Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Week In Worst: When Baseball Goes Wrong

Should Cards Re-Sign Lohse?

Lately, I have been contemplating whether the Cardinals should try to lock up Kyle Lohse for an extended term and plan on declining the options of Mulder and Clement?

From 2005-2007, Lohse has normally not produced well in the months of April-June (era's over 5 in each of those months, op ba over .300 each month).  Is this season a fluke, or has working with Duncan enhanced the value of another SP (2.36 era, .248 op ba)?

As the weather heats up, so does Lohse (July & Aug. 2005-2007- 3.89, 3.36 era, .276, .255 respectively).  Should we expect great things from him this year?  If so, then we should lock him up now before Boras makes him even greedier and with leverage this upcoming offseason.

Last offseason, Lohse was looking to get a 4 yr/40 million dollar contract.  I believe the Cardinals should go ahead and decline the options on Clement and Mulder (declining would cost the Cardinals 1.75 million, but picking up Mulder's 11 million or Clements 8.75 million would be worse) and begin investing in a 29 year old pitcher who has never been on the DL and can provide quality starts.

My recommendation would be to try to lock Lohse in for 4 years at 8 million/year with incentives that if achieved would put him slightly over the 40 million he sought last offseason.

Comment 29 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

They just mentioned

that idea during the telecast. With a nice year, he may just price himself out of St. Louis.

by mikeonthecards on Apr 28, 2008 8:44 PM EDT reply actions  

This guy is pitching for a contract next year

likely out of our pocketbook. I’d rather the Cards save the money and get a big name than spend little by little on bit players like Lohse.

Rasmus or bust.

by Zoop on Apr 28, 2008 8:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Gimme the draft picks

BABIP is down, LOB% up, HR/FB% sits at 0. Somehow he actually isn’t throwing that many strikes and still having success. Obviously he’d have to regress a ways to keep him from still being a good major leaguer, but he’s not the results he’s had so far. No point in taking on a 40 mil risk on him continuing all this good stuff. Awesome on a one year deal, not so much on 4.

With no evidence to the contrary, Colby Rasmus is clutch

by joker24 on Apr 28, 2008 8:49 PM EDT reply actions  

He still wants a big deal...

That’s why he signed a 1 year deal. If he does well, then he’s going to try to cash in again.

I really don’t think they could re-sign him, unless they give him the sort of deal he wanted (4 years, 40 million) but couldn’t get. And I don’t think he’s worth that much.

Start Ludwick vs righties (maybe this will work)

by DiscoJer on Apr 29, 2008 12:30 AM EDT reply actions  

4 years is too long

For a #3 or #4 pitcher. I think that we would be well served to offer him a 2 year deal, maybe an option for a 3rd. 8 mil for 1st, 9 for second, and option at 10 with 1 or 2 mil buyout. 4 year 40 mil is top of the rotation numbers (just shy of what we are paying Carp). I think that Lohse is serviceable, and I am happy with his performance thus far, but I think the Cards should be reluctant to tie up too much money in a pitcher. To put it in perspective, there is a total of nearly 20 million being paid this year to pitchers currently on the DL. It is just too risky to tie that much money up. When you have an ace (Carp and Wainwright) you lock them up, anybody else, 2 or 3 years max.

by ckeiner on Apr 29, 2008 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Two things

1. I doubt he continues this run of ridiculously good pitching.

2. If he does, he’s going to get a wad thrown at him by some silly GM, and therefore will price himself out of a team that has to be thinking quite seriously about getting ready to resign a certain Dominican-born, KC-raised first baseman.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Apr 29, 2008 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Incentive based...

Offer Lohse a solid 8/year and then provide incentives that if he performs well would put him well over the 10 mil/year mark. Is he not worth that as an innings eater who gives you quality starts?
Who are these Free Agents that the Cardinals would be looking at? Sabathia (will be way out of the price range and has worked a TON of innings so far in his career) Burnett (assuming he opts out of his contract (he has injury issues and will probably be seeking at least 15 mil/year) Who else would be available that would be better than what Lohse provides?

by Jumsy on Apr 29, 2008 1:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Personally

I’d talk to him with reasonable numbers before he’s considered the quick trade bait for the year.

He hasn’t been overworked through his career so considering he’s not a heat type of guy he’s open for durable innings.

If he pitches so well under an incentive based scenario (as pitching for one year for a long term setup obviously is showing)then maybe bulking up a contract with heavy incentives may be worth while.

Right now he’s a #2 starter in our setup compared to who he’s playing with. If Carp comes back and is in Carp form, he’ll be a #3. We may have some depth in the farm, but we don’t have 2 or 3 people that is going to be a better than average coming up, the upcoming free agent market doesn’t guarantee anything for us of value.

He should be trade bait if he brings us some massive value from a contender that gives us something cost controlled in return.

But if I were Mo, I’d take some time in June and really start talking about getting a reasonable deal, and if Lohse is going to let Boras be an ass about value, then ship’em and get something of value.

Suppan like money with incentives is quite reasonable to me. We have a fair share of coin coming off the books soon on other investments that we have a lot more depth in.

Lohse isn’t an opportunity cost, not for the next couple of years anyways.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 29, 2008 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

restructure???

Is it possible, that if the cards were interested in keeping him long term, that the cards restructure his current contract to get a raise, as was done for Waino and other youngins around the league? I mean, we had no obligation to offer wainwright a multiyear deal, but in giving him a slight raise this year, we probably decreased the cost of resigning him in his arb – post-arb years. Might a similar deal be done here or does the players association or MLB have regulations against it? Just thinking that it may be easier to sign him long term at a more reasonable price if the cardinals were actually paying him something closer to his market value (we are getting a deal right now….). Increased leverage maybe?

That being said, I would not go past two years, that is the 2009-2010 seasons, for number three. Maybe bump him up to 7 this year, 8, next, and 9-10 in 2010??? I like the incentive laden contracts as well, so maybe that could be worked in, if it reduces base salary.

by cdb on Apr 29, 2008 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Bait

What I think AdjustedExpectations is hitting on briefly, is really where this conversation should be focusing it’s attention. Lohse does remember what this offseason was like, and though I’m sure he’s happy he’s got a gig and is starting off well, he wants his cash. He also is a major league baseball player and a starting pitcher nonetheless, so there’s a lot of pride and ego to come into factor. Not to mention the fact that he has Scotty EGO Boras giving him advice (albeit, it may be bad, but…). With all that being said, I think it’s naive to think he’ll give us a hometown discount. This isn’t Carpenter’s situation where a team signed him injured, worked with him for a season and a half, then he came to CY Young prowess, in order to sign a great deal for him and his family, but also a discounted one for the current market of MLB SPs. Mozeliak won’t be able to sit Lohse down without 4 years/40 mil that they wouldn’t give Soup, and so he’ll be forced to trade him. Approach Lohse all you like; i personally think he is a good thing for our rotation for a couple of years in the #4 hole plus/minus 1spot; but I don’t think it’s reasonable. He wants his cash, and why shouldn’t he get it. Since we’re the team that gives him the shot, we should be able to work that into an B/B+ level prospect and/or a young arm from a team that needs the experience. Either way, it must be said…it looks like one more feather in the young cap of Mozeliak. God, I love being a cardinal fan.

by timmycardinals on Apr 29, 2008 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Well..

Instead of replying to all of the newer comments I’ll just tack on another post and leave it at that.

Sabathia, why?
He’s a hard thrower that has been involved in a massive set of innings since coming in. He may be an innings eater, but he’s going to come at a massive price. If you think the price for Lohse could be bad, that’s nothing like what you’re going to have with CC. He’ll have full major market teams taking a large look at him. Also consider that his era does tend to inflate down some due to the sheer amount of innings he can swallow. And to boot he gets massive run support. That run support is the difference in a 19-7 record or a 15-10 record or even a .11-10 record.

I thought it was ironic that two of the players that he’s compared to on baseball reference is Zito and Mulder. Scary if you ask me. Also to note that Carp is also on that list so I don’t appear to sway the arg with those two names.

Speaking of Carp. We have quite a bit invested in him, and a long time left on his contract (‘11, option for ‘12). We have no clue exactly how he’ll turn out post surgery. Like most I’m hoping like crazy he bounces back like the last time, but it’s still out in the open.

If Mulder doesn’t do a thing he’ll be gone at the end of the year, worst case he’ll be gone at the end of ‘09.

Looper, Welly, Lohse, Izzy, Springer, Flores, Clement (option for ‘09) are all signed or gone at the end of the year. Which, you have to note is 5 starters and 1 closer. (2 on DL). Which represents over 30 million of this year’s payroll alone.

Izzy most likely is gone, Clement is too. His option for ‘09 is massive and the likelyhood of them extending that 1.25mil gamble for an extra 8.75mil based on half a year’s performance (if that) wouldn’t be wise at all. Mulder’s option? 11mil.

Pineiro is up at the end of ‘09

Unless we get stupid and take Clement’s option, keep investing in Mulder, or throw Izzy some ungodly amount, we have a lot of cash coming off the books at the end of the year.

We have one pitcher locked up for a considerable amount of time who’s active and that’s Adam. Carp is a question mark, but shows promise.

So ‘09 looks like Adam, Carp and Pinerio providing that Carp comes to form. Looper – considering his ability to relief, close, and start, and Lohse should both be part of the conversation.

Trade both of them if we’re not contending and we can get some cost controlled talent that we really need for all I care. But if I were in Mo’s ear I would seriously consider talking to Lohse before putting him on the trade lines. Boras is the shark of the seas, but as you seen this off season he’s not exactly feared as much of late. Lohse would do himself some justice on hearing us out, and he very well may. Lohse isn’t a flamer, obviously, and is just 29 he’s moving in his prime.

Lohse, Adam, Carp trio.. man that smells good.

Yeah, we have a couple of prospects that could fill that role, but when that is mentioned as the promise land I’ll just note the last prospect Reyes and leave it at that.

To qualify some comments. I’m aware it’s very early into the season. I’m trying to look from a trade deadline looming point of view and that’s without Lohse regressing too much. Everyone mentions Suppan like money for him, and considering how much younger, less innings worked, Suppan money sounds like a deal. If it’s primed with incentives on innings pitched, or other measures it would protect a solid part of it in case he happens to injury out. Something we did not do with Mulder.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 29, 2008 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

no...

... if we’re gonna drop that kind of money ($10+mn/year) on a starter, then we should go all the way and get one of the aces. either that, or Lowe on a two year deal at $10-12 per.

but i wouldn’t even rush into that. next year we’re set with Carp, Wain, & Piniero. we’ll still have Thompson and Reyes, and i believe that we’ve still got an arb option on Wellemeyer (could be wrong tho). McClellan will likely be transitioned back to starting next year, and Boggs et al will all be a year closer and possibly ready for MLB action. plus the options for Clement and Mulder are only 1 year; not 4.

in other words, we’ve got plenty of #4 or #5 type starters in the system already. no need to spend that much money on another. save it for an impact SS or SP. it’s also likely that we’ll have some bullpen needs, since Izzy might be gone, and McClellan and/or Reyes are likely to be either in the rotation or off the team. and if we really need another starter, there’s a decent chance that somebody like Lohse/Weaver/Colon will be available next year for cheap.

so the money can be better used elsewhere.

by kindred on Apr 30, 2008 12:32 AM EDT reply actions  

i wasn't clear...

... my point was that if you’re going to spend $10-12 mn/year on a starter, then you may as well spend $15-16mn/year and get an ace. or, if you’re going to just spend $10-12, then sign Lowe on a two year deal instead of Lohse on a four year deal.

by kindred on Apr 30, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear ya!

I guess I was confused by what you were saying. I hear what you say, just up the pot a bit and go after a legit guy.

Too bad there is not anyone that will be worth that money in my opinion. Sheets has just been hurt way too much, and I just don’t get a good vibe on CC hitting the market let alone coming to STL.

by ICbirdfan on Apr 30, 2008 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carpenter
Wainwright
Loshe
Piniero
prospect?

that wouldnt be terrible. I think if he pitches well enough for us o afford him we wont want him back though ;-)

plus the team seems infatuated with making something out of Welly

by jealousblues on Apr 30, 2008 4:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't see it...

unless Carp/Mulder/Clement all are either ineffective or injured to some extent. I think Carp will be fine based on the historical performances of TJ pitchers post-operative, but Mulder and Clement worry me.

Still, if Lohse is open to returning, I don’t see the Cards doing a CArp deal for him, and he ain’t staying for under $10 mil/year—that seems to be the going rate for a pitcher. Would guys like Sabathis come cheaper? Doubtful.

So that means sign Lohse as a 3/4 starter at Carp money, spend Monopoly money on CC or someone like him, or trade Lohse near the deadline (assuming he has decent value based on current stats) for an impact bat and let one of the kids come up and see how they can do.

Best option, IMO, would be to re-sign Kyle at 3/30, or 2/20 w/club option, but I think that Mo will move him if he can get value for him.

"Is this Heaven?"
"No, it;s Iowa."
"I could've sworn it was Heaven."

by Ted Glover on Apr 30, 2008 5:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Best option, IMO, would be to re-sign Kyle at 3/30, or 2/20 w/club option, but I think that Mo will move him if he can get value for him.

Highly agree.

To qualify, a Carp deal is 5 years and a lot of coin. 10 mil + this year, 14+ the next few years with club options.

Clement is having serious velocity concerns at the moment, so should he build strength he’s worth half a year. Next year if we pick it up he’s going to get well over 8 million. Even if it is one year instead of 4, it seems like a waste of money to me.

I’d say the smart money is Mulder being done at the end of the year. I just don’t see the further investment on him coming back for another year.

If there’s any consideration for wanting either of those guys, but hesitation on Lohse @ 10 mil, just spread one of those two’s 8mil over 3-4 years,and it makes a little more sense.

We’re still paying for a #3 irregardless of who we get, we have Carp and Adam for quite a while.

I’d rather look at someone who’s playing like they’re heading into a FA year. CC? seen what he’s done as of late? Ouch.

And if he pitches 3ish era and has 12-15 wins through the year,10 mil is pretty damn cheap if you as me.

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 30, 2008 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I see the sense in spreading money out over 4 years,

but the Cards are reluctant, historically, to sign pitchers to four year deals. And by looking at the wreckage of starting pitchers over 30 that have arm problems 1 year into a 4 year deal, I can kind of see their point.

"Is this Heaven?"
"No, it;s Iowa."
"I could've sworn it was Heaven."

by Ted Glover on May 1, 2008 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Indeed

but that wreckage is limited to Carp, as far as recent memory goes.

Mulder gave us a great 2005, and 10 or so games into 2006. Our obligations were done with him then. However, then we signed him on FA during surgery, so ungodly amounts of cash. 13m over 2y with an 11m ‘09 option.

Clement I believe is the new style of thinking. A cheap first year, prove yourself and you’ll have a damn nice second year option. Mulder didn’t get that and should’ve.

That’s why I qualify myself with incentives. Give him 8, let him earn up to 12. If he’s earning up to 12 then he’s performing where no one can really complain. Or give him 2 years and an option 2 years. Throw in a 2m buyout on the option years. He may look at the option years as a negative, but if he were to get a couple mil regardless of those option years and be young enough to take on another short term contract post Cards.

Either way, I just hope that the standards “he’s a FA, so trade for something” happens post sign talk, rather than being the automatic.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on May 1, 2008 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

lackey

i would be much happier if we went after him with sabathia-type money than any of the others on that list.

go cards, o's, and phillies.

...boiler up.

by moboiler on Apr 30, 2008 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

If Lohse is completely off the table for whatever reason, money, length, etc.

I’d be thrilled to get Lackey, how’s his injury? I’ve read the standard blurbs from here and there, guess I could check out the Angels blog and see what they have to say. When it comes to pitchers it seems that it’s reasonably hard to steal solid ones from the AL on the FA market, lots of eyes. lots of cash

by AdjustedExpectations on Apr 30, 2008 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lackey will not be a FA

The Angels have a club option for him in ‘09 and there is NO WAY they will decline it.

by Jumsy on Apr 30, 2008 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

loshe

we need to wait until the trade deadline…see where we are then…if we are in contention, then talk to him about a 2-3 year extension at no more than 8 mil a year…this guy is a solid number 3, and should be paid like that(what i’m saying is 4/40 is too much).

if we aren’t in contention, then we need to flip him for a couple of middling prospects or one really solid prospect(not an outfielder though)...i’m sure a team like the phillies or mets would pay a high price for loshe if he continues to pitch near this level(if they are in contention)

problem is, i think that by definition we will be in contention because of the weakness of the division…every contender in the central has holes….i just hope we see if we are in fool’s gold contention

no way we sign a acey free agent pitcher this offseason…they cost way to much, and ususally are busts(zito, schmidt, et al)

by VolsnCards5 on Apr 30, 2008 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

FA's available...

http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2002/02/2008-09-free-agents.html

The players with * by their names have options for ‘09.

I don’t see anyone who is better than Lohse that would cost less than 10 mil/year on that list. Jon Garland may be the only one.

by Jumsy on Apr 30, 2008 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I have no problem offering something reasonable to Lohse . . .

but as said above, I do think he’d likely turn it down in hopes to rake in more (Suppan money, say) in the off-season.

However, as I’ve said at least once before, I think of the three FA starters, the one we could likely get for the least money now is Wellemeyer. I do think that if we threw out 1.5M, 1.75M now, he might bite. No way Looper or Lohse would go for anything that low. And if the Colonel improves dramatically, he will become rapidly more expensive. Every win he gets, the more we’ll have to pay to keep him.

If we offer him small money now, and he goes in the toilet or gets injured, then we’ve lost little. If he gets to where we think he might, and becomes a credible #5, then we’ve saved a TON of money. If he comes back to earth and remains a credible middle reliever, then we’re paying decent money for an OK reliever. It’s a risk this early in the season, but a decent risk.

by tom s. on Apr 30, 2008 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I like Welly

the only negative I have on him is the amount of balls hit into the air, popfly.. or hr. Always have hidden fears on guys who rely on missing bats, but if he’s cheap, he’s a small cost liability to a large payoff win.

Looper is kinda in the same ballgame.Like him or not long term, he’s shown he can do all three roles. Close, Relief and Start. So if his starting game fades, you have proven alternatives you can look at.

But, while it’s not mentioned as much, cost wise Loop could really drive up a price because of those three things. Having around 100 saves and then showing promise as a starter could drive a solid deal. Fade as a starter and then you can have a closer.

For us though, that does have opportunity cost. As we have a couple of players on the team who could start, a couple who could close.

I use statistics much as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – as support rather than illumination. - Andrew Lang

by AdjustedExpectations on May 1, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Cardinals by the Numbers
Small
If the season were to end today...

Recent FanPosts

Delino_small
The Big Puma: A Ballplayer Through and Through
Small
Poll: Best Age Bracket in Baseball? (Game 2)
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
A look back at my predictions for the Cardinals' 2012 season
Kyle-lohse-is-hipster-tony-la-russa_small
2012 1/4 Season stat check writeup
Avs2_small
NL teams and their AL counterparts
Pic_small
Diagosing the Cause of My Albert Pujols Schadenfreude
Small
Poll: Best Age Bracket in Baseball? (Game 1)
Hahaha_small
VEB day discussion thread
Post_logo__small__small
STL Cardinals Watch Party and Ticket Giveaway!!
Small
Shane Robinson vs. Stan Musial

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols