Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Off-day Musings Vol. II - First to 40, But Not Zirconium

Ok, I know it's not an off-day, so the second installment of what I hope becomes a regular fanpost doesn't exactly live up to its name.  But I got an idea during my latest endeavor (Infinite Jest - worth the time, Spants!) that I couldn't wait until July 5 to share because I think it is very illuminating and worthwhile as we approach the halfway mark of the season.

 

The Redbirds are the first to 40 wins in the NL Central.  Awesome.  But how did we get there?  Which way are we headed?  Is this first-place position sustainable?  Slow down, people.  One question at a time.

Let's start with the offense.  In O-DMVI, I presented our then struggles in terms of a declining BB% by month.  Here, I want to take a more comprehensive look at the offense's contribution to our win total as the season has progressed.  I have chosen to do so in terms of WPA (Win-probability added, or the difference in win expectancy between the start of each individual play and the end of the play). Batters' cumulative WPA graphically:

Batters' WPA

As you can see by the bat-with-birds-on-it colored line, we came out white-hot on offense, propelling the team to a great early start.  In mid-May, however, we started a disastrous skid that turned our cumulative WPA well into negative territory for the season.  Thanks to a recent surge we currently sport a -0.26 WPA on offense, good for 15th in MLB and 7th in the NL.  Those numbers are passable, but not anything that is going to get the job done if we have title aspirations.  Even more concerning is the fact that if the GOB were somehow to take Albert (and his 3.4 WPA) away from us, we would be sitting at -3.66, 25th in MLB and 11th in the NL.  Albert Pujols is ridiculous.

 

On the flip side of the coin, I don't think anyone could have predicted just how outstanding our pitching performance has been this year.  It really hits home when you see pitchers' WPA graphically: 

Pitchers' WPA

Wow.  Our pitchers really turned it on at the right time, just as our offense began to struggle.  The staff has combined for 4.258 WPA, which is 5th in MLB and 4th in the NL.  Especially outstanding was the five game stretch starting May 19, where the pitchers put up WPAs of .462, .612, .465, .454, and .369 consecutively.  For an elementary lesson for those of you less familiar with WPA and WE, each team starts out with a WE of .500 for the game.  So by adding an incremental .462, .612, etc. for those games, the pitchers were basically winning games without help from (and sometimes in spite of) the offense.


Now it probably makes sense to combine the two charts and overlay our W-L to see just how we have navigated our way to the top of the standings:

Combined WPA and W-L

 

Obviously, when the hitters and pitchers work together, we have had our greatest success, and thankfully the pitchers showed up when the bats were afraid.

Now the fun part:  where can we expect to fall at the end of the season?  If we extrapolate our previous efforts over the whole season, we get a trendline that looks like this...

WPA trendline

...which accumulates to a total of roughly 93 wins for the season.  93 wins seems about right for this rudimentary projection:  our offense is bound to be better and our pitching likely won't be quite as good.  That should be good enough to put us right in the thick of the playoff hunt, and with a little luck maybe even a division title.  I know vivaelpujols has done some work and regression on how many wins it likely takes in a given year to reach the playoffs, so maybe he can help us out a little.

 

For fun, here is a breakdown of our best/worst offensive/pitching performances:

Best/Worst of 2009

 

Go team.

 

____________________________________

Notes, caveats, etc.

All data taken from FanGraphs.

When I say pitchers, I really mean pitchers and defense.

WPA is by no means perfect.  It is important to understand what is being presented here.  WPA measures contributions to wins, not actual value, if that makes sense.  So the offense and defense could have an awesome day, but each be credited with only half of the .500 WPA.  In other words, if the offense is great and pitchers suck, the offense will get more credit in that game than in a game where it was similarly awesome but the pitching was decent.  Also, it can be biased sometimes.  A-Rod got a huge boost in WPA just by having Castillo drop that fly ball a couple weeks ago (and K-Rod was unduly punished).

10 recs  |  Comment 15 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Viva El Birdos

Patience...please!

Oct 2009 by chuckb - 457 comments

Trader Mo Redux

Oct 2009 by the red baron - 209 comments

Albert Pujols freakout #1

Oct 2009 by DanUpBaby - 647 comments

To Hit or not To Hit

Oct 2009 by chuckb - 709 comments

Vince Coleman Overflow Thread

Oct 2009 by DanUpBaby - 1183 comments

Comments

Display:

I would venture to say

that our Pythag is going to be around 86 wins, but I don’t have time to count it right now. We’re in the middle of the pack in both runs allowed and runs scored, and the fact that we’re playing in possibly the worst division in baseball should help us win a few more games. I really, really doubt we’ll get to 93 wins unless there are some significant additions via trade, free agent signing (Ray Durham? Please? WTF?), or Wallace comes up and plays like Robin Ventura for two months. I think that 88 wins will be enough to win the division, because the Cardinals are really the only team that has significant payroll space and significant prospects to pull off a trade that pushes us over the top.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 24, 2009 6:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

before today's game

we had a pythag of 40-32. After tonight’s thrashing, we have a pythag of 39-34.

Those ratios taken over 162 games would come out to 90 and 86.5 wins, respectively. That actually sounds like a pretty good range for this team, barring some ridiculous injury or something.

- "I went at it and didn’t slow down, so it kind of bounced off me." -Lil' Dunc

by SleepyCA on Jun 25, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yah, I was trying to extrapolate on the fly...

Thanks for the full analysis

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 25, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reality is like this.
Also, it can be biased sometimes.

well presented stuff, though. cumulative WPA is an interesting way of looking at this.

if you really want to look at what it takes to win the division, maybe look at the brewers and cubs through the same lens? alternately, i wonder if there’s a way to “adjust” the pitching and batting WPA to project the win total once you control for BABIP for and against, HR rate anomalies, etc., to show what the “norm” is to which we will return.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 24, 2009 6:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cards/Brewers cumulative WPA rank:

Cubs batters: -4.15 (27th in MLB)
Cubs pitchers: 4.15 (3rd)

Brewers batters: 4.09 (6th)
Brewers pitchers: -1.59 (21st)

I don’t have the game-by-game data handy for these two teams, so I can’t make any graphs. Cubs seem like the Cardinals minus Pujols. It would be interesting to annotate their graph with their various DL stints.

"It starts at the top with the manager."
-- Clint Hurdle, when asked what's behind the Colorado Rockies winning 17 of 18 games

by all4tookie on Jun 25, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent post

You know me, I love the graphs :).

St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/

by vivaelpujols on Jun 24, 2009 6:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Infinite Jest

rules.

Pemulis would’ve been proud of this fanpost.

by Andyfantastic on Jun 24, 2009 10:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice post, al

I agree with fourstick here – I don’t want to trade any important pieces of the farm, but adding 1-3 marginal wins over the rest of the season by making small, efficient moves is really a must for this team. We’re right in there in the NLC, but I don’t think we’re that much better than the Cubs or Crew at the moment. I really think the case for DeRosa is growing daily, and I think we should’ve picked up a cheap OF RHB already (Kearns, Murton, someone like that).

It will suck if we miss the post-season by 1-2 games following front office inactivity and more baffling roster/team decisions by LaRussa and the boys.

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Jun 25, 2009 8:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love the way you organized it all. Thanks for sharing.

I’d “warn” that pitching is really pitching+fielding or total defense.

by Sky Kalkman on Jun 25, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that was in the notes:
When I say pitchers, I really mean pitchers and defense.

Thanks for checking it out. I think its hard to make conclusions or predictions based on WPA alone, but it definitely is demonstrative of offensive/defensive contributions to wins over time.

"It starts at the top with the manager."
-- Clint Hurdle, when asked what's behind the Colorado Rockies winning 17 of 18 games

by all4tookie on Jun 25, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

kudos

very good, well thought out post. easy to read and to get the idea, and the graphs help a ton! I think we’ll get around 90 wins, plus a few depending on who we bring in. I think you’re totally right, we can’t expect the pitching to keep this up, but we also can’t expect the offense to be this horrid the rest of the season.

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 25, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

oh and btw

the title of the post scared me, I thought it was an offday today!

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 25, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This post was linked to by Beyond the Boxscore

Well done!

St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/

by vivaelpujols on Jun 25, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Broken clock, blind squirrel...

"It starts at the top with the manager."
-- Clint Hurdle, when asked what's behind the Colorado Rockies winning 17 of 18 games

by all4tookie on Jun 25, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm surprised!

After losing 3 out of 4 games to the injury plagued mets I would never have believed the Cardinals could win 90 games this season. I guess I need to quit being a nattering nabob of negativity. Thanks for the great insight.

One note: “we can’t expect the offense to be this horrid the rest of the season” Gulp. I hope you are right.

by spfldbird on Jun 26, 2009 6:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Jeff Pearlman Thinks Of Hair Clumps When He Thinks Of The Thief McGwire
Black-spider-monkey_small
Losing my religion (w/ baseball)

Recent FanPosts

Small
40 Man Question..
Cathybachebay1_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?
Avatar_small
VEB CheBird T-Shirt for Sale - Red or Powder Blue, CLEARANCE
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
October Lore: One In A Million
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
A Team of Free Agents
St-louis-cardinals_small
Report: LaRussa Will Return
Small
Skip's Lament: The Curse of Too Many Decent Players
Stlcardinals4070_small
Closer Fail

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Trigun_001_small the red baron