Who is to blame most for the Cardinals loss last night?
Pretty simple. After I get the results, I'll delete this FanPost and re-post them in a FanShot.
Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words Words
0 recs |
99 comments
Comments
Why is Boog an Option?
Did I miss something?
"I knew they were up to shenanigans." --TLR
by IHeartBoog on Oct 9, 2009 5:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He had quite a poor day at the plate
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah.
But nothing in particular. I can’t hardly blame Boog for anything. Except being AWESOME.
"I knew they were up to shenanigans." --TLR
by IHeartBoog on Oct 9, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 PAs with RISP
I think
Free Milton
by all4tookie on Oct 9, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
replace boog
with tlr/hal and my vote goes there
"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension
by sportsman on Oct 11, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two horse race imo
It’s pretty close between Holliday and Franklin based strictly on the 9th. Holliday’s solo shot means Franklin get’s my vote.
by brackenthebox on Oct 9, 2009 5:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry for the runaway apostrophe
*gets
by brackenthebox on Oct 9, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is Franklin
you give a hit up to Mark Freaking Loretta, you wear the collar.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 9, 2009 5:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"
by rocKStark5 on Oct 9, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Although the image of Holliday dropping that ball with the F7 on the scoreboard behind him is a big punch in the gut.
"It reminds us of all that once was good, and could be again." - Terence Mann.
by TurdFerguson on Oct 9, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should have been:
E7’s Dong
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"
by rocKStark5 on Oct 9, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Holliday
because if he catches that ball, Mark Loretta never sees the damn batters box.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Oct 9, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Franklin had just struck that batter out with 2 strikes
Matt doesn’t have to even catch the damn ball.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 9, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Franklin was striking out
10 guys per nine, I’d agree with you. But he doesn’t — he counts on his defense to get outs for him, so if he creates a “routine fly ball” you better damn well catch the fucking thing.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Oct 10, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what about tony?
even after the dropped fly ball he had mutiple chances to bring a different reliever in. franklin clearly didn’t have amazing stuff.
How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor
by themanthemyth on Oct 9, 2009 5:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did anyone else see the look on Franklin's face right before his last pitch
I told my roommate that the game was over right then. As the manager you have to know when your players are done. Franklin was done.
(Insert Your Own Joke)
by AWolfAtTheDoor on Oct 9, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that
d), Anybody that had anything to do with the game except WW and Miller.
"There is not a better feeling in the whole world than knowing that you are the best team in both leagues."- Bob Forsh on winning the 1982 World Series.
by MaytheForschbewithyou on Oct 9, 2009 5:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You get that many hits
and score two, count them, 2 measley friggin runs and you are asking to get beat.
"There is not a better feeling in the whole world than knowing that you are the best team in both leagues."- Bob Forsh on winning the 1982 World Series.
by MaytheForschbewithyou on Oct 9, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And what about Corey's baserunning misplay?
I don’t know if that was him or Oquendo, but if he stays at second, we score at least one more run in that inning.
Not that I would specifically blame Cris Rustin for the loss…just sayin’
"I knew they were up to shenanigans." --TLR
by IHeartBoog on Oct 9, 2009 5:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding me?
What about that clutch RBI double off of one of the best lefties in the game? OH NOES! Due to the base running error, his WPA for that play was only .130!! Not to mention his combined .083 WPA for the game.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I know
I don’t think any of the blame lies with CR. I guess my point was just that there were a lot of things contributing to that loss, not just Holliday and Franklin. I think Tony should take just as much blame. In fact Holliday probably shouldn’t have been playing. What happened to the defensive replacement? Ank could have been out there, right? Or did we use him as a PH already?
"I knew they were up to shenanigans." --TLR
by IHeartBoog on Oct 9, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Equal to Holliday's game
home run and massive error = rbi double and running into an out at third
by ubeddie on Oct 9, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
Hollidays’ double was a lot less “clutch” and his error was more costly. For the game, Rasmus: .083 WPA, Holliday: -.119 WPA (including the error).
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i still question that -.119 WPA value
When you calculate the value of defensive events for something like UZR, you add the “positive value” of the out plus the “negative value” that the hit would have had, right?
When talking WPA, 2 outs in the ninth is a special case- the “positive value of the out” is huge. It would have made the WE go to 1.0, and there would have been no opportunity for further scoring.
Therefore, imho, the “negative value” of not making the catch should follow rules similar to the ER rules- everything that happens after the game should have ended can be considered the fault of the guy who didn’t make the third out. Now, he might get lucky and have someone like Franklin pick him up, and franklin can still get negative credit (in parallel to MH, not in lieu of) for NOT doing his job with 2 outs and a man on second, but I think the -.119 underrates the negative WPA value of the error.
I know that’s not how WPA works, but it meets the intent of what WPA is supposed to measure better than the WPA implementation, I think.
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 9, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a matter of preference I guess
WPA is pretty simple: what is your teams chance of winning the game after the player – before the play. In any case, the Cards had a 96% chance of winning the game before the error and an 87% after. I don’t think that Holliday should be penalized much more than that.
When you calculate the value of defensive events for something like UZR, you add the "positive value" of the out plus the "negative value" that the hit would have had, right?
I’m not sure what you mean by this. UZR is simply the players out percentage – the league average out percentage * balls in play. So if Holliday misses that play, his out% is zero, while the league average out% of the play is 98% (or whatever). I don’t really see how that would be applicable in the situation that you described.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, i meant UZR as measured in runs, the way it is presented at fangraphs
per fangraphs glossary:
UZR (ultimate zone rating): The number of runs above or below average a fielder is in both range runs, outfield arm runs, double play runs and error runs combined.
What you’ve described gets you to the “event” stage, but you then have to multiply that times the estimated value of the events to get run value.
Since WPA attempts to contextualize value, i think it’s fair to do the same thing when trying to consider the effect of that error. There is actually a discontinuity with the value of the event that Holliday was involved in- if he catches that, it makes it impossible for further events to occur. The event horizon is crossed, WE goes to 1.0, the game ends, 60,000 rally towels shrivel up and go into the rag bin where they belong. 18 cardinal fans are murdered at chavez ravine, but they die happy.
Sure, the positive value of successfully accomplishing the event is only “+0.04 WPA”, and the negative value of not accomplishing it was “-0.092”, but the result of adding that event is a WE of 1.0, which is a unique state; achieving a WE of 1.0 is the ultimate goal. That should be accounted for, and it isn’t.
Franklin also bears a ton of responsibility- I’m not trying to absolve him of guilt; I even voted for him in the poll, as I think he was more responsible for the LOSS than H. OTOH, H is also completely responsible for not winning.
I just don’t think the two are the same thing.
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First off
Just FYI, UZR is basically what I described multiplied by .8, which is the linear weights value of each hit.
Secondly, I understand what you are coming from. Obviously, .94 to 1.0 is different ten .93 to .99. However, you go down a slippery slope by giving a special value to 1.0.
If Albert Pujols hits a game tying 3 run double in the bottom of the ninth, then the next guys singles him home to win the game that player would technically have more of a contribution than Pujols.
OTOH, H is also completely responsible for not winning.
You could also say that about Franklin in the next at bat. If he had gotten him out the game would have been over.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
".8, which is the linear weights value of each hit."
That’s what I’m saying. That number is calculated using an average linear weight for a hit around 0.5 runs and an average weight for an out around 0.3 runs. IE, 0.8 runs. Sorry if I was confusing, it’s been a long week.
Here’s a link to a comment by tango that says what i was trying to say better than i did. I know there is a more rigorous derivation out there, but google sucks these days if you aren’t trying to buy something, and i really don’t have any more time to spend on this. Anyway, this should serve to communicate the point I’m trying to make. The WPA value we have fits the “-0.3” part, but that’s only some of the impact of the play.
You could also say that about Franklin in the next at bat.
But the odds of an outfielder catching a can of corn fly ball approaches 1.0. The odds of a pitcher getting an out is much lower. And if the OF does his job, there is no “next out” to get. Again, WE = 1.0 is a special state.
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 3:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and there is no "slippery slope"
WE = 1.0 is a discrete event. Once you get to WE = 1.0, it’s over. We’re talking about only a defensive play that will bring you to WE = 1.0, not WE=.99 or .97 or anything similar. And because we have the leisure opportunity to scrutinize, we’re adding a level of detail that goes beyond “player y throws ball”, “player x hits ball”, “player x is on second base”. Holliday had the chance to make that game a win by doing something he was expected to do 98 times out of 100 chances, and he did not do it.
As a visiting team, you can’t have this scenario in the top of the ninth; you can’t have it in the bottom of the 8th. It only exists in the bottom of the ninth, with either 2 outs or with base runners on such that a double or triple play ends the game- though baseball rules (idiotically, perhaps) assumes that double/triple plays are never “automatic”.
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 3:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh, 99.8 out of 100
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 3:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh, 98 out of 100
i’m goign to bed ;)
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 3:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aah, but here is the problem
A “replacement level” fielder makes that play 98% of the time, or whatever, so you can’t assign all of the blame to Holliday. Only 98% of the blame, which makes the probability of reaching a 1.0 win expectancy ever so slightly less than 1.0.
You could do the same experiment with Franklin. Even though his job was appreciably harder for him to do in comparison to Holliday’s, it would have ended the game if he had done it. A replacement level closer gets the next batter out 75% of the time (or whatever), so Franklin should be blamed for 75% of his failure, not 100% – and neither should Holliday.
Unless Holliday failed to make a play that literally would have ended the game 100% of the time (and I can’t think of such a play), you can’t put his error on a different scale than Franklin’s inability to record the last out – you just make it greater in magnitude, which is what would be done using something like WPAAR (WPA above replacement).
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 4:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, anyone who dropped a ball that is caught 99.6% of the time
would be equally to blame, whether they are a 6 WAR player or a replacement level player.
(99.6 comes from the fact that most OF errors are on throws and misplayed GB’s. In holliday’s career before last night, he’s dropped 6 fly balls and caught 1501).
I guess my biggest emotional investment comes from the fact that baseball is fundamentally a game of man-against-man. Franklin vs Manny- and Franklin beat Manny. Franklin vs Loney- and Franklin beat Loney. But his teammate didn’t close it out. So then Franklin had to beat Blake, or Belly, or Martin, or Loretta, etc.
And that is not only “appreciably harder”, but it’s also completely different type of conflict. Franklin had to defeat another player on the field, and even with the odds in his favor, that’s not something you can predict on such a tiny sample size. Holliday only had to catch a fly ball, and he failed, which is monumentally more significant. The ball wasn’t fighting back.
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 10, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't matter
Holliday SHOULDN’T have been expected to catch the ball 100% of the time. As long as that is the case, his situation is no different from Franklin’s in the next batter.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he is expected to catch that ball
much more often than Franklin is expected to get any hitter out. So it DOES matter. It’s a routine play, it should have been made, and it’s a whole lot easier to catch that ball than to get the next hitter out.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Oct 10, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't matter in the sense that Sleepy is saying
Obviously, Holliday’s play was easier than Franklins, but it was on the same scale (IE 0% < x < 100% out probability). I see no reason to treat his misplay any different than Franklins, besides obviously adjusting the “replacement level” much higher.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 11, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
holliday home run not double
on another point, how does Albert get the second best WPA (.061) with a single and IBB in 4 PA’s?
second another point, what would have been the reaction if Thurston was thrown out at 3rd instead of Colby?
by ubeddie on Oct 9, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Was Jose theoretically waiving Joe to make third?
"In 2035, 25 young men will be able to call themselves world champions. Some of those guys haven’t even been born yet. And some of them are Asian." -Mike Shannon
by Alxfritz on Oct 9, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I no blame Thursty Joe.
"In 2035, 25 young men will be able to call themselves world champions. Some of those guys haven’t even been born yet. And some of them are Asian." -Mike Shannon
by Alxfritz on Oct 9, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Waiving joe?
Freudian slip?
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Oct 10, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Thurston probably wouldn't have hit the fucking double in the first place
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are prolly fucking right about that.
"There is not a better feeling in the whole world than knowing that you are the best team in both leagues."- Bob Forsh on winning the 1982 World Series.
by MaytheForschbewithyou on Oct 10, 2009 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't find the game thread
4th inning double down the right field line, thrown out at third.
As far as doubles, 2009 Regular season: Joe’s got 17 doubles in 304 PA, Colby had 22 in 520. vs LHP Thurston 4 doubles Colby 1 double 3 HR
But your response does tend to show that the player involved in the play does contribute to the VEB reaction. Colby is getting some slack because he is Colby and Joe would have been lit up for another base running blunder. I filed this one under a great play by Looney.
by ubeddie on Oct 10, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Thurston had hit the go ahead double
I think nobody would have been pissed to see him be thrown out.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have been ecstatic that Joe Thurston
hit a double off the base of the wall that gave us the lead, and then tipped my hat to Loney, who made a great play to cut off that ball.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on Oct 10, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I went with Franklin too
After Holliday dropped the ball, four straight batters reached base, and they weren’t exactly murderer’s row.
by BTown Birds fan on Oct 9, 2009 6:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Look...it's Franklin.
Holliday scored one of our only runs, so at worst he’s even.
And who here thinks Brendan is on the team to score runs?
If Holliday went 0-4 with plenty of LOBsters, and Brendan botched a routine grounder — maybe.
But Franklin’s job is quite clear. His job is to get 3 outs. Hell, he only had to get two last night. He didn’t do it. Plain and simple, very cut and dry.
It’s easy to blame someone else, because deep down we all know that’s who Franklin really is, but truthfully there’s nobody else to blame.
In the end, perhaps there’s just no one to blame. It just plain sucks regardless.
Offseason Rumors : Me :: Unicorn Blood : Voldemort
by Cardinals645 on Oct 9, 2009 6:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
then he needs to be out of the 2-hole
Of course, hope means being cut down on some street corner, as you run like mad, by a random bullet.
by prophetjohn on Oct 10, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't help but think
(and this has nothing to do with your post per se) that if duncan (god rest his soul) or even somebody like thurston had dropped that ball, there would be a few more people blaming the outfielder. holliday shouldn’t get a break because he’s generally good. he dropped the last out. it’s on him.
but tonight’s a new night.
by rannpb on Oct 10, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How has Holliday gotten a break?
“Holliday error leads to Dodgers walk-off” at CBS.
Holliday error pic highlights this article at STL PD.
Holliday error lost the game, no mention of Franklin crapping the bed at the PD here.
All about Holliday’s “crucial error” at ESPN.
etc.
If anything, Franklin is getting a break for not getting two outs in a situation where a WonderBrad appearance is likely to secure the win.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Oct 10, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's kind of a decent point, actually
equally, you could blame Mozeliak that Jess Todd and Chris Perez are currently playing golf somewhere in Ohio.
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 9, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
let's blame david freese
for having that car accident and not telling anyone, then sucking in april, forcing us to trade for a 3B.
And glaus, for being made of glass, of course.
OTOH, wonder how game 1 would have gone with Freese pinch hitting instead of a completely useless fat man?
it's Clydesdales vs Goats. Actually sums up Cards vs. Cubs quite nicely. -all4tookie
by SleepyCA on Oct 9, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this all goes back to Tony not being able to make peace with Rolen.
Do any of these events happen or chain together without that? No.
(Insert Your Own Joke)
by AWolfAtTheDoor on Oct 10, 2009 4:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's blame Walt Jocketty.
He traded for Rolen, and without that trade we’d still have Placido Polanco who is right handed and could have hit an uber clutch RBI double off of Kershaw, and Dan Haren would have pitched a 9 IP shutout.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Oct 10, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, let's blame Milton Bradley,
because he would have made that catch.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Oct 10, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would've made that catch.
So, sorry guys. My bad.
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 10, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I blame Abner Doubleday
without him, we wouldn’t be in this mess at all
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Oct 10, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can i blame Adam Kennedy somehow?
"Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does all the work"
-Mark Twain
by Taskmaster on Oct 9, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's just blame all the mothers
that conceived all these culprits and be done with it.
by ridgesee on Oct 10, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I blame myself, really.
I mean, I’m the one who put my whole heart and soul into this team, leaving them there to be ripped out and pummeled into the dust.
Oh, who am I kidding? This one’s all on Franklin. And LaRussa.
"Baseball has been good to me since I quit trying to play it." - Whitey Herzog
by Bring Back Tommy Herr! on Oct 9, 2009 7:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it was a team effort, so the whole damn** team is to blame
except for the Wagonmaker, cuz he was fucking amazing.
* * /not damning the team, spare us GOB!!!
Lighten up, Francis - Sergeant Hulka
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on Oct 9, 2009 8:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
joe thurston
pretzels pretzels pretzels pretzels
by gdm426 on Oct 9, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I think we all know that this is only sensible answer.

Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 9, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is something I can get behind.
Offseason Rumors : Me :: Unicorn Blood : Voldemort
by Cardinals645 on Oct 9, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn VeP
Knowing you, I figured this was a post about who’s WpA or WAR or whatever the new “per-game” clutch statistic or something was the worst…but…alas, it’s not. I guess that’s what being a good poster gets you, sometimes others are disappointed.
by stlfan on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Well that question is pretty easy
By WPA, the clear goat is Franklin. I just wanted to see if you guys thought the same or differently.
So far, the results of the poll are slightly more blaming of Holliday than WPA is.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't think WPA is the be all end all here
Like so many other things, it probably gains more value the longer the window you use it for. I don’t want to sound like Joe Morgan here, but I’m afraid I’m going to anyway. That was a catch Holliday makes every other time. That’s a catch everyone makes. That’s a catch Chris Duncan makes.
I think when you add the fact that it was the 27th out, I’ve got to say Holliday carries the blame in my mind. Clearly I am in the minority on that, and that’s fine. Still, I just think this is one area where you trust your lying eyes a little bit.
But what can we do about it, either way, I guess. I’m just ready to see Jo-el induce grounders in the dirt all day. Hopefully, Ludwick, Rasmus, and especially Holliday have a very easy day of it tomorrow.
by Merry CRasmus on Oct 9, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know how you feel
But the numbers show that Franklin was the goat for that game. I mentioned this above, before Holliday’s out, teams win the game 96% of the time given that situation. If he had made the play, they win 100% of the time. If he didn’t, teams still win 87% of the time. I don’t see how you would be able to get around that when assigning the blame.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 9, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Put another way
Would you rather have a 1 run lead with a runner on second and 2 out, or a one run lead with 2 out, nobody on, and a fairly routine fly hit to left? Regardless of WPA, I think you have to look at the ease of the situation. You put anybody that’s played at a high school level or above in that spot (left field) and there is a real good chance they can make that play. You put a high school pitcher on the mound with the tying run on second and I don’t like my chances. The ease of play, and the fact that the game is over if the play is made, is enough for me.
by Merry CRasmus on Oct 9, 2009 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
b/c it's one play...
… you’re not comparing apples to apples. so franklin could give up a single at any old time, and the WPA wouldn’t take too much of it hit. but because there just happened to be a runner on 2B, and that runner just happened to be the tying run, then his catcher can’t call a straight sign and a single cost the team the lead. after that, a broken bat dumbass bloop bleeder cost the team the game.
arguably, Franklin pitched very well. he got two outs (one of which negated by Holliday), then got crossed up with Molina (i’m blaming Yadi for his paranoia of sign-stealing), then gave up one single and the broken-bat bleeder.
Franklin got completely jobbed. this one’s on Holliday.
by kindred on Oct 10, 2009 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
We ARE comparing apples to apples, as Holliday’s play DOES NOT result in an out 100% of the time. Neither does Franklin’s inability to retire the next hitters. It’s all probabilities, and in both situations the probabilities are never going to be equal to 1.
Regardless of the fact that Franklin pitched well (I don’t think he did, but whatever); he should have been expected to get that final out a certain percentage of the time. Ditto with Holliday, although his percentage was much higher.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 4:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, Franklin faced 6 batters.
A replacement level pitcher records two outs before allowing two runs 85% of the time. Facing 6 batters, a replacement level pitcher can be expected to record 1 K, 1 BB, 2 H, and has an 18% chance of allowing a HR. He’s also likely to get a ground ball or two, a fly, and another ball in play that’s likely to be a liner or fly. His fielders will probably get most of the grounders, almost all of the flies that stay in the park, and a few of the liners, meaning he’s very likely to get at least two outs, with a good shot at more.
Ryan Franklin got 0 K’s with only one generous swinging strike, walked two men (one possibly UIBBed), and gave up two hits on one fly ball and three line drives. His fielders were likely to catch the fly ball, but there’s only a 48.8% chance that they get an out from any of the line drives.
Ryan Franklin’s performance was not a particularly unlucky, considering his stuff and his batted ball profiles. He pitched like shit. Holliday screwed up, but he played well in the game otherwise, and most players are not likely to hit the homer that put us up. Most pitchers, even of replacement level, are likely to escape Franklin’s situation without giving up two runs. Most fielders are not likely to catch line drives.
"Of course Kolby Rasmus was going deep! That’s what Kolby Rasmus does! You don’t give Kolby Rasmus second chances!" -Kolby Rasmus
by hazel on Oct 10, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but they're not even leading in the 9th without Holliday's HR
shouldn’t that be a factor, too?
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Oct 10, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A smart-ass Cubs fan.
"There is not a better feeling in the whole world than knowing that you are the best team in both leagues."- Bob Forsh on winning the 1982 World Series.
by MaytheForschbewithyou on Oct 10, 2009 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
7 people now

(Insert Your Own Joke)
by AWolfAtTheDoor on Oct 10, 2009 4:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AZ, can you please edify us to said jackasses?
So we can ban them to BCB?
by vivaelpujols on Oct 10, 2009 4:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Boog in protest because this thread, and the poll, is stupid and totally unproductive.
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 10, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was an experiment for my own amusement
I didn’t offer any conjecture of my own, all I did was ask a question. I wanted to see how VEB thought.
by vivaelpujols on Oct 11, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose it's fair enough as an experiment
in terms of “people’s subjective opinions vs WPA” or whatever – I thought it was just an exercise in blame, which didn’t really achieve much. But I see what you mean.
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 12, 2009 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's face it
Holliday’s miscue will be known as a “Buckner” from now on. How anyway can blame anyone other than him is amazing to me. The Cards can still pull this out and if they do all will be forgiven if not, he pulled a “Buckner!”
by nybirdfan on Oct 10, 2009 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It has to cost us the series, first
We’re not dead, yet.
by thepainguy on Oct 10, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"We're not dead, yet"
Come back here, I’ll bite your ankles off!
by stlfan on Oct 10, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Merely a flesh wound

"Who is John Gall?"
by iron duke75 on Oct 10, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You what? Your arm's off!
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 10, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had a big post written up in the other thread about how this could haunt an otherwise good player
but no need to jump the gun.
(Insert Your Own Joke)
by AWolfAtTheDoor on Oct 10, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now that we are out.
Holliday’s error is now and will forever be a “Buckner!”
by nybirdfan on Oct 11, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd put the blame on both Holliday and Franklin
Holliday makes the catch, game over. Franklin gets one more guy out, game over. Why Franky couldn’t get one more guy out, I don’t know. I don’t think Yadi ever went to the mound to calm Franky down, did he? If not, Yadi should’ve. Whoever the blame is on, it was a weak end to an intense game.
I have a good feeling about this - Ben Crenshaw, in a press conference on the night of Sept. 25, 1999. The American Ryder Cup team was down 4 points and came back and won the following day. It was, and still is, the largest comeback in Ryder Cup history.
Let's get it together boys, and let's shock the world!
by zoomzoomj88 on Oct 10, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Overlooked Yadi Play
I am one of Yadi’s biggest supporters, and not get all Hrabosky here, but the passed ball with Loney and Blake (I believe) on was pretty big and no one has really said much about it. He didn’t really go after it either, he just seemed resigned to the fact that both runners were going to move into scoring position.
That almost necessitated a walk with first base open and then, Franklin’s selection had to be even finer, even tougher with a guy who has seemed to lose some of the feel for his pitches since September.
Just my two cents from a long time lurker. I don’t think it lost them the game but it was a play that didn’t help matters much, to give up two bases in the bottom of the 9th.
by CPABird on Oct 10, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the passed ball actually made any real difference at all, really.
if there was fewer than two outs, maybe, but I can’t honestly see how it was relevant in any way. We still needed to get one of the next two hitters out. That was the situation before, and after, the passed ball.
Felonius Monk - bitching to contact since 2008
by Felonius_Monk on Oct 10, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















