Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Game 138 postgame vent thread

isringhausen appears to have lost faith in himself. he doesn't trust the cutter, can't get the fastball over --- that just leaves the curve.

i've thought all season long that he'd pull it together by now. but he looks absolutely lost out there. my faith in him is gone.

at the beginning of the inning, the washington announcers said "i'm glad they didn't bring in wainwright; i'd rather face isringhausen." too true. the team can't keep losing games like this. they need to make a change.

Comment 258 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Izzy's contract
That $1.25M buyout for 2008 can't come fast enough. I think we need to salary dump Izzy in the offseason, he makes $8.75m next year, maybe someone will take him if we eat half of that and take a bag of balls in return.

by mikedallas23 @ Viva El Birdos on Sep 6, 2006 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Change must occur
How long can TLR keep doing placing his faith in Izzy?  Thoroughly frustrating.....

by Cards67 on Sep 6, 2006 4:24 PM EDT reply actions  

This is quite simply
unacceptable. Isringhausen has no business being our closer. What is that, 10 blown saves? Give the job to Looper, Wainwright, a trained chimp. And I don't CARE what Isringhausen's salary is! I'd rather we pay him 10 million to scratch his ass in the bullpen than pay him 10 million to hand games to the other team like this.
"Players like Pujols don't come along once in a lifetime. They never come along." -Buzz Bissinger

by PujolsFor President on Sep 6, 2006 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I think
something on the order of a two week break from closing is in order.  Or a 15 day DL stint - like a mental health break.

Something is not right this whole year.  First it was command of the fastball, then no confidence in the curve, then poor command of the cut fastball.

Too many excuses, too little execution.  I know Tony will want Izzy as the closer for the postseason, so a break now to clear the head and then get confidence in the last 1-2 weeks of the season is in order.

And it will be a frustrated group on the flight to AZ.  Can't blame Carp - everyone has an off day.  But Izzy's blow ups are too frequent to ignore.

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 6, 2006 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

They need to, at least a temporary one.
I'll be surprised if they do it now, though. I think Izzy's got another blown save or two before a move is seriously contemplated. Hope I'm wrong, but TLR and DD have a history of staying with a guy for an insanely long period. Sometimes, it's worked out for them. One doesn't get the feeling it will this time, though.

by steve in georgia on Sep 6, 2006 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

the change....
should have come a month ago...and I'm so tired of LaRussa blowing games with his damn refusal to accept that Izzy is not capable of being our closer.  We should be SEVEN game up right now..and there is no excuse other than our favorite managers ego again...

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I too thought Izzy would come around
but now I don't know what I was thinking. He is a crappy, crappy pitcher.

by newguy @ Viva El Birdos on Sep 6, 2006 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Is this the breaking point?
If Tony does not demote Izzy NOW and replace him with Looper or Wainwright, then what will it take?!

This reminds me of the handling of Mulder. TLR & Dunc constantly giving the vote of confidence even when they KNOW that the player can't do it anymore. Mulder's condition was physical. I believe Izzy's is mental but the treatment is the same. TLR will probably continue to trot him out there until it's too late, even when we have better alternatives.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

They'll probably
stick with him through September so he can "work through" these problems before the playoffs.

by stlmapman on Sep 6, 2006 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

You're exactly right,....
...but Izzy will not get fixed in time for the playoffs and will cost the cards at least 2 of their 3 losses in the first round knockout.

by Ignatius J Reilly on Sep 6, 2006 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The other thing is that you get the
feeling that LaRussa is trying to prove something to people like us, like he's trying to show us that he is SOOOO Smart and we don't know anything about the true inside of the game.  Jeez, Louise.
After 2 walks you have to pull him.... but NOOOO!
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

dude...
...larussa doesn't give a shit what any of us think.  Ask him about Viva El Birdos and I bet you he couldn't even tell you where the name comes from.

by BigJawnMize on Sep 6, 2006 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone....
...from Goold to Gordo to Leach stands up with stats about Izzy and tries to affirm that he is the best option.  They bring up Lidge and compare; "everyone's closer has been inconsistant this year."  Goold did it in the PD today.  How can they continue to bring up his previous years, when this year, isn't this 10 blown saves now?  Doesn't that lead the NL??
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Gordo's...
... ripping Izzy right now on FSN. said the team needs to make a change. even made a joke about Prez. Bush issuing an executive order to that effect since it doesn't seem like TLR is going to do it.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

HA!!!!!!
Now that is funny!!!
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have lost all faith in TLR
as a manager. I truly believe he has lost his mind.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

what is it going to take
for Larussa to open his eyes? No excuses for Izzy he is nothing short of pathetic, but TLR's job is to put his team in a position to win. Everytime he trots Izzy out there he is doing nothing short of impairing this team. w/o izzy's 10 blown saves we would be discussing the Cardinals' magic number about now rather than intently watching whether or the Reds won or loss. How can a manager sit and watch his "closer" load the bases without making the other team swing the bat and not make a move. After the HBP, Izzy should have been in the showers. RIDICULOUS! DFA him and hope Houston or Cincy picks him up.
"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Sep 6, 2006 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I'l bet ...
there are a few players on the Cardinals that are about as fed up with this guy as we are...but again...I put the blame totally on LaRussa's shoulders... When he walked the first guy?...he should have been out of the game...period. If you are going to let him come into these 9th inning situations then you MUST use a short leash on him...but no...he lets him WALK two men and STILL?...will not accept that he is not the man for the job....it's almost comical in a way.

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 4:33 PM EDT reply actions  

LaRussa
will stick with the veteran or "his" guy until the bitter end.  See Matt Morris last year.  He will not make a move and Izzy will continue to blow games.  

by rw on Sep 6, 2006 4:34 PM EDT reply actions  

La Russa
I thought he stuck with Carpenter too long in the 6th and Izzy too long in the 9th.  I think both (yes, even Izzy) are good pitchers, but La Russa needs to be a little better at identifying when someone (especially pitchers) are having a bad day, and be a little quicker with the hook in such situations.

by Silent George on Sep 6, 2006 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

We have waited all year
for this team to get inspired, to start coming from behind to win.  There were points where even a one run lead seemed insurmountable.  Since Preston has joined the  team, the attitude change is palpable.  That 500 foot homer was electric.  Isringhausen is an embarrassment.  Carp is not at fault here at all - TLR is for leaving him in too long.  This is ALL on Izzy.  I hope that this is only a wasted win and not a mentally crushing defeat that soaks in on the cross country flight and destroys them.  By the look on Yadi's face at the end he may have to be moved out of the dugout in a wheelchair to make the plane.  I don't care if we're stuck with the guy and we have to keep him - he must be removed from the closer role NOW.

by postsupervisor on Sep 6, 2006 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

It doesn't affect the regular season,
because we're going to make the playoffs no matter what happens.  But once there, we can't piss games away like this.  And so he'd better start grooming someone who can do the job.  Months ago we analyzed salaries and came to the conclusion that Izzy was the most overpaid player, even assuming that he was producing.  But he's not.  So go to a bullpen by committee.  It's been known to work.  Sooner or later people are gonna wise up and realize that the concept of closer is bull, and won't spend 8 million to get themselves one.

by tinstl on Sep 6, 2006 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

If there isn't a change made now,
it hurts me to say it, but then TLR should be gone after the season along with Izzy.  Why not Wainwright?

PS:
Here I was being ostracized for questioning Izzy.  Hate to say I told you so, but....

http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/comments/2006/8/10/14255/3124/157#157

by stash3630 on Sep 6, 2006 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Congrats, you're 1 of
a million people who've questioned Izzy.

by sdrone on Sep 6, 2006 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

c'mon
it's got to be more like 3 million right?  That's what I get for tooting my own horn I guess.

Seriously though, if he is going to be our closer in the postseason we're done for; or we better destroy teams by about 5 runs per game.  I wonder what the record for blown saves is in a year?  To me the holder of that dubious honor owes his manager for the title.  Its more the manager's fault for continuing to trot the guy out there than it is the guy who who is doing the sucking...err...blowing...err...sucking.  Shoot, you know what I mean.  

by stash3630 on Sep 6, 2006 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'll admit
that i was wrong about him. i've been confident that is'hausen's problems were temporary and he'd work through them. but that hasn't proven to be the case.

go ahead and toot --- you were right.

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

no change
Izzy will continue to be the closer until he removes himself from the job, for the same reason that Mulder was "one of the best five pitchers" on the staff to merit starts over Reyes.

Closers, with the rare exception of guys like Hoffman or Rivera, seem to rarely sustain effectiveness over more than a few seasons (was there a post detailing this on here a month or so ago?).  I fear that Izzy's time has passed.

by blove121 on Sep 6, 2006 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

If Izzy was a team player...
he would remove himself as closer. That is the only way he'll get removed from the spot. It's obvious that he can't do it anymore, stop throwing yourself out there. The fans hate you, they've made it blatantly obvious, so just take one for the team and tell TLR you are injured or just can't deal with it anymore.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 4:38 PM EDT reply actions  

He's NOT "pathetic"
He's saved 33 games in 43 chances, with a 3.26 ERA.  He obviously didn't have it today, and was pacing a lot. After he walked/hit-by-pitched the bases loaded, he SHOULD have been yanked.  He at least needs to be on a short leash.
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Pathetic?...
10 blown saves and 8 losses?....for a CLOSER?...okay if that isn't pathetic pick some other word for it......and I don't care if he has 50 "SAVES"....its a deceptive stat at best...the guy can not come into a game and NOT give up runs. That is the bottom line...if he come in with a 4 run lead...and gives up 3...he still gets the "save"..right?...but the bottom line is he is not a effective pitcher to close out games.
He can not give up as many Walks as he does and be a closer.

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bet you're a fantasy player...
if you value saves that much.  It's a useless stat.  Getting a save is relatively easy.  Pitch one scoreless inning.  Lots of pitchers could get 33 saves if given enough chances.  

A stat that is NOT meaningless is blown saves, and 10 is a HUGE number.

Furthermore, 3.26 for a reliever is in the territory of decent setup man.  Remember that for every run that a reliever allows, there's probably also someone else's run that they allowed to score before their baserunners started crossing the plate.  I'm not impressed.

by tinstl on Sep 6, 2006 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just being reasonable....
I don't think that he is a good closer.  But I do think he is valuable in the pen. "DFA HIM!!" is pretty silly.  Is Wainwright a better option?  Is Looper?  I really don't think so.  Honestly, I feel like it might be Hancock.
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll agree to a point
He is not pathetic - and he should not be DFA'd.  His ERA is relatively respectable, but he needs to be removed from the role at present because as a closer he is less than effective.

He should already have had a short leash, especially when pitching on back-to-back days.

I'm wondering if he needs the Wainwright treatment - earlier in the year, Wainwright was not allowed to pitch on consecutive days to protect his arm.  At very least this should be employed for Izzy.

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 6, 2006 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, but he's pathetic (this year)
Today's game is a perfect example of why ERA is a bad stat to evaluate closers with. When the game ended there were still two runners on base, if it wasn't the ninth inning at least one of those runners likely would have scored, thus closers ERAs are often artificially low. His K/BB of 52/38 is awful, 10 HR's in 58.1 innings is very bad as well.

by mikedallas23 @ Viva El Birdos on Sep 6, 2006 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

He leads all of baseball
in save opportunities
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, 10 blown saves
does lead the NL (Ambiorix Burgos has blown 12 in 30 opportunities to lead all of baseball).

But it's the blown-save percentage, more than the sheer number, that's so frightening:

There are 20 pitchers who have at least 30 save opportunities, and Izzy ranks 18th in preserving the lead---ahead of Derrick Turnbow of Milwaukee (6.06 era, lost the job) and KC's Burgos (6.12 era, lost the job).

The walks are what's killing Izzy---now 38 (3 intentional) in 58.1 innings, or 5.9/9ip. That's, like, so bad that the guy shouldn't be pitching to protect a 1-run 9th-inning lead.

Looking down the list of blow saves, so many of the top closers have just a handful---Jenks (3), KRod (3), Rivera (3), Hoffman (4), Todd Jones (??!!) (4), Billy Wagner (5), Freakin' Joe Borowski (5).

And while none of those guys has as many save opportunities as Izzy (he leads all baseball with 43), they all have at least 36 opportunities, and none have blown it more than 13% of the time (Jenks and KRod only 7% of the time).

Izzy blows a save 23.3% of the time.

At least he's not Derrick Turnbow (25%) or (shudder) Ambiorix Burgos (40%).

by salvomania on Sep 6, 2006 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

And to go back to an earlier poster
That qualifies as "PATHETIC".  And I could actually come up with a whole slew of far more colorful words to describe his performance but I will refrain.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

walks and homers
His stuff has diminished some, and his control has disappeared.  His best pitch is a curveball in the dirt.  How sad is that?

His BAA is only slightly higher than in the past.  K rate is about the same (unless you look at K/PA).  But...

Walks are up 40% over last year.
HRs have more than doubled.

That's a real bad combination for a closer.

The walks are especially bad for him, b/c he doesn't hold runners on.

He's a playoff disaster waiting to happen.  This team simply isn't good enough to give away games in a short series.

by Speedy G on Sep 6, 2006 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about a closer-by-committee approach
With Wainwright/Looper/Izzy?

I defer to the intelligence of the VEB blogosphere, so I ask as a question:

Which would be more valuable: Wainwright and Looper in set roles, albeit moved up to the 8th and 9th

or

A closer by committee set up with those two and Izzy (on a rare occasion)

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 6, 2006 4:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd love to see...
a bullpen by committee.  I think it would work if these pitchers could get past the mental hurdle of "having a role".  I think you pitch the guy with the hot hand, or one guy per batter in the ninth if necessary, and who gives a rat's patooie who gets the final out.

by tinstl on Sep 6, 2006 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh no
Not the dreaded "bullpen by committee."

by sdrone on Sep 6, 2006 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd see a closer by cmte
and I just blogged it over at Redbirds Fun.  If Izzy is not DFA'd, then he should at least get demoted in the pen.

I CAN MANAGE BETTER THAN TLR, and I myself have not played the game in many years though I've watched plenty of it.

by cardsfan84 on Sep 6, 2006 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: I CAN MANAGE BETTER THAN TLR
I'll give Walt a call for you then. There will just be about 85,000 people in front of you...

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

C'mon man
drop the DFA thing.  Why do people keep saying that?

You don't just drop him and get nothing for him.  We'd ridicule Jockety if he did that.

by sdrone on Sep 7, 2006 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have defended Izzy until the Beltran homer...
and today was even worse. I would rather of him given up two frickin homers than a walk, and hit batsman, and another free pass. Your closer can't walk people. For crying out loud, bring back Ankiel if you want someone that completely melts down and loses all pitch control whatsoever. My grandfather turns off the games when Izzy comes in, his bp gets too high. Think I'll start doing the same.

by fuegophil on Sep 6, 2006 5:02 PM EDT reply actions  

i agree with the sentiments expressed above
by several people who are saying "short leash." i think it would be a defensible option to keep izzy in the role IF and only if they're ready to yank him before he can lose the game. have someone warming up behind him. evaluate him pitch by pitch, at-bat by at-bat. he wasn't even coming close to the target today, and you could tell by his body language that he was at a complete loss --- didn't know how to adjust. if you see that from the dugout, then get him out of there before the damage is completely done.

it was clear after two batters today that he had zero command. so from now on, he should no longer have the benefit of the doubt; he doesn't get 6 batters to work things out.

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 5:02 PM EDT reply actions  

When he threw that ball at Johnson
they showed video of the dugout from the perspective of the opposite dugout as the ball hit Nick.  Tony and Dunc didn't flinch, bat an eye, act disgusted.  They simply stood their stoic, as if nothing had just happened.

The only hope we had that inning was a lucky DP.  Izzy had nothing and he knew he had nothing.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, he did know he had nothing...
... and said as much in the post-game interview. he said he was fine warming-up and it just "came unravelled" on the mound. "Bad pitches, bad mechanics, bad everything."

he knew it. we knew it. evidently, TLR didn't.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

and it's not as if
this was the 1st time this year. it has been a season-long pattern --- things unravel on him and he can't ravel 'em back up.

so the team should be ready with a Plan B next time he closes, and implement it when he starts to unravel.

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly
and I think he would have agreed with it today, as well.  I can't imagine he believed that after barely finding the strikezone on 3 straight batters that he deserved to gut it out and finish the game.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

if you're his teammate
do you think less of him if he signals the dugout and says --- "get me out of here, i'm driving blind --- i'm driving the team off a cliff" ?

or does that make him look like too much of a coward? given his long track record, maybe he doesn't lose too much face if he takes himself out of the game. . . . .

certainly the team can't be too happy with him if he knows he's driving blind --- and evidently he did know it -- but insists on driving the bus anyway. . . .

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, then...
Fake a back strain or something.

by Speedy G on Sep 6, 2006 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah...
but I thought he was pretty clear about how much he was struggling.  He was taking 30 to 50 seconds between pitches at points in the game, and not that traditional 'hold' stuff.  He was walking around, rubbing the ball, wiping his face.  He was just out their lost and the fact that no one in the dugout would come out and say anything until the bases were loaded is ridiculous.

That's is a thin line a player toes, though, taking himself out of a game like that.  It shows to the rest of the team that you have zero confidence in yourself to get the job done.

I really don't know though, because it's so rare that a situation like this comes up.  It was an instance were 99.9% of the people involved with the game, watching it or listening to it knew he was in serious trouble but the only .1% that mattered (Tony/Dunc) were the clueless .1%.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lets face it...
A closer consistantly facing five or six batters is NOT what you want to see.

by EckEqualsClutch on Sep 6, 2006 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

But would you
stick with Izzy as the sole first option?  How about on consecutive days?  

I'm inclined to advocate a committee approach with Izzy in the mix so that noone is closing on consecutive days, if possible.

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 6, 2006 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm inclined to give Izzy 2 or 3 days off...
...then use him as the closer, but once he runs into a bump of trouble (something other than an 'excuse me' hit or the like), go out for a visit.  If it isn't the winning run at the plate, if he finishes off the batter, let him go.  If he is all over the place, bring in someone else from the pen.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I 'm with you on that...
Last night?..Wainwright comes in ...looks a little shakey at first...but settles in and strikes out the last batter in the 8th on a devistating hook...right? But does Tony let him come back out?..nope..He brings in Izzy and what happens?..another nail biting 9th...
Why not just let the kid finish the inning?  Or today?...After that performance last night...why not bring him back in to close it out today?  Your closer is having problems..its obvious to everyone who is watching for the last 3 months...why not do something to HELP him ..by taking the pressure off of him and reversing the roles for a game or two...that's all..to see how it works..Who's to say that Wainwright doesn't excell in that closer role?...we wouldn't know, and niether will he...untill he gets a CHANCE to try it...

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 5:04 PM EDT reply actions  

But he's a rookie
He can't get the job done like a veteran can...
"Do you find me sadistic?"

by iron duke75 on Sep 6, 2006 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Never been given the chance .....
So it's better to stick with what you KNOW won't work...that seems to be Tony's thinking...

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Piss and moan all you want folks
but TLR is like Tammy Wynette; he's gonna stand by his man.

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 5:09 PM EDT reply actions  

per FSN:
this season Izzy has 33 saves (10 blown):

11 came with a 1-run lead.
11 came with a 2-run lead.
11 came with a 3-run lead.

his problem is that he is maddeningly inconsistent. and the last place a maddeningly inconsistent pitcher should be is in the 9th.

i'm really torn. if Izzy's right, he's the Cards best option. but he's not right. so do you keep running him out there and hope it clicks at some point? this team will not be successful in October without him - probably not even with him - so i think you might just have to stick with him and pray for the best.

i like having Wainwright available for situational relief - coming in with a guy or two on when you need a strikeout. if Wainwright closes then you have no one who can bail you out of a 6-7-8 inning jam. Looper is no better than Izzy, in my view. and Sosa has been horrible as a closer earlier this season.

another hole, with no viable way to patch it.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

izzy
The only reason why his ERA is reasonable is because he gives up walk-off hits that end the game, thereby erasing other baserunners. For instance, today there was a runner on first when the game winning hit occurred. In most other innings from third base with one out, he would have scored too.

If LaRussa does not start trying out other pitchers in the closer role ASAP he is not serious about winning.

by AL on Sep 6, 2006 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Not This Year
Few things.

One there are way to many "automatic" outs in this line up. Ronnie, Yadda, So, Miles. Eventhough Yadda went deep today, he is still having a bad year. Sad thing is Ronnie was brought in because he COULD HIT. Now, who knows whats wrong. The fact that So keeps getting at bats is so fustrating. No pun intended. With so many auto outs, or offense just cant be expected to out hit every team like they have in the past.

Two, IZZY just needs to be replaced with LOOP. I hate to say it since I am such a big fan. But clearly he cant be counted on when we need him most. Its pretty sad that now when he comes in, we all expect bad things. Just like when Jason Marquis pitches. Its sad because he used to be a shut down guy. Now he is not. I know everyone is upset at IZZY. But he is just as mad at himself for letting the team and us down. Got to give him that. When he blows it, he always takes the blame. If LOOP can close in New York with a bad shoulder, he can close for us. If we are going to get deep into the playoffs, which lets all face it, this year its going to be very very hard. We need a reliable closer. And right now, its NOT IZZY. Bring in LOOP. He is the best chance we got. I like Adam, but I still think he does not have the experince to close. LOOP does, and I really think its time for him to start closing games.

Eather way, no world series for this years Cardinals. I think we all have known that since June. Wheather we want to admit it or not.  

From THE MAN, to Gibby, to The Wizard, to Albert the Great. Cardinal Tradition lives on.

by gdm426 on Sep 6, 2006 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Wainwright's lack of experience
How much experience did Papelbon have at closing before this year? Wainwright is clearly the best pitcher we have in the pen right now, I say get him in there when the game is on the line (this doesn't have to be the 9th inning, by the way. If it's bases loaded in the 7th and we're up by 2, then in comes Adam).

by mikedallas23 @ Viva El Birdos on Sep 6, 2006 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

or jenks
last year for the wc chisox, or todd worrell.  it's not experience that makes a good closer.  it's throwing nasty stuff and/or having that ridiculous confidence.  izzy currently has neither.  

by sdesserman on Sep 6, 2006 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

huston street...
... k-rod, etc.

then again, there's Turnbow/Sosa/Burgos/Carmona/ who  have all sucked lately. i think it's kind of a case-by-case thing when it comes to closers. some can hack it; some can't.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

all good points
But Papelbon is done closing acording to nesn. Will move to rotation next year. Closing has hurt his shoulder and he needs regular work instead of the up and down work of a closer. Sounds weird, but thats boston for you. Houston street hasnt been exactly a shut down closer. He was on the DL too. Jenks isnt eather. He has had issues this year.

Face it folks, outside of Mo Reviera, there is no shut down closer anymore. Hoffman has been as close as it gets during his career. And even he had a ruff patches. (see the All Star Game. After that he was bad for weeks) Simply dumping IZZY for Adam is not the way to go. Adam has done a fantasic job this season. But LOOP has proven success as a closer. And with IZZY on the fritz, thats what this Cardinal team needs to finish the season. Before this week, Adam was having a hard time getting outs for a while.  We all have confidence in Adams abliity to get outs. But, and I know a lot of you hate this, LOOP is a proven vet that has closed out a World Series, in New York. Then he went on to close for the Mets. That kind of pressure isnt half of what IZZY is now getting. In New York, its eather win it all, or go home. LOOP knows what it takes to close games. Adam does not. Leave Adam alone for the rest of the season, and next year he can win 20 games for us in the rotation.

The Cardinals need someone who knows how to close games, and can do it on a regular basis. LOOP has done that in New York, with a bum shoulder. And you know what they say, if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere. Thats all I am saying. LOOP has done it under the most extreme pressure you can close under. And now he is pitching well. So in my humble uneducated opinion, LOOP over Adam simply because he has been there, done that, and is doing it right now.  

From THE MAN, to Gibby, to The Wizard, to Albert the Great. Cardinal Tradition lives on.

by gdm426 on Sep 7, 2006 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand what you're saying
about Izzy taking the blame after he blows it...but honestly, what else could he say? That it's not his fault?

Shouldering the blame is fine, but after 10 blown saves, I don't want to hear "It's my fault" anymore. I want to hear how he's going to fix it...or alternately, how TLR is going to fix it...

"Do you find me sadistic?"

by iron duke75 on Sep 6, 2006 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is a thin line
between being loyal to a player...and just being stupid.  Remember the definition of Insanity...doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results..

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 5:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Yuck
the general tone of this 'bash Izzy' stuff is a bit much for my liking.  Yes, he sucks hard right now, but with the likes of Josh Kinney and Tyler Johnson in the bullpen..people are actually talking about DFA'ing Izzy?

His horrid save rate is just that, horrid, but he does have 33 saves meaning he CAN be a very good closer.

I don't want him in the closer role for a few games atleast, but I certainly don't think we should throw him under the bus.

Same cast of characters with some of the stuff though, so I can't say I'm suprised.  Just, leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:13 PM EDT reply actions  

C'mon HL...
We all just got bit by a big, nasty rattlesnake.  Let us suck out the poison and spit it out for awhile.  

At least its a civil bashing.  :)

by EckEqualsClutch on Sep 6, 2006 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Echo Chamber
It does kind of become an echo chamber though.  After a game where a role player makes a mistake that costs a win it just becomes "DFA [Player who lost the game]. He's a bum!"

by dontEATnachos on Sep 6, 2006 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah....I think a lot of what some said...
was nothing more than letting off steam and frustration. NO one, I'm sure would actually want to DFA Izzy...but I do think it's reasonable and would make sense to do something Different in the closer situation for the next couple of weeks... perhaps let Izzy pitch the 7-8th for a game or two and see what Looper and Wainwright can do in the closer role. Playoffs are right around the corner and he can not be trusted in those games at this point, do you think?

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

can we please shorten his leash a litlle bit.
Lets trot him out for a three run save.  Let's yank his leash if he walks the tying run to second.  Especialy if we have mr. wainwright in the pen.  Granted, Tony may not have had him on his availabile list...... <sigh>

I just want off the Izzy merry-go-round.  It is making me ill.

by Schnake on Sep 6, 2006 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

A look at the stats...
everyone is saying more or less the same exact thing... so im gonna back it up with statistical evidence to prove that Wainwright should be closing and not Izzy...

Izzy (Before today's game)

58.0 IP
3.26 ERA
8.07 K/9
1.44 K/BB
.335 OBP
.219 BA
1.41 WHIP
10 BLSV (including today)
10 HR

Wainwright

67.1 IP
3.04 ERA
8.55 K/9
3.20 K/BB (more than double's Izzy)
.294 OBP
.230 BA
1.14 WHIP
6 HR

Anyone feel like forwarding these stats to TLR and DD?

by BigMac545 on Sep 6, 2006 5:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I do
But I feel like it just won't matter. Seems like the Cardinals always hang onto closers way too long. At least since Worrell got hurt. Lee Smith used to do this crap, and Dave Veres, and even the last year Eckersley was here. But I don't remember any of them looking as helpless as Izzy did today.

by fuegophil on Sep 6, 2006 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only 3 and a half...
weeks left 'till the post season...I have faith that Tony is giving Izzy the Ray King treatment right about now.  He's in his home stretch, and wants to give guys a chance while there's a chance left to pull their head out of their rectum and produce...he'll do the right thing come Oct
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Did you see the game?
Izzy could not locate a pitch. He was helpless out there and you could see it in his face. He has no clue what is wrong.

This is not physical. This is mental and that's worse. At least Mulder can have surgery and possibly come back next year.

Mental problems can ruin a player. Look at Brad Lidge. He has not been the same player since Pujols took him deep. Mental problems are a lot harder to fix than physical or mechanical.

At this point, Tony MUST demote Izzy and hope that he can get it together for the playoffs, if we make it there.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I meant that
Tony will do the right thing.  I don't expect Tony to leave Izzy in long during the post season if he shows poor command....and I wouldn't be surprised to see Looper out there in the 9th either
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, my bad.
I hope that Tony has a short leash and I think you're right, we may see more of Looper in the 9th.

Although sometimes TLR can be stubborn, hopefully that is gone after today.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

What...
...in his track record suggest that he would actually do that?

He sticks with what he's had, to a fault.

by whopperman on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Blech
All I have to say.  I was in class and didn't get to watch it, but I assumed he gave up another long ball...this almost seems worse, though....
In Albert we trust. In Izzy we don't.

by Mr Redbird on Sep 6, 2006 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

ugh
TLR in St. Louis = Grady Little in Boston

by Schnake on Sep 6, 2006 5:19 PM EDT reply actions  

cont.
i.e. leaving the pitcher in a little too long

by Schnake on Sep 6, 2006 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

todays game
I think complete blame for the game today should go on George W.

by gdowdy3 on Sep 6, 2006 5:30 PM EDT reply actions  

George Wallace?
Is he still alive?

The former governor or the African American comedian?

Or George Washington?  The school and the monument were very close today - perhaps casting a long shadow?

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 6, 2006 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carp deserves
some blame, as well as Pujols, Encarnacion, Belly, and everyone else who missed all those chances to drive in runs.

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Carp was Izzy...
...to a lesser extent today.  He was getting beat around pretty good early on and the fact that it was a 1-0 game was simply stunning.  That 6th inning was indicative of how he was the first 2 innings of the game.  He settled down for a stretch there, but it all came back...this time unable to stop the bleeding.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not?
Why not give Wainwright the chance?  We have a month of the season to go, throw him in the closer role and see how he does.

A) He can't be THAT MUCH WORSE, Izzy is already near the bottom.

B) If it works, keep him, if not, we can go back to a rested Izzy.

TLR was way too 'loyal' to Mac, way too loyal to an injured Walker (and Rolen when he was obviously hurt in the WS), and now Izzy...  It's the same TLR story all over again.

33 "saves" is easy too easy, pitch an inning and try not to give up 3 runs please.... you get a save for that.

Izzy WHIP for 2006 is 1.41.  Wainwright is the best reliver 1.14, if not him because of a lack of experience, Hancock is 1.15 stats nearly as good as Wainwright.   Heck even Looper is better.  Looper especially attractive because he doesn't give up the HRs.

The thing about izzy that really drives me, is that if he isn't blowing the save, he's walking the tying run to the plate.   That's just unforgiveable.

by redbird2006in on Sep 6, 2006 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Tony is cautious with Adam's arm
He will be a starter next year. Let's use looper.

by Schnake on Sep 6, 2006 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looper should close...
I would like to see Wainwright as well but Looper has been a closer before. He could make an easier transition than Wainwright. Plus, you know how TLR loves the veteran player.

I think if anyone is named the new closer, it will be Looper first, than possibly Wainwright, if Looper fails.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Izzy
I've always been a person who doesnt come down on the players too harshly. BUT, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!! This team does have a realistic chance in the postseason. But not with Izzy as the closer.TLR needs to make a change now while there is still time to groom someone else.( Looper or Wainright)

by BGFOOT17 on Sep 6, 2006 5:48 PM EDT reply actions  

We are stuck with Izzy...
unless Bill Dewitt forces Tony's hand. I can't wait til playoff time when we bring in Izzy to close games. Should be funny.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 5:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey, baseball philosophy question for ya...
...rewatched the end of the game just now and I have a question about Pujols being so far off the line.

With the winning run at 2nd base, 1 out and the bases loaded....where should Pujols have been playing?

Should he have been in 'no-doubles' defense?
Should he have been in normal defensive alignment?
Should he have been back for DP depth?
Should he have been shaded towards 2nd as he was?

Where should the first basemen be standing at that point in the game?

I'm not trying to say Pujols could have stopped ANYTHING from happening there, I just wondered everyone's opinion on it.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 5:52 PM EDT reply actions  

i also noticed that Pujols was...
... pretty far off the line.

i would guess that a defensive alignment would have Pujols shading towards the line (but not on it), with Belliard swing over a little and Miles playing up the middle.

either way, i don't think the positioning is to blame.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do think we'll make the post season but
I am still nervous in that we still have to play Houston 7 times.  And with our offense facing that pitching, we could see another sweep like we got swept a couple of times earlier in the year against the Cubs.
That's why it is so nerve racking to watch "Walkoff"-hausen give up a game at this point in the season.  Everyday matters and that's why people are venting so vehemently.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 5:52 PM EDT reply actions  

i did a little shorthand
if the cards play poorly down the stretch --- if they go, say, 10-14 from here on out --- they would finish with 84 wins.

to get to 84 wins, cincinnati would have to go 15-7 down the stretch. anybody see that happening? esp w junior griffey hurting?

the astros would have to go 17-7 to get to 84 wins. anyone see that happening?

even if the cards continue to scuffle, the competition is so bad that they will probably manage to straggle home with the division  . . . . . and if the cards can just manage .500, their lead is almost insurmountable.

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention
that the Astros have more road games than home games left and the Cards have more home games than road games left.  I think it'll take at least 85 wins to win the WC and the Cards should finish w/ around 88 wins.

by chuckb on Sep 6, 2006 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Watch out for
the Dodgers
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 6:02 PM EDT reply actions  

As in?
the postseason?  If the postseason started today, we would play the Padres and the Dodgers would play the Mets....that's if the Dodgers make the playoffs.  They are sliding hard right now and have a chance of not only falling out of the division lead, but out of the Wild Card as well.  A 4 game (to go with the current 3 game) losing streak and they could be 2 back in the West and 1-3 back in the Wild Card.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hardcore that is not accurate
The Dodgers still have a 1 game lead in the West....they have lost 3 in a row while the Pads have won 4 in a row. If post season started today it would be Mets/Pads and Cards/Dodgers.
http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/standings/index.jsp
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

From Kindred's numbers above,
this season Izzy has 33 saves (10 blown):

11 came with a 1-run lead.
11 came with a 2-run lead.
11 came with a 3-run lead

_______________________________________________

Of his 10 blown saves, 6 came with a 1-run lead, 4 with a 2-run lead.

Which means that Izzy is only 11-17 (64.7%) at saving a 1-run lead this year.... and only 11-15 (73.3%) in saving a 2-run lead...<b>so he blows leads smaller than 3 runs 31% of the time!!!</b>

But, he is 100% at saving 3-run leads!!!

by salvomania on Sep 6, 2006 6:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Per Bernie...
Strauss told us on 1380 ...

Izzy's left hip -- which has been problematic in the past -- is bothering him again... all the more reason why it's so strange that La Russa went back with him again today, after Izzy threw 28 pitches in the 9th inning Wednesday.

--B

There may not be a choice now...

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 6:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Bernie
says Izzy is hurt...hip again. http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=3895750&highlight=#3895750

i guess that sorta explains it. i agree with wainwright getting a shot. there's just no real argument for izzy or anyone else over him imo, other then maybe looper..maybe.  

aka "the Rev"

by erik on Sep 6, 2006 6:23 PM EDT reply actions  

no, this makes
perfect sense. it explains why he was taking 45 seconds between pitches; it explains why he was nowhere near hitting molina's target on any of his pitches.

and it explains the facial expressions and body language that bespoke of utter helplessness. can't make your body do what it won't do.

so the question is --- if he was so badly imparied, why the f**k did he stay out there and bring a loss upon the team?

and why did la russa / dunc let him?

by lboros on Sep 6, 2006 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

BINGO!!!
There were still arms in the pen at his disposal. Why kill the guy? Why is it they don't pick up on this stuff. All i can say is it's tough luck for izzy. wonder how long he's been in pain. that would explain a lot. now it's time to turn the page and put reserve someone else for the 9th.
aka "the Rev"

by erik on Sep 6, 2006 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

This makes
two pitchers now that supposedly were/have been hurting for a while before anyone hears about it. It makes you wonder if there's a "Cone of Silence" surrounding certain players...

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

also explains...
... the "bad mechanics" that Izzy was alluding to during his post-game questioning.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is...
very similar to the Mulder situation. Pitcher is hurting but says he can go. So, they continue to throw him out there. Management says he is fine, needs to work on mechanics, will get better.

Now, it's apparent that his injury is affecting him. Question is will they rush him back like Mulder because they desperately need him?

Of course, if Looper and/or Wainwright step up, maybe the Cards won't need to rush Izzy back.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

He didn't "turn himself in"
Because he didn't want to get the JD Drew treatment of being castigated for not trying to play.  I think that was part of Edmonds trying to play through it all too -- you don't want to give the impression that you're not trying to help the team.

LaDunc didn't pull him because...because...um...

That's what's most frustrating to me about this year.  LaRussa will go on record saying he's sticking his head in the sand hoping it'll go away ("I will choose to believe he's improving") and they're paying no attention to mechanics, results, etc.

by whopperman on Sep 6, 2006 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

and how long
has he been hurt?  Will rest solve the problem?  How much does he need?  The postseason starts in 4 weeks and if he needs 6 weeks rest, we're in trouble.  I do not for the life of me understand the Cards' medical staff.  They screwed up w/ Rolen last year, Mulder this year and now Izzy's hurt?  Bulls*&t!

by chuckb on Sep 6, 2006 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now people
are attacking Bernie; schmucks..

by cardsrul on Sep 6, 2006 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I confess to not reading other comments
But I still say give Looper a shot at it. He's used to the role. It wouldn't hurt at all. Let Izzy take a few games off, give him some bullpen sessions, maybe work up some confidence, and meanwhile, see how Looper will handle it. And with his numbers, the chances are, if he does blow it, the team will come back and win anyway so he'll get yet another W.

by aet15 on Sep 6, 2006 6:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Looper's contract incentives
"Looper's deal calls for salaries of $3.5 million in 2006, $4.5 million in 2007 and $5.5 million in 2008. He can earn $1 million annually in performance bonuses, some of them based on games finished in case he becomes the closer."

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2260552

aka "the Rev"

by erik on Sep 6, 2006 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

mental fortitude
I'm not feeling very generous toward Izzy at this point, but still -- the guy tries hard; I know he beats up on himself as much as anybody; and I know he wants to win.  The problem, as most of you have pointed out already, isn't really Isringhausen.  It's La Russa.  CLEARLY Izzy is not our best option out of the pen, and everyone knows it (you, me, Bob Carpenter, Tom Paciorek -- even Izzy himself).  Then why use him in crucial situations?

The answer, I think, is obvious, at least if you asked TLR.  It's b/c Isringhausen is a "closer."  He's been our closer for years; he gets paid like a closer; therefore he closes games (i.e., the same rationale for starting Mulder over Reyes in August).

But didn't Isringhausen have to earn his closer status at some point?  Why can't he "un-earn" it?  I think La Russa doesn't want to make Wainwright our closer b/c of that old myth that it takes a special kind of mental fortitude to close out games.  But clearly Isringhausen has lost his mental fortitude (have you ever seen anyone pitch slower and more timidly than Izzy this afternoon?).  And if he HASN'T lost his mental fortitude, then surely he's tough enough to handle a demotion.

Brian Gunn

by briangunn on Sep 6, 2006 6:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Always good to see your name..
Great comments as usual Brian. I was one of the guys who used to write on your Cardinal Nation..and miss it and your great daily writing.
You are right one the money here as to Izzy and his being able to handle a " de-motion" ...Now it appears he is also hurt...so perhaps the gods are looking down on us if that will force LaRussa into trying Looper or Wainwright in the 9th. Take care and hope to see you here again soon

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whew!!
I HAVE read all the other comments and agree with almost all--especially the "short-leash" proponents. If only TLR would do any of it. He won't, though. If he does, I'll be the first to hooray. Unfortunately, I think we're gonna have a September and (maybe) a little bit (very little bit--1st round, perhaps) of October filled with Izzyball. Stock up on whatever booze or drugs gets ya thru, cause unless he really is hurt or gets hurt--Izzy is TLR's Chosen One. Sink or swim, probably sink, Izzy will continue to be on the mound exactly when he's the worse possible choice. Ug.

by rockin redbird on Sep 6, 2006 7:00 PM EDT reply actions  

...and
ya know, it pains me to have written that. Like LB and a few others, I've been sort of an apologist for Izzy almost all season. He's always come around in the last couple years--always brought the drama, but was able to walk the line and get the wins. Not this year. I'm sorry to say y'all were right.

by rockin redbird on Sep 6, 2006 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

if Izzy is hurt...
... and can't go in the post-season, what you folks think of having Reyes closing, or having Wainwright closing and Reyes taking over Wainwright's "situational shutdown" spot.

i know it's kind of a pipe dream, but i kind of doubt that Reyes will be starting in October. putting in him short relief would allow him to go all out for a few batters at a time, and would allow him to get by using only one or two pitches (change-up + 4-seam, w/occasional curve for effect).

won't happen. probably shouldn't. would be sort of ironic, tho.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 7:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Let's put this Izzy thing in a vaccum for 1 second
and look at this sentence as I'm about to type:

"Braden Looper is our closer"

Somewhere Mets fans are laughing hysterically all the while crying about bad memories.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 7:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Which is exactly why
he should be closing against the Mets in the NLCS....coming off shoulder surgery with an axe to grind.....
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup
I agree. I've been saying it all along. No point in moving Wainwright. He's solid where he is. Looper has done the closer thing before, and succeeded. Give it to him.

by aet15 on Sep 6, 2006 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't say he has
succeeded with too much confidence.

Over a two year span in New York, he had 70 save opportunities and converted 57 of them.  That's an 80% conversion rate. That is only slightly better than Izzy's 78% success rate this season.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

in fairness...
... he won a WS with Florida, and was pitching last season with a frayed shoulder.

he ain't Rivera in any case, but the fact that he's healthy this season and wasn't healthy last season does count for something.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven't gone and looked
at the gamelogs, but looking at the stats themselves he had a horrible WS.  During the regular season, though, he converted 28 of 34 saves for an 82% conversion rate.  Not bad compared to what is going on now in the 9th but just thinking of Braden Looper as the closer makes me almost as scared as Izzy.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well
in the WS he was a set-up guy. He might've not been used to the role. I had him on my fantasy team for a few years around there, and remember him being solid. All I'm saying is it might not hurt to give him a chance.

by aet15 on Sep 6, 2006 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

he was also pulled
from the closer's duties w/ Florida and replaced w/ Urbina b/c he was having trouble getting it done.  In fact, if I remember correctly, McKeon didn't even trust him w/ setup duties.  Who was the RH who's always hurt but pitched well that postseason?  I can't remember his name.

by chuckb on Sep 6, 2006 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crap! Lance "Porno Name" Berkman
drives in Biggio in the 1st.  Pettitte looks sharp going 1-2-3.
LBoros, your earlier post on how hard it would be for the Cards to blow it makes a lot of sense but for some reason I just can't shake this feeling about the Astros.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 7:27 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm with you AB....
I posted pretty much the same thing earlier...my brain tells me the Cards should roll into the playoffs, no sweat...but my heart tells me that those Friggin Astros are a team that needs to be watched and smashed as quickly and completely as possible. No mercy.

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey...
...I've got no problem with the Astros making the playoffs.  Let them win the Wild Card, give us the Padres in the first round and they can go steal a series from the Mets.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to speak for AB..
but I think what he is worried about is the Stro's coming back and taking the Division....at least that is my deep lying fear...silly I know...but that team just has something about it that worries me..

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm more concerned with the Astros actually
winning the division and someone else winning the Wild Card.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Timbo, you obviously read my mind.
Just posted it faster.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL
Great minds bro....great minds...

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Glad I had class and didn't know it was a
day game.

That looks like a rough game.  I'm not going to rip into Izzy esp. if he's hurting.  I'm just wondering why our medical staff continues to send injured pitchers to the mound.

Whatever...I still don't feel like we have a great option to replace Izzy.  Wainwright gets slammed by lefties .894 OPS against.  And as good as Hancock has been, he doesn't really have closer stuff, imo.

With rosters expanded, sit Izzy for a while and hope he can sort things out.  Izzy 'clicking' is still the best option at closer for this team.

Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 6, 2006 7:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Crap again.
Former Cardinal Abraham Nunez grounds into a DP with the bases loaded.  Had Pettitte against the ropes and let him off.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 7:41 PM EDT reply actions  

my god...
... jason lane sucks (.208/.320/.408). they DFA Wilson to have Lane bat clean-up against lefties? i still don't get it.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 7:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Boy, wouldn't you give your left arm
to have a guy like Jimmy Rollins or Jose Reyes playing shortstop?  Very fast, power hitting switch hitters who lead off and steal bases... Not to mention they are damned fine defensively as well.  Both have cannon arms.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 7:59 PM EDT reply actions  

well......
Luna is a FA this winter....not  the same level as those two guys....but a step up in my opinion from what we have now.

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

oops...
I meant LUGO....of course...sorry...

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know, if it is just raw talent to be
considered, I think Luna has it... BUT I never felt from day one that he had that "DESIRE" thing that great players have.  He just always seemed to be going through the motions to me.  I always felt and still do feel the same way about J.D. Drew.  Just going through the motions and then being polite.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Michael Young
I'm not sure what his contract status is (know where a person could easily look that stuff up?) but Young is seemingly pretty pissed off at basically being called out by the Rangers' owner, Tom Hicks...I know he's been called overrated, but...I gotta think he'd set the table for Albert (and Dunc) better than Eck, IMO...

from espn:
""Absolutely not," shortstop Michael Young told reporters when asked if he thought the team lacked toughness. "If anyone questioned my toughness or my ability to grind through a season, I'd have a big problem with it.

"We didn't win because we lacked toughness," Young added. "We didn't win because we got outplayed. But don't question my approach to the game. Any player that takes pride in the game would look at those comments personally."

Young's comments came after Hicks singled the shortstop out during his radio interview, saying that the All-Star Game MVP and reigning batting champ is a great player and leads by example but is "not a captain of the clubhouse kind of guy.""

by glennrwordman on Sep 6, 2006 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow, I wasn't aware of the Michael Young
stuff.  I thought any team with half a brain would lock him up long term.  If he were available at all he would be terrific.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Michael Young...
is a monster man....if the Rangers would EVER let that guy go?...they should be thrown out of baseball.. I like Lugo and have been singing his praises here for awhile now...but if Young were available?...shooot.....that is a no brainer. Snap that boy Up!

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Whole Brouhaha
...could blow over pretty quickly, but Hicks has proven again and again that he's a first-rate dumkopf, and if Young is well and truly peeved...he could ask out, and I think he'd look perfect with the Birds...

by glennrwordman on Sep 6, 2006 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

an .800 OPS is nice from your SS
but he's under contract for another year at 3.5 million and an option for 08 at 4 million.  He's projected to be worth more than twice that both years.

I'd be awfully surprised if he were available.  Prolly require major league ready talent in return.  Think Reyes and some midlevel prospect (Hawksworth).

I think that if Eckstein was having a career average  year at his salary there are better places to upgrade (namely the rotation). But given that Eckstein has been hurt for a good portion of the year...gotta wonder what he's gonna give us next year.

Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 6, 2006 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

azruavatar, yes
That package sounds abour right to me.  Would a) signing a free-agent like Buehrle or Zito and b) acquiring Young make it worth getting rid of two major-league or near-major-league ready pitchers?  I think it'd have to be a two-part invention, as they say.  There'd have to be a replacement for the rotation immediately, and an improvement at that...

by glennrwordman on Sep 6, 2006 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think we can financially sustain
giving away Reyes or Wainwright.  We should be able to afford Schmidt or Zito plus an upgrade at 2b this offseason without having to give up either of them.

I guess I wouldn't be horrified by the trade but I don't necessarily think it's the best idea.

Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 6, 2006 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Young is signed thru 2007...
with a club option of $5 mil in 2008.

I thought it would be a no-brainer for the club to pick up the option but after reading Tom Hicks' comments, I'm not so sure. I think Tom Hicks is an idiot. He signs A-Rod for a quarter billion dollars causing salary havoc in baseball and now he publicly slants his all-star SS. How did he get a baseball team anyway?

BTW, you can get contract info at this website:

Cot's Baseball Contracts

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

jdubya...
...thanks for the contract site!

I know it's fantasy baseball, but I wonder who pitching-poor Texas would want for MYoung?

by glennrwordman on Sep 6, 2006 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably...
a couple of our top young pitchers or prospects.

Think Reyes or Wainwright with prospect, i.e.

Reyes & Hawksworth or Pomeranz or Lambert. Same guys with Wainwright.

If we could keep Reyes & Wainwright and swing an all prospect deal, that would be sweet. Say, Narveson & Pomeranz or Hawksworth.

All this is a pipe-dream because Young and Idiot Hicks will probably kiss and make up and Hicks will extend Young's contract giving him millions of dollars and half of Texas.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correction...
Young's option is $4 mil in 2008 but could increase to $5 mil.

He's due to make $3.5 mil in 2007.

Wow, he's cheap! Love to have this guy. Maybe he'll demand a trade now that he's on the outs with Idiot Hicks.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

A bonus to acquiring michael young...
is you have a great chance of getting Vernon Wells also. They are good friends.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, Lugo I like.
Being out here as you are in LA, I too have seen quite a bit of him lately and I think he has a lot of positives.  My favorite thing about him is that he is VERY FAST.  He can steal some bases.  Good bat too.  I know others are knocking his defense but I can only go by what I've seen and it has been pretty impressive, especailly since he is not playing where he would like to be.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Dmitri Young
just released by the Tigers, he could add some pop to our bench, should walt take a flyer?

by Bullet Bob Gibson on Sep 6, 2006 8:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Another wow!
St. Louis native comes home and becomes a big guy off of the bench.  Probably too late to add him now though.  Anybody know if it would even be possible to put him on the roster?
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

He came up with the Cards...
but he's from Camarillo Ca. man...I watched him play in High School back in the 90's....

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I thought he was from StL
Guess it was just the fact that he went through the Cards system.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey Timbo
I graduated from Ventura High in '94...you??
I probably think about this stuff too much......

by cardsnutincali on Sep 6, 2006 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

OH not even close bro...
I grew up in STL...and graduated from HS there ...in a year that is WELL before you...naw..I just work in Westlake Village, and used to live in Thousand Oaks for about 10 yrs...have freinds who's kids were playing ball then and I would go to the games...that's where I saw Young...he was a great high school player.

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was cooking dinner
and this just came to me.

Actually, I started with the line "Where have you gone Johnny Littlefield?  Card Nation turns its lonely eyes to you," but that went nowhere fast.  This is what replaced it.  Apologies in advance to Johnny, June, Roseanne, Norm, Dave and the rest of the Cash family:

I see the ninth a-comin'
Its comin' right as rain
We've only got a one run lead
So there's gonna be some pain
Cause we close with Isringhausen
Kiss that lead goodbye
We close with Isringhausen
So hang your head and cry.

When I was just a baby,
My Mama told me, "Son,
Don't put your faith in Izzy
If you're up by just one run
Cause he'll pitch to Jose Vidro
And make him look real fine
When you hear those Nat fans cheerin,
You know that lead is dyin'.

I bet there are teams relaxing
With real closers on their staffs
They've all got low blood pressure
And their close games are for laughs
But we know when Izzy's comin'
That the laugh's on us
And the other team won't stop laughin
Til we're on the bus.

Now if I owned the Card-nals,
If the Redbird pen was mine,
I'd move old Izzy's carcass
Just a little down the line
So what happened just won't happen
Like it did today,
But we'll close with Isringhausen
Til he's DFA.

I'm here all week.  Try the veal.

The cat is fine, thank you.

by Intheway on Sep 6, 2006 8:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Yo man....
that is friggin classic....Nice work!!

by Timbo02 on Sep 6, 2006 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just sang your lyrics
..to my wife, who's a huge cash fan (and a Cards fan). Needless to say, we both got a kick out of it.

by salvomania on Sep 6, 2006 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Props to you on that.
That is pretty damned funny.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've heard a lot of comedians say,
It's funny because it's true.  I think that applies here.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Permission granted.
Gladly.
The cat is fine, thank you.

by Intheway on Sep 6, 2006 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

bloody awesome
and yet... so true /sheds tear

by Nagle80 on Sep 6, 2006 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice work!
been chuckling since I read it.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, Philly HR
Have know idea who this Ruiz is but it is now 2-1 Houston.  And just when I was going to say Pettitte is looking really good.
Maybe I can jinx his ass!
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I have to go back to this Dmitri Young thing
When was he sent down?  And I'm pretty shocked.  He was the Tigers star outside of Pudge last year.  This year he was hurt for awhile, but what could he have done to be sent off like that?  He has a hell of a stick and switch hits. That's not something you want on the bench? I can only think that Sean Casey being brought into Detroit caused this.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

that...
... and he was arrested earlier this season.

with the Shelton/Casey platoon, they don't need him anymore.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

honestly...
... i don't remember. nothing too serious, i don't think.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

he went to rehab
so I'm left to assume drug/alcohol problems.

by Elle on Sep 6, 2006 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looks like off the field problems...
Tigers management said it was performance but I have to believe that it was off the field stuff.

See this article from Tigers website:

Tigers unconditionally release Young

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Philly 2 Houston 2
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Anibal Sanchez
has a no hitter in the 8th.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

And now he is thru 8
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm cheering for him to get it...
seeing how it's not against us ;)

Demoralize the DBacks right before we get there.

That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me too pal
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Watching it now on MLB.COM
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Randy Johnson was the last guy
to do it in 2004.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Anybody who cares should go see this kid
2 outs away from the No-No now.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:17 PM EDT reply actions  

1 out away now, check it out.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:18 PM EDT reply actions  

HE GOT IT AND THEY'RE GOING NUTS!!!
Anibel Sanchez. Marlins
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Going crazy, all...
13,000 of them! Wow, Marlins are in the wild card race and have a good young team and still can't draw a crowd.

Good for the kid! He's a good looking rookie pitcher.

by jdubya on Sep 6, 2006 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I lived in Miami for a while
and it is hard to explain why they don't draw.  There are two things that come to mind though.
It is hotter than hell at high noon there.  I have been to Busch 2 when it still had Astroturf which was the hottest place on earth and it did not compare to going to that...
And here is my second point... chasm that they call a stadium.  It does not work for baseball.
Now, think about how many die hard Redbird fans are either Seniors or are on the cusp of being so and they go to games in good old StL... In FLA. these same people don't go to the games because of the heat and the hassle and the fact that most are transplants that are still Yankee or Met fans.
Think Seinfeld's parents on the show.
Also, it's a football town.  It's a cooler weather sport and they still are living on that undefeated season.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention
they have just turned into a basketball town after shaq came to town and the heat won the championship last year

by MarcGldstn on Sep 7, 2006 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

the marlins remind me
of the Indians in the first Major League movie. A ragtag team who has to make it to the playoff to prove to the crummy owner that they're worth a damn.

Dontrell's no Vaughn, though.

by effin fisk on Sep 7, 2006 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought Byrnes beat out that throw...
it was real close. Hanley would've felt like such a jerk if he waited to long to throw it.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 9:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Don Denkinger would not have even called
Byrnes safe there.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep
No ump would call him safe right there, even if he was. You'd break that kids heart, and Hanley Ramirez would probably hang himself.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was SOOOO safe
Dude got screwed. Mr. Byrnes beat that throw. But what Ump in the world was going to call him safe? Kind of cheep way to get a no-no. Your short stop takes his good old freakin time and almost blows your no-no because he didnt want to make a bad throw. Any other time in the game, like the 2nd inning, I think they call him safe. Which would have been the right call. But you cant call him safe when its the last out of a no hitter. Can you?
From THE MAN, to Gibby, to The Wizard, to Albert the Great. Cardinal Tradition lives on.

by gdm426 on Sep 7, 2006 2:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Randy Johnson
Also has a no hitter going in Kansas City

by Brownale on Sep 6, 2006 9:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Lots of potential no no's lately
In the past week there have been tons of no nos that have made it to about the 7th inning or later.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

ends the longest...
... no-hitter drought in MLB history.

by kindred on Sep 6, 2006 9:34 PM EDT reply actions  

So, Is Izzy Injured?
What's the news? I'd like to see Looper closing. He has pretty good numbers when he starts an inning.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 9:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Anibal Sanchez
Sanchez, Hanley Ramirez, JesĂşs Delgado, and Harvey GarcĂ­a were traded to the Marlins for Josh Beckett, Guillermo Mota, and Mike Lowell

My hat's off to him 8)

by cardsfan84 on Sep 6, 2006 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey Rick Vaughn...
Can you talk to Izzy about an eye check-up and maybe some new specks or contacts, thanks bro.

by riescher on Sep 6, 2006 9:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Wouldn't it be weird if Johnson gets the no-no
on the same night as the kid?  I mean, of course, since he was the last to do it before tonight.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Crap, crap, crap!!!!
Berkman... three RBI double with 2 outs in the 9th.  He is so clutch.  Astros now will Win.  It is 5-2. It was just like watching Izzy blow the game today.  Same shit.
I'm out.  Have a great evening.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 9:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Ass-trots Win. Crap!!!
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 6, 2006 10:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't mind ragging on the team
But I have to admit that I'm not a big fan of the Ass-whatever nicknames for the Astros.  They're a legitimate team that seems to find a way to win.

I don't know if it's just me or what (and I'm just bringing it up this once) but it kind of seems unnecessary so if you wouldn't mind it, could we stop with that?

And now the awkward silence ...

by dontEATnachos on Sep 6, 2006 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh come on!!!
Go eat a nacho!  What a dumb post.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 7, 2006 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey
I just was saying once that it kind of annoyed me (and thought that if I threw it out there some other people may agree with me).  Clearly no one else has so you can do with that knowledge what you will (ie. ignore it).

by dontEATnachos on Sep 7, 2006 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't feel alone....
...I think alot of what allenbrent says is for shock value.  He seems to be way over the top on a lot of stuff.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 7, 2006 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah
i agree that the name-calling is juvenile.. i just ignore it, though.  such are the burdens of open forums

by shawnz303 on Sep 7, 2006 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hardcore you disappoint me
You are the shock value King of this sight.  I am not in it for that at all.  I just have a die hard love of the Cardinals and that's all that I am here for period.  I thought you were an astute fan but now I wonder.
As far as Nachos and shawnz, say what you want. I'm just a fan. No hard feelings.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 7, 2006 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree
not terribly clever
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Sep 7, 2006 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

And you are always clever.
Broglio for Brock!!!

by allenbrent on Sep 7, 2006 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Atleast Ryan Howard didn't go yard...
....that would have been the cherry on the sundae of today's sucktitude.

by Hardcore Legend on Sep 6, 2006 10:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Not worried about the Astros at all..
their hitting makes ours look like the Yankees.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 10:25 PM EDT reply actions  

About Looper
Wasn't he supposed to be a spot closer anyway? Isn't that why we gave him such a large contract?  Would going to a 2 closer system really hurt that much the rest of the way out, especially considering we now have expanded rosters?

by bailorg on Sep 6, 2006 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

ok
I posted before I was worried about the Wa AZ then back to STL swing jet lag, and showed frist night in WA...

but now this series coming up with AZ is big especially with the stros next week...they need to at least split with Zona who will be ticked after getting no hit youd think...maybe they can get weava some runs to go with his snappa...then stros nest week..neword if clemens will be there?

by punchinjudy on Sep 6, 2006 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I remember that...
I was the smart guy who responded with a dismissal of the pitchers we were going to face and a prediction for 40 runs on this trip. I'm out of the prediction business for '06...

by guayzimi on Sep 6, 2006 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

well i dont
play pro ball and stats r good, but i was going purely on the lag factor which was ther maybe for 2 games def.1 not today..that was bad pitching...it will get ya the first couple of days

by punchinjudy on Sep 6, 2006 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, the pirates have to be crying...
Oliver Perez finds himself with the Mets... Can that team catch any break at all...

by guayzimi on Sep 6, 2006 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

finds himself?
He's had 1 good game and 3 terrible ones with the Mets. I'd hardly say he found himself yet.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 6, 2006 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but....
it doesn't even start to make up for the Pirates stealing Jason Bay from the Mets.

not that the mets care, they can just go out and buy more outfielders

by FitzLikeAGlove on Sep 7, 2006 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Technically
The Pirates got Jason Bay in the Brian Giles swap with San Diego.

The Mets stole Bay from the Expos.
The Padres stole him from the Mets.
The Pirates didn't quite steal him from the Padres.

by Solanus on Sep 7, 2006 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess my point was that...
the pirates endured 35 or so starts of plus 6 era pitching for what the Mets got after 3 starts...

by guayzimi on Sep 6, 2006 10:44 PM EDT reply actions  

UHGGG
When the cardinals Lose, the Red Sox/Yankees/Notre Dame/Patriots Network shows every play.

by TNFan32 on Sep 6, 2006 11:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Perhaps I've been waxing hyperbolic...
But this year's performance by the managerial crew in handling the pitchers seems to be especially poor.  

Whether it be the handling of Reyes (forcing the 2 seamer) or Mulder (stubbornly refusing to acknowledge he was way off or hurt) and Izzy (not recognizing or not acting on a possible recognition of his struggles).  And I don't know where to begin on Marquis...

How is it that the VEB group can pick this up but TLR etc. seem to be late to the party, or are stubbornly trying to enter the party through the attic?

We don't do this for a living.  One might surmise we do after reading the posts, but we don't.  This is TLR et al's JOB.

Am I blowing this out of proportion?  Was their performance this bad in 2003 or the late 90's?

TLR was great in 2002 and 2004 especially, but man, I just feel this has ben a poor year.

And of course, the players deserve a great deal of blame for their poor performance as well.

by BozCardsFanSF on Sep 7, 2006 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree entirely.
I'm more than willing to give the benefit of the doubt, but management has long since passed "benefit" territory when it comes to their handling of certain situations.

by Elle on Sep 7, 2006 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

less than a month ago
i said izzy wouldnt make my top ten closers list, and i stand by it
i cant watch it
is that what they look like? psychos? let me tell you something...pyschos dont explode whhen sunlight hits them, no matter how crazy they are

by benstl on Sep 7, 2006 12:46 AM EDT reply actions  

wainwright...
anyone still not think he is the best option at closer right now?

by lopey986 on Sep 7, 2006 12:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think AW should turn into a strict closer
because I think he is slated for the rotation in 2007. Becoming a closer would move him even further away from that goal than being a spot reliever has. Now, I wouldn't mind seeing him pitch the ninth every now and then, or better yet, bring him in to the game in the eigth, and let him pitch two. But I hate to screw up a solid young starter, by putting him in a spot where he is consistently closing games. To me, it's not worth the risk.

by fuegophil on Sep 7, 2006 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

The bright side of a blown save
There was a time when I would risk trips to the refrigerator during Isringhausen's appearances, reasonably certain I would miss, at the most, chop fouls and crooked necks as batters watched his cutter grind against the plate black.  Obviously those days are over.  You head to the fridge now to make sure the Tupperware with your heart transplant is burped tight and chilled.

But I think we have to acknowledge something here: LaRussa's philosophy compels him to stick with players like Izzy because he's been around long enough to know you won't win consistently from April to September if younger, emerging players (we have one or two) and more experienced role players (we have a baker's dozen) routinely witness you throwing older, well established veterans under the bus.  If someone like Isringhausen is going to lose his role as the closer, the lawyer in TLR needs a preponderence of the evidence -- not so much for Jason's sake, but for the club house as a whole.

So let's hope for some good out of this latest blown save.  Maybe now, at last, we can get late relief reorganized for the post season without a lot of internal chaos and bickering.  Everyone can see the facts now.

Or look at it this way: if Ozzie Guillen were managing the Cardinals, Izzy would have been exiled two or three months ago.  Who knows?  Maybe a more effective closer would have taken his place ... but you wonder how much fight there'd be in a team where your all-time franchise saves leader can get canned on a team whose starting pitching, until recently, regularly left him with almost no margin for error.

It's bad luck to be superstitious.

by red menace on Sep 7, 2006 1:05 AM EDT reply actions  

no way
do you really want ozzie guillen in charge of the Cardinals? God forbid.
From THE MAN, to Gibby, to The Wizard, to Albert the Great. Cardinal Tradition lives on.

by gdm426 on Sep 7, 2006 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

What now?
Obviously, Izzy is hurting... in both his hip and his head. But he can't keep going out there. He hasn't been "on" (that is to say, if he ever was) since early August and he'll continue to cost the team wins if he keeps his role as a closer.

So what do they do now?

Looper has closed before, but he has been brutal for the last two weeks and I have about as much confidence in his stuff as Izzy's.

Wainwright has one of the sickest curves in all of baseball. He could probably get the job done, but he isn't exactly dominant (or even good) against lefties.

Reyes would probably be the best option, but he would have to recondition his arm and Thompson would probably have to move into the rotation.

Or, they could go straight K-Rod in '02 and bring Chris Perez up from A ball. He closed games for one of the most storied college programs and has been lights out this year for The Swing. Of course, this would be the most radical move La Russa would have ever made, so it really isn't very likely.

Sooo... what to doooo?

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Sep 7, 2006 2:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Whoa.
Um, in the interest of everybody keeping their cool, I just want to mention that Al never

(a) said he was clever, nor
(b) said you weren't clever

He just agreed with an already-expressed opinion: that the nickname wasn't all that clever. We're all friends here, yes?

by Hummingbird on Sep 7, 2006 7:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perez
walks ALOT of people. He still needs to work on his location. Definitely not ready for the big leagues. I'd go with Mike Sillman (Palm Beachs closer) before him.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Sep 7, 2006 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know
he's not quite ready for the show, but that 97mph heater of his is damn seductive. Maybe I'll just kidnap Joel Zumaya.
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Sep 7, 2006 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

not if he gets anywhere near a baseball
or you might catch that 100mph heater coming at your face in self defense.

kids got a live arm

Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 7, 2006 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

He is awesome
I enjoying watching him pitch more than any rookie since Wood in '98.
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Sep 7, 2006 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Short term: short leash
seems reasonable.  But it doesn't answer the really nasty question of what to do if Izzy proves completely unable to hack it--and the injury talk suggests that he really shouldn't be out there.  So...I'll cast my vote for Looper.  He hasn't been very good, but maybe--maybe--throwing him back into the closer's role with something to prove will somehow give him a jolt. That phenomenon befuddles me, but it's happened before. That said, I wouldn't give him a whole lot of rope. I'm not inclined to use Wainwright, but I don't want to rule anyone out, because the nature of closing is such that almost anyone can be effective for a short period of time--and that's really all we need.

As lboros's shorthand math makes clear, we very likely have a postseason spot wrapped up. So here's the plan, LaDuncan: experiment, fiddle, futz, rest people, do whatever you have to do...but by the time the playoffs start, we'd better have someone closing games who inspires at least a smidgen of confidence.

Please.

by Hummingbird on Sep 7, 2006 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols