lonely little game
the irony. after nearly a full season of skepticism, emphasizing the cardinals' flaws and waving red flags -- their lousy strikeout rate, their negative homerun differential, their imbalanced rotation and misappropriation of roster resources -- after months and months of, in essence, issuing "sell" recommendations on st louis cardinals stock, i come to find that, at the very end, i may have overestimated this team.
i knew they weren't good, but i thought they were good enough to win the division. now i'm not so sure.
as the astros have gotten closer and closer and closer -- and as the st louis bats went limp, the izzy-less bullpen disintegrated, the staff ace faltered -- even as all those things happened, the cards always had dumb luck and the schedule on their side. but luck is no longer quite so one-sided an asset, and they can't run the clock out on the schedule. the astros want this; they're really playing for something. whereas the cardinals seem to want nothing more than a negative -- ie, they want not to go down as the biggest chokers in history. houston's got the initiative, and that might prove to be more important than the one lonely little game in the loss column the cardinals still possess.
if i turn out to be wrong and the cardinals finish 2d, i'll accept the verdict of the scoreboard; it don't lie. whatever their fate turns out to be, they will have earned it -- and i will be able to live with it. i suggested a few days ago that the cardinals' last 7 games amounted to a de facto playoff series -- win 4 of the 7 and they (probably) advance. they're now down in that "series," 2 games to 1; they need 3 more wins. they'll have up to 5 games to get them. if the cardinals aren't up to that very small challenge, then they don't belong in the playoffs -- plain and simple.
i mean, they don't belong in the playoffs anyway -- not under any circumstances, not even if they win out. in a best-case scenario, the cardinals will finish with 85 wins; relying strictly on memory, i think that would make them the 4th-worst postseason team of all time, after the '05 padres (82 wins), the '73 mets (also 82), and the '84 royals (84). they currently have the 13th-best record in baseball; they'd be no better than a 3d-place club in any of the 5 other divisions, and a 4th-place club in two of'm. the texas rangers still have a chance to flag down the cardinals in the win column on this final weekend.
they already don't belong in the playoffs.
so if the cardinals do, in fact, miss the playoffs, i won't lose a minute of sleep over it. the guys losing sleep will be the new york mets and all their fans. you think they want to face clemens oswalt and pettitte? they're all rooting like hell for the cardinals -- probably harder than some of us are. they, not we, may be the real losers if st louis completes its collapse. i daresay even some of those american league teams are pulling for our guys; of all the nl teams they might wish to avoid in the world series, houston probably ranks at the top of the list. just what we've always wanted -- the whole baseball world is rooting for the cardinals!
if it should come down to a one-game playoff between st louis and houston -- an increasingly likely scenario -- the projected pitching pairing would be jason marquis vs roy oswalt. after last night's game, la russa wouldn't commit to naming marquis as his starter; it seems to have dawned on him, somewhat belatedly, that jason isn't very good and that he, as the manager, has the discretion to use another pitcher. marquis' era now stands at 6.02; unless he gets in for another couple of (scoreless) innings between now and sunday/monday/tuesday, he will set a new record for the worst era in franchise history by an era qualifier. that's a 77-year-old record, set in 1929 by bill sherdel, who posted a 5.93 era. since 1950, only 12 qualifiers in all of baseball have posted worse era's than 6.02 -- and 4 of those guys pitched in coors field, including darryl kile, whose 6.61 era in 1999 is the 4th worst since 1950. also on the list is our own chris carpenter (6.22 in 2000 for toronto, 7th-worst). heck, dave n' tony turned kile and carpenter around; maybe . . . . . ?
just kidding.
jason's 16 losses are the most by a st louis pitcher since 1990, when the last-place cardinals had two 17-game losers (magrane and deleon). if tony comes to his senses and finally cuts bait on marquis, here are are his options for tuesday:
- weaver on three days' rest
- narveson
- thompson
- sosa
- hancock
0 recs |
198 comments
Comments
The truth hurts
Is TLR's future in question if we pull "the biggest collapse ever?"
by wildman on
Sep 29, 2006 9:13 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Couldn't Agree More
so if the cardinals do, in fact, miss the playoffs, i won't lose a minute of sleep over it. the guys losing sleep will be the new york mets and all their fans. you think they want to face clemens oswalt and pettitte? they're all rooting like hell for the cardinals -- probably harder than some of us are. they, not we, may be the real losers if st louis completes its collapse. i daresay even some of those american league teams are pulling for our guys; of all the nl teams they might wish to avoid in the world series, houston probably ranks at the top of the list. just what we've always wanted -- the whole baseball world is rooting for the cardinals!"
I couldn't agree more. I have a friend who's a Mets fan and he's scared shitless that the Astros are going to make it and steamroll everyone else in the NL playoffs. He's rooting for the Cardinals pretty hard now, especially considering the latest developments with Pedro. Imagine if the Mets had pulled off that trade deadline deal and acquired Oswalt? We wouldn't be talking about the Astros right now.
I hope we miss the playoffs and it wakes management up. Is it even worth making the playoffs at this point? The team is a shell of its' former self. I think it's better to not make it and avoid suffering the humiliation of a first round knockout by San Diego or the Mets or whoever we'd end up playing.
by I Bleed Cardinal Red on
Sep 29, 2006 9:17 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mood Rings and Thermometers
This forum features the voices of grim realists, and rose-colored optimists, and all the shades in between. I count myself closer to the former than the latter. Being a baseball fan since '67 has taught me how many ways things can go wrong, if nothing else.
My first reality check this season came during the Great Trampling of June, when the Cards visited the South Side, then Detroit, then experienced further ignominious humiliation at the hands of the ROYALS, and so on. The ship listed then, and has never quite righted itself. At that point, I experienced the bitter deja vu of the '04 Series, and overwhelming feelings of being mismatched (outgunned?). My first sensations of "this-team-may-make-the-playoffs-but-do-I-really-want-to-go-through-this-kind-of-rout-again?" surfaced. If nothing else, the LaRussa years have made us somewhat accustomed to October baseball (Hello, Cub fans!), imbuing us with a "Hey, no big deal, bring it on" attitude. Playing these first and second rounds is no longer the end-all scenario. We expect bigger things. 100 win seasons will do that to you. But with this team, after that horrible stretch in June, I suddenly lost my great reserve of October Anticipation. It just didn't feel right. I waited for the team to prove me wrong in July. In August. In September. But, aside from a few glimmers of competence (thank you Albert and Chris) they haven't.
by Urban Pawnee on
Sep 29, 2006 9:24 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Somebody start a fight....
Last night, I was hoping and praying that Duncan would've punched Marquis out there. Knock him on his rear, and show the rest of the club that they deserve better than that "I don't give a rip how I pitch" Jason Marquis. I have stood up for players that just didn't play well; shoot, I even stuck up for Mulder this year, but for crying out loud, the whole team walks into the ballpark knowing they are gonna have to push for double digits at the least, whenever JM was pitching.
I still cannot believe that he has gotten worse and worse (wanton profanity omitted for the sake of other readers).
So, our season comes down to Weaver. Hopefully we can get Blondo a lead, and hopefully he looks far better than that (wanton profanity omitted again) thing we had on the mound last night.
And to think, Redbird fans started the season booing Encarnacion and Izzy!
by fuegophil on
Sep 29, 2006 9:25 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's great ...
by Urban Pawnee on
Sep 29, 2006 9:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agreed
by redrey on
Sep 29, 2006 12:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Question
I still can't help but think that this team will get it done. (of course, I didn't watch last night's game either). We can't win 2 of 3 at home vs. Milwaukee w/ Weaver, Suppan, and Carp going? I can't see the Astros sweeping the Braves and extending their winning streak to what, 11? Too far fetched. We may have to play Monday but I still think we'll get it done. Maybe this season's driven me completely insane.
by chuckb on
Sep 29, 2006 9:28 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, the one-gamer
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 9:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sweet
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 9:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Screw that...
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 11:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There was an awards dinner late last year
Rolen was standing - he didn't grab a seat for some reason. Gibson had just sat down near him; someone asked Rolen why he hadn't just grabbed that seat.
"I was afraid Gibson would kick my ass."
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 11:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This team really needs...
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 12:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
or the talent
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 1:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was there
by liam on
Sep 29, 2006 2:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A one game playoff
One other thing to consider. Lets say:
St. Louis goes 1-3 in it's last four
Houston goes 1-2 in it's last three
Cinci goes 3-0 in it's last three (vs Pittsburgh)
Now you've got a three way even after the Monday Cards/Giants game.
The possibilities are facinating.
by brianp88 on
Sep 29, 2006 9:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
there could also
i bet fox would love that . . .
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 9:41 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its unlikely the Cards or Houston can catch the wi
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Management
The apologists will point to injuries. Honestly, how can we not give them SOME credence. Any team that loses their 2nd or 3rd best bat, a gold-glove center-fielder, their leadoff hitter, their #2 starter, and their closer SHOULDN'T win.
Take Oswalt, Taveras, Burke, and Lidge from the 'Stros, and you basically have no team left. Notice that their dramatic comeback has coincided with the rebound of the team's health. The basically got Clemens back from the DL after the All-Star break.
From this point of view, we should be ecstatic that we even have a chance to make the playoffs. The Cubbies have seen much the same injury trouble we have seen, and they have fallen to the worst team in the national league.
With that being said, I still believe that TLR has to take SOME of the blame for the gross mishandling of this team. LaDuncan had to know that Izzy was hurt earlier in the year. Maybe if they shut him down for a month earlier, he could have come back. AT LEAST he could have had his surgery and been ready for opening day next year. Heck, I don't know, maybe we are all scapegoat hunting, and it is easy to villify the manager. I'll use the Cubbies again. Dusty Baker took a thin, aging Giants team to the playoffs time and time again, even with personalities like Jeff Kent and Barry Bonds in his clubhouse. Now, the Cubs can't keep a healthy pitcher, Lee goes down with injury too, and somehow it is Baker's fault that the Cubs can't win with what amounts to a triple-A ballclub!?
Look, as I see it, I very much agree with you LBoros, if, in April, we were told that we would hold a 1/2 game lead over the 'Stros, wouldn't we be satisfied with that? I mean, most of the pundits and even us, the fans, expected us to win the division, but with a razor-thin margin of error.
Anyhoo, I still think that TLR is not the man for this team any longer. We have gotten younger, and he cannot manage young players. I hope for our sake that we don't trade away all our great young talent just to keep LaDuncan happy next year. I can handle inconsistency from young guys. They will learn how to win. I am really excited about a future team with Pujols, Wainwright, Reyes, Duncan, Hancock, Narveson, and company. We just have to be willing to endure a bump or two in the road to get there.
Lboros, sorry for my continued rantings, but it sure does make me feel better. Thanks for the great site!!!
by Eckstreem on
Sep 29, 2006 9:42 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You also have to look at management
The fact that management didn't pick up more guys to bail us out as the ship was sinking just seems to indicate that they thought that what we had and making it to the playoffs (cross your fingers::hopefully).
Obviously there are plenty of people who have at least some measure of responsibility. You'd think the ownership would be willing to spend a little more money this year just so that people wouldn't associating us not being that great with the new ball park and new radio station.
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 10:14 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't want to sound like a TLR apologist
I know that, given the precipitious dropoff in talent as you go down this roster, let ALONE go down the pitching staff, I couldn't have done crap with this team.
OTOH, that makes me appreciate the bright spots. All hail Reyes, Wainright, and Duncan. And maybe even some of our young/cheap relievers.
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 10:33 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd add
by sdesserman on
Sep 29, 2006 12:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sunday's start
On the subject of the rotation, if anyone is interested, I've got a diary here making the case that, if the team has a chance to clinch Sunday, it might make sense to hold Carp until Monday. No evidence that Tony is listening to me.
by DCGreg on
Sep 29, 2006 9:45 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I say no
by chuckb on
Sep 29, 2006 10:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but it won't
by DCGreg on
Sep 29, 2006 12:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
play with some rage or something
on a side note, if by some miracle we make the playoffs marquis will be upset he is not on the playoff roster, marquis is clinically insane. if he had sanity he would not be able to show his face to his teammates EVER again. id like to see him committ sepuku myself. you are garbage marquis. go home.
by 2ndprize on
Sep 29, 2006 9:59 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we...
Seriously, it's well past time to give up on him, and yet I have this horrible feeling that he's going to get re-signed because of a weak FA pitching market.
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 10:04 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't have high hopes
by MdRedbirdFreak on
Sep 29, 2006 10:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 11:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
NOT THE DUCKS!
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 11:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha

by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 11:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well now that's just ridiculous.
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 11:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That is classic.
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 12:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 12:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nah
Can you imagine the Halloween haunted house that has people dressed up as Jason Marquis running at you with a contract extension and a pen. Frightening.
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 12:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i'm laughing so hard...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 2:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rough Week
"Minnesota's victory and Detroit's loss creates a tie for first place in the AL Central. It's the first time this season that the Twins (who've played 159 games) have been in first place. It's the latest point in a season that a team reached first place for the first time. The previous record was held by the 1964 Cardinals, who gained a share of the top spot for the first time following their 158th game."
by Cardinal70 on
Sep 29, 2006 10:10 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
lets at least learn from this...
i just dont understand how tony la russa teams can have these collapses. in the WS in 2004, that NLCS with atlanta, he even got swept with an A's team by a vastly inferior reds team.. maybe tony should change the way he goes about approaching and preparing his teams for playoff situations.
by 2ndprize on
Sep 29, 2006 10:23 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
why I *need* the Birds in the playoffs
He asked, almost pathetically, "When do I get to start razzing the Cardinals' fans? The Cardinals haven't won a World Series since 1982."
This is the primary reason I need the Cardinals to make the playoffs. Obnoxious Cubs fans (not all, just the obnoxious ones) will be talking about 2006 for years if they think they had any hand in keeping the Cardinals out of the postseason.
Looking at the season as a whole body of work, I completely agree with lboros that the Cardinals don't deserve an appearance in the postseason. However, if they can pick themselves up and dust themselves off and make it in, they'll "deserve" it in the sense that when they had to (this final weekend), they won. (Sort of a relative maximum thing.) If they don't, it's gonna be a long offseason.
Quietude, MdRedbirdFreak: I'm starting the rumor right now that TLR is planning to teach Marquis to play middle infield so he can keep his bat on the roster for 2007. :-)
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on
Sep 29, 2006 10:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And when they talk about it
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 10:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cub Fans ...
by Urban Pawnee on
Sep 29, 2006 10:36 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But the Cubs
by rockin redbird on
Sep 29, 2006 12:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All good points, but
However, Alberticus Maximus and Preston Wilson took care of last night and somebody (didn't get to see the last 3 innings today) took care of today, so hopefully, at this point, my concerns are moot.
TSF
by TedSimmonsFan on
Sep 30, 2006 5:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So I Go
The Astros are in town tonight, of course, and it appears as though they are riding in like a rabid foal. It just dawned on me this morning ... I mean, not that they are coming to town .... but after all the sleep I've been losing in the last week-and-a-half; after all the silent moments on my couch, in front of the TV, in the dark of the room, letting the remote fall uselessly from my lap, without the energy to pick it up; with the rally cap turned in and then back out and then several more rally caps drug out of the back of the closet; with my framed Busch Stadium picture from 1996 collecting dust on the wall (the year they brought the fences in and put the grass in and started playing Baseball Like it Oughta Be played); the Post-Dispatch white playoff towels; the seats I ordered from old Busch; you know, all these things, these reminders, they are just too much to absorb every day and not wind up in this situation and not get my ass up and take it to Turner Field, where I will be tonight, representing everyone here--the anger of everyone here; the frustrations of everyone here; the hopes of everyone here ...
and I'll have a cold beer in my hand, and I'll be sitting somewhere cheap, but I'll be louder than anyone in a half-empty Turner Field screaming for the Braves to kick the Astros' ass and for the Cardinals to make the playoffs.
by AtlantaBird on
Sep 29, 2006 10:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We hereby deputize you -
by Urban Pawnee on
Sep 29, 2006 10:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's the spirit!
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
another Atlanta Cards fan
by wildman on
Sep 29, 2006 11:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll be there on Sunday...
by bkwelker on
Sep 29, 2006 11:09 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
great post
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 11:17 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The hours nearly gone
Even now I hope there can be magic. I desperately root for it. Like game 5 last year, in the NLCS, when I was resigned to the off-season and what was to come, that feeling ... and then it all changed in one swing.
That's why I'm going. Besides .... the Braves owe the Astros one.
Go Cards.
by AtlantaBird on
Sep 29, 2006 11:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Excellent post ABird
by jdubya on
Sep 29, 2006 11:40 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe it's just me
by Pokey Joe on
Sep 29, 2006 10:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Scary Scenarios
Fri - Weaver
Sat - Suppan
Sun - Carpenter
I'm assuming we HAVE to win 2 of those or Monday won't even be an issue. Preferably, we need to win Fri and Sat and get that 1.5 game lead back heading into Sunday. Then you can save Carp for Gm 1.
If that doesn't happen, we go to
Mon - Reyes ---- the kid is solid, but our entire season resting on him? I won't feel good about that.
Tue - Marquis v Oswalt in Houston. If this happens, why even bother making the trip down there? Disgusts me to even think about it.
BUT, what if....what if Reyes and Marquis come through and we claw our way into that 1st round matchup with the Mets...then what?
Gm1 on Wed at Shea and who takes the mound to face the lefty loaded lineup? Jeff Weaver.
Ugh.
by TheFranchise9 on
Sep 29, 2006 10:32 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
I'm OK w/ Reyes vs. the Giants, they won't be thrilled about making the trip, in fact Alou already said as much. It'll be like a playoff game, the crowd should be pumped, etc.
So if we can find a way to avoid using Carp on Sunday, we should but I'd say that train left the station last night. We absolutely have to win 2 out of 3 b/c the Braves will win at least 1, won't they? And Smoltz goes on Sunday if the game matters.
by chuckb on
Sep 29, 2006 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Correct me if I'm wrong
by stlmapman on
Sep 29, 2006 11:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
correct
by TheFranchise9 on
Sep 29, 2006 4:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's it.
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 10:59 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This may be
by rockin redbird on
Sep 29, 2006 11:07 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i am with you rockin
that sort of attitude does not bode well at all for our little fan base . . . .
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 11:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yikes...
He has generally been a stand up guy in his years here. Granted it has been mostly good times, but after '99 and '03 I don't remember him scapegoating... he just buckled down and made the team better.
by guayzimi on
Sep 29, 2006 11:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bull crap
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 12:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 12:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you're wrong zubin
going back to the series in milwaukee, when this whole mess started --- they lost a game started by chris capuano (no shame in that), beat ben sheets (kudos), and lost to a hot rookie -- a bad loss. in houston they lost games started by pettitte, oswalt, and clemens -- and scored runs off all of them, only to have the bullpen (or carp) lose the games late. in their one game vs a replacement-level pitcher, when houston started jason hirsh, the cards beat the hell out of hirsh only to have the bullpen blow the game.
vs the padres, they beat the hell out of the replacement pitcher (thompson), but carpenter blew the lead and they lost. they faced sd's two best pitchers, era-wise, the next two nights (williams and young) and split vs them.
last night was an ugly loss --- but not because they failed to hit. they lost because they got put in an insurmountable hole early. that's on marquis, and more to the point it's on the stubborn manager who keeps running him out there.
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 12:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Respectfully, I disagree.
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 3:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i'm not disagreeing
i'm only disagreeing with the portion of your post that states they're losing to AAA replacement-level pitchers. that is not true; the only replacement-level pitcher they lost to was milwaukee's villanueva, in the 1st game of the losing streak --- and he, don't forget, threw a no-hitter at triple A earlier this year.
and his ERA in 10 big-league starts is better than any st louis pitcher's except for carpenter, so it's not exactly fair to characterize him as a pushover.
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 5:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
to qualify further
big, big difference.
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 6:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with you on that point,
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 6:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm confused
Also I have been thinking really hard about this and although it might not work everytime it is something that should be considered. I think the Cardinals need an Eddie Gaedel type player to pinch-hit in front of Pujols in close game situations. Or pinch hit when we are down by 1-run in any part of the line-up during the ninth. It's a guaranteed base-runner. Then pinch-run for him when he gets on. I am writing this half-humoredly but when you sit and think about it, it kinda makes sense. There probably is some rule about it now though.
Eddie Gaedel was the St. Louis Browns player that was about 3' 7" and wore the number 1/8
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 11:20 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
They would
And I think midgets were outlawed from baseball after the Gaedel stunt.
by Nate811 on
Sep 29, 2006 12:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They did
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 2:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What is it?
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 2:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ha, someone should challenge it
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 3:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Questions
and how do the Ginats figure into all of this?
Could you guys make it clear on both levels for me...
by punchinjudy on
Sep 29, 2006 11:27 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
tie going to a team based on the series record
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 11:32 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Will we be better next year?
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 11:28 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Backup Team
by DimitroffVodka on
Sep 29, 2006 11:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll take the easy route...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 11:30 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I live in Brooklyn, so
by redbirdbrain on
Sep 29, 2006 11:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Monday Start
I think everyone underestimates the weird, personal damage that the Ankiel debacle had on Tony. I've seen him talk about that awful game against the Braves like other people talk about combat or a car wreck. He feels personally responsible for the kids' professional and personal demise - and it eats at him.
This, I believe, accounts for his unwillingness to rely on young players in pressure situations. He certainly did not have that problem in Chicago or Oakland.
If that's right, that means we're looking at Weaver (on three days' rest) or Sosa. I think Sosa could give you 5 innings and 2 or 3 solo home runs. Not too bad for a team that has an offense. But we don't. And we don't have a 9-inning 3-hit shutout option. So better bring the bats, boys.
Remember, we're likely to have to win 2 of 3 w/ Brew-Has to make Monday matter. I think Weaver's the right guy tonight, but I doubt it'll matter b/c our whole team curls up in a fetal position anytime somebody steps up on the pitchers mound with a glove on their right hand. Count on 4-1, 5-1 loss tonight. That's a BIG load on SoupCan and Carp.
I'd LOVE to wait Carp til Monday's game, or even to a playoff(s) on Tuesday (and Wednesday, in a 3-way) but I dont' think we'll have that luxury. After tonight, we will have must-wins Sat and Sun, followed by a must-win v SF on Monday, followed by must win playoff v HOU (with maybe a must-win v. CIN in the middle just for fun) -- and IF we win ALL of these must-wins, we get to go to NY or SD to start the playoffs. The pressure will be "off" for the first 2 games of the LDS in the since that, if by some bizarre quirk of fate we make it there, they'll be the first two non-must-win games in more than a week!
Good luck.
Weave me a dream, tonight, Jeff.
Get lots of sleep, Soup and Carp.
Sosa - stay ready.
by ITouchedMcGee on
Sep 29, 2006 11:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: the one-game playoff...
Wouldn't it be fun (and potentially effective) if TLR lined up Weaver to start, then, a la Whitey, sent Narveson into right field so he could swap him in to face the 2-3-4-5 lefty part of the Astros lineup?
This sounds kind of nutty now, but Whitey used to do it, although I can't remember if it ever really worked...
What makes it practicable is that the Stros bat Lamb-Berkman-Scott-Huff all back to back instead of alternating them. Or at least they did that last time the teams played.
by guayzimi on
Sep 29, 2006 11:35 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
At some point after Whitey had been
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 11:45 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rule?
by jfs on
Sep 29, 2006 12:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know...
The reality is that Marquis can't pitch. That leaves Narveson or Weaver.
Lamb-Berkman-Scott-Huff, in the two games on 9/12 and 9/24 against Weaver, went a combined 8 for 20 with 4 doubles, a triple, a home run, 3 walks and a sac fly.
Righties went 5 for 20 with a double, hr, 2 bbs and 5ks.
Narveson, in his two games against the Stros on 9/13 and 9/22, got the aforementioned lefties to go 1 for 5 with a double, 2 walks, and 3 ks. Strangely, the righties actually did worse - 2 for 14 with a double, a homer and a walk.
Bottom line: Narveson seems all around better, but after seeing him a couple times I suspect the Stros could tee off. Weaver can truly be dominating against righties but he's equally bad against lefties.
Also, putting Narveson in right field would likely make Garner's head spin and he might do something crazy like pinch hit for Scott or Huff in the first inning.
We are desperate after all.
by guayzimi on
Sep 29, 2006 2:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe the rule
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 1:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 1:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
look at rule 3:03
it states:
Rule 3.03 Comment: A pitcher may change to another position only once during the same inning; e.g. the pitcher will not be allowed to assume a position other than a pitcher more than once in the same inning. Any player other than a pitcher substituted for an injured player shall be allowed five warm-up throws. (See Rule 8.03 for pitchers.)
8:03 simply refers to the number of warm-up pitches that can be thrown.
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 2:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay
It's not going to happen, but these silly rules are still fun and why I would never want to be an ump or official scorer.
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 2:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This rule would be a problem...
Announce Weaver as the starter, let him pitch to Taveras/Biggio leading off, then swap him for Narveson to face the next four lefties. In the second inning start off Weaver again on the mound, swap him out if it gets around to Lamb, and so forth. You only need to swap them once per inning.
Ok, fantasy hour is up, let's talk about something that might actually occur.
by guayzimi on
Sep 29, 2006 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Technically
Purely hypothetical questions: in that hightened circumstance, could you have a reliever pick up a hold and a save in the same game? Or have a starting pitcher save his own game? I'm guessing common sense would have to intrude at that point.
by Solanus on
Sep 29, 2006 2:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We need someone...
I'd do it myself but the paint is almost dry...
by guayzimi on
Sep 29, 2006 2:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If pulling this stunt
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 2:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that rule is silly
Regardless, with the way that HOU stacks its lineup, this rule wouldn't much get in the way of doing what was suggested above.
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 2:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't wait to see the first
by MdRedbirdFreak on
Sep 29, 2006 2:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe that there has been one
by Valatan on
Sep 29, 2006 2:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd imagine...
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 3:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His name was
I believe several ninteenth century ball players also threw from both sides.
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 3:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Expos pitcher, maybe?
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 2:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Greg Harris
by Cardinal70 on
Sep 29, 2006 3:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Andy Van Slyke
His Baseball-Almanac page lists him as throwing (and batting) both ways. They also list three other players (all pitchers) as being ambidextrous: Tony Mullane (1881-1894), George Wheeler (1896-99), & Moxie Manuel (1905-08). No mention of Curtis King, though.
by Solanus on
Sep 29, 2006 3:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pat Venditte Jr.
"If another guy throws 30 pitches one day, I know I'm not going to be able to use him the next day," Servais said. "With Pat, if he throws 30 pitches, and 15 are right-handed and 15 are left-handed, I know I can come back to him tomorrow."
Entering his Junior year, now.
by liam on
Sep 29, 2006 3:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tony Mullane
Mullane, who pitched in the 1880s and '90s, wore no glove and would face the batter with both hands on the ball before throwing it with either one.The article also says that Greg Harris switch-pitched an inning for the Expos on 9/28/95.
by liam on
Sep 29, 2006 3:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Problem with it is...
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 3:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is there really a rule
by MdRedbirdFreak on
Sep 29, 2006 3:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not in the official rules...
Of course, it's been 11 years since it even came up, so who knows what the reaction would be now.
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 3:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Makes Sense
But really, would you want to, since it's all about getting the side advantage?
by Cardinal70 on
Sep 29, 2006 3:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the reason for it
by Solanus on
Sep 29, 2006 3:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Devil Rays
by Edmonds is baseball on
Sep 29, 2006 11:41 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Chances in the playoffs
Okay we're waiting for the last week-end instead, but we can still pull this thing out. And like lboros says... its just 3 series, anything could happen. If Bennett gets on fire again or Duncan has another hot streak, or even spiez, we could pull it off! Really!
Btw, anyone really look at marquis on the mound last night? Have you ever seen a more uncomfortable looking pitcher ever? I wanted to jump through the TV and just scream at him "GET THE BALL, PITCH, GET THE BALL, PITCH!"
Maybe it was "I need to soak this in, because it's the last time I'll ever pitch." searching he was doing.
by redbird2006in on
Sep 29, 2006 12:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks Pokey Joe
--------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's just me
but this Cardinals team doesn't seem as good as the last couple of versions. Idunno.
by Pokey Joe on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 06:31:38 AM PST
--------------------------------------------------
That had me laughing pretty hard. I needed that.
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 12:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Please somebody check Weaver before the game
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 12:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Clemens
Dear Roger,
I know tonight is possibly your last regular season start, at least for this year. We all admire you for the great pitcher you are, and all the sharades you have done over the past 3-4 years. Who else in baseball has ever had several farewell parties. You my friend are the "KISS" of baseball. With that said I hope you just fall apart tonight in ATL, because we all know we will see you again next year around February deciding who to play for and when. Yes you may have earned the right, but not the right to escape critisim. The only thing better than you loseing tonight, would be a one game playoff where the Birds chase Oswalt and you come into relieve and we all hear how you are on short rest, and about all your great relief appearences, and the brids give you a hefty parting gift...
You may say Im a dreamer...
Truly yours
Punchinjudy
by punchinjudy on
Sep 29, 2006 12:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
playoff favorites
by 2ndprize on
Sep 29, 2006 12:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gee,
by lb3000 on
Sep 29, 2006 12:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gee,
by lb3000 on
Sep 29, 2006 12:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
HECK
We are the Cardinals!
The Mighty Mighty Cardinals!
Everywhere we go, people want to know!
Who we are, so we tell them!
We are the Cardinals!
The Mighty Mighty Cardinals!
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 12:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Stop drinking at work! :P
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 12:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm trying to
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good to see...
by Timbo02 on
Sep 29, 2006 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree about the owners'
by MdRedbirdFreak on
Sep 29, 2006 2:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You are probably right...
I find your thoughts on the ownership pretty much giving up at the AS break an interesting concept. And after watching the Marlins...I'm not so sure that perhaps they might have the right idea. Their payroll is what? 15 million? and they had as good a season as the Cards did...well mostly.
I wouldn't mind seeing them re-build for a couple of years...and find some young guns to put around Albert.
by Timbo02 on
Sep 29, 2006 2:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i don't think they gave up at all
sadly enough, i think they believed those moves would shore up weaknesses and position the team for a run in october.
by lboros on
Sep 29, 2006 3:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A little face-saving
by MdRedbirdFreak on
Sep 29, 2006 3:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Completely off topic post.
by dan8260 on
Sep 29, 2006 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
been asked earlier
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 2:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tampa Bay AAA
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 2:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahem
I never saw Reyes pitch this summer, but I wasn't at very many games.
by calico30 on
Sep 29, 2006 2:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh
Either way, though: Hit Bull. Win Steak.
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 2:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha
For me, the trips to the minor league ballparks are mostly about feeding my need to sit in a ballpark in the sun & watch professional baseball being played. My husband (not a big sports fan in general) has asked me to explain why I need this every summer, and I have no answer for him. It just makes me happy.
I agree with you about Reyes. Hopefully, he will see better things next year.
by calico30 on
Sep 29, 2006 7:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget about next year
by Irishman on
Sep 29, 2006 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Crazy talk..
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 2:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's about
Definitely not trivial.
by SleepyCA on
Sep 29, 2006 3:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tonight
Though, one of the bands is from Chicago, and are Cubs fans, seems pretty likely they're going to give us all a hard time...oh well.
by Bowen on
Sep 29, 2006 2:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
What bands
Perhaps they could bring us some mojo.
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 2:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the bands are
by Bowen on
Sep 29, 2006 3:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahh the creepy crawl...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 3:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep
by Bowen on
Sep 29, 2006 4:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I remember back in the day
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 4:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sweet
by Bowen on
Sep 29, 2006 5:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lawrence arms
by jroman on
Sep 29, 2006 4:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am
by Bowen on
Sep 29, 2006 4:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
tonight
by redrey on
Sep 29, 2006 2:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My plans
And whenever I see a TV, the peepers will be glued to it.
by liam on
Sep 29, 2006 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
College hockey...
by Timbo02 on
Sep 29, 2006 5:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
here is a thought on payroll
in my understandings MLB and the teams I believe share these proceeds
by punchinjudy on
Sep 29, 2006 2:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
if and only if you can laugh about all this ...
by DCGreg on
Sep 29, 2006 2:54 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm a little disappointed...
Some guy named Al...
by Quietude on
Sep 29, 2006 3:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's all about the pitching
Albert and a healthier Rolen can keep the offense at a reasonable level but the pitching has to get better.
by azruavatar on
Sep 29, 2006 2:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man
by Alxfritz on
Sep 29, 2006 2:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If we are going to
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 4:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jason Jennings and Josh Francis...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 4:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is there a stat
by OKCardsfan on
Sep 29, 2006 4:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From Hardball Times
Pitchers 4.74 4.87
Hitters 5.53 4.31
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/out-of-thin-air-mdash-the-new-coors/
by sdrone on
Sep 29, 2006 4:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Does anybody know if it's possible...
by toris34 on
Sep 29, 2006 3:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
laptop
by jeff abs on
Sep 29, 2006 3:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hmmm
There are plenty of USB dongles that let you get TV on your laptop but there isn't really a usb device that will convert video on the screen out to composite or whatever.
This is assuming you've got the games streaming to your laptop (via the internet) and you're trying to get that on your television.
by dontEATnachos on
Sep 29, 2006 3:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
NO Usb cord
by DimitroffVodka on
Sep 29, 2006 3:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Easiest way
by liam on
Sep 29, 2006 3:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i think the way you do it
by nota bene on
Sep 29, 2006 3:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its easy
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 4:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, but you need audio
by Hardcore Legend on
Sep 29, 2006 4:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
IHBP
i think i would go with thompson, with hancock next in line to take the baton. i also -- and this is not a strategy i would normally advocate, but these are special circumstances -- might order the pitcher (whoever it is) to hit a batter early in the game. and make no bones about the intention.
Pretty sad that we're reduced to this but I was thinking the same thing yesterday. I wanted Duncan Sr to tell Marquis to plunk somebody on purpose, just to get some fight back in him. The batters opposing Marquis in particular are just not afraid of him (and why should they be?). He needs to be throwing inside, and if the pitches get close enough to count the stitches, well....maybe he can start getting the outside corner.
Mercifully, I think Marquis will be relegated to the pen from here on out, if we ever do see him wearing the Birds on the Bat again....
PS I'd suggest starting Narveson instead of Thompson, but it's a tossup either way.
by nota bene on
Sep 29, 2006 3:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
spit soda out on my tie
This is a rattletrap car of a club . . . . These guys are gamers, no doubt, but there's just too great a chance that the kids at home would be exposed to sustained periods of Preston Wilson and Scott Spiezio if [Eck, JEd or Rotten] go down, and that's just not fair to the kids.
by ITouchedMcGee on
Sep 29, 2006 4:02 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Been listening to ESPN radio all day
by I heart eckstein on
Sep 29, 2006 4:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hehe
as far as the talk of a pitcher who can throw from both sides, cold pizza had a college guy on, and he said he can only switch once, if he changes its done for the game, cant change per batter, or even per inning. id imagine mlb rules are even stricter. there wouldnt be much point to it.
as far as this collapse thing, i dont want it to happen even if to us it isnt that big of a collapse, because we seen em lose 8 in a row twice and 7 and seen plenty of other periods where oru boys were just plain bad. the problem is everyone outside st louis will see it as the biggest collapse ever, regardless.
by 2ndprize on
Sep 29, 2006 4:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
John Smoltz was on KFNS today...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 4:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Umm, do we want the Braves in playoff mode?
by bailorg on
Sep 29, 2006 5:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well if we can make it, Pedro is out for..
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2606427&campaign=rss&source=MLBHeadlines
That is good.
by riescher on
Sep 29, 2006 4:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man everybody is taling about a one game play-off
Go Braves!
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 4:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on
Sep 29, 2006 5:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitching for next season
He's younger than the other stud (Schmidt). He provides an EXCELLENT contrast to Carpenter going 1-2 (as opposed to this year's Carpenter and a bunch of pitchers not as good throwing similarly).
Someone mentioned this last month: if you want to make a run, one last run, for the WS, you overpay for a 5 year stud contract, and then, at the end of the first or second year, trade him (make sure it doesn't have a no-trade ;)). SOMEONE will bite.
by SirVLCIV on
Sep 29, 2006 4:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
ironic to me...
ive moved around and always been a hometown team guy, but you dont escape kansas without being a jayhawk fan, you dont get outta montreal without rooting for the canadiens, and even if i left st louis/missouri ill be a cardinals fan for life.
and now, smoltz, a pitcher who made me a fan of the game 15 years ago, i will depend on to help save my cardinals from the worst collapse in the history of the game. i like it.
i cant think of another pitcher id want out there going up against the astros with cardinal pride on the line. espn had a neat stat, smoltz, the winningest right hander in post season history, will face off against andy pettite the winningest left hander in postseason history. what a game..
i love baseball, and im right handed, go smoltz! beat that lefty so bad he wants to become a righty!!
by 2ndprize on
Sep 29, 2006 4:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Is there any chance we put up
by Hardcore Legend on
Sep 29, 2006 4:49 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Its completely possible,
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 4:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
back to fuegophil's point....
Although Juan got a bit better (league avg player?), Izzy sure as hell didn't. But the other players have been so poor that I have actually come to think of Juan as our 2nd best hitter right now. Really, it's that bad...
Here's to the hope that the Cards find something to play for, even if it is the hottie in the front row. And pray that the Jeff is Weaving tonight, not bobbing.
by DuncanDipper on
Sep 29, 2006 4:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I have nothing against guys like Juan'cion.
by Zubin on
Sep 29, 2006 4:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree...
About guys like Aaron and Izzy - I don't think any one of us questions their effort. They try, and Miles hustles, and Izzy tried to play hurt for the team (we've been sooo great without him, AW is what? 2 for 4 in save oppurtunities?). You may question Juan's hustle, but I don't even think that is justified.
by fuegophil on
Sep 29, 2006 5:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But Marquis looks like
by fuegophil on
Sep 29, 2006 5:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
would you...
by redrey on
Sep 29, 2006 5:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was at Marquis' start against Cleveland
I will never believe that the fans caused or enhanced his performance. To me, if he was concerned about what fans thought, he would step up and perform better. Grief, you have to earn fan support, and giving up as many runs as outs you get is not the way to do it.
You have to show effort. IMO, Marquis didn't. When he did, he was a better pitcher than what we have grown accustomed to seeing.
by fuegophil on
Sep 29, 2006 5:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree
by nota bene on
Sep 29, 2006 5:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
of course
by redrey on
Sep 29, 2006 5:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe
by sdesserman on
Sep 29, 2006 6:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Marquis maybe the first
by TBender on
Sep 29, 2006 5:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
About Izzy . . .
If I've lost massive trust in anyone this year it's the Cardinals brain trust regarding medical issues. It's their responsibility to find out how injured their players are and get issues fixed instead of just hoping things will magically get better. The team's handling of Izzy and Mulder utterly shocked and depressed me. That isn't even mentioning the hitters. I think this team would be in a far better position now had TLR seen fit to give Eckstein, Pujols, Rolen, and Edmonds a few more days off throughout the season.
by bailorg on
Sep 29, 2006 5:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














