Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Oooo. . . shiny. . .

Have you ever misplaced something? I do it all the time.  My hands seem to have thoughts and a will all their own.  I tend to be a very fastidious person; everything has a place and everything should be in said place.  Not being able to find something bothers the hell out of me. 

Where did I put it?  It should be in this drawer.  I had it earlier today.  Retrace your steps.  I came home.  I walked over to my desk.  I was on the internet.  I. . . hell, I don't remember where I put it.  O wait.  Yes, it is in my pocket.

My short term memory is less than exemplary so keeping everything in it's designated area is very helpful for me.  The problem is shiny things distract me.  That may make me sound like a twit, which I'm not, but I do have a very short attention span.  If I don't watch myself put something away and mentally check that off my list, I'll quickly hop to the next item on my to-do list without resolving the previous task. 

Despite the last two games, the Cardinals are pretty damn shiny right now aren't they.  They're fun to watch.  I haven't sat down for a game yet where I thought, "OK, tonight we get pummeled." They've the best record in the NL Central.  Before the season, I thought they'd win about 70 games.  I'd like my crow medium well, please. 

That outfield that looked so iffy and unsure before the season, they've given prognosticators the middle finger, metaphorically speaking, of course.  From left to right, the outfield positions have OPS marks of .789, .882 and 1.026 -- little better than anyone expected.  The rotation that we were all concerned about has the 5th best ERA in the bigs with a 3.51 and a 130:58 strikeout-to-walk ratio.  Can I get some humble pie on the side. 

Everything is going so well.  It's so. . . shiny. . .

Wait, I kinda glazed over there.  Where was I?  No, no this wasn't all supposed to be about how the Cardinals are coalescing as a team.  It was about distractions.  Well, not the distractions themselves so much as the things they've distracted from.

 

Remember when the Cardinals signed Ron Villone?  He was on a minor league deal.  Depth in left-handed relief since the Cardinals don't really have anything in the minors.  In 14 innings, he's allowed 6 hits and 1 run.  He's struck out 14 and walked 8 on his way to a 0.63 ERA.  Shiny, no?

Tyler Johnson.

You almost forgot about him too?  He went down with some shoulder troubles during Spring Training.  In fact, he's been sidelined for over 2 months now with nary a whisper about any improvement.  He had a cortisone shot about two weeks after the MRI (around the 20th of March) and wasn't going to even throw a pitch before the season started.  Since then -- nothing.  What happened to him?  Is he getting better?  Where the initial MRI results wrong?  Is he in extended Spring Training?  Heck, I can't find anything on in within the last month.  Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.  Good thing Villone is performing well.

4 Million dollars.  That's all Kyle Lohse cost the Cardinals.  Even though he's taken his lumps over the last couple games, he's on a 1 year contract for chump change.  Remember when he was asking for money similar to Carlos Silva's 4 year/44M dollar deal.  Forget that.  We got him for 1/12 of the commitment (1/3rd of the yearly rate * 1/4 of the years -- shady math courtesy of azruavatar) and he's been more than sufficient as a middle of the rotation stalwart.  Check that Rotoworld sidebar and you'll see that he had a 2.45 ERA through his first 6 starts.  Shiny, no?

Matt Clement.

Is this guy's arm still attached?  I'd completely understand if it wasn't but what the heck happened here.  The Red Sox paid him a year to rehab (essentially) and then decided they were done.  Did the Cardinals doctors not see anything at all during the physical?  At first the word of mouth was that his arm strength just wasn't game ready.  He hadn't really thrown in well over a year so him being in a weakened state was more than understandable.  Umm, Matt. . . how's your arm strength?  If you put the ball in your right hand can you take your left hand and throw both your detached right arm and the ball across the plate?  How about for a strike?

Ryan Ludwick smacked a pair of solo shots yesterday. His OPS is 1.185.  We're arguing over whether he or Duncan deserves more playing time .  It's a left-handed starter, where the heck is Barton?  It's a righty, we need Schumaker at the top of our lineup!  All hail Rick Ankiel, savior centerfielder of the Cardinals and mythical thrower outer of baserunners.  Touch head to ground in prostrate position now.

Colby Rasmus.

This one's a little hard for me.  Rasmus is my favorite player in the Cardinals farm system.  I've got his Springfield T-shirt jersey.  I make sure to find his box line every night.  He's hitting .200/.293/.344 for a .637 OPS prior to last night's game .  Now, there's a myriad of reasons why this could be.  He's a notoriously slow starter.  His father (who has long had a hand in Colby's development) thinks Colby is taking too many fastballs.  There's also speculation that Rasmus was really bummed out that he didn't make the team out of spring training (where he hit .302/.464/.605).  For all the talk prior to the regular season that the future might be now with Rasmus becoming the Cardinals centerfielder, his struggles this first month have gone somewhat unnoticed with the major league outfielders tearing the cover off the ball.  I don't want to strike alarm for anyone, I think Rasmus will be fine in the long term, but it's a pretty significant slump for the Cardinals only blue chip prospect.

The Cardinals head to Milwaukee for a 4 game series starting tonight with Todd Wellemeyer on the mound.  I'd love to see the Cardinals take 3 out of 4 and bury the Brewers a little bit further in the standings.  They're still a scary team, imo.  Todd Wellemeyer's been awfully good this season for someone who the Cardinals plucked off of waivers a year ago.  He's averaging 6 innings a start.  He's got a better than 2:1 K:BB ratio.  I bet they'll get back to winning.  Winning cures all sorts of ills. Or at least distracts from them.

Now, where did I put my keys?

0 recs | Comment 130 comments | Add your comment

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

If you're not wearing your shoes,

check the insides of them; things sometimes are lost inside of shoes.

Life's a river, kid, you gotta go where it takes you.

by KerouacCardinal on May 9, 2008 8:15 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

my keys were in the front door

of my apartment when i woke up this morning. true story.

e'rebuilding mang

by nycbirdo on May 9, 2008 1:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Steven Wright

One night I came home very late … it was the next night.
I walked up to my apartment building and put in my car keys. The building started up … so I drove it around for awhile.
Policeman pulled me over and asked me where I lived. I said, “Right here”.
Then I drove my building out onto the highway, parked it in the median, & yelled at all the cars to get the hell out of my driveway.

That said, the Cubs do deserve my pity, but never my support.

by Solanus on May 9, 2008 1:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

That one

is a CLASSIC!!

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on May 9, 2008 1:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Steven Wright

is a backward genius. or a zen master, one of the two (or both)

Ankiel is Jesus!

by Cards Fan in Chitown on May 9, 2008 7:40 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Anybody here remember the 2005 Orioles?

First 36 games of the season: 23-13

Finished: 74-88

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on May 9, 2008 8:25 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

your signature

fits that post perfectly.

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 8:38 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

rockstark5, here's a question ---

when you look at that ‘05 orioles team, do you see any parallels between it and the current cardinals? i mean, other than the hot start, did that team have any characteristics in common with the ‘08 cards that lead you to believe the cards will suffer theh same type of collapse?

by lboros on May 9, 2008 9:30 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

The 05 Orioles

were more of a veteran based team than the ‘08 Cards. The O’s also had severe organizational issues impacting the play on the field. The manager (Lee Mazzilli) was on a renewed one year contract with no owner support even after bringing the O’s the closest to a .500 finish in 5 years. Mazzilli had a bunch of ornery vets too with Steve Kline leading the way. Sammy Sosa was signed to a big contract (50% more than 2nd highest paid player Tejeda) to drive in runs (which didn’t happen) and added to the clubhouse mess.

The Palmerio steroid issue hit them at the end of July during a 2-12 streak that had pulled the team below .500. Palmerio tried to throw Tejeda under the bus for the failed drug test and the clubhouse fell apart. Mazzilli got fired three days after Palmerio got suspended.

The ‘05 Orioles are a closer resemblance to the ‘07 Cards than the ‘08 team.

by ubeddie on May 9, 2008 10:02 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

kline

i blamed mazzilli’s usage patterns for kline’s struggles. la russa used kline as more of a LOOGY, facing primarily lefties, with pretty decent success. mazzilli tended to use kline as purely an 8th inning setup guy against any lineup; he faced a lot more right handed batters, struggled with control and got shelled.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on May 9, 2008 2:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

actually

There are some similarities between those two teams:

1. Young top of the rotation starter: Bedard :: WW
2. One stud righthanded bat in the middle of the lineup: Tejada :: Pujols
3. Third basemen beginning to show signs of decline—Mora and Glaus
4. Bullpen full of aging LOOGY’s and young pitchers with a inconsistent closer (Ryan)
5. Poor defensive corner outfielder scheduled for a breakout season at the plate (Gibbons)
6. A bunch on unknowns in the rotation behind the top starter including a couple who have put together league average seasons (Ponson, R. Lopez)
7. Possible PED use hanging over certain members of the club (Sosa, Palmeiro :: Ankiel, Franklin)

All that being said, I think this Orioles teams looks much more like the ‘07 Cards than the ‘08 version. The current team has a lot more youth and they really don’t have a lot of money invested in bad contracts like the ‘05 Orioles (J. Lopez, Sosa). They also played in a division with two powerhouses and a pretty decent #3 team (Toronto), so a slide is much more predictable for them having to play an unbalanced schedule against the Yankees and Red Sox.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on May 9, 2008 10:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I dunno about Ryan

he was pretty damn consistent—one of the best closers in the league that year.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on May 9, 2008 12:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

i followed that team religiously

in my first year out east, it was a fun bandwagon to jump on, for a while anyway.

some points of clarification: sosa was traded for jerry hairston jr. and others (mike fontenot turned out to be one of the others). it was an option year of the cubs’ bad contract, but still.

the hot start was brought on mainly by the ridiculous april/may that brian roberts had. after hitting no more than 5 HR in a season previously, he had hit 11 by may 17 of that year, in addition to a .453 OBP at the top of the lineup. bedard started 5-1 but got hurt in late may and didn’t pitch again ‘til july. javy lopez broke his hand around the same time, and despite the heroics of pre-fu manchu sal fasano, there was too much geronimo gil involved. jorge julio was also lights out the first two months; on may 26 he had a 1.90 ERA, and finished the season just shy of 6. oh, and lee mazzilli was an idiot, they won in spite of him in the early going.

i still think that team had the goods (if not the manager) to hang in further that year, but injuries and the steroid/clubhouse issues really hurt ‘em. they stayed in first into june and were only ½ game out on july 18, but they went 1-14 in the next 15 games. then the palmeiro stuff came out, and it got really ugly.

i agree that that club was a lot more veteran than ours, it may not be a good comparison structure-wise. but it does prove that we need to avoid injuries, clubhouse issues (doubtful in our case) and steroid scandals.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on May 9, 2008 2:03 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Well....

....there is a real possibility that we play .500 ball the rest of the year – but in this division, that’s ok! We don’t have to crack 90 wins to take this division. Right now I think its moore important cow we coalesce as a team. Moore than anything it was as a team we made the run through the ‘06 play-off and WS, and winning teams are built early. I thuink we’re headed in the right direction; let’s just make all appropriate offerings to the Baseball Gods that we have no significant injuries the rest of the year out and we’ll be in the thick of it come September.

:=8)

"We're against society, authority, and anything else that ends in y"
- Johnny Rotten

by The MooCow on May 9, 2008 10:09 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

I think the Cubs are for real and a 90+ team.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on May 9, 2008 10:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Re: Outfield

Ankiel may not be savior of the Cardinals. But the man is a top centerfielder. If he was a little bit more conistent with the bat he would be an All-Star IMO.

Right now I think Ludwick should get the start on most days instead of Duncan. He seems to be the only hitter to really do anything in the 4th spot.

That leaves Barton and Skip to fight it out. Skip has been great at the leadoff spot. Barton looked pretty bad against right handed pitching on Wenesday if I remember correctly. Skip seems to have cooled off a bit. Still got to love it how we have outfielders fighting for playing time.

Rasmus will make it to the bigs. To worry about someone hitting .200 the first month after moving up a level is silly. He has shown in the past that he can and more than likely will adjust. But it’s great that the team this year are not in a position where they are hurting without him.

As for the last two games. It’s the Major Leagues. It’s hard to sweep a 4 game series. Lohse wasn’t his best again. It’s never a good feeling when I guy has 2 bad starts in a row. I still like that he stayed out there and kept fighting. I didn’t watch the game so I really couldn’t tell. But judging by the game day thread he wasn’t getting the boarder line calls. Which Lohse needs to be effecient. And if he is forced to throw over the plate in that park…well.. The outcome would be a lot like thursday afternoon. I still think having him in the Rotation instead of Kip Wells makes this team so much better.

by Evilfrog on May 9, 2008 10:28 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Agree with

what Evilfrog said. I would rather see us questioning who to put in the outfield because all of our options offer something positive instead of questioning which option is the “lesser of two evils”.

by cardsgirl95 on May 9, 2008 10:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

LaRussa on WW abuse

Just wanted to point out a quote from LaRussa in today’s Post. After WW’s 120 pitch night, many were accusing him of being shortsighted in his use (or abuse, as many claimed) of WW. WW was pulled after the 7th inning wednesday, resulting in a bullpen implosion and a loss. LaRussa addressed it saying:

“Concluded La Russa: “The idea is to have him all year, all career to the best of his abilities. If we win a game in Colorado and in August or September he’s tired and not pitching effectively, then we’re not doing right by the team.” “

Not trying to refuel the fire of that debate – just saying that we can sometimes be a bit overly dramatic in our kneejerk responses to managerial decisions….

by cdb on May 9, 2008 10:36 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Promotion drop-off.

I’ve been thinking about this for a couple of years now. Has anyone noticed the distinct LACK of a drop-off in hitting for our newly promoted Memphis players. Guys like Duncan, Schumaker, Luddy, JRod, etc… just continue producing at about the same level as they did in the minors.

Do we need to readjust what we are thinking about the MLE’s of our AAA players? Is this trend (if it does exist) indicative of what we can expect of players being promoted from Memphis? Or, is this simply a short-term blip in the long-term performance of our players?

Baseball's only fun if you're playing it, watching it, or thinking about it.

by Eckstreem on May 9, 2008 10:52 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Random thought

Bat Glaus 6th and Ankiel 5th?

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 10:58 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

If Glaus can maintain his current pace,

he could possibly end up with 5 home runs this year. Is he on a down hill slide or just going through a temporary funk.

by ridgesee on May 9, 2008 11:11 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

PED withdrawl.

Who knows.

"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on May 9, 2008 11:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

could be

seems, like he’s come up with warning track power all of a sudden. a guy his size should be hitting ‘em further that Ludwick.

by ridgesee on May 9, 2008 11:29 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

temporary funk

he’s done it before on other teams. There’s no need to panic. Look at his doubles. The guy is still hitting for power, just not quite enough.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on May 9, 2008 12:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Glaus

Power should come around if he stays healthy. I think he looks a bit gimpy at times and I really think he needs more time off than Albert by far. There is just something about him that makes me think his foot is getting a bit sore, and I think if he can stay healthy he should start to hit some balls out of the yard. A hurt foot can throw off things just enough that it takes away a bit of your power

by ICbirdfan on May 9, 2008 12:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I vote Funk...

he’s been getting XBH, he just hasn’t “elevated” the ball yet. Glaus is a notoriously “streaky” hitter; I suspect once the weather warms up and he gets to hit in the bandboxes in Cincinnati and Philadelphia, he’ll smote the ol’ pelota over the wall.

(Sometimes my mind works in weird ways… thinking “Troy Glaus is in a funk” gave me the image of him dressed like this...)

Yikes!

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on May 9, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

new nickname?

atomic glaaaauuusss (think george clinton)

by mattybobo on May 9, 2008 1:26 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

It's the ballpark...

If you compare the ball park factors between Busch and Toronto, his lack of HRs is not all that surprising.

Start Ludwick

by DiscoJer on May 9, 2008 5:59 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Doh..

Forgot to add, a lot of his his doubles (which he has a lot of) would have been HRs in Toronto, but where only doubles in Busch.

Start Ludwick

by DiscoJer on May 9, 2008 6:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

how 'bout this

2 Ankiel, 3 Pujols, 4 Ludwick, 5 Glaus

by ifionly ... on May 9, 2008 11:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Hasn't Ankiel

slumped big time in the 2nd spot?

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 12:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

plus.. AK in the 2nd spot

is working great

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 12:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Trying to outguess TLR

on lineup construction is an idiot’s game… but I’m an idiot, so here’s one goalie’s opinion (Parra’s a lefty):

Barton LF
Miles 2B
Pujols 1B
Ludwick RF
Glaus 3B
Ankiel CF
Molina C
Wellemeyer P
Izturis/Ryan SS

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on May 9, 2008 12:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Question for all

In Colorado Lud played LF and Barton played RF?

Barton’s weakness is his arm and in RF you generally put the stronger arm. However Lud really doesn’t have a great arm either. Why do you think thy put Barton in RF in Colorado? Was LF a tougher field to play in Colorado?

by ICbirdfan on May 9, 2008 12:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yes

LF is tougher to play in Colorado. Looking at the field I don’t really know why. But Tony mentioned it on one of the pregame interviews. I believe it was for Tuesdays game with Shannon interviewing him. But I forget.

In a couple of parks I believe Barton will play right field for at least our first trip through them.

by Evilfrog on May 9, 2008 1:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

A lot of ground to cover in LF

It’s a huge field. We did the same thing in Pittsburgh earlier in the season.

by liam on May 9, 2008 1:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

thanks

I knew there was a reason but I never really heard it discussed why Barton was out there. I figured it had to deal with a tough LF but never really got an explination. Look what good things I miss by skiping the FSN pregame.

by ICbirdfan on May 9, 2008 1:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Skip/Barton
Kennedy
Mang
Ludwick
Ankiel
Glaus
Yadi
Pitcher
Ryan (Izturis)

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 12:46 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

au contraire

must have people on in front of albert or he’ll never see a strike worth swinging at.. highest obp should be in those slots

If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, perhaps you haven't grasped the situation!

by sportsman on May 9, 2008 4:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I've always liked that thought

With Glaus, we have another Ron Gant/Reggie Sanders type streak-hitter with flashes of power (in Glaus’ case it’s doubles, not HRs). I love him in the 6th spot and Ank 5th.

"Well, folks, this game began as a tiny worm and is blossoming into a large cobra." - Mike "The Moon Man" Shannon

by Tudor's Electric Fan on May 9, 2008 1:03 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

that was my thought exactly..

I like that type of hitter in the 6 spot – probably not a rally starter (ie he won’t hit for average) but is good for some homers.

Of course, right now he’s not hitting homers and there’s a chance he could still hit for average this year (275-280 range).

Proud President of the Unofficial Skip Schumaker Fan Club!
(now accepting applications)

PUT SKIP ON THE BALLOT!!!

by stltrav09 on May 9, 2008 1:11 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

thanks for that...

the past couple of games have upset me deeply, but great post, great pick-me-up.

by gashousegangup on May 9, 2008 11:49 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

all of the shiny comments had me thinking

I was watching a rerun of Firefly ;)

by outraged on May 9, 2008 11:59 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

my thoughts exactly

our love for him now ain’t hard to esplain
the hero of st. lou, the man they call “Mang”

by mattybobo on May 9, 2008 1:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Are you saying we are mudders?

If you didn’t watch the show, I can’t even start to explain that one.

Staying OT: for those that did watch the show (and the movie), did you prefer the plump Kaylee from the show or the slimmed down Kaylee from the movie? I vote plump.

That said, the Cubs do deserve my pity, but never my support.

by Solanus on May 9, 2008 1:53 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

either

I just like chicks who are good with spaceship engines….

If I had to choose I’d probably say the slimmer version I guess

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on May 9, 2008 1:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

awesome reference!

I think that the tv show version fit her character better…

but honestly, either way, she’s goram attractive!

by A1R3Z on May 9, 2008 2:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I'll be in my bunk

n/t

That said, the Cubs do deserve my pity, but never my support.

by Solanus on May 9, 2008 3:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

VEBer 1 / Zoë:      ”Tony’ll have a plan…always does.”
VEBer 2 / Kaylee: “That’s good, right?”
VEBer 1 / Zoë:      ”It’s possible you’re not recalling some of Tony’s previous plans…”

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on May 9, 2008 3:35 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

The Captain to Jayne

“Well my days of not taking you serious are certainly coming to a middle.”

by six on May 9, 2008 3:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Or, actually, VEBer to LaStache

by six on May 9, 2008 4:08 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Chain of Command

“You know what the chain of command is? It’s the chain lboros goes gets and beats you with ‘til ya understand who’s in ruttin’ command here!”

by Cardinal70 on May 9, 2008 5:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Az

very nice post….....I’m right behind you in the lunchline…........waiting for my extra helpings of crow and humble pie

by Hinkster on May 9, 2008 12:04 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Middle Infield Check

At a month an a half, we have a pretty consistant story with the middle infield. Absolutely no pop, but with surprisingly good obp. Also, the defense has been good, especially from Iz2.

AK
.310 .365 .368 w/ 4 extra-base hits.

Iz2ris
.244 .346 .289 w/4 extra-base hits

Ryan
.281 .303 .313 w/1 extra-base hit

All in all, I think this is a middle infield we can win with, so long as the pitching maintains its level quality.

So says, Titus Pullo (formerly The Dude)

by Titus Pullo on May 9, 2008 12:18 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Great OBP for Kennedy

but laughable SLG across the board.

"Well, folks, this game began as a tiny worm and is blossoming into a large cobra." - Mike "The Moon Man" Shannon

by Tudor's Electric Fan on May 9, 2008 1:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I believe

Ryan’s slug will come around a bit. Just haven’t had enough PAs.

by Evilfrog on May 9, 2008 1:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

AK has higher SLG than

C Duncan .247/.372/.364

That’s laughable. Or another way to look at it—we’re eight games over .500 with no production from Duncan or Glaus.

by gocards62 on May 9, 2008 2:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Which is beyond the realm of "laughable"

and more into the territory of “fuck the heck?”

"Well, folks, this game began as a tiny worm and is blossoming into a large cobra." - Mike "The Moon Man" Shannon

by Tudor's Electric Fan on May 9, 2008 3:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

ak, duncan, isolated power, line drives, babip, obp

this isn’t to necessarily say that duncan isn’t slumping, but slugging needs the context of average to be meaningful. kennedy’s isolated power is .368-.310 = .58, duncan’s is .364-.247=.117. so duncan is infact hitting the ball harder than kennedy.

comparing the two again, kennedy has 23% line drives while duncan is at 27.1%. kennedy’s formula-predicted babip is .230+.120=.350, and his actual is .365. not a big gap. duncan’s prediction is .271+.120=.391, but his actual is only .298. that indicates bad luck, and empirically related i’ve seen duncan smoke several line drives into infield gloves.

finally, even if a player were prohibited to take extra bases an obp of .372 against a league average .330 wouldn’t match my definition of “no production”. first and foremost i like to see batters not recording outs. i recognize that duncan has to rely on his pop more than others to make up for his shortcomings on defense, though.

by astrostl on May 9, 2008 4:35 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   1 recs

quick follow-up on glaus

.225/.336/.350. isolated power is .125, ld is 16.8% babip is .277, predicted babip is .288.

by astrostl on May 9, 2008 4:40 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs