ugly tone at VEB today
i'm really upset about the tone of this place right now. everybody chill the hell out and let me enjoy the last few hours of my vacation. when i get back, this place needs fumigated --- big time.
a lot of newcomers to this place are way over the top today, acting like idiots. if you have something intelligent to say, say it --- otherwise go post your dumb "vent" threads and your low-class "f you la russa" garbage at some other site.
not mine.
i need to hear from you guys`--- if there is a particular post or poster that has made you go "yechhh" recently, e-mail me: vivaelbirdos@yahoo.com. the community here does not have to get uglier as it gets larger; standards of appropriate behavior and tone can and will be upheld. getting feedback from all of you will make it easier to establish and maintain appropriate standards.
0 recs |
57 comments
Comments
I know you're talking to me
by Scarlet the Cardinal on Aug 19, 2006 6:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thank you scarlet
by lboros on Aug 19, 2006 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a fine line to toe.
I am not going to apologize for not liking Larussa, frankly Tony dosen't care if I like him or not.
I am not apologizing for saying this team plays a hard 6 maybe 7, if we are lucky. I don't think many on this team care to play a hard nine.
I am dissenchanted with this team, it is just no fun to watch.
So where do intelligent people go to vent? Most of us need to...
by BigJawnMize on Aug 20, 2006 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should apologize
by BigJawnMize on Aug 20, 2006 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
where to rant
by janderson on Aug 20, 2006 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you are giving up on the team...
by MRCARD on Aug 20, 2006 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I am saying is...
by BigJawnMize on Aug 20, 2006 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks LB
I love VEB because we can look at matchups and start a smart, logical discussion on why a move was made, why a move wasn't made, or why a move should have been made. I love it for the collection of characters who comment, each contributing in their own way. I love it for the respectful, inteligent, and witty dialogue that we have here.
Not for half-assed, immature pissing contests.
There are plenty of other places out there for that.
Now lets all be glad that we have one of the best pitchers in baseball taking the mound for us tomorrow and beat the damn Cubbies.
by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 6:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll Second That Motion...
by Baily on Aug 19, 2006 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
THANK YOU
For my part, I'd take today's game over any of our lackluster losses to the Pirates. With two of our starters not starting, we almost scratched out a win against a Cy Young candidate. We fought hard, hit a couple homers, and only lost by a run. Our new collective man-crush Chris Duncan continued to mash the ball. And, despite all its frustrating moments, today's game was undeniably entertaining. If Mike Shannon's call on Jimmy's mad dash to home didn't have you leaping out of your chair, well...you'd better check your pulse.
About all the blame-placing, some of which seems almost mean-spirited (although that's surely the frustration talking), again, I can only offer my own opinion. The problem is this: in baseball, every event changes the state of the game--often drastically--so it's difficult to hold a single individual responsible for a single event. Example: I don't understand the anger at Taguchi for not catching that flyball. Yes, he might have caught it if he had been playing shallower. But if Sosa hadn't given up a hit to John Flippin' Mabry to lead off the inning, that situation might have never come up. Yet I don't see anyone blasting Sosa. I'll take it a step further--if Jim Edmonds had reported his post-concussion symptoms when they began, he might have been in the starting lineup today, and caught that ball. Is Edmonds to blame? My point is, that dying quail has a pretty complex history, and I'm not comfortable blaming any one person for it. It dropped. Which sucked. Let's move on.
Sometimes, though, blame is easier to assign. As far as we know, Tony acted completely on his own in allowing Juan to pinch-hit for Duncan in the ninth. That decision lies solely with him. Here, I feel more comfortable blaming Tony (and Juan, for failing to hit at least a sac fly). But even here--just because we can blame Tony for this decision, can we really blame him for losing the game? For this roller-coaster season? For the fact that we haven't won a World Series in 24 years? The rancor in the remarks today just doesn't seem in proportion to the mistakes Tony made.
I don't mind playing the blame game; in a sense, it's the way to critique a team's performance. And criticism is good. But it irks me when people assign blame without a lot of justification--it's unproductive, and often misleading.
I'm not trying to tell people what they can and can't say on this blog (that's Mr. Borowsky's thankless job). And I'm not trying to tell anyone how to root for their team (if that's anyone's job, it's Albert's). I just think we should try to think a bit more before we let loose with the nasty comments and blame-placing.
Whew. Sorry for the length. Let's get 'em tomorrow.
by Hummingbird on Aug 19, 2006 6:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There is always the 'butterfly effect' to blame...
However, what Tony did in the 9th was indefensible. I know that Juan is hitting over .300 against righties this season and I believe has most of his homeruns against them as well. However, pulling Duncan trumps TLRs decision in Game 5 of the 2001 NLDS. At least in that situation, it was a longshot asking McGwire to not hit into a DP, even though he had only done it 7 times that season.
For those interested, this is what I'm referring to:
*CARDINALS 9TH: Edmonds singled to center; ROBINSON BATTED FOR
MCGWIRE; Robinson out on a sacrifice bunt (third to second)
[Edmonds to second]; Renteria struck out; Matheny struck out; 0*
I'm sure in that situation he felt much more secure with Renteria's .235 and Matheny's .200 than McGwire's . 091, even if McGwire was hitting a homerun every 10 ab that season. That's for another day, though.
Anyways, I was the one (unless someone else said so too) that said 'this is why we never win a World Series. It isn't because of necessarily the moves in themselves that Tony makes, but it's the confidence he shows in players. Moves like this tell a player that Tony views you as 'you are what you are and you'll never be anything else'.
Duncan since the All-Star Break is hitting .261 with 2 HRs and 2 RBIs against LHP with 4Ks, as opposed to
Juan? .293 with 2 HRs and 9 RBIs, along with 6 Ks.
There seemingly was not 'higher reward' with making this move. Chris Duncan was either going to get walked or see a pitch to hit with Pujols hitting in behind him.
Clearly, Juan could have gotten a hit, Pujols could have hit that ball into a gap somewhere, Izzy could have pitched better in his second inning of work (something that shouldn't have happened) and Tony would have been absolved to some point.
However, this was a situation of micromanaging gone wild. For Duncan, I hope it doesn't hurt his confidence. When he looks at this, what can he possibly do better to give Tony the confidence in him to allow him to hit in that situation?
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playing the odds
I'm not terribly worried about Duncan's confidence. He's shown remarkable maturity for such a young player and, as someone who has grown up in the professional baseball culture, knows the score. Besides, LaRussa has demonstrated how high he is on Duncan by essentially giving him an everyday starting spot, except against certain LHP. A rookie couldn't ask for much more.
by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's such a small sample size though....
Duncan vs LHP with the bases loaded has only had 1 AB this season. With RISP, only 9 ABs.
I just think that Tony, if he does provide a defense, is doing so with the slightest amount of statistics to back it up.
Let's look at it this way. After Juan was taken down by the lefty, Dusty brought in a righty in Wuertz. This season against righties with the bases loaded, Pujols is hitting .182. Would you pull the best right handed hitter in the game today because of that split? No.
I don't know. I guess I can just say that I don't like the move in the least and nothing will probably change my mind. If it had worked out, I still would have said Tony dodged a bullet getting his 'match-ups' to work.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand
As for the comparison with Pujols, well, think about it. With Pujols, you throw out the numbers. He does not get pinch-hit for, in any situation against any pitcher for any reason. Whatever his stats may or may not be, who on the Cardinals' roster would you want up there with the game on the line? Duncan ain't Pujols, although he shows signs he eventually be the next best thing (I really like the kid).
I agree in substance with your point; LaRussa does micromanage. Given the success he's enjoyed throughout his career, I'm hesitant to macrocritique this tendency. Hey, he may not have brought the Cardinals a Series title, but when was the last time when they were so consistently a contender? The '80s, only the playoff string didn't last as long. The '60s, ditto. The St. Louis Swifties of the '40s, same. You'd have to go back to the late '20s through mid '30s to find a like period of Cardinal success. The Cardinals have a .524 winning percentage from 1996 to 2005, with six division titles, and .592 record in 2000-05. LaRussa may irritate Cardinal fans sometimes, but he's probably a Hall of Fame manager. Taking the long view may help alleviate the frustrations of this difficult -- although not yet wasted -- season.
by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Going with the managerial tendencies
Considering every manager in the game this year, Girardi would be the only one doing a better job, in my opinion. And his style (this year) would never work on a veteran laden team. Oquendo, who I am pretty sure is TLR's replacement, will probably run a good ship, too. As will Matheny one day.
Right now though, I can't think of any active manager I'd rather have running this motley crew of superstars and scrapheapers that we have.
If you want to say TLR sucks, that's cool. A lot of times, I won't even disagree with that. However, would you rather have Narron or Baker calling the shots?
by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No on said Tony won't be a HOF manager....
10 years in St. Louis.
5 Division Titles
1 Wild Card birth
1 Pennant
If this were the 1960s
3 National League Pennants (2001, 2004, 2005) in 10 Years. One of which may or may not have happened because 2001 would have been a playoff with the Astros.
If it were the 1980s, we've only had a better record than Atlanta or the Mets (T-2000, 2001, 2004, 2005), putting us in the playoffs 4 times.
All of those are respectable, however Whitey was here in that 1980's format and made the playoffs 3 times and the World Series 3 times with a St. Louis win % of .530, to go along with giving them the 2nd best winning percentage in the NL for the combined 1981 season.
Red Schoendist in his initial 11 years posted a .521 winning %. They won 2 pennants in 1967 and 1968. If in todays baseball world, they would have won the NL Central in 1967, 1968, and the Wild Card in 1971. Not as rousing a success as Tony.
So, stacking Whitey and Tony up in 1980's terms:
Whitey .530 w%, 3 playoff appearances, 3 pennants, 1 WS
Tony .551 w%, 4 playoff appearances, 3 pennants, 1 WS
It fuzzy trying to figure playoff results in this hypothetical.
So, Tony has been slightly better than Whitey, but hasn't brought home a WS yet.
Tony isn't a bad manager, in fact, I like Tony as the manager of the St. Louis Cardinals. I think he is better than Torre, Leyland, Baker, probably not better than Cox. That doesn't mean that sometimes he overmanages things.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
Either a hot pitching staff or a all-pistons-running offense wins it. Every year.
Is Tony putting us into the position to have that chance come October? I'd think so.
Is he hindering our chances once there? Generally, I'd say no and blame the offense, but I wouldn't fault someone for saying that it fall on his, as the managers, shoulders.
One of these years though, lightening in a bottle will hopefully be brewed here in St Louis and we'll get a Championship.
by Alxfritz on Aug 19, 2006 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we all welcome that result...
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why did I give Tony a World Series win?
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, no general disagreement here
I've always considered comparing eras in baseball a futile exercise. Baseball at the turn of the century, the "dead ball" period, was significantly different than that after 1920. The war years of the early '40s, before the arrival of African-American players, had little in common with that of the '60s. The arrival of free agency in the '70s and expansion of that practice in the '80s changed the game radically. The '90s and beyond have seen the introduction of more advanced training methods -- and, unfortunately, steroids -- which have also altered the game.
It may be easier to get into the playoffs today, but possibly more difficult to win the World Series since it requires beating three high-quality teams, one in a five-game series and two in best-of-seven sets. As another poster noted, the playoffs are a crapshoot. Of course, 2004 was a disappointment, but it was somewhat freaky: never before had a team come back from down 3-0 in a post-season series as did Boston against the Yankees, and the momentum built by the Sox was an irresistable force. (Not having Carpenter and coming off a grueling series against Houston -- without a win streak -- took their toll, too.)
I don't know if LaRussa will get to the Cardinals to the Series again, much less win it. Ultimately, he'll be held accountable for not doing so, but that will only be when the Cardinals begin underachieving. I don't see the 2006 Cardinals as a great team, especially compared to the '04 squad. The starting rotation -- other than Carpenter -- is merely serviceable. The bullpen is young. The overall defense is only marginal -- especially middle infield, that most crucial of spots. Eckstein, Belliard and Miles are not Gold Glove-caliber fielders. The batting order is the team's strength, but how often have the Cardinals had that line-up intact? The opener of the Cincinnati series was the first time in weeks that I thought St. Louis had the order it wanted (Eckstein-Duncan-Pujols-Edmonds-Rolen-Encarnacion-Belliard-Molina).
If the Cardinals even get to the Series this season, it may well be LaRussa's finest job of managing.
by MoCrash on Aug 20, 2006 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was a tough loss...
by Timbo02 on Aug 19, 2006 7:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by amettrick on Aug 19, 2006 7:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would hope ...
I can't help but believe Izzy is on the down side of his career. He's been a good, although tension-inducing, closer over the years -- although his save numbers are probably slightly exaggerated because of the way LaRussa maximizes closer usage, there being times I would prefer him leaving in a starter or set-up reliever who has remained effective. Of course, it's been a tough year for many closers -- Lidge, for example (he's never been quite the same since Albert took him deep in Game 5 of the NLCS last year, although I hesitate to apply a causal-relationship). Jocketty needs to be looking for a new closer in the off-season.
Preston Wilson was a good pick-up for the Cardinals, who have needed another corner OF all season (especially since Bigbie couldn't get healthy and return to his 2004 form). However, we have to be realistic about Wilson can do, and throwing him in against Zambrano wasn't an especially good match-up since Wilson is primarily a lefty-killer -- which the Cardinals definitely needed. I think the idea is to platoon him with Duncan, but -- given how Edmonds has struggled against LHP -- I'd use Wilson in CF against hard southpaws (those who are tough on LH hitters), with Edmonds as a defensive replacement, and on the corner against reverse pitchers from either left or right.
by MoCrash on Aug 19, 2006 7:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Agree About Wilson...
by Baily on Aug 20, 2006 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Boss
And Carpenter is on the mound tomorrow- Redbirds are going to win (I feel that way everytime he pitches)
And I like Spez's red soul patch- it looks ridiculous, but no more so than my "STL in a red heart tatoo"!( I hate explaining it to people that don't follow baseball!)
by RosevilleRedbird on Aug 19, 2006 7:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Apology
I left an apology under the "apology" thread under diaries before entering this comment section. I hope you get the chance to read it. Again, sorry for any offense caused.
by aet15 on Aug 19, 2006 7:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Glad
by chuckb on Aug 19, 2006 7:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ha
by DimitroffVodka on Aug 19, 2006 8:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lboros
there is a time and a place for all that, and surely, its not fair to blame it all on Tony La Russa. A lot of Tonys' moves today could have went the other way and possibly had a positive effect on the outcome of the game. And who knows, a crucial call in tomorrows' game by Tony may deliver us a win. Its his team, his call..
Just like this is your site, YOUR call..
And I do mean it sincerely when I say I'm sorry and hope that you can forgive us all...
on a brighter note, it was very encouraging to see our birds come around that mid season funk! I believe Scott Rolens' heroic performance on Thursday really uplifted the team and I truly believe that all of our studs in redbird uniform are on the same page..
And now we have our ace going tomorrow for a series win, so what more can we ask for?
And again, I apologize for everything I said today that may have offended anyone in cardinal nation, and will try my best to refrain myself from bringing any further nonsense to this site..
and I just want to say, St. Louis Cardinals kick ass!!!!
by cubHATER on Aug 19, 2006 8:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I also apologize
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Aug 19, 2006 8:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I tend
by cardsrul on Aug 19, 2006 8:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Weaver
by truemun12 on Aug 19, 2006 8:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ehh....
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Aug 19, 2006 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Mets offense scares me vs
by calico30 on Aug 19, 2006 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank You, LB
by calico30 on Aug 19, 2006 8:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more, Larry
One thing I think everyone should be clear on: It's not the negativity that's the problem, but the tone. If you're down on the team like many of us are, by all means put together a thoughtful post explaining why LaRussa or Jocketty or Miles is screwing up like nobody else in the history of the game. But we can do without the mindless invective.
As the comments in this thread already indicate, I suspect your post will have a huge effect, Larry.
by DCGreg on Aug 19, 2006 9:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
poor lboros.
by redbirdbrain on Aug 19, 2006 10:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
in other news ...
by DCGreg on Aug 19, 2006 10:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and in other news...
i don't know anything else about it.
by kindred on Aug 19, 2006 10:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just saw Pujols' 9th inning AB...
Props to you, El Hombre.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 11:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
According to Bill James Cy Young predictor....
He would also get his ERA below 3 again and put pressure back on Webb to perform.
I'd love nothing more that through this medicore season, Carpenter shined to the point that he would tie Bob Gibson in Cy Youngs won.
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 19, 2006 11:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
trivia question
the cardinals have seven coaches who dress out every day, TLR, big Dunc, Hal "Number one Blowup, Baby" McRae, Joe "I do too do stuff!!!" Pettini, Dave "Yeah, we wrote it. So What?" McKay, The Secret Weapon, and Marty "Yeah, it's not me" Mason. six played in the mlb. who, of the following, has the second most home runs?
(because first place is a bit too boring)
by sjoshi on Aug 20, 2006 12:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Goo d Trivia... I have No idea
by Alxfritz on Aug 20, 2006 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Guess
by DimitroffVodka on Aug 20, 2006 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The challenge...
by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man, did I miss that one big.
by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dave Duncan?
by Hardcore Legend on Aug 20, 2006 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunc was before my time...
That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
by Quietude on Aug 20, 2006 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
an even better question would be
by sjoshi on Aug 20, 2006 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitching
by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can somebody do this...
by longinesincenterfield on Aug 20, 2006 1:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
why are people trying to be rational about this
by jojo5492 on Aug 20, 2006 1:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs



















