Tyler Greene could be one of the best base-stealers in the recent history of baseball
I was having a quick look at Greene's FanGraphs page the other day, and it struck me (as it has done every time I've looked at his stats in the last couple of years) what a truly exceptional base-stealer he is, potentially even verging on the "great" in this regard. The unfortunate thing about Greene is that he's a real bit of a mishmash of uncomplimentary talents - plenty of power for a shortstop, but serious contact problems, and exceptional speed and instincts on the basepaths, coupled with an unfortunate propensity for making outs before he reaches first base (career MLB OBP of only .307 in 359 PAs), but this doesn't necessarily detract from the fact that, in isolation, his stealing stats are genuinely exceptional.
It's been pretty well-documented in recent years that stealing bases is only actually valuable if you can do it without giving away too many outs doing so - taking, for example, Vince Coleman's 1988 season - 81 SB is a hugely impressive number, but when you also take into account the fact he was thrown out 27 times attempting to swipe a bag (which means that 15% of the time he got onto first base, he actually made an out on the basepaths), the final analysis is that his basestealing wasn't that productive in that particular season.
It's been pretty well-documented that the "break even" percentage, at which the benefit of advancing a base starts to outweigh the cost of giving up an occasional out, is a success rate of about two-in-three stolen base attempts. So, a guy who swipes 20 bags per season but gets thrown out 10 times on the basepaths isn't really adding anything more to the team (ignoring the small benefits of creating possible throwing errors and being able to steal a base in a close game) with his running game than a guy like Jim Thome, who averages less than 2 stolen base attempts per year for his career. Indeed, unless you're stealing a LOT of bases, there's really only pretty marginal value to guys who have lower than an 75% success rate. To put that into context, in the history of baseball (at least since SB and CS started to be counted) there are only 16 players with more than 300 SB and a success rate of 80%+.
So the guys who can steal a LOT of bases, with a HIGH success rate, are the ones who really benefit a team - take Ichiro and his remarkable 2006 season. 45 SB from 47 attempts, or a 96% success rate. You can basically turn those 186 singles he hit that year into 141 singles and 45 doubles.
Greene has, by any standards, a fine record of base-stealing success rate. He's quick, but has great instincts as well, hardly ever getting thrown out (which, at the major league level, is even more impressive, given that many of his appearances this year have come as a pinch runner). Take a look at his numbers from his short MLB stint, and his longer career in AAA:
Greene MLB:
PA: 359
SB: 16
SB%: Infinity (Greene has never been caught stealing in the major leagues).
Greene AAA:
PA: 1204
SB: 68
SB%: 87%
Greene combined totals:
89% SB success rate.
He steals a base every 18.6 PAs.
A quick comparison of these rates to some of the best base-stealers, statistically, of the modern game shows that Greene is right up there with them. In fact, his only problem (as I touched on at the beginning) is his inability to get on base. Compared to the Ichiros and Beltrans of the game, Greene's OBP is always going to be poor, and it's that which will presumably prevent him stealing a lot of bases (say, having a 40+ season) or being considered in the same breath as some of these guys.
Carlos Beltran career:
88% SB success rate
SB every 26.3 PAs
Ichiro career:
81% SB success rate
SB every 19.1 PAs
Carl Crawford career:
82% SB success rate
SB every 13.8 PAs
Jimmy Rollins career:
83% SB success rate
SB every 20.3 PAs
Jose Reyes career:
80% SB success rate
SB every 13.1 PAs
When you focus purely on base-stealing capability, Tyler Greene is right up there with the best in baseball. If his slightly mismatched hitting and fielding skills can coalesce into something that makes sense as a major league ballplayer (and despite being a fan of his, I'm by no means certain that this can happen), his ability on the basepaths will be his one truly elite skill.
51 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is some interesting stuff to think about
It’s nice to have this fanpost come after the Tyler Greene fire storm of 2011 has settled into quiet resignation that he’s not going to get any real playing time this year (though by this point it’s not like there was much more time to be had with four games left).
Ceterum censeo La Russa ire necesse est.
Great post
Greene is eligible for the post-season roster, right? Is it worth having a guy on the roster who has an 85-90% chance of stealing a base? It definitely paid off yesterday, and if we make the playoffs, I imagine there’d be several close and late moments where pinch-running Greene in order to get a stolen base would be beneficial.
Kumar: I don't know man, I lose my touch, man.
Dignan: Did you ever have a touch to lose, man?
Chambers could pinch run, too.
Hard to say, but it seems Tony knows what Tyler is really good at.
"Sometimes you scare me." - azruavatar
Chambers can't be on the post-season roster...
… b/c he was called up after Aug. 31.
Same is true of Greene, I believe.
Both are eligible should Corey Patterson somehow end up injured....
Just saying. Well, pleading, I guess.
Pujols or not Pujols. That is the question.
As long as they were in the organization on 31 Aug they can be used
to replace an injured player. I beleive you can count 60 day DL plays as well but not sure so I think our pool of eligbles is the 25 man roster as of 31 Aug + 2 to replace Lynn and Wainwright (and I think Sanchez too since he was on the 60 day DL at the time). So we could replace Theriot or Patterson without another injury but an injury to any other player also gives us a replacement player. And if the 06 rules are still in place you can set your roster per series so we could go without a pitcher (Westbrook?) for the NLDS but add him back for the NLCS.
"Come test me every day if you want," says Pujols, "Everything I ever made in this game I would give back to the Cardinals if I got caught."
I beg you to consider a player tag
so that all future Tyler Greene posts will be reminded
would've.
"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there..." - THT
dangit, I came here to delete that and close this tab.
my bad.
would've.
"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there..." - THT
the post is tagged "tyler greene" already.
home isn't where it used to be. home is anywhere you hang your head. - macmanus
Now, wait a second...
are you actually suggesting that stealing bases is a good thing? Now, I’m not the biggest stathead, but I thought it was pretty much established that the risk of stealing bases negated the benefits of OBP. Seems like any time I brought up the importance of infusing the team with speedier runners, I would get a statistical smack-down.
Of course, I still this team could use more speed. I’m as big a fan of Moneyball as the next guy. But I’ve also seen enough of Whiteyball to know that speed and aggressive baserunning has a lot of value – though it might not be easily quantified in sabermetrics.
Obviously if you could steal a base successfully every time then you should do so often.
Because it’s lots and lots of free bases. But the thing is, there are two possible outcomes with a stolen base attempt. An extra base, or an unnecessarily-created out. The out hurts you a lot more than the extra base helps you, so you have to have a really high success rate in order for your base-stealing to be a net positive for the team. It’s not quite black and white (stealing is good or stealing is bad) it all depends on the details.
Ceterum censeo La Russa ire necesse est.
read the article
do it for torty!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Sep 25, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Stealing bases is a quite good thing. Making an out on the basepaths is a really, really terrible thing.
Ergo, anyone good at the first, who doesn’t do the second, is going to be highly rated by both the moneyball and the whiteyball crowd. I guess perhaps the thing that the whiteyballers maybe don’t put enough emphasis on is success rate – stealing 40 bases in a season is not helping your team if you’re also getting caught 25 times, but stealing 30-some bases and only getting caught 3 or 4 times (as I suspect Greene could if he was given a full-time role ) is pretty big news.
I’m not arguing for or against Greene – I’ve always been slightly ambivalent about him. But he is an excellent (and, outside of St Louis, hugely under-rated) baserunner.
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 26, 2011 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
The thing is,
as far as player value goes, it’s about 40% OBP, 30% Power, 25% Defense, and 5% Baserunning. It is also much easier to provide negative value on the bases than it is to provide positive value, and the players with the highest baserunning scores are the ones with extremely large negative values.
Is stealing bases sometimes good? Yes. Is stealing bases ever something that should be prioritized over any other baseball skills like power, patience, or defense? No.
Just look at the points made in this post: Tyler Greene may be one of the best base-stealers ever, yet he can’t hold a major-league job. Certainly some fault for that goes to the manager that insists on playing a player with no baseball skills rather than a player with a few fringy ones, but the fact is that even very mediocre players are able to stick on the roster if the skill they bring is a highly important one.
Q. What's the sound of Colby clapping with one hand?
A. I DON’T KNOW BUT HES A LAZY BASTARD FOR NOT USING BOTH
-a fink
Infinity is an exaggeration
100% is the highest possible stolen base success rate.
100%< infinity
do it for torty!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Sep 25, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Nothing is higher
than 100%.
You can’t give 110%! No one can, Crash!
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
100% is a known quantity
infinity, not as comprehensible
do it for torty!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 6, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
not if you're Tyler Greene it isn't
FIRE EVERYONE
by Notorious PSC on Sep 26, 2011 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Reach for infinity.
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 26, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
nice post
and a great argument for tyler greene being an important part of the team (especially b/c speed in general is something we’ve been lacking the past couple years)
i was a bit confused by an apparent contradiction in your discussion of vince coleman’s ‘88 season though. vince stole, as you say, 81 bases at a 75% clip. but your final analysis that his baserunning "wasn’t that productive" contradicts your later (and, i believe, accurate) point that ‘unless you’re stealing a LOT of bases, there’s really only pretty marginal value to guys who have lower than an 75% success rate."
if you want to argue that his .313 OBP and .652 OPS made his season not particularly productive, i’m on board. but those 81 SB, even with the 27 CS, actually made his ’88 season much more valuable. some quick and dirty math (which i think helps prove your ultimate point):
i extrapolated from your ichiro 2006 example (of turning his 186 singles into 141 singles and 45 doubles) and simply added the 81 steals from vince’s ’88 season to his total bases count and – voila – a paltry .339 slugging percentage balloons to .471. by the same token, subtracting those 27 CS from his OBP leaves it at an even more embarrassing (especially considering he was our leadoff hitter) .273. that resulting .744 OPS, though, is almost a hundred points better than the .652 figure on his baseball card.
it’s not a perfect way to show the value of stolen bases, but it reinforces the point that a 75+% success rate (especially at that volume) is pretty damn productive, if not quite elite.
Coleman
It’s also really valuable to have a guy who can swipe second and third (which, with a RHB in the box, is actually the easier base to steal, imo*) when your baseball team is as power constrained as those Whiteyball teams were. You can create a lot of runs without hits in those instances, although it would be best if that guy could also walk and put the ball in play. Coleman hit a lot of IFFB if I remember correctly — I always remember listening to Jack on the radio lament the fact that a “guy that fast should be hitting the ball on the ground”.
FWIW — his ‘87 season is probably as valuable as any a basestealer has ever had, based purely on stolen base value. Had baserunning WAR existed starting in 1975, I would guess it would add 25-30 wins to Rickey Henderson’s career total of 114, putting him in some pretty elite company.
Pujols or not Pujols. That is the question.
Yeah, maybe Coleman wasn't the best example
and he had some TRULY elite running seasons too (like 87). I was merely pointing out (perhaps awkwardly) that 81 SB would be a pretty astonishing number in the modern game, but that (due to the CS) it probably isn’t any more valuable than (say) Ichiro’s 45 SB from 47 attempts (in fact it’s quite possibly less so).
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 26, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
on a team that hardly has any speed
Greene should be a vital player
do it for torty!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Sep 25, 2011 9:43 PM EDT reply actions
You can find a lot of critical game situations
Where that breakeven point is a lot lower than the overall average. Situations where that one run translate to a win a lot faster than the average run does. I’m thinking it has taken a 180, and having assets that can swipe a bag is now probably more valuable than the average guy realizes.
In critical game situations
the break-even point would be far higher (say 95% or greater) because of the limited number of outs. You really don’t want to run at all in late game situations unless you’re nearly 100% sure that you’re going to be safe. Better to play the percentages, bunt the runner over and hope that you can get a base hit before accumulating one or two more outs.
Pujols or not Pujols. That is the question.
How often are sac bunts unsuccessful?
Probably at least 10% of the time, right? Although some percentage of the time a “sacrifice” ends up generating no outs, via error or beating out the throw. I don’t know what the relevant percentages are.
How many sac bunts end up with nobody on base though?
That’s a key difference between a stolen base attempt and a botched sacrifice. Even if you botch the SAC, you still have a runner on first base.
Pujols or not Pujols. That is the question.
Here's how I view it
And feel free to correct me, because I have been drinking a decent amount today. If you look at a win expectancy chart, with a runner on first in the bottom of the 9th, in a tie game, your win expectancy is .637. If you successfully steal you increase your odds of winning by 10.4%, to .703. If you attempt, and get thrown out, you reduce your odds of winning by 16.5%, to .532. So the breakeven point is .105/.171 = 61.4%.
Given that it is the bottom of the 9th, you’re probably facing a pitcher with nasty stuff, so that probably edges the number down a bit more. If you have a slappy singles hitter up there vs. someone with some power, that might inch it down even further.
by Merry CRasmus on Sep 25, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
There are actually instances where the breakeven point is below 50%,
such as late in games with a man on third for a steal of home.
Q. What's the sound of Colby clapping with one hand?
A. I DON’T KNOW BUT HES A LAZY BASTARD FOR NOT USING BOTH
-a fink
Steal of home breakeven is like 30% IIRC
Secretary of WAR and defense (Tyler Greene Fanclub). PUT TYLER ON THE GREENE.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 3, 2011 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Most analyses I've seen disagree with this
Because the limited number of outs also increase the cost of waiting for a hit. A team down one run in the ninth has more pressure on it to make something happen than a team in the first looking to maximize its score.
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
Vince Coleman's career OBP is only .324
and Tyler Greene really isn’t too far off that mark. Given regular playing time, I think it’s possible that he could be a .250/.320/.380 type of player with decent defense and good speed.
He’s got to be a bench guy next year, without question (he can’t be optioned, so it’s either here or somewhere else). I have no hope that he will be though, as La Russa clearly doesn’t care about speed on the basepaths.
Pujols or not Pujols. That is the question.
Yeah, I agree with that
.250/.320/.380 is well within his capabilities, I think. Also tend to agree that he probably doesn’t get a chance in StL. I think Ryan Jackson might overtake him by the middle of next year anyhow. But I’d have liked to have seen him given a chance – you also have to feel sorry he’s not been given more than 300-odd MLB PAs because he’s probably only got a couple more years to make an impact before he starts to be getting too old.
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 26, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
interesting post. do we know when SB/CS rates stabilize?
home isn't where it used to be. home is anywhere you hang your head. - macmanus
I know that.
But I’m not telling you.
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 26, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
don't think that just because you're a fricking dog with a fricking toupee on your head on the other side of the atlantic
that i won’t hop on a plane and kick your ass.
home isn't where it used to be. home is anywhere you hang your head. - macmanus
by tom s. on Sep 27, 2011 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Greene would be great if there was such a thing as a designated base runner.
Other than that, getting on base is the first step to becoming a really good base stealer. Stolen base percentages alone shouldn’t be what makes a great base stealer..OBP should have something to say about it.
Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
by Dave Pendleton on Sep 27, 2011 11:39 AM EDT reply actions
You mean how Tyler Greene has an above-league-average OBP for the last two years?
by Willie McGee's Twin on Sep 27, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
no, not exactly.
I would say yes if he played a lot (every day) and was above league average.
Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
by Dave Pendleton on Sep 28, 2011 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree.
He’s a guy with a lot of useful skills, but not ones that coalesce together. He can hit it hard, but he struggles to make contact. He’s great on the basepaths, but he doesn’t get on base enough. His defensive skills are good, but he sometimes struggles with concentration and making routine plays. I guess he’s potentially a good player, but quite a frustrating one.
Still bitching to contact.
by Felonius_Monk on Sep 28, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Sounds like next season's "trade away from the doghouse for 30 cents on the dollar" candidate.
Though what 30 cents would be on Tyler Greene’s dollar right now, I’m not sure. Maybe a single A d-level prospect.
Last night,
Pujols took sole possession of the team lead in steals of third base with three, breaking a tie with Tyler Greene.
"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."
--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by 





















