Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Uga VII, Requiescat in Pace: A Tribute to a Damn Good 'Dawg

Albert and Luck

Funky game today, to say the least.  Even great pitchers need a little luck to throw a no-hitter, and Ortiz had a fair amount going today.  Duncan in particular has to feel a little cheated; he hit the ball hard multiple times, and has nothing tangible to show for it.  Anyway...all the talk about Albert has made me wonder how lucky he's been this year, so I checked out his BABIP.  Don't know if anyone's mentioned this, but Albert's BABIP is way down from his career marks.

From 2001-2005, his BABIPs were .341, .310, .350, .304, and .318, respectively.  That's an average BABIP of .324.  This year he's down to .276 after today's game.  That's quite a dip--the implication being that Albert has had a bit of a hard-luck year.  Which sounds a little silly, considering he's still putting up a ludicrous .321/.423/.681 batting line.  Still, I was wondering what his numbers would be like if his BABIP were more in line with his 2001-2005 average, so I gave him 17 more singles to raise his BABIP to .323.  With those 17 extra singles--singles, mind you--added to his numbers, Albert's line would be a frightening .360/.456/.720, which is top-30 all-time territory.  Yikes.

Keep in mind, this is just bringing his BABIP up to its established levels, and doing it all with singles.  If he were having a "lucky" year (like 2003, if you're inclined to call it that), and if some of those hits were XBH instead of singles (not implausible), he'd be in truly rarefied air. And I'm not even mentioning the 2 weeks he spent on the DL. Although I think I just did.

None of this is particularly enlightening; it mostly just makes me feel fuzzy about just how ridiculously good Albert is.  I s'pose you might take from this the expectation that his 2006 luck will level out a bit, and he might hit the ball even better the rest of the way.  I'm not sure how expectations for Pujols could be any higher, but I don't doubt he could meet 'em.  As far as the MVP debate goes, I...well, I'm biased.  In any case, I doubt many voters credit BABIP or its implications about the relative contribution of luck to a player's performance, but...OK, let me just say this:  Ryan Howard's BABIP is .347.  Not helping his case.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I would have predicted that
he had a high BABIP b/c of his insane April.  Suprising.  Thanks Hummingbird.

by Valatan on Sep 4, 2006 8:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Noticed
I notice this once, but didn't think much of it since it is a "luck" stat.  Looking back I noticed that this year his FB% has increased which (I don't have any stats to back it up) I would assume that fly balls are turned into outs more often than GB or LD.

by Just Rope Ball on Sep 4, 2006 9:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that's correct --- w qualifications
flyballs only fall for hits about 10 percent of the time, excluding home runs --- which are not considered "balls in play." grounders are hits about 22 pct of the time; line drives are hits about 70 pct of the time.

the 1st two months of the season, an insanely high pct of albert's flyballs were home runs --- something like 35 or 40 pct --- so the increased flyball frequency wasn't hurting him in any way. on the contrary, it was helping. but he's fallen off considerably since then --- down to 23 pct homer / flyball ratio, which is slightly above albt's career avg.

like the post, hummingbird.

by lboros on Sep 5, 2006 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks
and thanks for bringing up the HR/FB issue; that's another aspect of performance that seems to be at least partly constituted by luck, if I understand it correctly.  If you're having a good month for HR/FB, it'll inflate your homer totals.  If you're having a good BABIP month, it'll inflate your average.  If you're having a good BA/RISP month, it'll inflate your RBI totals.

I take it that it's one of the Holy Grails of analysis to dissect issues like this, in order to figure out with some precision just how much luck has contributed to a given player's performance.

by Hummingbird on Sep 5, 2006 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

luck yes
but that elbow & oblique injury probably caused some balls to die at the warning track that would have been HRs.
Acquire Jason Schmidt!

by azruavatar on Sep 5, 2006 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

Recent FanPosts

Arch_small
Number 15
Small
Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
Small
Ok let me try this again...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..
Yavonne4_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Kid-a-bear_small the red baron