Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Cardinals re-sign Joel Pineiro/ 2yr

Dear Diary,

Per Joe Strauss
The Cardinals continued to complete their pre-free agency checklist Monday by agreeing to terms with starting pitcher Joel Pineiro on a two-year contract, pending completion of a physical, club and industry sources confirmed.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/B0CEC1C1A5F2934386257375005B923E ?OpenDocument

I agree with this signing.  A 2 year deal, as long as we aren't talking $9 M/year is a good risk to take with no arms out there.

Star-divide

With all my love,
HL

XOXOXOXOXO

Comment 301 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like the move but
This line scares me a bit on the money issue:

"Terms of the pending deal were not disclosed as Pineiro traveled to St. Louis to undergo the physical; however, the contract's annual average value is expected to exceed the one-year $4 million contract he signed with the Boston Red Sox last winter."

I think it might be a 9-10M deal.  Which probably won't be too bad.  Hopefully he pitches the way he did at the end of the season.

by StLHugo on Oct 15, 2007 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

You've got to be kidding me...
9-10 not too bad? In 2005 he was worth -3 WSAB, in '06 -4, and with Boston last year he laid a 0.

He wasn't so much better with the Cards as lucky. His slugging against was .490. That's not going to translate to a sub-4 era in '08 or even a sub-5.

Cards fans have to demand smarter decision making than this. If Dave Duncan wants Pineiro its time to thank Dave Duncan for his wonderful service to the Cardinal organization and get somebody else to coach.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Negative much?
I am not sure what happened to him post 2004 but I think if he was able to somehow do what he did from 2002-2004 it would be a steal otherwise he still eats innings I think it is worth it.

by StLHugo on Oct 15, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mistake...
Counting on players to regain their level of performance from 3 years is ago is beyond foolish.  See Wells, Kip.

Just another bad baseball decision in a long line of them lately.  So much for player development ehh.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you on both points
TLR has mentioned that Duncan thinks he may be his easiest reclamation project he's undertaken because it was not difficult to identify the bad habits Joel had fallen into and Joel has been easy to work with in making adjustments.  Since he wasn't conditioned this year to be a starter, it will be interesting to see what he can do now that he has time to prepare for being in the rotation.  And you're right, if he doesn't meet expectations, he still will be a reliable innings eater.

Plus, what a relief to get away from Wells' and Reyes' endless nibbling at the strike zone.  After what we've gone through this year with too many wilting pitchers, I'll just be happy to see his him out there attacking the strike zone, pitching quickly, and playing aggressive defense.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

The over-under...
for his 2008 ERA is 5.00

Anything above $2 million per is a mistake. I'm bracing for 2/10. Yuck...

Can we hire a GM please?

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

hmm
2/10 I might be fine with I think.  We need an innings eater and we need stability.  I really don't see it as a bad deal and if it is incentive laden it will be better.

2M per wouldn't even get him talking since he holds a 4M one year player option anyway.

by StLHugo on Oct 15, 2007 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought that...
was a mutual option... The guy's been below replacement level for years and he projects to get worse not better. If he stays the same he wouldn't be worth a roster spot on a half-way decent team, and if the Cardinals aren't going to be half-way decent they might as well turn things over to somebody who might actually become better over time.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dumb, Dumb, Dumb
Hopefully he fails his physical and saves us from this mistake.

I'm sure he got at least 7M per.  Doesn't bother me so much for this year, but next year when the SP FA market is so great...that 7M is the difference betweed some averagish overpriced starter and lets say Jake Peavy.

We couldn't find someone to post a 5 era for close to the league minimum.

No change in philosophy, same ol' same ol'.  I expect Rasmus to be dealt for D Willis or someone like that soon.

Mozeliak has hand cuffed the new GM with 10M invested in players who, best case scenario, are woefully average.  You tell me those spots could not have been filled cheaply at nearly the same results.  Boy that 10M would be nice to throw at an impact player.

Don't know why I expected anything different.  The Good Ole Boy Baseball Network isn't done running this team into the ground quite yet.  Bring on Eckstein for 3 years.

Mozeliak should be getting Starbucks and making sure the office is thoroughly stocked with pens, staples, and paper.  He shouldn't be signing contract extensions.  He is in way over his head.

The most poorly ran team in baseball.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Amen...
I need to step away from VEB for a bit because I'm just getting madder and madder.

It's one thing to give up on '08, but for this clown Mozeliak to hose the new guy and hobble the team for 2009 is absolutely infuriating.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fine...
I'll be realistic.

Pittsburgh and Kansas City are worse.

Other than that, can you think of a team that is a bigger mess than the St Louis Cardinals?  I sure can't.

Hell, Tampa Bay has a much brighter future.

We need some new blood badly.  Either we commit to player development or we raise payroll to 150M.  We know the latter isn't happening and the former was just lip service so that DeWitt had an excuse to fire Walt.

This team is a cluster fuck.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

thinking seriously
i figure you were exaggerating, but i'm seriously thinking about it because that's how depressed i am. what teams are clearly being run worse than the cardinals right now?

in addition to pittsburgh and kc, i think you have to throw on baltimore, the white sox, the rangers, the nationals, and the reds (dusty BAKER?!?). i think those are all clearly worse.

balancing out the pros and cons, i think that puts the cards up in the next grouping, basically below-average, with teams like toronto, seattle, philly, houston, and san francisco.

but you're right - it's sad to see the team with no real direction right now, and these new contracts aren't helping. i'm optimistic that piniero's deal is for less than looper's. if it is, i'll be sort of "meh" about it - not thrilled, but not that upset. it's annoying, but not infuriating like a $7M/per would be, and i doubt it's really that.

Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

USS Mariner...
weighs in:

http://ussmariner.com/organizational-rankings/

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

26th...
About right, and an overall organizational grade of D...seems a bit high.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

you are completely unreasonable
in your comments.  There's no middle ground to anything you say.  The organization isn't as bad off as you make it to be.  Everything isn't puppy dogs and roses but please stop this apocalyptic talk; it's tiresome.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'll second that
bobby's act has gotten old....actually it reached that point about a month ago.
10-time World Champs!

by TheFranchise9 on Oct 15, 2007 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry...
I'll try and regain your approval in future posts...I could care less if you haven't figured that out yet.

Don't agree, that's fine.

BTW....It's not an act.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seattle is certainly being run worse
huge chunks of money dedicated to Beltre/Sexson, their starting SS is playing 2B for the Indians in the ALCS, they fired a good manager just so they could devote a small fortune to a 33 year old OF.

They are in much worse shape than the Cardinals.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Beltre is tradeable..
with 2 years and $24 million left on his deal. No one would take Pineiro at 2/10. I'd take Sexson at 1/14 over Pineiro.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

his ops last year
was less than aaron miles'. richie sexson's ops was less than .700.

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seattle...
They won 88 games last year in a much tougher division.  They have a better farm system, and have a inside track in the asian market.

I disagree.

Care to make a side wager on who wins more games next year?  I won't even adjust for leagues.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...
"i think you have to throw on baltimore, the white sox, the rangers, the nationals, and the reds "

I think you put us in this category.

We are actually quite similar to BAL, CHI, TEX and CIN.  Teams with the means to compete, sizeable payrolls, and solid fan base...but just don't because of poor baseball decisions.

The way the roster is constructed and looks like it's goind to continue to be contructed,it's quite possible we are the worst team in the NL next year...save the Pirates.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stop it
We've competed for ~10 years before this season hot shot.  When have any of those teams aside from Chicago for one year competed recently?
Cheeseburger in paradise.

by joker24 on Oct 15, 2007 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great point
and we would have stayed in contention this year (and I believe we would have won our division) if any one of the following had not happened:  (i) if JH hadn't died, sending us into a long losing streak, (ii) if we hadn't had so many injuries, (iii)  if the HGH story had not come out when it did and had not hit the team as hard as it did.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?
How does the past have anything to do with the future of this team?

I'm not discounting the success we've had.  I'm talking about going forward.

This team is an absolute mess from top to bottom and it's painfully obvious for anyone who cares to look.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

How does the past relate to now?
...the team is a mess from top to bottom?

Hello....  many of the players on past successful teams are still on this team and they still can be as or more productive than they have been the last several years.  

Yadi remains a defensive gem and has been progressing offensively.  Pujols will have more time to heal this off-season than he's had for years.  Edmonds showed signs of heating up several times this season even though he was still recovering from surgeries, and now he will have the winter to focus completely on strengthening (rather than recovering).  Rolen's shoulder should have much more flexibility than it had when we won the W.S.  We have potential power from Duncan and Ankiel.  If Eck stays, he hit offensive highs this year (and he has a tested replacement if he's injured or does not re-sign.)  And Kennedy, here's hoping he had an off year.

Pitching is a puzzle, but it's been a puzzle for years.  On the bright side, Wainwright was one of the three best pitchers in the NL in the last half of the season and both Looper and Pineiro were reliable.  The FO has said that they want to get an additional front of the rotation pitcher.  And Carpenter should be back sometime after the AS break.  In the meantime, we have back of the rotation guys who can fill in.  Plus, Mulder may be productive next year.  You should look at the Met's pitching (including their bullpen)--it may make you feel better.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha!
"many of the players on past successful teams are still on this team and they still can be as or more productive than they have been the last several years. "

Who would they be?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you might be happier rooting for
another team with players you like and a manager and coaches you like.  Because this is what you've got.  And I can't imagine surviving the season next year if I had your "everything is gloom and doom" attitude.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I might be happier...
You are correct in that statement.

Unfortunately, I have no choice.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

re: "I might be happier..."
"Unfortunately, I have no choice."

actually, there is nothing stopping anyone from becoming a fan of the devil rays, royals, marlins, or any other team that specializes in going "young and cheap" and developing a large number of young players at the major league level each year. that is always an alternative.

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

ehh..
"that is always an alternative."

Not for me.  I'm a Cardinals fan.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Um
Albert Pujols, Yadier Molina, Scott Rolen, Jim Edmonds, Adam Wainwright, Chris Duncan, and Jason Isringhausen, for starters.  You could even make an argument for Adam Kennedy, who while never part of a successful Cardinals team, was on a successful Angels club for years.

Albert Pujols - Look at his numbers from 2007.  A down year for Albert is on par with a career year for most ball players.  He's got from October to April to get healthy again, more time off then he's had in years.  

Yadier Molina - One of two bright spots from the 07 team.  He's the best defensive catcher in baseball, and if his 06 playoff and 07 regular season offensive improvements hold up he's an All Star catcher for years to come.

Scott Rolen - I'm not entirely optimistic about his healthy return, but I'd be willing to bet he improves drastically from his 07 numbers.  Probably not back to career norms, but enough to be a contributer.  Possibly the best defensive third baseman ever.

Jim Edmonds - He's a platoon player at this point, but if he can stay healthy in 08 he's bound to put up better numbers than he did in 07.  That's a big if, but it's not out of the question.

Adam Wainwright - The other 07 bright spot.  Staff ace material, young, cheap.  I think he might regress a bit in 08, but he'll still be in the upper tier of NL starters.

Chris Duncan - Another player plagued by injuries in 07.  A healthy Chris Duncan is a solid ball player.

And while the starting pitching was downright awful aside from Wainwright and day-time Braden Looper, the bullpen was one of the best in all of baseball.  They'll all be back.  And for all the flak they get around here, our bench led the NL in pinch hits.  The problem there is that they were forced to start far too much because of all the injuries.

You've really got to cut it out with the gloom and doom stuff.  It's not THAT bad.  We've been spoiled by years of winning seasons and playoff appearances.  For all the injuries and PR disasters and things that went wrong in 2007, we were contenders through the end of August.  No, we probably won't be a 100-win juggernaut, but a rotation without a Wells and a starting lineup that stays even remotely healthy and we're in the thick of the 08 Central race.  

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

just want to say
thank you to nycardfan for being one constant voice of sanity and level-headedness on here. i don't have the time or energy to post as much as may here do these days, but the doom-and-gloom tone and the sheer anger of the posts is very saddening sometimes, especially when you consider:
  1. the team has been one of the best in baseball for the last decade
  2. our predictions and premonitions about next year are just that -- none of it is fact yet, and projections are often wrong
  3. it's only a game
and fans of the royals, reds, rangers, and orioles would, i'm pretty sure, trade their past decade for ours, and possibly the next five years as well. "the grass is always greener..." so forth.

if one cannot get enjoyment (only anger and frustration) out of following a sports team -- esp. one as successful as the cards -- then why follow them in the first place?

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

True, it's a lousy division...
But with the Cubs being sold to a new owner, can we count on the division being terrible in the future? They can jack up the payroll even more.

And I would also like to see more WS appearances. 2 in the last 13 years isn't terrible, but it's not great, either

by DiscoJer on Oct 15, 2007 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

2 WS appearances in last 13 years
Only the Yankees, Braves, Indians, Cardinals and Marlins have been 2x in the last 13 years.  BOS and ARI have a chance to join that group this year.  Unless you're expecting STL to be the Yankees, I'd say we've done alright.

by spants on Oct 15, 2007 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with Spants
I don't know how anyone can be upset because we have only made the World Series twice in 13 years. And we have been in the playoffs for what 7 years out of the last 11 years.

You don't think about 95% of the teams and their fans in MLB would dream to have done that? Only the Yankees and Braves can claim to have been as or more successful as the Cardinals during that stretch.

Until he have a drought to where we haven't made the playoffs in 4 or more years, there isn't a whole lot to complain about in my opinion.

That whole Seattle fansite rankings of baseball front offices or whatever is a joke to have the Cardinals near the bottom and yes I realize we don't even have a real GM right now.

by KYCards on Oct 15, 2007 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dug even deeper
to see how well the Cards have done in my lifetime.  Since 1980, the year I was born, only three teams have gone to the WS 5 times or more: Yankees (7, won 4 WS), Braves (5, won 1 WS), and Cardinals (5, won 2 WS).  We have it pretty good, especially since two of those appearances and one WS title were within the last three seasons.  

I'm not happy with a lot of stuff right now, but I'm confident that DeWitt wants to win.  That gives us an advantage over several MLB franchises.  So, let's just all take some pills, wash them down with some scotch, and relax.

by spants on Oct 16, 2007 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

bobbyballgame, I'm going to ask you
and everyone else to quit picking on the Royals.  They have made some very smart, high risk moves since Dayton Moore took over about a year and a half ago. And yes, the Meche deal was a good deal for THEM-they HAD to have a youngish veteran to put all that great young pitching on the way--and some of it is already in KC. They have a long way to go, but they are well on their way.....

Please don't pick on the Royals-they are proceeding with the right kind of changes to get them out of the mess they were in....

by jillsinmo on Oct 15, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I meant to say a youngish veteran to
put all of that great young pitching around.  I was responding to a post several posts up, and I did hit the reply to button....I don't know how the hell I ended up down here.  I think it's past my bedtime.....

by jillsinmo on Oct 15, 2007 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who is woefully average?
Who in the $10MM is woefully average?

by reed600 on Oct 15, 2007 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both of them...
3.5M for Springer

7M (I speculate) for Pineiro.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Springer?
How exactly is he woefully average?  Did you pay attention to what he did in 2007?

by reed600 on Oct 15, 2007 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure did...
Have you paid attention to the other 13 years of his career?  Or how about about his career ERA+ of 94(below avg).  

I'm sure he established a new level of performance at age 38....wait, are you Mozeliak himself?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe I am Mozeliak...
And I think you have to keep in tact the 1 good part of the team, the bullpen. Part of the $3.5M is rewarding him for a stellar year in 2007.

If you estimate $7M for Pineiro, who out there would be a better/cheaper alternative?  Kip Wells?

by reed600 on Oct 15, 2007 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK
"Part of the $3.5M is rewarding him for a stellar year in 2007."

YOu are probably right and that is a terrible strategy.

"If you estimate $7M for Pineiro, who out there would be a better/cheaper alternative?  Kip Wells?"

Do I really have to come up with better ways to spend 7M dollars than a replacement level pitcher?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

let's wait until the results start coming in
from other teams' signings. last year's padilla and marquis deals, this year's looming deals for kyle lohse and others. i think $13 is a little much for pineiro, but i have no say in what the market is.

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sooo...
If someone makes a worse signing it makes our bad signing better?  I fail to follow, unless you are talkinga about every action has an equal an opposite reaction type of thing.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jason Marquis
makes $6.375M in 2008 and $9.875M in 2009.  I feel better already.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unless I'm wrong
The Springer deal was a 1-year deal and the Pineiro deal is 2-years.  Neither one of these deals, but especially the Springer deal, is going to hamstring the new GM from making any real moves.

I'm certainly not in love with this signing, but let's be a little less dramatic than saying the Cardinals, posting two 100-win seasons and a World Series championship recently, are the worst run team in baseball.

by mtalken on Oct 16, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

This team...
will be lucky to win 70 games.  Hell, if everything goes exactly right they may come with in shouting distance of .500 ball.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

If everything goes right?
They'll win 80+.  Everything right would be:

Pujols goes back to 35/120
Rolen, Edmonds, Duncan stay healthy and produce 20/70+ each.
Ankiel hits 25/80+
Kennedy returns to career norms
SS isn't a complete blackhole

Wainwright and Looper don't regress.
Mulder returns to April/early May 2006
Carpenter is back shortly after the ASB
Pineiro maintains his 2007 starting level
The bullpen doesn't implode.

That would be everything going 'right' and that would be a talented team, most likely capable of winning the NL Central.

Your hyperbole seems to get worse every diary that passes.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know, I actually agree with
a lot of that.  Though I'd throw in "non sucky leadoff man"

by sdrone on Oct 15, 2007 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Have to agree....
that it is a little out of control with the "sky is falling" syndrome". The fact remains hat the Cards ended the season with only two starters returning in the spring (accepting the premise that Reyes is gone, as he should be for trade bait). Pinero does not fill that impact starter position, but there are very few on the f.a. market that do. At the right price this is not crippling to the team financially, nor an indication that we are the worst run team in baseball. Take a deep breath, it's a long off-season.
go crazy folks..........

by wwbd on Oct 15, 2007 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm...
How likely is "everything going right"?

Not very.

As contructed now, and I don't see it being upgraded, this team wins 70-75 games.

Half of those things you are counting on happening are about as unlikely as me sleeping with Scarlett Johanssen.

Rolen, Edmonds healthy?

Mulder pitching effectively ever again?

Carp coming back and being Carp in '08?

Pipe dream roster that has to have everything go right to compete in the worst division in baseball.  Terrible.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

You didn't say that
you said if everything goes exactly right they may come with in shouting distance of .500 ball.

I'm just calling you on the 'sky is falling' overstatement.  If everything goes right, this is a talented team.  Will everything go right?  Hell no.  But that's not what you said.  You believe that if everyone is healthy and plays at expected levels, the Cardinals will be lucky to win 81 games.

I don't buy that for 1 minute.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough...
We disagree.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.
No personal attack intended.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know, Bobby
I'm with you on a lot of this.  But, others are right, your hyperbole is a little too much.  Lucky to win 70?  C'mon.  Your points have more credibility if you don't write stuff like that.  The worst run organization in baseball?  C'mon.  It's not even close and you know it.

As for Pineiro, if he's $5 M per and eats 200 innings, this isn't that bad but, you're right, we are basically paying for a replacement level pitcher -- but one that should provide 200 innings.  Now, if we add Eckstein, too -- heads should roll.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed
I'm not as disgusted with the Pineiro signing as most but if Eckstein returns, I'll sharpen my pitchfork.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That ain't hyperbole my friend...
The USS Mariner has the Cards front office at 5th worst in the majors and that was before they inked the worst contract a Cardinal GM has signed in a long time.

Last year the team won 78 games, and its pythagorean record was 71-91. Izzy will get worse before Edmonds or Mulder gets better, we have two replacement level starters and counting locked into the rotation, and there's not much help on the horizon.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

the post has nothing to do
with how many games the team won the previous year.  And yes, it is hyperbole.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the team won...
78 in '07 and gets measurably worse, doesn't that mean it will probably flirt with the 70 win mark in '08?
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we have a misunderstanding...
Bobby said we'd be lucky to win 70 in '08, HC called  this "hyperbole", I pointed out that the club is already close to the 70-win mark, and so Bobby's prediction wasn't hyperbole at all.

The rankings had nothing to do with the second paragraph of my post

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahh I see.
I was speaking more to the fact that bobby is hyperbole than that instance which isn't far from the truth this year.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just because
the USS Mariner has us at 5th worst doesn't make it so.  If Pujols gets hurt, we'll be lucky to win 70.  And having 2 replacement level starters now means more wins than 2 below-replacement level starters which is what we had last year.

This organization has its warts, to be sure, but it's not in the bottom 3rd in MLB.  My guess is that ranking done by USS Mariner was a reaction to Walt's being fired.  Most of the reaction around the country was negative and the idea is that the owner doesn't know what he's doing or he's too meddlesome if he's firing a great, stand--up, GM like Jocketty.  To me, it was the right move, assuming Mozeliak isn't hired on and a sign of progress, not regress.

You like Antonetti.  Me, too.  If DeWitt hires him or Woodfork, this organization will be improving, though most will see it as a step backward.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hyperbole..
is defined as "extravagant exaggeration". If we're one rickety player away from being a 70-win team, it's not hyperbole to say that we will, in fact, be a 70-win team. We'll be lucky if Pujols makes it through another campaign without going on the DL. In that sense we'll be lucky to win 70 games.

As for the USS Mariner rankings, the Cardinals weren't punished for firing Jocketty. They received a low score in part bacause of what the front office, with Jocketty, became.

Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disagree...
"This organization has its warts, to be sure, but it's not in the bottom 3rd in MLB."

Couldn't disagree more.  This organization is at least that bad and trending downward.

As for your earlier comment.  Yes, I do overstate things from time to time.  I'm so emotionally invested in this team, as many of us are, that when blatantly stupid baseball decisions are made it sends me into a state of outrage.  Some of the statments I made were pure emotion.

However, with a 71-91 pythagorean record last year and the moves that Mozeliak has made so far...I wouldn't call 70 wins out of the question.

If they go into this season with the roster as it sits now...it may be likely.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for playing homie
>Couldn't disagree more.  This organization is at >least that bad and trending downward.

 Wow, thanks for being the world's biggest drama queen.

 Jocketty hasn't done much in years and he was holding everything back.  Hopefully they will get a good GM and one that wants to build up the farm system and one that wants to win instead of doing nothing at all.

 However, unlike you, I am waiting to see who they choose and how they go forward.  I am not going to have some silly emotional knee jerk reaction (ie. see your post with no good logic.)

>Some of the statments I made were pure emotion.

 Well thank God they were based on pure emotion and are not based on any facts.  Facts is what it is all about, emotion is meaningless.

by Docwiz on Oct 15, 2007 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, if a front office that won a WS the
previous year is the/one of the worst in baseball, does that means the Indians are REd Sox are each winning 140 games/year and sweeping the playoffs?

by sdrone on Oct 15, 2007 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's see where the money comes in...
this thing all depends on the money.  Anything with the average salary of 4-6 over the two I'm fine with.  6-8 over the two makes this questionable, but given the options, probably not horrible.
Anything over 8 and this deal is no good.
"Baseball is the only field of endeavor where a man can succeed three times out of ten and be considered a good performer." - Ted Williams

by WiscCard on Oct 15, 2007 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

13 million
2 years 13 million is what it looks like he recieved.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7336974

by strainer1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Unbelievable...
Mozeliak should be run out of town on a rail. This is a sub-replacement level pitcher over his last 600 innings.
Ease LaDunketty out gently, thank him profusely, and... Hire Antonetti!!!

by guayzimi on Oct 15, 2007 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

hire a gm
the mozeliak era has not got off to a good start...ugh.

by erik on Oct 15, 2007 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was most bothered
when I read that he was negotiating w/ Eckstein.  I knew we'd bring back Pineiro, but I was hoping for $5 M.  At least it's only 2 years?...

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, that sucks
It probably doesn't kill the team for years to come, but it is way too much -- see Rosenthal's comments on the sidebar

Isn't the point of getting a new GM allowing him to do something to put his stamp on the team?  What's the point of spending so much of the (little) money he has to work with this year before he even shows up?  

And if the Cards want to retain so much of the team that Walt put together, what did he do that got him fired?  Not refill the water cooler when it was his turn?

by tdawg on Oct 15, 2007 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Walt was fired because he did not play
well with the house that was divided.  He probably would have kept his job if he hadn't treated Lunhow so poorly.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also
It probably had something to do with his public outcries of mistreatment.

The whole change in philosophy thing was/is a complete farce.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just plugged Pineiro's contract into
the payroll matrix and the Cardinals have $16 M left (if payroll is $115 M) to spend on a backup C, a SS or backup IF and a starting pitcher (if they aren't content with the current crop).

This also depends on whether they attempt to trade Reyes, Looper, Duncan, Schumaker.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow
horrible.
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

* vomit *
Jocketty must be having a good laugh right now.

by jeff abs on Oct 15, 2007 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

ugh
what a horrible, terrible, no good, very bad contract.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

No,
although I was a little off on the title.  It should read a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Contract by Judith Viorst.  One of my favorite books when I was a child.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

My daughter loves this book
I, instantly, recognized the reference.  

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

handcuffs
The next GM is now already shackled by a shockingly bad FA contract. On the bright side it's only 2 years. But a complete waste of resources on a replacement level commodity.

Mozeliak = disappointing.

by airhad on Oct 15, 2007 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That article
FoxSports really needs to do away with user comments on their articles. Entire regions of my brain turned to snot reading them.

This isn't a great contract, but not the end of the world. He compares favorably to Jeff Suppan heading into his age 29 season—better peripherals and about the same demonstrated innings-eating skills. He's not a great pitcher, but is a good-to-decent 3 or 4 if he can simply maintain the skill level he showed after coming over.

I'd wait to see how the contract is structured before throwing a hissy-fit—if it's something like $5M and $8M, it would be a great deal if he puts up 04/05-Suppan production next year and the next GM trades him next offseason if Boggs or Garcia are ready to step in.

by liam on Oct 15, 2007 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, I like the deal, then
P-D is reporting it to be a backloaded contract: $500,000 signing bonus, $5m in '08 and $7.5m in '09. If he puts up the Suppan-esque or better performance I expect in 2008, we could trade him after the season.

I don't see a problem here.

by liam on Oct 15, 2007 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not so sure...
Backloading makes the deal worse in my estimation.

'09 is where the Cardinals should be focusing their efforts...great FA class, help from the farm etc.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree
The Springer deal doesn't bother me one bit even though we were bidding against retirement for a player we could have kept for probably 60% of what we're going to pay him.  It's still a one-year deal and there aren't any really better options out there that are affordable.

The Pineiro deal, while not the end of the world, isn't a good one, but it could be better if the 7.5M and 5M were shifted, because it would at least open up 2.5M more to potentially throw at a better pitcher or shortstop for the 2009 season, when it seems like there's a better free agent crop coming up, in addition to some of our top prospects probably being ready to contribute and even out the roster(both age-wise and salary-wise).

by mtalken on Oct 16, 2007 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

piniero's heist...
I can't believe that number.  Wow.  I was formerly in the "I'm fine if we keep Mo" camp, well I'm going to have to sleep on that one now.  That is unbelievable.  

by MrPlow on Oct 15, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here is good reminder of Pineiro's talents
This offers an assessment of him as a pitcher in 2004 when he signed his last contract with the Mariners.  

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1713128

If Duncan thinks he's found a way to rectify certain bad habits he's picked up since that time and can get him back to his earlier form, then I'm all for signing him.

Anyway, who would you put in his place?  He's not bumping anyone on our pitching staff who is better.  And I'll bet that other people who offer his potential upsides (and a big upside is that we already know he works effectively with Duncan) will get caught up in a bidding war and will be out of our reach.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 2:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Ahh...
Here we go with Duncan the miracle worker again.  The man is a mere mortal as hard as it is for some to believe.  The list of pitchers who failed under his guidance is as long as the list of those who prospered.

If he can turn chicken shit into chicken salad then why do you have to give 2yrs/13M for the chicken shit.  It can be had much cheaper.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

now that's a damned good point
if Duncan were a miracle worker, couldn't he work his miracles w/ Brad Thompson for 1/2 a million rather than Pineiro for 13 times that?

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, no, no.
you completely misunderstand the magic of the duncan. the duncan's powers only work on has-beens, not never-was's.

for duncan's powers to take effect, the pitcher in question must have been good at some point several years ago, and then fallen on hard times, due to injury, flaw in mechanics, walking pnumonia, etc. also, the pitcher must come along with several other similar pitchers, on whom the magic does not work, and who we will all ignore.

also, you only get three wishes from the oquendo leprechaun if you rub his head COUNTER-clockwise. a clockwise rub means so taguchi kicks you in the balls.

Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brad Thompson
threw 50 something consecutive scoreless innings in the minors.  Doesn't that count?

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many pitches does Thompson have?
How many pitches does Pineiro have?  How many complete games or complete game shutouts has Thompson pitched in the past?  How many has Pineiro pitched in the past?  What are the overall tools available to each pitcher and how much experience does each have with pitching effectively in the big leagues?  I like Thompson.  But he doesn't have the same toolset as Pineiro.  

It just amazes me that people on this site never give up on Reyes-always waiting patiently for him to "recover" his old form, and all the while refusing to admit that any other pitcher could do the same.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

you don't have to bet $13m on reyes
or any other young pitcher, to find out if he can turn it around. that's the difference. the cards are placing an enormous bet on a pitcher who has a very good chance of being kip wells, sidney ponson, or jeff weaver --- all pitchers who duncan said he could fix, but couldn't.

by lboros on Oct 15, 2007 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1,
Pinero can be worse than any of the names on that list since we are not stuck with him for two full years.

by DriverZn on Oct 15, 2007 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Weaver may have been OK if he stayed here
don't blame Duncan for Weaver's nosedive after joining the Mariners.  Suppan took a nosedive as well in the second half of the season.  And Morris went downhill when he left the Cards.  Do you want to pile all that on Duncan too?

And what about Duncan's many successes?  The list is much longer on that side.  We wouldn't have won as much as we have since TLR came to St. Louis if Duncan wasn't the pitching coach.  I just think there is an almost pathological dislike for Duncan because Reyes did not succeed.  

If Duncan feels confident that he's ALREADY FIXED the problem, as TLR has said in interviews, then he doesn't think of this as a Wellsian kind of experiment.  Anyway, we know Wells couldn't make adjustments that Duncan suggested to him and Duncan has made it clear that Pineiro has easily made his suggested adjustments.  They shouldn't be equate at all.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

not piling anything on anyone
just stating facts.

i've given duncan full credit for his successes. if pineiro turns out to be a success, i'll credit dunc for that too.

i still wouldn't bet $13.5m on this particular player. lotta downside risk.

by lboros on Oct 15, 2007 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

AND
what if Duncan isn't here next season?

by spants on Oct 15, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

what the hell does Reyes
have to do w/ Thompson? -- although, you're correct, the point is the same. If Duncan's a miracle worker who can turn the Pineiro of recent memory into the Pineiro that he once could have been, why can't he do the same w/ Reyes (who has better "tools" than Thompson).

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

not better
i agree "he's not bumping anyone on our pitching staff who is better." definitely agree with that. the rotation is still basically half-empty, or at least 40% empty.

but there doesn't have to be someone better for this to be an awful deal. piniero isn't likely to be markedly better than brad thompson next year. even assuming thompson doesn't have more upside than piniero (which i'm actually perfectly willing to grant at this point; i've been successfully un-sold on thompson), thompson still would have given roughly the same performance and cost about $12M less over two years. that plus ryan over eckstein is $20M+ in savings over two years.

Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pineiro prior to 2004 was much better
than Thompson--he had a consistently lower ERA, BB9, Whip, ate more innings, he pitched complete games, he pitched complete game shut-outs.  He has more pitches at his disposal.  And he has much more experience in the big leagues.

For all of those in hysteria right now, maybe you should go back and watch our last Mets game and listen to Keith Hernandez' glowing descriptions of the quality of Pineiro's pitches.  They did say that they thought he was the best pitcher the Mets had faced all year.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

We didn't sign Pineiro
prior to 2004.  And frankly, Keith Hernandez' opinion doesn't mean much to me.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

well then
you under-estimate the power of Just For Men.  REEEEJECTED!  NO PLAY FOR MR. GREY?
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Oct 15, 2007 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

and I'm sure your assessment
of the quality of Pineiro's pitching doesn't mean much to the Mets.  Pineiro was key to their not making it to the post-season.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Was he???
I seem to remember Mike Maroth twirling a gem against them as well.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Mets won that game
It was a tough luck loss on MM's part, but it had no effect on the Mets playoff aspirations ;)

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

You miss the point every time
we go down this road.  You base your analysis of whether a player is going to perform well off of anecdotal remarks made by random people in baseball.  That's a bad/wrong/ignorant way to assess players.  Someone remarking that Pineiro looked good once MEANS NOTHING.  The fact that he hasn't been decent in 3 years should tell you a lot more than some off the cuff remark made in a broadcasting booth.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Have you ever heard the term
reclamation project or overgeneralization (or maybe it's overreaction)?

I was responding to the chicken little calls about the sky is falling, which of course is based on solid evidence and has nothing to do with speculation....

And yea, what could I be thinking?  How could I rely on remarks by random people, like TLR and Dave Duncan, which I've already mentioned repeatedly?  Trusting their assessments must be bad/wrong/ingorant and must MEAN NOTHING because they are looking at a small sample size and comparing it to Joel's past performances.  Give it a rest with all the "every times" and "means nothings" and "hasn't ever been decent in 3 years" (I thought he played well enough for us) and other random absolutes you toss about.  

BTW, I mistakenly said that it was Keith Hernandez who was positively analyzing Pineiro's pitches during the Mets' game.  It was actually Ron Darling, another one of Duncan's "reclamation projects.  

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony and Dave aren't infallible
it didn't work out with Wells this year -- what is it about their remarks re: Wells that are different.

And give it a rest with the unsupported suppositions.  You inevitably arrive at grandiose conclusions with no supporting evidence other than something someone said sometime.  That's literally what your argument is reduced to -- because a few people have randomly said that Pineiro is going to be good you fall in line.

How many times to you hear respected people come out and trash someone's pitching ability?  Never.  But you don't think that there aren't plenty of other people that could anecdotally remark on Pineiro's stuff or pitches and say that they thought they a pitcher was crap?  Because that seems fallacious to me.

My so called "absolutes" are based on statistical studies with evidence.  If you don't like those types of things (you know, things like research and odds and facts) then go play in neverneverland where pitchers magically return to a skillset they haven't exhibited in years.  Your condescension towards statistics is annoying, especially for someone who purported them self as an academic.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

They didn't know Wells
and, as someone else put nicely, they hadn't test driven Wells.  They know what it's like to work with Pineiro compared to Wells and they have a good idea of how well he listens to them and how well he makes adjustments that they ask for.  Pineiro is not an "enigma" to them, like they've described Wells.  Other people have talked about this in the thread so I'm not going to go on about it.

Your "absolutes" are not always based on statistical studies.  You make over the top statements from time to time, like you are making now, which do not seem to be carefully considered, well organized, or adequately documented.  

You also sometimes seem adverse to reading other posts attentively--taking out of them what you want rather than what they actually say.  I never claimed Duncan is infallible.  I said he makes mistakes and isn't perfect.  But he still is gifted and has had success with many reclamation projects.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

AZ
AZ, I do agree with you that Pineiro has NOT been an effective pitcher over the last 3 years, if you look at his body of work.  I know you are a "proof is in the puddin'" guy.  With that said, you have to realize that these are PEOPLE.  They DO have capabilities of performing better.  Have you not gotten into bad habits yourself at work, but fixed them later?  Have you not worked on your swing and improved your golf game?  

There IS an anectdotal factor here, not just a statistical one. I think everyone will agree that Pineiro does have some quality pitches.  I don't know if he was tipping them (as Dunc suggested) or what, but the facts about him remain.

  1. He's healthy (better than 40% of our staff)
  2. He's probably going to stay healthy.
  3. He has the ability to throw some quality pitches.
  4. He threw well after coming over to the Cards.
I do know that the first 3 look similar to Kip Wells, but Wells sucked (excepting his 1st start) from the get-go.  

With the team backed into a corner on SP's, we really had no choice, and he was the youngest, healthiest pitcher we could have gotten for that kind of cash.  

I'm a man, a manly, manly, man. Unknown

by Eckstreem on Oct 16, 2007 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

The pineiro deal
reminds me of the clamoring for Weaver at the end of last year.  It's possible that Pineiro has developed bad habits but I don't think that's the most likely reason for his lack of success.  If a player's skillset deteriorates because they can't physically compete at the same level (this could surface as command issues, decrease in velocity, decrease in movement), then it isn't about habits; it's about ability.  I think it's far more likely that Pineiro had a fluky good run with STL but that he's far more similar to the guy we've seen for 3.5 years (2004-2007) than the one we saw in STL for .5 years.

by azruavatar on Oct 16, 2007 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

There hasn't been a single pitching
coach in the last three years that could figure out what Pineiro was doing wrong except for Dave Duncan?  I would work well with Dave Duncan; that doesn't make me a good pitcher.  

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, I happen to think we have a better
pitching coach than the Mariners do.  And Boston hardly used him.  With their money, someone else became available, and they sat him on the bench for the year.  So if I have a bench and the Mariners pitching coach against Dave Duncan, I'm going to go with Dave Duncan.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently Duncan was also the only one
who watched any video of Pineiro for 3 years?  You have to see Pineiro in person to spot the flaws?  I don't know how you can assume that for 3 years Pineiro has been using broken mechanics but absolutely no one outside of Dave Duncan was smart enough to see it.  I'm not disparaging Duncan but your premise is just not probable.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

You said someplace you would get along well
with Duncan....  Methinks you might be wrong.  

Yes, I believe Dunc is especially gifted at spotting discarded pitchers who can be "repaired."  He makes mistakes,  He's not perfect.  But I think there are not a lot of coaches who can do what he does as well as he does.  

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok
then pay dave duncan.  If he's the miracle worker, why are we paying Pineiro for Duncan's prowess at fixing broken things?

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not taking a stance one way or another
however, Dave Duncan said that he found a flaw in Pineiro's delivery that was allowing hitters to distinguish what he would be throwing in his first start against the Nationals.

He said they fixed the flaw and Pineiro went the next 10 starts with a 3.68 ERA, a 5.8 K/9, a 9.6 H/9 and a 1.5 BB/9.  Nothing to spectacular, but servicable.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

apropos of nothing
i hadn't heard that, and obviously small sample size, which i'm very skeptical (read: downright cynical) about continuing over the length of this contract.

but if it were to continue? i mean, 3.68 era, k/bb of almost 4? that's not "serviceable." that's "better than wainwright."

but. it's not going to continue.

Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully
the 11 taters in 60 innings and the 500 SLG doesn't either.

by plh903 on Oct 16, 2007 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Many of his stats were all off from what I've read
I also thought I saw that his walk rate was unnaturally high?  Maybe I'm wrong.  If that's the case then you have to figure that some of these stats will revert back to their mean and cancel each other out.  

It doesn't fully mean he's capable of posting a sub 4.0 ERA, but it doesn't mean he's NOT capable of posting a sub 4.0 ERA either.

by mtalken on Oct 16, 2007 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Walk Rate...
It was abnormally low.

His strand rate was abnormally high.

Both if they revert back to the mean.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 16, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very bad...
Both very bad if the revert back to the mean.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 16, 2007 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Walk Rate
In 2007: 2.40
Career: 2.90

There good reason to believe the reduced walk rate reflects an altered approach to pitching, not random fluctuation, as has been discussed previously around here.

by liam on Oct 16, 2007 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's what TLR said was the problem
he had fallen into a pitching pattern that telegraphed what he was throwing.  He said that that's why Pineiro was such an easy reclamation project, and even hesitated to label him as such, because it was really more a matter of making a number of small adjustments to all of his pitches and his pitching pattern.  

And wow...what a lot of hostility towards Duncan.  You'd think he never gave us any winning pitchers in the past.  He doesn't have to be a miracle worker to have successes.  We don't live in a black and white world like that--people can be successful and not be perfect, you know.  More hyperbole... on and on it goes....

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

11 starts
isn't enough to tell us he's fixed. jason marquis put up some pretty nifty stretches back in 2005, only to come back more craptacular then ever.

by erik on Oct 15, 2007 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said it was
I don't think we can determine exactly what Pineiro gives us based on those 10 starts either.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

TLR said that Duncan felt this way
None of us will know whether he's right or not until next year.  But DeWitt seems to trust Duncan's assessment.  Nobody hired Pineiro against DeWitt's will.  And he's the guy with the money.  He gets to spend it the way he wants.  

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

both of these are bad arguments.
  1. the "i guess we won't know until we see him next year" argument would be fine if this deal were for 1.3 instead of 13. but 13 million over two years should buy a lot more than "wait and see." that's pretty much why people are upset.
  2. true, dewitt can spend the money how he wants. but if he spends it unwisely, the cards won't be as good. and we think this was unwise. are we not allowed to say that? we're fans, just like you; every one of these moves will have a direct impact on our happiness in the future. why shouldn't we voice our opinions?
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

What bothers me the most
is that Mozeliak is doing this in lieu of interviewing for the GM job.  Now, I'm biased b/c I want an outsider (Antonetti or Woodfork) to get the job but, you'd have to think that Mozeliak's resume to DeWitt will be -- Look at all the signings I made happen.  I've single-handedly filled many of our holes (esp. if he brings back Eckstein).  Will DeWitt read anything that says "Good God, you overpaid for Springer, and Pineiro (and, gasp, Eckstein)?"  I doubt it.

Hopefully one of the other candidates will bring it up.  To me, this is showing how eminently UNqualified Mozeliak is but it may give the impression that he's qualified.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 3:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Mo...
He isn't qualified to be GM of my Sunday Beer League.

(We need to get younger and more athletic at SS, 3B, 2B...well, virtually every position on the field)

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's a lot easier to do
in a beer league than it is to do in MLB...

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

(also)
"getting younger" by itself is a poor goal to pursue; "youth" doesn't win ballgames.  "Getting better" is a worthy goal, but just kicking the old guys to the curb and hiring youngsters isn't going to fix any problems unless they are better ballplayers than the ones we've got access to now.  

Right now we have no guarantees that anyone fitting that description available is available; a blockbuster trade is a possibility, but it involves more risk than an FA signing, and going into trade negotiations with too weak of a position is just begging to be Muldered.

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, but
you can't get better, long-term, w/o getting younger -- or at least the Cards can't. We can get better short-term which, perhaps, is what we did today. But it did nothing for us long-term. In fact, by adding $6.5+ M to the books for a replacement level starter for 2009, it helps to ensure that we won't be getting a lot better 2 years from now.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

How?
"In fact, by adding $6.5+ M to the books for a replacement level starter for 2009, it helps to ensure that we won't be getting a lot better 2 years from now."

We didn't trade any talent, and we didn't lose draft picks by signing someone else's FA.  All we did was commit a little too much money to a pitcher already under our control.  That will limit our ability to sign a big-name FA, perhaps, but it's only a 2 year deal and a lot of money comes off the books after 2008 (~$40M, unless they extend edmonds/looper/mulder/izzy/speez/springer).  2 years from now, Garcia or Walters or whoever else is ready can take his place if he isn't worth extending.

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

How?
Because it's $7.5 M MORE we have to pay than we would've had to pay if we didn't sign Pineiro. (backloaded contract) Therefore, it reduces, by $7.5 M, the amount we'll have to spend in free agency or in acquiring another contract through trade in '09. It doesn't cost us any prospects (except those who won't get to play b/c we're using Pineiro instead) but it may cost us someone better ($7.5M worth) next year.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

i have to believe
that Mo is on a very short leash as an interim GM, and that all of this has to have been at least discussed with DeWitt.  In fact this might be something that DeWitt ordered done- it might have nothing to do with Mo's wishes.

On the bright side, we've potentially filled a rotation spot without sacrificing any prospects, which could fit into DeWitt's comments regarding a new direction for the franchise.  Money is just money, and there are no awards for finishing second with an efficient payroll...

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a very important point
about not having to sacrifice prospects to fill this spot.  

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

i mean,
no, it isn't. because it's replacement level. so rather than not give up prospects by overpaying, they could have not given up prospects by, you know, actually giving the job to a prospect. and that would have gotten them roughly the same performance for 10% of the cost.
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 15, 2007 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

i keep hearing this repeated
"Pinero is replacement level".  I thought I cleared that up above, but I guess I didn't.  Pinero is NOT replacement level, whatever the guy who runs the mariners blog says.  He is a safe bet to be between 9 and 37 pitching runs above replacement level, based on recent history, with the potential to be much better based on ancient history.  Having him for a full season should make us several wins better than we were this year, with Reyes and Wells in the rotation.

Mo probably paid too much, but what we bought was a "slightly below average pitcher with potential", not a "replacement level" pitcher, and all he cost us was money, which is a renewable resource.

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

the marginal difference between a replacement
level pitcher and Joel Pineiro is not worth 7M.  How about that?  I prefer VORP to PRAR but at best they both show he's below average at worst he's a touch above replacement level.

by azruavatar on Oct 15, 2007 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

i've been struggling with this
Do you know of a good discussion of what the difference is between VORP and PRAR?  They seem to give wildly different results (see the Piniero 2005 -14.4 VORP vs +9 PRAR) above.

Also, what metric do you think should be used monetarily value a pitchers contribution?  $xM/PRAR or $xM/VORP etc?

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Set your replacement
level at what you have in-house (pick a decent projection system) and then go from there. A good rule of thumb is $3M for a win (ten runs).

No need for BP's retarded replacement level then.

by plh903 on Oct 16, 2007 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

in-house
Joel Pineiro would look like he would be worth $20 M a year.  Stack him up against Thompson, Reyes, Wellemeyer, Mulder's half-shoulder, Looper 'The Vampire' and Maroth and Pineiro looks like a world beater.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 16, 2007 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah?
They've got Joel Pineiro starting 22 games, pitching in 36.  

His Zips are based on bouncing from the bullpen to the starting rotation.  I'd be interested to see who they rate if he is strictly used as a starter.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 16, 2007 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

You can ask Dan
but I imagine they'd be higher. When he used his starter-to-reliever toy last year for Looper and Wainwright (and Thompson IIRC) they all went up as you would expect with that transition.

Since it looks like the bulk of his innings are as a starter, I imagine you'd see similar numbers.

by plh903 on Oct 16, 2007 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

the hyperbole part is pretty damn funny
now I'm going to have stuck in my head "Looper The Vampire" all next year.

by nycardfan on Oct 16, 2007 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

denominator should be
WARP or WARP3, imho.
Hello, playoff watching

by nycbirdo on Oct 16, 2007 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

WARP
is terrible, even for BP

by plh903 on Oct 16, 2007 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't really like
pitching runs stats for projection purposes.

Oh, and to use Kip Wells as an e.g., in 2007 BP has his production at +17 PRAR and a 1.6 WARP3 -- which according to MORP is probably worth some stupid amount of money. So anyway, that's proprietary, and it's a "50/50 pitching and fielding split, with 6.11 being the RL RA" if I'm reading it correctly.

So if you are basing how much someone should be paid, and are using WARP, it tells you that a guaranteed 5.70 ERA has some value. Something like $3M-4M probably according to MORP. 17 runs worse than that (we'll pretend like you can just add those on to Kip's ERA) is a 6.66 ERA. Woo hoo!

If I were to figure out wins between him and Brad Thomspon, I'd just use the runs against numbers for the ZiPS -- or when PECOTA comes out, VORP would work for me.

by plh903 on Oct 16, 2007 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Money is NOT
a "renewable resource."  If there's a budget (and there is), once it's gone -- it's gone.  The team can't get it back.  By signing Pineiro to a contract that pays him $5.5 M in '08, and $7.5 M in '09, that's $5.5 M LESS we have to offer other players (through FA or trade) for '08, and $7.5 LESS we have to offer in '09.  

Working with a budget is a zero-sum game -- if we use some of it, it precludes us from using it again on someone else.  I realize it's not YOUR money that is being spent here.  Perhaps that's your argument?  But it doesn't mean that there is an unlimited amount that ownership will spend.  Spending it on Pineiro precludes us from spending it on someone better!

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course you can get it back
you can dump payroll elsewhere or dump a percentage of the contract on someone else.

If he's crap and has no trade value, then ya...he is sunk cost.

But if this signing frees the Cardinals up to move Braden Looper for something (same cost) they've replaced Looper with a pitcher they believe can be successful, costs the same (this year) and will still get a return from someone for Looper.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Looper could've been traded
he could've been traded regardless of the Pineiro signing.  You're right in that trading Looper would reduce by 1 the number of bad contracts on the pitching staff, but I seriously doubt that Pineiro's signing portends a greater demand for Looper around baseball.

It is conceivable that the Pineiro signing will set off a chain reaction, whereby Lohse, and Silva, and Livan, and Fogg and others all become vastly overpaid.  Perhaps, then, Looper and the $5.5 M still owed to him makes him become much more palatable to other teams, thus making them more likely to trade for him.  But that's reaching quite a bit for now.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

by "renewable" i mean...
I understand what you are saying- each year we have a finite set of fiscal resources.  Every time the clock turns over another year, we have $xM available again. The problem is that to get a pitcher much better than Pinero we're going to have to make a trade, and that costs us resources that don't come back.  Once a prospect is traded, he is gone, making money far less precious than young talent (if we even have any young talent!).  In the market that seems to exist today, no one is selling anyway.  

We have to do something about our pitching.  2007 was a miserable year.  WJ left Mo holding a terrible hand; he's going to have to dig us out of the hole WJ put us in, and letting available talent walk away is not the way to do it.  We're GOING to have to overpay some players to get back on our feet.

For those saying the free agent pool after next season is going to be so much better -- wait until mid-2008, and I think we'll find a lot of those exciting free agents safely tucked away with long-term deals and unavailable.  

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Overpaying
for mediocre (generous depiction) free agents is not the way to build a successful franchise.  The way to do it is by building from the draft and the farm system.  The idea that we needed to sign Pineiro to this contract b/c "we had to do something" smacks of panic.

It is OK to overpay for some free agents -- top-notch free agents, not those that are a handful of runs better than Brad Thompson.  Signing Joel Pineiro to a backloaded, overpaid contract doesn't put the Cards back on their feet.  It stunts their growth.

by chuckb on Oct 16, 2007 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Stunts their growth
they'll still draft average players that they can sign and their best pitching prospects will be lucky to be 2nd half 2009 if they aren't currently hurt.

I just don't see how Joel Pineiro sets the team backwards.  Buying out Anthony Reyes arbitration, that would stunt the teams growth.  Overpaying (we assume before seeing the contracts the FA pitchers get this year) for Joel Pineiro is a sideways move.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 16, 2007 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

your right
But we have to do something between now and when these prospects we're drafting are ready.  There simply aren't any top-notch FA's- unless you consider Silva and Hernandez to be "top notch"- so our choices are either fix things how we can (Re-sign pinero for whatever he bends us over the barrel for, then trade duncan for a pitcher, etc) or lose 90 games in '08.  

Screw losing, imho.

by SleepyCA on Oct 16, 2007 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather...
lose 90 (which we may anyway) in '08 and start trending upwards after that than continue to fill roster spots with guys who, at best, aren't making a difference one way or another and, at worst, are hurting your chances of winning.

I'd gladly sacrifice '08...if it meant we don't have to be mired in 75-80 win seasons for the next five years.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 16, 2007 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Take it easy, Champ.
Why don't you sit this next one out, stop talking for a while.

No wonder agents love Mozeliak!

What a horrible contract at 2 years and $13 million. I am scared for what Eckstein will get. How about the 4 years and 40 million the Cards wouldn't pony up for Edgar back in 2004?

by JMedwick on Oct 15, 2007 3:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Pinero
I don't think 6.5 mill/yr is that bad.  Face it pitching is getting more expensive and this deal seems pretty cheap if he even pitches like he did for us in the 2nd half of 07.

Who do all you negative people think we should get? Our system has no pitcher better than Joel.  He is not blocking a singler arm at this point.  I think the deal seems reasonable.

Livan Hernandez and Josh Fogg will be so over priced it will not be funny.  Fogg more so because he has never really done anything either.

What pitchers do you guys want?

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Anthony Reyes
can't mimic Pinero's production for only $500,000 a year?

What about Brad Thompson?

Or maybe Wellemeyer?

Or even Franklin?

Seems to me like saving at least 9 million over 2 seasons makes alot more sense.

by JMedwick on Oct 15, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anthony Reyes has trouble mimic-ing
the same delivery on every pitch.  

If Anthony Reyes or Brad Thompson outpitch Joel Pineiro, isn't that a problem we'd like to have?

The money is Bill DeWitt's and if Joel Pineiro for 2 years and $13 M keeps us from getting Josh Fogg or Livan Hernandez...Yippee!!!

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reyes
If he outpitches Pinero then great!!  I will not hold my breath on that one though.

The Cards have so many ordinary arms they just need to stock pile them.  They learned this year there is no such thing as too much pitching.

This deal does not seem that bad.  

Jason Marquis signed for more last year.

This is about league average people.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

why should we stockpile arms
if it's going to cost us $6.5 M to do so?  We can find others to do this job for much less.  Should we also add Livan, Lohse, Fogg and Silva and pay them $3 M more than they're worth (each) just so we can have lots of mediocre, overpaid arms?

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes and No...
"If Anthony Reyes or Brad Thompson outpitch Joel Pineiro, isn't that a problem we'd like to have?"

I see what you are saying, but if that happens it just means we are stuck with another player that noone wants with a contract that noone wants.

Also, that depends on just how bad Pineiro pitches.  It's quite possible that Thompson and Reyes throw up an ERA of about 5 and still outpitch Joel.

I don't think that would have anyone jumping up and down out of joy.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't get it...
Why are so many operating on the assumption that Pineiro is even an average pitcher...much less a good one.

He hasn't been above replacement level since 2003...yes 2003.

6.5M is a reasonable price to pay, but not for such a gamble.

You can roll the dice, but why pay 6.5M for it.  You can find a replacement level pitcher for the league minimum.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Known quantity vs other FA
They have had the chance to take him for a test drive and really like the way he handles.  If you go after a lot of the middling FA's you barely get a chance to kick the tires.

They obviously think he's better than replacement level.  We'll see.

youneverknow

by meat on Oct 15, 2007 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't know where you are getting your numbers
ut BP says that Piniero was above replacement every year that he has pitched in the big leagues.  He's been below average, but "below average" is a long, long way from "below replacement"...

year  PRAR3
2000    2
2001   27
2002   65
2003   63
2004   37
2005   24
2006    9
2007   29

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

According to BP...
He's had a cumulitave VORP of about 5 since '03.

It all depends on the metric.

He's been a bad pitcher since for over 3 years now.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

still not following
You said he was below replacement.  That has a very specific meaning, which piniero's performance has exceeded significantly.  Now you change the metric and say the metric used doesn't matter?  

Where are you getting your VORP numbers, btw?  The "VORP for pitchers" statistic selection is unusable due to the slowness of BP's server, but the specific claim you are making now -- "cumulative 5 VORP since 2004" doesn't mesh with the WARP3 values (10.3 cumulative for 2004-2006) on the DT card.

Are you just pulling this stuff out of your arse and pretending the stats are real?  If so, that's a Very Bad Thing imho.

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, stat selection worked
I had bad math on my WARP3 calculation- did it in my head and had a column off.  The correct number is 9.2 WARP3.

The VORP for 2004-2007 is 22, according to BP.


YEAR    VORP    WARP3
2004    18.4    3.3
2005     2.3    2.2
2006   -14.4    0.9
2007    12.7    0.7
2007     3.0    2.1

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok...
My goodness.  Yes, I'm just pulling them out of my ass.

Here you go....

www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/pineijo01.php

Look at the VORP on this page.

Cumulative since the end of 2003....5.6 or about 5.

Link good enough for you?  My goodness.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whatever...
I admitted the mistake (you have made one of those before right?).

No need for the superior attitude.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

i posted that before you apologized
And I wasn't trying to be superior; I'm just sick of the constant negativity.  

by SleepyCA on Oct 15, 2007 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

"i posted that before you apologized"
I see that now.

As for the negativity...well, if there were something to be positive about then you probably wouldn't see it.  I don't think too many people were bemoaning a WS championship.

However, when a 78 win team (with no GM, a luke warm roster, and a manager who lives in the past) is doing everything possible to retain the same roster...well, you see what you get.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...
Yes, my fault.  For some reason the 2007 values didn't show up on the screen.  Not sure how relevant they are anyway as he was used mostly in relief last year.

Anyway, I wasn't just "pulling stats out of my ass"

I think, while arguing semantics, my original point has been lost.

-----He's been a bad, bad, bad, bad pitcher since the end of the 2003 season save 11 starts with the Cardinals where he was tolerable at best------

Therefore, the contract he received is ill-advised, short-sighted and foolish....regardless if his VORP is 5 or 9.  Neither of those numbers, over a 3 year time period, are anywhere close to resembling a good pitcher.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

In Pineiro's Defense
I know it was pointed out that Pineiro's FIP era was like 4.8 last year.  But that was based mostly on a horrendous homerun rate from a small sample size.  From 2005-2007, on average, Pineiro would have only allowed 8.5 homeruns, rather than 11 (at a much pitcher friendly ballpark, mind you, in a pitcher friendly league).  The old homerun rate combined with over his 63 innings in stl would have produced a FIP Era of 4.24; very palatable for such a contract.  Jeff Suppan-lite.  

by Jonathan23 on Oct 15, 2007 3:54 PM EDT reply actions  

but there's a reason he gave up more HRs
he threw more pitches in the strike zone. pineiro's walk rate reached an historic low with the cards. he threw more strikes, which is good . . . . but that made him more hittable, which is not good. a lot of those strikes got hit out of the park.

by lboros on Oct 15, 2007 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hate to play
the "situational pitching" card... But Pineiro's 14 homeruns forked up in 07 yielded a mere 16 runs.  Is it possible he intelligently sacrificed a few dingers to keep the walk rate stingy in low leverage situations?  This seems inline with a Duncan philosphy, similar to a Curt Schilling without the strikeouts/opinions.

by Jonathan23 on Oct 15, 2007 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's possible
without having looked at the ####s, i'd say that's possible.

by lboros on Oct 15, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

This Whole Thing
Is puting down more cash over two years than Baron von Kippington, Lord of Wells was paid this year, hoping that a pitcher who has stunk up the joint for 3 years can recover under Duncan and put up his second half numbers, which in my eye were the results of executing his pitches only after he loaded the bases with a single, a missile off the center field fence, and a walk.  This is kind of nerve-racking.  

I've said several times that this staff is made up of a #2, borderline ace (Wainwright), and a whole bunch of 4s and 5s.  Add Mr. Piniero to the list.  I certainly hope he's more like Dave Stewart, Woody Williams, or Todd Stottlemyre than Kip Wells or Brett Tomko.  I'll admit he's got some good stuff...But three years of stinking scares me.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 15, 2007 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Problem
Yes everyone knows our pitching is a bunch of #4 or #5 starters.  

There is no other option really.  It's not like we have studs at the minor league level who we could just throw into the fire.  We are stuck, and we need people to eat innings.

Now I don't think Kip Wells or Anthony Reyes will eat innings.  They had plenty of chances last year and did nothing with the opportunity.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pineiro ...
he's had plenty of chances in the last 3 years and also has done nothing.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

This quote
"Plus, what a relief to get away from Wells' and Reyes' endless nibbling at the strike zone.  After what we've gone through this year with too many wilting pitchers, I'll just be happy to see his him out there attacking the strike zone, pitching quickly, and playing aggressive defense."

Those strikes don't do a lot of good when they get crushed for a home run.

by ryanisforever on Oct 15, 2007 4:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Have you bothered to count up how many games
Pineiro's pitching, compared to Reyes and Wells, left the team in a competitive position to win?  Maybe not nibbling at the strike zone and pitching quickly worked with our team.

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fuck.
that is all.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 15, 2007 4:11 PM EDT reply actions  

haha.
So concise, yet so accurate.
On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Oct 15, 2007 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still need a frontline starter
DeWitt said the Cardinals were going to go after a frontline starter this off-season.  

Who are they going to get?  They've got atleast $14 M left to play with.  AJ Burnett for $12 M?

That would leave them $2 M to get an OF bat or a SS.

Does Looper become a priority to trade and clear his $5.5 M?  That buys them $7 M for a SS.

Rotation
Burnett
Wainwright
Pineiro
Mulder
Thompson

Ugh.  Who knows.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Thinking about it
The Cardinals have a propensity to getting guys who beat them at one point or another or that they admired:

Curt Schilling - $13 M (07)
Tom Glavine - $11 M (07)

Double Ugh.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why won't someone give us a discount?
Schilling is rumored to be going to the Phillies for a discount.

Glavine is rumored to be going to the Braves for a discount.

For whatever a rumor's worth.

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Players tend to give discounts to teams
that have a chance of winning something.  We'd have to be considered a long shot.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

carpenter gave a discount
then got hurt. he could have gotten a way bigger contract. way bigger.

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am surprised to see that Schilling is
considering going to the Phillies; I also read that he said he DIDN'T want to go the NL because he didn't want the additional wear and tear on his legs that batting would cause.  I guess it's because he was with the Phillies before.....

by jillsinmo on Oct 15, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Phillies
Are apparently the only NL team he'd consider, because he pitched for them before and is interested in returning before he retires.  

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm from Missouri
on this whole "getting a frontline starter" thing.

by sdrone on Oct 15, 2007 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

amen brother
and this signing sure as hell showed me nothing.

by sdesserman on Oct 15, 2007 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was all for bringing back Piniero
But it should not have cost that much money.

As soon as the talks got over 9M it should have been "Well kid, have fun with free agency."

As a question for someone who is a better statistician than me, how well would Piniero have to perform over the next two seasons to be worth 13M dollars?

I wanted to bring back Jo-el, but I certainly didn't think it would take that much.  I'm holding my ire in for now, but if we re-sign Eckstein I'm going to be ticked.

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

How bad did they want him?
I think they knew that once he hit FA, he was going to command a 3 year deal (much like every sub-40 yr old) pitcher will in this years market.

They probably overpaid for 1 less year.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

This signing shows 2 flaws
with the Cardinals:

1)they have no minor league starters who can be counted on to contribute in 2008

2)Tony LaRussa is still in charge of the major league roster

Another scary thought I heard from the interim GM this week...he is counting on Mark Mulder to be ready for opening day.

by lefty fan on Oct 15, 2007 4:32 PM EDT reply actions  

That's worse than the Piniero signing
Counting on Mark Mulder for anything is a baaaaaaaad move.

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he meant 'ready' for their 8 am
tee-time that day.  Mark is bringing the Budweiser.  Big day, gotta start out on the right foot.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

#1
You are correct.  The Cardinals have zero minor league pitching at this point.  It is not like they could just let guys learn at the major league level.

Jamie Garcia-  may be out all of 2008 with elbow injury.

Adam Ottavio- really wild!  He hits 98 MPH and throws mid 90's when worrying about control.  Has stuff to be a top line pitcher if he gains some control.  I guess his mechanics are kind of bad.

Tyler Herron-  Just started pitching after high school.  Never seen as a top of the rotation guy but could develope.

The Cards pitching situation is not good at the minor league level.

Pitching is getting more expensive every year so if you can't develope it you have to buy it.  That is why people who argue the $$ of the Pinerio signing are not thinking.  The cost of pitching will be more next year as well, the price never just stops or goes down.  So if you can't develope it you have to trade or buy.  The Cardinals do not have the system to trade at this point.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugghhhh
"Another scary thought I heard from the interim GM this week...he is counting on Mark Mulder to be ready for opening day."

Wow...just, wow.

It amazes me that every time I read a piece of news about the Cards it leaves me shaking my head in disgust/disbelief.

Also, you make a good point.  Tony is in charge of this roster, especially with Mozeliak.  I'm sure Tony called him today to lay out the terms of an Eckstein extension.  Not to mention contracts for So and Miles.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

flaws
"2)Tony LaRussa is still in charge of the major league roster."

indeed, what a massive flaw to have one of the top three winningest managers in history in charge of the team.

by willievinceterry on Oct 15, 2007 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony...
He's living in the past.

Yes, it is a huge flaw to have him contructing our roster and here's why...

  1.  The game has changed.  With the salaries these players are getting paid you can't afford to make mistakes.
  2.  This team does not have the budget to field proven veterans at every position.
  3.  Tony will not commit to a young player..no matter the situation.  The only time one gets to play is when Tony is forced into it.  I shutter to think what would have happened had Bobby Bonilla not gotten hurt in ST.
Tony would be a great manager for the Yankees.  For a team that needs to rebuild...not so much.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a HUGE LaRussa supporter
but his use of the pitcher batting 8th is a stroke of genius and I hope it returns again next year no matter who the manager is.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me too...
I too like the pitcher batting 8th.  You put AP in a better RBI situation without having to bump him down a spot in the order...effectively costing him 40-50? PAs a year.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 16, 2007 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Priorities??738
Hmm, I don't know what to think right now.  I won't say this is horrible, and I most certainly won't say this is good.  BUT, aren't there larger fish to fry??  Here are what our priorities should have been prior to Piniero signing:
  1. HIRE A REAL GM!!!  If you want Mozeliak making moves, remove the "interim" from his title, but if you don't want him handling the big kid tasks, get someone else in here!!
  2.  Once the GM is hired, handle the LaRussa and Duncan situation.  It's simple.  LaRussa likes the GM, he probably stays.  He doesn't, he goes.  And no matter what anyone else says, Duncan will do whatever LaRussa does.
  3.  Start your off-season resignings, trades, signings, etc.  But get your front office and manager situation fixed first.  Piniero is ultimately Duncan's "project".  What if Duncan isn't here next season? Wait, what's that flushing sound??? 13 million down the toilet.  Who knows what Joel will do the next two seasons, but I'd sure like to be certain that his "mentor" is going to be in that dugout with him in '08 and '09.  If not, I hope we have a clause in his contract that voids the entire thing if LaRussa and Duncan bolt town.  
Again, I am waiting to pass judgement as far as how I feel about the signing.  There have been and will be too many average pitches that sign bigger AND smaller contracts.  On paper it doesn't look so hot, but when you have so many average/below average pitchers signing enormous contracts, I wouldn't mind having one with a slightly better upside and previous extended success for a lot less money and years.  Take a look at this:

Here are some #s since 2003 (thru 2007) for two pitchers, the same age:            

              ERA    W-L     IP    Salary
Pitcher A   4.96   44-51  804  2008:6 mil   2009:7 mil

Pticher B   4.47   52-49  860  2008:11 mil  2009:11 mil

Pitcher C   4.83   48-45  738  2008:7.7 mil 2009:8.5 mil

By now I'm sure you figured out that pitcher A is Pineiro.  But look how he stacks up to other pitchers his age and caliber.  I am, like I said, withholding judgement for now.  However, I did find this information interesting.  

Oh, by the way.  Pitcher B was Gil Meche (who is also signed with KC in '10 and '11 for 12 mil each year), and pitcher C was Adam Eaton (who has a mutual option in Philly for '10 at 9 mil).  

by joecardsfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I'll agree it's not the worst contract ever
I just thought we'd be able to retain him for considerably less.

Shows what I know, I guess.  Some very, very bad pitchers are going to get some very, very good deals this year.

by stl tyler on Oct 15, 2007 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Duncan is under contract
they may release him from it if he asks but if they are investing $13 M in something he asked for, I doubt that.
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pineiro is the definition of AAA flotsam
this is a horrible horrible deal.

CAN WE HIRE A GM PLZ K THX

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 4:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Pinero's biggest prblem
is that he had all his suceess when he was juicing. Now that he is off the juice his velocity is way down and his breaking pitches don't he bite.

Be shocked if he posts and ERA below 5.

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Piniero was juicing?
Is this a commonly known rumor?

I wonder what pitch f/x says about his breaking pitches bite.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's not a story, it's baseless blog speculation
because his pitching didn't match his zips.  Can you get back to the facts now and get out of the sewer?

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

The authors of USSM and LL
have contacts inside the Mariners organization. If they are willing to write it on their blogs, you can bet that it is not speculation.
Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nonsense
They were joking about a player they don't like. They weren't reporting anything.

by liam on Oct 15, 2007 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope.
It has been mentioned many a time in a non-joking manner.
Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean like Pujols' power drain
after the supposed outing of him being on HGH?

And I just spent the last 30 minutes looking for anything other than that joking article finding Pineiro linked to steroids.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh, they explained
the jump in MPH...pitching out of relief.  Wainwright threw harder out of the pen.  So did Looper.  Were they both juicing?
"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Oct 15, 2007 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

No
But to my point earlier, they are good writers who have (a) contact(s) inside the M's organization. I'm am sure that they would not bring it up if they did not have ample reason to believe it was true.

As for Pineiro: sucked, added a bunch of velocity out of nowhere, was awesome, lost said velocity, and has sucked since.

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 16, 2007 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

To my point earlier
This is nonsense.

The guys at LL are good writers who make a lot of jokes, many of them great (like the Weaver shift).

And you've got Pineiro's history all wrong. He had a promising minor league career. He struggled a bit in his first call-up. He dominated in his rookie year and was great his next two. After that, he started to struggle due to gopheritis (2004) then peripherals trending in the wrong direction (2005-2006).

It's speculative joking. Ain't no contacts within the Mariners organization that would talk about current or former players using steroids.

by liam on Oct 16, 2007 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Apologies for the tone
I get annoyed when people throw around steroid accusations.

Pineiro injured his elbow in 2004. His strikeout rate dropped off after that but came back some last year. I'd blame the injury before tagging him a cheater.

by liam on Oct 16, 2007 4:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Believe me
as an religious LL reader/comment and lifelong Mariner fan I can tell you that 1) I understand the tone of the blog, and 2)Pineiro was nothing special in the minor leagues

http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=26337

Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 16, 2007 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate baseless juicing rumors
can't we just stay with facts in these vigorous disagreements.  Do we have to launch a witch hunt accusation against the guy?

by nycardfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

see post above yours
This is not a horrible signing.  If you think it is there will be a lot this off season.

If you have a better idea please show it with stats like above.

This deal is not that bad.  Just wait you will see worse moves by other teams.  Pitching is not that deep anymore, so an ERA in the 4's with past success is going to get you $$$$

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can get dozens of pitchers ust like Piniero
for the MLB minimum. This deal is a disaster.
Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

the mike hampton
and denny neagle signings in colorado - disastrous.  this deal - awful, probably unforgivable, but a disaster might be a little over the top.

by sdesserman on Oct 15, 2007 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Flushing $13m down the shitter
qualifies as a disaster.
Cardinal fan from Washington

by JI on Oct 15, 2007 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not a bad deal
b/c other teams will make worse deals?  Huh?

So Baltimore's signing Jamie Walker to a bad contract last offseason wasn't really bad b/c Houston signed Carlos Lee to a horrible contract?  

Nope.  Bad is bad, and this is it.  There will be worse, to be sure, but it doesn't make this one shine any brighter.

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think what was meant is
that in this market, pitchers, even below average ones, are commanding 3/4+ year contracts for 10's of millions per.  You have to look at his market value.   If Jeff Weaver can get 8 million, Piniero on the open market would have been pretty damn close to that.  

Now please don't think I am saying this is a great signing or that I think Piniero is necessarily worth 13 mil over two years.  But who is that would be worth it?  Also, compared to all the other FA pitchers signed last year, and that will sign this year, 2 years is delightful as opposed to 3, 4, 5, or in Barry Zito's case 23 years.  Let's wait and see how this pans out before we say it's horrible.  

We all agree it's not what we necessarily wanted, but if he pitches 200+ innings, has an ERA around 4-4.5, and keeps us in ball games, we'll be saying how great it is that he only costs $6.5 mil/yr.  Now if he tanks, it will affirm our first thoughts, but I'm holding off judgement until May/June '08.

 

by joecardsfan on Oct 16, 2007 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow
Mozeliak sure likes spending money, doesn't he?
On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Oct 15, 2007 4:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Well...
The "Casual" fan thinks this is a good move.  85% of people polled think it's a great move.

Looks like nearly 85% of people on this board disagree.

Baseball is just better here.  People here tend to question conventional wisdom and come to some really good conclusions.

You almost never see anybody touting W/L records here.

VEB...home of the knowledgable fan.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Ohh...
The poll was on STL Today.
"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

It probably shouldn't
but this really bothers me.  I can't help but think that DeWitt might go scrolling through Cards Talk to see what people are saying and the fact that they're positive on the signing may make him inclined to go w/ Mozeliak.  Much worse than the decision to bring back Pineiro on a too-expensive contract is the decision to pick Mozeliak for the GM position.  

He already gave Springer too much money.  Now he's given Pineiro too much money.  And he's negotiating w/ Eckstein.  There should be no negotiation.  We should offer him arbitration and say "Thanks for the memories!"  Mozeliak seems to be going in the opposite direction from where we need to be going and the fact that he's going there so quickly tells me DeWitt needs to speed up the process of selecting a GM -- unless he's already selected one!

by chuckb on Oct 15, 2007 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you are right...
Looks like he already has selected a GM.

Why else would he allow him to go all willy-nilly if he wasn't being given the job.

Very disappointing.  The Cardinals will be the last team to change and we will all pay for it.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know why...
everyone here is upset.

We heard several days ago the cardinals were trying to negotiate a multi year deal with piniero.

When a team wants to negotiate a multi year deal to retain a crappy player it works 100% of the time.  No way with Piniero's #'s or recent history would he be bold enough to test the market and allow the Cardinals to possibly retain him.

So I was mourning this resigning several days ago.  It was already a done deal.  And, based upon the ludicrous contracts handed out last year I figured 14 million was in the ballpark.  13.5 actually seems like a victory.  That's 500,000 dollars more we can give to make sure Gary Bennett doesn't slip away.

To me this was good news.  Multi can mean an awful lot of things.  The smallest thing it can mean is 2.  So in two years we can look forward to this contract and kennedys being off the books.

The signing and the overpaying was a done deal.  Mo was just giving us something to look forward to in two years.

by bretsyboo on Oct 15, 2007 5:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Costs of signing Pinerio:
I think you have to look at the signing in 3 ways:

1.  Does the Pinerio signing preclude us from a better free agent that we would have been able to afford without him?

-opinion:  No for 2008, Maybe for 2009.  Anyone that has seen the free agent list for 2008 can't think that we'd get someone as good or better for 5 million.  Remember, just because we have money in the budget to spend, doesn't mean there is some magical player out there to spend it on.  Even if there was such player, they would have to then agree to sign with the Cardinals (I doubt Glavine/Schilling would come here unless we offered them crazy money) and that signing would have to fit in a budget (i.e. no crazy Suppan signings).  So in essence, we didn't spend our money (Dewitt spent his), and in 2008 Pinerio will be better (however marginally) than our alternatives.  It's difficult to say about 2009, and the detractors have a very valid point with this one. But, none of us know the budget for 2009 (or the free agents for that matter, players can still sign with their teams ala Mark Buehrle), but I expect contracts to go up, possibly making this deal a (relative) bargain.  Gulp

2.  Is Pinerio blocking someone that needs development IN THE MAJOR LEAGUES for 2008 or 2009?

-opinion- we are bereft of starting pitcher talent in AAA.  Reyes could possibly turn things around, but there are still 2 spots open in the rotation (and Reyes would probably need to earn a 5th spot, once he found his missing velocity).  

3.  Who does Pinerio replace from the 2007 team?  Will he be better than that person in 2008?  

-opinion- He was better than all but Wainright in 2007, so I would say yes to this.  He would seem to provide some stability to a position where we had very little.  While people seem to disagree on what he will provide, most people think he will at least be league averagish innings eater.  (Which I still contend that his 5 mil salary will be a bargain at the end of the year for a LAIE)

You may not agree with me in my opinions, but I think these are valuable questions to ask when evaluating the signing.  

Remember, every year everyone picks out 10 players they think the Cardinals should pick up.  Invariably 9 of them fail to perform or get picked for MUCH higher than what they were expected to go for (or both).  One of these players performs so well that the "expert fan" says, 'SEE, we should have signed him!'  It would be interesting to see what everyone said last year (Giles, Schmidt, Meche, etc.) and compare them to performance.  Hell, even Burnett (who I'd love to have), hasn't performed up to his contract so far due to (surprise!) injury.  

If you really want to evaluate what the Cardinals do this offseason, pick out who you would take over them (and for how much).  See how close you come to what they actually get, then see how they perform this year.  Invariably you will get some right and some wrong (but probably mostly wrong).  I think you'd be surprised how things are different in the "imperfect" world.

"It takes pitching, hitting and defense. Any two can win. All three make you unbeatable". Joe Garagiola

by MRCARD on Oct 15, 2007 6:15 PM EDT reply actions  

We did what you suggest at the end
In this diary, many of us came clean on FA's we wanted to see the Cardinals pick up and how they ended up performing.

It was fun, if a little humbling.

by liam on Oct 15, 2007 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I won't be mad at this Pinerio signing..as long as
  1. LaRussa & Duncan are back for next season.  Because yeah I think Pinerio can be our 2008 version of Jeff Suppan as long as Duncan is keeping his eye on Joel.
  2. If DeWitt is serious about getting a "front line" starter later this winter. If that is just "talk" then I will be pissed. But if they are truely going to get a sure thing 13-15 game winner then signing Joel as a 4th or 5th starter I can live with even with the price tag.
At this point Tony & Dave really do need to come back for the next 2 years. I was ready for a change, but since we are going to go with all of the vets for the forseeable future, then Tony will be the best captain for the ship. And probably our best chance to guide this team to contend.

by KYCards on Oct 15, 2007 6:30 PM EDT reply actions  

This is a terrible signign
Even factoring in last year, his ERA over the last three years is 5.50+. I wanted Pineiro back, don't get me wrong, but for $6.5 million? Christ.

by mojowo11 on Oct 15, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

optimism...
... isn't my strong suit. i don't really like this signing, for all the reasons mentioned here. but here's an optimistic take:
  1. It's only two years: we're not getting locked into a 3 or 4 year deal, which marginal pitchers have been getting (Batista, Marquis, Eaton, Meche, etc.).
  2. It's two years: After next year, we lose Mulder and Looper. We don't have any guarantees that anyone from the farm system will be MLB-ready by then. We don't know what to expect from Carp in '09. Basically, past '08 all we've got for sure is Wainwright. This provides some level of certainty. So we get some stability for '09 without having to go beyond that.
  3. It's only $6.5mn/year: The average annual value is less than Marquis', or any of the marginal FAs signed last year. It will certainly be less than what Lohse or Silva is going to get. Like this signing or not, it is definitely below-market. Hell, Jeff Weaver was DFA last year, reclaimed by the Cards, pitched worse than Piniero (at least until the playoffs) and got $8mn this year. Assuming the Lohse/Silva types can get something like 3/$24 or 4/$32 (or more), this deal is substantially cheaper in both dollars and years than any other option.
  4. It's worth it: I think it's probably reasonable to expect Piniero to provide 180+ innings @ ~ 4.50 - 5.00 ERA. In other words, it's reasonable to expect Piniero to match Looper's level of production from this year. In '08, Looper  will be making about the same as Piniero (since both deals are backloaded). If we're fine with Looper, why wouldn't we be fine with Piniero?
  5. We didn't sacrifice prospects: The only other real options were to trade for a Contreras-type, who might not be any better, will have a higher salary, and will cost us prospects. By signing Piniero, we can afford to keep our prospects. This is consistent with the player-development philosophy that DeWitt (outwardly) espouses. Also, by not signing a Silva/Lohse type, we won't be giving up any draft picks.
  6. There wasn't another option: Going into '08, our rotation options are (roughly in order of desirability) Wainwright, Looper, Reyes, Thompson, Mulder, Franklin, Maroth. Past Wainwright, the chances of any one of those guys completely washing out is pretty high. Adding as many possibly-average options as possible seems wise, when you don't have any proven commodities.
i'm not sure how convincing any of these are. but i'm trying to think of this as positively as i can.

by kindred on Oct 15, 2007 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

mad props
for taking the optimist's perspective. the draft pick point is a good one.

by airhad on Oct 15, 2007 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

81%
say its a good signing on the poll over at stltoday.com/cards

interesting.

course that could change if the angry mob from veb seens this and heads over there!

me? i'm indifferent towards it. don't think its really that much of an impact move one way or the other. now if we bring eckstein back for a big package and multiple year...now then I'd be concerned.

10-time World Champs!

by TheFranchise9 on Oct 15, 2007 7:02 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah...
already stated that.

Have you ever read Cards talk?

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

2008 Pinero = 2007 Wells
Thats about my expectation.  I don't think this is a disaster but I don't really like it either.  Realistically, we didn't have any other good options.

The Giants are in desperate need of OF, any chance our surplus OF (Duncan + ?) might be able to land Cain?  I can dream.

by DriverZn on Oct 15, 2007 7:12 PM EDT reply actions  

I disagree that Pinero
will = Wells of 2007.

Wells was/is a headcase, I just don't get that feeling that Joel is even close to the type of pitcher like Wells was that will crumble just about every start he makes.

Now I don't think Joel will be a 15 game winner but I can see him winning around 11-12 games. He will give up the long ball, but I believe Joel will keep us in games a heck of a lot more than Wells did last year.

by KYCards on Oct 15, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree
Wells has talent but not the ability to use it.  Pinero's talent is mostly gone but he gets by on guts.

I suspect his W/L will look better but that he will only be a margionally better pitcher.  

by DriverZn on Oct 15, 2007 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Confused
If you say that you think "2008 = 2007 Wells" then how can you say "[You] don't think this is a disaster"?  Do you not think 2007 Wells was a disaster?  Or are you saying that when we signed Wells you thought "not a disaster, not great"?  Or are you referring to 2007 David Wells?
Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 15, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was talking about Kip Wells
The contract isn't for enough money and years to be a disaster.  Its painful and I don't expect Pinero to produce.  But for a contract to really, really hurt a club it has to be for several years and a lot of money.

See:
Hampton
Neagel
Bagwell (last few years)
ARod (for tex)

by DriverZn on Oct 15, 2007 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well shit
I'm already sick of this offseason.  It seems like Cardinal nation is currently in complete disarray.

I'm really in the middle on this signing.  It caused me to utter an emphatic "Eh."  Really, it doesn't trigger armageddon-like prophecies to me like it does some people, but I also don't see him (now, this is my opinion on ABSOLUTE best-case scenario) posting an ERA under 4.  Really he's just that - an "eh" starter.

Thank God Auburn has been turning it around.  If we can beat LSU on Saturday night (I'm going, I'm STOKED), then I may be MIA from VEB for awhile.

Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Oct 15, 2007 7:20 PM EDT reply actions  

good sign
First of all, you guys out there who thinks a 2 year at 5 mill per is a bad deal then you need to wake up and look at what happened last year.  sub-500 pitchers banked in last year with 10-12 mil per year deals.  this guy was 6-4 for us with a sub 4 era...how is that bad?  Yeah he gave up 11 bombs in 11 starts but at least he throws strikes...he only walked 12 guys in like 60-some-odd innings.  I like it...I like it a lot.  now if we can get a no. 1 or 2 guy we are in good shape with Joel and Loop taking up the 3, 4 or 5 spots and Wainwright showed that he can be a number 1.  you get a number 2 and you are set

by BigLance29 on Oct 15, 2007 7:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Good and Bad
It's good to get a guy for less than what average starting pitchers are going for, but I agree with most people that this wasn't the guy to spend the money on. Not when you've already got Franklin, Reyes, Wellenmeyer, et al hanging around. I thought 2 yrs/9 mil would've been appropriate. (But then I also thought 1 yr/2 mil would've been the max to pay for Springer.)

What's nice about this contract (I think) is that the 2008 salary is only 5 mil. Let's just agree that they probably will NOT have Mulder next year, at least for the first month or two. If Mulder and/or Carpenter come back and can add significant innings in the second half, Pineiro becomes a nice trade chip. Like many have pointed out, average starting pitchers are getting 3 years at 8-10 million in this market. Presuming the Cards aren't in the thick of the race next July, I can see another team willing to take Pineiro (1 1/2 years at ~10 million) and maybe even give up a prospect.

I think the only way WE pay him his entire contract is if
a) He reverts to 2003 form, which would be a good deal for us.
b) Carpenter and Mulder don't come back from injuries, in which we have bigger problems than paying Pineiro a couple mil too much in 2009.

"Sometimes beating these last-place teams is like trying to chase kitty-cats in the park... you just can't do it!" - Mike Shannon

by Oregonian Redbird on Oct 15, 2007 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

or c)
he's so awful that no team will take him off our hands, even if we pay all the salary.

by kindred on Oct 15, 2007 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh boy...
Where to start?

"you guys out there who thinks a 2 year at 5 mill per is a bad deal then you need to wake up and look at what happened last year."

Your contract figures are off.

 "sub-500 pitchers banked in last year with 10-12 mil per year deals.  this guy was 6-4"

Please quit qouting W/L records.  They are beyond useless.

"this guy was 6-4 for us with a sub 4 era...how is that bad?"

FIP 4.80, BAA was nearly .300, opponents slugged nearly .500 against him.  He got pounded, and the 3.96 ERA was based almost entirely on luck.  AS LB stated, his 80% strand rate will not hold up and his walk rate was completely out of line with what he normally is.

"1 or 2 guy we are in good shape with Joel and Loop taking up the 3, 4 or 5 spots and Wainwright showed that he can be a number 1.  you get a number 2 and you are set"

This where you may be right.  In a division that has been won by low 80 win teams the past two years...if you get a legit 1 or 2 starter (those do grow on trees right?) then you can probably at least pretend to compete in the craptastic NL Central.  With two excellent starters on the team, it may not matter what shit bums throw after them.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

BOOO
i dont have time to type out an inteligent remark. that's all i have for now.
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 15, 2007 8:53 PM EDT reply actions  

piniero
back and forth we go.  mo yes, mo no, someone new?  the real issue to me here is that the front office,including bdw, found it necessary to do this.  the real shame is the bankruptcy of our system that this deal emphasizes.  how can a draft of 50 players a year end up incapable of providing any internal, starting pitching for years at a time.  seems we don't need a gm as much as we need some voodoo!

by sportsman on Oct 15, 2007 9:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I love this thread
saw some familiar faces blended in with lots a new ones..some humor, some rumors..

snow cones for everyone?
thats the real question witch backup catcher will return..or not

07 Cards more drama than a daytime soap..with replacement actors

by punchinjudy on Oct 15, 2007 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Backup catcher?
Probably gets a 3yr/8mil deal the way we are giving out contracts this week.

by DriverZn on Oct 15, 2007 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

blah
that is pretty much the way i feel about the joel signing

i do not see the signings as to date the same way as bobbyballgame, but he has every right to feel the way he does, in my opinion, i just think he is going a bit far on the negative side

i personally was hoping we would sign joel, but i was figuring more along the lines of 2 years and between 9-11 mil, so two years/13m isnt totally out of the realm

if he can pitch the way he did in those last ten starts, he is a 9m per year pitcher; but if he pitches like he did in seattle at the end, he would be lucky to be a 2m per year guy

so where will he land? prolly somewhere in the middle, 4.25-4.75 era, or basically league average, and if he does that, 6.5m per year is about right

i would be much more upset about this signing if he was clearly blocking someone, at this time, he is not

so did we overpay? maybe, but at least if we did, he was someone we had already seen pitching for us close up, and i would rather take a flyer on joel, than someone we had never worked with (see kip wells, 2007)

another thing about joel is that he never really got the chance to stretch out last year, this year we will get to see that, i just hope it is a good thing

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 15, 2007 10:17 PM EDT reply actions  

ehh..
"if he can pitch the way he did in those last ten starts, he is a 9m per year pitcher"

To a foolishly ran team like the Cardinals...yes.

It's been laid out repeatedly in this thread alone that he actually pitched pretty poorly and was the recipient of some great luck as a Cardinal.

And no, I don't think the money is totally out of line IF (and that's a big IF) he can be respectable.

My problem with the deal lies in 1. The second year of the contract, and being backloaded makes it even worse.  2.This guy is just as big a gamble as Kip Wells was last year, and cost us 9M more.

Teams with limited budgets shouldn't be taking 13M dollar gambles...it's bad business.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Funny thing
Funny thing is this whole debate just shows how god awful our minor league pitching is.

How do we not have one pitcher who can be thrown into the starting rotation at the MLB level?  

There are lots of teams who "rebuild" like many say we need to do who bring up AA kids to pitch at the MLB level.  They figure why not.  Well our minor league system is so bad we have no real prospects.

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes...
Having a barren farm system for so many years is probably the biggest reason we are in this mess.

I really don't feel comfortable throwing any of our minor league pitchers into the big league rotation.  Garcia may have worked, but he got hurt.

However, I do think that you could have came out of ST with someone who is capable of throwing a 5 ERA without paying 13M for it.

You are right though, if we had young arms ready to go...we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree with a lot that you are saying, but
like i said above, i like this gamble better than wells, because at least duncan has worked with joel

as far as backloading, you are right that it could look real bad that second year, but i am sure the reason they did it that way was the fact that jed, mulder, juan and bloop come off the books in 2009

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Oct 15, 2007 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not really arguing with you...but
"you are right that it could look real bad that second year, but i am sure the reason they did it that way was the fact that jed, mulder, juan and bloop come off the books in 2009"

IMO, those contracts coming off the books make an even better case for NOT backloading this deal.

Having that extra 7.5M to spend, and about 50M total, could reallistically net us 3 legitimate IMPACT players.  Best thing about, they are actually there to be had next offseason.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 15, 2007 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree
I agree with you.

These are you starters next year if Wells & Joel were not around.

Wainer
Looper
Reyes
Thompson
Wellemeyer
Maroth

Wow that is tough considering Maroth was just awful.  So now you would bank on Wainer, Looper, Reyes, Thompson, and Wellemeyer.  Wow that is scary.

This at least gives us a guy who looked alright.  I agree he now has a full offseason to prepare to be a starter.  Maybe it will be Marquis esque, in that he realizes this may be his last chance so he comes back more focused.

Note I don't even bring up Mulder and Carpenter.  Unless you want to be like Cubs fans who always thought Wood & Prior would be back please do not count on Carp and Mulder.

Where else are we going to get a 2 year deal for 6.5 mil each year?  Not a bad price.  Who else is even out there for that cost, with his upside?

by ICbirdfan on Oct 15, 2007 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pineiro's signing requires faith in Duncan...
Which, admittedly, is probably at a low after the Kip Wells debacle.

Pineiro was actually quite solid after coming to the Birds; half of his 11 starts were quality starts, and two more were only one out away. He gave up more than 3 runs only TWICE.

Many of his outings hovered around 5 innings, but for a guy coming out of the pen all year in Boston, and with our outstanding bullpen, I think that was just savvy managing by Tony. His stamina will likely improve next year as the season progresses.

I bet Pineiro is a solid #4 next year, and for around 6 mil per that ain't bad. Don't see why everyone is flipping out.

by RedbirdAvenger on Oct 16, 2007 12:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Maddux?
His projection for next year is up.  ERA under 4 looks pretty nice.  If he doesn't exercise his player option I think you have to give him a look.  Probably only needs a 1yr deal but for a pretty large chunk of change.

by DriverZn on Oct 16, 2007 2:55 AM EDT reply actions  

#284
I wrote up a little piece on the signing: Pick a Card, Any Card...

I claimed somewhere in this thread that Pineiro and Suppan were similar pitchers before arriving in the Lou. Here's the table comparing the two over the four years before signing their two-year FA contracts with our beloved Redbirds:


AGE---BB/9---K/9----HR/9---FIP----G:F----P/IP
25----3.48---5.31---1.49---5.44---1.39---16.5
26----3.05---4.95---1.07---4.83---1.36---16.3
27----2.94---4.72---1.38---5.23---1.30---16.5
28----2.25---4.85---1.38---4.45---1.30---15.7
Ave---2.94---5.31---1.24---4.99---1.34---16.63

25----2.75---7.10---1.34---4.56---1.18---16.0
26----2.66---5.10---1.10---4.63---1.29---15.5
27----3.48---4.73---1.25---5.29---1.61---16.6
28----2.40---5.53---1.29---4.69---1.59---15.8
Ave---2.87---5.54---1.23---4.81---1.39---15.87

The Cards have made this deal before. It worked out then and isn't too wild a risk.

by liam on Oct 16, 2007 4:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Liam...
you are doing a decent job of convincing me this contract is decent. (I won't give it even "good," but his upside is "decent.") I look forward to the all star break to know for sure.
Well, let's go to the old mill anyway -- get some cider!

by Alxfritz on Oct 16, 2007 4:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK, here's what i think.
here's my thoughts. i know you've all been on pins & needles wondering what i had to say. so i wont make you wait any longer.

(yes, just like Dr. Cox i have a giant ego.)

i'm not a fan of this deal. it's way, WAY too much money for a guy who's only worth the league minimun.
my thinking is the Cards felt like they let Dream Weaver get away last year &
they think he could have been really successful under Dr. Dave.
they now feel the same about Joel, even though he was only here for barely two months.
he fits Dr. Dave's style & he started making progress so their thinking is, what the heck?
what do we have to lose? lets see if we can't strike gold one more time.

there really isn't a top of the line starter on the free agent market. and if they want one,
they are going to have to make a very unpopular trade and give up some kids to get some.
they say dont want to do that. so what can they do?
because with Tony & Dave still around they cant go into a full rebuilding mode because they wont stick around for one.

seams to me they really are trying to do both at the same time. rebuild, but also WIN NOW.

can it be done? maybe. but i dont want them to try it.

the Cards are confusing & disappointing me with this move.
it's more of the same old song & dance.
bring in a washed up vet & pray Dr. Dave can work his magic.

i thought they fired Walt because they weren't in the business of doing the same old song & dance

(yes, this was in the other thread, but it looks like all the cool kids are still playing in this thread so i put it in here)

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Oct 16, 2007 4:52 AM EDT reply actions  

As an aside...
does anyone know if this is the most comments ever for a diary?
"The only thing you know about pitching is that you can't hit it." Bob Gibson to Tim McCarver

by player2bnamedl8r on Oct 16, 2007 8:26 AM EDT reply actions  

As of right now, it's number 2
I may have missed one, having just done a nonscientific study (briefly scanning through the "recent diary list"), but it seems that at 295 posts  it is in second place.  Combine it with JJray's thread and it would be #1.

Azruavatar's "elimination game" thread, which was basically a spring training time killing device, is still #1 with 324.  Josh Hancock's thread is third with 198.

by SleepyCA on Oct 16, 2007 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols