Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The USA TODAY/Bloody Elbow Top 50 MMA Fights Ever, I


Tangled Up in Blue

Good morning, gentle denizens of Viva El Birdos. I hope everyone had an enjoyable, or at least satisfactory, Independence Day holiday.

Myself, I had a bit of a mixed day, I must admit. I attended a barbecue at a friend's house, whose birthday also just happens to fall on the fourth of July. That was wonderful; it was the good portion of my day. We shot off fireworks, ate inordinately large amounts of tasty animal flesh, threw a baseball around in the yard, and just generally had a gay old time. The not so fun portion of my day was largely the result of the fourth degree burns I sustained over most of my left arm due to a flareup on the barbecue front.

I beg your pardon?

There's no such thing as fourth degree burns, you say? Well, it was the fourth of July, so I'm classifying these as fourth degree, in honour of our great nation's independence. USA! USA! If you question the severity of my burns, you obviously hate America. You don't hate America, do you? Of course not. What kind of burns do I have? That's right. Glad we're on the same page now. 

Of course, the other unpleasant portion of my Independence Day is what I'm here today to talk to you about.

I'm not sure exactly how many people managed to see the game; judging by the site traffic, a lot of people were otherwise engaged. However, if you did manage to see the game, you saw one of the single most inept performances by an umpire that I've ever been witness to.

I'm generally not one to complain about the umpires. All in all, baseball really has some of the best officials in all of sports. Just take a look sometime at the NBA referees, if you don't believe me. Even the ones who aren't deliberately throwing games are awful. NHL refs aren't much better; no two games are ever officiated quite the same. Football? They're mostly okay, but there always seem to be one or two suspicious calls in any given contest; a phantom hold here or an odd pass interference non call there. Still, not too bad. Baseball, though, generally has very solid officiating. You rarely see massive variation from game to game, inning to inning, and that's really all you can ask for. The umps may not always get the calls exactly right, but they do their best to be consistent.

Combine the generally high level of consistency with the difficulty of calling balls and strikes, and I usually don't get too very down on the umps. I'll complain during the game, mostly out of frustration, but I maintain that, in general, the officiating in baseball is of a pretty high standard. Besides, usually, if your team loses, you can find better things to blame than the officials. If the shortstop hadn't thrown away that routine grounder in the fifth inning, those three unearned runs wouldn't have scored, and the game wouldn't have come down to a call. It's really rare that you can actually point to a given call in a game as the only reason your team lost. Along the way, there were almost surely enough opportunities missed and mistakes made that the losing team probably really didn't deserve to win anyway.

However, I just cannot let what I saw last night go.

First, let me set the scene for you. Early in last night's game, the top of the fourth inning, to be exact, with the Chicago Cubs already leading the game by the score of 1-0, Geovany Soto stood at the plate.  Braden Looper was pitching quite well, having given up only one run to the point, on a solo shot the Kosuke Fukudome in the first inning. The pitch that Fukudome deposited in the right field seats was certainly a mistake, as I'm really not sure a tee ball would have been in better position to whack, but apart from that, Looper had cruised along, supressing a very dangerous lineup.

Looper got ahead of Soto, building a one ball, two strike on the Cub catcher with two fastballs, one each a ball and a strike, and a nasty slider that was waved at and missed. Looper came with another slider, and Soto got just a piece of it, fouling it off to stay alive.

That's when Looper's problems started.

Looper's next pitch was a fastball, a 93 mph heater with nice cutting action to it that appeared to graze just the barest outside edge of the plate. The man in blue behind the plate, though, didn't see it that way, and called it a ball. All of us watching the game groaned a bit; it was a hell of a pitch. Looper just didn't get the call.

Looper fired another fastball, an even better one this time. It came in at 92 mph, cutting over the outside corner again, knee high, about an inch or two closer to the plate than the previous pitch. Fists were pumped in the air, hands were raised for the strikeout celebration, as Looper clearly painted the corner on that one. In fact, as Al Hrabosky so aptly described another pitch during last night's telecast, Looper had truly threaded the needle on that one.

Ball three.

And now the grumblings really began. He's getting squeezed, we all shouted. That's bullshit, many of us said. That's two in a row. Where in the hell were those pitches? You know the drill.

So, from a 1-2 count, it was now 3-2, on two questionable calls. Both were borderline pitches, absolutely, but at least the second one definitely should have been a strike. Still, a good pitch here, and none of that matters.

The next pitch was, unfortunately, not so good. I believe it was supposed to be a splitter, but it did precious little splitting. What it did was exit the park in a rather rapid fashion, and just like that the Cubs had an insurance run.

You know what, though? Stuff like that happens. One of those pitches should have been a strike, but they weren't called that way, and Looper hung a breaking ball to a very good hitter. He got beaten. Nothing we can do about it. The calls sucked, but as long as it's the same strike zone for everyone, that's just the game. No use in complaining about it.

Well, fast forward a little while. During the course of the evening, we had all watched the ball game intermittently in between various games of cards, a trip to procure additional fireworks, and the viewing of a very funny video that featured the animatronic characters from Showbiz Pizza performing the newest Usher single.

Carlos Zambrano, henceforth known as Public Enemy #1 'round these parts, continued to have the Cardinals' collective number. Looper had nearly matched him, pitching quite a fine game in his own right. Russ Springer came in and did his job; sadly, Bob Howry did the same. Albert did reach a nice milestone, hitting home run #300, but, like the Mang himself, individual accomplishments mean little to me when the team is suffering.

And so we came finally to the bottom of the ninth inning. The Cubs were clinging to a one run lead; the Cardinals had one last chance to rain on the Northsiders' parade. Troy Glaus was set to lead off the inning, followed by Chris Duncan and Yadier Molina. Not the most magical of bullets, but you could certainly do much, much worse.

At this point, we had all migrated out into the street to try and set ourselves on fire. I managed to add a singed thumbnail on to the- what kind of burns?- that's right, fourth degree burns I had already sustained on my arm. We all stood out in front of the house, watching all the houses around us put on their pyrotechnic displays, occasionally adding our own to the fray.

A vehicle door was opened; the baseball game was located on the radio. We listened to the reports and whistles, hoping to hear the voice of the Moon Man raised above the fray, exhorting the ball to get up, baby, get up. Instead, what we heard were groans and grumbles coming from the booth, apparently quite a bad strike call had been made.

At this point, being the baseball fan that I am, I immediately took off away from the fireworks, running back into the house to see if the call was as bad as they made it sound on the radio. I arrived back at the television just in time to see Troy Glaus stalking away from it, angrily shouting as he headed back to the dugout.

I quickly grabbed the remote and ran the game back, (oh, the wonders of the DVR) to see what the fuss was all about. Imagine my surprise, then, to see the exact same pitches that had been called balls two and three to Geovany Soto in the fourth inning called for strikes two and three to Troy Glaus in the ninth.

You know what? I could have handled one of the two. Hell, I thought they were strikes before. In fact, I wouldn't have had a problem with either of those pitches being called strikes if it weren't for the fact that we had already established that they were not, in fact, strikes earlier in the game. My biggest problem with the whole thing, though, was the umpire's reaction after Glaus expressed his frustration with the first call. The ump stared at Troy as he stepped out of the batter's box, adjusted his uniform, and took a couple of breaths to steady himself. The umpire continued to stare Troy down as he stepped back into the box and readied himself for Kerry Wood's next pitch. In fact, I'm not entirely sure the umpire wasn't still staring at Troy as he called the third strike, on the same pitch that wasn't a strike in the fourth for Looper, and shouldn't have been a strike for Wood in the ninth.

Of course, after Glaus headed back to the dugout, clearly upset and making no great secret of it, the umpire kept staring over at the Cardinal dugout. Neither Tony nor Duncan appeared to be making any sort of noise over the calls, so I have to wonder why the ump saw the need to keep stealing glances over at the Cardinal bench.

So, was this simply a case of incompetence, of an umpire who couldn't keep the strike zone consistent throughout the game? Or was it a case of an umpire who made a bad call, then decided that the player who had dared to show his frustration with what he thought was a poor call needed to be shown just exactly who was the boss? I have to wonder, which one of those guys do you want to be, blue? Bad at calling balls and strikes or trying to make the game about you? Hmm?

I said earlier that there are enough missed opportunities and mistakes made in any game that you can always make the argument that the game never should have come down to a call by an umpire. And technically, that was probably true of the game last night, but it certainly didn't feel like it. It was a magnificently played game, with quality pitching and defense on both sides. You can complain the Cardinals didn't work the count against a pitcher who was on a pitch count if you want; I certainly did so. But when it comes right down to it, last night's game was a clean, quick duel of two pitchers doing just what they needed to do to win. One was certainly a bit more efficient than the other, but they were both effective.

Unfortunately, the game was ultimately decided by an umpire. If either one of the balls he called on Soto were ruled strikes, #300 ties the game up. If either one of the strikes he called on Glaus, which were the same pitches he called balls earlier, went the other way, the Cardinals have their leadoff hitter on in the ninth inning of a one run game. How might things have gone from there? I have no idea. Unfortunately, we'll never get to find out.

I am not at all in favour of computerized ball and strike calls. I like the fact that we still have a human being behind the plate. Call me old fashioned if you must; I probably am. But MLB needs to do something about the quality of their umpires. It seems the pool of ump talent is becoming more and more diluted every season; we're seeing more  of these kinds of problems all the time. At the very least, there needs to be a concerted effort to teach the correct strike zone to these umpires. Again, all that's really required is consistency. The strike zone is laid out clearly enough in the rules that you would think it could be taught.

There also needs to be something done about the confrontational attitude many of these umpires, especially the younger, less proven ones, take toward the players. How many times in the last four or five years have we seen umpires engage in actively antagonistic behaviour toward players? The old axiom, that the best umpires are the ones you never notice, doesn't seem to have any adherents among this new crop. The arrogance, the animosity, the aggression, all are bad for the game and need to be stamped out.

I understand that an umpire has to maintain control of a game. But umpires are not in contention with anything. The players are the ones competing. They're the ones with their careers on the line if they somehow don't manage to move a runner over from second to third with no outs. The umpires need to understand this, and maintain their distance. No official should ever aggressively pursue a confrontation with a player, no matter how much the player pisses the ump off. The player says one of the magic words, he's gone. He makes physical contact with an official, he's gone, and probably fined. That's all well and good. But players shouldn't have to deal with umpires showboating and posturing, in an attempt to somehow prove they belong in the league.

MLB generally has the very best officials in all of sports. I really do mean that. But the quality has taken a hit the last couple of years, and it's bad for the sport. I don't say this as a Cardinal fan, angry that his team lost a game last night. I say it as a fan of baseball who's angry that I increasingly see poor officiating and, worse, officials making themselves part of the game, when they have no business being part of the contest.

MLB needs to get a firm handle on this. We all know what a joke NBA refs are, and it's killing the sport. It's not at all the same way in baseball yet, but the indications aren't good.

I'll be back with a game thread later. I think I'll try a haiku again; it worked last time. Need to get a game back in this series today.

0 recs | Comment 101 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

early one morning the sun was shining, i was laying in bed,

wonderin if she’d changed at all, if her hair was still red.

I, too, hate to place blame on an official but that ump called balls and strikes like an asshole. To the QuesTek!!!

I hate to classify game 89 of the season as a must win, but…

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 5, 2008 8:08 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am in favor of computerized balls and strikes

Period. Regardless of last night’s game. I am sick and tired of home plate umpires determining the outcome of games. ESPECIALLY in the playoffs.

I didn’t see the Soto at bat. I saw the Glaus at bat. And I knew as soon as Wood got that 1st call, the game was over.

by sdrone on Jul 5, 2008 8:22 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I watched every pitch

on WGN and even they commented (mildly) on the Soto and Glaus AB’s. Basically how the calls could have gone either way. To me, the second Glaus call was clearly an “I’m in charge” call.
The technology is such today that they clearly could use lasers to set a hologram strike zone for each batter. I’m as old school as it gets (just turned 65!), but I’m all for it. It would speed the game up tremendously and eliminate the crybabies in the batter’s box, in the dugouts, and on the mound. It would also eliminate the pitchers who get the widened strike zone (see Maddux, Greg). I’m all for leveling the playing field. The technology probably also exists to determine whether the ball hits the first baseman’s glove or the runner’s foot hits the bag first (remember the Card’s missing World Championship?). You would probably still need the umpires for the bases,but their influence on the outcome of games would be substantially reduced.

by vinniefromjersey on Jul 5, 2008 8:31 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wouldn't speed the game up

IMO, a computerized strikezone is not the answer, and it has nothing to do with new school or old school.

I don’t think pitchers like maddux should get bigger strikezones, but I do like the fact that strikezones are different for each and every ump. Last night was a disgrace because the strikezone changed, not because it was a bad strikezone. These hitters are so good that if it was computerized all games would end up like the rockies/marlins game last night. With the way the players study film they would have the strikezone down to a tee. Scoring increases, in general, as the game goes on. There are many reasons for this, like batters start to figure out the pitcher the 2nd or 3rd time through the order, and the pitchers stuff gets less effective, but it also has to do with figuring out the strike zone for that particular game. Glaus did a good job of learning the strikezone and then got screwed. He is often a baby at the plate, but I can’t blame him on that one. I would have reacted the same.

Bottom line is consistency is all we need. Not consistency from an entire umpiring core, but from the one ump who is calling the game.

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 5, 2008 10:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you could randomize the strike zone each game

and just make a point of keeping it consistent through the night.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Jul 5, 2008 2:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

good idea

as long as it is a slight randomization (maybe from 5% to 8%)

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 5, 2008 2:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am SO glad you posted what you did

I share almost all of your sentiments. I have a Yankee friend down the street who cries every time his team loses – it’s always somebody’s fault – never the fact the other team outplayed his. HOWEVER, there are times when teams get screwed, through either bad breaks, dumb coaching or poor officials’ calls. Last night’s Cardinals – Cubs game was clearly the latter.

Watching with a friend, I actually called Soto’s home run. I told my buddy, “Well, after five strikes being called on Soto, watch – the idiot will now hit it out of the park!” Sadyly he did, and, of course, that turns out to be the winning run. Looper is a better man than me. He showed no emotion.

Glaus’ at bat was really frustrating. I can see one bad call – the ump is human – but back-to—back? If that was, as you state, payback time because Glaus swore after the second strike, then you DO need computerization on balls &strikes, because the human element should not include personal vendettas. .....and, too often lately, I’ve seen this happen. Frankly, I was disappointed Troy didn’t really get in the guy’s face, and I’m sorry TLR didn’t make a scene. That was a crucial call. A leadoff walk almost always comes back to haunt a pitcher and the ump took this one away from the Cards. I hope this guy – and all umps – have their work reviewed by somebody with some guts to do something about incompetence.

Instant replay has to come to this sport, as it has to the others…...simply in the name of fairness. “Bad calls are part of the game” is unacceptable when you have the capability to provide more justice.

by ccthemovieman on Jul 5, 2008 8:52 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the magic word(s) ?

Jumping off from cc’s post above, and the opening prompt, I wonder if there is also some inconsistency in what magic word(s) will get you tossed. You don’t have to be a lip-reader to know that Glaus clearly shouted the GD one. Maybe three times; at least once after both controversial ‘strikes.’
Did he not get tossed because GD can sometimes pass but the F or MF one won’t ? Or was it the context? That is, he did NOT say GD You (mr umpire) but just a general ol’ GD ?
From my fan-heart perspective I was expecting Glaus to get tossed and I was hoping he would; I was even more disappointed that Tony seemed to let it pass. If nothing else he should have taken up for Glaus. And even tho it would have been an ejection for LaRussa, I still wanted him to come out there.

Two other tassels that make the two strikes called on Glaus a big issue: Troy literally murdered the first pitch from Wood, unfortunately way out in front and a foul ball right off the bat. And the first strike called on Yadi was nearly identical to the two Glaus calls. Molina did his best to show disgust, but THAT was the pitch that clearly showed the ump either had it in for us, or he was Kerry Wood’s first cousin.

That it was Kerry flippin Wood as the pitcher that benefited from all this may have been, to ME, the worst part of the aggravation.

by the Tewk on Jul 5, 2008 12:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wait

why did you want Glaus to get tossed?

by Evilfrog on Jul 5, 2008 12:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At that point...

I would have been thrown out of the game in about a millisecond. I can’t believe Troy was able to walk away without getting in that umpire’s face.

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 5, 2008 1:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wasn't there an umpire

That was disciplined a couple weeks ago, for getting into it with a player/manager?

I often wonder if the reason officiating in all sports seems to be rapidly declining every year, is that fewer officials today are as unbiased as they used to be. With sports coverage available 24/7, it has to be easier to pick teams that you like/dislike than it was many years ago. An ump, inundated with coverage of different teams, is more likely to develop a bias, based solely on increased familiarity.

by fuegophil on Jul 5, 2008 9:36 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think...

...the guy’s name was Brian Runge, and he chest bumped Carlos Beltran and then tossed him for it. I think that was what happened anywho.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 5, 2008 1:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Edmonds

What kind of greeting did he get? I don’t feel like going back through last night’s game thread to see if it was already discussed.

Thanks.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 5, 2008 9:40 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A very classy greeting. And I'm a Cub fan.

But one who has appreciated the class of Cardinal fans throughout this rivalry.

by Rick B on Jul 5, 2008 9:49 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

speaking of class, I thought Bernie Miklasz's article was ridiculous and classless today.

He complained that cards fans were too nice to jimmy.

I’m starting to get really sick of his obnoxious attitude. He tends to take real low shots generally. He had a comment during the Royals series about Kansas City getting running water in the mid-70’s. He had a nasty article about Boston fans earlier this year. He had the “No Tinker, no Evers, no Chance” article that Tony called him out on.

As if being gracious were an offense.

by tom s. on Jul 5, 2008 10:41 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

just a token media guy trying to sensationalize and play it up for Joe Cardsfan.

I take it about as serious as I take anything out of Joe Morgan’s mouth.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 10:53 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Miklasz is obnoxious?

Seriously? He’s easily the most good-natured sports commentator in town, and admirably endorses statistical analysis when the likes of Plaschke and Joe Morgan lazily rely on anecdotal evidence. He’s also the best sports commentator in town. His Royals column was clearly tongue-in-cheek, or are you unaware of the friendly barbs he and Joe Posnanski have thrown at each other over the years? I remember a few years before the Cards returned to the WS, Posnanski wrote a column making fun of St. Louis for, among other things, not winning it all as recently as the Royals.

His Boston article, I thought, was funny. He gave them their due while also writing a curmudgeonly take on the success of Boston teams. And if you can’t admit that their teams have an abnormally large amount of obnoxious boosters, well, I question your judgement.

And are you seriously defending La Russa’s typically thin-skinned response to the No Tinker, No Evers, No Chance article? I can’t locate the article online, but if I recall, Miklasz didn’t even write that column. But if I’m wrong and he did, so freaking what? It’s what the press in a rival sports towns is supposed to do.

What Miklasz was saying is that for all the Cards fans who say they hate the Cubs, it’s inconsistent to applaud Edmonds. Because he is a Cub now, you see. Though I must say, I did applaud Edmonds last night – after every one of his strikeouts.

by Pozzer on Jul 5, 2008 2:42 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A light standing o

for his first ab, nothing too over the top. Tipped his cap to the crowd and promptly struck out. After that, there was nothing special. Exactly how I thought it should play out.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 5, 2008 9:51 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

umpires

I think the ump might have called the second strike just because Glaus was complaining . If they are close enough to call once he should know better than to swing at them . Might have been bad calls but does not mean Glaus’s at bat would have changed anything , he strikes out way too much

by bilyuds on Jul 5, 2008 9:43 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol, that was funny, but

he has a point. If an umpire rang him up on that call you should know there’s a pretty decent chance it’s happening again, especially after the tirade.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 12:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't know if the MLB umpires are the best

officials in sports but I do believe that the talent level is as watered down as the talent in MLB. The home plate umpire can have a major impact on the outcome of a game because a 3-1 count is much different than a 2-2 count to a hitter. There shouldn’t be as many different strike zones as there are umpires. But if they did go to a technology driven strike zone, the games might last 5-6 hours because of the increase in offense.

Anyway, something must be done. Especially with the umpires that seem to want to be part of the show.

Lastly, I don’t think you can make the assumption that if Soto is called out, that Albert hits #300. In a 1-0 game Howry doesn’t go right at him but probably walks him.

by Rick B on Jul 5, 2008 9:46 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Questec strike zone

If they went strictly to Questec, pitchers would lose a couple of inches on the outside corner but would probably gain a bit at the top of the zone. I think it would benefit the power guys that can blow hitters away with high heat and really hurt the Glavine types that make careers on the types of calls that Wood got in the 9th last night.

by mikedallas45 on Jul 5, 2008 10:11 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pitchers would adapt to Questec

as they have adapted to other strike-zone changes over the years. No sympathy there.

by StanTheManFan on Jul 5, 2008 10:59 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's a computer

It could be adjusted to give a slightly wider strike zone if needed.

by sdrone on Jul 5, 2008 11:05 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

funny you say that

there were job postings on monster that did exactly that, adjust the system to each batter for the strike zone…the funny part is the little strike zone box used to be in game day, not it’s not…..

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I missed the early part

of the game; we were visiting my mama-in-law (a sweet lady whom I love dearly), and my wife’s schizophrenic aunt wanted to watch “A Capitol Fourth” on PBS. (Goalie’s Law #4: Don’t get into arguments you can’t win…) Since Mrs. Goaler had spent 12 hours or so on July 3rd grilling about 25 pounds of dead animal flesh to take to Mama’s, I wasn’t about to complain!

As for the very-doubtable Mr. Barrett, it appeared to me that he became irked with Glaus, and was gonna call Strike Three if’n it was anywhere close. I’ve umpired (at the high -school/American Legion level), and while I’ve missed my share, I NEVER took any irritation I had with the batter or pitcher into the next call. Nobody ever paid to watch a guy umpire!

That said, I’m not in favor of Questec replacing the home-plate ump… that system isn’t infallible, either. As much as I hate to do so, I gotta tip my cap to Carlos; he was simply better than Looper and the Cards last night.

Let’s get ‘em today, boys!

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on Jul 5, 2008 10:17 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Red Baron

“MLB needs to get a firm handle on this.” You mean like the firm hand they have taken on the splintered Maple bat issue. Don’t hold your breath.

by ridgesee on Jul 5, 2008 10:18 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doesn't Glaus have to know

the next pitch is going to be called a strike? He simply cannot afford to take that pitch.

Titans Blogger at Music City Miracles

by Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 10:29 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

maybe

But the only thing he could have hoped to do with that pitch is foul it off. Anything else whoudl have been an out.

by Evilfrog on Jul 5, 2008 10:32 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

Glaus couldn’t hit that pitch. It WAS a perfect pitch. After getting the call the pitch before old Lou might have been out on the field if they would have called that one a ball

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 5, 2008 10:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I missed most of the game.

We started playing poker after Soto’s HR. Then I came back just in time to see Albert’s 300th. And then I saw the Glaus AB.

Okay, Glaus shouldn’t have got that upset on the first call. But he looked like he stepped out. Got his head back and came in to do what he had to do. That 2nd strike was just ridiculous. A call should never go like that…

Anyway. Looper bounced back nicely from his last shot. 2 solo homeruns. Only 1 walk and 5 Ks.

by Evilfrog on Jul 5, 2008 10:30 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you look on Gameday

The 3rd strike to Glaus was about a 1/2 ball closer than the 2nd one. The really stupid thing about the 2nd one is that Wood didn’t even hit his spot, Soto had to pretty blatantly frame it.

by mikedallas45 on Jul 5, 2008 10:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

makes me doubt gameday

I watched the game, rewound, etc. and the second pitch was definitely farther off the plate

"Give a man a fire, and he’ll be warm for a night. Set him on fire and he’ll be warm for the rest of his life."

by BigMOman on Jul 5, 2008 3:38 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He didn't really hit his spot on either of them

that is what I was yelling at the TV last night. Looper put both of those pitches to Soto right where Molina wanted them. It make the call that much worse.

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 5, 2008 10:37 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did anyone hear Tony's post game comments?

Bernie’s extra points has this.

I don’t blame Tony La Russa for being upset with umpire Ted Barrett’s strike zone in the ninth inning, but he’d better hope that the umps will forget TLR’s postgame comments instead of holding a grudge.

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/bernies-extra-points/bernies-extra-points/2008/07/cubs-cards-game-1/

by Evilfrog on Jul 5, 2008 10:41 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And that's another thing

If his comments affect the umpire, then the umpire should be suspended without pay. Immediately.

Of course, we could never prove it. Sigh.

by sdrone on Jul 5, 2008 11:07 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Perhpas he said some of this during the postgame press conference.
La Russa’s irritation grew in the ninth inning when he thought plate umpire Ted Barrett widened his strike zone against third baseman Troy Glaus and catcher Yadier Molina. Glaus struck out looking at consecutive pitches for the inning’s first out. Molina eventually flared a two-out single but not before La Russa claimed Barrett had glared into the home dugout.

“The miss was the ninth inning,” La Russa insisted. “I thought the umpire, Ted Barrett, had a very consistent game and I think if he’ll review the tape … and see if there was something there that was questionable.”

La Russa cited two pitches to Glaus, one to Molina and one to Ryan Ludwick in the game’s final at-bat as “not consistent with the zone (Barrett) had called all game.” Some within the home clubhouse believed Looper had Soto struck out twice before allowing the home run on a misplaced change-up.

Added La Russa: “What I think they’re doing is sitting in there complaining about Troy Glaus getting upset and Yadier looking. They should check the tape.”

Glaus failed to put a fair ball in play during the game. He said of his called strikeout against Wood, who closed his 22nd save, “It meant one out in the ninth inning of a one-run game against a very good pitcher. I felt like I had the at-bat taken away from me. I don’t know what more I can say beyond that.”

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/8773A071ECD385E68625747D0014895C?

by Don Zero on Jul 5, 2008 11:19 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

20 something replies and no one has

mentioned the streaker on the field in the 7th inning. Actually, she was partially clothed, but I am suprised that I am the first to mentioned it.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 10:46 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey!

anybody got any pictures of this. If so, share.

by ridgesee on Jul 5, 2008 10:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

She was able to dodge the first old security dude as she hopped

onto the field down the left field line. The babe made it…say, 100 to 150’ into shallow left field before the younger security dude tackled her. IIRC it was somewhere around the 7th inning. She was a hottie. Like I said, partially clothed, so technically, it wasn’t a true streaking, but what the hell…it was a Cubs/Cards circus type atmosphere in the ballpark. It just added to the general craziness.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 11:09 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heck

I was at the game and didn’t even notice it (I was at the bar at the party porch at the time) or hear anyone mention it, really.

She had been planning it for some time, though. Also, it’s not streaking if you’re not naked.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 5, 2008 11:19 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed that it was not a true

streaking, but still a fun diversion on a truly wild night in downtown STL. We were sitting behind the Cards dugout and had a great view of the ‘gal gone wild’ episode. My section went nuts. It was absolutely harmless, yet the babe is no doubt waking up in jail this morning.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 11:24 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was at the game, and I did see it

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 5, 2008 1:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Umpiring haiku

That sounds like a good idea, RB; here’s a starter…

Umpiring was bad
But go and win the next game
That’s the best revenge.

by StanTheManFan on Jul 5, 2008 11:01 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mostly over it
But when we win the next two
Barrett can suck it.

by Phizzle on Jul 5, 2008 11:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

that works two ways because Michael Barret can suck it as well, but for different reasons.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 12:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Argh

I know we don’t know if it would’ve made a difference, but it very well could have and umpires should not decide games like that. I don’t have a problem with outside pitches being balls or strikes, it’s the ump’s discretion. But be consistent. That was completely horsesh*t last night.

Did anybody ever tell him he looks like a penis with that little hat on?

We need to shake it off and get two this weekend. I’ll take a 1.5 game lead after a 3-game series with the Cubs.

"Jimmy told me, 'If you keep it right there at two runs and no more, we'll win this game,'" Wainwright said. "'Me and Albert will get the job done."

by Andie203 on Jul 5, 2008 11:36 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm assuming you mean a 1.5 game deficit

Also, we have to win the next two or else we’ll be in third place by the time this weekend is over

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jul 5, 2008 11:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Her's hoping TLR puts out an above average lineup

today.

What I don’t get is that Chris Duncan needs playing time to get out of his funk and then once out of his funk, of course he’s going to get playing time. But how the heck does the team’s RBI leader go back to being a part time player? Does that make ANY sense?

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 5, 2008 12:09 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why wouldn't he?

What kind of lineup do you think he’ll play?

I’d guess:

Barton
Ludwick
Pujols
Ankiel
Glaus
Molina
Miles
P
Ryan

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 5, 2008 12:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Those will be the players

He would be smart to drop Ankiel down to 6th thou.

Westcoastbirdwatcher

by westcoastbirdwatcher on Jul 5, 2008 1:10 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

let santa bat cleanup today.

by stlcardinalsfang on Jul 5, 2008 1:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

actually

this is the lineup i’d like to see

crabman
grit
mang
studwick
santa
roy
molina
lohse
boog

by stlcardinalsfang on Jul 5, 2008 1:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Luddy still really isn't hitting

Glaus is pissed, lets make something out of it. Ank is completely over matched today, unless there is a mistake offered.

Westcoastbirdwatcher

by westcoastbirdwatcher on Jul 5, 2008 1:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

au contraire, mon frere

Luddy last 7 days: .375/.474/.438 Maybe the SLG is a little low, but he is certainly hitting

Glad they made two mistakes to Ank.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 5, 2008 11:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd like to see

Barton
Ryan
Pujols
Glaus
Ludwick
Ankiel
Molina
Lohse
Izturis

But I doubt that is what we will see.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 5, 2008 2:18 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I almost forgot

kudo’s to red baron for slugging his piece with a classic Bob Dylan tune.

by the Tewk on Jul 5, 2008 12:24 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

off topic but....

Has anyone ever done the KTRS First Pitch tickets? I was expecting a huge line for the tickets, so I got there at 5:30ish this morning. To my surprise I was probably the 15th person in line. People were still able to get tickets at 8:45. I thought, especially with the cubs series, there might be a decent demand for the tickets. Can you usually get KTRS tickets that late in the morning?

by NorseKaiser on Jul 5, 2008 12:29 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That is a pretty sweet deal

I use it quite often. I am always suprised that more people do use this promotion.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 12:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I figured it'd be gimmicky or something.

Post Article <-

I might try it next home stand…any more details/tips/tricks anybody would like to add?

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 1:32 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No real gimmicks or tricks to it

and it really is luck of the draw with the tickets that you will recieve. 9 times out of 10 you will be very happy with your seats.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 2:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

that's pretty cool, one last question

In the article it says people line up across the street and race over when they open but in the article it says you get a cert. and don’t know your seat until game time…my question is does it really matter when you get the tickets as it’s all random OR if you get there first do you get the best avail and it goes in order?

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 2:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My understanding is that they are all random (of course, I will find that out for sure in about an hour).

We lined up across the street from the ticket windows. At 6am, they moved the line across the street, snaking the line away from the ticket windows outside of the stadium. At 8am, someone handed out little tickets that you turned in at the ticket window at 9am for vouchers for the tickets. You turn in your voucher 15 minutes prior to gametime to get your ticket.

by NorseKaiser on Jul 5, 2008 2:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yesterday

I had friends go down there around five and they were about 100th in line, so I guess it changes day to day. For what it’s worth almost all of them yesterday were SRO.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 5, 2008 12:42 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have used this promotion maybe 45 -50 times

during the last couple of seasons and am amazed by the quality seats. One of the best deals in town, right up there with the Best Steakhouse across from the Fox.

Steriods is...is bad.

by Handsome Jimmy on Jul 5, 2008 12:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Speaking of Maple Splinters.....

To me the solution for the bat situation is fairly simple. Wrap the lower half of the bat in a very light fiberglass or cloth tape(in factory). The wrap would be light enough to not affect the recoil strength of the bat (ie. not juice the bats) and prevent pieces from turning into projectiles because someone is likely to be impaled and seriously injured if measures are not taken soon. Do we really want to see some fan, player or umpire injured with a piece of bat sticking sticking in them…blood going everywhere? If it hits a neck artery, They could be killed. All kidding aside, ( i know we could joke about Barret getting some wood) It would be a positive, proactive step for MLB to do something before things get ugly.

mattnj

by mattnj on Jul 5, 2008 12:35 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Umpires

My brother completed Harry Windelstedt’s professional umpire school in Florida, which is one of the two schools from which MLB gets its umpires. At the end of each session, which ends just before spring training begins, the instructurs (most of whom are MLB umpires or retired MLB umpires) select approximately 20 of the students to send on for consideration by MLB. Each school does this, and from these 40 or so graduates all vacancies in the low minor leagues are filled.

If an umpire doesn’t advance to the next level within two or three seasons, he’s a wash and usually moves on to getting a regular job or umpiring college games. That’s usually how vacancies occur, as graduating to the next level becomes more difficult each level becuase there are fewer umpires the higher up you go.

The first time my brother completed the course, he missed two or three of approximately 2,500 test questions, far and away the best score in his class. He did everything exactly how they told him in the field, not varying from their dictated style (umpire school is not where you’re supposed to express your individuality or creativity with making calls). I’m not saying he never made mistakes – he was there to learn their system, but he was easily in the top 5 of his class. Some of the students were real losers who would never get it right no matter how hard they tried, some simply didn’t do enough homework and couldn’t get the rules right, and some were individualists who tried their own styles of calls and were chastized by the instructors.

At the end of the class, my brother was pretty confident he’d be in the 20. He wasn’t. Instead, people who had family ties or other country club contacts with the instructors were selected instead. I’m not joking- guys whose dads knew the umpires, or guys whose uncles were umpires, or other similar ties were graduated.

The whole system is a fraternity where merit is not how you advance. They make you think it’s about knowledge and ability, but it’s not what you know but whom you know when it comes to getting in. It’s also expensive; one of the instructors told my brother that he just had a couple things to work on and that if he returned to the school he’d definitely make the cut the next time.

My brother went again, with even better scores than the first time, and with experience to know how to do everything in the field. Second verse same as the first, just another few thousand dollars and another year later.

I’m not surprised that some of these umpires have a chip on their shoulder; they deserve to be there after all, ‘cause daddy’s friend at the country club invited them. It has nothing to do with whether they can call a strike consistently.

by lawman3842 on Jul 5, 2008 1:07 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Enlightening

I’m not sure if this has changed recently, but for a long time the umpires who did premium games (ASG and playoffs) were not selected based on their performance throughout the season, as they are to one degree or another in other sports, but rather on some kind of rotating basis. Therefore, umps like the late Eric Gregg got to be behind the plate for NLCS games, where he promptly turned the plate into a entire dining room table in terms of k-zone width. It was a disgusting system, and I don’t know if it still is in place or not. But given what you’ve stated here, I’m not shocked they had such a lousy system in place.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 5, 2008 1:26 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Very interesting post

I won’t have too much sympathy for these guys when they are at least partially replaced by technology someday.

by mikedallas45 on Jul 5, 2008 1:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well I guess...

that means the umpiring business in not much different from the rest of corporate America.

by rthorat on Jul 5, 2008 2:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

OT : Is Colby Rasmus hurt?

Don’t know about tonight’s game, but he hasn’t played at all the last three days. I know he hasn’t been playing every single day, but three in a row?

by LukeMP1186 on Jul 5, 2008 1:13 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A poster on FutureRedbirds

mentioned that he was resting a sore hip flexor. I have no confirmation and nothing that indicates the severity, but let’s hope they’re just giving him a few days to heal.

by punditmoi on Jul 5, 2008 1:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good post, Red

I was at the game as well, and not exactly at the best angle to see balls and strikes, but the zone clearly changed throughout the night. It was so aggravating. Plus, I had to sit there and listen to Cubby fans acting like they’d just won the World Series even though they’d just won a game playing with 10 guys on the field for the last inning. Glaus’s 3-1 and 3-2 pitches were just awful, and Yadi’s first strike was on a pitch that damn near hit him from what I could tell.

The whole situation reminded me of Phil Cuzzi in Game 4 of the 05 NLCS. That was the worst umpiring job I’d ever seen, and this one was pretty close.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 5, 2008 1:29 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Says to

provide a right handed veteran influence…....um, aren’t Franklin, Isringhausen, Springer, veteran influences? I guess Herges is slightly younger than Springer, but still. Doesn’t Brad Thompson qualify as a veteran at this point? I mean he’s not even close to being a rookie anymore…..

It’s just a rumor, I know, but someone care to try and explain why this makes sense-because it really doesn’t to me.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 5, 2008 1:40 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sounds like a meaningless comment

Like picking up a starter to “eat innings.” But Tony and Dave definitely have little to no confidence in Brad Thompson. I don’t know. I don’t understand a righty either. Two new lefties, that I get.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 5, 2008 2:02 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

K-Mac making a post-ASB transition to the rotation?

I’m totally making this up, but it’s the only thing I can think of as to why we’d be targeting a righty.

If we bring on Herges, who gets bumped? Thompson, sure, but I think he’ll be shipped out soon enough anyway, because I can’t believe we’re planning on carrying 13 pitchers the whole season. So that leaves Izzy, Franklin, Springer, Perez, and K-Mac.

Unless something else is afoot, I don’t see how Herges is an upgrade.

by Mr. Erin Andrews on Jul 5, 2008 2:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am not opposed to the idea of K Mac as a starter, but......

He appeared in 50 games last year, all as a reliever. He missed the complete season before that. He also missed the complete season before that-both times for arm surgery.

Am I wrong to wonder if this might lead to more arm/elbow injuries-throwing too many innings?
I just hope they’d be really careful about how they proceed since he’s already got an injury history.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 5, 2008 2:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He would make a dandy starter

But he is a very critical piece of the bullpen right now. He can give two quality innings against tough competition, get rights and lefts out. Them’s big shoes to fill. I don’t really see Mulder filling them, and he and Villone are the only two others in the pen (besides Thompson) who can really do multiple inning relief.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 5, 2008 2:32 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is Perez a keeper for sure?

I don’t know if he sticks the whole season. My guess is not if Izzy returns to form.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 5, 2008 2:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm sure he'd be the one to go down

if we acquired another righty. I don’t know… maybe another minors stint could help him with his control, but more ML experience would likely help him too. And he’s really the only fireballer in the current pen.

Although now that I’m looking at Herges more closely, he has a pretty wicked reverse split this year, and he’s got a club option for ‘09. Perhaps this is a step toward rebuilding next year’s pen?

by Mr. Erin Andrews on Jul 5, 2008 2:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pitch Fx

Glaus’ AB was clearly poor officiating. Soto’s? Not so much. Take a look at the pitch locations with Gameday’s Pitch Fx:

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2008_07_04_chnmlb_slnmlb_1&mode=gameday

Glaus got screwed, Soto’s pitches just weren’t strikes. That slightly oblique angle of the camera on TV (so it isn’t directly behind the pitcher) makes those pitches look closer than they are. The two strikes to Glaus really weren’t that close.

by jordanR on Jul 5, 2008 2:01 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i agree

I don’t care that it wasn’t a strike, It just needs to be called the same throughout the whole game.

by hoofhearted-pujols on Jul 5, 2008 2:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes, but...

Most umpires give the pitcher that pitch just off the corner – especially with 2 strikes. But the complaints are not about that – fine, the guy has a smaller strike zone than most (but closer to the real zone). But you can’t call it a strike suddenly in the 9th inning to the detriment of one team. And then add insult by getting all uppity on that team, glaring into their dugout.

by rthorat on Jul 5, 2008 2:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

...

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 2:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Glaus and Yadi

both got jobbed. The Soto thing looks like a judgement call, and probably the right one. But that Glaus at bat is a disgrace.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 5, 2008 2:33 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The true tell on the umping

was Soto and Woods after their congratulatory hand shake. Both turned to the team high five line., and after a few straight faced words, broke out laughing. The center field camera doesn’t lie.

Westcoastbirdwatcher

by westcoastbirdwatcher on Jul 5, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I guess I'm going to be the contrarian this time

While I think all the close calls listed did not go our way, I do not make the leap that the umpiring cost us the game. Read the language used when describing the pitches one by one. “Grazed the barest outside of the plate”...”“Cutting over the corner”... “I could have handled one of the two. Hell, I thought they were strikes before.”

I’m not saying this to play gotcha or anything, so I hope it is taken in the spirit intended. But obviously most of us agree these are all, more or less, calls that can go either way. Or at least close calls. Now all 4 went against us, but they were all pitches that were on the fringes, so I personally am not going to make the jump that the umpiring was incompetent. Tragically coincidental, but not sinister. What if they went the other way around and Soto K’d and Glaus homered. If Cubs fans talked about umpiring deciding the game, what would our reaction be? I think we might consider them whiners. And I think we might be right.

There are maybe 250-300 pitches thrown every game. I think you can look at those closest 10% of the pitches (25-30), and find inconsistencies in how they are called in just about every game. To me it is just coincidental that most went against us. I don’t expect umps to keep a tally of who’s getting the borderline ones and try to even it out. Just have to call it as you see it.

And Santa needed to swinging after that first one got called. If he thought it was a strike the first time, he sure as heck was the second time too.

by Merry CRasmus on Jul 5, 2008 2:23 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the quotes...

"Grazed the barest outside of the plate"…""Cutting over the corner"… "I could have handled one of the two. Hell, I thought they were strikes before."

Did Glaus say that? My rationalization was they weren’t even close…when I think pitches were too close to go either way I immediately check Gameday and in this case I would have bet my right nut they were off the plate before checking.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Jul 5, 2008 2:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He couldn't have touched those pitches

with anything less than a long shafted driver. It appeared that Woods was pitching around Glaus after the titanic foul ball. At least not giving in to anything hittable. Soto and Woods stumbled upon an Umps desire to go home. The second pitch was a thing of beauty, as far as lookalike con jobs go. Beautiful control.

Westcoastbirdwatcher

by westcoastbirdwatcher on Jul 5, 2008 2:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the ump was lame last night

but he was also probably watching fireworks at the same time. it really does suck that we lost that game, but chances are, we probably still would have lost. sure, Glaus might have hit a home run, but he could have just as easily popped out. what sucks is the ump probably wanted the rest of the night off….

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 5, 2008 2:54 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Bernie *loves* RBIs as a measuring stick for offensive talent
Photo_29_small
The hiatal hernia (Or why you should stop worrying)
Small
DeRosa a LOOGY?
Small
The rotation and the rest of the year
3341_633586789887_5605975_37208363_4035095_n_small
Off-day Musings Vol. II - First to 40, But Not Zirconium

Recent FanPosts

Small
" YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING ME"
Small
The pitches the Cardinals throw.
Small
Five players I'm watching in July
Images_small
Nothing Short of a Machine: Albert Pujols (nice article i found)
Kmaccooler-01_small
Ank vs. Dunc: Who Would Get Voted Off?
Images_small
Every Cardinal Matters Segment: Request
Small
Addition by subtraction
Jesus_pariah_small
What about #61?
Cards_dl_-_01_small
Game 80 Overflow
Cigar_small
Why put so much stock in the Farm?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Ulquiorra2_small the red baron

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports