Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

Brainstorm, starring Christopher Walken and the Cast of VEB

ca·thar·sis 
Pronunciation: \kə-ˈthär-səs\ 
Function: noun 
Inflected Form(s): plural ca·thar·ses \-ˌsēz\ 
Etymology: New Latin, from Greek katharsis, from kathairein to cleanse, purge, from katharos
Date: circa 1775

Is the offense fixed? Well, probably not, no. We saw some signs of life in the Florida series as well, only to watch the team crash right back down to earth against the Indians. What's the old saying about blind squirrels and all?

Still, it was certainly rejuvenating to watch the Cards whale away on Verlander last night, who must by now have nightmares featuring beautiful, naked women who turn into Fredbird mid coitus. He's been one of the best pitchers in all of baseball for most of the season, with only his first couple outings of the year negatively impacting his overall numbers. And it didn't appear as if he were badly off last night; on the contrary, Verlander's stuff was popping in there with remarkable life, and his command was pretty solid. No, the Cardinals just flat out beat Justin Verlander last night. The plate appearances were just what most of us have been clamouring for the past month or so; Yadier Molina's at-bat in the first inning was a thing of beauty. Yadi fouled off pitch after pitch that he couldn't handle, until he finally got just enough wood on one to drop a hit into right field. It was the sort of at-bat we haven't seen too very much of, the sort of at-bat that would have looked eerily at home in October of 2006, rather than June of 2009. Same pitcher, same result, drastically different circumstances.

But honestly, I'm not here to talk about the offense this morning. You'd think I would take advantage of the first really good game the hitters have had for a while and just ride that wave, but I can't. There's something else that's been on my mind, and I would like it if you could all help me out.

Star-divide

 See, right now, there's this outstanding article over at SI.com, written jointly by Joe Posnanski and Bill James, and it regards pitch counts. More specifically, it regards Nolan Ryan's crusade to try and destroy the modern notion of pitch counts and the way they are used.

The current gospel in baseball, of course, is the 100 pitch threshold; when we see a manager consistently let his pitchers throw more than that, we immediately get up in arms about it. We joke about Dusty Baker, and how his pitchers will all have their shoulders explode after about two years of his routine abuse. We here at VEB have ourselves fretted over the high pitch counts that Tony La Russa has occasionally allowed Adam Wainwright to rack up at various times.

The Nolan Ryan article has crystallised something that I've been turning over in my mind for a very long time now, an idea I have about pitchers and why they break down. I've written here and elsewhere that I, in fact, agree with Ryan, in that there's really very little logical cause for pitchers to be on such strict pitch limits, particularly since it doesn't seem to be lowering the rate of injuries very much, if at all.

I think there are several reasons for the continued prevalence of arm injuries; kids don't throw nearly enough, but pitch far too much, the effects of excessive weight lifting, more breaking balls, awful mechanics being taught to young pitchers (Tom House, I'm looking at you), and a different culture in baseball that encourages working the count more are all likely culprits to my mind. That, however, is a conversation for another day.

This is what I'm looking to do; the point of all my pointless rambling. Most, if not all of us, have read the excellent articles from the past over at Baseball Prospectus and elsewhere about what the effects of overwork can be. BP of course has the Pitcher Abuse Points system. There's the Verducci Rule. Will Carroll routinely writes very solid work on the subject. The problem, of course, is that we're still not really sure exactly what causes pitchers to get hurt.

We've all heard a lot of old baseball men, men who have seen arms come and go for years on end, talk about how it isn't the number of pitches, it's the number of jams. And personally, I happen to agree with that train of thought. Simple logic dictates to us that not all innings are created equally, and neither are all pitches.

Back in the early days of baseball, pitchers routinely racked up huge pitch counts, the type of counts that would get contemporary managers fired in a week or two. Part of the reason they were able to do so, I believe, has to do with the parks they played in, as well as the type of hitters they were facing. Pitchers didn't have to max out on every single delivery then, as hitters weren't nearly as capable of hurting you with any one swing of the bat as they are today. Modern ballparks are smaller, and modern hitters are much stronger, making the longball a constant threat. When the center field fence was 455 foot away, you could toss a high fastball in there without a ton on it, confident in the knowledge that a ball hit to the outfield was just going to die in someone's glove.

This, then, is my hypothesis: the number of pitches thrown is less important than the amount of stress a pitcher is put under during the game. I believe that an inning in which a pitcher throws 30 pitches and struggles to get out of a jam is much, much more taxing that an inning in which he throws 15 pitches and sets down the opposition in order. Now, I'm sure that doesn't exactly seem like an earth-shattering revelation, by any means, but here's the rub: simply taking the two pitch counts, you would think that the 30 pitch inning would be twice as taxing as the easy 15 pitch one. I don't think it's that simple. I believe that 30 pitch inning is several times more tiring, and is less a function of the number of pitches than it is the stress the pitcher undergoes in getting out of the jam.

So what I'm looking for is a system to quantify the actual amount of work that a pitcher is doing.  I think that we can come up with a numerical system to track exactly how stressful a given outing is. Now, please note, I'm not looking to make any sort of correlation here with injury probablity; there are so many other factors that go into whether or not a pitcher can stay healthy, including his level of conditioning, heredity, and mechanics, that I wouldn't presume to be able to draw any direct conclusions.

No, all I'm looking to do is come up with a measure of how hard any outing is for a pitcher. I'm working off of these assumptions:

  • Throwing a large number of pitches in one inning is much more stressful than a similar number spread out.
  • Throwing with men on base is more stressful than throwing with bases empty.
  • Pitching with men in scoring position is even more stressful. 
  • Breaking balls are more stressful than fastballs and changeups. 
  • Easy innings are less taxing in general, and allow a pitcher to get into a rhythm.

Now, if anyone has any issues with any of those assumptions, feel free to say so. I feel like those are fairly solid ideas, but I'm certainly willing to hear any objections.

What I'm looking for is a numerical system to quantify all these factors. Currently, I'm thinking of basing it on a simple point system, and then add in multipliers based on the level of stress that a given situation entails. Something like:

  • One point for every pitch thrown.  
  • Add one point for every breaking ball. (i.e. fastballs/ changeups are one, sliders/ curves are two) 
  • Any pitch thrown from the stretch is doubled. 
  • Pitches thrown with men in scoring position are tripled in point value. 
  • Every pitch thrown beyond a certain count in an inning is again doubled, in addition to any other modifiers. 

I'm considering some other modifiers as well. I'm wondering if a large number of pitches to a single batter should count as more stressful; those ten or eleven pitch at-bats feel tough and stressful to us, I'm sure, but I wonder if they have any sort of effect on a pitcher?

Something else I'm wondering: should easy innings actually help bring the count down? Obviously, an easy inning is going to count as less work anyhow, but does having a couple of quick 1-2-3 frames in a row allow a pitcher to relax, get in a groove, and actually  help him go deeper into a game? For instance, if a pitcher throws an easy, six-pitch inning worth nine points, given that it falls below a certain threshold (whatever that threshold might be), could we halve that value, or does that not make any sense?

Basically, what I'm looking for from everyone here is a big brainstorming session. As I said before, I'm not trying to base this system on anything concrete, or establish a value that becomes damaging. What I want is to be able to add up everything a pitcher did on a given night and have some idea of just how hard he actually worked. What I need is for this very knowledgeable community to help me flesh out some ideas as to other ways I might handle it. In the end, I would like to get some sort of community approved numerical system put together, strictly to get an idea of the workload a pitcher may be asked to shoulder in a particular game.

I realise this whole thing is relatively arbitrary, and I honestly have no idea how useful it's going to be, but I've had the idea in my mind for quite some time, and I'm curious to see what everyone else thinks about it.  Hell, it may even be that someone somewhere else has already undertaken this sort of an experiment before, and I'm just not aware of it yet. If so, just ignore everything I said and talk about how awesome it was to put up eleven on El Tigres.

And lastly, with apologies for my forgetfulness the last couple of weeks, I give you the Baron's Playlist for this week:

"I Wanna Kill"- Crocodiles- Okay, so yeah, it sounds like a Jesus and Mary Chain song. If you ask me, the world would be a much better place if more things did.

"Holocaust"- This Mortal Coil- It's really sad to me that This Mortal Coil has been almost entirely forgotten, outside of a very specific segment of the population that no one really listens to anyway. Intensely sad? Absolutely. But this may also just be one of the two or three greatest songs recorded in the entire decade of the 80s.

"Grace Kelly Blues"- Eels- Your crystal ball, you keep it hid.

"On My Block"- Scarface- What rap should be, and can be at its best.

Have a lovely day, everyone.

0 recs  |  Comment 325 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Viva El Birdos

Gee, but it's nice to see you again

Jun 2009 by DanUpBaby - 399 comments

Around SB Nation

U-G-L-Y: Cardinals 11, Tigers 2

Jun 2009 from Bless You Boys - 15 comments

Comments

Display:

I'm not going to read this right now

but the title excites me.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 7:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Verlander …who must by now have nightmares featuring beautiful, naked women who turn into Fredbird mid coitus.

RB, you don’t know how disturbing that image is!!

by tbell61 on Jun 17, 2009 7:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

red baron is a sick puppy

But I’ll admit that I laughed when I read this sentence.

by JWO on Jun 17, 2009 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and under the beak, it is the abyss.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jun 17, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he were really twisted

then part of Fredbird’s anatomy would morph into a toaster.

The word itself makes some men uncomfortable. Toaster.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a good man...and thorough.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't be fatuous, Jeffrey.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Verlander seems to subscribe to RB's theory:

From the Detroit News:

By [Verlander’s] own admission, the first inning, in which he faced eight batters, wore him out.

“I was exhausted,” Verlander said. “I’d never been like that before. I don’t know what it was. Maybe the humidity. Towards the end of the first inning, I was gassed.”

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 8:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Considering his comments

wouldn’t the weather also play a part in it too?

by saladdays on Jun 17, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe what he had for dinner the night before too.

And what he drank.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would love to try and quantify this

But there is one factor that just cannot be accounted for. Every individual is wired differently. There are some people who “like” the pressure. They may even thrive on it. These are often the closers, men who eat the ninth inning like a bowl full of yummy pasta.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are your post-traumatic stress disorder types, who break like eggshells the second the wheels come off.

And then you have all sorts of odd social flavors. Where would you put a man like Zambrano, who bulldozes the opposition, but can flip a switch and go on “tilt” if he feels like he’s being shown up?

Bottom Line: the human “X” factor cannot be measured. Some people actually NEED pressure and perform better because of it. Others crumble like a house of cards.

by JWO on Jun 17, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

so...

Gather the raw numbers first. Jams and number of pitches by pitchers. Percent of pitches in jams.
Compare against Fangraphs for percentage win expectancy lost during the jam.
Figure out if there are Jam Positive Pitchers and Jam Negative Pitchers. Separate the groups.
Do further testing.
Have a franklin.

?

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Jun 17, 2009 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although you left out "disseminate the results"

I am pretty sure I’m gonna use this example when teaching my class(es) about the Scientific Method.

Well done…particularly the crucial “Have a franklin” step of the method.

by goodymobb on Jun 17, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Links

There has been quite a bit of discussion on this lately, so here are some links from other sources.

Sky at BtB has tried to compile links to various articles: Pitch Count Theories

Tom Tango was discussing the same article by Poz yesterday: The Magic of 100 pitches is new?

I won’t try to summarize all of them but what I take from them is that it doesn’t have any effect of the present but can extend the length of a pitchers career.

by JBrew on Jun 17, 2009 9:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that's my impression too...

… though obviously Nolan Ryan is an exception. those extra pitches early in a career can come back and haunt pitchers later in their career.

by kindred on Jun 17, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kids Don't Throw Nearly Enough?

Lots of people make this argument, but it doesn’t hold up if you understand adolescent physiology. Kids under the age of 16 generally have an open growth plate in their elbow at the Medial Epicondyle. The ONLY way to prevent an avulsion fracture or the premature closing of that growth plate is to limit overuse.

I have talked to stress experts like Dr. Robert Sapolksy of Stanford and he agrees that all pitches aren’t created equal; a pitch thrown in a high pressure, competitive game situation is likely to be more damaging than one throw in a sandlot game.

So I think part of the solution is limit the number of organized games that kids play.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 9:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Explain this then...

Why have pitchers like Warren Spahn and Nolan Ryan benefited from throwing all the time in their youth? Spahn has been quoted as saying that he probably played baseball nearly every day growing up, chucking the ball around the diamond. Sure, he wasn’t pitching, but he was out throwing every day, building up arm strength which allowed him to throw for years at the major league level.

We need to define “overuse” as part of this exercise. Kids throwing at 100% effort 3 days a week pitching in Little League are much more likely to get hurt than kids throwing the ball around in pickup games. But this is the problem — coaches at that level don’t understand “overuse” the way some of us do. Rules limiting pitching “innings” at the Little League level help to curb it, but they don’t necessarily prevent overuse.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spahn and Ryan

First, I’m not sure they benefited from throwing all the time as much as they just weren’t worn down by it.

Second, when Spahn played, it was probably mostly in kid-organized, lower-pressure games with no parents screaming at them. I think a big part of the current problem is travel and tournament ball. Those can be very high-pressure settings and pressure is a big problem due to the human stress response (which is somewhat variable between people but generally not as much as some believe).

Third, there is a difference between throwing and pitching. Pitching is much more likely to be done at max effort and to cause problems faster as a result.

Fourth, to be effective you have to limit pitches and not innings. My son has thrown 5-pitch innings and 30-pitch innings. That’s why you have to count pitches and not innings.

Finally, I am living this right now. On my 9YO son’s rec league team, he’s the best pitcher in the league and he hasn’t given up a hit all year. I’m sorely tempted to have him pitch in our games on Friday and Saturday in order to get a win (we’re 0-4). I’m trying to justify this by telling myself that it’s just going to be once this season. However, I may be rationalizing things in my desperation for a W.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As the father of a D1 college pitcher

who just had his elbow ruined by his college pitching coach, I would tell all youth baseball players to focus on hitting, fielding, and running. Learn how to pitch, but don’t do it competitively until your bat won’t take you any further. Most coaches at all levels either don’t know how to take care of pitchers’ arms or don’t care about pitchers’ arms.

There is absolutely no way a 9YO should pitch on back-to-back days!!!!!!

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 17, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overuse is a problem, not a solution

Spahn’s story is totally anecdotal and is easily balanced by the anecdotal accounts of 21 year olds throwing complete games and never being the same again. There is evidence that little leaguers are suffering epicondylitis and other injuries because of overuse on immature bodies.

More importantly, we should be looking, as RB and others are, for a threshold at which overuse and increased stress really occurs. 100 pitches is arbitrary and stupid, but to say that Spahn and Ryan weren’t injured just because they played every day as children is simplistic and nonsensical. Ryan was a physical freak in a way that no freak (not even Randy Johnson or Tim Lincecum) is today. He threw more pitches with runners on base in one season than most current pitchers average from the windup and the stretch combined every season.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jun 17, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simplistic, yes

Non-sensical, hardly. They didn’t pitch as many games as kids because there simply weren’t as many games to pitch. They had Little League and Babe Ruth or Pony League baseball, but they didn’t have umpteen postseason tournaments, AAU tournaments, and traveling teams back then where they played 100 some games in a summer. Less competition, but they probably played more pick-up games, so they were still throwing the ball around quite a bit, just not in games and not from the pitching mound.

I gave two examples, but I could give hundreds more guys who threw 250+ for 7 to 8 years or more with no ill effects (Robin Roberts, Bert Blyleven, Whitey Ford, etc.) due to that amount of use. I don’t know why this is, but it seems to me that they may have developed differently or weren’t stressed into pitching in 20 games a summer until their bodies were ready for it. That doesn’t seem to be the case today.

I’m not sure where you’re getting that i was using overuse as a solution. That’s completely false, you’re reading into my argument instead of looking at it on it’s face. What I am saying is that kids aren’t out playing baseball now unless they’re playing in league games or practicing. They don’t just round up a bunch of kids from the block and have a sandlot game — they’d rather play video games or be on the internet than do that. So all of their throwing is now limited to a more structured environment and you have parents training them from age 6 on up to be major leaguers, which results in more injuries to younger kids.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You said Spahn and Ryan benefitted from throwing every day.

That’s an anecdote and has no bearing on the argument, but you did say it.

I think we agree on little league pitchers. You just sound like Al Hrabosky when you bring in them damn video games and talk about how it was better in the old days.

And I never argued that pitchers can’t throw 250 innings. In fact if you read my post I said 100 pitches is an arbitrary and stupid limit. I said throwing every day as a child was not the reason those men were able to do that.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jun 17, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the distinction RB was trying to make..

..was that kids pitch too much, but don’t throw enough. As in they spend too much time pitching from a mound and not enough time long-tossing to build arm strength. At least that is the way I interpreted it.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Arm Strength

Due to the issue of open growth plates, there is only so much you can do you build arm strength in kids. If kids over-throw, even with just long toss and no pitching, you’re still going to have problems.

In Taiwan, their catchers have almost as many problems as their pitchers.

Again, kids are not little adults. Their bodies are very different.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Assumptions

Throwing a large number of pitches in one inning is much more stressful than a similar number spread out.

I think this is valid.

Throwing with men on base is more stressful than throwing with bases empty.

I think this is valid.

One reason is that you are more likely to develop a timing problem due to the need to get to the plate faster in order to prevent steals.

Pitching with men in scoring position is even more stressful.

I think this is valid.

Breaking balls are more stressful than fastballs and changeups.

I think this is true for sliders and cutters but not for curveballs.

Easy innings are less taxing in general, and allow a pitcher to get into a rhythm.

I think this is valid.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Could you elaborate?
Breaking balls are more stressful than fastballs and changeups.

I think this is true for sliders and cutters but not for curveballs.

I’m interested on your thoughts concerning curveballs vs. sliders/cutters.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it relates to the type of curveball thrown.

IMO, a Darryl Kyle hard curve probably stresses the arm a lot more than a more looping curve.

Personally, I wish coaches would stop teaching the slider all together. Again, IMO, the slider is the highest-stress pitch there is.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is consistent with my

perception. I’m glad the Cards drafted a curveball throwing right hander in the 1st instead of another fastball/slider guy.

by Toddius on Jun 17, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kile's Curve

I don’t remember what Kile’s curve looked like, but what you seem to be describing is a power curve (e.g. 80 MPH plus).

In that case it’s basically a slider.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A slider in the sense that it puts a lot of stress on the elbow?

Because as a pitch, it CERTAINLY was not a slider. DK’s curve was of the nasty 82mph variety that was absolutely unhittable when he threw it right.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a slider

it was a hard breaking rainbow-y sort of curve. If I remember correctly, like Wainwrights, but with more break.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jun 17, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's true

A 12-6 curveball has no extra strain on your arm/elbow. The sweeping curveball requires the pitcher to “snap” the ball off, similar to a slider… that’s where elbow damage can come in.

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

by stltrav09 on Jun 17, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Curveballs

Most curveballs (not power curves) are thrown at a significantly lower velocity, and therefore with less force, than are sliders and cutters. Usually the delta is 10MPH or more. I think that’s a significant difference.

FWIW, I think Mazzone’s ideas about padding or protecting the elbow don’t hold up. The only way to keep the elbow from locking out is to pronate the curve.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've often wondered if the screwball was a pitch that should re-emerge.

But I don’t know there is enough data to rank its wear and tear aspects.

by DriverZn on Jun 17, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It Already Has

Many major leaguers throw the screwball, either explicitly or under the guise of a change-up (especially one that moves). That includes Maddux and Pedro.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thrown at a lower velocity

but thrown with a different kind of torque. aren’t all pitches thrown with the same amount of effort? A pitcher moves his arm at the same speed to throw each pitch, it’s just what he does differently with the grip and release that changes velocity. When I pitched, I might have even thrown my curveball harder, in order to get enough spin for it to break harder.

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Curveball Spin

The break of a curveball is more a function of the RPM than the speed. RPM is mostly a function of how, and how hard, you pull down with the middle finger.

Wainer’s got a great CV because he pulls down so hard with his middle finger and thus gets such a high RPM level.

Of course, that’s also why Wainer had finger problems last year.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah,

but doesn’t he have to move his arm at the same speed in order not to tip the pitch?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

Not if your curveball is really good.

Wainer’s curve, as was Sandy Koufaxs’, is a “hit it if you can” curve. You know it’s coming, but you can’t do anything about it.

Nobody would confuse Sandys’ curve with his fastball, but they still couldn’t hit it. The same is true for Wainer’s when it’s on.

Just ask Carlos Beltran.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you say so

I still don’t believe it though. I’m no major leaguer, but I had a pretty good curveball in high school and college, and my arm moved just as fast

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't buy it

Not at all.

Hitters knew Koufax’s curve was coming, but it was because he fanned his glove to get the grip, not because he “slowed his arm down.”

The ideal goal is to throw every pitch with the same arm speed. Ball speed changes because of the grip, but the arm speed—and the speed of the entire delivery—darn near must be exactly the same on every pitch, or the hitter will know it’s coming, and will hit it.

Saying that a pitcher’s arm doesn’t move his arm at the same speed for a curveball “if your curveball is really good” is simply, truthfully and completely false.

by Jhusk on Jun 17, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Measuring It

You might be able to build up a per-inning or per-appearance WHIP and multiply that by some stress factor.

However, as I think about it I’m not sure how much you would get out of that. I’m pretty sure that Mark Prior would put up consistently good WHIPs. His problem is mechanical, but overuse probably accelerated his breakdown.

I also know that Francisco Liriano was putting up absolutely historic WHIP numbers and other ratios right before his injury. His problem is that he was a fastball/slider pitcher. The same thing was true of Kerry Wood before his injury.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 9:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Injury concerns

Ah, but see, I’m not interested in how all of this relates to injuries, at least not yet. Of course, this line of thinking eventually leads back to health, but that’s not what I’m looking for. What I want is simply a better way to quantify a pitcher’s workload on any given night. We can see a pitch count in the box score quite easily, but I don’t think that tells us nearly as much as we think.

You read the game summary stories, and you can start to get a feel for how a pitcher’s night actually worked; if you simply watched the game, you could tell even more easily. But what if there was a number that took into account how tough a pitcher’s night really was? I have no idea if it would correlate to injury or not; I’m just interested in figuring out a way to measure the outing itself.

You can't teach a hammer to love nails.

by the red baron on Jun 17, 2009 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One problem with a uniform quanitification:

Different mechanics. Every pitchers throws the ball differently, which no doubt has a slightly different effect on his physical health. As thepainguy pointed out, Prior’s problem was mechanical, which was likely exacerbated by overuse. There are only so many throws in an arm. Depending on your mechanics, that number of throws could be quite fewer. (This is why I would draft only HS pitchers, but that’s a theory for another time.)

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RB, have you thought about measuring stress by measuring fastball speed?

I would think that a pitcher really starts to show signs of serious stress as his fastball begins to lose speed. That indicates that the pitcher is laboring.

Since most pitchers predominantly throw fastballs, we could simply track a pitcher’s fastball MPH and show his stress level as that measurement begins to drop off.

Another great measurement might track a pitcher’s percentage of strikes thrown per inning. Again, as a pitcher begins to get fatigued, he will begin to miss the strike zone more often. Thus, his percentage of strikes should fall.

Am I being too simplistic here? I think that should be pretty accurate. Fatigued pitchers (for the most part) begin to lose speed and control.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would be interesting to have an average fastball velocity and strike % at Pitch Count #

Say, at Pitch No. 1, the average FB velocity is 91, at Pitch No. 20, it is 92, at Pitch No. 97, it’s 90.75, etc.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I am replying to myself. I am that pathetic.

Something like this could really work.

For every MPH slower a fastball is thrown than his established baseline from the first inning or his first 10 fastballs thrown, a multiplier can be attached to the pitch.

For instance, pitcher W throws his first 10 fastballs at 90 mph, average. He continues to throw his next 45 fastballs with the same speed. If his fastball drops more than 2 MPH from that 90 mph baseline, then we can attach a 1.25 multiplier to each fastball thrown at less than 88 mph. Clearly, if pitcher W is struggling to throw an 88mph fastball, then stress is evident.

The same can hold true for location. If the pitcher throws 70% of his first 20 pitches for strikes, then a 1.0 multiplier is in place. Again, if that pitcher begins to fatigue, he should lose some command. For every inning he throws less than his baseline percentage of strikes, we can attach a multiplier to those pitches as well.

Now, if he is losing both velocity and command, the multipliers would BOTH affect the pitches thrown.

Example: We will use pitcher W again. Pitcher W throws 70% of his first 20 pitches for strikes and averages 90 mph of speed on his fastball. By the 7th inning, he is throwing 50% of his pitches for strikes and averaging 87mph, then those pitches would carry a 1.5 multiplier, instead of the normal 1.25.

What I am proposing would imply that any time a pitcher drops 3 mph (that number can change) in speed, he is fatigued enough that he is requiring 25% more effort to throw that pitch. If he is struggling to throw a strike, than he is requiring 25% more stress on him to throw a pitch. If he is losing both command and speed, then each pitch is putting 50% more stress on him.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It has been shown that a pitcher's fastball high and low do not vary too significantly over the course of a start.

If the pitcher really loses velo he’s probably already injured.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jun 17, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that is true, then

why do most of the starters that I watch gradually lose a couple of mph over the course of a start?

Pet Peeve Alert!!!

Velocity: the measurement of speed in a direction.

Speed: the measurement of travel over a course of time.

Folks, we are talking about speed, not velocity!

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

given that the direction is always from the rubber to the plate, why

does it matter if it’s called “speed” or “velocity”? we know the direction of the vector. the only variable is the speed. while they’re not complete synonyms, the term isn’t being misused.

if we say “the velocity changed,” we all know it’s not because the pitcher is throwing at the same speed to first base.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know its semantics, but it is just a small peeve of mine.

Kind of like those doormats that say “The Smith’s” , when they should say The Smiths’. It’s dumb of me to be bothered by this, I know. But a mat saying The Smith’s implies that there is only one Smith, and this is his house, because the apostrophe before the s is singular posessive. The plural posessive should be used with the apostrophe after the last s.

If a pitcher’s velocity changes, he could be throwing more balls, because the direction of the pitch thrown has changed.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would say neither

If my name were Smith, it would say “Smiths” to signify the home of the Smiths. This throws out possessives entirely in favor of simple plural nouns, which are a little less confusing (except for those pesky irregulars. I’m looking at you, geese).

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would personally be interested in a doormat that says:

“If I seem a little strange, well, that’s because I am.” – The Smiths.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

What do you suppose Rob Deer's family's mat says?

If it says The Deers’, it’s no good.
If it says The Deers, it’s no good.
If it says The Deer’s, it’s ambiguous.
The Deer? Is that what they have to go with?

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Parcel or Bevy

And Aaron Crow’s would say Murder.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You people are crazy and probably not very smart

/hyperbole

Anyway, I stand by my assertion that a simple plural is the most sensible thing to have on your doormat. And if you people can’t understand that, then maybe the blog should just go and trade me to Oakland after all!

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

English teacher chiming in....

Either The Smiths or The Smiths’ could be correct, but I would personally prefer the Smiths without the apostrophe, which is just saying it’s the Smiths that live there, not necessarily implying ownership (even though ownership also exists).

by mtalken on Jun 17, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not if you're renting.

I kid, I kid.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the Smith's are incredible narcissistic.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to take this time

to pat myself on the back.

I’m calling it now Duncan will go yard tonight, earning himself almost daily playing time, deservadely(no idea how the heck that is spelled, or if it’s even a word) or not
by STLRegalia on Jun 16, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Isn’t it great when One of a few hundred predictions come true?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I anticipated, but did not outright predict, Albert climbing to the MLB lead in homers

And getting his SLG over .700.
“… and whatsoever thou shalt loose online, it shall be loosed also in baseball heaven…”
We live in strange times, my friend.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Impressive game from Duncan

However, I have gone into 2008 mode with him. I’m just waiting for him to club homers, knowing that he can, and as the games go by, I become more and more convinced that his health is far below 100 percent.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you guys notice that BabyDunc....

seemed to really be swinging the bat with a lot more speed last night? My impression from early in the year was that he cut down on his swing so he could hit lefties better. While he did that (to an extent), I think he robbed himself of a bit of power. Last night, it seemed we saw that reckless abandon back in his swing.

CDunc, kudos for going to left center on the homer, too!

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another observation

It seems like Duncan the Younger gets pull-happy when he presses. A case in point was his PA with runners on in the second inning last when he grounded weakly to first base on a high and away pitch. However, in his other PAs, he seemed content to sit back and shoot the ball to the opposite field (or drive the ball to the opposite field, as the case may be). Last night’s PAs were heartening.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whaling

How does one whale on a pitcher? Do you throw the large beasts toward the mound? Do you grab the tail fin and swing the creature soundly, hitting the baseball out of the park? Or do you simply fire harpoons at the hurler, hoping to extract ambergris from his exploited remains (assuming you are claiming aboriginal rights to do so legally)?

[/silly rant on misused words]

Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - anon.

by Solanus on Jun 17, 2009 9:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

even if it's a widely accepted idiom?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Merriam-Webster seems to agree with you guys

Although it appears that the word I always used “wale” is correct as well. I guess if you use a word wrong enough times that it becomes correct. But I shouldn’t go any further, lest we start talking about religion & politics.

Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - anon.

by Solanus on Jun 17, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you know, Jesus was a Jew...

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wail

is an audible expression of sorrow…that and 99.5 Classic Rock for the Keys

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whenever I said it...

…I said it as “wailed” and not “whaled”.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I always

assumed that it was ‘wailed’ on the pitcher – not that it necessarily makes that much more sense….

by cdb on Jun 17, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At this point I would believe that Albert could use Moby Dick as a bat

[pauses for Ankiel, TWSS, spermaceti/seaman jokes]

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of spermaceti/seaman

I went to Navy technical training in Orlando 17 years ago with an E-3 with the last name of Cannon. Yup, SN Cannon.

Oh, spermaceti … nevermind.

Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - anon.

by Solanus on Jun 17, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

come on man

Come back to the 80s with us.

by sdrone on Jun 17, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Any pitch thrown from the stretch is doubled.

I think there are relief pitchers that only throw out of the stretch, thus this could possibly be changed to “Any pitch thrown with a runner on base is doubled.” If we’re only talking starting pitchers, then this does not matter nearly so much.

by stlfan on Jun 17, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is only an issue...

…if the pitcher typically goes from the wind-up.

Also, I would triple the stress level for pitches thrown from a slide step.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. This can really mess a player's action up.

Decrease runs scored?
Maybe.

Decrease winning? Never seen that proven.
-SFTU

by hazel on Jun 17, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For more info on the topic, BP subscribers can check out this

link. It’s a detailed FAQ and breakdown of all the nuances of PAP, including a lot of discussion about tangential topics that aren’t exactly quantifiable. Tons, tons, tons of info there that touch on a lot of what RB has mentioned here and the BP team’s take on it.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 10:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think there are a couple of reasons.....

For the lower pitch counts.

I think pitchers today through more “stressful” pitches. I mean that in two ways. First, the actual types of pitches thrown, I would think, would be more stressful to the human arm than the pitches that were popular 30 years ago. Things like the cutter and the sinker are used MUCH more in this day and age.

I’d also think that pitchers are throwing more stressful pitches in general. And what I mean by this, is that the lineups they are facing are much tougher, top to bottom, throughout the league than before. Hell, it wasn’t that long ago that Jack Clark and Terry Pendelton hit in the middle of the Cardinals lineup. They may not have combined for as many HR’s as Pujols alone will hit this year. I’d think that it was much easier to work your way through a lineup as a pitcher 30 years ago than it is today. Tougher lineups = more stressful pitchers = lower pitch count.

You hear that last scenario play out with Carpenter all the time. Al and Dan would say that Tony planned to through Carp 80 pitches, but if he labored, that might be cut to 70, and if he didn’t labor at all, that might go up to 90.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jun 17, 2009 10:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Also, more money invested

I’d say that ownership has a much greater interest in keeping a $50MM pitcher healthy than a $1MM. The contracts these days are gigantic and the owners wish to protect their investments as best they can. I can’t blame them. If I were an owner and agreed to a contract for 3 or 4 years worth $10MM or more per season (let alone one of the longer contracts worth even more money), I’d be mandating lower pitch counts, too, so that my investment did not go to waste.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree...

Can’t say it any better than Ken Tremendous:

BP has done a lot of work on pitch counts, as evidenced in their PAP (Pitcher Abuse Points) index. You can find that here. Other, more qualified people than I have researched the effects of pitch counts on the human physique, and I won’t pretend to know nearly as much as they do. But it stands to reason, in this day and age, that 7-, 8-, or 9-figure investments should be protected slightly more than their more expendable counterparts in years past.

It also stands to reason that pitchers probably have to work a little harder these days to be successful, what with all of the modern strength training, nutrition, drug abuse, tape-watching, analysis, and preparation that hitters have at their disposal. Albert Pujols (and others) routinely go into the clubhouse immediately after at bats to review the tape on how the pitcher got him out. If you could go back in time and take Nap Lajoie into a room after Rube Waddell K’d him on three pitches and show him a glowing box with a video replay of the at bat, he would call you a demon, slit your throat, tear out his eyes, and generally freak the fuck out. It’s a different game, these days.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And one more thing.....

Forgot to add this, but was reminded by the below post:

I think bullpens are much stronger now days as well. So, in some ways, it makes sense to use them. I mean, surely a good, rested reliever is going to be better than a mediocre starter who has thrown 100 pitches, right?

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jun 17, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Generally - yes

But how many times have you seen a manager who pulls a starter who is cruising through a game just because he got to 100 pitches? He isn’t laboring, he hasn’t had more than one tough inning all game, but because he got to that magical number he’s coming out. Consequently, how many times have you seen that same team go on to lose the game when the bullpen blows it?

That’s essentially what RB’s point is here: We need a better system to judge how much a pitcher has left and how tired he is, not just the magical 100 pitch number. It’s different strokes for different folks. Nolan Ryan would send TLR back to the dugout if he came out at the 100 pitch mark in the 7th inning of a shutout and asked for the ball.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would he really?

Seem like he’d leave a healthy Carp out there longer, or a Waino.

Going back to Oakland, I don’t think TLR was pulling Dave Stewart out of games early.

There is no “measurement” for how much a pitcher has left. And it isn’t always about pulling a guy b/c he IS out of gas. Sometimes you pull a guy thinking ahead 2 months. Why push a guy if you don’t have to? What good comes from letting a guy throw another inning or two in a blowout, regardless of how well he is throwing?

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jun 17, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What good comes from letting a guy throw another inning or two in a blowout, regardless of how well he is throwing?

Plenty, actually.

  1. He’s not throwing in high-stress situations, making the pitches less stressful on his arm.
  2. You can save your bullpen for another night. Remember, they have stress on their arm too, and overusing your bullpen usually has far worse consequences than letting a starter throw another inning or two during a scheduled start. But I guess you could just carry 13 pitchers too….ZING!!

You seem to presume that letting a guy get throw 130 pitches in a start in May is going to effect his performance in a start in August. That’s total crap. You have less of an idea of the correlation of those two events than you do when trying to determine whether that pitcher is tired or not. As long as that pitcher gets regular rest between starts and remains on his throwing program, I don’t see how you can make the case that 130 pitches is any different from 100. Roy Halladay and Johan Santana have thrown more 120 pitch outings than any other pitchers — and they are the most durable pitchers in terms of innings and lack of injury in all of baseball.

Pitchers used to routinely throw 230+ innings in a season — now very few pitchers every throw 230 pitches in a season yet they get injured at a similar rate. It’s obvious that limiting pitch counts isn’t preventing injuries, so why are we still doing it?

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.....

Do you not agree that there is SOME line in the pitch count to where it is probably unhealthy for a pitcher? You don’t think there is a difference between 100 and 130. What about 150? 175? Maybe 200?

I don’t agree with you. But you are also assuming that guys are getting pulled from games for that one reason. In alot of those cases, maybe it had been a stressful 100 pitches. Maybe that is THAT pitchers limit, and he gets warn down after that. Maybe he had been lucky and the other team was hitting him pretty well. Maybe one particular guy do up that next inning had hit him well. There are tons of reasons to pull guys out after 7 innings and 100 pitches.

And like I said, if you won’t allow me to differ between 100 and 130…..than I won’t allow you to differ between 130 and 175. Pretty silly if you ask me.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jun 17, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know what...

Contextually, there’s no difference between 130 and 175, because there’s no constant limit to where a pitcher may need to be pulled out of a game. That’s the problem: 100 pitches is an arbitrary number, and has never been proven to be the breaking point at where a pitcher becomes a greater injury risk. Also, I was referencing how 130 pitches in May could effect a start in August, like you posited. Again, he could throw 200 pitches in May, then miss a start in August and you would be hard pressed to show evidence that the 200 pitch outing in May affected the missed start in August. It’s a really crappy argument, imo.

I would contend that some guys, like a Nolan Ryan, have a much higher pitch limit before they are at any risk for injury or lose their effectiveness as a pitcher. Some pitchers have quite a bit less. The problem here is that 100 pitches is based on little to no physiological evidence, but if you tell a guy that he’s limited to 100 pitches psychologically you’re putting that nugget in his head that he should begin to tire around that point. There are numerous studies that show that psychological state can greatly effect physiological performance. If you’re pulling a kid every time he hits 100 pitches, you’re telling his mind and body that that’s as far as he can go. There were probably more 15 year pitching careers from 1950 – 1980 as there have been from 1980 to now, so where is limiting pitches per start helping keep pitchers from wearing out or getting injured? You’re trying to argue that it’s “common sense” and I’m saying that your common sense isn’t backed up by scientific or empirical evidence to prove that it’s true.

There are tons of reasons to pull guys out after 7 innings and 100 pitches.

Are you arguing that a pitcher hasn’t ever been pulled because of pitch count? That’s utterly ridiculous and you know it.

This conversation is over if you’re going to make that argument — managers have said many times that they pulled a guy due to the number of pitches he had thrown at that time.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dave Stewart

TLR managed the A’s from ‘86 through ’95. Dave Stewart pitched for the A’s from ’86 through ’95. Stewart is, perhaps, an individual that needs to be looked in the study RB is proposing in the Main Post. From 1987 through 1990, Stewart was incredibly effective, pitching 261.1, 275.2, 257.2, and 267 innings in each season, respectively. (In 1991, Stewart hurled 226 innings, but only managed a Pineiro-esque 5.18 ERA. He led the league in IP in 1988 and 1990. Those seasons, he also led the league in CGs with 14 and 11 respectively. In those 5 seasons, Stewart threw 41 CGs (an average of over 10 per season). From 1991 through ’95, Stewart 5 CGs and saw his IP totals fall off from 226 in 1991 to 199.1, to 162, to 133.1, to 81 (over 16 starts).

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.....

And that is what makes it tough to evaluate, b/c you don’t know whether to attribute any loss in abilities to the innings, or something else.

Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable." - Manager Bobby Bragan

by SoonerfanTU on Jun 17, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another aspect of the bullpen

Statistical analysis shows that, generally, LHPs are more effective vs. LHBs and the same goes for righties vs righties. TLR adheres to this platoon split almost religiously. A lot of times, it makes more sense to bring in the LOOGY late in the game.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so did TLR plan to throw Carp through 80 pitches?

I agree on the types of pitches, just not the sinker. I could be wrong, but isn’t a sinker thrown just by adjust how you grip the ball? Cutters, Split Finger Fastballs, and Sliders definitely, imo, put more stress on the arm though.

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they are

but spreading the fingers adds tension to the forearm/elbow

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Questionable

This is a questionable claim that some people make but that isn’t well back up.

Lots of injured pitchers (e.g. Bruce Sutter) throw it, but usually/often post-injury.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

have you ever thrown a baseball?

take your fingers, right now, and act like your griping a fastball. now spread your index and middle finger apart as far as possible. do you feel that?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

but he also hasn’t stretched those fingers out every day for the last 3 – 5 years either. Ron Darling could put a softball between his index and middle fingers because he had stretched his muscles to accommodate the ball being placed there.

I could ask you to sit with your legs out in a V, then bend over and touch your nose on the floor in front of you. You can’t do it, but many gymnasts and professional athletes can. Does that mean that they are at the same risk of injury as you are? No, just that they are more flexible and in better shape, having done that move 3-4 days a week for 3+ years time.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

when those gymnasts do things that make me cringe

are their tendons, ligaments, muscles, whatevers, still moving? Just because I gain more flexibility, and feel the pull less, doesn’t mean they aren’t being put in a different position

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What Stretches

Technically, it’s the tendons and ligaments that stretch and not the muscles, and in actuality they just loosen up.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have small fingers

But I also don’t see how throwing a splitter/forkball affects the elbow

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kudos to you...

I don’t know about the stress thing, but you did get VEB nation to simultaneously do this exercise. I bet you have a 100% success rate for people that read the comment.

It’s like the old pickpocket trick: one guy poses as a good samaritan, telling everyone to be leery as pickpockets have been known to frequent the area. Everyone within earshot touches their valuables immediately. Crook #2 has a field day.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

small victories...

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wait, where's my wallet?

how did you pick my pocket over the internet?

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, not really

I used to try throwing split fingered fastballs up against a wall for hours. But I could be different.

by sdrone on Jun 17, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, But

I fell strain in my hand, and between my fingers, but not in my forearm or elbow.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In-game Performance: Pitch Counts vs. Batters Faced

Isn’t Tony’s thing not that high-pitch counts are necessarily bad, but that each time a pitcher goes through a lineup again batters do exponentially better. You know, the fourth time you see the same pitcher you are much more comfortable hitting him. So for him it is less about protecting the pitcher’s arm and more about going with his typical 7th, 8th, and 9th inning relievers.

I know that whole relationship is endogenous (pitchers who face a batter the 4th time by the 7th have obviously been knocked around a bit more than pitchers who face the minimum) but the stats I’ve seen show it to be true.

Has the BP group or others made a firm distinction between pitch counts and batters faced and their relationships with in-game performance? It’s just another reason for low pitch counts.

by enoscountry on Jun 17, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

you can get splits from B-R that tell you this
link

Basically, each time through the order adds 40 points of OPS to the opponents. # of pitches thrown is much less conclusive, for many reasons (bad pitchers don’t get to 100 pitches often, pitch 25-50 are usually against bottom of order, etc).

- "I went at it and didn’t slow down, so it kind of bounced off me." -Lil' Dunc

by SleepyCA on Jun 17, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You mentioned players using weights for training

and I don’t know what effect this has had on pitchers or position players, but I do know that baseball up until sometime in the early eighties outlawed weights from training rooms and discouraged players from using weights at all, believing that it caused a player to become “muscle bound” a term you hear seldom used today but meaning it caused loss of flexibility of the body and therefore more prone to muscle injury.

This makes sense to me especially for pitchers. I think pitchers should run and excercise a lot and not mess with weights.

Also, I can remember when teams discouraged and in some cases outlawed players playing golf during baseball season, with the belief that it messed up a hitter’s timing. I don’t know where that is true or not but a lot of baseball people believed it.

by ridgesee on Jun 17, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Golf messes up my softball swing

I always end up popping it up the first couple at bats after a round of golf.

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmmm.
"muscle bound" a term you hear seldom used today but meaning it caused loss of flexibility of the body and therefore more prone to muscle injury.

So, when Steve Phillips said during a broadcast earlier this season that you see more oblique injuries nowadays than in the past because guys have more muscle, he was using outdated, traditional baseball thinking?

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

reply fail?

was Phillips saying that the extra strength leads to faster, more powerful swings, which leads to more stress being put on the oblique?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which, of course, is bullshit

Perhaps the reason we see more “oblique” strains right now than in the past is that “oblique” strains were diagnosed as something else before? Do you think that’s possible, Steve? Kinda like NBA players didn’t have microfracture surgery on knees before a few years ago. Does that mean that microfractures didn’t exist? Or were they simply diagnosed as “tendinitis”, which has similar symptoms?

Have the players with the most powerful swings by bat speed and torque (Sheffield, Soriano) have a better than average rate of oblique strains? No, they don’t, so saying that it’s due to guys being in better physical shape is really a ridiculous statement with no evidence to back up the claim.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point, and Steve Phillips is certainly an idiot.

But “microfractures” aren’t an injury. Microfracture surgery is a practice where tiny holes or fractures are deliberately made in the bones of the knee, with the idea that new cartilage will grow in and around them, hopefully providing more cushion to a worn-down knee.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say it was an injury...

only that knee tendinitis has similar symptoms and microfracture surgery could have been a possible treatment for these injuries in the past had they been diagnoses properly and the surgery been available.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Knee tendinitis has similar symptoms to what?
Does that mean that microfractures didn’t exist? Or were they simply diagnosed as "tendinitis"

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Similar symptoms

to lack of cartilage in the knee joint, which is what microfracture surgery is attempting to fix.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then why did you say
Does that mean that microfractures didn’t exist?

Shouldn’t you have said, “Does that mean cartilage loss in knees didn’t exist”? I’m sure you can see why it is easy to interpret your statement as a misunderstanding of “microfracture surgery”. Anyway this is dumb and Steve Phillips sucks.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A "New" Plague of Oblique Injuries

I totally agree that this is probably more about terminology than incidence.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, Reply Fail

I hit “reply” to the wrong post…

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rotational Swing

In a rotational swing, you do use the obliques more than in a linear, arm-y swing.

I converted a hitter over from a linear swing to a rotational swing and he ended up on the DL due to his using different muscles than before when he was just trying to slap the ball.

However, this is an easy problem to fix with good conditioning.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just said the term

“muscle bound” is seldom used; not the concept. I remember hearing Phillips remarks and I think he was referring to the same thing. I was just trying to say that 30 years ago frowned more than today on players trying to “muscle up” (another term seldom heard) but feel free to disagree.

by ridgesee on Jun 17, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know

I was using your comment concerning the now-viewed as ridiculous former logic that permeated the sport of baseball to show that Steve Phillips has little-to-no baseball knowledge.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah?!

Softball messes up my golf swing!

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tried learning both left handed

and concluded softball was the easier switch.
(and cheaper)

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think they should lay off of doing arm and shoulder training

but they absolutely should be doing strength and conditioning for their legs and core muscles, as these will help to prevent injury to the arm if used with proper mechanics.

That said, long toss is really a form of strength training for throwing, and should be a program in any high school and college baseball program. It helps put all of the proper mechanics of throwing together while stressing the muscles around the shoulder joint to help them get stronger.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a quick formula

Comments a thoughts welcome. I’m sure I got something off base here and this needs some tweaking:

S = (r + 2b) (1+ m) + ([(r+2b)^2].5) / |L| + 1

S refers to pitcher stress r refers to regular pitches (fastballs and changeups)
b refers to breaking pitches
m refers to MISP
L refers to the lead at the time of the pitch

The absolute value of L + 1 captures the idea that in games where the pitcher is far ahead or far behind in runs he is going to be under a less stressful situation. Tie games will be most stressful (L would be zero).

([(r+2b)^2].5) — half the squared number of regular plus twice the number of breaking pitches — captures the idea that pitches will have an additive but non linear fatigue effect. This term probably needs some work (as it’s seems pretty messy to me). Some of you math and stats nerds should chime in.

Hopefully this formula is a start. Or maybe it’s total crop. But it was a way from me to drink coffee for a few minutes and not work.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.

by Gregatron on Jun 17, 2009 11:11 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

my contacts just dried up

and now my nose is bleeding

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Not trying to be snarky

but your shit’s to deep for me , but you might have somthing.

by ridgesee on Jun 17, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

THis might make it easier to read

S = (r + 2b) (1+ m) + ([(r+2b)^2].5)
____________________________
                            |L| + 1

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.

by Gregatron on Jun 17, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope

Didn’t help, lol.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep,

that did the trick. Now I see it

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looking at this

I’m thinking I need to replace “|L| + 1” with the square root of “|L| + 1”. Pitching in a tie game is not, after all, twice as stressful as pitching in a one run game.

Also, the additive stress term should include “(m + 1)”. Taking half the term squared is still way to messy. Anyone have any ideas on a more elegant approach?

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.

by Gregatron on Jun 17, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

to each his own

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HA!

That just made my day.

by peach concrete on Jun 17, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never doubted that somebody would get that

Good times.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couple of questions

This S value is for every pitch, correct? Thus, you need to sum S over all the pitches in the outing in order to get a correct S value. I’m not sure what MISP is, so this may be what it is, but I would also include something that factors the inning in the stress. For instance, a tie game in the first inning (starting pitcher starting the game) is not the same as a tie game in the 9th inning. The latter is more stressful.

Good start, though.

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the thoughts

MISP = men in scoring position

I’m not sure the model needs a summation. S is a stress score. Though I should have specified that the r and b terms refer to the number of those types of pitches thrown.

I do need something that factors in the lateness of the game to make a more complete model.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.

by Gregatron on Jun 17, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you're deviating from the time-honoured RISP

I’d personally suggest either DISP (Dudes in scoring position), LISP (Lads in scoring position) or my personal favourite, GFYTBATSSFTNOPAMWRASOTBB (Go fuck yourself traditional baseball acronyms, this stat stands for the number of plate appearances made with runners at second or third base, booyakashaaaaa!!!)

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Jun 17, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I propose "DISPUPIUIWCTANLISPBBTTYPTAHWHET"

“Dudes in scoring position unless Pujols is up in which case they are no longer in scoring position because by the time you pronounce this acronym he will have eliminated them”

Just flows a little better.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about CISPWMTAGTIWP

Cards In Scoring Position, Which Means They Are Going To Intentionally Walk Pujols

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice

I should have put RISP. :P

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.

by Gregatron on Jun 17, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Velocity Factor

1. IMO, stress levels rise non-linearly as you move above 90 or 91 MPH. IOW, I think a 95 MPH fastball is significantly more stressful than a 90 MPH fastball. I would apply an overall stress multiplier based on the velocity of a pitcher’s top fastball (and perhaps how often he throws it).

2. I am more concerned about sliders and cutters than curves.

3. I also think you have to take into account the FB/SL+CT ratio. The more FBs, the better.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll never find the link but there was a scientific study made to measure the force on the body

from the various pitch types. I’’m not sure if it measured “interesting” stress, i.e. that which leads to injury. But the changeup was the lowest stress pitch of the bunch. Less so than the FB. Which is why it saddens me that we largely don’t use it as an org, but instead go the the worst in terms of stress the sl/ct.

by DriverZn on Jun 17, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Problem With This Study...

…is that it likely didn’t measure quality, big league change-ups, which are thrown with fastball mechanics. Many poor pitchers throw their change-ups with different mechanics, but this doesn’t work at the higher levels because you end up tipping the pitch.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not going to pretend like I know anything here...

but I don’t understand the MPH issue you bring up. To me that would have to vay player to player. 95 MPH to Strasburg is like 88 MPH to most pitchers. You’d have to include average fastball velocity if you were going to include actual velocity.

"Don't do anything till I get back!" - Jesus to the Cubs

by cardzfanbub on Jun 17, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

PD Writers (Goold Excluded) are Really Terrible

This is from Gordon today:

“Fans keep dwelling on big-picture concerns for this franchise, such as whether Pujols will walk as a free agent 2 ½ years from now.

But it’s the little things -– like one great at bat at such a critical juncture -– that can make all the difference in this sport."

Really? I thought it was Bernie Miklasz and Brian Burwell who were “dwelling” on whether Pujols will walk. Are they the “fans” you are referring to? And is he really suggesting that if Pujols does walk in 2.5 years that the Cards will be okay as long as Yadi takes good at bats at critical junctures? This is just a terrible piece of writing.

And circling back to the topic at hand — Did folks see the story about the UT closer who pitched 13 innings in relief a couple of weeks ago, 12 1/3 of which he no-hit the other team. He threw 169 pitches. Pretty amazing performance. I think he was drafted in the 4th or 5th round.

by OCCardsFan on Jun 17, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Austin Wood.

Taken in the 5th round by the Tigers. He defines the term “rubber arm”

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

by stltrav09 on Jun 17, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, intentional balls should get zero points

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jun 17, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Based on the current state of the Cardinals...

I missed the game last night and was shocked to see the Cards won 11-2. As i checked the box score I expected to see 3 or possibly even 4 HR’s from Pujols.

How else could we score 11 runs?

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

by stltrav09 on Jun 17, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

gdm.

cardinals are the things with feathers that perch within the soul.

by ilrosso on Jun 17, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love the smell of gasoline

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love the smell of people walking through hell

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Works every time.*

*Shown to function in 60% of above time intervals.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's has bits of real panther in it

that’s why it works.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i dunno, it smells like

straight gasoline.

cardinals are the things with feathers that perch within the soul.

by ilrosso on Jun 17, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

smells like bigfoot's dick.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His interviews are just awesome

i caught him late night a few weeks ago talking to Dan Patrick . It’s like talking to a really cool grandpa who used to kick people’s a$$es.

You get lines like “the guy though he should bunt on me” and “I just showed him I didn’t appreciate that.”

by sdrone on Jun 17, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did somebody piss in Hrabosky's Cheerios this year?

He seems to be in a terrible mood and is acting like a complete asshole most of the time. I don’t remember him being this negative in years past.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jun 17, 2009 12:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He's just getting old.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's really fallen into the "good ol' days" trap, it seems

The Mad Hungarian is very mad. At what, I don’t know. How would you like to have his job as your job in retirement? I suppose that if you hate young players, and rookies in particular, you might hate having his job this season. He sure seems to.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

mercury poisoning?

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love Kevin Pollak

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 17, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ditto

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jun 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a very unheralded comedian

His impersonations are great.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Including Christopher Walken, IIRC

Which ties this whole thread together nicely

Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - anon.

by Solanus on Jun 17, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which is what HL is quoting from

(just for those who don’t know)

That’s a great piece by Pollack, BTW, hilarious.

by ArkansasTravs on Jun 17, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also really like Jay Moore's Walken routine

Also, Kevin Spacey, in one of my favorite SNL skits, protrayed Walken trying out for Han Solo in the original Star Wars, which was brilliant. In fact, Spacey is a very good with voices and impersonations as well, but it doesn’t get seen too much because he tends more towards dramatic film roles and not comedy stuff. He can be very funny.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spacey is one of the best but lesser-known SNL hosts.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Link baby

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-dtxpnjbkE

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had no idea Spacey did impersonations, until now.

And here I thought he was just Keyser Söze in The Usual Suspects

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!

I actually guessed the ending of that movie correctly. Of course, I saw it for the first time like 3 years ago, after Twisty McTwisterson M. Night Shyamalan started making movies, so that may have something to do with it.

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know where that ranks on IMBDD(too many D's?)

but it’s one of my favorites

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cause/Effect Confound

RB, I should start by saying I like your hypothesis and I like the way you’re thinking about it.

My concern is that you may end up measuring an effect rather than a cause of pitcher injury. Most pitching injuries – in my understanding, which is somewhat rudimentary – begin gradually and end with a pop. A labrum starts fraying, a ligament gets tighter and thinner, etc., with every pitch the pitcher makes.

So, if a pitcher has a lurking injury, like an elbow ligament that has grown thin and tight and rubs against bone in the pitcher’s mechanics, this lurking injury could damage his control leading to . . . more walks, more big innings, and more “high-stress” outings. Then, some time later – three weeks, ten months, whatever – his ligament would give way with a pop and he’d have a season-ending surgery.

If we used your theory on this imaginary pitcher, we’d seem to affirm your hypothesis. However, what is really going on is not that the pitcher got injured because he threw high-stress innings, but he threw high-stress innings because he was injured.

I have no idea how you sort out these problems. I wish I had a better idea. Conversely, there are clearly pitchers who are doing just fine who just have a crap outing. And those high-stress outings probably do have a negative effect on pitchers. I just don’t know how you prevent the pitchers with lurking injuries from the pitchers who merely have a bad day.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

*"prevent" was meant to be "separate" in the last sentence. i was considering two phrasings and

mixed them up.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Elbows and Shoulders

I thought I was a friggin’ genius when I noticed that elbow injuries are usually preceded by control problems and shoulder problems and usually preceded by velocity problems.

Then I heard that someone figured this out 50 or more years ago.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would raising

the mound a couple of inches cut down on pitcher injuries?

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i've read at least one study that shows that raising the mound CAUSES pitcher injuries.

pitchers experience less stress on flat ground than on a mound.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

pitchers experience less stress on flat ground than on a mound.

I smell a paper in the Lancet – “Chronic vertigo underdiagnosed in Major League Baseball pitchers”….

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Jun 17, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You arms hang down

the further you throw ‘downward’ the more natural it is.

Yes, I just made that up.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 17, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, no, that perfectly makes sense.

Drop a ball off of the Sears Tower, now that’s a heater.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...

Well, then that makes Gibson’s sustained dominance all the more impressive.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fyi, "study finds pitching mound height affects throwing motion, injury risk"

this is done by the brewers’ team physician. he’s done some interesting work. i didn’t readily find the original study, but i’m sure if you google raasch and “mound height” enough you can find the original.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct

It certainly makes things worse than throwing off of flat ground.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

11 runs was quite nice

and hopefully their plate discipline last night will be emulated going forward… it’s as if there was a big talk, like we had hoped. Tony going from his be agressive at the plate to a more patient mantra. I just don’t want to see us go into an offensive draught for 4 or 5 games because we scored all the runs last night… which is something we’ve been doing the last few seasons.

I texted this to Tackle Box last night, this season is so weird that Wellemeyer will pitch a complete game shut out tonight. Just hoping for a “quality start” however.

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

actually

they said their approach versus Verlander was to be aggressive against early fastballs. The difference last night was hard hit balls finally finding holes and missing gloves.

MyBrute - Where tiny gladiators rule the internets

by dcfcblues on Jun 17, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BABIP was friendly to us last night

finally

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only 4 walks though

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

10% of PAs

I’ll take that any day…2x our June pace going in to the game

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NL average right now is

9.34% though. So we’re a smidge above average in our most patient game in weeks and everyone thinks we’ve gotten our eye back. I’d rather have a 10% of PA’s night be our average night, every now and then bump it up to around 15%, sometimes go a little lower than 10 than the dumbassery we’ve been trying lately.

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Dumbassery we've been trying lately"

Truer words have not been spoken all day, my friend. Did you see my fanpost on this subject?

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

Excellent work

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still cant wrap my head around the declining BB%. Its so bad.

I didn’t even have the heart to do it for all hitters – Albert by month. But I can assure you: the results would have been
Terrible.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are starting at the finish line and trying to find the starting line

If you really want to see if their is any correlation. Is compile data between hurt and non hurt pitchers than look for patterns to separate them.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jun 17, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ahh, and there the door is wide open for survivorship bias.

This is quite the complex problem, indeed.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you don't know where you're going....

how will you ever know when you get there?

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe everyone is just different.

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 2:06 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

So we're all the same?

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

But the similarities are much greater than the differences.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

did we sign Shelby?

would go along well with the Colby

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not yet. he'll be a harder sign. although I'm sure his agent. . . i mean, advisor, really let him

have it about his statement that college wasn’t for him and he’d be pitching for the cardinals. that probably helped a lot.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

48, I think. check out the discussion in the comments

here.

we’ve signed about half of the top ten talent — still waiting on our #1, #3, #4, #7, and #10. but we had a very good draft and we’re doing quite well in signing these guys, including some HS guys who were considered hard signs — Tyler Bighames was lured to the big club from a 31st pick, which I thought would almost certainly send him to college in the fall.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

goold now says we signed 50. sorry.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitch Count Multipliers

I haven’t read any comment because I’m working and only have so much procrastination time, so I apologize if this has already been suggested.

But maybe after a certain number of pitches (15 or so?) you could multiply the pitches.

Example:
First 15 pitches just count as 15 points.
For the 16th pitch, multiply the 15 points by 1.1 = 16.5
For the 17th pitch, multiply 16.5 × 1.1 = 18.15
Then repeat until the end of the inning.

Those numbers are just an example, but I think the concept could be useful. Maybe moreso for individual plate appearances, or pitches with runners on base, etc.

by Cardinals645 on Jun 17, 2009 2:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i havent read all the posts but I have been noticing that the abs are getting better

not just last night in the FL series as well. mostly certain individuals been having good abs..even the other night in a loss several guys worked the count and got the rook from CLE out…one problem they waited til the 8th inningg i think..the difference yesterday is that they were having scrappy abs in the early innnings…

i think this is some hope maybe at least we arent seeing the Xbox 360 7 pitch inning

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jun 17, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I, on the other hand, am not getting better abs

something to do with beer, burgers, and a lack of exercise

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fine Post, RB

Here’s the thing…the concept of rigidly adhering to a pitch count isn’t necessarily the best idea. However, I remember reading an SI article from like 2003 or 2004 about The Cubs Boy Band of Dusty, Larry (Rothschild), Mark, Kerry, and Carlos and how Dusty and Rothschild basically tossed their middle fingers at pitch counts. I think we all know what happened to Kerry and Mark. I think they would have broken eventually because they both have, IMO, inefficient deliveries and, well, they’re pitchers and pitchers break. But I can’t shake the feeling that being abused to no end by Dusty in his campaign to prove that baseball is played by men and stats and research is dumb and so on played a significant role in the Kerry Wood/Mark Prior Greek tragedy (Woodtigone Prioristeia?)

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 17, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Follow up

So…I don’t think pitch counts are perfect, or necessarily even good. But I don’t think you can just toss your guys out there and take them out whenever anymore. I think the baseball community is smart enough now to realize that just because old Walter Johnson threw 198 pitches on Friday and threw BP on Sunday and threw 202 on Monday or whatever, doesn’t mean that pitchers can or should do said superman-feats. It’s a different game.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 17, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Abuse...

…probably accelerated their decline, but the root cause of the problem was crappy mechanics.

That’s why you can “abuse” guys like Nolan Ryan and Randy Johnson and they will show no ill effects.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chris, I'll say this again

I think you’re heart is in the right place and I admire the dedication you’ve shown to this topic. I think you have learned a great deal about biomechanics and pitching.

However…you will never convince me or any one else with even a rudimentary understanding of science that you know what causes pitching injuries. Your conclusions are all hopelessly confounded. You cannot and have not isolated variables, so you cannot describe cause and effect with any kind of scientific certainty. For example, how can you say with certainty that Prior’s conditioning program was not the cause of his injuries? How can you say that the myriad of strange injuries he suffered were not the cause of his arm issues? How can you say for certain that Randy Johnson’s arm isn’t some kind of scientific marvel that is capable of things only 2-3 people are capable of? You and I could go on for hours and days about all of these variables. In any case, your X→Y statements don’t carry any weight in light of these issues.

Do problematic pitching mechanics cause injuries? Maybe they do. Are they the only cause? Logically, they probably are not. If all you said was that you see a correlation between inverted W/L/timing issues and injured pitching arms, I could get on board with that. If all you said was that you THINK or you BELIEVE or, hell, you OPINE that these types of deliveries are MORE LIKELY to cause injuries, I could agree with you there. But when you say you KNOW that these things ARE the cause of injuries, you are crossing a line that you scientifically and logically CANNOT cross. Am I splitting hairs? It may seem that way, but I absolutely am not.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 17, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Persuasive?

“you will never convince me or any one else with even a rudimentary understanding of science that you know what causes pitching injuries. Your conclusions are all hopelessly confounded.”

Maybe not, but many people at the major league level think I may be on to something.

As we speak I’m working with an oft-injured major league starter who thinks I may be able to help him. Assisting me in the effort to help him is a high-level major league player development person.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My dad..

..is cooler than both your dads.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

names or it never happened.

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Jun 17, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Confidentiality

Give me some time.

He’s come to the conclusion that his club doesn’t know what it’s doing and now he’s seeking second opinions, which obviously wouldn’t go over well with his current club staff.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know, i know

just being a wiseass

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Jun 17, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

See here's the thing

Chris, I’ve been reading your stuff on letstalkpitching, your personal site, and here for years now, and ever since you got this alleged “major leauge” gig, you’ve never given us a player or even a team name.

I’m not saying I don’t believe you, but…

it’s hard to believe you.

by Jhusk on Jun 17, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My History to Date

During the 2007 season I did some free consulting for a cross checker for the Mets. I looked at 30 or so of his top pitching prospects, including David Kopp.

I was bummed the Mets didn’t get Kopp (the Cards took him 2 picks before the Mets were about to take him), but I was glad the Cardinals did.

I did some work for him in the early part of the 2008 season, but we parted ways half way through the season when he tried to dramatically increase what he asked of me and never lived up to promises to start paying me for my time. We also don’t see eye to eye when it comes to hitting.

Most people assume my contacts are all with the Cardinals, but most of the people I know are with other organizations.

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hitting Clients

My highest-level hitting client is a guy named Andres Torres, who is the Giants’ fifth outfielder. What I did with him was help him move from linear (Ichiro) to rotational hitting mechanics, with Pujols as his new model. I helped him understand what Pujols did and why. He’s a very gifted athlete and has dramatically improved his numbers, and in particular his power numbers. Two days ago he hit one into McCovery Cove in SF.

http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=5064441&c_id=sf

by thepainguy on Jun 17, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wooedipus at Chicago? Priormetheus bound (for the DL)?

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why not "Wooedipus Wrecks [His Arm]"?

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On that topic...

any idea if Prior had outings in high school or college when he did what Wood did? Pitches some huge number of innings in a small number of days?

by sdrone on Jun 17, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LaRussa to decide if Khalil Greene is activated today

after meeting with him, per Joe Strauss.

I can only imagine how having this meeting and then being rejected would effect Greene’s anxiety issues.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well, what's really the alternative?

i agree this would be simpler if greene were a shoe salesman from columbia, sc. but he’s a major league baseball player.

is it better for him to get booted out of baseball temporarily or permanently, making him feel like a failure?
is it better to put him on a major league field without checking in with him?

in this kind of case, i think we should defer to the people supervising his treatment to know what’s right for him. and i sure don’t see an easy answer.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leave him in Memphis for his 20-day rehab

assignment.

I can’t imagine that he’s recovered from his anxiety disorder in 3 weeks to the day. They could have given him 35 days to get this all figured out, or even more. Instead, they gave him 3 weeks.

Maybe he is on the right meds now and he has his mind right but this smacks of every other player they’ve rushed back. And this isn’t the kind of injury you can put a player through a test to see if all is healed.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

There is no reason not to have him go through his entire 20-day rehab. I just don’t get their handling of this situation. (Come to think of it, I hardly ever understand the St. Louis Cardinals, LLC’s handling of their DL.)

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i share both your frustrations with the management of the DL generally.

but i also can’t complain to providers who are seeing khalil that the extra 14 days are going to make the difference.

maybe a new medication/coping mechanism/talk therapy are going to change things in the short term (i’m guessing 21 days and 35 days are both the “short term” in the psych world) or maybe he needs a long term break from baseball. i don’t know.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya thats a key point

short term focus of tx for anxiety issues is symptom reduction. this can be done by a combination of medications and therapy techniques (usually CBT skills). the issue is not that he is cured, but that the functional impairments have been reduced to allow him to perform his duties. and this is where we really have no idea.

by FunkeeC on Jun 17, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

funkee, what sort of cognitive-behavioral stuff is effective for anxiety? just

curious what a standard treatment would be.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

beer and shock therapy?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I did some Googling.

http://www.anxietynetwork.com/hcbt.html

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is exposure and response prevention used for anxiety disorders?

I have no idea. It’s been a while since I had to study up on this stuff. Hopefully I will enter grad school some day… and have to do massive amounts of review.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh

I knew it was used for phobias and OCD and stuff like that, didn’t know about other anxiety stuff.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

for some reason

when I read your link, I read cliff LEE notes…wierd

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kbot had to agree to the DL

The CBA doesn’t allow a team to just DL a player. Kbot had to agree to be placed on the DL. Maybe he is making noise about coming off the DL. The Players Union power combined with HIPPA regulations confuse the whole situation.

On another note regarding the Cards Medical Staff – I wonder if the NL All Stars are concernced about this annoucement made along with naming the coaches

Keeping an eye on the players, St. Louis head athletic trainer Barry Weinberg and Chicago Cubs director of athletic training Mark O’Neal will tend to the NL All-Stars

by ubeddie on Jun 17, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if you're familiar with the shoe-selling business in Columbia, SC, but let me tell you

Those guys lay it on the line every night just like ball players. Every move they make is under constant scrutiny. Make one little mistake, then you start thinking too much. Before you know it, you start making more mistakes than not. “Actually, I asked for this in a size 11 wide.” Might as well send him down to the Florence Pay Less.

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Who goes down?

Please be a pitcher! Is hawksworth still on the 25 man roster? If so, him or Walters need to go.

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

by stltrav09 on Jun 17, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

With Walters pitching yesterday

and Wellemeyer starting today, I hope it isn’t Hawksworth until AFTER the game.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the early days of baseball...

It was basically the survival of the fittest arms. Guys that didn’t have rubber arms burned out after a few years in the minors. And even upon making it to the majors, short careers were the norm (8-10 years), not long ones.

I don’t think arm injuries are more prevalent than they work. Look at a roster of any old time team, chances are good at least one of the starters had a freakishly short career (and the rest 8-10 years).

Look at the Cardinals in the 30s. Dizzy Dean’s career was cut short as we know, but what about his brother, Paul? He had 2 great years with the Cardinals, then basically his career was over at age of 23…(he played a few years more, but very sparingly and not effectively)

by DiscoJer on Jun 17, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I know how/why Dizzy's career was cut short

but I have never heard a reason or explanation about why Paul only pitched a few years. Did he have an injury or just suddenly lose effectiveness or ?

by ArkansasTravs on Jun 17, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wiki says he pitched a no-hitter at 22

then his career ended several years later because of an injury. I would really like to thank the asshole who submitted that info, cuz it was really helpful.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 17, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You mean THAT no-hitter?

You’ve heard the story, no-doubt, of how Diz threw a 2 or 3 hit CG SO in the first game of a double header then Paul threw his no-no in the second game which prompted Diz to say that he’d known that Paul was going to do that, he would have too!

by ArkansasTravs on Jun 17, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Replying to myself here,

but, if I get the chance, I might ask Paul’s grandson. He’s Jr. high principal in my hometown.

by ArkansasTravs on Jun 17, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is downtime a factor?

Couldn’t downtime between pitches thrown be a factor as well?

Examples:
Length of time on the bench between innings
If the Cardinals put up 6 runs in an inning and the SP sits on the bench for 20-30 minutes between innings, does the “warmed up” factor go away, creating the potential for injuries since he is no longer stretched and ready? I know they get warm up pitched before each inning, but the different between resting for 5 minutes and 30 minutes could be a big factor, especially after all of the pre-game warm ups, and even in the days leading up to a start. Muscles perform best when they’re stretched and warm.

Rain delays
Same as above, but exaggerated even more. Without looking at numbers, it seems like pitchers who return after a delay see wild variations on their ability to pitch successfully. Then again, it would be hard to determine if this is caused by pitcher downtime or the opposing hitter’s downtime, since both are delayed equally.

  1. of days rest*
    This is taking it to the extreme, and i know that articles have been written about four-day rest vs. five-day rest, but have these studies been tied to injury risk? (If they have, post a link. I’m interested.)

Maybe this should be studied as a separate project, but it seems like the timing of innings could be a factor just like the number of pitches thrown.

defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

by effin fisk on Jun 17, 2009 3:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

re: Days of rest:

There is an entire chapter of

Baseball Between the Numbers
devoted to a 4-man rotation and all the studies indicated that days between starts was not nearly as important as pitches thrown in those starts. They actually supported a 4-man rotation with shorter, stricter pitch counts to minimize pitcher fatigue.

Further, they found that pitching when tired was the most stressful and most injury-correlated (i.e. 2 starts of 150 pitches on 4 days rest each is MUCH more taxing than 3 starts of 100 pitches on 3 days rest, for a rudimentary example).

Its a great book and a lot of it is viewable for free on google books, you should check it out.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oops, italics fail

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude

MAJOR italics fail. You somehow typo’d an “i” into a “blockquote.” Kudos.

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

When you got it, you got it.

I’d tell you how to pull it off, but it would be a little like Jeter trying to tell A-Rod how to wear the pinstripes. Somethings just can’t be taught.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Especially English, insofar that "some things" is two words.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, I'm actually reading that right now.

I just started. Guess I need to skip ahead a few chapters. Thanks.

defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

by effin fisk on Jun 17, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OT, and Old News:

I just saw that Joe Maddon picked Trey Hillman and Don Wakamatsu as his All Star Game Coaches. Little guy sticking up for the little guys I guess. Good for him.

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 3:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Love it

defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

by effin fisk on Jun 17, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn

Next thing you know Elvis Andrus will displace Jeter as AL starting SS! The horror!

"If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it up on the scoreboard?" - Jeff Francouer

by jd is legend on Jun 17, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

can the NL have him

instead of Jimmy Rollins?

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trey Hillman?

Does Joe Maddon need help writing crappy hitters into the lineup or tossing Kyle Farnsworth out there in leverage situations.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 17, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that was supposed to end in a question mark

I swear, I did pass kindergarten!!!

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 17, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Catch 22 of the Wild Card and making a trade

I was just looking at the standing and the parity of the NL. 13 of the 16 teams right now are in a playoff spot or no further away than 4.5 games away from one. The Cardinals currently lead the Wild Card race. So with every Cardinal win we separate our self farther from the pack and with every loss they get closer.

If we get hot and start winning than they will say we don’t need to trade for anyone. If we start to lose more than no one will deal to us since they are still in the playoff hunt.

I just pray we get lucky and hot at the right time.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jun 17, 2009 4:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sox up 3-0 on the cubs

after a little small ball, 1st & 3rd 1 out bunt single

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 4:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

OT: So I rewatched Citizen Kane

I just don’t think it is even in my Top 100 favorite movies. It is a good looking movie but I just didn’t like the character’s at all in the movie.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Jun 17, 2009 4:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that sounds very subjective

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

won't be watching it then

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Derek Jeter, huh?

I guess that means you think Citizen Kane is over-rated.

by cardsgirl95 on Jun 17, 2009 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

THAT

or he means that Citizen Kane is a real winner.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 17, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

or uses a Gillete razor

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

or flimtotheflam is a-rod's secret online identity.

and a-rod really hates citizen kane.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on Flim's comments,

I think he means over-rated. But it could be the razor. ;)

by cardsgirl95 on Jun 17, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It could be that Citizen Kane, as a film

does all those little things that don’t show up in the box office revenues or the awards shows.

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

that's what she said

How did the pig corner the breakfast market?

by STLRegalia on Jun 17, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I gotta rec this comment

because for the first time probably ever, it’s actually true.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

if we're talking movies

the last thing I tried to watch was Synechdoche, that was a doozy

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the thing:

I would say that Citizen Kane is the Babe Ruth of movies. Here’s why:

  1. It’s hard to understand the impact of the movie on the whole of Hollywood itself. There are tons of things done in Citizen Kane that were never done before. Certain lighting, certain camera angles (especially the one looking up a character, making him feel larger than life), background focus, and deep focus were all done for the first time in Citizen Kane. Just like nobody had made a living hitting homers like Babe Ruth.
  2. It’s also really hard to understand the impact of the film when you compare it to modern cinema, because all the little tricks used in Kane are now used by every filmmaker known to man, and they might not have ever seen Citizen Kane, but they’ve seen other movies that use those techniques. Similar to how it’s hard to appreciate how incredibly good Ruth was in the context of the last 80 years unless you can break down what he did compared to his peers that were playing at the time.

I, too, don’t find it endlessly rewatchable like I do films like “The Maltese Falcon”, “Casablanca”, “The Waterfront” and “It’s a Wonderful Life” because there are no really likable characters in the movie and the script is very obtuse and confusing at times. It’s probably not even the best film that Welles’ directed, I would give that title to Touch of Evil from 1955. But it’s hard to overstate the impact that it made on how movies are made.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jun 18, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

(ahem)

“On the Waterfront.” If you’d gotten it right, your comment coulda been somebody.

I’d also add that “Citizen Kane” used make-up like no other movie ever had. Everyone in the cast was aged via makeup special effects, something that now routinely happens in films. Several of the camera movements were also new and widely adopted after the film.

"If I prepare myself, my stuff is good and I'm going to get outs. That is a fact." - Chris Carpenter

by spants on Jun 18, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cubs lose 4-1.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 5:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

woooo!

although not all that surprising anymore

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Wooo!-ing for Cubs losses!

Only nodding will be tolerated, unless of course the loss came at the hands of a Redbird win.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only if performed in such a way that is consistent with expectations being met.

ie. a smirk of satisfaction for knowing an outcome before a conclusion. Never under any circumstances should a Cubs loss fall into any category besides expected.

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think for a cardinal fan in chicago, we can allow him a little private e-gloating.

i can’t imagine what it’s like to live there day-in day-out.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha, fair enough

Does this mean I can go crazy in jubilation at every Mets’ face/palm?

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Jun 17, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gonna be a great summer

Mang Says...
"There is no "I" in team, or in B g Mac Land, either."

by all4tookie on Jun 17, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and I'm on the northside too

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have no friggin' idea.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But what if I told you Ron Santo seemed really sad.

Because I know that always puts me in a good mood.

I have a very, umm...photographic brain. A lot like Ansel Adams but in color and with a lot more, uh.....insertion and pubic hair.

by Tackle Box on Jun 17, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oooh good call

one of my fav’s

wonder if RB has checked aesop rock or el-p, they would seem to be up his alley and 2 of my favorite artists

by FunkeeC on Jun 17, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

those two are amazing, I'm on a big MF Doom kick lately though

atmosphere can be pretty great too

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you heard the new DOOM album?

cant decide how exactly i feel about it

and yea atmosphere is always a good call

Living Legends are probably my other current favorite group, the new G & E album getting lots of love in my ipod currently

by FunkeeC on Jun 17, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not my favorite one

but it was pretty decent. doomtree is the new hiphop label I’ve been into

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do enjoy Brother Ali.

Good stuff.

Aesop rock and el-p both very good, can’t stand Atmosphere.

Love Aceyalone as well.

You can't teach a hammer to love nails.

by the red baron on Jun 17, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i knew i met my future wife

when on my 1st date, we spent about an hour discussing Book of Human Language

by FunkeeC on Jun 17, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

atmosphere is really hit and miss for me

4B - beer baseball bands blog
history tells us again and again how GOB points out the folly of man

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jun 17, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lineup - IMO Not too much to complain about here

1. Schumaker 2B
2. Rasmus CF
3. Pujols 1B
4. Duncan LF
5. Ludwick RF
6. Molina C
7. Thurston 3B
8. Wellemeyer P
9. T.Greene SS

by OCCardsFan on Jun 17, 2009 5:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I like it well enough

Maybe Ludwick in the cleanup hole (even after Duncan’s big night last night, I think he should be either #2 or #5 in the order).

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jun 17, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

lol

Proud sponsor of the Official 2009 StL Cardinal theme song: Reason to Believe

by gocards62 on Jun 17, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No more personal catcher!

"I usually don’t read other peoples sigs." -Cuttah

by Alxfritz on Jun 17, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats not a good thing.

Welley, Perez, and Motte all seem to pitch better to Larue than Molina.

by DriverZn on Jun 17, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

there was no personal catcher.

/straight face.

cardinals are the things with feathers that perch within the soul.

by ilrosso on Jun 17, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's see...

Ludwick in lineup: check
Rasmus in lineup: check
Everything else: can’t keep track of it anymore anyway.
Looks good!

There's no "I" in team. There's also no "I" in "B-g Mac Land".

by mattybobo on Jun 17, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

red baron--

likely as not nobody will see this now, late as I am to the party.

But something to keep in mind for your system is fielding the position as well. Comebackers, infield pop-ups, dribblers & Baltimore Chops, but above all the much-maligned bunt all force the pitcher to get out of the comfort zone and move around. He has to back up plays at the plate, etc. The more runners are getting on, the more of this stuff is happening, further taxing the pitcher physically as well as mentally.

A pitcher who has a really awful follow through, falling off the mound and what not, is IMHO vulnerable to a team that is skilled at bunting and can get several pushed back in the pitcher’s direction, away from the charging 1B & 3B.

by nota bene on Jun 17, 2009 8:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My Experience at the Major League Level

So that my reply to questions about what work I have done for whom and with whom doesn’t get lost in the shuffle, I’ll re-post it here…

During the 2007 season I did some free consulting for a cross checker for the Mets. I looked at 30 or so of his top pitching prospects, including David Kopp. I was bummed the Mets didn’t get Kopp (the Cards took him 2 picks before the Mets were about to take him), but I was glad the Cardinals did. I did some work for the same guy in the early part of the 2008 season, but we parted ways half way through the season when he tried to dramatically increase what he asked of me and never lived up to promises he had made to start paying me for my time. We also don’t see eye to eye when it comes to hitting.

Most people assume my contacts are all with the Cardinals, but most of the people I know are with other organizations.

My highest-level hitting client is a guy named Andres Torres, who is the Giants’ fifth outfielder. What I did with him was help him move from linear (Ichiro) to rotational hitting mechanics, with Pujols as his new model. I helped him understand what Pujols did and why. Andres is a very gifted athlete and has dramatically improved his numbers, and in particular his power numbers. He also had an insane Spring Training. Two days ago he hit a bomb into McCovery Cove in SF.

http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=5064441&c_id=sf

by thepainguy on Jun 18, 2009 10:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
Do the Cardinals need to add another Bullpen arm?
Ozzie_small
VEB Needs a Tagline
Photo_29_small
Rich Hill still has two arms for some reason.
Cardinals_spring_baseball_small
2010: A Baseball Odyssey
Pcb_sunset_web_small
What does the BA Top 100 tell us?

Recent FanPosts

Mizzou_small
VEB Bracket Contest (EDIT: Created)
Veb-adam-yadi-boog_small
Strasburg v. Wainwright - March 14, 2010
St
1985 Don Denkinger bad call photo
74591_missouri_state_small
(Another) Fantasy League
Images_small
Wednesday Morning Fun Fact
Cardinal70-48_small
2010 Cardinal Approval Ratings

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Minnesota Twins outfielders, from left, Brian Dinkelman, Juan Portes, Jason Kubel, Denard Span and Delmon Young joke before starting drills on the first day of full squad workout at baseball spring training in Fort Myers, Fla., Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010.(AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Minnesota Twins, Reaching New Heights

Los Angeles Dodgers Reed Johnson, left, signs autographs for fans before a  a Cactus League spring baseball game against  the Arizona Diamondbacks in Tucson, Ariz., on Saturday, March 13, 2010. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski) +4 updates

Spring Training News & Notes, 3/15: Catching Up With Everyone

Boston College's Mike Sudol, right, is caught by Boston Red Sox shortstop Jose Iglesias while trying to steal second base  in the fourth inning of a baseball spring training game in Fort Myers, Fla., Wednesday, March 3, 2010. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

Blue Jays, Not Yankees, To Sign Adeinis Hechavarria

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Images_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb