Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Ole Miss-Alabama: "Let's Go Eat.Wait. What Happened?"

ugly tone at VEB today

i'm really upset about the tone of this place right now. everybody chill the hell out and let me enjoy the last few hours of my vacation. when i get back, this place needs fumigated --- big time.

a lot of newcomers to this place are way over the top today, acting like idiots. if you have something intelligent to say, say it --- otherwise go post your dumb "vent" threads and your low-class "f you la russa" garbage at some other site.

not mine.

i need to hear from you guys`--- if there is a particular post or poster that has made you go "yechhh" recently, e-mail me: vivaelbirdos@yahoo.com. the community here does not have to get uglier as it gets larger; standards of appropriate behavior and tone can and will be upheld. getting feedback from all of you will make it easier to establish and maintain appropriate standards.

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I know you're talking to me
and I apologize. I was over the top. I take full responsibility for my actions and I have deleted the offending diary. Yes, the game was frustrating and should have been won, but it wasn't. So I overreacted. I sincerely apologize to you, lboros, and to any other posters I may have offended.
"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." -- Ozzy Osbourne

by Scarlet the Cardinal on Aug 19, 2006 6:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

thank you scarlet
i appreciate that. excellent response.

by lboros on Aug 19, 2006 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a fine line to toe.
You are asking for people to be inteligent, intelligent fans are going to reall notice when players are taking poor atbats (eg JuanE yesterday), they going to notice when management is being stubborn (eg Reyes), many of these guys understand the concept of sample size much better than TLR.  I have gotten to the point were I feel I care more about this team making good baseball decisions than the people on the field or running the team care.  I think many of the people on this site feel the same way.  I have come to realize this isn't good for me emotionally, so yes this team is as good as dead to me.  I will not watch a game the rest of the season.  It is just not worth the resulting despression.

I am not going to apologize for not liking Larussa, frankly Tony dosen't care if I like him or not.

I am not apologizing for saying this team plays a hard 6 maybe 7, if we are lucky.  I don't think many on this team care to play a hard nine.

I am dissenchanted with this team, it is just no fun to watch.  

So where do intelligent people go to vent?  Most of us need to...

by BigJawnMize on Aug 20, 2006 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

where to rant
stltoday cards talk forum is the place to go if you're looking to post unintelligible rants. Have fun.

by janderson on Aug 20, 2006 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you are giving up on the team...
I doubt if you care more about the team than the players and management running it.  It's Ok to be critical, but this sounds like it is ruining your life.  Good luck...
"It takes pitching, hitting and defense. Any two can win. All three make you unbeatable". Joe Garagiola

by MRCARD on Aug 20, 2006 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I am saying is...
...rooting for this team is like dating a manic depressive girl.  I have dated a manic depressive girl, you keep thinking that she is going to pull it together.  Eventually you realize you just have to cut the tie.

by BigJawnMize on Aug 20, 2006 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks LB
slow clap

I love VEB because we can look at matchups and start a smart, logical discussion on why a move was made, why a move wasn't made, or why a move should have been made. I love it for the collection of characters who comment, each contributing in their own way. I love it for the respectful, inteligent, and witty dialogue that we have here.

Not for half-assed, immature pissing contests.

There are plenty of other places out there for that.

Now lets all be glad that we have one of the best pitchers in baseball taking the mound for us tomorrow and beat the damn Cubbies.

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 6:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll Second That Motion...
...this is supposed to be a safe haven for good discussion and debate. It's not "CardsTalk." It seems perhaps this site has received too much publicity from the P-D and thus has too many CardsTalk posters moving in and bringing the low-brow rants and disparaging remarks along with them. So glad lboros is not shy about keeping the standards expected of this place. Leave it to the Cubs to put a damper to the end of his vacation.  
Baily

by Baily on Aug 19, 2006 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

THANK YOU
Thank you, LB, for beginning to clear the air.  There's an awful lot of venom flying around...and blame, too.  On some level, I guess it's understandable--that was a frustrating loss to our rivals, at a time when we need to win every game we can.  Worse, our manager made a questionable decision at a key point late in the game.  So I can appreciate why people are upset.  But the level of digust seems a little overboard, as does the finger-pointing.  

For my part, I'd take today's game over any of our lackluster losses to the Pirates.  With two of our starters not starting, we almost scratched out a win against a Cy Young candidate.  We fought hard, hit a couple homers, and only lost by a run.  Our new collective man-crush Chris Duncan continued to mash the ball.  And, despite all its frustrating moments, today's game was undeniably entertaining.  If Mike Shannon's call on Jimmy's mad dash to home didn't have you leaping out of your chair, well...you'd better check your pulse.  

About all the blame-placing, some of which seems almost mean-spirited (although that's surely the frustration talking), again, I can only offer my own opinion.  The problem is this:  in baseball, every event changes the state of the game--often drastically--so it's difficult to hold a single individual responsible for a single event.  Example:  I don't understand the anger at Taguchi for not catching that flyball.  Yes, he might have caught it if he had been playing shallower.  But if Sosa hadn't given up a hit to John Flippin' Mabry to lead off the inning, that situation might have never come up.  Yet I don't see anyone blasting Sosa.  I'll take it a step further--if Jim Edmonds had reported his post-concussion symptoms when they began, he might have been in the starting lineup today, and caught that ball.  Is Edmonds to blame?  My point is, that dying quail has a pretty complex history, and I'm not comfortable blaming any one person for it.  It dropped.  Which sucked.  Let's move on.

Sometimes, though, blame is easier to assign.  As far as we know, Tony acted completely on his own in allowing Juan to pinch-hit for Duncan in the ninth.  That decision lies solely with him.  Here, I feel more comfortable blaming Tony (and Juan, for failing to hit at least a sac fly).  But even here--just because we can blame Tony for this decision, can we really blame him for losing the game?  For this roller-coaster season?  For the fact that we haven't won a World Series in 24 years?  The rancor in the remarks today just doesn't seem in proportion to the mistakes Tony made.

I don't mind playing the blame game; in a sense, it's the way to critique a team's performance.  And criticism is good.  But it irks me when people assign blame without a lot of justification--it's unproductive, and often misleading.  

I'm not trying to tell people what they can and can't say on this blog (that's Mr. Borowsky's thankless job).  And I'm not trying to tell anyone how to root for their team (if that's anyone's job, it's Albert's).  I just think we should try to think a bit more before we let loose with the nasty comments and blame-placing.

Whew. Sorry for the length.  Let's get 'em tomorrow.

by Hummingbird on Aug 19, 2006 6:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There is always the 'butterfly effect' to blame...
...in that you can always find another situation in the game that relieves blame from one person or another.

However, what Tony did in the 9th was indefensible.  I know that Juan is hitting over .300 against righties this season and I believe has most of his homeruns against them as well.  However, pulling Duncan trumps TLRs decision in Game 5 of the 2001 NLDS.  At least in that situation, it was a longshot asking McGwire to not hit into a DP, even though he had only done it 7 times that season.

For those interested, this is what I'm referring to:
*CARDINALS 9TH: Edmonds singled to center; ROBINSON BATTED FOR
MCGWIRE; Robinson out on a sacrifice bunt (third to second)
[Edmonds to second]; Renteria struck out; Matheny struck out; 0
*

I'm sure in that situation he felt much more secure with Renteria's .235 and Matheny's .200 than McGwire's . 091, even if McGwire was hitting a homerun every 10 ab that season.  That's for another day, though.

Anyways, I was the one (unless someone else said so too) that said 'this is why we never win a World Series.  It isn't because of necessarily the moves in themselves that Tony makes, but it's the confidence he shows in players.  Moves like this tell a player that Tony views you as 'you are what you are and you'll never be anything else'.  

Duncan since the All-Star Break is hitting .261 with 2 HRs and 2 RBIs against LHP with 4Ks, as opposed to

Juan?  .293 with 2 HRs and 9 RBIs, along with 6 Ks.

There seemingly was not 'higher reward' with making this move.  Chris Duncan was either going to get walked or see a pitch to hit with Pujols hitting in behind him.

Clearly, Juan could have gotten a hit, Pujols could have hit that ball into a gap somewhere, Izzy could have pitched better in his second inning of work (something that shouldn't have happened) and Tony would have been absolved to some point.

However, this was a situation of micromanaging gone wild.  For Duncan, I hope it doesn't hurt his confidence.  When he looks at this, what can he possibly do better to give Tony the confidence in him to allow him to hit in that situation?

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playing the odds
LaRussa is, of course, notorious for making moves for even slim statistical advantage. It didn't work this time, of course. With both bases loaded and runner on third with less than two outs this season, Duncan has hit .111. Encarnacion was hitting .300 with bases loaded and .240 with RISP/<2 outs.

I'm not terribly worried about Duncan's confidence. He's shown remarkable maturity for such a young player and, as someone who has grown up in the professional baseball culture, knows the score. Besides, LaRussa has demonstrated how high he is on Duncan by essentially giving him an everyday starting spot, except against certain LHP. A rookie couldn't ask for much more.

by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's such a small sample size though....
...I mean, if we are going off of such small sample size, Juan is now 0 for 3 against LHP with the bases loaded and although .310 with RISP.  

Duncan vs LHP with the bases loaded has only had 1 AB this season.  With RISP, only 9 ABs.  

I just think that Tony, if he does provide a defense, is doing so with the slightest amount of statistics to back it up.  

Let's look at it this way.  After Juan was taken down by the lefty, Dusty brought in a righty in Wuertz.  This season against righties with the bases loaded, Pujols is hitting .182. Would you pull the best right handed hitter in the game today because of that split?  No.

I don't know. I guess I can just say that I don't like the move in the least and nothing will probably change my mind.  If it had worked out, I still would have said Tony dodged a bullet getting his 'match-ups' to work.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand
Yes, it is a small sampling (I didn't check bases-loaded split vs. LHP, but Duncan hasn't hit lefties that well anyway). However, considered within that paradigm, I can understand LaRussa's reluctance to go with a young Duncan rather than a veteran like Encarnacion -- who has been in that situation many more times. The argument can be made that Duncan won't get experience in that situation without being tried, but as a regular starter now he will get plenty of opportunities in similar spots -- only before the 9th inning of a tie game on the road.

As for the comparison with Pujols, well, think about it. With Pujols, you throw out the numbers. He does not get pinch-hit for, in any situation against any pitcher for any reason. Whatever his stats may or may not be, who on the Cardinals' roster would you want up there with the game on the line? Duncan ain't Pujols, although he shows signs he eventually be the next best thing (I really like the kid).

I agree in substance with your point; LaRussa does micromanage. Given the success he's enjoyed throughout his career, I'm hesitant to macrocritique this tendency. Hey, he may not have brought the Cardinals a Series title, but when was the last time when they were so consistently a contender? The '80s, only the playoff string didn't last as long. The '60s, ditto. The St. Louis Swifties of the '40s, same. You'd have to go back to the late '20s through mid '30s to find a like period of Cardinal success. The Cardinals have a .524 winning percentage from 1996 to 2005, with six division titles, and .592 record in 2000-05. LaRussa may irritate Cardinal fans sometimes, but he's probably a Hall of Fame manager. Taking the long view may help alleviate the frustrations of this difficult -- although not yet wasted -- season.

by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Going with the managerial tendencies
and I am in no means in love with Tony (Chris Duncan and Albert Pujols aside, I'm not really in love with any men) however, and after the last two series this has shown itself even more, who would you rather have in the dugout?

Considering every manager in the game this year, Girardi would be the only one doing a better job, in my opinion. And his style (this year) would never work on a veteran laden team. Oquendo, who I am pretty sure is TLR's replacement, will probably run a good ship, too. As will Matheny one day.

Right now though, I can't think of any active manager I'd rather have running this motley crew of superstars and scrapheapers that we have.

If you want to say TLR sucks, that's cool. A lot of times, I won't even disagree with that. However, would you rather have Narron or Baker calling the shots?

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No on said Tony won't be a HOF manager....
...however, those results are inflated because of the set up of the playoff system now.

10 years in St. Louis.
5 Division Titles
1 Wild Card birth
1 Pennant

If this were the 1960s
3 National League Pennants (2001, 2004, 2005) in 10 Years.  One of which may or may not have happened because 2001 would have been a playoff with the Astros.

If it were the 1980s, we've only had a better record than Atlanta or the Mets (T-2000, 2001, 2004, 2005), putting us in the playoffs 4 times.

All of those are respectable, however Whitey was here in that 1980's format and made the playoffs 3 times and the World Series 3 times with a St. Louis win % of .530, to go along with giving them the 2nd best winning percentage in the NL for the combined 1981 season.

Red Schoendist in his initial 11 years posted a .521 winning %.  They won 2 pennants in 1967 and 1968.  If in todays baseball world, they would have won the NL Central in 1967, 1968, and the Wild Card in 1971.  Not as rousing a success as Tony.

So, stacking Whitey and Tony up in 1980's terms:
Whitey .530 w%, 3 playoff appearances, 3 pennants, 1 WS
Tony .551 w%, 4 playoff appearances, 3 pennants, 1 WS

It fuzzy trying to figure playoff results in this hypothetical.

So, Tony has been slightly better than Whitey, but hasn't brought home a WS yet.

Tony isn't a bad manager, in fact, I like Tony as the manager of the St. Louis Cardinals.  I think he is better than Torre, Leyland, Baker, probably not better than Cox.  That doesn't mean that sometimes he overmanages things.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think
Over the last six years (more than ever) I've learned that once you make the playoffs, it's a crapshoot.

Either a hot pitching staff or a all-pistons-running offense wins it. Every year.

Is Tony putting us into the position to have that chance come October? I'd think so.

Is he hindering our chances once there? Generally, I'd say no and blame the offense, but I wouldn't fault someone for saying that it fall on his, as the managers, shoulders.

One of these years though, lightening in a bottle will hopefully be brewed here in St Louis and we'll get a Championship.

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we all welcome that result...
...no matter what Tony does in an August game at Wrigley.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought
you had configured a few stats in some sort of time-warp-continum theory which I was not aware of, but I was still happy to see a championship, albeit fictional.
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, no general disagreement here
I'm not contending that LaRussa is better than Whitey or Red, or even Billy Southworth or Frankie Frisch, but he's certainly in the upper tier of managers in the game today. Other than Cox and Torre, none have had such consistent success -- and, when you combine his tenure with the White Sox and A's, LaRussa's been doing it longer than the others.

I've always considered comparing eras in baseball a futile exercise. Baseball at the turn of the century, the "dead ball" period, was significantly different than that after 1920. The war years of the early '40s, before the arrival of African-American players, had little in common with that of the '60s. The arrival of free agency in the '70s and expansion of that practice in the '80s changed the game radically. The '90s and beyond have seen the introduction of more advanced training methods -- and, unfortunately, steroids -- which have also altered the game.

It may be easier to get into the playoffs today, but possibly more difficult to win the World Series since it requires beating three high-quality teams, one in a five-game series and two in best-of-seven sets. As another poster noted, the playoffs are a crapshoot. Of course, 2004 was a disappointment, but it was somewhat freaky: never before had a team come back from down 3-0 in a post-season series as did Boston against the Yankees, and the momentum built by the Sox was an irresistable force. (Not having Carpenter and coming off a grueling series against Houston -- without a win streak -- took their toll, too.)

I don't know if LaRussa will get to the Cardinals to the Series again, much less win it. Ultimately, he'll be held accountable for not doing so, but that will only be when the Cardinals begin underachieving. I don't see the 2006 Cardinals as a great team, especially compared to the '04 squad. The starting rotation -- other than Carpenter -- is merely serviceable. The bullpen is young. The overall defense is only marginal -- especially middle infield, that most crucial of spots. Eckstein, Belliard and Miles are not Gold Glove-caliber fielders. The batting order is the team's strength, but how often have the Cardinals had that line-up intact? The opener of the Cincinnati series was the first time in weeks that I thought St. Louis had the order it wanted (Eckstein-Duncan-Pujols-Edmonds-Rolen-Encarnacion-Belliard-Molina).

If the Cardinals even get to the Series this season, it may well be LaRussa's finest job of managing.

by MoCrash on Aug 20, 2006 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was a tough loss...
Remember...this was against Zambrano and the CUBS...peoples emotions are going to be a bit more tense and on edge for a game like todays. I think we all were thinking when the day started that we would have a good chance of losing this game.. top pitcher in the NL...a place that we haven't won all season...so when they went ahead 2 runs...well we all get our hopes up and got really excited..and well..perhaps say and voice some opinions that don't really make a lot of sense or stay in the boundries of good taste. Granted, I'm as guilty as the next guy here..but let us not judge all too severely okay?  Most of the comments today were just out of true frustration and loss, and not meant, I'm sure, to insult or demean this fine place. Everyone appreciates having such a great site to talk about and exchange information and ideas on the Cardinals...and I for one plan on making sure I do a much better job of offering quality writing and comments in the future.    Lets go get 'em tomorrow!  

by Timbo02 on Aug 19, 2006 7:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

agreed
i've been avoiding the comments section for the last few weeks. partially due to a lack of time, but also partially due to what feels like an overwhelming sense of negativity within a lof of the comments. i understand that everyone is frustrated with the perplexingly inconsistant play of the team, but it seems unecessary to voice them in such a negative manner all of the time, as some of the posters have been doing recently.
The St. Louis Cardinals: No Curses, No Excuses, Just Wins

by amettrick on Aug 19, 2006 7:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I would hope ...
... that we can still be critical, although I would agree with there being limits in terms of how that is expressed (I find vulgarity personally distasteful in this type of forum, just as I do at dKos; it's unnecessary and only demeans the user).

I can't help but believe Izzy is on the down side of his career. He's been a good, although tension-inducing, closer over the years -- although his save numbers are probably slightly exaggerated because of the way LaRussa maximizes closer usage, there being times I would prefer him leaving in a starter or set-up reliever who has remained effective. Of course, it's been a tough year for many closers -- Lidge, for example (he's never been quite the same since Albert took him deep in Game 5 of the NLCS last year, although I hesitate to apply a causal-relationship). Jocketty needs to be looking for a new closer in the off-season.

Preston Wilson was a good pick-up for the Cardinals, who have needed another corner OF all season (especially since Bigbie couldn't get healthy and return to his 2004 form). However, we have to be realistic about Wilson can do, and throwing him in against Zambrano wasn't an especially good match-up since Wilson is primarily a lefty-killer -- which the Cardinals definitely needed. I think the idea is to platoon him with Duncan, but -- given how Edmonds has struggled against LHP -- I'd use Wilson in CF against hard southpaws (those who are tough on LH hitters), with Edmonds as a defensive replacement, and on the corner against reverse pitchers from either left or right.

by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 7:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I Agree About Wilson...
TLR has the propensity to throw a non-regular right back in the lineup if he had a great game. However, it would have been nice if Wilson was left out against the RHP Zambrano and was available to pinch-hit against a lefty over JuanE if it was inevitable Chris Duncan was not going to have the opportunity to hit the LHP. That is the reputation this season of Wilson: Lefty Killer/Flighty vs. Righties.
Baily

by Baily on Aug 20, 2006 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Boss
Some of the comments today were way out of line- I was every bit as frustrated as anyone that TLR ph'd for Dunc in the 9th, with the bases loaded- but let's keep it civil, huh?

And Carpenter is on the mound tomorrow- Redbirds are going to win (I feel that way everytime he pitches)
And I like Spez's red soul patch- it looks ridiculous, but no more so than my "STL in a red heart tatoo"!( I hate explaining it to people that don't follow baseball!)

I'm going to my happy place now.

by RosevilleRedbird on Aug 19, 2006 7:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Apology
lboros-

I left an apology under the "apology" thread under diaries before entering this comment section. I hope you get the chance to read it. Again, sorry for any offense caused.

by aet15 on Aug 19, 2006 7:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Glad
I'm glad to see this sort of admonition.  I like that more people are on this forum.  Those "FU TLR" posts are why I stay away from Cards talk.  This forum is different b/c, by and large, there is one intelligent, insightful post after another.  Great contributions from lboros and lots of regular posters who are knowledgeable and love the Cards.  The other screeds should be posted on some other blog.  Start a "I hate TLR" blog if you want.  This blog is different for a reason.

by chuckb on Aug 19, 2006 7:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ha
Ha, happy you stopped by Larry. I thought people were going to kill me when I talked about how Enc hit against lefties. I still think it was the right call by LaRussa. I had a worst time running Sosa for as long as he did and Taguchi playing too deep. I still thought it was a good game by our team. Mini Manny had a good game, Molina hit a homer, and Miles provided a decent job at leadoff.

by DimitroffVodka on Aug 19, 2006 8:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

lboros
I too feel extremely guilty for filling your site with negativity today.. I understand it completely when you say we were out line, and will take majority of the blame for encouraging others into it by posting negative subjects...

there is a time and a place for all that, and surely, its not fair to blame it all on Tony La Russa.  A lot of Tonys' moves today could have went the other way and possibly had a positive effect on the outcome of the game. And who knows, a crucial call in tomorrows' game by Tony may deliver us a win.  Its his team, his call..

Just like this is your site, YOUR call..

And I do mean it sincerely when I say I'm sorry and hope that you can forgive us all...

on a brighter note, it was very encouraging to see our birds come around that mid season funk!  I believe Scott Rolens' heroic performance on Thursday really uplifted the team and I truly believe that all of our studs in redbird uniform are on the same page..

And now we have our ace going tomorrow for a series win, so what more can we ask for?  

And again, I apologize for everything I said today that may have offended anyone in cardinal nation, and will try my best to refrain myself from bringing any further nonsense to this site..

and I just want to say, St. Louis Cardinals kick ass!!!!

by cubHATER on Aug 19, 2006 8:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I also apologize
for my negativity today. No excuse for it, just extremely frustrated. Won't happen again.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Aug 19, 2006 8:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I tend
to leave my ranting and raving for my own blog, but I can get carried away like anyone else. If I stepped over the line today, I sincerely apologize, lb. It won't happen again.

by cardsrul on Aug 19, 2006 8:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Weaver
I dont mean to change the topic but is anyone else excited to see weaver pitch on tuesday, after his last performance i have found myself really excited to watch him pitch

by truemun12 on Aug 19, 2006 8:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ehh....
I want him to do well, but him vs Mets offense scares me.
That's beer, that's Budweiser.

by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Aug 19, 2006 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Mets offense scares me vs
any of our pitchers not named Carpenter.  

by calico30 on Aug 19, 2006 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank You, LB
I just want to say thanks for your committment to keeping this a quality blog that is above all the vulgarity and venom that is so common on most other blogs & message boards. That's why this is the only blog I visit on a daily basis.  

by calico30 on Aug 19, 2006 8:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't agree more, Larry
I was monitoring the last couple innings on Gameday with my kids, and I quickly discovered that I couldn't check this site without introducing a couple of words my six-year-old isn't ready for. And I agree that it's been building up for several weeks.

One thing I think everyone should be clear on: It's not the negativity that's the problem, but the tone. If you're down on the team like many of us are, by all means put together a thoughtful post explaining why LaRussa or Jocketty or Miles is screwing up like nobody else in the history of the game. But we can do without the mindless invective.

As the comments in this thread already indicate, I suspect your post will have a huge effect, Larry.

by DCGreg on Aug 19, 2006 9:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

poor lboros.
You're never going to be able to take another vacation, are you?

by redbirdbrain on Aug 19, 2006 10:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

in other news ...
Sidney Ponson is available again.

by DCGreg on Aug 19, 2006 10:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

and in other news...
... looks like Eddie Guardad might be injured. he left the Reds/Pirates game after throwing a pitch and feeling something wrong.

i don't know anything else about it.

by kindred on Aug 19, 2006 10:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just saw Pujols' 9th inning AB...
...and I didn't realize how close to being a HR it was.  I thought it was kinda a liner hit up against the wall, but with that overhang netting at Wrigley, it was literally 8 inches from being a grand slam.

Props to you, El Hombre.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 11:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep
The game really did come down to an extra 5mph in the wind at the moment El Hombre made contact. Just one of those losses, ya'know...
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to Bill James Cy Young predictor....
If Carp can go 7 innings tomorrow, give up no ER, and get 6 Ks, he would move into 2nd place in the 'Cy Young' predictor totals for the NL.

He would also get his ERA below 3 again and put pressure back on Webb to perform.

I'd love nothing more that through this medicore season, Carpenter shined to the point that he would tie Bob Gibson in Cy Youngs won.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 11:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

trivia question
don't cheat - don't click the links before you guess your answer.  even the nicknames.
the cardinals have seven coaches who dress out every day, TLR, big Dunc, Hal "Number one Blowup, Baby" McRae, Joe "I do too do stuff!!!" Pettini, Dave "Yeah, we wrote it.  So What?" McKay, The Secret Weapon, and Marty "Yeah, it's not me" Mason.  six played in the mlb.  who, of the following, has the second most home runs?  

(because first place is a bit too boring)

by sjoshi on Aug 20, 2006 12:42 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Goo d Trivia... I have No idea
But I do know that Joe Pettini ranks number one in both kicking ass and taking names.
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 20, 2006 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha!
I actually did guess it right, but knowing the amount of years and success all of those guys had in the bigs it was really only between the two of them.
Cheers

by Alxfritz on Aug 20, 2006 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My Guess
My guess is Hal McRae just because he is the hitting coach.

by DimitroffVodka on Aug 20, 2006 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The challenge...
is deciding whether McRae or Oquendo had more.

by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man, did I miss that one big.
Never woulda guessed, but I suppose it makes sense.

by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dave Duncan?
Being a catcher, I'd think he'd have more pop than the Secret Weapon.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 20, 2006 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dunc was before my time...
and I missed most of Jose's career since I didn't become a huge baseball fan until around '94, when I became old enough to appreciate the game.

That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.

by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

an even better question would be
which cardinal coach has major league pitching experience?

by sjoshi on Aug 20, 2006 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitching
Oquendo...against the Braves?

by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep
Oquendo shut out the Braves for 3 innings in 1988.  

by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can somebody do this...
Post side by side pictures of The Deacon (when he was at his Grizzly Adams best) and a present day picture.

by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

why are people trying to be rational about this
it seems to me that tlr's over analyzing that got us in this situation in the first place. baseball players like to play. they don't like to be moved around like chess pieces. didn't we learn anything from ozzie guillen last year. he let his players play. period. i used to love tlr. after today i say its time for a change of pace.

by jojo5492 on Aug 20, 2006 1:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0981_small
Put Some Hot Sauce On My Burrito (It's OT, Yadi2.)
God_small
Albertofstan fact sheet
Gawstab_small
Offensive Ability Rating Rankings for 2009
Royconrad_fullthrottle_small
25 players : 25 seasons, 1910-1934

Recent FanPosts

4849_buschstadium_small
My Hall of Fame Induction Speech
Mightymouse_small
Schumaker Gets New Contract
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
The_i
VEB Day 2010 v2.0
Small
Spring Training Split Squad?
Cardwash_small
Chris Duncan signs minor league contract with Nats, also a great pic of him

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Le-samourai_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb