Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

BPA rankings

Read the site and fanposts daily, but haven't posted before. I was inspired by Cards fan in Chitown's recent post regarding OAR to share a statistic of my own. As we all know, OPS is an excellent statistic, but certainly has flaws. In an effort to more equally weight the components of OPS, I came up with BPA: Bases per Plate Appearance. The name is pretty self explanatory.

I think, with my most recent incarnation, that I've managed properly weight the values of your "normal" stats (H, 2B, BB, etc.), while taking into account SB's, SF's, HBP's, etc as well. Using a league average OBP (adjusted for each player's PA's), I've valued all hits greater than walks, etc based on the greater likelihood additional players will advance due to the live ball.

Pillory me if you must, but any feedback would be highly usefull and appreciated.

Top 100 (Note: My dataset includes all players with at least 50 PA's, so keep that in mind):

Rank NAME POS BPA
1 Albert Pujols 1b 0.788974
2 Chipper Jones 3b 0.680988
3 Rafael Furcal ss 0.677308
4 Taylor Teagarden c 0.649303
5 Cody Ransom 1b 0.637312
6 Carlos Lee lf 0.633368
7 Lance Berkman 1b 0.624951
8 Nelson Cruz rf 0.624765
9 Manny Ramirez lf 0.616236
10 Jerry Hairston ss 0.608195
11 Hanley Ramirez ss 0.607029
12 Matt Holliday lf 0.606782
13 Mark Teixeira 1b 0.602254
14 Dustin Pedroia 2b 0.598559
15 Chase Utley 2b 0.597546
16 Ramon Santiago ss 0.596816
17 Ian Kinsler 2b 0.591132
18 Jose Reyes ss 0.590194
19 Carlos Quentin lf 0.587953
20 Aubrey Huff dh 0.586604
21 Jimmy Rollins ss 0.581795
22 Grady Sizemore cf 0.580507
23 Nate McLouth cf 0.569673
24 Carlos Beltran cf 0.565696
25 Milton Bradley dh 0.564401
26 Alex Rodriguez 3b 0.563035
27 Kevin Youkilis 1b 0.561108
28 Mike Fontenot 2b 0.560736
29 Nate Schierholtz rf 0.556422
30 Brian McCann c 0.553364
31 David Wright 3b 0.549587
32 Andre Ethier rf 0.547429
33 Josh Hamilton cf 0.545704
34 Joe Mauer c 0.543907
35 J.D. Drew rf 0.542733
36 David Ortiz dh 0.542125
37 Johnny Damon lf 0.539329
38 Justin Morneau 1b 0.538064
39 Aramis Ramirez 3b 0.537246
40 Martin Prado 3b 0.536881
41 Mike Napoli c 0.536709
42 Chris Dickerson lf 0.535968
43 Brian Giles rf 0.534272
44 Ryan Doumit c 0.530735
45 Oscar Salazar ph 0.530731
46 Denard Span rf 0.528153
47 Shane Victorino cf 0.524339
48 Brian Roberts 2b 0.524062
49 Nick Markakis rf 0.520519
50 Ichiro Suzuki rf 0.520371
51 Kazuo Matsui 2b 0.519561
52 Nick Johnson 1b 0.519207
53 Jody Gerut cf 0.519098
54 Shin-Soo Choo rf 0.51868
55 Conor Jackson lf 0.518417
56 Jason Bay lf 0.516456
57 Russell Branyan 3b 0.516339
58 Vernon Wells cf 0.515218
59 Ryan Ludwick rf 0.514982
60 Vladimir Guerrero rf 0.513712
61 Joey Votto 1b 0.513657
62 Carlos Delgado 1b 0.51076
63 Randy Winn rf 0.509316
64 Marlon Byrd cf 0.509283
65 Alfonso Soriano lf 0.508846
66 Prince Fielder 1b 0.508135
67 Anderson Hernandez 2b 0.507035
68 Curtis Granderson cf 0.505214
69 Pablo Sandoval 1b 0.503773
70 Jason Giambi 1b 0.503758
71 Jermaine Dye rf 0.501787
72 Ryan Braun lf 0.500628
73 Ryan Shealy 1b 0.500173
74 Ben Zobrist ss 0.499322
75 Placido Polanco 2b 0.498913
76 Stephen Drew ss 0.494688
77 Juan Pierre lf 0.493574
78 Ty Wigginton 3b 0.492517
79 Mike Sweeney dh 0.491776
80 Mark DeRosa 2b 0.491566
81 Miguel Cabrera 1b 0.49053
82 Moises Alou lf 0.490356
83 Doug Mientkiewicz ph 0.489349
84 Mike Aviles ss 0.489276
85 Pat Burrell lf 0.487752
86 Ryan Spilborghs ph 0.486826
87 Cristian Guzman ss 0.485362
88 Raul Ibanez lf 0.483994
89 Gabe Kapler cf 0.483319
90 Xavier Nady rf 0.482576
91 Adam Dunn lf 0.482244
92 Melvin Mora 3b 0.482014
93 Joe Inglett 2b 0.48178
94 Troy Glaus 3b 0.480363
95 Hank Blalock 1b 0.480266
96 Mike Rivera c 0.47972
97 Adrian Beltre 3b 0.478715
98 David DeJesus lf 0.478495
99 Bengie Molina c 0.478155
100 Jacoby Ellsbury cf

0.477888

Comment 46 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i like this...

… don’t have much more to say. although i am curious as to how (and why) you weighted hits and walks differently. for a hitter, a single and a walk should be counted as the same, since whether or not there is a baserunner is essentially random from the hitter’s p.o.v. also, giving walks less weight than hits skews against guys who draws lots of IBBs when runners are on base. if this were a “per-AB” measure than that wouldn’t matter, but since it’s a “per-PA” measure, it does.

i understand that there may sometimes/often be more utility to a hit than a walk, but unless you’re going to go full-bore and include some sort of situational-hitting stat — or at least build a more nuanced term including chance that a runner is on base, chance that he advances, not discounting IBBs, etc. — then i don’t think you should be prejudiced against walks.

but i certainly like the idea.

by kindred on Jan 6, 2009 10:19 PM EST reply actions  

whether or not there's a baserunner is essentially random

but on average, it happens in a pretty significant number of times, and a hit advances a runner more than a walk. Though, of coure, balls in play do end in double plays more often too.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jan 6, 2009 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

sure...

… but if we’re trying to measure the ability of individuals then it could skew results. for example, if Rick Ankiel bats fourth or fifth and hits a single, there’s a stronger chance that Pujols will be on base to advance than when Kennedy (say) bats ninth, after the pitcher. and whoever the lead-off hitter is will get 150+ ABs every year where he is guaranteed to have no chance to advance a runner, and where a walk is just as good as a single.

by kindred on Jan 6, 2009 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

That's why you'd

use averages that aren’t biased to specific situations. And on average, hits are worth more than walks because they generate more runs.

by haltz on Jan 6, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

it's not a measure of run creation...

… it’s a measure of bases per plate appearance.

by kindred on Jan 7, 2009 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

It's his stat

He can make it whatever he wants.

by vivaelpujols on Jan 7, 2009 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Hits get runners

closer to home on average. Ie, more bases.

by haltz on Jan 7, 2009 1:32 AM EST up reply actions  

oops

didn’t see your post below.

by haltz on Jan 7, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

It's trying to figure out who is good at run creation

Just like all offensive stats intentions. Who cares about anything else?

Not afraid to nitpick

by joker24 on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 AM EST up reply actions  

oh, and you should definitely post more...

… especially when you’ve got new stats to share!

by kindred on Jan 6, 2009 10:20 PM EST reply actions  

This is very good

It seems very thorough and I love the fact that it includes steals because it values the complete ballplayer a little more. Also I like the fact that hits are move valued than walks.

by vivaelpujols on Jan 6, 2009 10:22 PM EST reply actions  

this sounds like an attempt at linear weights

on a rate basis. . . unless I’m misinterpreting things.

by azruavatar on Jan 6, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, I read

it and thought wOBA or EqA. Even OPS breaks down to values that are similar values. Anyway, I’m assuming that this is independent of any knowledge of linear weights, so it’s impressive that you came up with this idea. To me anyway.

by haltz on Jan 6, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

It is an impressive thought process if original.

Lord knows I don’t have the creativity for something like this.

by azruavatar on Jan 6, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Just you wait

Azruavatar v 2.0 is going to blow some freaking minds.

hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit

by Alxfritz on Jan 8, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Good work, devil

I, for one, would like to see more about your methodology. How did you value those extra bases? Did doubles get greater than twice the weight of a walk b/c of the likelihood someone might score from 1st? I’m also not crazy about including sacrifice flies since, in many cases, it’s not at all clear that those batters “gave themselves up.” All that said, I like what you’ve done here and would be interested in reading more about it to help me understand why Pujols is worth .79 bases per PA.

by chuckb on Jan 6, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks for the feedback

Yes, doubles, triples, and home runs all get more value than a walk. My newest method (I’ve been working on this off and on for roughly a year) of accomplishing this is to add the probability of one runner on, two runners on, and three runners on to the amount of total bases each hit/whatever provides, and then multiply that by my perceived likelihood that a runner will gain more than one base from the hit. For instance a double would be worth 2*(1+(avgobp*1.33)+(avgobp2*1.33)+(avgobp3*1.33)). I decrease the value of a walk/ibb/hbp(same as walk) by then multiplying each of the likelihoods my admittedly arbitrary prediction that a pitcher is less likely to walk a man with runners on first, first and second, etc: 1*(1+(avgobp*.5)+(avgobp2*.25)+(avgobp3*.125)). As I said, those are arbitrary numbers, and probably a far less than perfect way of doing things, but one that enables the outcome (BPA) to tell a more complete story.
Sac flies and hits are included because the idea of BPA is to determine how many bases a batter contributes to the team. This is also why gdp’s, CS, and pickoffs are included.
I also have attempted to penalize strikeouts (but not to the extent that some would) by using the following calculation: -(k/(1+(avgobp^3)). Again, a somewhat arbitrary calculation, but one that I think makes the stat more complete.
Note: the numbers I originally posted are slightly off due to an error in my calculations. Numbers for notable Cardinals are:
Pujols: .8513
Glaus: .5304
Ankiel: .4893
Molina: .4948
Ludwick: .5712
Greene: .2854
Kennedy: .4368
Schumaker: .4939
League average (adjusted for PA’s): .4601

by asufan550 on Jan 6, 2009 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

okay...

… i think i misunderstood at first. so the measure is TEAM bases per INDIVIDUAL plate appearance? Thus, a double that scores a runner from first is worth 5 total bases, discounted by the probability that a runner is actually on first (which is less than 1.00).

am i reading you right? if so, then treating walks differently from hits makes sense, as does adding value to sac flies. although you still need to correct for IBB and HBP, i think, since those are out of the batter’s control.

by kindred on Jan 7, 2009 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes. I do treat IBB’s differently(much lower ratios). HBP’s, however, are currently treated the same as a walk. I’m no so sure that they are completely out of a batter’s control. See Biggio and Quentin – guys that have always had high HBP numbers.

by asufan550 on Jan 7, 2009 2:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Can you explain

this to me: “(k/(1+(avgobp^3))”

what does avgobp mean? I think you are taking too large a chunk out for strikeouts (which combined with less GIDP, should be fairly negligible when it comes to the players TB or runners advancing).

by haltz on Jan 7, 2009 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

interesting to see the players with fewer PAs

but where’s Mather? he had more than 50 right? Barton? etc

I think you have a better grasp of the math involved than I do, at least it seems that way… some of the stuff you mentioned I’m not totally following, but hey, I didn’t do the best job of describing mine either. I’m a bit leery to divulge my formula, but I suppose I should.

I also like the idea of giving more value to hits than walks, even if just a little bit more. interesting that you’ve been working on this for a year! we should collaborate perhaps, I only started after the season was over, and it has become apparent to me that this project is going to take more work than I thought; although my favorite part was the creativity involved and naming the stat. glad I could inspire, and I’d like to hear a more in-depth description. I’ll probably go into the components of my stat a little more when I get the time; right now I’ve been writing this:

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jan 7, 2009 2:21 AM EST reply actions  

Pujols number is stunning

I assumed he would be near the top (if not #1). But the gap between his numbers and the next player (Jones) is amazing…

by JWO on Jan 7, 2009 8:54 AM EST reply actions  

yeah

same in my OAR stats, he was like 10 points higher than everyone else, and the ranking was pretty tight for the rest of it.

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jan 7, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

For those still interested

Another slight change to the formula (told you it was a work in progress). Cardinals and their ranks(out of 567):
Molina: .4909 (101)
Pujols: .8046 (1)
Kennedy: .3951 (272)
Ryan: .3355 (372)
Greene: .2540 (455)
Glaus: .4934 (96)
Ludwick: .5293 (58)
Stavinoha: .1515 (505)
Barton: .3387 (368)
Ankiel: .4516 (157)
Schumaker: .4499 (163)
Just for kicks:
Miles: .4420 (180)
Lopez: .3803 (297)
Izturis: .4537(!) (152)
Roberts: .5378 (47)
Adjusted Avg: .4222

Entire list, along with subsequent updates and other invented stats, will be up at overzealousfan.blogspot.com in the near future.

by asufan550 on Jan 7, 2009 11:57 PM EST reply actions  

If you don't mind my asking

are you developing this for a particular source? Your blog, website, book…someone else’s? I’m just curious.

by Toddius on Jan 8, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Any way you could throw up a link for a spreadsheet file of this?

I’m not interested in the process, that’s what you’ve come up with and I don’t want to steal your work, but I’m interested in throwing the values into my fantasy baseball cheat sheet Excel spreadsheet for 2009, along with the Marcel projections, Bill James, etc.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jan 9, 2009 2:56 PM EST reply actions  

Im just curious...

… in the last set of stats you provided, I assume, the strikeout penalty is included. How much does it affect/help Yadi’s and Pujols’ BPA?

Yadi swings and hits a high fly ball... Endy Chavez goes back, to the track, to the wall... ITS A GUNNER!! Yadi gives St. Louis the lead in the top of the ninth!

by Paulspike on Jan 12, 2009 2:45 PM EST reply actions  

yeah

I wonder how much a strikeout should penalize an offensive player’s stats…

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jan 12, 2009 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Formula is still being tweaked

However, in that incarnation, Pujols (well, everybody) was penalized far too many TB’s (52) due to an error in my calculations. The actual number should be 2, leaving him with a BPA around .8826. FWIW, Yadi should be at .5055. Average changed to .5815.
I’m working on the formula tonight. Will have updated numbers at my blog shortly.
Thanks, everyone, for all the interest and input. I’m hoping to also have a RC stat up shortly based on these numbers.

http://overzealousfan.blogspot.com

by asufan550 on Jan 13, 2009 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Alright. It's done for the foreseeable future.

I found some helpful statistics in my spreadsheet that I had failed to utilize before. I believe this is the most accurate figure yet.
Cards:
Molina: .5440 (344)
Pujols: .9460 (2)
Kennedy: .5340 (360)
Ryan: .4857 (432)
Greene: .4947 (424)
Glaus: .6861 (100)
Ludwick: .7990 (18)
Stavinoha: .3276 (533)
Barton: .5628 (302)
Ankiel: .6959 (90)
Schumaker: .5792 (264)
Just for kicks:
Miles: .5623 (303)
Lopez: .5522 (324)
Izturis: .5344 (359)
M. Young: .5763 (274)
Adjusted Avg: .6150

Turns out I was over-penalizing strikeouts by quite a bit (in my eyes). I used these numbers to come up with a RC/27 stat that ended up pretty close to James’, and pretty close to average RPG last year. Both of these facts make me quite pleased and lead me to believe that I’ve created an accurate, useable statistic.

http://overzealousfan.blogspot.com

by asufan550 on Jan 13, 2009 11:28 PM EST reply actions  

Until you tweak it

So that Pujols is first, I won’t trust it.

/sarcasm*

*mostly

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Jan 14, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Well the guy above him does have all of 47 AB's

There’s always that…

http://overzealousfan.blogspot.com

by asufan550 on Jan 14, 2009 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha

Naw, that couldn’t be it. I’m sure it’s an error in your formula. ;)

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Jan 14, 2009 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

At the risk of sounding too self-promoting (although there's really very little for me to gain from it),

A basically finalized BPA formula is up at my blog for those still interested.
I’m extremely happy with the finished product.

http://overzealousfan.blogspot.com

by asufan550 on Jan 26, 2009 12:21 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinal Managers EVER!
Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols