Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

The Waiting is the Harden Part

That was, without a doubt, one of the best wins of the entire year. I admit, coming into the game last night, I didn't think there was any way the Cards win it. Pineiro vs. Cole Hamels? No way.

I thought the real keys to the game last night was the way that Joel handled the lefties in the Phillies' lineup. He managed to navigate a lineup featuring Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins, and Ryan Howard, and held the Phillies' lefthanded contingent to a single base hit in ten at bats. Any time you can suppress those hitters that effectively, you've got a great chance to win the game. Of course, the double plays didn't hurt any.

Strangely enough, the Phillies, as good as their offense has been this season, have been shut out six times already this year, compared to only four shutouts all of 2007. I have no idea if that means anything one way or the other, but I thought it was an interesting little tidbit.

Obviously, though, the really big story of the day yesterday as far as the Cardinals are concerned didn't happen anywhere near Philadelphia. It happened quite a ways to the west, where the Chicago Cubs were finalising a deal to bring Rich Harden over from the Oakland Athletics.

The gist of the deal is this: the Cubs got Harden and Chad Gaudin, the Athletics received Sean Gallagher and three other minor leaguers.

I find myself with decidedly mixed feelings regarding this deal. I've said all along that I wanted the Cardinals to be patient, not make any rash deals that would compromise the future in any way. I've also spoken at great length about the need to avoid players who have health risks. I'm tired of looking at the Cardinals' disabled list and seeing half of their rotation there.

All of that being said, I still can't help the way I feel this morning. One of my very favourite pitchers in all of baseball got traded to the Cubs, and when I look at the package they gave up, I get the distinct feeling that the Cards could have easily done just as well without hurting themselves. So, I thought I'd take a look at what the Cubs sent out to the East Bay and see what it would have looked like from the Cardinals' end.

First off, Sean Gallagher. The center piece of the package the Cubs gave up, Gallagher is a solid, though not exactly big name, pitching prospect. He's pitched quite well for Chicago this year after being recalled, posting a 4.45 ERA with 58 hits allowed and a 49/22 K/BB ratio in 58.2 innings. He basically profiles as a mid rotation type starter, a #4 guy with a ceiling in the #3 range.

The Cards don't really have an exact comp for Gallagher; very few of their pitching prospects have had success at the ML level yet. Boggs is probably the best match, but Mitchell isn't quite the prospect that Gallagher is just yet. Still, it's close enough to start with. Boggs it is.

The catcher, Donaldson, is an interesting case, because we do have a pretty solid comp for him. Donaldson was just drafted last year, and posted a ridiculous OPS of right around 1.100 in his pro debut. He's in High A ball this year at 22, and struggling a bit, putting up a .634 OPS. Donaldson profiles as an offensive catcher, and we just so happen to have one of those. Bryan Anderson is a significantly better prospect here, being younger and performing at a higher level at Triple A this year. Personally, I think Boggs and Anderson is probably a better package than Gallagher and Donaldson. Just how much better is up for debate, but I think it's pretty clearly stronger.

Matt Murton is an odd duck. He's been pretty mediocre in his career thus far, but many around the game seem to think that with a proper opportunity, he could really bloom. Again, the fact that Murton has done it at the major league level makes him a tough comp in the Cards' system, but Chris Duncan is a pretty decent start. Duncan's health and recent struggles make him a little less attractive than Murton in certain ways, but I think Duncan's ceiling is higher. He has better power and a bit better plate discipline, so I think it's pretty close to a wash.

As for Eric Patterson, we have a formerly highly touted middle infield prospect who has struggled to make contact consistently and hasn't looked to be able to make the necessary adjustments as he's moved up the ladder. We have yet another similar player in Tyler Greene. Greene isn't as valuable as Patterson, as he is playing at a lower level and not doing as well, but it's not a huge stretch.

Okay. That's about the package I see the Cardinals having to put together to match what the Cubs gave up. Boggs and Greene are lesser prospects than their counterparts Gallagher and Patterson. On the other hand, Anderson is significantly better than Donaldson and Duncan has a bit of an edge over Murton, in my ever so humble opinion.

So, Boggs, Duncan, Greene, and Bryan Anderson for Gaudin and Harden. Anybody here care to make that deal? Come to think of it, the Cards probably wouldn't have been quite as interested in Gaudin, so you might be able to take out one of the prospects. Obviously, you couldn't take out Anderson, since he would be the center piece of this hypothetical deal, but you could probably take out either Boggs or Greene.

I'm perfectly aware of all the problems that Harden has had staying healthy. Even so, he is perhaps the single most talented pitcher in the game when he's right. I really don't know if he's worth what it would have taken. According to published reports, Harden's velocity has been significantly down in his last few starts, with his fastball averaging slightly less than 90 mph in his last start, after sitting at roughly 95 mph earlier in the year. He may already be hurt, for all we know. Still, I look at the news this morning, and I can't help but struggle to remain patient. There was a 26 year old dynamo on the market, who was had for a very reasonable price. I want the Cards to hold tight and stay with the plan, but Harden would have looked awfully good in Cardinal red, and he has a team option for next season, making his contract situation a positive as well.

What do you guys think? Would that package have been worth it? Or do we not need another health risk in the rotation?

I have to say, patience is all well and good in theory, but actually practicing it is hard. I guess that's why I'm not paid to make these sorts of decisions.

Later, everybody.

0 recs  |  Comment 335 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Unbelievable.

The Cards will, at worst, have split the season series with a Phillies team which – it would appear – outmatch them in every facet. Lucky for us, wins like last night’s are the hallmark of this year’s edition of the Redbirds. Great stuff.

"Well, folks, this game began as a tiny worm and is blossoming into a large cobra." - Mike "The Moon Man" Shannon

by Tudor's Electric Fan on Jul 9, 2008 9:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

the phillies

while fun to watch, have an offense that is heavily reliant on the HR and thus is inconsistent as hell. their 2 outs/RISP offensive splits are .239/.372/.384. overall, they’re 10th in the league in average but 5th in OBP and 3rd in SLG – those sorts of splits lead to runs in bunches.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No split possible

They play the Phillies 9 times this year.

by Hal Lanier's Pants on Jul 9, 2008 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More amazing

We are 3-1 versus Philly despite being outscored 28-14 in those four games. Our combined run differential in our wins is +4, while their lone win had a run differential of +18. What a wild game this is.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It seems like

Beane knows just the right time to dump guys. Maybe he didn’t get more because he was in a hurry. I’m glad we passed, personally. Even if we made an acquisition, I think there’s a good chance we’d have a hard time making the playoffs, and perhaps they didn’t value those prospects the same. I’d also like to have Anderson catching about 60-70 games in the big leagues in a year or two, keeping Yadi fresh and bolstering the offensive production from the position. Just my two cents.

by Toddius on Jul 9, 2008 9:32 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

No more trades with Oakland please...

Let’s focus on swindling the mediocre to average GMs…

by musial6 on Jul 9, 2008 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beane

One of my friends, who is objective since he is from New Hampshire and Sawx fan, put it best, in my opinion, while we were shooting emails back-and-forth on the subject:

“With Beane, do you really want to be buying when he is selling?”

I think my friend has a point. Given Harden’s drop in velocity in his recent starts, don’t you think this is Beane leaveraging a commodity into its greatest return during its peak value? Beane would not trade Harden if he believed Harden would be taking the mound every fifth day down the stretch.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And the Mulder deal...

Okay, we won’t talk about it.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It did at that

However, I don’t think that the Hudson-to-Atlanta deal is an apt comparison. It was more speculative, where Beane did not acquire MLB-ready talent.

In AAA this year, Murton has hit .297/.382/.382. He has a good batting eye, which fits with the Oakland skillset and many believe he will be a serviceable big leaguer (myself included since I live in DSM and make it out to Sec Taylor with frequency). Same goes for Patterson. In AAA last season, he hit .297/.362/.455 and this year, .320/.358/.517. Patterson could start tomorrow for Oakland and could open the door to Beane flipping Ellis for more prospects. Add to this Sean Gallagher who has a 3.10 ERA for Iowa 30 SO to 9 BB this season, piggybacking last year’s 2.66 ERA in 40.2 IP with 37 SO to 13 BB, and you have three solid soon-to-be big leaguers. The cherry on top is Donaldson, who I know nothing about because he doesn’t play in DSM.

In the Hudson deal, Thomas is analogous to Murton—a guy with limited MLB experience and decent MiLB numbers. Cruz isn’t comparable to Gallagher. Dan Meyer had a good year in the PCL last year, but has stunk this year. He’s also 26 and seems to be regressing. Again, though, acquiring him was speculation, since he was far from big league ready.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying the deals were comparable

merely that you can make trades where you come out ahead of Oakland.

by azruavatar on Jul 9, 2008 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

also

in our obsession to find a “winner” of this deal, I kind of wonder if it isn’t good for both teams. They’re in different stages right now and the trade could simply be one that gives Oakland some future needs while sacrificing the present and Chicago so present needs while sacrificing the future. It’s a matter of priorities rather than who “won”.

by azruavatar on Jul 9, 2008 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Az, I was typing the same thing

The Cubs have blocked Murton, for the most part, as well as Patterson, with their roster decisions. Especially given the way Chicago’s payroll is set up, having Harden now helps them win now, which is how they are positioned. This deal could work out very well for both clubs.

I’m probably one of the few people (admittedly, fueled by hometown bias) who thinks that Beane did well with what he got for a pitcher who has such a sketchy injury history.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It very well could....

Or, it could work out like the Mulder deal did for the Cardinals, albeit worse because Murton, Patterson, and Gallagher are all potential big leaguers. I’m not sure the Gallagher profiles better than Haren—although he certainly has the potential to be a good #2 or #3 starter in the big leagues. Patterson and Murton are much better players at this point than either Daric Barton or Kiko Calero were when they were moved by St. Louis.

Yes, those prospects were blocked at the big league level, but that isn’t an excuse to just throw them around as trade bait for a pitcher you don’t necessarily need. With Dempster, Lilly, and Z the Cubs still have the best 1,2,3 in the division. Gaudin will help their depth in the bullpen, but looks like a throw in player to me. Harden has never been healthy his whole big league career, so why throw 3 good prospects and an unknown talent away to get back a question mark?

They didn’t NEED Harden, just like St. Louis didn’t really NEED Mulder after 2004, it was a knee-jerk reaction based on the end of the previous season to bolster the rotation. The Brewers got closer with the CC trade, but they didn’t pass them going 100 mph like the Chicago media would like to think.

Had we gone into the 2005 season with Carp, Morris, Suppan, Marquis, and Haren in the rotation we’d certainly be better off now.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 9, 2008 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats why I can't get too worked up

about either the CC or Harden deals. All four teams seem like they will come out equal; nobody is very likely to rip someone else off here.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Silly?

Why is it silly? Just because Harden is available doesn’t mean the A’s had already done their due diligence on the players they are being offered.

The Cubs have been watching Harden for over a month—every pitch. You don’t think the A’s spent a lot of time getting to know the Cubs players in return? This wasn’t a salary dump, it was a meaningful trade for both teams. And being besieged by suitors offering up dozens of combinations of players is a bit distracting to say the least.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And the McGwire deal worked out pretty well for us

Just because Beae has made some good deals doesn’t mean that you have to abandon all rationality with him and pretend that dragons tread in Oakland

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is this assumption that in order to make a good deal

Billy Beane has to rip some team off. Can’t he simply get what he wants and the Cardinals get what they want?

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I know

and I know that people are jittery after the Mulder deal. But still, you can make a horrendously bad deal with any team, especially when the centerpiece of that deal gets horrendously injured

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He definitely can

I think the resistance to doing deals with him is a belief, correct or not, that he’s smarter than other GMs. If not smarter, at least very good at predicting upcoming injuries or drop offs in production for his players so deals look very lopsided in retrospect.

by birdo rojo on Jul 9, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His first year was 1997 per Wikipedia

so I’m pretty sure that he was

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beane seems to have, if nothing else, incredible insight

I don’t mind this trade as much today as I did yesterday. Beane either really sees a lot in Gallagher, or he doesn’t think Harden makes it through the rest of the season. I just think him trading Harden for those players when he probably could have got a lot more closer to the trade deadline is a big red flag!

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I want none of that bidness.

by UNCDubya on Jul 9, 2008 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I look at a guy like Harden

And I keep asking myself, what’s the point? He would come to St. Louis and he would be pitching to contact. His velocity would dip to the low nineties or low eighties. Not every pitcher thrives under Duncan, especially the guys with “stuff”. What you need is a mediocre fastball you can command and a nice curveball and you are going to succeed here.

However, when you have an opportunity to get one of the best players in the game (and yes, I felt this way about Mulder too) you have to do what you can. So maybe the trade comes back and bites you… but for a few prospects you get one of the best arms around? Seems to me the Cardinals brass either didn’t want him, or didn’t feel there was enough discussion about Harden on VEB to help them make their dicision.

by Turkatron on Jul 9, 2008 9:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

amen

ernie broglio was a pretty good young pitcher for the cards. lou brock was a speedy but raw, unproven, disappointing outfielder for the cubs. i’m sure at the time many wondered what the cardinals were doing. of course, we all know how that one turned out.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harden

Given his price next season (only $7.5M), and what the Cubbies gave up, yes, I’d have to say I’m a little disappointed we didn’t make a play.

Imagine this next season:

Carpenter
Waino
Harden
Welly
JP

With guys like Boggs, Garcia, and Todd all waiting in the wings.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 9, 2008 9:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The problem is

these deals aren’t advertised. It isn’t an auction. There is value to Beane to do a deal quietly and not have to scout out 30 of the suitor teams’ players. I’m sure if the price tag were advertised for Rolen, McGwire and others, there are teams out there who could have given a better package. There’s more to it than that.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we had been actively.....

kicking the tires, we’d have had a good idea what the price was.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 9, 2008 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

heh

a quiet deal is better because then the GM doesn’t have to scout more players? that’s silly.

we’ve all known harden was available at the right price for some time now.

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why is it silly?

Your statement, “We’ve all known __ was available at the right price for some time now,” would apply to all but a handful of major league players. Is that supposed to mean the seller has already done his due diligence on what he’s getting in return?

The Cubs have been watching Harden for over a month—every pitch. You don’t think, for their part, the A’s spent a lot of time getting to know the Cubs players, especially Gallagher? This wasn’t a salary dump, it was a meaningful trade for both teams. And being besieged by suitors offering up dozens of combinations of players is a bit distracting to say the least.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why silly?
And being besieged by suitors offering up dozens of combinations of players is a bit distracting to say the least.

because you are suggesting fielding multiple offers from other teams is bad because the sorting process is “distracting.” that is silly.

offers have been made for harden before. beane chose this one.

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I give you logic

and you give me assertion. I’m done discussing this. You obviously haven’t ever done a deal before.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now I guess I'm confused

How does involving more teams in your pursuit of trading your asset hurt? By involving more teams you create even more leverage because you create a situation where teams are actaully competing with each other and are more willing to go above where they would if they’re the only bidders.

And I guess if you’re going to throw out a statement like “You obviously haven’t ever done a deal before” then you might want to explain that a little.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

easy

he’s steve phillips

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

red, i think you’re done discussing this because it’s a crazy argument. yes, most players are available “at the right place.” it is advantageous—not “distracting” to field multiple offers. period.

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RB, i think you're selling Marshall and Patterson short

I think Marshall’s minor-league numbers more closely resemble Jaime Garcia’s than Mitch Boggs’. Most people project Garcia as a #3 starter, which is about where Marshall’s ceiling lies. And Patterson has a much better resume than Tyler Greene — Greene has posted sub-.800 OPSs at double A, while Patterson has been well above .800 at Triple A. This year Patterson is hitting .323 / .356 / .519 at triple A; last year he hit .297 / .362 / .455 in a full triple A season. very good numbers for a middle infielder. the Cardinals don’t really have a prospect like this guy; if they did, he would be starting for St. Louis.

i think the package would be more along the lines of Garcia, Duncan, Skip Schumaker, and a throw-in from class A. if the cards sent another top pitching prospect to Oakland for another injury-prone veteran pitcher approaching free agency, how would it go over?

by lboros on Jul 9, 2008 9:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I think the Boggs/Gallagher comp and the Patterson/Greene comps are more than a little unfair to the Cubs. I don’t think the deficit there makes up the positive in Duncan over Murton and Anderson over Donaldson.

That said, I understand the point of the exercise and see what you’re saying. Personally, I like that the Cards stood pat. Harden’s talent is undeniable, but given the low number of innings he’s thrown in the last three years, I don’t think he’s worth it.

"Chokes it hard down on the knob from the right side. Stands erect deep in the box."

by arch support on Jul 9, 2008 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sean Marshall

wasn’t part of the deal.

You’re probably right about Patterson and Greene, though.

How about Boggs, Duncan, Anderson, and, say, Jon Jay?

What about those four just for Harden?

I think I just put Garcia significantly above Gallagher. Maybe a guy like Mortensen?

Why don't you just make like a tree, and get out of here?

by the red baron on Jul 9, 2008 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hopefully this trade

will forever put to rest the sean gallagher/sean marshall mixups.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a feeling Jon Jay

will be gone by the end of the month. Which is a real shame considering he has the best name in the org.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Patterson

I live in Des Moines and have seen him play on countless occassions. To me, his offensive skills seem better than Pie’s, just from an eye witness perspective. He is a good player. What strikes me is that the A’s traded for a secondbaseman who is MLB-ready while supposedly in negotiations with Ellis. Doesn’t this also make Ellis a chip to be flipped either now or in the offseason?

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or Patterson a piece to be flipped?

The A’s really like Ellis. He’s planning on giving them a home town discount. That doesn’t mean they won’t trade him though…....

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even a hometown discount

...would cost the A’s much more than Eric Patterson under control.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leverage

If you have it, you are always in a better negotiating position.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chone Figgins clone

XM MLB reported that Patterson is very good at several defensive positions and so the A’s might be looking to replicate the usefulness the Angels found with Chone Figgins

by ubeddie on Jul 9, 2008 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

as a note from a cubs fan...

patterson plays several defensive positions quite poorly. he’s a subpar second baseman and looks lost in the OF.

by bobby h on Jul 9, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's anti-Southern

In the South, everyone has last names for first names. He as a first name for a last name.

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

right RB, i got my cub "seans" mixed up

i meant gallagher. he’s a legit prospect —sickels had him as the #41 pitching prospect in baseball this year (no cardinal pitcher was on the list) and #38 last year (again, no cardinals on the list). if beane was looking for a certain type of pitcher back in the deal, the cards simply might have been hosed -- they might not have had anybody who was as attactive as gallagher, in which case they couldn’t have matched the deal no matter what they did.

by lboros on Jul 9, 2008 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beane has had his eye on Gallagher and Murton for several years

according to a number of reports this morning. These are players he really likes—I don’t see any reason to believe we could have matched it without giving up at least one of our top five prospects

by tdawg on Jul 9, 2008 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read that too......

You know Oakland…...they fit pieces together differently than other organizations do. Single hitting corner outfield? No problem, come on down Matt. It’s hard to hit home runs in their park anyway….gap power, walk, and single you to death works for them.

Gallagher will be a more reliable arm for them than Harden was. But how do you ever let a pitcher as fine as Harden go? I wonder if Beane went and cried in a corner somewhere. Injuries or not, that has to hurt to let that walk off your mound….

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No....I'm sure he didn't...

because he’s a guy who shoots at angles that other teams don’t see. He got two legit position players and a legit pitching prospect for a guy who hasn’t thrown 140 innings since 2004.

Beane has proved time and time again that he’s willing to move great talent for players that can be put into the system and can be a productive part of a great whole. He’s probably wishing Chavez would have stayed healthy so he could shop him around to team needing a 3rd baseman before the deadline as well. Injured players don’t fit into his consistency model, so he moves them. It’s smart management, and he always seems to see things that others don’t

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 9, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's a guy who

just doesn’t believe in an “untouchable” player. Maybe it’s not that he’s smarter than other GMs, but that he, for whatever reason (personality, sentimentality, or maybe the demands of his ownership?, etc.), sees ALL his players as trading chips. He’s able to look at them all very objectively.

And IIRC, the team’s attitude about managers is different from many others. Beane can trade whomever he pleases w/o worrying about his manager getting in the way. That can’t be the case in St. Louis, for instance.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 9, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha! Good point.

Beane knows what kind of players he wants. Geren just says thank you and makes it work the best he can. Same with the fans. He’ll deal the most loved, keep the most hated. If it works for the team, it’s done. He’s built trust that he has to rely on to do what he does. It’s fun to watch…...and yes I do follow the A’s a bit. Murton will hopefully make Emil Brown go away…..Beane will decide on that soon.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

IIRC

Beane has a minority stake in the club so he has considerably more latitude than other GMs might.

by azruavatar on Jul 9, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

makes me feel better about the deal

My first impression was the Cubs gave up very lttle,

but if you feel this is the equivalent package from the Cards, it doesn’t seem so bad.

Plus Beane has the Branch Rickey touch at bailing on vets at the perfect time

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not upset

the trade was made by the Cubs and not pursued by the Cardinals more, but I wouldn;t have been upset if we would have swung that trade, either. And I agree that it was probably a good move for the Cubs, but I just don’t trust doing business with Billy Beane.

If he is selling low on a guy, it’s for a reason.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 9:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I hate to see old Billy get the better of the Redbirds twice in one decade. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice . . .

So says, Titus Pullo (formerly The Dude)

by Titus Pullo on Jul 9, 2008 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't get fooled again

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*more* starting pitching?

I just don’t think the Cardinals really needed to make this deal. Yeah, sure, you can ship Welley and Looper back to the bullpen, but the way this iteration of the Cards rotation has performed, I wonder how many additional wins adding a Harden to the mix would actually bring them.

They need another big bat and/or bullpen help. Save for that, let’s keep the kids for now, at least IMO.

by Pitchers Hit Eighth on Jul 9, 2008 9:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pass

I’ve had my fill of trading with Billy Beane, and the LAST thing I’m interested in is another starting pitcher who’s going to be sitting on my DL in the near future.

I can’t support w/numbers, but I think the Cubs gave up a lot. Should the Cards falter this summer, I’ll bite my lip, remembering that we committed to this movement last winter.

by Hoffa on Jul 9, 2008 9:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

agreed

my nba team is the trailblazers, and i’m amazed the last couple years that anybody makes a deal with us, our GM just fleeces people. i don’t think haren will pan out, otherwise beane would’ve tried to get more for him. the guy knows what he’s doing

by bluthbanana on Jul 9, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

harden??

i like the slip

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Jul 9, 2008 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It Depends on a Lot We Don't Know...

The Cardinals are in a position to contend, but are they in a position to stay there?

First, they are generally regarded as overachieving. If Mo thinks they really aren’t as good as they look, then they probably aren’t in contention and shouldn’t make it.

However, they have blown a ton of saves. They could easily have half a many blown saves and several more wins. They might really be better than their record, and if you feel this way, and if Mo does, then they are for real and should make moves.

What we don’t know is what the team really thinks about some players. Do they think they will get anything from Mulder, Clement, Izzy, and Carpenter? Do they think Wellemeyer is pretty much toast? Do they think Wainwright will really come back soon. Do they think Duncan can come back? Do they think Pujols will last the season? Do they think Ludwick is for real, or do they really think he’ll hit .256 with 10 HR after the break? Do they have other trades in the fire that might address other needs? Is their AAA coaching staff saying Garcia and Rasmus are almost ready? Do they think they need Anderson in case Yadi goes down for a significant length of time? Are other players nursing injuries we don’t know about (Glaus?)

Mo may be sitting on coaching, trainer, and medical reports that make the Cardinals look in great shape for the second half. He also may be sitting on reports that may make them look to be in serious trouble. As fans, it is fun to speculate, but we often don’t have the information to look at this like a GM.

by tarakas on Jul 9, 2008 9:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Piniero is starting to look strong against good teams (big game pitcher)

His ERA against Mil, Bos, NYM and PHI is right around 3…and he hasn’t lost to any of them yet. This is considerably better than what he has done against the bottom dwellers he has faced this year. Suddenly Wainwright is back in Aug 1 or sep 1 and the Cardinals have 3 strong pitchers going into the playoffs (fingers crossed for getting in).

mattnj

by mattnj on Jul 9, 2008 9:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Have to think.....

The Cards need a bat (alot more than an arm), to stay in the race.

I’ve been on record as saying that someone like Holliday would be great for this lineup. The other option is to upgrade at MI, but I really don’t see this happening, b/c I don’t think the club wants to cut Iz or AK.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 9, 2008 10:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Peralta?

Will he get shopped?

Just thinking out loud here.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peralta has some definite pop for a SS

low average, good pop. I like the idea, actually, since our current MI hits for a low average with no pop. How’s his fielding?

by Ray Lankford on Jul 9, 2008 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sub average i'd guess

peralta was benched for asdrubal cabrera (an awful hitter) when he wasn’t hitting early in the season.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cabrera

for his age, fielding ability, and (potential) hitting ability, is what makes me think Peralta might be available.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just looked at Peralta's stats

And although I’m not sure what all the fielding stats mean, necessarily, they look pretty decent—a shade under Izturis, and his offensive stats represent an upgrade, with the potential for more improvement.

His Fielding % is .981—a career high (Izturis is .973). His RZR is .838 (Izturis is .848) and he’s made 26 OOZ plays (to Izturis’ 29). He’s hitting .250 now with a gastly .279 OBP, but these represent career lows (for a full season). His low BA is partly due to the fact that his BABIP is .276, while for his career it is north of .320. LD% is down a shade, but doesn’t seem to be too far out of line with his career. (18.2% compared to 18.7% and 19% in 2007 and 2006, respectively).

I think he’s a good “buy low” candidate. Now, he isn’t going to have Harden or CC impact, but who does, anyway?

by Ray Lankford on Jul 9, 2008 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to try Peralta out... Wonder what the tribe would want for him...

If his defense is that good I think the Cards should look into him.

He is way better offensively than Brendan Ryan or Cesar Izturis.

by ICbirdfan on Jul 9, 2008 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FRAR

(measures the “runs” a player creates on defense ABOVE league “replacement level” at that position.)

This year, Izturis has 3 FRAR at SS. Peralta has 17, though he’s played in 16 more games.

FRAA is similar, but uses “above average” instead of “above replacement level.”

By this metric, Izturis is actually -5 this year, while Peralta is +5.

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's confusing

and, once again, I am at a disadvantage here but am trying to figure this stuff out.

Wouldn’t “creating runs on defeense” be a negative aspect?

When I read what you’ve written and put everything into context, it seems as though you are saying Peralta is the better defender, but the whole “runs created” is throwing me off.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe someone else can explain it better

but defensive runs are GOOD for a team. you want your players to have a high FRAR/FRAA, not low.

in other words, these metrics are supposed to measure a player’s ability to SAVE runs… either vs. replacement level (often considered unrealistically low) or vs. the average player at that position.

peralta has been better by this method. it’s a little surprising, to me, at least.

there’s a better explanation here and you can find the numbers for every player by searching for a player and clicking his DT card at baseball prospectus

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was a little confused too...

but i think i understand: it’s based on the idea that preventing a run by the opposition has the same effect in the end as causing a run for your own team on offense… if you are able to prevent a run that the average fielder wouldn’t have, you’ve done the equivalent of creating a run.
do i have this right?

by mattybobo on Jul 9, 2008 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're right

but that doesn’t sound like a solid foundation to base anything off of to me. It’s like pitching a shutout, but if your offense doesn’t score, you aren’t going to win either.

Whatever, I’ll just have to accept that this means he’s better than Izturis even though I think the terminology is weird.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, it's not perfect i guess

but i think the key is assuming that the average fielder (or replacement level, respectively) would never make the play, but player x (peralta or whoever) did make the play. even if it’s a tie 0-0, and he catches a line drive that would normally automatically make it 1-0, then he has preserved the tie, which would be just as good as coming up to bat later and scoring a run, making 1-1.
as an aside, does there exist any fielding metric designed to be an overall rating, the way (if i’m not mistaken) EqA does for hitting?

by mattybobo on Jul 9, 2008 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

gotcha

and….I don’t know (you probably weren’t asking me though)

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, i was asking anybody who knows really.

i’m very interested in fielding stats even though they’re really confusing to me. they attempt something much more difficult than hitting stats, and i find that kind of noble.

by mattybobo on Jul 9, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BPro's defensive stats are largely a joke

I’m nearly positive they look at overall results and not on a play by play basis. RZR is way better…

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2008 SS

RZR
izturis .848
peralta .838

OOZ:
izturis 29 (139 plays)
peralta 26 (186 plays)

Win shares, fielding:
izturis 1.6
peralta 3.6

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is a solid foundation

in the context of this discussion because it means swapping Peralta for Izturis does nothing but good for your D, and you get a superior offensive player to boot (pun intended).

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 9, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if the A's are packing it in

Does Dan Ellis become more available?

I’d love to get him into the Cards lineup.

by Pitchers Hit Eighth on Jul 9, 2008 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

me too

sure, yadi is great behind the plate. but you would never get anything past dan ellis.

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

but Mark Ellis might :P

and anyways, mark ellis only offers a verrrrrrrrrrry slight upgrade over Adam Kennedy.

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jul 9, 2008 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

watched the game last night

they talked to Mo and any deals the Cards make have to be tempered with the fact/hope that Carpenter and Wainwright will be back pitching for the Cards come Aug. 1st.

Mo said (paraphrasing) that Carp will be in the starting rotation, not the bullpen. His throwing program is designed to create the arm strength needed for a starter.

Just have to wait and see…... don’t know if this info was said to help in any trade talk or what?

Great win last night.

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 10:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The prime reason for STL not to trade for Harden

Do we really want to be waiting on three aces to return from the DL?

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

aren't we

currently waiting for three aces to return from injury (at least a return to effectiveness in one case)? 1. Carp 2. Wainer 3. Mulder

by spencegrif on Jul 9, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mulder is back

Tonight! Tune in for the dominance!

Excuse my facetiousness. For me, Mulder fell from the “ace” stratosphere long ago.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't we already try this?

I could SWEAR we already traded a package of pitching prospects and hitting prospects for an Oakland pitcher who was injured and suffering from a drop in velocity. Maybe I’m just dreaming.

On a side note, I’m glad that Mulder guy is finally pitching for us tonight. He’s been our best minor league pitching prospect ever since we lost that Haren kid.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jul 9, 2008 10:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I doubt Mo wants to start trading the farm

for a questionable arm. I’ll be very interested in Mo’s first trade to see what value is added vs. what is loss…. (my Duh! statement of the week)

This season has been so full of surprises….. good and bad….. mostly good.. Go Cards!

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Freese for Edmonds

wasn’t it?
then Glaus for Rolen

by Glowsticks on Jul 9, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure what you mean?

Surprises that were good? I agree.

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ahh! my bad

Can’t read my own thread. Those trades have been good….. just forgot all about them. Thanks Tackle Box

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm definately a recognition cherry picker

but in this case it’s too close to the source not to point out. All thanks go directly to Glowsticks.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I cannot get anything right today

You’re right (again).... You be correct Glowsticks, thanks for reminding me…. Think I’ll just read instead of type for a while…..

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harden's drop in velocity

I saw this posted elsewhere too—where did you get this info or hear it?

by Ray Lankford on Jul 9, 2008 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not exactly sure

but I think there was at least a mention of it in Oaklands last game recap in which Harden started the game.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a quick look at gameday

doesn’t show a significant drop when comparing Harden’s starts of 5/17 & 7/6.

In May, 1st inning 90-96, avg 93; 5th inning 90-96, avg 93
In July, 1st inning 91-93, avg 92; 5th inning 91-95, avg 92

They were both away games, so there is a greater chance of calibration issues than if I’d chosen home games, I suppose.

by random on Jul 9, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw it on Yahoo

here

It also backs up what Alxfritz comment on Harden complaining about a dead arm

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looking at that July 1st start

It does look at bit different from the other two above
1st inn. 88-93, avg 90; 5th inn. 89-95, avg ~92.5

by random on Jul 9, 2008 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

does anyone know

how much of a pitch count mulder will be restricted to this evening, if at all? that is, in the event he pitches well enough to think about such things…

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 10:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

75-80

they are hoping to get over 5 innings. I’ll believe it when I see it.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don't think it's a gimme for the phils

mulder will be watched like a hawk and i don’t think tony will leave him in for a beating. and the opposing starter will be j.a. happ, who is making his third major-league start. i’m not taking anything for granted. of course, i have to think that way because i’m driving 3 hours round trip to go to the game. :)

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Happ does throw from the sinister side.

That automatically makes him a Cy Young-type pitcher against us.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jul 9, 2008 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think this is as true this year as it was last year

Just from my vague memory. We’ve been shut down by an odd lefty or two, but we haven’t been destroyed by EVERY lefty.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm guessing it'll be a quick hook

this would’ve been boggs’ turn, correct? so i’d assume he’d be shadowing mulder. although is he still even on the 25-man roster? it’s so hard to keep track sometimes… ahh turnover.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so then wonderbrad?

i’ve gotta believe some long reliever will be mulling around out there the entire time mulder’s in the game. maybe we’ll see 2 innings from chris perez.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wouldn't be a bad idea to recall Boggs

in case we need multiple relief innings
probably have to send out ryan or mather (or Thompson)

maybe Looper can have “back spasms” to give us an excuse so its not obvious we’re concerned Mulder may not make it through 2 innings

problem is we pitched Villone, McClellan and Franklin last night and Villone’s the only lefty in the pen, so none of those guys are likely to provide multiple innings tonight.

Thompson pitched Sunday…only one inning admittedly….but if we need him to go 4 or 5, that may be pushing it. Thats leaves Izzy, Perez, and Springer—2, 2, and 1 at most. If both Mulder and Thompson struggle, we may burn up our bullpen.

Boggs is on his normal rest to start (but so is Parisi who can start for Memphis tonight since Memphis basically has 6 starters at the moment).

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you want them to DL one of our most reliable starters

just to have an emergency plan for Mulder…...

And people think TLR and Duncan make strange decisions.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

I’m saying Looper claims spasms today so we recall an insurance policy for tonight
and tomorrow looper who’s fine is fine to start

clearer?

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not really

who does said “insurance policy” replace?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

mulder

worst case scenario
mulder doesn’t make it out of the first and we have a long BP night

if you mean on the roster, think I said ryan, mather or thompson
I’d probably keep thompson for same reasons as recalling boggs
so whoever you’d prefer backing up at 3rd for a day stays and the other goes for a day trip to Memphis

but its a moot point since boggs pitched last night

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so you would shorten an already short bench?

and players have to stay down for 10 days once sent to the minors. So, Mather would work but then you’ve got like a 2 man bench (not including the backup catcher). And Ryan would be lost for a week and a half.

And as far as sending down Thompson, why can’t he be the insurance policy for Mulders disasterous start?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a 15 day DL.

Who would take Loopers next two starts?

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

looks like Mortensen is scheduled tonight for Memphis

and it looks like Boggs pitched last night

my bad

we lost power with the storm last night, so I didn’t check the scores

assumed Mortensen pitched on schedule last night

guess we could recall Parisi….......sigh….......that would be like waiving a white flag though
brewers get CC
cubs get Harden
we get Parisi

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boggs threw last night

6 IP for Memphis

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 9, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I only hope

that it’s 15. Seems to me that should limit the damage somewhat…

"Slide DiMaggio, slide!" "Hey, my name isn't DiMaggio, my name is mm..mmmm...mmm....mud."

by cmat on Jul 9, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beware of trading for an A's starting pitcher...

I was discussing with a friend of mine yesterday the pitfalls of picking up an A’s starter for a package of prospects (this before the trade was announced). Still, I hope the front office knows what it is doing in seemingly standing pat.

"If Satch (Paige) and I were pitching on the same team, we would clinch the pennant by July fourth and go fishing until World Series time." Dizzy Dean

by Simba648 on Jul 9, 2008 10:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Snice I've been drinking my Mulder Coolaid Everclear mixed...

I believe we determined that the Brewers stand to pick up 4-5 wins with CC starting over who ever else they whould have had pitch. (I believe he is taking over Suppan’s place right now snice Sup hit the DL. But when he gets back im not sure.(

How many wins do we believe that Harden will give the Cubs over Gallagher?

Does Mulder over Boggs match does wins? I’d say yes because Im drinking the strong coolaid right now but…. If not. Is there someone out there who can?

How many wins would Carp or Wainwright pick up pitching in August? I’d say it would only be 1 coming off of the DL.

If we could aquire say…Ian Snell. How many wins could we pick up throwing him in our rotation?

Oh. And I don’t care who it is. Im not making a trade with the As. Screw that noise.

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 10:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

FWIW

Kool-aid, unless you’re drinking some cheap knock-off version…..

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To answer the last question of your post

We do not need another health risk in the rotation.

by Youneverknow on Jul 9, 2008 10:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

By the way

That game was awesome last night. I love the way Hamels pitches. Get the ball. Throw the ball. Some of those strike outs where just unfair to the hitter. Like Duncan’s first AB.

I feel like we stole one. But because we were out played. But because we went in with Pinero matched up against Hamels. Even if Pineiro pitched a good 6 Innings 3 run game we would have lost it. But he stepped up.

The bullpen followed it up nicely. Villione comming in to get the DP. K-mac came in and pitched a great inning. And then franklin got 4 outs for the save. (counting Iz2 misplay as one of the outs.)

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 10:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love the way Hamels pitches too...

Saw him at Busch last year. He stands on the mound with the glove held at arms length in front of his face, with the ball snowconed in the glove at eye level. It’s like he’s actually staring down the baseball, making it conform to his evil will, rather than staring down the batter.

It’s a travesty that this guy won’t be pitching for the NL in the All Star game, btw. He has the lowest or second-lowest BAA in basball… just unlucky in wins so far.

"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz

by taiko on Jul 9, 2008 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rich Harden

Rich Harden has some subtle mechanical, genetic, or conditioning problem (e.g. flying open with his glove combined with showing the ball to CF) that is causing his injury problems and driving up his risk. Combine his injury history with a recent velocity drop, which is often a harbinger of impending shoulder problems, and you have a VERY risky trade.

by thepainguy on Jul 9, 2008 10:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Plus

the guy openly mentioned he had a “dead arm” just a few weeks ago.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 9, 2008 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was hoping you'd weigh in

I’ve only seen gameday video of Harden, but I can say the way he finishes does not look easy on the arm.

by random on Jul 9, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harden's Mechanics

The issue with flying open with the glove is that it can make you less efficient. You have to throw more with your arm and less with your body.

by thepainguy on Jul 9, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He doesn't exactly Dontrelle Willis the front side but yeah

I think the bigger issue is his active breaking of the arm. Little guy throwing 95 shouldn’t be stopping his arm that fast.

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think...

...You’re both right. One makes you work harder to throw the ball, the other doesn’t let gravity stop your arm in a natural way. What he does is certainly not ideal, and it’s a shame b/c he’s so frickin’ gifted at throwing baseballs.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 9, 2008 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AJ Burnett

I have a seat near the front of the “explore a trade for AJ Burnett” bandwagon. Obviously I would not want to give up a lot, but maybe Anderson and lesser prospects could get it done?

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 9, 2008 10:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Catcher with pop in early 20s at AAA....

...for a rental? Burnett can opt out at the end of this year.

I think people are underestimating the value of a catcher with a bat, and people are singing praises of Anderson’s commitment to improving his defense.

by mojowo11 on Jul 9, 2008 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow! I am one of the few that get upset about everyone wanting Anderson traded.

He’s very YOUNG! He’s had no problems hitting AAA pitching. He still has growth as far as defense-and enough skill to improve there. There is a shortage of GOOD young catchers. I think you get nowhere near his worth if you deal him now. The offer would have to be more than a rental pitcher who has been on the DL ten times in his career.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want to deal him either,

but I just cannot envision - short of really serious injury - Yadi Molina losing his starting job anytime during his current contract. (Under another manager, maybe; under TLR, never.) I can only see Anderson riding the pine in the Cardinal dugout, unless it turns out he hits like Mike Piazza … which he ain’t gonna.

And of course I wouldn’t trade him for a rental either, I would insist on getting real value for him, but at the end of the day, “trading chip” is his only role for the Cardinals.

BTW, I really, really hope I’m wrong about this.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jul 9, 2008 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm in the same boat

I don’t think you can be casual throwing around Anderson’s name as potential trade bait. Last year, the Braves got Teixeira by trading 5 minor leaguers, and Saltalamachia – a young catching prospect – was clearly the centerpiece. I have to think that Anderson is close to Salty’s equivalent, and maybe a little better defensively. So yes, he’s extremely valuable and not someone that should be traded for a short rental, especially one with an injury history like Harden/Burnett.

Free Colby

by Oregonian Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pop?

where is this pop from Anderson? I agree that he is a good prospect, but he does not have much power. Sure it could develop, but he hasn’t shown any. He is a decent defense catcher who hits for average, little power, and doesn’t walk much. We already have a young catcher who is locked up for a while and if Yadi can continue to hit close to .300 with his defense he is a much better option than Anderson.

If the Cards traded for Burnett, I would only want them to make he deal if he agrees not to opt out.

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 9, 2008 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, so maybe "pop" is exaggerating it

But the guy can hit doubles, and he’s getting on base at a .400 clip this year.

And he’s 21.

I guess that’s really my biggest problem with the whole thing. I just don’t think Anderson is that far away from being the same player that Molina is (better bat, worse glove), and he’s four years younger. Four years may not seem like that much now because Molina is only 25 (“we’ve already got a young catcher”), but in four more years, Anderson is just turning 25 and Molina is approaching 30. Who knows how much Anderson develops in that timeframe.

The goal is to plan for the future, right? If we were in win-now mode, fine, maybe you swing Anderson for something. But we’re not. So why does everyone want to trade him so badly? He could easily be the better option at catcher in a year, or maybe he’s a 22-year-old catcher with even more trade value as he develops. I mean, he’s almost certainly not going to get worse at baseball between now and then, and he’ll probably get a lot better.

by mojowo11 on Jul 9, 2008 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Salty doesn't have that much POP

He was only carrying an OPS of .882 in AAA compared to Anderson’s .844 at Memphis. I’m sorry but that is not enough of an issue to harp on. The other variable is Anderson is 2 years yonger than Salty and should develope power equal to or beyond what Salty’s got. IMHO

by DJ4508 on Jul 9, 2008 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

anderson's OPS

is based on a much higher BA (.344 to salty’s .291). salty’s ISO is .200 to anderson’s .122. (granted, only 55 PA in AAA compared to anderson’s 131.)

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two Thoughts

1. As we learned with Mulder, Billy Beane knows exactly when to cut bait on a pitcher with health problems. Thus, the Cubs may not have gotten the hurler they think they have. That’s the point of view of Athletics Nation.

2. BCB predicts Bi-Polar Betty gets the ol’ DFA as a result of this trade. Which would really be a shame.

So says, Titus Pullo (formerly The Dude)

by Titus Pullo on Jul 9, 2008 10:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That was and is my worry as a Cubs fan.

Harden’s great when healthy. His problem is staying that way.

Small correction—Josh Donaldson was playing in Low-A, not High-A, this year for the Cubs.

Al, visiting from Bleed Cubbie Blue

"That's my opinion and if you don't like it, well, I have others." ~ Groucho Marx

by Al on Jul 9, 2008 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still, the Cubs are in win-now mode

The guys they traded weren’t going to contribute a whole lot to the quest for a championship this year. if Harden’s arm falls off tomorrow, the team’s chances of winning aren’t particularly worse than they would have beeen had they not made the trade. Actually, given that they got Gaudin, the Cubbies chances of winning this year are probably better regardless of what happens with Harden . . .

As I write that, however, I do think of opportunity cost—if Harden does turn out to be hurt or gets hurt soon, the Cubs are deprived of the opportunity to use some of their more tradeable assets to get a helpful piece or two.

by tdawg on Jul 9, 2008 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sign 'im up

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Betty's in the same situation as Kennedy

he’s got another year on his contract after this year and his salary climbs from $6.375 million all the way up to $9.875 million. That’s an awful lot for them to eat for a year and a half.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting post on Fangraphs

I highly recommend it. Here’s a taste:

Harden is obviously the better pitcher, but we have to account for the difference in durability as well, so let’s add Harden’s theoretical replacement into the equation. The A’s are one of the best organizations in baseball at finding spare parts to put up solid performances in their rotation (their defense and home park don’t hurt), so let’s assume that Amalgamation Of Harden Replacements will make up the 80 inning difference by posting a 5.50 FIP, a tick or two above league wide replacement level.

That brings the combined totals for Harden + Harden Replacements to 180 innings with a 4.25 FIP, compared to the 180 innings we were projecting from Gallagher at a 5.00 FIP. That’s a difference of three-fourths of a run per nine innings, which while significant, adds up to a grand total of about 15 runs over the course of an entire season.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 11:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's A Little Discouraging

.....when the two teams you’re fighting with for a playoff spot go out and sign front-line pitchers who – in all probability – will help their clubs. Sabbathia has already paid dividends with a pretty good performance last night. What will Harden do? Who knows, but at least the Cubs are making an effort. What does our front office usually do to help this team?

Hey, we can still beat these big-spenders but in the long run, usually you get what you pay for. Hell, the Yankees have bought themselves a playoff spot for how many years now? Talent may not be enough to get a WS ring, but at least it gets you in the hunt. I am tired of being David trying to fight off Goliath all the time. I’d love to see the Brewers and Cubs fall on their faces, but I am definitely concerned over what has transpired the past week with our competition.

P.S. That WAS a great win last night ! You should have heard the Philly announcers crying about their “inept offense.” Can’t blame them. Hope it continues tonight.

by ccthemovieman on Jul 9, 2008 11:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So...Bedard or Burnett?

Phillies are rumored to be homing in on Bedard. Jays rumored to be tossing in the towel.

Thoughts?

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 11:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What about a deal

if he waives his opt-out clause in advance—sort of the reverse of Glaus’s situation?

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The 2002 version right?

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 9, 2008 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Velocity drop?

Looking back at the gameday, Harden was 90-94 the entire game reaching back for 96 touching 97. Fangraphs has him the past 14 days being fine. Myth.

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 11:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

might be

but it might not be too

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here we go Mulder, Here we go CLAP CLAP

I’ll be rocking my 1982 Powder Blue Cardinals Mulder throwback I got for $100 this winter in honor of Mark’s start.

You better pitch well, Marky, or I’m getting this thing restitched.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, at least it's a night game

He sucks (worse) during the day.

Those powder blues really should be thrown back. Almost as bad as Pittsburgh’s uniforms.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+2

Gray is so 19th century.

"Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals." --Churchill

by lordsummer on Jul 9, 2008 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+3

Def. much better than the Padres all-yellow throwbacks…

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 9, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually those powder blues are sweet

But the cheap ones they wore last year that had the big collar were horrible.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The ‘82 unis that the Brew Crew supplied for their “Remember-the-last-time-we-were-in-the-World-Series” Night last year were UGLY. The ‘80s throwbacks the Cards wore against TB in 2005 (?) were nice.

by cardsgirl95 on Jul 9, 2008 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats it!! The damn Brewers!!

I kept thinking it was the Padres (in their yellow unis) but we wore odd grey unis that night, i believe.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which was equally inaccurate

the problem is that teams are too cheap now to actually pay for real throwbacks from the likes of Mitchell&Ness and Ebbets Flannel, when they can get them discounted greatly from the Official Supplier (Majestic).

Majestic just takes all the current logo styles (with white iron-on trim and all) and slaps it on the jersey.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

with that said

the cubs did a really good job a couple weeks ago with the 60 year anniversary of baseball on WGN. Of course, WGN probably paid for everything, but those were really nice unis worn by the cubs and the Braves. And honestly, the cub unis were a thousand times better than the pajamas they wear now.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this same discusssion was had

last year after the Brewer-supplied ugly unis. It would be nice if we would get a couple of NICE throwbacks to wear whenever other teams wanted to go retro and avoid the problem of ugly and inaccurate unis supplied by the home team.

by cardsgirl95 on Jul 9, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly!

And they don’t have the yellow-eyed Cardinals! It’s crap!

While we’re complaining, let me complain about the Ozzie Smith throwback jersey tees. How is it they don’t have “O. SMITH” across their backs? Hardcore, if you can supply me with information validating the “SMITH” #1 throwback jersey tees, I will then purchase one.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"I see (powder) Blue! He looks glorious!"

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

5 seconds

and basically saying it out loud, and I GOT IT!!!!!

Great reference.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just re-watched that movie the other day

Fresh on my mind :D

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In support of Marky Mark's start

I will be wearing my custom-made Mark Mulder tank top. However, mine is an iron-on. I make a tank top that references our starter for every game I go to…I made this one back in ‘05 for the Cards/Braves game. Let’s hope it’s as successful for this start as it was for that one.

by launchshuttle on Jul 9, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In honor of Mark's start

I will be pounding Jack Daniels while listening to “Good Vibrations” over and over again (the Funky Bunch version, of course)

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course, you will be wearing Calvin Klein underwear, too

C’MON C’MON!!!

(For those of you too young to remember, I point you here It’s really hard to remember that he’s a “serious” actor now)

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only is he a "serious" actor now

He’s also a “badass”

Marky Mark was a badass in the Departed

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is true

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would definitely be pounding the JD as well

if I didn’t have to drive to and play in a volleyball match at 9:30pm.

by launchshuttle on Jul 9, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreeing with the Baron

Great post, one of the best I have read in recent days. I think I agree with what was said in every way. I felt disapointed last night when the news broke, but at the same time, I think we should stick to the plan.

On the Bryan Anderson front, he is much to valuable to just be trading for a rental. If we could get Burnett, I would try to get him with much lesser prospects. Having Anderson and Molina behind the plate next yera in a platooning situation would be great. It would keep both guys fresh and you could play yadi against teams with speedsters and Bryan when we need some more offense (although Yadi has been no slouch this year) Maybe making Anderson the fulltime catcher for one pitcher and then giving him other random starts would be advantageous. (I think Maddux used to have his own catcher). That would allow him to really conentrate on one guys game calling tendencies, and would allow him to get enough at bats to where he wasn’t getting stale on the bench.

by t7rick on Jul 9, 2008 11:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree on Anderson

Love Yadi, but there is no guarantee he will stay healthy. Maybe we could get Anderson to grow a pornstache so he would fit in.

Yadi is having a great season but is still hitting .271/.309/.316 vs RHPs while hitting .375/.462/.550 vs. LHPs. If the kid actually gets a chance to play some in the big leagues and then proceeds to hit .300 what do you think his trade value will be?

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 9, 2008 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and here's why I'm forced to hate Jeter
Jeter clutch as Pettitte, Yanks blank Rays

Jetes hit a THIRD INNING DOUBLE. THIRD INNING.

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 11:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry

They’re paying him $20 million for .284/.345/.390 and middling-to-bad defense at shortstop. Jokes on them this year, at least so far.

Then again, there’s the intangibles…

by mojowo11 on Jul 9, 2008 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you sure he's not a cub?

he does have a no-trade clause, correct?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i read that

and i think they were also referring to jeter’s inning-ending defensive play in the seventh. i guess that could be considered “clutch.”

by baw on Jul 9, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i watched that play live

it was a heck of a play

i dont get the Jeter hate. the dude is the SS for the Yankees. who wouldn’t want that job?

he’s the king of New York. the greatest city in the world. who among us wouldn’t want to be the king?

he dates all the hottest women in Hollywood. who wouldn’t want to do that?

he makes $20Million per year. would you turn down that coin?

he has 4 World Series rings. how many rings do you or i have?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Jul 9, 2008 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Jeter hate is just centered around him being made to be better than he is

if he was a Royal or an Indian playing exactly how he is, I think he’d probably be popular, and make a lot of ‘underrated’ lists.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's exactly it

How he is idolized and A-Rod is demonized is beyond me. But you can look to FJM for all the discussion you could want on that subject.

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

After reading that

maybe we can just chalk it up to jealousy?

that said – he could be just a tad overrated

by TNTinCO on Jul 9, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Jeter hate, but media hate

The way Jeter is portrayed, as some mythical being who possesses the ability to win in his genes through clutchness is just ridiculous.

Jeter is a very, very good offensive SS (until this year) who does not deserve a single golden baseball mit to his name.

by bgh on Jul 9, 2008 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HE DOES WIN THROUGH HIS CLUTCHINESS!

He’ s so clutch, OMG…The guy has balls made from gold orbs, he sweats determination, his pheromones cause women to melt and opponents to tremble. His presence at once calms and motivates his teammates to be true warriors, not just mere knights but true Scottish highlanders…those kind of warriors.

Or something like that, right?

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 9, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I was pretty sure that was how it went

Thanks for helping me out!

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 10, 2008 2:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fun with comparables.

Per Baseball Reference:
Harden’s comps by age:
22 yrs old: Jake Peavy
23 yrs old: Floyd Youmans (former Montreal flame-out)
24 yrs old: ERNIE BROGLIO!!!
25 yrs old: Rick Aguilera.

So Harden’s gone from Peavy Cy Young style guy to Dwight Gooden’s cousin to famed Cubs hurler to MOR closer in the span of 4 years…

As most of you know, I’ve stated previously that I would trade ANY prospect to make the MLB Cardinals better. In this instance, I feel the Cubs made themselves worse yesterday.

Gallagher is really good & a MLB starter right now. Patterson can hit MLB pitching right now.

The Broglio comp is priceless.

Boomer.

by glamboomer on Jul 9, 2008 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No way man

Bowie rules

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not over

there have just been some slight ch ch ch ch changes in our regular reference lineup.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mulder's game tonight

Is on Espn. Brewers get CC and that’s all they talk about on Baseball tonight. Then the next day the Cubs get Harden and thats all they talk about on Baseball tonight. Then the next day we get Mulder back on national TV…

Lets hope that everything said on Baseball tonight is as positive as the last two nights. :-)

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 1:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Glad we didn't get Harden

First off, my opinion is that we need a bullpen guy or a middle infielder with a plus offensive side (and hopefully being no slouch at defense either, since last night’s game showed that we need to turn those DP’s) over another starter. A starter that could easily be hanging out with Matt Clement, etc. at any point in time. There’s no way Beane would have dealt a starter with those numbers without fleecing the Cubs.

Last night’s game was almost like the story of the season, very on the edge of your seat drama-wise, and us proving that we are not quite the overachievers we are portraid as. I mean, we do have the better record over the Phillies, so let’s not just assume we are automatically going to lose there. and it was important for us to win, after losing 2 out of 3 to the Cubs, especially when compounded with the news of the Sabbathia and Harden trades. Let’s not be copycats and automatically assume we need to get another starter until we actually need one.

Now what would be funny is if we somehow traded with the A’s and got Erik Patterson!

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 9, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i was thinking this same thing
Now what would be funny is if we somehow traded with the A’s and got Erik Patterson!

Don’t know what it would take or if it would even be a good idea, just had the same thought. :-)

by hex706f726368 on Jul 9, 2008 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question about compenstation picks

I understand that in order to be awared a compenstion pick, the team must first offer the player arbitration which the player then must refuse. However, what happens if said player, for this example let’s call him A.J., opts out of his contract due to declining a player option and is deemed a Type A free agent?

What happens then?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 1:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They can still offer him arbitration

It’s one of the ways to resolve a contract: you can declare for free agency or accept arbitration (if your team offers it).

Regardless, Burnett was a Type B last year and barring a 2nd half for the ages in terms of wins/ERA he isn’t going to prop himself into A-hood.

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whatever, A or B

What I’m trying to figure out, does the team HAVE to offer arbitration in order to get compensation pick(s) when a player opts out of his contract?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jul 9, 2008 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Billy Beane sends fine pitchers out into the world......

It’s always a question of health and how much do they have left….....quality isn’t the problem IMO.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Zito thing is still baffling

Why did he collapse so horribly, so suddenly? I know that isn’t a trade, but still… his rainbow is still bending, pretty much. It’s just like he’s not fooling batters at all. He has to be tipping his pitches or something.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Though it is funny that his #3 comparable at br is Steve Blass.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's mostly just luck

Things were going his way before, now they are going against him. His FIP has been steady for the last 5 years after the 2003 season.

"Regression to the mean is so much more fun to watch when it’s a Cub who is regressing." SleepyCA

by joker24 on Jul 9, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Being consistently lucky for five full seasons

I don’t buy that.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I just don’t think that FIP is the end all that people claim it is—it only really factors the three true outcomes, and the weightings are kind of wonky from an a priori standpoint.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to say that it's not a useful too

because it is, but…

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they were working on something called tRA

over alt Lookout Landing that factored in batted ball data as well. There’s talk of them posting full data at some point. It was pretty interesting.

by azruavatar on Jul 9, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know, his last outing he was like the Zito of old......10 K's in 7

I was thinking maybe he snuck in a session with his old pitching coach who was free after being let go by the Mets. If he didn’t, the Giants should quietly give him a call. It’s just amazing that he could fall so far so quickly so young and unhurt…...

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 9, 2008 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unhurt???

I’m not quite ready to assume that’s true. He hasn’t had the catastrophic injury needing an overhaul, but lots of little dings do add up.

by birdo rojo on Jul 9, 2008 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

was it really a rapid collapse?

he was declining statistically for a while. One thing was that Oakland was typically putting him in front of good defenses in a huge park. That always helps.

by azruavatar on Jul 9, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought about the park thing

but it’s not like Pac Bell is a bandbox, either. But yeah, changing defenses like that probably didn’t help.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought I read somewhere

that he decided to change his mechanic after signing that contract. That might have something to do with it. Of course he wasn’t exactly the same old Zito since around 2003 anyway, but I am sure the giants would like the 2004-06 version better than the one they have now.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This one isn't the one I remember

But the Righetti quote from before the 2007 season hints at it:

“He’s gone from one extreme to another from a pitching standpoint,” (Dave) Righetti said after San Francisco’s pitchers and catchers finished their initial workout. “His ball flight is going to be different, no doubt about it.”

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Random Thought: Is Dave Duncan injuring our pitchers?

Last night, someone made the comment that Joel Pineiro’s velocity was down. Whether or not it was, I don’t know and that really isn’t the point. It just got me thinking.

We always hear people talk about how Dave gets the pitchers to sacrifice velocity for control and movement. It’s a great idea because if you throw 97 mph and couldn’t find the plate, you aren’t worth your salt. However, how does he get the pitcher’s to do it?

Is it with the grip? Partly it could be. Certainly, you can increase movement by changing the grip but that isn’t really going to effect command of the strikezone. Are you going to throw softer? Possibly.

And that’s where this idea was born. Isn’t it more ‘un-natural’ for a pitcher to restrain their arm than to simply let ‘er fly? When a pitcher throws a curveball, slider, change-up, etc, they still throw ‘relatively’ as hard as they can, they just change their arm motion/grip slightly for the desired effect.

Wouldn’t it put more un-due strain on the ligaments and joints to ‘ease up’ on throwing?

Obviously I don’t think Dave Duncan is trying to hurt our pitchers. He’s obviously trying to increase their effectiveness. But has anyone ever done a study on this topic?

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Breathing thru the eyelids

is Duncan’s secret to slowing them down.

by ubeddie on Jul 9, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Possiable

Jo-el was throwing around 90 most of the night. Even in the first inning. But he was hitting 93 on some pitches later in the game. (same AB he was hitting 90) It could be the deference between throwing a 4seamer and a 2searmer. Wether not those contribue to injuries im not sure.

But Carp, Mulder, Wainwright, and Wellemeyer all have every different injuries. So it doesn’t seem like 1 common thing.

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pineiro probably just slightly adjusted his mechanics

because his last two outings weren’t all that great, so maybe he was trying too hard?

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 9, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe its more of a lack of focus against the lesser teams

something that has seemed to become a theme with the entire team.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

I think you nailed it there

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 9, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was just avoiding "overthrowing"

Really just by slowing down a bit balls tend to have more relative movement and less elevation—- right?

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Jul 9, 2008 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But wouldn't the act of slowing down

force the pitcher to put more strain on their arm? Kinda like when a pitcher is ‘aiming’ rather than ‘throwing’.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

by overthrowing you are over-extending into a realm that is not natural or beyond what is comfortable. You don’t slow down or stress the arm by not over-throwing, you simply perform a motion that is much more comfortable.

Lets compare Matt Thornton and Mike MacDougal. Two guys who throw in the upper 90s. When you see MacDougal pitch, it’s extremely violent and he has to put everything he has into the pitch to hit 98. Then you watch Thornton and it looks like he’s doing nothing more than playing a leisure game of catch….and he’s hitting 97-98 on the gun.

MacDougal is over-stressing his arm and not only does his health suffer, so does his accuracy.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said he had to overthrow

I doubt that Joel consistently throwing at 92 mph is overthrowing. However, he is now sitting routinely at 90 mph.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you know Joel throwing 92 isn't overthrowing?

Hitting 72 for me would be overthrowing. It’s not like theres a magic number where you can say a pitcher is overthrowing. Each guy is different.

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure what you & Chitown are referring to...

or seeing w/ Pineiro. Might could be “rushing,” when the lower body gets ahead of the arm. That can leave the ball up while decreasing velocity, though you don’t necessarily lose movement. Carp used to fall into that from time to time.

The way I look at it, rushing is a synchronization or timing problem that can happen with or without overthrowing, which is a loss of smoothness in mechanics due to increased effort. “Slowing down” can adversely affect smoothness as well through altering rhythm.

I have no idea why I spend so much time thinking about this stuff. I liked baseball just as well when it was “hum that pea” & “see ball, hit ball.”

by random on Jul 9, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is really over-reaching

You do not actually slow the pitcher down. Just teach them to pitch under control. The goal is a smooth delivery that produces repeatable, accurate results that increase a pitcher’s ability to locate pitches. A pitcher would never intentionally slow down in the middle of his delivery and no one would teach that. If anything, I think you could argue Duncan’s philosophy should minimize injury because it focuses on finesse rather than power. I happen to believe that any benefit or drawback of a particular style of throwing is negligible. Further, I think analyzing a pitcher’s mechanics to find injury potential is nearly useless. More important to me is how many pitches a pitcher is throwing, how tired he is, and his age in many cases. That will tell you how likely he is to get hurt. The bottom line is that the human arm was not meant to throw a baseball constantly, so players will hurt their arms from time to time, regardless of their mechanics. And I have yet to see anything that indicates certain mechanics cause more injuries. I have yet to find any agreement on what the proper mechanics even are. Everyone seems to have their own opinion, and they often contradict each other.

by rthorat on Jul 9, 2008 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

The discussion of Duncan’s teaching is more about philosophy than mechanics. The more broad statement about analyzing mechanics was talking about those who look at pitchers and say “x part of his delivery will cause injuries.” I am not aware that Duncan teaches specific mechanics to every pitcher, just a certain philosophy/style. The Cardinals pitchers have varying mechanics and pitching motions, but they all throw with the same style, which has been shown to be successful, and if you ask me is not controversial.

by rthorat on Jul 9, 2008 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jo-El really surprised me last night

His ability to go from terrible games to wonderful ones makes me think he needs a nickname. Perhaps Bipolar Betty.

What? That nickname is taken.

Guess who is Pineiro’s #1 comparable at Baseball Reference?

None other than Ms Betty herself, Jason Marquis.

File this under “Things that make you say Hmmmm”

by Poop on Jul 9, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

wow - that's funny

Although I don’t think they take attitude into account over at BR. From all accounts Marquis/Pineiro are acceptable back end rotation guys. Marquis’ problem is that he tries to pull crap that only a #1 could get away with.

I’ll take Maruis performance from a guy with a decent attitude at a low cost. Especially when you factor in the ability to make some wicked kick saves.

by birdo rojo on Jul 9, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except Joel is coming up big in big games

Something Marquis consistently failed to do in the three years (it was only three? Seemed like a decade!) he was here

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now

Go look at Adam Wainwright’s comparable and tell me where this logic stands.

B-R comparables means little to nothing and always will.

and should you actually watch both of those players pitch, it’s night and day.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

comparables on a pitcher with less than 3 years service time really is amusing

Jose Melendez? Newt Kimball?

I agree though, Pineiro and Marquis ?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Priceless

The Broglio/Marquis comparisons are priceless… Makes me feel a little better about Mo not makin a move for harden

by NattyNat on Jul 9, 2008 2:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Harden

You can count me in the “don’t trust Beane” camp.
Besides, quite honestly I doubt the Cardinals first half perfomance is sustainable even with Harden (or similar pitcher).

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Jul 9, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Runnin' down a dream


Waiting might be the Harden part….but tonight we will be “Runnin down a dream”...that Mulder will tell the Phillies that “I won’t back down”. Please Mark don’t have a “Breakdown”...please “Don’t Do me like that” or we might have to send you packing “Into the Great wide open” as a “Refugee”.

by KYCards on Jul 9, 2008 3:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ummmm..... Wow, I mean, really, Wow.

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on Jul 9, 2008 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And don't push the arm. Remember, you're on a pitch count

“Handle With Care”

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"yer so bad"

i wonder if it’s already “time to move on” from the tom petty references? i fear this thread might go “free fallin’” into something ugly.

by mattybobo on Jul 9, 2008 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

furthermore

even the losers get lucky sometimes

ok, i’m done, honest

by mattybobo on Jul 9, 2008 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You gut lucky, babe, when Walt found you

and gave you that contract.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's good to be king

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One last more...

I bet Tony & Mo had to say “I need to know” before they say “Don’t come around here no more.”

by KYCards on Jul 9, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hopefully...

by the end of the night Mulder isn’t saying “You Wreck Me” to the Phillies hitters.

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 9, 2008 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will it be the "Last Dance"

with Mark Mulder?

The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Jul 9, 2008 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we're too hard on Mark

I know he thinks “You don’t know how it feels…to be meeeeeeeeee”

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lineup tonight

Schumaker
Ludwick
Pujols
Glaus
Ankiel
Miles
LaRue
Mulder
Izturis

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 4:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

skip

why is skip starting against a lefty? didn’t we call up Mather to face the gult of lefties. oh well.

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 9, 2008 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I’d rather have Miles leadoff and Mather bat 6th, with no Skip

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He bats righty, and Skip bats lefty

Facing a LHP tonight

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and Skip

hasn’t fared so well against lefties.

by TNTinCO on Jul 9, 2008 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tony has a new theory!

Start a lefty against a lefty to confuse pitcher so that he thinks that he is not actually facing the Cardinals because their eccentric manager normally has 8 righthanded bats in the lineup.

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has a new theory

keep giving away outs with Skippy vs LHP so that maybe someday he’ll learn to hit them and then the two (Tony and Skip) never apart will be.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man...

I’m not sure I wouldn’t throw Kennedy back out there. I know there’s not much love for him in this place, but he’s been mashing the ball lately. Miles has not.

by Hoffa on Jul 9, 2008 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Miles

I love ya buddy… but you do not belong in the 6-hole in ANYONE’s lineup.

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

by stltrav09 on Jul 9, 2008 4:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He had to sacrifice his 2-hole position

to make room for Ludwick. Don’t you know hitting in front of Pujols is the magical spot where hitters find their stroke and start mashing the ball like the Serrano of old?

by Tackle Box on Jul 9, 2008 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear that

Hitting in front of Pujols is going to be listed as a preformance enhancing drug next year.

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reports in Chicago show that Harden has been throwing 90-92 mph, topping out at 94 earlier this year. However, he apparently hasn’t been throwing his slider or splitter since returning from injury.

The Cardinals should look at what it will take to get Ron Mahay out of KC, and they might look at a Brian Roberts (.862 OPS). Both of them are signed through ‘09. The biggest difference in Chicago’s offense and St. Louis is the production of the middle infielders. Mark DeRosa (.837 OPS) and Ryan Theriot (.752) are vastly superior to Aaron Miles (a streaking .719), Kennedy (.686), Izturis (.616) and Brendan Ryan (.599). A package of Bryan Anderson (R. Hernandez is signed through ‘09 in Baltimore) and pitching probably gets it done.

Milwaukee just got a Cy Young winner, and we’re about to (Carp). Get a better offensive 2B or SS with an upgrade LH reliever, and the Cardinals will be just fine.

by Tito Landrum Jr. on Jul 9, 2008 4:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Strauss said on his chat

that Roberts was viewed as an “impact player” but not an “impact bat.” They are after the latter, not necessarily the former in the form of Roberts. If you look at how many runners the Cardinals strand, it’s easy to see why.

He did say a lefty reliever was at the top of the wish, and seemed confident they would get one soon.

As to 2B, I think they are standing pat with Kennedy/Ryan/Miles, as the combo at least gets on base. The all-glove, no-bat at shortstop is a different problem. I think they should address it now if possible, because the shortstop market over the winter isn’t going to look a lot better. That assumes they won’t let Ryan have the job.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't know a ton about him.....

But he’s a power guy, right?

Doesn’t our lineup have enough of that? Pujols, Glaus, Ankiel, Ludwick…..all should be above 30 HR’s this season. We need good, consistent table setters. If they have power AND hit for average, great. Last thing I’d think we need right now is another power bat that is up and down.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 9, 2008 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But when you consider his ups and downs have power

Its far better than the consistent “down” we have with no power in Izturis, right? Low average + no power < low average + decent power. Especially when it looks like any defensive change would be marginal.

I’m not saying the guy is great, just that he’d be a great improvement over Izturis. Yes, I’d rather have a guy who hits for average and power and plays great defense. If we can find that guy, and acquire him without gutting our system, then great. Until we find that . . . I like Peralta.

by Ray Lankford on Jul 9, 2008 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peralta's splits

this season: career
vs RHP .266/.309/.468 .262/.326/.415
vs LHP .194/.256/.403 .268/.343/.466

so clearly he’s having a bad year vs lefties, but that fits ok with a platoon with either Ryan or Izturis and against RHP he’s a huge upgrade

Ryan: RHP .214/.258/.262 LHP .308/.348/.354
Izturis RHP .217/.284/.279 LHP .274/.354/.356

by vances law on Jul 9, 2008 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you've convinced me too

Ray Lankford, king of the golf swing!

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 9, 2008 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How are they going to do better than Roberts at 2B?

Unless they think that they’re going to get Uggla (or Peralta, I guess)

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which, i would love to start exclaiming Jhonny B. Goode! after every key play he makes

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every time I see his name spelled that way I feel like I'm drunk

As somebody with the first name John, it really throws me off

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Strauss's point was

that Roberts gets on base but doesn’t hit for impact. At least I think that’s what he was trying to say. That, plus the cost consideration, has the front office not looking at him very hard right now.

The obvious problem is there’s limited room for a bat in the lineup unless he can play MI.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 9, 2008 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roberts not an impact bat?

Brian Roberts leads Baltimore with 32 doubles, and he is slugging .488. He has slugged .515, .410, and .432 the past three years, and his OBP has been .387, .347, and .377 in those years. Oh, and he’s stolen 25 SB’s this year, with 27, 36, and 50 stolen bases in ‘05, ‘06, and ‘07.

I don’t know about his glove, but I don’t know what Strauss is talking about. I do like Roberts better than Peralta; he gets on base more than Jhonny, and he steals a ton more bases. Peralta has a nice contract which isn’t over until 2011, but he doesn’t get on base enough to bat in front of Pujols and Co. Roberts is a better bat, and he’s probably worth what the Cardinals would have to give up.

by Tito Landrum Jr. on Jul 9, 2008 5:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They said he was an impact player

not an impact bat. What they are looking for is a 1 dimensional player, obviously. Someone like McGwire. They just want a guy they can send up to the plate to hit 40 HR a year but not really exhibit any other talents.

Duh!

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 9, 2008 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing that I can think is that maybe Strauss said what he was trying to say backward

Maybe he meant to say that Roberts is an impact bat, but not an impact player. I don’t know much about his defense, maybe it’s a big liability.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 9, 2008 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing...

Roberts is slugging more than Glaus right now.

by Tito Landrum Jr. on Jul 9, 2008 5:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I know the Cards aren't probably going to get a huge name

But the trade talk always gets me giddy every year.

by saladdays on Jul 9, 2008 5:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Burnett

Would anyone do Duncan, Greene, and Anderson for Burnett? Before this week I’d say absolutely positively no way, but it just makes me sick to think that this season might very well be irrelevant in August. I’m not entirely sold on the Harden and Sabathia trades yet, but there’s no question in my mind that both of our rivals just got a lot better than us this year. Could we still get the wild card this year? Maybe. Will we be better than both teams next year and in years to come as things stand today? Probably. But I agree with the Baron…I really like this team, and I want to win now.

I’m not saying the Jays would do such a trade; just for the sake of argument.

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Jul 9, 2008 5:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

maybe

if burnett agreed not to opt out and toronto also gave us a lefty reliever (scott downs or jesse carlson, not tallet)

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 9, 2008 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rain delay tonight?

Hope the ground crew does a good job….. unlike the last road trip…. was it Washington that had a pretty inept crew?

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 6:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He got my to trade a snackpack

for one of Tiger Woods apple cores…oh wait….that trade actually worked out…

by saladdays on Jul 9, 2008 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Walt thought his apple was bad and that the choc pack had the “free trip to disney” hidden inside.

it’s a shame how one GM gets a bad rap when he wasn’t the aggressor, he didn’t resign the guy fresh off of surgery without a pitch thrown, when it wasn’t him that ignored the coaches about how one of the trade items was an asset.

wonder if the braves are crying over the drew trade that worked out so well for us, clearly we won out on that trade.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Strauss on 1380AM

TLR is really pushing front office for help now…. not wanting to wait till Aug. for Carp and AW. Strauss will write about it tomorrow morning. Looks like a little riff going.

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Jul 9, 2008 6:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Stick to your guns, Mo

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and MO says on the pregame show

that the Cards are not opposed to moving ANY of their prospects. Just depends on the caliber of player they could get in return.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

which should be his mentality.

“hands off” should never mean hands off per se, it just means that you’ll be getting known quantities for it

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

To Mr. Beane’s mindset, no one should be untouchable, but the cost for some should be significant.

I’d trade Rasmus, I’d just want Hanley Ramirez in return.

by birdo rojo on Jul 9, 2008 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that is the kind of player I would want back too

youngish and studish.
Take Matt Holliday. I like Holliday and all, would love to have him be a Cardinal, but I think Rasmus is too much to give up for him.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh

I originally put that in without thinking about it, now it got me thinking.

How would Rasmus and a top pitching prospect for Ramirez work??? It would fill a huge position gap for us and our current outfield isn’t too bad and should be more than adequate for the next couple of years.

by birdo rojo on Jul 9, 2008 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Makes sense, Tony is now in win now mode.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tony is always in win now mode

He does a lot of winning too.

by Evilfrog on Jul 9, 2008 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

just saying that now he smells a chance, and rightfully so.

you can’t look at our record and the things we’ve done and not look at the chance we have.

just depends on how much of it is smoke and mirrors and how much of it is a foundation. Tony, of all people, would know which is which IMO

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ah man...

those trolls from BCB got my diary shut down.

I really do think the Cubs will average ~92 loses from 2010-2014. Where will they get good players from?

by guayzimi on Jul 9, 2008 6:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree with you

They have no farm system to speak of and a lot of backloaded contracts.

They better win this year or next, or else their window is closed for a good period of time.

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jul 9, 2008 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and *anyone*

us, the cubs, ‘stros whomever start putting plays to get the Brewers to deplete their stockpile is helping us down the road as well.

I’m not worried about the Cubs the next half decade, I’m worried about Cinci and the Brewers.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jul 9, 2008 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me also add an apology for letting it get out of hand

I certainly didn’t do my part to keep the discussion civil

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 9, 2008 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's alright...

Cubs fans are notoriously thin skinned.

by guayzimi on Jul 9, 2008 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

101...

I believe

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a bummer

that was some serious back and forth snippiness going on.
They sure better hope they win, the Yankees are proof that having close to $100M in old guy contracts is not a good idea.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 9, 2008 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We need to trade for Brian Roberts

and George Sherrill

That would make me happy.

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jul 9, 2008 6:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If it were me. This is the direction that I would go..

I’d like to have a pitcher who is durable and can eat innings. Hopefully one that has numbers inflated due to ballpark constraints/defense behind them. A lefty with BP experience would be a bonus as guys start coming back he’ll be able to slot over. This way we’ll have injury protection, innings protection and it should be reasonably cheap.

If that doesn’t come to be, I’ll take someone with solid lefty splits (RH or LH – though Tony wouldn’t use them as a RH).

Another bat, but with our situation getting that is harder than it should be. They’ll hold onto Kennedy and hope, they’ll keep Iz because of the glove. Ryan is a solid utility at two positions and Miles, while being open to being overexposed.. is getting attention because he’s doing a solid job.) So with 1st, 3rd sewn up, that leaves the OF where we already have glut.

But I’d be happy with that to start, and to aggressively start using platoons as we did in April with the OF.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on Jul 9, 2008 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anderson

Don’t trade Anderson for Burnett. Anderson looks like a player that will keep getting better. The Cardinals might be able to get more value for him later….This might be the Cubs Mulder trade if Harden’s fastball topped out at 90….

by Hancock on Jul 9, 2008 7:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
How to EASILY make tables for Fanposts
1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

Recent FanPosts

Arch_small
Number 15
Small
Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
Small
Ok let me try this again...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Kid-a-bear_small the red baron