I inquire about McGwire
As the team turns from promise to seemingly fulfilling its pre-season predictions of mediocrity, I thought it might be appropriate to visit another bitter-sweet time. Namely the Mark McGwire years. As this season fades, do you look upon the big Mac era nostalgically, with regret and remorse or some mixture of each? Given the responses generated by the question of whether or not to sign Barry Bonds, I thought it might be interesting to see how the VEBosphere distinguishes McGwire - home runs to Congressional Ks (www.youtube.com/watch?v=942HcHKbOno) – from Bonds – homeruns to the memorable VEB phrase “douchebaggery.”
Quite apart from the PED issues, do we give Mac a pass because he brought a (goodly) measure of excitement to the Cardinals, or do we hold him to the ridicule that seems attendant with Barry Bonds? What say you?
0 recs |
23
comments
Comments
I stuck up
for Big Mac until his appearance before Congress. I wish he handled that better. But as far as comparing him to Bonds. There is no comparison. I don’t think Mac was using other than andro as a Card. He most likely did do more with the A’s.
Mac said he was using because it helped him with his back and knee problems, and once he stopped his injuries flared up. Remember he had a contract extenstion in is desk draw unsigned. He walked away from the game. I think Mac has class.
by nybirdfan on Jul 26, 2008 7:48 AM EDT 0 recs
i still stick up for him
the congressional hearing was a joke, a show trial. were i mark, i would have told them the exact same thing: its none of your goddamn business.
How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor
by themanthemyth on
Jul 26, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
0 recs
me too
I’m not going to bury my head in the sand and insist that he wasn’t juicing. I’m not naive enough to believe that about anyone in that era. But most people comparing McGwire and Bonds ignore key points:
1. Steroids were not against MLB policy at the time. That’s the league’s fault. Doesn’t make it right, but it’s important because Mac wasn’t breaking the rules, even if he was juicing.
2. Mac did admit to taking legal substances – Andro and Creatine. You could get them at the mall, and they will bulk you up.
3. Mac never tested positive for illegal substances, unlike Barry.
4. Congress would not grant Mac immunity for his testimony, so he had no incentive to talk. Those who cite his appearance before Congress as their main criticism should pay particular attention to this one. It was and still is a witch hunt, a ploy to keep the finger of blame from pointing where it belongs (Selig). I would’ve told Congress the same thing too.
by hit and run on
Jul 28, 2008 6:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I don't recall #3 ever happening
Am I forgetting something?
by jdub176 on
Jul 28, 2008 11:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
love mac
he wore the birds on hte bat….to me hell alwyas be a cardinal and someone who is a class act. I dont doubt he took PEDs but he and sosa those two brought baseball back into the spotlight and I think Mr. Selig should privatley thank him and Sosa. As far as Bonds goes I have no hatred towards Bonds whatsoever he obviously made a mistake. But with all the other players of the era and pitchers of this era all using he still did what he did….the man is an all-time great.
Another thought his record setting homerun ball should be in the hall of fame without an asterisk that is a disgrace to the game defacing history in such a way. I sincerley hope no Cardinal fan took part in that ridiculous vote
by pujols_5 on Jul 26, 2008 9:22 AM EDT 0 recs
Too soon to tell -
because the dust is still settling from the PED scandals … there are no doubt lists yet to be brought to light, tests to be failed, more suspensions and insinuations, pundits weighing in with phony authority, and wringing of collective hands. Meanwhile, McGuire is off on some uncharted island right now, in exile from the game. His vanishing act has been rather complete; as shy and reclusive as Bonds is brazen and bold. To that I would add, as likable as Bonds is surly and despicable.
I confess that I don’t think about him much. It makes me a little melancholy to ponder all that late 90’s glee over his power displays that has since turned to ashes for me. I suspect many Cub fans have a similar disconnect with the Sammy Sosa era.
And it’s pointless for any of us to speculate on what McGuire, or any player, used, or didn’t use, for what alleged purpose. We simply don’t know – and probably will never know. That’s why I get a little crazy when talking heads profess that certain players “played the game the right way,” as if they alone are judge and jury, when in fact they know virtually nothing. For that reason, the game will have to paint this era with a broad brush – give the barrel-chested, inflated-bicep sluggers their laurel wreaths of greatness and send them to Valhalla – because, while it’s hard to definitively prove guilt, it’s conversely hard to prove innocence. All that’s really left are the numbers.
by Urban Pawnee on Jul 26, 2008 9:37 AM EDT 0 recs
One hell of an articulate response. My thanks for your insights.
Have you read Canseco’s book? Even though Jose the C has the credibility of a Pravda editorial, he writes a compelling account of injecting multitudes of players including M Mc. For me the telling difference between McG and Bonds is the arrogance the latter displayed at each step. For someone who was/is paid three per cent of the world’s money supply to cry “racism” is folly beyond hubris.
My sense is that almost any of us would have (happily) accepted a small fraction of Bonds’ wages in exchange for the “slings and arrows” the media and fans would have visited upon us. And been humble for the privilege of being paid to play a game.
An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.
HL Mencken
by akaitori on
Jul 26, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Haven't read Canseco's book -
I feel that I got enough of the gyst from the breathlessly reported pull quotes. While he’s been a bete noir of baseball for quite a while now, the knee-jerk reaction to his book is one of “kill the messenger” because he dares to break the code of silence. (Ever read “Ball Four” ?)
I sort of diverge from the herd mentality here and appreciate the fact that someone speaks out, be it for personal gain or whatever.
by Urban Pawnee on
Jul 26, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I dunno...
“Innocent until proven guilty” doesn’t seem to apply in The Court Of Public Opinion; while “andro” was not only legal (according to US law) during Mac’s career, it was available without a prescription as a “food supplement” at the time!
Whether McGwire used illegal steroids or not, his Congressional testimony made it appear that he had something to hide. I believe the BBWAA will keep McGwire out of the Hall of Fame, using him as an “example”, while ignoring other players who might have been using PEDs. I always wonder how many pitchers were using PEDs during the same time period; the only Hall-worthy hurler I can think of off the top of my head linked to steroids is Roger Clemens. (Roger’s got all sorts of legal problems right now, while the reclusive McGwire faces no legal charges.)
The ‘98 home-run race put fans back in the seats across MLB; from a Cardinal-centric perspective, the additional attendance helped lead to team success in this decade. Bud Selig and his minions didn’t want to know anything about steroids back then.
Bonds was a jerk long before he bulked up; I didn’t like him back then, and haven’t changed my opinion since. But I bet Bonds does get into the Hall of Fame… “juice” or no.
"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra
by The Ol Goaler on Jul 26, 2008 9:39 AM EDT 0 recs
number 25
I have little doubt about mac’s use of ped’s. I think as a country as a whole we like to forgive, we don’t forget but we do forgive. I believe if mac was to come out and say this is what i used and why i used it, he could come back to baseball. Just look at andy pettit how much he used will be in question forever, but he is still considered a yankee hero. I believe if would admit his guilt he would get into the hall and tony would probably give hima job as hitting coach (becasue hal has togo) or something like that. intill them his fame will wither and he’ll just be a shell of his glory.
Barry bonds problem is he thinks he is bigger than the game, barry we know you took drugs, let that go and stop being an ass and you’ll get some respect. I personally can’t stand the man, but i can not doubt his skill as a ball player. Although he still should have thrown out sid fuckin bream!!!!
On a side note when the rosters expand i wouldn’t mind seeing him as a cardinal, could you see al, him, glaus @ 3,4,5 then you throw in ankiel and ludwick, the offense could slug with the brewers and cubs, but only when rosters expand he would need a boat load of time off.
"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell
by elirock83 on Jul 26, 2008 10:12 AM EDT 0 recs
Good post, and my thanks for your comments. Do you/ would you admit Pete Rose and Joe Jackson to the HoF?
I claim no moral high ground here. I just don’t know when numbers trump character.
An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.
HL Mencken
by akaitori on
Jul 26, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Nice posts.
Figured I would throw my .02 cents in the ring.
People try and put Mac and Bonds on the same level, and that confounds me.
Player A- known to hit homeruns from day 1(49 in his rookie season) in the majors. Admitted to using a legal supplement at the time. Surly. Disliked the media. Mumbled words and looked bad in front of Congress.
Player B.-hit 73 homeruns in his 15th season. 24 higher than in any other previous season in his career.(25 in his rookie season). Admitted to using “the cream” and “the clear”, both being Anabolic Androgenic Steroids(outlawed by U.S. at that time, but oddly not by MLB). Surly. Disliked the media so much he had his own T.V. show. Former trainer Greg Anderson spent a year in jail for his involvement with AAS.
So explain to me again why Mac should get the same treatment as Barry?
McGwire did alot of things for baseball in 98. And now baseball has turned its back on him.
And why? Because he had big arms, hit bombs that even Barry couldnt touch, and squirmed in front of Congress.
It’s okay though. Bryan Burwell doesn’t need facts or prove to play judge, jury, and executioner on this one.
by bdmcleod on Jul 26, 2008 1:27 PM EDT 0 recs
why did Burwell come into this?
As much as I loved Big Max, how can anyone rationally not look at McGwire and Bonds in the same light?
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Jul 26, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Rationally?
The original poster pointed out a ton of rational reasons not to look at them in the same light.
1. McGwire hit 49 home runs in his rookie year and hit the majority of his career home runs in a pitchers haven in Oakland. If not for injury he probably would have easily passed Willie Mays on the list for career home runs. Bonds had his best home run seasons after the age of 37.
2. Mac admitted to using androstendione, but quit using it after it was banned by major league baseball. Bonds has admitted using two steroids, then proceeded to lie about them enough that he’s being federally indicted for perjury and obstructing justice.
3. In 1998 Mac and Sosa really did save the game of baseball by bringing fans to the ballpark with the home run chase. Few will remember much else about that season. Bonds was jealous of this fact and the 1998 season seems to be one of the main factors for him starting the juice.
"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller
by fourstick on
Jul 28, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
about 1998
I remember something about that season: the Yankees went 125-50. Sosa and Mac weren’t the only things going that season.
by jdub176 on
Jul 28, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
that season that season that season
Apparently I wasn’t paying attention when I constructed that sentence. Nonetheless, I think Sosa’s the real bad guy here. Bonds is a liar and whatnot, but he doesn’t hide the fact that he’s a head case. Sosa on the other hand acts like he’s a saint, when he was actually the biggest benefactor of the three. Look at his numbers. Before ‘98 he was an all-or-nothing hitter – “Sammy So-So.” I’m glad everyone caught on to his act.
McGwire is harder for me to assess. Fanboy glasses can be awfully thick.
by jdub176 on
Jul 28, 2008 5:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The way I look at it it is all overblown
I hold no grudge towards McGwire or Bonds. I just can see how they will both be held in the same light. They are the two faces of the steroid era. Until McGwire comes out and puts the topic to rest though, I will look at them both in the same light. I won’t try to convince myself that McSwire didn’t do them, he has to be the one to do that.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on
Jul 28, 2008 9:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I don't know
I was pretty agnostic about him at the time. I invited ridicule from my friends with the desire to shop him in exchange for Maddux/Martinez/Johnson or someone like that (I didn’t really think about no-trade clauses back then). I had a feeling that McGwire was ehaded for a fall, and that the team was not going to be able to hang with Manny Aybar in the rotation and Ricky Bottallico closing out games.
I still have really mixed feelings about the guy. I was surprised to see a Big Mac land installed in new Busch, and was pretty disenheartened by his Congressional testimony. Though it’s funny that he was able to escape the srcuitiny that Bonds went through
They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...
by Valatan on Jul 26, 2008 3:01 PM EDT 0 recs
mcgwire and sosa
they brought the game back in 98, and yes they probably used peds
in my opinion, barry wanted to use to get to the level of mcgwire and sosa
should any of the three not make the hall?
what about palmeiro?
the numbers these guys put up make it awful hard to keep them out
as with clemens, how many pitchers were using? how did that affect the hitters?
i am not backing the pitchers or the hitters
i just think the writers should be consistent one way or the other
Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.
by bigcardsfan5 on Jul 26, 2008 9:32 PM EDT 0 recs
Burwell.
Has made it his personal goal to trash the name McGwire every chance he gets.
And I don’t look at them in the same light because of the reasons I stated in my post. McGwire is being scapegoated for an entire era of cheating. Oh and where exactly does Mac admit to using an illegal substance, ala Barry? Bear in mind Andro wasn’t illegal. Now tell me again why we have to look at them in the same light.
by bdmcleod on Jul 27, 2008 12:54 AM EDT 0 recs
the thing about Mac that ticks me off
is that in the Mitchell witchhunt none of the trainers teamates etc verified Cansecos claims about Mac. However Several claims by macnamee(sp) have been verified by the actual athletes. This got very little press in helping Macs case at all.
Yes his appearence gave us some great audio bites but who knows what legal counsel said we can only specualte.
I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2
by punchinjudy on Jul 27, 2008 5:06 PM EDT 0 recs
Kudos on the rhyming post...
Oh, Mark McGwire…
As a fairly young fan (just turned 24 in May) McGwire is an essential part of my Cardinals experience. I grew up idolizing Ozzie like many kids, though his most relevant years were either before I was born or when I was way too young to appreciate baseball; I remember the excitement of ‘96 and the heart-breaking loss to the Braves, and imagined Ozzie must have been sad to go out on a note like that. I loved Lankford and Willie as well, and fondly remember the day when Geronimo Pena hit a homerun and started a fight on the mound sometime in the 90s ( I swear I went to a game when this happened…) So when we got this Superman of a slugger named McGwire I thought he was the coolest thing ever. Ironically, in the post-McGwire era I followed baseball less and less, and only after the 2004 world series did I start reading blogs, learning about statistics, and starting to become a more enlightened fan.
Anyway, McGwire always seemed like such a good guy. He seemed to love playing in St. Louis, and if I recall correctly, stated that if baseball stupidly went on strike again as was rumored for a while, he would just retire (am I making this up? Please correct me if needed, I’d rather get the facts right if I am romanticizing the man).
And if he juiced? Well, I’ve gotten to the point where I can forgive an awful lot about the steroid era because of what a circus it has become. I don’t even really hate Barry Bonds since there’s no way for him to really be treated rationally in the court of public opinion anymore. But McGwire still kind of hurts, because he seems like a good man who made a mistake and put himself into exile because of it. That’s how it appears to me anyway.
And nice Pravda reference too!
by mattybobo on Jul 28, 2008 11:36 AM EDT 0 recs
Enjoyed your comments immensely. Your sentence on McGwire's exile is, I think, near perfect.
An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.
HL Mencken
by akaitori on
Jul 28, 2008 7:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs











