Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

brewers put




just read on MLB daily dish that the brewers put trevor hoffman, mike cameron, jason kendall, craig counsell, braden looper, and felipe lopez on waivers.

Star-divide

I would Definately like to see the Cards pick up Hoffman for righty support, and Felipe Lopez as well, and send donw Khalil.  Anyone else you would like to see in the Birds on the bat?

 

also what would the Cards have to give up to nab these guys off the waiver wire

Poll
who would you rather have
Trevor Hoffman
84 votes
Craig Counsell
3 votes
Mike Cameron
5 votes
Braden Looper
6 votes
Jason Kendall
2 votes
Felipe Lopez
10 votes
None of the above
34 votes

144 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 85 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

no thanks

i’m good with what we have…wouldn’t give up a minor leaguer for any of those guys

"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister

by VolsnCards5 on Aug 26, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions  

but not worth a minor leaguer

unless its a nobody…which i doubt the brewers would take

"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister

by VolsnCards5 on Aug 26, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure he is

We have absolutely no right handed relievers besides Franklin who can get the job done. Hoffman projects for a mid 3’s FIP going forward, which would be a huge upgrade over Motte. And he would pitch a lot of high leverage innings in the postseason.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 26, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree.

He’d take the place of what I thought the Cards were acquiring Smoltz for…until Lohse went down.

"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"

-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.

by Tackle Box on Aug 26, 2009 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

smoltz will be in the bullpen when we need him there

Of course, hope means being cut down on some street corner, as you run like mad, by a random bullet.

by prophetjohn on Aug 26, 2009 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

honestly

if smoltz continues to pitch well just sit lohse the rest of the season, and get hoffman, or keep lohse and send down boggs either way

Pujols takes out "I" in BIG and "A" in MAC, previously considered to be an unyielding, consonant threat

by DESTROYER on Aug 27, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind Looper out of the pen again

I’m assuming he’s over that, though.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Aug 26, 2009 9:09 PM EDT reply actions  

The brewers don't plan on trading any beneficial player to us

They are just putting them on waivers to gain interest. The chance we get any of them is almost 1%

Man, with this outfield, need to get rid of that Rasmus, no Ankiel, wait no, Rasmus wait...To hell with Ankiel FREE KOBE RAMSIS

by Taskmaster on Aug 26, 2009 9:18 PM EDT reply actions  

worth a phone call for a few

since theyre most likely all free agents anyways, and low draft pick might snag one

Pujols takes out "I" in BIG and "A" in MAC, previously considered to be an unyielding, consonant threat

by DESTROYER on Aug 26, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

i wish you could trade draft picks

but alas, its not an option

"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister

by VolsnCards5 on Aug 26, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is smart by the Brewers

I’d like to see other teams go this route.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 26, 2009 9:40 PM EDT reply actions  

no

"Ludwick, I could kiss you on the nuts!" - the red baron 7-29-09

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Aug 26, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or future HOF's?

The answer is still “no”.

No longer patiently awaiting. Raz has arrived.

by RunninRedbird on Aug 27, 2009 6:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

out of the choices,

flip or cameron, but really, i’m cool on all of them. they’ll want way more than they’re worth

Of course, hope means being cut down on some street corner, as you run like mad, by a random bullet.

by prophetjohn on Aug 26, 2009 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn't do that.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 27, 2009 5:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why not?

Motte’s got his ERA near 6 and has struggled. With Hoffman, we’d get a good set-up guy.

Carp (or Waino) for NL Cy Young!

by zoomzoomj88 on Aug 27, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Motte's under contract for another 5 years, while Hoffmans 'pretty much done after this year

Although there is probably a case to be made that Motte is easily replaceable.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 27, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

If that's the case, we were probably short-sighted not to send him to Cleveland instead of Perez.

I think Motte’s AAA numbers suggest that he can work things out. I don’t believe it’s JUST the fact he doesn’t have a 2nd pitch that’s hurt him – his velocity’s down this year, he’s walking more guys than he did in AAA, and not throwing the ball past them as much. Something is wrong, more than just not having that 2nd pitch, and I think it’s likely to be correctable.

Also, I don’t see how it’s so hard to teach a mediocre changeup or a splitter or something to a guy who throws 97mph+. They need to get it done.

However, if Hoffman’s a type A, and we’re pretty sure he won’t accept arby, it’s worth getting him. However, I reckon he quite probably WOULD accept, given he’s earning $8m this year and he’ll probably get at least that in arbitration. I’m not sure we can afford $8m for a relief pitcher in 2010, especially if we want to sign Holliday.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 6:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

They put all those guys on waivers?

Wow… they’re going on a firehouse sale.

I wouldn’t mind seeing the Cards pick up Lopez or Counsell (just in case of a middle infield injury). Hoffman wouldn’t be bad either.

Carp (or Waino) for NL Cy Young!

by zoomzoomj88 on Aug 27, 2009 7:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Why is Mike Cameron getting no votes?

He’s not signed past this year, we’d assume about 2M or so of his contract for the rest of the season, and I believe he’ll be at least a type B FA after this season.

He’s a .356 wOBA player this year who can still play an above average defense in CF, has a career .850 OPS against left handed pitching (.847 this season), and is slugging .451 this year with 18 homers.

He’s probably not going to cost more than a B level prospect, and we could get that back if he’s type B, and he most certainly will be at least that at the end of the season.

Seriously people, what’s not to like here?

We could push Hoffpauir off the 40 man to make room for him, he relegates Ankiel’s crappy bat to the bench pretty much full time, gives us a RH bat to put in the lineup against lefties so that we’re sitting Colby’s struggling stick against lefties and we’re not hurting the club much defensively. He makes a great late inning pinch hitter since he has pop and the ability to get on base, and he could even lead off occasionally against lefties with Skip out of the lineup (but I’d much rather see him down in the order).

I understand the want of someone like Hoffman, but since he’ll be a type A guy at the end of the year I don’t see us getting him for a bag of peanuts either — I think Cameron would actually come much cheaper.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 27, 2009 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

But we don't exactly have a player like Cameron

or he’d actually be playing against left handed pitching. Considering that the front office has made big moves to put the team in World Series contention, you have to figure that this would be another good move. It improves the ballclub and we’re going to see a lot of left handed pitching in the playoffs if things finish as they do today. Think about it:

Rockies: Francis
Phillies: Lee, Hamels, Moyer (although he probably wouldn’t start a playoff game, but who knows)
Dodgers: Kershaw (and some very good left specialists out of the pen)

That’s 4 lefty starters out of a group of 11 or 12 guys, so you’re talking about 35% of the innings in the postseason could come from lefties. It wouldn’t hurt to have a veteran player like Cameron on the club for that very reason.

The question isn’t whether we have enough outfielders, the question is whether Cameron is better than Ankiel or any other player we could call up from AAA that plays outfield. I think the answer to that question is a resounding yes.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 27, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

But, if Cameron is going to be a part time player

Which inherently limits his impact, he likely won’t be worth what we give up in prospects.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

if 'better than Ankiel' is the bar

Cameron is only one of several who could leap over that.
Yes, Cameron would be fine (pretty good defense, too), but while we are musing {as one who voted ‘none of the above’} I would like to take a shot at Gary Sheffield for a month + rental.

In any case, ANY musing move needs to happen in the next three days or so, or the new guy would not be playoff eligible, right? I don’t think we need any help getting the division sewed up, but a masher like Sheff would be a nice add to the playoff roster.

by the Tewk on Aug 28, 2009 5:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

So

We pooh-pooh a guy like Cameron, who can play all three outfield positions well and start in CF against lefties, and then we bring up GARY SHEFFIELD, who plays terrible outfield defense, and, last I checked, was having a similar season to Cameron offensively.

Now, how does Sheffield help us? He really can only pinch hit, because he’s not pushing Holliday out of the lineup, and I don’t think he should push Ludwick out of it either. He can’t play CF, so we’re still stuck watching Ankiel swing and miss pitches by 2 feet on days when Colby gets a rest, and we’re still playing a left handed bat in CF against lefties. I don’t understand how Sheffield helps us MORE than Cameron does, just that Sheffield would cost less to pick up, and you don’t even know if that’s the case.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sheffield is also a big douche

and, AFAIK, we’ve got a pretty tight-knit team this year. No thanks on the Sheff front.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes, we do.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Aug 27, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

How so?

It’s obviously not a bad thing to have, but we would be better served upgrading in spots where we don’t already have above average players at each postion.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

of our four OF, only two of them have wOBAs over .330, and ludwick's is only .335.

if we’re looking to upgrade our offense – which is really kind of stalling – the OF would be a natural place to do so. a player of cameron’s caliber is not gonna fall out of the sky. we could DL or even just release rick ankiel at this point (whose net value is now less than replacement value). cameron would be the perfect player to justify that.

i agree it would be better to get some bullpen help, but cameron is hard to pass up.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Aug 28, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

is Cameron better than Craig?

is Cameron worth giving up prospects b/c he’s superior to our MiL OF?

Proud sponsor of the Official 2009 StL Cardinal theme song: Reason to Believe

by gocards62 on Aug 28, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

For 2009

Cameron is easily better than Craig, and Craig can’t play CF either, so it’s not a like comparison.

Is Cameron better than Ankiel, Jay, and Robinson? Yes, yes, and yes. Would I give up Jon Jay right now to get Cameron for the rest of the year? Yes, I would.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the 1.5 month period that Cameron was on our team

He would add maybe 1 WAR at most, and that assume he starts everday, which would of course take time away from Rasmus. That wouldn’t improve our playoff odds, because we would already be a lock, and would only marginiall improve our World Series odds.

It doesn’t make sense to trade away anyone with a future in this organization for someone who won’t help us very much.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

John Jay has a future in this organization?

As what exactly? He’s pretty much a B level trade chip unless you think he’s starting next year in LF, in which case, well, I REALLY hope your wrong.

Now, as far as “helping us very much” in terms of WAR, no, he won’t. In terms of high leverage AB’s in the postseason? Yes, he would.

If you want to break everything down in terms of WAR, then you shouldn’t ever comment on postseason play because you’re never going to have a playoff sample size big enough to predict anything.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh god
As what exactly? He’s pretty much a B level trade chip unless you think he’s starting next year in LF, in which case, well, I REALLY hope your wrong.

He’s been a solid outfielder every year, and we aren’t exactly swimming in those. I don’t think he’d be a starter next year, but I definitely think he’d be a valuable player for the Cards.

Now, as far as "helping us very much" in terms of WAR, no, he won’t. In terms of high leverage AB’s in the postseason? Yes, he would.

Actually, no, WAR is pretty much what you want here. Rasmus projects to have about a .320 wOBA, Cameron projects to have a .350 wOBA. Do you really think that .30 point difference, which may only be manifested in 5-6 high leverage at bats in the playoffs, is worth taking away time from Rasmus and trading away a good prospect in Jay?

Cameron would improve our world series margianally. Not enough to justify giving up Jay.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I keep forgetting

that once you decide you’re right, you can’t be swayed. I don’t know why I try.

If you don’t think that Cameron can help us in the postseason, when we’re likely to face at least one lefty starter, if not two or three, in each series. Your argument about “taking time away from Colby” is bullshit. The idea is to win the World Series, that’s what you play for, and if a guy gives you a better opportunity to do so, then you make that deal as long as it doesn’t cost way more than market cost. If it costs us a B-level prospect than i think that’s acceptable. Our offense is NOT the juggernaut that you make it out to be.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, calm down

I agree that Cameron will help us.

I don’t agree that that his help is worth trading away Jon.

Also, I’m done arguing with you on this board. I’m just, done.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm calm, WTF?

Seriously, VEP, you take a position and you stand your ground, you never admit that someone else might have a point.

Look, what we’re talking about here is a matter of opinion, there’s no right or wrong answer. I would give up Jay to get Cameron right now because I think that having a veteran outfielder that can hit lefties fills a big hole in our current lineup. You wouldn’t. That’s find, but making it sound like a black and white case when it isn’t is just ridiculous.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Other issues to consider

Cameron will cost about $2m over the rest of the year. That’s not an insignificant amount.

However, I suspect he’s probably a Type B (I haven’t checked the elias rankings) which means that if you’re prepared to offer arby, we COULD net a draft pick (that is probably worth as much or more than Jon Jay) in return. Obviously, though, at his age, there’s a chance he accepts, in which case you’re paying him somewhere in the $10m range. Which also, obviously, means there’s no room on the payroll (or in the OF) for Matt Holliday, which I’m ambivalent about – I like Holliday and I’d like him back, but I think it’s actually possible we can construct a better team by redirecting the Holliday contract money into other areas (such as Mike Cameron + Mark DeRosa, or Cameron + a FA pitcher like Smoltz or Penny, or even Pineiro in this scenario).

So there’s a lot to consider. Still, I probably lean towards the idea that Jay for Cameron might not be a bad deal. I don’t think Jay is going to amount to much, and is fairly fungible in this organisation (Tyler Henley does much the same job and has had a much better year).

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 30, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I totally agree with everything you said

It’s about weighing options, both this year and in the offseason. I think we’ve got 2 other guys similar or better than John Jay, and one of them is 22 and is the org’s top prospect and has been in the big leagues all year. I think that he’s pretty much redundant here, but Milwaukee might be very interested in a CF with a good glove who hits left-handed, so I think you might be able to get Cameron for him straight up.

Now, I happen to believe that he helps us for the next month and in the playoffs, so I think it would be a good deal to make. But that’s just my opinion and there’s plenty of evidence to support the other view.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 30, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

i didn't say we should give up any particular prospects.

if the price is high, i wouldn’t do it. the original question was “do we need OF help?” right now, nyjer morgan would have the second-best wOBA in our OF.

i say yes, we do need OF help. mike cameron is a pretty top notch OF (#13 among qualified OF by WAR).

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Aug 28, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since when do we only use this year's stats?

Ludwick projects to have a .361 wOBA going forward.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mike Cameron

has a .357 wOBA

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rasmus has a .320 wOBA

So if you’re going to quote how much better Ludwick is, and that he should continue to play, then you can’t argue that Cameron isn’t an upgrade over Colby offensively.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok. but he's having an off-year, which may be dumb luck, lingering injury,

what have you. ryan ludwick, one must admit, is a player who is extremely hard to project, because of his history.

regardless. rick ankiel is a net negative on the team. colby ought to be playing every day, but his health is a question mark. if we can spell colby with a good player, it seems like our team is better going forward.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Aug 28, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I also don’t think that marginal improvement is worth giving up a good prospect like Jay.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

jay has a .702 ops in AAA at age 24 - mle of .593.

he could turn it around, but i think most people see him as a fourth outfielder/defensive specialist. he’s pretty replaceable – tyler henley and adron chambers may both have a comparable ceiling.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Aug 28, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

He also has a nice history of success in the minors

And is an excellent defender by most reports. I don’t think he great, I do think that Jay for 6 years is more valuable than Cameron for 1 month, especially when Cameron will be replacing Rasmus, who is nearly as good as him and is the future of this team.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, he's the future

but Cameron could help us win right now, and Colby would still play, just not against lefties.

You’re being obtuse.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

you might be right that 6 years of Jay is worth more than 1 month of Cameron

but from the tone of your posts, I feel you’re slightly over-rating Jay, perhaps. I feel that guys like him are very prevalent in the minors and I think he’s barely a prospect (certainly no more than a C) at the moment. I’m also not sure he’s the sort of player that a contending team will ever want to give a lot of PAs to.

That doesn’t mean he’s without value, but I see his value to this organisation as somewhat marginal, and I don’t think he has a significant future in the major leagues.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 30, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cameron wouldn't be given away for free...

and he wouldn’t bring any kind of a pick because we wouldn’t offer him arbitration. You offer him arbitration, he asks for $10 million, and the team is seriously exposed. They never put themselves out there like this.

Please take this comment in the spirit it was intended.

by guayzimi on Aug 27, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is also what the Brewers are probably thinking

which is why he won’t cost that much. They’re not going to want to pay him that kind of coin going forward, so they’d probably take a B level prospects or a couple of C level guys to get some return for him before the offseason. They thought they might be in contention until about 2 weeks ago, or he probably would have been dealt at the deadline.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 27, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cameron cost $7m this year

and has a $10m option next year with a $0.75m buyout. He’s worth that easily, and if we buy him out and offer arby I suspect we could get his value down somewhat (or, indeed, he might say no, play the market, and we’ll get a supplemental pick back).

The only problem is that Cameron for ~$8m means no Holliday. However, I think I wouldn’t mind that too much. It leaves us about $20m to add a starter, a 3B and a relief pitcher, and may ultimately give us a more rounded team. We could probably keep Pineiro (or maybe Smoltz), keep DeRosa to play 3B (or maybe a bit of LF now and again), and add a reasonable set-up guy like LaTroy Hawkins or someone like that. It also gives us more flexibility long term to buyout Ludwick’s next couple of years, buyout Colby’s arby years, and give Pujols That Extension. No Holliday in this scenario, but perhaps we’ve got a better team…

I think there’s a few ways of skinning the cat of 2010 and putting a competitive team on the field, and I’d be open to a number of them. I could go either way on signing or not signing Holliday. One important point is that Holliday will be THE top Elias-ranked free agent, so if we don’t sign him we are GUARANTEED a first-round pick (probably the Yanks, Angels or BoSox, so it’d be late-20s), which isn’t the case with any of our other type As.

I could very much live with Cameron in LF, Colby in CF, Ludwick in RF, DeRo at 3B vs RHP and DeRo in LF, Cameron in CF, Ludwick in RF, Freese/Craig at 3B vs LHP (or perhaps Matt Murton in LF?), especially if we’ve still got Pineiro and his likely 4-ish FIP as our 3rd starter, and somebody good (Smoltz? Hawkins? Maybe even Hoffman or someone?) at the back end of the bullpen with Franklin. Equally, I’d love to have Holliday in LF going forward, but that probably means a cheap option at 3B (Freese/Lugo/etc), Pineiro walking, and a cheap option as our #3/4 starter.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 6:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

ignore the contract info

I got that wrong. He cost $7m last year, $10m this year and is a FA in 2010.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 30, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we needed more offensive K's

we’d add this guy. He strikes out a ton, and we have more than enough OFs.

Carp (or Waino) for NL Cy Young!

by zoomzoomj88 on Aug 27, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Please don't mention K's when deriding a player

They really don’t have any negative value.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 27, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Got a question here

It’s been something that comes up in my mind every once in a while, but I never really dig in and think about it too much.

Why is it that K rate for a pitcher is highly valued, but a hitter that K’s a lot is not relevant. I mean, I subscribe to that school of thought myself for the most part. I guess I accept there is a tradeoff there, generally speaking. Meaning that the guy that strikes out a lot generally is the guy that hits for extra bases. I loved Ray Lankford, for example. He struck out a lot, but he never got cheated and when he’d make contact he made hard contact. Obviously it doesn’t tell close to the whole story if they rack up a lot of whiffs, but should it really be completely irrelevant?

by Merry CRasmus on Aug 27, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

K rates by themselves don't mean a whole lot

For example, Ricky Nolasco and Francisco Liriano have very high K-rates, but they’re other peripherals aren’t all that great. Similarly, Jack Cust, Brandon Inge, and BJ Upton all have high K rates for hitters and have average wOBA’s. The point is that it doesn’t tell you everything. In the absence of other information you really can’t get a lot of out of the K rates for either pitchers or hitters.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 27, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lincecum has amazing peripherals

Nolasco’s make him look like he’s a lot better than his, imo.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well that's

FANTASTICALLY MAGICALLY AMAZING if Nolasco’s 3.54 FIP and 4.33 tRA are “amazing”, as you said. Nolasco’s riding a horse, Lincecum is riding a pegacorn.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing.

You’re just extremely obtuse today and are being a contrarian.

If you say that Nolasco’s peripheral’s are “amazing” and Lincecum’s are better, then Lincecum’s are “better than amazing”.

Perhaps you should take a step back and figure out what you’re going to argue before you start arguing and things like this won’t happen.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right

We certainly don’t need someone in the outfield that’s getting on base at a .360 clip, plays good defense, hits home runs, and has a higher wOBA than all our outfielders not named Holliday.

FWIW, Ludwick strikes out a lot too, I guess we should just trade him away — nobody with that kind of K rate is going to be a successful hitter.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 27, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm all for anything

that puts Rick on the bench, DL, or waivers.

But I’d like to see us call up Mark Hamilton to have another LH bat.

Proud sponsor of the Official 2009 StL Cardinal theme song: Reason to Believe

by gocards62 on Aug 27, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree, I think, fourstick

but I wouldn’t want to give up more than a B-level prospect (at the most) for him. I wonder if just trying to get Matt Murton wouldn’t be a better option.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 6:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't give up more than a B level prospect either

I just think the Brewers want some minor league depth in return for a guy that they plan on buying out and letting go for free in the offseason.

Murton is an option, but he doesn’t solve our CF problem against lefties, which is really our only offensive problem right now: We’re essentially starting two pitchers against lefties every time we face one, because Rasmus and Ankiel don’t hit much better than Carp does against left handed pitching. Rasmus’ defense should keep him in the lineup, but getting a guy like Cameron to play there would be a very good move, imo, since we’re likely to see quite a bit of left handed pitching in the playoffs and (hopefully) World Series, no matter who we’re playing.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 28, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brad Penny

Just released by Red Sox.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090827&content_id=6642322&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb

Again, we could get another player for free from the Bo Sox. I’m all for it. If it doesn’t work we don’t lose much.

by Schnurdog on Aug 27, 2009 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

More Red Sox trash for our gain?

Wouldn’t be bad, but who would go to the pen if we got this guy? Maybe they’d finally cut Welly?

Carp (or Waino) for NL Cy Young!

by zoomzoomj88 on Aug 27, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Correct me if I'm wrong somebody...

But I think the rosters expand in a few days. Can’t Penny be added without taking anybody off of the active roster (well, after a couple days).

Basically, I’m not real sure about Penny’s stats, but I would at least give this guy a chance in the bullpen. He could turn it around in the NL under Duncan. He is a 2 time all star.

by Schnurdog on Aug 27, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

The whole reason...

he was released is because he did not want to go to the Red Sox bullpen once Wakefield came off the DL.

Please take this comment in the spirit it was intended.

by guayzimi on Aug 27, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well...given his current situation

I don’t think he would have a problem being moved to the bullpen for StL, as apposed to sitting at home for the rest of the season watching ESPN. There is very little risk and possible high reward for both parties. I don’t see how this doesn’t make sense.

by Schnurdog on Aug 27, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow. Penny is a guy I would LOVE to sign.

4.48 FIP in the AL East. He’s probably going to be better than that in the NL Central. I’m thinking he’d be a better option than Lohse going forward, and then we have a reliable 4th starter for the post-season, and can use Lohse and Smoltz out of the pen, which takes Motte and possibly also KMac out of the more high-leverage innings.

Also, we’re 9 games ahead in the standings. SURELY if we want him, he’s more likely to want to play for us for 2 months than he is someone like Colorado or Florida (who are by no means a post-season lock).

I’d get on the phone to his agent, tell him he can be our 4th starter in the playoffs, and get him on the first plane to St Louis. Also, this gives us another option for next year. Let’s say he comes here, and likes it here. He’s, at the very worst, a #4 pitcher, and he’s definitely as good as Lohse (and arguably likely to be as good as Pineiro next year). He’s had a mediocre ERA (with decent peripherals) in the toughest hitters’ league in baseball, and cost $5m this year. I’m sure we could get him on a similar one-year deal next year. Either him or Smoltz (or maybe even both!) for ~$5-8m and let one of the youngsters take the 5th rotation spot, and we’ve got the cash to extend Holliday without crippling the rest of our team. I like.

Jeez. Add Penny and we could have one of the best rotations in the HISTORY of this franchise. GET HIM SIGNED.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Additional Penny info re: signing him next year

He’s been above average for the last 7 years except 2008 when he was injured (WARs: 3.0, 2.7, 3.2, 3.4, 4.3, 0.1, 2.1 so far this year).

His fastball velocity is actually UP this year (sitting at 94mph; his career average is a little over 93). His K/BB ratio is 2.12, which is slightly down on his career 2.17. Batters are swinging at his pitches at the same rate as usual, but making slightly more contact (he’s got a 13% whiff rate on swings this year, as opposed to a career 16%) but his control and first strike % are equivalent with his career rates.

His main issue this year is the HR – he’s giving up 1.16 per 9 innings, as opposed to a career rate of 0.87. Moving to a pitcher’s park (Busch) will help, and I feel that working with Duncan may help too – he’s a career 45% GB pitcher, but is only producing GB at 41% this year. A move to a bigger park, and a few more GB, and he’ll be back to being the ~4FIP pitcher he’s been for his career.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008

by Felonius_Monk on Aug 28, 2009 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

He looks like a very good pickup. I would be interested in signing him next year as well, as he has been a very good pitcher for most of his career, and still looks like he can pitch. It’d be nice to sign him this year and see what he’s got. Then next year, I would like to offer a 2 year deal if he works out.

Smoltz.

by vivaelpujols on Aug 28, 2009 6:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Felonius_Monk

That’s what I was hoping for. I like reading about all those stats, but I’m not quite up to putting them all together. I remember that the Cards did have some interest in Penny during one of the off seasons. As mentioned it could be a viable option going forward as well, depending on this years results. I also agree that Penny would have to want to come here. If you look at the string that we have put together since assembly of our new team, we would have to be on the top of nearly anyone’s list.

by Schnurdog on Aug 28, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really need a primer...

on revocable and irrevocable waivers…. I Think these moves have been misunderstood just about every way possible on this thread.

Please take this comment in the spirit it was intended.

by guayzimi on Aug 27, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Indeed

Man, with this outfield, need to get rid of that Rasmus, no Ankiel, wait no, Rasmus wait...To hell with Ankiel FREE KOBE RAMSIS

by Taskmaster on Aug 27, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here is a

link to an article over at Purple Row that goes over all the rules around Revocable and Irrevocable waivers

No excuses. No injuries. No "better luck next time"
Do it, and shut the f—- up.
-Reggie Jackson

by stlwcards on Aug 27, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Corner Outfielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols