adam kennedy and kip wells reportedly signed by cards
posted 15 minutes ago by bernie miklasz at the pressbox:
Kip Wells in the back end of the rotation...
Gary Bennett re-signed as backup catcher...
Eli Marrero signed to a minor-league deal.
i'll withhold judgment until i have a chance to do a little research and see the exact dollar amounts. i also want to see the rest of the cards' moves.
none of these players costs the cardinals a draft pick.
Update [2006-11-28 15:11:39 by lboros]: here's the 1st bit of good news: ken rosenthal says the cards got kennedy for 3 yrs / $10m, a decent enough deal for the club.
Update [2006-11-28 17:18:4 by lboros]: wells signed for one year, $4m. bennett will make $900K.
Update [2006-11-28 15:17:18 by lboros]: kennedy's ZIPS projection for 2007 is pretty flimsy: .277 / .335 / .370. last year's PECOTA numbers for kennedy project him to .267 / .326 / .385 . . . . if anybody has bill james' projection, please put it in the comments.
Update [2006-11-28 15:23:43 by lboros]: kennedy did not hit left-handers in 2006: .193 / .256 / .277 vs them last season (83 at-bats). that's well below his career performance vs lhp and probably just an aberration. vs right-handers last year, kennedy hit a robust .291 / .351 / .408; his career line vs right-handers is .287 / .338 / .417.
Update [2006-11-28 15:35:27 by lboros]: wells looks like this year's version of sidney ponson --- a groundball pitcher with a big body whose last good season was 2003. here's his career mark, vs jeff suppan's career mark when he signed with the cardinals:
| w-l | era | whip | k/9 | k/bb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| suppan | 62-75 | 4.90 | 1.42 | 5.0 | 1.7 |
| wells | 57-74 | 4.46 | 1.49 | 6.6 | 1.6 |
Update [2006-11-28 16:7:51 by lboros]: scouting report on wells, from baseball prospectus: "wells doesn?t have an outstanding pitch, but he can get to the mid-90s with his sinking fastball, though his comfort zone is lower. He also has an average curve and average slider, but he lacks a change or split to keep hitters off-balance. When Wells keeps the ball down consistently, he can win." his comparables at baseball prospectus: #2 is jason schmidt, #3 is russ ortiz, and #20 is ernie broglio.
Update [2006-11-28 16:17:9 by lboros]: here's a scouting report from stats inc.: "Wells has the arsenal to be a very successful starting pitcher in the major leagues. He has a lively fastball that routinely is in the 91-93 MPH range and can be dialed up to 96 MPH when he needs a little something extra. Wells also has a hard slider with good late bite and a curveball that he throws at varying speeds, though he sometimes has a problem controlling it. His changeup is serviceable and would be even better if he didn't tend to overthrow it in tight situations. Wells is not the innings-eater type you look for in a potential No. 1 starter, as he tends to lose his effectiveness around the 100-pitch mark."
Update [2006-11-28 16:4:24 by lboros]: back to kennedy for a second --- his defense isn't so hot, according to various diff'nt systems. both chris dial's Zone Rating Plus and david pinto's PMR estimate that kennedy cost his team 6 runs in 2006. he fares better in chris davenport's system --- 11 runs better than the avg 2b. the most recent UZR rating i could find for kennedy dates to 2004; he was 2d best in the league at his position, saving an estimated 12 runs.
157 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rosenthal is reporting
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6216252
by vince eating tarp on Nov 28, 2006 3:03 PM EST reply actions
wow
Wells scares me though, unless we got for good money. I'd personally much rather have Lilly.
we can still...
by cards4ever on Nov 28, 2006 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
Thank God
Finally some action. I was concerned this year was going to end up like last when we couldn't get anything done.
It's not all that's needed, but I'm glad to see this much.
I'm particularly glad to see Wells cheap and Bennett back catching.
Don't stop now, Walt!
I like it alot
Schmidt
It would make sense
Go get Zito, Walt--please?
Kennedy
for wells
by cards4ever on Nov 28, 2006 3:17 PM EST reply actions
It's a start..
Good and bad
I also like Eli comming back to the Cards. He was a great utility guy. Played all over the place.
Kip Wells is a decent 4 or 5. I want to see the money though.
I don't like the signing of Bennett to be the back up. He helped us while Yadi was hurt, but that was a spoof and I don't see it happening again. I would have rather used Rose from Memphis
by Edmonds is baseball on Nov 28, 2006 3:21 PM EST reply actions
rose
by cards4ever on Nov 28, 2006 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
I also like the Marrero signing
Is Kennedy really worth...
$400,000 and change for a .270/.320/.360 season or $3.3 million for a .275/.330/.380 season? What was the point?
I don't think so
by Pujols4Pres on Nov 28, 2006 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
if the cards really spend $100m on payroll
Payroll
by its in the cards on Nov 28, 2006 5:15 PM EST up reply actions
I agree
by Pujols4Pres on Nov 28, 2006 6:01 PM EST up reply actions
I suppose...
Larry
Bill James...
Wells 24 GS, 138 IP, 144 Hits, 99:63 K:BB, 16 HRs
Just read this on the ESPN.com article...
Kennedy
Agent Paul Cohen said Kennedy turned down more money from two other clubs that had an interest. The Toronto Blue Jays are believed to be one of those teams.
"Adam's going to the World Series champs, to one of the two or three best baseball cities in America, to a place where he's been and he knows well,'' Cohen said. "On a 1-10 happiness scale, he's like a 12 right now.''
Kennedy is a .280 hitter over eight big-league seasons with the Cardinals and Angels.
This is good to hear, IMO.
THis makes me
Marrero not really a C anymore
It would...
I'm in the same place. My question
But please, let's not oversell Eli Marrero. He's not even Larry Bigbie, fer chrissakes.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Nov 28, 2006 9:07 PM EST up reply actions
I like this..
This does save us some money to use for someone else.
Not to mention
Does anyone know
by El Schweenador on Nov 28, 2006 4:08 PM EST reply actions
Eckstein and Kennedy...
I propose we borrow a nickname and start calling them the "Vanilla Midgets" now.
by Quietude on Nov 28, 2006 4:11 PM EST reply actions
958 3Y OPS against LHP
Kennedy was cheap and will be able to fill the 7 or 8 slot (and there are no better prospects coming up soon). 3 for 10 is at least not overspending which is good.
Wells' salary figure will be interesting. I gotta believe it is about 3/20. Anyone else want to hazard a guess before it becomes public?
Bennett - Well the guy did single handedly allow us to make the playoffs. Lifetime pass!!! Although I was pining for J.R. House.
Back to work before I am caught! This will make for outstanding speculation on the big fish as these minor moves make you think that there is a big move in the works (Dontrelle???)
Type of free agent
types
The 18th pick is still secure.
by edgesofsanity on Nov 28, 2006 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
That OPS split
he was 4-for-29 vs. lefties in '06;
22-for-89 (.247) vs. lefties in '05;
then a crazy .415 (44-for-106) vs. LHP in '04;
but a pedestrian (if even that) 28-for-123 (.228) during 2002-03.
Does NOT seem like a good platoon bet vs. LHP in 2007...
Glad someone else noticed...
by El Schweenador on Nov 28, 2006 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
Marrero vs. LH, not incl. 2004
.233/.307/.431
I don't know what I'd call that except that I wouldn't use any form of the word "mash."
E-lie
by Jonathan23 on Nov 28, 2006 5:46 PM EST up reply actions
Yes he had the most PA in '04
That makes his .414 avg vs. LH in 2004 aberrant, compared to his hitting .233 vs LH in the other 82.2% of his career.
Are you really arguing that the fluke season Marrero had in 2004 is really indicative of his talent/potential going forward?
Including 2004, Marrero has a career OPS+ of 85. He's 33 years old. He may turn out to be the '07 version of Scott Spiezio v.06, but more likely, he'll be the Eli Marrero of 2005-06, except worse.
Hmm
Throw out his aberrant '02-'03 (which are, fairly, less recent than '04) and he's a .315 hitter against left handers.
Additionally, '04 he had more plate appearances than the other years, save '02, so maybe this is more indicative of his actual results when healthy? Or maybe '04 is more indicative of how he'll hit when he's not catching, than say '02, when he was splitting time there and his body was taking the usual beating?
I think there are much better reasons to lable years abberant than because it was a successful year.
by Jonathan23 on Nov 28, 2006 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
Technically
So yeah, I agree, we can't just go around tossing away certain years at will.
Correction
Wells doesn't have a big body (6'3 205) and won't have the same conditioning problems that ultimately brought Ponson to the DFA platter (and to other literal ones). I've been pumping Wells for a few weeks (and called that we would sign him in June), as long as it's around 2 or 3.5 guaranteed, it's a good high reward/low risk deal for a 5th starter.
Kennedy over Miles
Miles: 86, 75, 75
Kennedy: 98, 97, 90
Let Miles play vs. lefties
press conference
by cards07 on Nov 28, 2006 4:33 PM EST reply actions
mighty mice
Kennedy is 6'1"
by ryanisforever on Nov 28, 2006 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
really?
550
by Pujols4Pres on Nov 28, 2006 4:39 PM EST reply actions
in other cardinal news
Does he have a chance?
by Ignatius J Reilly on Nov 28, 2006 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
Don't you only have six years w/ the writers?
It's 15 years
by 26thMan on Nov 28, 2006 7:33 PM EST up reply actions
don't believe the systems
So, does the Kennedy signing in effect make the trade...Bottenfield for Edmonds? =p
by STLCardinalsFan on Nov 28, 2006 4:44 PM EST reply actions
Bennett $
I'm fine with Kennedy
Kip Wells?
I'm happy with the other moves and some ex-Cards coming back, but... ugh.
contract details for all of them
wells, 1 year $4 million. bennett, 1 year $900,000
really can't complain about that Wells contract
cards signings
by cards4ever on Nov 28, 2006 5:06 PM EST up reply actions
Too much guaranteed by a bit
a team can absorb a 4 M dollar hit
On the Other Hand
I like it simply b/c it's cheap and provides him incentive to prove something.
by DuncanDipper on Nov 28, 2006 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
Something in the high minors
Wow if that's the money
I'm not thrilled by Kennedy. The $$$ and years don't bother me, 10/3 isn't bad but I just don't think he can hit and at best he's a nuetral fielder imo. If they platoon him religiously with Miles, that may suffice but I'd have liked to get a better production line out of 2b. I also wonder if the team doesn't plan to take a look at Brendan Ryan at SS next year depending on how his AAA goes this year. He's done well in the AFL but it could be a fluke.
Bennett and Marrero get a 'who cares' as far as I'm concerned. The only way we were going to upgrade at C was Piazza to share time and Marrero seems like Timo Perez from last year.
Backup Catcher
The Kennedy deal is surprisingly reasonable. If his bat bounces back, it'll be a steal. I'm sure he'll outplay Mark DeRosa for cheaper in 2007.
Was poking through some stats earlier and noticed that AAA FA Tim Redding, five years removed from big prospect status with the Astros, had put together a nice season with the White Sox IL affiliate last year:
<center>Stats | Splits</center>
He'd add good depth to the rotation. Can't hurt to approach him now with a minor-league contract.
Ah, right
Former Cubs/Jays RHRP Hugo Castellanos put up some pretty attractive numbers starting in Mexican ball last season as a starter and carried it over in the winter.
It's not that we couldn't have a better backup
I seem to remember
by viva el rojo pajaro 42 on Nov 28, 2006 8:57 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sorry...
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:07 PM EST reply actions
if not
...coming from someone who knows :o)
I feel confident...
I'm just looking for props in vain to calling this signing.
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:18 PM EST up reply actions
i agree
$$$ and years are completely satisfactory imo
i got your props
by TheFranchise9 on Nov 29, 2006 1:30 AM EST up reply actions
adam eaton and ted lilly got all the attention...
he's the cheapest young sinkerballer out there.
I'm happy with the signing and feel confident that he is the type of pitcher duncan work with... i.e. already a groundballer. eaton, lilly and wolf never really fit this mold. also, the one year deal allows the cardinals to bridge the gap to more promissing pitchers next offseason... Jake Westbrook, Jason Jennings, and Mark Buehrle.
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:16 PM EST up reply actions
I hope you're right
stat wise...
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:34 PM EST up reply actions
LBoros Already Did a Roster Matrix with Kennedy
It's here.
Incidentally, the title of that Roster Matrix was "Acquite Jason Schmidt!!" Just noticin' . . . .
forgot about it...
it also has Schmidt @ 13 million. i think it'll take at least 15 million now... maybe more. but the total was at 94.7 million.
it's starting to look realistic. substitute Wilson's presumed 2.5 million for Spiezio, add one million to Edmonds' price, and we're just about there. a few hundred thousand here or there, and the roster has held fairly close to reality.
which means that, if we could sign Schmidt, we'd still have 6-8 million left over for spare parts or another starter.
of course, we can't sign Schmidt, because he wants to play in Seattle. but the money is probably there.
quick numbers
by Birds on the Matt on Nov 28, 2006 5:20 PM EST reply actions
from my research
by cards4ever on Nov 28, 2006 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
Two more starters and possibly a LF for that
Can we get a Kip Wells Post??
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:24 PM EST reply actions
I'll volunteer to do it?
I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be a nuisance, but I'm very excited about this deal, and excited by the possibility that maybe I do, in fact, understand a very little something about baseball.
by ilillillli on Nov 28, 2006 5:39 PM EST up reply actions
then lets
Regarding Wells:
First Name: 9 K / 9 IP..... pretty darn good
Last Name: Just 1 W for every 2 L's.... .333 ain't gonna cut it.
Not thrilled with Kennedy
My main concern is he is just not a good productive hitter. And unless Yadi can have a big improvement hitting next year, the bottom of our order will be a black hole.
I just can't imagine opposing pitchers getting too worried facing Juan Enc, then Yadi, then Kennedy then the pitcher.
Unless Jocketty has something up his sleeve as far as a trade for a power hitter for LF, I am not impressed with a big chunk of our line-up. Let's pray Edmonds has a huge comeback year and Rolen stays healthy!!!
Typical Cardinals
nothing flashy, but the needs were filled. Typical Cardinals.
Lineup...
I see him in the seven spot, unless Yadi hits better this year moving Kennedy down to #8.
Eckstein 290/345/360
Duncan 275/350/485
Pujols 331/425/650
Rolen 305/395/560
Edmonds 265/375/520
Encarnacion 280/320/450
Kennedy 302/355/375
Molina 265/330/425
Pitcher
where are you getting your numbers from
are you just making guesstimates at what they will do next year. I don't think Kennedy is gonna hit .300 next year.
Sorry...
.312/.345/.449 2002
.300/.355/.370 2004
So, I think it's within reason. Maybe not from the seven hole, though...
It won't be at 2
by Baily on Nov 28, 2006 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
my 2 cents..
As to Kennedy....I've watched him here in LA since he came over..not the best fielder I've ever seen..but he will be a decent defender and I think we will see some timely hits out of this guy. I like the pick-up but I'm sure going to miss the Gangsta B!...
Why?
You are assuming that his perceived value
by Hardcore Legend on Nov 28, 2006 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, I tried to be clever and backfired
by Hardcore Legend on Nov 29, 2006 12:16 AM EST up reply actions
Duncan stays
Now watch them trade him. :)
by vince eating tarp on Nov 28, 2006 10:47 PM EST up reply actions
er
how about the guy they are backing
by vince eating tarp on Nov 29, 2006 8:03 AM EST up reply actions
Wells...
I want to boil this down to its simplest form...We owe kip wells at least $4M for one year. We paid approx $5M for Marquis last year. It is not likely he sucks as bad as Marquis...and if he does we owe him only $4M as I am guessing no pitcher could earn any incentives if they pitched any one season like Marquis did last year. Unless of course, the incentives of the contract were based on breathing.
In that case...this is a good deal. Seriously, in this crazy market, we are paying a guy with a great gb to fb ratio - (and likely more between the ears) $1M less than Marquis earned last year....and no commitment beyond that.
How can you object to that?
by wrv18 on Nov 28, 2006 6:11 PM EST reply actions
RE: ELI MARRERO...
Plus, his wife is sooo cute!
by Vince Coleman Firecrackers on Nov 28, 2006 6:27 PM EST reply actions
per bernie...
- were looking at other 2B, but Kennedy really wanted to be here, and signed for less than what he would have gotten elsewhere. La Russa wanted him; thinks he's a tough, winning player.
- Talking to Alan Hendricks about Jason Schmidt.... has had a couple of good conversations...Jocketty indicates they will make a competitive bid for Schmidt... Hendricks is also Kip Wells' agent.
- Duncan really wanted Kip Wells -- ground ball machine, anxious to be here, they think a winning atmosphere will bring out the best in him.
- they did have a meeting in Florida with Soriano and his agent -- La Russa even flew in from California for the meeting -- but backed away when they found out Soriano wanted 8 years for over 100 million.
- still waiting on Wainwright and whether they will use him in relief or in the rotation.... depends on what they can do in finding a couple of starting pitchers.
- wants to add a veteran bat; reminded us about the wisdom of waiting for whether some guys are offered arbitration by their teams. (they don't want to give up draft picks).
- not much going on with Suppan or Weaver.... only one conversation so far with Boras (weaver's guy)... but he thinks they are waiting for the market to be set even more...
- is exploring both trades and FA for those two starting pitchers...
- So Taguchi will be back...
by matt reeder on Nov 28, 2006 7:05 PM EST reply actions
I guess I can live with So coming back
Two words...
and a shift from So to Skip wouldn't save that much money. plus, it seems like we may need a RH bat, even if it's got no pop.
So Taguchi
i think so...
unless he tears it up in Spring Training. honestly, i'm not even sure why we signed him. i guess he's this year's Timo, as someone already said.
skip schumaker
if he makes less than $1M
Yep, and if Marrero
by MdRedbirdFreak on Nov 28, 2006 9:22 PM EST up reply actions
pitcher and veteran bat
re: pitcher
I'm fine with filling out the back of the rotation with guys like Weaver and Wells, etc. I'm fine with starting Wainwright off in the pen but I hope they learned their lesson from last year when they gave Marquis 30+ starts. If a player is consistantly bad and you have a replacement in the wings, PULL THE PLUG. If Wells bombs, I hope they don't hesitate to replace him with Wainwright or Narveson.
I think one of the most important reasons to get Schmidt (or Zito) is because they can go deep into games. I don't have confidence in Wells or Reyes consistently going 6IP. When our rotation doesn't log enough innings it causes our bullpen to get overtaxed (see 2006 when Suppan, Marquis and Mulder couldn't make it out of the 4th to save their lives). Even if Schmidt regresses (and Zito isn't as good as his reputation imo but still averaged 6.5IP per start), he's still dependable for 6IP and not overtaxing the bullpen. Right now only Carpenter can be relied on for 6IP and I think that is a serious concern.
It might be me but...
We can make moves later on. The Astros can't do that.
I still think Walt plans on moving Juan. I never thought he planned on seing that contract to the end. Ask yourself this. What would Juan get this year based on Pierre and Mathews? At least 5@$50M and you can have him for 2@$10M?!? To bad the Giants don't have anything to trade for.
Pipe dream
Defensive Assessment
Not what I asked Santa for, but...
So right now Cards have a #1 (Carpenter), a #3 (Reyes) and a #5 (Wells) with potentially Wainright moving into the rotation if just one more pitcher is signed.
Reyes probably moves to #4 if Suppan or Weaver re-ups, yes? Is Lilly someone who could be a #2 starter? Any serious effort being made for a 1-year incentive-laden deal for Mulder?
by Baily on Nov 28, 2006 9:39 PM EST reply actions
Loretta
Lilly could be a #2 but I have a strong feeling he is going to end up in SF...
A good day for the Cards.....
Wells at 4 mil--fits the profile of a Duncan reclamation projectc. Are you kidding me? Wolf at 8 mil or Wells at 4? Any word on whether the Cards hold an option for year 2? I'd be interested...
Bennett--fine. Must have been OK in the clubhouse--he started to hit later in the season.
Marrero--I like. Only 33. Hit well for ATL in 2004, just hasn't stayed healthy the past couple of years. He'll get in great shape and a have a strong chance to compete for a roster spot in the spring. Like his versatility (can still catch).
Taguchi--According to Bernie (per his radio interview with Walt) will be back. You gotta like So.
by stanchar @ Viva El Birdos on Nov 28, 2006 9:49 PM EST reply actions
I'm happy....
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Nov 28, 2006 9:50 PM EST reply actions
Eric Gagne anyone?
by DimitroffVodka on Nov 28, 2006 10:07 PM EST reply actions
So Taguchi
by DimitroffVodka on Nov 28, 2006 10:09 PM EST reply actions
Still could sign him?
by Baily on Nov 28, 2006 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
These Moves...
Hilarious clip from a TV show:
Check out this link: Pretty funny stuff.
That was
by vince eating tarp on Nov 28, 2006 11:00 PM EST up reply actions
"in that case...
Something tells me he used that line before.
finally!!!!!
but hey just glad they have gotten to work
kennedy-very surprised he took 3/10, and i am happy with him at that price
wells-once again, happy with the price, even happier it was for one year, very little risk
bennett-he is ok, not enough money to care much either way
marrero-low risk, if he plays well, u keep him, if not you dont, simple as that, nothing to lose for the team
i just hope this allows them to get a big time pitcher now, like schmidt, with wainwright in the rotation, or leave wainy in the pen and get two from among lilly, padilla, meche, supp, weaver
not sure about the moves yet
but long way to go to april, so lets see what else they do
Kennedy comments/GM profiles
"The Cardinals have reportedly reached an agreement with free agent second baseman Adam Kennedy on a three-year, $10 million contract. That effectively takes the Cards out of the running as a possible Marcus Giles destination. It's also a relatively sane contract compared to what has being handed out elsewhere, and it is more reasonable for a more proven commodity than the three years and $13 million that DeRo got from the Cubs. Kennedy's contract is the same money and length that former fellow Angel David Eckstein got two years ago from the Cards.
It is interesting that from the Cardinals' perspective, the value for middle infielders has not changed in the last couple of years, yet everywhere else they seem to be exploding. I also think it further underscores that there are two or three different camps of General Managers; those who will spend whatever on whomever (Cubs, Angels, Astros, Phillies), those who spend what little money they have on the wrong people (Pirates, Blue Jays, Reds, Dodgers), and those who wait for the sane contracts that largely go unnoticed but add up to the right pieces (Braves, Cardinals, Brewers, A's)."
Here's the link: http://www.talkingchop.com/
After today we are set up to chase a big name, hopefully for the starting rotation. Another stud to pair with Carp would be killer in the postseason. Let's see how Walt plays this one - his endless patience could have us waiting through the winter - spring training - even into the season!
like the moves...
i like the wells signing. i hope he pitches up to his potential under dunc and we sign him to an extension during the year.
i don't know my so many people are against the gary bennet signing. i think bennet did a great job for us this year. heck, i would have signed him just for that slam he hit last year. a team's back-up catcher is not that big of a deal especially when you have a horse starter like yadi.
i definitely wouldn't mind keeping dunc if his defense improves. as long as we keep him in that 2 whole and he keeps seeing a steady diet of fastballs i think he will keep hitting the way he did last year. that said i also wouldn't mind seeing his trade being back a semi-young picther.
mulder won't be back until mid-season apparently so if we sign him we would need a good stop gap till then. plus it sounds like mulder is getting from many overpaying teams and there is no way walt wants to compete with that. i think his track record over the past couple years warrents a lot of concern.
walt does it again...
now we got a legitimate chance to get a top notch ace to go along with carp and finally remove some of the weight from his tired shoulders. we also have enough room to make some very interesting trade moves too with enc where we can take on some salary. and not to mention we could also find a high potential #4 out there. i think wells is going to pitch a lot better for us because of dunc, a good defense behind him, and the confidence associated with playing in a winning atmosphere.
i like the kennedy deal a lot. i think kennedy is going to be a real nice player for us, both defensively [remember he's gonna work the secret weapon, which definitely improves most infielders he works with] and offensively in clutch situations. and isn't that what we are worried about most? who really cares if kennedy hits .265 all season, but hits .325 in the playoffs? i'm not sold on bringing back so, even though he came through huge for us last year. i was a little partial to preston wilson or jose cruz as has been discussed numerous times on here.
lastly, i would definitely endorse bringing in both zito and mulder. nice diversity in a pitching styles for our rotation. overall, very happy today. nice start, walt!
by stlspecialsauce on Nov 29, 2006 3:04 AM EST reply actions
kennedy
by johnstjc @ Viva El Birdos on Nov 29, 2006 4:54 AM EST reply actions



















