Alex Rodriguez tests positive for steroids
On the 104 player list from 2003, Alex Rodriguez tested positive for 2 different anabolic steroids (per SI.com).
I'm a little worried that a few Cardinals could be on this list. We dodged a big bullet with the Mitchell Report but I don't know that we would be that lucky with this 103 list.
I'm not even sure why this list is being released. This was supposed to be anonymous and some how the Feds are releasing all this information. That shouldn't be.
3 recs |
260 comments
Comments
And Keith Hernandez tests positive for handsomeness
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
classy move, federal government, SI, et al
very nice.
by DanUpBaby on Feb 7, 2009 2:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
MLB made this bed
now they have to lie in it.
by azruavatar on Feb 7, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, the lab they hired to take the tests
made this bed.
When the tests were taken, the ANONYMOUS tests the MLBPA agreed to take to see if drug testing would be needed, the lab labeled the tests with a players first initial and last name.
It doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to figure out who these guys were.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure the lab rats were fools.
But in the larger sense of the steroid scandal (and I really don’t care much who did or didn’t do steroids) MLB is responsible for the way this has unfolded. Selig has bungled this time and time again.
by azruavatar on Feb 7, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
baseball is getting what was coming for turning a blind eye to this abuse. Other leagues were putting in plans while baseball wringed it hands. Selig ranks 3rd, and only because bettman is a complete douche, and his unwillingness to put feet to fire is why the mess baseball is in now. I personally don’t care if a cardinal(s) is on the list. Mcgwire is the big card from the era and we all know he did, i have put it to bed. I’ll be glad when this is all in the rear view mirror, to bad it’ll take another 10 years.
"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"
by elirock83 on Feb 7, 2009 11:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it was Aneury Rodriguez
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
"i’d challenge you to offer me alternatives which would convey the same level of meaning without being even more wordy and verbose."
by baw on Feb 7, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
but the players agreed prior to 2003 to testing that would NEVER be revealed in order to see if mandatory testing was necessary moving forwards and then it got leaked. If it was by the Feds or by MLB and not just some industrious sleuth then there is no reason (no fu*king reason!) that the union should voluntarily comply to something like this again.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
time for a union uprising!
On with the (good) youth movement!
by aet15 on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If I was them, I'd sue
the players (other than a few elite) aren’t getting much money this year anyways. Sue just for the hell of it.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
let's sue the government!
they can just print up some more $
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 3:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that how we're building 800 billion worth of shit?
[/politics]
Not afraid to nitpick
by joker24 on Feb 7, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
soverign immunity
born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red
by totalloser on Feb 7, 2009 6:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Get the pitchforks!
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
there was a segment on ESPN radio this morning
about the union being at fault too. They were saying they should have been more active in making sure these list were destroyed. That seems like a bit of a reach for me, but I don’t care, the union is as much at fault as anyone for this whole steroid mess.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 7, 2009 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
uh, no
the list wasn’t supposed to exist. The testing was supposed to be anonymous.
I guess the union should never have allowed the testing to take place at all, but you can’t blame them for the existence of a list that should not have existed.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really
I blame them for turning a blind eye to the steroid use in the first place.
The list thing…I agree with you. I couldn’t understand how they were saying the union was at fault for making sure the list didn’t get out, when there wasn’t supposed to be a list kept, thus the “bit of a reach part”. Just another reason why I am sitting here asking myself why I let the radio stop on ESPN radio in the first place.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 7, 2009 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
imo
they didn’t even turn a blind eye. that is giving them too much credit. they consciously guarded these players. that’s why testing was so hard to implement and why all these tests had to be anonymous. they wouldn’t allow the tests if they weren’t anonymous.
i agree with you on the espn radio. i was listening to it tonight on my way home and the only thing i heard on my 35 minute commute was a-rod talk and most of what they were saying i didn’t even agree with. very frustrating.
"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy
by FutureMan on Feb 8, 2009 4:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe they shouldn't have made the bed
it just makes things a lot easier
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the results should've
been public from the start…why so much protections for cheaters?…oh yea, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Why the uproar over the release? Ballplayers are public figures. I hate all this secrecy junk.
born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red
by totalloser on Feb 7, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You kidding me?
The 2003 tests were EXPLICITY supposed to be anonymous. That’s the MLB/MLBPA agreement. It’s the only reason the Union agreed to it.
- It turns out they weren’t anonymous. Against the agreement with MLB.
- The tests were by contract to be destroyed within 6 months. They weren’t.
- Prosecutors had a subpoena for TEN of these supposedly anonymous records associated with the BALCO case. Instead of seizing just 10, they took the entire list because they were all in the same database. It’s like having a warrant for one file in an office and taking the whole file cabinet because of convenience. It’s unbelievable illegal that the non-BALCO records were taken in the first place, and now it’s unbelievably illegal to leak this. Whoever did this should absolutely lose their job no questions asked, no hearing, nothing: fired.
Not afraid to nitpick
by joker24 on Feb 7, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
agreed
It’s crap that any of it leaked
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 7, 2009 8:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
absofreakinglutley
they should not only lose their jobs, but face some jail time
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 7, 2009 8:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
leaks
The feds wanted this stuff to get out, they might make some aid or lawyer with lots of time in the system be the scape goat. All and all i doubt it. This stuff happens all the time. IF the feds aren’t sure if they can’t make their case float they let sh*t like this out to rattle the cage of ppl in their line of fire. They just want to keep moving up the ladder. People like us get on our soap box and scream but the out come (firings) has already been decided before it happened.
"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"
by elirock83 on Feb 7, 2009 11:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Has no one even considered that
A Rod’s ex-wife may be the source of the story. Seems to me, if Orza tells A Rod, you may or may not be on a list that the feds have, then he might have been concerned enough to seek advice/guidance from his chosen life partner.
One might argue, that he might not have said anything to her because of a their media, highlighted marriage “difficulties” at the time, but I would suggest that this is just the type of subject a husband would discuss with a wife (who sees pictures of him with other ladies)to let her know how important she is in his life.
I would be suprised if she didn’t know, not only about the list, but also how honest he was with Peter Gammons in his confession. If he was completely honest he has nothing to worry about, of course. But, if he lied, thinking the source had to come from the government, or a law office somewhere, then a follow-up interview with his ex could be coming soon.
I think it has something to do with hell, fury, and feeling of scourn!
by Beardsville Rockers on Feb 11, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lol, she might be one of the 4 sources
but the reporter who broke the story says she “has some other names too” but wants to save them for her book, or something like that.
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 11, 2009 9:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but those other names
could have come from A Rod’s jilted. The players get word they’re on the list, first they discuss it amongst themselves, and then take it home to the spouse…
AROD: Angel Muffin, i found out my name is on this list that says I have tested positive for whatever that stuff is in the medicine cabinet that makes all the pretty girls want to take a picture with me and not Derek.
NOT MADONNA: Why don’t you just tell the truth for once in your life. A true Yankee shortstop would not hide and continually surround himself with scandal.
AROD: But I moved to third base this year Sugar Dumpling.
NOT MADONNA: I know.
AROD: Well, I can’t say anything now. I talked with
story says she "has some other names too"
{he says nonchalantly} and we agreed it would be best not to say anything at this time. I am just worried, what if someone does leak my name?
NOT MADONNA: Don’t you ever listen to me? COME CLEAN NOW! Admit you are wrong before anyone knows you did anything wrong. Most decent people tend to forgive people who openly accuse themselves.
AROD: Of course I listen Schmoopie. Your right, I shouldn’t let someone take my picture after having had lunch with that woman from the tan sallon. And then later with that woman I just had drinks with. It was foolish. Thank you for forgiving me. Now that everything is out in the open, maybe you should stop accusing yourself.
by Beardsville Rockers on Feb 12, 2009 2:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Something tells me
that he and his ex might have some sort of clause in their divorce contract disallowing her to speak about his professional interests.
by spants on Feb 12, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I, no doubt, believe there is such a provision in the settlement.
I also have no delusions about how effective the modern contract is at keeping all signees in adherence to its creed.
I don’t necessarily believe his ex is the source. I am just posing another scenario that is plausible, IMO, and was overlooked by the some 200 plus comments on the topic.
She could have given the interview before the divorce, when pictures and rumors were swirling. She could have just as easily broken her signed agreement, knowing how hard it is to get a reporter to divulge her sources.
“I cannot comment on my ex-husband due to stipulations in our divorce settlement” is all she has to say publicly from here on out in order to keep her fortune. DeepThroat = DeepPockets
by Beardsville Rockers on Feb 12, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"Tested" might be a better word for the title
But yeah, this sucks, even if I do hate A-Rod.
Please please please don’t ever let Pujols’ name show up in one of these rumors.
by mojowo11 on Feb 7, 2009 2:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This isn't a rumor.
I hope AP never did PEDs, but I have no illusions about these guys.
by spants on Feb 7, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It would hurt AP's chance at sainthood.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about the HOF
if Bonds doesn’t get in because of this, A Rod won’t get in because of this.
Who are the position player HOF’ers for the next 10 years going to be? Frank Thomas, Ken Griffey Jr and…and….Craig Biggio?
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do I think
A-Rod will get in anyway? I also think Bonds will get in. I think McGwire is going to be the only one blackballed. Just a hunch.
by spants on Feb 7, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No way
raffy gets in.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
where do you think sosa stands?
he’s really the only one that seems to get blackballed without proof. However…a rational person can assume that he took them because of his body, his numbers, and the his ability to speak perfect english on every talk show and sports show in the world and then forget the language entirely in front of congress.
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think Sosa has gotten the worst bad rap of anyone,
because he wasn’t involved in the NY, Oakland, or Balco busts; there is literally nothing incriminating him except numbers.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
by hazel on Feb 7, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the
corked bat incident soured people on Sosa.
by spants on Feb 7, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
jeezus!!!!
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That has to be photoshopped.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 5:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
glorious quote from the source of that photo:
(talking about bonds)
“And in a matter of days you will hold the home run record for at least a few years, until Alex Rodriguez breaks it, legally.”
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In no way am I accusing you of it
but, living in Chicago, I’ve seen hundreds of games played by Sammy and there’s no way that’s a real photo. I’m gonna email it to some of my friends to get a better idea.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've never seen him sleeveless or flexing
but that looks pretty believable to me.
Looks like a steroid user who overcycles, really.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Now that you mention it
he did always wear sleeves. Even on the hottest days.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 5:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
GUILTY!
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 5:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...

What looks wrong to me in that first photo is the shoulders. He could hide the biceps under sleeves, but those shoulders are enormous.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 5:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The one time I saw McGwire in person in 2000
I remember thinking that his forearm was the size of my calf.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
McGwire
The more videos I go back and look at now of Mark McGwire… it’s shocking how muscular and defined he really was. If I were old enough/knew what I know today, I would have probably said, “Someone should probably be checking this dude out.”
Numbers be damned, the dude looks like a gym rat.
by mynameistyler on Feb 8, 2009 7:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see what you are saying about the shoulders
but I think shoulder definition is relatively easy to hide. Especially when you have traps crawling up the side of your neck.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 7, 2009 8:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I lived in Chicago during the Sosa era, too.
He was pretty jacked towards the end of his career. We’ve got realize, like Alex said, that we rarely saw him walking around sleeveless, so that could by why it looks so strange. I really hope that’s not real, though — that can’t be healthy at all.
On with the (good) youth movement!
by aet15 on Feb 8, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I ran this by a friend of mine
who used to do video and image forensics. Here’s what he said
Pretty hard to tell with all of the compression in the image. Compressing an image will hide a lot of seams and blending. I did a quick look and it seems fairly legit. Keep in mind, I did this type of thing for a living for a long time. Without a detailed analysis nothing is jumping out at me on the muscle pic to make me think it isn’t him.
One of the keys I am looking at is the left shoulder, you can see the shape of his shoulder continue into the shirt. The shirt keeps the shape of the shoulder. The shirt itself looks like it has not been touched up which is telling since Easton was a sponsor and he was #21. The head doesn’t look like it was pasted on the body. Although there is a funny white thing on the left of his neck. That could be a lot of things. Like I said the photo was heavily compressed and that can hide a lot of defects.
If it was photoshopped, they did a good job.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the best bet, i guess
would be to find the original picture of the dude wearing the Easton shirt and see if the faces match. That face doesn’t even really look like Sosa to me, to be honest, thought the facial expression is so extreme that it’d almost be better to check the dental records than the picture…
FWIW, I just watched the Mcgwire HR#62 video a couple of days ago (where they hugged and sosa kept doing the weird salute thing) and i don’t think Sosa was anywhere near that big in 1998. At the very least he struck me as being surprisingly not-huge, while I doubt that guy would have seemed that way.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 3:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
then again
even an average dude can add 2-3 inches to his biceps after a workout (the saturday night pre-bar-hop pump-up) so he might have been coming out of the weight room when that pic was taken, and he’d look totally different than he’d look when in game form.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 3:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In a recent interview about the ARod
allegations, TR Sullivan, beat writer for the Rangers in ‘03, made the comment that ARod didn’t carry any suspitions (3;16 into the interview) around him because he didn’t compare with the St. Louis Cardinals first baseman.
I believe this way of thinking was one of the reasons a blind eye was turned for so long. Too many people were comparing players bodies to the biggest of the big. Of course no one matches up to Mac, he has always been a monster.
by Beardsville Rockers on Feb 8, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was pretty swollen by the time he got to the Orioles.

A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 8, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fake
Here was Sosa just a year before…

No way he beefed up that much in so short a time…roids or not… ;-)
"Over Macho Grande?"
"No, I don't think I'll ever get over Macho Grande."
by iron duke75 on Feb 8, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He also hit the tanning booth.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 8, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No Proof of Sosa Juicing, But...
He had a decent year with Texas in 2007, was bad with Baltimore in 2005, but never came close with either team of duplicating the numbers he put up with the Cubs. I don’t think it was just because of age. He declined some in 2004, when he was still with the Cubs. The changes in his physique were too pronounced from the early 1990’s to the late 1990’s to think it was merely because of extensive weight training.
I think, but don’t know, that Sosa juiced, and when I think, but don’t know, Sosa stopped in about 2004, his performance suffered. I give Sosa a 40% chance of ever making the Hall. I don’t know if that’s fair or not. There’s far more hard evidence against Bonds than there is against Sosa.
I would personally still vote for Sosa to be in the Hall because I wouldn’t feel right not voting for him based on mere speculation. There are valid suspicions about his PED use. At this point, they are unsubstantiated.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 9, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Biggio's as dirty as anyone
he & Bagwell weren’t even close to clean, they just have clean images.
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 7, 2009 8:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bagwell I'm sure of
but Biggio? I don’t know. I really hate this junior high schoolgirl sort of gossip. And I also don’t care for using the term “dirty” to describe 1 or 2 players in a system that was encouraged by the powers that be. They’re no “dirtier” than the baseball executives who encouraged it, the media members who ignored it, and the fans who oohed and aahed at every 500 foot home run ball.
by chuckb on Feb 8, 2009 5:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my source on the B's is a journalist with a lot of clubhouse access in the 90's
he worked for among other papers, the Washing Post & BMore Sun. he covered both MLB & some Minor league ball. along with the NFL,NBA, NHL & college sports. if he says he knows without a doubt both B’s used PED’s, i believe him. and i wouldn’t spread gossip just to look cool or bring another player down from a rival team. my friend also told me some Cardinal players other than Big Mac used PED’s. my friend was there, he had first hand knowledge, he has seen & heard things most of us will never see or hear. and probably never want to. i know i sometimes blow things up, but this is one time i’m speaking the truth. it’s a serious subject & i wouldn’t just throw wild accusations around.
the term “dirty” has been used for a long time. i agree with you though that if the players were, so were their bosses. i don’t know if it’s bad or not. i never really thought about it to be honest with you.
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 8, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I sort of glossed over gdm's post
and totally thought he was talking about Biggio’s helmet.
And I agree with you chuck, I doubt Biggio’s did steroids but really no one gets a free pass anymore. But, I definitely wouldn’t go pointing fingers at Biggio.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 8, 2009 6:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ivan Rodriguez?
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Feb 7, 2009 10:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Piazza probably has a shot, too
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Feb 7, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pudge is in Canseco's book
no way he gets in. Everyone else in the book has popped on a test.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Robbie Alomar?
kinda seems like he jumped off a sinking ship at the right time….i’d have to think he was dirty.
andre dawson? seems like a shoe-in now. Omar Vizquel? somebody better get to drawing up the ozzie/omar comparison. Barry Larkin? this should be a lock. Biggio is a lock unless he turns out to be as dirty as I think he is. Piazza should be a lock…still interesting how a 62nd round pick goes to HOF status, though…especially during this era. Ken Griffey Jr….still no rumblings about him. Jim Thome? hmmm….I guess we’ll have a better grasp if the other 103 players names are released.
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 8, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that's probably the list
Larkin
Alomar
Griffey (barring a big announcement)
Thomas
Vizquel
Piazza (even though I think he’s dirty as sin)
I don’t know how Piazza has escaped. He was in BOTH clubhouses that were in the Mitchell Report (Mets and Dodgers). He must have been like Sgt. Shultz.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
From the Sports Illustrated article
Primobolan, which is also known by the chemical name methenolone, is an injected or orally administered drug that is more expensive than most steroids. (A 12-week cycle can cost $500.) It improves strength and maintains lean muscle with minimal bulk development, according to steroid experts, and has relatively few side effects.
If this drug improves strength, lean muscle and has relatively few side effects….why aren’t they putting it in my water supply?
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 2:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm still wondering why steroids are bad
but cortisone is great.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the short answer
Cortisone doesn’t have strong androgenic (muscle building) effects, whereas anabolic steroids do.
by edgesofsanity on Feb 7, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that's fine
but we’ve had plenty of guyswho could barely walk play baseball b/c of cortisone. How is that not a performance enhancing drug?
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because cortisone is being
used to bring them back to their average level of play. Anabolic steroids are used to make the player better than their career average had been thus far.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 7, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
We can artificially improve ourselves, but not to above what our average is without it being immoral*?
*wrong, cheating, whatever word you want to use for semantics sake.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no problem w/ players using cortisone shots
If you’re sick and can’t work, you take medicine to get better so you can get back to work. That is what cortisone is for. If a guy can “barely walk” and he takes a cortisone shot and is able to play, I see nothing wrong with that. Jimmy and Walker both took the shots when they were playing for us. Were you against them being on the field after they got those injections because they were “cheating”?
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 7, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
If a player isn’t hurt and takes a cortisone shot, it isn’t going to do much for him. The same can’t be said for steroids. Cortisone is meant to help play through pain. Anabolic steroids are meant to help make guys huge so they hit the ball harder and farther. Big difference.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 7, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree w/ you
I don’t believe cortisone shots don’t give a player the ability to play above their natural ability. If we are going to say that is cheating, then I guess so is asperin and tylenol.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 7, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"Were you against them being on the field after they got those injections because they were "cheating"?"
Absolutely not.
I’m in no way, shape, or form against someone using a drug that makes them play better, as long as it is accessible and condoned to all other players. Like steroids were.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Steroids in 2003
= Not cheating.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anabolic Steroids are illegal in the US
Possessing them w/o a perscription is a federal crime punishable w/ jail time. I don’t care if ML baseball didn’t have regulations against them in 2003. Players were using illegal substances. MLB and its players should adhere to the laws of the country in which they operate in. And the fact that they didn’t have a strong steroids policy in 2003, when many players were using, and it was still illegal in the US, just shows a lack of responsibility on the part of Major League Baseball.
Just because the FO of MLB didn’t officially say it would be cheating, it doesn’t mean the players weren’t cheating. They were enhancing their bodies in an unnatural manner to gain a competitive edge. That is cheating.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 8:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't there some kind of rule...
in Major League Baseball that states any act that is illegal under national law will be, whether explicitly stated in official MLB regulation or not, that it will be considered illegal activity by Major League Baseball?
by mynameistyler on Feb 8, 2009 8:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Drunk driving is also illegal in the US
does that mean that TLR should be banned from the HOF?
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Feb 8, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Does driving drunk
enhance Tony’s performance as a manager?
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 8, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Props man
That was funny.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 9, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"does that mean that TLR should be banned from the HOF?"
Of course not. Unless he got so drunk that he crashed into the stadium and drove onto the field, that has absolutely nothing to do with him in managing in the dugout.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This argument about
“The US government has decided that it’s illegal, so therefore MLB does, and MLB should hold them accountable” is a non sequitir.
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Feb 8, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
MLB and its players are not above the law
I’ve said before that the fact that the government had deemed steroids illegal and MLB didn’t do anything serious early on to restrict the use of it by its player was pure irresponsibility. Bonds, McGwire, and Sosa were reviving baseball in the late 90’s and early 00’s. So was MLB gonna do anything about them using steroids? Hell no. This argument about how the players of MLB shouldn’t be held accountable for their illegal actions is ludicrous. As is the idea that the MLB doesn’t have to be accountable for not acting on it.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Punching someone in the face is illegal too
and NHL players aren’t arrested for it every night.
And almost everything a football player does would fall under assualt.
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 8, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand what you are saying
but who enforces laws? The police, right? Who enforces MLB rules? The MLB. While it may have been illegal to take roids without a prescription in 2003, the police enforce that, not MLB.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 8, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's true
But the police have other areas to work in besides patrolling baseball for illegal substances. MLB needed to take more of an initiative in the one major illegality that was occuring in their league. Cooperation with law enforcement would’ve made it easier for the police to enforce these laws.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Since the police aren't enforcing the laws
MLB should enforce them? That’s a small step from vigilantism.
by azruavatar on Feb 9, 2009 7:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
MLB can be more
specified in investigating and penalizing the abuse of those laws then the police can. Law enforcement has to deal w/ investigations of murders, burglaries, etc. There is less opportunity on their end to devote to policing steroid use in baseball. So the MLB should just sit back and say “Ok, it’s illegal, but since the police are busy we’ll just sit back and let it happen in our league.” No, that’s not how it should work, IMHO. It’s not vigilantism to have stronger policies and penalites for people who break laws w/in an organization.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 11:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Large, self-interested organizations
policing themselves. Hmm… How’d that work out for Wall Street?
by spants on Feb 9, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
worked out great for wall street.
did you see the size of those bonuses?
for us, not so great.
by tom s. on Feb 9, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Jeez
I’m getting tired of having to argue everything I say and we’re about to run out of room.
US Gov’t in 2003 = steroids illegal and a federal crime punishable w/ up to 7 years in prison
MLB in 2003 = steroids not against league rules
Which is the group w/ higher authority? Call it cheating or don’t, but players were breaking the law and the FO of MLB knew it. They weren’t going to say anything because these sluggers were making the game relevant again. And even if this wasn’t cheating (which it is) then why all the secrecy about it? Oh, because it is illegal and morally wrong. I’m done trying to argue this logic w/ those who believe that steroid use in 2003 wasn’t cheating, wrong, etc…just because the MLB didn’t take an outright position on the issue.
Sorry again if I come off as a jerk here, but to me using an engineered substance that aids to make a player unnaturally stronger so they can increase their power production is cheating. I don’t really give a shit what MLB said at the time. And I wasn’t directing this comment towards you Spants, I was just speaking in general. Sorry again.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think your position is reasonable, and I'm not piling on
But I think your position raises many questions I’m content with not addressing, and simply focusing on future prevention. For example:
1) Which group has higher authority? Well, the federal government, which is why they should enforce their own laws.
2) While I agree with you that groups should do their best to uncover and prevent illegal activity, I prefer to vest MLB culpability in their failure to maintain and regulate an anti-steriod policy. This is a subtle point, but in my opinion an important one. IF MLB had a policy, then they should enforce it — but they didn’t in 2003, and I’m not comfortable saying, “well, you knew it was illegal, and you are therefore culpable in failing to enforce the laws.” That’s sticky because, if applied universally, it has drastic implications (who’s responsibility is it really, and what happens when a company has a happy hour and an employee drives home drunk?). I find it far more culpable that MLB didn’t have their own policy in place. Without that, players’ actions – while tecnically illegal – didn’t violate MLB policy and the feds weren’t really enforcing it either.
3) I think you define the issue far too broadly:
using an engineered substance that aids to make a player unnaturally stronger so they can increase their power production is cheating.
Then in your opinion Andro is cheating, even though it was over-the-counter? How about creatine? Muscle Milk (or whatever Adrian Peterson endorses)? There are lots of supplements players take — in fact, I’d be surprised if most didn’t take some sort of supplement. Steroids is another, albeit more powerful supplement that the government has deemed illegal. That’s why I don’t perceive it as a moral issue, as you do.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 9, 2009 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
With regards to 3)
I should’ve been more specific. How about substances that give cause coronary artery disease and wither you testicles down to nothing? Because that’s what steroids do. None of those other supplements have such adverse effects on their users. Or at least I hope they don’t.
I’ll going to put this to rest now. I may or may not agree with your points on 1) and 2) but to each his own.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying that MLB
shouldn’t police themselves, but that they won’t do a good job.
by spants on Feb 9, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cocaine in 1985
= Not cheating in baseball
by ubeddie on Feb 8, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this is a great argument!
and one no one will ever go near. We just place these labels — good and bad — on certain medicines or drugs or whatever and brand them and that’s that. Steroids = good. Cortisone = bad. HGH (does not help 1 iota) = bad. Amphetamines — fine during the 50’s and 60’s; bad today.
by chuckb on Feb 8, 2009 5:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Lots of questions like that
Why is pot bad but tobacco and alcohol are fine?
by Ray Lankford on Feb 7, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2003/12/22/whyIsMarijuanaIllegal.html
criminalization is filled with:
* Racism
* Fear
* Protection of Corporate Profits
* Yellow Journalism
* Ignorant, Incompetent, and/or Corrupt Legislators
* Personal Career Advancement and Greed
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
every single one of those
is 100% accurate. Most of all last 2.
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
sorry
didn’t mean to take the emphasis off of steroids ;)
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm assuming the cost has something to do with it...
not being in your water supply…but seriously, “few side effects”, what does that mean? does it only give you heart disease and shrink your balls? or does it only give you acne and shrink your balls? i’m not concerned with how many side effects there are, I’d be more concerned about how severe they are. “the only side effect is you die at age 50” …seems like the “steroid experts” could be minimizing, ya know?
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sunlight has relatively few side effects
like cancer, blindness, skin irritation and stroke.
It’s all perspective!
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
hmmm
more info about it here:
http://www.steroid.com/Primobolan.php
Looks like hair loss is the main side effect. Most of the typical side effect like acne aren’t a problem with this one.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If your a man (not you specifically)
you are likely to lose your hair anyways.
Come on, load me up with this stuff Federal Government!
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
then I could just bike up to Milwaukee and back
to see the cardinals play the brewers
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
a-rod has a little bald spot I think
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So does pujols, and clemens has hair.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
by hazel on Feb 7, 2009 4:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Clemens has receded.
But most men do. Besides, they could be taking Propecia to counteract the hair-loss.
by spants on Feb 7, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
i still have all my hair. for now.
please God don’t let me lose my hair. i can lose my mind and some weight, but please don’t let me lose my hair.
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 7, 2009 8:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just think
If I lose my hair, I’ll not only have to live with the shame of being bald but everyone will always question whether or not I’ve been juicing at work.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
they've also worn hats and helmets
every day since they were about 5. Hair loss in baseball can absolutely not be considered a determining factor. In fact, it shouldn’t be considered at all.
by chuckb on Feb 8, 2009 5:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Never said it
was indicative of anything. Only that there are medications one can take to thwart that potential side effect.
by spants on Feb 8, 2009 8:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How come only baseball gets this treatment?
I find it a little weird that the media ignores steroids in other sports.. cough…NFL..cough.
We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.
by KYCards on Feb 7, 2009 2:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i think its because the nfl has been more proactive...
in having a steroid policy and being public about it. With MLB it seems to be a widespread cover-up from the highest executive to the lowest minor league clubhouse attendant. And I still think that its suspicious that no “star” players have ever been busted other than Raffy
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know this is a "wild conspiracy theory"
But I swear there is something going on where the media or some sections of the media are trying to do their best to kill baseball or at least trying to do major harm to the league. It just seems like the NFL, NBA, ect. get free passes and MLB is pounded on. It seems to me that the NFL has been treated with kids gloves with just about everything including steroids.
We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.
by KYCards on Feb 7, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NBA has nothing to worry about in regards to steroids
Now if they started testing for marijuana, that’s a whole ’nother story……
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
heh
baseball too, at least in the past
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think baseball's problem was cocaine
A teenage boy with a sprit inside
Of a Samurai warrior who long ago died.
Now he's O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
O....O....O....O Oshikuru!
My oh My he's a demon Samurai
Who's the guy who had to die.......Oshikuru!
by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
[Darryl Strawberry nods his head in agreement]
by Ray Lankford on Feb 7, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and Dwight Gooden to a lesser extent
hell, the whole 1986 mets team was on everything really
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and the pittsburgh pirates
Countdown to world series #11
263 days
by bearcatcardfan on Feb 8, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
both of the cardinals pitchers who died in recent years
have done it, and I’m sure a ton of them have done it over the history of the game. on my little league team alone, half the team…. non-baseball, josh phelps, etc etc etc. what I’m trying to say is, tons of people like to do it. and it’s not really a problem (unless you’re drinking and driving at the same time talking on a cell phone).
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think you were going for
michael phelps there
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
dangit
you are right, sorry josh!!!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 7, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think it's just that no one cares about the NFL records/players
it’s a bunch of physical freaks, like watching a circus act or pro wrestling, and they beat each other up in a scrimmage. It’s a sport that’s all about testosterone, so having your trainer inject more testosterone into your lineman’s arse doesn’t really sully it.
Baseball, on the other hand, is a cerebral, man-on-man sport. The managers jockey against each other to get the best advantage they can; the batters line up against the pitcher, like an old west shootout. You see the players’ faces; the announcers talk about how player Y has done against player X in the 18 other times they’ve lined up one on one this year. The human element is removed from football.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i never thougt of the human element
The batter-pitcher match up is the game, no other sport has 1 on 1 match ups that make the game, 1 person can win or lose the game.
Although hockey now has the shoot out but that is only regular season.
"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"
by elirock83 on Feb 7, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And has nobody in the history of the NBA ever done steroids?
I find it odd that those genetic freaks of nature playing in a league with a terrible drug testing policy never get looked into.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There's always been hints that Jordan
was using late in his career. He went from skinny, high flyer to power forward in SGs body.
Plus, he maintained 5% body fat while eating steaks, smoking cigars and staying out all night.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 7, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was ripped
by the time he came back with Washington. Him and Malone always stood out to me.
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Feb 7, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I don't leave out the NBA
To me they are getting to the point of being like pro wrestling. Fixed outcomes and all.
We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.
by KYCards on Feb 7, 2009 3:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
nba is guilty too
but its more speed than power to smash a ball 500 feet.
"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"
by elirock83 on Feb 7, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I might sound like a little girl here,
but cycling has a worse rep with steroids and whatnot within the media.
by WyoCardsFan on Feb 11, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Contemplate this
Albert has finished in the MVP voting:
1st,9th, 2nd, 1st, 3rd,2nd, 2nd, 4th
If Bonds gets expunged from record books on a guilty verdict the the line reads:
1st, 9th, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 3rd
And arguably he never should have lost to Ryan Howard.
Just win
by The Duke on Feb 7, 2009 4:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
the most amazing thing...
as Derrick Goold pointed out over at Birdland….is that he has the triple crown for the decade…despite spotting the national league the year 2000. I think he points out that Hornsby was the last player to do that .
I hate winter!!!!
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Feb 7, 2009 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A further note
In 2001, the other 2 people in front of Albert are Luis GOnzalez and Sammy Sosa — both suspected steriod users and the only other person in front of AP in 2004 is Adrian Beltre another suspected user. So it is not too hard to argue that if Albert was competing on a level playing field he would have 6 MVP awards and a photo finish with Ryan Howard in eight year run.
Just win
by The Duke on Feb 7, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
assuming his name wasn't on this list.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True enough but
just because you are good doesn’t make you a suspect. So far Albert has not appeared in anyone’s cross-hairs. If there was any chance I think we would have seen his name linked in to any one of a number of these probes, but nary a bad word yet.
I just think he is Ted Williams good
Just win
by The Duke on Feb 7, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nooooooo
Pujols isn’t on steroids. waaaaa
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 7, 2009 8:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's just my gut
but I don’t think Albert has ever used steroids. He is a pure hitter w/ power like A-Rod, but just look at how different the two are built physically. Albert’s foundation is supported by thighs that are second in baseball only to Brett Wallace. He derives a ton of power from that. Whereas, you look at A-Rod who is a little bit leaner in that area. He would, in order to create more power, find strength in his upper body. What’s a quick and easy way to increase your body strength? Hey, steroids!
That being said. Because Albert is super competitive, it wouldn’t shock me if he ever did test positive for something. If he ever were to, a part of me would probably die inside. That being the childhood innocence part that fell in love w/ baseball to begin with. Seeing some of these guys tainting their careers just hurts a little bit inside.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 7, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Albert has huge thighs
…much like Roger Clemens. His ‘foundation’ was viewed as a his greatest strength.
Albert was always blasted for being too chubby. If you want to cut weight but maintain muscle, there are substances that help that process along.
I’m not saying Albert used but if Alex Rodriguez was using in that culture in Texas, I can’t ignore the possibility of Albert using in the drug culture Tony LaRussa has overseen in St. Louis early this decade.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Albert quote about his weight
"I don’t care about looking ripped. I still have some fat on me, but you need extra weight on your body when you play sports, because that’s where your power comes from. When I gain weight during the season, I just feel like I have a little more power. "
Quoted in Men’s Health, April 2005
"Over Macho Grande?"
"No, I don't think I'll ever get over Macho Grande."
by iron duke75 on Feb 8, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well put
If Pujols took steroids I would be heartbroken.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 8, 2009 1:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
at some point, rather than “dying inside”, you have to decide whether it’s worth changing how YOU feel about things to match what other people are trying to make you feel. make up your own mind about whether you think it was cheating or not. Whatever you do, don’t let some poser on ESPN who is trying to make his own career by tearing other people down tell you what to think.
Even here, there is no objective evidence that A-rod was “caught”, just 4 people who called SI and told them they saw his name on a label. For all they know, he was just one of the guys tested and tested negative, but they saw the list of all the people tested and came to the wrong conclusion.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 3:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying that I'm "dying inside"
because of A-Rod supposedly testing positive. I said if Albert were to ever test positive for something I would. He is w/o a doubt the greatest player I have ever seen (during my lifetime). And he probably will be the greatest player for the rest of my life. I like to think that his talent and abilities are natural. But if I were to ever learn that the greatest player of this era, whom I admire more than any other player, tainted himself, a part of me would for lack of a better term “die inside”. I would have a hard time trusting any of the top players in the game from then on. Even if MLB had tougher restrictions from here on out, guys still try to find ways around it.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 8:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As Ken Burns says
the Black Sox are still on the books. Pete Rose is still on the books.
Barry Bonds isn’t going anywhere.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Those are different...
The Black Sox deliberately lost. Pete Rose apparently bet on his own team (possibly to lose).
People using PEDs, even if there is a provable effect on their performance, are cheating to win, not throwing games.
And AFAIK, there haven’t been any studies that has proven they really do increase a players ability to hit or even hit home runs. Sure you have freaks like Brady Anderson, but look at the 60s, Roger Maris had one big fluke year of hitting 61 home runs.
In say, McGwire’s case, he suddenly started hitting home runs at a crazy pace after being traded to St. Louis. Are we really supposed to believe there are drugs that work almost immediately like that (if he only started taking them here?) Or perhaps the massive HR totals in the NL at the time had more to do with really awful pitching?
Felipe Lopez - next year's Joel Pineiro (on another team, thank you Mo!)
by DiscoJer on Feb 8, 2009 3:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not trying to argue with you here
but as far as anyone knows, Rose never bet on his team to lose. the whole argument against him is that sometimes he didn’t bet on his team to WIN, which could be construed by his bookies as an indication that he wasn’t going to play his A-team, so THEY bet against his team. He never profited from his team losing, as far as anyone can prove.
OTOH, McGwire always had incredible power; he hit 49 HR’s as a 23yo rookie. He hit 125 HR in 1403 Pa’s in the 2.5 years before being traded to STL. he then hit another 159 in 1566 PA’s in the next 2.5 years with the cards. Not that much of an increase, esp considering the park effects from moving out of the oakland ballpark.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 4:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
However
he did bet on his team to win which incented him to use his starting lineup, pen, and bench in a manner that would be conducive to winning today — at the expense of games in the future. Betting on his team to win, though not as egregious as betting on the team to lose, potentially set the team up to lose the next day’s game or a few thereafter and is ethically reprehensible.
by chuckb on Feb 8, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's inaccurate...
the whole argument against him is that sometimes he didn’t bet on his team to WIN, which could be construed by his bookies as an indication that he wasn’t going to play his A-team, so THEY bet against his team.
The case against Rose is that he bet on baseball when there was a specific rule stating that anyone engaged in gambling on baseball while being member of any baseball organization would face severe punishment. He broke a specific rule. One that every player, manager, knows the rule and the consequences of breaking the rule. It also doesn’t help his case that he lied about it for 15 years and then told the truth as a means to sell his book so he could profit off of it. I love Pete Rose the player, but he’s a selfish and despicable man in general.
There was no specific rule against steroid use in Major League Baseball. You could derive that they were illegal, but nobody knew the consequences of being caught with them on their careers. The drugs were and are illegal, but you can find someone to give you access to those type of drugs in many gyms across the country, and star athletes with a lot of money are very good targets for companies like BALCO to push their product on.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh, yes
players or managers betting on baseball is wrong, no doubt, no matter how it’s done. DiscoJer set me off by saying “possibly to lose”, when the way I understand it that he never bet on his team to lose. That’s all I meant. it’s definitely wrong.
And I wanted to point out that McGwire did not really “start hitting home runs at a crazy pace after being traded”. He hit HR’s at a crazy pace his whole career.
"young pitchers will break your heart". -sam rich
by SleepyCA on Feb 9, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree on McGwire
FWIW on Rose:
I’ve read the Dowd report, and it never mentions that Rose bet on his own team, so you are right on that point. I was worried that you’re one of those people that thinks that because he didn’t bet against his own team it makes his actions less severe (which is total bullshit), because there are too many people out there who take that stance. You don’t seem to be one of them based on your above comment.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well, i do think it's less severe
betting on his team to win (and then obviously trying to make it happen) is much “less bad” than betting on your team to lose, and then making it happen.
But “less bad” =/= “acceptable”.
"young pitchers will break your heart". -sam rich
by SleepyCA on Feb 9, 2009 7:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No one has taken away
Whitey Ford’s numbers either.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this will be a tipping point
With how any users that get caught are viewed, and how HOF voters will act on those cases. I think it is safe to say that Ken Caminiti was telling us the truth years ago – more were probably using than weren’t. At least at the highest levels. I’ve demonized Bonds, Sosa, Clemens, even McGwire here and there over the years. Others too. I’m done with it.
Everybody is responsible for their own actions so they are all going to have to live with the consequences, but most of the blame starts at the top. The weak leadership didn’t have the will to force the unions hand on this stuff. In fact it is pretty clear to me that there was a wink-wink, nod-nod relationship at all levels that served to encourage this.
Making individuals the villains here misses the point. If I’m going to point one individual out it is going to be Bud Selig. I’m ready to take everything from the late 80’s into this decade with a grain of salt and leave it at that. People are going to be twisting themselves in knots trying to justify HOF votes for and against. At this point, I don’t think it’s worth the trouble. Vote based on their numbers. Pitchers were using, hitters were using. The level playing field theory loses it relevance once you come to the conclusion that most were using. At the point the only way you are truly playing on a level field is if you join the fray.
Not saying I condone it. Just saying that the greatest failure in this was the system, and the leadership that allowed that system to exist.
by Merry CRasmus on Feb 7, 2009 5:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this to a point.
The problem is that there are certain players who were clean the whole time, like Frank Thomas, Manny Ramirez, and Ken Griffey Jr. If any of those guys had used steroids they would be setting milestones. As it is, they’ve had very impressive careers while playing clean in a steroid era.
If you assume that Griffey is healthy for all but one year in Cincinnati, you’re looking at a guy with more homers than Bonds. He’d be on the verge of 800 right now if he had continued his production of his last 5 years in Seattle. As it is, he’s one of only 6 players in history to hit 600 homers, and he didn’t while being clean.
Manny is the best right handed hitter of his generation, and probably one of the top 10 offensive players of all time. If he has two to three more solid seasons, he joins the 600 homer club as well, and may even pass Griffey. Had he been juicing, he may have hit 700+ homers over the course of his career. There’s no indication that he’s ever taken steroids.
If The Big Hurt had been able to extend the prime of his career into the early part of this decade, he’d also be on the verge of 700 homers. There’s no indication he’s ever taken steroids, but he was a dominant player in the steroid era of the mid-90’s
The problem with your theory is that these guys would have put up these numbers against pitchers who were juicing while they were playing clean. If, like you point out, that most were using, doesn’t this put these players on a pedestal if they weren’t? They’ve achieved things that only a few players have ever achieved in the history of the game, and did it while playing in an era where they would have had the least amount of advantage against the other players. Using your theory, their numbers get thrown in with the rest of the players in that era and end up being tainted.
I agree that the system was a big part of the problem, and the existing problems between the union and ownership caused this to happen after the strike of ‘94, but those players who have done things the clean way shouldn’t be tarnished along with everyone else. They played as they were supposed to play, when they could have been cheating and damaging their long term health the whole time. I think that deserves special recognition.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There's the dilemna
I don’t think there is an easy way to approach this. You can keep out all who got caught, but I am almost certain that when you do that you are still going to be voting in a number of people that did the same thing but had the good fortune of not being outed. I wouldn’t stake my reputation on anybody being completely clean in such a corrupt environment. I really believe things were that bad. They found one dealer, basically, and look at how many names surfaced. Surely there were other key dealers out there in such a lucrative underground business. A business that had implicit backing and, as a result, some amount of protection from the highest levels of the sport. And how do we know the source they found gave all the names he had either? He is likely to only give the names that he knows/fears they may have already.
Is that it is becoming so clear to me that this thing mushroomed to such an extent that we cannot say with any certainty that anybody didn’t use. It’s not fair at all, and I know that, but that is where I am. I hate to give kudos out to people, including the ones you mention, because there’s a good chance something could come out about anybody at this point.
It’s a terrible situation. I want to be clear that I am not condoning anyone that used. I’m just done with the moral outrage for users. My position is based more on emotion than logic – I realize this.
I am angry about it, but I’m going to reserve most of my anger for those that allowed such a system to fester. I know people who did things right are getting screwed over, and that is wrong. That too is completely the commissioners fault.
by Merry CRasmus on Feb 11, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What a surprise... not!
Had to figure that this was coming. He’ll be heckled like crazy now, possibly even by Yankees fans. He likely won’t get into the Hall now that this has come out.
Welcome to Baseball Heaven.
by zoomzoomj88 on Feb 7, 2009 5:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
he is already heckled by Yankee fans
will A-Rod be forced to play home games this season with earmuffs?
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 7, 2009 6:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Couple comments:
1. I find it interesting that Jose Canseco has once again been proven to be telling the truth.
2. I don’t feel bad for anyone that this information has been “leaked,” and I would like to know who the other 103 players are. We fans make them rich, and we deserve to know who has been cheating. If Bonds, A-Rod and the others who have been “outed” are going to be denied the hall of fame. which I think they should be, we need to know who the other cheaters are to prevent any of them getting in.
3. In the midst of all this, I still believe Albert is, and always has been clean. If I am ever proven wrong on this, I don’t think I would ever get over it.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 7, 2009 6:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What's your opinion on users of greenies?
Not afraid to nitpick
by joker24 on Feb 7, 2009 6:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know of anyone
that has been kept out of the hall for using them. Obviously their use was widespread and it is a shame. Now that a precedence has been set for steroid users, I think they all have to be kept out of the hall. My previous post wasn’t meant to be as preachy as it came off, I just think that if there is info on other steriod users, it should be made public. Everyone should be treated equally on this.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 7, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you know, steroids were invented in the 30's
and were used by olympic athletes int he 50’s and NFL teams in the 60’s. How do we know Hank Aaron’s ex-record, or anything done by anyone since the 50’s, is “clean”?
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose we don't know
But if those guys were using roids, they were a lot better at hiding it. We didn’t start seeing the “incredible hulk” effect until the late ’80s. But your pont is taken.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 7, 2009 7:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They weren't
doing as much weight training as modern ballplayers.
by spants on Feb 7, 2009 11:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Roids and Greenies serve different purposes
Greenies are just to get you through the night. Basically a medicinal Red Bull. Roids are designed to improve bulk and help restore muscles after workouts. In the first case, it just gets you up to home plate. In the second case, it helps you be productive once you are there. Roids strike me as far more insidious because once your competition starts using them, you have to use them as well to stay competitive. In the case of greenies, you can achieve the same effect by not whoring and drinking.
Just win
by The Duke on Feb 7, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
negative
greenies have a HUGE effect on reflexes and ability to concentrate. That’s pretty valuable when trying to hit a 95 mph fastball.
“the psychic effect of amphetamines depends on the dosage, mental state, and personality of the user. in general, 10-30 mg cause wakefulness, alertness, a reduced sense of fatigue, and an elevation of mood. other behavioral changes may include increased initiative, self-confidence, ability to concentrate, elation, euphoria, and increased motor and speech activity. Physical performance in athletes may be improved” ( Fleisher, Ludwig, Henretig, Ruddy, and Silverman, 2005, page 999)
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 9:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
actually
if 1 out of what, 7, 8? MLB players was using steroids in 2003, I think this helps Bonds and McGwire’s HOF chances immensely.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 7, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it would have to be a much higher percentage than that
to help them immensly. As long as most of the players were not using, I don’t think the “level playing field” argument can be made. But I am not a HOF voter, so I will be as curious as anyone to see how this plays out.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 7, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They weren't cheating
there was no rule against steroids in baseball in 2003 other than a memo in 1992 that never was adopted into the CBA.
So…they were cheating. If your sole justification of knowing was because they were somehow cheating you, as a fan, then it appears you weren’t cheated at all.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Breaking the law = cheating
And you can’t tell me that those players didn’t think what they were doing was wrong.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 8, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was illegal in Florida in 1964 for Curt Flood
and Bob Gibson to stay in the same hotel as Tim McCarver and Dal Maxvil. When they bought their own hotel and stayed together anyways, were they cheating?
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is starting to just get absurd
Are you really comparing civil rights injustices to performance-enhancing drugs? HUGE difference. We’ve all heard that just because something is a law, that doesn’t make it right. That is true when people are being treated like second-hand citizens because of the color of their skin. Those laws were outrageous and shameful.
The same does not ring true, however, for steriods. Steroids are illegal because they can cause among other things: coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, negative changes in HDL and LDL cholesterol, infertility, and testicular cancer. (Don’t ask me why cigarettes and alcohol aren’t illegal because they can be just as harmful, I don’t have those answers) In the instances when steroids do work they give the user an unnatural ability to rapidily gain muscle mass and strength. So he is cheating and breaking the law.
Gibson and Flood may have been “breaking the law” back in those days, but there is no way one can possibly say they were cheating. Was Josh Hancock cheating when he was driving drunk? No, but he was breaking the law, and unfortunately he died in an accident because of it. Just because someone is breaking the law it doesn’t mean they are cheating. But when they are breaking the law by using performance-enhancing drugs, yes, they are cheating.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just because someone is breaking the law it doesn’t mean they are cheating
That about sums it up.
Performance Enhancing Drugs is such a throw away line. What is an enhancement? Above normal? What is normal.
Baseball doesn’t know the effects of steroids on players yet it is banned. According to MLB, if you had prescription pre-2004 for steroids, they were legal.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 8, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"Performance Enhancing Drugs is such a throw away line."
Ok, maybe.
But,
What is an enhancement? Above normal? What is normal.
If Barry Bonds doesn’t allegedly use steroids does he break the all-time HR record?
If McGwire doesn’t allegedly juice does he have a surge late in his career where he hits 50+ HR’s for 5 straight seasons?
If Clemens doesn’t allegedly let MacNamee stick needles in his ass does he go on to put up his surefire HOF numbers?
All of these have to be anwered with: possibly, because we will never know for sure. It is safe to say that all of these guys were pure enough talents that they would have had solid careers without steroids. But, they wanted to be the best the game has seen. They couldn’t do it with their natural abilities alone (or at least they believed they couldn’t) so they improved their games by artificial means. They’ve tainted their careers forever, so we will never be able to tell to what extent their “enhancement” was or how far “above normal” it was. And the fact that they have tainted themselves is what makes it wrong. If steroids didn’t bring them “above normal” then why the hell would they use the damn things anyway?
Baseball doesn’t know the effects of steroids on players yet it is banned. According to MLB, if you had prescription pre-2004 for steroids, they were legal.
Baseball knows of the adverse effects steroids have on the body and that is at least one reason why they are banned. And if players pre-2004 could simply get a prescription for steroids from their doctors (or even possibly their team doctors) why didn’t every single player in the game do it? Many didn’t because they knew it was wrong. They probably knew that others who they were competing against were using them and moving ahead of the curve, but they still didn’t use steroids because they knew it wasn’t right.
I’m sorry if I’m coming across as aggressive in any of my comments, but this is just a subject that gets to me. I just want to defend my stance on the issue.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's the difference
You admit the uncertainty about the effects of steroids, or their supposed ability to give one athlete an advantage over another.
because we will never know for sure. It is safe to say that all of these guys were pure enough talents that they would have had solid careers without steroids.
The difference is, in the face of this uncertainty, I choose to say, “you know what, lets just move on and not worry about putting an asterisk by records or reaching back a decade to skewer alleged users.” On the other hand, you focus on the fact that it was illegal, (even if it wasn’t banned) and exposing the users. Its a fair difference of opinion.
The reason I don’t really give a shit about whether McGwire or Bonds or A-Rod were doping is because we don’t know a) how much it helped (although I’ll admit it clearly did), and b) who else was doping. Maybe the proliferation of steriods among pitchers was just as widespread, and therefore the competitive balance wasn’t affected. For me, this uncertainty, on which we can all agree, means MLB should just focus on what it can control: preventing widespread doping in the future.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 8, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want to necessarily
expose all of the users. Especially if it is done in the manner in which A-Rod and these other 103 players were exposed. I just want to make sure that those who are proven to have used them, face the consequences. Whatever that may be. If MLB wants to asterisk their numbers or remove them all together I don’t really care. Just so long as the exposed players in this era don’t go down in record books w/o recognition that they used an illegal substance to try and gain a competitve edge.
We both agree that the MLB needs to mainly focus on preventing this in the future. That should be priority one.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So you don't want to expose players, per se
But you want to completely undermine the achievements of those who have been exposed? Seems unfair to me. Either the MLB peels all the layers off the onion, or they say, “we probably aren’t ever going to know the full extent of this, so we’ll admit that we let this get out of hand and we’ll make sure it doesn’t happen again.”
Sorry to keep belaboring this argument, but I think it is really interesting, and presents many delicate issues that ESPN usually glosses over. We do agree on the focus of prevention in the future. I just don’t know what else can be done in an even-handed fashion.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 8, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no problem with the argument continuing
the Hot Stove is pretty cold right now.
But I never said I wouldn’t want the users exposed. I just wouldn’t want it done in the fashion it was done just two days ago. But if Joel Piniero tests positive tomorrow for a banned substance he should be exposed for it. I agree that the extent to which steroids have touched the game will probably never be fully uncovered. We both obviously would rather the MLB focus on future prevention as opposed to past investigation.
Just for the record, I don’t think an asterisk would “completely undermine the achievements of those who have been exposed”. For me, I can look at an asterisk and know to myself that that player was not playing the game with the same purity that Maris, Gehrig, and DiMaggio were. And even today, I still consider 61 to be the all-time home run record. An asterisk would be for the benefit of future fans to know when they look at the numbers that a certain era in the league was undermined with a substance control problem. I know I said the MLB could simply disregard their numbers in the record books, but I don’t think that would ever happen. And even if their were to be expunged I wouldn’t feel very much sympathy for them. They used, they got caught, they pay the penalty.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 8, 2009 8:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious?
Baseball doesn’t know the effects of steroids on players yet it is banned
Then why the f*** would the players be taking steroids? They could ruin your long term health, cause cancer, and shorten your life. The athletes who’ve died from them are well documented, Lyle Alzado being most famous. Why would players who were already very good baseball players risk those type of harsh side effects if what they were taking didn’t help their performance? If taking a couple aspirin and lifting weights is enough, why take the risk?
That’s just an asinine argument to make — “We don’t know the effects on performance, so we should continue to let players in our league degrade their future quality of life by taking dangerous substances.” Give me a break, you sound like Bud Selig in 1999.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 1:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What's with the attitude in your posts
MLB has NEVER done a study on the effects steroids have on players performance. We’ve seen players take steroids and still be terrible baseball players (see: Lawton, Matt). People do lots of things they think will help with no evidence to prove it (see: religion).
I don’t know if you just believe in the dogma surrounding ‘performance enhancing drugs’ or want it to be true so you have something to rail against.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 9, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So the MLB has to do a study on everything before it can be true?
There are plenty of studies done by the IOC and other amateur competition committees that clearly show the gains in performance from using these drugs.
RE: Matt Lawton: I give you Brady Anderson, Bret Boone, etc., who were average players and then suddenly hit ridiculous amounts of home runs at the mid-point of their careers.
So because some players got bigger, faster, and stronger but didn’t get better at baseball that means that nobody gets better at baseball when they get bigger, faster, and stronger? Again, that’s just a dumb argument and doesn’t follow. I guess that all those guys who train with weights and plyometrics do that for no reason at all too, huh?
I don’t know if you just believe in the dogma surrounding ‘performance enhancing drugs’ or want it to be true so you have something to rail against.
Who has attitude in their posts? If you honestly believe that steroids have no effect on performance I could site NUMEROUS studies (like these here and here) from physiologists that beg to differ with you. If you want to argue with double blind studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine go right ahead. If it doesn’t help performance, then why have nearly all professional and amateur sports leagues and unions around the globe banned competitors from using them?
Beyond the scientific evidence, true or not, my problem is that these players intended to cheat . They knew that using steroids would give them a leg up on everyone else, they knew they were illegal in the United States, they just didn’t know the circumstances of being caught because the MLB had no policy. If it wasn’t such a big deal, then why do all of them consistently lie about it? By not coming forward and admitting it out in the open, they defame all of the other players who haven’t been juicing.
My attitude is such because you make outrageous arguments like this. I’m not railing against anything other than players who full well intended to cheat. Is it fair that Randy Velarde beat out other second baseman while juicing when those other players may not have wanted to risk their long term health or prison time to take that spot away? I’m not going to be an apologist for people like Bonds, Clemens, and Rodriguez when there are other players who are innocent of doing anything being defamed and their career accomplishments mucked up because of people who took advantage of the lack of rules and oversight.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 5:23 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Here's another good article for you
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I agree with everything you say, and you state it better than I could’ve.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks man
Outstanding post.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 9, 2009 6:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did Brady Anderson only use steroids for one season?
Because 1996 was the only season that he had an out of line HR total. That’s the problem with assuming steroids = good times for players. They don’t.
Steroids help players get stronger, they help players heal faster. Does that make them better players? Not necessarily. The healing effects steroids have on the body are more powerful than those that add bulk. Is a player cheating by trying to get healthier faster? How do you know that the intention of the player was to cheat the game instead of get his body back to the level needed to be able to play?
Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t make it an outrageous argument. And calling it that from on-top of a soapbox makes the claims seem less level-headed than normal.
Why would players be secretive about it? Perhaps because of the scarlet-letter type nature many in society put on the issue? If you used steroids at all, whether it be for an elbow injury or to add 10 pounds of muscle in the off-season…it’s all the same to most people.
I’m not apologizing for anyone. I’m also not self-righteous enough to believe that with absolute certainty that every player using steroids was trying to cheat the system to get an unfair advantage.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 10, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow...just WOW!
That’s the problem with assuming steroids = good times for players. They don’t.
That’s also the problem with picking out one player who took steroids and didn’t get better. That doesn’t mean that they don’t help other players who have a little more talent. Regarding Anderson: Yes, I do find it strange that a player who never slugged above .450 or hit more than 21 homers in a single year suddenly slugs .637 and hits 50 homers in a single season, at age 32 no less. Can I prove he used steroids? No, I can’t. Does it seem likely given the context of the steroid argument? Yes, which is exactly the problem. Maybe he didn’t take steroids and just had a spectacular season — but his numbers will always be tainted by those who did take them because of the cloud over the entire era.
Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t make it an outrageous argument. And calling it that from on-top of a soapbox makes the claims seem less level-headed than normal.
What isn’t there to understand? Even assuming that steroids don’t help performance at all, the fact that players were using an illegal substance in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage still qualifies as, um, cheating. I’m not even soapboxing, I’m stating a rational argument here: Players who attempt to gain a competitive advantage by unethical (banned by other sports) and illegal (under federal law) means are cheating the game, the fans, and themselves.
Is a player cheating by trying to get healthier faster?
If they’re using a substance banned by other professional sporting institutions and illegal under U.S. federal law to do so? Yes, that’s cheating.
How do you know that the intention of the player was to cheat the game instead of get his body back to the level needed to be able to play?
Because, by definition, that player is using a substance that is not freely available to those who don’t want to risk their long term health or prison time to “get his body back to the level needed to be able to play”, therefore it follows that they are using it as an unfair advantage not available to everyone — that’s cheating.
If you used steroids at all, whether it be for an elbow injury or to add 10 pounds of muscle in the off-season…it’s all the same to most people.
Please find me a physician who would prescribe the use of anabolic steroids in recovering from an elbow injury, and I’ll show you a quack doctor who writes prescriptions for cash. Why would the medical establishment prescribe a drug that causes muscle to grow faster than the tendons and ligaments of the joint could withstand? My guess is that if the player was taking steroids, that probably led to the need for rehabbing and elbow injury.
I’m also not self-righteous enough to believe that with absolute certainty that every player using steroids was trying to cheat the system to get an unfair advantage.
I’m not self-righteous, anything but. You’re making a self-righteous argument by stating that people who used steroids in baseball were not looking to gain a competitive advantage, when you have absolutely, unequivocally no proof that your statement is true, or has any letter of truth about it. The only reason to take steroids is to cheat the system to get an unfair advantage over others who do not take steroids.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 10, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
BTW
Did you see A-Rod’s interview last night?
Quote:
“When I arrived in Texas in 2001, I felt an enormous amount of pressure. I felt like I had all the weight of the world on top of me and I needed to perform, and perform at a high level every day,”
Quote:
"Back then, [baseball] was a different culture. It was very loose. I was young. I was stupid. I was naive. And I wanted to prove to everyone that I was worth being one of the greatest players of all time.
“I did take a banned substance. And for that, I am very sorry and deeply regretful.”
Quote:
“I’m finally beginning to grow up. I’m pretty tired of being stupid and selfish, you know, about myself. The truth needed to come out a long time ago. I’m glad it’s coming out today.”
And my personal favorite:
Quote:
“Can I have an edge just to get out there and play every day?”
Emphasis mine.
My thoughts exactly, Alex. And bravo for standing up and coming clean about your past use. You could have taken the Bonds and Clemens route, but you stood up and acknowledged what you did was wrong and that you’re ashamed by your actions. While I feel your legacy has been tarnished come, I do respect you more as a man for facing up to the allegations and telling the truth.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 10, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Hopefully by making this statement
other players will realize it is smarter for them to come clean, than go Rafael Palmerio. Look at Pettite last year. He fessed up to the allegations, and he has been able to continue his career w/o a cloud hanging over his head. Good move by A-Rod.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 10, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't come clean
Why do you keep latching on to little things and overblowing them?
You just used a proven liar and seeming narcissist that will say anything to make himself look better to try and prove an argument that is pure speculation.
He was asked if he had used steroids between 2001-03 and his replay (when he went off the prepared statement) was “That’s fairly accurate”.
Fairly accurate? That’s not coming clean, that’s trying to apologize without actually apologizing.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 10, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He said he stopped using steroids in 2003
but he wasn’t informed or was informed of the failed test until 2004.
Did he suddenly have a moral epiphany sometime in 2003 or, the more likely answer, HE IS STILL LYING. You only believe him because it fits your argument.
Emphasis mine.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 10, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure why I care
but this is a fun discussion.
I didn’t really take what fourstick said as an absolute endorsement that A-rod was telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I think he was pointing out the fact that A-rod took substances with the inent of getting an edge (ie cheating). That was his intent. I really don’t want to argue about whether it worked or not, but that was his reasoning for why he took steroids. And on that point, I believe he is telling the truth.
Websters defines cheating as:
to deprive of something valuable by the use of deceit or fraud
Sounds like what A-Rod did to me.
Obviously there are some details missing about the extent of his use and there are some holes in his story, which you pointed out. But that isn’t relevant to the issue of why he took steroids.
And I say England's greatest prime minister was Lord Palmerston.
by tangledbrett on Feb 10, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So now who's on their soapbox?
In the beginning it wasn’t a big deal to you that players were taking steroids because they may not be performance enhancing.
Now you attack A-Rod for being a liar, even though every other player not named Andy Pettitte has also lied about this very subject. Again, why would they lie if their intent was not to cheat? You’ve now refuted yourself three different times in the course of this argument.
If it isn’t a big deal to you, fine! But don’t go around accusing other people of throwing stones because it is a big deal to us. Did A-Rod ever lie under oath? No. When he got caught, did he come clean about using steroids? Yes. That’s far more than I can say for Mr. Clemens, Mr. Bonds, or Miss Marion Jones (who professed to tell the truth and then still maintains and the evidence against them is just as damning, imo. I’m sorry that I’m impressed with his ability to come out and admit that he was wrong, why he felt the need to do them, and that he was ashamed of himself. For a guy with an ego as big as his, that’s got to be a very difficult thing to do.
Did he suddenly have a moral epiphany sometime in 2003 or, the more likely answer, HE IS STILL LYING. You only believe him because it fits your argument.
So he’s lying about why he took steroids? I suppose you, the almighty Hardcore Legend, know better than Alex Rodriguez himself why Alex Rodriguez took steroids, right? He said himself that he wanted and edge when he was playing everyday, he didn’t say “I wanted to look good for the ladies” or “I heard back acne and butt abscesses were really in style in 2003 and wanted a piece of that action”. If he’s admitting steroid use, why would he then lie about the reasons for him taking them? Your argument here has no grounds whatsoever.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 11, 2009 9:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I seriously have trouble keeping up
with both your constant indignation and your shifting argument.
Consider my half of this ended.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 11, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good
You lose an argument so you quit. Nice.
Shifting argument? Hardly.
My argument:
“Those who took steroids intended to cheat by using illegal means to enhance their performance.”
That’s it. It’s simple. It is you that is all over the map on this subject, so don’t try to make it look like it’s me.
Indignant? Good call, way to go out on a high note. I guess this whole debate has devolved into name calling. Oh, wait, you’ve been name-calling me the entire time. Classy, you are.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 11, 2009 4:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As final evidence you couldn't tell if you were
coming or going:
Give me a break, you sound like Bud Selig in 1999.
We must be equally classy people.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 12, 2009 12:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not calling you names...
I’m stating that your argument sounds a whole lot like the words coming out of the commissioner’s office in 1999, the year after Mac & Sammy’s Great Home Run Chase.
“We’re not sure the effect that certain supplements might have on player performance. The MLB has no formal policy on the use of these supplements and they are over the counter, etc, etc.”
Bury your head in the sand about certain things and you end up with egg all over your face when it comes back up.
The difference between you and Bud is that he was still dealing with the ill effects of the 1994 strike on the baseball and nearly 2 decades of inaction from men like Bowie Kuhn, Bart Giamatti, and Fay Vincent in addressing the steroid issue. He also reversed course 5 years ago, even though it was entirely too late. You’re still eschewing the same argument he was 10 years ago despite boatloads of evidence to the contrary, which concerns me because it adds a lot of misinformation and outside noise into the argument by misrepresenting factual evidence.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 12, 2009 9:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK
How about this one:
“I did take a banned substance”
Yup, no admission of anything there.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 11, 2009 9:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This clears the way
for pujols to be the only player who might break the home run record without taking steroids. At the pace Albert’s going, he will have nearly 800 homers by the time he’s 40.
by ultimatecardinalfan on Feb 7, 2009 7:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Or Miguel Cabrera
And of course Brett Wallace.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 7, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Amaury Marti would hit 800 HR's in a single season given 600 AB's...
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Feb 9, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing I really have to say about this:
Now that Bonds’ and ARod’s tests have come back positive on anabolic steroids, and nobody has one from McGwire, if either of them get into the Hall Of Fame before Big Mac (who I believe was as guilty as those two) then something is seriously wrong with baseball.
by stlfan on Feb 7, 2009 8:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
There is already something seriously wrong
with the Hall of Fame voting right now.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 7, 2009 8:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
true dat
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 7, 2009 8:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
mcgwire
his “not here to talk about the past” doomed him, i personally think if he admitted use and said “i’m sorry” he could probably would get in. Him and sosa saved baseball after the strike, personally i think they should both get in just for that fact.
"When the boogie man goes to sleep he checks his closet for Chuck Norris"
by elirock83 on Feb 7, 2009 11:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
unlike most here, i don't care who used or did not use PED's
i also do not lump HGH under the PED umbrella.
anyway, this doesn’t really matter. it does when it comes to his PR & public perception. and maybe his HOF eligibility. but so what? almost every player of his era used PED’s in some form or fashion. and if it is indeed cheating, then what he did is right in line with almost every other great player that’s ever stepped foot onto a diamond did. if anyone is naive enough to believe the great players from the past didn’t cheat, or didn’t try & cheat, then i have some ocean front property in Montana i’d like to sell you.
it is complete hypocrisy that the HOF is keeping Big Mac out. as will it be when they don’t vote Bonds, Raffy, or any other player who belongs in there just because he used or more importantly like in Big Mac’s case, is merely suspected of using PED’s. Cobb, Ruth, and almost every other player in the HOF should be ripped out of the HOF if the players from the PED era are not allowed in. they cheated just as much or more so than than the players of the recent past did.
i will say, as a Cardinal fan i’m worried about Albert. now more than ever he has a bulls eye on his back. i guarandamntee you someone out there is looking to take him out big time. i don’t care if he took anything, hell i’ll be more surprised if he didn’t take anything. he’s our guy though, and he’s done so much to build up his rep as a clean player, and potentially the greatest player to ever set foot on a diamond. if someone digs up some dirt on him & he goes down, i guarantee you it will be a much bigger story than ARod’s. Albert’s not only the face of the Cardinals, he’s the face of everything this great game stands for. and if he goes down, boy i don’t even want to think about what will happen then.
this news just saddens me more than anything. it’s just another black eye on baseball. our game has taken many many hits over the years. far, far more than any other pro sport. i’m beginning to wonder how many more it can take. it’s everyone’s fault this is happening. yours, mine, good ole Bud’s, the union, the owner’s, the players. everyone. we all have some blame to bare when it comes to this mess. i’m sick of this. i’m just flat out sick of this mess. i have PED fatigue. much like i’m sure many of you do. my hope for this game & the future is we can all just move on from it all. learn from our mistakes & never make them again. somehow make this game pure again. i don’t know if it can be done or should be done. but i hope & pray it will be done.
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 7, 2009 9:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I was really hoping to see
some fireworks over this at Pinstripe Alley , but alas, the Yankee fans have disappointed me again. They don’t even seem to get the joy that is SBNation.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 7, 2009 10:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
my take on the steroids issue
is that if they are going to make such a big deal out of it, they need to make damn sure no one is getting away with it now, otherwise why even bother making them illegal? I don’t want certain teams to be better just because they know how to get away with ped’s. it’s pretty hypocritical overall for them to pretend that they didn’t know it was happening… I’m sure they did.
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 8, 2009 2:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
imho if the government is going to get involved
they need to REALLY get involved. As in, forget 50 game suspensions etc. Arrest people who are guilty of illegal drug use, charge them with the crime they have committed, and send them to play in the california penal league for a few years.
That’ll clean up the game in a hurry.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
funny thing is
if they had done that less than 10 years ago, it would have destroyed mlb… I’m guessing now hardly anyone is doing it, save perhaps a few players that you can’t really tell the difference, hopefully. I’m just amazed at how childish the whole thing was handled, just look at the b.s. they pulled with ankiel, all the hypocrisy is rather unnerving
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 8, 2009 7:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm still convinced
that the whole ankiel kerfluffle was masterminded by the chicago tribune, as a deliberate, malicious act of unsportsmanship. i think they got scared we were going to catch the Cubs with Superman putting up a 1.100 OPS and went to the mattresses.
I really don’t think sports teams should own newspapers that report on sports teams. There’s a definite conflict of interest there.
still cannot accept that Rachael was Chani.
by SleepyCA on Feb 8, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have thought about that also
and it wouldn’t surprise me in the least
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 9, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
then we can get Major League 3!
“How’d you end up playing there?”
“Stole a car.”
by WyoCardsFan on Feb 11, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
FYI - A-Rod admits use.
Recent press conference confirms PED use.
by tom s. on Feb 9, 2009 2:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good, now he should use all his money
to sue MLB, MLBPA and have his lawyers push for a special prosecutor to investigate the leaking of Federally sealed evidenced.
by Hardcore Legend on Feb 9, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pujols
If Craig Calcaterra (editor/poster at the Hardball Times) is correct on his Bond case summary, the prosecution (government) is putting a lot of information out there to help try Bonds in the court of public opinion. They’re doing this because they don’t have a strong case against Bonds (which boggles the mind!).
IF this is true, then wouldn’t the prosecution want to leak the absolute biggest name on the list they had in front of them? If this line of reasoning is correct (AND THAT MIGHT BE A STRETCH), then we should be relieved!
I’d expect Pujols to be a much bigger name than A-Rod considering the recent MVP, clean record and lack of mention in Jose Canseco’s book. A-Rod has dealt with these accusations before.
That might be debateable, though.
jp
by jpmorgan5150 on Feb 9, 2009 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Only because he plays in NY
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My sarcasm meter is broken today...
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's also
because he’s been in MLB longer, he’s got a greater media presence for myriad reasons, and he’s been the game’s highest paid player twice. So… Yeah, everyone knows who A-Rod is.
by spants on Feb 9, 2009 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, dating Madonna
will make you more famous. It’s hard to argue though if Pujols played for the Yankees who would be more of a presence. A-Rod would be more of a media draw no doubt. But, I think fans would flock to Albert in masses and place him on his pedastal before they’d consider doing the same for A-Rod. I just base that on the way the Mang approaches and plays the game. Fans love it.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 9, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fans may love it,
but he wouldn’t sell newspapers. He’s not a celebrity. A-Rod’s celebrity and seeming need for constant attention has him snagging headlines left and right. Even people who aren’t baseball fans know of Alex Rodriguez. The same cannot be said for Pujols. I am more than okay with this.
by spants on Feb 9, 2009 10:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 10, 2009 8:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And in the category of most BSI response so far . . .
The New York Daily News!
Now that A-Rod’s pursuit looks as counterfeit as Bonds’, they should do what’s best for the organization:
Cut him loose – no matter the cost.
As difficult as it is to imagine eating $270 million, the Bombers will be making a statement, not just for the Yankee brand but for baseball as a whole.
Yes, cut loose A-Rod. Pay him $270M not to play for you! Excellent idea!
by tom s. on Feb 9, 2009 4:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Looks like we cut A.Kennedy a bit too early; should've offered him and Duncan for A-Rod.
As a sign of goodwill, I’d even throw in Glaus.
by Ray Lankford on Feb 9, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
haven't you heard? we need glaus to play second! that way brian barton can play third and
brendan ryan can go to left field.
at least no one has ever mistaken kennedy for a steroid user.
by tom s. on Feb 9, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs


