charts and minds
mlb.com has this nifty hit-chart feature that lets you see where a given player's hits are falling -- and where they're not; where he's making outs. they've beefed it up recently with some added functionality; you can now sort it by ballpark and by year. i decided to take a look at juan encarnacion's hit chart in pro player stadium, to see how many deep flyballs he has pounded over the years that died in that park's capacious outfield -- but that might have flown over the fence in more forgiving environs.
so without further ado, here are the charts -- last year only on the left, career on the right:
these are screen captures, and some of the sharpness got lost in the translation, but you still get the idea. to my eye, last year's chart shows only one possible dinger lost to the ballpark -- that out on the warning track in the right-field corner, just next to the 345 sign. that lonely flyball was juan's only manifestation of power to the opposite field last year (in his home games, anyway); all his other right- and right-centerfield flies barely flew.250 feet.
the career chart -- which encompasses all of 2003 and 2005, and parts of 2002 and 2004 -- tells a slightly different story. it looks to my eye as if he lost no fewer than 6 and possibly as many 10 home runs to the ballpark over that time. the 4 no-brainers are the flyouts to the warning track in dead centerfield; all carried 400 feet and change, enough to clear the wall in most stadiums. at new busch, the centerfield fence will be 410 feet from home plate, the same distance as that little dimple in pro player's centerfield wall; at least two of encarnacion's outs to deep center would have cleared 410, and the other two look as if they'd have fallen a couple of feet one way or the other.
juan also probably lost a few dingers in pro player's deep alleys. look right in front of the 385 signs in both left and right; some of those outs would've landed in the bullpens at old busch (372 to the alleys) or the bleachers at wrigley (368), and they'd probably clear the wall at half the parks around the nl. but they're probably still outs at new busch, which supposedly is going to have 386-foot power alleys.
the lack of power to right field, while less pronounced, remains evident in the career chart. in the equivalent of three seasons at pro player, he reached the opposite-field warning track just three times -- once a year.
that takes care of the flyball outs. now let's let at encarnacion's hits -- specifically his extra-base hits:
whoa. dead pull hitter. aside from one apparent blooper that landed on the right-field foul line, encarnacion in 2005 yanked every one of his extra-base hits at pro player to left. on the career chart, he does show a bit more power to the opposite field, including one home run to right, but you still wouldn't say he uses the entire field. (i'm not passing judgment on encarnacion, by the way; i'm not suggesting that he should use the whole field. this is a purely descriptive exercise, to try to learn what sort of hitter he is.) note that quite a few of encarnacion's doubles would probably have been home runs in most other parks; prob'y lost another half-dozen or so homers over the years.
for the sake of comparison, here's reggie sanders' distribution of xbh at busch last year:
different type of hitter. it looks to me as if a whole bunch of reggie's 2005 dingers at busch would've been outs (or doubles) at pro player --- about 6 of 'em barely cleared busch's more generous fences.
to get back to encar'cion: his dead-pull tendencies appeared to be more pronounced than ever last season. don't know quite what to make of that; his overall power (.160 isolated power) was about where it has been throughout his career, so he doesn't appear to have gained or lost anything overall. this could simply be a random thing. unfortunately, mlb.com's hit-chart feature doesn't allow you to combine all of a players hits (home and away) into a single graphic, nor even to collect all the away at-bats into a single chart; you have to go stadium by stadium, which isn't very useful. so we're left with only the home-game half of the picture. but encarnacion's tendencies are pronounced and reinforced over time; his home-game charts from los angeles in 2004 and detroit in the early 2000s show much the same thing, although i'm not gonna reproduce `em here.
he does spray the ball around somewhat; his career distribution of singles at pro player is pretty balanced, with the majority pulled to left but a sizeable minority served to center and right:
but encarnacion's ground outs (i'm not gonna lay another chart on you) are heavily skewed to 3b and shortstop, suggesting that he's a sucker for outside slop -- tries to pull it instead of taking it the other way and hits a two-hopper to shortstop. (point of information: juan'cion is 2 for 25 in his career against jeff suppan.)
there's only so much you can tell about a player until you see him play, but i think we can safely say that our new right-fielder is a pull hitter, pure and simple. because of new busch's dimensions, we should probably not expect him to hit with significantly more power now that he's free of the pro-player straitjacket.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow...
Some,,,
Neat graphs, though. Encouraging stuff about the doubles he lost at Pro-Player possibly becoming HRs at Busch.
by flynn on Jan 3, 2006 10:40 AM EST reply actions
Reggie
Sanders
Sanders surpassed 20 home runs 6 times in his career previous to St. Louis (and twice during). Encarnacion has had 20 home runs one time in his career. One.
There is a reason that no one was worried about Sanders' power and everyone is worred about Juan's. Reggie had proven that he hit for power, and was being paid little. Juan has not proven that he has power, and is being paid a little more than little.
Sure
J Rod
Baserunning gaffes aside, the fact that he crushed a ball about 425 feet in that ridiculous Houston park makes me want him playing in the playoffs next year.
Our best hope is that Juancion gets hot early and we can package him and Marquis to a losing team for a power pitcher in July.
Encarnacion lost more than one homer to PPS
The lurking variable I see is that the park he plays in isn't very conducive to hitting the ball the other way for power. Only a few guys can really power a ball the other way 390 feet, and he may have changed his hitting style to fit the park. His Busch career chart (admittedly with far too little data) doesn't show a great power spread, but it shows that he isn't necessarily a straight pull hitter.
He clearly can go the other way by the abundance of singles to the opposite field, and I think if he can learn a better approach from McRae, he can more effectively implement his skills.
Just looking at the charts, I almost think it wouldn't be a bad thing if he actually cut his home run power and focused not so much on pulling the middle-in mistake out of the yard but rather on driving those for doubles and eith lining the away pitch or just flat out taking it.
the lack of homers to right
to reiterate, i'm not criticizing encarnacion, just trying to characterize him. for whatever reason, he hasn't shown much tendency to take the ball the other way at any stop in his career, and i wouldn't expect him to change in 2006.
I understand
Judging by the chart, he seems to be grounded in a bad approach. Now I'm not saying he's going to go the other way like A-Rod, but he can improve himself if he gets out of what he is doing. Just based on that chart and his numbers, it looks like he is trying to crush anything middle-in then protect the outside fastball and this is inherently flawed. Guess where and what people would pitch him if that's the case? Outside junk. That approach would be fine--at 0-0 or ahead (swapping protect outside to take outside), but when he gets behind, he's got to change.
If I'm pitching to him, I'd probably start with an inside 2-seam and be sure to get it inside; he'll try to kill it seeing it over the plate. He's probably going to either roll it over or more likely swing and miss. Then go with a curve/slider over the middle that breaks down and out of the strike zone looking for a chase, a 4-seam inside off the plate, then go with a change outside and watch him look like a fool. It'd be all too easy (if I had a major league arm of course). If you execute that, he's toast which is why he needs to change...playoff pitchers execute.
And what I'm saying is that he can change. Take a look at Reggie Sanders' 2004 hit chart; looks almost identical to Encarnacion's 2005 with the exception of about a double and two triples (that probably would've been outs at PPS).
good analysis
Yes, but . . .
- aren't there going to be a decrease in non-homerun hits in a smaller park (i.e. outfielders have less ground to cover in new Busch vs. Pro Player and therefore can get to more balls thus making more outs).
- As far as J-rod is concerned after his initial hot streak, his numbers steadily went down as fast as a $10 stripper with a hell-fire Vicodin habit. My less than expert analysis is if J-rod makes it out of spring training, he'll be back in the minors by mid-June.
by titolandrum21 on Jan 3, 2006 2:02 PM EST reply actions
A quick look
Sanders
I guarantee the 4 homers he hit the other way were 94-96 mphs fastballs that he got lucky on.
by Retire 51 on Jan 3, 2006 3:26 PM EST reply actions



















