Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

flipped out

for the last word (we all hope) on The Flip, check out RB's diary and the associated link. albert made a (minor) mistake, he admitted it, and the whole thing's over with -- and not a moment too soon.

albert is currently on pace to break the following franchise records:

held by year category record pujols'
pace
mcgwire 1998 homers 70 102
medwick 1937 rbi 154 221
hornsby 1922 total bases 450 528
o'neill 1887 runs 167 179
burkett 1901 runs
(post-1900)
142 179

the anticipated dearth of hittable pitches has not occurred in the wake of albert's three-homer game; they keep pitching to him (he has walked only once in the last four games), and he keeps clobbering the ball. i still have a hard time believing he can get anywhere close to these records without tripping the "just walk him" trigger, which would propel him toward the runs-scored standard but keep him from reaching any of the others.

amazing albert fact of the day: as you marvel at this blistering start, keep in mind that he is historically a second-half hitter. over the last three seasons his avg, obp, and slugging are all higher after the all-star break, as is his home-run rate. so he may be slugging 1.200 by late august . . . .

re the squeeze in the 2d inning -- why play for one run there? it's early, and there's a big inning in progress. perez has only retired 3 of the first 9 batters (and one of the outs was the pitcher), and eckstein -- the team's 2d-hottest hitter, and one of the best on the team with men in scoring position -- is at the plate in a hitter's count. let the guy swing the bat, dammit. what's the worst that can happen? perez is a pronounced flyball pitcher, making an inning-ending double play unlikely; and the team's fastest runner is on third base, so it doesn't take much of a fly ball to get him home. and if either eckstein or edmonds (or both) gets on base, albert bats with a buncha men on.

you could argue that the squeeze kept the pirates in the game; cards could have put it away right there but instead only led 4-0, which became 4-2 -- a game again -- a couple innings later. i think the 2d inning's too early for a squeeze under almost any circumstances, but in last night's situation it was an especially dumb call.

how can juan encarnacion have drawn only one walk this season? this might help explain it: last night he saw 15 pitches in his four at-bats -- and swung at 12 of them. he put three in play, whiffed on three, and fouled the other 6 off. . . . yadi coaxed his first walk of the year last night, so he and juan'cion, between the two of them, have almost equaled mark mulder's walk total for the season.

baseball prospectus is out with its first postseason playoff odds of 2006. it's not encouraging news for cardinal fans; per this report, the cards have only a 1 in 4 change to make the playoffs. before you go hang yourself, though, consider this: the same report has the diamondbacks and rockies as the two likeliest teams to win the nl west, and it tabs the detroit tigers as the dominant team in the american league. so never you mind that both the cubs and reds are shown here as having about the same chance as st louis to play in october, or that the brewers and astros both have significantly better chances. look at it this way: somebody might read this thing and give you 3 to 1 odds on st louis to make the postseason.

reid gorecki hit two more dingers at springfield last night, bringing his total to 8 in 75 at-bats. impressive display, but let's not get too carried away. his career slugging percentage in four previous minor-league seasons is .422; he is 25 years old and still just getting established in double a. the more signficiant news from that game is that cody haerther also homered, his 2d in three games; after a slow start he's up to .293 on the year with a .551 slugging avg. 'nother piece a good news: colby rasmus homered again for single-a quad cities, his 2d.

per mlb.com: roger clemens won't return until june at the earliest, if'n he decides to come back at all . . . . and if he does pitch, it might be for somebody other than houston. even so, the rocket may return to the mound before aj burnett, who isn't seriously hurt but also isn't taking any chances. per associated press: "Burnett was alarmed by the pain and loss of velocity he experienced Friday. He said he'd be willing to miss a month to get it right."

Comment 71 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

On the squeeze play . . .
I don't think the Pirates were expecting the squeeze at all.  Eckstein squared at the last second and nearly beat the throw.  Had he beaten it, it is a great play.  Because he didn't, it is just a smart, sure fire way to score a run when you have your best pitcher on the mound.  Had Suppan or Ponson been pitching, maybe LaRussa makes a different call there.  Regardless, I don't think it is a dumb call at all.  
 
"Going to trial with a lawyer who considers your whole life-style a Crime in Progress is not a happy prospect." -- Hunter S. Thompson

by secretweapon on Apr 25, 2006 9:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I've got to agree with lb
The squeeze is a play for one run.  Yes, the offense (outside of Pujols) is scrapping, but you've got to give yourselves a chance to put up a crooked number, especially early in the game.  At this point, any time that you risk taking the bat out of Albert's hands, you're making a mistake.  While it is a "sure-fire way to score a run", I'm not convinced it's always smart.

It's another example of tlr trying too hard to make something happen.  Go back to Sunday night.  Down 2-0 in the 4th.  Lead-off single by Rolen.  Sure a hit and run with the struggling Edmonds at the plate makes some sense, but on the first pitch?  Edmonds misses a pitch that's virtually a pitch-out and Rolen is caught stealing.  We may have had no chance/clue vs. Maddux, but this choice merely screamed desperation and ensured that we went from threat to none.

I'm all for the small ball when it makes sense, but tony still makes poor decisions about its use.  Two theories:  1)  He's making these decisions due to the crappiness of favorite whipping boy JuanE.  Still 1 rbi even with 2 runs scored last night.  

Side note:  Anybody wonder how some players can play generally well, make one mistake and land in Tony's doghouse while others can spend months playing like dogs and only endear themselves further to him?

Theory 2)  His poor decision making in these situations is part of what comes back to haunt the team in the postseason.

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

damn good question
"Anybody wonder how some players can play generally well, make one mistake and land in Tony's doghouse while others can spend months playing like dogs and only endear themselves further to him?"

it seems off the top of me head that as long as you're a "proven veteran" you're virtually doghouse-proof.

i agree with theory #2.

by lboros on Apr 25, 2006 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...
JuanE is a "proven veteran"?????

He certainly gave yadi some flexibility last year, but 1)  his defense/staff handling/game calling skills were invaluable, 2) the kid needed it and responded and 3) he was a kid.

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

the very defnition of
a "proven veteran" --- ie, a guy who has proven that he's not very good, but stays in the league because he is a known quantity

by lboros on Apr 25, 2006 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

...and
the replays showed Eck did beat the throw--just barely, but he should have been gotten the call. I agree with LB that it was unnecessary at that point in the game, but ah well--maybe TLR just felt like trying it out and keeping Eck in practice for some time when it's really needed. It did catch them by surprise and score a run, so I don't have too much of a quibble with it.

by rockin redbird on Apr 25, 2006 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

The squeeze-
after toying around with WPA stuff, Eck's squeeze was a little helpful, like a 4% WPA increase. Had he hit a RBI single, the WPA wouldn't have been much different then the bunt. Then, Edmonds, the closest thing we have to a Three True Outcomes Hero, could've completely iced it by either drawing a walk or hitting a homer. But if he did fan, it wouldn't have hurt, and you'd still have the best hitter in baseball up.

But having said that, my guess is Eck tried to bunt for a single, given how close the play at 1st was.

by erik on Apr 25, 2006 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely Bunting for a Single
Perez' delivery takes him way over to the third base line. Eckstein was trying to make him uncomfortable on the mound by laying a perfect bunt down the first base line. Perez recovered admirably, and Eckstein was called out.

I would have preferred Carp had gotten the squeeze down instead of Eckstein, but don't think it was a bad play by any stretch.

by liam on Apr 25, 2006 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was expecting it
I even commented to my 8 year old son beforehand, "Pay attention and I'll teach you what a 'suicide squeeze' is."  And a pitch or two later, Eckstein made me look like a genius.

by Lance on Apr 25, 2006 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

squeeze...
I  think TLR may have made the call to practice the play in an actual game.  I'm not saying I agree with the call because of the reasons you mentioned above, but we had a three run lead and had the hottest pitcher in the league, right now, on the mound.  I can't remember how many games we won last year on the squeeze. The other team, of course would not be looking for the play, so maybe TLR knew it was the safest way to get a run home.  Plus, JED is not really swinging the stick with confidence right now.

by Schnake on Apr 25, 2006 9:18 AM EDT reply actions  

When does it become overmanaging?
Perhaps there is something to be said for the hit-and-run and the squeeze play but I thin Tony is getting a little overanxious.  Let the batters swing and do what they are accustomed too.  Forcing them to swing or bunt at these random occassions seems fruitless to me.  Not to mention we are giving the other team outs.  For everytime a hit-and-run works there's another time where the runner gets picked off.  I like TLR and I like his managing style since he came to STL and its hard to argue with his success the last two years...but the gimmick plays are wearing thin on me.

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2006 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Squeeze play a gimmick?
The hidden ball trick is a gimmick.  The squeeze play on the other hand is (when executed properly as it was last night) one of the most beautiful plays in baseball.
"Going to trial with a lawyer who considers your whole life-style a Crime in Progress is not a happy prospect." -- Hunter S. Thompson

by secretweapon on Apr 25, 2006 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

It seems to me...
that it's not the play itself wherein the gimmick relies, but rather, tony's use thereof.

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

How about Rolen?
His projections for this year based upon his start:

162 Games/546 AB/.313 AVG./.392 OBP/26 HR/111 RBI

Sure, he will not play all 162 games, but his start is promising. It looks like he will be the old Scott Rolen. (Knock on wood.) And for this we should be thankful.

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

one of the keys to the season
was thought to be rolen's health and level of performance. his showing so far augurs very good things for the cardinals.

by lboros on Apr 25, 2006 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nice!
Sweet use of "augurs" lb!  A tremendously under-utilized verb getting some play on VEB.  

cmat, go look up my "nerd" diary, please, before I go nuts.

by flynn on Apr 25, 2006 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

10-Q
I am now and forever a fan of cmat.

by flynn on Apr 25, 2006 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he'll actually do better than that.
Before his 3-3 game against the cubs, he was 2 for his last 22 (over 8 games!) with one extra base hit.   That kind of slump hopefully won't happen often, and skewed his projected numbers significantly since he's only been off the slump for 2 games.

by SleepyCA on Apr 25, 2006 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Edmonds in the 2 spot
Ok, thank goodness TLR says that's just for a game or so in today's Post Dispatch.

by sdrone on Apr 25, 2006 10:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Pujols and Rolen
Sorry, but I want to put in another word or two. Boy, are those guys classy. In this day of pampered, egotistical athletes, we are lucky fans indeed that these are among the guys we're cheering for.
DCGreg

by DCGreg on Apr 25, 2006 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Right on...
...Greg. And what is great about them is that they are tonesetters, so to speak. Their professionalism and hard-nosed play is contagious (in a very good way). We are very lucky to have them.

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

a week or so ago
people were bashing Pujols for the bat flip, and I heard different sides that it was frustration etc...Did anyone notice after his homer yesterday he didnt do much..he either reads this, or his wife got on him...

by punchinjudy on Apr 25, 2006 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Play Rodriguez
Two things.  First, there is no legitimate reason why John Rodriguez is not playing in the outfield on a REGULAR basis.  None.  I don't want to hear its because of his defense, I don't want to hear its because of his attitude.  He deserves a shot at a regular role.  He plays hard, gives a good/great at bat almost every time at the plate, has exceptional OBP in the scant time he has played, and he has the so-called "pop" that would be perfect for Tony's 2-hole hitter.  Hell, he's even a lefty, which would give LaRussa righty/lefty/righty at the top of the order. I think Tony has let his personal distaste for Rodriguez's arrogance/confidence/whatever you want to call it get in the way of the best BASEBALL decision for this lineup right now.  I don't think he is the reincarnation of Babe Ruth, but I think that he has shown the ability to consistently hit at the big league level with power, and could develop into an outfield staple.  He is not being given a chance, and it is unfortunate.

Second.  I absolutely freakin' HATE it when Hrabowski answers the trivia question like 3 seconds after it goes up on the screen.  Look, dude, I get it:  You know about baseball.  You supposedly even played the game at one point.  In fact, you are paid (quite well, I assume) to analyze the game, bringing your insight and knowledge to every FSN broadcast.  Let the viewers have some time to think about the answer.  Stop ruining my baseball games. Let McLaughlin handle that.  

by farley503 on Apr 25, 2006 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Those Fox guys
don't get that much email.  Email him and let him know.  He'll most likely see the complaint.

by sdrone on Apr 25, 2006 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was watching...
...the game at the neighborhood tap (with no sound). So I cannot comment on the trivia question.

Word to Farley. I think that we should start a "Play John Rodriguez Petition" and present it to TLR.

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with Rodriguez in the 2-hole
and it's worked out well when he's hit there also.

Is there a problem with his defense? I remember a mistake or two when he first came up last year, but is that unusual for a player who's just arrived? He seemed to be out of position sometimes, but I haven't noticed that or any other defensive mistakes this year. His base running was what concerned me the most, but hasn't he ran the bases very well so far this year?

I love the idea of Rodriguez in the 2-hole.

by rob is back on Apr 25, 2006 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree 100%
...with farley. Ned/Chico/J-Rod (whatever his nickname is this week) definitely deserves his shot. One thing though. About the trivia. I can't stand it  either when they yell out the answer right away, but last night, I'm pretty sure it was McLaughlin that did it, not Al. Regardless, that is the second time in the past couple days it has happened (the other one that I remember was the 2nd most cub home runs in old busch=Dawson). My other complaint-this one about Al- was his tirade about Philly Cheesesteaks and how disgusting he thought they were. Al, have you ever eaten in your own bar? I had a burger there that tasted like it came out of the trash from the Purina plant next door.

by WhackCuzzi on Apr 25, 2006 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Note from a Cubs fan...
... who is also a baseball fan.

The record for HR in the month of April is 13, held by Ken Griffey Jr, Luis Gonzalez and Mike Schmidt... Pujols has a pretty good shot at tying or breaking that record.

If he does it, glad it'll be against some team other than the Cubs.

by Al Yellon on Apr 25, 2006 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Doghouse
I've heard this Tony "doghouse" nonsense for years now and its just that, nonsense. It's one of those deals that if enough people talk about it and bring it up then maybe its true.

Well, its not. Its the same theory that many of the same people have that Tony dislikes young players (or at least more than other managers).

Again, despite ZERO evidence of any of these two situations fans continue to bring it up as fact. Its not, so let's drop it and focus on things that are real.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Apr 25, 2006 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

while I want to believe that you are right
I have a strange sense that there will be a LOT of forthcoming comments trying to prove you wrong.

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2006 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Two words
about TLR's doghouse... Kerry Robinson.

by cardsrul on Apr 25, 2006 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nonsense? A quick read of...
Bissinger's "3 nights in august" will support Kerry Robinson's presence/residence in tlr's doghouse while validating tlr as an impressive manager.  

The logical syllogism would suggest that if Robinson was in his doghouse, that, over time, other players must be as well.  This raises some Why is John Gall still in Memphis?  Why does jrod ride the pine while JuanE tries everyone's (except Tony's) patience with his substandard  play?  

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

not very persuasive
i'll acknowledge that your defense of tony may have some merit, although you offer no evidence to back it up. but my point of view has merit too, and it is not based on "zero" evidence as you allege. tony/dunc barely attempt to hide their distaste for young pitchers anymore; if you want "hard" evidence to support that opinion, start with this post.

then compare la russa's record with young pitchers to bobby cox's or felipe alou's.

pointing out flaws in the manager's style, by the way, does not amount to a blanket condemnation of the manager. the guy's a great manager; a hall of famer. that doesn't mean he's perfect.

if you have any evidence to support what you say, post it here. until then i'm not persuaded

by lboros on Apr 25, 2006 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sure
Well, for starters, Tony has managed six Rookies of the Year (Kittle, Guillen, McGwire, Canseco, Weiss, and Pujols). So, no problem with young guys there.

Now, these are all "young guys" that have played pretty major roles for the Cardinals in recent history.

20 year old Rick Ankiel started 31 games.
Bud Smith started 20+ games as a 21-year old. Albert Pujols became a regular at age 21.
Ditto for Yadier Molina.
Brad Thompson pitched 40 games out of the pen as a 23 year old.
Jose Jiminez started 28 games when he was 25.
JD Drew became a fulltime player at age 23. Placido Polanco was 23 when he became a fulltime major leaguer.
Hector Luna was 24 his first year in the bigs.
And Adam Wainwright plays a prominent role this year and he is 24 years old.

Is this enough evidence that Tony and Duncan will play "young" guys if they can help the team? Whose growth has been stunted by these two guys who supposedly obsess over older players?

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Apr 25, 2006 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Young guns?
20 year old Rick Ankiel started 31 games.  

and is an oft-injured outfield "prospect" after his one postseason.

Bud Smith started 20+ games as a 21-year old.

and is out of the league pre 30

Albert Pujols became a regular at age 21.

I'll give you that one, although I'm not sure that tlr can, or would, claim much responsibility for his development.

Ditto for Yadier Molina.

See AP.

Brad Thompson pitched 40 games out of the pen as a 23 year old.

and is in his second year in the bigs.  Proves nothing.

Jose Jiminez started 28 games when he was 25.

Last appeared in a ML game in '04.  When he was 31.

JD Drew became a fulltime player at age 23.

and would have become a fulltime player if managed by Bug Bunny.

Placido Polanco was 23 when he became a fulltime major leaguer.

and had to leave the Cardinals to become a 'starter' elsewhere.

Hector Luna was 24 his first year in the bigs.

and has yet to become a regular.  Although it might be nice as Miles struggles more.

And Adam Wainwright plays a prominent role this year and he is 24 years old.

again, one month hardly proves your point...

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

great
reply, I'm not sure why peopel think they know more than TLR though...Young old does it matter as long is the job is getting done. You have to give TLR a chance with this lineup before you tweek it, people wanted changes after game one....a win...Are people so spoiled like braves fans, they can't give it a chance? Sure like everyone else I wondered by the lack of spending this year, but look at burnett at least they didnt pay that money for whats happening now...give it time...

by punchinjudy on Apr 25, 2006 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Braves Fan?
What's a Braves fan? Those exist?

by WhackCuzzi on Apr 26, 2006 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

except his point....
was that young guys do have a "chance."  What they do with the chance is up to them.  No doubt there are times when perhaps Tony should look to young guys a little earlier.  But in those instances, you have to look at whom he has to look to.  Take John Gall.  I agree that he is probably a better hitter than at least one of our outfielders right now, but I'm not sure he was last year - and he got more at bats staying down.  Plus, the guy doesn't have a single position that he plays well.  There are usually reasons.  I would also like to point out that it isn't just Tony.  Walt and company didn't really sign Ponson to pitch out of the bullpen, IMO.  They signed him to be a starter - and maybe if he pans out well so they can trade Suppan or Marquis for other help, I don't know.  Reyes did not pitch well in spring training, etc.

I don't think Tony intentionally holds back guys that are obviously ready.

On the other side, Albert was obviously ready and wouldn't have made the team if Bonilla had not gone down.  Both sides have an argument, but I don't think there are circumstances where Tony has made glaring mistakes.  We don't have much of a farm system.  Walt trades them - and it's good, because we've had some great teams in recent years, but young guys aren't where our talent is at.  I think Tony probably does employ sort of a tie goes to the guy whose done it before approach, but I don't think it's unfair.  Wainwright made the big club, I don't think it gets much fairer than that.  He's also making us a better team.  I think Tony has very little to do w/ where Ankiel, B.Smith, or any of those guys are.  He didn't ruin their careers.  They made their own careers.  Plus, Smith and Polanco (and some cash) turned into Scott Rolen one day, so that has been pretty nice.

by Toddius396 on Apr 25, 2006 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks
Thank you Toddius. All I was trying to prove was that young guys were given the "chance" and that Tony has a solid track record of playing young guys.

This wasn't about developing young players or where their careers went. It was about how, supposedly, Tony never plays young guys. I think it is an incorrect statement. And it has been proven so.

Do I think he instills a "tie goes to the veteran" system? Sure. I can't say I blame him. You can't say, Tony never plays young guys and NOT give him credit for Pujols. It doesn't work that way.

We aren't the Pittsburgh Pirates, Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or Milwaukee Brewers. We are a team that has been competing for the playoffs for basically the last 10 years. How many CONTENDING teams play a bunch of young guys? Hardly any and certainly not many more than the Cardinals.

Again, this is a myth that gets perpetuated but it holds very little validity.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Apr 25, 2006 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Instant breakfast
Just a thought, with the caveats of small sample size, etc.  If someone is swinging the bat as badly as he is, isn't the pitcher a lot more likely to put the ball over the plate?

by knieriemd on Apr 25, 2006 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

If his weakness
wasn't being a free swinger, I'd agree with you.  But since the dude swings at everything, why ever give him a pitch to hit?

by Valatan on Apr 25, 2006 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keep Luna in the Infield
An article at the post discussing Luna indicates that he may start tonight somewhere other than 2nd.  I am not the biggest Luna fan, but I do support giving him a lot of ABs at 2d and filling in for Eck to give him some days off.  I am NOT a fan of giving him ABs in the outfield.  As has been pointed out above, I think we need to give Rodriguez a chance to succeed.  I don't think any player is going to succeed unless they play on a pretty regular basis.  I wish TLR would establish a platoon of JRod and Gooch and stick with it for a while.  Also the two of them to spell Edmonds and Enc so all are getting lots of ABs.  Sorry Skip, you're the odd man out.
OC Cards Fan

by OCCardsFan on Apr 25, 2006 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed
Tony has commented often about the reason why Gall's never been given a shot in the outfield is his defense.  But he's more than willing to put Luna out there.  Luna runs the worst routes to balls that I have ever seen.

by Lance on Apr 25, 2006 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eckstein
hasn't had a game off yet this season.

by liam on Apr 25, 2006 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luna's played well since late last season
What are the chances that he could replace Miles at 2nd?

by rob is back on Apr 25, 2006 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see no
reasons why he should not this year.  And this is after me decalring my undying hatred for him after his horrible throw during the playoffs last year.

by Valatan on Apr 26, 2006 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Timo
and now Desi Relaford? - From the Post online:

"Relaford joins Memphis

Desi Relaford, a 10-year veteran of the major leagues, joined the Cardinals' Class AAA Memphis affiliate on Sunday.

The infielder, last in Baltimore's organization for spring training, most likely will be activated Wednesday.

Relaford, 32, has a .244 career batting average and has played every position but first in the majors, including 672 at the middle infield spots.

With Colorado for 73 games in 2005, Relaford hit .224 in 210 at-bats, scored 24 runs and drove in 16. He was released March 30."

Doesn't exactly inspire confidence in where management thinks we are.  These aren't exactly players we're hoping will develop over time.  They aren't exactly Reggie Sanders in terms of talented, but journeyman status in spite of it.  More like journeyman status as a result of unfulfilled expectations and pathetic play.

by sdesserman on Apr 25, 2006 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Wasn't there...
...a piece in the Post-Dispatch last season about how Walt attempts to stock the AAA team with players who can play in the majors should injuries befall the big club? These recent moves would seem to be in step with this philosophy.

A and AA are where our future position players will development and I don't know that we have any top notch position players ready to take the step to AAA en route to the Cards.

I agree that these guys are journeymen has-beens and if they are taking away at-bats from Duncan, it is a problem. But, other than Duncan, am I forgetting any possible everyday MLB talent? or even bench talent?

(On a side note, I may be able to answer that myself after this weekend's Redbirds/I-Cubs series at Sec Taylor.)

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really,
I think that it should be worth thining about giving any of the OF playing in Springfield a chance to play at AAA, particularly Reid Gorecki.  I don't see the downside giving them a chance at Memphis to see if perhaps, they would be the answer in the OF late in the season, if no trade is forthcoming.

Hell, Rico Washington is 28, is slaughtering the ball in AA--give the dude a chance to come up, it's not like he's a prospect whose development is threatened at this point

by Valatan on Apr 25, 2006 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rico!
Do they seriously have a person named Rico Washington in their system?  That name is insanely awesome.  Promote him immediately.

If Rico Washington can accomplish what Uncle Rico failed to do (turn back the clock to 1982,) then he deserves a call up.

by flynn on Apr 25, 2006 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ditto
That Rico Washington is a fantastic name was exactly what I was thinking when I read that. Maybe he's friends with Razor Shines or Oddibe McDowell.

by 26thMan on Apr 25, 2006 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another cool name
is that of Marlins outfielder Reggie Abercrombie.

by 26thMan on Apr 25, 2006 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Am I the only one...
...who thinks that Sam Walton could be one of the coolest names?  Especially if we packaged him in a trade to KC to play for the Wal-Mart Pres!
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -Dr. Seuss

by thinktank on Apr 25, 2006 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Baseball Names
Wes Swackhamer has my vote for best name in our farm system, followed closely by the LOOGY Kevin Ool.

by liam on Apr 25, 2006 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, wacky question
Is Walt/management starting to worry about Edmonds?

by sdrone on Apr 25, 2006 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pujols pitches to hit and Squeeze Play
On the subject of Pujols pitches to hit, the one he got a hold of for the home run was not a great pitch to hit.  It was around the middle of the plate, but fairly low -- Albert made a good adjustment on it, and it just goes to show that even if Albert is not getting great pitches to hit, he will hit the opposing pitchers' mistakes (even when they are not that big of mistakes).

On the squeeze play, Eckstein should have been called safe, but that doesn't change the fact that it was a poor tactical move.  I do think Eckstein legitmately thought he could bring the run home and get the base hit, though -- the announcers noted that Perez was falling towards third after his pitches, so the bunt down the first baseline was a good move if Eckstein was trying to get on base and not just sacrifice.

by holden on Apr 25, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

it was low and maybe...
...a bit inside.  He likes that.  

by sdrone on Apr 25, 2006 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Rodriguez
For all you John Rodriguez fans: inspired by bgh's comment in last night's game thread, I've posted a diary attempting to make a comprehensive case for J-Rod as our everyday left-fielder. Take a look and let me know what you think. Let's hear from all the J-Rod fans!

by DCRedbird on Apr 25, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

The Hot Start of Aaron Miles
I've got some stats for you guys to peruse...

'04 522 AB/.293 AVG..329 OBP/29 BB/75 R
'05 324 AB
.281 AVG..306 OBP/8 BB/37 R

'06 43 AB.302 AVG..423 OBP8 BB7 R

Projected '06: 453 AB84 BB74 R

Will he finish with a .423 OBP? Probably not. Will he finish with 84 BB? His career trends scream, "NO". But, he will have more than 8 walks, which was his total in 324 2005 ABs, which is saying something. Say he has a .360 OBP and his career .290 AVG...

Grudz in '05  528 AB.294 AVG..324 OBP26 BB64 R/59 RBI

We may have gotten lucky on a different roll of the dice than anyone suspected. Yet, no one is talking about his hot start and seemingly better developed eye for the zone. The only discussion is about his falling back down to earth. What is "down to earth"? Miles' career average--over an admittedly small sample size--is .290 AVG.326 OBP, which is, essentially what Grudz put up last season, but with slightly less pop.

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 1:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Of course,
He was playing in Coors Field, where his splits were Bichette-esque.

by DanUpBaby on Apr 25, 2006 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

i can't say...
i'm all that high on aaron miles yet.  he has had a great start, but he made a couple of errors the other day, and it was my understanding we picked him up as more of a defensive specialist anyway.  i don't know... i say roll with the hot bat, but don't wait until it's totally cold to give luna the bulk of the starts

by gthedamned on Apr 25, 2006 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very true...
DanUpBaby and a fair point. However, Miles has a career 434:207 groundball to flyball ratio because he is a slap hitter.

Here are Miles' home/away splits:

'04
Home--266 AB/.308 AVG..355 OBP/21 BB
Away--256 AB
.277 AVG..301 OBP/8 BB

'05
Home--170 AB
.347 AVG..360 OBP/4 BB
Away--154 AB
.208 AVG..247 OBP/4 BB

Now, compare those Home/Away with this season's:

'06
Home--18 AB
.167 AVG..348 OBP/5 BB
Away--25 AB
.400 AVG./.483 OBP/3 BB

And that's without any games in Coors. What I'm really getting at is the fact that Miles has drawn the same number of walks in 43 ABs this season as he did in 324 ABs last season, which is heartening.

by bgh on Apr 25, 2006 2:20 PM EDT reply actions  

To those who say cards get no press
I tend to agree like when Pujols hit his milestones last week..Sportscenter led with it, ESPN News hid it under 20 min of other meaninless stuff.

Here is a side note that is funny...On ESPN 2k6 for X-box load scenes with tutorial on how to do stuff show Suppan, Carpenter and one of Pujols going yard at Houston...Some designer put that in..thsoe load more than other shots, I have noticed game makers do this before with teams..funny

by punchinjudy on Apr 25, 2006 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

ehhh
Another Cardinal fan myth. I think the Cardinals get more than their fair share of press. I live in Milwaukee and I don't struggle for Cardinal news.

I'm not sure what else we want. If you want Cardinal press read the Post Dispatch, this blog, etc. I've never understood this fascination with supposedly being snubbed by the national media.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Apr 25, 2006 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

i was responding
to a post aboput a week ago..i think it is mixed. I live out west and like i said when pujols hit his thousand hit and 200 hr it was not covered on ESPN News it lead on sportscenter though so it is mixed...i thought the game thing was funny...like a card fan put it in

by punchinjudy on Apr 25, 2006 5:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols