Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Feature: Mobile Commenting and Retweeting now live!


Jim Edmonds turns on St. Louis

In probably the dumbest business decision of his career, Edmonds disowns St. Louis media and the Cardinals organization after today's game:

 

 

No, what he did was this, according to Mike Claiborne of KTRS:

When FSN's Brent Stover and Claiborne (KTRS) approached Edmonds after the game for a quickie on-field interview that has become standard procedure for MLB rights holders, Edmonds blew them off and said:

"I'm (censored) done with St. Louis TV and radio and I'm (censored) done with the Cardinals."

And then he walked into the Cubs dugout. -B

 

 

I've got no problem with what Jimmy does as a baseball player on the field.  If he goes 4 for 4 with 4 Grand Slams vs the Cardinals, so what.  That's his job, that is what he is supposed to do.

 

However, this is different entirely.  A couple Cubs fans asked me a few weeks ago, "Don't you hate Jim Edmonds now that he is a Cub?"  I said, to them, how could I hate Edmonds just because of the team he plays on?

 

But, if he really did say what Claiborne and Stover say he said, I'm done with Jim 'There is more to life than Baseball' Edmonds.

1 recs | Comment 127 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Wow

1) Had his best years with the Cards
2) Fans adored him
3) Won a World Series w/ St Louis
4) Fans adored him

I cant believe he would say such a thing. Now if he said, “Im F’ing done w/ Larussa”, I could empathize but not what was said above.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 9:18 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed.

Hate the manager, not the city.

I’m sure he’ll get a nice ovation tomorrow.

by craig3410 on Aug 8, 2008 9:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Was going

to get one regardless but now it will be that much louder. He needs to get plunked.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 9:24 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is it true that the source of this little feud a personal conflict with LaRussa?

I haven’t followed all the sordid details, but that’s the impression I’m getting.
LaRussa’s a great manager; he really seems to be amazing at getting the best out of (most of) his players, especially when they can adopt an underdog/fighter attitude; and I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on a good portion of his questionable decisions, because lord knows LaRussa knows more about baseball than I do.

But one thing I will most definitely not miss when he moves on is the freaking drama. It seems like every week there’s a new soap opera plot unfolding between LaRussa and player, or LaRussa and a reporter, or LaRussa and an opposing team member, or LaRussa and the local garbageman. Damn, that gets old.

by BTown Birds fan on Aug 8, 2008 9:26 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edmonds

got his wish and was traded to the West Coast. It seems the team did right by him. Plus, look at the Cards outfield this year, where would he expect to play? Cant platoon w/ Ankiel. He needs to move on just like the Cards did.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 9:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He was told he would platoon with Ankiel

and he asked to be traded, preferably to the West Coast.

If he seriously has that big a beef with LaRussa and that bat flip today was directed at LaRussa, LaRussa should order Edmonds tower buzzed. You can’t let someone treat you like that.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 8, 2008 9:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who would have hit lefties?

I agree, he needs to get hit. Im sure Wellys ball would not feel so great.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 9:42 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Screw That

Let me throw one at his head…from 10 feet away

by pujols_5 on Aug 8, 2008 10:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Platoon? Not even that...

Since both are lefties (Skip and Duncan as well), basically Edmonds would never play except when Ankiel is hurt.

So basically he was looking at zero playing time, and more likely a forced retirement, a la Ozzie Smith (and Ray Lankford, the 2nd time around).

If a team decides they no longer want a player any more, why should that player continue to be loyal to that team? Why doesn’t loyalty run both ways? And why is it some players continue to be run out there even though they probably should have retired (Izzy), while others get pushed out? (Ozzie, Lankford, Rolen, and now Edmonds?)

by DiscoJer on Aug 8, 2008 10:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In Izzy's case. Well

that may not be true…see Motte/Perez

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 10:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Disagree

Rolen did not get pushed out. He was underperforming and was traded for someone who has been a nice addition for this team. I dont know how anyone could complain about the Rolen/Glaus trade unless you live in Toronto.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 10:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What were the Cardinals supposed to do?

They told Edmonds he would be a platoon player for the remainder of his contract after he had put up some dreadful lines post-concussion.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 8, 2008 10:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but

he platoons in chicago. just wish more patience had prevailed on by both sides before shipping him to sd. this shit with tlr is just more bs generated by tlr. i will not be sorry to see him go. bob melvin? pop warner?

If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!

by sportsman on Aug 9, 2008 12:33 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He's also embraced hitting to the opposite field

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 9, 2008 2:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm not trying to justify Edmonds' comments

And in the offseason I was under the impression that Edmonds left the team on pretty friendly terms, so I don’t know what’s up with him now. It just seems like everything these days (I know, not really everything…) is a TLR feud, and that gets a little tired after the first few dozen variations.

by BTown Birds fan on Aug 8, 2008 9:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, consider too that maybe he DIDN'T say what they said he said.

He does still have a business here, he has married a gal from the area, and still has a home here. I don’t blame him for being mad at LaRussa, he made some really jerky comments about Edmonds when the Cubs were here-it worked, because Edmonds went 0-for the series…...It sure fired him up today..

I would just suggest before you get too upset with him, make sure that he said what they say he said, that he meant it the way they say he did. He had a really good relationship with the media in this town for years-it just sounds odd to me. Or go ahead and hate him if you want…...

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Aug 8, 2008 9:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't know if that was directed at me personally since it was a reply to me,

but I never said anything even remotely suggesting that I “hate” him, unless that’s your own unique interpretation of the phrase “I don’t know what’s up with him.” But I certainly take your point that we don’t know exactly what he said or if there was some context that might change the overall vibe of the comments.

But it does seem fairly clear that at the very least there’s some beef between him and LaRussa that seems to be at least partly playing itself out through their comments to the media. My initial point, and really my only point with my posts here, is that LaRussa sure seems to have beefs with a lot of people, and that drama gets old fast, IMO.

by BTown Birds fan on Aug 8, 2008 10:13 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hating Larussa

I have no problem if Jimmy hates Larussa. Some nights I do too. But he should have been more specific in his comments.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 10:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Of course it might have been

one of those in the heat of the moment deals. I for one know that if I am in a pissy mood and someone brings up someone I really can’t stand, sometimes I have the same type of attitude and response. I was pissed at JEd when I read that this morning, but once you think about it , it all does kinda make sense (if the Tony-Jimmy feud can make any sense, that is).

Jimmy overreacts
Tony overreacts
I suppose it is just human nature that we overreact too.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Aug 9, 2008 9:28 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No, it wasn't directed at you. I was actually replying to the main post. I'll be more careful next time.

Sorry.

There is some bad blood between the two…..it’s stupid and childish and immature, and I’m sure it will continue as long as LaRussa is here and as long as Edmonds plays in the NL…....

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Aug 8, 2008 10:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Now that was supposed to be for BTown Birds fan.....

Ever since the platform switch, I get confused where comments show up….

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Aug 8, 2008 10:33 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I got it, jillsinmo, and thanks for the clarification

I definitely agree it seems childish; so did a lot of the stuff between Rolen and TLR, and a lot of stuff between the media and TLR. As you point out, we don’t know all the behind-the-scenes details, but I see a pattern….

by BTown Birds fan on Aug 8, 2008 10:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was done correctly

you were just the second person to respond to BTown Birds fan.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 8, 2008 11:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with you totally Jills

as of now, without definite proof, I don’t even believe it happened as reported.

by ridgesee on Aug 9, 2008 12:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I believe the quote was provided by Bernie

Unless Bernie publishes a retraction, the quote is what you use as proof. My read on what he is saying is he is pissed, not at LaRussa, but at the STL media for making so much of the issue last month. He is a Cub now not an ex-Cardinal and does not want to talk about STL any more.

LaRussa even took the media to task for trying to make a story that didn’t exist. This was in the story about Friday’s game.

Edmonds, apparently no longer on speaking terms with his former manager after receiving a public scolding through the media last month, appeared to flip his bat at the Cardinals dugout after posing in admiration of his second-inning shot. Edmonds later attributed the bat flip to excess pine tar on his hands. La Russa played down the whole thing.

“Everybody flips the bat,” he said. “Why do you want to stir up stuff like that? He’s been a good player his whole career and he had a good day. I didn’t notice. ... that’s just the way the game is today.”

by ubeddie on Aug 9, 2008 9:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well then what do you consider "definite proof?"

When will you be convinced? Do you actually have to hear him say it? I mean, I bring my umbrella with me to work whenever the weather forecast tells me there’s a chance of rain. And that’s just a prediction of what will happen.

by Ray Lankford on Aug 10, 2008 9:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm really starting to think it's more than just a feud with LaRussa.

Can’t prove it but I have the feeling there is more to this than what we know. Not sure if something happened before he was traded in the off season or what but I think he is pissed at Cardinals upper management/ownership as well. I haven’t heard of any bad feelings with players but it wouldn’t suprise me if something like this starts to piss some of his “friends” off too.
I have also gotten the feeling by listening to Shannon & Rooney that there is something up with Jimmy & the Cards that hasn’t been told. Shannon the ultimate Cardinal fan/employee hasn’t really been real kind with Jimmy. Anybody hear the call when Ankiel made that diving catch it was something along the lines of “Forget Jimmy Edmonds that is the best you will ever see.” Conspiracy stuff I know but these latest turns of events it really makes you wonder.

I REALLY doubt there will be any “Jim Edmonds Day” at Busch Stadium in the future and if he can somehow talk the HOF into it I bet he will try his best to not go in as a Cardinal if he makes the HOF. DUMB move Jimmy Hollywood…DUMB move.

by KYCards on Aug 8, 2008 9:54 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That seems extreme

I think this weekend blows over. But, if this happens in the playoffs all bets are off.

by njnick on Aug 8, 2008 10:18 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, he doesn't have a choice in what hat he wears IF he gets into the Hall

But, I have a feeling he got pissed at LaRussa last year over not playing. Star players often can’t handle taking a back seat to a position they’ve owned for years. We all knew he couldn’t play everyday, LaRussa knew it too, but I’m sure Jim refused to see it.

We complain about Duncan and Izzy hiding injuries and continuing to play, Edmonds is probably pissed he wasn’t allowed to play through it or wasn’t given 100% confidence that he would be able to play this year. Ozzie did the same thing. Hate LaRussa if you want, but he did the right thing with Jim and probably with Ozzie.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 8, 2008 11:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edmonds and Rolen

I loved all the memories they gave us in Red, but the end was ugly. Two guys who seemed to be nothing but for the team when they were here made some ultimate me moves and hold the Cards responsible.

The best thing they can do is win this series. Skip retaliation, skip the bull crap just win. Course e was there offense so getting him tossed may not be a bad idea.

I’m ticked tomorrow I have Yanks Angels..

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Aug 8, 2008 11:04 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edmonds was one of my favorite Cardinals / players ever

but I’m starting to lose a lot of respect for the guy. TLR is one thing but St. Louis TV AND the Cardinals extend far beyond management and the front office—they are both members of the fanbase. They are both part of who cheered loyally for him for years, even when he left.

Say what you want about management, front office, player, but saying that about SL TV and the Cardinals as a whole is also a shot in the face to the fans.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Aug 8, 2008 11:23 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

in fairness to Jimmy

it says nothing about the fans, does it?

Maybe he thinks that upper management (AKA -The Cardinal orginization) sides with Tony in this feud. Until he comes out and says he is done with those of us who have loved him for years, I am not gonna get mad at Jim for being the next in line in “who is Tony gonna piss of next?”

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Aug 9, 2008 9:33 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude just got married in STL

This makes little sense. I could see how he would have been pissed off by Bernie’s column (STL media) exhorting him to boo Edmonds; I could see how Bernie could twist a quotation to get his readers to see that BERNIE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG on that score.

He’s having a big and unexpected season back from the brink and he just had a huge game against a team that thought they had no room for it. I can’t blame him much for wanting to get out of the STL spotlight and into his clubhouse. If he says the same thing at the end of the year, I’ll change my mind.

by liam on Aug 8, 2008 11:24 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think you hit on a key point in that last sentence

This wasn’t a prepared statement that Jim gave at a podium after the game, it was a reactionary comment made on the field. Point being that I’ve made many statements in my life that didn’t come across exactly as I meant for them to, maybe this was the case maybe not.

by MotherTruckinSteve on Aug 9, 2008 2:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

exactly

you two make that statement in a much clearer way than I could this morning.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Aug 9, 2008 9:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

About Jimmy and the HOF

After closer look….big season or not for the Cubs there is no way he makes it in in my opinion. J. Hollywood is under 2,000 hits and will need 130 more to even get there. It will be hard for writers to vote a guy in under 2,000 hits. He’s 23 HRs shy of 400 which is doable for him if he stays healthy….but I doubt that will get him into the Hall either. Really the 8 Gold Gloves is all he has going for him and that didn’t get Royals 2b baseman Frank White into the HOF. He has never been a MVP and has only been an All-Star 4 times. Unless he does a Reggie Jackson and hits 3 HRs in a World Series game for the Cubs to win the series….his chances of getting to the HOF are VERY slim to none. So there really won’t be any need for Jim to come back to St. Louis after he retires anyways for any career celebrations.

by KYCards on Aug 8, 2008 11:39 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Frank White?
Really the 8 Gold Gloves is all he has going for him and that didn’t get Royals 2b baseman Frank White into the HOF.

Frank White was a bad hitter. Jimmy has slugged over .500 ten times in his career (and over .600 twice). ASG appearances are a poor benchmark…in 2004, Jim OPSed over 1.000 and didn’t make the team. It was his career year. He was also the best CF in the game from 2000-2005 – I’d say he has that going for him, even if he is a borderline candidate.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 12:30 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was using White as a Gold Glove comparison only... who also won 8 gold gloves

not comparing him as a hitter to Jimmy. I was pointing out that having 8 gold gloves by itself is not a lock for the HOF.

To me Jimmy would need to get at least 2,300 hits and 400 hrs + to even have a chance at the HOF and there is no way he will come close to get the total hits. When guys like Dave Parker, Andre Dawson, and Dale Murphy can’t get into the HOF. He doesn’t have a chance in my opinion. I don’t think it’s even borderline to be honest.

by KYCards on Aug 9, 2008 12:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not comparing him as a hitter to Jimmy. I was pointing out that having 8 gold gloves by itself is not a lock for the HOF.

Why is that even necessary to point out when we know that Edmonds has far more to offer than his 8 gold gloves, and White really didn’t?

When guys like Dave Parker, Andre Dawson, and Dale Murphy can’t get into the HOF. He doesn’t have a chance in my opinion

I’ve always thought Edmonds was severely underrated on the national scene, but among Cardinals fans as well? You do realize he is better than those three, right? Look at their stats. Edmonds got on-base more than any of them, hit for more power, and was a better defender.

And to put some icing on the cake:

RC/G (career)

Edmonds: 7.4
Dawson: 5.4
Murphy: 5.7
Parker: 5.5

Dawson will probably make it to the HOF within the next few years. Murphy and Parker won’t. Actually, look at another player from that era – Jim Rice. He’s the quintessential borderline player….but Edmonds is better than him, too. To say that he doesn’t have a chance or that he’s not even borderline is kind of absurd when you take this stuff into consideration.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 3:59 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I still think the thing that really hurts Jim's chance with the voters

will be his hits total. Guys that don’t get at least 2,300 hits are not going to be considered. And in this day and age if guys don’t even reach 2,500 hits they have a tough time getting serious consideration with the voters. If Jim could have got around 2.500 hits I think we would have a great shot of getting in. I don’t think voters will look at his RC/G (career). to be honest. Getting 400 Hrs will boost his chances but I still think his total hit total will be his downfall.

I think Jimmy will get some votes. Maybe enough to keep him on the ballot for a few years. But he just won’t have the “key stats” that voters like to get him 75% of the vote in my opinion. Of course alot of his chances will also have to do with who else will be on the ballot for his first year on the ballot. If it is a weak year of candidates he will get more of a look but I don’t think that will even tip the scale in his favor.

by KYCards on Aug 9, 2008 3:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you're talking about two different things.

kycards appears to be talking primarily about whether he WILL get in (e.g., “voters will look at,” “voters don’t consider,” etc.), while jdub is talking about whether he SHOULD (e.g., rc/9). i think both of you are actually correct: he’s better than the guys jdub cites, so if, e.g., rice and dawson get in, edmonds should, too. but kycards is right in that i don’t think his chances are as good as rice’s, for example, simply because the HOF voters are still atrocious when it comes to proper valuation.

actually e'contending mang

by nycbirdo on Aug 11, 2008 3:33 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah

Looking over things, I think you’re right. I was just making sure to set the record straight regarding Parker, Murphy, and Dawson.

by jdub176 on Aug 11, 2008 3:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i don't get the outrage

he said “ST Louis TV and media” and “the cardinals”, not “st louis”. He IS done with the cardinals, and he has no reason to suck up to STL media anymore.

then again, that works both ways. I thought it was borderline unsportmanlike for STL fans to give him an ovation when he returned. He’s wearing blue now; that means you kick him in the chin and give no quarter when he’s in your city. You don’t cheer for him, even if he was a great player for your team.

"..and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped." -Sir Belvedere

by SleepyCA on Aug 8, 2008 11:51 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

St Louis TV doesn't equal St. Louis?

The least he could have done is said, “I’m not on the cardinals anymore” and moved on, but “I’m (censored) done with . . .” sounds like dumping a girlfriend into the street with not a care in the world, and with that goes any friendship you had with her family and friends. Silly analogy, but think about it.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Aug 9, 2008 12:14 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Unsportsmanlike?

Don’t see how. I stand up and cheer for all the returning Cardinals.

You feel the same about Taguchi? Or Polanco?

by liam on Aug 9, 2008 12:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they didn't go to the cubs,

they didn’t specifically say they wanted to go to the cubs, and they didn’t say “fuck st. louis (anything).” that’s the difference.

actually e'contending mang

by nycbirdo on Aug 11, 2008 3:35 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not what he said

but how he apparently said it.

If he had said “I’m done on the Cards, I’m done with you guys”, then…ok, I kinda get it.

The ‘I’m $(*$##$# done with the Cardinals’ is the rub.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 9, 2008 12:58 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

focus on the "I'm F'ing done with the Cardinals" part

that is what i’m mad about. saying he’s done with the Cardinals is saying he’s done with us fans too. fine. if thats how he wants to play, then thats how we’ll play. if he wants to be a loser flub so badly, then let him be a loser flub. enjoy your fall collapse Hollywood. and dont come crying to us when they kick your ass to the curb come winter.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 9, 2008 1:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly

It’s our team just as much as theirs. Disrespect the Birds on the Bat, and you disrespect me. Period.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Aug 11, 2008 1:26 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh snap!

Well, I’m done with his restaurant.

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 12:45 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, now that I think of it,

I’ve never been there before. So I’m not sure if I can be done with something I never started.

Irregardless…

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 12:47 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Regardless

I know, nitpick and all. But “irregardless” isn’t a word. Besides, “ir” + “less” is double negative territory.

Don’t take it the wrong way. It’s just that I’ve seen it here on this site a couple of times in the past couple of days and it always catches my attention.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 9, 2008 2:17 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, it's a moot point.

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 2:26 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

don't you mean a mooo point?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 9, 2008 3:17 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I meant mute.

Damn langage!

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 11:02 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no

you were right. moot point is correct.

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Aug 10, 2008 1:03 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Irregardless.

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 10, 2008 5:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Strikes me as a joke now

when people use irregardless. Just because it has been picked over so much.

Irrespective of context . . . that’s how it reads to me.

by Youneverknow on Aug 9, 2008 2:58 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Me too

And if everyone in the office does want to go to F15teen for lunch one day.. Im not tipping.

by Evilfrog on Aug 9, 2008 10:38 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

I would too if I were a yuppie douchebag who went there to begin with.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Aug 11, 2008 1:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A lot of people are overreacting to this

He’s pissed off that LaRussa treated him so dickishly. He’s also pissed b/c he feels like both he and LaRussa have been baited by the St. Louis media. Whether or not the media did bait them or whether they were just doing their jobs, he’s upset w/ them. So what?

I didn’t get all those “Cards’ fans” who now hated Edmonds for signing w/ the Cubs. A lot of supposed Cards’ fans thought he should have retired rather than play for the Cubs. That’s asinine!

As for this stuff w/ LaRussa, he’s got a right to be pissed. Tony acted completely classlessly and he has a right to tell Tony to go f-himself. Some here want to split hairs between being pissed at Tony vs. being pissed at the Cardinals and take it as a personal insult that he “wants nothing to do w/ the Cardinals.” He didn’t insult me, you, or any other Cards’ fans so don’t take it personally. Want to separate Tony from the Cards? Good luck! Tony LaRussa IS the St. Louis Cardinals.

I’m an Edmonds fan. I have been since we acquired him and I always will be an Edmonds fan. It was time to get rid of him but I wish him all the success in the world. Tony should have treated him better…period. He deserved better than Tony’s sophomoric rantings. Maybe Tony will one day have the stones to apologize to him, but I doubt it.

But make no mistake, this is between Edmonds and Tony and Edmonds and the media. It’s not about any of us. Quit trying to make it about us.

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 1:28 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Then say he is done with LaRussa

don’t say that he is done with the Cardinals. This goes back to ‘he did so much for the organization/the organization did so much for him’. Whether he believes one or the other, to pop off like that at the organization, an organization I root for and have my entire life is crossing a line.

I don’t care that he is on the Cubs. I hope he hits 70 more career HRs and gets into the HOF. I didn’t hate him because he signed there. I probably never will ‘hate him’. But saying stuff like ‘I’m fucking done with the Cardinals’ doesn’t work for me.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 9, 2008 1:36 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ding ding ding

HL’s right. he said he’s done with the Cards, so fine. if he’s done with us, then we should be done with him.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 9, 2008 1:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

quick question

What constitutes being “done” with a professional baseball player? Are you going to stop having brunch with him on Saturday mornings? Are you going to throw away your 2004 NLCS game 6 tape? Maybe I’m missing something.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 4:14 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

make that three.

If he is done with the Cardinals then why should we view him as any different than another ballplayer?

And isn’t it funny how the same Cubs fans who spent 8 years telling us how overrated and juiced he is, now take him as the 2nd savior?

As far as fueding with TLR goes…. It seems to me that players that have been here for awhile(Ozzie, Jimmy, Rolen) expect to have their starting job for as long as they want it. Even if it handicaps the team. To me that shows a lack of caring about the team’s results and them placing more importance on themselves.

And as great as he was yesterday, today could always be one of his famous 0-4 3k’s game.

by bdmcleod on Aug 9, 2008 10:09 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ozzie's a bad example

One could make a strong case that Ozzie deserved the starting job in 1996.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 11:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And one could make a strong case

that Ozzie’s healthy numbers were attributable to him not playing every day, getting regular rest and being put into situations where he was more likely to succeed.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 9, 2008 12:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he still could have gotten regular rest, etc.

...even if he had been the starter. Clayton only started 111 games that year. I think Ozzie could have handled that. It’s just speculation, but I think he had reason to be angry at La Russa. Harboring that grudge to this day is however pretty questionable.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 12:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

why should we view him any differently?

b/c we’re fans and he was a great Cardinal who had great years here?

Make this into an issue if you want, but he didn’t insult you or any other Cardinal fan. Why should we be pissed off b/c he’s upset w/ some people in the organization? He’s not pissed at you. He doesn’t hate your kids. He didn’t threaten your family.

Do you really, honestly think that Edmonds wasn’t a team player while he was here?

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 6:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes he did insult me

he said, “i’m fucking done with the Cardinals.”

i dont know about you, but i consider myself part of the Cardinals. i’ve been a fan from birth, i’ve followed them my whole life. i’m a fan who pays money every year to see them play, i buy their merchandise, hats, t-shirts, etc. i blog about them here & on my own site. when they win, i’m happy. when they lose, i’m sad.

so when Hollywood says he’s done with the Cardinals, then he’s done with us fans too. he has officially turned his back on us & is now the enemy. he did insult me. he did insult you & every other fan of the Cardinals. we are not making this an issue or over reacting. he’s the one who turned this from a TRL only thing, into a entire organization & fan problem when he said

“i’m fucking done with the Cardinals.”

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 9, 2008 7:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

heh
he did insult you & every other fan of the Cardinals.

Really? I’ve been a Cards fan since I was a kid, I buy merchandise, tickets, etc….and I wasn’t terribly insulted. It doesn’t affect me either way. He was a great Cardinal, and now in the twilight of his career, he’s a Cub. Here’s what I said earlier:

Is it our duty to be willfully irrational about what Edmonds said? I hope not; this doesn’t have to be a pissing contest.

That applies perfectly to the attitude you have toward this situation. It’s like you’re trying to prove something – “guys, I really do love the Cards! See? I’m mad!”

he has officially turned his back on us & is now the enemy.

Scroll down and look at what Jimmy said in the Tribune today:

"They’re so passionate here about the game, and they’re passionate in St. Louis. I’ve gotten the opportunity to play in two of the best baseball cities in the NL, and I wouldn’t trade it for anything. It has been quite a ride."

How’s that for turning his back on Cards fans? Those aren’t the words of an “enemy.”

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 8:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you may consider yourself part of the Cardinals but

and don’t take this the wrong way, you’re not part of the Cardinals. You’re a fan, as I am. We are not part of the Cardinals. I’d love to have been a part of the Cardinals but it isn’t going to happen. We’re fans. He’s done w/ the organization and, specifically, its manager. He wasn’t talking to you.

by chuckb on Aug 10, 2008 9:35 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if we as fans dont feel like part of the team, part of the "family" if you will

of any organization we pull for, pro, college, etc, then i guess i dont understand what being a die hard fan of one specific organization is all about. why do teams in all sports refer to their fans as part of the team & part of the “family” if they dont view some of their more die hard fans as such? i’m not some naive kid who’s young enough to still think his favorite team really cares about how i think & feel. i know it’s a business & a lot of talk about fans as part of the “family” is a ploy to sell more tickets & merchandise. just look at the sawx for instance. but some do feel that way, if only for a moment like say after a big win in big game at their home stadium.

but you are right. none of us are technically part of the Cardinals unless some on here work for them. i get what you are saying. and i dont want to come off sounding like a crazy person, at least any more than i already have. but because the Cardinals have take up so much of my past & my present, i really do get mad if someone says something derogatory about them. if they are insulting the Cards, they are insulting. maybe thats a sign i need to step back & get out more. i dont know.

dont fool yourself, Jimmy knew exactly what he was saying. he could have been a lot more specific, but he wasn’t. he’s looking to get his name in the paper & get the fans on both sides rilled up & talking about him. well guess what? it worked. he knows how to play the game, and he’s playing it very well right now. and i’m not talking about the game thats played on a diamond.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 11, 2008 1:04 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This isn't about you

and it’s not about me. Those of you who are personally offended or insulted by his pretty innocuous remarks are far too heavily invested in this.

Or, maybe we could ban him from the city! He’s a traitor to all that is good and decent in this world. Annakin has become Darth Vader! Let’s get him!

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 6:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed

There are a million ways to say you’re done with the circus the media has created or certain people you don’t like, without disowning an entire organization. When you say “F&*$ the cardinals”, youre saying that to the players and fans too. I’m under the impression that he’s just ticked off that St. Louis doesn’t love him like they used to, and that with his game he proved to us that we were stupid for letting him leave us.

by soccerfreak on Aug 9, 2008 3:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He isn't a Cardinal anymore

What does he mean by “he’s done w/ the Cardinals?” Sounds to me like he’s not a Cardinal anymore. Who cares? He didn’t say the fans can fucking go to hell but I guess that’s how people want to read it.

People who are upset by this are looking for a reason to be upset. He didn’t say anything obviously offensive, at least to the fans, and they need to relax.

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 6:02 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He wants to have his cake

and eat it too.

“Please cheer for me fans! I still love you! I’m fucking done with the team you root for but I still love each and every one of you!”

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 10, 2008 3:02 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm hoping we get info on the whole story at some point.

Something tells me this “feud” runs a little deeper than just Tony vs. Jim. I kind of wonder if Jim has problems with others in the organization that we don’t know about yet. I’m sure Tony is a big portion of his feelings but I wouldn’t rule out that there is more to this story.

by KYCards on Aug 9, 2008 1:43 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't "care" what he said

one way or another. But it’s a very odd thing to say considering he owns a restaurant here, just got married here, and is looking to buy a farm here.

Maybe it’s just the concussions talking, maybe his feud with Tony was more than the old married couple that makes fun of each other as it was portraied, or maybe he fucking hates Steve Savard, but it was a very odd thing to say.

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 1:43 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edit:

Odd and newsworthy. I don’t think people here are overreacting.

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 9, 2008 1:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Kind of suprised to hear he's looking to by a farm in MO.

I always figured Jimmy Hollywood would head back to California after he retired. Thus the reason of wanting to be traded to a West Coast team in the off season. I never pictured Jimmy as being a John Mellencamp type of guy wanting to settle down on a farm….kind of funny to think about to be honest.

by KYCards on Aug 9, 2008 2:07 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

very much in agreement HoustonCardinal

I petition all Cardinal fans to put this thing in perspective. When his career is over I am sure he will look back fondly at his best years. His years with the Cardinals. I for one will always love Jim Edmonds

When the time comes for me to not be bothered by losing that is when I know it is time to retire my fandom

by ANDYAK47 on Aug 9, 2008 3:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Emote much?

The Cards made a completely rational decision to trade Jimmy. I’m going to shorthand this part of the discussion and presume no one here, especially in light of the performance of Ankiel, Ludwick, et al, thinks otherwise. But even back at the time of the trade, my sense is the VEB community understood the Cards’ logic.

And if you’re Jim Edmonds - ha! don’t you wish you were? - it was a rational decision to request the trade. You’re being marginalized, it’s obvious the team wants to see what Ankiel can do, your playing time is going to be very limited, and right or wrong, you think you can still play. You need to be somewhere else if you want to be in the lineup regularly.

Ah, but then Jimmy bombs out in San Diego and becomes a Cub. And he tries to fit in and says a few things along the lines of, I’m wearing blue now not red and give me a chance. Quit asking me about the damn Cardinals and judge me on what I do in 08.

Were any of you offended by that? If so, I don’t remember a lot of howls around here at the time.

Apparently TLR decided to be offended, though. And I use the word “decided” deliberately. I absolutely cannot see why Tony acted the way he did when Edmonds came back to St. Louis last month. What was the point? He almost had to have some agenda, but if so he hid it well. He stirred a pot that wasn’t even simmering.

Well, it’s boiling now. And it has a little habañero pepper in it, too, after Bernie wrote his columns kissing Tony’s butt, ridiculing the fans for showing their appreciation for Edmonds. Bernie criticizes TLR plenty often, and I figured those columns were pretty calculated, just to show he is evenhanded, but they were silly and emotional.

Ah, yes, now it’s emotional. TLR’s worked up, Bernie’s piling on, Jimmy’s vanity and pride are offended, and now poor, poor Stover and Claiborne have had their widdle feewings hurt, too, and are blabbing about it. The P-D boards are melting down and some VEB peeps are a little freaked, too.

Is it possible to say, take a deep breath, guys? Inhale up, exhale down. Jim Edmonds didn’t rip you. You are not the Cardinals, you are not the St. Louis media. If he wants to stick a bat up Tony or Bernie’s sphincter, that has nothing to do with us. He did his job and did it well today. Good for him. Tough for the Cards and tough for us to watch.

Edmonds was a great player for the Cardinals. Nothing he does with the Cubs changes any of that. He’s always been a compelling figure. Did you really think that would change when he changed uniforms? Actually, now that I think about it, he really is a player who demands an emotional response from people. So, in a way, I get all the angst. But I still think anger at him is misdirected.

by Youneverknow on Aug 9, 2008 4:09 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nothing he does with the Cubs changes any of that.

Unless he conducts himself in a way that diminishes what he did as a Cardinal. Playing a certain way? No. Willie Mays played for the Mets, was awful, crawled to 1st base and never diminished what he did with the Giants.

But the way Edmonds conducts himself towards the Cardinals on a personal level will change the way he is viewed by Cardinals fans.

Don’t take this as any kind of political statement, just a reference point. Bill Clinton was an immensely popular President, whether you agree with his politics or not. However, the way he has conducted himself over the last 2 years has drastically changed the way certain circles look at his legacy. 50 years from now will anyone remember? Probably not. But he has damaged a fairly popular public image.

The dripping irony of your post ‘Emote much’ is too much for me to bare. Good job, sir!

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 9, 2008 4:58 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And one could make the argument

that the fans are more the St. Louis Cardinals than Tony LaRussa, Bill DeWitt, Walt Jocketty, or Jim Edmonds ever was or were. They get paid to put on the colors where we pay with our wallets and our emotions to wear the colors.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 9, 2008 10:09 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Want to move to a team on the west coast"

was a diplomatic thing to say. At that time, there was all but one team that was thought of to be in the playoff hunt going into this year. La, Col, Ariz and San Diego. The west coast would have been balked if it was the Giants, he would have pulled the trade protection should that have been the team. Easily.

As luck would have it, Padres are the team that truly does suck and he gets released, a contender takes him on.

Frankly the whole move in the off season was more about how the Cards looked to play out than it was about the bench time he was going to endure.

Let the fool chase rings, and since he decided to chase with the Cubs, he can be apart of the team that starts the next hundred year tradition.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Aug 9, 2008 8:12 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is a stupid diary

It’s obvious he is mad at the media and not the city.

9 = 8

by JI on Aug 9, 2008 12:09 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

a stupid diary

that has almost 70 comments in less than 24 hours.

You should be so lucky….

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 9, 2008 12:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How cool

I didn’t notice it in your profile, but it’s cool you have the authority to go to other blogs around SBNation and deem peoples FanPost’s as either “Stupid” or “Not Stupid”.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 11, 2008 8:46 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cubs fan here

I think what he did was wrong. But what LaRussa said was wrong also. I understand why he says he’s done with the media, but why is he done with the Cards?

"Check the magic of a winning season and there are always reasons beyond the talent." Ned Colleti

by wrigleyrocker12 on Aug 9, 2008 12:29 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's hard to really know what his beef is with the organization

But I do think it’s borderline arrogance for people to feel personally offended by this and say that he swore “us” off. We are not the St. Louis Cardinals. In the same way that the fans have no feud with Edmonds, Edmonds has no feud with the fans. The problems are internal in the organization, and when Edmonds says he’s done with the Cardinals, he’s not talking about the fans.

Not Jimmy’s most classy moment, but I certainly don’t think it’s necessarily unprovoked and I don’t think that anyone should really feel like he was pointing the finger at the fanbase.

by mojowo11 on Aug 9, 2008 1:46 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I do not think you understand cardinal fans then mojowo11

When the time comes for me to not be bothered by losing that is when I know it is time to retire my fandom

by ANDYAK47 on Aug 9, 2008 4:32 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't know about that

mojowo’s response looks pretty nuanced and levelheaded to me. What doesn’t he understand about Cardinal fans? Is it our duty to be willfully irrational about what Edmonds said? I hope not; this doesn’t have to be a pissing contest.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 5:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i can piss farther than you

how’s that for nuanced

"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"

by baw on Aug 9, 2008 7:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

psh

Let’s reject that trade proposal and add Jim Edmonds to our team.

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 7:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

that proposal

was flat-out abzurd. i’m ready to send a derisive deadline message.

BAW

"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"

by baw on Aug 9, 2008 10:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it's pretty obvious by now

that LaRussa is a prick, and the media is trying to bait them both. That is why he is upset.

9 = 8

by JI on Aug 11, 2008 7:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

my take

or maybe hes just tired of it all
cant say i blame him
its old news, and an old story
leave it alone

no matter how nice hes been about, we beat it like a dead horse
tony was like than cordial in all things he said about jim
Jim was a great Cardinal

We didnt chase Matt Morris around for his comments did we?

Come on 2009!

by benstl on Aug 9, 2008 3:04 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edmonds quoted in Chi Tribune today

After the game he said, “They’re so passionate here about the game, and they’re passionate in St. Louis. I’ve gotten the opportunity to play in two of the best baseball cities in the NL, and I wouldn’t trade it for anything. It has been quite a ride.”

I won’t even add on to the quote. It speaks for itself.

by Youneverknow on Aug 9, 2008 3:25 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what a jerk!

He most certainly has turned his back on us. Shame shame.

/sarcasm

by jdub176 on Aug 9, 2008 3:35 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he's lucky he's playing with them

in a year that they’re winning . . .

but seriously, it’s true. I’ve lived all across the country, and it’s impossible to tell west coast fans about the intensity of baseball in the midwest. It’s like a whole different world in Chicago and St. Louis. Baseball is life.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Aug 9, 2008 4:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did he really just say that

Cubs’ fans love their team as much as Cards’ fans do? Let’s get him!

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 6:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You know, Hardcore...

your first sentence says it all (except for the first dependent clause)—“Edmonds disowns St. Louis media and the Cardinals organization after today’s game”

Why, again, does this offend you? Why are you so personally insulted by this? I know you realize that you’re not included in that group so….why are people so upset by this? You can’t be pissed at Bernie and Tony w/o being pissed at every Cardinal fan? I’m not buying that. If you want to get all pissed off by this feel free…but you’re making something out of nothing. I’m still Jimmy still appreciates all your support through the years. Maybe he’ll issue you, and all those equally insulted by his comments, a personal apology.

by chuckb on Aug 9, 2008 6:10 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

“Cardinals” doesn’t mean “Cardinals Nation.” I believe he specifically means the organization, perhaps specifically TLR. I don’t know how he could mean us. Either way, it makes me sad. I wish that something would take place that clarifies the situation in a positive way.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Aug 9, 2008 10:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are you his dad?

What’s with this randomly super defensive stance of Jim Edmonds? Was I insulted? Yes. Do I think Jim Edmonds needs to come to my house and apologize to me? No. He’s a million dollar athlete with a wife, multiple homes and business ventures. How I feel about him matters very little to me.

But if he’s done with St. Louis, stop sending text messages to his BFF to have read on FSN Midwest. Pull a Carlton and don’t come around the ballpark anymore unless it’s time for them to blow it up. If he’s done with the Cardinals, we can fondly look at his picture hanging on the walls of the club level but don’t have any expectation of coming back to St. Louis, stand in the building that is owned by the Cardinals organization and look for adoration to pour over him from the fans.

If he’s done with the Cardinals, thanks for the memories Jimmy. Now beat it.

by Hardcore Legend on Aug 10, 2008 2:57 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just think its humorous

how those who take the position of “not being offended” have to do so in a manner which puts them above the sorry souls who take things too seriously and need to come to grips with their lives.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 10, 2008 12:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hold on just a minute

I don’t really understand where this vindictiveness came from just because I didn’t take the quote to be an attack on the people who are members of the VEB community and Cardinal Nation. All I was saying is that the quote didn’t slam we the fans and that I could understand him having a problem with the organization and the St. Louis media. While I do think that he needs to get over it, I’m not personally offended by what he said, so I’m not going to pile on here and now. If you are personally offended, that is fine, because that is your subjective interpretation of what he is quoted as having said. That’s your right, as is to voice your disdain in a Fanpost, or in the comments thread.

I agree wholeheartedly that if Edmonds has that big a problem with the St. Louis media, then he should not engage it at all. If he is done with the Cardinals, then he should close down F15teen and move it and the chip on his shoulder elsewhere. The best way to put out the fire is to not give it anymore fuel. The best way to do that is to zip your lips about the whole situation, or just utilize the Crash Davis strategy in interviews.

I think that the whole situation has been blown out of proportion, from TLR and Edmonds back-and-forth over the July 4th weekend to now. I think it is sad and unfortunate because it is marring Edmonds’s Cardinal legacy. But, it is his decision on how he wants to be remembered in our collective memories and that is why I wish he would come forward and clarify what he said to diffuse the situation, or, reiterate his point so we know that he has, indeed, turned his back on the St. Louis Cardinals. If that is his stance, then I agree Hardcore, he should ride off quietly into the sunset and keep his nose out of St. Louis.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Aug 10, 2008 1:39 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well said

And as I read your comment a second time, I’ve come to the conclusion you weren’t responding to me. As I wasn’t making my comment about you, but to Hardcore and it was more of an observation about the whole thing than a direct response.

Personally, I’m not offended personally by what Edmonds said. I do think he meant more into it than what his words say, but that’s my opinion. I think he’s an idiot for saying it, and I’ll hold him accordingly in my opinion.

He might not have started it, but he definitely got caught up in it an said more than I bet he wished he had. Then again, maybe not, but that would be another reflection of his character.

In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.

by Tackle Box on Aug 10, 2008 2:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You think

that ESPN will get in on this, giving us hourly updates on the status of the Edmonds-STL feud, like the Favre drama?

"I believe he’s been reincarnated, that he played before, in the twenties and thirties, and he’s back to prove something." - Former teammate Mark McGwire about Albert Pujols

by cardzfan24 on Aug 9, 2008 7:32 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Have to toot my own horn here.

This is what I said today at 10:09 AM. Am i the next Nostradamus or what??

“And as great as he was yesterday, today could always be one of his famous 0-4 3k’s game”

by bdmcleod on Aug 9, 2008 11:24 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

hahah

i was thinkin it too..but theres always tom.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Aug 10, 2008 12:42 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What I find surprising

is that Mike Claibourne worked with Shannon yesterday on the radio broadcast and Claibourne praised Jimmy numerous times. Like nothing happened. Like Jimmy didn’t tell him off. Maybe Claibourne doesn’t hold grudges but he sure acted like nothing happened and seemed to go out of his way to sing the praises of Jimmy and what we brings to the Cubs.

by KYCards on Aug 10, 2008 2:35 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Completely agree with HL, as per usual.

If Jimmy is done with the Cardinals, that means he’s done with us. We should treat him the same way we would Brandon Backe, Brad Lidge, or Carlos Zambrano when he comes to town.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Aug 11, 2008 1:32 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or...

did he even say it?

I do wonder why Bernie would even report it. I mean, obviously, it sells, but chances are somebody says something offensive to those guys everday to get out of the interview. Could there be a bit of an ebilishment from the original source?

My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

by Alxfritz on Aug 11, 2008 11:41 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i listened to TMA this morning because i knew Mckernan would have some inside info about this

and he did. i listen every day, but i really wanted to hear what he said this morning. now for those who dont know, Edmonds owns part of InsideSTL.com. their headquarters are in the top level of Jim’s restaurant F15teen. needless to say, Tim & Jim are tight. but i feel after hearing Tim & reading his article he really is a trusted source on this story. yes he’s friends & business partners with Edmonds, but he’s also a good friend of Mike Claiborne. he really has no dog in this “fight”. he’s friends with both & doesn’t want either guy to be the bad guy here.

i’m going to back peddle here. after hearing Jim’s side of it, i still think he said it, but i think it was taken out of context. he’s pulled this stuff before & in fact has said a lot worse just to get out of a post game interview. listen to this clip, Jim Hayes of FSN Midwest backs that up big time. my beef with Edmonds is that he knew what he was saying & he just didn’t think that it was that big of a deal. he should know you dont drop “i’m fucking done with the Cardinals.” when you are wearing that jersey after you have done what he’s done wearing the Birds On The Bat. i get it, he’s pissed at Tony. fine be pissed at Tony. but choose your words more wisely, dont lump all of the Cardinals in with your beef with one guy.

now did we all overreact? probably. knowing what i now know, i really think it’s no big deal. listen for yourself, read the article & make up your own mind. i dont think we are going to get a better look inside the mind of Edmonds when he said that as he walked off the field, unless he comes out & tells us in a interview. which at this point i can’t see him doing. at least until he comes back to town in September.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Aug 11, 2008 2:54 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is not in response to you GDM426 but.............

I think am dumber for reading this post…...............

Why do people give a shit what Jim Edmonds says. You people are acting like your girlfriend broke up with you and kicked your dog on the way out…....

I can’t believe people are so offended. Jim Edmonds was never my favorite player, heck I don’t know if I really have a “favorite” player per say. I like to follow the team no matter who is on the team.

My god all of you guys are acting like you had some man crush on Edmonds and he told you to go fuck your self…......

Really this is quite funny to see the people who are upset over this.

by ICbirdfan on Aug 11, 2008 5:07 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Much ado about nothing

Too many tangibles and intangibles between Edmonds and the Cards/StL over the years to get too concerned over any one statement such as this, delivered in the dog days of summer, tough year for the guy, etc, etc. Humans in general, even ballplayers, are just too complicated to put too much weight into something like this.

by siddfynch on Aug 12, 2008 3:07 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What? HCL quits VEB over comments on this post!??

I hope not. This guy is a real baseball afficianado. OK we’re all a little pissed at JED & TLR. So what, I’m sure a lot of Cards fan are.

No need to lose a great VEB contributor…I mean really, look it up, over 16k comments….This guy is BoB all the way, and even more, an astute baseball commentator.

The sun don't shine on the same dog's ass all the time. - Catfish Hunter

by klcard on Aug 14, 2008 9:50 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_29_small
Wrist injuries (we've earned this)
Small
The pitches the Cardinals throw.
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Bernie *loves* RBIs as a measuring stick for offensive talent
Photo_29_small
The hiatal hernia (Or why you should stop worrying)

Recent FanPosts

Small
More Halladay
Ozzie_s_jacked__small
Tickets to All-Star Sunday w/ Futures Game!
Images_small
Rasmus miscellany
Small
Cardinals and Injuries/Announcements
Cardsvscubs2_small
Cardinals express interest in Roy Halladay.
Leopold_butter_scotch_southpark_small
Brewers imploding?
Small
CARDINALS/DOMINICAN BASEBALL DOCUMENTARY
Small
Five players I'm watching in July

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Ulquiorra2_small the red baron