Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Behind the plate -- Yadi's RAA

Yadier Molina is pretty widely regarded as a premier defensive catcher and that was that basis for the long term contract he signed prior to last season. His defensive excellence was finally recognized by the voting public when he won his first Gold Glove following the ’08 season. Still, as I noted back in September, ’08 was Molina’s worst season behind the plate. Fortunately for the Cards, it was Yadi’s best season standing next to the plate so his relatively poor season defensively (compared to previous Yadi seasons) was largely forgotten by Cards’ fans and the Gold Glove voters (ironically).

It’s extremely difficult to measure a catcher’s defensive value, as you’ll notice whenever you try to look it up over at fangraphs. Every other position player has a defensive value computed into runs by virtue of their UZR but catchers don’t really have a UZR. They do have to field some balls and make throws to 1st, 2nd or 3rd on bunts and other dribblers but much of their defensive value is unique to the position. It’s difficult to measure their ability to block the plate or call a game but slightly easier to measure their value in preventing runs from scoring through caught stealings (and runners who never attempt) and by blocking balls and thereby preventing wild pitches and passed balls. Today I’m going to attempt to compare the NL catchers in terms of their runs allowed last season through stolen bases, wild pitches, and passed balls.

Here’s what we know: based on research done by James Click of BP and presented in the book, Baseball Between the Numbers, a stolen base is worth .1593 runs and a caught stealing costs a team .3687 runs. Similarly, Dan Turkenkopf (of BtB fame) figured out that, in 2007, a wild pitch or passed ball was worth about .27 runs. So let’s use that data to determine which NL catchers saved, or cost their teams, the most runs in 2008.

I used 2008’s data for SB and CS and figured out the number of base running runs against for the catcher on each team who played the most games. Then, I used THT’s numbers for (WP+PB)/G to determine each catcher’s WP and PB against. Multiplying that number times 0.27 allowed me to determine the catcher’s miss runs against. Add the BR runs to Miss runs to get total runs against. Then I used that number to compute the number of runs against if each catcher caught 150 games to give us a standard comparison. I used that number (runs/150) to compute the average for each of the starting catchers (or ones who played in the most games for each team). I was then able to determine the number of runs each catcher was above or below average (on a 150 game scale) for 2008.

It can be fairly argued that my number for the "average" catcher is incomplete b/c I simply took the average of each team’s best catcher. If I had used all the NL catchers or, perhaps more effectively, all the catchers in the major leagues, the "average" runs against would’ve been a lot higher (since it would have incorporated all the catchers who weren’t good enough to play so many games) and, therefore, it undervalues each catcher’s defense. Perhaps that’s an exercise for another day. While this may undervalue each catcher’s (or at least the best catchers’) runs against, it will allow us to effectively compare each NL starting catcher (they'll still be ordered correctly) based on their performance blocking balls and preventing runners from stealing bases. To the results:

G SB CS WP+PB BR runs Miss runs Total runs R/150 RAA
Kendall 149 55 41 49 -6.36 13.23 6.87 6.92 9.54
Ausmus 77 19 5 16 1.18 4.32 5.50 10.72 5.74
Yadi 119 34 18 42 -1.22 11.34 10.12 12.76 3.71
Snyder 112 49 22 40 -0.31 10.8 10.49 14.05 2.41
Ruiz 110 65 20 28 2.98 7.56 10.54 14.37 2.09
Martin 149 70 23 44 2.67 11.88 14.55 14.65 1.81
Schneider 109 42 21 46 -1.05 12.42 11.37 15.64 0.82
Soto 136 69 25 48 1.77 12.96 14.73 16.25 0.21
B. Molina 136 68 36 64 -2.44 17.28 14.84 16.37 0.10
Bako 96 55 22 40 0.65 10.8 11.45 17.89 -1.43
McCann 138 93 27 43 4.86 11.61 16.47 17.90 -1.44
Hundley 59 42 14 21 1.53 5.67 7.20 18.30 -1.84
Treanor 65 44 15 26 1.48 7.02 8.50 19.61 -3.15
Iannetta 100 41 12 46 2.11 12.42 14.53 21.79 -5.33
Flores 82 47 17 41 1.22 11.07 12.29 22.48 -6.02
Doumit 106 68 25 56 1.61 15.12 16.73 23.68 -7.22

So using my (admittedly imperfect) methodology, the difference between the best defensive catcher in the NL in ’08 and the worst was about 17 runs – a little more than a win and a half. It’s a noticeable difference but not a huge one. Once again, the oft-maligned Jason Kendall comes up on top of the defensive rankings. He was tested often behind the plate and nearly 40% of the time he rose to the occasion. He’s always had a poor defensive reputation but managed last year to throw out a higher percentage of runners than any other NL regular – nearly 10% more runners than Yadi. I suppose it’s pretty good that Yadi, in a down year, was still the 3rd best defensive catcher in the NL, his Gold Glove notwithstanding.

Yadi made some comments earlier in the offseason indicating that he recognized that last year was a poor one relatively for him behind the plate and that he wanted to improve his defense in ’09. Hopefully that’ll be the case. While choosing to run against him was a net loss for the Cards’ opposition, he did allow .350 WP+PB per game. When he broke into the big leagues, he was just as highly regarded for his ability to block pitches as he was for his arm. Indeed, last year’s (WP+PB/G) was higher than any season since his rookie season and his CS% was the lowest of his career. He’s still a very valuable defensive catcher – worth about 3 runs above the average NL starting catcher over the 119 games he played last season.

The other question, of course, is can we get more than 119 games from Yadi behind the plate in ’09. His career high games played behind the plate is 127 so I wouldn’t expect that many more despite the fact that he’s suffered injuries each of the last 2 seasons. He’s a catcher. They get banged up. Still, we’re worse off w/ every game played by Jason LaRue than w/ Yadi in the lineup. All that said, it’s reasonable to think that if we can get 8-10 more games from Yadi and he can improve his defensive performance to where it was in previous seasons (in 06 his RAA – assuming 08’s average – was 10.97 and in 07 it was 12.03), it’s probably worth another half win or so to the team’s record and, if we’re going to make the playoffs, we’re going to need every half win we can get.

Comment 105 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

J Kendall and Yadi

I must admit being a bit happy seeing Kendall on top of that list- statistical debates on the list’s validity notwithstanding. I’ve always enjoyed Kendall and thought he was worth more than (insert cliche here). He’ll always be a Pirate to me.

I was happy with Yadi’s bat last year, but I wonder if that reflects a decision on his part to focus more on the stick at the apparent cost of his D.

Not that I’m complaining. His bat needed an upgrade and if he hits and fields like he did last year for the rest of his Redbird career I think most everybody would be happy.

I love his gun, his ability to shift around behind the plate, and pouncing on dribblers- all of which stand in stark contrast to his…ah-hem, physique.

I predict an uptick in his D this year, even before he openly addressed last year’s gold glove winning backslide.

by Scarecrow7775 on Feb 22, 2009 9:43 AM EST reply actions  

I think Kendall was helped by his previous years when he was really bad at throwing out runners.

For whatever reason, he threw out a ton this year which he couldn’t do the year before or the year before. Maybe more guys took chances which shouldn’t have? I think that coupled with getting better somehow in throwing out runners skyrocketed his numbers last year and I’d expect to see him fall back into the pack this year since teams will be more cautious against him.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Oy Jason Kendall

don’t remind me.

"If Bowden was a general contractor, he'd build houses with nine bedrooms, six garages, no bathrooms, and half a roof."

by DyeLongJustice on Feb 22, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

No doubt.

You’d know better than most how bad he was.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Luckily for me

I’m a two team man. When the A’s were playing the sludge known as Jason Kendall, I could at least concomitantly love Yadi and loathe Kendall in order to balance out my baseball cosmos. Otherwise, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have made it through his last baseball season with the A’s.

"If Bowden was a general contractor, he'd build houses with nine bedrooms, six garages, no bathrooms, and half a roof."

by DyeLongJustice on Feb 22, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know about guys who shouldn’t have taking chances, but among the people he threw out were Jacoby Ellsbury and Jimmy Rollins. Supposedly he tweaked his mechanics.

by ol Pete on Feb 22, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously, I didn't limit his success to people taking extra chances.

If you notice I said it was probably a combination of extra guys taking chances and him improving something he was doing wrong, but thanks for making me type it again.

Of course, it could also be the pitchers he’s now working with. That has a lot to do with throwing out runners.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

And I agreed with you, affirmed your speculation and made some conversation.

by ol Pete on Feb 22, 2009 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Seemed to me like you eliminated half of what I said

and then used that omission to tell me why I was wrong.

My bad. I guess it just confused me a bit.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know about taking chances

but more runners attempted to steal against Kendall than anyone else in baseball and, with the exception of Brian McCann, it wasn’t close. Everyone, seemingly, attempted to steal against Kendall and he was huge!

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

How difficult would it be...

to do this for 2003-2007? Would it not be worth your efforts? I would love to see how correct/incorrect we Cards fans were on Yadi’s previous defensive efforts compared to the rest of the league.

by stlfan on Feb 22, 2009 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

it's doable

but not today. First I’ll work on getting the average right for the majors in ‘08. Then I’ll do it for the other years and see. I’ve seen Yadi’s numbers though and I can tell you that last year was his worst defensively. There’s a good chance he was the best in the NL, and possibly the majors, every other year.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Cool.

Definitely let me know if/when you do this for historical years. We’d love to link it up heavily over at BtB or welcome a guest piece from you that’s less Cardinals-centric.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Feb 23, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

China-time

One of the things I enjoy is that given my geographical position (China) is that I can be one of the first to delve, if I so chose.

Chuck- as you state in your post… judging the 2Spot in totality is not easy, perhaps impossible.

What’s the price of keeping Maddux on your team, or going back further… Carlton. It seems to me that “deals well with the ace” is perhaps a grunts best tool.

I know it’s not quantifiable, and hence not in line with this site, but… ace pitchers usually know less about stats than I do.

by Scarecrow7775 on Feb 22, 2009 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

I have the inclination, but not the time...

…to evaluate the cost/benefit of keeping a substandard catcher at the sake of keeping an ace. That’s not to say that Yadi is a pud, which he surely isn’t. I’m just wondering.

by Scarecrow7775 on Feb 22, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

nice study chuck

one refinement might be to attempt somehow to account for SBs not attempted. i know you’re probably already aware of this; i can recall comment-thread discussions in the past where you pointed out that some (perhaps most) of yadi’s D value comes from the deterrence effect. players just won’t run on him, which theoretically leads to more double plays and fewer scoring opportunities.

your chart shows that deterrent effect very clearly: there were only 52 SB attempts on yadi in 119 games, or a little more than .4 attempts per game. for every other catcher on this list except one (ausmus), the SB attempts/game were north of .6 att / game, and some catchers had close to 1.0 att/game.

the methodology used here treats deterrence as a neutral effect, neither positive or negative; but theoretically there should be a small but measurable positive effect. even though he’s not throwing out baserunners (and deriving the .3687 RAA credit), yadi is still denying bases to the other team and thereby diminishing its scoring potential by some amount. there are various ways you could go about estimating that, but i’d be willing to guess it’s worth somewhere around 5 RAA per year for the very best catchers.

by lboros on Feb 22, 2009 12:33 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I actually

thought about this as I was doing it. I noticed the fact that Yadi had so few attempts against and my conclusion was that it would affect the number of runs b/c there were fewer stolen bases w/ fewer attempts. But I think you’re right — there’s a residual impact — more DP’s, more runners stranded at 3rd on singles and doubles, forces at 2nd that otherwise would be outs at first w/ the runner moving up a base, etc. I’m not sure how to quantify that but I’m going to go back and review this and make some adjustments to the average runs yielded based on all catchers (rather than just those who played in the most games) so I can try and figure that out as well. Thanks for dropping by and for the valuable insight.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

a follow-on, chuck

is there a way to control for the fact that CS is basically a team event — it requires the pitcher to be fast to the plate, the first baseman to properly hold the runner, and the second baseman or SS to be at the bag and apply the tag properly?

are there any ways to control for these factors?

by tom s. on Feb 22, 2009 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it has less (much less actually) to do with the infielders.

You could definitely make an argument for the pitcher.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

If you read

either Baseball Between the Numbers or the Book (I think the former) they determined that it almost all up to the C. Neither the pitcher nor the infielders have any significant, measurable consistent impact on a catcher’s success rate in throwing out runners.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Ehh that's one where I'll easily disagree with the numbers

There’s no way Isringhausen with his super slow delivery is going to be as effective at holding runners as say Carpenter’s slide step.

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Feb 22, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

it's not "the book"

the book says there is definitely an effect, at least due to pitcher handedness.

I’m with joker here; if someone looked at this and concluded that the pitcher doesn’t have an effect, there’s almost certainly a problem with their methodology.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree.

there’s a reason coaches time the amount of time it takes a pitcher to deliver the ball to the catcher.

Also, if a pitcher pays no mind to the runner, he’s going to get a much better jump.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

in 2008 baserunners were

9 for 12 against lohse (200 IP)
7 for 13 against wellemeyer (191 IP)
6 for 8 against isringhausen (42 IP)
5 for 9 against pineiro (148 IP)
4 for 4 against flores (25 IP)
3 for 4 against perez (41 IP)

by contrast they were

2 for 3 against mcclellan (75 IP)
2 for 6 against wainwright (132 IP)
1 for 1 against looper (199 IP)
1 for 3 against springer (50 IP)
1 for 2 against thompson (64 IP)

I’m unwilling to chalk that up to pure chance.

They’re seeing something in Lohse and Welly that makes them run twelve and thirteen times more than on Looper, in comparable numbers of innings. How does izzy give up 6 stolen bases in one-third the innings in which wainwright gives up two?

Last year, kip wells gave up 17 stolen bases on 22 attempts, which was more than a quarter of all bases stolen against the entire pitching staff, even though he pitched only 162 innings.

Kyle Lohse has given up 75 SB out of 113 attempts in his career.
Todd Wellemeyer has given up 20 SB out of 29 attempts in his career.

Chris Carpenter has never had a year when more than 50% of SB attempts have been successful.

I think there are so many variables here it’s very hard to rule out the role of other folks on the field.

by tom s. on Feb 22, 2009 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I agree about deterrence being good, at least in the way you mention.

The value the offense gained by getting their runners to second and out of GIDP situations is contained in the value of the SB. Keeping a runner on first doesn’t decrease their likelihood of scoring, because the likelihood of scoring is already built in to the run-expectancy chart. That’s poorly written, sorry.

I CAN see a value in that the defense doesn’t have to worry as much about hit and runs, the SS/2B don’t have to cheat towards second to cover steal attempts, and the pitcher can spend a little less time worrying about runners on first.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Feb 23, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

i believe pickoffs are separate from caught stealings.

by greenback06 on Feb 22, 2009 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

It's cloudy.

Per wikipedia:

A runner who is picked off, when that runner’s sole action after leading off is diving back to the base, only to be put out, is not caught stealing. If during the play the runner made any feint or motion to the next base, then the runner is caught stealing, even if eventually put out on the dive back.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Looking at some box scores at b-r, it appears that at least some of what we call pickoffs are not counted as caught stealings. For most, that’s not an issue, but over the years a good chunk of Molina’s value has come from those events. Pickoffs are also probably worth a little more than an average caught stealing, since a steal attempt is at the the offensive team’s discretion, sorta like a generic HBP is a little more valuable than a generic walk.

by greenback06 on Feb 22, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup.

And a pickoff where the runner takes off for second and the 1B throws to the SS for a tag out counts as a CS, too.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Feb 23, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I believe box scores do normally mention put-outs

by bornin82 on Feb 22, 2009 4:43 PM EST reply actions  

forgot to hit the reply button

by bornin82 on Feb 22, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Organizational rankings.

Found this to be interesting. Project Prospect ranked all 30 MLB organizations and has ranked the Cardinals as number 9 overall.

Link.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Does that completely kill the idea of an Ankiel-for-Johnson trade?

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Feb 22, 2009 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that trade is all but dead.

However, Atlanta is still two good outfielders short. Anderson is gonna platoon with Diaz in left.

by MattK on Feb 22, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

My first reaction to that news was.

Why do National League teams keep signing designated hitters?

(I’m thinking of Milton Bradley as the other).

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

He a first baseman.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

A fat first baseman who hates baseball and America

The artist formerly known as...
Mr Redbird @ Viva El Birdos
PowerOfDixieland @ Track Em Tigers, other SEC blogs

by jd is legend on Feb 22, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I also heard

he was offered a hot dog and he said “no way” and then flipped the bird to a guy driving a Chevy.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasn't that right after

he smeared an apple pie on the windshield of said Chevy? ;)

by cardsgirl95 on Feb 22, 2009 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, you mean that bradley's last deal was as a DH?

as opposed to being primarily qualified to be a DH? gotcha.

by tom s. on Feb 22, 2009 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure what you're asking?

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought you were referring to players who had no defensive prowess to speak of

and played only for their bats. i think of these as DH-types, even when they play LF or 1b.

you literally meant DH’s.

by tom s. on Feb 22, 2009 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I just meant, Bradley has played almost exclusively as a DH

the past couple of years and Anderson played a lot there too. I think part of Anderson being able to stay somewhat healthy the past couple of years is the amount of time he’s allowed to DH which saves him a lot of wear and tear.

I know I wouldn’t want to sign one of these guys and think they’re going to stay healthy in the outfield. Then again, it’s said Anderson is supposed to platoon with Matt Diaz, but I think since he’s a lefty hitter he’ll be looked at to supply around 400 at bats and I’m not sure he can come close to that playing in the field for all of those.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice analysis

one comment regarding the exclusion of the non-starting catchers.

the “average” runs against would’ve been a lot higher (since it would have incorporated all the catchers who weren’t good enough to play so many games)

I don’t have any evidence but would think that several of the back up catchers are as good defensively as the starters. The reason they are backups is that they are limited on the offensive side of the game. In his small sample size, LaRue had a lower SBA/G, lower CS % and a lower WP+BB/G than Yadi. If I ran the numbers right, (and that’s a big if) LaRue ends up with a RAA of 2.25. Not a bad defensive tandem.

by ubeddie on Feb 22, 2009 5:12 PM EST reply actions  

you may be right

I’d have to run the numbers to see for sure. I just took for granted that they’re probably not as good since they’re the backups. Even if there are a few who are better than the starters, I would think that the rest would bring down the average (or bring it up as the case may be). But it was entirely an assumption that may turn out to be completely false. You’re right.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point

I think the pitching staff and the coaching staff deserve a lot of credit here as well. Stolen base defense has always been a point of emphasis for this regime. I know some would minimize the impact of the pitchers, but the pitcher has to keep them close and be quick to the plate.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Those would not be catchers

A pitcher’s ability to keep the runner close and from getting a good jump is probably the single most important part of whether or not a stolen base is successful (that’s why teams time a pitcher’s delivery from the stretch to see if he’s vulnerable). The best throwing catchers give the pitcher a little more leeway and rarely have a base stolen against them (as opposed to it being stolen “off the pitcher’). A bad throwing catcher will get bases stolen "against him” frequently and, when combined with a pitcher slow to the plate, runners can practically walk to second (See Mike Piazza).

by fltfire on Feb 22, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely

my son was a D1 pitcher who started out as a catcher. He was nearly impossible to steal off of because of his excellent pick-off move, quick delivery to the plate, and he was a power pitcher who threw a lot of fastballs.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

it absolutely is not

that’s a myth. I’m pretty sure the book Baseball Between the Numbers debunked this myth. The most important part of whether or not a SB attempt is successful is the catcher’s ability to throw runners out. It may be the only statistically significant element. I’ll have to reread that chapter.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

they may have attempted to debunk the "myth"

which is very easy to do in a non-peer-reviewed publication. But I’d be AMAZED if they really did prove this.

This falls into sagan’s “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” class of arguments, imho.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Please do.

I’m intrigued at how a slow pitcher delivery has no effect on a stolen base.

Basically, you time the time period of when the pitcher starts his delivery to the point the fielder covering second catches the ball. If that time is faster than what it takes the baserunner to get to 2nd, then he’s out. If not, he’s safe. Typically, if the catcher gets a good pitch to handle, his time from glove to glove should be the same. Where you have a difference is when the pitcher is slow. That would cause the overall time to be slower.

If that’s a myth, then my whole world is about to be turned upside down because I don’t know how a catcher’s ability to throw makes up for a slow delivery. That’s why you often see pitchers go to a slide step as opposed to a high leg kick when they’re pitching out of the stretch.

Meeting is adjourned. Oh I am sorry sir, I didn't mean to overstep my bounds. You say that.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

No, you say that, Governor.

What?

Meeting is adjourned.

It is?

by Tackle Box on Feb 22, 2009 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

but it doesn't make a statement

as to the impact that pitchers have on controlling the running game. In fact, it implies that catchers do have a significant impact on controlling the running game w/o commenting whatsoever on a pitcher’s ability to do the same.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

So base stealers

steal more often and more successfully against certain pitchers because their catchers don’t like them or what? If you reread that chapter and it says what you think it says then I look forward to a post about it, ’cause that would really be newsworthy. Until then, I am going to assume that you misremember about that.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

nice sarcasm

have you anything else to offer other than conventional “wisdom?”

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Umm

He phrased it sarcastically but there was a point there: is there an explanation for why there are significant differences between SB attempts against different pitchers?

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Feb 22, 2009 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

i think we're all waiting

on the “wisdom” contained in this apocryphical work which you’ve referenced. It’s pretty much impossible for anyone to argue with vague recollections from a book none of us have read (and I’ll be damned if i buy a book by jonah keri).

Since you have the book, figure out what that section actually said and then we can maybe have a conversation. I’m certainly not going to take keri’s word for anything and a second-hand adaptation of what some guy says is worse than useless. It’s the farthest thing from a scientific approach possible.

I can’t picture any framework within which one can make the argument you’ve claimed Jonah has made. It seems like an absurd argument, intuituively, so it’s going to take a very sound argument to convince anyone that it is true.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

so your point is

“that book is beneath me but, oh by the way, would you please read it to me?”

Ok, I’ve found something here — you’ll be happy to know it wasn’t written by Jonah Keri, but there’s little doubt that, if it doesn’t fit your argument, you’ll have a problem with this particular author.

I’ll admit to bastardizing the point of the article some — Michael Wolverton makes the point that individual pitchers can have some impact on a running game. However —

The correlation coefficient for CS% from one team to the next was +0.53. That’s still quite strong, and not a whole lot lower than the year-to-year correlations for all catchers shown above. In other words, knowing a catcher’s CS numbers with one set of pitchers tells you a lot about what they’re going to be with another set of pitchers.

The bottom line is that all the evidence that I’ve seen on this issue indicates that catcher caught-stealing numbers are measuring the catcher, without too much interference from the pitching staff. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible that there will occasionally be extreme pitching staffs that can have some positive or negative impact on a catcher’s numbers, but it does mean that the next time a fan tries to defend his favorite catcher by blaming all his troubles with baserunners on his pitchers, you’d be wise to be skeptical.

The point — catchers have easily the strongest effect on a running game and the effect is strong enough that a catcher’s impact on the running game will be similar regardless of the pitching staff.

My initial argument was with fltfire who said that pitchers have easily the greatest impact on the running game. That is verifiably untrue, as Wolverton demonstrates. While some individual pitchers can have a measurable impact, they are largely outliers. The most important impact on the running game is the catcher.

Does that mean pitchers have no impact, as I implied? No. However, your argument and everyone’s thereafter dispute my assertion that

The most important part of whether or not a SB attempt is successful is the catcher’s ability to throw runners out. It may be the only statistically significant element.

Wolverton’s article supports that statement and I wonder now why it is my statement that “falls into sagan’s ‘extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’ class of arguments.” The notion that a catcher ISN’T the most important determinant of a successful SB attempt is pretty counterintuitive. Looking back, I wonder why I went to such great lengths to try to prove my point when those of you who believe that the catcher ISN’T the most important element to controlling the running game should have offered 1 piece of supporting data or evidence in your favor.

If it lacks the adequate peer review you need before you’ll believe something, I humbly apologize.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

sigh.

Do you seriously want us to uncritically accept anything you say?

you, and the guys you reference, are making an EXTREMELY bold claim here. On par with saying the earth is pretzel-shaped. it’s going to take pretty bold evidence before I or anyone else with a basic level of scientific education would be convinced that this claim is true.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

what I want, Sleepy

is for someone else to look something up rather than simply saying “No it isn’t.” “Prove it.” “That doesn’t make sense.” I was refuting the argument that a pitcher’s impact on the running game was greater than anyone else’s. I said no it isn’t and then spent a good deal of time looking for the article that backs that up. In the meantime, all I heard from people is how awful Jonah Keri is and smart-ass remarks and condescension w/o 1 person lifting a finger to point me to an article demonstrating I was wrong. Still, no one’s done that. You’ve picked out 1 sentence in the article I found and say, “Look, it also says pitchers have some impact.” Well, no shit! I found that and included that in my post above.

Furthermore, I’ve walked back the initial implication that a pitcher’s impact was negligible but no one else, save giveml below, has said, “Wait a minute. I didn’t mean to defend the argument that a pitcher’s impact was greater than the catcher’s.” I still don’t know what your perspective is, aside from a refusal to read anything Jonah Keri writes. Would you read it if it said that the pitcher’s impact was greater than the catcher’s?

“Uncritically accept anything I say” — horseshit! If I’m wrong, lift a finger to demonstrate it. The bottom line is that I wasn’t wrong. I overstated my position, and humbly apologize for having done so, but it’s frustrating to try and argue a point when no one else makes any reference to factual information or data of any kind. I’m not sure why I tried. Next time I’ll just say “prove me wrong.” Hopefully someone here will lift a finger to attempt to do it.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 11:49 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

and from the wolverton article:
"There’s no doubt that the pitcher has a huge influence on the success or failure of a particular steal attempt, and it pretty much follows that an individual pitcher who’s especially good (or bad) at keeping runners close can help (or hurt) the catcher’s CS numbers during the innings he pitches. "

Which is exactly the argument we are all making.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Danke

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Feb 22, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

and i should add

this is not something that is likely provable from the stats WE have available, but an MLB team with a dedicated coaching staff should easily be able to figure this out by timing pitchers’ release times etc.

"i have a feeling the answers are bigger than the questions" -Dr Heyward Floyd

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

no it isn't

or it certainly isn’t the argument I was refuting. I’m not quite sure what argument you were making, aside from you hate Jonah Keri and I was wrong. My point, from the beginning, was that catchers have the larger impact. I was refuting the comment above that said pitchers had the larger impact. In arguing with me, you were, in effect, embracing fltfire’s notion that pitchers had a larger impact than catchers. It’s false. Not true. Catchers have the larger impact and it’s not close. To you, that’s a bold claim. Ok. Have it your way.

If that’s the case though, I suppose we ought to do a thread on why it’s silly to pay Yadi to throw out runners when Bryan Anderson could hit just as well (or better) for less and it would have no demonstrable impact on the opposition’s running game.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m not seeing the proof that catcher have a larger impact. i’ve read the wolverton article, i’ve run through bbtn and i’ve paged through ‘the book’, and i’ve yet to see anything to justify the certainty you’re expressing.

i’m going to guess that no catcher has had a career sb/cs anywhere near what chris carpenter has (36/58).

by greenback06 on Feb 23, 2009 2:02 AM EST up reply actions  

you (and wolvarton) are confusing the mean with the individual.

what wolverton is saying is that because the catcher catches for a myriad of pitchers, their aggregate performance tends to approach the mean for pitcher sb prevention skill. because of this, wolvarton says we can assume yadi will have about the same SB/CS rate catching for STL or ATL or whatever.

Whereas, in the individual instance, it is clear that Chris Carpenter is much better at holding runners on than Wellemeyer. If yadi had 5 Chris Carpenters in the rotation, he’d have an amazing CS ratio.

When you say “the catcher’s ability to throw runners out may be the only statistically significant element”, you imply that runners don’t steal bases on pitchers, which is simply untrue. There’s no doubt that catchers are a huge (and probably the largest) impact, but pitchers also have a large impact that isn’t visible in Wolvarton’s data because he makes no attempt to even look for it.

"i have a feeling the answers are bigger than the questions" -Dr Heyward Floyd

by SleepyCA on Feb 23, 2009 2:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Far be it from me

to dispense advice to the main posters around here, but your analysis seems to come with quite a bit of emotion on this particular topic. You know what, I wasn’t being sarcastic. Your position on this matter is laughable unless you can back it up. I asked a legitimate question of you – why is there such a large discrepancy between the number of attempts and success rates of base stealers against certain pitchers if those pitchers have no effect on the frequency or success of base stealers?

Your only rebuttal to this point is that it is a covered in a book that you can’t remember. And of course there is the implication that I am some sort of clueless jackass for challenging you. Your assertion is baseless unless you have data to back it up. My assertion is that there is a well documented discrepancy here that is completely inexplicable by, and contradictory to, your position. There is no conventional wisdom aspect here at all.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions  

and yet none of you

to this point, have backed up 1 word that you’ve said with anything other than “that must not be right!” While I’m poring through books and articles to find what I’ve read, you’re not asking valid questions, as you seem to believe. You’re asking sarcastic questions and making judgments with (apparently) no data or information to back up your point. At least I’m attempting here. It’s easy to toss stones but less easy to back up what you have to say, huh?

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you not see the data Tom S.

posted in this thread or do you consider it insignificant? Sleepy stated there is no support for your position in The Book and that it actually contradicts your position.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

no he most certainly did not

did you read the article at fangraphs? It said nothing whatsoever about a pitcher’s ability to control a running game.

Neither does the Book contradict my position. The only thing in the Book that runs slightly counter to my position — that catchers have easily the strongest impact on the running game — is that lefties are generally better at controlling the running game than righties are. It says nothing whatsoever about catchers vs. pitchers. Trust me (you won’t — oh well) but I just spent a fair amount of time rereading that chapter to be sure.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay

So is there any explanation for Looper receiving 1 SB attempt against vs. Wellemeyer receiving 13? Surely you don’t believe that to be random chance right?

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Feb 22, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I really don't know what the explanation is

there probably is one. So what? Even if it has to do w/ his ability to control a running game, you’re talking about 1 pitcher in the major leagues. The question at issue is essentially, “Who has the greater control over the running game — pitchers or catchers?” The data support the notion that catchers have, by far, the greater impact on the running game. Even if Looper is an exception to the rule, he’s just that — an exception. He’s like the one lefty reliever who can’t get lefties out. Does that mean you shouldn’t bring in a lefty reliever to face the big lefty hitter? Of course not. It absolutely doesn’t change the fact that, if I’m trying to prevent a stolen base, I’d rather have Yadi behind the plate than Looper on the mound — and that’s supported by the data.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not arguing that

Catchers have the biggest impact, their pop times vary hugely. Yes. I agree.

I’m arguing pitchers do have a significant impact on the running game. To start a .55 R^2 is not that strong, 45% of the error is coming from something else and I’d venture to say a good chunk of that is the varying pitchers…it only makes sense. Is Isringhausen an exception we can toss away from the other side? Flores 4/4 in 25 innings? Is it a coincidence that Looper’s slidestep, Wainwright mixing in a slidestep, and Isringhausen being slow as shit to the plate conveniently order like that in preventing stolen bases?

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Feb 22, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

A couple things

First, I went back and reread fitfire’s post and I didn’t realize he had stated that a pitcher, “probably the single most important part” of determining a stolen base attempt. I don’t agree with that, but neither do I agree with your position that the pitcher’s role is negligible. Neither does Wolverton, as he says, in the same article, “There’s no doubt that the pitcher has a huge influence on the success or failure of a particular steal attempt.” It is also interesting to note that one of the catchers he cites in the article to support the “it’s mostly the pitchers” theory is Mike Matheney. Matheny’s throwing numbers took a huge jump when he joined the Cardinals.

I would be willing to take on the effort to do some research on this if you could point me to the raw data as I don’t know where to find the breakdown by pitcher/catcher combo.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

as I said above

I walked back the implication that a pitcher’s impact was negligible. Do I have to do it again? Does it require a pound of flesh. Here’s the comment:

I’ll admit to bastardizing the point of the article some — Michael Wolverton makes the point that individual pitchers can have some impact on a running game.

And

Does that mean pitchers have no impact, as I implied? No.

Once again, I apologize. That’s not the position I’m taking now and it’s not the position I took an hour ago.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Peace

My apologies as well. Do you have a link to raw data for pitcher and catcher SB data?

I don’t want to argue this any more, but for some reason the text you have highlighted doesn’t appear anywhere in my thread, so this is the first I’ve seen it.

I don’t really care who wins the arguements so long as I actually learn something from the exchange.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Feb 22, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

to clarify

when I said “single most important part” I think it needs a little context. First, I think that is a true statement in that most steals are off the pitcher, not the catcher (e.g. a guy who’s delivery takes three seconds will be stolen against all day no matter who the catcher is). That said, most pitchers aren’t too extreme in either direction and, in practice, the catcher has more of an impact than my initial comment could be taken to mean.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 1:37 AM EST up reply actions  

awesome work

chuck!

I'll be the one overrating these Faberge' eggs, thank you very much!
Future Redbirds / PAH9

by erik on Feb 22, 2009 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

inherent flaw

I’ll be honest – I don’t fully understand this analysis. I do maintain, as I’ve argued here before, that a catcher’s defensive contribution is all but unquantifiable given the countless confounding variables involved.

I am a former catcher, and I tremendously respect the improvements Jason Kendall made behind the plate last year and hope he continues that level of play. But, in all honesty, I cannot except any numerical analysis that so completely conflicts with what my eyes tell me. Jason Kendall was not the best defensive catcher last year. I’m sure they are out there (perhaps even more than I suspect), but no one I’ve talked to who knows catching has disagreed with that statement.

Catching is much, much more than throwing, catching, and blocking balls in the dirt. But even in those, more tangible, respects, the numbers can be deceiving. Kendall v. Yadi is a good example. Kendall had a terrible reputation prior to this last season regarding his throwing ability. Everyone knows Yadi’s arm is a weapon. Kendall’s improvements combined with his reputation resulted in a very high caught stealing . If you notice, he had nearly twice as many people try to steal on him than Yadi despite playing in only about 20 more games (innings at c is may be even closer, but I cannot find those numbers). I can’t find fielding split stats, but, by my recollection anyway, I remember Kendall’s caught stealing % being much closer to 50% for the first half, which would also reveal that his numbers went down as runners became more selective. Perhaps someone else can find out if my memory serves me correctly in that respect.

I’d expect to see Kendall’s numbers go down (both in attempts and ) next year if he maintains the same level of production – but would be just as good as this past year. No one does or will run on Yadi except the fastest and best base stealers who are pretty confident they can steal the bag on the pitcher. The fact that he routinely maintains a caught stealing percentage around 40 is very, very impressive.

There is no question Yadi had his worst defensive year last year and may not have deserved the gold glove (make up for getting robbed the year before). I think there is equally no question that Jason Kendall, despite signifigant improvements, was not the best defensive catcher in the league (much less MLB, as some metrics have suggested). Sometimes metrics and analysis can make more traditional people like me re-evaluate what their eyes tell them. But sometimes, when the metric or analysis seems so contrary to what my eyes tell me, I think that may be more of a sign that the analysis is inherently flawed and needs to be re-examined itself. Please don’t take this as an attack on the poster, as nearly every analysis I’ve seen has Kendall on top or near it. It’s just a critique of numerical analysis of catching defense generally.

by fltfire on Feb 22, 2009 6:09 PM EST reply actions  

I'll stick my comment here

because it has a lot to do with “eyes.” I’m all about eyes as well
With that said…a question and a comment:
Q: how did your eyes rate Mike Matheny? MY eyes said — excellent, better than Yadi.
C: I seem to be the only one who wishes that Yadi would quit BOUNCING around behind the plate. Not in blocking balls in the dirt, or whatever; I concede he is pretty good at THAT kind of movement. But as I watch on TV he annoys me often because he doesn’t seem set enough to give the pitcher a stable target AS the pitcher is just about to or already is in his throwing motion. I wanna yell at him, “SIT STILL.” Does no one else notice (or is bothered) by this ?

by the Tewk on Feb 22, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Bugs me, too

My guess, though, is if it irked the pitchers the way it does us, Dave Duncan would find a way to put an end to it. I liked watching Matheny’s catching better, but Yadi’s throwing sometimes just amazes.

by random on Feb 22, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

close

Matheny is a machine. One of the best behind the plate I’ve seen. Yadi is maybe a little more talented defensively and a little more of a “weapon.” Matheny would go years without making an error and be a plus in all defensive aspects. On the whole I’d take Matheny, but Yadi still has time to gain consistency.

That bouncing is a matter of catching philosophy (late set-up v. being quiet behind the plate). I’ve always been a proponent of the late set up, as Yadi clearly is. Some pitchers don’t like it, but you can do it less when for them. As said above, if it was a problem, I’m sure Dunc would address it.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

As much as I love Yadi

I’m higher on Matheny & Ausmus. I’ve also liked watching Henry Blanco, despite his Cubness. You can learn a lot about a catcher in a single game because he’s in on every pitch, whereas even a shortstop gets only about five chances a game.

by random on Feb 23, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

First of all

our eyes lie to us all the time. Perhaps yours don’t, but everyone else’s do. This is why eyewitness recollections are so often inaccurate in criminal cases. It’s why many of us thought that Ankiel was a pretty good defensive player last year when every available metric tells us otherwise. Moreover, I don’t know how much Jason Kendall you saw last year, but you didn’t see every play behind the plate and you certainly didn’t see every play by every catcher in baseball last year, as the numbers do.

Second, whether or not Kendall’s numbers are worse this year is wholly irrelevant. Nothing I reported on here was meant to be predictive and I never even hinted that it might be. It’s a measure of what happened, not what will happen.

Third, Kendall played 30 more games than Yadi behind the plate (as the table above clearly demonstrates) and the difference in innings was Kendall — 1328 to Molina — 1002. The difference — 326 innings — more than 36 9-inning games.

Most importantly, however, is the fact that you provide no justification whatsoever for saying that Kendall wasn’t better than Yadi last year. He threw out more runners. He threw out a higher percentage of base runners. He was more adept at blocking balls than Yadi. His pitchers had a lower ERA than Yadi’s did (irrelevant, but I thought you might like it anyway). Kendally had 6 errors to Yadi’s 9 despite playing in 30 more games and 326 more innings than Molina. In what way was Molina superior to Kendall defensively? You seem to base you assertion on Kendall’s reputation and the suspicion that Kendall will be worse THIS YEAR.

Which numbers here are deceiving? It’s true that more runners tried to steal on Kendall. That makes him worse defensively? He threw out 39.6% of base runners compared to Yadi’s 30.2%. Kendall’s ability to throw runners out last year was worth more than half a win to the Brewers — and more than half a win more than Yadi’s was. Even if you assume some residual impact of Yadi’s reputation — that many wouldn’t attempt to steal b/c of his reputation — it’s not worth anywhere close to half a win. If your eyes tell you it is, they’re deceiving you. And even if they aren’t, Kendall was still better in every other aspect behind the plate.

So, the bottom line — Kendall was better throwing out runners. He was better at preventing wild pitches and passed balls. He was better fielding and throwing balls and his pitchers had lower ERAs than Yadi’s. In what way was Yadi superior? In what way was any other catcher superior to Kendall? In what way was Kendall lacking defensively? You say that “there’s no question that Jason Kendall was not the best defensive catcher” last year. On what basis are you so certain? All these numbers tell you otherwise yet, since they contradict something your eyes saw, you’re willing to discard them. Why? There absolutely is a question, since — your words — so many others back up my analysis. I’d love to hear what you saw that makes all these numbers worthless.

I think that the only flaw in this analysis (save the one I’ve already acknowledged) is that it didn’t fit your preconceived notion as to who the best defensive catchers were. Please don’t take this as an attack on the poster, but there’s an inherent flaw w/ any argument that says that a numerical analysis is flawed simply b/c it conflicted w/ something your eyes saw last year.

by chuckb on Feb 22, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

hey buddy

slow your roll. I didn’t attack you, so don’t attack me. You can throw out all the numbers you want, but I was a catcher a long time and no amount of saying Kendall was a win better than Yadi defensively makes it so. I have neither the time nor the inclination to truly break down what all is missing from any attempt at valuing catchers defensively.

What I said about kendall’s possible numbers this coming year was meant to illustrate my point, not comment on the predictive power of your analysis. I was pointing out that if he plays as well this year as he did last year his caught steal % and total numbers of those caught stealing will both go down because fewer people will take chances against him. Same ability and performance, “worse” numbers due to that performance’s effect on his opposition. It’s kind of like a shot blocker in basketball – it’s not just the blocked shots, it’s how many are altered and how many times people simply don’t challenge him.

You ask what was Molina better at last year? For starters: framing pitches, blocking the plate, plays at the plate generally (positioning/tagging), handling the pitching staff, slowing down the running game (I know the numbers you cite, but I don’t think they mean what you think they mean), pick offs, making the other team play station to station (due to the threat of pick offs limiting secondary leads).
Without doing another list, let me be clear that Kendall did do several things better than molina did last year.

I know you cited pitcher’s ERA with each behind the plate. I agree with you that that doesn’t mean much of anything. But saying that a catcher’s defensive ability doesn’t have a clearly identifiable effect on pitching performance doesn’t mean there is no effect. If you’ll pardon the loose analogy, in a horse race, clearly the most important factor is the horse, not the jockey. And it would likely be very tough to show that a jockey clearly had a signifigant effect on a horse’s performance. But that doesn’t make the jockey irrelevant or mean that one is just as good as the next.

Bottom line: I don’t need statistics to tell me that Ozzie Smith was a better defensive shortstop that David Eckstien. If you can statistically show me that actually David was a half a win better or whatever, something is wrong with your analysis, plain and simple. You say that our eyes lie – this is true. But so do numbers, particularly when one person (or a small group of people) are dictating what is and isn’t measured, how its measured, and how those measurements are used and doing so without true peer review. Ask any statistician or scientist, numbers can be made to say anything. That is by no means saying they are useless – numbers and analysis are very important. But when they fail the smell test, I’m not going to believe them just because they are numbers.

I really must ask, and I don’t do so to be insulting: have you ever really learned the position of catching? You may well have, and if so, I’d like to have a civil discourse with you about your perceptions of things I feel are unquantifiable and get your opinion on why you think they are quanitfiable or why you think they are irrelevant. But I get the impression you have not, primarily because you seem to only mention throwing out baserunners and blocking balls in the dirt as measurements of a catcher’s defensive performance. I agree that those are amoung the few quantifiable measurements, but in reality are only a small portion of being a defensive catcher – kind of like saying a centerfielder is all about highlight reel catches and making great throws from the warning track, that’s what sticks out the most, but is by no means the whole story.

You’ve asked for my evidence and why I discard the numbers. Well, you can read what I’m saying, think about and check it out on film – or sometime we can spend a weekend and watch about 20 hours of film so I can show you. The fact that I can’t break down film with you on an internet blog doesn’t make me wrong or my points invalid.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Numbers

I’d still like to look at month by month fielding numbers for Kendall to see if they support my hypothesis, but I cannot find them kept anywhere.

While looking for them, I did discover some numbers that show what I’m getting at regarding caught stealing %. Although Kendall was had one of the highest % of runner’s caught last year, People attempted to steal .62 times per nine innings off of him – placing him in a tie for 10th, with about several more catchers in the .63-.69 range. Yadi was #2 in all of baseball in this category, with .44 attempts per 9 innings. (Ausmus was #1, another great defensive catcher).
I’d also like to add that Kendall’s WP+PB/G of .332 is nothing to write home about (though better than Molina’s rather pedestrian .35). For comparison, 8 catchers (4 in the NL) w/more than 500 innings behind the plate had WP+PB/G under .3, with Ausmus leading the way again at .205.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 2:14 AM EST up reply actions  

evaluating two high quality performers is sort of a fruitless exercise

but some of the stuff you say is rather bold.

You ask what was Molina better at last year? For starters: framing pitches, blocking the plate, plays at the plate generally (positioning/tagging), handling the pitching staff

You think Kendall could improve his framing of pitches? Or his footwork at the plate or working with the pitching staff?

And comparing him to Eckstein and Yadi to Ozzie is over the top.

by ol Pete on Feb 23, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

ah, the old "I was a catcher so I know more than you" routine...

not to just pick on you fltfire, but why is it catchers think they are smarter than anyone else about baseball? do you really learn the secret of baseball by squatting behind the plate a lot? Ill admit that I was a catcher for most of my life but I dont know if I didnt get the epiphany or just that am not oblivious enough to believe that my eyes that see only what the camera shows on games I watch know more than the numbers that follow every pitch for all 30 teams for 162 games a year.

is catching a tough position? yes. do you have to have a mental toughness that not everyone has? most likely. do you get receive special powers that allow you to know more than stuff that has been researched and researched from data on every game going back 100 years? uhh….no. I blame baseball itself more than just the catchers. they are treated like they should know more than anyone else so I think they start to believe they do. I call it Varitekitis…so far it is incurable…

"Baseball is dull only to dull minds." - Red Barber

by nomar34 on Feb 23, 2009 8:08 AM EST up reply actions  

All I've talked about is catching

not general baseball knowledge. And yes, I do think I know more about the position of catching than someone whose never learned the position. Do I know everything about catching, certainly not.

All I’ve really said is that catching has much more effect on a game than throwing out a certain percentage of would-be base stealers and blocking balls in the dirt. I really don’t think that is too extrodinary of a claim.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

its not...

and for the most part i agree with that.as i said im not trying to pick on you specifically but my issue is they way you presented it. saying you were a catcher has no point other than to say you were a catcher…it gives you no extra credibility and that was the foundation of your argument: you were a catcher so you know…now if the topic was “is a sweaty face mask better than a non-sweaty face mask”* then you would probably have more knowledge than stats can provide.

*everyone know a sweaty face mask is better. a dry face mask will stick to your chin and when you go to take it off quickly it will tear a piece of your skin off with it. while a sweaty face mask slides on and off perfectly!

"Baseball is dull only to dull minds." - Red Barber

by nomar34 on Feb 23, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

My point

was that a good defensive catcher does much more than block balls and throw out runners. I believe much of what I’m talking about would be very difficult to quantify if it’s possible to do at all. Because of that belief, I obviously don’t have statistical support of that assertion.

I don’t think that my having been a catcher makes me know more than any one else about baseball except maybe people that never played the game at all – but I do think it helps me know more about catching than those that have never learned the position. That’s the only reason I mentioned it. Based on my experience catching and my coaching from more experienced catchers, I look at many more things than caught stealing percentage and WP + PB/g to evaluate a catcher defensively.

For instance, when evaluating ability at blocking balls (an area Yadi didn’t do very well last year) I’ll look at numbers, but also how the catcher positions himself to block the balls. Does he stab at the ball/try to glove it too much, does he fail to angle he’s body correctly to redirect the ball back in front of the plate, how quick is he in lateral movement and positioning. These kinds of observations give context to the numbers and help you evaluate whether a catcher’s numbers are lucky (something sabermetric advocates always seem to want to account for)/ how much he’s benefiting from pitchers making their job easy, etc.

But even more than observations giving context to raw numbers, I look to see how and when a catcher sets up, how well they expand the strike zone with positioning, how well they frame pitches with their glove, how closely they watch for batters trying to steal their signs, how well they hide their signs from batters when no one is on base, how close to the bag runners stay on their secondary lead off, ability to block the plate, plays at home re: holding on to the ball and quickness from catch to tag, positioning for plays at the plate (which is/can be different than blocking the plate). As I have many other times, I decline to spend hours trying to establish an exhaustive list – and I don’t think I could, inevitably those that know more about catching would point out things I’ve missed. I don’t know how these variables and qualities can be accounted for.
       Particularly where many of them are not in effect at all times. For instance, a batter tring to steal the catcher’s signs may not try to sneak a peak every at bat. Rather, they might notice a catcher is weak in protecting the signs and doesn’t watch batters very often, and save that info for a time when it is most useful. If they did it everytime, they’d be caught too often and not be able to do it in more important situations. They’ll also likely get a fastball in the small of their back if they get caught too much. Things like that might only save one or two runs a year over an average catcher – but those are much more likely to be game-winning runs because an opponent is going to try and exploit correctable problems in high leverage situations to get the most bang for their buck before the other team catches on.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t have a list, but you keep citing examples that Kendall is excellent at.

by ol Pete on Feb 23, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

is that a typo?

I’m assuming you meant I don’t have to list? Otherwise I’m not sure what you meant with your first clause.

Regarding Kendall’s ability at the things I’ve been discussing: First I’d like to say I’m not talking about Kendall at all times in these posts because people have challenged what I’m saying much more generally. Even my initial post was mainly directed at the notion that blocking balls and throwing out runners are the only important meaurements of a devensive catcher.

Second: based on your tone, we will simply disagree because I thin saying Kendall is “excellent” at all the things I’m talking about is certainly not how I evaluate him when I watch him play. I’ve always liked watching Kendall play, and I’m not saying he doesn’t do anything excellently – but he does not have an excellent arm. His technique and consistency in blocking balls in the dirt is not excellent. I would not saying his framing of pitches or set-up to the plate are excellent. His blocking of the plate isn’t excellent from what I’ve seen, though that’s a much smaller sample size. I’m not saying he’s terrible at all this stuff, I’m just saying he’s not the best.

If I’m expected to truly grade Kendall out and peg him as average/below average/above average/excellent or poor on the various things I’m talking about, I’d have to go look at tape again to be that specific. What I can say is that I was impressed by the numbers he was putting up defensively and tried to go out of my way to watch him. I thought he was clearly improved from what I’d seen in the past – but I was not blown away and do not think he was the best defensive catcher last year. I’d probably have gone with Ausmus based on what I remember seeing.

I’d even entertain an arguement that Kendall had a better defensive year than Yadi, though I don’t think I’d agree with it ultimately. What bothers me is the just a small segment of defense is being used to elevate his season to one of the best, if not the best, of anyone in the majors. That simply doesn’t match my evaluation of him. As someone said above – extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims, and I don’t think reducing catching defense to sb success % and WP+PB/G (also without any additional context) falls way short of convincing evidence to me.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is your comment:

I decline to spend hours trying to establish an exhaustive list

Among the people who have highlighted his defensive skills including framing pitches are Ray Fosse and Ted Simmons.

by ol Pete on Feb 23, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I've also seen

great catcher’s praise Mike Piazza’s defense. People will say nice things and I’m not trying to say the Mike Piazza or Jason Kendall (who I think is much better than Piazza was) don’t do anything well behind the plate.

I haven’t seen the remarks or highlighting you’re talking about – were they pointing out something he does well or something he is a model cather at? Personally, I would have said his framing would be in the former, not the later. If they were holding him out as an example to be followed, as being one of the best then I disagree with them and perhaps am wrong in that evaluation.

by fltfire on Feb 23, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

great article

can’t wait to see Yadi pick someone off of first base this year!

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 22, 2009 7:28 PM EST reply actions  

seriously

that’s one of the greatest things about being a cardinals fan. That pujols/molina dynamic is just amazing.

I was at the game in SD a couple of years back (2006?) that ended on a brian giles-pickoff from first, and it is in the top ten of cardinals baseball game memories for me. Right up there with that curve ball to beltran and the home run off lidge.

"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo

by SleepyCA on Feb 22, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Part of what makes it remarkable is that every runner was likely warned.

by ol Pete on Feb 22, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinal Managers EVER!
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols