Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Rickey Henderson Coming Back to A's? Bar-right-arrows



Barry Lamar Bonds?

Well, why not toss a grenade into Busch Stadium? Barry Bonds, according to his agent, has been rejected by all 30 teams. He was rumored to have been worked out by the Red Sox last month in the wake of David Ortiz's injury, but this was denied by Boston G.M. Theo Epstein. The Arizona Diamondbacks evidently rejected the idea of signing him as recently as this week. Bond's agent claims he is in good shape and could be ready to play in 10 days.

Star-divide

Tony LaRussa urged John Mozeliak to sign Bonds this past spring. The word back was that the ownership nixed the idea, citing the turmoil surrounding Bond's indictment for charges of perjury and obstruction of justice last November related to his testimony concerning personal steroid use.

Last year he sported an OBP of .480. His lifetime line is .298/.444/.607. The three closest comps are Willie Mays, Hank Aaron and Babe Ruth. I think we can all imagine the fits a R-L Pujols-Bonds order would cause opposing managers.

Bonds has apparently indicated he would play for the major-league minimum ($390,000), this down somewhat from his reported free-agent asking price for one season of $10-15  million prior to the indictment. He has reportedly offered to donate his salary to charity.

Previously an excellent fielder and 8-time Gold Glove winner, Bonds now has limited range in left field due to age and three knee surgeries. He would probably not present much of an improvement fieldingwise over Chris Duncan.

The advantages to signing him are: (1) run production and "protection" for Pujols in the order; (2) boost to morale of a team in need of a shot right now; (3) satiation of Tony LaRussa, who is rumored to have threatened to quit after the season if the front office does not get active and improve the roster this year; and (4) very low current year outlay; and importantly (5) no prospects would be sacrificed for what in all likelihood would be a two-three month rental.

The disadvantages are: (1) he is widely disliked for a sullen and arrogant attitude, by many fans and perhaps players as well; (2) he is under indictment and has thus been disdained by all of Major League Baseball; (3) he is tainted with steroid use, a connection he shares with former LaRussa players Jose Canseco and Mark McGwire; and (4) his presence would require some disruption of the outfield sets and almost certain trading of either Chris Duncan or Skip Schumaker; (5) finally, he would be a controversial figure in a warm-and-fuzzy baseball town that has seldom embraced such players--at least since the 1930s.

There was another rumor that a second team was quietly considering Bonds besides Arizona. Could it be St. Louis? Would a humbled but still powerful slugger be a good fit for the roster, and why? Let 'er rip.........................!

2 recs | Comment 71 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

You knew I would be in this one...

but at this point it just isn’t a good idea. With less than 80 games in the season, there is very little reason to think that Barry is in MLB game ready shape. Even if it is simply a matter of getting the rust off, there isn’t much time for that. One bad month could sink our chances, and certainly would not endear us or any fans to Mr. Bonds.

I was for this at the beginning of the year, but now is simply too late. We can all debate the ramifications of Barry being shut out this season and what it means because there is simply no baseball reason why this dude isn’t on a squad, but that will have to be another discussion.

I would rather have Rasmus called up soon and see if he could give us a shot in the arm over the final two months. Those ABs would be better for the Cardinals long term.

"I believe he’s been reincarnated, that he played before, in the twenties and thirties, and he’s back to prove something." - Former teammate Mark McGwire about Albert Pujols

by cardzfan24 on Jul 10, 2008 8:10 PM EDT   0 recs

The only way

I think that the only way you do this is if you are TLR and MO and decide that your outfield next year is going to be Rasmus, Ankiel, and Ludwick (you can replace Ludwick with Skip or Duncan if that’s what’s decided) and you actively pursue a trade of BOTH the other two “expendable parts” and find teams willing to give up a good prospect. If we are down to 3 OFs (this would assume Barton stays on the DL and Rasmus is brought up) then I say sign Bonds to the minimum to be the 4th man in the OF, getting starts regularly.

by stlfan on Jul 10, 2008 8:17 PM EDT   0 recs

Will Bonds sue MLB for collusion?

why not pay for the cheap rental? Plus, it goes to charity.

strikeouts from left-center

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Jul 10, 2008 8:24 PM EDT   0 recs

Good idea

The ownership could say they are just projecting the MLB from being sued. Ha!

by Red in Chicago on Jul 10, 2008 8:28 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I had no problem with this...

until I just tried to picture him in Cardinal Red. Ugh, I feel a bit sick…

Obama/Pujols 2008.

by davethebutcher on Jul 10, 2008 9:53 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I want Barry Bonds

...there, I said it. Make it happen Mo.

Just for a few months, seeing Pujols and Bonds batting back to back would be something to pay to see.

by paposse on Jul 10, 2008 8:28 PM EDT   0 recs

He is an ASS but

this could be the best thing we do. Don’t get me wrong I don’t like him but if it gets protection for Pujols then do it. If he will sign for the minimum bring him in, lay down the ground rules and go. If he starts to be an enigma he’s gone and we are out $390,000 that went to charity. Maybe this has really humbled him, stanger things have happened. I say go for it, the only thing it costs us is money and not much considering the alternatives.

by DJ4508 on Jul 10, 2008 9:20 PM EDT   0 recs

a lot of major leaguers are "ASSES"

I have even heard people call APu one. I think that word gets thrown around too much with Bonds. Outside of Kent, which teammate has really had a problem with him?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 10, 2008 10:35 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

With Rasmus' injury, he is no longer a real option

before August or even mid-August. This team needs some offense so why not give it a shot? Tell Lamar you’ll give him $850 K plus incentives. If he works out, the Cardinals offense drastically improves. If he fails, you lose $850k.

It’s never going to happen but it is fun to think of that kind of power and batting eye hitting cleanup behind The Pu.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 10, 2008 9:22 PM EDT   0 recs

No

The Cardinal organization is above that.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 10, 2008 10:17 PM EDT   0 recs

Ponson

on said beach, in Aruba. Possibly on a beach volleyball court

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 10, 2008 10:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

For some reason

I thought he had reached over the bench and punched him in court. I guess that I had imagined it that comical way so long that it made it real in my mind.

Anyways, yes…Ponson.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 10, 2008 10:59 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Doesn't matter that the guy was a judge.....

A man punching another man, while not exactly good behavior, is alot more acceptable, to me, then what Bonds has done. There is a reason NO other team has even given him a sniff.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 10, 2008 11:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Assault >>> Using PEDs and lying about it

"I believe he’s been reincarnated, that he played before, in the twenties and thirties, and he’s back to prove something." - Former teammate Mark McGwire about Albert Pujols

by cardzfan24 on Jul 10, 2008 11:06 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Uh.....

Pretty sure lying under oath is a felony, while punching a man is more than likely a misdemeanor at most.

And I’m not just talking in the eyes of the law, but also in regards to the game of baseball. STL is known for being classy, and doing things the right way, for the most part. Why in the HELL would we open up that can?

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 10, 2008 11:12 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

STL is known for being classy and doing things right

and yet we have had many suspected and confirmed users of PEDs on our teams. Bonds would hardly be the first.

As far as the misdemeanor vs felony argument, we just disagree and that’s fine. Ultimately Bonds just lied about his use of drugs to help him play a game better. That is a fairly petty offense and I just think hitting someone else is worse.

It isn’t the main issue, and your point of Bonds being an ass and possible clubhouse poison is well taken and I agree with it. Its just that Bonds tends to poison clubhouses into winning a ton of games.

Whether or not he can do that now, without seeing live MLB pitching for months is another story. I don’t think he can be good enough, fast enough to help us.

"I believe he’s been reincarnated, that he played before, in the twenties and thirties, and he’s back to prove something." - Former teammate Mark McGwire about Albert Pujols

by cardzfan24 on Jul 10, 2008 11:21 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Glaus, Franklin, Ankiel...

McGwire, etc.

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 10, 2008 11:54 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I can think of several players off the top of my head that have done worse than Bonds

Ponson
Dukes
Brett Myers
M Bradley
Chacon

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 10, 2008 11:12 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Suggesting that a fist fight amongst men

makes somebody a worse person than lying under oath, and cheating the game of baseball, is silly.

by SoonerfanTU on Jul 10, 2008 11:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Technically

he wasn’t cheating.

Of course, Ponson was also busted twice for driving drunk and the sucker punch of the judge was a result of operating his boat while blitzed out of his mind.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 12:01 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

a fistfight is one thing

assaulting someone is a different story. I suppose some people just think violence is acceptable.
Cheating the game of baseball is worse than assault? That is just plain silly.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 11, 2008 12:03 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

and the part i wrote about violence was just low of me

i take that part back

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 11, 2008 12:26 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

i don’t know all the stories but ponson and chacon did not sound to be two gentlemen stepping outside for a duel. a “fist fight amongst men” would be a lesser offense to me too, but is that what occured?

FIP > ERA, OBP > AVG

by astrostl on Jul 11, 2008 11:42 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's the thing

Using PEDs and lying about it is perjury, since he was under oath, so yes, legally, that is a felony, and in fact, unless Ponson KNEW the guy was a judge, if you asked any judge which offended them more, assault or perjury, they’d probably tell you perjury.

But that’s only part of it. Having recently read Game of Shadows, all the stuff is talks about how he treated his girlfriend (oh yeah, he was married at the time) pretty much makes him a total scumbag.

So he’s not just soemone who cheated and lied. He was a violent, threatening menace to his girlfriend. He is an adulterer (I know many big-time athletes are, but it doesn’t make it better). He also has a level of hostility towards the media and fans due to a sense of entitlement mixed with the thought that the only thing that stifles him from getting what he wants is the rampant racism that everyone he’s ever dealt with has towards black people.

I won’t make any grand statement about how I’ll root against him if it happens or I’ll stop watching the games, but I really don’t want them to go after Bonds and I would be conflicted every time he did something good.

by mtalken on Jul 13, 2008 11:05 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Physical violence towards someone else

is not worse than using PEDs, which a vast amount of major leaguers have done.
I just don’t understand that at all.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 10, 2008 11:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Weren't they on a beach at the time?

But I digress.

I’d vote yes for Bonds, not only b/c he’d improve the lineup, but also because I love media shitstorms.

Well who the hell can see forever?

by Alxfritz on Jul 10, 2008 10:39 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

ESPN

Would have to put us at the top of at least one SC broadcast except for the games against the Sawks I loved so dearly. Which come to think of it, they put us on later in the two games we won and only first when Boston won, those dirty rats.

My only comment on BB, is wait 5 years and see what happens during that media shit storm. There will be one when he goes to prison, but that will pass as quickly as any thoughts of Micheal Vick.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 11, 2008 4:10 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Can Barry play 2nd?

I’m all for the move if he can.

by MotherTruckinSteve on Jul 10, 2008 10:41 PM EDT   0 recs

no, but skip can

and if he can’t, I bet seeing Barry lamar Bonds in the clubhouse would convince him to stand there and look like a second baseman for two months, dammit.

"If thats bad luck, lets DFA our luck away." -DriverZN

by SleepyCA on Jul 10, 2008 10:49 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Skip is an outfielder

Maybe he was drafted as a middle infielder, but if you look at his stats in the minors, he has played all but 6 games in his entire career in the outfield. Those other 6 games were at third base, not a middle infield position.

Unless there’s some information I missed, it’s probably not a sound plan to think Schumaker can play 2nd base at a major league level.

by mtalken on Jul 13, 2008 10:54 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah, I got that.

I know that he has never played second base. He was blocked at UCSB by the guy who was the MVP of the summer league that Kyle Russell couldn’t hit in, so he played CF instead and stuck there after he was drafted by the cardinals.

He’s also a great athlete, is built like a middle infielder and would be a borderline all-star at second base, and there is nowhere for him to play if we signed Bonds, so at the very least maybe it would inspire him to take some ground balls there. There’s a chance he’d be good at it.

"If thats bad luck, lets DFA our luck away." -DriverZN

by SleepyCA on Jul 14, 2008 1:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm torn

I’ve hated Bonds for so long, that I just couldn’t see myself rooting for him.

However, I know how much his bat would potentially help the ballclub. It would be a terror to opposing pitchers to see Pujols and Bonds back to back in the lineup.

All that said, I just don’t think it will happen. We already said no to him once, his agent said “all 30 teams” don’t want anything to do with him, I’d be shocked if it happened.

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 10, 2008 11:56 PM EDT   0 recs

agreed on Bonds hatred

I rooted hardcore for the Angels when they played the Giants in the WS just because I didn’t want to see Bonds on a team that won it all (Jeff Kent too, but that’s another rant). My hatred of the man often blinds me of rational thought, and I really don’t know why I hate him, but I do. However, if signing Bonds meant that we won the WS or even just allowed us to remove the small bears from the running it might just be worth it. I know that neither one of those scenarios would be a guarantee, but it should improve our chances to do either.

by MotherTruckinSteve on Jul 11, 2008 12:44 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I rooted against the Giants because they have our number

And because they knocked us out of the playoffs that year. F’in Benito Santiago and Jeff Kent!

Cardinal fan in the heart of Braves country
DFA Adam Kennedy and Randy Flores!
Track 'em Tigers - An SB Nation Blog for Auburn Tigers fans

by Mr Redbird on Jul 11, 2008 12:48 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I like to forget that the Giants beat us in the playoffs that year.

However, that is an equally, if not better, reason to have rooted against the Giants. Although, I tend to root for teams that beat my favorite in any given sport, it makes me feel like my team was close to being the best that year if a team that beat them is declared champion.

Why am I still awake…stupid insomnia.

by MotherTruckinSteve on Jul 11, 2008 3:42 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

barry

basically he would be a mercenary, a hired gun to help lift us to the playoffs for one season. i would not associate him with cardinals history at all.

it comes down to asking if you would mind having a player you hate on the roster in order to do everything it takes to win. to me the answer is easy, of course i would. i’d would want any player as long as he increases our chances to win, sure i’d feel a little dirty rooting for him, but i’d rather feel dirty and be in the playoffs than squeaky clean and miss them. that is why i think bonds is at least worth giving a look at in a workout. if he shows that he can still play a passable (chris duncan-esque) left field, hit a ton, and walk, then you sign him and let him work his way up to the majors over a couple weeks in the minors (like a spring training). seems like the perfect plan to me.

"The right-hander is throwing up in the bullpen." -Mike Shannon

by DJ87 on Jul 10, 2008 11:59 PM EDT   0 recs

Bonds...

I hate Barry “I don’t sign for white people” Bonds (just ask Ron Kittle) so much that I’d rather the Cardinals not make the playoffs at all rather than see Bonds win his first ring on the Cardinals. I guess that means my hate for Bonds is greater than my love for the cardinals.

It’s funny to me that some of the same people that suggest trading Kyle Lohse are the same people in favor of signing Barry Bonds.

By the way the Cardinals, do not need outfielders they need infielders, lefty relief, and probably a starter. The outfield hasn’t been an issue at all, with the exception of Duncan. These (s)crappy weak hitting MI are the issue with the line-up. And for all you Miles haters, he has been the best of the bunch regardless of what you want to say about his defense. That being said, he still shouldn’t be relied on for anything more than a spot start and pinch-hitting duty.

In a PERFECT WORLD we’d be able to get Brian Roberts and Edgar Renteria for the IF. Roy Halladay (not that he’s on the market, but it’d be a nice answer to the CC and Harden trades) or Greg Maddux for the rotation. And both Fuentes and Mahay for the bullpen. Obviously that’s not gonna happen but I’d be happy if 2 of those transactions happened without Rasmus being involved.

Possible trades:

Bryan Anderson for Renteria (plus option gets picked up)
Mortenson, Kozma, Motte, and Mather for Roberts
David Freese for Maddux (imagine being traded straight up twice for two HOF’s)
Jon Jay and Shane Robinson for Fuentes
Chris Duncan and Anthony Reyes for Mahay

I know thats looks like a lot of talent being given up, but it doesn’t really hurt us.

Anderson, Duncan, Reyes, and Freese have no future with us anyway.

Mather, Jay, and Robinson are expendable because Rasmus and Ankiel will be 2/3 of the OF for at least several years and I’m not so sure you can count out All-Star Ryan Ludwick either.

Kozma is expendable because it already looks like Nico Vasquez will surpass him within a year or two. Trade him now while his value is still high.

Mortenson is expendable because we already have Garcia, Boggs, Parisi, and Todd.

Motte is a flamethrower who’ll be attractive, but doesn’t really have the secondary pitches for big league success.

The lineup then looks like this:

Roberts
Renteria
Pujols
Ludwick
Ankiel
Glaus
Molina
Pitcher
Schumaker

The bench:

Miles
Ryan
LaRue
Barton
Stavinoah

The Rotation

Wainwright
Lohse
Maddux
and 2 of the (Wellemeyer,Looper, Pineiro)

Bullpen:

Mahay
Fuentes
Franklin
Springer
Perez
Isringhausen
(looper,wellemeyer, or pineiro)

Maddux and Fuentes would be gone after this year, but would be replaced by Carpenter and Tyler Johnson in ‘09

Mahay, Renteria, and Roberts are all signed for ‘09

Also in ‘09 Rasmus replaces Skip in the lineup and Skip replaces Stavinoah on the bench.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 4:22 AM EDT   0 recs

damn..

I left out Kyle McClellan in the pen…see ya next year Perez

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 4:29 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm one of these people
It’s funny to me that some of the same people that suggest trading Kyle Lohse are the same people in favor of signing Barry Bonds.

And the two have nothing to do with each other.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 4:55 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yea i know you are...

and the two have everything to do with each other. If you trade Lohse you are giving up on the playoffs which leaves no point of needing to sign Bonds

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 4:58 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Not at all

Trading Lohse doesn’t ‘give up’ on the playoffs. Lohse has been a phenomenal commodity to have but he is also very valuable should he be put on the market. He’d be worth 3 or 4 prospects, atleast 1 of which an above average.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 5:00 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

That's fine...I'd agree with the return value on Lohse,

but you’d absolutely be giving up on the playoffs. When your 2 division rivals add starters like harden and sabathia and you trade your best starter, you are giving up

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 5:04 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

For those wondering...

what I did with Villone, Flores, Thompson, Kennedy, and Izturis….I ask you, who cares? DFA all of them except maybe Thompson who could be stashed in the minors with Perez in case of injury.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 4:56 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And the roster moves you just suggested

don’t really have any chance of happening. You took a bunch of marginal prospects and created an All-Star team.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 4:56 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No shit...

I pointed that out in post

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 4:58 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I mean, I'm having trouble finding even one

that would happen. Maybe if San Diego was really hellbent on getting Freese back or if we were crazy enough to give up that much talent for Mahay, maybe.

It was a fun list, though.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 5:03 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

well sure,

it was all in fun, and lesser trades have happened in the past. I don’t think any of them would happen, because all negotiations would end at our refusal to part with Perez, Rasmus, Garcia, and Todd

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 5:06 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'd take a year and a half of mahay

if for only it would mean the end to all duncan and reyes arguments on VEB

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 5:09 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

whats your point?

The fact that Barry Bonds did steroids isn’t at all my reason for not wanting him on the team. And I don’t think you’d get the media “shitstorm” if Brian Roberts made his way to STL.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 11, 2008 11:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No thanks

Maddux currently has an ERA+ of 99 at age 42. He’s a league average pitcher at this point, and trending downward. He also makes $10M/year.

Renteria, after one good season in Atlanta, has an OPS+ of 69, which is really bad. Now maybe you think he just hits better in the NL? I’d prefer not to lay that bet.

The Cubs were offering two top pitching prospects for Roberts, and Angelos still couldn’t get over his man-crush on the kid and allow him to be traded. Now he’s not going anywhere, especially not for a couple of floundering prospects and a non-prospect. Did you not see what they got in return for Bedard and Tejada?

Jay and Robinson for the most highly sought-after LHRP on the market? No problem.

And of course, no trade proposal would be complete without a “Let’s package our castoffs and leftovers for someone else’s prized commodity” suggestion.

But seriously, fire up the XBox360 and let’s get this one done.

by Huck Finn on Jul 11, 2008 1:15 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Damaso Marte

After watching him torch the Yankees in the 9th inning tonight, this seems like it should be one of our top 2 or 3 options for a LOOGY.

Don’t let his low .200s BA vs LHB fool you. He’s got a .400+ BABIP vs lefties. It didn’t appear he had much in the way of a slider, but a 97 mph fastball sure is nice coming out of that arm slot. He is currently the closer for the Pirates but in all honesty they don’t need a closer being 11 games out of 1st place. He is a non-factor for the Pirates after this season as he has a $6 M club option for 2009.

by Hardcore Legend on Jul 11, 2008 5:01 AM EDT   0 recs

The Pirates...

can decline the option, offer arbitration and then if he rejects and seeks employment elsewhere, the Pirates will be compensated with draft picks. It is very likely that he will reject since they didn’t pick up the option, and he is talented enough to go somewhere else which would net those picks for the Pirates, almost guaranteed. He will most likely be a Type A free agent, so the Pirates will seek a pretty big talent for him, which leads me to believe he won’t be traded.

by Jumsy on Jul 11, 2008 11:54 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Bonds

I think someone needs to mention in here that we’re debating on the “should,” and not on the “will.” Will the Cardinals sign Bonds? No. They will not. Certainly I’m the only one who’s seen multiple TV interviews with Mozeliak this year where he all but laughed at the very idea of even considering signing Barry Bonds. I really don’t think it’s something Mo will do. Should he? Okay, up for debate. Will he? I really think there’s almost zero chance. So the whole conversation is somewhat moot.

As for the should, I really don’t think it makes all that much sense. He’s a force, sure, but he’s also a media circus (something the Cardinals have avoided since the Rolen feud) and a defensive liability. He’s also not really addressing a need—as someone pointed out in another thread, all of our starting OFs (Luddy, Ank, and Skip) have VORPs of 17.4 or more, good for 2nd-4th on the team. Playing Bonds means benching someone who has been, at best (worst?), our fourth best player.

So we have to weigh the marginal gain between (presumably) Bonds and Schumaker with the media scorn and large defensive downgrade. If that isn’t enough, Bonds hasn’t seen live major league pitching in a long time and probably needs a readjustment period. Considering all that, I’m gonna say it’s probably not worth it.

Of course, then there’s the possibility of signing Bonds and trading an OF or two away for a middle infield upgrade (Grudz and Durham being popular names). We measure all the above negatives against the marginal upgrade of Bonds over whoever we traded AND the marginal upgrade of our new MI over Kennedy or whoever else goes away.

I don’t know. It’s a complex issue. However, it’s really more of a non-issue, because Mo’s not going to do it anyway.

by mojowo11 on Jul 11, 2008 12:10 PM EDT   0 recs

Correct

I wanted this to be a discussion of the pros and cons, not an exercise in speculation. I find the former interesting and the latter better suited to horse tracks. Just because someone personally hates Barry Bonds, is not a good reason to reject the idea of signing him.

by Red in Chicago on Jul 11, 2008 12:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

exactly

and isn’t speculation of matters the real premise behind this site? If we stop doing that every time someone thinks we need to stop proposing these things, the site would be a lot less interesting.
Considering the fine ideas the manager and editors of this site come up with, I think that just about confirms it.
So yeah, I with mojo on the debating the “should” part. Well put!

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jul 11, 2008 3:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

take advantage of market inefficiency

isn’t that the summary lesson of “Moneyball”?

Signing Bonds for major league minimum money should be a no brainer. Not signing him means you are allowing things with minimal impact on winning probability to stop you from taking advantage of a huge bargain deal on things that can improve your chance of winning—i.e. not signing a likely top 10 OPS+ player this year because he’s a jerk and will star in the California Penal League future’s game next summer.

If the Cards are looking for an ‘impact bat’ and don’t want to mortgage the future to get it, what better option is there than Bonds?

to address other issues…..
signing Bonds leaves the surplus of near major league ready pitching and outfielders available to deal for other needs: middle infield, SP, LHRP.

signing Bonds would not mean Skippy would never see the field. TLR spreads PAs around as it is. Bonds would likely only start at most 3/4 of the games and would come out ‘late’ for defensive replacement. Skippy would get most of the other starts, the late inning work and be our top PH option off the bench.

Even if we strictly used Bonds to pinch hit(a feasible option at league min money), he’d be a huge upgrade over our current options.

No to Bonds, but yes to Roberts? Is it easier to forgive a good player for using PEDs than a great one?

by vances law on Jul 12, 2008 5:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

again...

it has nothing to do with PED’s… and everything to do with the fact that miles, kennedy, and ryan aren’t major league starters.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Jul 13, 2008 3:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I say sign him

to a minor league contract so we can gauge how well he will do after his long layoff. Then, after 3 weeks or so, he could have a clause that says we have to promote him to the MLB or release him (ala jeff weaver’s brewers contract).
IF we decide to bring him up, just send Duncan down. We know that Bonds won’t play all the way into most games, and he will usually only play 2 out of every 3 games, so Skip still gets plenty of playing time (maybe mixing him in at center on days when Rick gets a day off).
I just think it would be very interesting to see what he could do in the minors and use that to gauge public opinion vs. his productivity.

"Them Cubbies can kiss my ass" -Dizzy Dean

by Molina4MVP on Jul 11, 2008 5:18 PM EDT