Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

up through the ranks

troy cate's south-of-border season continues: los venados de mazatlan swept the last two games of their semifinal series vs culiacan to advance to the Mexican Pacific League finals vs hermosillo. padre 1bman adrian gonzalez starred in game 7, swatting 2 homers --- the 2d a 2-run shot in the bottom of the 7th to break a 6-6 tie. adrian's younger brother (and cardinal minor leaguer) edgar v gonzalez has lost his job, alas; he went 0 for 11 in the first 4 games of the series and never came to the plate again thereafter. . . . but back to troy cate: he's starting tonight at hermosillo in game 1 of the finals. he'll face a lineup that features former big-leaguers vinny castilla, erubiel durazo, and geronimo gil, plus chris roberson, who took 41 at-bats for the phillies last season. hermosillo also happens to be the MPL team of breakout prospect jaime garcia, who apparently is not on the playoff roster; he hasn't thrown a pitch since the end of the regular season in december.

here's the league home page, and here's the venados' official site.

a couple of quick followups to erik's post yesterday about the cardinals' top prospects. first, the quad cities franchise has new ownership. the new owners have pledged major ballpark upgrades and a new general manager described as "an impressive person with a long history in baseball." no news of the sale or the gm hire at the official team website, although you can learn there that trey hearne was named south texas professional pitcher of the year. . . . .

second item: erik's post got me thinking about the longer-term trajectory of this organization, and its attempts to shift a heavier burden onto its long-neglected farm system. the franchise made an important stride toward turning that corner in 2006: last year was the cardinals' best in half a decade in terms of rookie production. st louis rookies piled up 24 win shares and 64.1 points of VORP, their highest totals in both categories since 2001, the year albert pujols broke in. that appears to be part of a slowly building trend; here are the totals for cardinal rookies going back to 2000:

year win
shares
pct VORP pct primary rookies
2006 24 9.6 64.1 16.7 wainwright, duncan, reyes
2005 21 7.0 12.4 2.6 thompson, rodriguez
2004 16 5.1 0.0 0.0 taguchi, molina
2003 16 6.3 20.1 4.7 calero, haren, hart
2002 15 5.2 21.2 4.6 crudale, simontacchi
2001 50 17.9 118.2 23.6 pujols, mi matthews, bu smith
2000 23 8.1 46.4 9.1 ankiel, reames

only once in the last 7 years (ie, 2001) have the cardinals gotten more win shares or more VORP out of their rookies. taking a slightly longer view, all 7 of the players who established themselves in the last 3 seasons remain in the organization, as do players not listed such as kinney, tyler johnson, narveson, and schumaker. of the rookies who broke in between 2000 and 2003, only 1 remains with the team: alberto. (ankiel doesn't count.) accordingly, the cards' share of production from homegrown players is also on the rise. "homegrown players" are defined here very liberally as those who established their careers with the cardinals while their rookie status was still intact. john rodriguez thus qualifies as "homegrown," even though he spent less than 2 months in the st louis farm system; likewise, adam wainwright is deemed a homegrown product, despite having reached double A in the braves' system. even kerry robinson, who made his major-league debut with the devil rays (3 at-bats in 1998), qualifies as homegrown. "homegrown" is merely semantic shorthand for "young and cheap"; i'm not interested in whether the cardinals signed and developed the talent, only in whether they broke it in at the big-league level and retained it. here's that chart:

year win
shares
pct VORP pct primary homegrowns
2006 96 38.6 162.1 42.3 pujols, duncan, wainwright
2005 101 33.6 133.8 27.6 pujols, morris
2004 69 21.9 122.4 21.0 pujols, morris
2003 89 34.9 155.9 36.4 pujols, morris, drew
2002 106 36.4 147.4 32.0 pujols, morris, drew
2001 117 41.9 247.7 49.5 pujols, morris, drew
2000 74 26.0 115.7 22.9 ankiel, drew, lankford

about 40 percent of the cardinals' value last season came from "homegrown" players --- the highest share since 2001. and this wasn't simply a function of playing time; ie, the increased share of homegrown production does not simply reflect increased opportunity. homegrown pitchers threw only 20 percent of the cards' innings last year, but they piled up 31 percent of the pitcher VORP; they made 39 percent of the plate appearances but accounted for 54 percent of the position-player VORP. thanks to pujols, homegrown position players have been contributing more than their share of the value for years, but the efficient performance of homegrown pitchers is something new --- and most welcome. one more table, this one quantifying the contribution of homegrown pitchers:

year innings pct VORP pct diff primary homegrowns
2006 287.2 20.1 61.5 31.2 +11.1 wainwright, reyes, thompson
2005 276 19.1 26.0 10.1 -9.0 morris, thompson
2004 328.1 23.0 29.3 11.4 -11.6 morris, calero, haren
2003 444.1 30.3 40.5 34.2 +3.9 morris, calero
2002 612 43.0 54.6 25.2 -17.8 morris, simontacchi
2001 507.2 35.2 93.0 37.4 +2.2 morris, mi matthews, bu smith
2000 358.1 25.1 60.0 25.3 +0.2 ankiel, morris

the "diff" column measures the difference between homegrown pitchers' share of innings and their share of value; last year was their best in quite some time in that regard. because of matt morris' departure, homegrown pitchers logged their 2d-lowest innings total in this period, yet still produced the 2d-highest VORP harvest --- the cards are getting more out of homegrown arms now than they have since the heyday of mattymo and ankiel.

we already knew this was the case; it's hardly a secret. but now we have a better sense of the trend's proportions. and the signs are encouraging.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

LB, given that
A'Pu adds so much value, especially in a year like this, what happens to the percentages if you take him out?

by Zubin on Jan 22, 2007 9:21 AM EST reply actions  

SI's top 75
i dont know if this was in the comments on erik's prospect post, but SI's top 75 compiled by bryan smith is in the process of being posted.  jaime garcia ranks 74.  rasmus apparently is in the 30-16 range which will be posted later today.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/01/17/prospects.partone/index.html

by dmb60614 on Jan 22, 2007 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

That Jamie Garcia blurb...
is starting to get me really excited.  i first started hearing about him mid-season as a sort of a sleeper pick or a "stranger things have happened" kind of guy.  now it seems as if this kid might acutally have the goods.  i know he's still only so, and so he'll probably be kept out of the rotation for another 4 years regardless of his ability and stat line (is that an office decision or a larussa decision?), but I'd love to see what this kid can do in AA and AAA.  

Does anyone know what league he'll be starting in, and the "fastness" of his projected promotion track.  It seems as if he should spend at least part of this coming season in AA, right?  A possible 2008 spring training invite?

o8o88o888o

by ilillillli on Jan 22, 2007 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

AA
i dont know if he will start in AA but he should definitely see some time there.  its hard to say what his ETA is since double AA is the real proving ground.  i would guess his ETA is around 2009...maybe a sept callup in 2008 if all goes well.  he has been described as advanced for his age.  he also gets grounders which bodes well for promotion to the big league club.

by dmb60614 on Jan 22, 2007 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

in his top 10 lists at baseball prospectus
kevin goldstein rated every prospect on "Gap Between What He Is Now, And What He Can Be" --- ie, how "ripe" each player is. garcia's gap was rated as "low," which means (if you're with me) that goldstein thinks garcia is almost ripe.

see this recent comment for a look at how rapidly some other stl pitchers moved through the system.

by lboros on Jan 22, 2007 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

the word is...
I have heard the same thing in scouting reports--Garcia has basically reached the ceiling of his ability.  Still what you got is a league average or better innings eater.  I will take that.

by BigJawnMize on Jan 22, 2007 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I think there's a good chance
that we'll see Garcia this year in a Cards' uni.  Maybe Hawksworth also.  But Garcia seems close to ready.  Apparently his ceiling isn't particularly high, but he's not far away either.

by chuckb on Jan 22, 2007 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Hawksworth definitely...
Garcia maybe. Depends on  injuries/or an implosion like last year.
Miller sucks.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Jan 22, 2007 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Weaver news
Any news on Jeff Weaver?
2006 Cardinals- An underdog story

by Born in 82 on Jan 22, 2007 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

I was wondering the same thing today
Here's what Bernie M. writes on his forum:

The same as we've been reporting for the last 10 days or so -- he wants years to sign with STL and the Cardinals are only willing to go 2 years.... but if he doesn't get any offers that can top that, I don't see where he'll have much of a choice but to accept the cardinals' offer. One new thing: La Russa is pushing for it. It's my understanding that they've increased their offer in terms of salary.

--B

2006 World Champs! Inconceivable! You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jan 22, 2007 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

they need to stop
increasing their offer.  I'd rather see them say "Sign with us today and we'll give you 2Y/$8 per, but if you wait till next week, we'll only offer 2Y/$7 per.  And then 2Y/$6M.  Mu-wa-hahahaha!!!"

He needs us more than we need him right now imo, and if he's too dumb/greedy/indecisive to realize that, then he should have to pay for it.  

"...in winter, when there's no baseball... I stare out the window and wait for spring." -Rogers Hornsby

by SleepyCA on Jan 22, 2007 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

can we get a list...
of the impact bats that may be available at the trade deadline? That's basically where I think the comparison is in terms of whether it's worth it to sign Weaver.

Based on the salary projections that have been posted on this site, they've got the money to pay 2/$16. The question is, could they get something better at the trade deadline for that $8M? Mulder is already coming back midseason; I don't know of anything SP-wise that will be available for $8M and won't involve giving away too much (Washburn, given his wealth of suitors). But is there a 2007 version of Larry Walker out there?

by nycbirdo on Jan 22, 2007 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

and that's aside from the fact, obviously,
that a substantial percentage of the people who frequent this site don't think Weaver represents much of an improvement over Brad Thompson. But setting that argument to one side for a moment, just for the sake of argument.

by nycbirdo on Jan 22, 2007 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

40 + 1 = -1
Not to mention the fact that if the Cards sign Weaver, someone on the 40-man roster has to go.

Any guesses on who that might be?  I have a strong hunch, but it's worrisome. (Hint: It probably relates to today's post from lboros...)

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Jan 23, 2007 2:50 AM EST up reply actions  

hanson or rincon
i would drop either hanson or rincon from the 40-man.

by dmb60614 on Jan 23, 2007 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

On Foxsports.com....
Dayn Perry ranked the GM's. Our very own Walter came in 2nd behind the Braves GM. Congrats WJ!
"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Jan 22, 2007 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

colby rasmus
is #28 on bryan smith's list:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/01/22/prospects.partiv/index.html

"If there was ever a season for a teen-age star to be lost in the shuffle at A-ball, it was 2006. Six other teen-age outfielders who excelled at Low-A are ranked higher on this list. Rasmus possesses a polish that few have at his level, a refinement that extends to his offensive approach, baserunning and defense. In his first 12 games of 2006, Rasmus hit just 8-for-49 with 14 strikeouts. After that, before a promotion to the Florida State League, Rasmus batted .339 with 41 strikeouts in 66 games. The Cardinals want Jim Edmonds to hang on two more seasons, hoping their center-field position goes from one sweet left-handed swinger to another."

by lboros on Jan 22, 2007 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

thanks for the update...
also, well done on the post today.  its pretty amazing, in my mind, to be able to be this prolific with new, interesting articles in the middle of winter.  thanks for all of them.
o8o88o888o

by ilillillli on Jan 22, 2007 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I have never seen Colby Rasmus
play.  I hope he turns out to be as good as advertised.  But I am concerned that he is a little overhyped for a prospect who has never played a game above A ball.  The Cards are definitely improving their farm system, and I think by 2008 we will see more and more fruit from their efforts. It's amazing that they have been in the playoffs 6 of 7 years with the lack of "youth". How would those 7 years be different without Pujols?  Wait, don't answer that!

by lefty fan on Jan 22, 2007 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Rasmus interview
I enjoyed his from the winter warm-up (they're all on the right-hand side of the page):

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/cards

While you obviously can't tell a lot from a five-minute radio interview, he seems to strike a good balance between confidence and humility.  Here's to a big upside for Mr. Rasmus on his development track.

by wildman on Jan 22, 2007 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

The Cards have seemed to do better
recently with role players.  They seem to always have middle relievers coming through the pipeline and that's so important b/c those players are so inconsistent and difficult to find.

This organization is definitely improving and a sign of its arrival among the better organizations in the game will be when it adds, with some frequency, impact players.  Duncan, Reyes and Wainwright are three.  There's a pretty good chance that Hawksworth and Rasmus will be two more, maybe Garcia as well.  The key will be to see the progress of people like Tyler Greene, Jonathan Jay, Dwight Jones, Perez, McCormick and Ottavino.  Also, they seem to have put together 2 very solid drafts in a row.  Obviously, that trend needs to continue.

by chuckb on Jan 22, 2007 10:18 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols