Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

Cardinal Prospect Questions / Comments

I went and watched Springfield play against Frisco last week and was surprised by a couple of things and thought I might get some feedback. 

#1.  Jones hit way down in the order and I had heard so much about him that I figured he woIuld be in the top of the order.  Does anyone have any insight as to why he might be hitting 7th?

#2.  I have not heard anything about their catcher (Hill) - he is hitting about .400 and I am wondering what the book is on him.

#3.  Springfield has a some guys hitting in the top of the order that I have not heard anything about.  I am wondering if they are good prospects, etc.

#4.  Wallace did not get any hits but hit a ball against the CF wall in his first at bat.  He made all the plays at 3B but did not have any tough chances. 

Memphis:

#1.  Noticed that Craig is now playing LF since Freese was sent back down.  Has he played there before, etc.

#2.  Jay has cooled off and Mather finally got a couple of hits going 2-4 on Thursday night - maybe that will get him going.

Overall - I don't see anyone knocking the door down to get promoted - I know it is early.

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm headed out the door but quickly. . .

1) He profiles as a top of the order hitter (high OBP, very fast, moderate power) in the big leagues but I wouldn’t read anything into his batting # at Springfield.

2) Hill is someone the Cardinals are converting to catcher if you will. He’ll spend about 1/3rd of this season behind the plate but also at 1st and in LF. I tend to be more pessimistic about his bat than others — some see him as hitting well enough to force his way to the majors, I’m just not sure he’s going to break that offensive threshold for 1st/LF. He’s not a catcher long term for me.

3) Wallace and Hill are middle of the order prospect bats, Jones and Rapoport are top of the order prospect bats (Rapoport is a fringy prospect — think Shane Robinson) and Daniel Descalso is forcing his way into the 2nd base discussion.

4) Was the other team pitching to Wallace? He’s been having a bit of a slump recently but it’s hard to say if he was getting the pujols treatment or not.

1) Craig has played a little outfield previously. The Cardinals prefer Freese’s glove at 3rd and seem to be down on Craig’s defense. He’s got a good bat, imo, so they’ll test it elsewhere. I’d like to see him remain at 3rd though. I’m not a David Freese believer.

2) Jay being left handed is going to be a problem for him especially if Mather picks it up.

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Check out

this site. Az runs it.

Classic underachiever.

by spants on Apr 25, 2009 10:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Follow-up

Nice Robot – Great insight – thanks!

Couple of follow-up thoughts – Jones hit second Friday night and had a couple of hits keeping his average above .350.

Wallace – they did pitch to him but they may have expanded the strike zone – all I could tell was that they got him out. He got a walk off homer on Friday night – maybe he is heating up. After listening to all of the comments I was more interested in seeing him defensively and was unable to get a feel for his defense. Maybe someone else who has seen him play recently can comment on how he is looking. I will say that he does not look mobile enough to play the outfield – 3B seems more realistic because he seems to have good hands, quick reactions, and an accurate arm.

Jay continued his slide Friday while Mather and Craig each got one hit.

Re: Freese – I am no expert on Freese but I do think that Thurston and Barden are doing a great job for the Cards. There may not be a need for a 3B if these guys keep playing – I never thought of them as a long-term solution but they have been very impressive.

by Warcard on Apr 25, 2009 10:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I see Hill as possibly another Matt Stairs

I also see Shane Robinson as more than a fringe prospect , quote from Strauss in his feedback column the other day,

“Joe Strauss: Jon Jay has many advocates within the organization, including several in the major-league clubhouse. Mather’s time may be closest because he is a power-hitting RH bat. Problem is, he’s not hitting as we speak. Shane Robinson is a smurf who can play a larger man’s game: Plus arm, occasional power. Robinson, 24, also has plus speed and may track a fly ball better than anyone in the organization, St. Louis included. He projects as an overachiever. Those who dismiss him as a possible extra outfielder based on his size may be missing something.”

I agree with Strauss

by ridgesee on Apr 25, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

one thing i am sure of

if robinson ever makes it to st louis he’ll be a crowd favorite in no time. Since schumaker has changed the way i view positional adjustments, i’d really like to see sugar shane tried around the infield in the ryan freel mold.

HE SAID WITH A SMIRK

by Dave Barry on Apr 25, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

occasional power

as in once every 12 weeks he might homer?

by erik on Apr 25, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you project someone as an overacheiver

if you project them to do X and they do X than they’re an achiever. If you project them to do X but really expect them to do X+1 aren’t you just being intellectually dishonest.

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get what you are trying to say

but then if somebody does better than anybody projected, he might be considered an over achieiver by some people that try to project how much people will achieve. Me, I don’t try to project what people can or cannot achieve. I just make note of what people are achieving and give credit for it.
I do not take time to surmise whether I’m an intellectual or not but I do try to be honest.

As far as Shane Robinson goes, the scout that signed him obviously thought he had the talent to become a Major leaguer, I’m not going to second guess him. I hope he makes it. I hope he’s another Matty Alou or Nellie Fox.

by ridgesee on Apr 25, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To me,

and I’m being a semantics asshole, I don’t think you can expect some to overacheive becuase that means you expected it in the first place meaning it’s just an acheivement.

In any event, leave it to Strauss to champion one of the non-prospects for our outfield. From TLR’s mouth to Joe’s typing strokes.

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

That Strauss quote really griped your ass, didn’t it. I’ll try to be more considerate next time.

by ridgesee on Apr 25, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I struggle with Strauss.

A lot of time he puts out quality work but ruins things with backhanded remarks that aren’t really related to the topic. He seems like he’s got some axes to grind and I’d rather he just report rather than try and be a columnist.

Future Redbirds - tracking Cardinal prospects for Cardinal Nation

by azruavatar on Apr 25, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why are you so in love

with the home run. Do the Cards really need a HR hitter hitting 1st or 2nd in front of Pujols and Ludwick. Heavy HR clubs have 2nd to 4th as long as I can remember.

This particular Cardinal club is built to have speed, high average hitter in the 1st or 2nd slot……even if it’s an outfielder. I’m not saying that Robinson is that man but I am saying that I’m beginning to think you don’t know as much as I thought you did.

by ridgesee on Apr 25, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ask

the Indians how having a tools-y HR hitter in the 1st slot is working out for them.

Classic underachiever.

by spants on Apr 25, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah

It’s working real good for them. They are tearing up the American League Central. Let’s see they are what? 5 and 12.

by ridgesee on Apr 25, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that has much more to do with the pitching

and c’mon, you would rather have Skip leading off than Sizemore? He has both speed and power coming out of the leadoff spot. Why would you rather have just speed? I would think the reasoning behind having a speedy leadoff hitter is that you can move him into scoring position in the first inning. Sizemore and the like are always in scoring position.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Apr 25, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

Plus, it’s pretty simple. All other things being equal, more power = more runs = more wins.

Classic underachiever.

by spants on Apr 25, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said

I would rather have just speed. I just said you need a good hitter with speed. If you have a power hitter with some speed that is a plus but if he has good power I would first look to see if it would make better sense to hit him 2nd or elsewhere. Obviously, Cleveland has and likes Sizemore leading off. I have no Qualms with that. Oh and yeah, I would rather have Sizemore than Skip leading off but we don’t have Sizemore.

I just say that you don’t have to power to have an effective top of batting order. EX. Brock and Flood -Coleman, Mc Gee

by ridgesee on Apr 26, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not

because Sizemore isn’t doing his job. He’s tearing it up.

Classic underachiever.

by spants on Apr 25, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not so much that anyone's in love with the home run

it’s just that Robinson’s a marginal prospect, at best.

Don’t get me wrong, if he’s as good a defender as advertised he’s probably got a future somewhere as at least a backup in MLB, but his bat really doesn’t profile to put him in the top 5 OF in the Cardinals organisation any time soon. We have a LOT of OF depth, and a lot of guys with everyday-player-potential in the high minors (Jay, Craig, Jones, Mather). Robinson is 25 this year and didn’t dominate AA last year (a solid .891 OPS, got on base well, didn’t walk much), then absolutely stunk in 151 PAs in AAA (0.21 BB/K ratio, .248 OBP, albeit with a really unlucky BABIP, and no power).

It isn’t JUST that Robinson doesn’t really have any HR power to speak of. It’s the fact that:
a) He’s not especially young for the level he’s at, considering he isn’t tearing it up
b) He is a BA-dependent OBP guy who just doesn’t ever take a walk, a contact hitter with no real power to speak of, and that’s generally not a skillset that profiles to do well against better pitchers, i.e. in MLB
c) His numbers so far just aren’t that great. He had a good year in AA last year, then fell down a bit in AAA. He doesn’t walk, doesn’t hit for power, and the jury is firmly out on whether he can do the one thing he’s done in the minors (hit for average) against better pitchers at higher levels.

Shane Robinson is a marginal prospect, I don’t think that’s a particularly controversial statement, and it’s certainly true that there’s a bunch of guys in our already-crowded OF picture who are far more likely to succeed at major league level. I don’t know whether we’re that bothered about having a HR-hitter at the top of the order, but we want a guy who gets on base – we’ve got guys who profile to do that better than Robinson, with more power to boot, and I think that’s the major issue. Robinson, likeable as he is, and I do hope he succeeds, hasn’t (yet) shown anything that is likely to translate with a high % of success to MLB.

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Apr 27, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is?

Why is speed important to “this Cardinal club” in the first two spots? Isn’t OBP THE most important thing when you’re hitting in front of Pujols? Get on base as much as possible so that #5 gets opportunities to drive you in. Why would a running game in front of him be a good thing? So that they can steal second only to see Albert get walked? I’d rather see two guys with Molina’s speed but OBP’s of .380+ in front of Albert than two guys with Robinson’s speed but OBP’s below .320. Obviously that’s an extreme example, but it outlines my overall point.

Robinson has no future with the Cardinals. Absolutely none. He’s Willy Taveras. Fast, decent ball catcher, but he’s going to have to play CF because of his lack of power, he doesn’t have great OBP skills at any stop in the minors, and Rasmus is everything that Robinson is, with the potential of a .400 OBP and a slugging of .475 or better, which Robinson doesn’t have. Robinson is a poor man’s John Jay.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 27, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

except Jay Jon

has shown tremendous defensive ability, as well as decent OBP skills and power.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 27, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

colour me a non-believer

at least thus far, in John Jay. I think he’ll probably make it to the show, eventually, but the fact he bats from the left side and doesn’t have a great deal of power makes me think it won’t be with the Cardinals.

Decent prospect but I think his ceiling is not-much-above average CFer, and we’ve already got a CF who projects much better than that. I dunno if his bat’s going to play in the corners, and I’m not sure his minor league OBP will translate to the majors unless he shows a bit more pop to make pitchers throw him a little more outside the zone. We’ll see.

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Apr 28, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hence

Robinson being a “poor man’s John Jay”, i.e. he’s got a similar skill set but just isn’t as talented.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 28, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

jon jay’s AAA line (2008): .345/.406/.500/.906
shane’s AA line: .352/.396/.496/.891

shane’s line, though marginally worse, was picked up in the Texas league which has an average OPS 40 points lower than the PCL.

i think the jury is still out on their relative prospects.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 28, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ignore that line from jay -- i was reading the lines across wrong.

his sample size from memphis is too small (around 60 PAs).

his 2008 AA line was .306/.379/.457/.836 in 427 PAs at springfield in 08. robinson’s line was 271 PA’s from springfield. robinson actually picked up more PA’s (151) than jay at memphis last year but was not impressive, while jay’s was dramatic. on the other hand, shane is having a great start in memphis this year, and jay’s year is not going so well.

regardless, both of them seem to have pretty comparable stats. jay’s 08 slugging is more HR driven, while robinson hits a lot of doubles.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 28, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think Jay's power may be developing

Robinson simply doesn’t have any.

Regardless, I don’t think either have any future with the MLB Cardinals with all the great OF prospects that we have.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 28, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a .496 slugging percentage isn't "any" power? in one of the toughest leagues?

you may very well be right they have no future with the cards, although i’d like to see mather get his pop back before we sell them off.

ludwick has two more years of arb, and I think dunc has one more, right? so we could have a ludwick/duncan/rasmus OF with mather (hopefully) as a 4th OF/utility guy through 2010 — maybe craig, instead of mather? after 2010, rasmus, one year of luddy (if he’s not too expensive), probably daryl jones.

i can see room for at least one of them as a fifth OF in 2010.

the truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark/ it scares you witless, but in time you see things clear and stark -- macmanus

by tom s. on Apr 28, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

by the way

With the mention of speed, it seems that some people wants to take the narrow minded view that speed means only stealing bases. Getting on base with a single, stealing second and comitting the unforgivable sin of taking the bat out of Sir Albert Pujols hands.

No…No…it means going from 1st to third on a Pujols single. Scoring from 1st on a Pujols double. Breaking up a double play on a ground ball by the 2nd place hitter in front of Pujols and just in case the number 2 hitter and Sir Albert make outs without moving the runner from 1st, he can steal 2nd with 2 out and still get in scoring position for the clean up hitter.

Now that is just the first inning. After the game gets past the first inning, things change. Hitters just become one after another. Then a lot of occassions will arise when a leadoff hitter can steal to get to 2nd place hitter with 2 outs and score a run and extend the inning to Pujols.
In short a number of instances will arise for stealing by 1st and 2nd place hitters without stealing in front of Pujols… And also why do some people want to take narrow minded view that if you mention speed, you must mean some banjo hitter that cant hit, like Willy Tavares. No! No! we mean somebody like Flood, Brock, Mc Gee, Willy Davis, Matty Alou, Richie Ashburn. Which brings me to my mention of Shane Robinson. Yes in my 60 years of following baseball I have seen speed win as much as power. The ideal though is the right combination of both.

I only mentioned Robinson in a previous post because Azru deemed him to be a “fringe” prospect. I think Robinson might possibly be more than that. Now whether he is or not, I don’t know for sure. Whether he will prove to have more value to the Cardinals than Daryl Jones, Jon Jay or Mather, I don’t know but and neither does anybody else posting here. Robinson is small but has talent, and with that he has something to overcome but he might just be a good fit for some team in the future. After all he has hit close and over .400 for extented periods in A, AA, AAA. and has other tools. That to me is more than fringe.

To conclude, it gripes my ass that al lot of people that frequent this blog just can’t seem to show the courtesy to type “in my opinion” or “I think,” rather than from an elite expert “all knowing” viewpoint. ( and this thread is a prime example) Also the use of Molina to make a point about speed was about the silliest I have ever seen.

by ridgesee on Apr 28, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

whoa whoa -- easy there....
No…No…it means going from 1st to third on a Pujols single. Scoring from 1st on a Pujols double. Breaking up a double play on a ground ball by the 2nd place hitter in front of Pujols and just in case the number 2 hitter and Sir Albert make outs without moving the runner from 1st, he can steal 2nd with 2 out and still get in scoring position for the clean up hitter.

You know what has to happen to do all of those things? Being on base in the first place! If your fast but can’t get on base, then what good are you? You’re just thrown out at first base by half a step instead of a full step, or you walk back to the dugout quicker after a strikeout.

No! No! we mean somebody like Flood, Brock, Mc Gee, Willy Davis, Matty Alou, Richie Ashburn. Which brings me to my mention of Shane Robinson. Yes in my 60 years of following baseball I have seen speed win as much as power. The ideal though is the right combination of both.

But Shane Robinson isn’t any of those guys. He’s more like Willy Taveras (Robinson vs. Taveras) — hence the comparison to Willy Taveras instead of Lou Brock.

My main point, which you completely glossed over, is that he has no future with the Cardinals. We have a guy with better on base skills, who plays a better CF, hits for power, and is younger (22 vs. 24) in the big leagues right now. Daryl Jones has the same tools as Robinson, plus better on base ability and power, and he hasn’t reached his potential yet. There’s simply no place for him here.

Also the use of Molina to make a point about speed was about the silliest I have ever seen.

That comment just illustrates that you missed the point entirely and then decided to make a snide remark about it. Being on-base at the top of the lineup in front of your team’s best hitters is The. Most. Important. Thing. If you get on base at a high clip and you happen to be fast (see: Rasmus, Colby or Henderson, Ricky) then you have the makings of a great 1 or 2 hitter. But I’d rather have a .380 OBP Molina, who sees a ton of pitches to boot, in front of Albert than a would a .320 OBP guy who happens to run a 3.4 to first base.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 28, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fourstick

can you even read! I said: I that I didn’t see how Robinson could could be considered no more than a fringe prospect when his record tells me that he could be for the right club. I NEVER in any of my comments said that he should be rated over any of the outfield prospects that the Cards have. I do not favor him over others. I only say he deserves to be considered in the mix untill proven otherwise.
You are without a doubt the most narrow minded person I have ever came across. Obviously you are a frustrated “wanna be GM”
“My main point iwhich you completely grossed over that he has absolutely no future with the Cardinals” My God, you determined that? How arrogant and the sad part is you don’t even realize it.

Who in the Cardinal orginization have you heard say that.. Did you along with a few other hiarchy on this blog determine that? Only you would come along on a 3 day old post and try try to throw your expert advice in anyway. You are the greatest I’ve seen and misstating other’s comments while trying to make yourself look like a tower of knowledge. Snide, you invented it. I’m tired of you misrepresenting what I say and your little lectures. go fly a kite.

by ridgesee on Apr 28, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overreact much?

And are we not allowed to comment or try to create new discussions on 3-day-old posts? If that is stated anywhere, please bring that to our attention. In any case, there is no reason to retort with pointless and insulting remarks. Completely unecessary sir.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 28, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In defense of reading...
This particular Cardinal club is built to have speed, high average hitter in the 1st or 2nd slot

Don’t we already have that? Don’t we also have 2 other OF in the minors who have those skills plus power potential? Why are having an argument about Robinson then?

I didn’t see how Robinson could could be considered no more than a fringe prospect when his record tells me that he could be for the right club.

Why is he a fringe prospect? Perhaps because he doesn’t appear in anyone’s top 20 prospects for the Cardinals. Does that mean he can’t be a major league player? No, it doesn’t, but it does make him a “fringe” prospect. I think that you’re confusing the fact that he could be a useful major league player with that fact that he’s a prospect that nearly every team in the majors has in their minor league system. If you look at the AA and AAA teams for most MLB clubs you’ll find someone with Robinson’s skills, so why would anyone consider those guys to be anything more than “fringe” prospects? Barton had similar skills with a couple of differences (can’t play CF, better OBP, better power) and the Cardinals just traded him for a recently DFA’d reliever, so someone like Robinson really doesn’t have much value.

Yes in my 60 years of following baseball I have seen speed win as much as power.

I used to think this way, but I disagree with it now because it’s been proven sabermetrically that having high OPS guys is more valuable than having high average/speed guys. Yes, the Cardinals of the 80’s were very successful with this strategy of speed and defense, but that was a different era of baseball, and the Cards were beaten regularly in the playoffs by teams built the other way.

I’ve stated everything here as an “opinion”, look at the way I’ve worded things. I’ve put “I’d rather have” in front of the points that I believe to be my opinion. The reason that I don’t put “opinion” qualifiers in front of statements like “OBP is the most important thing in the 1 and 2 spots” is because that’s a fact. It is the most important thing for those lineup spots for the Cardinals because it helps to ensure that Albert will come to the plate with runners on base. It’s been shown time and again to be factual, therefore it’s not an opinion.

Lastly, you don’t know me, so calling me a “wanna-be GM” is pure speculation, and unfounded speculation at that. Arrogance would be me saying that he has no future with the club and not showing evidence as to why I think that way. I provided ample reasons as to why Robinson doesn’t have a good shot at being in the mix for the Cardinal outfield of the future. What’s more, you agree with me! You called me arrogant for pointing out something that you yourself believe to be true: that Robinson really doesn’t have a future with the Cardinals. Just look at your own first statement that I quoted here.

I have yet to misrepresent anything you’ve said. In fact, I use quotes out of your posts to ensure that I am not misrepresenting things. Just because I don’t think he’s much of a prospect doesn’t mean I don’t value speed, it just means that I value things in addition to speed, and Rasmus, Jay, and Jones can all run but they also hit for power, play above average defense, have good plate discipline, and get on base a lot. They have other skills that I don’t feel that Robinson has, and they’re all younger than he is which means he’s further down the development curve than they are.

You have a right to disagree with me, but that doesn’t mean that I can’t state facts to argue my position. The scouting reports that I’ve read, from people far smarter than I (Sickels, BP, BA, Future Redbirds), feel like he’s approaching his ceiling as a player right now, when his MLE numbers would be similar to someone like Willy Taveras or Michael Bourn with fewer steals. I don’t think that’s someone with a future in an organization with a large amount of outfield prospects at it’s disposal.

If you can’t stand people disagreeing with you than you are in the wrong place. There’s plenty of us that disagree with each other on this board, but I enjoy reading other arguments when they’re backed up by facts, stats, and descriptive opinions that are well researched. I’ve learned a lot since becoming a member of this community and it’s changed the way I see the game.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 28, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Who! Ho!

I see you got off line, whipped out your old Microsoft Word and prepared a meticulous document to defend your self, fourstick Must have put a lot of time into it. That’s good; I notice you do that a lot for impression, don’t come up with much “off the cuff” do you? You never give up, do you?
To every one else I apoligize, It’s just Fourstick that gripes me.

by ridgesee on Apr 28, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he was pretty restrained, given your last post

I’m not sure why you’re taking this so personally. It’s a difference of opinion. It happens.

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Apr 29, 2009 6:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Felonius Monk

It’s not that a difference of opinion bothers me, Monk. It’s people that have the habit of making “absolute” statements all the time that bothers me, like kinda’ having an air of superioty or maybe posting for “show”

Now we all have a tendency to do that sometime and I over look it mostly, but from the first time I started visiting this site about 4 years ago, the one person that really bothered me with this was Fourstick and I admit have probably let it become personal.

 Like your 1st post, you started out by saying, “It’s not just that we’re in love with the home run, its just that Shane Robinson is a Marginal prospect at best.” That bugged me a little, but I let it pass. Now I’ve got to ask; how do you know this? Is it because you are a scientist, and you have developed some method; if so clue us in. The kid has hit at all levels and there is a possibility he can hit in the majors if given the chance by some club. He probably won’t make it because of his size and I do notice that he is not playing right now since Freese has gone down. So the orginization may be thinking like you and others that have posted here. Jay has been playing CF. Robinson might have a slight injury though.

Now I have the habit of taking little shots at people in a humorious way on this site sometimes and from time I have to take a shot back for doing it. That’s how I took your post because I had needled Azru a little just before.

by ridgesee on Apr 29, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't post for show

I am a natural contrarian, however, and I think that’s what pisses you off.

I participate because I enjoy it. I’m sorry if it upsets you, but attacking me personally is no way to make your argument seem more credible. Instead of backing up your argument you moved to discredit me by calling me arrogant.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 29, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There have

been times when your tone has been really rude. But honestly, it’s been a long time since I’ve seen you take that tone with people. You just like to argue and debate. Some people don’t like that. To each his/her own.

Classic underachiever.

by spants on Apr 29, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Contrarian,

is that the definition for somebody that likes to beat a dead horse?

by ridgesee on Apr 29, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No. No, it is not.

Fourstick apologized to you (though he really didn’t need to) and you respond with another pointless remark. Enough already. You’ve admitted you don’t like his style of posting and the positions he takes on this blog, and you’ve let it become personal when there is no reason to. If you don’t like Fourstick’s approach and you have been around VEB for 4 years why haven’t you just learned to ignore his comments?

Would you prefer we didn’t put any thought into our posts and just made “off the cuff” comments, that have no substance to them whatsoever, all the time? I for one appreciate those who take the time to research the subjects we are discussing and provide well-thought out responses, even though I may not always agree with them.

And just to let you know, you are the one beating the dead horse by making this meaningless remark. Sheesh, why come along to a 4-day-old post and try try to throw around a worthless post?

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 29, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RunningRedbird

Your point is taken Running Redbird. It was a cheap shot and you are right. Fourstick did not apologize but maybe did attempt somewhat to end with a resolutive remark and I should have been big enough to move on.. but I couldn’t resist to take one more shot at him; that is my shortcoming.

I noted your earlier remark that chastised me for critized Fourstick for posting on a 3 day old post and again of course you are right again. Sure it is all right to post…but to come riding in with a big chastening prepared post I think is a bit tacky and uncalled for. I quite often read old posts and run across someone that was getting a good bit of “flack” from some comment he has made a couple of days ago and I just stay steer clear. Why pile on…Fourstick has done this before to me and others and I don’t like it and I don’t mind saying so

Also, You wouldn’t notice but I do not comment on any of Fourstick’s post. It’s not worth it.

by ridgesee on Apr 29, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're taking this way to personally

I don’t come up with things “off the cuff” because they tend to be emotional arguments and don’t hold a lot of water. I prefer to research my opinion to make sure it’s the correct one that stands up to evidence.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 29, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice reply

This line made me laugh for some reason

Lastly, you don’t know me, so calling me a "wanna-be GM" is pure speculation, and unfounded speculation at that

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 28, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks!

I do enjoy the occasional play on words….

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Apr 29, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"why are you so in love with the home run"

Because it is the single most valuable thing a hitter can do in baseball. Power dwarfs speed any day. Also, in the 1 and 2 spots, you want OBP, OBP and more OBP. The reason being that Pujols and Ludwick hit so many extra base hits, that getting on at a high clip is much more important than being able to steal a bag. You want speed in the 6th or 7th spot, where there are singles hitters behind you instead of power hitters.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 27, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Springfield:

1) I know Jones was hurt and sat out for a couple of games early on, so they might have just been working him back into the lineup. I was at the game last night and he batted in the 2-spot.

2) Hill’s a natural 1st baseman they are starting to convert. He’s the position player (besides Wallace and Jones) I’m going to keep an eye on this season down here.

3) Rappaport has been hitting well so far, but he’s yet another outfielder. He’d have to do something spectacular to stand out IMO. Descalso has looked good so far. Most of the fielders in Spfd I haven’t heard of until this season. Solano’s really the only one and he has been terrible on defense so far.

4) Wallace has been in a mini-slump since Opening Day, but he did hit a walk-off HR last night. His defense has looked OK so far, he tends to bobble the balls hit hard to him when he’s trying to transfer to make the throw. I was at the game with thegodfather and we both agree he seems like he’s going to need a slight attitude adjustment before he gets to the bigs.

As for Memphis, I don’t live there so I don’t see any of the games, so any of my opinions on the players there would just be based off of what I’ve seen them do here in Springfield.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 25, 2009 6:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

OK, when you use

an ominous phrase like “attitude adjustment” I’m going to have to insist that you elaborate on it.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Apr 25, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

It’s kinda hard to explain, but we both thought that he appears to be carrying a sense of entitlement. Like he knows he’s the no. 1 pick and one of the top prospects in the organization and believes he needs to be treated differently because of it. Don’t get me wrong, he deserves all the praise for his offense, as he hit another walk-off HR last night. But he’s far from being a complete Major League ready player. It just seems to me like he’s caring more about getting to Memphis at this point, then he is about improving as a total baseball player. I just think if he tries to carry himself the same way in STL as he has thus far in Spfd guys like Albert and Yadi will be quick to put him in his proper place.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 26, 2009 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Attitude Adjustment

I (as a Coach) would much rather have a player who is very confident in his abilities than one who sulks and reserved when things go bad.

by RDF922 on Apr 27, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying he shouldn't be confident

I’m saying he shouldn’t be arrogant. That’s the way he’s kind of appeared early on and that won’t fly in STL.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 27, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most scouts think that Wallace is major league ready with the bat

It is his defense that still needs work.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on Apr 27, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes. I know.

By saying “he’s far from being a complete Major League ready player” I was referring to his defense. Sorry I didn’t make that clear.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 28, 2009 6:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wallace

certainly got limited opportunity during the spring. Could it be that there was a message behind his lack of opportunity?

by Warcard on Apr 26, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Management

probably went into ST knowing that Wallace’s defense was not going to be Major League ready. So they were more than likely going to focus on giving guy’s like Mather and Freese more of an opportunity to earn a spot and just let Wallace get the experience of a ML ST camp.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...and I'm wanting an Allen Craig call-up!

by RunninRedbird on Apr 26, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta agree with you on the Allen Craig thing

we badly need another right-handed bat. One who can play a bit of LF and 3B would be just gravy.

Because chicks dig the intentional base on balls.

by Felonius_Monk on Apr 27, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

tony said

that his invitation was not one aimed at giving him a chance to make the club. he is obviously not ready yet. they invited him knowing that he will be ready soon and the invitation was one to get him a taste of major league spring training, the opportunity to be around major league players and to learn. he never had a chance coming into spring, and i think that’s okay. if we don’t see him in the expanded roster, we’ll see him next year

by prophetjohn on Apr 26, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Monday night games

are still in progress but several hitters at Springfield continue to get multiple hits while everyone at Memphis seems to be in a slump. Jones, Decalsco, Hill, & Wallace already with multiple hits tonight and the game is ongoing. Hill continues to hit the ball and when I saw him play he really handled himself behind the plate very well.

I know absolutely nothing about 2B Decalsco but he is hitting for average, for power and has a ton of RBI’s and he looked to be a very good defensive player as well. Does anyone know anything about him?

by Warcard on Apr 27, 2009 10:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What I just saw from Memphis

After getting to see two of the last three Memphis games, I came to realize that we are developing 20 third base men, and 20 first base men. Now they are all learning new positions.

Seriously, Freese played above average defense, and made a few very nice plays. Mather is still in a funk, and looked lost at the plate. Jay hit the ball sharply and had one caught on the track. Craig also looked good at the late. Thompson had a Pinero game going, but lost it on ground ball singles.

by Remember Kenny B on Apr 28, 2009 6:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
Do the Cardinals need to add another Bullpen arm?
Ozzie_small
VEB Needs a Tagline
Photo_29_small
Rich Hill still has two arms for some reason.
Cardinals_spring_baseball_small
2010: A Baseball Odyssey
Pcb_sunset_web_small
What does the BA Top 100 tell us?

Recent FanPosts

Mizzou_small
VEB Bracket Contest (EDIT: Created)
Veb-adam-yadi-boog_small
Strasburg v. Wainwright - March 14, 2010
St
1985 Don Denkinger bad call photo
74591_missouri_state_small
(Another) Fantasy League
Images_small
Wednesday Morning Fun Fact
Cardinal70-48_small
2010 Cardinal Approval Ratings

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Minnesota Twins outfielders, from left, Brian Dinkelman, Juan Portes, Jason Kubel, Denard Span and Delmon Young joke before starting drills on the first day of full squad workout at baseball spring training in Fort Myers, Fla., Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010.(AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Minnesota Twins, Reaching New Heights

Los Angeles Dodgers Reed Johnson, left, signs autographs for fans before a  a Cactus League spring baseball game against  the Arizona Diamondbacks in Tucson, Ariz., on Saturday, March 13, 2010. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski) +3 updates

Spring Training News & Notes, 3/15: Catching Up With Everyone

Boston College's Mike Sudol, right, is caught by Boston Red Sox shortstop Jose Iglesias while trying to steal second base  in the fourth inning of a baseball spring training game in Fort Myers, Fla., Wednesday, March 3, 2010. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

Blue Jays, Not Yankees, To Sign Adeinis Hechavarria

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Images_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb