Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Pujols is healthy...Duncan back to minors!

Could this be anymore cut and dry?  Duncan was sent to the minors to work on his swing.  While in the minors he was terrible.  Pujols goes on the DL so the team brings Duncan back up to play 1stbase.  Duncan continues to stink!  Pujols gets healthy enough to man 1stbase again.  Duncan stays on the team????  Mather is healthy and crushing in the minors!!!

Why the hell hasn't Duncan been sent back to the minors for god sake??  He was only brought up to fill in for Pujols.  It wasn't that he found his batting stroke.  Lets hope the team is just waiting to make sure Pujols has a few more games under his feet before they make the move. 

0 recs  |  Comment 65 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

You may see this move

Monday, with interleague play ending. On the other hand, Nick Stavinoha may be sent back to Memphis, since we’re done with the DH after today. OR the Birds may make no move at all, and go with what they’ve got!

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on Jun 29, 2008 10:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mo stated a couple days ago

that Chris Duncan would be given the opportunity to “figure it out up here”. It’s a terrible decision, but it’s his decision, so expect to see Duncan for quite a while longer.

boo cubs, hooray beer

by Raconteur on Jun 29, 2008 11:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Dunc's gone 5 for 15 in the last week, with 2 doubles.

He’s not yet back to his old form, but I think he should keep getting his chances against righties.

by tom s. on Jun 29, 2008 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree

He has taken a good approach, hit a few balls very hard, and has still been walking at a decent pace (including two last night). It amazes me how people just want to drop a proven MLB outfielder with an .840 career OPS. I can understand if you want to trade him for value, but right now his value happens to be at a low. It happens to all players: they go through slumps. If you insist on getting rid of him, let him play his way out of it, then trade him when you can get something in return.

by Zack Morris on Jun 29, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree as well

I have dogged Chris Duncan verbally (not so much on here that much) for the past 2-3 months now…probably as much as anyone else. I have been at the last two games, though, and I saw all 3 Royals-Cardinals games in STL. I don’t have numbers to back it up, but he seems more comfortable at the plate this series and he seems to be more in command. When he takes pitches, he does not look like he’s questioning if it was a strike or ball – which makes me believe he’s seeing pitches better. He seems to have a little quicker bat than the series 2 weeks ago. I think he’s regaining a little bit of his stroke at least. I am going to wait until I see a 2 or 3 or 4 home run week before I believe it is completely back…and I may still keep dogging him a little bit until then, because I don’t believe he should start on a major league club right now, but I think things are coming along for him a little.

by stlfan on Jun 29, 2008 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Duncan and all

but he has had two decent halves of 2 different seasons
That can’t be the definition of a proven MLB outfielder
His value is low. he doesn’t need traded. You need some pop out of him, how long do you wait?
Hopefully he is finally coming out of that dreadful slump

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he's lay off the low and away change ups

he’d be doing much better. plus, he gets the chance to get going so they can move him. one way or the other, i don’ expect him to be one of the 25 after july 31 unless he get going offensively. getting it together at memphis does improve his value and i understood mo’s comments yesterday to indicate the focus is heavily, if not totally, on 09 and 10.

If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!

by sportsman on Jun 29, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncans all messed up

The book on Duncan is constantly pitching him away. If he wants to stay up in the Bigs, he needs to adjust to the way their pitching him. Also, hes not waiting for his pitch. He needs to sit back and wait for something up and in because thats the only thing he can drive for power. As of right now, he has little value to the team which makes me wonder if his dad wasnt one of the coaches, would he keep getting these chances to prove himself? When Barton has just one bad game, he sits for a week straight. Duncan has sucked it up all season but LaRussa keeps throwing him out their waiting for him to get hot. The best thing for Duncan right now is to either get traded or sent back to the minors (for more than a week.)

by CarlCrawford on Jun 29, 2008 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really don't see how you justify ABs

for Duncan once the DH goes away. Slump or no slump, Ludwick is a better option against RHPs and plays better defense. Schu has a .936 OPS against RHPs and Ank the Crank has a .925 OPS against RHPs. The fourth and fifth OFs need to be guys who can sting LHPs and, even at his best, Duncan is helpless against them.

I am all for rebuilding his value, but unless the team wants to go into next year mode it must put its best lineup on the field.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 29, 2008 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is the best argument...

against Duncan being on the team. Ludwick and Ank should be playing almost Everyday, and Schu needs to be platooned. Duncan doesn’t currently belong in the starting OF rotation, but needs everyday at bats.

by cardzfanbub on Jun 30, 2008 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No body mentioned Mather in their arguement

he’s still hitting well and plays better defense and deserves the spot in place of Duncan. Next.

Milt Thompson FTW!

by gossard56 on Jun 29, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Jun 29, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if mathers dad was joe petini or something

he might get some playing time, but with mr. duncan in his pocket, so will be his son.

by from First to Third on Jun 29, 2008 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's an original comment..........

I am tired of the his dad is the reason comment… Please bring something new to the table.

Chris earned his chance to play at the MLB level.

by ICbirdfan on Jun 29, 2008 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

your wrong

I was a big Chris Duncan fan from when he got called up in the 2nd half of 2006. I could take Duncans suspect defense when he was crushing doubles and hitting towering home runs. The fact is Chris has sucked it up for a whole year and he needs to go back to the minors to rediscover his stroke. Their are plenty of guys in the minors who can play better right now in every aspect of the game than Duncan is doing for the Cards right now.

by CarlCrawford on Jun 30, 2008 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is such a tired argument

and, from what I can tell, completely baseless. It wasn’t all that long ago when all Cards fans did is complain that Duncan didn’t get the chance to play against lefties. Now, he’s only on the team b/c his dad’s the pitching coach. I’m going to have to learn to start ignoring these sorts of comments.

by chuckb on Jun 29, 2008 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

for the 3rd time here

overdone…Geez, I prefer the Duncan sucks one to this. It doesn’t sound as pathetic

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does he deserve it more than Stavinoha, who by repute plays worse defense than Dunc and has no ML record?

Admittedly, no record one way or the other.

I have no problem with sending stavinoha down for Mather.

by tom s. on Jun 29, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mather slugged .343 when up with STL...... He was no better than Dunc.

Why bring up Mather? Just play Barton as your back up RH outfielder…......

by ICbirdfan on Jun 29, 2008 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know that isn't a fair cmparison

35 at bats… I guess some people just don’t deserve a chance

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and I am not saying Mather is better than Duncan

I just don’t see how you can seriously make that as a comparison…but I should get used to it

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree too small of a sample size.......

Like I said I try not to compare them due to the fact that one is LH and the other is RH so it’s not like someone could say bring Mather up and he just slots in where Dunc was….

I don’t think 35 at bats is much of a sample size but some people just are not looking at this very rationally. It would be a bit different if Mather came up and hit the crap out of the ball….

I would prefer Mather play every day and his only chance to do that is stay at AAA…. I think Mather looked pretty good when up, good looking athlete with a powerful swing.

by ICbirdfan on Jun 29, 2008 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I got it now

I thought you were comparing Duncan’s full season to Mather’s 35 ABs.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stavinoha

Is it me, or does the guy just have no life in his bat, or his play for that matter? Seems like he’s just going through the motions, and I don’t believe he’s had an XBH yet.

I say send both him and Duncan down, call up Mather and Baby Brad.

by arfuze300 on Jun 29, 2008 6:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

now that is really

giving him a shot before you damn his abilities. All of 16 at bats..wow

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 29, 2008 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will believe it from you

and if arfuze has seen more than those 16 ABs I will believe it from him too.
Like it really matters, from what I have read he doesn’t have much of a future as anything but a DH

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 30, 2008 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with arfuze

Stavinoha does not look like a player, to me. At best he looks like a Gorman Thomas type. I think I would shudder if I got to see him play defense anywahere.

by the Tewk on Jun 30, 2008 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

while Thomas didn't have much of a BA

he had some major power and, if i remember right , he could really play some D when he was young. He did get a lot of time in CF so he probably had to be at least decent with the glove, no?
If Stav ever has a year with 45 HRs and 123 RBIs I would think he would qualify as a player, DH or not.
In other words, Gorman Thomas was a player.
You might be right about Stav

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Jun 30, 2008 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

send down stav and duncan

and bring up Mather and any other player in our system, i dont care.

Milt Thompson FTW!

by gossard56 on Jun 29, 2008 6:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Outfield should consist of.....

Lud, Ank, Skip and Barton is the back up….

If Dunc goes down don’t bring Mather up, I think Barton is fine as a back up… I used to be skeptical but I think he has some hidden pop.

by ICbirdfan on Jun 29, 2008 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan needs ABs

If Dunc is going to improve his swing, he will need consistent ABs to try and find his groove. He will not get those at the big league level. I think that potentially when it comes time to trade Dunc that he will have some value to an AL team looking for a 20 HR guy. Ank, Luddy, Schu, and Barton as the back up.

by emc2013 on Jun 29, 2008 6:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

People are stupid saying bring up Mather….... WTF, so he can sit and not play much….

You don’t face that many LHP so Mather will just rot on the bench.

by ICbirdfan on Jun 29, 2008 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mather needs PAs too

why is it that Duncan’s the only one who needs PA’s? At least I’m finally reading people who are complaining about Duncan offering a solution—to bring up Mather. Everybody is so pissed off that Duncan’s in this funk that they can’t evaluate this objectively.

Mather needs PA’s too and it will do him no good to bring him up and have him ride the pine as he did when he was called up a month ago. And, does no one else remember that Mather didn’t exactly scorch the ball when he was recalled? It’s time for Duncan to sink or swim at the major league level. There’s no better option available. Well, there’s one - Rasmus - but he shouldn’t be called up until the team is prepared to play him every day and they’re not right now. He needs to play every day at Memphis.

Mather’s not going to improve the team by coming up and sitting on the bench or by hitting the way he hit when he was recalled a few weeks ago. Everyone needs to get over their anger at Duncan and deal w/ the fact that he is where he belongs. If time goes by and it seems that his success at the big league level was a fluke, we can release him but it makes no sense whatsoever to send him down and have Mather come up and ride the bench w/ the big club.

by chuckb on Jun 29, 2008 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

and IF Duncan were to be sent down, where would he play to get all of those plate appearances? The outfield is crowded a Memphis too, and guys like Mather, Stavinoha, Rasmus (obviously), Robinson as well as the guys at Springfield have a much greater value for the long haul than Duncan does. So sending him to Memphis to take away at bats from those guys is a bad idea too.

by Tackle Box on Jun 29, 2008 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HC you hit the nail on the head

a lot of people (including the writer of this fan post) are not looking at this situation objectively; they’re just angry. duncan is young and cost-controlled; he’s still in his 20s and still 3 years from free agency. it’s in the organization’s best interest to try to get him back on track. there’s a legitimate debate about whether he’s most likely to get back on track in memphis or in st louis — but sending memphis simply to punish him is a stupid idea.

by lboros on Jun 29, 2008 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't necessarily disagree

but if Duncan is to get straightened out he has to play. Who is going to lose ABs so he can play? All three of the current OFs are hitting RHPs for over a .900 OPS. What would it hurt for Duncan to go to Memphis until we figure out if we are buyers or sellers? After all, it will take more than a week or two of him tearing the cover off the ball for his trade value to rebound.

I don’t think it does irreparable damage to our player development if Josh Phelps has to sit for a while. Don’t you think that most potential trade partners will look at him as a DH or a 1B anyway?

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 29, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

your rationale for sending him down is legitimate

ie, send him down to get him straightened out, with the hope that eventually he will be back in the big leagues. that’s a legitimate position. but there are others who have the attitude of “send him down because he sucks.” that’s not a serious point of view.

by lboros on Jun 30, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mo may have have shot me down

as Strauss says, “This much is known: The Cardinals have no intention of becoming ‘sellers’ at the non-waiver trade deadline.” I really don’t understand that sentiment unless ownership is thirsting for a little playoff revenue. Now maybe the quote should say, “This much is known: The Cardinals aren’t going to make any trades at all.” The only way it make sense for us to be buyers is if we are buying from Memphis and/or Springfield.

If you are determined to contend this year, and you are not going to be a “seller”, then I don’t know what you do with Duncan. Still seems best to send him to Memphis for a while, but if you have no interest in trading him then I don’t know what good that will do.

I do know that I will have significant blood pressure spikes if Duncan gets ABs at Ludwick’s expense just because he happens to hit from the right side. At some point, TLR has to acknowledge that Ludwick is not a liability against RHPs.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 30, 2008 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ludwick has been playing against everyone

why do you think he’s a platoon player?

by Tackle Box on Jun 30, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is true

But if my eyes don’t deceive me, Ludwick is more likely to get his days off against righties, which is actually backwards since he’s got that platoon split. I think the harm is pretty negligible overall, but TLR still considers him a primarily against-LHP hitter.

by mojowo11 on Jun 30, 2008 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But here's the thing...

It seems to me that the whole Duncan issue hinges on how you feel about this statement…

“If time goes by and it seems that his success at the big league level was a fluke”

At what point do you make this determination? HC says “it’s time for Duncan to sink or swin at the major league level.” OK, at what point do you pronounce him sunk?

What are the parameters for answering those questions?

by Hal Lanier's Pants on Jun 30, 2008 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

YES!

If Duncan recover SOME of his form he’s a very valuable piece of this team. He’s one of two lefties w/ true power, he’s cheap, and he’s had ML success. If he continues to stink up the joint, he’ll be ditched, and if he turns it around he’s suddenly a tradeable commodity or a valuable asset. Like you said, it’s not like anyone in AAA is trapped there right now.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Jun 29, 2008 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

....Adjustment or repetition?

Duncan wouldnt be the first guy to lapse into mediocrity at the plate after being around just long enough for pitching coaches and mentors to find the hole(s) in his swing. Theres a major league level book on the guy now and it says pitch him low and away with about anything but a fastball, unless you miss the plate completely with one and get him to chase.

If he can adjust and draw walks and hit mistakes, he’ll start to see stuff he can hit. Its a natural progression for young hitters, its not “finding his stroke” IMO just by getting ABs or nepotism…...its whether or not he has the patience to be selective and has a real understanding of what they’re doing to him. He has to adjust, either by laying off, or becoming a better out of the zone hitter. Its a little late for that last part.

Not being able to hit the few mistakes he sees aint helpin’. He been off balance and guessing on everything, but the last two games at least show some basic improvement in patience.

The hitters that stick are the ones that adjust…..or play great D.

by cardschinmusic on Jun 30, 2008 7:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of off balance

Does anybody have any video of Duncan’s swing last year? I don’t remember him having so much movement in his lower body that gives him the “flail” look. If true, then send it to McRae, or get Big Mac to sneak into town or something. Sure doesn’t look like a big league swing right now, even on the few occasions he has made solid contact.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 30, 2008 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's always been like that

I used to notice that some times it looked as if he came off his feet when he swung. But, i will agree that I used to look for it last year at times and he wasn’t doing it as much. Maybe that was my first impression of him (in 2005?) and then he got it under control. Now maybe he’s back doing it again due to being fooled too much?

by Tackle Box on Jun 30, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As of late Dunc seems to be hitting from more of a crouch than I remember.............

I thought he used to be a bit more upright, but it appears he has started to crouch a bit more… Maybe trying to stay back and not get out in front too much.

by ICbirdfan on Jun 30, 2008 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Classic 8th inning AB for Duncan....

The way the Mets pitched Duncan in the 8th with the sacks jammed was pure Duncan game plan, and it followed a visit to the mound by the Mets coach.

Watch it if you have a copy, all pitches except for the second and fifth were down and away until he was offbalance on a 2/2 count and looking for a pitch off the plate and they froze him on a fastball right over the plate on the inside half.

Tho Al and Dan had to yak about how the HR in the 5th took the pressure off, it was huge popup that Dunc wondered about until it cleared the fence and it was mistake on the inner part of the plate by Muniz.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 1, 2008 5:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the nepotism angle

one thing i’d like everyone who spews venom at chris duncan to do: take a look in the mirror, and make sure you aren’t channeling your dislike for his father, la russa, or who knows what else into all that angst. if everyone looks at the guy objectively – like lboros said, he’s a young, cost-controlled OF that needs to get back on track – and then this debate can gather some real legs. i have a hunch that if his name were chris jones or something, there wouldn’t be nearly as many harsh words for the guy.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Jun 30, 2008 9:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I am not a venom spewer

I just want the Cardinals to win and to play the best players. I am on the fence about Duncan and somewhat conflicted about what to do about him, but I think it is less than fair to totally dismiss “the nepotism angle”. You can go all the way back to his minor league history and he was a marginal prospect at best. His career MiLB OPS is .751. In his first five full professional seasons, three of which were in low A, he struck out 24% of his at bats and never hit more than 16 HRs. Only once did he slug above .473. His career best MiLB season, the only time he ever hit 20 HRs in the minors projects to a .219/.293/.370/.663 MLB line (using minorleaguesplits.com MLE calculator).

I can’t find any fielding stats for this first three seasons, but in his fourth season of pro ball he made 19 errors at 1B in 117 games, followed by 14 in 116 games. As recently as 2005 he made 17 errors in a mere 104 games at 1B in Memphis.

In his September callup in 2005, used primarlly as a pinch hitter, he recorded 10 ABs, struck out 5 times, and hit one home run. In fact, that lone HR looked at the time as though it might be his crowning achievement as it was the last HR hit in Busch II.

To many observers, it looked as though John Gall was a better prospect as he had been, I think, a two-time minor league player of the year and had hit .270/.282/.514/.763 in limited action with the big club in 2005. The TLR rap on Gall was that we didn’t play good enough defense to be in the bigs. In 2006 Gall got all of 12 PAs before being pushed aside in favor of Chris Duncan, who started out pretty well at the plate and got better, hitting .330/.393/.634 by the end of August. His overall numbers declined, but he did hit eight home runs after September 1st. In short, the Cardinals never would have made the playoffs without him. Whether nepotism had a role in his getting the opportunity or not, he clearly made the best of it and earned his playing time.

I think we all know the story pretty well after that with Duncan getting off to a great start in ‘07 before the injury. Had he come out this spring and put up good numbers I think everyone would be happy and it would have been sort of a gritty Cinderella story of coach’s son who struggles in minor leagues, but always believed in himself and just kept working. I certainly don’t blame the Cardinals for wanting to rediscover that power stroke and get Duncan back on track.

However, I do not ever recall a young player, other than Yadi with his premium defense, getting the extended playing time in spite of his struggles that Duncan has gotten. When the club finally made the decision, against TLR’s public stance, to send Duncan to the minors to straighten things out most observers agreed it was time for that move. When he was recalled a mere six games later, after hitting a whopping .160/.300/.240/.540 at Memphis, I don’t see how anyone can say with a straight face that move was not based on nepotism. The Cardinals had a chance to give Joe Mather two weeks of full time play to see what he could do, with the out of being able to send him down when El Hombre returned.

Sure enough Duncan hit .136 in Pujols’ absence with only one extra base hit. He was so lost that Adam Kennedy actually played back-to-back games at 1B. That being said, I am relieved and happy that Duncan is 4 for 10 since EH has returned, but now that the DH is gone I am fearful of what the lineups will look like and which productive players wlll sit because Duncan needs to “figure it out at the big league level.”

As a footnote, I was never a John Gall lover and used him as an example of a defensively limited player who never got a chance with the Cardinals. It would be great if Duncan can resurrect his career, but I do think it is pretty clear that he has gotten better treatment and more opportunity than virtually any other prospect the Cardinals have brought along in the past 15 years. Maybe TLR’s eyes are just better than all the statistical measures and all our number crunching is just a waste of time, but the way Duncan has been handled has been different than all other prospects on TLR’s watch.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 30, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

For me, I don’t care whether Duncan plays in St. Louis or Memphis. I just care who starts, and I don’t particularly like Duncan starting right now—not over Skip, Ank, or Lud. That said, I’ve got no objection to letting Dunc ride the bench. Mather’s defense is better, but Dunc has built up a record that earns him a preference over Mather.

But what worries me is seeing Dunc start over Lud or Skip.

So says, Titus Pullo (formerly The Dude)

by Titus Pullo on Jun 30, 2008 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I think it really comes down to Skip vs. Dunc….................

Lud was taken off platoon duty a while ago so he is going to start unless he needs a break, and we don’t know when/why he needs breaks. Maybe the Cards would be facing a tough righty and Lud’s wrist is a bit banged up…..Who knows… Obviously Rick is not a platoon player either…

It’s going to come down to Skip and Dunc splitting time against RHP. At this point Skip needs to be starting.

Dunc is in a tough spot and I dont see him getting much PT unless he has some ridiculos splits against a RHP they are going to face….

by ICbirdfan on Jun 30, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

(OT) Rome series

Titus Pullo from the Rome series off of HBO?

My wife and I are on Disc 4 of Season 1 right now. Netflix cannot pump them out to us fast enough. We’re hooked.

by stlfan on Jul 1, 2008 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a few statty nit-picks: strikeouts haven’t been found to be materially worse than other outs and even offer positive predictions on both power and walks, SLG is linked to AVG so ISO is the stat to use when measuring pure power, errors are better viewed as a rate comparison with other fielders at the same position in the same league (which would still probably look bad).

i will say with a straight face that i don’t think nepotism was the reason for chris duncan’s recall. mo was the one that announced it after the game, not larussa. he was sent to memphis to get consistent at-bats, something that playing first base in the majors would also provide for him. for direct comparisons, duncan has 425 minor league games played at 1B compared to mather’s 69 – only two of which came above AA. finally, several sources stated that mather was suffering from back spasms at the time and missed games in AAA after returning.

i don’t currently see a fit for duncan in our lineup now that albert has returned and we’re out of interleague play that wouldn’t compromise our chances of winning games. if we’re facing RHP i want skip, ank, and ludwick in the OF. i would prefer that he return to memphis at play every single day, starting in LF.

FIP > ERA, OBP > AVG

by astrostl on Jun 30, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for keeping me honest

My only nit-pick is that Duncan’s superior number of games at 1B only show he is below average at the position. Mather looks to be a better athlete/defender to me and handled his few chances at 1B flawlessly. That said, I do not want Mather on the bench at the big league level. I just thought it was a risk-free opportunity to give the kid a chance while Duncan got an equal chancein Memphis without the media scrutinly and disgruntled fans.

Just curious about your desire to see Duncan play LF in Memphis – do you think other teams will see him as a left fielder or do you just think that is his opportunity with the Cardinals?

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 30, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another minor quibble

I don’t think Mo’s announcement of the move means anything one way or the other. Given that TLR had angrily defended Duncan after Bernie’s article suggesting the move, and given that Mo made the announcement he was being sent down, any other course would have made it clear that MO had been overruled. I am not suggesting he was, but I just don’t think you can draw any conclusions from the fact that he announced that Duncan was being recalled.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Jun 30, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i wouldn’t take a ton away from that independently either, but as you know it was one of many factors that i mentioned which would seem to discount the likelihood of nepotism.

FIP > ERA, OBP > AVG

by astrostl on Jun 30, 2008 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i would suggest him in AAA’s LF even if it were only in the cardinals’ best interest, but i think it’s in his as well. if he picks up his offense i think most teams would be happy to slide him in at 1B or DH without reservation, but 1B is a popular place to hide sub-par defense and he’s not going to be dislodging fielder, howard, morneau, etc. if he continues to focus on outfield defense i think it gives him one more position where he can land on his feet, but it just so happens that it’s the one place we might want him too. unless he magically learned to play second, of course :)

FIP > ERA, OBP > AVG

by astrostl on Jun 30, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its time for Duncan to sink or swin in the majors????

What the hell type of comment is that HoustonCardinal????

So the guy has been terrible for a year now, is that not sinking? So your idea is to let him drag our team down and continue to play regularly in St. Louis? I am ALWAYS on the side of playing the best players and Duncan isn’t one of them.

I don’t remember, were you in favor of him being sent down to the minors a month ago to work on his swing? Well regardless, he never got that chance. He went down for a handful of ABs (terrible ones at that) and got pulled back because of the Pujols injury. Now that Pujols is back Mo should follow that plan again. Send him down!! I’d rather have Mather on the bench so we have a platoon for Skip and a power bat to pinch hit instead of the light hitting bench we carry. If the arguement is that Mather needs to play everyday (which i disagree with sinces he’s crushed it for basically a year and a half in the minors now) maybe bring up Phelps as a true bench bat.

Continuing to play Duncan is bad baseball and i can’t understand. And i’m am blown away by how many of you are now argueing that sending him down makes no sense. Just a month ago EVERYone wanted him sent down and due to Pujols injury that never played out.

Milt Thompson FTW!

by gossard56 on Jun 30, 2008 9:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Duncan has been bad for a year now

But I think it’s pretty well understood that he struggled with an injury for the second half of 07, which really sapped his power numbers—he OPSed .927 in the first half last year, but only .677 in the second half. And to say that he’s a first-half player would be silly, since he’s still got a better OPS in the second half over his whole career.

I don’t know what’s up with Duncan now, but if it’s not an injury, then I have to think he can figure it out. Last year it was an injury.

I’m all for him going to the minors, but I just don’t think citing his second half of 2007 as an indicator of his true ability is fair. You might as well point out that a guy who sits out the whole year didn’t manage to hit any homers.

by mojowo11 on Jun 30, 2008 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the last several games are a fluke and Dunc will regress to the Mendoza line,

But I saw his swing tonight, and it looked confident. It did not look like a flail. It did not look lucky.

Dunc has been hitting things solidly and in the air recently, with much fewer groundouts. I truly hope that his homer tonight is a sign of good things to come.

If so, the Department of the Interior may have to declare crow a protected species with all the eating that will be done on this board . . . .

by tom s. on Jun 30, 2008 10:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Classic 8th inning AB for Duncan....

The way the Mets pitched Duncan in the 8th with the sacks jammed was pure Duncan game plan, and it followed a visit to the mound by the Mets coach.

Watch if you have a copy, all pitches except for the second and fifth were down and away until he was offbalance on a 2/2 count and looking for a pitch off the plate in hopes of running the count full and they froze him on a fastball right over the plate on the inside half.

Tho Al and Dan had to yak about how the HR in the 5th took the pressure off, it was a huge popup that Dunc wondered about until it cleared the fence and it was mistake on the inner part of the plate by Muniz.

I dont think the homer means much at all, frankly. They hung him out to dry him with the book on how to pitch him in the 8th. This happens to all batters, all the time, but its the book on Duncan these days.

by cardschinmusic on Jul 1, 2008 5:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Jeff Pearlman Thinks Of Hair Clumps When He Thinks Of The Thief McGwire
Black-spider-monkey_small
Losing my religion (w/ baseball)

Recent FanPosts

Small
40 Man Question..
Cathybachebay1_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?
Avatar_small
VEB CheBird T-Shirt for Sale - Red or Powder Blue, CLEARANCE
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
October Lore: One In A Million
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
A Team of Free Agents
St-louis-cardinals_small
Report: LaRussa Will Return
Small
Skip's Lament: The Curse of Too Many Decent Players
Stlcardinals4070_small
Closer Fail

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Trigun_001_small the red baron