Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Trade rumor/speculation catch-all overflow thread

The last thread was getting slow. The topics have been the same all year. Bull pen help, 2Ber that can hit, OF bat, or SP

We left off with a comment about Halladay:

Did anyone else catch this?

Over at mlbtraderumors.com there was a story about the blue jays quietly shopping Roy Halladay that linked the Cardinals as a possible suitor. Obviously, I think the only way this would happen would be if Rasmus was involved. Halladay would be a great answer to the C.C. and Harden trades. Is everyone here too scared off by the Mulder trade to do something like this? If I were GM, I’d strongly consider it, and I’m not sure what my answer would be at this point. Assuming we extend his contract, do you think having a top 3 of Carp, Halladay, and Wainwright is going to be more beneficial over say a 3 or 4 year span than having Rasmus? I think if it were me, i’d do it. But then again, I don’t know if I could stop reminding myself of the Mulder trade….

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 25, 2008 11:11 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

5 recs  |  Comment 147 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

too bad...

rasmus is hurt, so no point in discussing it.

by bigJOE1 on Jul 26, 2008 9:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I like it

I would extend this further and say what would our chances be in ‘09 with a starting 4 or Carpenter, Wainwright, Halladay and Lohse. Add one of Garcia or Boggs and I think we are in good shape.

I don’t think we can let the Mulder trade freeze us out of making moves. After all Rasmus is a “Maybe”. We think he will be good, we project he will be good, but will he be better than Ankiel? Heck, we know more about what Brian Barton can do at the major league level than Rasmus. Rasmus may be the next Jim Edmonds but he is just likely to be the next Corey Patterson, a highly touted minor leaguer who can’t quite get it done in the majors. I think we are just fine with an outfield of Skip, Ankiel, Ludwick and Barton.

I would say go for it.

by O'Fallon Park on Jul 26, 2008 9:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow ... That's nice to dream about

That would be a No. 1-4 starting staff that would compete and compete well. Only I think Halladay would become the staff ace and the other three would fall in at No. 2-4 depending on performance and health. Wellmeyer is a better fit for a No. 5 spot over anything higher than that. Give what youngster starters remaining more time to ripen in the minor leagues over this ridiculous yo-yo act of bringing up and sending down of Boggs, Garcia, Parisi, etc., etc., etc.-fill in whatever name you want. However, if Wainwright is a starter, who holds the one or two run lead after the seventh inning-especially the ninth inning?

by RedbirdattheBeach on Jul 28, 2008 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

john hadley reporting anthony reyes has been dealt

hadley: “While I remain confident my source is legit, and that Reyes been dealt, until I can confirm the personnel in return, I’ll pass on mentioning the trade partner.”

by matty fred on Jul 26, 2008 3:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's not a bad deal

but I was really hoping we’d try to land somebody that could help us somewhat right now. At least Mo is showing he’s willing to make a move. Maybe he can pull something off in the next couple of days.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 26, 2008 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

moved from another diary by fzeballer

Could the Reyes for Luis Perdomo be the beginning of Mo’s trades. Does this mean that there’s going to be a huge move? no….. but the cardinals are still pursuing George Sherrill, Brian Fuentes, and Jarrod Washburn.

Don’t really know to much bout washburn bout sounds like the yankees are the most likely to get him. but as of yesterday according to mlbtraderumors.com the cardinals are the most likely team to land fuentes and our interest in Sherrill is well-known especially after sending a couple scouts to their game vs toronto. Which could indicate interest in AJ Burnett.

Take it for whats it’s worth but with interest in both lefties, getting one would be good but both would be wonderful.

Comments or other talks heard?

by azruavatar on Jul 26, 2008 4:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fuentes: Yes Please, Sherrill: Meh

The last week’s worth of games, in my mind, have pushed Fuentes into near “must-have” territory. It seems that Perez is a bit further away from being ready than most projected. Obtaining Fuentes and, say, an Arthur Rhoes would, IMO, be the best possible combination. I fear that Sherrill’s asking price is too high for what is, basically, an average lefty. He isn’t an upgrade over the Villone/McClellan combo that TLR should be using currently but can’t due to our starting woes.

Villone vs. LHB: .186 BAA / .292 OBPA / .322 SLGA / .614 OPSA
McClellan vs. LHB: .187 BAA / .274 OBPA / .329 SLGA / .603 OPSA

Sherrill vs. LHB: .167 BAA / .263 OBPA / .250 SLGA / .513 OPSA

Lefties absolutely do not hit for any power versus Sherrill, which would make him very palatable for situations with inherited runners, but, other than that, I don’t know that he is worth all that much in prospects.

It is my opinion that TLR needs to implement a bullpen realignment, shifting McClellan and Springer into the Izzy/Franklin closer role, and bringing up Perez so that he can mix-and-match Villone and Perez in the 8th with a touch of Franklin (who would be relegated to the 6th/7th along with Izzy). At least until the cavalry rides through the clubhouse door in the form of ____. (Mo, I’m counting on you to save my summer and fall by filling in this blank with a heart-warming name.)

by bgh on Jul 27, 2008 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sherrill scares me as a closer

and the asking price for him is too high to justify using him as a loogy (i’m assuming). The fact that he’s 31 and just now closing makes me wonder if he’ll sustain this type of performance. I’m guessing he comes back down to earth.

by kalmavet on Jul 27, 2008 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can they land Burnett

and Fuentes? What would that take? Can they do Holliday on top of that?

by Red in Chicago on Jul 26, 2008 4:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

isn't it

a little early for the bob marley special?

it would be impressive for Mo to acquire any of these players, let alone all three. it would gut the majority of our quality prospects on the farm.

i would love to see burnett though, i could see swinging a deal for him. burnett seriously considered us two winters ago besides being a diehard cards fan.

by stlsportsfan06 on Jul 26, 2008 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

they definitely could get Burnett. his value isn’t as high as it could be w/ that scary opt out clause.

Everything i’ve read indicates the asking price for Fuentes remains high. It’ll be interesting to see what the market looks like for him at the deadline.

by kalmavet on Jul 26, 2008 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the only place i have heard these rumors

VEB

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 26, 2008 8:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fuentes

From MLB Trade Rumors from Peter Gammons:

The Cardinals now appear to be the favorite for Fuentes

My question is “with who?”

I don’t understand who we could possibly be offering that would bring back Fuentes. Maybe because of Tulo’s struggles they are desperate for one of our scrub middle infielders? (that was a joke)

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 27, 2008 1:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah....

That is THE question du’ jour, who the hell IS Mozeliak discussing with O’ Dowd re: Fuentes. Im thinking it wont happen! The Rockies are dealing right now, rosters getting an overhaul….like our 40 man roster needs to.

Ohman’s having a good, year. Dark horse trade candidate? I think I remember reading that the Braves want to extend Ohman and are the getting first shot to get it done.

Being Aaron Miles has to be so much more fun than being you...

by cardschinmusic on Jul 27, 2008 6:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

O'dowds now saying...

...we’re buyers! Count on a 180 if you’re winning around the dealine in the West.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 29, 2008 6:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gammons

Here’s what the Hall of Famer says of Fuentes:

The Rockies want Anibal Sanchez and a prospect for Brian Fuentes. The Marlins will not give up Sanchez and are likely to pursue Seattle’s Arthur Rhodes instead. The Cardinals, Angels and Rays are also in on Fuentes, and the feeling is that the Cardinals are the favorites. Colorado likes the Cards’ farm system.

Fuentes = Wainwright starting, right?

by bgh on Jul 27, 2008 12:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fuentes may = Waino starting...

which is good. If Fuentes = Rasmus, Anderson, or a couple pitching prospects being moved for a rental, then NOT GOOD.

by stlfan on Jul 27, 2008 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He won't be that much

but the fact that they actually like our farm system are words I feel like I’ve never heard muttered.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 27, 2008 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

yeah i kinda find that hard to believe.

“the system has improved” is a whole lot different than “seller team X LIKES our system”

hm….

I’d take him, don’t get me wrong, but I’m not sure how we matchup.

Rasmus-off the table
Anderson-do they need a young C? Not really…
Garcia/Mortenson/Todd—ok there’s value there, but how many of these guys do we move?

by kalmavet on Jul 27, 2008 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funtes or

Sherrill or Street or….

There’s several names out there. I’ve got $$$ that says there will be a new closer by Thursday. Wainwright is conditioned as a starter, and there’s no way we beat Milwaukee or Chicago without him starting.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 27, 2008 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

im hoping this isnt the usual

trade deadline.. name mentioned in all th ebig names, but then settle for someone like Garcia, or maybe a August waiver deal.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 27, 2008 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't mind Freddy Garcia

as a waiver deal depending on how he looks of course. I’d rather him start if he’s 100% than Looper, Pineiro, or Wellemeyer, who may not be 100% himself.

but he’s a huge wild card for sure. Still:

Carp, Wain, Lohse, Garcia, odd man in with the odd men out in the pen would do a lot to help this team handle all the remaining innings.

by kalmavet on Jul 27, 2008 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just

random stuff but you think we would consider getting manny? hah just saying doesnt sounds like BoSox will ask for a ton since they just want him out but the biggest thing would obviously be the contract if the sox would eat some then we should do it

by fzeballer15 on Jul 27, 2008 5:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

BoSox...

... won’t give ManRam away in the middle of a pennant race unless they get back a LOT. and even if they would, we wouldn’t go for him. and upgrade in OF is way down on the priority list.

by kindred on Jul 27, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, when things get that public

I think they would pretty much give him away. He’s a pretty darned expensive outfielder right now, and he’s causing strife in the clubhouse. Sounds a bit like a couple of our former outfielders acquired in trades.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 27, 2008 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, but do they really expect to go deep in the playoffs

and win the series wo him?

www.GriffinandtheGargoyles.com
www.myspace.com/GriffinandtheGargoyles

Dont take me seriously :-D

by jealousblues on Jul 28, 2008 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why the hell

do we even want fuentes? do we have any plans to resign him? its clear we ain’t getting to the playoffs..

by KeepOnRolen on Jul 27, 2008 7:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah

4 games out (which we wouldn’t be with a better bullpen) is definitely out of the playoffs.

/sarcasm

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 27, 2008 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the current deficit is something of an illusion

Since May 6th the top three are:

MIL 44-29
CHC 42-30
STL 36-37

That puts us 6.5 games behind the Cubs since then and 8 games behind the Brewers. In the games from May 6th until Wainer went down we were 14-15. We have been exactly .500 without Wainer. I am not ready to give up, but it would be pretty miraculous to right the ship and start playing .600 ball again.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 28, 2008 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so?

You can crunch numbers and pick dates all you want, but look at how closely we have played the Brewers and Cubs. We aren’t a worse team than either of them. What you’re looking at right there is what we have had with a tiring bullpen. If we can make a trade we get back to the team that put us right with those teams and gives us a shot to win games. The deficit isn’t an illusion at all. It is what it is. Anything can happen. As long as we’re right there, we’re a trade away from being put over the top of those guys.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 28, 2008 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think

you can say we had a “tiring bullpen” over that entire stretch. It is unlikely that somehow the bullpen will suddenly become fresh again. It is undeniable that the team has been consistently mediocre now for quite some time. It is equally undeniable that the Brewers and Cubs have been better than us for quite some time as well.

If the Brewers and Cubs win at the same rate as they have since May 6th they will each win 95 games. to win 95 games the Cardinals will have to go 36-18 over the remaining 54. I am not saying it is impossible, but I would sure like to see the “one trade” that would convert us from a .500 team to a .667 team.

Interesting that you want to disregard the reality of the situation and base your faith on “one trade” and then your signature says “on with the (good) youth movement!”

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 29, 2008 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not disregarding any reality.

If anything, I’m looking at the cold, hard fact that we are only 4 games back. I am also looking at that we have several games against both of those teams (only 3 against the Brewers but NINE against the Cubs) and that we have played those teams well with all of our games being lost by little factors (like our bullpen).

I don’t see how one trade ends a youth movement. I’m not saying a Holliday type trade. I’m saying we bring in an Arthur Rhodes, a Will Ohman, a Ron Mahay. We bring in a stable bullpen presence that can make sure we don’t have the most blown saves in the league anymore. That’s along with the invisible trade of adding Carp and Wainwright. Right there you have added two ace-type pitchers and strengthened the bullpen. After that, we could easily be a .600 team again.

I know you’re toying with the record over there, but do you realize if we had had another stable bullpen arm, we’d be tied with both of those teams, if not possibly ahead of them? Just look at how many of those losses have been because of the pen. It’s incredible, in fact. That’s why I think it’s silly to look at the record like that. With a stronger bullpen, we would be a completely different team.

Those guys I mentioned would consist of one or two farm guys. It’d be nothing that ends the youth movement. We don’t have enough roster space for 10 starting pitchers and 10 outfielders, so dealing one of them in AAA isn’t going to kill our future. We need to at least get value out of them.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that should read

Arthur Rhodes, a Will Ohman, OR a Ron Mahay—not all three.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

plus...

... we likely only have to pass Brewers or Cubs in the standings to make the playoffs, not both. it is easy to imagine one of the two slipping a bit. after all, it’s happened the past several years: the Brewers and/or Cubs were supposed to overtake the Cards, but they faded at the end.

i still think the Cards are the third-best team, but we’re in a position where we might be able to sneak in regardless.

i am certainly not in favor of selling the farm. and i’m unsure that any mid-impact trade (for, say, Mahay) would make any real difference. but i’m also not ready to give up on the team.

by kindred on Jul 29, 2008 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I had forgotten about that key point. When’s the last time we can ever remember both of those teams finishing strong? They definitely showed weaknesses at the beginning of the year. Neither one of them are juggernauts and carry several injury prone players (especially notable: Harden and Sheets).

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess we just have a difference of opinion

I don’t think adding a middle reliever makes us as good as either the Cubs or the Brewers, let alone good enough to overtake them. The back end of the bullpen is not good, it isn’t going to get any better unless both Isringhausen and Franklin get hurt and force TLR to put someone effective in the setup/closer roles.

I (wrongly) assumed the one trade you were talking about was a real blockbuster, because my view is that is the only type of trade that closes the very real talent gap between the Cards and the Cubs and Brewers. The only chance I can see to really close that gap is to get Carpenter and Wainwright both at 100% with the back end of the bullpen somehow solidified. Realistically, we will need them both back and need to win 80% of their starts to run down the wild card. Don’t discount the runnerup from the East as a wild card contender.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 29, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true...

... but we can help ourselves a lot in that regard by beating up on Philly this weekend.

if we can win 6 of 9 against the Cubs (a tall order, i know, but not impossible), then we will put ourselves in position to play for the WC at least. even if we only win 5 of them, plus 2 of the remaining 3 against the Brewers. we also have to make up ground this week while the Brewers and Cubs are playing each other. the Cubs and Brewers also plays each other 6 times in the final two weeks of the season (with the Cubs playing us and the Mets in between). we could make up a lot of ground in that two weeks if we’re playing well.

i agree that we aren’t as good as those two teams right now. but if Waino and Carp come back effectively and the bullpen settles down at all (with or without a trade) then we might still have a pretty good chance of sneaking in.

by kindred on Jul 29, 2008 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anymore news on Burnett??

I heard that he was in support of a trade to the Cardinals, but are we as interested as he is?

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it."- Rogers Hornsby

by redbirds8233 on Jul 27, 2008 8:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Burnett-Washburn

Washburn has been solid lately and I heard his name mentioned among cardinals. apparently the yankees are getting him for peanuts due to the salary dump. now I know Burnett wants to come to stl, but as a earlier thread pointed out, the problem with our bullpen may just be the exposure and workload created by our starting pitching who is not gettting in quality starts anymore. Washburn has no injury history as of the last few years, plus Washburn can be had for little in terms of prospects. here’s their stats over the past month

washburn – IP-33.1 K-15 ERA-2.97 WHIP-1.23
Burnett – IP-39.2 K-42 ERA-3.86 WHIP-1.29

Washburn just pitched 8 innings with 1 earned.

Heres to Holliday!

by Yadi on Jul 27, 2008 9:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

just more random stuff

mlbtraderumors notes that we have the best chance on signing Burnett

but yes i dont expect this to be thought as possible but its just some kinda start or complete bs trade talk

Cards get:
fuentes
holliday
sherrill

O’s get:
brian barden
barmes
boggs
PTBNL

Rox get:
Anderson
Todd
Garcia
Shane Robinson
Perez

Probably not possible but we can dream

by fzeballer15 on Jul 27, 2008 10:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That is a god awful trade

We give up 4 of our best 5 prospects, 7 of our best 15, for two lefties, one of whom is 30 and has done nothing before this year, and the other who is a FA after this year, along with a guy whose OPS is 170 points lower away from home and who could command a contract of 18-20 million after ‘09.

Is very bad to steal A-Pu's rum...is very bad.

by Power Slurve on Jul 27, 2008 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

i agree the rox will want a ton of guys, but that is way too much high end talent (for our system). that better come w/ an extension for Fuentes.

not much reason to get sherrill if we get Fuentes. get a cheaper loogy—rhodes, et. al.

by kalmavet on Jul 27, 2008 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

more

but yeh the latest from MLBTR is that YES Roy Halladay is unhappy in toronto.

Halladay is signed through ‘10 and with the ways he’s pitched wouldn’t you give up rasmus for Halladay if Burnett also came along since he would want to pitch in STL

Burnett and Halladay for Rasmus Garcia/Boggs and Anderson

so rotation looks like this:

Halladay
Carp
Waino
Burnett
Lohse

for the remainder of this year

then Since Burnett seems as if he would like it here would stay ensuring we keep all but lohse which is still a possibility although his agent is boras and maybe demand big money

SO who wouldn’t want a rotation that looks like this??! even if you give up rasmus

by fzeballer15 on Jul 27, 2008 10:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it's not going to happen

but thats the only deal i’d give up Colby for.

still, its not going to happen. the Jays wouldn’t do that deal. they could get so, SO much more for Halladay alone, let alone throwing in AJ.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Jul 27, 2008 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I seriously doubt

that the Jays could get a better deal than that for Halladay alone. Rasmus is a top 5 prospect in all of baseball and Garcia is our top pitching prospect. Anderson is one of the better catching prospects in the minors. I’m not saying that deal would fetch both Halladay and Burnett, just stating you would be hard pressed to find an offer that good for Halladay alone.

by stl522 on Jul 28, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably right

Such a staff for St. Louis probably is not going to happen. But man that sure looks good! That’s one of the only starting rotations 1-5 I’d feel good about compared to what the Cubs have going for starting pitchers.

by RedbirdattheBeach on Jul 28, 2008 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

who

else would have to be thrown in for halladay

garcia AND boggs and/or parisi and/or clayton mortenson??

i just come up with random stuff

by fzeballer15 on Jul 27, 2008 10:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

HELLO

can we bring it back down to earth here??? the last two trade proposals suggested had a total of 17 players moving including Toronto’s top two pitchers in the same deal. How about just thinking about what may actually happen. Now I know we may be going after Burnett, and I’d be the first one to give up Rasmus for Halladay, but lets keep it real, even if we didn’t have a stingy front office, no one blows up an organization like that in one trade. EVER

by Yadi on Jul 27, 2008 11:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

4.0 back

also I’d like to say that those trades by milwaukee and chicago early on are really paying off. We of course will wait until the deadline where we will be around 5.0 back. Which means we will no longer be just keeping up with these guys anymore, we will have to continuously play better ball than at least one. Which is probable but not likely. I’m down for selling on this year. Of course this comes after a sweep and a series loss, but what are you going to expect? I think we need to start looking at veterans who can help all these prospects come along. a.k.a. role players/innings eaters

by Yadi on Jul 27, 2008 11:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

two things

1. yes, to win, we will have to play better than the competition. this has always been true. what do you mean when you say it’s “probable but not likely”?

2. “selling on this year” means acquiring innings-eating veterans? i would think the opposite..

by baw on Jul 28, 2008 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

sorry for the brain fart….in terms of innings eaters helping, I think we need them to protect the bullpen for the rest of the year.

you are correct about always having to win more games than the competition, but it seems like they put it into 5th gear two weeks ahead of us while we’re still idling…I think doing nothing does just as little for us as building more for next year. and acquiring ONE middle reliever is next to nothing.

by Yadi on Jul 29, 2008 4:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no matter what happens...

... i can’t wait until the deadline has passed. i’m sick of this already.

by kindred on Jul 27, 2008 11:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fuentes

Ken Rosenthal believes the Rockies would trade Fuentes for a “young, mlb-ready starter.”

I assume that means starting pitcher..? I wouldn’t give up Garcia but if they’d be willing to take Boggs I say go for it.

THE SKIP IS LEGIT!!

Seriously... what were Rich Harden's parents thinking?!?!?!

by stltrav09 on Jul 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that could've been why Boggs pitched the other day

to try and impress the Rockies. Unfortunately, if true, there’s no way that worked.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 28, 2008 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fuentes staying miles high?

Rockies likely to keep Fuentes

This could just be standard price-up-driving posturing, but I thought it’s worth posting (per ESPN).

Monday, July 28, 2008 | Print Entry

Posted by Andrew Marchand
An executive involved in the Brian Fuentes trade talks says the Rockies are “pulling back” and don’t seem like they intend to trade him now that they are moving into contention in the National League West. The Mets are still among the teams interested in Fuentes.

Rockies GM Dan O’Dowd told SI.com that it’s “highly unlikely” Colorado would trade Fuentes or Matt Holliday.

by cardsfaninmass on Jul 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think they'll move Fuentes

I think they were banking on ripping someone off, but the price has gone down after people saw what the Yanks gave for Marte. They’re still very much in the race in that terrible division, so they’ll probably hang onto Fuentes. Just my opinion, of course.

by mojowo11 on Jul 28, 2008 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya i posted this on saturday

per Tim K about holliday yet everyone continued to believe it would happen..

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 28, 2008 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mo just said on FSN

That a left-handed reliever is the #1 priority right now, trade-wise.

He also mentioned that Wainwright is being considered for the closer role…sigh.

by mojowo11 on Jul 28, 2008 8:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

another thing i hinted at a week ago

but i didnt catch the guys name from TH STLPD..he mentioned it in his thing on Charlie steiner show.. i dont know why i post thing i hear on here at times…no one seems to listen its usually refuted..im not talking abotu the mlbtraderumors stuff, but like xm and stuff..ah well .

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 28, 2008 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still don't get why we aren't trading for Arthur Rhodes.

Seattle has absolutely no use for him. The other teams we’re talking about (Fuentes, Ohman) at least have some shot at contention.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 28, 2008 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

but who knows their asking price..Seattle isn’t exactly smart when it comes to these things. The who

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 28, 2008 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they have a new GM

so you can’t base your opinion on previous deals.

I’m sure if we tossed them anyone under 25 that has MLB potential, they’d be happy. Especially if we paid the rest of Rhodes’ contract.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 28, 2008 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

i know that what they were askign for beltre was reported as high..they said they didnt want fans to think that the O they were fielding was weak..A healhty dunc may have done it..the sad thing is dunc was starting to hit too..they are squabling with the yanks right now..

you’re right i should forget the past gm. only time will tell

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 28, 2008 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

almost gotta wonder

if Reyes would have worked.

I know I shouldn’t have gone there just now, but I did.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't hear the interview. Was he responding to a question?

Like prompting from Al. Or did he offer up that tidbit?

One thing to keep in mind with this rumor is that Mo might pick the players, but Tony makes the decisions on who plays where. LaDunc would have to think Wainer would be better in the pen to have this happen. My take is that the talk is all smoke.

by ubeddie on Jul 28, 2008 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was responding to a question

He said that with the way the bullpen is structured, left-handed relief is a major part of blah-dee-blah and so-and-so, so that was probably the top concern right now. He mentioned get another bat for the bench as well, if I’m remembering correctly.

by mojowo11 on Jul 29, 2008 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Phillies working on a deal for Mahay

Okay. And the Mets are all over Ohman, apparently. That leaves Rhodes, Sherrill and (maybe) Fuentes. Grabow appears to be injured. Guardado is probably not a fit. We’re duking it out with the Red Sox, the Devil Rays, the Marlins and the Angels.

It’s time to pull the trigger, Mo! Don’t get shut out while posturing and talking about how Flores is fixed, Izzy is our closer and Perez invented sliced bread. Everyone knows our bullpen sucks.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 29, 2008 1:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rhodes is our man!

He’s cheap! Proven! Good!

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

SI Rumor

Cards shopping Lohse for prospects (via St. Paul Pioneer Press).

A little birdie says the St. Louis Cardinals are shopping ex-Twins pitcher Kyle Lohse for prospects before Thursday’s trade deadline, mostly because they’re not sure they’ll be in the playoff hunt and because they figure the 29-year-old right-hander won’t be affordable with high-demand agent Scott Boras. Lohse is 12-3 with a 3.68 earned-run average.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jul 29, 2008 3:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

not an awful idea

because we’ll have Carp and Wainwright coming back, but I’d rather us shop Looper. He’ll also be a free agent, and we probably won’t be able to re-sign him either. Also if we did that, we’d still have Lohse, and thus a good 1-2-3 punch.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well...

... did you see what the A’s got for Blanton? Lohse is far better and might command a similar return. Looper isn’t as valuable.

any chance Loop’s a Type B?

by kindred on Jul 29, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not as valuable

but won’t kill our playoff chances. This is our opportunity to strengthen our farm while still competing.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 29, 2008 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But who is left out there that’s in contention with prospects as good as the ones traded for Blanton? I can’t see anyone that needs starter that has those type of prospects.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 30, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stark on the Rockies' fence-straddling

It’s an interesting piece about how the Rocks are kind of in the position the Cards were last year, with this interesting tidbit:

So baseball people who have spoken with O’Dowd say he seems to know what deal he reasonably could make with each of the seven teams still chasing Fuentes—the Cardinals, Marlins, Rays, Tigers, Phillies, White Sox and Angels. And if he decides it’s time to move, he seems to believe he could close a deal fast.

"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."

--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS

by bgh on Jul 29, 2008 4:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Utterly ridiculous

They aren’t in the race, and they won’t be. Why they would believe they were in the race one day, and reverse their position two days later is beyond me. Fuentes will be a free agent at the end of the year. He needs to be dealt. Period.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 29, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

Yeah their situation is almost exactly like the Cards last year. Mediocre-to-bad team in an awful division, therefore not really out of the race, but not due to their own good-ness level. Really, they should do what the Cards should have done last year and shop anyone whose contract is nearly out.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 29, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the rockies

did not go from world series team to mediocre-to-bad team in one offseason. they have suffered a glutton of injuries and are finally getting guys back and they are heating up as a club, they are anything but out of the race. i wouldn’t be suprised if they still trade fuentes (since he isn’t good) and holliday (can’t resign him it seems) but it isn’t cause they are giving up, just trading them because they don’t fit into their long term plans (which is what the cardinals should do with lohse, trade him while his value is sky high, i don’t think he’ll maintain this for another 3 or 4 years, which is the length of deal he’ll be looking for.)

by lopey986 on Jul 30, 2008 5:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The iron was hot at the ASB with Lohse, we should have done that deal then. O’Dowd has to be feeling pulled in two directions even with their recent run in the West tho. I hope we dont deal for either unless its Lohse straight up, which probably isnt gonna happen.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 30, 2008 6:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TEIXEIRA

traded to the Angels.

Life is short! Break the rules! And never regret anything that made you smile.

by Section8 on Jul 29, 2008 6:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ESPN.com

Jayson Stark is reporting that the Angels are close to getting Teixeira for Kotchman (and presumably some other pieces).

Now, earlier this morning before leaving to go play a round of golf I heard that the Angels were concerned about losing Kotchman. Now, am I missing something, but isn’t Kotchman, like, not as good at hitting baseball as Teixeira? Isn’t Teixeira, like, really daggone good? And the hold up was apparently Casey Kotchman, he of a lifetime 101 OPS+ with a mediocre power for a first baseman? Don’t the Angels have like a gazillion dollars to spend to resign the guy?

Keith Law is apparently saying this thing is done. That’s probably good for the Angels, as Teixeira seemed a perfect fit for that power-starved team.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 29, 2008 6:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Kotchman and Stephen Mark

I don’t know anything about Mark, but he was #6 in their system according to BA and he’s a RHP.

by mojowo11 on Jul 29, 2008 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont know about you guys

but that looks like a terrible haul for Tex

www.GriffinandtheGargoyles.com
www.myspace.com/GriffinandtheGargoyles

Dont take me seriously :-D

by jealousblues on Jul 29, 2008 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Especially considering they gave up Andrus and Saltalamacchia, two pretty promising kids, plus 3 more prospects for him. All they really got in that trade was a year of good play from Teixeira, plus Kotchman (who I’m not big on) and Stephen Marek, who looks like sort of a backend starter/middle reliever to me. I don’t think this is how they saw that deal going down.

On the flip side, the Angels come out pretty good, upgrading first base big time, adding a legit middle of the order hitter, and holding on to Nick Adenhart. Seems to me like the Braves just wanted to get rid of Teixeira while they still could.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 29, 2008 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

cotch under contract fro

3 more years though

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 29, 2008 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe im missing the boat

but isnt Kotchman, who i know VERY LITTLE about, just a mild power hitting, non walk taking ok hitting 1b?

doesnt seem like a prize really

www.GriffinandtheGargoyles.com
www.myspace.com/GriffinandtheGargoyles

Dont take me seriously :-D

by jealousblues on Jul 29, 2008 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much

He’s probably a 15-20 home run, .280/.350/.450 kind of guy or so. But he’s young, so I guess he could develop some more. I dunno, I’m underwhelmed to be honest…he doesn’t seem like a fair swap for Teixeira. But who knows…

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 29, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not a fair swap

but the braves had no chance of resigning tex, so why not get something rather than nothing?

i’d have probably held out a little longer and tried to bring in a bigger haul, but maybe they just wanted to move him and get it over with.

by lopey986 on Jul 30, 2008 5:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they did need to trade him

...But for Kotchman? They couldn’t do better than that for a legit middle-of-the-order like Teixeira? Screams “dump” to me…

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jul 30, 2008 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kotchman

Was leading the Angels in hits and is only 25 years old. He showed signs earlier in the year of developing a power stroke, and I can think of a few first baseman who took some years to get going in the big leagues, Derrek Lee being among them. At the very worst he’s another Mark Grace, GG type defensively and is going to hit 18-25 homers a year while hitting around .300.

I would guess Atlanta is probably going to talk extension with him after this season or next season and try to get him signed to a friendly contract as part of their rebuilding process, with he, Escobar, McCann, and Jurrjens being centerpieces of their turnaround.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 31, 2008 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I agree they had to pull the trigger and get something, I think Kotchmans gonna like hitting at Turner. He’s more than a hole filler.

sleepyca might know more about Marek from pitching in Rancho Cucamonga. He pitched at Hammons recently and has a good fastball, can get SOs but has control issues.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 30, 2008 6:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Grabow

Just a gut feeling, but I’m guessing he is the reliever we end up getting.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 30, 2008 9:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ivan Rodriguez

Wow. He goes to the Yanks for Farnsworth.

Life is short! Break the rules! And never regret anything that made you smile.

by Section8 on Jul 30, 2008 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

Out of the blue, much? Hadn’t heard about the Tigers packing it in at 5.5 back.

by stlfan on Jul 30, 2008 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Packing it in?

They were paying him a fortune and he has 5 home runs this year? It’s addition by subtraction.

by Turkatron on Jul 30, 2008 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Jul 30, 2008 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Trading a veteran doesn’t always equal sell. The Yankees just happened to need him more than the Tigers did.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 30, 2008 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only that

Farnsworth will help their bullpen, which has been in disarray all season long.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 31, 2008 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

odds

what do you think the odds are cards get these players

1) Will Ohman
2) Brian Fuentes
3) Jason Bay
4) Edgar Renteria
5) George Sherrill

or anybody else in mind you have an opinion on
according to experts Ohman seems the best bet that ive heard and Jason Bay are in talks of both us and rays but rays seem to have an edge

by fzeballer15 on Jul 30, 2008 4:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Answers

1) 1:2
2) 20:1
3) 75:1
4) 60:1
5) 35:1

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 30, 2008 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That seems about right...

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 31, 2008 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd probably change Ohman to 3:1 now

Based on some of the things I’ve read since I posted that. I still think he’s the most likely scenario of the five that he mentioned.

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 31, 2008 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

bryan anderson

just looking around at teams that don’t have that solid of a catcher or an old one that we could use anderson as a center piece or close to

1) Pirates- Doumit can also play outfield and is having a lot better year then michaels there RF so one trade i thought of is Bay & Wilson for Anderson, Garcia, Barden

2) Marilins- Probably lot less likely but Uggla for Anderson, Garcia, PTBNL

3) Astros- Tejada or Lee for Anderson, Garcia, Barden, Jay, PTBNL rather have Lee but either would be phenomenal

4) Padres- Greene for Anderson

any oter ides

by fzeballer15 on Jul 30, 2008 6:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

RED SOX RED SOX RED SOX

Anderson for Lowrie. Varitek seems like he’s done. Lots of catchers on one year deals next year to provide insurance for the kid. Gives each team what they need.

by flipthebird on Jul 30, 2008 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

naw, the Sox have their biggest hole at SS right now. Lowrie looks like he may be an internal answer.

Tek is getting bad press, but he’s still got a huge following in Boston (and elsewhere—he was a player pick at the ASG this year). I don’t see Tek getting bounced from Boston soon. And I sure don’t see Boston giving up a serious SS prospect, unless they make a deal to fill the hole there. Neither Cora nor Lugo seem like great options there.

by tom s. on Jul 30, 2008 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Varitek

How old is he? Isn’t he 37 or so? For a catcher that’s very old. Did the players elect him as one last hurrah in the season that could be his last? Is this a guy that has enough sense to walk away when the time is right or is he going to bleed the Red Sox payroll and get 10 mil a year for 3 years?

by flipthebird on Jul 31, 2008 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather not have a mendoza line

hitting Greene this season. He’s a good player, but he won’t help us win right now.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 30, 2008 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but he's got pop

and I believe he has a higher OBP that Izturis while hitting near the Medoza line. He’s good defensively, probably not as good as Cesar, but he’s not a butcher. His numbers at PetCo are absolutely terrible—if we could get a small improvement from those numbers he’d be worth getting, and it may not even take a really good prospect to pry him loose. We’d be buying at his all time low, so why not roll the dice?

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 31, 2008 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For the right price

Greene would be a terrific addtion. He is having a down year all around, but last year he was an .849 OPS guy on the road. Just get him away from Petco and he will turn around.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jul 31, 2008 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he punched something in the dugout yesterday

and may have broken his hand
probably not on anybody’s front burner now

by vances law on Jul 31, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sweet

maybe he’d come cheap, then…

"..and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped." -Sir Belvedere

by SleepyCA on Jul 31, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

3 way bay Manny deal?

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/07/manny-ramirez-2.html

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 30, 2008 8:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it is scary to pin your hopes on a pitcher. even the proven workhorses are still an injury risk. as volatile as pitchers are as to who’s hot and who’s not, i think it’s better to build a core of fielders and go for quantity in pitching, hoping someone will get hot. i.e. lohse

victim of the sixties

by victim of the sixties on Jul 30, 2008 8:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i love Carp and Adam

but pinning your hopes on two guys recovering from injuries and expecting them to perform at the pace that Harden and C.C. have for their new clubs is a bit high. We’ll see what happens.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 30, 2008 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

here's a question I don't really see anywhere here.

Not necessarily something I’m hanging my hat on, but why wouldn’t the cards kick the tires on Manny?

The Cards have the money. They probably have the prospects to get it done. A Manny-Ank-Ludwick outfield would be stunning, with Schu and Mather as backups.

Yes, the ego would be huge, but Albert might cope with the attitude to get that bat behind him. If he was willing to cope with BB . . . .

by tom s. on Jul 30, 2008 11:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ya its a pipe dream

but thatswhy you call themdreams…I would think mather would have to be in that deal or a 3 way..Cause the Red Sox are supposed to get bay…

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 30, 2008 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this sounds idiotic, but....

Reyes for Perdomo – I thought it was a pretty weak haul for the Cards and have seen the same said by some national MLB writers. A starter with MLB experience, that has shown flashes, for a 24 yr. old, recently promoted to AA reliever?

Watching BBTN tonight, shortly after the Card highlights of Carp’s return, Buster Olney was talking about Cleveland and mentioned that Paul Byrd is likely to go. Something clicked in my head. Consider:

- Carp skips additional rehab starts and pitches the night before the trade deadline.
- Byrd likely to be traded.
- Recently completed trade that seems to favor Cleveland.

Is it possible that part 2 of a trade was in place with Cleveland, that included Byrd if Carp failed or got hurt tonight? If Carp is okay (as appears), then a deal is in place for something else from Cleveland (a reliever?).

I know it sounds far-fetched, but possible?

by stltxfan on Jul 31, 2008 1:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Could have been a gentleman's agreement to let us bid

on Byrd if he went on the market, etc. I don’t think anything more than that would have taken place. Cleveland’s a disaster this year, and they’re just trying to salvage some value out of the players they have.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 31, 2008 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AN OBSERVATION

I have been watching the Cardinals/Braves series this week and one thought has me puzzled; why are both Nick Stavinoha and Joe Mather currently on the roster, since they are the same type of player? (Mather looks to be the better power bat between the two) Yes, Ankiel is on the DL, but is St. Louis showcasing Mather for a trade with Atlanta? If that’s the case, it’s likely St. Louis would pickup Will Ohman as the lefty they’re pursuing. Should Mather be headed to ATL, my guess is Mark Kotsay is likely on the move as well.

What’s more interesting is that Skip Schumaker was pulled from the game in the 9th with "leg cramp” and Nick played left while Mather moved to centerfield. Based upon everything I’ve read, my roster observations, and the comments made by Dan and Al during tonight’s broadcast a roster move seems imminent. I’m hoping we land Will Ohman, but Arthur Rhodes would fill the role too; the question becomes are we looking to rent-a-player or a possible addition to pitch this year as well as 2009.

by REDROBIN1892 on Jul 31, 2008 2:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Interesting, but...

1. I don’t think pulling a player in the ninth inning should be considered signs of anything.
2. Mather and Stavinoha are both on the roster because they are the only two outfielders in Memphis right now who can/have hit major league pitching. Barton is rehabbing, Duncan is broken and I don’t think anyone else has seen time on the big club this season.
3. The latest on Ohman is we’ve dropped out.
4. I’ve heard nothing on Rhodes for a while. I forget who was in on him, but it wasn’t us.

I think you can say for certain that Kotsay is also on the block. I don’t know if we’re trying to fill a LOOGy role for this year, a closer role for this year, or a closer/uberLOOGy role for the future. The targets vary depending upon what we’re looking for. Based upon everything I’ve read, we’re open to a variety of ways to strengthen the bullpen.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 31, 2008 3:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

MLB.com

Saying that the Cards are out of the Ohman bidding. With Fuentes likely not going anywhere, and the Sherrill talk being quiet of late, I’m a little concerned that we won’t be getting any help today. Might get something through waivers I guess.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 31, 2008 8:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and this is really frustrating.

It’s obvious we need relief pitching. If we don’t get anything, that’s just depressing. There are decent pitchers out there that definitely won’t cost us too much, so I don’t understand why this is so difficult.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 31, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very disappointed in Cardinals front office

GM Mo’s lack of action has told me and the players on the roster he’s satisfied with third place this year … and in if he’s keeping all these great prospects in the fold, we’re not looking at a division leader any time soon … if I’m Pujols, I’m privately pissed off big time … gotta believe steam is coming out of TLR’s ears tonight … thanks for nothing Mo … Carpenter and Wainwright do nothing but lower player & fan morale and don’t solve the missing (for years) additional big bat in the lineup for Pujols, the team’s lack of a quality lefty and the need to keep dishing up starting pitchers like Piniero, Parisi, Boggs, Thompson, etc., etc., etc.

by RedbirdattheBeach on Jul 31, 2008 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

let me clarify that...

I was referring to the seeming front office theory that Carp & Waino are being considered the team trade deadline roster boost vs. a top quality acquisition … after waiting until after the Milwaukee series and now the way the Cubs & Hardin are playing, Mo missed the mark … and please spare us another scrap heap DFA signing … we’ve heard that song before.

by RedbirdattheBeach on Jul 31, 2008 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

um

carp & wainwright are far better acquisitions than anyone we could have gotten at the deadline. hands down. no question.

by lopey986 on Aug 1, 2008 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats Okee,

To the man at the top of this thread. It was said nothing was gonna happen many times recently by several posters, not just me. Also that Carpenter and Wainwright fitting in and other pitchers taking BP roles would be at the heart of the Cardinals plans beyond the trade deadline, as supported by lopey above.

You called that delusional thinking a few days ago following my post! Without of course, supporting it with a dose of reality for us.

To the dissapointed of the head offices inaction, go read Azrus header today. Its not delusional either.

by cardschinmusic on Aug 1, 2008 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rhodes and Ohman

I think the talks on those two guys may resume after the deadline. Generally, you can get a player cheaper if he passes all the way through waivers, since most teams have usually passed on the player so there just isn’t as much market for them.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Jul 31, 2008 9:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

But...

There is a big market for these guys. You cant hope that these guys pass through waivers cause every playoff team needs a LOOGY. I am not saying sell the farm for one of them but if it gets down to the wire and you need him maybe up the offer slightly to get him.

by CardsFan85 on Jul 31, 2008 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Counter that

by thinking that everyone who’s looking also knows what the price is going to be, so they may not want to make a claim. I’ve been surprised in the past at some of the guys who pass through waivers, so I think it’s a possibility that they make it through.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Aug 2, 2008 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read some of the comments earlier about Lohse being traded

am i the only one that doesn’t want to trade him? i know there is a good chance he will be gone after this season, but having a top three of carp, waino, and lohse in the playoffs has to put us in a damn good spot, doesn’t it? i understand we will get a good package and i want us to trade for a reliever, but i dont want to trade what has been our best pitcher so far this year. if we trade him, i will be sorely disappointed.

10.27.06..greatest day of my life

by steveo61086 on Jul 31, 2008 10:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Depends on what we get out of it

If someone gives up their kingdom for Kyle Lohse, you have to consider it

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 31, 2008 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RHODES

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/07/arthur-rhodes-t.html

Traded to the Marlins for Gaby Hernandez.

Don’t tell me we couldn’t have matched that!

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 31, 2008 11:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

not like

rhodes is mr. consistency. he just blew a game last night.

by lopey986 on Jul 31, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/royals/story/728663.html

get on the phone, Mo

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Jul 31, 2008 9:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

meh

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Jul 31, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
How to EASILY make tables for Fanposts
Arch_small
Number 15
Small
Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
Small
Ok let me try this again...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Kid-a-bear_small the red baron