncan (Ludwick)
CF Rasmus (Schumaker)
RF Ankiel (Jay, JRod, Stavinoha, Mather...etc.)

Money off the books. Juan E., Izzy, Edmonds, Looper, Taguchi, Spiezio, Maroth and maybe Mulder.

That is $30 to $40 million to play with to upgrade the above roster in a few places. That 2009 team might be pretty good.

How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Oct 5, 2007 5:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0981_small
Put Some Hot Sauce On My Burrito (It's OT, Yadi2.)
God_small
Albertofstan fact sheet
Gawstab_small
Offensive Ability Rating Rankings for 2009
Royconrad_fullthrottle_small
25 players : 25 seasons, 1910-1934

Recent FanPosts

4849_buschstadium_small
My Hall of Fame Induction Speech
Mightymouse_small
Schumaker Gets New Contract
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
The_i
VEB Day 2010 v2.0
Small
Spring Training Split Squad?
Cardwash_small
Chris Duncan signs minor league contract with Nats, also a great pic of him

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Le-samourai_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb