FA pitchers
Here is a list of some of the bigger name fre agent pitchers available this off season copied from Fan Graphs http://tinyurl.com/6l7wk8
CC Sabathia, 2.98 FIP, 4.05 WPA/LI
Ben Sheets, 3.20 FIP, 2.18 WPA/LI
Derek Lowe, 3.33 FIP, 2.33, WPA/LI
Ryan Dempster, 3.38 FIP, 2.91, WPA/LI
Mike Mussina, 3.44 FIP, 1.62 WPA/LI
AJ Burnett, 3.65 FIP, 0.00 WPA/LI (can opt out of current contract)
Andy Pettitte, 3.78 FIP, 0.99 WPA/LI
Randy Johnson, 3.83 FIP, 0.23 WPA/LI
Kyle Lohse, 3.90 FIP, 1.54 WPA/LI
Greg Maddux, 4.03 FIP, 0.70 WPA/LI
Jamie Moyer, 4.29 FIP, 0.63 WPA/LI
Randy Wolf, 4.32 FIP, -0.43 WPA/LI
Oliver Perez, 4.74 FIP, 0.37 WPA/LI
Braden Looper, 4.89 FIP, -0.44 WPA/LI
Jon Garland, 4.91 FIP, -0.72, WPA/LI
Pedro Martinez, 5.40 FIP, -0.62 WPA/LI
When I survey the Cardials pitching situation for 2009 I see a solid core in Wainwright, Carpenter, and Wellemeyer. The Cardinals also have a couple of youngsters that could serve well in the rotation. But, factoring in injury potential and youngster inconsistency and durability issues, I'd say the Cardinals would do well to get at least two FA pitchers, even with Pineiro as rotation spot filler insurance.
From the list above I think we would agree that Sabathia and Sheets are the top free agents. We'd also probably agree that they are out of the Cardinals' price range. Dempster has impressed me this season with a dominating and consistent effort. But I doubt the Cardinals will be able to get him either. Most of the others I don't see as providing much value. But I do think Lowe would be a great fit for the Cardinals. His durability and his ground ball-ness are exactly what the Cardinals need. And if the price was right I'd also like to see them go after Randy Johnson or Pedro. They would be tremendous 4th or 5th starters and it would be great to have HOF caliber former Cy Young winners as part of the team. All three of those guys, (assuming short contracts for the oldies) would be worth whatever it would take to get them. They have been healthy of late and as 5th starters their risk would be minimized. And with Looper, Loshe, Mulder, Clement, and Isringhausen off the books we could easily afford them. How about this for a rotation (I made it six deep to account for the fragility take off one of the last two if you think it is too much):
- Wainwright
- Carpenter
- Lowe
- Wellemeyer
- Johnson
- Martinez
Or better yet, trade Pineiro.
Which two or three from that list would you pursue if you were the Cardinals? The rules for this discussion are - be reasonable and conscientious of the Cardinals budget, and no talk of minor leaguers in the opening day rotation (I know there are reasonable arguments for those guys but save those for other fanposts). Also, what do you think it would take to sign the guys you like. For my three I'd guess 14 or 15 for Lowe, and 8 - 10 each for Pedro and Randy. Pricy for oldies, but with guys like that I don't think the cost matters as much because of marketing and merchandise gains.
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
no johnson and martinez
because if both are healthy what do you do with the other one. but i like the lowe idea
6 man rotation
Yeah, both aren’t necessary, but a six man rotation wouldn’t be so bad for a bunch of balky pitchers.
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd rather
move Wellemeyer back to the pen until 1 or 3 of the starters get hurt. Wellemeyer would be the first man to enter the fray when someone goes down. Then, Thompson, Garcia, Boggs in some order could enter the fray. I’m looking at that list…and you could have the five starters (not Welley) realistically start only 110 games. I don’t think you can count on Carp, Johnson, and Pedro for more than 50 total at this point. I don’t know that I like that. Plus, you’d be spending approximately 25-30 million on pitchers at that point…outside of your top 2.
Could they give you more than simply having a rotation of:
Waino
Carp
Welley
Pineiro
Garcia
Boggs
Thompson
I bet my 7 could throw 162 games in a season. I don’t know that the 6 above could get 100 depending on the breaks.
I think you are overly-optimistic about Boggs and Garcia
Your seven is the same as mine except for Johnson-Martinez for the rookies, and mine has innings machine – Lowe. So either I’m not following you or you aren’t following me. Wellemeyer has handled the innings jump reasonably well. He has been pitching strong late in the season. I don’t know why you’d want to move him into the pen. He’s primed for 200 innings next season.
I believe Johnson-Martinez have as much of a shot at starting a goodly amount of games as Garcia-Boggs. Plus, they are known quantities as far as performance and they are marketing boons. The money saved going with unproven rookies over a one year contract for still-performing HOFers isn’t worth it in my opinion.
Think of it this way, if you were the Cubs, who would you rather face, mid-to-back-of-the-rotation rookies or Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez?
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions
plus
With guys like Johnson and Pedro, you could always trade them at the deadline, or keep them for draft picks.
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
assuming they're healthy
assuming a team is going to take a chance on pitchers that are worn down and injury riddled since 2006.
assuming you could get anything back for them if you can trade them
assuming that they pitch well enough to get listed as a type A or type B
That’s a lot of assumptions for two guys who haven’t thrown 150 innings combined the last two years….
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
not really
Martinez is healthy and pitching well and Johnson has dragged himself through a season nicely, considering. Remember too, we are talking about our fifth and sixth starters here.
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Good luck
talking two hall of fame pitchers into taking contracts as the 5th and 6th starters. Those guys will either stay with their current teams or go somewhere where they’ll be looked at as a one or two year savior, not a one or two year 5th starter.
Garcia is scheduled for Tommy John surgery on Sept 8th
From the Cards medical report. Won’t see Jaime until 2010.
Both...healthy?
Can I get the Vegas odds on that happening with both of those pitchers?
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
Lowe
I think he would be a great fit in St. Louis as well. You would also think he’d be a guy that Dave Duncan would covet having in his stable of starters. He could be another Duncan project that comes over after a middling year with an average team and then win 20 games and get in the Cy Young hunt (think Bob Welch). Given the fact that he’s already a pretty damn good pitcher with a good sinker and pitch to contact philosophy, the chances of him being successful in St. Louis are extremely high.
However, he will turn 36 in the middle of the season next year and made $9.5 million a year ago (which is pretty cheap when you consider that Pineiro will make $7 next season), so what kind of deal are we looking at here? He will be a type A Free Agent, so he’ll cost a draft pick (although we’d pick one up for losing Lohse) as well. I’m thinking somewhere in the neighborhood of 3Y/33M-36M would be about right. That averages out to $11-$12 million a year and if you backload the deal by paying him $8 million next year and $15 million in 2011, you’d still have the flexibility to go out and sign bullpen help and possibly a middle infielder for 2009.
I don’t think you can go longer than 3 years with a pitcher that’s his age, but I think if you go shorter than that I think he’ll sign elsewhere. Someone is bound to give him a three year deal.
Martinez and Johnson don’t interest me at all after the Mulder/Clement/Carpenter saga, but Jamie Moyer would be an interesting pick up considering how good the Cardinals play defense. He’ll pitch over 160 innings and won’t miss many bats, but if he can solidify the 5 spot in the rotation and put Piniero in the pen for around $6 million next year I’d at least kick it around a bit.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
I bet he'd cost more
But I agree with his potential here. I am not too worried about his age. His consistency puts him in the ‘gets better with age’ category in my book. Some guys break down by 32, and then there are those who power through and enjoy sustained success ‘til 40. Lowe seems like the latter type. I’d even consider a fourth year team option with a buy-out if that would grease the wheels.
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
if mlbtraderumors is to be believed
Lowe is a type b….which means we don’t lose a draft pick…the dodgers would just get a supp. pick
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!
no more injured starters!…that is all
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 5, 2008 5:02 PM EDT reply actions
they aren't injured.
they were injured.
by abothecardinal on Sep 5, 2008 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
fine...
i’ll give you $100.00 if Pedro makes 30 starts next season. you give me $50 if he doesn’t….anyone wanna make that deal?
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 5, 2008 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions
hell no...thats what I'm saying..
I don’t wanna see more of the same bs next year, where we are constantly waiting on 2 or 3 guys to return
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 5, 2008 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not depth ..
if they are on the DL. Remember how deep our starting pitching was gonna be this season? What were we gonna do with all the extra guys this season? Who was gonna get traded to make room? It never happened.
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 6, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
who's on the DL?
Randy and Pedro are not on the DL. That is a big difference from what the Cards tried tis season.
by abothecardinal on Sep 6, 2008 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm specifically referring to Pedro, not johnson
Pedro has been hurt since 2006 and it’d be crazy to give him a large sum of money to ride the DL for half a season. We already have a major question mark in Carpenter, but we are free of Mulder and Clement. Why replace them with another guy, who will more than likely end up hurt for most of the season? I’m fine with Lowe, but Johnson would be 46 by the end of next season. I’m guessing he’d be ok for another year and assume he’ll try to pitch untill he hits 5000 k’s, but I’d rather get guys that we KNOW we can count on for at least 2-3 years. With Jaime’s injury, the assumption that Jess Todd is more than likely a reliever, and the struggles of Parisi, Mortenson, Ottavino, and herron, it seems that we aren’t at all that deep in the minors for pitching. I think Boggs might be ok, but I can’t envision him getting a legitimate shot with dave and tony. I don’t think its a bad idea to get a guy or 2 for the upcoming seasons, just not a guy who’ll more than likely be hurt.
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 6, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
not advocating for Pedro...
… but we’ve already got injury concerns in Carp, Waino, and Welly. Garcia is now out for the year, and maybe the first half of ‘10 as well. i’m really not interested in going into next year with a rotation of Carp, Waino, Welly, Boggs, Piniero and no real back-up plan. we need more depth.
no dispute there...
but the signing of an injured/injury prone guy is not going to help anything.
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 6, 2008 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
i would totally make that deal.
But I don’t have $50.
by abothecardinal on Sep 6, 2008 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions
yea...you'd definately need it
Nick Stavinoah = John Gall
by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Sep 6, 2008 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Lowe for 2/$24 if possible...
… 3/$36 if necessary. RJ and Pedro won’t come here even if we wanted them. Lowe is a Type B so he won’t cost a pick. get Lowe and you’ve got:
1. Carp
2. Waino
3. Lowe
4. Welly
5. Boggs/Piniero/Mac
now that Garcia is hurt and might miss all of next season, the need for another starter has gone up. if Mac is to be moved to the rotation, then Boggs or Piniero goes to the pen, and the other to AAA to cover the inevitable injuries to Carp, Wain, Welly, and/or Mac. you’re basically taking Looper and Mulder’s salary and giving it to Lowe. you’ve still got ~ $10mn from losing Izzy and Clement, plus no more money to Flores, Encarnacion, etc. so there’s still $15-$20mn to spend on Furcal if you want him and/or bullpen help.
one or two of the Mort/Garcia/Boggs/Todd tandem might be a mid-rotation guy in ‘10, which is good because we’ll be losing Welly and Piniero then. Glaus’ contract is up then, too, and chances are good that Freese or Wallace will be ready then or sooner.
hope Ty Johnson comes back and sign another LOOGY. as always, there’s a lot of LOOGYs out there: Marte, Eyre, Ohman, Affeldt, Rhodes, Embree, and others. take your pick (i like Ohman or Affeldt). bullpen with Mac in the rotation:
1. Perez
2. Motte
3. LOOGY 1 (Ohman)
4. LOOGY 2 (Johnson)
5. Franklin
6. Thompson
7. Piniero/Boggs
bullpen with Mac:
1. Perez
2. Motte
3. Mac
4. LOOGY 1
5. LOOGY 2
6. Franklin
7. Thompson
if Kinney comes back, then maybe he’s in the mix also.
i think that team can go toe-to-toe with the Cubs and challenge for the division, while still keeping payroll flexibility and room for the kids to come in and contribute over the next 1-2 years. if you trade an OFer and/or Anderson, you can boost the MIF depth in the high-minors or maybe even get somebody MLB-ready.
How about Oliver Perez?
He’s a young left hander. His numbers aren’t that bad either. I’d rather not see the team splurge on some older pitchers if we are truly dedicated to rebuilding. If the team wants to wait and see on Rasmus then we need to find pitchers that will help in ’10 and beyond, not just next year.
Um, no. I love Oliver Perez, but he does not fit current coaching philosophy.
He can be so awesome though-strike out 11 in 7 innings or walk six in 5 innings. He’s definitely a high risk high reward type of pitcher, and I actually think he’s going to end up with the White Sox. They love pitchers that throw heat.
She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.
see, I disagree
I think Lowe is less of a fit, because he’s the type of guy Duncan turns people into, meaning, he already throws a sinker, so what does Duncan have to teach him?
Whereas Perez is the type of guy Duncan converts into a Cardinals pitcher. He’s had less success than was expected of him and is old enough where he might appreciate that striking out everyone isn’t everything.
I would love to see Perez more than any of the other pitchers, because I’d rather bank on either Carpenter or Wainwright being healthy all year and spending the real cash on some offensive support for Pujols, preferably from a mif spot. Orlando Hudson and Oliver Perez would be pretty much my ideal signings this off-season.
This already happened
in pittsburgh after perez’s breakout season. They tried to change him and he went anthony reyes on them for a couple years. It was a miserable failure. Why not bring in pitchers who jive with the philosophy in the first place ala lowe, maddux, moyer? If you’re spending big you’d better get something that doesn’t need to be changed.
Also, because of his youth and flash, Perez will likely cost at least as much as Lowe. Higher risk, and really, less reward.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
considering lowe is probably a type b
i see we try to get him for around 9-12 million a year for 2 years…he’ll replace loshe, be cheaper(years and probably dollars) and we won’t lose a pick…sounds good to me…how many other teams are thinking this though
yeah
Lowe sounds like a great fit…. but I think he might re-sign with the Dodgers
it's time to bring the rock!!!!!!!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on Sep 6, 2008 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I've really changed my opinion,
on the possibility of signing Lowe and I would love him in STL. It seems like many people are thinking the same thing, and unfortunately they are not all cardinals. It doesn’t seem certain that he’ll be a dodger, but his price tag could get out of hand if there are too many bidders, zito style.
9-12 mil for three years is probably the best we will get a chance at. It seems less and less likely now, however.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
A few weeks ago
I was very high on Burnett, but it seems like he may just be leveraging the interested parties against eachother for longer and more money. His pitching style could also clash in STL.
A few ideas,
Lowe and Maddux together, 3/36 and 1/5-7m
Wolf and fill out the rest with rookies 2/16 We still have no LH starters.
Burnett could be an extra ace for us, at 4/48: This is now probably a dream.
Garland seems like he would jive with DD, and he could get the bump that many GBing vets get when they come to STL. Will probably cost 3/30 unfortunately.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
no to Garland...
… Maddox will only play on the West Coast, i don’t want Wolf and he’ll probably stay on the West Coast also. Burnett and Lowe seem like the best options. maybe Penny. either that or it’s time to say hello to Jason Jennings and Livan Hernandez.
Wolf stated the
he is keeping his options open from here on out. I really don’t want Wolf though, he hasn’t pitched close to 200 innings in close to 5 years (although he might come close this year).
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
right, but...
… that doesn’t mean his preference isn’t to stay on the Left Coast.
but he probably won’t able to. the Friars are cutting payroll, the Dodgers probably have enough pitching even without Lowe, the A’s don’t tend to sign old so-so pitchers, and the Angels are stacked. unless the Giants bite, Wolf probably doesn’t have a West Coast team to play for, and the Giants have major needs just about every but SP.
Any specific reason you’re against Garland? He’s been over and underrated during his career, but right now I think he would be a pretty good fit.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
I disagree
I think that Looper, were he a starter his whole career, would be like Garland. However, Garland is a legit 205-210 IP/season starter. Looper is a guy who is going to do well this year to get into the 190’s. They give you the same production. Garland will walk a couple more, but will strike out a couple more. Garland will probably give up a couple less homers per inning, but his WHIP will be slightly higher.
I still think the biggest differences will be that Garland is entering his prime (probably) at 28 years old and Looper is probably coming out of his at 33…
AND
…Looper is going to be lucky to throw 190 innings a year, whereas Garland will be lucky if he throws 215 or 220. I’d rather have the guy that will absolutely give you 195-210 innings and can do it for 4-7 more years…instead of signing the guy that’s 33 years old and will probably give you 180-195 innings at about the same level for 1-3 years.
i'd rather have the extra half-inning per start also...
… but my point was that the quality of those innings was similar, except that Loop’s ERA+ and WHIP are better (this year) and Garland will cost more money.
really, i don’t want either of them. but Loop will probably get 3/$21 or something, whereas Garland will get 4/$40. if i had to pick between those two pitchers and those two contracts, i’d take Loop’s every time.
even with looper
being 33 years old? I dunno if I want a career reliever as a starter into his later 30’s…especially if it’s not a top notch guy.
i'm not planning on signing Loop to a 6-year extension...
… actually, as i’ve said, i don’t want to re-sign Loop at all. but if i did, i don’t think it’d be for more than 2-3 years. Garland will likely require 4, at a larger AAV, and he’s just not much better, if any.
keep in mind: i’m not defending one over the other. i don’t want either of them. it just seems a little crazy that the same people who want us to ditch Loop want us to sign Garland. it’d cost us more money, more years, and Garland hasn’t been any better than Loop in recent times.
Re: Johnson, Martinez and Lowe.
Randy isn’t going anywhere. He’s made it abundantly clear that he wants to stay in Arizona as he lives there and can pitch in a relatively pressure-free environment. Unless he blows out an arm he’s going to get to 300 wins next year for the Diamondbacks and he’s going to be their first Hall Of Famer. Why bother chasing him?
As for Pedro, there’s just too much risk. Let the White Sox or Red Sox or Dodgers pick him up and pay him to sit on the DL half the season. He’s this generation’s equivalent of Sandy Koufax, except that he didn’t retire when the injuries finally caught up to him.
I’m all for signing Derek Lowe if they can. Give him 3/36 mil and put him after Carp and Wagonmaker. That would be a good, responsible signing. He eats innings, he’ll always compete hard and Duncan wouldn’t even need to do much coaching. It’s a lot less of a risk than Oliver Perez, Sheets or Burnett and we wouldn’t need to give him Santana money like with Sabathia. After signing Lowe they could still afford to find some MIF help and a LOOGY or two, both of which should be the utmost priority this winter.
Am I the only one that thinks it might not be a bad idea to throw Mussina a 1Y deal with maybe an option for a second?
Right now, we need a short term guy who can be relied upon until we find out what’s going on with the kids. He’s had a great year this year, and he won’t be a huge committment in terms of years. Why not throw him something like 1Y/$12M, with an option for a second, and maybe a $3M buyout?
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
I don't know
I think people way overvalue picks around these parts. And we’re going to get two back from Lohse anyway, and maybe another from Izturis. This team needs to be peaking around 2011-2012, and can probably contend until then, barring some horrible decisions—too soon for a 2009 draftee to be making the majors. Grabbing someone who can provide some stability without a bunch of long term risk is more valuable to me than making a high risk/high reward signing at this point.
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
I wouldn't mind it.....
If you figure we have Carp, Waino, and Welly around for a few more years…..it would be kind of stupid to tie up the other two rotation spots with long-term deals, as at some point, you’d like to think Boggs/Parisi/Garcia/Todd/etc might be ready.
by SoonerfanTU on Sep 10, 2008 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions

by 
















