Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Game 1 Open Thread: April 3


carpenter             lieber
21-5, 2.83            17-13, 4.20

good to have this part of our lives back, no? baseballs in motion constantly -- pitched, hit, taken, hidden, tipped, broken off, misjudged, outrun, scuffed, thrown out of play, lost in the lights, snared, stroked, pegged, dug out of the dirt, driven high and deep, fired, flipped, dribbled, one-handed, and flared . . . . a swarm of charged particles; a big fusion reaction, just like the sun. and like the sun, baseball's gonna rise ev'y day from now till the first of november, whatever wins and losses the season may bring to our team and to each of us as individuals.

the "perfect world" box is back in place on the left-hand sidebar; it'll flex during the year as trends and lines of discussion come and go. also have a new poll up on the right-hand sidebar; i'll repeat this this one from time to time and chart the ebb and flow of our confidence in the team.

one other sidebar note: my apologies for the "Houston Astros Championship Season" ad. it's an SB Nation network ad; i wouldn't take these guys' unholy money if it were up to me. whatever you do, don't click on the damn thing or they'll re-up for another week or month or whatever.

in case you missed the news on junior spivey, scroll down one post -- he's been DFA'd, with plan A to send him to memphis.

i was so busy last week i never got time to organize my thoughts about the 2006 cards into any sort of coherent package to kick off the season. maybe the exercise would have been pointless anyway; almost anything i might say at this point is gonna be repetition or overkill. ye faithful readers already know how i feel, so rather than rehash it i'm just gonna chuck a few final considerations out there, beginning with this one:

It's Still the Preseason. the cardinal franchise has arrived at the same point the yankees and braves reached some years back: only october matters. the regular season is nothing to take seriously; it's a lark, a good time, a six-month series of exhibitions. that's not to say the cardinals are invincible; far from it, they could miss the playoffs under any number of scenarios. but simply making the playoffs is no longer enough; not even close. anything less than another world series appearance will be judged a disappointment. the 162 dress rehearsals will have their memorable plots and their indelible moments, but the handful of games that (we hope) will define this year are still a long, long way off.

as they're presently constructed, the cardinals have an all-too familiar look about them -- likely to win the nl central, then get bounced in the playoffs. so a big part of the drama in these 162 walk-throughs will be how well jock (and to a lesser extent tony/dave) can improve the cast -- and how much maneuvering room the owners will allow -- before the curtain lifts on october.

Three Stats I'll Be Watching.

  1. jason marquis' walk rate. through 26 starts last year, marquis issued 3.7 walks per 9 innings and had a 4.67 era; in his last 6 starts he issued 0.8 walks per 9 and cut his era in half, to 2.30. walks were never his main problem, but they were a telling symptom of it -- ie jason's tendency to make things too complicated on the mound. when he finally accepted duncan's advice and simplified matters -- fastball/sinker, pitch to contact -- the at-bats resolved in shorter order, and the walks naturally disappeared. this spring he walked 2.3 per 9 innings and had an era of about 2.00. i'm gonna set the cutoff point at about 2.5 walks per 9: if he's walking guys more often than that, i'll expect the same old inconsistency. if he's below that figure, he may take a big step forward.
  2. mark mulder's strikeout rate. most of y'are sick of hearing about this, but i still think it matters. he whiffed 4.8 batters per 9 in 2005; if he's below 5.0 again in 2006 i have a feeling his era's gonna end up north of 4.00. but they say his mechanics have been sharp this spring, enabling him to miss more bats -- 15 ks in 21.2 spring-training frames, an avg of 6.2 strikeouts per 9. if he can sustain a rate of 5.5. k/9 or above this season, then mulder might finally be the ace the cards hoped he would be when they acquired him.
  3. the cardinals' double-play rate. the cardinals' 196 double plays last year were the 19th-best total in mlb history, and the marginal value of all those twin killings was, conservatively, three wins. what are the odds that the 2006 cards can even come close to last year's total, which set a new franchise record? surprisingly good. the 18 other teams who recorded at least 196 double plays in a single season averaged 174 double plays in the following year, with a median total of 181; only 5 teams failed to turn at least 1 dp per game in the ensuing season. the cardinal pitching staff's extreme groundball emphasis hasn't changed, but the keystone combination has -- and the instability at 2b could prove costly. as long as the dp rate is at least 1.0 per game, i'll feel pretty good about it..

The Schedule: as acr noted here, it's tailor-made for a fast start; the cards will not face good pitching early on. their first 35 games include 5 against the reds, who may have the worst staff in the national league; 6 against the cubs, who will be without prior and wood; and 3 each against florida and colorado. they also have 6 against the pirates, who are tough at the top of the rotation (perez and duke) but soft in spots 3-5; depending on how the pitching pairings break, those may be easy games too.

their toughest stretch begins on june 20, when they face the defending champs for 3 at comiskey, then play detroit on the road and come home to take on the indians. after a 3-game breather vs the royals, they head back out on the road to close the first half in atlanta at houston. and it gets no easier after the all-star break -- their 1st 10 games are against the dodgers (7) and braves (3).

of the cards' 27 games after labor day, nearly half (13) will be against teams outside the division; the only divisional rivals they will face down the stretch are milwaukee and houston.

I Guesstimate the Cardinals Will Win 93 Games in 2006 Because . . . .

  1. History says so. the 2004-05 Cardinals are the 13th team of the divisional era (ie, post-1969) to log back-to-back 100-win seasons. the previous 12 teams won an average of 94 games in the 3d year -- ie, the year after the 2d 100-win season -- and saw their victory total decline by an average of 8 wins.
  2. Diamond Mind says so. in three separate multi-trial simulations based on this computer game, the cardinals ended up with between 93 and 96 wins. the diamond-mind projections have a pretty good track record.
  3. Las Vegas says so. the over-under on the cardinals is 93 games.
  4. I said so last spring. although my 93-win prediction was way too low in 2005, the possibility exists that i actually had the right win total, just the wrong year. so i'm going with the same number again.
i'll be in a work (so-called) session until mid-afternoon and won't get back to my computer before the first pitch, so this slapdash post will also have to serve as today's game thread. play ball.

Comment 68 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If 3 of your questions are answered positively:
  1.  Double plays
  2.  Marquis walks
  3.  Mulder Ks
I think this could be a VERY good season.  2 pitchers on a roll (besides Carp) could really get us going.

by sdrone on Apr 3, 2006 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Work stinks...
I have to do it today as well, lots of it the past few weeks.  That's why I've been a flake and not gotten discs out to the people who requested them.  I'm going to wait until the week after Easter as I'm getting another Wilco show and will send both.

On baseball notes, I'M GOING TO THE GAME SATURDAY!!!!  Wrigley Field!  My friend, who is the man, screwed up and bought tickets for this game instead of the one he wanted in August.  I get them!  My parents are coming up to visit and this is my mom's early mother's day gift.  Blecher seats.  I'm torn, help me out.  Left field to catch potential home runs are CF to be behind the great Jim Edmonds?  Thoughts?  

93 seems good as any. I'll take the over though.  If time allows, I'll post a diary on the mood here in Milwauke and why a good Brewer fan base is good for the Cardinals.  

by Brock20 on Apr 3, 2006 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Wrigley
Hey Brock

I'll be @ the game on Sat. too.  I live in Chicago, so I catch them up here whenever I can.

As far as Wrigley goes, I'd skip the bleachers.  They are HIGHLY overrated and expensive.  You'll get alot of drunk frat boy types out there too who have no idea what is going on on the field.

There aren't many bad seats in Wrigley, unless you're upper deck "obstructed view" of course!!

Enjoy the game

by jschryver138 on Apr 3, 2006 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's where our seats are...
I would prefer elsewhere, but can't pick hand me down seats.  I usually average one game at Wrigley a year. Last year, it was the Sunday night game against the Red Sox.  My wife leveraged the best come back I've heard in a long time.  We were walking around the backside of Wrigley, with her two cousins who are seven and ten, when two frat boys started chanting "SWEEEP" at us.  My wife let them get four feet from us, and held up her hand and said, "RING!"  

I must admit I was pretty damn proud of her at that moment.  

Wrigley staff wouldn't let the kids down by the field though, because we didn't have seats down there.  I think all kids, regardless of ticket, should be let down on the rail for BP.  

by Brock20 on Apr 3, 2006 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thunderstorms
scheduled to hit by 4pm in Philly today....

by salvomania on Apr 3, 2006 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Play Ball
Thank god. I'm always out of sorts till baseball comes back, but for some reason this off-season seemed extra excruciating.

GO BIRDS!!

by rockin redbird on Apr 3, 2006 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Ponson instead of Morris
suggests the cards have a good chance of coming close to the DP total from last season.

I think the Cards will be able to win >99 games this season, based on their pitching staff and my percieved lack of strength in the National League.

by elderj on Apr 3, 2006 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Cubs up 5-0 in the 1st...
Pierre leadoff triple, followed by double, walk, single, error, DP, 3-r homer by Murton...

Womack leads off bottom of the 1st with a 4-pitch walk off the Jackal.

by salvomania on Apr 3, 2006 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Wainwright
Miklasz reporting the possibility that Wainwright could start the game instead of Carpenter. The thinking apparently is that if the starter is going to have to come out after a couple of innings because of a rain delay, better to save Carp til tomorrow.

That being said, it appears Carpenter is warming up.

DCGreg

by DCGreg on Apr 3, 2006 2:54 PM EDT reply actions  

lineup
  1. Eck
  2. Enc
  3. APu
  4. JEd
  5. Rolen
  6. Gooch
  7. Yadi
  8. Miles
  9. Carp
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred on Apr 3, 2006 3:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe we're spoiled, but
that looks like an ugly lineup to me. Maybe we'll only win the Central by 8 or 9 games this year...
Visit Cork, Ireland!

by gbrusca on Apr 3, 2006 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Ireland
I'm studying int'l law in Ireland this summer.  I'll be at universities in Dingle, Renvyle, Galway, and Dublin...is Cork close and easily accessible to any of those places?

by Toddius396 on Apr 3, 2006 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

mlb.tv
is anyone else having problems with mlb.tv?  i cant seem to use real player.  its forcing me to go with windows media player, which needless to say sucks.

by dmb60614 on Apr 3, 2006 3:16 PM EDT reply actions  

at least
you guys can get mlbtv. i'm in a financial quandry where i can't even afford that. at least EI has a free preview going...

by cardsrul on Apr 3, 2006 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

21-pitch inning in the 1st for Lieber...
...and a very scary 1st pitch for Carp as both Rolen and Eckstein nearly get killed chasing a foul pop....

Nice catch by ECK!!!

by salvomania on Apr 3, 2006 3:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Should we be at all concerned...
...with three strikeouts in the 1st at the hands of Lieber?

by bgh on Apr 3, 2006 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

fwiw, I see today's 3B umpire...
... is none other than our friend from Game 4 of last year's NLCS, Phil Cuzzi.

And I see that Albert has just homered. Yeah, he's ready to go.  :-)  Too bad Eck and Juan Enc haven't gotten on base today, otherwise this thing could be 4-0 now instead of 2-0.

by DCRedbird on Apr 3, 2006 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

elegant simplicity
Scoring Summary
Top 1st: St. Louis  
- J. Edmonds doubled to deep right, A. Pujols scored, J. Edmonds to third advancing on throw

Top 3rd: St. Louis  
- A. Pujols homered to deep left

by madridbend on Apr 3, 2006 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cubbies
I see that the Reds have tied the Cubs now.

by Archaeopteryx on Apr 3, 2006 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Miles!
Have we found our 2b?? I know, I know...one game only...

by cmat on Apr 3, 2006 4:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't care what anyone says
I still don't like Aaron Miles. But, hell, it's opening day, so he's my new favorite Cardinal. Bo Hart redux!
Visit Cork, Ireland!

by gbrusca on Apr 3, 2006 4:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't hate on Miles just yet....
He just came up big with a 2 run triple.

by wcheuk on Apr 3, 2006 4:06 PM EDT reply actions  

make a note
This may be the only point in the season Carp has as many RBIs as Pujols.

by photoman on Apr 3, 2006 4:08 PM EDT reply actions  

eh
So much for that.

by photoman on Apr 3, 2006 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

ROLEN!!
I am a happy, happy, camper...

by cmat on Apr 3, 2006 4:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Good idea to walk edmonds to pitch to Rolen?
Maybe not.
Way to go Scott for making em pay...
10-0
OC Cards Fan

by OCCardsFan on Apr 3, 2006 4:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Question for stat people
When did Rolen last hit a home run?  I know he was 0-fer in spring training.  Wow!! What a start to the season.  

by wcheuk on Apr 3, 2006 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

his last homer
came on may 10 2005 --- the day before he injured himself

by lboros on Apr 3, 2006 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

So much for acquiring Dunn
A friend watching the Cubs game says he has 2 errors, and on the last one he just fell down chasing a ball.

by sdrone on Apr 3, 2006 4:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Does all the off-season worrying seem overdone...
I know,I know, it's only four innings... but, BOY, did those two jacks look good!  (Keep booing Scotty, you [bleeper-bleepers]!)

by The Ol Goaler on Apr 3, 2006 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Scotty Slam!
boy, nice way to start the season, eh? I know it's just one game, but recall some of the offseason question marks:
  1. Will Rolen still have HR power to left? Check.
  2. Will the offense be able to score runs? Check. (everybody in the lineup has a hit today)
  3. Is Miles an OK stop-gap at 2B? Check.
Go Cards!

by DCRedbird on Apr 3, 2006 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Miles...
3 for 3...can he hit for the cycle today?

by cmat on Apr 3, 2006 4:34 PM EDT reply actions  

wha?
who said we couldn't hit?  we sure are raking today.
albert is scary good.

by jroman on Apr 3, 2006 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe this Miles kid deserves a shot.
Only one game, but so far a pretty good game.

Plus, Scotty's back. Heh, heh, heh.

by madridbend on Apr 3, 2006 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Second dinger for Pujols today
Good Lord, these guys ate their Wheaties this morning. Hey guys, save some runs for the postseason!

by DCRedbird on Apr 3, 2006 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

This is a nice surprise
but remember that offensive bursts are different from consistency.  I'd exceedingly encouraged by this start but I'll reserve some of my optimism for a few weeks from now.

Still, Rolen + Homer = sigh of relief

by azruavatar on Apr 3, 2006 4:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Carp
holding the fort but giving up his share of hits...I can't watch the game, so how does he look?

by cmat on Apr 3, 2006 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

he's throwing strikes
but he's getting some pitches up. breaking ball doesn't look sharp

by lboros on Apr 3, 2006 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doing what he's supposed to do
When you're up 10-0, THROW STRIKES.

OK, so Burrell takes him yard with 3 balls.  Better than walking him.  I don't think Carp is finessing anything right now.  Fling away, this one's in the bag.

by tinstl on Apr 3, 2006 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

homers vs. walk
How can giving up a homerun be better than walking him?  One scores someone for sure, the other puts a man on first base, with no guarantee that he'll score or even advance.  I respectfully disagree with you.

In other news, Al Pujols is a BEAST.  I hope that means that Rolen is back, too.  And I hope this isn't indicative of how Carp is going to pitch...I hope it's just that it's the first game.

by Toddius396 on Apr 3, 2006 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Homer vs. Walk
The point is that with a 10 run lead, you  make the other guy beat you.  Even if a pitcher makes a relatively "fat" pitch (unless Bonds or Pujols or A-Rod) is at the plate, chances are its nothing more than a well hit out.  

by Zubin on Apr 3, 2006 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

the schedule
I'm glad you brought up the schedule.  I've never seen this mentioned anywhere else but this year we play 16 games vs. the astros.  Rather than having 8 in Houston and 8 at home, 10 of those 16 games are in Houston!  Does anyone else see a problem with this?  I hope it won't matter (though it certainly could) but I can't believe that, for whatever reason, mlb decided to give houston the home field advantage in their games vs. the cardinals.  Maybe schedule-makers could rationalize this by our games v. kc or maybe they've made up for it some other way but I've yet to hear any kind of justification.

by chuckb on Apr 3, 2006 5:40 PM EDT reply actions  

re: the schedule...
I'm obviously an Astros fan, so forgive me for sticking my nose in here, but...

It's the 'Stros schedule, quite frankly. The 'Stros don't have an easy schedule (IMHO. Check out their August/September schedule. It's brutal), BUT they have easily the most unbalanced schedule in their favor in the division.

Things of note:

They play no team more than 16 times. They have the same unbalance in their favor (9-10 home games) vs. the Cubs (10 home games of 16, I believe) and the Reds (9 home games of 15).

They do, however, play 10 of 16 on the Road vs. the Brewers and 9 of 15 vs. the Pirates. (BTW, SEVEN of the 10 Brewers road games are in 3 1/2 wks in late Aug/early Sept.)

IOW, in division they don't have a single even SLIGHTLY balanced season series. Lazy scheduling

Out of the division they don't play the Indians in interleague AND the face the D-backs 9 times, the Nats 8 times and the Marlins 7.

I've got to admit that if I were an opposing fan I'd be fuming about the 'Stros schedule. Seeing as how I AM one, though, I love it!

Except the last two months of it.

by StrosDux on Apr 3, 2006 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

rollins doubles.
good for him.  glad it didn't do any damage, of course!
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred on Apr 3, 2006 5:49 PM EDT reply actions  

speaking of Rollins
I'm curious what people think about this. Can a hitting streak (or scoreless innings or whatever) carry over legitimately from one season to the next? I'd say no. I don't want to hear people talking about Rollins chasing DiMaggio if the guy starts out w/a ten-game streak this season that is "added" to the streak he ended with last year.

by DCRedbird on Apr 3, 2006 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd say it's more difficult for Rollins
since he had a 5-month lull in the streak.  

Whether or not Rollins' streak is "true," I personally think it is.  No matter what happens though, Dimaggio's single-season streak probably will remain intact, while Rollins perhaps will have the record for double-season.  

matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred on Apr 3, 2006 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rollins already has...
the longest hit streak across multiple seasons with his hit today.

If he gets to 57, I'll be just as impressed as I would have been if he'd done it in the first 57 games of the season.

by Quietude on Apr 3, 2006 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The other thing about Rollins is
I would really like for him to at least come close to 57.  Rollins by all accounts is a decent and likeable person chasing a "hallowed" record, as opposed to a certain other person chasing a "hallowed" record ...
matty fred is a web log.

by matty fred on Apr 3, 2006 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Return of Bo Hart?
Is Aaron Miles the next Bo Hart?  The comparison is attractive given their shared diminutive stature and position, i.e., 2d base.  

However, Bo Hart was a flash in the pan because he merely took advantage of the grace period that many minor leaguers get after they are promoted to the Bigs and before the scouts get a good look at them.  In the case of Miles, by contrast, he's already been scouted for three years.  What gives?

The answer, it seems, is that Miles ain't a half-bad hitter.  In three seasons with 858 at- bats, he sports a career .289 average.  That's not an All-Star number, but that's a respectable contribution.

If he improves by just 10 more hits over his career, he's a career .300 batter.  

As I said, not too shabby.  And certainly, NOT Bo Hart.

So says, The Dude

by Titus Pullo on Apr 3, 2006 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

The thing everyone's ignored...
in looking at his home/road splits is that he was a quality hitter in old Busch.  .375 average (9-24) in 24 ABs with a .375 OBP and .542 SLG.  If new Busch plays similarly and he can post numbers that are just a slight dropoff from those, I'll be thrilled.

by Quietude on Apr 3, 2006 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dunno you guys
i admire the guy for getting to the bigs and performing well enough to have a career . . . . but i've watched him play out here in colorado, and he's just not very good. not enough range to play short, not enough bat to play third . . . he's at best the lh half of a 2b platoon.

in that very narrow role, and with the right platoon partner (and maybe it's luna), then i could imagine him being a mark lemke type.

by lboros on Apr 3, 2006 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Homers VS Walks
up 10-0, making guys beat you with a homerun is better than walking guys. when guys are on base the whole dynamic changes, they string together a few hits, and it could have gotten ugly.

homeruns, are sometimes rally killers even on offense. it clears the bases and makes ya "start the scoring" over. shannon talks about it a lot..

by 2ndprize on Apr 3, 2006 8:01 PM EDT reply actions  

i don't....
i think he needs to hit in 56 straight games in one season. dimaggio is my favorite player and i just don't want rollins to take away the only thing he ever had. But guess i'm happy that the new is overcomeing the old.

by tnek5 on Apr 3, 2006 8:38 PM EDT reply actions  

diminishing reputations
I'm beginning to take less and less stock in this theory that a fallen record makes that player less known in baseball lore.  Babe Ruth has been in 2nd place for 20 years now, and many still think of him as the HR hitter.  He certainly doesn't have any sort of reduced stature (pun intended).  Sure, Aaron wound up with more overall, but he didn't spend his first few years as a pitcher.  I'm sure if Rollins beats 56, people will say "Yeah, but if Joe D hadn't had to cut his career short, he'd have made a longer streak later on." or something like that.  My point is that people will still recognize how good DiMaggio was regardless of whether he holds the record for longest hitting streak.

by john vb on Apr 4, 2006 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

sorry
just shoot me and my bad typing skills.

by tnek5 on Apr 3, 2006 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Funny you should mention double plays
I wrote about that last week!

Was still living in the Spivey era then, so I might go into Miles' stats later on :)

by Neuronix on Apr 5, 2006 4:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols