sanders carp and such
some data:
STL HITTING LEADERS, JUNE
| player | ab | r | h | hr | rbi | bb | sb/att | avg | obp | slg | ops |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sanders | 56 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 6 | 8/8 | .393 | .444 | .679 | 1.123 |
| pujols | 67 | 20 | 25 | 6 | 16 | 13 | 2/2 | .373 | .475 | .672 | 1.147 |
where is the love for reggie sanders in card nation? the sanders 22 jerseys? the chants of reg-gie!, reg-gie!? . . . . ok i admit it, i take the guy for granted too. worse than that -- i tend to discount him. he bats down in the order, whiffs a ton, somehow seems worth less than his stats suggest . . . . right? in may, when there rose a rumor that sanders might be shipped to the athletics for eric byrnes, did stl fans rise as one to denounce that idea as sheer madness? to shout that sanders is too valuable to move? no, not really . . . . it was kind of like sander, byrnes, what's the diff? one's 37, one's 29, but they're basically the same player -- we need to get younger in the outfield so yeah, sure, why not?
inevitably rolen will start to hit, edmonds will return to the lineup, sanders will drop down to the 6 or 7 hole in the order, his avg will drift back toward .260, and we'll forget all about games like last night. so before all that happens, let's give the man some recognition. with walker edmonds and rolen all ailing or faltering, reggie has stepped up and held the middle of the order together. very quietly, like a pro. i'm damn glad he's on our side.
more kisses for the reg and his stat profile at beyond the boxscore.
add'l data, courtesy pinto's day-by-day database:
NL ERA LEADERS, MAY 20 - JUNE 20
| player | ip | h | r | er | bb | so | era |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| carpenter | 45 | 33 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 46 | 1.60 |
| pedro | 45 | 31 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 47 | 2.00 |
| rocket | 31 | 22 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 30 | 2.03 |
| santos | 31 | 27 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 2.32 |
| v zambrano | 33 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 2.45 |
carp. rocks. . . . has now put up zeroes in 47 of last 52 ip
battle of the 1st-pitch: cardinal hitters were particularly aggressive on the first pitch against aaron harang last night; musta had a scouting report or something. of the 29 stl hitters who faced him, 13 swung on 0-0; after he departed, only 2 of 12 stl hitters swung at the 0-0 pitch. carpenter also faced 29 hitters; 9 swung at the first pitch. the results:
1ST-PITCH SWINGING, JUNE 20
| foul | miss | out | h | ops | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| card hitters | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.000 |
| red hitters | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | .000 |
i'll tell you one cardinal who strikes me as an indiscrimate 1st-pitch swinger: mabry. i've seen flashes of such before, and now that i'm paying real close attention he's doing nothing to alter my opinion. in the first, batting with the sacks jammed and one out, mabry swung at a fastball in on the hands -- might've been ball one, but even if it caught the corner there was nothing he could do with the pitch; might as well take. mabry fouled it back, ultimately whiffed. his next at-bat, in the third, he came up with two out and a man on second -- rbi situation, good time to look for a pitch. but with the stale, rh-hitting rolen on deck, you're probably going to get worked carefully. sure enough, harang started mabry off with a low curve, and mabry swung and, again, fouled it back. if he takes the pitch, maybe it breaks out of the zone for ball one.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I echo
by cardsrul on Jun 21, 2005 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kinda reminds me of someone else...
by VanRam on Jun 21, 2005 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reggie
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2005 10:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
worth less than his stats?
by Vidor on Jun 21, 2005 11:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that's an interesting
by lboros on Jun 21, 2005 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
reggie proved
by cardsrul on Jun 21, 2005 1:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
AP Reporting
by Matt on Jun 21, 2005 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't have any facts
--i'm not buying it until you back that up with some facts--
by Vidor on Jun 21, 2005 4:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
well now i'm curious
vs tampa, 4 for 8
vs toronto, 3 for 6 with an hr
vs yankees, 3 for 12
vs boston, 4 for 11 with an hr
vs houstn, 5 for 8 with an hr
vs colrado, 1 for 13
vs washton, 1 for 8
vs pitt, 5 for 12
vs kcity, 0 for 4
vs philly, 2 for 8
vs mets, 1 for 8 with an hr
vs dodgrs, 5 for 12 w 2 hr
vs padres, 4 for 11 w 2 hr
that takes it back to rolen's disablement, which is as far as i'm taking it. i make the totals at
vs +.500 teams: 17 for 56 (.304) w 4 hr
vs -.500 teams: 21 for 65 (.323) w 3 hr
that does not prove or disprove your opinion, vidor. i'm like you --- in crunch time of the nlcs, i don't necessarily have great confidence in reggie. (per baseball ref'nce: .188 career postseason avg in 191 at bats.) but i'm not talking about that. i'm saying --- appreciate what he has done for the last six weeks. he came through when the team needed him ---- against all competition.
by lboros on Jun 21, 2005 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs



















