Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

The Best Defense

Thank god that my day is Wednesday. Instead of having to try and come up with something illuminative to say about the shit sandwich that was Opening Day, I get to coast along on the wave of good feeling brought about by a pasting of those pesky Pirates of Pittsburgh.

To be frank, the difference between last night's game and Opening Day was nothing short of startling. Last night,  the Cardinals drew eight walks. While Ian Snell was admittedly lacking in the command of his pitches, the Cards' approach against him was the really big factor. Compare that to Opening Day, when the Cardinals, with Joe West and his Disappearing Strikezone of Wonder behind the plate, somehow managed to work only two walks the entire game.

We saw last night what this year's edition of the offense should look like. This team has more than enough firepower to beat up on opposing pitchers, but the real kicker in this lineup should be the near-constant stream of baserunners. We all know what Pujols can do, and as much as it pains me to say it, Chris Duncan brings outstanding on-base skills to the party as well. (I'll be perfectly honest: Chris Duncan bugs me on a really visceral level, the way that Juan Encarnacion used to bug other people. I know the numbers, I really do, but just watching him play the outfield is like pulling eye teeth to me. Because of this, I'm fully aware that I'm often much tougher on him than actually warranted.) Colby Rasmus, possible slow start aside, has proven himself to be a remarkably patient hitter, capable of posting walk rates over 10%. (Even in his lost season last year, Colby still managed to walk in 12.7% of his at-bats.)

 Schumaker appeared to make significant, and real, progress last year in his plate discipline. Maybe he keeps it up, maybe he doesn't, but hey, what can I say? I think Skip is entirely capable of putting up a .350 OBP without too much trouble. I've been a Yadi skeptic for as long as I can remember, not because of Yadi himself, but because I happen to be one of those people who think catcher defense is the most overrated thing since the Rolling Stones. (Seriously, what am I missing with those guys? I loved Her Satanic Majesty's..., but the rest of the catalogue just basically leaves me scratching my head. I flat out don't get it.) However, the fact is, Yadier Molina has put up an OBP over .340 each of the past two years, and all of his numbers are trending in the right direction. Yadi is, in fact, a pretty decent hitter these days. With those five players in the lineup for most of the year, the Cardinals shouldn't have any trouble generating enough runners to score a large number of runs. Add in Ludwick (2007 or 2008 version, take your pick), and Ankiel occasionally taking a pitch or two, and the offense will be a serious strength.

Now, I freely admit that other parts of the order may be a little more shaky. We're all a little unsure as to what Freese is going to give us, and while I'm all kinds of excited to see what Khalil 'Mr. Roboto' Greene is going to do in a Cardinal uniform, the man is not, by any stretch of the imagination, an on-base machine.

Still, it looks to me as if those are probably the only two spots in the lineup that are really going to be question marks. (Well, outside of the occasional La Russa brain storm when he decides to play nothing but backup middle infielders in every spot  on the field, that is.) I don't think any of us would have thought that at the beginning of last year, when we looked around the diamond and saw damned near nothing but question marks.

It might give Dusty Baker the mean reds (like the pun?), to watch a team create this many base-clogging runners, but I have to say, this offense is going to be very, very potent, mark my words.

And yes, I am fully aware that is was one game, against the Pittsburgh Pirates, and Snell had a hell of a time throwing strikes. However, there is a lesson here. When we look at players who depend on high batting averages to get on base vs. those who have good ISO plate discipline numbers, a very powerful rule emerges: those who have to hit their way on base are much more prone to wide variance than those who can draw a walk to get on base as well. There's no such thing as a BABIP number attached to walks. A team that draws free passes at an elevated rate is going to fall under that same axiom.

Of course, they could also go back to their Opening Day approach of hacking at anything and everything, as early and as often as possible. I suppose we'll just have to cross our fingers and hope. (Oh, and not pencil Brendan Ryan into the lineup too very often.)

Finally, I have a question for all of you. We've broken down the great outfield debate a thousand different ways this offseason, to the point that I don't know there's a whole lot more to be said on it either way. Nonetheless, I'm very curious as to the community opinion on this query: You have to trade either Chris Duncan or Rick Ankiel. Which one do you move, and why?

See, I find this interesting because I would lean toward moving Duncan, for reasons I've already stated in this post. However, the more and more I look at the situation, I think the only answer that I can give in good faith is that Ankiel would be the guy I move. Financial reasons, age reasons, positional reasons, offensive reason, I've got 'em all, but I'm not trying to make my own case here. I want to hear your take.

Other stuff:

Alex Eisenberg, the always wonderful mechanics guru of Baseball Intellect and Maple Street Press fame (I'm the one who recruited him for the MSP thing; yay me), has a very nice breakdownof the Cards' maybe-he-is maybe-he-isn't closer candidate, Jason Motte, over at Future Redbirds. Good stuff, as always.

To celebrate Opening Week, I've been interviewing Cardinal fans over at the RFT. I've got two in the can already, including Will Leitch, and two more to do, with the scion of VEB himself, Larry Borowsky, coming up sometime today. I was thrilled with some of the stories I got from the interviewees; I think they're definitely worth a read.

Schlafly beer is now available in Busch Stadium! Oh wonder of wonders! Oh, glorious day! Oh joy unbounded! Oh, no. Think of the damage to my wallet.

I'm planning on doing haikus again for game threads this year, but if anyone has any objections, I'm willing to hear them. I'll probably do them anyway, but if you really don't like them, feel free to let me know. If public opinion is decidedly negative, I may reconsider.

Anyhow, have a nice day, everyone, and just think, there's a baseball game on tonight. All is right with the world.

Comment 502 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sticky Fingers

is one of the great albums of all time. Damn you, RB!

On the offense, I fear there’s going to be a big difference between how we handle RHPs and how we handle southpaws. Greene in the 4 spot is a bad omen. Mather in the minors is a bad omen. I hope I’m wrong — that the distinct difference between the 2 games isn’t really a harbinger of things to come.

As for the haikus
They’re great to read, keep it up
True Cards fans approve

by chuckb on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Haiku fail

He did it right, 5-7-5. I don’t know where you got 5-8-5…

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He did do it right

The “they’re” is one syllable
Haiku are easy!

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I think this lineup is one of the very elite when facing righthanders. More research needed but I’ll be surprised if it isn’t top 5 at end of year OPS vs. righthanders.

On the flip side, I am not sure it is top half against lefties. Outside of Pujols, there’s not much to give a lefty nightmares.

by Merry CRasmus on Apr 8, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

It has

one of the best covers ever, the Andy Warhol-designed zipper cover, but the music contained therein, meh. Everyone tells me they’re great, and it just doesn’t make much sense to me. Weird.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

totally agree

rolling stones are one of the most overrated bands ever, just don’t get it. so formulaic

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

that means you just need one album and your set

I don’t get how they constantly sell out stadiums to this day… but then again, I don’t get the whole U2 thing either

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

I have never seen then live – nor will I. They are walking corpses. That doesn’t diminish the quality of the original early releases. Ditto U2. Some good albums early and a lot of marketing later.

by cdb on Apr 8, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exile on Main Street

admittedly, it’s too long by about half. But the good half is pretty amazing. “All Down The Line” just flat out rocks.

Best song on "Sticky’ for me is “Can’t You Hear Me Knockin’” in which the Stones get all trippy/jazzy toward the end.

In general, I find I like certain songs by the Stones a TON, but a lot of other songs leave me a little meh.

One of these days I’m going to actually post something about the Cards…. Don’t hold yer breaf.

youneverknow

by floodOfLove on Apr 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't bother.

I’ve made a pretty solid career around here by barely talking about baseball. The secret is to announce you’re not going to talk about baseball, give a reason why, and then talk about whatever you want to. Works every time.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

rb actually only watches cricket.

he thinks a slider is some kind of hamburger dish.

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing in this world compares to a properly executed wicket toss.

(No idea if he’s using this correctly or not)

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

heh.

Having lived in Australia for a better part of a decade and a fan of cricket. I don’t know which would be worse protecting the stumps against a spin bowler like warne, or locking in Adam’s curve.

Both would be amazingly hard.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking as someone who LOVED the Rolling Stones

and who drove hundreds of miles to see them in several cities on their ’75 tour, and who thinks Beggars’ Banquet and Let It Bleed are classics . . . I can’t muster up much of an argument for them. I can’t think of the last time I listened to a Stones song.

Between the Beatles, the Stones and the Who, the three giants of the British Invasion, by far the band I listen to most is . . . the Kinks. Their best music has held up extremely well, if you ask me, which you did not.

Red Baron: Your touting of Airborne Toxic Event made me listen again to a cd that I had acquired but overlooked. Now I can’t get it off my iPod. Cheers to you.

by Youneverknow on Apr 8, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

on the Airborne Toxic Event. Fantastic stuff

"Statistics mean nothing to the individual"
"You are what you eat and you clearly went out and devoured a big fat guy"

by jacksonian on Apr 8, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I loves me

some Village Green. Still love the Beatles, though; at least from Revolver on, anyway. The early stuff sucks ass.

It is odd, though, how the Kinks have gotten so much more beloved over time.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

A common, and wrong,

opinion re the “early stuff.” Compare the early stuff to what else was on the radio in 1965, don’t compare it to what you like now.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, this

I don’t know how many times people were young back then have told me things like “when I heard the Beatles for the first time, it was unlike anything I had heard before.” Apparently those people weren’t listening to enough Buddy Holly, but still, they were innovative.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

you guys/gals are making me feel old

my favorite bands are Bush, Tool, & Breaking Benjamin followed by any 80’s power ballad

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I'm only talking in terms of what people have told me

I kind of messed up my first sentence, it was supposed to say “people who were young back then have told me…”
Don’t worry, not that young. I’m only 24.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

24? damnit you are still a kid!

i’d do almost anything to be 24 again

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

19

Do I win as the youngest?

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Apr 8, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, i'm an ASU student

and you’re not that far off. this is definitely a huge party school.

by Phizzle on Apr 8, 2009 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

my wife went to SIUC

and I definitely would have flunked out of there

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Undergrad: Mizzou; Grad: Tulane

Columbia, MO was a pretty good party spot, but it has nothing on New Orleans.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

meh. the early beatles and stones were mostly doing either literal or figurative

covers of what other bands were doing. the beatles and stones just happened to be the right color.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

And of course it is perfectly natural

that any band of any era is going to reflect the times they lived in, so to talk about “figurative covers” is not really an argument against the Beatles specifically. Second, the number of literal covers the Beatles did was very very small in comparison to their own writings, especially compared to what other bands were doing in 1963. That’s one of the things that made them stand out, fer chrissakes, that they were doing their own material on their own terms.

I can’t and won’t try to argue against your taste, because you have every right in the world to dislike the Beatles, just like I never liked Lou Reed or The Band, and can’t get excited about Radiohead. But to paint them as just another band that got lucky is wrong … and to bring this back to baseball, kind of like painting Pujols as just another ballplayer.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

The whole reason they became huge

is because people realized that the songs they wrote themselves were way better than the “safe” songs they covered.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like the beatles as a whole, i was just replying to your comment that

they needed to be compared to what was playing in 1965.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I'm not comparing it to anything.

I just don’t like it.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Revolver's good but Rubber Soul sucks ass?

Or do you mean the really really early stuff? I love me some Revolver. Possibly my favorite album still. And of course when I was in highschool VH1 went and picked it as the surprise “best album of Rock n’ Roll history” in some countdown which instantly killed any credibility I used to have for liking it so much.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh,

and yeah, that ATE album is pretty remarkable.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll Take The Who

Live at Leeds and Who’s Next

And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.

by tangledbrett on Apr 8, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who - Live at Leeds

“A Quick One, While He’s Away” is one my favorite songs…have to admit I first heard it on the Rushmore soundtrack.

by phesto on Apr 8, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Her man's been gone

For nigh on a year,
he was due home yesterday,
but he ain’t here…..

And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.

by tangledbrett on Apr 8, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

My wife's fave group

She started listening to the Who in the 60’s, as a pre-teen, turned me onto them in the early 80’s. I really like Pete Townshend as a songwriter, along with Elvis Costello and Joni Mitchell. The Kinks are excellent, also; another of my wife’s favorite bands. Couldn’t stand the Stones for a long time, until I heard some of their greatest hits, then they were ok.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Apr 8, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

now the who is someone i can get on board with

Baba O’Riley is one of the greatest songs evar

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd really like to see an outfield next year that includes neither Ankiel

nor Duncan, frankly (assuming that Dunc is gone because he’s been traded for something valuable, like a middle infield prospect or pitching). But if we’re moving only one, I vote for Ank. Three reasons: 1) Dunc is still in the inexpensive part of his career while Ank is about to get expensive; 2) Ank has a special place in TLR’s heart that, I fear, will prevent Tony from ever seeing him or using him in a rational way, e.g., putting him into RF already and giving CF permanently to Raz; and 3) I think Ank is always a heartbeat away from a season-ending injury. (To be fair, I have no illusions about Dunc’s ability to stay healthy either.)

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Ankiel

is worth more to other teams and would garner a larger return. Of course, if Duncan keeps mashing, he might be worth almost as much, especially to an AL team.

Hmm…

I’d move Ankiel. I like both guys, but Ankiel brings home the most and Duncan is still cheap.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

Ankiel would bring a lot back in a trade than Duncan, because even if Dunc starts to rake, nobody is going to give up anything of value for someone has been unhealthy and ineffective in about half of his major league career. That being said, I love Duncan and hope that he continues to rake and we keep him.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

In fairness, ...

I don’t think that Ankiel has been consistent in production or health, either. In addition, Dunc is younger and still cost-controlled. Ankiel is on the verge of being a Boras free agent. If you take away the loyalty factor with the Cardinals, then Boras is going to maximize the cash for his client. Teams know that, and it will diminish the return we get back for him at the deadline.

Ankiel’s ability to match his offense with relatively good defense makes him more valuable, all other things being equal; but, as I’ve stated, all things aren’t equal. At least you could trade Ankiel to another NL team, where that will be more difficult with Duncan.

by etp_stl on Apr 8, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like the idea of moving ank, partially because of the added haul in trading him.

my prejudice is also that tony is going to futz around with who gets time in CF if ankiel remains on the team. clearly colby should take center. obviously, we shouldn’t HAVE to trade somebody in order to make a cogent defensive decision, but i think it would be better if colby was our full-time CF, working with the manager we have.

last, i can just “see” a very nice outfield with ludwick, rasmus, and a split of mather/duncan/barton out in the field. I can see each of them getting good time in and having a role.

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreement

There is enough talent to warrant a platoon in left with duncan and barton/mather. makes the team more potent against lefties, still something that looks to be lacking

"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"

by elirock83 on Apr 8, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd move Ankiel

Correct me if I’m wrong, but Ankiel is a FA after this season and Duncan isn’t, correct? Even if Duncan isn’t the power hitter he was from June 2006 to June 2007, he gets on base more often than Ankiel. He’s probably a more valuable player than Ankiel is, even though I love Rick (I almost said I love Dick right there, but that would have come out the wrong way).

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

i'd trade pujols and move duncan to first

i’d then sign rick to a contract for life, however much money he wants…i mean seriously, he used to be a pitcher and now he’s a hitter…why would we not want him on our team

i keed i keed….trade ank…sorry tony

by VolsnCards5 on Apr 8, 2009 12:43 PM EDT reply actions  

can we trade pujols

in a multi-team deal and get suppan, looper, marquis and miles back? that would be $$.

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Apr 8, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ankiel

looks to be the odd man out to me as well. Rasmus belongs in CF and should hit in the #2 spot in front of Pujols. Ankiel is going to be expensive, has been injury prone, and he is not consistent enough to hit behind Pujols, which is the current need. Ludwick, to me has to be the guy behind Pujols and I cannot understand why he is not. Come on he is the defending silver slugger in RF. He hits a bomb on the first day and gets the bench for the second day. To add insult Greene, who I really like hits clean-up – where is the respect?

This team as it is currently structured needs another star player to hit behind Pujols. That is why they went after Holliday. That is the weak spot and Duncan and Ludwick are adequate but an upgrade at that position would make this team really good.

by Warcard on Apr 8, 2009 12:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Clogging the basepaths
Now, I freely admit that other parts of the order may be a little more shaky. We’re all a little unsure as to what Freese is going to give us…

I was incredibly pleased with David Freese’s pinch-hit AB last night where he drew a walk. In his first ever AB, Freese took a called strike, a ball, then fouled off an low and inside pitch, laid off a ball down, and then weakly grounded a changeup to SS. In his second AB, he swung at the first three pitches he saw in his first AB, took a ball, then popped out to RF, a poorly struck ball by a defensive swing that scored a run only by the grace of God giving Joe Thurston wheels. Last night, he just looked much calmer and more locked in, laying off bad pitches and drawing a base-on-balls.

FanGraphs doesn’t have his AAA numbers. What type of a walk rate did he have last season?

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 12:44 PM EDT reply actions  

i was similarly impressed w/ Freese's walk last night

I hope he gets an actual chance to play consistently. I’d much rather see him than Thurston/Barden, and I think it’s fairly obvious that most of you agree w/ me in that respect.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barden

He should be sent down to Memphis today. His bat is nonexistent and he has little experience at 3B. His skill set is redundant to Ryan’s. It makes no sense to have Barden on this club. His pathetic flailing at the plate Opening Day only further cemented this reality in my mind.

TLR should play Freese regularly for his defense alone. Thurston nearly got Pujols plowed into last night with a Schumackevelian throw. It’s bad enough that our second baseman puts our franchise cornerstone in danger with every throw. Why double those odds with a third baseman who has never played third base? It makes absolutely no sense.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

I see no reason for Barden except that he is RH and can play 2nd base/SS. There is no reason to have him & B.Ryan on the same roster (But I think I prefer Barden to Ryan). I assume that one of them will be sent down once Mather starts hitting in AAA, though. Isn’t that the most logical move?

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I too prefer Barden to Ryan...

he’s the better hitter and 3B. Problem is Ryan is out of options and would have to go through waivers to be sent down. I feel it may be time to take that risk, as I don’t think we could get much in a trade for Brendan.

Sometimes I wonder,
"Why is that frisbee getting bigger?"

...and then it hits me!!

by cardzfanbub on Apr 8, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barden/Ryan

One or the other. Whomever is irrelevant to me. They are that duplicative, in my mind.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I forgot Ryan was out of options

I may not be seeing his worth rationally because of how much he pissed me off on Opening Day. I just hate it when a leadoff hitter is impatient as he is. Grounding out on the first pitch of the season just infuriates me.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought Barden was primarily a 3B in the minors, at least up to a point?

And that he made some sort of selection as the best defensive 3B once. I could be conflating more than one player in my head though.
That said, if Freese beat out Mather then damnit, he should be our starting thirdbaseman and actually start. Thurston does not ever belong at 3B unless it’s a really weird substitution situation.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

And to his credit, he's at least put up quite a few .800+ OPS years in the minors

But it’s not like he’s a 21 year old shortstop prospect doing that in his first AAA stint or something. Still, if Freese doesn’t begin to get more starts than Slur-it and Thursty I’ll eat my hat.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I enjoyed "Thursty," also

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't take credit for either

Slur-it might have come from one of the main posters… can’t recall.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

DanUp

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was a brilliant stroke.

Also, Applesauce is really catching on I think. My mom, a pediatrician, said her baseball-fan colleague used it the other day.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

who came up with Applesauce?

please don’t tell me it was GDM

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Apr 8, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

and what if it was?

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it was

does it offend your tender sensibilities? j/k

I don’t like that nickname that much personally, but it works I guess. I like the simplified version, ’sauce, better

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

if i weren't so lazy, i'd dig up some of your quotes about not judging somebody (in that case

motte) by one game from earlier this week.

give him a chance. like ryan, he wanted to impress on his first game of the year with the club. i agree their skillsets are comparable, but don’t judge on a couple swings.

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some of mine?

“One game a season does not make,” is one of favorites. I don’t see a reason for Ryan and Barden on the big league roster. Especially, when we could have Barton or Mather on the roster instead, who are more valuable (particularly Barton who could play LF and leadoff vs. lefties). I watched Team USA Olympic games online solely to watch Brian Barden. I don’t want to give the impression that I am doing that. I’ve also watched him play for Memphis a few times and had his stat page bookmarked last season.

Again, remove either Ryan or Barden. They have redundant skill sets.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't believe I missed that. Awesomeness.

Is it better for Schumakiavelli to be loved, or feared?

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Feared

he agrees with The Prince, and his namesake.

by Toddius on Apr 8, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

perfect

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

A definite improvement

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Feared

If we love him we will hurt him, or something like that. We don’t want to hurt him.

by ajo080s on Apr 8, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

His ISO OBP

2006: 78
2007: 98
2008: 55

Thank you, Baseball-Reference.com.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mr. Freese

walked in 7.6% of his at-bats at Memphis last season.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the information, RB

PAs or ABs? I guess I’ve never calculated a walk rate myself, thanks to FanGraphs.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whoops.

Plate appearances, rather.

I have a bad habit of using those two terms interchangeably.

And I didn’t calculate them myself, I just got them from First Inning.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Refresh my memory...

ABs are basically the subset of PAs that count towards calculating BA, right? Baseball=alphabet soup.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup.

At bats are:

total plate appearances

minus

walks, hit by pitches (I believe), sacrifice flies, sac bunts, and I think there may be one other thing I’m missing, but damned if I know what it is.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes..

AB’s = PA’s – BB’s – HBP – Sac’s.

Sometimes I wonder,
"Why is that frisbee getting bigger?"

...and then it hits me!!

by cardzfanbub on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Too fast for you, Bub!

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

too much commenting going on...

the screen is jumping all over the place, and I can’t keep up with posting or reading.

Sometimes I wonder,
"Why is that frisbee getting bigger?"

...and then it hits me!!

by cardzfanbub on Apr 8, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

i know

this is really debilitating when you’re trying to study for law school exams

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is on VEB...

that you’re studying for law school?

I keed!! Seems like I’m always on here when I’m supposed be doing homework/real work.

Sometimes I wonder,
"Why is that frisbee getting bigger?"

...and then it hits me!!

by cardzfanbub on Apr 8, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right

Someone, long ago, probably a member of the Baseball Writers A.A., decided that the number of plate appearances doesn’t matter, only the number of times you try to hit the ball. So, they developed a system of measuring batting average, where everything not a hit or an out is not counted as an at-bat. If you wrap your mind around this, you recognize how truly revolutionary using OBP is.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

nice

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another dimension

The fact they built-in “manufacturing runs” (or, “playing the right way,” if you will) by also subtracting sacrifices from “at-bats.” This way, a player is not punished in his batting average by sacrificing himself to advance a runner.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

In fact, if you look at an expected runs chart, most have a negative offensive value. There are a few, select situations when managers should utilize the sac bunt.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

in praise of the sac bunt --

when you are kyle lohse or joel pineiro, and your lifetime BA is like .083, i think the sac bunt has a role.

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

It absolutely does have a role

That role is just a lot smaller than most of the commentators would accept. Have you noticed how seemingly without fail whenever a players lays down a sac bunt—whoever that player is and whatever the situation is—the announcers will praise the manager for “manufacturing runs”? Here’s a good article on the matter that goes beyond ERTs in its analysis.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

The one problem with run expectancy

is that it is context neutral. Late in close games, if you have a high average hitter up next, moving a runner to second raises the run expectancy slightly, but enough to be statistically significant.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The negative offensive value of a Lohse sac bunt is still smaller than the negative offensive value of a purely unproductive out.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right

If you have a horrendous pitcher at the bat, then it is probably a better move to bunt that pitcher.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

my favorite Pineiro at-bat

last year against U. Jimenez, 2 on, 2 out. First pitch flies inside and hits Joel on the arm…but he swung at it, so strike 1. It’s hard to look any worse at the plate than he did on that play. Next, quickly 0-2, and he then proceeds to foul off 4 or 5 pitches, work the count full and eventually rip one down the line for a 2-run double. awesome.

by phesto on Apr 8, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

with his eyes closed

you left out the best part!

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Apr 8, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is interesting...

An article by F.C. Lane in the March 1917 article of “Baseball Magazine”, titled <a href="http://www.geocities.com/cyrilmorong@sbcglobal.net/LaneBaseonBalls.htm" target="new">The Base on Balls: Why Should the Records Ignore This Powerful Factor in Brainy Baseball?

I found it randomly in the interwebs recently, probably linked from Beyond the Boxscore or The Hardball Times or something. Ahead of his time, F.C. Lane was.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crap. SBN doesn't like URLs with e-mail addresses in them apparently.

Don’t click the link, just copy-paste. It’s awesome, and written in old-fashioned-ese

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you just forgot to close your anchor tag.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

UZR-type stats are analogous w/ fielding

Under the range factor/FRAA approach, if it’s not a PO, assist, or error, it does not count. Lichtman and Tango, IMO, deserve lifetime free admission to ballparks everywhere. Vive le Revolution.

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the League of Main Posters should issue a decree

On VEB, we only use PAs. I think that this part of the necessary transition in truly valuing walks.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know,

that’s not a bad idea.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll second and third that motion.

I try to always make myself “think” in PAs instead of ABs.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

And, though I love

Baseball Reference, it bugs me that they list PAs in a separate table from ABs; I wish they were listed side by side.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

his walk rate was solid last season

but very good in years past

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point, I move Ankiel

Mainly for monetary reasons. Ankiel is one of my all-time favorite Cardinals, but in a business sense, it is better to trade him. For one, I think he has more value on the trade market. And two, I don’t think there’s any chance in hell that we sign him in the offseason. (e.g. Boras likes to make money)

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

undecided

But I think Duncan would do better away from his daddy than Ankiel would away from his (figurative). I mean— we broke him, we bought him.

(My metaphors are brutal today. I can’t think of anything else.)

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Apr 8, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Do the White Sox have ANYTHING we want?

They need a centerfielder bad. BADLY I say.

Centerfielders do seem harder to come by this year. I’d rather keep Ankiel (I think, probably ’cause I value defense). But I think he could get more for us in trade, at least later in the year assuming he performs.

OTOH, today God does’nt have me. I think I can get Cards/Cubs tickets in Chicago on 4/18 from a friend.

by sdrone on Apr 8, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Valuing Defense

If you value defense, then, if you kept Ankiel, you’d move him to right field. He’s a good defensive right fielder, but a below average defensive center fielder. Rasmus is far superior defensively in center. No one will probably believe this, but if you go by UZR/150, Ankiel is as good as or worse a center fielder than Duncan is a right fielder (big caveat: small sample size causes Duncan’s UZR/150 to fluctuate widely).

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's almost as if Tony thinks Colby has to prove he can handle LF and RF

before he’ll believe he can play CF. Or maybe it’s just that he thinks Ankiel’s desire to play center trumps what’s best for the defense? Very frustrating.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

or maybe they are showcasing him as a CF?

i hope not, but that’s purely emotional and not business related

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

it may also have something to do with

Rasmus making a few errors in the OF during spring training. That could cloud TLR’s mind.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

and it’s not like that throw last night didn’t settle anything either.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

especially after Dick's throw

i know it was a bad decision, but it was a freakin rope

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

i know it gives the runner on first an extra base

but i love that throw. That’s intimidating to be able to uncork a frozen rope from deep centerfield to 3rd on the fly that quickly….

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

and I liked how thurston played the throw.

the more I see Thurston the more i like him

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Imagine it in RF

You’re right, Ankiel’s arm is one of God’s wonders. It reminded me of this quote from Peter Gammons’s blog:

Question 4: Who had the best arm you saw this spring?

This wasn’t close. Boston’s Daniel Bard got three times as many votes as anyone else. Actually, tied for second were a catcher (Carlos Santana) and an outfielder (Rick Ankiel), although the latter doesn’t qualify as a kid.

I will add that, in Des Moines last season, I saw Rasmus make two laserbeam throws to gun down runners by multiple feet. It was very impressive.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

to me it’s a reminder throw that’s a table setter for the rest of the series (and possibly season).

“yes I had a sports hernia, but I still have a gun. Run at your own risk”

and I absolutely love it.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm. They can put him in center this year

and put him in right next year when Dye is gone.

by sdrone on Apr 8, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1,000,000

the I could still watch him on tv and catch a few games a year. And they are also the only AL team I like

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would actually like them then

I listened to the game yesterday afternoon, it was fun…. plus cubs fans would hate me even more if I started siding with the white sox fans

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's the added fun of liking the sox

I started following them back in the days of the big hurt, ventura, 1-dog, black-jack mcdowell, ect

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

My parents were both south siders

My mother went to parochial school w/ Charles Comiskey’s granddaughter. People wearing Cubs gear are not safe around some my cousins, and I mean that literally.

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

My buddy from college

grew up on 63rd and Naraganzzet (sp?), so i’ve hung out around the south side a few times

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Move Ank

I agree that La Russa and fan sentiment make this a tough move, but I can’t get over all the question marks with Rick. His arm is only slightly less frightening in the outfield than it was on the mound. We know it has a great throw in it, but there is also the distinct possibility of disaster. My stomach churns in a unique way every time he come up firing… in hindsight it certainly makes watching the game more dramatic, but it isn’t good for the team. I haven’t been so impressed with his glove that I’m willing to ignore the mis-throws. Overall I think he’s something of a wild card as a defender. Sometimes great, sometimes bad, ultimately average. He’s hacktastic at the plate and while the numbers are certainly intriguing, I’ve never gotten to the point where I’m glad to see him come up with 2 outs and runners on. And of course there’s the injury risk. Throw in the fact that Duncan is cheaper and we have a fair supply of + defending outfielders and I have to vote for moving Ankiel.

-- Aidan Sonoda
In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas.

by Aidan Sonoda on Apr 8, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

quick thought

Correlate to this discussion, is it possible to calculate the value, in runs, of defense in left field. Then compare the difference between the best and worst left-fielders to determine how much it actually costs a team to put a sub-par defender in a low-value position like left?

Forgive me if this is something I should be able to do myself… I’m not as stat savvy as most.

-- Aidan Sonoda
In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas.

by Aidan Sonoda on Apr 8, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, you might already know this so sorry if it sounds obvious...

but all the value stats seem to make positional adjustments. But I can never remember/get it straight in my head what these adjustments are based on. I’ve always assumed they had to do with the run-value of the defense there, ie how important SS is compared to 2B for run prevention, but it could have to do with difficulty/talent scarcity as well? And now I’ve gone and confused myself so I’ll kindly stop there.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know what though?

You did a fantastic job describing Ank, and I absolutely love the guy for those very same reasons. He brings an Edmondsesque quality to the team. He can play fantastic defense. He can also make horrible throws and decisions. He can hit the ball out of any part of the park. He can also look like a little-leaguer up there too. He is an all-or-nothing guy, and nobody on the team evokes the kind of love-hate relationship that he does.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Apr 8, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he becomes...

the on base machine that Jimmy was I don’t want to see him play for somebody else.

Sometimes I wonder,
"Why is that frisbee getting bigger?"

...and then it hits me!!

by cardzfanbub on Apr 8, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not betting on that,

though if he does it his story, already amazing, gets even more so. Not only making himself a hitter, but then afterwards making himself a different kind of hitter.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bet he gets nothing but better as a hitter for the next few years.

This is still a guy that has precious few at-bats in his major league life. I’m willing to wager that Colby Rasmus has more PA’s professionally than Rick does.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Apr 8, 2009 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yay Haikus!

I swear I got Schlaflys at games last year. I think the bar right behind homeplate and the Casino Queen PP bar sold them.

I have the same reaction to Duncan. It pains me to watch him, but I can put up with him due to his plate discipline and power.

To be honest about your question, I’d probably look at opportunities to move both of them. You have Jon Jay, Joe Mather, Brian Barton, and even Skip Schumaker available to step in and play outfield. If a team was offering something worthwhile in return, I would move both of them.

The thought that I have is that the season is over. And that everybody in the game; a fan, a coach, a player, a manager, front office, scouts...surrender. They say, "that's enough," especially after a game like this. But then Christmas comes, New Years, contracts are signed, trades are made, free agents are signed; and then baseball, like the rose beneath the April snow will force it's way to the front again. And we'll have the fever once more.
-Jack

by Jack618 on Apr 8, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I like Ankiel and Duncan

better than Jon Jay, Joe Mather, & Brian Barton.

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Do you prefer Ankiel and Duncan

over those guys if it can be Jay, Mather, or Barton PLUS a young starting pitcher or an experienced second baseman?

I’m not saying the team should just dump Ankiel or Duncan to the first team that inquires about them, but if there were good offers for both of them, I’d certainly entertain them.

I think this team is lacking depth at young starting pitching, and while I like Skip, I’m still worried about his defense at the keystone. In my opinion we’d be in a better position going forward if we could turn either of Ank or Dunc into one of those two needs (or both).

The thought that I have is that the season is over. And that everybody in the game; a fan, a coach, a player, a manager, front office, scouts...surrender. They say, "that's enough," especially after a game like this. But then Christmas comes, New Years, contracts are signed, trades are made, free agents are signed; and then baseball, like the rose beneath the April snow will force it's way to the front again. And we'll have the fever once more.
-Jack

by Jack618 on Apr 8, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possibly for a good SP

but I’m not as much into possibilities as I am results, admittedly irrational, but my driving force nonetheless

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

There were a couple of places

that you could find Schlafly, even last year, but there are about seven or eight places this season, rather than one or two. It’s certainly progress.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's good to know.

I hated having to walk halfway across the stadium to get it when I got tired of the same old AB domestics.

Actually the news may have made my day.

The thought that I have is that the season is over. And that everybody in the game; a fan, a coach, a player, a manager, front office, scouts...surrender. They say, "that's enough," especially after a game like this. But then Christmas comes, New Years, contracts are signed, trades are made, free agents are signed; and then baseball, like the rose beneath the April snow will force it's way to the front again. And we'll have the fever once more.
-Jack

by Jack618 on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is awesome

I just finished my last Scotch Ale the other day… colon open parenthesis.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Schlafly makes a scotch ale?

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

I like it, but I like almost everything of theirs that I’ve tried.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

You have to move Ank.....

Assuming we aren’t going to be able to afford him next year.

And idealy, Duncan doesn’t start, at least not full time, in the OF next year. Rasmus and Ludwick do, and somebody else, with Duncan getting 4th OF starts, being the power bat off the bench, and backing up 1B.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Apr 8, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree with you

but I just don’t that’s going to happen. As long as Tony is the coach, Chris is going to be a starting OF going forward. For most teams, that wouldn’t be a bad thing but for this team, we’ve got some really great young OF’ers waiting to get their shot.

by Hardcore Legend on Apr 8, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

While I'd prefer to keep Duncan as a reserve....

If he swings the bat like he is capable of, and keeps making the plays he should in LF, I don’t have a huge problem with him starting. Behind AP, Duncan probably has the most power on the team.

Guess we’ll just have to see how it all plays out.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Apr 8, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't mind him starting against righties

Which does end up being the majority of games. That would permit Barton, Mathur or Jay (if he has a breakout year) to be the platoon partner.

I love Ank but if he could help us upgrade elsewhere on the field I think you have to do it.

by birdo rojo on Apr 8, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Ank

I was thinking last night about an outfield of Duncan, Rasmus, Ludwick for some years to come. And I am higher on Duncan than some I guess. He appears to be back at the plate, and to me, though he looks odd at times, he actually does fine in left field. There just isn’t a place for Mr. Ankiel. Trade him for something, whether we can afford him or not, we just don’t need to afford him.

As for the haikus, do what you want, it’s your personality. Seriously, who could possibly be bothered by creative outflow? Also, that kind of thought hopefully detracts some lesser intelect from the board.

by ajo080s on Apr 8, 2009 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Is that a picture of Old Hickory?

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

its does look like him to me

"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"

by elirock83 on Apr 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

My first name and middle name happen to be Andrew Jackson. I thought it was fitting.

by ajo080s on Apr 8, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Positive response to

haikus
Schlafly beer
Aaron’s interviews at RFT
Alex Eisenberg on Motte (the Hoople)
trading (sob) Ankiel

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Who leads off tonight?

Duke is a lefty. Doubt TLR will put Schumaker up there. Maybe Rasmus. Righties on the team right now:

Ryan
Molina
Pujols
Ludwick
Greene
Freese
Barden
LaRue

Sigh. I think we’re going to see BR lead off again tonight.

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions  

please god no BR

He’s the worst possible leadoff hitter we could throw out there. I will be ecstatic if Colby starts leading off against LHPs, but I don’t expect TLR to be that easy on us.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

It isn't too late to send Barden down and call up Barton or Mather.

Wouldn’t Barton be ideal to leadoff vs. lefties? At minimum a .350 on-base performance.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barton would definitely solve the leadoff vs. LHP problem

this line-up seems to have. I’m all for it, but I don’t think it will happen.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

add me to the list

3 &%#(*$&#($&*^ middle infielderson the bench, why? WHY?

"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"

by elirock83 on Apr 8, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does anybody know where to find Barton's spring training stats?

If he was hitting well, can there possible be a justification for him not making the roster over one of the MIFs? It’s just annoying.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He hit pretty well

But for some reason Tony doesn’t like him. It’s a shame, because he would be a great leadoff hitter against lefties.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

having a law degree makes tony smart

being an astronaut makes Barton smart.

Last year, due to Rule 5 keeping Barton up with the team, TLR and Barton often got into long, heated, educational debates, which took away from the game planning and caused to TLR to throw MIFer everywhere in a haphazard order. therefore, to help the team, TLR insisted that Barton play in Memphis

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Eh.

I can fill in the accent in my head just fine. Mo tells me we gotta yute movement. But I really like grits now.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mo does like da yutes

does thurston have both yute and grits?

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think reyes ate his grits.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spring Training stats

Here are the Cardinal’s stats.

Barton was hitting .192/.323./.538 in only 26 at-bats. Not very telling except that he was doing just fine despite not getting many hits.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

See, there's that awesome walk rate

I know, I know, small sample size. But he’s been an ideal leadoff hitter for what, ever?

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

for tonight?

start out with 2 lefties against a lefty?
how about:
Rasmus
Freese
Pujols
Ludwick
Greene
Duncan
Molina
Pitcher
Ryan

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like
Ras
Luddy
El Hombre
Dunc
Freese
Greene
Molina
Pitcher
Ryan

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

that is almost perfect

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

my original thought

but perhaps giving Freese the ’ol fastballs in from of Pujols treatment might unleash his long ball ability

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Figured as much. Just thinking that Luddy may need those as well – considering his on and off spring and then the jolt to cold weather (which with as much work as his body has had to handle, can’t be a great thing).

Let him rest in fastball country until we get to Az in a few days

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's just a list of the righties on the roster

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Apr 8, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you

Wasn’t trying for a lineup right there, just wondering out loud who TLR would slot at the top of the order. Probably going to be a righty, maybe Rasmus, maybe Skip. I’d say the odds are:

Ryan 75%
Rasmus 15%
Schumaker 8%
Barden 2%

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd put Barden higher

I’m guessing Barden at 2B, Freese at third.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I could get behind that

Rasmus would need to lead off and play CF

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's Flipper!

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha

I had a ball on fire in one of mine (because 70mph equals gas)

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think we can assume we won't be able to afford Ank next year...

It’s true Boras likes to get the best for his clients, but sometimes his players tell him to butt out because they want to be someplace in particular. (see Loshe, Kyle). I could see Ank maybe giving an un-Boras-like larger discount to stay with the Cards.

However, with that said, I still think that between Ank and Dunc, we trade Ank for the following reasons:
1) Dunc seems to get on base more often (personal observation… I tried to back it up at fangraphs, but his OBP was historically only a couple points higher in any given year).
2) We’ve still got Dunc on the cheap, whereas with Ank, it’s still alot more even with a discount.
3) We’ve got a cheap replacement player already on the bench who’s played CF for the bulk of his career.
3a) Said cheap replacement player might actually get to play CF.
4) Ank would bring more in a trade.
5) And most importantly – being in a new town/market it would allow Ank to not have to worry about the whole name change thing – he could be Dick right from the start!

by A1R3Z on Apr 8, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I still think teams are evaluating Ankiel

it will depend on his numbers… if he doesn’t do that well, no one is really going to give us much for him. I’d trade Duncan since he’s not an outfielder and he is being played in the outfield here

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep Baby Dunc

I’m as big of a Ank homer as anyone, but between those two (unless the offer was fantastic), I’d keep Dunc.

The easy things to cite are not much difference in power vs what would most likely be a massive difference in OBP, years under team control, cost etc.

Duncan gives us a fairly decent hitter that can spell Albert for 15 games a year and plays a “reasonable” 1B. He’s also short term injury insurance (long term you’d have to think Craig, Wallace would be in the mix). His left field play isn’t as bad as most would make it out to be.

Ank’s in an area of glut. Colby can step in should Ank not be here, Jay can still fill out more and add to the equation, and Mather (when he’s back 100%) can spell days off without much concern.

Right now Dunc is more of a team asset short and long term than Ank, and if Ank doesn’t start taking pitches like he did in ST, personally I’m going to be pissy if he’s not relegated to 4th OF playing time.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:18 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

yeah

but wouldn’t Dunc bring more back in a trade? I think he would… this argument seems like an ages old dilemma, thanks for resurrected it RB!

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know. With that mental offseason we just went through, not sure anyone does. You’d think he would, but it would have to combat what his extra worth would be to us.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

we won't know which one to trade until midseason

and we would really have to convince a team that half a season of Ankiel would be worth much of anything

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

if the pitching holds up

and they are in contention, I don’t see either being traded

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

this whole thing is moot, it would be too big of a gamble to trade away core players

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

we don’t have to convince anyone, we’ve paid for him. He does, and it needs to suit whatever playoff push the (whatever team) needs.

I’m not really even thinking trades at the moment. But if I had to pick who’d I’d keep, it would be Dunc due to the above.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well,

I think we already know what the offers for Duncan would be. One of Lincecum or Cain, plus a prospect or two.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bumgarner?

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bingo.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think I’d be happy with that trade. So I guess it doesn’t qualify as fantastic. Lincecum? Please. This is Duncan we’re talking about.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true.

Like I said, the guy drives me a little crazy; maybe I’m just having a tough time with his true worth.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT, but is this not the best argument for making oquendo tony's replacement?
"I’m not concerned about Skip Schumaker," Pujols said, "because we have one of the best coaches working with him. I can call him the best because I’ve seen guys that come through this organization with bad hands and leave here with Gold Glove hands. That’s what Jose Oquendo does for this ballclub."

Do you think berto is talking about himself and his defensive wanderings all over the diamond – obviously, among others?

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Personally I think that Tony is a bad manager

so I would like to see Oqeundo.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see Oquendo as well

but wouldn’t classify TLR as a “bad manager”

he could do better is all, his genius gets in the way of practicality

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Returns

Everyone appears to be greatly interested in the return on a trade of Duncan and/or Ankiel, but I have to say – I’m doubtful on the return being what everyone appears to think we’ll get (young, inexpensive and eventual, if not one year away, all-star). In today’s new world order of baseball, those kinds of players are only traded away for some of the best talent around (C.C. Sabathia, Johan Santana, etc.).

I will admit however, I am just infatuated with Ankiel’s arm and no matter what team he plays for, will come back time and time again just to see him launch that ball from the warning track to the other side of the field without a bounce or much loft. Too much enjoyment in watching him play the game to have interest in him going anywhere else.

by jomfa on Apr 8, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I think you are correct

maybe if we traded both of them, Duncan as a 1B and Ank as a CF, we would get some talent that would be worth the whole thing

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately

Dunc as a first basemen has little value.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

why?

because he has so little playing time there? or the plethora of 1Bs?

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

1B is a step above DH, it’s very rare for them to be value drivers. But average LF/just below with a decent bat’s value dropped significantly over the offseason too. Which just adds that his value is here, because our return isn’t going to suffice for what he offers us.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

1st baseman as a whole put up a wOBA of around .360 last year

So Duncan would really have to hit well for anyone to trade anything of value for him.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah! Let's call the Cubs!

They covert lefhanded hitters though I’d hate to see them replace their current ground ball machine at first with a better hitter.

by sdrone on Apr 8, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

D-Lee isn't that good a defender anymore

Dunc is probably just as good

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

When was Derrek Lee a good defender?

2003: 0.4 UZR/150 (10th place), gold glove. Teixeira had 11.7.
2005: -3.4 UZR/150 (12th place), gold glove. Morneau had 15.6.
2007: 1.1 UZR/150 (10th place), gold glove. Pujols had 15.7.

He didn’t even crack the Plus/Minus leaderboard lists (10+ players) for 2004-2006, 2005-2007, or 2006-2008. On RZR he’s got an average of .758 from 2004-2008 with a low of .714 and a high of .838 (the only time he cracked .800). Pujols has an AVERAGE of .826 over the same time period with a LOW of .806 and a high of .843.

by astrostl on Apr 8, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

But

he’s taller, so he must be better!

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

what would happen then?

Duncan becomes a card-killer?
Papa Duncan tells cards pitchers how to become Duncan-killers?
Papa Duncan joins the cubs pitching staff, they sign Jeff Weaver, and win the World series?

I don’t like it

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

haiku fun

ankiel is better
duncan cannot catch the ball
crabman for the win

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Apr 8, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

he made a great catch last night

i was sitting behind home plate up near the press box, and when the ball was hit my friend and i both groaned. we thought it was a double for sure, there was no way duncan could get to it.
and then he caught it. i think everyone in the stadium was surprised.

by adiueordie on Apr 8, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

will not take pitches
seemed to do it yesterday
give me mather thanks

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

brendan ryan… uggh
el hombre hit a monster
rasmus is for real

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Apr 8, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreement on ryan
Albert ’09 MVP
hand speed is awesome

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

A site question in haiku

VEB screwed up?
Why no FanPosts? WTF?
Or is it just me?

by BTown Birds fan on Apr 8, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

You can still see fanposts.

Click on the fanposts link at the top.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think btown is referring to the lack thereof

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Apr 8, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

?

they are still showing up on the side of the main posts and if you want to acces them from the home page you just click the fanpost tab.

Chuck Norris doesn't need a bat.

he just roundhouse kicks the ball out of the park.

by bearcatcardfan on Apr 8, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are they not supposed to be accessible from the main page anymore?

Right now all I see down the right side of the main page, where the most recent FanShots and FanPosts used to be, is solid dark blue. It also looks like something is messed up because when I scroll down to the “Motte gets Apple Jacked” post by DanUp, the white background in the middle of the page disappears and the background across the whole width of the page becomes dark blue. I’d be really surprised if that were intentional, partly because it makes the black text really hard to read.
If the removal of FanPosts from the main page was intentional, I’m not sure why they chose to do that. It’s really handy to have the most recent ones accessible from there.

by BTown Birds fan on Apr 8, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

no the page is messed up

it has been since yesterday, although it doesn’t seem to be messed up for all browsers. It is for Firefox, though.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Google.

Chrome.

(although it can’t run certain things..like ABC’s media player, stuff like that..)

by leefyg on Apr 8, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fine in Opera.

And Opera is awesome, by the way… (this should be in singsong, but I don’t know how to type that)

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I misread your post

They are still showing up for you, but I guess there’s some problem with some browsers.

by BTown Birds fan on Apr 8, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I finally

saw it in Firefox, and holy crap—you guys were not exaggerating. I sent an e-mail to the SBN team, hopefully they’ll get to it soon.

(Incidentally does anybody know if it’s glitched in IE? It looks like the error is in Gecko browsers but not Webkit browsers.)

by DanUpBaby on Apr 8, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

i refuse to use IE ever again, it just won't work on my computers

i was away yesterday but when i got on last night i thought the server crashed or something because the front page is all f’ed up & still is. i was also logged out, which never happens, so i thought maybe i did something. nice to know it’s not just me this time.

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's sounds like the makings of a hell of a weekend in Vegas

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, it's Fear and Loathing in St. Louis

“We were somewhere around Clark Street at the edge of the stadium when the drugs began to take hold.”

by BTown Birds fan on Apr 8, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Duncan's "exploits" in the field can be hard to watch

But he is cheaper and cost controlled for a longer time than Ank.

Pujols dominates
Cardinal haikus are great
Pennant celebrate

by nmstar on Apr 8, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Trade Ankiel

Blasphemy! I hope Ankiel retires a Cardinal.

Put aside his “Cardinal lore” and he’s still more valuable than Duncan. They both have power, you can’t expect either to hit for high average, both will strike out a lot, and both have struggled with injuries.

However, Ankiel gives you defense, speed, and arm strength over Duncan. I still say it’s a conflict of interests for Duncan to be on this team with his father coaching, but that’s a topic for another day.

Our outfield is staked! Trade Duncan.

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

Seriously... what were Rich Harden's parents thinking?!?!?!

by stltrav09 on Apr 8, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

well if you want him to retire a cardinal

he best retire at the end of the season

Chuck Norris doesn't need a bat.

he just roundhouse kicks the ball out of the park.

by bearcatcardfan on Apr 8, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess he already did sort of retire as a Cardinal before coming back as an OF.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade which ever you can get the most for

but whatever you do, do it quick!!! So we can make sure and have Ludwick starting everyday!! Benching Ludwick is flat out stupid.

Milt Thompson FTW!

by gossard56 on Apr 8, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

No other team in MLB

would bench a guy in the 2nd game of the season that was coming off a .299/.375/.591 season.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

seriously

Couldn’t believe TLR benched Ludwick.

As for the trade Dunc or Ricky, the question assumes that we’ll have both (and our outfield surplus) forever, but Ricky can walk after this year, and then we’re down to the three. So, the answer, unless we sign Ricky now, is keep Dunc and either trade Ricky or take the picks.

by EasternCardsFan on Apr 8, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

This was my thought yesterday.

I looked back at the AllStar Rosters from last year. I don’t think there is a position player except for someone hurt or perhaps a token player from a bottom feeder who would sit the second game of the season.

Yes, the lineup scored a lot of runs last night. Yes, I want to Colby play. But I really so no reason, no excuse for Luddy sitting the second game of the season. Is he going to be a platoon player? Why?

This just seems like lunacy.

by OCCardsFan on Apr 8, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kosuke Fukudome

didn’t start yesterday.

I get a "D" in common sense ... and an "F" in general helping.

by Tackle Box on Apr 8, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right

I should have mentioned him as well. He seems distinguishable as a “first-half” all-star.

by OCCardsFan on Apr 8, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

A "first-half" "all-star"

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Technically,

all All-Stars are first-half all-stars.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Cubs fans re-he-heally hate Fukudome

I was just over at BCB trying to convince some of them that he is a quality player, but they see no reason!

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gotta admit it was shocking

and a little dissapointing, him and albert should be in the line up every day.

"Chuck Norris CAN divide by zero"

by elirock83 on Apr 8, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

TLR was playing the platoon

Lefties his .301 against Snell last season. So, TLR started every LHB he could. This is why Thursty started at third over Freese and Duncan & Rasmus in the OF over Ludwick. I have to admit that it worked pretty well, wouldn’t you? (And I was as annoyed as anyone with the lineup when it was announced.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the worst thing TLR does all season

is sub in Duncan for Ludwick when playing against a RHP that gets shelled by lefties, then I’m ok.

I still don’t like Duncan (or Schu) starting against lefties though.

by Willie McGee's Twin on Apr 8, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

totally agree with this...

I think people may be overvaluing Ankiel in here. He’s a decent player, but I would think Duncan to an AL team might have more appeal. The guy can mash, but his defense causes me to seize uncontrollably. Bottom line though is which ever one brings us the most back, is who should be traded.

by Cardsfan25 on Apr 8, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

right or wrong

it seemed to work out in the end. (see duncan HR)

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that it worked out

But there is still no reason for Ludwick to sit. Ever. (Unless he’s slumping badly, but in the 2nd game of the season? No)

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

and it’s not like we don’t have plenty of games in the next month to make up for an early day off.

I don’t think people really get how much of a toll that cold weather is going to take on Luddy’s hip. 162 games, sitting the second one isn’t that big of a deal. It actually sets him up to have quite a few games in a row since a road trip to Chase is right around the corner.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

and personally if he’s going to have a day off, I’d much rather it be against Pitt than I would against Houston (next), Az at Chase (after) or Wrigley.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haikus!!!

Please trade Dick Ankiel
If it’s between him or Dunc
Rasmus is a star

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Apr 8, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

It is Ankiel and it is not even close

We have Duncan under control to at least 2011 and Ankiel is gone after this year. Last year Ankiel didn’t even qualify as a Type B FA under Elias but it is not unthinkable he could finish as a Type A. Ludwick finished as a Type A with one great season.

So a trade of Ankiel would have to be worth more than a supplement pick and possibly a first round pick also. He has also much more value as a CFer than a corner OFer. It is a lot safer to offer arbitration to a CFer than a corner OFer due to scarcity.

I still have a strong feeling that Ankiel will be a Yankee next season. So would Ankiel for Phil Hughes seems to make a lot of sense. Cause we seem to be missing someone in our minor league system that has high enough upside to be a #2 or #1 starter.

If Ankiel is on a massive power ride which I expect due to a contract year the only way I would trade him would be for someone with high upside as a starter and no one else.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Apr 8, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Ank, Bart, Bleed

Ank has to go because of salary and obvious replacement…

Barton should replace Miles…

Let It Bleed is the Stones’ best album, and the first song, Gimme Shelter, may be the greatest rock song of the twentieth century…

by SLOKev6 on Apr 8, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

+1 on Let it Bleed

Forgot about that one. When the backup singer takes over on “Gimme..”, that is an absolutely electrifying moment. “Live with Me” is really great too.

youneverknow

by floodOfLove on Apr 8, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

New Giants advertising slogan: "Let's play with balls of fire"

When I saw this ad, my initial thought was that it had to be fake. Surely they couldn’t be so totally oblivious to the more…um…prurient interpretations? But apparently it’s real.

by BTown Birds fan on Apr 8, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions  

CSN Bay Area runs and ad

in which this ugly bar wench waits on these men and begins to talk sports. The more and more she speaks, the hotter she gets. Finally, by the end of the commercial, she’s a smoking hot babe…only to yell something out to the bartender and return to her ugliness.

They’re edgy on the Left Coast, I tell ya!

by Hardcore Legend on Apr 8, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you and I

need to get rip roaring drunk and listen to Exile on vinyl. I swear you’ll get it.

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Apr 8, 2009 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh, no. No no no.

That’s how I ended up with all of those Alice In Chains tee shirts. Never again.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of Alice in Chians

I once caught a Saxophone at a Jerry Cantrell/Metallica concert.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Apr 8, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like a foul ball?

But it was a sax?

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Apr 8, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

awesome. bela sat behind me once on a radio-miked banjo.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 9, 2009 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sympathy for the Devil?

Under My Thumb? You Can’t Always Get What You Want?

C’mon, RB, these are classics!

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 3:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Paint it black, I am waiting, Let's spend the night together

I actually think they are maybe a tad overrated, but I totally get why they’re so enormous.
Gotta give RB credit for taking a bold unpopular stance. I for one can never get into Pink Floyd and think they’re very boring. I tend to think Radiohead is overrated too. This would probably get my killed if it weren’t for internet anonymity.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

death to you! internet fatwa!

“electioneering”!?! the band who produced “electioneering” is overrated?!!? bah.

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You had me at "internet fatwa"

Man this board has some funny people.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

funny, nothing, man! i've got an angry mob of hipsters out hear burning your

(internet) image in the street. it’s ugly.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

*here

spelling fail. see how angry you made me.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh. If an angry mob ever burns an effigy of me I'll consider it an accomplishment.

I mean, it’s not like I think they’re bad or talentless. They’re just one of those bands that people, especially some good friends of mine, seem to worship and I don’t understand it. I could never enjoy them for periods of time long enough to actually want to listen to more of their music.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

admittedly, the other half of the mob of hipsters

says you’re right and wants me to listen to this new hungarian electro-country band they’ve just discovered.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

That band probably exists

One time I thought I had invented a funny genre, glam emo (glemo or glammo for short). Then a friend of mine pointed out that what I had thought I invented was actually My Chemical Romance. I cried.

by mattybobo on Apr 8, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i think that was david bowie for a week in 1983, actually.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is AWESOME...

So sometimes I do the same thing. I have some friends who are REALLY into indie stuff and are always clamoring on about all these bands that no one has ever heard of.

So I was driving with a co-worker and she was going on about her affinity for all-things-indie when I asked her (as I looked at random things on the road and in the car) the following:

“Do you like Science [saw a biology textbook) of the Trees [saw some trees on the side of the road]?” She proceeded to eat it up and tell me how great this made-up band was. I called her on it. She was embarrassed.

A few weeks later, she sends me an effin’ link to some crap band by the same name.

On a related note, if you haven’t seen this, check it out:
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/01/30/40-indie-music/

by goodymobb on Apr 8, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're the kaizer soze of indie rock!

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Flagged.

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Apr 8, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pop in OK Computer

and drive around on a rainy day. You will get it.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disagree.

The Bends is driving on a rainy day. OK Computer is being strapped down by a CIA agent getting ready to drill out your forehead. On a rainy day.

Then again, No Surprises may be the single prettiest song I’ve ever heard.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

See

I like The Bends when it’s sunny.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

Wow, that’s weird. Something about Fake Plastic Trees or High and Dry just seems to cancel out sunlight to me.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe I just

like the juxtaposition.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough.

Do you also enjoy Joy Division’s Eternal at wedding receptions?

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Awesome.

You know, I’ve always desperately wanted to deejay someone’s wedding reception, and just totally destroy the thing with all the wrong music. Maybe some Richard and Linda Thompson, toss on Suicide’s first record, stuff like that.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would totally do that

but i doubt the crowd would let me get pasted two or three songs

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

100 years by the cure for the spotlight dance.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweet.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

We had some

darker music at our reception. The playlist was Cure-heavy and included some odd choices, like Nothing Compares 2 U.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

My wedding party walked out to Michael Jackson: Thriller

and entered with 1 white glove, a spin, and a brief moon walk

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

For real?

Like the YouTube videos?

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

If i had it on video

it would be my first ever youtube posting

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

it was an October wedding

and a combination of people expecting something crazy and shock didn’t allow for shit-giving. overall i think people walked away impressed (tooting own horn alert)

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I meant

you didn’t get THAT shit on video. Sorry.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing Compares...

That’s very nice. I’ve always loved that song, no matter how crazy Ms. O’Connor turned out to be.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

You remember it was written for her

by (&^%&^%), or whatever Prince is calling himself these days.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Apr 8, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

i totally agree Red

especially on Fake Plastic Trees

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I got 100%

on rockband vocals for Creep on medium. I have no voice whatsoever, but the booze enabled me to put on one hell of a high note performance…your so fuckin’ special

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That

is impressive.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

did you guys like Thom Yorke's solo album?

“The Eraser” was a fantastic track, but the album as a whole was nothing special, imo

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like it.

“Black Swan” is good, too.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not too bad.

But Kid A was basically the same record, only better.

There are a couple of pretty great tracks on Eraser, though. And it has grown on me over time.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's funny you say that

I was just looking on Amazon and their review says many fans call it “Kid B” for that very reason.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

amnesiac.

in the snow.
driving.
in the dark.
alone.

did that this winter. awesome.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Amnesiac.

Most Radiohead people I talk to scoff at Amnesiac.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

amnesiac is awesome

pyramid song, knives out, you and whose army?

by adiueordie on Apr 8, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

packt like sardines.

it has its place. it’s not listenable like many of them. that’s why it’s great in the car as a stream on a long drive. it kind of rolls over you. you absorb it more than listening to it.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wolf on the Door

is a ridiculously amazing song, along with We Drink Young Blood. Overall, though, I was a little underwhelmed by Thief.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gimme Shelter!

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 8, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know,

it’s funny, but the more songs everyone lists, the more songs I realise I probably do like from the Stones. Maybe it’s just early Stones that I hate. Satisfaction, is, in my ever so unhumble opinion, the single most irritating song in the history or mankind. Ditto Street Fighting Man and Jumping Jack Flash. Oh, and Gimme Shelter? Awesome on Rock Band, awful on the radio.

Sorry.

But Under My Thumb? That is a really good song. And yes, Sympathy for the Devil is ridiculously awesome.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Joe Piscopo's Frank Sinatra

imitation, doing a medley of songs, including Under My Thumb, is absolutely hilarious.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Apr 8, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

angelique kidjo has a phenomenal cover of "gimme shelter".

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Devo

has an interesting cover of “Satisfaction”, in case you’re looking to fill your second-most irritating song spot.

by phesto on Apr 8, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Much prefer Devo’s version.

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Apr 8, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah dude

Satisfaction is great. That guitar lick, though simple, is great for the song. “He can’t be a man ‘cause he doesn’t smoke, the same cigarettes as me.”

Incidentally, Don McLean saw the Stones do Under My Thumb live in California one time, and at that concert the security guards beat a fan to death. The lyrics in the fifth verse of American Pie reflect that.

Also, American Pie is an awesome song. Reading up on what he means with all the lyrics makes it even better.

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Altamont!

/shiver

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Apr 8, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Phillies about to get swept

reminds me of the beginning of 07 when we got swept by the Mets to start the season after winning the WS.

MyBrute - Where tiny gladiators rule the internets

by dcfcblues on Apr 8, 2009 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  

but hamels didn't

Chuck Norris doesn't need a bat.

he just roundhouse kicks the ball out of the park.

by bearcatcardfan on Apr 8, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

good stuff as usual Red

i say trade Dunk. for all the obvious reasons. but as long as Dick is a Cardinal, he’s the CF. so his presence is also a hindrance to one Colby Rasmus. both guys are in their own little way making it hard for Colby to be the star many of us hope he will be. so i don’t really know what to do.

just read your piece with Will. i think it’s cute he feels he thinks he’s bad luck for the team. 25-30? i can only dream of being that lucky.

oh & damn the haters, keep the haikus

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought of asking

you for an interview, but considering your Cardinals-related record, I was afraid I would get fired, or the offices would burn down, immediately afterward.

If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it.

by the red baron on Apr 8, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

and a swarm of locuts & frogs would have taken over the city

and fire would rain down from the heavens.

so yes, you made the right call

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

if you substitute shuttle disaster debris for fire

that pretty much sounds like east Texas.

That’s A Winner was good stuff and you’d make a good interview, I’ll bet (ducks, looks for emergency exit)

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank you, but i'm no william f leach

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do greatly admire

The way he kept his composure on the Costas show when arch-jackass Buzz Bissinger went after him. But hey, he’ll never match your avatar

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

my avartar is all adiuerodie's

i am merely lucky enough to be able to use it.

and yes, will handled buzz a lot better than i would have. if it were me, buzz would have found out what it’s like to have a chair broken over his head.

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

is anybody gonna throw a baseball?

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I might get in trouble for that while sitting in the office

listening to the diamondbacks vs rockies, gave up on the braves phils game, braves seem to be dominating them

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'm spoiled. i wait all winter, now i expect baseball on demand.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

the braves really blew that game… their bullpen makes ours look amazing

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

WTF!!!! I didn't do that....

I haven’t picked a ball and glove up since college

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on Apr 8, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm thinking about buying a glove

to play catch down by the lake

“lakeside park, willows in the breeze, lakeside park, so many memories”

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

tonight's lineup

Rasmus Leads off with Khalil in the 2-hole. Ryan starts at 2B against the lefty, and Studwick is back at Cleanup

The Cardinals’ batting order:

1. Rasmus, LF

2. Greene, SS

3. Pujols, 1B

4. Ludwick, RF

5. Molina, C

6. Ankiel, CF

7. Freese, 3B

8. Wellemeyer, P

9. Ryan, 2B

Stupid Sexy Flanders!!!

by timmycardinals on Apr 8, 2009 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

nice

i can deal with that….

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

i can live with that

but still Skippy needs to be starting every day if this move is going to work

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d rather him stick to his platoon. There’s plenty of at bats vs RHP on the way.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

good point

I know that Skip doesn’t hit left handers, but Ryan doesn’t really hit anyone. So what’s the difference?

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan plays good D?

If Skip is not going to hit (as he has not done against lefties) then why wedge him into 2B?

by OCCardsFan on Apr 8, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

minus a bad throw

skip made some nice plays and I wouldn’t mind him getting a few extra groundballs against a team like the Pirates (even though they seem to own us)

by STLRegalia on Apr 8, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

He looked good

The nice thing about learning on the job next to Pujols is that when you range to your left, you can go back and to the left just to get anything that gets by el Hombre.

I’d seen him make some nice plays to his right, but last night was the first time I saw him gobble one up to portside.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

for the simple reason

to give him more time at 2b. The more time he gets, presumably, the more comfortable and better he gets.

by bmorgan on Apr 8, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barden does, too

And his AAA days have been more consistently good offensively (unlike Brendan, who was bad last year for Memphis). There are two better options against lefties than Skip, when you combine offense and defense skills.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought so too (about Skip)

but I think Tony has extended ST a bit…auditioning Ryan/Barden/Thurston to see who separates themselves from the pack, then make a move in May/June when either Glaus’ timetable is set and/or Mather or Barton forces his hands

Stupid Sexy Flanders!!!

by timmycardinals on Apr 8, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

also

Skip will play all year in STL, so no rush.

Stupid Sexy Flanders!!!

by timmycardinals on Apr 8, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm. apparently tony thinks we're still dealing with Khalil's springtime twin, Kal-el,

the onbase machine.

in the two slot. okey-doke. lineup makes some sense, otherwise.

btw, i think we totally missed the fact that razza did not show up in the nine slot yesterday, as had been threatened. the leadoff seems like a positive endorsement here.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was hoping above for Ras in the leadoff tonight, but didn’t really expect it. Let’s hope Colby keeps the same approach and just bats, the rest will come.

Don’t mind Greene in the 2 hole with a lineup that doesn’t have Duncan in it. As long as he takes a few pitches and isn’t one pitch hacking.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 8, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

i liked stlregalia's suggestion of freese in the 2 slot earlier.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

As did I

I agree wholeheartedly, Tom. Why is Khalil in the no. 2 slot? He won’t be putting much dinnerware on the table for Pujols, I fear.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Swinging a hot bat.....

Has some power, and will see great pitches in front of AP.

I like it.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Apr 8, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like it

btw, where did you find the lineup?

by phesto on Apr 8, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK Raz, time to start

making your move for permanent leadoff status. How about:

3-3 (2 singles and a triple) in 5 PAs, plus a walk and a HBP which you don’t even acknowledge just to deny the pitcher the satisfaction and establish the first entry in your Grit Index.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 8, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

When's the last time

the Cardinals led off a game with a home run?

I’d like to see that tonight.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Outfield Rotation

I could definitely see a lineup either Thursday or Friday with Duncan/Rasmus/Ludwick as the outfield. Optimally, I would prefer that Ludwick have more of an everyday presence, but a simple rotation of who gets the off-day would be a respectable timeshare, giving opportunities for showcasing Ankiel & Duncan for potential suitors (including AB’s versus left-handers in the hopes of improvement), while essentially handing Rasmus a “starting” gig from Day One.

Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - anon.

by Solanus on Apr 8, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Swithc Yadi and Freese

and I like it more, but that’ll work.

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Apr 8, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yadi did hit a 3b and HR yesterday though...

Not that I think you’re wrong, I’m just stating the opposing ideas logic.

by TheBirds on Apr 8, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yadi getting a triple =

an outfielder lying on the ground?

There was Gibson in the Reds' dugout, visibly manhandling about three Reds and tossing them bodily out of the dugout and onto the field...He was the toughest athlete mentally I ever saw, and the greatest competitor. JACK BUCK

by ISawGodInGibby'sRightArm on Apr 8, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It kicked around in that

weird RF corner and then the throw to third was low and missed.

by spants on Apr 8, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love it....

Rasmus, Freese, Ludwick, same lineup….finally!

Last nights lineup wasn’t that bad, but really I think Snell was going to get crushed by any combination of hitters.

by TheBirds on Apr 8, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweet

So Ryan’s not leading off. Hallelujah! I would only give it some minor tweaking, like getting Greene out of the 2-hole and Molina out of the 5-hole, but hell, I’m just excited about Rasmus leading off and wreaking havoc in front of Pujols.

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Apr 8, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Razzle out of the two-spot

We’ll get to see him stealing bases.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wonderful nugget from Strauss's chat

Apparently, we may soon have two colonels in the clubhouse:

Wellemeyer sponsored Dave Duncan as a Colonel this winter.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Apr 8, 2009 5:20 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought Dave was from Texas

doesn’t seem right. The Colonel implies one

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

changed my mind

Wellemeyer should do whatever he can to keep Duncan happy

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay

As long as he doesn’t make me listen to more Radiohead…too much of a good thing around here

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

The VEBers have missed their baseball!

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Apr 8, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh good

Because I was about to make one there for a second.

by mojowo11 on Apr 8, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've really enjoyed reading through comments today

Everybody is much happier.
Funny how winning does that.

And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.

by tangledbrett on Apr 8, 2009 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

you should go to lookout landing and check out their game thread from last night.

mariners fans officially broke the word “fuck.”

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, then you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 8, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

no can do

As they’d have to change the site’s color scheme.

"There are children who frequent this blog. Angry, insane children." - RB, Opening Day 2009

by random on Apr 8, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

true

plus there’s already enough comments in the game threads as it is!

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Apr 8, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

yeah, I checked it out…pure pandemonium.

by DisplacedCardsFan on Apr 8, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dave was on the radio early today

and had some good stuff to say.

listen here listen hereer’s

BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson

by gdm426 on Apr 8, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Mylanta

that’s a cheesy intro song.

by liam on Apr 8, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

What have you done RB?

Has there ever been an overflow thread on VEB that wasn’t a game thread? You may yet make Blogger Superhero status, or Blogger Supervillain. Never know how these things work out. As for all the music talk I never was a Stones fan, best songs have been overplayed. I just became reacquainted with The Traveling Wilburys. Roy Orbison, Bob Dylan, Tom Petty, George Harrison and Fred Lynn. I wish the Cards could put that kind of talent together,

If you didn’t see it Derrick Gould is doing a new thing called 10@10 and you might want to check out the comments. Some poster dared to post an 11th point. How dare he try to tell DG what points of the day are important. What does he have to back that up, typical P-D poster.

Lastly, how about Tony’s take on the blown Motte save.

“Those weren’t boos there. Lou (Brock) must have been leaving or something,” La Russa said. “Cardinals fans don’t boo. I’ve heard that since I’ve been here.”

La Russa chastised anyone who suggests he would come off Motte as his closer based on a single traumatic outing.

“I’d be real surprised” if fans are expecting a change of closers, La Russa said. “There must be some real (poor) reporting to make fans want to believe that. If fans would believe that then I would blame the media, because they learn so much from you guys.”

Tony made a funny. I thought they where saying Boo-urns.

"Do what you want to the women and children but leave me alone"- George Carlin

by That's a Winner on Apr 8, 2009 7:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Haikus

Love haikus, I do
Please keep them up, red baron
They improve game threads

Life's a river, kid, you gotta go where it takes you.

by KerouacCardinal on Apr 9, 2009 4:32 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cards should...

trade Ankiel. I would honestly like to see A-Rod not return healthy this season, Freese get off to a great start, Glaus comes back strong and the Cards ship Glaus to NY (pay him to waive his ntc) along with Ankiel and Bryan Anderson for Hughes and Cano (Anderson can take over for Posada and Jose Molina).

by Jumsy on Apr 9, 2009 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Fox Blackout Rules


Does anyone know an address to write to Fox Sports to complain about their blackout of Saturday afternoon games—either email or snail mail? I know it probably won’t do any good, but at least I could vent my anger!

by Cards Fan 2008 on Apr 11, 2009 5:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols