Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Albert and Luck

Funky game today, to say the least.  Even great pitchers need a little luck to throw a no-hitter, and Ortiz had a fair amount going today.  Duncan in particular has to feel a little cheated; he hit the ball hard multiple times, and has nothing tangible to show for it.  Anyway...all the talk about Albert has made me wonder how lucky he's been this year, so I checked out his BABIP.  Don't know if anyone's mentioned this, but Albert's BABIP is way down from his career marks.

From 2001-2005, his BABIPs were .341, .310, .350, .304, and .318, respectively.  That's an average BABIP of .324.  This year he's down to .276 after today's game.  That's quite a dip--the implication being that Albert has had a bit of a hard-luck year.  Which sounds a little silly, considering he's still putting up a ludicrous .321/.423/.681 batting line.  Still, I was wondering what his numbers would be like if his BABIP were more in line with his 2001-2005 average, so I gave him 17 more singles to raise his BABIP to .323.  With those 17 extra singles--singles, mind you--added to his numbers, Albert's line would be a frightening .360/.456/.720, which is top-30 all-time territory.  Yikes.

Keep in mind, this is just bringing his BABIP up to its established levels, and doing it all with singles.  If he were having a "lucky" year (like 2003, if you're inclined to call it that), and if some of those hits were XBH instead of singles (not implausible), he'd be in truly rarefied air. And I'm not even mentioning the 2 weeks he spent on the DL. Although I think I just did.

None of this is particularly enlightening; it mostly just makes me feel fuzzy about just how ridiculously good Albert is.  I s'pose you might take from this the expectation that his 2006 luck will level out a bit, and he might hit the ball even better the rest of the way.  I'm not sure how expectations for Pujols could be any higher, but I don't doubt he could meet 'em.  As far as the MVP debate goes, I...well, I'm biased.  In any case, I doubt many voters credit BABIP or its implications about the relative contribution of luck to a player's performance, but...OK, let me just say this:  Ryan Howard's BABIP is .347.  Not helping his case.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would have predicted that
he had a high BABIP b/c of his insane April.  Suprising.  Thanks Hummingbird.

by Valatan on Sep 4, 2006 8:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Noticed
I notice this once, but didn't think much of it since it is a "luck" stat.  Looking back I noticed that this year his FB% has increased which (I don't have any stats to back it up) I would assume that fly balls are turned into outs more often than GB or LD.

by Just Rope Ball on Sep 4, 2006 9:33 PM EDT reply actions  

that's correct --- w qualifications
flyballs only fall for hits about 10 percent of the time, excluding home runs --- which are not considered "balls in play." grounders are hits about 22 pct of the time; line drives are hits about 70 pct of the time.

the 1st two months of the season, an insanely high pct of albert's flyballs were home runs --- something like 35 or 40 pct --- so the increased flyball frequency wasn't hurting him in any way. on the contrary, it was helping. but he's fallen off considerably since then --- down to 23 pct homer / flyball ratio, which is slightly above albt's career avg.

like the post, hummingbird.

by lboros on Sep 5, 2006 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

thanks
and thanks for bringing up the HR/FB issue; that's another aspect of performance that seems to be at least partly constituted by luck, if I understand it correctly.  If you're having a good month for HR/FB, it'll inflate your homer totals.  If you're having a good BABIP month, it'll inflate your average.  If you're having a good BA/RISP month, it'll inflate your RBI totals.

I take it that it's one of the Holy Grails of analysis to dissect issues like this, in order to figure out with some precision just how much luck has contributed to a given player's performance.

by Hummingbird on Sep 5, 2006 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

luck yes
but that elbow & oblique injury probably caused some balls to die at the warning track that would have been HRs.
Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 5, 2006 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols