Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Deal of the Century

Matt Holliday was 4-5 w/ a double last night. Therefore, the trade was a tremendous coup on Mo’s part. Thank goodness, Holliday has arrived to solve all of our offensive woes and the price we’ve paid will be nothing in comparison to the gains we’ll get these next 2 (dare I say, 3?) months of Matt Holliday.

It’s important to note that none of us disparaging the trade believe Brett Wallace to be the 2nd coming. But he is an outstanding prospect – ranked recently by BA as baseball’s 21st best – and he’s close to being ready for the majors as well. It was likely that, had he remained a Cardinal, he would have stepped in to the 3rd base position next spring and, assuming a Schumaker-like competence at the hot corner, solidified the team at 3rd for the next 6 years. For all those questioning his defensive talent and ability to stick at 3rd – and I’m one of them – how long do you think it would take him to become a better offensive performer than Skip Schumaker? I’ll bet it’s not very damned long and if we’re going to continue running Skip out to 2nd there would be no reason not to run Wallace out to third.

For those of you unfamiliar w/ Victor Wang’s research on prospects’ values, I’ll explain it briefly and allow you to read the links for more details on the methodology. The bottom line is that Victor analyzed historical performance by draft picks and prospects and compared their performances to the salaries they’ve received in their first 6 years in the league. Why 6 years? Because that’s how long they’re under their teams’ control. Sky Kalkman over at BtB put together a chart summarizing Wang’s conclusions and you’ll see from that chart that a hitting prospect ranked between #11 and #25 – as Wallace is – has historically averaged being worth more than $25 M more than they’ve been paid over that time period.

Let’s pause here for a moment. Many will say – as many did yesterday – that prospects don’t always pan out. There’s nothing guaranteed in a prospect and Wallace may end up being worth nothing. That’s true. That’s accounted for in Wang’s research. Wallace may also end up being a perennial All-Star or end up in the Hall of Fame. (Why are those possibilities never stated by anyone who disparages the value that a prospect has?) Holliday may blow out his knee tomorrow and never play another game for the Cardinals. The bottom line is that the $25 M quoted above is an AVERAGE of all those hitting prospects rated between #11 and 25. He might turn out to be worth 0 or maybe he’ll be worth $50 M but the $25 M is a weighted average based on 70 prospects from 1990-1999. We can, therefore, dispense with the disingenuous argument that "prospects may flame out." Ok, so back to the trade.

Wallace figures to have surplus value of $25.1 M. Mortensen is graded by John Sickels as a C prospect (though I think he’s really closer to a B minus) who is 24 years old so his surplus value is $1.5 M. Peterson is also a grade C prospect whose surplus value is $0.5 M. Add all these together and the Cards traded away $27.1 M in surplus value. Again, that’s not the value these players expect to provide but rather the value in excess of their salaries that they would have provided the Cardinals and now will provide the A’s. Is that guaranteed? Of course not, but nothing’s guaranteed. They may all become Hall of Famers and Matt Holliday may suffer a career-ending injury tomorrow.

So what’s Holliday’s value to the team? Well, he’s probably worth 2 wins over Ankiel the rest of the way (though less than that over Rasmus if Tony persists in allowing Slick Rick to take Colby’s playing time away) so that will provide the team $9 M in value (not surplus value, however). Erik over at BtB estimates that the Cards’ increased playoff odds as a result of the trade provide about $4 M to the team. Apparently, Billy Beane was nice enough to throw in $1.5 M. When Holliday leaves via free agency the Cards will receive a first round pick and a supplemental since he’ll be a Type-A free agent. That value, using Wang’s research, -- assuming (generously) that Holliday doesn’t sign w/ a team selecting in the first half of the first round and that he isn’t the 2nd highest rated free agent signing w/ a team – is worth about $7.8 M to the team. Add all that up and it comes to $22.3 M. Subtract now Holliday’s salary. The Cards are on the hook for about $6 M so Holliday’s surplus value to the team is about $16.3 M – well beneath the $27.1 M that the Wallace, Mortensen, Peterson trifecta would have been worth to the team. In fact, it’s pretty clear that Holliday wasn’t worth Wallace BY HIMSELF.

Many of you will take issue w/ the SABR slant of this analysis and say "how do you place a value on things you don’t know for sure will happen?". What if the team wins the World Series? Is it worth it then? Perhaps, but what if they fail to make the playoffs or lose in the first round? If we’re going to play the "what if?" game, it can’t just be "what if we win the World Series" or "what if Wallace can’t play 3B or never makes it as a major leaguer?" We’ve gotta look at the other side as well. What if we don’t make the playoffs and Wallace becomes a perennial All-Star? Those are possibilities as well. Holliday simply wasn’t worth the cost…period. I hope we win this year and that Holliday plays really well and brings us 2 picks that Luhnow, the guy responsible for drafting Wallace btw, turns into great prospects as well. But the likelihood is that Billy Beane got the better of us again. In this case the likely return to the A’s will be 66% higher than the value we receive.

I’ll deal w/ the possibility of resigning Holliday in the offseason tomorrow b/c I know that many are saying that this becomes a great trade if we resign him to a long-term contract. It’s worth noting that Holliday will, undoubtedly, receive a 5 or 6 year contract worth somewhere between $15 and $18 M per season this offseason. We’ve already got Carp signed for $14.5 and $15 M the next 2 seasons. Lohse will receive almost $34 M the next 3 seasons. Ludwick is arbitration eligible each of the next 2 seasons and set to receive pretty decent raises, even with a decrease in performance this year. Wainwright is set to receive a pretty healthy raise each of the next 4 seasons, assuming the team picks up his 2 options. Rasmus is going to become arbitration eligible and see his salary go up in the next 3 seasons. And we’re all too aware that Pujols’s contract is going to need to be renegotiated, if not this offseason, then probably next offseason. Expect him to get a raise between $10 and $15 M PER SEASON. That’s Holliday’s salary (almost) right there! And we don’t have a 3B, we don’t have a closer (past next season), and we only have 3 starters. Plus we have little depth. The bottom line is that, to afford Pujols’s extension, we’re going to have to find more good, young, cheap players and not more older, $15 M players. Wallace was one guy we could have used.

The last thing I’ll say in this thread is that there appears to be a disturbing trend developing. The last 4 trades made by Mozeliak have all involved the team trading younger players for older players. I still say the Lugo trade was a good deal. I’ll also say that the Greene trade was worth the risk, though the Padres will clearly win that one. The jury is still out on the DeRosa deal, considering we don’t yet know who the PTBNL is and therefore don’t really know how high that cost is. There is an increased recognition of the importance of scouting, development, and young players in general and the team has done a great job over the last 3-4 years particularly in developing young players. But the days of developing prospects simply to trade them for older, more expensive veterans and being able to prosper as a result are over. The team’s future will be built around guys like Rasmus more than they will people like Matt Holliday and if we think that the only purpose for developing young guys is to trade them for older guys, we’ll lose far more often than we’ll win.

Comment 600 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Erik over at BtB estimates that the Cards’ increased playoff odds as a result of the trade provide about $4 M to the team.

Lame

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 2:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Thank you

I’m feeling awfully slighted over here. My genius should be recognized.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

well said, VEP

it’s good to see you’ve put so much thought into your posts today!

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, what?

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

you pick out 1 sentence from the thread

and label it “lame” w/ no explanation whatsoever.

Apparently, as erik says later, he got the $4 M number from you. Had I known that, I’d have credited you so my sincere apologies go out to you if you feel slighted. I didn’t intentionally slight you.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't slighted

It was just a little joke, that apparently no one picked up on :)

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 26, 2009 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also, it was a shitty trade, yes

But can you just let us enjoy our awesome new offense for a couple of days :)

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 2:12 AM EDT reply actions  

it was fun watching last night.

Lugo’s triple! Damn he is fast! The ball hit the wall and I said out loud. ’He has a stand up double. OH shit he is on third!"

This is going to be a great team with great chemistry. They will have a lot of fun and they will win a lot of games. OH BOY IS THIS GREAT!.

Now I know It was a bad trade.

by nybirdfan on Jul 25, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with you!

For the first time in months, I was EXCITED to see us at the plate. Before yesterday, it was always exciting watching the pitching and then just hoping the offense would bloop a run or two in. That new “enjoyability” of watching this team must be worth something . . .

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 25, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

a few more sellouts and jersey sales

might go into the Save Albert Pujols jar.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

If desire to win is really his motivating factor ...

wouldn’t you expect him to take a contract extension commensurate with the market he plays in? Albert is one of the few players that I actually believe when he speaks, so I have no reason to doubt that his ultimate goal is win championships. So, wouldn’t one expect him to forego some of the market value in order for the organization to be able to surround him with quality players?

by etp_stl on Jul 25, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

but other teams can win championships too. And if he feels another team might have a better chance who offers him more money, we’ll be in trouble.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 25, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT: Trade Post

Since we’re all in the trade mode now, would a trade of Glaus for Penny be something to consider?

....my quick smells like french toast...

by mstreeter06 on Jul 25, 2009 2:29 AM EDT reply actions  

So it's 2:40 AM and I'm watching this show on the History Channel...

about the guys that stole Abraham Lincoln’s body. 1) It’s actual, real-life history, which is nothing to scoff at for the History Channel anymore. 2) These historians are killing me. They’re talking about it with such shock and indignation, you would think this had just happened yesterday to Ronald Reagan. 3) Albert Pujols is ridiculous (but not lately).

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 2:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I've seen it many times

the shock and indignation is what the family and cemetery workers did to his body.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 25, 2009 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Like Jacko..

…who still isn’t buried? He’ll need moore than one glove while he’s chillin’ in the family freezer…
:=8/

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

The history and discovery channels have become pretty terrible.

The credulous nonsense that they constantly show (will the world end in 2012???!?! did Nostradamus predict the internet???!?!?!!? was the titanic sinking a consiracy??!?!?!?! check out this haunted house!!!!11) is embarrassing.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jul 25, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

You forgot to mention

UFO’s over Montana?!???!! Cupacardey sightings by rednecks in the southwest?!??!!!! Bigfoot’s hair found on a nail in Montana?!!???!! Sorcery, is it real? Let’s ask some men who don’t shower.

Absolutely ridiculous. It was one of my favorite things to watch. Now it infuriates me as much as Moz trades.

HE SAID WITH A SMIRK

by Dave Barry on Jul 25, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

they do Ice Road Truckers, though.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man

I hope you’re being sarcastic. IRT and Deadliest Catch irk the hell outa me.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Jul 25, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Deadliest Catch

is the best program on television by a mile. As soon as I’m done with school… I’m on a fucking crab boat.

by mynameistyler on Jul 25, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

They can both eat my poo.

If you’ve seen one episode, you’ve seen them all.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

If the Cardinals

thought Wallace could hold down third base, he’d already be there. That’s the rub. If they thought he could this trade wouldn’t have happened, but to me it seems like they dealt a 1B with a minor league ISOP of .160 to take a shot at a very real playoff window. Flags fly forever, and we have the best player in the game at 1B. It’s not like they traded Rasmus for Halladay, moving a potential two-way difference maker for a short term gain.

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 3:13 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I don't buy that argument

There is a chance that Tony was actually right about Wallace, in you know, letting him get his bearings at AAA before calling him up. As much as I wanted Wallace at 3b instead of Thursty, it probably was best not to rush him. All in all, I think the only thing this trade proves is that the Cards really, really wanted Holliday.

I just hope this trade gets us into the playoffs, on to the WS, it ends up with another flag flying, and Tony decides it is time to ride off into the sunset.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

The MooCow has lready said what he’s gonna say about Wallace and this trade – its all moot now. Now, the herd is gonna sit back and hope the Cards blow out everyone for the rest of the year.

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I say there Moo Cow

you’re taking this better than I thought. For me I’m still unsure about this trade and I didn’t even think that Wallace was quite the talent that a lot on this blog thought.

It was refreshing to watch that almost right handed lineup last night put up runs against a pretty good left hander. I hardly reconized that team.

by ridgesee on Jul 25, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

anytime you trade prospects for a superstar its questionable especially with the cards history cough cough mark mulder cough cough but this one i see as a win, even if only for a few months. I do think Holliday will resign with the cards though you have Kbot, and no arm glaus coming off the books which with those two you have enough to resign Holliday and DeRosa

Pujols takes out "I" in BIG and "A" in MAC, previously considered to be an unyielding, consonant threat

by DESTROYER on Jul 25, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

speaking of which, did you guys

Read dave cameron’s “well-researched” article about how we are never going to be able to hit right-handed pitching? Good stuff.

He’s a smart guy, but he sure throws a shoe periodically.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jul 25, 2009 2:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It's a valid concern

if everyone had Mark DeRosa’s splits. With guys like Pujols and Holliday, I don’t worry about that so much.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah that was odd

Dave sort of looked down the lineup real quick like and noticed a bunch of righties. I think he forgot that Pujols is fucking awesome, Holliday’s key split is home/away, Ludwick has a reverse split, and Raz and Schumaker are still LH.

Oh well. Everyone screws up sometimes. They do good work over there so I’ll let an eff up slide here and there.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure. That makes sense.

Cuz righty-righty troubles are exactly as pronounced as lefty-lefty troubles usually are. Or not.

by etp_stl on Jul 25, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

its all moot now

it’s all moo now….FIXED!

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

well Tony doesn't make

the trades, and it’s not like his scouting opinion isn’t legit (there are like nin jokes to be made here I guess..). He didn’t get called up IMO because this is what he was drafted for, and he can’t play 3B. I mean, we’ll see if he does in Oakland I guess, but there’s a good chance we just traded Scott Hatteberg and Kyle Farnworth to get DeRosa and Hallday instead of Joe Nathan and Miguel Cabrera.

It’s completely a question of defense and power potential, and the Cardinals had the best look of anyone at that over the past year. Occam’s razor or whatever here, we don’t need a conspiracy theory here.

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

hmm.
well Tony doesn’t make the trades

Accounts differ. (Wait till the whole section loads so it’ll jump to the comment.)

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha

I had to read that like 5 times before I realized it meant to be nine instead of NIN.

"Baseball is dull only to dull minds." - Red Barber

by nomar34 on Jul 25, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve got no soul to sell

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jul 26, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

"If I ain't startin' I ain't departin'"

by templetown on Jul 25, 2009 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree with haltz view. I have to it is the only way I can put this trade to bed so I can enjoy this beautiful, beautiful team.

Wallace who?

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Defense

Your analysis doesn’t take into account that no one thought Wallace could play 3rd in the majors. Its an important datapoint you’re completely ignoring.

I think both the Derosa and Holliday trades are a good thing. Especially if we resign them. There is no reason why we can’t make it to the WS with this roster.

The same group of people complaining right now were aching for Joe Thurston to be the starting 2B. The prospect man crushes have to end at some point and you have to be a grown up.

by mmomansi on Jul 25, 2009 3:14 AM EDT reply actions  

The words "Joe", "Thurston", and "prospect"...

have never been uttered in these quarters. Unless you count someone saying “I’m a little bit wet over the prospect of Joe Thurston impaling himself on the dugout steps.”

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 3:18 AM EDT up reply actions   4 recs

defense

he made the defense argument in the second paragraph. his “analysis” had links and numbers to back up his argument. i don’t see your retort having any.

and saying that people are “aching for joe thurston to be the starting 2B” is just ridiculous. show me a quote where people are “aching” for that and i’ll take it back. however, i can show you a thread where several people thought trading colby + some for peavy was a good idea. how would that have worked out for the people without “prospect man crushes”?

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 3:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I'd consider even assuming Schumaker-like defense is a stretch

Duncan-esque would seem to be the safer assumption at this point if we made him play 3B/LF.

by bailorg on Jul 25, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

in case you didn't notice

Tony accepted Duncan-esque defense in LF without any problem.

by apack on Jul 25, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think both the Derosa and Holliday trades are a good thing. Especially if we resign them

Why are those things considered dependent on eachother?

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

SHEETS

Cardinal fanatic since '82

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 25, 2009 4:46 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

how is SHEETS!!! doing?

since the FO is obviously going all in right now, can they please take it one step farther and dump Welley and sign BEN SHEETS*****

 * * * * *sarcasm is NOT involved in this comment

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I Think..

…moost people assume that if he signs this year it will be in Texas.

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

they have bacon lung in Texas

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why?

They still haven’t stepped up and done anything. They’re totally being a tease for him right now.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luckily I am not most people

and MO has been known to read VEB

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

HI MO

get us something good for santa!!!

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

According to Jayson Snark over at WWL

Sheets won’t be pitching for anyone this season. Plus, I bet MO only reads VEB during the off-season.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Jul 25, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I forgot about Sheets.

Also Garcia threw a few innings in the gulf coast league last night didn’t he?

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm, yes, quite

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

so what?

if Wallace can’t play 3rd does that mean he automatically has no value to the organization?

he could be traded for another player in a similar scenario (i.e. blocked by a super-star) that would be under team control for 6 tears rather than 2 months. or he could (maybe) be transferred to LF.

just ‘cos he (maybe) can’t stick at 3B doesn’t mean he’s worthless.

by kindred on Jul 25, 2009 4:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

The win now crowd

seams to keep forgetting that Wallace would be a cost controlled masher who COULD hit the majors like a Miggy Cabrera. Would you like to reviisit that trade. If after two or four years of that Miggy like production if we didn’t like his d off he goes and we clean out another teams prospects.

This in the long run is a bad trade. The fact that we had to throw in two other prospects bruns me.

But last night was fun to watch!

by nybirdfan on Jul 25, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think realistically

Wallace has always been trade bait. His chance of hitting the major league 25 man roster as a Cardinal was small. Masher or not, prospects need to play, everyday, not hit off the bench. No way Tony brings him up if he’s not going to play him, everyday.

His value is likely at its apogee right now, and likely to come back towards earth. I don’t want to call it a prospect crush, because that’s unfair, there’s a good case to be made that we didn’t get maximum value for Wallace.

But maximum value for Wallace is playing him at first for the next six seasons and we’re (pujols help us) not going to do that. I think the error in analysis is thinking that you can take a below average fielding first basemen and turn him into a slightly below average fielding third basemen. A tougher base to play and a vastly more important base to play. The reasoning “we can deal with below average skip we can deal with below average third basemen” is obviously specious and I’ll chalk it up as the product of some late night typing.

I think everyone is going to end up really liking this trade. The psychological lift of plugging a leak dramatically is huge. If willingham comes over from the Nats we do not have a presser, we don’t rush him into the lineup that night, we accrue the value of the upgrade over the course of the season. It’s nice, but it’s not impressive, and Pujols puts another check in the “Cardinals don’t want to win” column. There are too many checks in that column for my liking already, and if Pujols hasn’t shown that he’s the most important thing we have to worry about as an organization over the last decade, then we haven’t paid attention.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im going to have to agree with one point you touched on

I do not think Wallace will ever be as good as a defensive third baseman as Skippy is skippy is defensively over at 2nd.

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

There's just a lot of if

In my mind he’d have to be a David Wright kind of bat to make up for subpar way he’s going to play 3rd.

Maybe not but we’ll never know since he’s never playing another game at third for the rest of his career.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

one last thing

Passan doesn’t write a “Holliday dramatically shifts the NL landscape” column today.

This is the biggest offseason for the cardinals in ten years, and pujols will have some long months to think it over when Mo comes knocking looking for an extension. Every game the cards win easily when pujols go’s Ofer or 1fer will be very happy memories.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Isn't Miggy a 1B now?

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

I totally agree with dugsmart. Yes, Wallace is a great prospect, but he didn’t mean a lot to OUR organization for the future. What he meant to us was to be used in this capacity, and we got a pretty good superstar considering this.

Sure, it will be painful if he succeeds, but I don’t see this guy being a 3B all his life. And if he succeeds at 1B or DH, then this was a good deal for us.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 25, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

See, I fundamentally disagree

Just because he can’t play 3rd base doesn’t mean he “didn’t mean a lot to OUR organization for the future.” Maybe Wallace was always trade bait. Fine, I understand that. He was currency. But that still doesn’t mean we couldn’t have gotten more for him than 2 months of Holliday. Holliday is good, but Wallace has the potential to be good for years to come. I think we could have / should have gotten more for him that a 2 month rental.

by Ray Lankford on Jul 25, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I agree

Well said. I was surprised we had to give this much to get him. This year’s team looks very good on paper 4 days out of 5, though. I still don’t think it was worth it.

by Merry CRasmus on Jul 25, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's say we didn't trade for DeRo and Holliday,

and then we signed them both this offseason, or we did trade for them both and resigned them both this offseason. What exactly does trading for them have to do with that (except the fact that they’ve actually played here for a partial season and their signing elsewhere nets us picks)?

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jul 25, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure what you're asking

but I think we are waaaay down the list of teams if we DON’T trade for them. Maybe we re-sign one or both of these guys, maybe not, but I think the argument about “just wait 2 months and sign him in the offseason” doesn’t hold a lot of water. I mean, in that environment, when have the Cardinals actually landed one of the prized big FA fish? We’re competing with everyone and we all know how it would likely end:

“Well, we really put our best offer out there and in the end, they chose _

Again, I really don’t know what you were getting at with the question, but I think our history shows that the Cards have a hard time landing big ticket items in the offseason, no matter how fun it is for us to talk about it.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point.

By signing them in the off season we would have given up 4 picks and missed out on the playoff run.

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

You have no basis for

saying that “no one thought Wallace could play 3B” apart from your own wishful thinking. If Wallace had been stuck in AAA for 2 years there might be some foundation for it, but he was there only a few months, after rising to that level extremely quickly. I think this was a LaRussa-forced trade (which is actually an indictment of DeWitt, for not allowing his GM to say no to Tony) that might yield wonderful things in 2009 but will likely handicap this time for several years to come.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think there's something to the "La Russa-forced trade" aspect

if SI’s Jon Heyman is to be believed. He was quoted on MLB Network’s analysis of this deal as (I’m paraphrasing) “Sources I spoke with indicated that La Russa was not happy after trading Chris Duncan, who was like a nephew to him. Tony demanded Matt Holliday and the front office got it done.”

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

It would be pretty quick

to go from zero to holiday in two days.

Maybe it was meant to take the sting out of losing dunc, but I seriously doubt Tony ordered the trade.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

since last season really.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Mo was inteview on some show on XM yesterday after the trade

He said that they decided to revisit the Holliday trade when DeRosa went on the DL. Could he be blowing smoke out of his ass? Of course, but ZI am going to believe him. And this is coming from someone who is not a big TLR fan.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

who, exactly,

is no one? He was playing 3B in AAA and, considering the A’s have recently traded their 3B, I suspect they’re going to give him a chance.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except

a) The A’s playing him at 3rd doesn’t mean the Cardinals thought he could play 3rd
b) Ryan Braun played at 3rd for a while too. In hindsight, does anyone think that was the right spot for him?

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never did

which is why I favored drafting (is it?) Aaron Hicks — the guy the Twins drafted last year — but there’s little doubt the Cards were going to try it and I think he could’ve been at least passable there for a couple of years at least. Braun was downright awful. I don’t think anyone expected that level of futility.

And as Ray Lankford said above, even if he’s not a 3B and he was destined to be traded, we didn’t have to settle for 2 months of Matt Holliday for him. His value is clearly greater than that.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Food for thought here chuck...

lboros posted in the Payroll Obligation Fanpost yesterday that the front office may have Daniel Descalso passing Brett Wallace on the prospect board already, which is something that I hadn’t considered until I went looking at Descalso’s numbers:

  • Right now, he’s putting up pretty much the same numbers as Wallace is at both AA and AAA over the last 18 months and he’s a year younger than Brett is.
  • He’s currently playing second base in the Cards system and if he could stay there defensively would be a very good second baseman at the big league level.
  • He played 3B in college, so it would seem likely that if he’s playing well enough to hit AAA as a 2B, he should be able to handle third base defensively.

When you look at the numbers, he might actually end up being a similar player to Wallace offensively (line drive hitter with moderate power), with the ability to play both 2B and 3B at an average or above average level. Wallace will have more upside offensively, but considering that many scouts didn’t see him as a long term solution at 3B, Descalso might be the better player for the Cardinals.

Just food for thought that we might have sold high on a player that’s fairly redundant offensively in our system. I still think we got ripped off, but Wallace might be more replaceable than we think.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

can we please

just enjoy the rest of this season and see how all of this pans out?

please?

by jeff_abs on Jul 25, 2009 3:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Dude

You realize that the trade happened yesterday, right? Of course there is going to be a front page post on it and I thank chuckb for his incisive analysis. Furthermore it’s a fallacy to assume that people criticizing the trade aren’t enjoying the season. Despite his analysis, I’m sure chuckb had as
much fun as any cards fan
last night watching us
put up an 8 spot on the champs

by mattyp on Jul 25, 2009 7:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I have to disagree with some of your reasoning

This measurement seems to be a little off to me. That may be the value to an average team, but we have a situation that is very unique. We have the best player in the game at first, and we are in the NL. Therefore, he is worth nothing to us. We can’t play him, it’s that simple. And if you think that sticking him in the outfield will work, say hello to Adam Dunn Jr, whom is unproven.

If we fail at getting to the WS, oh well. It shows that we want to win. I know many people, including our dear old Albert, have been looking for that in the organization.

We can worry about our financial decisions after our run is over(hope it doesn’t ever end this year)

Man, with this outfield, need to get rid of that Rasmus guy. :)

by Taskmaster on Jul 25, 2009 3:17 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

miggy is much better than wallace, across the board

he had a higher OPS as a 20yo in MLB than Wallace has as an old 22yo in AAA, vs miggy’s “born in apr”. Miggy also had as many SB in MLB as wallace has HR in AAA.

Now, I surely don’t think that’s a fair comparison, but it’s not fair at all to project wallace to be a ~.950 OPS guy at 3B going forward, which is what miggy was at the same age, given that he hasn’t yet been within 200 points of that at AAA.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 3:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

ugh

somehow formatting, or maybe the correlejo anejo, ate a paragraph.

Anyway, being born in APR makes miggy effectively almost a year younger (by B-R years) than Wallace, who was born in AUG, and even assuming the ages are equal, miggy was better at the MLB level, 3 years younger, than wallace was at AAA, so it’s silly to compare the two.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think he meant from a defensive point of view

his UZR/150 was -4.5 in 2006 and -8.0 in 2007 (courtesy of fangraphs).

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 4:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

right

to be a league average player with those defensive numbers, wallace would have to have a

.380 OBP/.500 SLG (-4.5 defense)
.380 OBP/.520 SLG (-8.0 defense)

hands in the air for all who think he’ll do that within the next 2-3 years, at 3B?

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

meh

forgot to factor in the positional adjustment. 3B = +2.5 runs, so at 3B, league average value =

.380/.479 (-4.5)
.380/.502 (-8.0)

Still, a pretty lofty goal to seek. Good luck, prospect formerly known as walrus, who shall have a new name in oakland that he hopefully likes better.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe not those numbers

but i don’t think .360-.370 OBP is out of the question. now .500 slg is definitely a stretch but he is also only 22 so who knows when the power will develop.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hoof in Air...

…not only 2-3 years, possibly moore. This guy flat out rakes. And Sleepy is right: if Migster can play 3rd, so can Wallace. Or at the very least LF.

It’s all moo juice udder the bridge now. My favorite Cards prospect may be gone, but I still root root root for the Cards to just win baby!

:=8)

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good thing you're not in Australia

with all that rooting.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Jul 25, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where are you getting that from?

Those two slash lines translate to wOBA’s from .388 to .395. Those translate to 30 and 34 batting runs respectively over a full season. If you combine that with the positional adjustment and the defensive numbers you ciited, he would be about a 4.8 WAR player! I don’t know how you pulled league average out of your ass.

For him to be a league average player with those defensive numbers, he would only have to have a .340- .345 wOBA, which translates to a .340/.430 to a .340/.440 line.

I’m pretty sure my numbers are right, how are you doing it?

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

using GPA

assuming league average = +2 WAR on defense, then subtracting defensive runs and adding offensive runs to GPA prediction for those numbers, and adding +2.5 for position.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

and using 2008 NL league average

as the offensive baseline.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

1.8*obp... /4

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nevermind, that's the quick and easy wOBA calculation

Sleepy, your numbers are definitely off.

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

How are you converting to runs?

If your doing it like this: ((gpa- league gpa)/1.15)*600, that would explain your error.

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's the

+2 WAR defense thing. Sleepy’s got an average player at replacement level (or thereabouts).

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 4:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

but average on defense = league average

by definition.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

right. could you show your work?

it should be replacement level, .338 woba – woba/1.15, position adjustment, fielding

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 4:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have league wOBA at .330

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

well, .331 OBP, .413 SLG

which shouldn’t make much of a diff.

In 650 PA, per GPA is ~76.96 runs. (-.4.5 + 2.5) + .380/.479 per GPA is 98.96 runs, or 20 runs above replacement. IE 2 WAR, IE lg_avg.

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 5:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your numbers are definitely off

I don’t know why your sticking around with GPA, just use the wOBA formula, it’s easier to deal with.

A .380/.480 slash line translates to a .380 wOBA using the (OBP*1.75+SLG)/3 formula.

Then you do this: ((.380-.330)/1.5)*650, which is +29 batting runs per 650 plate appearances.

Positional adjustment is +2.5, replacement is +20. Add -4 defense and you get a 4.75 WAR player, not league average.

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 5:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

i guess I'm confused

you start off assuming replacement_level_d = lg_avg defense.

And you start off assuming LG_AVG_off = rep_lvl_off + 20 R

So, knowing lg_avg_off, you then add a positional adj, which I get, but then you add another 20 runs for replacement? Why? Isn’t that already included in the definition? Why add it again?

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 5:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

because the

offensive and defensive components are both above/below average, and we know than an average player is about two wins above replacement level (depends on the PA, could be more like 22-23).

Basically to get WAReplacement instead of WAAverage. I got the feeling earlier you had confused these things, which was why your 0 WAR was more like 0 WAA, if that makes sense (and 4 WAR turned into 2 WAR). Though I’m still not sure that was the problem, since the GPA conversion numbers look wrong.

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 5:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't you people sleep?

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

:(

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

was assuming 650 PA

if that makes a difference.

How in the world do you do wOBA using just SLG and OBP?

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

(1.75*OBP+SLG)/3

It doesn’t count for steals, but it’s pretty close.

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here is how you do it

wOBA = (1.75*OBP+SLG)/3

BRAA = ((wOBA- LgwOBA)/1.5)*600 (or 650, whatever)

Positional adjustment = 2.5 runs for third

replacement adjustment = 20 runs

As I showed above, if Wallace was a -4 to -8 fielder, he would only need to hit .340/.435ish to be league average. The slash lines you quotes above make him a 5 WAR player.

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh for the

good old days when players were not judged by fuzzy math and money was seldom necessary to be mentioned when discussing the national pastime we love so well.

Oh well, nothing lasts forever.

by ridgesee on Jul 25, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's high tide...

for the sabr mafia. Look for qualitative analysis to make a comeback.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Meh

Players are overrated

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

players have always been judged by the fuzzy math

it just didn’t make its way down to the masses until recently

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

if Ryan Braun can't play

3B then Brett Wallace definitely can’t. Wait a second..

Anyway, Schumaker will be worth 1 WAR this year if he’s lucky and Wallace doesn’t have Braun’s power, or Matt LaPorta’s power for that matter. I can’t get worked up about these 2-3 future wins (which is always the case with these trades on paper). that Beane beat us by, for a guy that seemingly was drafted for this very reason.

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Does't have their power..

…yet. He will.

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Power Numbers

I expect Wallace to have more Rolen-like power numbers in the Bigs rather than Braun/Miggy power numbers.

by Fred Head on Jul 25, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why do you think that?

He’s going to fill out more than he already is? He’s 23 years old and built like an iron horse! He’s not going to be a .500 slugging guy — he’s a line drive type of hitter who will probably hit around 20-25 homers a season at his peak, he’s not a 40 HR guy by any stretch of the imagination. I would guess that if he realizes his upside that he’s probably a .290/.380/.470 type of hitter at the big league level with lots of doubles power.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

well...

…a 200+ hits, 40+ doubles, 25 HR guy wouldn;t be such a bad thing to have – Youkliss type numbers

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 26, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Didn’t see your post as I scrolled down. Glad some one thinks like i do. LOL

by nybirdfan on Jul 25, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Miggy isn't playing 3B anymore.

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

did i mention i hate the word unproven?

its amazing how 16 weeks can make someone proven and untouchable. before the season rasmus was trade fodder for peavy and now he’s an everyday major leaguer and too much to pay for halladay.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 3:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

I don’t think albert is worried about Brett Wallace’s cost savings. He’s more worried about commitment from management and that commitment could save us some cash as well when we go to resign albert.

"If I ain't startin' I ain't departin'"

by templetown on Jul 25, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

You’re also not giving any consideration to the frame of time we’re discussing. The value this year is heavily in our favor but your argument is over the next six or so. Why not consider the potential value of two essentially first round draft picks down the road also?

Doubt, indulged and cherished, is in danger of becoming denial; but if honest, and bent on thorough investigation, it may soon lead to full establishment of the truth.
-Ambrose Bierce

by CorkyRasmit on Jul 25, 2009 3:48 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

It's there

he talks about the value of the draft picks according to Victor Wang’s research.

by haltz on Jul 25, 2009 3:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I just caught that. It’s tough to read quickly on an iPhone. My bad, I’ll shut up now.

Doubt, indulged and cherished, is in danger of becoming denial; but if honest, and bent on thorough investigation, it may soon lead to full establishment of the truth.
-Ambrose Bierce

by CorkyRasmit on Jul 25, 2009 4:00 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

no, don't shut up

it’s always good to ask questions. Worst case, someone answers and tell you you missed something, but even then, you learned something, right?

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Learned...

that he needs to shut up!

I’m not funny.

by mynameistyler on Jul 25, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

ANYONE ELSE

notice his last name is wang?

junior high immaturity over lol

Pujols takes out "I" in BIG and "A" in MAC, previously considered to be an unyielding, consonant threat

by DESTROYER on Jul 25, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not over, til I say it's over

and jr high immaturity is NEVER over!!!

:p

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

potential value

he did consider the potential value, its 7.8mil. plus the chances of us getting a prospect as good as wallace after the 15th pick in this draft is slim.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 4:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

wallace was #13

What is the marginal diff between #13 and #15 over the last 10 years? Does anyone have any idea?

the end of every half inning IS a turning point. -Evilfrog

by SleepyCA on Jul 25, 2009 4:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

12 WAR

looking at sky’s (BTB) preliminary findings it seems to be around 12 WAR for a 6-year total.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 4:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's total value

Not on an individual player level. This is a better chart:

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Source

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 4:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

gotcha, thanks

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 4:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

this is why I like having VEP around

amazing the awesome stuff you can find

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would prefer the organization try to maximize the wins for their dollars in general rather than focusing on particular years to aggresively compete

Sure it’s nice to have a better year than you may have had if you don’t trade in your longterm prospects for short term gains, but I think the team will win more playoff games and championships if they stockpile a steady flow of cheap talent. Besides, rebuilding years are very tough to sit through, and not worth risking it all on one year. You never know what will happen, the best Cardinals team of this decade got swept in the WS while one of the worst won it all. So why embrace that randomness, try to get there each and every year with cheap talent. It’s a crap shoot and I’d rather play with multiple roles of the dice than rolling one slightly rigged one.

I will admit with Pujols being a once in a lifetime player, there is a little bit of urgency. And it is fun to watch Holliday play, even if it’s just legging out infield hits.

Also, the Lugo deal is looking good so far, really shores up the lineup against lefties.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 4:08 AM EDT reply actions  

you said it all
I will admit with Pujols being a once in a lifetime player, there is a little bit of urgency.

"If I ain't startin' I ain't departin'"

by templetown on Jul 25, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

preach it, chuck

we got hosed, even if Wallace can’t play 3B.

and Mo will really look dumb as fuck if he doesn’t re-sign Pujols for life next off-season.

by kindred on Jul 25, 2009 4:36 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

the jury's out on this

just so you know, chuck

Cardinal fanatic since '82

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 25, 2009 4:48 AM EDT reply actions  

No its not.

Numbers don’t lie as long as you understand what they mean. Bottom line is we got the shaft so Tony could have a vet.

We don’t have the Yankees payroll. We cannot build a roster out of just high paid older players entering the decline phase of the career. We, given the limits of our payroll, need cost controlled players to mix in with the high paid tallent. We just tradded away the single best prospect we had in the minors for yet another player in the decline phase of his career.

Now unlike our last epically bad deal, no one is projecting Wallace to out hit Holiday next year. Though its likely to be closer than 90% of the readers here realize. The catch is we either won’t have him or will be on the hook for a bit payday. If we go the payday route then you cannot bring Pinero back (not that I think that is a good idea) and now you need 2 starting pitchers. We threw in one of our 4 best options to fill those spots also to add insult to injury.

Far too many of the casual fans don’t think past the real limitation we operate on and just see a shiny new toy.

Worst part of this is Rasmus appears set to see his playing time drastically cut, which offsets much of the gains from the trade for this year.

by DriverZn on Jul 25, 2009 5:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

The fallacy of this argument is that we want to build to a long term plan

Mo and the team have been saying that we want to do that, but the reality is that they are going for broke for the next few years because Albert is ridiculous. This is clearly the right thing to do. The whole focus for the next five years should be to get to the playoffs and hope that Albert and a couple of strong pitchers can get hot and carry us to WS.

Now when you make the decision to do that, you only have a few ways to get there. We didn’t have three or four options or variants to choose from. This year it was Peavy, Halladay, Holliday, Lee and Derosa. At the end of the day Carpenter’s return and Piniero’s resurgence made getting more hitting the better alternative. So you can argue that Wallace for Holliday doesn’t net you fair expected return but with no other choices you either do this deal or don’t do anything.

Holliday will want to play for a contender, he works out with McGwire and Schu so we already have an edge to sign him. Fourstick shows that we have plenty of room to do so. To your point, we don’t have a 4th and 5th starter, so that will be the challenge next year. This is where they will try to rely on Dave Duncan to create another starter from the reject pile as they do every year.

It all seems reasonable bet to make. I would put my chips with the F.O. Win now, baby.

Just win

by The Duke on Jul 25, 2009 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I really don't get this "doing it for albert" logic.

You realize that so far in the 2000s that 8 or the 9 teams that won the WS didn’t have albert. they also didn’t’ have Tony.

We are supposed to be building the best team we can, not a team to make one player or manager happy.

by DriverZn on Jul 25, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know the OF is too crowded now, but did anyone else want Matt Murton?

He’s above average defensively in left and has a career .857 OPS in his career against LHP.

Plus he’s a ginger.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 5:12 AM EDT reply actions  

That's one ex-Cub that I'll pass on.

Although I do like that OPS.

I'm the guy that does his job, you must be the other guy.

by The_teague on Jul 25, 2009 5:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's unnecessary now

Unless you want to see Rasmus completely bolted to the bench vs. all lefties and see some wacky OF with Holliday/Ludwick/Murton (LF→RF).

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

damn...

…he did.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

This Analysis

has to be done, and I don’t disagree with anything therein. The pain of the king’s ransom we might pay for Holliday or Halladay was well-documented beforehand. Although I haven’t spent the time to attempt to entirely understand the statistical formulations that support this conclusion, I believe them and I know folks like VEP argue the evidence as plainly as is possible. But even having been aware of the potential imbalance of such a trade, there was a part of me curious to see it happen.

It’s a bold fucking statement and a gesture of commitment to now, which I can only marvel at, despite any future repercussions. I envy the fans that will be present at Holliday’s first home game and I’m really gonna enjoy the games, the box-scores and the talk the rest of the season.

Other mysteries remain. TL

by BKKCard on Jul 25, 2009 8:13 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Statistics can't be the only basis for a decision...

The statistics have to be used correctly. I know just enough to be dangerous, so forgive my arrogance in posting this.

Satistics allow us to measure how predictive a large number of nonpredictive events are. For example, one prospect succeeding has no direct relation to another prospect succeeding. You can’t say that every first round pick will succeed BECAUSE JD Drew succeeded.

However, with a large number of first rounders, you CAN say the probability if a first rounder succeeding. Hopefully that makes sense.

SO – analysis of this trade is not complete without taking BOTH the statistical viewpoint coupled with the particular details of the individuals involved in the trade.

As I see it, we need to know more about Wallace, Mort and Peterson’s specific abilities in order to make an accurate assessmentof this trade.

What is the liklihood of Wallace playing acceptable defense at third or left? Who are his comparative players? Does he really throw like a girl?

We need to quantify more unknowns about the prospects in this than we have to apply their ability and statistical profile to this major league team.

We have less unknowns about Holliday, but there are still unknowns. In spite of last night, what if he plays like Duncan for the rest of the year? Once holliday’s unknowns are quantified, apply it to the team. I’ll say this part has pretty much been done.

I’m not dogging the stats, I’m just saying we have to take the stats and couple the exact situation with the stats to prevent or minimize the liklihood that our particular situation is not an outlier. I guess I’m a stats AND scouting guy due to the lack of general statistics ability to predict the future with exact accuracy.

And finally, I like the new baseball idea of building from within with prospects. HOWEVER, we are blind not to see that the last decade, which was arguably the cardinals BEST decade ever, was built by throwing prospects away for proven major leaguers, several of whom were traded for right before they became free agents and were then sugned to long term deals (mcguire, token, maybe Edmonds). I don’t know about you, but I enjoyed the last decade TREMENDOUSLY!

And finally, do we have any examples if teams who have built from within and had the same stretch of success that we had in the same stretch of time?

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 8:16 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Sorry about the errors

I did this from my iPhone. That would be Rolen, not token. Spell check.

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 8:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Very good analysis

but I would like to make one minor change. You said that “statistics allow us TO measure” I would prefer to say " statistics allow us A measure.’

by ridgesee on Jul 25, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

No freakin' shit

It took me 15 min just to type this.

"Baseball is dull only to dull minds." - Red Barber

by nomar34 on Jul 25, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

HOWEVER, we are blind not to see that the last decade, which was arguably the cardinals BEST decade ever, was built by throwing prospects away for proven major leaguers, several of whom were traded for right before they became free agents and were then sugned to long term deals (mcguire, token, maybe Edmonds). I don’t know about you, but I enjoyed the last decade TREMENDOUSLY!

This is true. However, we are also in an era of more sophisticated methods of evaluating prospects. As such, teams have both a better understanding of where their prospects sit and who the other teams’ best young guys are. As such, teams are less likely to be duped into taking crappy players who are shielded by the term “prospect.” Also, with the rapid escalation in FA salaries, teams NEED to know which prospects are likely to become legitimate players and NEED to hang on to them.

Here’s my point, which I’ve admittadly reached in something of a roundabout way…Walt Jocketty was able to pull off those trades b/c baseball was a different market at the time. Now, things have changed. If you want a top-flight player in trade, you have to give away really good young talent b/c the other teams KNOW who those guys are and they are more likely to be valued correctly than in years past.

If you look at some of the better trades of WJ’s tenure, he was able to toss overvalued prospects in big piles at players who often were in tenuous situations with their current teams. His big trades were for Big Mac, Edmonds, Rolen, Renteria (who I maintain is sort of overrated), and Chuck Finley. Only a small number of the prospects from those deals amounted to anything (the best probably being Braden Looper, Coco Crisp, and Placido Polanco), and interestingly two of them boomeranged back (Kennedy and Looper).

In short, as fun as those trades were and as much as they helped this team, they wouldn’t likely work anymore. Do you think we could sling off Todd Wellemeyer (of last season) and Daniel Descalso for Grady Sizemore? B/c that is sort of the Edmonds for Bottenfield/Kennedy deal.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes...

“and finally, do we have any examples if teams who have built from within and had the same stretch of success that we had in the same stretch of time?”

I’d say the Bo-Sox…

by duncans_army on Jul 25, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would agree with both of those comments

But Boston also spends a gob of money and doesn’t always spend it wisely. Julio lugo and dice k to name a couple, but they have done a fantastic job on the player development front.

The environment has changed, but that only means the statistics are better. Stats can’t provide a clear predictive future(regardless of what Issac Asimov thought), so there is always going to be uncertainty in trades and drafts.

We just won’t know who came out ahead until time passes. And even if we do, the item no one had truly quantified in the statistical analysis is the time.

While Wallace may turn out to be as good a hitter as Holliday, we are paying holliday to do that NOW. there has to be a dollar amount attached to the opportunity cost of waiting for prospects to develop and I have yet to see that calculated.

I’m OK with the FO paying more for performance now. Every team that builds from within needs to analyze the chances of winning now and weigh the time to wait for prospects to develop.

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 1:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

So if we're right and the Cardinals

don’t win the pennant this year, and find themselves in a bad way in 2 years because of this, you’ll admit that the gamble you wanted to make was a mistake? And will refrain from bitching at the front office as they try to dig out of the mess?

I’ll be happy to admit my error if this trade does not bite us in the ass, I just want everyone to be honest as well.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually haven't bitched about the FO

But am encouraged by both their emphasis on building the farm and the emphasis on trying to win at the major league level.

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 11:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'll also admir

A small man crush on holliday. There, I said it.

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 8:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

he looks like someone chiseled him out of bedrock

…which I find a little creepy, personally. Does he talk with his teeth clenched?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

He is a physical freak for sure.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean...

talk that sexy-stern-chin talk?

Yeah. He does it.

by mynameistyler on Jul 25, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great job of breaking down the trade in terms of value, but...

You cannot ignore the human element in all of this either. You can’t sit down with Pujols in December when you try to work out an extension and hand him a sheet that explains the reason we didn’t improve the team this year was that the adjusted value of our high level prospects outweighs the adjusted value per wins above replacement that a power hitter would have cost to the organization over the course of the next 6 years.

He would stand up, crush the table with his bare hands, and beat you to death with it. And then go sign with the Yankees in 2 years.

Nobody wants either of those things.

by farley503 on Jul 25, 2009 8:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Amen

We have now likely reached accord in the Competitive Lineup Act of 2009. May the LaRussas and Pujolses now be appeased.

But I still worry about 2010 and 2011. One could argue those are more critical years in the re-signing of Pujols. Perhaps though Mo will now sit Albert down immediately after a (fingers-crossed) stellar 2009 run and knock this thing out before he has a chance to realize we could be strapped to replicate said competitive lineups in 2010 and beyond AND sign him.

by Fred Head on Jul 25, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

And what's he going to do

when we tell him that we can’t afford the $28 M the Red Sox and Yanks are willing to pay but we can go only as high as $23 M b/c we just signed Matt Holliday to a 6 year $100M contract?

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He'll say goodbye

and become an AL East hero.

Albert’s got a lot of friends around MLB, especially the Dominicans, who his wife cooks for, for chrissake. He talks to those guys; he knows those guys have great lives playing ball in LA, NY, Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle, etc. He knows perfectly well the grass is plenty green in any number of cities and that what he’s giving up in STL is NOT irreplaceable. This fantasy theology that so many fans have about playing in the Lou is just appalling.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That fantasy was created by the players.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

By SOME of the players.

And of the ones that speak of it, how many really mean it?

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't freaking know.

And I don’t freaking care. But Albert Pujols will never play for another team. Mark my words.

/bold prediction
/possible delusion

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't think so either

but I don’t think we’ll sign Holliday. I do not believe we can afford to sign both and maintain a strong team. Signing Holliday would be a huge mistake, IMO.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

The baseball Gods must be appeased.

Although I was eager to see the Walrus on the field the baseball gods must be appeased. You see the baseball gods in their power gave to St. Louis a ballplayer for the ages named Albert Pujols, but like all things in life nothing lasts forever. The depression that will be felt in St. Louis when Albert is no longer able to play here will be spirit crushing. Carpe Diem we need to make a run at our titles in the next five years, we need quality players young and old to achieve that goal. If sacraficing Wallace is what the gods ask in return to help us and Albert put more bling on our fingers – I"m all for it. I think MO has done a tremendous job and this a the biggest pickup in St. Louis in a looong time. Resign DeRosa and see what Holliday wants to stay here, either way it’s about winning a championship today, not in 2012. Well done Mo.

by ghostofjimlindeman on Jul 25, 2009 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

when will the haren nightmares go away

For me never… Every time I see Dan Haren pitch now I have to go to my happy place because fantasies of a Carp, Haren, Wainwright, Loshe rotation flutter through my brain. Billy Beane has spanked us in the past, he may have spanked us again, but how many titles has Beane earned for Oakland? How packed is their stadium on home games? How many regular good players do you recognize on their team? Do you even care to watch Oakland at all?

Again MO has been pressured to make way worse moves then this one in the past and stood his ground, Ludwick could very well be playing for the Rockies in return for Holliday, instead Mo gave up Wallace and has kept Colby a future star on our team for a long time. Walt never gave a damn about the farm system, Memphis became a baseball retirement home for washed up players. The plan with Mo has always been to develop within to help support a pennant run and surround Albert with talent, that’s what he is doing. We don’t have Wallace but we have Rasmus who is only gonna get better.

by ghostofjimlindeman on Jul 25, 2009 8:51 AM EDT reply actions  

It's important to remember the particulars...

of the various trades we’ve had with Oakland. The Mulder trade was much worse than this one because there were red flags all over the place with regard to Mulder, and there was clear evidence that Haren would perform at a roughly equivalent level in 2005.

Holliday, while struggling earlier this year, appears to be firing on all cylinders, and no one we shipped to Oakland could do what he’s likely to do from here on out

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was asking myself the same question...

People seem to obsess over Beane’s team building ideology, however, I fail to see a championship ring on his finger.

I know that the McGwire deal went down before he was GM, but still…you could easily see how lopsided that one was in our favor. I certainly don’t miss the likes of Blake Stein. All of these numbers predicting the value of prospects going forward have merit, but as other posters have mentioned, there are simply more variables to the equation. Pleasing guys like Pujols and LaRussa for at least the short term can help immensely going forward. Unlike what some GM said to Gammons in that we “emptied our farm system” (paraphrasing of course) for rental players, I simply do not feel that way. Our farm system was one of the top 10 in baseball, and there are still great players in place (Jones, Kozma, Miller after signing of course, Mateo, etc). Just take a step back for a second, enjoy the rest of the season, and focus on right now.

Any idiot would know that.

by The Classical on Jul 25, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Mulder deal

went down before Mo was GM also.

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

People seem to obsess over Beane’s team building ideology, however, I fail to see a championship ring on his finger.

The playoffs are a crapshoot. That term has been typed so often on this and other blogs that you may as well just make a button on every keyboard that inserts it. The regular season is a test of how deep and talented your team is, while the playoffs can be dominated by a team with hot play that comes from nowhere. Think of the ‘06 Cardinals…they didn’t win b/c they were good, they won b/c Yadier Molina played out of his mind, they got a few timely hits, b/c Jeff Weaver and Jeff Suppan pitched their asses off, and b/c the Tigers decided to swing at every damn pitch they saw, which against a Duncan pitching staff is a recipe for disaster.

From 2000-2006, the A’s won 91, 102, 103, 96, 91, 88, and 93 games. They went to the playoffs five times and made the ALCS once. They did it all with a shoestring payroll. At first it was easy b/c Billy Beane was so far ahead of the curve he was able to supplement his team with good players that other teams scoffed at. True, those really great teams were largely centered around The Big Three, Tejada, and Chavez, but as many recent champs have shown those fill-in and 2nd tier players are huge boosts to success as well. Guys like Jermaine Dye, Scott Hatteberg, and Ray Durham were put on those teams for minimal cost and all helped in one way or another in getting those teams to the playoffs.

Then, as Moneyball was gaining acceptance and teams were retooling, thinking about all-offense OBP machine teams, foolishly thinking that was the central theme of the book (and not using advanced methods and an open mind to find market inefficiencies), Billy outsmarted them all. He built the 2006 team around pitchers and tacked on some guys who no one else would touch, namely Milton Bradley who played a 94 pretty good games in RF as well as a .361 wOBA. He signed Frank Thomas to a bargain-basement deal and The Hurt turned in a near-MVP season. That was arguably the best GM-ing he’s done in his career.

Yes, the recent seasons have been unkind to Billy Beane and his squad, and he’s made some missteps (i.e. acquiring Holliday in the first place). However, I think he’s proven that he’s one of the best GM’s of all time, putting together really good teams on tiny budgets while some of his other small-market comrades (KC, Montreal/DC, for the most part Tampa Bay) wallow around in a big heaping pile of inept suckitude. Now that the richer teams are getting smarter about evaluating talent AND can spend the necessary coin to get the stars they want (think Boston), Billy has tougher competition.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would argue the 06 Cardinals won because they were good...

were they the best team in the playoffs? Probably not. But they were finally healthy and had everyone back, and Tony had finally committed to using the good youngsters over the inept veterans in the ’pen. The ’06 playoff team was a very, very solid team.

Plus, they had Albert Pujols.

by longhornscardinals on Jul 25, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

that injury bug bit us hard that year

I don’t think I really saw our team, all together, until San Diego.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have always thought that

that 2006 team was much more like the 2004-05 teams than a lot of people want to admit.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 25, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

The national “sportscasters” blow it out their asses about how bad it was, but the core of the 100-win teams was still there.

If I ever learned anything from Dragonball, it’s that the guy might be wearing 2-ton training weights. /nerd

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That team had a garbage pitching staff

Suppan and Carpenter were the only good pitchers they had that year, and Suppan’s goodness was something of a mirage built around a pretty good defense in my mind. Weaver pitched better in the last few weeks of the regular season, but by and large he was trash. Reyes was, well, Reyes. Jason Marquis picked up 15 wins as some of my dumbass friends like to point out to say he wasn’t that bad or whatever…but he was awful that season too. True, Mulder and Izzy were injury flops, but Mulder was in steep decline anyway (so I’m not optimistic about what kind of season he would have had w/o injury).

Once the playoffs rolled around Weaver caught lightning in a bottle and Suppan was particularly sharp. Marquis was relegated to sitting in the dugout and cheering the squad on. Reyes had that brilliant start against the Tigers but another crappy one against the Mets. I can pretty easily chalk all of that up to random variance.

Those kids in the pen have done what since then? Kinney’s been hurt and ineffective. TJ is gone. Wainwright was good obviously. I’m pretty comfortable saying that Kinney and TJ were talented guys who had a month of really good pitching…that didn’t make them good, just that they pitched well for a month.

The injury bug is a legitimate excuse for the lineup, but then again that team had an offensive blackhole in Yadier Molina and was dependent on two guys, Edmonds and Rolen, who didn’t exactly have sterling injury histories. I think that 2006 team was better than the 83 win team they wound up as…I’m going to go more like 86/7 though, not 90+. It was a house of cards team that was built on what I view as fundamentally unsound grounds.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

They also didn't have Izzy as a closer any more...

His being run out there, despite being hurt, cost what, something like 8 blown saves? Maybe they don’t win them all, but they win probably 6 of them if they had used Wainwright earlier…

by DiscoJer on Jul 25, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't say for certain which GM said that.

But I absolutely know for sure Jim Hendry said something extremely similar. It was reported by David Schuster (I think) on 670 The Score here in Chicago last evening (around 5 o’clock) that when asked about the Holliday trade, Lou and Hendry both said it was “unfortunate because the Cardinals added a very good player to their lineup” and Hendry went on to say that the Cardinals had “hamstrung themselves for years to comes.”

Seriously?

I can’t think of a worse General Manager to make that statement. So, trading away our top prospect (whom we drafted a year ago) is worse than the contracts for Alfonso Soriano, Kosuke Fukudome, Milton Bradley, and Ryan Dempster all rolled in to one?

(btw, the cubbies have already committed like $119 M in 2010 and that doesn’t include 2 starters, their platoon partner for Fukudome, both catchers, their middle infield, and both closers.)

Give me a fucking break. And as a bit of advice. Start packing your bags Hendry. Once the new ownership takes hold and comes to grips what you’ve done to the cubs payroll (if they haven’t already), you’ll bet getting the Dave Tallon treatment right soon.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jul 25, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good post; however, the question that occurs to me is how many title Beane might have won had he possessed the Cards' fan base and payroll options

An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.

HL Mencken

by akaitori on Jul 25, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

You give beane another 15-20 mil

during those years, I would have to guess he would win at least one championship

by from First to Third on Jul 25, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's something more...

that the formulas don’t capture. Getting a guy like Holliday gives everybody a little jolt. It takes pressure off Rasmus and Ludwick, and just makes everyone relax. I know we don’t especially like this kind of talk here, but the players are people, and not everything can be captured in numbers.

The second thing I would add is, if Wallace was drafted to be traded, doesn’t he have to go now for whatever we can get? We’ve got a healthy and high-performing Pujols and Carp, we’re in first place, and there’s a chance Wallace’s value will go down if he struggles in Spring Training next year. Holliday is exactly what this team needs, and now is the time.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

disagree

I think the expectation would be that Wallace’s value would be the same next year. Look at Colby as a proxy. I feel like he has lived up to Colbyish rookie season expectations and his trade value is similar to what it was last year.

Wallace struggling in ST is a guess and is irrelevant anyways, because it is unlikely we would’ve been making a move in March 2010 involving Wallace.

by Fred Head on Jul 25, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I meant...

Holliday >> Wallace for the remainder of 2009. 2010 is a different story, but Wallace would have to hit a ton to make up for the defense. As for ST, sure a guess, but it is certainly possible his value is at an all time high. Daric Barton’s value peaked in August 2005. That was a long time ago.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

if trading Wallace was a foregone conclusion

as many people here are asserting, why couldn’t we have gotten something worth Wallace’s value? Say, a young pitcher or an outfielder who’ll be with the team longer than 2 months? How about a young 2B or…

There’s no reason we HAD to use Wallace to obtain Holliday.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

This.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jul 25, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many teams that are sellers are

looking to sell young cost controlled players? Just curious because nothing comes to mind for me. You just don’t see prospect for prospect swaps very often.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

we're not sellers

we’re buyers. My point is when was the last time you saw a deal surrounding players that are both in their first few years in the majors? The Garza deal. . .and that one remains very uncommon. It’s isn’t like the Cardinals had a choice between cheap awesome 2B player and Matt Holliday and decided on the latter.

Now, do I think that justifies the Holliday trade? No. But your characterization of their options is wrong, imo.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

why did trading Wallace have to take place now?

you don’t think a trade of Wallace for another young player could’ve occurred in the offseason or, perhaps, after next season? I don’t understand the immediacy of dumping Wallace. Therefore, they had lots of options.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure they could have waited

but the available targets still would have been limited. My point is you just don’t see good cost controlled players swapped often, if ever.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 26, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Although I wonder if there were talks with the Red Sox about getting Clay Bucholz and they just wanted WAY more than Wallace for him.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

because they had to go and deal with Billy Beane

we shoulda got more, but you can’t deny that the team is a different team now, especially when you add in the tandem of DeRosa and Lugo with Holliday, this is a new team

Cardinal fanatic since '82

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 25, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're in danger...

of becoming Joe Morgan’s mirror image. This is why Ken Tremendous hung up his spikes. He saw the errors of his extremism.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

no, that's not why he hung up his spikes.

unless you don’t believe the man himself. i believe he became slightly more involved in writing episodes of the office and he could no longer balance his work and his fun side-project blog thingy. unless you have some other info.

The first thing that a pitcher has to understand is that Albert is better than you.-- Jim Palmer

by ilrosso on Jul 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually,

he got that show “Parks and Recreation.”

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

I lost count of how many times that made me laugh out loud, starting with “fake name guy.”

by Youneverknow on Jul 25, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually I know for a fact that is'nt a Joe Morgan quote because it makes sense.

But I’ll give it rec number 8 anyways.

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I give it a B-

Where are the spelling errors? The thoughts are disjointed, but are they Joe Morgan disjointed? You also miss points for the mention Wallace’s first name, which Joe Morgan wouldn’t know if he had a media guide 10 inches from his face turned to the appropriate page.

See me after class.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

An aside about trading for Gary Sheffield

would have also made a nice addition.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha!

It’s an off-point, rambling, vague load of incomprehensibly nonsense. That’s basically everything you need to know about Joe Morgan’s broadcasting style. A lot of off-point generalities, cliches, and “get off my lawn” arguments.

Well said, HL! If I didn’t know any better I would think you were the real Joe Morgan!

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

whoops

touchy laptop. Mean to type “freakin’ awesome.”

I think it would’ve also been better if you could’ve worked “slidepiece” in there somehow.

Good stuff though. Well done.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hardcore, what are you doing?

you know that Joe Morgan has no idea what a dirge is!

Hilarious post, btw.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone Think...

….we’re not done yet? Any chance we cud get in on Sanchez over in SF? I wasn’t bullish on him before, but having a lefty who tossed a no-no in place of Welly wouldn’t be a bad moove.

I hate Jason Marquis!
:=8O

by The MooCow on Jul 25, 2009 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Look for a Glaus trade to the AL...

that could happen anytime in August though.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know...

it depends if he can do something other than play DH. Looking at AL teams in need of offense, Detroit and the Chisox jump out, but they’re set at 1b/DH. Maybe Tampa if they want to toss Burrell overboard, or Texas. Not a huge pool of potential suitors. He might not even bring a Shane Peterson-type back.

Given our difficulties against lefties, I’d keep him to pinch hit. We don’t want to be like the Rockies, trotting Ryan Spilborghs out there when it really counts.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chris Duncan with options on Shelby Duncan as PTBNL

An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.

HL Mencken

by akaitori on Jul 25, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Glaus off the bench isn't horrible.

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could use some Panda

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

this was the exact name i was thinking about earlier we could swap glaus for sanchez though i fear they would reference his near perfect game and ask for more. bet he is a larussa type of guy the secret weapon picked him to start in the wbc over pinero. (hems been tooo good to call him pinata any more.

by callmesir on Jul 25, 2009 3:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I understand...

… that reward/risk value analysis gives Beane the nod in this deal; and I know we lost a dear prospect that we all were eagerly awaiting to see in the show… and control for several years.

But is there ever a trade where this analysis works out in favor of the team buying (giving up prospects for a proven impact player)? Examples? Of course, if the Cards provided a lesser prospect than Walrus, then the value (in terms of dollars) would be closer… but isn’t unlikely to get a player of Holliday’s caliber without offering up a top-25 prospect? Does this mean that deals like this are never worth making?

Personally, I wonder if they could have nabbed Adam Dunn from Washington for less. And, if not, maybe they would have offered Willingham for even less.

But, as much as this trade clouds the team’s future, it’s hard not to be excited about this lineup and just enjoy it while it lasts.

by AndyB83 on Jul 25, 2009 9:44 AM EDT reply actions  

As chuckb pointed out so eloquently above

 Mo really got pwned by Beane…or I could use another more blunt phrase from South Park. Either way, it really is World Series or bust

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 9:52 AM EDT reply actions  

I just can't see Holliday resigned

But I can see DeRosa resigned. Their is a very good chance that DeRosa will end of this season a Type A free agent and I think the team is banking on it. He is a good player but I don’t see many teams giving up a first round or 2nd rock pick for him. It will shift the leverage to the Cardinals. I think a two year deal will be hammered out. I think that is the reason they saw Wallace as so expendable. They have already picked his replacements.

The Cardinals will receive at least 2 picks for Holliday this offseason and 1 for Pineiro. With additional possibilities for Ankiel (Type B), Glaus (Type A), DeRosa (Type A/B), and Wellemeyer (Type B).

Now honestly I can’t see us offering Wellemeyer arbitration. Ankiel could get hot at the end of season even playing PT to be worth offering arbitration. DeRosa will be almost likely be offered regardless unless he is hurt. We will most not likely offer Glaus arbitration unless somehow he learns how to throw across the diamond. Which is a shame. I think the Cardinals would be smart to offer Glaus a one year contract to rebuild his value and allow him to hold onto his Type A free agent status.

So lets assume at least 3 to 8 1st round and draft round picks next year. That is awfully fast way to rebuild a farm system you just sold out. This is the path the Cardinals took.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jul 25, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Correct me if I'm wrong

But isn’t there a rule that you cannot offer arbitration to someone and cut their salary by more than 20%? If this is true, I can’t see the Cards offering arbitration to Glaus…especially if they plan to offer arbitration to DeRosa. I also cannot see a team forking over a first or second round pick for a 33 year old player who cannot throw the ball.

They certainly shouldn’t off arb to Wellemeyer who has been in top five worst pitchers (if not the actual worst) in all of MLB. It might be possible for Pineiro to move up to a B if he keeps his string of stellar performances going. They would certainly offer arb to him I think.

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is true, arbitration offer can't be below 20% of current contract

(at least on MLB 2009 The Show, and I think that’s based on the real MLB rule).

by creativereason on Jul 25, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

We won't get picks for Glaus

if he isn’t traded, I don’t believe we’ll offer him arbitration. He’d likely accept and end up making $13-15 M. We may resign him for something like $5 M for 1 year but his value has fallen dramatically so it’s in his interest to accept arbitration if offered.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fully agree

Glaus won’t receive a better offer than arb on the open market. Ben Sheets had to elect surgery instead because Texas didn’t want to lose the first round pick. Glaus’ remaining value to the Cards is as a PH during the playoff run or August trade bait/waiver salary dump.

by ubeddie on Jul 25, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree on this

It makes sense for the Cards not to offer Arb but still sign him to a one year deal. Then hope he regains his value so you can offer Arb in 2010 to get those draft picks then.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jul 25, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

If a trip to the playoffs is worth $25M

and Holliday is the one or two wins we need to make the playoffs, doesn’t this value trade become moot?

I think I’ve talked myself into the trade. Lets win this fucking thing.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 10:33 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

but the issue is

he only increases those odds by 15%. So it’s 15% of $25M, which is about $4M. But yeah, if Holliday =’s playoffs, then I guess you can call it moot.

godfather of futureredbirds.net

by erik on Jul 25, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Going all in is exciting.

I know it’s normally a bad idea, but it’s still exciting.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

i disagree

I don’t think it’s fair to decrease the money by the percentage added.

If we get to the Playoffs the trade was worth $25mil
If we don’t, it was worth $0 mil.

All or nothing.

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

$25 M

times the increased likelihood of making the playoffs. That’s expected value.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we make the playoffs

by beating out a team by 1 game, and Holliday adds 2 WAR, then, all else being equal, he helped by more than 15% no? Because without him in this case, we don’t make it at all.

"I throw him four wide ones then try to pick him off first base." - Preacher Roe on Stan Musial

by Shi on Jul 25, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel the same way

It is all or northing. I don’t believe that 15%/$4M stuff. If we don’t make the playoff’s we have not got $4M of value.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jul 25, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's ballplayer value

Their only endgame is a ring. Maybe a record or two if they’re a vet or a rookie. I suspect most fans who are aghast by all this VEB “negativity” are on board with that. The champagne is sweet.

I expect a little more from our front office.

That said, there are two critical time-delay pieces here: Carpenter’s arm and Pujols’ elbow. Maybe we do need to win now. And we totally trust the medical staff, right?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's what I've talked myself into,

re: The time is now.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Amen.

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

credit where credit is due

I got that increase in playoff odds talking to vivaelpujols.

godfather of futureredbirds.net

by erik on Jul 25, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

honestly

I just think this is another way to try and bitch about a trade, I am excited for the win now attitude, I understand consistent winning comes from within but we still do have david freese and joe mather under control right? before Freese got hurt all I heard was how good Freese is and should be a cornerstone at the hot corner, I understand everyone is kinda butthurt over wallace leaving but he wasnt going to play this year, and with this trade it made the Cardinals a very real contender, thus gaines my approval, last night may have been a fluke to you but it showed me that the trade was worth it, watching that game with pujols, holliday, and ludwick all in a row i certainly got the feeling that there were going to be some runs scored

Pujols takes out "I" in BIG and "A" in MAC, previously considered to be an unyielding, consonant threat

by DESTROYER on Jul 25, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

question question [raises hand]

If you had to shop Wallace, by himself, who would you acquire for him, and with what package? Ignoring the Cardinals’ needs, and focusing on the current need in the market. If Beane fleeced us, how much is that Walrus in the window really?

I ask because if Mo meant him to be trade bait in the first place… did he fulfill that goal?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

I think most, including myself,

hoped to get not just equal talent value, but equal cost value. Or, at the very least, more than two months of talent.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

that's my question

Who would it be? I mean, if we’re tossing numbers around, let’s toss some names around. It’s fun and names are more illustrative to the casual fan.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

ROY!

but apparently Toronto is being unreasonable.

A Dodgers OFer (Eithier or Kemp) would have a been sweet package trade.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kemp. I would love Kemp.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

either would be nice...

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think

Wallace for Holliday should have been enough to get the deal done.

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

the extras were too much?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes...

That’s a big part of the argument against the trade. The Cards’ probably shouldn’t have had to “throw in” a 4th/5th-type starter prospect and another solid OF prospect (wasn’t Peterson named to some AA All-Star team?).

We only get our guy for 2 months, while OAK gets this big-time hitting prospect that by all accounts Beane absolutely coveted for 6 cost-controlled years. That should’ve been more than enough.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

how much value is lost with them?

I dont understand how to calculate all this value and compare the trade, but what I do know is prior to this trade, I didn’t think we’d still be in first after we get finished in Philly, then LA. Now I think we can at least win one of these series and maintain our lead. I think I’ve read people put a $ amount on the value of a win. I would expect the value of picking up some tough games that we probably wouldn’t have won to be greater than what we lost tossing in Peterson and/or
Mortensen to get the trade done before the deadline. That is assuming Wallace was going to go regardless

by nrichar2 on Jul 25, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

more than likely..

If Billy would have taken just Wallace for him then yes, the extra’s were to much.

But I get all giddy every time I fill up a lineup card and write in “Holliday” where there once was “Duncan”

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

And no Thurston anymore!

Bernie made a point in his column today that of the three best hitters traded this season (DeRosa, McClouth, Holliday), the Cards got two of them. It’s like a totally different team from earlier this season.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

You know Al(xfritz) it really is!

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I go by Al

in real life, so that works.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Intersting.

You’re the second person I’ve run across recently named Alex/Alexander (I’m assuming that’s your full name) and goes by Al.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jul 25, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I go by both

Alex at work and by my wife, Al by friends.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're jason marquis??

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

shhhhhh

it’ll be our little secret

FOR RENT

by gdm426 on Jul 25, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

i get it

That blister on your finger was from refreshing the trade rumor blogs.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

if two C prospects are making you question the trade

It’ll take all of three wins to forget about.

I was excited yesterday when it was announced and I plan on staying that way for the next few months.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

if it was enough for matt

how would it have been enough for roy?

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

hahaha

sorry i swear i can read

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I won't be crying in my cheerios over Mort or Peterson. Meh...

"Rasmus doesn't hit lefties. Instead he bashes them over the head with their own bleeding arm he just raced to the mound to rip off before the ball arrives to the plate. He then smashes that baseball with the pitchers bloody arm over the wall because he does not hit lefites he bashes them." Ted Lilly

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've really loved all the analysis about this deal.

And based on some solid, detailed work by many of our posters, it’s pretty clear to me that the Cards probably got hosed on this one, at least in the longer term.

However, the one thing that I keep going back to is how we (fans) were clamoring for the FO to trade Player X, Y, or Z like, forever ago, and they end up holding on to these guys so long that they get nothing really in return.

Take Anthony Reyes who, by most accounts, was a top pitching prospect. By many reports, we could’ve flipped him when his value was high and gotten who knows what.

However, the more he stuck around and the more it became clear he didn’t really fit into the org’s plans, well, we all remember what we ended up getting for the once-prized prospect Anthony Reyes.

There was also a huge debate on the merits of flipping Duncan back when he was actually hitting the ball. Tons of power. Good OBP. Yeah, let’s flip this guy for something (after all, most reports indicate that SF was looking for a left-handed hitting 1B at the time ;-).

Yet there were the prospect, build-from-within folks who argued about how dumb it would be to trade a cost-controlled player with his skillset. I actually remember someone comparing Duncan to Ryan Howard (but cheaper!).

So we kept him to until it became clear that he didn’t fit into the org’s plans either (different situations, but same outcome in the end). Then we traded him for a guy who was DFA’d.

So I guess I try to look at this as “selling high” on Wallace in particular. When I do that, I can get behind this deal.

Oh, and last night was awesome. It was great to see all the righties getting hit after hit off a lefty who has been pretty nasty to date.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

I think of a Duncan/Reyes package after 2006

and cry.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha

Duncan’s package.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Passan

thinks this is a good deal. Therefore it isn’t.

End analysis.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT: TLR is crazy to want to take a train from Philly to St. Louis

Last time I dealt with Amtrak’s screwy-assed “network”, all trains from the east pass through the Chicago nexus. I’ve made only 40% of my connections at that station. (Unless one of the freight trains takes priority, which they always do.) Granted, they chartered a train, so they’re not subject to scheduling… but Chicago prioritizes the commuter trains. They won’t be so amused stuck a half-mile from the station waiting for a track to open.

It’ll probably be Philly to Pittsburgh (transfer) to Cleveland to Chicago (transfer) to St. Louis. That does not take one night. More like 23 hours minimum. Basic geography ftw.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions  

You didn't have a charter, though.

I think it’d be pretty dope.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but I'm saying it doesn't matter if you have a charter or not

Chicago physically can’t add more tracks, and they’re a national and local transfer point. Unless they get really lucky, the train will be held in an outlying track until there’s a track open at the station.

And besides that, the optimistic travel time remains almost 24 hours.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how private trains work

but I’d imagine they don’t have to go through connections, just reserve the rail time straight to where they are going.

If anyone knows anything about this, please respond, because now it’s got me wondering.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but the connections don't matter

It’s still 24 hours traveling on the rails from Philadelphia to St. Louis. That does not count transfers, sudden stoppages because of freight traffic, or delays because some idiot truck driver hit a low bridge (true story).

Here. Your computer might choke on it, though, I can’t tell what app it’s using.
http://tickets.amtrak.com/secure/content/atlas/index.html

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

There have to be more direct lines

from Philly to St Louis though, right? I mean, I can’t take a train from St Louis to Memphis (or at least counldn’t three years ago), but trains still run from St Louis to Memphis. If not, this country needs more of a rail overhaul than I though.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

no

And even if there were, it would still take 20 hours. There are those mountain things. Philly to Pittsburgh alone takes 7 hours. (St. Louis to Chicago takes 5 hours.) And there are almost no commuter tracks though Kentucky.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

We need bullet trains.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

actually if you're traveling within Illinois and Missouri

The service is great. One instance when I’m all for state subsidies. Which might mean we get the bullet trains first, too.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

it is for going north-south in illinois

beats driving to chicago… i just take the train from chambana

by BirdsonFire on Jul 25, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

blame st louis

they had the chance to be a major train hub & said no thanks

FOR RENT

by gdm426 on Jul 25, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, I know, I'm mostly pissed at Amtrak

And the massive geography fail.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

because I'm a nerd....

They can take a train after the following series…

August 5, New York to Pittsburgh (there’s an off-day, as well)
9:15

August 16, Los Angeles to San Diego
2:50

September 9, Milwaukee to St. Louis (also an off-day)
7:18

  • A St. Louis – Pittsburgh route, which happens twice, takes 15 hours and 21 minutes on the rails.
  • The route to Houston is way too long. Just going to Longview, which is east of Dallas, is a 13 hour trip.
  • Shockingly, there is no direct route from Houston to Colorado. I guess the cattle cars all went northeast and nowhere else. They wouldn’t make it even with the off-day.
  • No direct route from St. Louis to Cincinnati either. They probably sensibly used the river.
  • If they’re willing to go 28 hours on a train, they can make it from Denver to Cincinnati during their off-day.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony is really taking this

“I love old things” attitude a bit too far.

Although, the train is awesome. Especially if you are taking it with Eva Marie Saint.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can only hide blonds in the sleeper cars

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or Daniela Bianchi.

But then you have to be wary of SPECTRE agents.

by notmorganfreeman on Jul 25, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe the Cards will do the old mustache-shaving trick to evade...

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

what about this??

Its all well and good to look to the future but everyone just seems to gloss over the fact that
a) Pineiro is pitching out of this world
b) Carpenter is healthy
c) we have Wainwright and Lohse to solidify a very nice rotation
d) Holliday changes the whole dynamic of this offense (by being in there himself AND removing a lesser quantity)
e) our bullpen has been fairly consistent this year(not last years debacle)
f) we are solid minus a little tweaking that Mo saw and fixed as best he could

All these things are really only adding up to the fact that, yes, Wallace could be a future all-star 10 times over and be the next Albert Pujols but I think we have already seen that w/o luck ‘06 and some better assistance ’04 he can’t realistically do that on his own.

The main key though in this rambling is that anyone of these guys could go down and we not have a shot next year or the year after. We have all already seen it ie. Carp, so why not take this golden opportunity seize it and try to let one of the other guys dry hump another trophy this year!! We can’t just keep playing “for the future”. We gave up a decent hual for a markedly better chance at a World Series. We can replace a couple of pieces we gave away just in those 2 draft picks.

Oh, and the trade already happened so it doesn’t matter. Sit back and enjoy the Cardinals making some noise the rest of this summer.

by 07saluki on Jul 25, 2009 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Comparing to past Cardinal teams this decade

The lineup is now the best it’s been since 2004, and the pitching can match up with any Cards collection this decade

That being said, this is still not a great team. The trade has merely moved them from “the division leader at the AS break most likely to fall way out of playoff contention by mid-August” to “potential playoff team”.

But get them into the mix of the playoffs, and they have proven playoff performers (including Holliday in 2007) and even plenty of realistic DH possibilities if they get to the WS and Glaus returns.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Carp/Pineiro/Franklin/Pujols prime argument,

is actually the strongest one for this trade.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jul 25, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm buying it.

I just don’t want to pay for it.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree its expensive

thus the phrase “you’ve got to pay to play”

by 07saluki on Jul 25, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely OT:

Is Manny Ramirez a never-nude?

“I was just trying to get a good pitch to hit,” said Ramirez, who arrived at his locker and peeled off his Dodgers shirt and white pants to reveal street clothes.

Link.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Present Value

I’m a finance nerd, but I’m also too lazy to click on the links in the post. I was wondering if this analysis accounts for the time value of money. All of the values in the deal should be discounted to present value. If this is not done in the analysis, I believe this would make the trade look a lot better. Most of Holliday’s value is being had this year whereas Wallace et al’s value is spread out over the next 6 years or more with most of it being at the back end of those 6 years b/c presumably that is when they will be having the best years.

Another finance type thing that is not accounted for is that eventhough an average value is used for the prospects that does not cover the risk entirely. I think its safe to say that Holliday’s value is more stable and well known whereas Wallace et al’s value is more of a high risk / high reward type that averages out to the $25 million or so. If you think about it in terms of investments the eventhough the average return on Holliday is a little lower the fact that you know what you are getting makes it more valuable. The Wallace investment has more risk. Therefore, I still think there needs to be some kind of risk adjustment done, but thats just me.

Hopefully this made some kind of sense and is not just a crazy rant.

by DJ87 on Jul 25, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

agreed

Saying Wallace is worth 25Mil cause that’s the average that prospects like him are worth is uh, sloppy. I mean if you want to base your entire argument on the math of the thing, anyway, which is what the anti-Holliday argument does.

Especially when that number is based off a study of……..90 prospects. To people who consider 650 PAs a small sample size that’s an odd number to put a lot of faith in.

I’d like to see the standard deviation, personally, I’d bet it’s pretty high.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

nevermind

I got up some gumption and click the link and read Wang’s research. It looks like he does adjust for PV.

The Cards gave up an awful lot and having a cost controlled Wallace at 3rd would have been nice, but I’m not totally upset with the trade. I like the Cards chances this year and I’m glad they are going for it. Damn the torpedoes!!!!!

by DJ87 on Jul 25, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

RIGHT ON

As an insurance guy, this is exactly what I was trying to say above when I said I didn’t think time was accounted for.

This has been consistently overlooked and should be addressedfor better evaluation.

jp

by jpmorgan5150 on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It does include the time value of money

I didn’t address it hoping that, for those who were interested, they’d go back and look at the methodology. But it’s there, yes.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

good

If true (and we often see things like this come out and then later a deal is made b/c it was just posturing) this is very good news for the Cards. With Holliday and a healthy DeRosa I think the Cards are the best team in the NL, but if the Phils had gotten Halladay that would have put them over us. I may be forgetting about the Dodgers, but for some reason they just don’t impress me very much.

by DJ87 on Jul 25, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really want Doc to stay in the AL

the Phils getting him would trump us getting Holliday

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I got the opposite impession from that article

They don’t sound so far apart, just waiting for Philly to bite the bullet.

I’ll be shocked if it doesn’t happen.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's perplexing

you have to assume they now move him in the offseason or next deadline when the team getting him will be getting him for less total time, likely giving up less prospects as a result. Not sure how this helps Toronto. Trading him = likely peak value

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll bet you're wrong

especially now that the Cards got Holliday.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you're the Phillies

You should be selling what you have to get Halladay for the next year and a half. After that, it may be time to start blowing things up to rebuild. All of their main pieces are getting into their prime years right now, but they won’t stay there forever and they’re also going to become insanely expensive to keep as well. Utley, Rollins, and Werth are all 30 and older, Howard gets more expensive every arbitration year, and Ibanez is 36 years old.

I’d be pushing all in with Doc for this year and next year to try and win another World Series. Let’s hope that they don’t.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Working on Saturdays blows.

Just throwing that out there.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes. Yes it does.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm...

You could just go back to sleep. And you can do whatever you want. I fail to see how that sucks more.

Of course, I’m just glad I can look at VEB at work.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I got up at 5:45

threw up trying to swollow asprin because I have the worst gag reflex in the world and have been sitting in my office since 7.

Your day does not blow more.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Working Saturday does blow

but you’ve got me beat for sure. All i’m doing is prepping a few lectures ahead of time

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

ANOTHER LINK...

Ted Lilly Knee Surgery

Link

This just keeps getting better.

Go Cards!
GolfHog44

by golfhog44 on Jul 25, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

ow

I’m sorry for the player.

I’m not sorry for the fans…

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the Cubs docs were the Cardinals docs

This would mean that Lilly’s estimated return date of three weeks is sometime around August 2010.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

what gets me is he went in for shoulder soreness and came back with ... knee surgery?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha

Though, okay, maybe he was changing his slot to compensate for the knee, thus messing up his shoulder.

Still. It’s like the Cracker Jack Prizes in the ivy.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol ... they spray-painted the field at Wrigley

Apparently they hosted a few concerts recently…

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

He'd come back with a wooden leg.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Not my arm, dumbass, my KNEE!! as in the thing that bends in the middle of my LEG!!"

so yeah, if treated by our docs, i’d say he’d be coming back w/ 2 legs, but one untreated knee injury, and shiny new pirate hook hand. He’d look pretty bad ass on the mount

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

but as long as

the hook hand was his glove hand and he could still pitchy lefty, well, he’d still give the Cards fits.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

this all sounds like a Capital One commercial

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cubbies

They have had their share of injury woes as well the past few years as well (especially the Prior and Wood years). I think their docs and the Card’s docs were roommates in medical school.

by DJ87 on Jul 25, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

it just goes to show

that counting on too many older, PROVEN vets and a high payroll doesn’t always pay off. Good thing we’re taking the opposite approach!

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, Mo overpayed.

I don’t think there is any questioning that, and anybody that wants to debate that is going to have to make assumptions much greater than those made to value prospects. That said, there are times to overpay.

I don’t think that anyone can objectively say that we are not entering a transitional period of Cardinals baseball. They are changing the focus of how they do business, and it has caused a HUGE PR problem with their many of their fans. In addition, they have a manager that does not believe in the new focus feeding that negative PR image, but he probably is only a concern for a few more years anyway. The players have been muttering about this organization’s lack of committment to winning now, including the big guy that plays 1B.

Also, there is definitely additional value in the present. Right now this team is in 1st place in their division. Right now this team plays in a division with several underperforming, flawed teams. Right now this team has their ace pitcher throwing like he can, and history tells us to take advantage of it. Right now Albert Pujols is making a push for the Triple Crown and deserves help. Right now Ryan Franklin and Joel Pineiro are pitching wildly beyond expectations. Right now they have a 2-time WS champion manager that has one of the highest win totals in the history of baseball. There is no guarantee of any of these items, nor even reasonable equivalents, will happen again in the next 6 years. Even the best organizations can’t expect to reasonably have the opportunity to win a WS every year, and most can’t expect it every decade. If the opportunity presents itself to take a very realistic run at it, then there is value in putting all your chips on the table.

I’m not necessarily one of those who believe that this was the right move to make. I think the team overpaid, and I doubt this organization’s solvency to be able to continue to make this work after this year. I think this team is caught between two philosophies, and I seriously hope they get off the damn fence soon. I don’t necessarily think we’re entering another era like the 70s were, but I think that they have put themselves in a position to not be serious contenders for 5 years after this one.

Then again, I’m not much of a poker player because I’m too damn conservative. It often takes great risks to reap great rewards.

by etp_stl on Jul 25, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions  

In past seasons

This move might have been received with more applause than it is now. Fans in general are becoming more savvy to the philosophy of building from within and only dealing prospects when you have an excess. Despite improvement in this department, the Cardinals farm system is not flush with prospects.

I agree etp, that the Holliday trade sends out mixed messages. It seemed that they were headed towards the “build from within” strategy when they avoided offers for Rasmus. However, they pretty much traded their only “flashy” prospect this year the first chance they got (probably the second chance, since they didn’t have enough to get Halladay).

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Question

I personally lean towards thinking that Wallace could stick at third for at least a year or two, but, for arguments sake, let’s say he can’t. In that case, his prospect ranking of 21 would seem high, and he would likely then fall to the 25-50 range. What would his value be then?

"I throw him four wide ones then try to pick him off first base." - Preacher Roe on Stan Musial

by Shi on Jul 25, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

He would be a problem

However, if he was producing at the plate, they would have the upper hand in hand-picking targets to trade for in the AL. Who needs a DH/1B and has top prospects or a slugger with a reasonable contract in return? To me, the Red Sox were the logical destination for the Walrus if he eventually came up for the Cards. They need a DH soon, and they have plenty to offer in return (mostly from the pitching side).

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, I found the link I was looking for

It was in the main post, of course. Top 26-50 hitters are valued at $23.4 M. So the loss in value is not too great from $25.1 M.

"I throw him four wide ones then try to pick him off first base." - Preacher Roe on Stan Musial

by Shi on Jul 25, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is a good question

you’re right. If he’s a 1B/DH, he falls to 25-50 or maybe even 50-75. If he’s a 51-75 prospect, his value drops to $14.1 M and the trade is about even and, therefore, defensible. I think, however, that had he remained in St. Louis, he would have begun next season as our 3B and ended up playing at least a couple of seasons at the hot corner for the Cards so maybe his true value is somewhere around $20 M. It’s still a win for the A’s, then, but your question is a really good one.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

see above

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

What luck

The Cardinals game is being broadcast in the Northeast today, as this is a rare weekend when the Red Sox, Yankees, or Mets aren’t scheduled at 4.

I assume that means that it is the “national” game. (Looking at the others, I can’t see how it wouldn’t be).

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 12:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Ah yes. I saw that as well. I can at least thank Mo for that I am sure the Holliday deal helped with that one.

I hate comcast and to a lesse degree the Red Sox, Yankees, and Mets. I am sure that is why I can’t buy the baseball package to watch the team I want to watch. So I go out of my way not to watch the others.

Damn you and your rules MLB!

Holliday.
Uh huh, oh yeah.
Holliday.
He will be so nice.

by Red Blazer on Jul 25, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

surplus value is a gm’s measure or somewhat worse, an accountant’s measure, since it’s a measure of profitability. it’s unwieldy as a fan’s measure. volkswagen may well be more profitable than porsche, but they don’t make a better product for their consumer. the connection between surplus value and won-loss value is only achieved through the bridge notion of a payroll ceiling. the problem is that payroll is flexible, it depends on who is available to the team and who is not. furthermore the significance of surplus value in a win-loss discussion also depends on the team’s proximity to its payroll ceiling. as was noted yesterday, cardinals revenue is going down if pujols walks away. the fact that player payroll as a percentage of revenue is lower in baseball than in other sports also suggests the ceiling is higher than generally perceived. we simply don’t have the same kind of knowledge of that ceiling as the man who ok’d this trade yesterday does, and anything that dwells the topic is founded on little more than a guess.

we’ve seen how this plays out when the cardinals don’t chase stars. they give more money than they probably should to encarnacion and looper and post-rotator cuff surgery mulder and an aging edmonds and lohse. shots in the dark really. so they have been trying to spend money to build winners in ways that make accountants cringe. what’s been different is that they haven’t been willing to risk losing talent. victor wang’s research also shows just how good draft picks and highly ranked prospects are, and it’s depressing. it’s incredibly hard to find star talent before it becomes widely accepted as such. the cardinals aren’t players on the type-a free agent market; even during the most liberal payroll years, the highest profile free acquisition has been tino martinez, which most of us would like to forget. there’s only one avenue left.

with the obvious concerns about the coors stuff, holliday is a genuinely good ballplayer, probably worth 5 and maybe 6 wins over a full season. wallace looks like he’s sean casey (seriously, has anybody looked at wallace’s groundball rates?) with a little less defensive value. if a small market team like the cardinals are serious about winning, they’re not going to be particularly concerned about surplus value. sure, they’d rather win on a $60 million payroll than a $120 million payroll, but the bigger point from this trade is that they’d rather win with a $110 million payroll than be meh with a $80 million payroll. this is a good thing from a fan’s perspective, even if it makes the team less analytically sound. considering the drive towards a great team hasn’t been obvious the last couple of years (‘dewallet’), it’s a very good thing from a fan’s perspective. it’s a renewal of the kinds of trades where surplus value was lost and won-loss value was gained, such as polanco-for-rolen or kennedy-for-edmonds. the cardinals have reinforced that they aren’t beane’s a’s, and honestly i’m grateful for that.

St. Louis Cardinals -- 2006 World Champions

by greenback06 on Jul 25, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Sour Grapes

Is the purpose of this blog to say, “The sky is falling on the Cardinal organization!”? I just don’t get it… Mo acknowledges the trade was a risk. The deal is done. The one thing that makes baseball unique is the uncertainty that comes with any front office move. If Wallace chokes on a chicken bone tomorrow (let’s hope not), this blog will look ridiculous. If tomorrow, Holliday gets incarcerated for organized K-9 fighting, well…looks like Mo made a huge mistake.

Bottom line is StL FO are big boys. They have all the numbers. I love this blogsite because it does post VERY intellectual data in a fun way. I also value being able to question decisions made in the organization…Looking at things from a different point of view. In this situation, though, complaining and worrying about the sanity of the FO seems like beating a dead horse. As for me, maybe I’m blissfully ignorant (Im not saying it is beyond possibility:) but…I’d rather have our management staff and FO than any other team in the MLB. I’m happy about the Cards, the direction they’re going, and the risks they are taking.

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 1:04 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The quality

of the decision isn’t just judged by the results. The actual decision-making is what is being judged here. We gave up 6 cost-controlled years of Brett Wallace (valued at $25 million), for TWO MONTHS of Matt Holliday and an outside shot at extending his stay here. Financially, it’s a poor decision.

That said, the Cardinals are in win-now mode, and that has its own merits. I don’t think anyone here is declaring that the sky is falling or that the Cardinals have doomed themselves for all of eternity. That’s your narrow interpretation of many nuanced, thoughtful opinions.

Blogsite.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

there are too many factors in this deal for people to claim that we’re all doom and gloom here. Chuck’s post was about the value of the players changing teams over the long haul. Examined w/ that lens, there’s no arguing we gave up more than we received back.

However, though I’m not entirely convinced of this, I do feel that one can argue that extenuating circumstances regarding the Cardinals this year give this trade additional value in the short-term sense (whether than makes it worth it is also debatable). To me that doesn’t make it worth the longterm cost, i’m just saying I think that this argument is more tenable than saying, “stop being depressing, Holliday is awesome!!” (not that those are your words OK USA, just generalizing)

Along those lines, one could claim that “Win Now” mode has value in and of itself (I think DanUp alluded to this in one of the many threads yesterday—not that he agreed w/ it, just that it was possible to argue that point) and I think that argument holds more weight than people saying that one the surface Holliday was worth Wallace +. Clearly, he’s not.

Regardless, I find the argument to be essentially philosophical. To that end, this trade doesn’t fit the philosophy of building from within to many us. To others, it does simply because building from within developed the parts necessary to pull off the trade. It’s a matter of degrees in some sense. I personally feel that Holliday in teh lineup is exciting for the rest of this year but not worth the cost. I’ll try to enjoy his presence, nevertheless. In the longrun, though, you can field a much better team w/ cost controlled Brett Wallace in the lineup + ~15m to spend on other needs than you can w/ 15m-MH in the lineup and less money to spend on pitching, etc.

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is very well said, spants

I was going to say something, but you hit it on the head.

  1. The decision made was a poor one, regardless of the outcome.
  2. OK USA’s comment wwas something of gross simplification.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear ya...

Although my interpretation was very narrow and unthoughtful (apparently)… I’m just trying to say- these decisions (made by FO) are calculated and refined. We all know Cards FO NEVER makes mistakes:) As I acknowledged before, I appreciate a nuanced (or occasionally lackthereof), thoughtful opinion. It comes down to, what’s the ultimate point of some of the negativity? I’m pretty sure Mo can’t call up Bean and say, “Whoops, I was reading vivaelbirdos.com (Blogsite.) this morning and they brought up a few, really good points that hadn’t occurred to the Card’s front office before we decided to make this deal. Holliday & co. have been sent back by train to New York. He should be there by the sixth inning. How would you like to send our prospects back? Thanks for your understanding!”

Risk: “RISK can be defined as "the threat or probability that an action or event will adversely or beneficially affect an organisation’s ability to achieve its objectives"1. In simple terms risk is ‘Uncertainty of Outcome’, either from pursuing a future positive opportunity, or an existing negative threat in trying to achieve a current objective.”

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

With that being said...

to reiterate… spants your point was taken. On paper, the trade may appear to be a poor decision. I disagree with the “regardless of outcome” comment b/c the nature of baseball dictates a poor decision and a risky decision that may pay off. That’s my opinion is all.

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

"what’s the ultimate point of some of the negativity?"

and “Is the purpose of this blog to say, "The sky is falling on the Cardinal organization!"? I just don’t get it…”

Why do you have a problem with people voicing their complaints? Nearly all of the responses to the trade have been tempered, reasonable, and within the community guidelines. This isn’t the StL Today forum, so to come in here and act like it is is narrow and unthoughtful.

Further, the Cardinals FO makes all sorts of gaffes and behaves in an unrefined manner. And there is no reason why people shouldn’t critique, criticize, and analyze, especially if it is something people like to do.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

wait...

So you’re saying discussing whether a trade is good or bad should only be done by the fans if we’re sending a memo directly to the front office? There has to be an ultimate point?

The front office willingly risks the fans assessing their risk. It’s not evil or anything. Last I checked, blogs were for talking about stuff. Occasionally they rise to some sort of cosmic significance, in which case, round here, the comment helpfully turns green.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Yadi

Yadi2Second, you know, you are right! I guess that’s why I’m in here too to offer a different perspective. Listen, I repect the Blog:)

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do agree with you

That baseball as a game is unique in its balance of risk and reward. However, I think it’d be a good idea not to discount other people’s opinions in the course of offering up your own.

At least not without stats.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right...

Even though I did…I did not mean to come in here and step on toes, discounting opinions and the sort. I quickly found out the vivaelbirdos mafia will put your back to the wall pretty quick. I don’t have any stats (I think they’ve all been leveraged)… I’m a fan of the trade… Yes, I understand on paper, it doesn’t make the most sense. This team needed a jump start. Is it unreasonable to think we can’t sign Holliday after we win the World Series:)? Weren’t the Rolen/Walker/Drew trades similar in nature? spants & co…sorry I peed in your soup. Lesson learned:)

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Drew trade was nothing of the sort

if anything it was the exact opposite. In the Rolen deal they didn’t give up anyone as highly-touted as Wallace. The baseball world has changed a lot since then.

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

apparently the decision was made

through a phone call from LaRussa to MO that said “Get me Matt Holliday” when Tony was throwing a fit over Chris Duncan being traded to the Red Sox. Combine that call w/ the fact that Tony has a lot more pull w/ DeWitt than Mo does and it’s not too difficult to imagine a similar phone call from Tony to DeWitt and from DeWitt, Mo’s boss, to Mo. Does Tony have all the numbers? I don’t know but I don’t believe they were used when he made those phone calls.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, and I don't

think enough fans realize just how dangerous it is to have a situation like this … an effectively untouchable manager who knows his bull-in-china-shop routine WORKS. And an owner who, for some bizarre reason, believes his team can’t win w/o TLR. And Mo is caught in a bad situation—he’s basically got his dream job, one of only 30 in the world, and if he walks away on principle he might never be part of that fraternity again.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where

does this information come from? Link?

by OK USA on Jul 25, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Checkout this video

this video from MLB Network.

If you don’t want to sit through the whole 2 minutes and changes of analysis and just want to hear the part about Tony saying “Get me Matt Holliday,” go ahead to like the 1:56 mark.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

you definitely have the coolest avatar

Cardinal fanatic since '82

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 25, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT: this is hilarious

http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/2009/7/25/962305/casey-mulligan-doing-awesome

start e-mailing, this needs to get internet meme time.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions  

ha...that's pretty funny.

I don’t know anything about that dude…any chance he could fetch us a slugging OF?

;-)

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

with those moves?

He might get us a pitcher.

….wait a minute….

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure that I won't be the only one feeling this way...

…But if this Holliday acquisition kicks off some kind of thought-chain in Tony La Russa’s brain that leads to Colby Rasmus’s PT being reduced, then I will go from strongly disliking this trade to thoroughly hating it. Colby has been a big part of this team’s staying-afloat, helping boost the offense while Ludwick was hurt/bad, Ankiel was bad, and Duncan was abominable. Furthermore, UZR shows he’s been one of the best CFers in baseball this season, and while that’s not really predictive it still says something about this kid’s talent.

However, I’m literally terrified that TLR will decide that Rick’s recent hot play indicates he’s turned a corner or some shit, and therefore deserves to start b/c Colby isn’t ready or shouldn’t have to deal with that pressure or because he didn’t get a hit that one time or what-the-hell other logic he uses regarding young players. Now that Holliday is firmly installed in LF, Ankiel’s PT will spill over into Rasmus’s.

Here’s how I see it…Rasmus’s play to this point has been exemplary, esp. considering that he’s 22-going-on-23. He’s shown plus power and a really good glove. Yes, he’s got things to work on. But even in “working on” those things, he’s still a better player in every conceivable way than Ankiel right now. Playing the worse player b/c of loyalty, protection of Raz, whatever is blatantly stupid and wrong. Ank is this team’s 4th outfielder and should be used as such. Anything else is a travesty.

Footnote-my posts today have been remarkably verbose. I apologize…I guess I just have a lot to say today.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Since I see this happening likely

If they’re are going to split playing time, the only way I see it not being too bad, if it is just a platoon, where Ankiel would start against the lefties. And we are now in a position to move Colby into a spot in the lineup where he can steal some bases.
3 games of Ank > season of Rasmus??

The poster formerly known as JoeyBombs.

by RasRoY on Jul 25, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not saying he did or will but,

what if Rick did turn the corner? What do we do then? I doubt he has/will, but wouldn’t that just make this trade look even worse. Also, what is the over under on how many games we will see dick, rasmus, and luddy while holliday is on the bench? I see it happening about 6 times.

gonna need more franklins to get through this one.

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 25, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I say under

about 2 or 3. We’re going to try and get the most out of Holliday while we have him.

The poster formerly known as JoeyBombs.

by RasRoY on Jul 25, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's a name

Which means he’s a full time OF. It took a long time for Ludwick to become a name. Rasmus isn’t a name yet, unfortunately.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

there is no reason to sit Holliday

given what we paid to get him.

I take the under too.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope Ank has turned a corner

If he does, this team has a great 4th OF’er, if La Russa uses him as such. I doubt that happens though, b/c Colby doesn’t get to play through slumps apparently while Rick gets to play through suck.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they are

very similar players.

Playing time should be determined by matchups/who has the hot hand.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

um, no

"I think he's the best hitter of all time. I think there has never been a better hitter than him. And I know I didn't see them all, but I just don't think there could be." - Adam Wainwright on The Mang

by bmorgan on Jul 25, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

They most certainly are not

Rasmus is 22 years old and has shown a modicum of plate discipline this year, has hit for more power, and is a truly elite defensive CF. Plus, it’s important to his development that he play…a lot.

Rick Ankiel is a raw OF’er who is solid, but unspectacular, and has NO discipline whatsoever. He’s hit okay for about 20 minutes this season.

Colby Rasmus is a better player right now in every measurable way.

Spend five minutes at Fangraphs if you don’t think there is a major difference between the two of them.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

and colby is

3-31

ankiel is 7-17

You might not agree with it but it doesn’t seem beyond reasonable to play the guy.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

*cough SMALL SAMPLE SIZE *cough

Streaks aren’t predictive.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true of course,

but Ankiel has proven to be streaky as it is. Maybe just ride out his streak for awhile? Not a long while, though.

"I throw him four wide ones then try to pick him off first base." - Preacher Roe on Stan Musial

by Shi on Jul 25, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I tried to ignore that (though I took a little stab at it) in the thread but the benefit of the trade is reduced if Ankiel takes PT away from Rasmus.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lineup from Goold

Incoming Blogriot :(

1.Skip Schumaker, 2B
2.Julio Lugo, SS
3.Albert Pujols, 1B
4.Matt Holliday, LF
5.Ryan Ludwick, RF
6.Rick Ankiel, CF
7.Mark DeRosa, 3B
8.Yadier Molina, C
9.Kyle Lohse, P

If Holliday to STL = Ankiel the new CF then I’ll from major reservations about the trade to white-hot-sun-burning-rage over it!!!

at least Ankiel’s been hitting better (of course that’s why he’s starting, dammit i can’t win!)

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Under no circumstances

should Lugo be playing SS.

Colby has officially been buried.

by indakind on Jul 25, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Riding a hot Ankiel

I hope that’s all it is. Tony tends to play him until he flames out. And the few hitting streaks he’s had this year have corresponded to some of the team’s best offensive stretches.

Since April, the only two Ankiel “tepid” stretches were in the Detroit/KC stretch and the Florida series.

Plus, keep in mind, the more Tony plays Ankiel, the more likely he gets hurt or aggravates his shoulder. Don’t worry, it’s only a matter of time before Rasmus is forced into duty.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony tends to play him UNTIL he flames out?

TLR plays him long after he flames out.

Is TLR gonna pull another shitfit leading to Rasmus being traded for Halladay?

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

An extremely porous middle of the infield

Could not have gotten away with that with Piniero on the mound.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

EXACTLY

wtf? Lugo at short? Wow, this keeps getting better.

Hopefully anyway today’s lineup can give Lohse more than the 2 runs they gave him his last turn.

by goodymobb on Jul 25, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

how has he been buried?

he’s struggling a ton and Ankiel had a 3 hit game last night. If you expected TLR to play Colby today then you are delusional.

by dcfcblues on Jul 25, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

by the way

i’m not saying I agree with it. i’d much rather see Colby in the lineup. but i’ve watched TLR ran teams enough to know that this was going to happen.

by dcfcblues on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you don't agree

with it then we agree with each other. And I envy your ability to stay calm about it, I just can’t.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

I believe Colby should play, but I 100% expected Ankiel to play today. I just wasn’t sure if Ludwick or Colby would it. I feared Lugo at SS after the HR that he crushed.

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boogscrimination

I’m rec-ing this and may create more accounts with the sole purpose of rec-ing this more than once. Lugo at short SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN ON THIS TEAM barring a Boog & TGreene murder-suicide pact. Even then it would be questionable.

I’d bitch about Rasmus riding the pine…but what’s the use anymore…pass the Haagen Daas, I need a good cry.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

T-Greene's not on the team

and neither is Barden. in order for Boog to get a day off, it’s either Thurston or Lugo. You choose!

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I choose Slappy McCracken

a 39-year old journeyman who has played for 8 teams in the last 10 years, garnering a decisive majority of those in the minor leagues. He’s an outfielder who has converted to a reliever and then to a middle-infielder as an attempt to garner more playing time. His “hustle first, ask questions later” has cost him some frustrating injuries and untimely outs on the basepaths, but have helped him capture the hearts of many adoring fans. Also, he exists entirely in the subconscious of Tony LaRussa.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

To summarize: Slappy McCracken plays baseball "the right way"

by which I mean “at replacement level”.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

cake!

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll restrain myself for a day

But if this goes on, with Boog finally, finally coming into his own… I’d be more pissed about that than Colby, to be honest. How many years have we gone without a solid keystone?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

sigh.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is bullshit

if there isn’t a Colby Rasmus is hurt (worse than Ankiel) story in the next 24 hours.

I can’t stand Rick Ankiel.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

and you just know Colby won't get the same treatment as a "veteran" during his slump

ie—we won’t hear that Colby is getting 2-3 consecutive starts to “try to get him going.” He’ll play one(ish) game a series until Ankiel flames out again, forcing Tony’s hand, which could take awhile based on Tony’s definition of flaming out as applied to Teen Idol Ricky

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really don't care if Rasmus is slumping

At WORST they both suck equally on offense and then Rasmus should be in the field for his glove. Just like Brendan Ryan. It’s bad managing and I’ve tried to be equitable to TLR w/r/t to Holliday but he has to pull this crap.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Jul 25, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boog :(

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh i'm totally in your corner on this one

Colby’s defense is absolutely worth playing him. Plus, there’s something to be said for letting him play through his slumps so he can DEVELOP!!!

finally, it’s not like his mini slump is anything compared to Ankiel’s season long/general talent issue. It’s not even comparable. In fact, you’d have to invert it. Thus, Ankiel’s been good for roughly the same amount of time as Colby’s been bad. It’s completely bass ackwards

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

eat more philly cheesesteaks, Colby

You’re gonna be reclining.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony Lukes!!!

Though lately its been Paesanos in fishtown. Great potatoes.

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony is doing two thing

three actually.

1) He is bonding Ankiel to Holliday. 6 days to trade dead line and Tony needs another arm. If Rick stays he wants a player. If Rick goes he wants a good arm.

2) Colby is in a funk, he is a rookie and is acting like one. Tony now has choices. Thats why Lugo is at short. He hit the ball harder than anyone yesterday.

3) There is a mad dash for leverage right now between BD and Tony. May they both win.

Rasmus is fine. He will start developing an attitude that he doesn’t have now. He is self motivated and is laking momentum. He will rise.

by OperaCard on Jul 25, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fucking shit, Tony

I sincerely hope this is not what can expect to see from here on out.

  1. The pitcher should hit 8th b/c it does provide some extra oomph to the lineup
  2. I’ll give TLR the benefit of the doubt and say he’s playing Lugo at SS to see what he can do, so to speak, or to give Boog a day off. I have to say that or I’ll lose my sanity.
  3. Rick Ankiel with two straight CF starts? What? I understand that Colby has struggled a bit post-ASB. But Rick Ankiel has struggled the whole fucking season. Rasmus is a better player in every single measurable way right now, and two good games don’t change that. I think there are many things to admire about Rick Ankiel, but just because you feel bad for ruining his pitching career (which TLR DID NOT DO!) or b/c you think Colby is too young to handle the pressure or whatever DOES NOT MEAN that Rick is the starting CFer if he plays well. Gah….

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think La Russa has earned it

I think a manager with that many career wins has earned the right to make the decisions he does. And to boot, the Ankiel decision last night turned out pretty well.

Rasmus is still going to get more starts than Ankiel anyway.

Last I checked, this team is in first place. A team that until recently hada lot of holes. Gotta give credit where credit is due.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 2:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Rasmus is still going to get more starts than Ankiel anyway.

I’m not so sure I buy that.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, to the players.

Way to go Albert, Carp, Waino, Yadi, Franklin, Brendan, Colby, and Ludwick.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

No Joel?

Damn you’re heartless.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whoops!

Just distracted at work!

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

And especially

Joel with his new approach, his willingness to have Oquendo berate him, and his bitchin’ Zorro ’stache.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

viva piñata!

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

the credit goes to Tony?

Tony is the reason this team’s in first place? I’ll give credit to Albert, Carp, Pineiro, and Wainwright. You can give credit to Tony.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

hehe....

So La Russa deserves none of the credit? By that logic, anyone could manage this team to first place at this point in the season. Maybe even you?

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 2:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'll tell you what --

I’ll take the current Cards roster and let you select anyone you want to manage them (including me) and give you Tony and any 25 players I select. Which team do you think will win more games? Maybe Tony can win w/ anyone but I wouldn’t bet on it.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I will…way to go Pujols, Carpenter, Wainwright, Franklin, Rasmus, and Molina. Recently Skip has really stepped it up offensively and defensively, as has Ludwick. Way to go guys!

TLR on the other hand has done many a thing to HURT this team. The Skip experiment has begun to bear fruit on both sides of the ball, but he was atrocious defensively for months and didn’t hit well either. TLR kept a 13-man bullpen and wasted a roster spot by not using that 13th man for several fucking weeks. Tony kept playing Duncan, even though (and I hate to say this) Ankiel was the better choice b/c he’s at least a good OF’er.

I think a manager with that many career wins has earned the right to make the decisions he does. And to boot, the Ankiel decision last night turned out pretty well.

Those arguments are childish at best. The first is a blatant appeal to tradition, and furthermore he (as with all managers) is indebted to his talented players for those wins. Don’t try to tell me that no one else could have done as well with the late-80’s A’s or the early-00’s Cardinals…to think otherwise is blatant stupidity.

Also, TLR had no reason to expect Ankiel to get two extra-base hits last night, unless he’s got some kind of magical foresight that I don’t know about. You’re evaluating a decision on the result, not on the process…and LaRussa played an inferior player with no clear, defensible reason and it happened to work out. I’ll borrow the red baron’s Toaster Analogy. I stuck my man-meat into a toaster, and I didn’t get burned, therefore sticking my dong in a toaster is a good idea! Wait, no it’s not…

On the same note, Ankiel got two hits last night! Great…wait a second, Rasmus is a better player and was probably in fine physical condition to play? Ah screw it…play the worse player b/c it worked out!!!

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

double-switches I see in my nightmares...

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

OOPS...

The first is a blatant appeal to tradition…

No it isn’t, dickhead…it’s more of an appeal to authority…or something else. You are not up on your logical-fallacies, you (or me? I’m lost…)

Just shut up now…

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Albert's having a 9 win season

Pineiro’s having a career year and I think Carp’s performing better than anyone imagined. This “all the credit goes to Tony” meme is tiresome. I’d rather have all those players than Tony.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

didn't someone make a related comment about Charlie Manuel

and his managerial skills during the ASG?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess you take the leap and say that...

…TLR deserves credit for writing Pujols into the lineup a lot or getting the ball to Wainwright or Carpenter…

But then again I guess I could say you are a good blogger b/c you know how to type. Or that my TV is a great TV b/c it turns on. You don’t get or deserve credit for doing painfully obvious or easy things.

I’m thoroughly with you RE:
bq This "all the credit goes to Tony" meme is tiresome

It gets really old to hear that Tony is doing a great managerial job when you consider some of the awful things he’s done this year and in light of the fact that Albert is having arguably his very best season.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shit

This “all the credit goes to Tony” meme is tiresome

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

take a nap.

preferably not in an intersection.

/blatant_irreverence

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again....

No one said the players don’t deserve credit. Kind of hard to hide a shitty manager over the course of 162 games though, wouldn’t you say?

No, you’d probably say that that’s possible as well. I’m sure there’s some statistical anagram that proves it….

awesome.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dusty

Must have done a pretty good job that year.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or maybe they got there in spite of Dusty?

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

um, no...

are you being sarcastic? first off, barry bonds ops during the 2002 playoffs was 1.515. he was absolutely insane. the giants got to the WS on the strength of his bat, to a large extent.

secondly, there are so many other factors that have more to do with the fact that they made the playoffs than dusty’s managerial skills suckitude: maybe the team over-performed their skill level; maybe the team was actually really good that year; barry bonds; etc.

The first thing that a pitcher has to understand is that Albert is better than you.-- Jim Palmer

by ilrosso on Jul 25, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Now you're being difficult...

Gotta give credit where credit is due.

You started that comment talking about TLR. What was everyone supposed to think? To me the logical conclusion of said comment was that La Russa has done an admirable job this year and deserves the majority of the credit for this team being in first place.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where would you get that?

Just because you give credit, doesn’t mean it’s all the credit.

Great, whatever, now you know.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you trip backpedaling?

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Have you met SoonerFanTU?

You guys would get alone GREAT! You should start your own Tony LaRussa fan club website or something.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

They may be the same guy...

Sooner usually stays civil, if irrational, in his own comments. Maybe this way he can let lose his vitriol???

/sarcasm

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

What I want to know, if TLR even having a positive impact on this team?

It’s hard to counteract things like sticking with Wellemeyer, Ankiel, Duncan, Thursty by hitting the pitcher 8th.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tough to know that...

TLR seems to be having a down year, but he’s been brilliant many, many times during his term. Is Phil Jackson a great coach? Or did he just happen to manage Jordan, Pippen, Shaq, and Kobe?

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

dude

If TLR weren’t the manager for STL wtf would we talk about?

(cutting off the snarky Pennants and Rings comments that might follow)

by dugmartsch on Jul 25, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last I checked

Duncan is gone, Thurston’s time is going to be limited now, Ankiel is hitting. If they don’t get some one to replace Wellemeyer, what would you have him do? A four man rotation?

He uses what they give him, and has clearly done something right this year. Proof? First place. Just win baby.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

last time i checked

Mitchell Boggs or Blake Hawskworth are still in memphis waiting to outpitch Welly.

Ankiel is hitting…for 1 or games.

And trading Duncan or Limiting Thurstons play NOW, does not undo THE PAST.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not the general manager or owner

Boggs and Hawksworth aren’t any great shakes either. I’d rather see them go get a veteran innings eater for the 5th spot.

You can’t argue with some people, but I guess I’ll try: Look, with the holes this team has had in THE PAST as you put it, how the hell were they supposed to be 15 games in first place? You had a converted outfielder playing second, a starting shortstop leave with a psychological disorder, a 3rd baseman gone all year. Ankiel and Duncan are just one piece to that puzzle.

They’re in first and are now the favorite in the division. Amazing how some will punch a gift horse in the mouth.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

They still have had 3 dominant starting pitcher and Albert Pujols

You misplace the value in this team, most of the other pieces don’t matter to much by themselves, which is why TLR can’t sink this ship as long as he remembers to let his good pitchers pitch and play Albert Pujols.

And thinking the Tony could get Hawksworth or Boggs to the bigs on his request is just foolish.

Who said we’re supposed to be 15 games out of 1st. Why do you have to go to extremes? Maybe we’re supposed to be 2-3 games out of 1st at this point with an average manager, that would still be considered a really bad season for Tony. Not saying I know he’s a negative impact, but I wonder.

So I’m not about to credit TLR for anything if I’m wonder how much I have to blame him.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

And how much of that has anything to do with La Russa?

And it has nothing to do with whether or not those guys SHOULD have played.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know

The things I thought a manager was supposed to do. Juggle lineups through injury, play match ups, position fielders, when to steal, when to pitch out, when to take, when to swing away, when to pull a pitcher, when to get a guy warmed up in the bullpen, what pitcher to put in, when to bunt, how to manage egos, etc, etc, etc.

Wait, your right, most of that of course the players can take care of themselves.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Blah blah blah

A manager is in charge of strategic and tactical moves, of course, but ultimately it’s the players who have to play. I could go through that list and demonstrate pretty vividly that La Russa has fucked up a significant number of those situations you wrote out.

This team has been good b/c Pujols is hitting the shit out of the ball and because Carp/Wainwright/Piniero are pitching the shit out of it.

By the way, I’m done with this discussion because you are being a moving target. If you go back through the comments here you’ll see you are constantly trying to change the focus of the argument, and quite frankly it’s tiresome. Whatever…good day to you.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

why!!!!

TLR should be aloud to carry 9 position players. the 8 starters and one backup catcher. That is the only way he won’t screw things up!

gonna need more franklins to get through this one.

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still, I'm not pining

For the days where you dreaded seeing a lineup with Duncan, Ankiel, TGreene, KGreene, and Thurston all in it.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

well I take cold comfort

in the fact that this isn’t the real test.

Four at home against the Dodgers is the real test.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is 2.0, though

a reboot, if you will.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

We've played the Dodgers well

Even after the Manny trade last year. I’ll be more optimistic those 4 games that I was for this Philly series.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

slash lines for july

ankiel – .196/.240/.304
rasmus – .239/.311/.448

i love how when colby goes 0 fer for a couple games he is struggling. ankiel can play just awful for the entire year and after one good game he’s back. ridiculous, defense alone should make colby the everyday CF.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I generally agree,

but to be fair, he has had 2 good games…

"I throw him four wide ones then try to pick him off first base." - Preacher Roe on Stan Musial

by Shi on Jul 25, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe...

TLR thinks Rasmus has a stamina issue and wants to keep him fresh for September and October. He’s played 96, 128, and 127 games the last three years.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please,

you’ll have to do better than that.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm...

ok….

…maybe TLR doesn’t think that UZR is worth a sh** and values Ankl’s arm over Raz’s range, or

…maybe TLR thinks Rasmus could use a break b/c he hasn’t had an xbh in his last 45 PAs, or

…maybe TLR thinks he’ll need Ank’s LH bat down the stretch and wants to help him get right, or

…maybe TLR has information on an injury that hasn’t been disclosed, or

…maybe TLR is disciplining Rasmus for a unknown transgression, or

…maybe TLR possesses some other piece of information that there rest of us don’t possess, or

…maybe the 4,709 major league lineup cards that TLR has filled out in his lifetime gives him some insight on which players will do best in a given situation, just like it did last night.

How about that? I myself am moved to varying degrees by these possibilities.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Nice post.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

no

F%#& Billy Beane. Actually... I kinda like Holliday

by vivaelpujols on Jul 25, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm

…rasmus’ arm is pretty good too the last time i checked. if tony thinks the difference between his arm and ank overshadows colby’s dominance in range and speed then he shouldn’t be managing.

…rick has had 2 xbh in his last 55 ab’s before thursday and friday. color me unimpressed.

…last time i check rasmus was left handed as well. and he’s had all freaking year to “get right.”

…rick has a shoulder injury that is disclosed

…can’t say anything there. that’s pretty mush an argument against larussa anyways

…give me a break

have any reasons that don’t make tony look like he is full of crap?

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Jul 25, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i will refrain from complaining.

Lohse however says AAAAAUUUUGGGHHHH!

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jul 25, 2009 4:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure I get the logic

So now the only qualification defensively to start on a major league club is that, at least in this case, the second baseman is poor defensively?

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 1:45 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

My guess

Tony knows that Lugo has more experience against Lopez from their time in the AL East together—he likely has faced him more than any other Cardinal.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not exactly

My interpretation is that if Wallace is Schumaker-level bad at third, but hits like he’s projected to do, then he’s still a valuable player.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just an alternative point of view

There are others that think this the kind of trade that needed to be made. I think this Bernie column sums it up nicely:

http://m.stltoday.com/STL/db_7568/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=v52bLJRH&detailindex=3&pn=0&ps=5

This is the kind of trade Jocketty would have made. He didn’t do so bad in his time here.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 1:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I said it above but it

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

keyboard FAIL

continuing: needed to be repeated.

Passan thinks this is a good deal. Therefore, it isn’t.

"Every epoch dreams its successor" - Jules Michelet

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 25, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

not sure I get that logic either

It’s bad because a particular person thinks it’s good.

Again, I guess that’s why they play the games….

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 1:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

it's kind of like that green comment of HL's

We’re joking… but then again we’re not.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

If that particular person is a crappy source...

…then it makes perfect sense to be skeptical of that point of view.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

(again). I’m glad I don’t have to read him in the KC star anymore.

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

WJ...

…GM’d in a climate where teams did not know how to accurately measure there’s and others’ prospects, and as such he rarely got burned by dealing his so-called top prospects b/c said prospects were not that great in the first place. Remember Eric Ludwick, Blake Stein, and TJ Mathews? That’s who was booted for Big Mac. They were pitchers, one a reliever and the other two starters I think, and none were very good but were perceived as good b/c no one knew better.

Now, teams have a better understanding of each other’s assets and as such are more ruthless when trying to pluck said assets. Jocketty himself has said as much, that those one-sided trades he was famous for would be difficult to pull off now b/c of those very reasons. This team cannot continue to operate looking backwards, saying that this and that happened and therefore we should proceed as such, at least not without understanding the context in which those deals were made.

Think of the Mulder trade. Beane was insistent that Haren be part of the deal, b/c he knew that Haren was a hell of a pitcher. WJ scoffed and said, “ah, we’re getting an ace-type pitcher!” Never mind that Haren was remarkably close to being that same caliber of performer. Beane also wanted to Barton, who was a blocked-OBP machine. Now Barton has not panned out, but the third throw in (Calero) did well for the A’s. And Haren…well you know the answer to that. In this case, the former big-game hunter became the hunted b/c he failed to properly evaluate his own top prospect.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

getting Bernie's seal of approval

doesn’t exactly do it for me. I’m sure Strauss and Gordo liked it as well but until they learn something about player value, I’m not impressed.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

not the point

That it was Bernie, but rather the points he made.

by mwrg on Jul 25, 2009 2:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I just read it

it was more of Bernie’s usual blather. Win now b/c 2012 is irrelevant b/c you have Albert. I guess, using that line of logic, we shouldn’t bother to resign Albert since those years are irrelevant. If we resign him, won’t we have him for 8-10 more years? I guess that slipped Bernie’s mind.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Bernie feels...

we’re seeing Albert’s peek now.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, to Gordo's

credit, he wrote a column just a couple of days ago begging Moz not to make the Holliday deal. I was shocked, but pleasantly.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 25, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

matt leach seemed ambivalent.

He said something on twitter like “holliday’s great but did they give up too much?”

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jul 25, 2009 3:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Lineup

I can understand you guys being upset with Raz not playing. I happen to think riding a hot Ankiel while Raz is “struggling a bit” isn’t the worst thing, but I’m willing to acknowledge your concerns.

But bitching over Ryan having a day off is silly. He’s 5 for his last 31 or so with 2 walks during that time. He hasn’t sat out a complete game since June 27th. Lugo is the backup SS. He is going to get time there. And for a team that more often struggles to score runs, then prevent them, playing the “offensive” guys in front of the “defensive” guys, isn’t always the worst thing. I still want Raz and Ryan playing more often than Ankiel and Lugo, but if one gets hot while the other is cold, ride the hot hand.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, it could be worse.

Could be Thursty!

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.....

When Thursty starts two games in a row over DeRosa, you’ll hear me complaining as well.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

We are going to hold you to that

/mostly kidding

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 26, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

and I think I pointed out Thursday

that Lugo isn’t that much worse than Ryan anyway. I don’t really care who starts at SS but Colby belongs in CF every day.

by chuckb on Jul 25, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with Lugo playing

He’s hit Lopez well and has faced him 30 times. However, I’d rather see him in there with a competent infielder at short.

In addition to the Cardinals, the other team I end up watching a lot of games of is Boston. Visually, Schumaker’s range (or lack thereof) at second is comparable to Lugo’s at short. Any ball up the middle, if not positioned perfectly for it, is going to get through. Plus, Lugo boots more balls hit right at him and makes more errant throws. Plus he grabs his crotch too much.

He might prove to be a decent hitter in the NL.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

last two times

Rasmus had two days off in a row he was hurt.

by Evilfrog on Jul 25, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lugo over Ryan is defensible

He is LaRussa’s shiny new toy, so it’s a valid thought to take said toy and play with it and see how it works out. Plus, Ryan has been playing a lot recently, so he needs an off day.

I’m telling myself this though b/c I’m afraid TLR will decide Lugo is the new SS and bold Ryan to the bench. It wouldn’t be surprising anyway. Ryan is a better fielder and as such should be the starting SS with Lugo as the 3rd MIF.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

or Ryan is getting his knuckles slapped for nearly killing Albert

Such is the brutal justice of the Mustachioed Marauders.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jul 25, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

I wouldn’t have a problem with Lugo beating out Ryan if say, he hit like Lopez did last year. Of course, if all our other “weapons” are on, we may not need offense from the SS position. It’ll play itself out.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I shall now point out timidly

That I’m okay with Ankiel starting again over Colby. If Ank could get his bat going down the stretch, it would be a huge boon to our team, even if it’s just to the bench. And it’s not like Ank is dropping bloopers all over the field lately — he’s been tagging the ball. Don’t mess with it.

I still believe Colby should be the most-of-the-time starter, but it wasn’t that long ago that we all thought Ank could hit 30 homers this year. If his shoulder is feeling better and his approach has improved to the point where he might be the player we thought he could be…man, that’d be nice, wouldn’t it?

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well put. Flags fly forever...

and when if we win one this year, I’ll feel a lot better about all this.

Until then,

FML

Pretty much FML any time Todd Wellemeyer touches a baseball.

by Cardinals645 on Jul 25, 2009 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

So is Dave Duncan goingg to apologize to Mo his comments on trading his son now?

He was so absorbed in his little conspiracy theory that he didn’t realize that moving an OFer would make perfect sense if we were acquiring Holliday.

No, I doubt it, I’m sure Mo just wanted him gone because he’s a jerk face.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

In the words of the immortal Stanley Hudson...

It’s like I used to tell my wife. I do not apologize unless I think I’m wrong. And if you don’t like it you can leave. And I say the same thing to my current wife and I’ll say it to my next one too.

VivaElBirdos...Scoring less, but more frequently since approximately 1903.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 25, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

a day later

I was pretty down on the holliday and dero trades iniitally for a variety of reasons, but mostly because if you are going all in, then you need to go all in, ie, win the ws, and i thought halladay was the guy for that. for me, we don’t have the pitching to win the 7 games series and these short series usually boil down to pitching. a little worried about lohse, carp, and a&w, but more worried about the pen. kmac has not done well lately and neither has porkchop (sad he is on a 2 year deal). i am kind of surprised they have not looked more closely at bj ryan, but i guess he has dropped out of sight for many teams. interesting to see if mo does one more such as rick-dick for a set up man. i think they need it. no point in going 90% in.

"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

by sportsman on Jul 25, 2009 2:57 PM EDT reply actions  

This is the second straight day

That I’ve seen you make a post that completely ignores how completely dominant Joel Pineiro has been this year. Have you not noticed? Trying not to jinx it? Hate Jo-El too much to mention him? What’s the deal?

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

0.82 ERA in last three starts

unbelievable. Yes. Unsustainable. Yes. But man what a ride!!!

Proud sponsor of the Official 2009 StL Cardinal theme song: Reason to Believe

by gocards62 on Jul 25, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's got a 2.90 FIP

It’s not like he’s just getting lucky out there. He’s walking nobody and inducing grounders like nobody’s business.

0.82 ERA isn’t sustainable, of course, but Pineiro’s success appears to be.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair

Joel isn’t very good. He doesn’t suck quite yet, but he still isn’t very good

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 26, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Joel continues to pitch well...

the only NL rotation with a better top 3 is the Giants…

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you see what they asked the Phillies for?

I’m not even sure we could put a package together that they (Tor) would accept. And if we could, we’d have NOTHING left in the minors.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

the latest has Tor wanting Happ AND Drabek, plus 2 other solid hitting prospects (names elude me atm). that’s insane!!

by kalmavet on Jul 25, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't even know what the StL equiv of that would be

but it wouldn’t be worth it.

I guess if you are a team like the Phils who pretty much is assured a playoff birth then a dominant starter like Holliday becomes much more valuable then he otherwise would be. Still, they shouldn’t be too desperate.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

They asked too much from the Red Sox as well

But why not at this point? Halladay will be on the block again after the season and at the trade deadline next year. It’s in Toronto’s best interests to shoot for the moon at this point and hope someone bites.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't blame Tor for asking.....

I’m just saying STL might not even be able to match that, and if we could, I certainly don’t think I would.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 25, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow...

Mariners dfa wladimir balantien. That’s a guy I’d take a flier on for sure… and not just b/c his name is wlad.

by guayzimi on Jul 25, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions  

the new Cardinals

Matt Holliday career wOBA .399, OPS is .927… put up 7.9 WAR in 2007

Mark Derosa career wOBA .336 (.341 this year, and better in recent years) .772 OPS ISO .196 in ’08 and ’09… 3.8 WAR in ’08… although we can expect him to be about 2.5 this season unless the wrist is not much of an issue

Julio Lugo career .323 wOBA, OPS .726 (.767 this season) WAR was quite high in ‘05, but he’s been pretty average since then

Cardinal fanatic since '82

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 25, 2009 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

OT: From the "WTF?" Department.

Tigers are interested in Milton Bradley.

Really?

How much of his salary would the cubs have to eat (keep in mind….3 years, 30 Million) for you to be interested in trading for him? Does the term “Julio Lugo” come to mind? And frankly, I think Lugo’s a better hitter….well, he is this year.

Also, why in the hell would you want him in the first place? Are there no other DH types available that wouldn’t be a major distraction in and outside of the clubhouse.

Oh, Troy Glaus, you might mention? Apparently they aren’t interested.

I guess the Tigers want a “left-handed thumper”……even though Milton’s obp is currently about 10 points higher than his slg.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jul 25, 2009 3:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Right as I read this comment

Bradley went oppo yard against the Reds.

I blame this on you.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, we need to remember

Franklin Sucks

Bradley is a great hitter and a handsome man.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's also

completely rational and a great teammate.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jul 25, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anybody think that maybe....

Ankiel is actually getting better now following his f’d up shoulder collision injury.. and isn’t really as bad as he’s looked this year (no he’s not great, but they call this regression to the mean)

by slash2049 on Jul 25, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

No

I don’t. His AB’s are still horrible, and when pitchers are able to follow the “book” against him, they get him out 85% of the time. You throw away to get a strike and then get him out by going up and away and down and in. He can’t lay off either pitch out of the zone.

When you have to throw one strike per AB to get a guy out, he’s not going to just turn into a .350 hitter for the next two months, which is essentially what he’d need to do to get his average up to around .270 this season.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 25, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

This team needs offense

does everyone really care where it comes from. If Lugo was ropadoping in Boston and is really a blue chip play, don’t you what some of that? If he does the job, and hits, he don’t wants some of that over Ryan? Colby is more than a slump. If Rick is producing, your not into it because it hurts Colby’s feelings? Enjoy this, the Cream will rise.

by OperaCard on Jul 25, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions  

i liked you better when i had no idea

What you were saying.

I don’t know why, but suddenly this blog is overrun by folks who mistake two games for a trend. Lugo getting a Homer and a triple is not evidence that he’s a great player. Ankiel stringing a couple of hits together doesn’t show he’s better.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jul 25, 2009 4:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Most people

think Ankiel has some value if he’s healthy/producing/etc. But he’s not as talented as Rasmus, he’s not as cheap as Rasmus, he’s not as good a defender as Rasmus, he lacks Rasmus’ plate discipline, etc. Colby’s slump this month is still better than Ankiel’s. Oh, and Rick’s a FA after this season.

Rick Ankiel is not Alpha, nor Cream, nor any other ridiculous thing you want to compare him to. He’s gifted, but we’ve seen his ceiling. We’ve yet to see Colby’s.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jul 25, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sophomoric comment alert

I’m into the Cards winning games. I’m into pennants. I’m into being competitive in every game. I’m into winnable playoff games. And I’m into World Series’. Was this the most prudent long-term play? No.. But, we have a real shot. And I’m into that. If we were prudent in every decision in life – life would be pretty damn boring with no memories or experiences to draw upon. I am fired up for the next 3 months of Cards baseball!

by mattysha on Jul 25, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Too risky

The Cards were in the division conversation before Holliday, and he helps them a bit. Winning the division was a long shot/iffy proposition before the trade and now it’s just an iffy proposition. The Cubs are a loss up, and the Astros are tied, and they haven’t even made their big deadline moves yet. These are teams that have made excellent acquisitions at the deadline in past years.

by olddomination on Jul 25, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Cubs/Stros can't even match Wallace

I’m not worried about them sniping Holliday from us.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cubs scare me a little

Yesterday, Lee and Ramirez went yard.

Today, Soriano and Bradley both go yard.

If that lineup heats up, this division race could be a tight one, even with Holliday/Lugo/DeRosa.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Also, the Cubs are an out away from winning

C’mon Dusty, can’t you even muster a win against your former team? Please?

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

El oh el

Heilman just gave up two homers in the ninth. One to Votto, one to Gomes.

Cubs still up 5-3, though…Gregg in for the save.

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm perfectly content claiming the Wild Card...

and winning the pennant by beating whatever team sweeps the Cubs in the NLDS. But I’d rather win the division…

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe...

But the Rockies and Giants have been playing over their heads in my opinion…

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess, but I personally hate watching the Cards play the giants

all though a lot of that was the Card’s offense’s fault as well as the Giant’s pitching.

by TheBirds on Jul 25, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great post, Chuck

I didn’t read through all the comments, so I apologize if my point is redundant. I was wondering how the current market conditions might figure into this analysis. How many teams were in the mix for Holliday type bats and how many teams were supplying them. It seems to me that the demand was arguably high and the supply low which led to overpaying. I don’t think anyone is disagreeing that we overpaid. But did Mo do ok in light of the current market conditions? Also, how to quantify playoff opportunity cost? Hope always springs eternal at the beginning of the season but the likelihood calculations for playoff success should be much more accurate now. Sorry, that I don’t have any numbers to support what I just said.

born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red

by totalloser on Jul 25, 2009 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

It's on regular TV.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

tvants link

tvants is pretty hit or miss, but here’s the link, for what it’s worth:

tvants://list.tvants.com/tvants/?k=7f009042993ea6f00f882e16b31a7738

by mojowo11 on Jul 25, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

True...

But my TV doesn’t get any channels at all when the cable is out…

by slash2049 on Jul 25, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

How did you not hear

about the digital upgrade!!!

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean the part where when you have cable you don't need to upgrade?

Or the part where I should be able to predict that there is a cable outage on my street and buy an extra TV just in case

by slash2049 on Jul 25, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

The second part.

It was all over the news.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jul 25, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wondered about those white vans...

But I couldn’t catch anything about it for all the static…

by slash2049 on Jul 25, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Umm...

You need to ratchet up the sarcasm meter.

V, b.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 25, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Late to the party

this team had no chance to get to the world series before this trade…now there is a small chance…wallace is a 1st baseman in 3 years, mort is a 4th starter(replaceable from our system)…i hate to see a bat like wallace’s go…but this is one of teh reason why a strong farm is important, to make the big club better…we have done that and i think it may just work out

"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister

by VolsnCards5 on Jul 25, 2009 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't know if you have checked lately

but our system isn’t exactly pumping out back of the rotation starters—let alone front-end ones. Tony is adamant that there is no better option in the minors to replace Todd Wellemeyer—the worst pitcher in th bigs. So unless you think Boggs can gain Tony’s confidence, or P.J. can at least halve his MLB ERA then I’m not sure where the replaceable talent is coming from. I like Lynn a lot but will Tony trust a rookie next year (and one who would need to skip a level)? Jaime is still coming back from TJ so it still a bit early to pencil him in too. After that, ???

by nmstar on Jul 25, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

well done chuck

i think Dewitt has put his faith in the wrong man. instead of trusting Tony, he should be trusting MO. this trade may work out, it may not. i’m not so much against trading Walrus, because if he really had no position to play, they almost had to trade him now while his value was high. but i’m against how it went down, who he was traded for, and i’m against throwing in Mort, a guy we very well may end up missing more in the long run.

the facts are Walrus was worth more than Holliday, throwing in two more prospects was flat out stupid. they should have gotten the most for Walrus, and it’s clear they did not. that’s what i’m upset about. that & Bill listening to his manager over his GM.

FOR RENT

by gdm426 on Jul 25, 2009 10:41 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols