How much for Manny?
Just an academic exercise. Feel free to use numbers or hunches. Commentary from Dayn Perry thinks the Cardinals are missing out on not upgrading the team now.
Link: http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/pgStory?contentId=9225080#sport=MLB&photo=9225064
Of the players out there in free agency limbo, I think Manny Ramirez is the best option for the team. The question is, given realistic payroll limitations, how much would you pay Manny to play in St. Louis? Realistically, I think $30million for one year. I think the ticket sales alone would pay for 1/2 the salary, given that the Cardinals are really pushing for fans in the seats.
(And if not Ramirez, who is avaiable now that could possibly make this team better? Not that there's no room to get better, but do any of the free agents offer significant improvements?_
0 recs |
53 comments
Comments
No personal attacks!
FLAGGED!!!
On the subject of the fanpost: This team doesn’t need Manny. It needs starting pitching.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 19, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I really hope you're being sarcastic
by outraged on Feb 19, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was
I tore a page outta Tackle Box’s book on that one.
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 19, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, pitching...
My mantra for all who want to know what it takes for the Cardinals to be successful: Pitching, pitching, pitching. My thinking for Manny was this: For one year, Manny – in all his glorious wackiness – would be tolerable. He could be worth as much as 500,000 increase in attendance over 82 games (average of 6097/game), and at the average ticket price that’s approx $13.5 million just at the gate. Thinking in terms of a business, that’s getting Manny – yes, oldish but still devilishly bat lethal – for a mere 26.5 million out-of-pocket. And if it doesn’t work, you don’t have him back at age 38. The outfield includes Manny, Ludwick (what are the odds he’ll be injured at some point?), Ankiel (what are the odds he’ll be injured at some point?), Duncan (I really, really want him to do well, and he’s relatively cheap, but returning from neck surgery gives me the shivers), Rasmus (total x factor). Skippy plays 2b. All I’m saying is roll the dice (yes, I know, not my money…) and call Manny’s agent… who? Scott Boras? Shucks, maybe not.
PS: If “You are insane” is the worst personal attack on this site, VEB wins the Civility of the Year award. Much love to all.
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
by palampe on Feb 19, 2009 3:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about that
“A mere 26.5 million”
and WHERE will this money come from? If we are supposedly out of money, then thsi isn’t possible. Ofcourse, i would love Manny to come here, but he doesn’t want a 1 year contract. He wants security.
If you wanna give him something, give him 3/51 or 4/68. That would not be something Mo would do, but a 1-2 year deal will not cut it.
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 19, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
do you have nothing better to offer
than this bullshit?! You usually have something intelligent to say. This is worse than worthless and you’ve been around long enough to know better!
by chuckb on Feb 19, 2009 11:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't being serious
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Chuck was joking too
not sure…but maybe.
Chuck Norris bows to no man...but he does bow to The Mang.
by miniboscorino on Feb 20, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The word "bullshit" is probably your cue.
If he was truly upset, there would be a much more civil tone with larger more complex words, like: Despicable, verminous, assiduous, and a word I just made up, irriduous.
Chuck Norris bows to no man...but he does bow to The Mang.
by miniboscorino on Feb 20, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well I got a notice when I logged in
so I guess he was serious.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 7:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I got one of those from Robot
one time, and he left a smiley face in it, sooo it was like a warning but I like you. Wish I remember what it said….
Chuck Norris bows to no man...but he does bow to The Mang.
by miniboscorino on Feb 20, 2009 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
just say no.
manny has only once arguably been worth $30M – last year. if you check his fangraphs page, he had a freakish year defensively and became a 6.5 win player. but that’s in a year when he posted only a -2 run defense, after three years of -15, -19, and -20 runs defensively. So, i think it’s reasonable in a 37 year old outfielder to expect his defense will get worse (feel free to make whatever caveats about LF in Fenway), more along a -15 run level.
His offense is terrific, regularly worth about 40 runs/yr. I imagine we could anticipate getting something along those lines. but he’s not the steady metronome of production that, say, pujols is — manny wasn’t even worth 2 wins in 2007. he’s difficult to project, especially as he ages.
the question is whether manny is an improvement over what we’ve got. Well, we have a stacked outfield, full of great defensive and offensive talent. Ludwick is a 3-4 win player, even with some regression; ankiel is likely a 2-3 win player. Rasmus should likely a chance to start in center. Behind that starting three, we have schumaker, who can be valuable role player, duncan who may very well come back with a .550 slugging percentage, mather and barton who show a great deal of promise in the field and at the plate, and a wagon train of talented OF behind them (Jay, Jones, etc.).
So, we’re probably talking about replacing a 2-3 win player with a 4 win player, and paying $30M for the privilege? No, thanks. If we were going to spend money, we would do much better to take on one of the orlando’s and have a good chance of getting 2-3 wins at second for much less money. Or we could look at trading for substantial starting pitching help. This of course leaves aside the fact that we would have to find this $30M somewhere, which I don’t see happening.
by tom s. on Feb 19, 2009 1:55 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Not that much
I don’t think Manny will generate 15 million dollars in just extra ticket sales. The average ticket price is around $30. An extra 500,000 people would have to show up to justify half his salary. I think that number is way too high and not doable.
by KDesai on Feb 19, 2009 1:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
One Year Wonder
The only way Ramirez comes to Saint Louis is if his buddy Albert convinces him it would be fun to spend one year “making his point”. Rather than sit out a year, or take a sub-par offer from the Dodgers, Manny COULD come to the Cards for a very affordable 1-year rate. But it would have to be rock-bottom low.
Even Mozeliak would drink the Kool Aid if Manny agreed to something like $5M for a year of service. Then just let him pinch-hit every game (7th inning or later) in the four-hole behind Albert. Would you do a deal like this?
150ABs
15 HRs
30 RBIs
.320 AVG
1.000 OPS
And don’t forget, with Ramirez batting fourth, Pujols probably sees his numbers go UP (hard as that is to imagine). BUT – before I’m flamed, let me be very clear. THIS DEAL WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
by JWO on Feb 19, 2009 3:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
how on earth
could the cardinals afford Manny? plus we already have a shit ton of good outfielders last time I checked
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Feb 19, 2009 3:45 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
rec'd
30 mil for manny is absolutely insane especially when we have 7 in the OF that could almost start on any team in the league.
Chuck Norris hit a Home Run
with his beard
by bearcatcardfan on Feb 19, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Orlando Cabrera would significantly improve the team at 2B. Juan Cruz would add a nasty arm
for late innings. But Manny is just not feasible in any scenario. Trading away 2 cost-controlled OFs just to make room for him is bad business.
by Czechguardsman on Feb 19, 2009 3:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i think we should add jake peavy and chase utley for the league minimum
this team would ROCK!!!
by VolsnCards5 on Feb 19, 2009 4:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I would have liked the FO to be/become a more aggressive suitor for Peavy.
As much as I want to avoid a repeat of a Haren/Mulder deal, I wouldn’t oppose acquiring Peavy for a package built around Colby Rasmus. I think that acquiring Peavy would have been a move that would have put the Cards up at least as equals with the Cubs and would have been a means for improving this team that seems to have fallen by the wayside.
All the Cubs really have to offer the Padres is Vitters. It seems like the Cubs will probably pick up Peavy at the deadline like they did with Harden last year and such a move would wrap up the division for them in 2009 while we suck our thumbs and sign guys like Benson.
by Czechguardsman on Feb 19, 2009 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a rough decision
If Rasmus turns out to be a bust in MLB (Highly Unlikely), we will all scoff at the FO for not trading him, but if he becomes a star, we will all be glad we kept him.
I don’t think we will sit idle while the Cubs make moves at the deadline. If we need to make a move we will. If not, we prepare for next year, we will have a lot of money coming off the books next year to play with, and hopefully Wallace becomes a great MLB everyday starter to plug in for Glaus. I look forward to the future.
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 19, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if we knew daryl jones
would become a good to great ML centerfielder…i would agree with you
but its way to big a risk for a pitcher who at any moment could have his arm fall off
by VolsnCards5 on Feb 19, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
All of these win-now deals seem to be blowing up in the faces of teams who are acquiring the "established" veteran
for the package of prospects. See Mulder, Sabathia, etc. I would hate to see Rasmus go to SD and become the next Sizemore and Peavy come here and struggle. Unfortunately, it seems that the Cubs will be in position to move Vitters at some point for Peavy and pull ahead to wrap up the division in 2009. Still, if we could get in the mix for Peavy, our rotation entering 2009 could be…
Carpenter
Peavy
Wainwright
Wellemyer
Loshe..
I think that could be the best rotation in the game. In 2013 the deal might not look so good but I think it would make the Cards the 09 favorites.
by Czechguardsman on Feb 19, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
09 isn't everything
Adding Peavy wouldn’t upgrade us enough to catch the Cubs. He is “only” a 3 or 4 win upgrade over Piniero and most projection systems have us over 10 games back of the Cubs. Furthermore, Peavy is due for a hefty amount of salary over the next 4 years. An upper mid market like the Cards can’t afford to pay Peavy 15-20 million a year AND extend Pujols. If you factor in the fact that to land Peavy we would have to trade away good prospects who would be giving us cheap production which is the only way that we could have the previous scenario, then the deal doesn’t look really good.
Look towards the future. As early as 2010, the Cubs may start to regress a lot. They have a lot of big contracts garaunteed to players who are either declining in performance (Lee), have an injury history (Soriano, Bradely) or have general performance issues (Dempster, Fukudome). It is very possible that the Cubs will become very old, very fast and they have do not have the farm system from which to get cheap production from.
If you figure that we can be competitive in 2010 then Wallace and Rasmus will be playing a huge part in that role. We will also have a lot of money coming of the books so we can take a run at one of the starters in FA. Brett Myers, John Lackey, Rich Harden, Erick Bedard and Ben Sheets (eh?) could all put of close the production of Peavy for a lot less money and without having to trade away future major league pieces.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 4:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, if we trade Rasmus, move Schu to 2B and let Ankiel walk as a FA...
then in one year we could go back to a position of not having much OF depth. It would be impossible to get Peavy and have the Padres still pay his salary, and like I said, I really don’t want to do any “win-now” deals unless it is clearly tilted towards us. It seems to me like all of those Haren for Mulder or Laporta/Sabathia deals seem to be backfiring. I feel that the Cubs will regret giving up Gallager for Harden.(scouts compare Gallager to Chris Carpenter.)
I didn’t know that Peavy was making that much from SD.
The Cubs window of opportunity is definitely within the next 2 years. The Cubs are at right now where we were at the start of 2005. I think you will see the Cubs regress a lot this year.
by Czechguardsman on Feb 20, 2009 4:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Duncan's Healthy
Then he can mash the ball and have LF adventures just as much as Manny at like 1/25 the cost.
by bornin82 on Feb 19, 2009 8:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Actually Duncan rated as a well above average feilder last year
reason 23249030 why UZR is flawed.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 19, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I could almost see if he was rated as around average
but my mind cannot comprehend how he could be well above average.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 19, 2009 9:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually I lied
he was still below average. I don’t know why I thought he was good.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 19, 2009 9:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i swear he was, too.
something must have changed with the way fielding stats are calculated at fangraphs, because he was well above average a week ago, at least in my mind.
Ah, here’s at least a bit of proof:
Tom S says: “Duncan 9.6 in LF” by UZR/150 on 6 Feb 2009.
Things like this really, really make me question everything that i see at fangraphs. Seriously, assuming Tom’s data was right, an unexplained 16.5 run swing(!!!) — almost 2 wins — in 2 weeks, during the post-season?
And, uh, skip schumaker is now +27 in LF. Shakes head.
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 20, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that was one of the first things I noticed when they changed the UZR ratings
to include ARM. dunc’s defensive marks sunk like a brick. i have no explanation for such a broad swing. it was certainly the biggest swing of any of our outfielders. barton’s numbers rose a bit, suggesting maybe he has a better arm than we gave him credit for.
right now he seems to have settled on being about 8 runs below average in the field. that’s probably well within the tolerable range for him in LF. if he’s healthy, i would imagine that his upside is probably a net 2 win LF if started against right-handers.
by tom s. on Feb 20, 2009 1:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If his upside is 2006
than he is a 4 WAR player over a full season.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 1:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm trying not to get carried away here.
but yes. though he is unlikely to go unplatooned this year. 300 or 400 PA’s is pretty realistic for him.
by tom s. on Feb 20, 2009 1:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
didn't think about ARM
but that’s a huge swing, if that’s all that changed.
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 20, 2009 1:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't the arm
arm is a counting stat and Duncan only had like 250 plate appearances. The minimum arm rating last year was Brian Giles at -10 or something.
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 2:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I’ve been referring to UZR/150, so depending on what happens within the black box (and to be fair, fangraphs is much, much more open about what happens within the black box than any other site) if ARM was pro-rated to 150 games, and duncan was -3.2 runs in a mere 336 innings due to arm weakness (which isn’t out of the realm of possibilty), then that could be almost the whole difference. 150 games is roughly 1300 innings, and 3.2*1300/336 is about 12.4 runs…
Anyway, since we’ve been involved in this conversation, the numbers seem to have all changed again. Now he’s -4.4 UZR/150, instead of -6.9, as he was an hour ago. This is fascinating.
I keep reloading his page, hoping to see him magically get better ;)
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 20, 2009 2:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
actually
i think i screwed up the -6.9 number, as well as the 16.5 run bit above. i think I must have added his career left field number to tom’s number above and got 16.5 (9.6 + 6.9). Sigh.
But still, a (4.4 + 9.6 = 14.0) run swing, that occurs during the off-season and which isn’t readily trace-able (with a change log of some kind) is an issue, for a sabermetric-oriented web site (even a free one).
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 20, 2009 2:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You should email the guys there
cause this is pretty wierd
vivaelbeñsheets
by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 2:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
$20 Million
Because of the financial status of many franchises, that’s all he’s going to get. He should have taken the $25 million from LA, when he had the chance.
"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray
by memphiscub on Feb 20, 2009 8:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Manny want his money!!!!
He no play for team that no make him happy!!!!
Anyone think Scott Boras could create his own major league team? That way he doesn’t have to negotiate with anyone, and he can have all the superstars he wants because he’ll be making the deals himself.
Chuck Norris bows to no man...but he does bow to The Mang.
by miniboscorino on Feb 20, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think that even by boras's system of ethics, acting as an agent and an opposing party
to the negotiations would probably not fly.
by tom s. on Feb 20, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny talk like Pedro Cerrano
Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...
by RunninRedbird on Feb 20, 2009 4:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No chance
You really want a clubhouse cancer on your team? I know I sure as hell don’t! Not only would it be a waste of money, but Manny’s attitude is terrible. Not to mention we have an abundance of OFs…
Welcome to Baseball Heaven.
by zoomzoomj88 on Feb 20, 2009 5:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ugh...not the clubhouse cancer argument again
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
and....BEN SHEETS!!! **
**not that BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment, just BEN SHEETS!!!
(BEN SHEETS might be involved in this comment)
by mattyfrommo on Feb 20, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because Obviously
He ruined the Dodger’s locker room and their season….
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 20, 2009 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not as badly as he ruined boston's -- i mean they only won two world series with him.
if he had had a good attitude, they might have won four.
by tom s. on Feb 20, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hehe
The media only publicized that Manny was revolting against Boston. From what I have heard, the Boston FO has been threatening to trade EVERY season, and that they had been treating him terribly. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was true, and without his bat, they weren’t the same team.
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 21, 2009 7:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"they had been treating him terribly."
No, they weren’t treating him terribly. They weren’t kissing his ass, but they were treating him badly, either. He wanted special treatment, and they gave it to him, for the most part, but he just kept asking for more.
Turning an insane, petulant and 36yo Manny Ramirez into a 29yo Jason Bay was a fabulous move.
"If I'm right, it was a brilliant move, if I'm wrong, it was a crazy idea". -Mo
by SleepyCA on Feb 21, 2009 8:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it was borderline miraculous
i still want him hitting 4th behind Albert. if only to see the opposing pitchers have to change their pants 5 or 6 times a game.
BEN MOTHERHUSHYOURMOUTH SHEETS
ManRam
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on Feb 21, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree that it was a good move
but it had to be done. Like with AK, if you have a guy that doesn’t want to be there, get him the crap outa there. Besides, they traded for an extra year of Bay, not like he has a long contract.
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 22, 2009 1:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think it's a good situation for both the sox and bay. it sucked for manny, and
i think we’re about to find out how much it sucked when he signs a one-year with LA at less money than anybody anticipated. LA probably runs away with the best situation of any of the parties involved, though.
it will be interesting to see if bay moves into the dh slot if big papi is injured, and the sox pick up another outfielder (ankiel?).
by tom s. on Feb 22, 2009 1:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a more likely scenario
is that they move Youkilis to DH and put in Lars Anderson. Something like that would make sense to me.
My avatar is 3 years into the future for sure...
by Taskmaster on Feb 22, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















