Game 1 Open Thread: April 3

carpenter lieber
21-5, 2.83 17-13, 4.20
good to have this part of our lives back, no? baseballs in motion constantly -- pitched, hit, taken, hidden, tipped, broken off, misjudged, outrun, scuffed, thrown out of play, lost in the lights, snared, stroked, pegged, dug out of the dirt, driven high and deep, fired, flipped, dribbled, one-handed, and flared . . . . a swarm of charged particles; a big fusion reaction, just like the sun. and like the sun, baseball's gonna rise ev'y day from now till the first of november, whatever wins and losses the season may bring to our team and to each of us as individuals.
the "perfect world" box is back in place on the left-hand sidebar; it'll flex during the year as trends and lines of discussion come and go. also have a new poll up on the right-hand sidebar; i'll repeat this this one from time to time and chart the ebb and flow of our confidence in the team.
one other sidebar note: my apologies for the "Houston Astros Championship Season" ad. it's an SB Nation network ad; i wouldn't take these guys' unholy money if it were up to me. whatever you do, don't click on the damn thing or they'll re-up for another week or month or whatever.
in case you missed the news on junior spivey, scroll down one post -- he's been DFA'd, with plan A to send him to memphis.
i was so busy last week i never got time to organize my thoughts about the 2006 cards into any sort of coherent package to kick off the season. maybe the exercise would have been pointless anyway; almost anything i might say at this point is gonna be repetition or overkill. ye faithful readers already know how i feel, so rather than rehash it i'm just gonna chuck a few final considerations out there, beginning with this one:
It's Still the Preseason. the cardinal franchise has arrived at the same point the yankees and braves reached some years back: only october matters. the regular season is nothing to take seriously; it's a lark, a good time, a six-month series of exhibitions. that's not to say the cardinals are invincible; far from it, they could miss the playoffs under any number of scenarios. but simply making the playoffs is no longer enough; not even close. anything less than another world series appearance will be judged a disappointment. the 162 dress rehearsals will have their memorable plots and their indelible moments, but the handful of games that (we hope) will define this year are still a long, long way off.
as they're presently constructed, the cardinals have an all-too familiar look about them -- likely to win the nl central, then get bounced in the playoffs. so a big part of the drama in these 162 walk-throughs will be how well jock (and to a lesser extent tony/dave) can improve the cast -- and how much maneuvering room the owners will allow -- before the curtain lifts on october.
Three Stats I'll Be Watching.
- jason marquis' walk rate. through 26 starts last year, marquis issued 3.7 walks per 9 innings and had a 4.67 era; in his last 6 starts he issued 0.8 walks per 9 and cut his era in half, to 2.30. walks were never his main problem, but they were a telling symptom of it -- ie jason's tendency to make things too complicated on the mound. when he finally accepted duncan's advice and simplified matters -- fastball/sinker, pitch to contact -- the at-bats resolved in shorter order, and the walks naturally disappeared. this spring he walked 2.3 per 9 innings and had an era of about 2.00. i'm gonna set the cutoff point at about 2.5 walks per 9: if he's walking guys more often than that, i'll expect the same old inconsistency. if he's below that figure, he may take a big step forward.
- mark mulder's strikeout rate. most of y'are sick of hearing about this, but i still think it matters. he whiffed 4.8 batters per 9 in 2005; if he's below 5.0 again in 2006 i have a feeling his era's gonna end up north of 4.00. but they say his mechanics have been sharp this spring, enabling him to miss more bats -- 15 ks in 21.2 spring-training frames, an avg of 6.2 strikeouts per 9. if he can sustain a rate of 5.5. k/9 or above this season, then mulder might finally be the ace the cards hoped he would be when they acquired him.
- the cardinals' double-play rate. the cardinals' 196 double plays last year were the 19th-best total in mlb history, and the marginal value of all those twin killings was, conservatively, three wins. what are the odds that the 2006 cards can even come close to last year's total, which set a new franchise record? surprisingly good. the 18 other teams who recorded at least 196 double plays in a single season averaged 174 double plays in the following year, with a median total of 181; only 5 teams failed to turn at least 1 dp per game in the ensuing season. the cardinal pitching staff's extreme groundball emphasis hasn't changed, but the keystone combination has -- and the instability at 2b could prove costly. as long as the dp rate is at least 1.0 per game, i'll feel pretty good about it..
The Schedule: as acr noted here, it's tailor-made for a fast start; the cards will not face good pitching early on. their first 35 games include 5 against the reds, who may have the worst staff in the national league; 6 against the cubs, who will be without prior and wood; and 3 each against florida and colorado. they also have 6 against the pirates, who are tough at the top of the rotation (perez and duke) but soft in spots 3-5; depending on how the pitching pairings break, those may be easy games too.
their toughest stretch begins on june 20, when they face the defending champs for 3 at comiskey, then play detroit on the road and come home to take on the indians. after a 3-game breather vs the royals, they head back out on the road to close the first half in atlanta at houston. and it gets no easier after the all-star break -- their 1st 10 games are against the dodgers (7) and braves (3).
of the cards' 27 games after labor day, nearly half (13) will be against teams outside the division; the only divisional rivals they will face down the stretch are milwaukee and houston.
I Guesstimate the Cardinals Will Win 93 Games in 2006 Because . . . .
- History says so. the 2004-05 Cardinals are the 13th team of the divisional era (ie, post-1969) to log back-to-back 100-win seasons. the previous 12 teams won an average of 94 games in the 3d year -- ie, the year after the 2d 100-win season -- and saw their victory total decline by an average of 8 wins.
- Diamond Mind says so. in three separate multi-trial simulations based on this computer game, the cardinals ended up with between 93 and 96 wins. the diamond-mind projections have a pretty good track record.
- Las Vegas says so. the over-under on the cardinals is 93 games.
- I said so last spring. although my 93-win prediction was way too low in 2005, the possibility exists that i actually had the right win total, just the wrong year. so i'm going with the same number again.
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If 3 of your questions are answered positively:
- Double plays
- Marquis walks
- Mulder Ks
Work stinks...
On baseball notes, I'M GOING TO THE GAME SATURDAY!!!! Wrigley Field! My friend, who is the man, screwed up and bought tickets for this game instead of the one he wanted in August. I get them! My parents are coming up to visit and this is my mom's early mother's day gift. Blecher seats. I'm torn, help me out. Left field to catch potential home runs are CF to be behind the great Jim Edmonds? Thoughts?
93 seems good as any. I'll take the over though. If time allows, I'll post a diary on the mood here in Milwauke and why a good Brewer fan base is good for the Cardinals.
Wrigley
I'll be @ the game on Sat. too. I live in Chicago, so I catch them up here whenever I can.
As far as Wrigley goes, I'd skip the bleachers. They are HIGHLY overrated and expensive. You'll get alot of drunk frat boy types out there too who have no idea what is going on on the field.
There aren't many bad seats in Wrigley, unless you're upper deck "obstructed view" of course!!
Enjoy the game
by jschryver138 on Apr 3, 2006 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
That's where our seats are...
I must admit I was pretty damn proud of her at that moment.
Wrigley staff wouldn't let the kids down by the field though, because we didn't have seats down there. I think all kids, regardless of ticket, should be let down on the rail for BP.
Thunderstorms
Play Ball
GO BIRDS!!
Ponson instead of Morris
I think the Cards will be able to win >99 games this season, based on their pitching staff and my percieved lack of strength in the National League.
by elderj on Apr 3, 2006 12:32 PM EDT reply actions
Cubs up 5-0 in the 1st...
Womack leads off bottom of the 1st with a 4-pitch walk off the Jackal.
Wainwright
That being said, it appears Carpenter is warming up.
WSJ has their projections up
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114402284535714829.html?mod=hps_us_inside_today
WSJ has their projections up
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114402284535714829.html?mod=hps_us_inside_today
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114380997593113485.html?mod=article-outset-box
Maybe we're spoiled, but
by gbrusca on Apr 3, 2006 3:10 PM EDT reply actions
Ireland
by Toddius396 on Apr 3, 2006 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions
mlb.tv
21-pitch inning in the 1st for Lieber...
Nice catch by ECK!!!
whoops---that was Carp's second pitch...
fwiw, I see today's 3B umpire...
And I see that Albert has just homered. Yeah, he's ready to go. :-) Too bad Eck and Juan Enc haven't gotten on base today, otherwise this thing could be 4-0 now instead of 2-0.
elegant simplicity
Top 1st: St. Louis
- J. Edmonds doubled to deep right, A. Pujols scored, J. Edmonds to third advancing on throw
Top 3rd: St. Louis
- A. Pujols homered to deep left
I don't care what anyone says
by gbrusca on Apr 3, 2006 4:06 PM EDT reply actions
Don't hate on Miles just yet....
by wcheuk on Apr 3, 2006 4:06 PM EDT reply actions
make a note
by photoman on Apr 3, 2006 4:08 PM EDT reply actions
Good idea to walk edmonds to pitch to Rolen?
Way to go Scott for making em pay...
10-0
Question for stat people
by wcheuk on Apr 3, 2006 4:18 PM EDT reply actions
So much for acquiring Dunn
Does all the off-season worrying seem overdone...
Scotty Slam!
- Will Rolen still have HR power to left? Check.
- Will the offense be able to score runs? Check. (everybody in the lineup has a hit today)
- Is Miles an OK stop-gap at 2B? Check.
Maybe this Miles kid deserves a shot.
Plus, Scotty's back. Heh, heh, heh.
Second dinger for Pujols today
This is a nice surprise
Still, Rolen + Homer = sigh of relief
Carp
Doing what he's supposed to do
OK, so Burrell takes him yard with 3 balls. Better than walking him. I don't think Carp is finessing anything right now. Fling away, this one's in the bag.
homers vs. walk
In other news, Al Pujols is a BEAST. I hope that means that Rolen is back, too. And I hope this isn't indicative of how Carp is going to pitch...I hope it's just that it's the first game.
by Toddius396 on Apr 3, 2006 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Homer vs. Walk
the schedule
re: the schedule...
It's the 'Stros schedule, quite frankly. The 'Stros don't have an easy schedule (IMHO. Check out their August/September schedule. It's brutal), BUT they have easily the most unbalanced schedule in their favor in the division.
Things of note:
They play no team more than 16 times. They have the same unbalance in their favor (9-10 home games) vs. the Cubs (10 home games of 16, I believe) and the Reds (9 home games of 15).
They do, however, play 10 of 16 on the Road vs. the Brewers and 9 of 15 vs. the Pirates. (BTW, SEVEN of the 10 Brewers road games are in 3 1/2 wks in late Aug/early Sept.)
IOW, in division they don't have a single even SLIGHTLY balanced season series. Lazy scheduling
Out of the division they don't play the Indians in interleague AND the face the D-backs 9 times, the Nats 8 times and the Marlins 7.
I've got to admit that if I were an opposing fan I'd be fuming about the 'Stros schedule. Seeing as how I AM one, though, I love it!
Except the last two months of it.
by StrosDux on Apr 3, 2006 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions
speaking of Rollins
I'd say it's more difficult for Rollins
Whether or not Rollins' streak is "true," I personally think it is. No matter what happens though, Dimaggio's single-season streak probably will remain intact, while Rollins perhaps will have the record for double-season.
Rollins already has...
If he gets to 57, I'll be just as impressed as I would have been if he'd done it in the first 57 games of the season.
by Quietude on Apr 3, 2006 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions
The other thing about Rollins is
Return of Bo Hart?
However, Bo Hart was a flash in the pan because he merely took advantage of the grace period that many minor leaguers get after they are promoted to the Bigs and before the scouts get a good look at them. In the case of Miles, by contrast, he's already been scouted for three years. What gives?
The answer, it seems, is that Miles ain't a half-bad hitter. In three seasons with 858 at- bats, he sports a career .289 average. That's not an All-Star number, but that's a respectable contribution.
If he improves by just 10 more hits over his career, he's a career .300 batter.
As I said, not too shabby. And certainly, NOT Bo Hart.
The thing everyone's ignored...
by Quietude on Apr 3, 2006 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions
i dunno you guys
in that very narrow role, and with the right platoon partner (and maybe it's luna), then i could imagine him being a mark lemke type.
Homers VS Walks
homeruns, are sometimes rally killers even on offense. it clears the bases and makes ya "start the scoring" over. shannon talks about it a lot..
by 2ndprize on Apr 3, 2006 8:01 PM EDT reply actions
i don't....
diminishing reputations
Funny you should mention double plays
Was still living in the Spivey era then, so I might go into Miles' stats later on :)
by Neuronix on Apr 5, 2006 4:22 AM EDT reply actions




















