The Best of What's Around
It’s been a pretty good week for Michael Phelps but it’s been a pretty good week for the Cardinals also. Just when it looked like the Brewers might run away and hide from the rest of the Wild Card field, the Cards decided to win 5 of 6, and the last 4 in a row – all on the road – to get within striking distance once again. Still, as I documented last week, the Brewers have a distinctly easier schedule coming down the stretch and the Cards are going to have to finish superbly in order to surpass them. So how to make it happen?
Well, first off – the Cards got some great news yesterday as Adam Wainwright pitched a superb game at Springfield. He was facing AA competition, but he threw 64 pitches – 43 of them for strikes – and struck out 7 while yielding only 3 hits in 4.2 IP. I wasn’t able to find anything about his use of the curveball but this start was distinctly better than his previous starts. It also seems that, based on the number of pitches thrown, the organization has come around to using our best pitcher as a starter – thus facing more hitters and pitching more innings – rather than as a reliever. Good news all around!
Pineiro’s thrown 2 good starts in a row and Looper’s pitching well. They’re going to have to keep it up now that Carp’s on the DL but it appears as though Wainwright will join the rotation Friday in Houston. Let’s pray that Chris Perez doesn’t blow a save in the next 6 days!
If the Cardinals are to make the playoffs, they’re going to have to pull out all the stops in the final month. Part of that, of course, means putting Wainwright in the rotation and taking advantage of our off-days as much as possible to utilize a 4-man rotation. A final suggestion I’d like to make, assuming he’s healed from his injury, is to call up Colby Rasmus and put him in the starting lineup. He should play every day, or at least against righthanders, where he could platoon w/ Mather. Ankiel and Ludwick would, of course, comprise the other 2 OF positions.
The team simply isn’t going to be able to upgrade in any meaningful way at 2b, SS, or in the pen, over the last month or so. Sure, we can call up Motte and hope that he provides a little relief but there are no shortstops for us to add, from Memphis or another major-league team, that could materially improve the team over the final five weeks. The biggest addition the team could possibly make would be adding Rasmus to the roster and putting him in the lineup most every day.
The advantages to this maneuver are the following: First, Rasmus has the potential to be a very good ballplayer. Skip, though he’s had a very good year, is limited in what he offers the team. He had a great 3-run homer yesterday but has little power and doesn’t steal bases. He’s been getting on base at a pretty good rate, but even w/ his .362 OBP his OPS is just .779. He’s had a good year, to be sure, w/ an OPS+ of 106 but Ankiel and Ludwick simply offer more offense and a defense that is at least equal to Skip’s. Rasmus’ potential is certainly higher than Schumaker’s as well and reports are that his defense is solid. According to BP, his peak translation EQA is .288 compared w/ Skip’s .279 EQA. The bottom line is that Rasmus simply offers the potential to be better than Skip.
I should add once again, that this is predicated on the notion that Rasmus returns from his injury healthy and able to play over the final month. According to reports, Rasmus is close to returning and is expected to play a few games for Memphis before their season ends on September 1.
Will he be better over the final month? Who knows? He might struggle over that month. He has shown signs of streakiness in the minors and it’s possible that he won’t be very good. If that’s the case, of course, Tony could bench him in favor of Skip. But it’s time to take some chances. We’re behind the Brewers and they have the scheduling advantage so we’re going to have to get every bit of help we can get. If Rasmus plays poorly, it likely will play little role in the team’s playoff hunt. He’ll get benched and it’s doubtful that his poor play would cost us more than a win or so. Considering we’re starting from behind anyway, it’s a risk worth taking.
Another advantage to playing Rasmus is that it will help him become accustomed to major league pitching. He got some experience this spring and played very well. He batted .302, w/ a .464 OBP, and a .605 SLG in 56 PA’s. He stole 3 bases w/o being caught and hit 2 2B’s, 1 3B, and 3 HR’s. He walked 13 times and struck out only 8. Granted, the fact that he often played later in games meant that he wasn’t facing the best competition, and we are only talking about 56 PA’s, but there’s every reason to believe that he can succeed at the major league level. I doubt he’ll be lacking confidence as he steps to the plate. Getting 60 or 70 PA’s over the last month will help prepare Rasmus for his inevitable (hopefully) entrance into the Cards’ starting lineup next year.
Another advantage to this approach will be that it won’t speed up Rasmus’ arbitration clock. He’ll get major league experience, and some service time, but it won’t put him a year closer to arbitration-eligibility or free agency. The Cards will be able to control him for the final month of this season + 6 more seasons. In other words, even if he struggles, the experience he gains will help him over the next 6 seasons and he’ll have that experience when he takes the field next spring. There’ll be little on-the-job training.
So how good might Rasmus be? That, of course, is hard to say. Pujols was almost an 11-win over replacement player in his rookie season and had an outstanding first month – better than his season as a whole. Even allowing that, Pujols would’ve only added about 2 wins during the month of April. Now, I would never expect Rasmus to be as good as Pujols, let alone Pujols in one of his better months. Nevertheless, if Pujols was worth 2 wins over replacement in his first month, is it not possible for Rasmus to be worth 1.25 – 1.5 wins over replacement? Now, Skip so far has been about 4 wins over replacement. That would translate to about .8 wins over replacement per month so the difference between Rasmus and Skip, even best-case scenario, is probably .5 to .75 wins.
Again, I didn’t say probable, I said possible. It’s possible, as I said, that he won’t be as good as most anticipate he’ll be, and it’s possible that he’ll struggle in his first month in the bigs, but that .5 to .75 wins he MIGHT ADD could be the difference between the Cardinals making the playoffs and not. And I’ll go out on a limb and say that, if he plays poorly and costs us a win vs. going w/ Skip the last month, it will hurt us less than the .75 wins he might add will help us. Since we’re behind, we have little lose by trying this.
There is danger in creating the idea, though it wouldn’t be true, that Rasmus is the savior – here to propel us to the playoffs. That wouldn’t be his role. His role would be to support Pujols, Ludwick, Glaus, and Ankiel and not to carry the team. That point would need to be made abundantly clear to him, to the media, and to the fans. But there is a danger if his being called up creates that mindset.
It’s entirely possible that the only way that Rasmus gets called up, or gets serious playing time, is if the Cards are eliminated but the truth of the matter is that Rasmus is the only addition the team can realistically make that MIGHT improve the team to any meaningful degree over the final month. It’s hardly a sure thing; I’ll be the first to acknowledge that but, at this point, assuming he’s healthy, it’s a risk worth taking.
I’ll be up w/ a game thread in a few hours. I’ve gotta get to bed. Cards’ll be going for the sweep against the Reds’ best pitcher this year – Edinson Volquez.
0 recs |
151 comments
Comments
First thoughts:
While my opinion may change after I thoroughly think this through, my initial reaction is to completely disagree. I’m all in favor of Colby Rasmus getting a September call up, but in no way do I want the kid playing everyday.
Of course he has the potential to be a great player, and for years to come, but to have him step in to replace a guy like Skip Schumaker at this point in the season seems ridiculous. First off, it’s well documented that Rasmus struggles mightily for a while after each promotion to a new level. It’s extremely probable to for him to do the same after the jump to the bigs. Secondly, Schumaker is having a fantastic year, and in my opinion, is a pretty big part of why the Cards are in the position they’re in. To remove a know commodity, who’s proven himself all year, and replace him with a kid that still hasn’t figured out AAA would be stupid.
Just to clarify, I certainly think that Rasmus will be the superior player in the long run, and most likely, by a big margin, but right now, in a playoff hunt, I’d much rather have Schumaker in there. I think your scenario hurts the club far more than it helps.
by mikeonthecards on
Aug 17, 2008 2:02 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mikeonthecards
It seems that we were both having simular thoughts as we were reading this post. Had I not read yours first, I would have made close to the same comments.
by ridgesee on
Aug 17, 2008 9:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"it’s well documented that Rasmus struggles mightily for a while after each promotion to a new level"
I’ve never seen that documented anywhere. Noone can find the breakdown during his time in the minors.
[/colby rasmus bias]
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I figured you would beat me to it
I also prefer facts over assumptions.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
HC is right
he’s not making wild assumpations; rasmus’ slow starts are very well documented and have been an ongoing topic of discussion. you can check his month-by-months at Minor League Splits - his page is at http://www.minorleaguesplits.com/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?pl=458675.
in his first month at triple A, rasmus hit .210 / .311 / .371. after his first two weeks at double A, he was hitting .189 -- see this box score from last april 17, which i picked out at random (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2007_04_17_friaax_spraax_1).
somebody posted the slow starts at class A down below; see also some of DanUp’s old coverage from 2006, describing Rasmus’ adjustments in the low minors —-
http://getupbaby.net/?p=1340 - “As I’ve noted before, slow starts are nothing new to him. . . "
<a href=”http://www.getupbaby.net/?cat=74" target="_blank">http://www.getupbaby.net/?cat=74 -- “He started slowly last year in Johnson City, and this year in the Quad Cities, where he led off the year 2-28 . . . . "
<a href=”http://getupbaby.net/?p=1614" target="_blank">http://getupbaby.net/?p=1614 - "habitual Colby Rasmus Slow Start watchers should start counting from yesterday . . . . "
by lboros on
Aug 17, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I saw them
and I agree. I have been looking for those for the longest time with no success. One of the reasons I love this place is that if you can’t find them, someone else probably can. I have never thought that he wasn’t a slow starter, I just had never seen the stats to back up the fact that he did start slow everywhere.
I really Like DanUps site, I never thought to look there.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 3:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and assumptions was a poorly chosen word on my part
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 19, 2008 6:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I missed the splits sites
glad they’re back up. It does look like he starts slow. . . although I’ll continue to believe that’s overblown. He’s got to get started in the majors at some point (although I don’t think now is the time necessarily).
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
I’ll call into the drive home tomorrow and see if bernie can locate a month to month break down Rasmus’s time in the minors.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 11:10 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
so we wanted proof instead of opinions
is that such a big deal? The poster below you found proof that we could not.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i wasn't being cynical
I was genuienly surprised at the lack of data to support this claim. Snice it has been said so matter-of-factly by so many. (Both here, in the local media, and pretty much any time anyone talks about Rasmus.)
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 11:44 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
understandable then
I have always been surprised at the lack of data to back up claims too. You would think that the media would be professional enough to back up those claims (and they might have, and we just hadn’t found them).
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rasmus starts
Rasmus did not get off to a slow in JC, but he did in QC and Palm Beach.
In JC he hit .323 with .389 OBP and .415 SLG in his first 65 ABs
In QC he started 1-24
In Palm Beach he started 3-24 and was around .200 for about 3 or 4 weeks.
by 1st&3rd2 on
Aug 17, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
finally
stats to back up the opinions, thank you!
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Springfield
Looks like he was 4-25 to start in Springfield.
by 1st&3rd2 on
Aug 17, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ST
Does spring training count as “starting at a new level”? he did ok there, though playing late in games in ST might not be a huge jump from AAA, i think it certainly is qualitatively different.
by spencegrif on
Aug 17, 2008 12:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Colby on struggles for 8 games before turning it on
then I’m not worried at all. I’d hope that puts to rest this idea that he’s going to need 1-2 months to adjust.
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 1:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with your conclusion, but not your reasoning
I don’t think we can overstate the fact that Rasmus — someone who is projected to be the cornerstone of the franchise for upwards of the next decade — is still hurt. It would be foolish IMO to rush him up to the majors after an injury like that. There’s no guarantee that he will come back healthy, and what kind of message does it send to the players on the team if he comes up and takes away ABs from Skip Schumaker, who’s having a career year and is working his ass off out there?
Speaking of the effect it as on Skip, what message would calling up Rasmus to replace Skip send to other GMs? I’m of the notion that Skip’s value will never be higher, so this offseason Mo needs to get something for him, since the Rasmus replacement seems inevitable in the next year or so. If we benched Skip in favor of him, it would show that we don’t hold him in the highest regard, and it would hurt the return we got from a trade partner.
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
plus
saying he’s the only player in the minors that could possibly help the team is patently false. hasn’t this blog been crying over motte languishing in AAA? what about a certain Mr. Phelps who seems to have a knack for crushing baseballs long distance? I realize there might not be a good spot for the latter, but the claim that colby is the team’s only possible hope at AAA is plainly mistaken.
by spencegrif on
Aug 17, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Famous last words
“Today’s thread may be a pretty short one”
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 2:30 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i thought you said this was going to be short?
man i can’t sleep. am i crazy that i’m this excited about going to a Cardinals game? i mean seriously, i can’t sleep.
interesting thoughts HTown. one thing that i’ll point out like you said at the end, Colby isn’t the savior. the Cards chances on getting to the playoffs lay on the shoulders of the young gets at the back of the pen not blowing up. Carp & Adam providing some innings, stability & more importantly health in the rotation. our MI’s playing out of their minds. and the Brew Crew & flubs coming back down to earth.
we really can’t expect Colby to have a first month like Albert did. Colby’s good, and he could be a great MLB player. but he’s no Albert F’ing Pujols. he would provide a great lift at the top of the order if he did come into the show like a bat out of hell. but we really can’t, nor should we expect him to. especially when the Cards are fighting for the playoffs lives. we all know Tony’s not going to play him every day if they stay 2 or so games back of either the WC or Division. Skippy’s like a vet in Tony’s eyes when he stacks him up against Colby, and i’m sorry to say there’s almost no way he’ll start Colby over him. but like you said, a lot of things have to go his way for him to be just another piece of the puzzle that helps the Cards get to October.
i’ll take it one step further. say with the help of Colby, the Cards make the playoffs, do they then pull a move like the Angels did in 02 with KRod & put a vet on the DL, and have Colby take his roster spot? if he’s as good as you say he might be, how could they not?
my final thought, it’s 2:30am. Albert Pujols hit 2 home runs today. were a half hour into SportsCenter & the WWL could care less. for shame.
I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!
by gdm426 on
Aug 17, 2008 2:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
"and the Brew Crew & flubs coming back down to earth."
It’s 4.5 months into the season. You can’t say they’re playing above their heads anymore, unless you think the Cardinals will still come back to earth. We could hope for a collapse, but I think both teams’ records are indicitave of their talent levels.
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:32 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
brewers are still
24-11 in one-run games. That should regress. And a number of Cubs are still playing well above their career numbers.
"..and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped." -Sir Belvedere
by SleepyCA on
Aug 17, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nobody
expects albert’s first month from anybody. not even albert.
and nobody expects the spanish inquisition
by spencegrif on
Aug 17, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
if Pujols was worth 2 wins over replacement in his first month, is it not possible for Rasmus to be worth 1.25 – 1.5 wins over replacement? Now, Skip so far has been about 4 wins over replacement. That would translate to about .8 wins over replacement per month so the difference between Rasmus and Skip, even best-case scenario, is probably .5 to .75 wins.
i dunno, maybe rasmus is a lock for “1.25 – 1.5” wins… but i really don’t see how you can come to that conclusion based on what albert pujols did in a month.
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Did I say a "lock?"
Here’s the quote: “is it not possible for Rasmus to be worth 1.25 – 1.5 wins over replacement?” If Albert was worth about 2 wins, 1.5 wins would be approximately 75% of Albert’s production. 1.25 wins would be 62.5%, approximately. Not possible? Even if it’s not that high, there’s a pretty good chance he’ll be better than Skip.
by chuckb on
Aug 17, 2008 9:30 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
didn't mean to put words in your mouth
but i just don’t see the validity (or the point) in comparing rasmus to pujols… to predict performance for all of one month. the rest of your points are well-taken.
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 1:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
An important consideration
is how Rasmus would look at the whole thing. He famously starts slow at each level, then accelerates as he gains experience. This year he started to perk up, then slumped and really never got completely on track. In reading the interviews with him, I think he is a pretty simple guy. His whole vocabulary is baseball. He thought if he had a great spring training he would be put on the big club. He did have an excellent spring as HC notes above, but he didn’t make the team.
What I have read is that this left him dejected. His expectations were that he would excel and make the team and that would be that. But according to Joe Strauss, as early as the first week of March (IIRC) he had already been ticketed for Memphis. And the reality is that he probably never a chance to make the team out of ST. So?
So…what we have is failure to communicate. Colby’s a simple guy. You tell him things. He processes them and acts according to them. His mental state adjusts the reactions to his behavior and the cycle repeats. Tony LaRussa never told him he would make the team…but he was just trying to push the right buttons probably, and rather than just get the competitive fluids bubbling, he inadvertently (IMHO) created an expectation in Colby’s mind that he would make the team.
This is not a new development with LaRussa. He plays mental games with many if not all of his players to a greater or lesser extent. Some respond well to them, others get frustrated and a few lose their tempers—or worse, like a certain third baseman who now travels on a visa to work.
Colby now regrets missing the Olympics and is telling interviewers he wants to end the season with a bang. He is absolutely, I think, counting on a call-up to St. Louis. I think it should happen, but how this kid is handled is extremely important. His role needs to be really clear, but it shouldn’t be a token assignment. He needs a bonafide chance to help the team, not sit around like Brian Barton and pinch-hit every fourth game. He shouldn’t be jerked around, and I’m just a little bit afraid that’s exactly what TLR will do to him.
by Red in Chicago on
Aug 17, 2008 2:53 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
wow
In reading the interviews with him, I think he is a pretty simple guy. … …His whole vocabulary is baseball. Colby’s a simple guy. You tell him things. He processes them and acts according to them. His mental state adjusts the reactions to his behavior and the cycle repeats.
i think you just described my three-month-old nephew trevor, who also shits himself and gurgles when he farts.
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 3:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
wow.
Are you blaming tony for Rasmus’s struggles in the AAA?
1.) If Rasmus can’t preform in the Minors because he didn’t get what he wanted than he is not someone I want on the St. Louis Cardinals. Let alone someone who will be a Marquie player for years to come.
2.) Rasmus did not out preform Ankiel, Ludwick, or Skippy (aka Mr. March.) In spring training. The Only way Colby was going to make the team was if he was able to lock down a starting spot. This was so they wouldn’t retard his advancement by sitting him on the bench. The only outfielders he out played; who made the team; were Duncan and Barton.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
are you just stating that as opinion
or do you have facts that back it up? It really doesn’t matter if he had better #s than Ankiel, he was the only one who was a lock to be a starter going into spring training, and why would you be upset at someone if he did earn his way onto the team and was disappointed that he didn’t make it?
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and I am not trying to be a-holey ,
I just thought at the time that Colby should have made the team over Duncan and Barton. Duncan, at the time, seemed like he should have started the season on the deal and go on an extended spring training/rehab assignment. I think that Colby also should have beat out Barton. I like Barton, but keeping a rule 5 player on the team who is 5 years older than Colby just didn’t make sense at the time to me.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
on the DL (deal?)
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rasmus
Could have easily beat out Barton. Expect that the Rule 5 trumpts him, and it would have put Rasmus on the bench instead of being an every day starter. The only way Rasmus was going to make the team out of spring trainning; which would have started his clock in a rebuilding year; was if he was going to play every day.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 12:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and that is why I don't like the rule 5
It just makes no sense to me to keep a rule 5er over someone who should have made the team. I also think that if Colby would have made the team he would have forced his way into the starting lineup over Skip, just because I think his talent would have won out in the long run.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but I don't think he had a realistic chance to make the team?
I was under the impression that he was going to play AAA this year no matter what kind of spring he had. And when they drafted Barton, it wasn’t to complete with Rasmus, it was because our outfield was a big ’ol question mark and he had the potential to be a starter down the road.
Obviously that’s not the case anymore, but it’s not that Barton failed. The rest of our outfielders proved to be much more than what we could have realistically hoped for. It’s rare that 3 guys all out perform the expectations and that’s basically what happened. Then a guy named Joe came along and is basically doing the same thing.
All in all, it’s a pretty damn good problem to have.
In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
by Tackle Box on
Aug 17, 2008 12:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't argue with you
I just hope that Colby forces his way into making it a much bigger problem next year. Or you know, they trade some of that surplus for a SS or 2B.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have no issues with him being disapointed
I have an issue with him being so disappointed that it hurts his preformance. That shows a lack of character. I dont think that is the case. That is what the post above to seems to suggest.
“Tony didn’t let him make the team and Rasmus is mentally weak that is why he struggled this year at AAA.” That is what I got out of the above post. Which just seems to be making an excuse for Rasmus at the same time making seem like a child.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 12:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only information you can get on Rasmus right now
is somewhat oblique. There were reports that the Cardinals tried to change his swing and screwed him up—Rasmus denied this was the case. But he has, in multiple interviews, indicated he was disappointed that he didn’t make the big club out of ST. Strauss, I believe, has also mentioned this. Look, he’s only a year-plus out of high school. He’s got some maturation to do. I’m not faulting him for it. But let’s not place too much weight on shoulders yet, either.
by Red in Chicago on
Aug 17, 2008 12:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
im not placing weight on his shoulders
I don’t care that he didn’t have the greatest season in triple A this year. That really means nothing. People are suppose to struggle a little bit in AAA ball when they first year. It’s normal. And I doubt if it will effect his major league career.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry Evilfrog, but you are wrong on this count:
“Rasmus did not out preform Ankiel, Ludwick, or Skippy (aka Mr. March.) In spring training”
Rasmus – 1.069
Schumaker – 1.032
Ankiel – .975
Ludwick – .936
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know my self imposed exile was a bit cryptic
so I’d like to try and explain it and then it can all be done with.
Over the last month or so, certain personalities on here had begun to wear on me. That’s to be expected as the community expands with each season. I had written a pretty abusive reply, which is extreme for me because 1) I know better and 2) I’d rather not give the person or persons I’m replying to the satisfaction of getting the GONG. But anyways, I wrote it but luckily didn’t submit it.
I was still fuming and stumbled upon cardsrul’s reply to a dialogue I was having with mojow11 about the whole Edmonds thing. In so many words, he felt that I was one of the worst behaving personalities on here and that my attitude was one of the reasons he stayed away from the site. I realized that if I was having the same effect on a fellow longtime poster that I felt was trolling on the part of others, then maybe I was the problem.
Sorry to derail your morning post HC but I didn’t think this warranted a fanpost.
by Hardcore Legend on
Aug 17, 2008 3:32 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I for one don't think you are a "problem"
and I think you should stay and be a part of this great forum for Cardinals fans. And I hope you will consider to stay around. And I think there are MANY here who share my opinion.
I took off about 4-5 days from posting on this site myself this week because I was also starting to butt heads with some of the folks here and I was starting to loose my cool. The break has helped me and I am in a much better frame of mind now plus I am going to take a different approach on how I post on here. I may not post as much as I used to, but I am addicted to this place …so what can I do…I can’t bring myself to leave forever..LOL. The moral to this little rant: It’s always good to step out of the house for a little awhile and get some fresh air and you will feel better when you come back in.
by KYCards on
Aug 17, 2008 4:03 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
cool
I was just reading your blog before this. I’d like to invite you over to my multi-functional forum/bbs thing: http://hypertextation.ning.com/?xgi=1xZbu6t
it's time to bring the rock!!!!!!!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on
Aug 17, 2008 4:04 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe we need a special fanpost
set aside for vitriol, bile, venom or whatever is your disagreeable fluid of choice. i know i’d read it. anywhere there’s bitching, i’m there.
we could call it “divas el verbose”
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 4:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
don't be so dramatic
it's time to bring the rock!!!!!!!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on
Aug 17, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dramatic?
i wasn’t. if i wanted to be dramatic, you’d KNOW IT!
(flourish.)
(exeunt.)
"so if you can’t understand what someone else is saying why don’t you just shut up about it instead of being a jerk-off?"
by baw on
Aug 17, 2008 4:12 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
touche
it's time to bring the rock!!!!!!!
by Cards Fan in Chitown on
Aug 17, 2008 4:19 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Acting!
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BRILLIANT!!
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
by Mr Clean on
Aug 18, 2008 2:39 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Glad you're back, HL
and I hope you stay. The personal attacks (?) at VEB don’t even compare w/what goes on at the P-D forums. I can’t imagine some of the posters at CardsTalk ever practicing your self-censorship. That’s why I’ve stopped posting there, and migrated here. The level of discussion is more civil and informed.
Proud sponsor of the Official 2008 StL Cardinal theme song: "Beautiful Day" by U2
by gocards62 on
Aug 17, 2008 8:51 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know...
…it’s all so silly. It’s just a game. Yet there are several posters who seem to over-react to just about anything. And then one player has a few bad games and a it turns into a bash fest. These are the reasons I don’t follow game threads.
I like your posts in the daily threads, but I’ll continue to avoid the game threads.
by paposse on
Aug 17, 2008 9:01 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hang in there
I don’t always agree with you and sometimes you are a bit too abrasive in the game threads, but I would be sad to see you go. I always look forward to what you have to say. You are not the worse offender for the abuse. The cards haven’t exactly faded, but they haven’t been able to keep up with the late season push that the Cubs and Brewers have made, so I think we are all a little bit depressed.
You do a good job. Don’t let it get to you.
by O'Fallon Park on
Aug 17, 2008 9:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I miss ya HL......I don't always agree with ya, but I think you bring a lot to this form.
I always think your posts are well written weather I agree or not. I can never fault the effort.
by ICbirdfan on
Aug 17, 2008 10:09 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There has been a time or two.....
When I felt like strangling you HL lol but I would be really sad to not see you posting on here anymore.
I certainly dont agree with you on everything but I think you add alot to this community and I dont want to see you leave!
I hope you change your mind HL!
"Even when the rain falls, Even when the flood starts rising, Even when the storm comes, I am washed by the water!" -NeedToBreathe
by Calhoun on
Aug 17, 2008 11:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Glad your back
I understand your frustration and you probably handled it in about the best way possible. Now if you want to e-mail me the “pretty abusive reply”….just kidding
I am very grateful to have found this site and enjoy it tremendously. It is one of few I visit regularly and the only one I really participate in.
Welcome back!
Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...
by giveml on
Aug 17, 2008 11:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I knew you'd be back
To paraphrase a cowboy movie…“[you] can’t quit [Viva el Birdos]”
In all seriousness, I’m glad you’ve cooled off and come back. Some of the things you post on here seems over-the-top or almost anti-Cardinals at times, but it’s never without facts to back it up. You’re not one of the people who, after Albert goes 0-4, says he sucks or something like that. All that being said, welcome home.
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:40 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm looking forward to Rasmus making his debut this Sept.
But I don’t think he will get to be a everday starter in the final month of the season in a race for the Wild Card. Plus It will be really hard to take Shumaker out of the line-up considering right now he is in the top 10 in the NL in BA. I think Rasmus should get a 4-5 starts in Sept. but he shouldn’t expect anything more than that and most of those starts should be against lefties when Shumaker might be on the bench anyways. And I hope Tony & Mo lets the kid know this but still letting him know that he has a big future with the team.
Mo has some pretty big decisions on how to make up the OF next season. With Ankiel, Ludwick & Shumaker having great seasons it puts Mo in kind of a tough spot. But I think everyone knows Shumaker will be the odd man out even with his great 2008 season. But the good thing is Skip will be MUCH more tradable than he was last off season and I would think Mo could find a good deal for Skip. Ludwick and Ankiel are locks in my opinion. And they just can’t leave Rasmus in the minors anymore. It will be time to see if he is the real deal or not. Mather should be the 4th OF for next season as well to back up Ankiel/Rasmus if either get hurt. At least that’s how I see the way things will pan out going into 2009.
by KYCards on
Aug 17, 2008 4:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
"
There is danger in creating the idea, though it wouldn’t be true, that Rasmus is the savior – here to propel us to the playoffs. That wouldn’t be his role. His role would be to support Pujols, Ludwick, Glaus, and Ankiel and not to carry the team. That point would need to be made abundantly clear to him, to the media, and to the fans. But there is a danger if his being called up creates that mindset!’Huh? So you take a regular out of the lineup and replace him with a rookie and then make it abundantly clear to Cardinal nation that it has nothing to do with performance expectations for Rasmus over the final month of playoff race? Calling Rasmus up in Sept. wont be the reason he’d be expected to carry the team, everybody is expecting that…but using him to replace a starter would create that mindset for certain.
“
”Since we’re behind we have little to lose by trying this?"
We have the the third best record in the NL and we’re one game behind the Brewers in the win column for the WC.
How do you make it clear that suddenly sitting Schumaker and playing Rasmus has no performance implications?
by cardschinmusic on
Aug 17, 2008 5:39 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
it's not the win column that matters
it’s the loss column, and we’re 3 back there.
by chuckb on
Aug 17, 2008 9:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ha Ha, Houston.
Now you’re the one everybody’s making fun of for not keeping things brief. I feel ever so vindicated.
Why don't you just make like a tree, and get out of here?
by the red baron on
Aug 17, 2008 5:41 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You are totally out to lunch on this one.
No way do you sit Skip and play an unproven, just off the DL rookie in the middle of a hot pennant race. Forget about it, bad idea, lets talk about something else. We’ll see Rasmus in 09.
by bigmotors on
Aug 17, 2008 8:01 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
where are your stats?
whoaaa, JK!
by spencegrif on
Aug 17, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagree
I’m very excited about having Colby as a Cardinal and look forward to him being in St. Louis for a long time, but nothing he has done so this year makes me think he would be an improvement over Skip during the balance of this season. I’m know the potential is there, but if he hasn’t reached his potential at Memphis this year, what makes you think inserting him in the starting lineup in St. Louis would suddenly turn on the light. I just don’t see the logic and think you underrate what Skip’s is doing this season as he is hitting over .300 and has been pretty clutch up to this point. Why would you want to replace actual performance with unachieved potential, especially during a team’s run at the wild card?
by Ress on
Aug 17, 2008 9:09 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Can't disagree more about Rasmus, HC
For the record, I’m a fan of Rasmus and think he’s a long term answer, but let me break down point by point why I think this isn’t the best of ideas:
Your first point mentions playing from behind, and adding Rasmus increases the chances of winning—a gamble worth taking. Sorry, but I don’t see it. Skip’s done everything that’s been asked of him and then some this year. If you unceremoniously bench him for an untried, unproven rookie, albeit a talented one, you risk a clubhouse revolt among the veterans. Remember, these are human beings, not machines. I think without the cohesion that this team has had all year, the chance of winning drops. I could buy your argument id there was an outfielder that wasn’t getting it done, but there isn’t.
In your second point, you mention that it will help him acclimate to big league pitching. True, but…so what? With his notoriously slow starting history, a month in St Louis of what he did starting out in Memphis wouldn’t do him or the team any good. To use spring training stats as a yardstick seems to be specious, at best.
Lastly, I think it would defintiely create the impression that Rasmus is some sort of savior—and the added pressure of that could actually retard his development, not speed it.
I like Rasmus, and I hope he becomes one of the all-time great Cardinals. I hope they bring him up in Sept to get a taste of the big leagues, but just not in the scenario you described.
"Is this Heaven?"
"No, it;s Iowa."
"I could've sworn it was Heaven."
by MilCardFan on
Aug 17, 2008 9:22 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
I hestitate to even call him up this year. Let him rest, let the team that has over-achieved, and has a very good OF so far play on, and let Rasmus win his spot in ST next year.
by SoonerfanTU on
Aug 17, 2008 10:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think if he is healthy you definitely call him up
I am not sure I agree with playing him everyday or even a platoon, but calling him up gives him a taste of the big leagues, and that can’t hurt. Giving Colby a little bit of confidence going into next year would be a very good thing.
Having Rasmus up also gives the Cards a legitimate lefthanded power bat off of the bench, something this team lacks sorely.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 10:41 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd call Rasmus up
solely for the reason of making sure relations between he and the organization are good. He was disappointed when he didn’t make the team earlier despite outperforming most OFs in Spring Training and then he missed the Olympics with an unfortunate injury. There’s no reason to upset one of your few legitimate blue chip prospects in the system.
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 10:56 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
out preformed who?
Ludwick .313/.389/.427
Skippy .394/.427/.606
Ankiel .351/.497/.568
Barton .351/.596/.424
Rasmus .302/.464./.605
He played great. But so did everyone else not named Duncan. He certainly didn’t play to a level were you would have wanted him to play in the bigs. Which would have started his clock in a year where we weren’t expected to compete, limited him to the bench, or risked him being sent back down.
Im also not sure I want to think our blue chip as the next Manny. Someone who needs to be cuddled and have his ego stroked at every point in his career.
I do think he should be called up in September though.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 17, 2008 12:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would have to say that if you go by the stats
he had better ones than anyone on that list but Skip.( I would like to see the ABs, though, where did you find those?) Unless you are in the camp that BA trumps all.
Is that right, did Barton really have a .596 OBP. I know that is ST, but WOW.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His OPS looks higher than everyone on that list to me.
I’m not going to say that he should have made the team; in fact, at the time, I advocated starting him at AAA to work on some things. But he was obviously disappointed and then he missed the Olympics because of the knee injury. If you were a 21 year old wouldn’t you be a little bit upset by all this. Even if it’s not justified, it’s certainly understandable that he could be disgruntled with the team. And hasn’t he earned a callup? He was playing better than anyone in our minors prior to the injury. I don’t see any problem with rewarding him a little to keep him happy. You don’t think Pujols gets certain perks so that the club can keep him happy.
I don’t want the next Manny but I also don’t want to piss off someone that I’m (probably) going to try and sign to a long term contract in the future.
by azruavatar on
Aug 17, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Call up Sept 1 is great
I think some people are thinking the main post suggests that he should be called up now, not after rosters are expanded. He needs to be with the big club in September. There is no reason to call him up prior especially since he hasn’t faced live pitching since July 22.
If he didn’t get selected to the olympics and was healthy when Ank went down, there may have been some front office interest in DLing Ank and promoting Colby. The alternative of using Stavinoha as the 5th OF just weren’t enticing enough to put Ank on the DL.
Also, I think too much is being made of his “disappointment” at starting at AAA, to the point now TLR is being blamed for his performance in April. I doubt Colby will have a chip on his shoulder for the rest of his career. Missing the Olympics probably will stay with him longer than where he played April – July 2008.
by ubeddie on
Aug 17, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Im all for a Sep Call up
And being disappointed is fine. Being upset to the point were it effects your play or you feel like you have been cheated is not.
by Evilfrog on
Aug 18, 2008 11:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Isn't there a great probability
that Rasmus struggles mightily for a while? If my memory serves me correctly, he has started slow every time he has been promoted. After a month or so, it seems like he figures it out, and his offensive production begins to rise.
Also, while I understand that OPS is the greater indicator of offensive production, isn’t Skip filling a much needed role as a leadoff man, getting on base and setting the table for the big boys? Wouldn’t trading Rasmus for Skip mean that while you might gain some slugging, you lose some OBP? Since it’s not Skip’s primary job to drive in runs, wouldn’t you be taking away a much needed asset (a good leadoff guy), and replacing him with more of a rbi guy (3-6 spots in the lineup?). Or perhaps Rasmus should, if he delivers what is promised, be a leadoff man in the mold of Alfonso Soriano? I dunno.
What might such a move do to Skip’s ego? If we assume that CR had a setback due to his great spring/not making the big club event, then what might “we know you’ve played great/but we’re benching you for a kid that has struggled at AAA” do to Skip? The possibility that we could end up with CR unable to perform, and with Skip suffering from such a move, resulting in two bad outfielders, in stead of one good/one unknown, has to be at least even with the possibility that Rasmus would contribute immediately.
All in all, I think it is a bad idea to bring up an unknown quantity, to take away AB’s from a known quantity, unless of course, the known quantity is bad. But Skip has not been Adam Kennedy or Cesar Izturis or Brendan Ryan, and unless Rasmus can fill in for one of those guys, I think Skip should keep his job through the end of the season. Not opposed to calling the Raz up, but disagree with him taking away AB’s from Skip.
by fuegophil on
Aug 17, 2008 9:26 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
cant agree about rasmus
the guy is going to be rusty and he was just catching on to triple A pitching
bring him in for the power off the bench and spot starts
skip has earned his playing time
i hope to see phelps and freese up to
their power numbers have been great in Memphis
Come on 2009!
by benstl on
Aug 17, 2008 9:32 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
my thoughts exactly
THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!
Seriously... what were Rich Harden's parents thinking?!?!?!
by stltrav09 on
Aug 17, 2008 10:12 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Have to agree as well
Skip has done an excellent job this year. Rasmus certainly has a higher ceiling and may very well push Skip out of job next year but I am not ready for that to happen now. I certainly would like to see Colby get a call up in September as it can only help him and the club down the line.
Regarding other callups, I certainly hope see Boggs back along with debuts by Motte, Freese, and Bryan Anderson. If Tyler Greene can hit decently at AAA, I would like to see him called up too to see if might be part of a long-term solution at SS.
by nmstar on
Aug 17, 2008 10:32 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would agree with all of those
I would also like to see Hoffpauir get a call. He couldn’t exactly be a downgrade, could he?
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 10:44 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
was really looking to see Hoff too
but he has really struggled down the stretch. As there is a crowd of 2Bs as it is, I just don’t see Hoffpauir getting any playing time. I wouldn’t be opposed to it though. Brendan Ryan will be probably be brought back too.
by nmstar on
Aug 17, 2008 10:57 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Couple points...
1. “Another advantage to this approach will be that it won’t speed up Rasmus’ arbitration clock. He’ll get major league experience, and some service time, but it won’t put him a year closer to arbitration-eligibility or free agency.”
Not necessarily true. I don’t think there is any guarantee that Rasmus makes the MLB team to start next season. If you add this month to his arbitration clock, we probably wouldn’t be able to call him up and prevent him from being a Super 2 until Mid July or so next season. It would cost the team money in the long run to call him up now.
2. I think Rasmus’ tendency to struggle at every level so far in his career initially, will prevent him from getting called up AND get significant playing time down the stretch. I also don’t think he fits in the leadoff role very well, so we’d be strapped by putting someone like Kennedy or Miles in there every night.
3. I just really don’t see this happening. Not at all.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 17, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I really don't think the arbitration clock is such a big deal
If Colby does end up playing up to his potential, then the Cards have shown that they won’t hesitate to offer a contract that buys out their young players arbitration years.
And I know I am gonna get railed on for this, but struggles at every level? I know that he has struggled at Springfield and Memphis, but I would like to see proof that he also started slow at Johnson City, QC, and Palm Beach . I don’t know if it is a fact that he has started off slow at every level, or it is just something that everyone assumes since it happened at Springfield and Memphis.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He's struggled at Palm Beach, Springfield and Memphis for sure.
I don’t know about QC, and could really care less about Johnson City because its basically a high school all-star camp. He hit .253 in his first 53 games at PB. The transition from AAA to MLB is much much more difficult than any of those levels. So yeah, you should get railed for that…
And his arbitration years are a big deal. Sure the Cards will try to lock him up with an extension, but that extension could be 1 year more if they hold until the end of May next season instead of calling him up now.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 17, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess we will have to agree to disagree
Because I don’t see how Johnson City doesn’t matter, rookie ball is your first jump into pro-ball, the competition is much higher than a all star camp, not a good reason to throw it out at all, IMO.
Arbitration too, Molina was called up way prior to September. If a players is good enough that you have to worry about arbitration, you should be offering the contract, and I have never seen proof that a September callup affects one’s arbitration clock anyway, If you have proof a link would be appreciated.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As someone who spent the first year or so of my life living in Johnson City
Yes, it DOES matter :)
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why should I do the research for you?
The rules on arbitration are available on the MLB website, so I suggest you do some research and educate yourself before you post. I know the rules, so I can save you time if you just believe me.
And JC is the least important stop of the 5 places a player would play in the minors. There are a lot of players that have success in rookie ball, and don’t turn out to be much. The competition level isn’t that high there. That was my point.
Either way (if JC is or is not important) your ignoring the fact that he struggled at PB, Springfield and Memphis. That should be enough to tell you he has some trouble adjusting at each level.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 17, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no need to get pissy
I am just saying that if you are going to make such statements, they are easier to believe if they are backed up, it just makes it easier to follow your argument. I wasn’t thinking about service time in that regard. I tend not to believe everything that people say on here, that is why most of us like links.
I am not ignoring the fact that he has struggled at PB, or anywhere else, I just like it when someone says that he has struggled at every stop, then that is what it was, not MOST. He struggles, I get it.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why should I have to back up statements...
that are common knowledge to educated baseball fans? This is the 2nd time in a week that someone has requested a link or “proof” for something that they could just as easily look up. Thats why I’m getting a bit annoyed by your comments.
I’m not your high school teacher. If you question something that I say, then go look it up before you question me about it. If you try long and hard, and still can’t find the answer, then say you’ve never seen the “proof.” Don’t just say it, without even attempting to find out if the information is available to you. Educate yourself, don’t expect others to educate you.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 17, 2008 10:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And you
educate yourself on the community guidelines. Then, try not being a dick by implying that someone else doesn’t know something that’s just ever so elementary. The condescension is unnecessary and adds nothing to the conversation.
Consider yourself warned.
Why don't you just make like a tree, and get out of here?
by the red baron on
Aug 18, 2008 12:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why would I get warned?
For asking someone to look up the information for themselves. I’m right about the issue. He just needs to look up some information before he calls me out on something he doesn’t understand. Thats just promoting someone to make an educated post…
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 18, 2008 8:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Two reasons
One, if you’re the one making a point, there’s absolutely no reason not to provide some sort of facts to back up your argument.
Two, much more than just the principle, your attitude was uncalled for. Telling him that you aren’t his high school teacher and that “any educated baseball fan” should know what you’re talking about is unnecessary. You can tell someone how you feel about something without implying that they are uneducated, or foolish, or lazy.
That’s why.
Why don't you just make like a tree, and get out of here?
by the red baron on
Aug 18, 2008 2:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I will try to be less condescending
I have just gotten a little perturbed about people replying to my posts without actually discussing the topic I posted about. People just constantly want “proof” about something, when it can just as easily be looked up. Just gets frustrating. I really didn’t think it was necessary to post a “fact” that when a player gets called up his arbitration clock starts. I figured people would know that, or at least feel compelled to look it up.
Its just hard to have a baseball conversation when people constantly post about small issues…
Like I said though, I won’t be as rude in the future. I will continue to encourage educated posting though. I’ll do my best to make that as Mary Poppins as possible.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 18, 2008 6:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FWIW, it seems that the question
Matty was asking was for you to provide a link showing that Sept callups count towards the arbitration/MLB service time clock. If this is true, I’d also like to see a link, because it’s also contrary to what my understanding is.
Everything I can find says that September callups do not count as MLB service time and therefore are not a factor in arbitration clock arguments as long as rasmus makes the team in ‘09. IE, if he’s called up on August 30th, september counts, but if he’s called up on 1 Sep, it does not, unless they decide to start him in Memphis the next year.
"..and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped." -Sir Belvedere
by SleepyCA on
Aug 18, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll try to explain it (since I've been asked to play nice)...
Your right if Rasmus makes the team out of ST next season. If that were to happen, then he’s already accumulating his 6 years of service time and almost a lock to be a Super 2, so the Cards have no reason not to call him up.
However, it is far from a lock that Rasmus would start the year in StL next season considering his struggles in Memphis at the beginning of this year. So if he gets called up September 1st, his clock starts. If you add that to next seasons total, it will be about 1.2 or so years of service time. After his second full season (2.2 years), he’d most likely qualify as a Super 2 based on playing time and get 3-4 M more in arbitration than we’d pay him otherwise.
If we wait, and not call him up in Sept and let him play until June in Memphis next season, he’d be under team control for 1 extra season, avoid super 2 status, saving the team 3-4 M.
In addition to that, the extra year mentioned above will be when he’s about 29 years old. If the Cards call him up now and start him in StL next season, we get the 22 year old version. The player in his prime is clearly a better option.
If there is any more incentive needed, then we would actually get Colby for 6.2 years the September call up scenario and about 6.5 years in the wait it out scenario.
So to recap…wait and get Colby 1. longer 2. cheaper 3. better version.
The best website I found was…
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 18, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sleepy was right
Everything I had found said that September callups did not count against the arbitration clock. I was just wondering if you could link to where you found it, since I could not find that information. I did try to find it, maybe I didn’t make that clear enough. I was not trying to say you were wrong, I was just trying to get the information. It is just something that some on here don’t mind doing, I know that when I have found information that others might like, I don’t mind doing that.
I suppose I will just refrain from that in the future.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 19, 2008 6:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Post a link to the sites your looking at then...
Show me where you found that September call ups don’t count as service time.
The reasons you can’t find a site that says it does, is that its just the rule. Any time a player is on the active roster, he is accumulating service time toward his free agency. Thats just the rule. Whether that service is in May or September is irrelevant.
Sleepy is right that it won’t matter if Rasmus is on the team out of ST next season. But if he isn’t (probably won’t be) then its a pretty big deal…
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 19, 2008 6:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I will change my comment to
refraining from commenting at all on anything you post.
It was obvious that I was trying to bury the shovel here. I agreed with you, and thank you for the information.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 19, 2008 6:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
bury the hatchet
shovel? Where the hell did that come from?
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 19, 2008 8:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wasn't being rude at all...
I was just asking for your links that say September doesn’t count against arbitration. I gave you the link from MLB that stated the rules. It doesn’t clarify about September because it doesn’t matter, its still service time.
My intent wasn’t to have to stop commenting on things to me. It was just to get past some of the smaller things to talk about real baseball issues. To do that, it takes some time and research. Sorry I was rude. But I’m really attempting to be helpful, but your not taking it the right way.
by CrimsonBirdFan on
Aug 19, 2008 9:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, I see what you are saying...good
And it looks like that in my haste to comment, I typed it wrong. I don’t know why I wrote everything I found says that it didn’t count, when I meant to write that I could find nothing that says it did. I guess this is just another case of hitting the post button when I should have hit the preview one.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 19, 2008 9:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow...this is maybe the most negative reaction to a post ever
fairly unanimous reaction by the posters so far and i agree. in fact as i was reading it i was amazed at your thoughts, they seemed totally out of left field. beyond what us opinionated fans think, there is absolutely no chance TLR would go for playing Rasmus everyday in favor of Skippy. skippy has played very solidly this season (hopefully setting himself up as tradebait!!!) and is certainly one of TLR’s pet players.
I do however absolutely agree with you that rasmus makes slippy competely expendable once he is called to the big league club, but it certainly isn’t going to happen this september.
Milt Thompson FTW!
by gossard56 on
Aug 17, 2008 10:38 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
New nickname for Schumaker
“Slippy” – I like it, although it sounds kind of gross…
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 11:44 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmmm...
Interesting idea, but I disagree. Rasmus hasn’t exactly lit the world on fire in AAA, in fact he’s been something of a disappointment. Missing significant time to the DL couldn’t have helped either. I think that it would be unrealistic to EXPECT him to put up numbers (specifically OBP) comparable with Skip’s with those two factors in mind. You risk pissing off an entire locker room full of guys, some of whom you’re going to have to reckon with financially sooner rather than later, for production that may, but probably will not, be just a hair better right now. That’s an enormous gamble, considering that the BOB is not exactly dead in the water here.
Now, if Rasmus was going bat-shit crazy with the lumber down in Memphis then we may have something…But he’s not. He’s not proven he’s ML ready quite yet. His minor league OPS is currently worse than Schumaker’s MAJOR League OPS. If that’s NOT beating a guy out for a spot I don’t know what is.
"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.
by redbirdnation8206 on
Aug 17, 2008 10:53 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
what is the likely number of september callups?
I was figuring on 5, but have no basis for that.
these would probably include Motte, a Flores, Phelps, a catcher and ?
by vances law on
Aug 17, 2008 10:53 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
please no Flores
I sure don’t want to see Randy up again, if it has to be a Flores, let it be his brother. The catcher better be Anderson, if it is one of the Johnsons it is just a waste of a callup, IMO
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wainwright's start
Can’t find it on the p-d or anywhere else, so I figured I’d ask here: How many curves did Wainwright throw last night and how did they look? Anyone know?
Even with the rest belated, everything is antiquated
Are you writing from the heart?
Are you writing from the heart?
by Alxfritz on
Aug 17, 2008 11:00 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
From P-D
Link.
Rehabbing a severely sprained right middle finger, Wainwright threw 64 pitches, and of the 14 outs he worked, half were strikeouts. Most of those strikeouts were on his off-speed pitches, including a curve that was the best it has been, Wainwright said. The righthander allowed three hits, all singles, all grounders that got through. Forty-three of his 64 pitches were strikes.
So it sounds pretty damn positive. I suppose if Waino feels good about his curve, I feel good about his curve.
by lightbulb on
Aug 17, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i did a quick write up over at Future Redbirds
it looked like is velocity was down all night…
"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum
by nomar34 on
Aug 17, 2008 12:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
trying to put the link
but im not smart enough…
"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum
by nomar34 on
Aug 17, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
use the preview option.
In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
by Tackle Box on
Aug 17, 2008 12:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Usain Bolt
Had to comment on that one being a life long track guy. That was one of the 2 greatest races I’ve ever seen. The other being Michael Johnson’s 19.32 in the 200M in the ‘96 Olympics. I can’t believe he stopped driving with 20M left, if may have dropped below 9.6.
Also a minor point that I always get into a debate about. There are 2 distinct reasons that sprinters don’t dive for the line.
1. In track it’s not the first part of your body that crosses the plane of the line, it’s your torso. So if you dive and stretch out your arm it doesn’t matter until your shoulder crosses.
2. You don’t really slide on a track as you do in the dirt, you stick and lose a lot of skin in the process. Unfortunately I know this one from way too much personal experience.
by birdo rojo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:04 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I've never
seen someone make a sprint look so effortless. In the semis for the 100, it looked like he was just jogging and he was still well under 10 seconds.
by jeff_abs on
Aug 17, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that...
He was trying to make the same points to Skip Schumaker and others that dive into first base. There’s no reason to do it in baseball/softball either…unless an errant throw is made and you are avoiding a tag.
by stlfan on
Aug 17, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only difference is that if you do dive in baseball and softball you can stretch out and as soon as your fingertip touches the base you’re safe.
I agree that diving into first is dumb from a injury standpoint, but using the analogy that you shouldn’t do it because sprinters don’t is invalid. You can gain an inch or two diving in baseball because you can stretch out.
by birdo rojo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No you don't
Running through the bag is faster. You start your slide 3 steps before you actually hit the ground so you’re slowing up for 10-15 feet and then using the friction of the ground to slow you down even more before you even touch the bag. This to gain what 5 inches of extra “reach” of hand instead of reaching with your leg? It’s not close, running through is faster.
Kosuke Fukudome: $55 million .270 .370 .395
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .362 .417
by joker24 on
Aug 17, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think there's two sides of the problem
Whether you slide into the bag or slide through it. If you hit the ground right at the bag, then I think it’s quicker. If you slide into 1st as though it were 2nd or 3rd, where you are trying to stop at the bag, then it’s definitely slower.
Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
"Just because nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist."
by Mr Redbird on
Aug 17, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was just about to say
that like Red In Chicago, Birdo needs a V-8
Amazing the fun you can have on here sometimes
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The hell with your
goofball beverages!
by Red in Chicago on
Aug 17, 2008 12:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought pulling his shirt out after crossing the finish line was a bit much
……………truthfully, that race was amazing. I’ve never seen anything like that before. it was like he was a quantum leap better than the rest
by vances law on
Aug 17, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, I'll be (sort of) bold and (kind of) agree
I definitely think Raz should get the call before 9/1 just in case he catches fire and we actually make the playoffs. Not that I think the only chance we have to make the playoffs is if he catches fire.
The difference is I would play him the first game or two after he gets called up and just react to what happens. The best guys play, right? I don’t buy into any of this “he starts every level slow” stuff – this isn’t another step on the career ladder, it is the top rung. If he strings together a bunch of good games and costs Skip some playing time, isn’t that a nice problem to have? He could potentially spell Ank and Lud, too.
I do disagree about the part that you just write his name in the lineup everyday irrespective of performance. That is what you do next year, even if he sucks. If it is good enough for Yadi, it works for Colby as well.
Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...
by giveml on
Aug 17, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
my 2 cents
rasmus stays in the minors until september 1
skip, ankiel, ludwick are the outfield with the caveat
skip sits against lefties and mather and barton play left
between injury recovery, not that great when he got hurt, and the public and media pressure that will be on him, especially at home, i think we’ll get more out of the rotation given above
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!
by sportsman on
Aug 17, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
What are we going to do with Brian Barton?
He’s a personal favorite of mine, and I can see him never amounting to much here—his rear will be glued to the bench. Next year he can stay in the minors all year…..which I predict will happen. Is there any chance they will just give him back to Cleveland? Trade him for a reliever? The hair, the socks, the brains-he’s just so cool. Too cool to be forgotten…..I’d like to see him PLAY!
She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.
by jillsinmo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
There's no reason to give him back to Cleveland
As long as he stays on the roster for 14 more days, he’s a Cardinal. This offseason, he might be moved.
And I for one, would not like to see him play other than pinch hitter/runner duties. I think he is our 5th best outfielder and at this point in the season (especially with all the off days coming up) there’s no reason not to go with Ankiel, Ludwick and the Skip/Mather platoon from here on out.
In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
by Tackle Box on
Aug 17, 2008 11:56 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like Barton too
but getting regular at bats would have been much better for him to develop as a ballplayer. Is he ever going to be regular outfielder here, he is already older than either Duncan or Mather. I just don’t see it happening in St Louis.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed, I would love to see hime play, but...
it probably won’t happen for him in STL. The guy is tailor-made to be a fan favorite. And I love the idea of some speed off the bench or in a platoon. But for even that to happen next year, one of the Big 3 of Rasmus, Lud, or Ankiel would have to depart (not saying I want that at all).
I think we need to keep him around into next year to see how things pan out. He is probably on the same line as a Mather – a guy who splits time between the minors and majors in 2009 assuming none of our current OFs depart. Granted, I think Mather has more upside and a better shot at a regular spot in STL in 2009.
So final verdict: Love the guy. Probably will be gone by the end of 2009 (or chilling in the minors).
by Fred Head on
Aug 17, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay.....why not let him go in this off season? In my mind he's similiar to Michael Bourn,
slightly worse fielder, seems to be a better hitter. Bourn was part of the deal for Lidge—maybe Barton could be part of a deal for a studly type relief pitcher? Maybe we need to trade someone a little too early instead of a little too late? If I have one criticism of current management it would be they are risk adverse to the point of almost being paralyzed.
If he’s gone after 2009, lets just do it after 2008. We have outfielders everywhere. Some of them are going to have to be moved/released. Do it in a way that helps the organization and gives the player a chance for success elsewhere. It’s win-win.
She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.
by jillsinmo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would have to agree with you
If we can trade him for a need, then that would be best for both Barton and the Cardinals.
C’mon Cards, trade early!
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agree too
the question is how to maximize his value in the interim. he needs some foundation of success in the majors to optimize his value. that means he has to play.
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!
by sportsman on
Aug 17, 2008 12:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He is very cool
but not one of our 3 best OF’s. He’s probably behind Mather and about even w/ Skip. He’ll be a nice 4th/5th OF but, if he’s one of our starting OF’s, we’re not going to be that good.
by chuckb on
Aug 17, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
with going through the year holding onto him as if he's an asset
it would be worth putting him in Memphis all of next year (short of maybe a sept call up or injury on the team) and give him a multitude of at bats to see if he can develop further, skipping a rank and then bench/injury can’t help
I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang
by AdjustedExpectations on
Aug 17, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Colby Callup Cameo
Geez, I’m glad you were able to get a little sleep HC. Sleep deprivation does funny things and you’re argument concerning Colby Rasmus had me gasping for air. To quote out of context: " And I’ll go out on a limb and say that, if he plays poorly and costs us a win vs. going w/ Skip the last month, it will hurt us less than the .75 wins he might add will help us."
Now that makes me downright dizzy. The bottom line, of course, is that TLR will not be moved by such arcane postulations. I like Rasmus too, but I’m thinking his chances to come to the Show and start over Shumaker this Fall are thin and none; and I suspect you know that as well. This makes any argument, featuring .5 to .75 wins or not, the 2008 baseball equivalent of arguing about the number of angels on the head of a pin.
by deweydell on
Aug 17, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I even said
that this is unlikely to happen. I certainly thought it. My post was about what SHOULD happen, not about what WOULD happen. I have no delusions that Tony would play Rasmus over Skip. He prefers the tried-and-true approach even if the upside is lower.
by chuckb on
Aug 17, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
a bigger question
call-up, not call-up, etc is one side of the coin. the other is to trade him. i bring this up after watching purported peer (if not superior) jay bruce. the league figured him out pretty quick. this brings up the question: when will jay bruce be worth as much in trade as he was last year? to me, this is the real question mo is wrestling with.
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!
by sportsman on
Aug 17, 2008 12:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh, okay. Jay Bruce should be written off after a half of a season.......
Do you seriously think that Jay Bruce is not going to be a good player going forward?
She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.
by jillsinmo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and I wouldn't recomend even thinking about trading Rasmus
based on the fact that Jay Bruce is struggling. That has “knee-jerk reaction” written all over it.
In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
by Tackle Box on
Aug 17, 2008 12:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nope
didn’t say that. saying that players value varies with time. kind of crystal ball stuff, but i was watching him, comparing that to the pre-season hype, and just wondering. people’s view of potential is pretty much unlimited, but real performance rarely matches the predictions. bruce may turn into a great ballplayer, so may colby, but for a team to win it needs its parts synchronized. so, simple question, if the reds offered bruce this winter, would they get as much as they might have last winter? if the answer is no, then the next question when will his value meet or exceed his value last winter?
don’t have an answer, just asking.
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!
by sportsman on
Aug 17, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think his trade value is moot to the Reds.
I would think their interest is in developing him for themselves. They did trade their older outfielders a few weeks ago. Bruce is the one who stayed put.
My own thoughts are that it doesn’t matter, and never mattered to the Reds what his trade value is because they have no intention of trading him.
She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.
by jillsinmo on
Aug 17, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're assuming they want to trade Bruce
and I don’t think they do. So, if they don’t want to trade him, I don’t think they care what his trade value is.
Other than that, I got nothing.
In the world I see--you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty carpool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
by Tackle Box on
Aug 17, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
too far out i guess
not saying reds want or don’t want to trade bruce. they have their own idea of how good he will be. it just struck me that players are assets and need to be continually evaluated. maybe there is no price for bruce. but a lot of AB shareholders though much the same. but somebody comes in and offers order the top for your shares, what do you do? i think we all knw the answer.
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!
by sportsman on
Aug 17, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How about Longoria as a counter
When (pre-wrist injury) was he more valuable than he is now?
Kosuke Fukudome: $55 million .270 .370 .395
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .362 .417
by joker24 on
Aug 17, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lineup
Skip
Studwick
AP
Ankiel
Glaus
Kennedy
Molina
Loshe
Izturis
Complaints?
by SoonerfanTU on
Aug 17, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
only that we dont have
Utley at 2nd and Ramirez at short
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Aug 17, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
considering we may have run based issues offensively
i like the idea of being defensively minded to try and keep us out of trouble today. Can complain about the black hole in the order, but frankly we’re going to have one of those near every game as we have had all year. Add to that the pitcher we’re facing could make us a black hold 1-9 if he wanted to.
We need this game, defense needs to be key
I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang
by AdjustedExpectations on
Aug 17, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hole* even
I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang
by AdjustedExpectations on
Aug 17, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My thoughts on Razzamataz
Bring him up in Sept. Let him platoon with Skip when we’re facing a lefty. Let Mather platoon with Rick and Ludwick when they need any time off.
If Rick gets hurt again between now and Oct. then shift him over and platoon Mather vs Skip on lefties.
It’ll get him a few at bats, let him be up with the team for the rest of the year, use him for defensive replacements or pinch running scenarios when he’s not starting. let the kid come up and have fun. Full time starter? After DL? After a season of “one month of goodness”? No thanks.
And if he’s going into ST with a starting bias then it may be worth working on a conditioning setup for the offseason in hopes of having him around for the full slog of the season.
For those who look at his ST numbers as being definitive, keep in mind that the four OF with most playing time performed almost opposite in OPS in ST then they have in the season.
Luddy was on the bottom in ST, Skip near the top.
For a place that considers small sample size and situationals a mantra, if anything ST is the utopia for both.
I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang
by AdjustedExpectations on
Aug 17, 2008 1:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
and I still say that with all of our OF glut, it may pay to try a couple in some offseason 2b based work and see if we may find a needle in a haystack, otherwise we have a bit to unload next year.
I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang
by AdjustedExpectations on
Aug 17, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














